WO2001097180A2 - Verfahren zur echtheitsprüfung von dokumenten - Google Patents
Verfahren zur echtheitsprüfung von dokumenten Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001097180A2 WO2001097180A2 PCT/EP2001/006579 EP0106579W WO0197180A2 WO 2001097180 A2 WO2001097180 A2 WO 2001097180A2 EP 0106579 W EP0106579 W EP 0106579W WO 0197180 A2 WO0197180 A2 WO 0197180A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- authenticity
- document
- documents
- criteria
- class
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
- G07D11/00—Devices accepting coins; Devices accepting, dispensing, sorting or counting valuable papers
- G07D11/20—Controlling or monitoring the operation of devices; Data handling
- G07D11/30—Tracking or tracing valuable papers or cassettes
Definitions
- the invention relates to methods and devices for checking the authenticity of documents, in particular bank notes, value or security documents, according to the preamble of the independent claims.
- the authenticity check of documents is generally carried out by measuring certain authenticity features, for example optical, electrical or magnetic features, on a document to be checked and then checking the measured authenticity features on the basis of predetermined authenticity criteria. For example, the optical reflection behavior of the document is measured as an authenticity feature and then it is checked whether the measured reflection behavior falls below or exceeds a certain threshold value as the associated authenticity criterion. Depending on the test result, the document is classified as genuine or false.
- certain authenticity features for example optical, electrical or magnetic features
- An increase in the reliability in the detection of forgeries can be achieved, among other things, by tightening the authenticity criteria when checking certain authenticity features, for example by raising or lowering threshold values.
- the authenticity criteria cannot be tightened arbitrarily, since otherwise the proportion of genuine documents that were not recognized as genuine - and possibly rejected or classified as incorrect - would be too high.
- banknote processing machines for example, which are used in commercial banks for deposit checking and settlement, for example, this would lead to increased effort in the manual and possibly further mechanical postprocessing of banknotes which are not recognized as genuine.
- authenticity check in cash deposit machines a general tightening of the authenticity criteria would lead to the fact that used or soiled real banknotes in particular, in which the authenticity characteristics of freshly printed banknotes are reduced by soiling or damage, are not recognized as genuine and as a result - depending on the application - be rejected or retained as an alleged forgery.
- counterfeit banknotes The reliability in the detection of counterfeit banknotes is therefore limited by the required low proportion of genuine banknotes not recognized as genuine. This is particularly problematic when, due to "soft" authenticity criteria, counterfeits are not recognized as such and come back into circulation, for example after a counterfeit banknotes have been paid in by self-service recycling machines by a customer and then the banknotes not identified as counterfeit have been issued to other customers ,
- the method for the authenticity check according to claim 1 there are at least two different authenticity classes, each with one or more Authenticity criteria are provided, the individual authenticity classes differing from one another in at least one authenticity criterion.
- an authenticity class is selected from the different authenticity classes and the document is checked based on the authenticity criteria of the selected authenticity class.
- the selected authenticity class is assigned to the document if its authenticity criteria are met by the document.
- the authenticity criteria are, for example, threshold values or intervals for the authenticity features used for the check.
- optical, magnetic, electrical or physical features can be used as authenticity features, for example optical reflection, transmission or emission, magnetic permeability, electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, thickness and format of the document as well as watermarks.
- the invention is based on the idea of combining different authenticity criteria in the authenticity check of documents into several authenticity classes, the authenticity requirements being different depending on the authenticity class, since each authenticity class generally includes a different number of authenticity criteria and / or different strict authenticity criteria. If, for example, an authenticity class with high authenticity requirements is selected, for example with very high threshold values for optical reflection or transmission, the authenticity of documents that meet the authenticity criteria of this selected authenticity class can be affirmed with high probability. Documents which do not meet the authenticity criteria of a selected authenticity class can be checked on the basis of further selected authenticity classes with lower authenticity requirements, for example lower threshold values, which means that their authenticity can be affirmed with a correspondingly lower probability. Overall, by dividing the authenticity property, ie the measured authenticity features, of the documents to be checked into different authenticity classes.
- the state and / or the denomination of the document is determined and then the authenticity class is selected depending on the state and / or the denomination of the document.
- the denomination is the value or currency of the document to be checked.
- the condition of the document is generally given by condition features, such as degree of soiling, limpness, damage, such as cracks, holes or imperfections in the printed image, as well as foreign bodies, such as adhesive strips.
