EP1960064A1 - Planche de surf sur neige - Google Patents
Planche de surf sur neigeInfo
- Publication number
- EP1960064A1 EP1960064A1 EP06817722A EP06817722A EP1960064A1 EP 1960064 A1 EP1960064 A1 EP 1960064A1 EP 06817722 A EP06817722 A EP 06817722A EP 06817722 A EP06817722 A EP 06817722A EP 1960064 A1 EP1960064 A1 EP 1960064A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- snow
- board
- sliding board
- snow sliding
- sliding
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63C—SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE
- A63C5/00—Skis or snowboards
- A63C5/12—Making thereof; Selection of particular materials
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63C—SKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE
- A63C5/00—Skis or snowboards
- A63C5/04—Structure of the surface thereof
- A63C5/0405—Shape thereof when projected on a plane, e.g. sidecut, camber, rocker
Definitions
- the invention relates to a snow sliding board according to the preamble of the independent claims. Since the beginning of alpine skiing at the beginning of the twentieth century, the simple wooden slats originally used have been continuously developed, improved and perfected. In contrast to the past, skis and snowboards (henceforth snow sliding boards) are now often placed on one edge when cornering and ideally the curve is completely driven on one edge. A lateral drift across the direction of travel can be reduced and the curve can be driven faster. The name “Carving” is derived from the "cutting" of these traces.
- the design of the tread in the top view (floor plan; outline) and in the side view (side view) is relevant for the behavior of a snow sliding board. So that carving is possible, snow sliding boards have a waist in the floor plan, which in combination with the resulting deflection results in the effectively driven radius. A problem with today's snow sliding boards is that the waistline in the floor plan is intended for carving, but the side plan has never been adapted to the new conditions.
- One goal is to show a short, waisted ski, the load-bearing area of which is to be enlarged compared to the prior art and which shows a more progressive behavior when cornering.
- an ISO standard 6289 is used, in which the snow gliding board, which otherwise protrudes as a result of the pretensioning, is pressed onto a flat surface so that it fits snugly on the middle area.
- the resulting contact area is limited by a front and a rear contact line (definition according to ISO standard 6289).
- the widest area of the blade lies in front of the front contact line and is between 5 mm and 15 mm away from the plane surface.
- An object of the invention is to show an improved snow gliding board, which has less resistance and better traction, especially when cornering.
- a sliding surface of a snow sliding board has the following areas in the side view from the front to the rear: concave pointed bend, which forms the shovel in the front area; convex leader (middle section); concave end bend, which opens into the rear in the rear.
- the central area has a positive, upward-convex curvature which merges into concave negative curvatures in the area of the ends.
- the areas in which the sign of the curvature changes are called saddle points.
- the curvatures are selected so that an unloaded snow gliding board placed on one level only rests in the area of its concave end curvatures, the contact areas of the sliding surface, and lifts in the central area (pretension).
- the function of the invention is not adversely affected by a geometry deviation, provided that the curvatures, their relationship to one another and the transition points (saddle points) are arranged in such a way that the kinematics according to the invention (“rolling effect”, cf. below)
- the direction of curvature of the leader between the peripheries (blade and tail) is defined as a positive, convex curvature and the peripheral curvatures in the area of the blade and tail are defined as negative, concave curvature.
- any existing straight sections between the convex and concave areas act to a certain extent as a deformation limitation, in that a snow gliding board can only be deflected until they lie (both in the inclined and in the flat state) along their entire edge length.
- Straight regions act in particular as deformation limitation when the curvature on the opposite side The opposite side changes, for example from concave to convex.
- Such straight areas are understood in the context of the invention described here as positive, convex curvatures, since they essentially behave like such.
- the following elements are differentiated when describing the limits of the sliding surface (viewed from front to back): pointed end, waist, end end.
- circular arcs or straight lines are used in a simplified manner, since they have geometric points that are helpful for the explanation. Instead of arcs and straight lines, however, other elements such as ellipse, clothoid, parabola, etc. can also be used to define the geometry.
