EP1295262A2 - Procede pour la verification d'authenticite de documents - Google Patents

Procede pour la verification d'authenticite de documents

Info

Publication number
EP1295262A2
EP1295262A2 EP01962728A EP01962728A EP1295262A2 EP 1295262 A2 EP1295262 A2 EP 1295262A2 EP 01962728 A EP01962728 A EP 01962728A EP 01962728 A EP01962728 A EP 01962728A EP 1295262 A2 EP1295262 A2 EP 1295262A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
authenticity
document
documents
criteria
class
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP01962728A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1295262B2 (fr
EP1295262B1 (fr
Inventor
Helmut Karl Reinisch
Karl Hermann Weilacher
Lukas LÖFFLER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=7645540&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1295262(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority to EP20100011637 priority Critical patent/EP2278559A3/fr
Publication of EP1295262A2 publication Critical patent/EP1295262A2/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1295262B1 publication Critical patent/EP1295262B1/fr
Publication of EP1295262B2 publication Critical patent/EP1295262B2/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D11/00—Devices accepting coins; Devices accepting, dispensing, sorting or counting valuable papers
    • G07D11/20—Controlling or monitoring the operation of devices; Data handling
    • G07D11/30—Tracking or tracing valuable papers or cassettes

Definitions

  • the invention relates to methods and devices for checking the authenticity of documents, in particular bank notes, value or security documents, according to the preamble of the independent claims.
  • the authenticity check of documents is generally carried out by measuring certain authenticity features, for example optical, electrical or magnetic features, on a document to be checked and then checking the measured authenticity features on the basis of predetermined authenticity criteria. For example, the optical reflection behavior of the document is measured as an authenticity feature and then it is checked whether the measured reflection behavior falls below or exceeds a certain threshold value as the associated authenticity criterion. Depending on the test result, the document is classified as genuine or false.
  • certain authenticity features for example optical, electrical or magnetic features
  • An increase in the reliability in the detection of forgeries can be achieved, among other things, by tightening the authenticity criteria when checking certain authenticity features, for example by raising or lowering threshold values.
  • the authenticity criteria cannot be tightened arbitrarily, since otherwise the proportion of genuine documents that were not recognized as genuine - and possibly rejected or classified as incorrect - would be too high.
  • banknote processing machines for example, which are used in commercial banks for deposit checking and settlement, for example, this would lead to increased effort in the manual and possibly further mechanical postprocessing of banknotes which are not recognized as genuine.
  • authenticity check in cash deposit machines a general tightening of the authenticity criteria would lead to the fact that used or soiled real banknotes in particular, in which the authenticity characteristics of freshly printed banknotes are reduced by soiling or damage, are not recognized as genuine and as a result - depending on the application - be rejected or retained as an alleged forgery.
  • counterfeit banknotes The reliability in the detection of counterfeit banknotes is therefore limited by the required low proportion of genuine banknotes not recognized as genuine. This is particularly problematic when, due to "soft" authenticity criteria, counterfeits are not recognized as such and come back into circulation, for example after a counterfeit banknotes have been paid in by self-service recycling machines by a customer and then the banknotes not identified as counterfeit have been issued to other customers ,
  • the method for the authenticity check according to claim 1 there are at least two different authenticity classes, each with one or more Authenticity criteria are provided, the individual authenticity classes differing from one another in at least one authenticity criterion.
  • an authenticity class is selected from the different authenticity classes and the document is checked based on the authenticity criteria of the selected authenticity class.
  • the selected authenticity class is assigned to the document if its authenticity criteria are met by the document.
  • the authenticity criteria are, for example, threshold values or intervals for the authenticity features used for the check.
  • optical, magnetic, electrical or physical features can be used as authenticity features, for example optical reflection, transmission or emission, magnetic permeability, electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, thickness and format of the document as well as watermarks.
  • the invention is based on the idea of combining different authenticity criteria in the authenticity check of documents into several authenticity classes, the authenticity requirements being different depending on the authenticity class, since each authenticity class generally includes a different number of authenticity criteria and / or different strict authenticity criteria. If, for example, an authenticity class with high authenticity requirements is selected, for example with very high threshold values for optical reflection or transmission, the authenticity of documents that meet the authenticity criteria of this selected authenticity class can be affirmed with high probability. Documents which do not meet the authenticity criteria of a selected authenticity class can be checked on the basis of further selected authenticity classes with lower authenticity requirements, for example lower threshold values, which means that their authenticity can be affirmed with a correspondingly lower probability. Overall, by dividing the authenticity property, ie the measured authenticity features, of the documents to be checked into different authenticity classes.
  • the state and / or the denomination of the document is determined and then the authenticity class is selected depending on the state and / or the denomination of the document.
  • the denomination is the value or currency of the document to be checked.
  • the condition of the document is generally given by condition features, such as degree of soiling, limpness, damage, such as cracks, holes or imperfections in the printed image, as well as foreign bodies, such as adhesive strips.