- the authenticity class can be selected during the authenticity check of a document depending on the degree of soiling of the document, whereby clean and undamaged documents with much stricter authenticity criteria, for example higher threshold values, can be checked than heavily soiled or damaged documents. This significantly increases the reliability of counterfeit detection of clean or slightly dirty documents. Overall, this condition-dependent authenticity check enables documents in very good condition to be identified as genuine or false with high reliability. Since this is only the examination of documents in very good condition is tightened, the proportion of genuine documents not recognized as genuine remains low.
- a further aspect of the invention is that part of the authenticity criteria used for the authenticity check is determined on the basis of forged documents.
- the authenticity check with specified authenticity criteria is expanded by an additional authenticity check with additional authenticity criteria, the additional authenticity criteria being determined on the basis of forged documents.
- the additional authenticity criteria are generally determined in a separate process, e.g. in specially designed facilities, in which forged documents are examined in particular for characteristic differences to real documents. From the differences found, additional authenticity criteria are determined, which are then fed to the authenticity checking process.
- documents are still checked against fixed authenticity criteria and classified as genuine if the authenticity criteria are met.
- forgeries can be recognized if the checked documents do not meet the additional authenticity criteria determined on known forgeries, which preferably relate to characteristic differences between a forgery found and real documents. In this way, increased reliability in the detection of counterfeits, in particular with regard to known counterfeits and in circulation, is achieved.
- Show it 1 shows the schematic structure of a device for checking the authenticity of documents according to the invention
- FIG. 2 shows the schematic structure of a system for checking authenticity on the basis of authenticity criteria determined on forged documents
- Fig. 3 shows the schematic structure of a system for processing paid banknotes.
- FIG. 1 shows the schematic structure of a device for authenticity checking of documents according to the invention.
- the documents 10, for example bank notes, provided in an input device 11 are individually withdrawn from the input device 11 and conveyed to the output device 12 with the aid of a transport system 14. There the documents 10 are sorted into three different sorting classes and output into corresponding output compartments 13.
- a document 10 to be checked is transported past a measuring device 15.
- the measuring device 15 measures the authenticity features of the document 10 to be checked. If appropriate, status features characterizing the state of the document 10 are also measured.
- the dashed line in the measuring device 15 is intended to indicate that the measuring device 15 can have two or possibly several sub-devices in which authenticity and, if applicable, status features can be measured separately.
- the measuring device 15 measures only on one side of the document 10 to be checked.
- the device can also be designed in this way be that the document 10 can be measured from both sides, for example by two oppositely arranged measuring devices 15 through which the document 10 is transported.
- Information about the features measured in the measuring device 15 is transmitted to an evaluation device 16, in which the authenticity check according to the invention takes place.
- the selection of a specific authenticity class and its assignment to the document 10 to be checked is preferably implemented here by a computer program.
- the computer program it is checked, for example, whether an authenticity feature measured on the document 10 to be checked, e.g. the optical reflection is greater than a threshold value for the optical reflection belonging to the specific authenticity class. If the test result is positive, document 10 is assigned the specific authenticity class, e.g. by writing a number characterizing the authenticity class into a variable characterizing the authenticity of the document 10. If the test result is negative, the computer program sets the test of the measured authenticity feature on the basis of lower threshold values belonging to other authenticity classes, i.e.
- the status of the document 10 is additionally determined from the measured status features.
- Document 10 is then assigned one of several status classes which are characteristic of the respective state of the document to be checked are assigned.
- three condition registers are usually provided, namely for an unusable (unfit), usable (fit) or very good (ATM fit) condition.
- the selection of the authenticity class in the subsequent authenticity check is then carried out as a function of the state class assigned to the document 10 to be checked.
- Banknotes in very good condition (ATM fit) are preferably subjected to very strict authenticity criteria, while banknotes in unusable or usable condition (unfit or fit) have to meet less strict authenticity criteria of other authenticity classes in order to still be classified as genuine.
- an additional authenticity check is carried out on documents 10 of a certain condition class, for example on banknotes in a usable (fit) or very good (ATM-fit) condition.
- Such an additional authenticity check can be carried out, for example, on the basis of already measured data on individual authenticity features.
- the denomination can also be determined via the measuring device 15 and the evaluation device 16, but if necessary this can also be carried out in separate measuring and evaluation devices.
- the documents 10 are divided into one or more sorting classes and output into corresponding output compartments 13.