- quadrant points extreme points are points that are the largest or the largest on the snow board. have the smallest rectangular distance to a longitudinal axis of the device.
- the pointed end and the end end begin, for example, at a front and rear quadrant point, respectively, which form the transitions to the waist.
- a middle quadrant point can be found in the narrowest area of the waist.
- Saddle points are understood to mean areas in which the sign of the curvature changes (positive, negative, or convex, concave). These are particularly relevant for the definition of the side elevation of the sliding surface.
- the snow gliding board When carving, when the snow gliding board is placed on an edge and guided by a curve, it deforms elastically in the central area as a result of the loads that occur, so that the originally convex curvature temporarily becomes a concave curvature.
- the side edge resting on the ground describes a substantially circular path, which is superimposed on the deformation state that arises as a result of the load, the side waist and the edging angle (angle between the sliding surface and the ground when the snow gliding board is placed on the edge) Ideally corresponds to the curve to be driven.
- the support areas and the saddle points in the shovel and rear area are very close together, the distance between these two areas is typically only 2% to 4% of the total length of the snow sliding board.
- the saddle point can often not be determined at all in the sense discussed here, since the sliding surfaces between the convex and the concave regions have straight sections which act as a limitation of the deformation.
- the average radii of the end areas (shovel, tail) are around 500mm and the average radii of the preload are around 13'0OO mm to 14'0OO mm.
- the shovel area (tip to support point in the unloaded state) usually extends over around 10% of the length of the snow sliding board, so that the saddle point is around 12% to 14% of the total length. Due to the large length of the tip, the effective edge length is reduced. In the rear area, the support area is around 2% to 4% and the saddle point is around 4% to 5% from the end (100%). When a conventional snowboard bends, the support area moves only a little, since the support area in the unloaded state and the saddle point are very close together, respectively. straight sections between the changes in curvature prevent the deformation. As a result, the tip always remains approximately in the same direction with respect to the ground, respectively. the direction of travel.
- a strongly upward-tapering, curved tip is required so that no insertion results. Since the contact point and the saddle point are very close together, a conventional snow gliding board is always pressed most strongly onto the ground in approximately the same area, regardless of the deflection. Areas with the greatest edge pressure are comparatively close to the end areas. As it has been shown, this fact has a negative impact on driving comfort and manageability. As a result of the high edge pressure in the run-in area of the edges, faults, for example in the form of bumps in the road, have a considerable influence on smooth running and directional stability.
- One idea of the invention is an optimal combination! the physics of gliding and the mechanics of the glider. This goal is achieved by a deformation-dependent change, or.
- a snow sliding board according to the invention has a curvature transition (saddle point) between the convex prestressing radius and concave peripheral bends, which, compared to a conventional snow sliding board, is arranged further towards the center (50% of the length of the snow sliding board) in the longitudinal direction, so that between the support point and a saddle point is formed at the saddle point, which enables a variable edge force distribution, especially when cornering in the upturned state.
- the side waist floor plan
- the roll-up effect arises in the case of an upturned snow sliding board as a result of the external forces acting on it, by deforming the snow sliding board in such a way that a “deepest edge region”, which forms the contact between the edge and a ground relevant for the direction of travel, as a result of the deformation that occurs
- the area of the snowboard that lies in front of the deepest area of the edge seen in the longitudinal direction is practically not loaded and thus essentially retains its original shape.
- the invention has the advantage that, due to the rolling effect, in particular the end areas of the snow gliding board in comparison can be made substantially stiffer compared to the prior art, so that less flutter and high-frequency interference occur, as they typically appear at high speeds.
- the distance between the support area and the saddle point, as well as the radii of the end areas are selected so that a load-dependent rolling up of at least one end area is achieved.
- Rolling up here is understood to mean a temporary, load-dependent lifting of the end regions as a result of a displacement of the bearing region to the longitudinal center and an associated rolling off along the concave sliding surfaces in the end regions.