  • the authenticity class can be selected during the authenticity check of a document depending on the degree of soiling of the document, whereby clean and undamaged documents with much stricter authenticity criteria, for example higher threshold values, can be checked than heavily soiled or damaged documents. This significantly increases the reliability of counterfeit detection of clean or slightly dirty documents. Overall, this condition-dependent authenticity check enables documents in very good condition to be identified as genuine or false with high reliability. Since this is only the examination of documents in very good condition is tightened, the proportion of genuine documents not recognized as genuine remains low.
  • a further aspect of the invention is that part of the authenticity criteria used for the authenticity check is determined on the basis of forged documents.
  • the authenticity check with specified authenticity criteria is expanded by an additional authenticity check with additional authenticity criteria, the additional authenticity criteria being determined on the basis of forged documents.
  • the additional authenticity criteria are generally determined in a separate process, e.g. in specially designed facilities, in which forged documents are examined in particular for characteristic differences to real documents. From the differences found, additional authenticity criteria are determined, which are then fed to the authenticity checking process.
  • documents are still checked against fixed authenticity criteria and classified as genuine if the authenticity criteria are met.
  • forgeries can be recognized if the checked documents do not meet the additional authenticity criteria determined on known forgeries, which preferably relate to characteristic differences between a forgery found and real documents. In this way, increased reliability in the detection of counterfeits, in particular with regard to known counterfeits and in circulation, is achieved.
  • Show it 1 shows the schematic structure of a device for checking the authenticity of documents according to the invention
  • FIG. 2 shows the schematic structure of a system for checking authenticity on the basis of authenticity criteria determined on forged documents
  • Fig. 3 shows the schematic structure of a system for processing paid banknotes.
  • FIG. 1 shows the schematic structure of a device for authenticity checking of documents according to the invention.
  • the documents 10, for example bank notes, provided in an input device 11 are individually withdrawn from the input device 11 and conveyed to the output device 12 with the aid of a transport system 14. There the documents 10 are sorted into three different sorting classes and output into corresponding output compartments 13.
  • a document 10 to be checked is transported past a measuring device 15.
  • the measuring device 15 measures the authenticity features of the document 10 to be checked. If appropriate, status features characterizing the state of the document 10 are also measured.
  • the dashed line in the measuring device 15 is intended to indicate that the measuring device 15 can have two or possibly several sub-devices in which authenticity and, if applicable, status features can be measured separately.
  • the measuring device 15 measures only on one side of the document 10 to be checked.
  • the device can also be designed in this way be that the document 10 can be measured from both sides, for example by two oppositely arranged measuring devices 15 through which the document 10 is transported.
  • Information about the features measured in the measuring device 15 is transmitted to an evaluation device 16, in which the authenticity check according to the invention takes place.
  • the selection of a specific authenticity class and its assignment to the document 10 to be checked is preferably implemented here by a computer program.
  • the computer program it is checked, for example, whether an authenticity feature measured on the document 10 to be checked, e.g. the optical reflection is greater than a threshold value for the optical reflection belonging to the specific authenticity class. If the test result is positive, document 10 is assigned the specific authenticity class, e.g. by writing a number characterizing the authenticity class into a variable characterizing the authenticity of the document 10. If the test result is negative, the computer program sets the test of the measured authenticity feature on the basis of lower threshold values belonging to other authenticity classes, i.e.
  • the status of the document 10 is additionally determined from the measured status features.
  • Document 10 is then assigned one of several status classes which are characteristic of the respective state of the document to be checked are assigned.
  • three condition registers are usually provided, namely for an unusable (unfit), usable (fit) or very good (ATM fit) condition.
  • the selection of the authenticity class in the subsequent authenticity check is then carried out as a function of the state class assigned to the document 10 to be checked.
  • Banknotes in very good condition (ATM fit) are preferably subjected to very strict authenticity criteria, while banknotes in unusable or usable condition (unfit or fit) have to meet less strict authenticity criteria of other authenticity classes in order to still be classified as genuine.
  • an additional authenticity check is carried out on documents 10 of a certain condition class, for example on banknotes in a usable (fit) or very good (ATM-fit) condition.
  • Such an additional authenticity check can be carried out, for example, on the basis of already measured data on individual authenticity features.
  • the denomination can also be determined via the measuring device 15 and the evaluation device 16, but if necessary this can also be carried out in separate measuring and evaluation devices.
  • the documents 10 are divided into one or more sorting classes and output into corresponding output compartments 13.
  • the output device 12 is controlled by the evaluation device 16 in such a way that banknotes - possibly of only one desired denomination - are issued in a first of the output compartments 13, which have a very good (ATM fit)
  • ATM fit very good
  • banknotes are issued to which no authenticity class could be assigned and / or which are in an undesired position and / or possibly do not belong to the desired denomination. If necessary, incorrectly drawn and / or transported banknotes, for example double deductions or folded banknotes, are also output in this output compartment. Finally, all remaining banknotes are output in a third output compartment, ie usable (fit), unusable (unfit) and banknotes to which an authenticity class with lower authenticity requirements - ie less strict authenticity criteria - has been assigned.