- the output device 12 is controlled by the evaluation device 16 in such a way that banknotes - possibly of only one desired denomination - are issued in a first of the output compartments 13, which have a very good (ATM fit)
- ATM fit very good
- banknotes are issued to which no authenticity class could be assigned and / or which are in an undesired position and / or possibly do not belong to the desired denomination. If necessary, incorrectly drawn and / or transported banknotes, for example double deductions or folded banknotes, are also output in this output compartment. Finally, all remaining banknotes are output in a third output compartment, ie usable (fit), unusable (unfit) and banknotes to which an authenticity class with lower authenticity requirements - ie less strict authenticity criteria - has been assigned.
- FIG. 2 shows the schematic structure of a system for checking authenticity on the basis of authenticity criteria, which were determined on forged documents.
- the mode of operation of such a system differs from the example shown in FIG. 1 mainly in that the authenticity check carried out in the value device 16 takes place in two partial steps.
- the authenticity check is carried out using - preferably divided into authenticity classes - Authenticity criteria.
- the authenticity class can be selected depending on the determined state of the document 10 to be checked. If the measured authenticity features meet the specified authenticity criteria, the corresponding authenticity class is assigned to document 10.
- an additional check is carried out using authenticity criteria which have been determined on known forged documents.
- authenticity criteria are determined here in banknote checking machines suitable for this purpose, for example in a central bank or at a corresponding service provider. For reasons of data reduction, these are preferably authenticity criteria which are characteristic of the difference between a forged and a real document.
- the authenticity criteria used in the second sub-step of the authenticity check are transmitted in the example shown from a control device 31, for example from a server of a central bank or a central service provider, via a wired or wireless connection 32 to one or more test stations 30 simultaneously.
- the corresponding data can also be transmitted by means of suitable data carriers, for example by flash card, memory chips, floppy, CD or DVD.
- the document 10 can be identified as a forgery with high probability, even if it fulfills the authenticity criteria in the first sub-step of the authenticity check.
- the chronological order of the two substeps can be chosen arbitrarily.
- this system allows a simple and quick update of features and criteria for checking the authenticity of banknotes in any number of test stations 30 simultaneously, so that a high level of reliability is guaranteed in the detection of counterfeit banknotes in circulation.
- FIG. 3 shows the schematic structure of a system for using the authenticity check according to the invention.
- Documents 10 in this example banknotes, are deposited by a depositor at a commercial bank 39.
- the deposit can be e.g. at the terminal of a self-service recycling machine.
- the checking station 30 which can be part of the terminal, the banknotes are checked for authenticity. If the banknotes meet the very strict authenticity criteria of a selected authenticity class, they can be made available for immediate further issuance, for example at the same terminal, at other issuing terminals 34 and / or at a bank counter 36. All banknotes that do not meet these very strict authenticity criteria are fed to a central checking device 35, for example in a central bank 40, to another
- a control unit 31 is also provided, in which - as already stated in the description of FIG. 2 - additional authenticity criteria are determined on the basis of counterfeit banknotes, which relate to characteristic differences between real banknotes and banknotes recognized as counterfeit in the central checking device 35 ,
- the counterfeits can be transmitted directly from the test device 35 to the control unit 31.
- the authenticity criteria determined there are which is then transmitted to the checking station 30 via the connection 32 and can be used there - if necessary in addition to the authenticity criteria divided into different authenticity classes - for the authenticity check of banknotes.
- characteristic data e.g. Print images and / or serial numbers for the paid-in banknotes together with data for the payer, e.g. Account number and / or personal identification number (PIN) are stored together in the control device 31.
- characteristic data e.g. Print images and / or serial numbers
- the bank note transmitted to the control device 31.
- the payer of the counterfeit banknote can be identified by comparing the stored data with the transmitted data.
- the control unit 31 can either be installed inside the commercial bank 39, as shown, or be located outside the latter, for example at a central service provider.
- the system shown in FIG. 3 deals, for example, with the use of the method according to the invention for checking the authenticity of banknotes at a deposit machine of a commercial bank.
- the authenticity check can also be carried out in a banknote processing machine in which banknotes - e.g. after deposit at the counter of a commercial bank - entered by an employee for checking and / or sorting.