- This roll-up effect results in a controlled release and a certain change in direction of the peripheral areas, in particular when cornering, with a central load.
- the distance between the support areas and the saddle points in the shovel and in the rear area is around 8% to 20% of the entire length of the snow sliding board.
- the mean radii of curvature in the support area are also selected to be significantly larger than in conventional snow sliding boards. In a preferred embodiment, they are around 3000 mm and are therefore approximately 4 to 6 times larger than in a conventional snow sliding board.
- the configuration according to the invention ensures that the support area is load to the saddle point in the direction of the middle of the snow sliding board and the tip, resp. the tail can be raised under load. This effect also occurs when cornering, when the snow gliding board is placed on an edge, as the swing is initiated more gently by the controlled lifting of the tip of the snow gliding board.
- a snow gliding board arise, inter alia, when traversing mountain edges where no changes in direction are to be made, if possible, with swing control on the slopes, in deep snow or when walking on gates.
- the speed of gliding will generally be higher in all snow conditions and applications, since the deformation resulting from the load results in an optimized sideline, which results in lower resistance and a reduced susceptibility to external disturbances.
- Dangerous digging in of the tips in radically carved corners is also significantly reduced as a result of the tip advancing.
- Another advantage is the ease of handling due to the good-natured driving characteristics due to the changed pressure distribution along the edges, especially in the peripheral area.
- the tip of the snow gliding board is of blunt design in comparison to the prior art and, as seen in the G ⁇ mdriss, has a central region with a radius of approximately 250 mm or larger.
- the floor plan In the transition area to the front quadrant points, the floor plan has a radius of around 100mm or less.
- a preferred embodiment has an average radius of around 300 mm to 350 mm and lateral transition radii from around 60 mm to 80 mm.
- the vertical elevation of the tip is around 10mm to 30mm.
- One embodiment of the invention relates to a snow gliding board with a tip, a middle part and a rear and with a sliding surface with a concave pointed bend, a convex middle part and a concave end bend, the concave pointed bend opening into the convex middle part of the sliding surface in the region of a front saddle point.
- the slope in the area of the front saddle point is 2 ° to 5 ° with respect to the support areas in the unloaded state. Depending on the embodiment, it can have a different value. In a preferred embodiment, the slope is around 3 °.
- the sliding surface has a concave roll-up surface in the area of the pointed bend, which enables the edge pressure to be shifted depending on the load.
- the concave rolling surface has a constant radius of curvature or a radius of curvature decreasing towards the front end of the snow sliding board.
- the radius of curvature of the rolling surface toward the front end of the snow sliding board is designed to decrease continuously or discontinuously, at least in some areas.
- the radius of curvature of the rolling surface is in the range of 1000 mm and 5000 mm or between 2500 mm and 3500 mm, depending on the area of application.
- the radius can decrease towards the front end.
- the radius in the region of the front end is between 200 mm and 400 mm.
- the field of application e.g.
- the front support area with reference to the total length L of the snow gliding board, is arranged 5% to 30%, 8% to 20% or 9% to 14% in front of the front saddle point.
- the front support area in the undeformed state with reference to the total length L of the snow sliding board and depending on the application, between 8% and 15%, 10% and 13%, respectively. 3% to 10% in front of the front support area.
- the snow gliding board can have a rolling surface in the area of the end bend. The invention is suitable for use on snow gliding boards in which a variable edge force distribution has advantages when inflowing in the plane and on the folded condition when cornering, especially snowboards, skis and monoskiem.