  • FIG. 2 shows the schematic structure of a system for checking authenticity on the basis of authenticity criteria, which were determined on forged documents.
  • the mode of operation of such a system differs from the example shown in FIG. 1 mainly in that the authenticity check carried out in the value device 16 takes place in two partial steps.
  • the authenticity check is carried out using - preferably divided into authenticity classes - Authenticity criteria.
  • the authenticity class can be selected depending on the determined state of the document 10 to be checked. If the measured authenticity features meet the specified authenticity criteria, the corresponding authenticity class is assigned to document 10.
  • an additional check is carried out using authenticity criteria which have been determined on known forged documents.
  • authenticity criteria are determined here in banknote checking machines suitable for this purpose, for example in a central bank or at a corresponding service provider. For reasons of data reduction, these are preferably authenticity criteria which are characteristic of the difference between a forged and a real document.
  • the authenticity criteria used in the second sub-step of the authenticity check are transmitted in the example shown from a control device 31, for example from a server of a central bank or a central service provider, via a wired or wireless connection 32 to one or more test stations 30 simultaneously.
  • the corresponding data can also be transmitted by means of suitable data carriers, for example by flash card, memory chips, floppy, CD or DVD.
  • the document 10 can be identified as a forgery with high probability, even if it fulfills the authenticity criteria in the first sub-step of the authenticity check.
  • the chronological order of the two substeps can be chosen arbitrarily.
  • this system allows a simple and quick update of features and criteria for checking the authenticity of banknotes in any number of test stations 30 simultaneously, so that a high level of reliability is guaranteed in the detection of counterfeit banknotes in circulation.
  • FIG. 3 shows the schematic structure of a system for using the authenticity check according to the invention.
  • Documents 10 in this example banknotes, are deposited by a depositor at a commercial bank 39.
  • the deposit can be e.g. at the terminal of a self-service recycling machine.
  • the checking station 30 which can be part of the terminal, the banknotes are checked for authenticity. If the banknotes meet the very strict authenticity criteria of a selected authenticity class, they can be made available for immediate further issuance, for example at the same terminal, at other issuing terminals 34 and / or at a bank counter 36. All banknotes that do not meet these very strict authenticity criteria are fed to a central checking device 35, for example in a central bank 40, to another
  • a control unit 31 is also provided, in which - as already stated in the description of FIG. 2 - additional authenticity criteria are determined on the basis of counterfeit banknotes, which relate to characteristic differences between real banknotes and banknotes recognized as counterfeit in the central checking device 35 ,
  • the counterfeits can be transmitted directly from the test device 35 to the control unit 31.
  • the authenticity criteria determined there are which is then transmitted to the checking station 30 via the connection 32 and can be used there - if necessary in addition to the authenticity criteria divided into different authenticity classes - for the authenticity check of banknotes.
  • characteristic data e.g. Print images and / or serial numbers for the paid-in banknotes together with data for the payer, e.g. Account number and / or personal identification number (PIN) are stored together in the control device 31.
  • characteristic data e.g. Print images and / or serial numbers
  • the bank note transmitted to the control device 31.
  • the payer of the counterfeit banknote can be identified by comparing the stored data with the transmitted data.
  • the control unit 31 can either be installed inside the commercial bank 39, as shown, or be located outside the latter, for example at a central service provider.
  • the system shown in FIG. 3 deals, for example, with the use of the method according to the invention for checking the authenticity of banknotes at a deposit machine of a commercial bank.
  • the authenticity check can also be carried out in a banknote processing machine in which banknotes - e.g. after deposit at the counter of a commercial bank - entered by an employee for checking and / or sorting.
  • the authenticity check and the subsequent procedure for sorting, reissuing and / or forwarding for checking in a central bank are carried out analogously.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé servant à vérifier l'authenticité de documents, notamment de billets de banque, de documents de valeur ou de documents de sécurité, à l'aide de critères d'authenticité. L'invention vise à augmenter la fiabilité lors de la vérification d'authenticité de documents. A cet effet, le procédé selon l'invention utilise au moins deux classes d'authenticité différentes présentant chacune un ou plusieurs critères d'authenticité, les classes d'authenticité individuelles se distinguant les unes des autres par au moins un critère d'authenticité. Une classe d'authenticité est sélectionnée parmi les différentes classes d'authenticité et le document est vérifié au moyen des critères d'authenticité de la classe d'authenticité sélectionnée. La classe d'authenticité sélectionnée est affectée au document si ses critères d'authenticité sont remplis par le document. On obtient ainsi une plus grande fiabilité de la vérification d'authenticité, car ce procédé permet de traiter les documents satisfaisant à des exigences d'authenticité plus élevées, donc à des critères d'authenticité plus sévères, que les autres documents et qui sont donc plus probablement authentiques.
EP01962728.0A 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents Expired - Lifetime EP1295262B2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20100011637 EP2278559A3 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10029051A DE10029051A1 (de) 2000-06-13 2000-06-13 Verfahren zur Echtheitsprüfung von Dokumenten
DE10029051 2000-06-13
PCT/EP2001/006579 WO2001097180A2 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede pour la verification d'authenticite de documents