- the authenticity check and the subsequent procedure for sorting, reissuing and / or forwarding for checking in a central bank are carried out analogously.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP01962728.0A EP1295262B2 (de) | 2000-06-13 | 2001-06-11 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur echtheitsprüfung von dokumenten |
US10/297,586 US7552864B2 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2001-06-11 | Method for verifying the authenticity of documents |
AU2001283852A AU2001283852A1 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2001-06-11 | Method for verifying the authenticity of documents |
US12/481,987 US8006898B2 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2009-06-10 | Method for verifying the authenticity of documents |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10029051.5 | 2000-06-13 | ||
DE10029051A DE10029051A1 (de) | 2000-06-13 | 2000-06-13 | Verfahren zur Echtheitsprüfung von Dokumenten |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10297586 A-371-Of-International | 2001-06-11 | ||
US12/481,987 Continuation US8006898B2 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2009-06-10 | Method for verifying the authenticity of documents |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001097180A2 true WO2001097180A2 (de) | 2001-12-20 |
WO2001097180A3 WO2001097180A3 (de) | 2002-05-30 |
Family
ID=7645540
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2001/006579 WO2001097180A2 (de) | 2000-06-13 | 2001-06-11 | Verfahren zur echtheitsprüfung von dokumenten |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7552864B2 (de) |
EP (2) | EP1295262B2 (de) |
AU (1) | AU2001283852A1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE10029051A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2001097180A2 (de) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10346635A1 (de) * | 2003-10-08 | 2005-05-12 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | System zur Prüfung von Sicherheitsmerkmalen von Wertdokumenten |
US7899233B2 (en) | 2003-06-17 | 2011-03-01 | Hitachi-Omron Terminal Solutions Corp. | System and method for tracing bank notes |
Families Citing this family (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4012423B2 (ja) | 2002-03-26 | 2007-11-21 | 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 | 紙幣取扱装置 |
DE10360859A1 (de) | 2003-12-23 | 2005-07-21 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Banknotenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren für das Erkennen von gefälschten Banknoten |
DE10360862A1 (de) * | 2003-12-23 | 2005-07-21 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Verfahren für die Identifizierung von gefälschten Banknoten |
DE102004024620A1 (de) * | 2004-05-18 | 2005-12-08 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung von Banknoten |
DE102004049998A1 (de) * | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur visuellen Darstellung von Meßwerten |
DE102005044092A1 (de) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-22 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Banknotenerkennung |
DE102005055682A1 (de) * | 2005-11-22 | 2007-05-24 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Vorrichtung für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten |
DE102006042186A1 (de) * | 2006-09-08 | 2008-03-27 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Verfahren für die Vernichtung von Banknoten |
JPWO2008056404A1 (ja) * | 2006-11-06 | 2010-02-25 | グローリー株式会社 | 紙葉類識別装置および紙葉類識別方法 |
DE102008020208A1 (de) * | 2008-04-22 | 2009-10-29 | Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Speicherung von Informationen über Gegenstände, die einem SB-Terminal zugeführt wurden |
US7941378B2 (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2011-05-10 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Stamp testing and monitoring |
KR101357122B1 (ko) | 2008-08-08 | 2014-02-04 | 글로리 가부시키가이샤 | 지엽류 관리 시스템, 지엽류 식별장치, 지엽류 관리장치, 지엽류 관리방법 및 지엽류 관리 프로그램을 기록한 컴퓨터로 읽을 수 있는 기록매체 |
KR101322374B1 (ko) * | 2009-03-19 | 2013-10-28 | 글로리 가부시키가이샤 | 지폐 식별 계수 장치 및 지폐 식별 계수 방법 |
DE102009044881A1 (de) * | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-16 | Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Rückverfolgung von Banknoten |
DE102009058438A1 (de) * | 2009-12-16 | 2011-06-22 | Giesecke & Devrient GmbH, 81677 | Verfahren zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten |
DE102010045879A1 (de) * | 2010-09-17 | 2012-03-22 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Banknoten |
GB201100803D0 (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2011-03-02 | Innovative Technology Ltd | Apparatus and method for generating dataset for items of currency |