- FIG. 1 shows a snow sliding board according to the invention in a front view
- FIG. 2 shows the snow gliding board according to FIG. 1 in a rear view
- FIG. 3 shows the snow gliding board according to FIGS. 1 and 2 in a side view and a top view
- Fig. 4 shows a conventional snow sliding board according to the prior art in a front view
- FIG. 5 shows the snow gliding board according to FIG. 4 in a rear view
- FIGS. 4 and 5 shows the snow sliding board according to FIGS. 4 and 5 in a side view and a top view
- Fig. 7 shows a perspective view of the snow sliding boards according to the
- FIGS. 1 to 3 and 4 to 6 shows a side view of the snow sliding boards according to FIGS. 1 to 3 and 4 to 6 when cornering;
- Fig. 1 1 shows detail H from Figure 9;
- FIG. 13 is a diagram of a second snow sliding board
- 16 is a diagram of a fifth snow sliding board
- FIG. 17 is a diagram of a sixth snow sliding board
- 21 is a diagram of a tenth snow sliding board
- FIG. 1 shows a snow sliding board 1 according to the invention in a front view and FIG. 2 shows the same snow sliding board 1 in a rear view.
- FIG. 3 shows the snow sliding board 1 according to FIGS. 1 and 2 in a side view (FIG. 3a) and in a top view (FIG. 3b).
- FIGS. 4 and 5 show a conventional snow sliding board 100 in a front view and in a rear view.
- FIG. 6 shows the conventional snow gliding board 100 according to FIGS. 4 and 5 in a side view (FIG. 6a) and in a top view (FIG. 6b).
- the scaling of the conventional snow sliding board 100 corresponds in the illustrations to the length L of the snow sliding board 1 according to the invention according to FIGS. 1 to 3 for a better comparison.
- FIG. 1 shows the snow sliding board 1 with a tip 8, a middle part 13 and a tail 9.
- the snow sliding board 1 has a sliding surface 10 with a concave pointed bend 21, a convex middle part 22 and a concave end bend 23, the concave pointed bend 21 in the area a front saddle point 6 opens into the convex middle part 22 of the sliding surface 10.
- the sliding surface 10 has a concave roll-up surface 17 in the region of the pointed bend 21, which enables the edge pressure to be shifted depending on the load.
- a device longitudinal axis 20 (x-axis) is shown schematically. As can be seen from FIGS. 1 and 2, the invention disclosed here makes it possible to design the tip 8 very flat, and thus in terms of flow, if required.
- the tip 8 of the front view according to FIG. 1 in the undeformed state does not protrude in a silhouette over the convex central region 13.
- the embodiment shown Form of the invention the front support area 2 in the unloaded state at about 1 1% total length L of the snow sliding board and the front quadrant point 3 with the front maximum width Bl at about 4.5% of the total length L.
- the rear Support area 4 is around 96% of the total length L and the rear quadrant point 5 with the rear maximum width B2 is around 98% of the total length L.
- the front saddle point 6 is around 18% and the rear saddle point 7 is approx.
- the front saddle point 6 is therefore about 7% from the support area 2 with reference to the total length L and the rear support area 4 around 6% from the rear saddle point 7.
- the slope in the front saddle point is approximately 3 ° with reference to the support points 2, 4.
- the area between the support area 2 and the front saddle point 6 serves as a rolling surface 17 along which the support area shifts in the direction of the front saddle point 6 when loaded .
- the areas 3, 5 with the maximum widths Bl and B2 are approximately 13.5% at the front and approximately 8% at the rear from the nearest saddle point 6, 7
- the front support area 102 is about 1 1% overall length L of the snow sliding board in the unloaded state and the area 103 with the front maximum width B3 is around 7.6% of the total length L.
- the rear support area 104 and the area 105 with the rear maximum width B4 are around 98% of the total length L.
- the front saddle point 106 is approximately 12% and the rear saddle point 107 is approximately 96% of the total length L
- the front saddle point 106 is therefore approximately 1% away from the support area 102 with reference to the total length L and the rear support area 104 about 2% from the rear saddle point 7.
- the areas 103, 105 with the maximum widths B3 and B4 are approximately 4.4% at the front and approximately 2% at the rear from the nearest saddle point 106, 107.