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100011637 Division-Into EP2278559A3 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits
EP10011637.5 Division-Into 2010-09-29

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1295262A2 true EP1295262A2 (fr) 2003-03-26
EP1295262B1 EP1295262B1 (fr) 2012-11-21
EP1295262B2 EP1295262B2 (fr) 2021-01-20

Family

ID=7645540

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100011637 Ceased EP2278559A3 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits
EP01962728.0A Expired - Lifetime EP1295262B2 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100011637 Ceased EP2278559A3 (fr) 2000-06-13 2001-06-11 Suivi de billets de banque contrefaits

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US7552864B2 (fr)
EP (2) EP2278559A3 (fr)
AU (1) AU2001283852A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE10029051A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2001097180A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4012423B2 (ja) * 2002-03-26 2007-11-21 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 紙幣取扱装置
JP4349849B2 (ja) 2003-06-17 2009-10-21 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 預金自動預け払い機及び紙幣の追跡方法
DE10346635A1 (de) * 2003-10-08 2005-05-12 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh System zur Prüfung von Sicherheitsmerkmalen von Wertdokumenten
DE10360862A1 (de) * 2003-12-23 2005-07-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Identifizierung von gefälschten Banknoten
DE10360859A1 (de) 2003-12-23 2005-07-21 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Banknotenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren für das Erkennen von gefälschten Banknoten
DE102004024620A1 (de) * 2004-05-18 2005-12-08 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung von Banknoten
DE102004049998A1 (de) * 2004-10-14 2006-04-20 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur visuellen Darstellung von Meßwerten
DE102005044092A1 (de) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-22 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Banknotenerkennung
DE102005055682A1 (de) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten
DE102006042186A1 (de) 2006-09-08 2008-03-27 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Vernichtung von Banknoten
WO2008056404A1 (fr) 2006-11-06 2008-05-15 Glory Ltd. Dispositif de distinction de papiers et procédé de distinction de papiers
DE102008020208A1 (de) * 2008-04-22 2009-10-29 Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Speicherung von Informationen über Gegenstände, die einem SB-Terminal zugeführt wurden
US7941378B2 (en) * 2008-05-16 2011-05-10 Siemens Industry, Inc. Stamp testing and monitoring
JP5501968B2 (ja) * 2008-08-08 2014-05-28 グローリー株式会社 紙葉類管理システム、紙葉類識別装置、紙葉類管理装置、紙葉類管理方法及び紙葉類管理プログラム
US8818071B2 (en) * 2009-03-19 2014-08-26 Glory Ltd. Banknote recognition and counting machine and banknote recognition and counting method
DE102009044881A1 (de) * 2009-12-14 2011-06-16 Wincor Nixdorf International Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Rückverfolgung von Banknoten
DE102009058438A1 (de) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-22 Giesecke & Devrient GmbH, 81677 Verfahren zur Prüfung von Wertdokumenten
DE102010045879A1 (de) * 2010-09-17 2012-03-22 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Banknoten
GB201100803D0 (en) * 2011-01-18 2011-03-02 Innovative Technology Ltd Apparatus and method for generating dataset for items of currency
NL2006766C2 (en) * 2011-05-11 2012-11-13 Nl Bank Nv Quantitative examination of counterfeits.
US8619245B1 (en) 2012-08-16 2013-12-31 Eastman Kodak Company Authentication device with access control and calibration
US8937712B2 (en) 2012-08-16 2015-01-20 Eastman Kodak Company Authentication device with access control and calibration
US11526821B2 (en) * 2013-08-29 2022-12-13 Ncr Corporation Managing media replenishment
US9165418B2 (en) 2014-03-06 2015-10-20 Eastman Kodak Company Authentication device with temporary enabling target
US9256809B2 (en) 2014-03-06 2016-02-09 Eastman Kodak Company Enabling an authentication device with temporary target
CN105989658A (zh) * 2015-02-12 2016-10-05 湖南求真电子有限公司 一种识别伪造票据和变造克隆票据的方法及装置
JP7043967B2 (ja) * 2018-05-14 2022-03-30 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 同一性判定装置、同一性判定システムおよびプログラム
US10769263B1 (en) 2019-05-07 2020-09-08 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Certificate verification
CN116931487A (zh) * 2023-07-25 2023-10-24 西安速度时空大数据科技有限公司 一种应用于军工企业的数据采集监控***

Family Cites Families (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52150699A (en) 1976-06-09 1977-12-14 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Bank note, etc. identifying apparatus
JPS58221490A (ja) * 1982-06-16 1983-12-23 株式会社東芝 入出金装置
NL8202920A (nl) 1982-07-20 1984-02-16 Tno Inrichting voor het herkennen en onderzoeken van bladvormige voorwerpen zoals bankbiljetten of dergelijke.
JPS59149564A (ja) * 1983-02-15 1984-08-27 Toshiba Corp 自動取引システム
JPH0666074B2 (ja) * 1983-04-04 1994-08-24 株式会社東芝 区分集積装置
EP0302458B1 (fr) * 1987-08-04 1994-05-25 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Appareil de traitement de feuilles de papier
DE3807727A1 (de) * 1988-03-09 1989-09-21 Robot Foto Electr Kg Ueberwachungsvorrichtung zum sichern von automaten
US5201395A (en) * 1990-09-27 1993-04-13 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Bill examination device
JP2639766B2 (ja) * 1991-04-10 1997-08-13 ローレルバンクマシン株式会社 貨幣選別装置
IT1250847B (it) * 1991-10-15 1995-04-21 Urmet Spa Apparecchio per la validazione di banconote
US5430664A (en) * 1992-07-14 1995-07-04 Technitrol, Inc. Document counting and batching apparatus with counterfeit detection
CH684856A5 (de) * 1992-11-30 1995-01-13 Mars Inc Verfahren zur Klassifizierung eines Musters - insbesondere eines Musters einer Banknote oder einer Münze - und Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens.
GB2279796B (en) † 1993-06-28 1996-09-25 Mars Inc Validating value carriers
GB9326440D0 (en) * 1993-12-24 1994-02-23 Ncr Int Inc Neutral network for banknote recongnition and authentication
DE69527136T2 (de) 1994-03-08 2002-12-19 Cummins Allison Corp Verfahren und apparat zum unterschreiben und zählen von dokumenten
DE4411403A1 (de) * 1994-03-31 1995-10-05 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Sortieren und Stapeln von Blattgut
KR0182242B1 (ko) * 1995-04-19 1999-04-15 사토 후미오 복수의 기기 사이에서 취급매체를 수수하는(주고받는)장치, 이를 구비한 현금처리시스템 및 거래매체의 수수방법
JPH11506555A (ja) * 1995-05-11 1999-06-08 ギーゼッケ ウント デフリエント ゲーエムベーハー 紙幣等のシート材料を処理する装置および方法
WO1997027566A1 (fr) * 1996-01-25 1997-07-31 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Procede d'examen de feuilles et de billets etc., permettant de detecter les contrefaçons et procede d'estimation de leur sens d'insertion
US5757001A (en) * 1996-05-01 1998-05-26 The Regents Of The University Of Calif. Detection of counterfeit currency
US6573983B1 (en) * 1996-11-15 2003-06-03 Diebold, Incorporated Apparatus and method for processing bank notes and other documents in an automated banking machine
GB9624895D0 (en) 1996-11-29 1997-01-15 Ncr Int Inc Automatic teller machines
GB9707243D0 (en) * 1997-04-09 1997-05-28 Ncr Int Inc Self-service deposit method and apparatus
US6065672A (en) * 1997-07-24 2000-05-23 Currency Systems International Method for currency distribution and management
CA2307589A1 (fr) † 1997-10-31 1999-05-14 Cummins-Allison Corporation Systeme d'evaluation et d'enregistrement d'effets monetaires
DE19750644A1 (de) * 1997-11-14 1999-05-27 Leicher Gmbh & Co Einzahlungsautomat
US6493461B1 (en) * 1998-03-17 2002-12-10 Cummins-Allison Corp. Customizable international note counter
SE514260C2 (sv) * 1998-10-22 2001-01-29 Nybohov Dev Ab Anläggning för hantering av sedlar inom ett geografiskt begränsat område
DE60137063D1 (de) * 2001-12-28 2009-01-29 Mei Inc Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Sortierung von Währungsartikeln

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0197180A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2001097180A2 (fr) 2001-12-20
EP2278559A2 (fr) 2011-01-26
WO2001097180A3 (fr) 2002-05-30
EP1295262B2 (fr) 2021-01-20
US20030168849A1 (en) 2003-09-11
EP2278559A3 (fr) 2012-06-06
US7552864B2 (en) 2009-06-30
AU2001283852A1 (en) 2001-12-24
EP1295262B1 (fr) 2012-11-21
US20090242627A1 (en) 2009-10-01
US8006898B2 (en) 2011-08-30
DE10029051A1 (de) 2001-12-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1295262B2 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour la verification d'authenticite de documents
EP1810251B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de traitement de billets de banque
EP1754204A1 (fr) Dispositif et procede pour verifier des billets de banque
DE2824849C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Feststellung des Zustandes und/oder der Echtheit von Blattgut
DE60117151T2 (de) Banknotenspezifische geldverarbeitung
EP2617016B1 (fr) Procédé de traitement de billets de banque
EP1576553B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour controler des billets de banque
EP1652153B1 (fr) Dispositif de determination de l'etat de billets de banque
DE102009034065A1 (de) Verfahren für die Bearbeitung von Banknoten
EP1776673B1 (fr) Procede de reglage d'une machine de traitement de billets de banque
EP1297498B1 (fr) Dispositif de traitement de produits en feuille
WO2002029736A1 (fr) Element de separation pour separer et traiter des produits sous forme de feuilles
DE69405105T3 (de) Echtheitsprüfung von wertträgern
WO2005001779A1 (fr) Systeme et procede de traitement d'unites de valeur
DE10360862A1 (de) Verfahren für die Identifizierung von gefälschten Banknoten
DE102008011664A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bearbeiten von Wertdokumenten
WO2006010559A1 (fr) Procede de verification de billets de banque par reconnaissance de formes
EP1700276B1 (fr) Machine de traitement des billets de banque et procede pour reconnaitre des faux billets de banque
DE602004008815T2 (de) Dokumentenverarbeitungsgerät mit Detektoren-Verstärkungssteuerung
WO2005109354A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour le traitement de billets de banque
DE10133860A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Bearbeitung von Blattgut
EP2427870A2 (fr) Procede pour le traitement d'articles sous forme de feuilles
DE19946536A1 (de) Verfahren für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten und Vorrichtung insbesondere zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE102020002587A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Substrats mit einem Lumineszenzstoff
DE102004045169A1 (de) Verfahren für Entwurf und Prüfung von Wertpapieren

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030113

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071123

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VERIFYING THE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GMBH, 81677 MUENCHEN, DE

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 585423

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20121121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130304

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130222

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

PLAA Information modified related to event that no opposition was filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299DELT

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130822

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BUNDESDRUCKEREI GMBH

Effective date: 20130819

D26N No opposition filed (deleted)
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130822

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130819

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20130630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130701

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 585423

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130611

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GMBH, 81677 MUENCHEN, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE AND DEVRIENT GMBH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PK

Free format text: DER EINTRAG 'KEIN EINSPRUCH' ERFOLGTE IRRTUEMLICH

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20180118 AND 20180124

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190619

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20190624

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190624

Year of fee payment: 19

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200630

Year of fee payment: 20

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20210120

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200611

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 50116204

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200611