NL2006766C2 (en) * | 2011-05-11 | 2012-11-13 | Nl Bank Nv | Quantitative examination of counterfeits. |
US8619245B1 (en) | 2012-08-16 | 2013-12-31 | Eastman Kodak Company | Authentication device with access control and calibration |
US8937712B2 (en) | 2012-08-16 | 2015-01-20 | Eastman Kodak Company | Authentication device with access control and calibration |
US11526821B2 (en) * | 2013-08-29 | 2022-12-13 | Ncr Corporation | Managing media replenishment |
US9256809B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2016-02-09 | Eastman Kodak Company | Enabling an authentication device with temporary target |
US9165418B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2015-10-20 | Eastman Kodak Company | Authentication device with temporary enabling target |
CN105989658A (zh) * | 2015-02-12 | 2016-10-05 | 湖南求真电子有限公司 | 一种识别伪造票据和变造克隆票据的方法及装置 |
JP7043967B2 (ja) * | 2018-05-14 | 2022-03-30 | 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 同一性判定装置、同一性判定システムおよびプログラム |
US10769263B1 (en) | 2019-05-07 | 2020-09-08 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | Certificate verification |
CN116931487A (zh) * | 2023-07-25 | 2023-10-24 | 西安速度时空大数据科技有限公司 | 一种应用于军工企业的数据采集监控*** |
Family Cites Families (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS52150699A (en) * | 1976-06-09 | 1977-12-14 | Fuji Electric Co Ltd | Bank note, etc. identifying apparatus |
JPS58221490A (ja) * | 1982-06-16 | 1983-12-23 | 株式会社東芝 | 入出金装置 |
NL8202920A (nl) | 1982-07-20 | 1984-02-16 | Tno | Inrichting voor het herkennen en onderzoeken van bladvormige voorwerpen zoals bankbiljetten of dergelijke. |
JPS59149564A (ja) * | 1983-02-15 | 1984-08-27 | Toshiba Corp | 自動取引システム |
JPH0666074B2 (ja) * | 1983-04-04 | 1994-08-24 | 株式会社東芝 | 区分集積装置 |
EP0302458B1 (de) * | 1987-08-04 | 1994-05-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Papierbogenverarbeitungsvorrichtung |
DE3807727A1 (de) * | 1988-03-09 | 1989-09-21 | Robot Foto Electr Kg | Ueberwachungsvorrichtung zum sichern von automaten |
US5201395A (en) * | 1990-09-27 | 1993-04-13 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Bill examination device |
JP2639766B2 (ja) * | 1991-04-10 | 1997-08-13 | ローレルバンクマシン株式会社 | 貨幣選別装置 |
IT1250847B (it) * | 1991-10-15 | 1995-04-21 | Urmet Spa | Apparecchio per la validazione di banconote |
US5430664A (en) * | 1992-07-14 | 1995-07-04 | Technitrol, Inc. | Document counting and batching apparatus with counterfeit detection |
CH684856A5 (de) * | 1992-11-30 | 1995-01-13 | Mars Inc | Verfahren zur Klassifizierung eines Musters - insbesondere eines Musters einer Banknote oder einer Münze - und Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens. |
GB2279796B (en) † | 1993-06-28 | 1996-09-25 | Mars Inc | Validating value carriers |
GB9326440D0 (en) * | 1993-12-24 | 1994-02-23 | Ncr Int Inc | Neutral network for banknote recongnition and authentication |
EP1227447A3 (de) * | 1994-03-08 | 2006-11-22 | Cummins-Allison Corporation | Verfahren und Apparat zum Unterscheiden und Zählen von Dokumenten |
DE4411403A1 (de) * | 1994-03-31 | 1995-10-05 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Vorrichtung zum Sortieren und Stapeln von Blattgut |
KR0182242B1 (ko) * | 1995-04-19 | 1999-04-15 | 사토 후미오 | 복수의 기기 사이에서 취급매체를 수수하는(주고받는)장치, 이를 구비한 현금처리시스템 및 거래매체의 수수방법 |
DE19618541A1 (de) * | 1995-05-11 | 1996-11-14 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von Blattgut, wie z. B. Banknoten |
US6157895A (en) * | 1996-01-25 | 2000-12-05 | Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. | Method of judging truth of paper type and method of judging direction in which paper type is fed |
US5757001A (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 1998-05-26 | The Regents Of The University Of Calif. | Detection of counterfeit currency |
US6573983B1 (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 2003-06-03 | Diebold, Incorporated | Apparatus and method for processing bank notes and other documents in an automated banking machine |
GB9624895D0 (en) * | 1996-11-29 | 1997-01-15 | Ncr Int Inc | Automatic teller machines |
GB9707243D0 (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 1997-05-28 | Ncr Int Inc | Self-service deposit method and apparatus |
US6065672A (en) * | 1997-07-24 | 2000-05-23 | Currency Systems International | Method for currency distribution and management |
CA2307589A1 (en) † | 1997-10-31 | 1999-05-14 | Cummins-Allison Corporation | Currency evaluation and recording system |
DE19750644A1 (de) * | 1997-11-14 | 1999-05-27 | Leicher Gmbh & Co | Einzahlungsautomat |
US6493461B1 (en) * | 1998-03-17 | 2002-12-10 | Cummins-Allison Corp. | Customizable international note counter |