- the mean radius R1 of the snow sliding board according to the invention according to FIG. 3 is around 3000 mm in the front support area 2 of the tip 8 and at the front saddle point 6 and decreases to about 400 mm towards the front end.
- the radius R2 in the rear support area 5 is around 1200 mm.
- the sliding surface 10 has an average radius R3 of approximately 15,000 mm in the convex prestressing region 11.
- the sliding surface 10 is in the support area 2, 5 due to the comparatively large radii Rl 1 and .
- R2 and the curvature which is drawn far back (distance between support area 2, 5) are suitable to serve as a virtual rolling surface along which the support area can be temporarily displaced depending on the state of deformation.
- Rear, resp. front boundaries form the saddle points 6, 7.
- the snow sliding board has a waist radius of around 20,000 mm in the plan, which in the embodiment shown decreases to 13,000 mm in the area of the front maximum width B1. In the area of the rear maximum width B2, the radius is around 16,000 mm.
- the comparatively blunt tip 8 has a radius of approximately 350 mm in the middle in the plan, which decreases to approximately 80 mm in the corner regions 11, 12.
- the rear end of the shown embodiment of the snow sliding board 1 according to the invention is here essentially straight.
- the radii in the area after the rear maximum width B2 are around 100mm.
- FIG. 7 shows schematically the two snow sliding boards 1, 101 according to FIGS. 1 to 6 when cornering. Both snow sliding boards 1, 101 pass through a curved path bl, respectively. b2 with the same radius in direction x.
- the snow gliding boards I 1 101 are shown in a bent state, as it sets approximately with a corresponding upward edging with respect to the ground by an upward edging angle ⁇ .
- the tip 8 is raised in the event of a deformation due to the load, as a result of the rolling effect (shown schematically by arrow zl), in that the tip 8 rotates around the support area 16, which is displaced to the rear, which on the one hand results in a reduction of the edge pressure in this critical foremost area and on the other hand enables the tip to be “gripped” in the direction of the curved path b 1 to be driven between the support area 2 and the front saddle point 6 serves as a rolling surface 1 7.
- Faults, for example in the form of short-wave bumps kl, k2 therefore have a significantly smaller influence on al. due to the lower edge loading in the inlet area in a snow sliding board 1 designed according to the invention s with a conventionally designed snow gliding board 101.
- FIG. 8 shows the two snow sliding boards 1, 101 according to FIG. 7 in a side view (y direction) in the roadway plane (shown simply as the xy plane).
- the invention makes it possible to design a snow gliding board 1 such that the effective length WI of the side edge 14 can be made much longer with an identical overall length L (see FIGS. 3 and 6, respectively).
- the difference dw between the effective edge sounds W1 of the side edge 14 and the effective edge length W2 of the side edge 114 of the conventionally designed snow gliding board 101 is around 4% to 5% (based on the total length L of the snow gliding board).
- FIG. 9 shows the inventive and the conventional snow sliding board 1, 101 in a side view in the plane of the snow sliding boards.
- the curved tracks b1, b2 to be driven are shown schematically and are located in the roadway level. Due to the edging angle ⁇ (see FIG. 7), only a projection of the curved paths b1, b2 can be seen.
- FIGS. 10 and 11 show an enlarged view of details G and H from FIG. 9.
- FIG. 10 schematically shows the course of the sliding surface 13 of a conventional snow sliding board 1 in a side view
- FIG. 11 shows the course of the sliding surface 13 of a snow sliding board 1 according to the invention in a side view.
- the sliding surfaces 13, 1 13 are shown schematically in the deformed state. Due to the edged arrangement, the curves shown are to be understood as a projection of the curves b1, b2 actually driven.
- the tip 8 (cf. FIG. 11) of the snow sliding board 1 designed according to the invention is designed to be substantially flatter than the tip 108 of the conventional snow sliding board 101.
- the very large negative curvatures on the peripheries flow very gently onto the snow sliding board 1 according to the invention .
- FIGS. 12 to 22 show eleven embodiments of snow sliding boards - skis and snowboards - on the basis of diagrams.
- a floor plan (top view according to FIG. 3b) and a side view of the sliding surface 22 (view from the side according to FIG. 3a) can be seen in each figure.
- the snow sliding boards shown in the diagrams are real geometries and therefore exact data.
- the length (X-axis) is scaled to 100% in order to take different lengths into account, or to better compare different snow gliding boards with each other.
- the effective length is of secondary importance for the considerations presented here. The prevailing conditions are much more important.
- the y-axis of the diagram shows the width of the floor plan (real y-direction) and the height of the snow board in the case of the side plan (real z-axis). Although the width and the height (leader) can also vary, they are scaled to millimeters [mm] in the figures 12 to 22 shown. It goes without saying that the description of the driving characteristics is primarily based on the ratios and relative sizes and less on the effective values. The dimensions can therefore deviate from the values shown without negatively affecting the properties.
- the base and side cracks are composed of radii, particularly in the area of at least one saddle point.
- the sliding surface there are no straight sections that adversely affect driving behavior, for example by limiting the deformation. With the sliding surface, this has the consequence that the ends, tip and / or rear, can roll up to the saddle points.
- the side cracks (sliding surfaces) of the diagrams from FIGS. 12 to 22 generally have the largest average sliding surface radius RS in the convex middle region between the saddle points (position indicated by the two vertical lines 6 and 7).
- the radii of the sliding surfaces decrease continuously towards the concave ends (tip / tail). In the transition areas, larger transition radii can appear for a short time. Short straight-line sections which have no influence on the function and in particular are not in the region of a change in curvature are not considered here and are therefore not shown.
- the sliding surface radii RS In the area between the saddle points of the sliding surface 6, 7 and the saddle points of the floor plan 24, 25, the sliding surface radii RS generally decrease comparatively more than the waist radii RG. This can be seen from the fact that the curve of the sliding surface radii RS tends to be steeper on average than the curve of the waist radii RG. The radii of the sliding surface radii RS towards the saddle points 24, 25 of the floor plan also tend to be smaller than the waist radii.
- the waist radii RG likewise have the largest average waist radius in the convex middle part between the saddle points 6, 7 of the sliding surface 10 (cf. FIG. 3). Depending on the area of application and the type of snow gliding board (ski, snowboard), the waist radii in the central area are larger, equal or smaller than the gliding surface radii.
- FIGS. 12 to 22 also show that the curve of the waist radii RG, except in extreme examples, generally decreases earlier towards the ends (tip, rear) than the curve of the sliding surface radii RS, which is generally the case with the Saddle point Tilt ten 6, 7 down towards the x-axis.
- the tilting ranges of the waist radii are shown schematically by the two vertical lines RV and RH.
- the tipping areas RV and RH are usually within (between) the tipping areas of the sliding surface radii 6, 7.
- the front tipping area RV is from -5% to 20% further from the tip (0 %) removed as the front saddle point 6 of the sliding surface radii RS (negative values mean outside the area between the saddle points 6, 7).
- the tipping area RH is also -5 to 20% away from the rear saddle point 7 with reference to the total length.
- the values of the snow sliding boards from FIGS. 12 to 22 are summarized in Table 1. While the absolute values relate to the total length L, the relative values relate to the length L A between the support areas 2, 4 in the undeformed state. With reference to the total length L, the tipping range of the waist radii RG lies between the maximum values 13% and 17% with reference to the total length L.
- the saddle points 6, 7 in the side elevation indicate how far the snow gliding board can roll up.
- FIG. 23 schematically shows the course of the sliding surface radii RS and FIG. 24 shows the course of the waist radii RG in the region of the front roll-up surfaces 17 (tip to saddle point 6) of the snow sliding boards according to Table 1 and FIGS. 12 to 22 (see FIG. 3).
- the x-axis is scaled to 100% length of the respective snow sliding board.
- the y-axis shows the radius in millimeters. It can be seen that the radii increase in some areas. Fluctuations can result from measured values.
Landscapes
- Devices Affording Protection Of Roads Or Walls For Sound Insulation (AREA)
- Cleaning Of Streets, Tracks, Or Beaches (AREA)
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
Abstract
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH19622005 | 2005-12-09 | ||
PCT/CH2006/000666 WO2007065280A1 (fr) | 2005-12-09 | 2006-11-28 | Planche de surf sur neige |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1960064A1 true EP1960064A1 (fr) | 2008-08-27 |
EP1960064B1 EP1960064B1 (fr) | 2010-04-28 |
Family
ID=37877611
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06817722A Revoked EP1960064B1 (fr) | 2005-12-09 | 2006-11-28 | Planche de surf sur neige |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9216343B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP1960064B1 (fr) |
AT (2) | ATE465789T1 (fr) |
CH (1) | CH697123A8 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE502006006873D1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2007065280A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT507737B1 (de) | 2008-12-23 | 2012-06-15 | Elan Sportartikelerzeugungs Und Handelsges M B H | Snowboard |
FR2955035B1 (fr) | 2010-01-08 | 2012-12-28 | Rossignol Sa | Ski alpin |
DE102010031838A1 (de) | 2010-07-22 | 2012-01-26 | Blizzard Sport Ges.M.B.H. | Gleitbrett, insbesondere Ski |
US8256791B2 (en) | 2010-11-16 | 2012-09-04 | The Burton Corporation | Gliding board with improved response to rider input |
US9610492B1 (en) * | 2015-05-06 | 2017-04-04 | John Moran | Adjustable camber snow-gliding board |
US20200210546A1 (en) | 2019-01-02 | 2020-07-02 | Shinc Inc. | Systems and methods for generating a design for a gliding board |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH196205A (de) | 1935-08-17 | 1938-02-28 | Chem Ind Basel | Verfahren zur Herstellung eines neuen Farbstoffpräparates. |
US2510794A (en) * | 1946-11-01 | 1950-06-06 | Beerli Louis | Ski having concave sides |
DE4112950A1 (de) * | 1990-05-04 | 1991-11-07 | Rohrmoser Alois Skifabrik | Schi mit einem trapezfoermigen breitenverlauf |
FR2665369B1 (fr) | 1990-08-06 | 1992-10-16 | Salomon Sa | Ski a face superieure convexe variable. |
US5405161A (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 1995-04-11 | Dennis Young | Alpine ski with exaggerated tip and tail |
US6352268B1 (en) * | 1994-09-19 | 2002-03-05 | Stephen Peart | Snowboard with transitioning convex/concave curvature |
US5954356A (en) | 1997-01-31 | 1999-09-21 | James Steele Busby, Jr. | Snowboard |
US5823562A (en) * | 1997-08-27 | 1998-10-20 | North Shore Partners | Snowboard |
EP0928622A3 (fr) | 1998-01-12 | 2000-02-23 | Franz Völkl GmbH & Co. Ski und Tennis Sportartikelfabrik KG | Planche de glisse, notamment un ski |
FR2786108B1 (fr) | 1998-11-25 | 2001-02-16 | Salomon Sa | Ski |
FR2804335B1 (fr) * | 2000-01-28 | 2002-04-19 | Salomon Sa | Planche de glisse destinee a la pratique du surf sur neige |
FR2845296B1 (fr) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-12-24 | Salomon Sa | Planche de glisse ou de roulage |
FR2845611B1 (fr) | 2002-10-15 | 2004-12-03 | Rossignol Sa | Planche de glisse sur neige a spatule et a releve de talon ameliores |
-
2006
- 2006-11-28 DE DE502006006873T patent/DE502006006873D1/de active Active
- 2006-11-28 US US12/086,277 patent/US9216343B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-11-28 DE DE212006000050U patent/DE212006000050U1/de not_active Ceased
- 2006-11-28 EP EP06817722A patent/EP1960064B1/fr not_active Revoked
- 2006-11-28 CH CH01778/07A patent/CH697123A8/de unknown
- 2006-11-28 AT AT06817722T patent/ATE465789T1/de active
- 2006-11-28 WO PCT/CH2006/000666 patent/WO2007065280A1/fr active Application Filing
-
2007
- 2007-11-07 AT AT0066607U patent/AT9812U3/de not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2007065280A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE465789T1 (de) | 2010-05-15 |
DE502006006873D1 (de) | 2010-06-10 |
CH697123A8 (de) | 2008-06-25 |
US9216343B2 (en) | 2015-12-22 |
EP1960064B1 (fr) | 2010-04-28 |
US20090273161A1 (en) | 2009-11-05 |
AT9812U3 (de) | 2008-09-15 |
AT9812U2 (de) | 2008-04-15 |
DE212006000050U1 (de) | 2008-03-27 |
WO2007065280A1 (fr) | 2007-06-14 |
CH697123A5 (de) | 2008-05-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1960064B1 (fr) | Planche de surf sur neige | |
AT505588B1 (de) | Snowboard oder ski | |
DD238726A5 (de) | Fuehrungsvorrichtung eines schischuhes, und an diese vorrichtung angepasster schuh und schigrundflaeche | |
DE60317439T2 (de) | Schneegleitbrett mit verbesserter Spitze und gehobenem Ende | |
DE2753608C2 (de) | Ski | |
EP2409741B1 (fr) | Planche de glisse avec cambre inversé, aussi appelé rocker | |
CH658602A5 (de) | Mehrschichtenski in sandwichbauweise. | |
DD239338A5 (de) | Seitliche fuehrungsvorrichtung eines skieschuhes, und an diese vorrichtungangepasster schuh und langlaufski | |
DE3633098C2 (fr) | ||
AT390006B (de) | Ski | |
DE69104156T2 (de) | Veränderliche konvexe Oberfläche von Skis. | |
EP2248560A1 (fr) | Planche de glisse sur neige | |
DE102008003369A1 (de) | Ausbreiterdüse | |
DE212017000346U1 (de) | Rollschuhe | |
DE202011001173U1 (de) | Ski mit asymmetrischen Charakteristiken | |
AT511461B1 (de) | Snowboard | |
DE19704959A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Montieren einer Skibindung | |
EP3743559B1 (fr) | Contre-aiguille | |
DE202019103938U1 (de) | Alpinski mit variabler Dicke | |
WO2005092453A1 (fr) | Ski, notamment ski de fond ou ski alpin | |
EP0429693A1 (fr) | Réservoir | |
DE7430185U (de) | Rinnenformstein | |
DE10229151B4 (de) | Sportgerät | |
EP2514495B1 (fr) | Ski Rocker avec au moins deux rayons de courbure | |
DE3341533C1 (de) | Längsverschiebbar gelagerter Fahrzeugsitz |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080709 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20081031 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: RENTSCH & PARTNER |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502006006873 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20100610 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20100428 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20100428 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100808 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100828 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100602 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100729 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100830 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: ALL MOUNTAIN SPORTS VERTRIEBS-GMBH Effective date: 20110128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: KESSLER, HANSJURG Effective date: 20101130 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: KESSLER, HANSJUERG Free format text: KESSLER, HANSJUERG#DORF#8784 BRAUNWALD (CH) -TRANSFER TO- KESSLER, HANSJUERG#DORF#8784 BRAUNWALD (CH) |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20101128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101130 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101128 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101029 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100428 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100728 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20141119 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20160729 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151130 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20161221 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20161129 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20161130 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PCAR Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: BELLERIVESTRASSE 203 POSTFACH, 8034 ZUERICH (CH) |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R064 Ref document number: 502006006873 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R103 Ref document number: 502006006873 Country of ref document: DE |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 465789 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171128 |
|
27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20171025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MA03 Ref document number: 465789 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171025 |