SE514260C2 (sv) * | 1998-10-22 | 2001-01-29 | Nybohov Dev Ab | Anläggning för hantering av sedlar inom ett geografiskt begränsat område |
ES2317879T3 (es) * | 2001-12-28 | 2009-05-01 | Mei, Inc. | Metodo y aparato para clasificar dinero. |
-
2000
- 2000-06-13 DE DE10029051A patent/DE10029051A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2001
- 2001-06-11 AU AU2001283852A patent/AU2001283852A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-06-11 EP EP01962728.0A patent/EP1295262B2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-06-11 US US10/297,586 patent/US7552864B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-06-11 WO PCT/EP2001/006579 patent/WO2001097180A2/de active Application Filing
- 2001-06-11 EP EP20100011637 patent/EP2278559A3/de not_active Ceased
-
2009
- 2009-06-10 US US12/481,987 patent/US8006898B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7899233B2 (en) | 2003-06-17 | 2011-03-01 | Hitachi-Omron Terminal Solutions Corp. | System and method for tracing bank notes |
US8155423B2 (en) | 2003-06-17 | 2012-04-10 | Hitachi-Omron Terminal Solutions Corp. | System and method for tracing bank notes |
DE10346635A1 (de) * | 2003-10-08 | 2005-05-12 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | System zur Prüfung von Sicherheitsmerkmalen von Wertdokumenten |
US7487919B2 (en) | 2003-10-08 | 2009-02-10 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | System for checking the security features of documents of value |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2278559A2 (de) | 2011-01-26 |
EP1295262B2 (de) | 2021-01-20 |
US8006898B2 (en) | 2011-08-30 |
EP1295262B1 (de) | 2012-11-21 |
US20090242627A1 (en) | 2009-10-01 |
US7552864B2 (en) | 2009-06-30 |
US20030168849A1 (en) | 2003-09-11 |
EP2278559A3 (de) | 2012-06-06 |
AU2001283852A1 (en) | 2001-12-24 |
WO2001097180A3 (de) | 2002-05-30 |
EP1295262A2 (de) | 2003-03-26 |
DE10029051A1 (de) | 2001-12-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1295262B2 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur echtheitsprüfung von dokumenten | |
EP1810251B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung für die bearbeitung von banknoten | |
EP1754204A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur prüfung von banknoten | |
DE2824849C2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Feststellung des Zustandes und/oder der Echtheit von Blattgut | |
DE60117151T2 (de) | Banknotenspezifische geldverarbeitung | |
EP2617016B1 (de) | Verfahren für die bearbeitung von banknoten | |
EP1576553B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung für die überprüfung von banknoten | |
EP1652153B1 (de) | Vorrichtung für die ermittlung des zustands von banknoten | |
DE102009034065A1 (de) | Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Banknoten | |
EP1776673B1 (de) | Verfahren für die einstellung einer banknotenbearbeitungsmaschine | |
EP1297498B1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum bearbeiten von blattgut | |
WO2002029736A1 (de) | Trennmittel für die trennung und bearbeitung von blattgut | |
DE69405105T3 (de) | Echtheitsprüfung von wertträgern | |
DE10360862A1 (de) | Verfahren für die Identifizierung von gefälschten Banknoten | |
DE102008011664A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bearbeiten von Wertdokumenten | |
WO2006010559A1 (de) | Verfahren für die prüfung von banknoten mittels mustererkennung | |
EP1700276B1 (de) | Banknotenbearbeitungsmaschine und verfahren für das erkennen von gefälschten banknoten | |
DE602004008815T2 (de) | Dokumentenverarbeitungsgerät mit Detektoren-Verstärkungssteuerung | |
WO2005109354A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung für die bearbeitung von banknoten | |
EP2427870A2 (de) | Verfahren für die bearbeitung von blattgut | |
DE19946536A1 (de) | Verfahren für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten und Vorrichtung insbesondere zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
DE102020002587A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Substrats mit einem Lumineszenzstoff | |
DE102004045169A1 (de) | Verfahren für Entwurf und Prüfung von Wertpapieren | |
DE102008053365A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Sortieren von Banknoten in einem Banknoten-Recycler sowie Banknoten-Recycler | |
DE102009017232A1 (de) | Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Blattgut |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2001962728 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2001962728 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10297586 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |