EP3589971A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassungInfo
- Publication number
- EP3589971A1 EP3589971A1 EP18708108.8A EP18708108A EP3589971A1 EP 3589971 A1 EP3589971 A1 EP 3589971A1 EP 18708108 A EP18708108 A EP 18708108A EP 3589971 A1 EP3589971 A1 EP 3589971A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- radar
- signals
- comparison
- radar module
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/89—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
- G01S13/90—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging using synthetic aperture techniques, e.g. synthetic aperture radar [SAR] techniques
- G01S13/9021—SAR image post-processing techniques
- G01S13/9023—SAR image post-processing techniques combined with interferometric techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/02—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
- G01S7/40—Means for monitoring or calibrating
- G01S7/4004—Means for monitoring or calibrating of parts of a radar system
- G01S7/4021—Means for monitoring or calibrating of parts of a radar system of receivers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/003—Bistatic radar systems; Multistatic radar systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/89—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
- G01S13/90—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging using synthetic aperture techniques, e.g. synthetic aperture radar [SAR] techniques
- G01S13/9021—SAR image post-processing techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/02—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
- G01S7/023—Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/02—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
- G01S7/35—Details of non-pulse systems
- G01S7/352—Receivers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/87—Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/89—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
- G01S13/90—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging using synthetic aperture techniques, e.g. synthetic aperture radar [SAR] techniques
Definitions
- the invention relates to a radar system for detecting an environment of a moving object and a corresponding method.
- radar is used to detect the environment of a moving object, such as a vehicle, in particular an autonomous vehicle, a robot (or a part thereof), a crane (or a part thereof), etc. In doing so, the most accurate possible detection of the environment, in particular with regard to distance, lateral position,
- the distance resolution for a radar is in the first approximation:
- the resolution of the speed is the first for equal goals
- the lateral resolution is usually given in polar coordinates relative to the origin of the radar wave and is:
- f start as the starting frequency of the signal
- m as the extension of the antennas (or the aperture of the antenna in the plane in which the angle is measured).
- Angular resolution i.e., the ability to separate or resolve multiple adjacent targets over the angle
- the object of the invention is to propose a method or a system for environment detection, which enables a comparatively high (lateral) accuracy and resolution with little effort.
- This object is achieved in particular by a radar system for detecting an environment of a moving object according to claim 1 and a
- the object is achieved by a radar system for detecting an environment of a moving object, in particular a vehicle and / or a transport device, in particular a crane, wherein the system is mounted or mounted on the moving object, wherein the radar System comprises at least two (non-coherent) radar modules with at least one transmitting and at least one receiving antenna, wherein the Radar modules are arranged distributed or can be arranged on the moving object, wherein at least one evaluation device is provided, which is configured to process transmit and receive signals of the radar modules to modified measurement signals such that the modified measurement signals
- a key idea of the invention is to configure the radar system to modify the transmit and receive signals of the radar modules
- Measurement signals (in the postprocessing) are processed, so that from the
- the at least two radar modules are preferably connected to one another via a bus system.
- the at least two radar modules are preferably connected to one another via a bus system.
- the at least two radar modules are preferably connected to one another via a bus system.
- Radar modules each form an independent unit.
- the at least two radar modules can be separated from each other (spatially) or
- the radar system is configured so that
- a first signal is generated in a first radar module and transmitted via a path, in particular emitted (or can be),
- a further first signal is generated and transmitted via the path, in particular emitted (or can be), in the evaluation device, in particular in the first radar module, a first comparison signal from the first radar module and from one such first signal formed by the further radar module, via the path, is / can be formed,
- a first comparison signal from the first signal of the further radar module and from such a first signal received from the first radar module is or can be formed
- Radar module transmitted to the first radar module, in particular is communicated.
- Such a system is basically known from DE 10 2014 104 273 AI in another context.
- DE 10 2014 104 273 A1 the disclosure content of which should form part of the present disclosure (in particular with regard to developments or specifications of the method described in the preceding paragraph
- generating a coherence of the fundamental signals can result in a method of radar imaging being applied to the larger possible array possible thereby.
- the radar imaging process can then benefit from the larger array.
- the radar system in particular the evaluation device configured to form a comparison comparison signal from the first comparison signal and the further comparison signal.
- the comparison comparison signal reference is also made to DE 10 2014 104 273 A1, in which by reference the relevant disclosure content of the
- method ⁇ or configuration ⁇ the method or the corresponding configuration according to DE 10 2014 104 273 A1 for the creation of modified, coherent (measuring) signals is referred to as "method ⁇ or" configuration ⁇ .
- the system in particular the evaluation device is configured to compensate for deviations of the comparison signals, which are caused by systematic deviations in the radar modules in a first step and at least one in a second step complex value from a first of the two comparison signals or from a signal derived from this first comparison signal to be used to adapt at least one complex value of the second of the two comparison signals or a value of a signal derived from this second comparison signal to form such an adapted signal, wherein the adaptation is such that by a mathematical operation the vectorial sum or the
- Difference of the complex values is formed, or the sum or the difference of the phases of the complex values is formed.
- Radar imaging method allows a particularly high resolution or accuracy in the detection by simple means and in particular without particularly high computational effort.
- the comparison comparison signal in which the two comparison signals are processed together - in particular conjugate complex multiplied - correspond to a comparison signal generated with a coherent radar system.
- the first and / or second radar module preferably has (at least) one, more preferably at least two (in particular own) transmitting antenna (s) and / or at least one, preferably at least two (in particular own) receiving antenna (s).
- the first and / or the second radar module each has / have at most four, preferably at most three (in particular own) transmit antennas and / or at most five (preferably at most four) receive antennas.
- Radar modules therefore preferably have at least one transmitting and at least one receiving antenna.
- the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna may also be implemented as a (common) transmitting and receiving antenna (ie as a single antenna for both transmitting and receiving).
- a plurality of transmitting and receiving antennas are accommodated on a module, wherein more preferably 1 to 3 transmitting antennas and 2 to 4 receiving antennas are present (which has proven to be an advantageous compromise between size and array occupation for the present application).
- the radar modules preferably each comprise a device for generating the H F signal (H F generator).
- the radar modules may include a device (including one or more antennas) for transmitting the H F signal and a device (including one or more antennas) for receiving the H F signal.
- the radar modules may include a device (including one or more antennas) for transmitting the H F signal and a device (including one or more antennas) for receiving the H F signal.
- a lower frequency level e.g. B.
- the radar modules each its own (local) clock source for the
- the radar modules can be arranged distributed, for example, a
- the radar modules can then exchange the received signals either with each other or with a central processing unit (evaluation unit). This is preferably done via a (digital) data bus.
- Due to the spatial distribution of the individual radar modules can be a
- Antennas of the (individual) radar modules can represent individual antenna elements.
- the radar modules are arranged comparatively far apart, for example at a distance of at least 5 cm, preferably at least 10 cm, more preferably at least 40 cm.
- Maximum distance may be less than 10 m, preferably less than 5 m, more preferably less than 2 m, even more preferably less than 1.50 m.
- the radar modules are arranged so far apart that the resulting aperture is understaffed (ie only a smaller proportion of transmitting and receiving antennas or transmitting and receiving patches is present over a complete antenna array, sparse array).
- Such underscored arrays usually have high side lobes. This can be optimized by individual arrangements. At least three radar modules are particularly preferably used, whereby the side lobes can be further suppressed.
- a sparse array is also an arrangement in which the transmit and receive antennas are not fully occupied in a periodic grid.
- a calibration measurement is carried out with the radar modules (preferably on a single target well known in the position).
- the radar modules preferably on a single target well known in the position.
- the (complex) correction terms can be adapted adaptively such that the estimation of the angle to a target from all radar modules yields a (as far as) consistent result.
- the radar system in particular the evaluation device, is preferably configured to determine an angular position of an environmental structure by means of phase monopulse methods.
- the system is preferably configured to determine an angular position of an environmental structure by means of phase monopulse methods.
- the evaluation device may be configured to estimate, in particular to determine, by means of a method in the state space of one or more angular positions of one or more surrounding structures.
- the radar system may be configured to first separate targets by range and distance
- the angle can be determined by processing by means of interferometry (also called phase monopulse method in radar technology). For example, a range Doppler diagram can be generated here for each receiving channel in a first step. Subsequently, for certain targets in a radar spectrum, a phase difference between two (close) adjacent channels can be determined. Subsequently, the phase difference to a farther away channel can be determined in order to increase the accuracy. Here, the accuracy can be increased by the (now) significantly increased base length between the channels. to Improvement or increase of the angle release (in particular for
- the Capon method is preferable because it does not require an assumption about the number of targets. Such an estimate may be included
- a correction of the hypothesis to be checked may be carried out, for example with a hypothesis of holographic method (see below in detail), if necessary after calculation of a beat spectrum, or alternatively a closed solution can be used by means of known methods, but these are comparatively computationally intensive.
- the system in particular the evaluation device, is preferably configured to detect an environmental structure by means of a holography method, more preferably by means of holography methods, an angular position and / or a, in particular vectorial (relative), velocity and / or one, in particular vectorial (relative), To estimate acceleration of the environment structure.
- the system in particular the evaluation device is configured to perform a calibration by holography method.
- the radar system in particular the evaluation device configured, a (lateral) speed or a velocity vector, in particular by means of a method for comparing a change of Determine differential phases of receiving channels.
- the system in particular the evaluation device is preferably configured to determine a (lateral) acceleration or an acceleration vector, in particular by means of a method for comparing a change of differential phases of receiving channels.
- a sparse array is particularly preferably constructed in order to be able to carry out a precise estimation with at least two modules at a greater distance (of, for example, greater than 10 cm).
- a preferred realization of an evaluation can be carried out in the FMCW chirp sequence method. In this case, for example, first a burst of several, z. B. 128, frequency ramps (with the same slope) of the at least two radar modules simultaneously (or temporally overlapping) are sent. The received signals may then be, for example, S. Roehr, P. Gulden, and M.
- Vossiek "Precise D / s ta nee and Velocity Measurement for Real Time Locating in Multipath Environments Using a Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Secondary Radar Approach," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2329-2339, Oct. 2008, to be separated.
- a processing step according to, for example, the method II or the configuration II for an indirect path can then take place.
- a range Doppler diagram can be calculated (for each path) and the object position and velocity can be determined.
- the determination of the angular position from the phase difference of the receiving channels can be carried out by known methods (for example by means of phase monopulse or holography).
- a differential phase change from ramp to ramp can be determined (angular velocity). This can then be measured at a measured distance into the lateral velocity be converted.
- the vectorial velocity can then be determined as the sum of the lateral and radial velocities. This method considerably improves the environment detection, since then the complete motion vector of the objects in the environment exists. The measurement accuracy of the lateral velocity is improved when a distance between the radar modules (a base between the modules) is large.
- a (lateral) one can also be used, in particular when using at least three receiving antennas.
- Phase difference changes If one then determines a radial acceleration from at least three consecutively recorded radar spectra, the vectorial acceleration can be determined as well. Also in this context, it is particularly advantageous if the antennas a
- L is the spatial extent of the antenna aperture
- f the transmission frequency
- c the speed of light.
- the system in particular the evaluation device, is preferably configured for a SAR application and / or a (SAR) imaging method.
- SAR stands for Synthetic Aperture Radar.
- the use of a large (distributed) aperture is advantageous for SAR applications.
- the radar modules are arranged or arranged on the moving object at different heights, in particular for
- a height of an environment object in an environment of the moving object preferably by means of (interferometric) SAR processing.
- the radar modules for example, in the vertical direction at a distance of at least 5 cm, preferably at least 10 cm, more preferably at least 25 cm.
- a second radar module on / in the roof of the motor vehicle and / or at least one radar module can be arranged in the region of the interior mirror.
- a transit time difference between several, in particular all, stations can then be used, in particular according to the procedure in the time of the application yet
- Phase noise, or of phase variations may be configured accordingly.
- the system, in particular the evaluation device is configured to have a
- the variation of measurement spectrum to measurement spectrum is determined as the first (separate) step (and possibly corrected).
- the accuracy of a measurement result can be significantly improved.
- a / the variation of the phase noise component of measuring spectrum to measuring spectrum as (shared) share in both stations from the
- a normalization of the amplitudes of the spectra to an absolute normal or to each other can take place beforehand. In particular, in a simple manner a
- An (optionally independent) aspect of the invention is (hence) a radar system (with movable or stationary radar modules or non-coherent transceiver units), in particular for detecting an environment of a (moving or non-moving) object in which the system is in particular mounted or mountable on the object,
- the radar system comprises at least two (in particular distributed) non-coherent radar modules with at least one transmitting and at least one receiving antenna,
- the radar modules are distributed or can be arranged, in particular, distributed on the object,
- At least one evaluation device is provided which is configured to process transmit and receive signals of the radar modules to modified measurement signals in such a way that the modified measurement signals are coherent with one another, wherein a correction of a phase noise or of phase variations (wherein the system, in particular the evaluation device, can be configured accordingly) takes place.
- the (possibly stationary) system, in particular the evaluation device is preferably configured to convert a phase noise component into a term for to divide a variation within a measuring spectrum (or a sweep or a ramp) and a variation from measuring spectrum to measuring spectrum (or from sweep to sweep or from ramp to ramp).
- the evaluation device is preferably configured to convert a phase noise component into a term for to divide a variation within a measuring spectrum (or a sweep or a ramp) and a variation from measuring spectrum to measuring spectrum (or from sweep to sweep or from ramp to ramp).
- the evaluation device is preferably configured to convert a phase noise component into a term for to divide a variation within a measuring spectrum (or a sweep or a ramp) and
- Variation of measuring spectrum to measuring spectrum determined as the first (separate) step (and possibly corrected).
- a variation of the first (separate) step (and possibly corrected).
- Phase noise component of measurement spectrum to measurement spectrum as (common) share in both stations from the (common) variation of the phase in each spectrum determined, preferably on the scalar product of the two
- Measuring spectra Preferably, an addition of two (of the two)
- a normalization of the amplitudes of the spectra to an absolute normal or to each other can take place beforehand.
- Another (optionally independent) aspect of the invention is (hence) a radar method (using movable or stationary radar modules or non-coherent transceiver units), in particular for detecting an environment of a (moving or non-moving ) Object, in particular using the above system and / or the above object, wherein at least two non-coherent radar modules are arranged distributed on and / or in the object,
- Measuring signals are processed such that the modified measurement signals are coherent to each other, wherein a correction of a phase noise or phase variations takes place.
- a phase noise component is divided into a term for a variation within a measurement spectrum (or a sweep or a ramp) and a variation from measurement spectrum to measurement spectrum (or from sweep to sweep or from ramp to ramp).
- the variation of measurement spectrum to measurement spectrum is determined as the first (separate) step (and possibly corrected).
- Phase noise component of measurement spectrum to measurement spectrum as (common) share in both stations from the (common) variation of the phase in each spectrum determined, preferably on the scalar product of the two
- Measuring spectra Preferably, an addition of two (of the two) Measuring spectra.
- a normalization of the amplitudes of the spectra to an absolute normal or to each other can take place beforehand.
- a path is in particular an (air) interface to understand, via which the corresponding signals (and possibly comparison signals) can be sent or transmitted and received by means of antennas.
- An indirect path (path) or a cross path is to be understood as the path (path) of a signal that originates from one (for example the second)
- Radar module comes from and another (for example, the first)
- a direct path is to be understood as a signal which is both transmitted and received (as a reflected signal) by one and the same radar module.
- a non-coherent radar module means a radar module whose transmitted signal is non-coherent with respect to the signal of another radar module (even if the signal of the first radar module or of the further radar module is coherent in itself).
- the respective radar module can be designed as an arrangement of in particular one or more antennas with a few signal-generating or signal-processing components, while other components such as signal comparison units or a
- Evaluation are connected as structurally independent components to such an arrangement.
- components can, if technically feasible, be processed as so-called hardware Be formed components and / or as a part or all in one
- the evaluation device may be part of one or more (both) radar modules or at one or more (two) of such
- Radar modules are connected. Possibly. can be a physically independent
- Evaluation be provided, which is connected to the respective radar module or the other components of the respective radar module.
- the evaluation device can optionally be integrated in the first and / or the further (non-coherent) radar module, for example in a common housing and / or as a structural unit.
- Evaluation device is arranged) that a cross path (indirect path) may arise, i. that a coverage of transmitting and receiving areas is provided accordingly.
- non-coherent transmitting and receiving units are to be part of the radar modules described further above (or to form them).
- the non-coherent transmitting and receiving units are also abbreviated as NKSE.
- signals transmitted between the NKSE are processed in such a way that comparison signals are produced which have advantageous properties which otherwise only have radar signals which are provided with only one common device for signal generation, ie with a coherent one
- method II is, in particular, methods for reducing disturbing effects which are uncorrelated by the method
- Phase noise of the multiple stand-alone devices for signal generation are caused.
- Method II is particularly advantageously applicable to the distributed radar modules according to the invention, which can form a network.
- the distributed radar modules according to the invention which can form a network.
- the method II starts with sending at least two NKSEs almost simultaneously. Almost simultaneously in this context means that the
- Displacement T_off should preferably not be greater than half the
- Signal duration but in any case be less than the signal duration. Due to the at least partially independent generation, the signals sigTX1 and sigTX2 have uncorrelated signal components which are due to the phase noise of the signal sources in the stations NKSE1 and NKSE2.
- phase noise and synchronization errors are then at least reduced by performing the processing of the received signals in two stages:
- systematic deviations are corrected, either before the signals are received via an activation of the signal source, and / or via a compensation directly in the received signal and / or via a compensation in the comparison signal.
- a second step for example, a shortened evaluation of the correlation or the formation of a comparison comparison signal takes place only for the expected shift range or, in the best case, in only one shift value.
- Multiplication or division of signals is a nonlinear operation.
- Nonlinear operations always involve nonlinear effects, that is, here especially with so-called intermodulation of signal and noise components. This results especially in radar signals with multiple signal components, ie signals that have multiple targets or more
- Signal transmission paths include, to interference.
- the use of the addition of the complex signals proposed according to method II has the great advantage that the addition is a linear operation, whereby non-linear effects, that is to say in particular intermodulation of signal and noise components, are avoided.
- This embodiment therefore generally leads to a significantly better reduction of the phase noise in comparison to methods for combining the comparison signals sigC21 and sigC12.
- the synchronization can be carried out separately before the measurement, as part of the measurement itself, or following the measurement.
- a synchronization in the context of the measurement or subsequent to the synchronization for example, via subsequent adaptation of the
- means or methods may be provided which are suitable for directly controlling the clock rates of the sources of sigTX1 and sigTX2 (eg using TCXO) or computationally (synthetic synchronization) to match.
- All of these methods for equalizing the clock sources can be implemented either via radio waves or via cable connections.
- Wired may mean electrical signals or optical signals carried by cables.
- Clock sources can also be very high-quality clock sources, for example
- Atomic clocks are used.
- signals (sigEP21, sig EP12) can be derived from the comparison signals, each of which represents a function having as a function argument the signal propagation time or the length of the transmission channel of the respective signal components.
- the offset T_off between the stations is then determined, for example, by the methods disclosed in DE 101 57 931, or by a correlation of the comparison signals of the at least two N KSE.
- the maximum can provide the offset. Alternatively, this can also be done below for FMCW signals
- At least one function value Fl can be determined, which is to be assigned to a specific runtime, and at least one further function value F2 of the signal sig EP12, which is to be assigned to the same runtime as exactly as possible. Fl with F2 you will be charged. This calculation takes place, for example, by adding or subtracting the two
- NKSE1 non-coherent transceiver unit
- a (further) first signal is generated and transmitted via the path (SP), in particular emitted,
- the signals (sigTXl and sigTX2) are received in the respective other transceiver unit directly or indirectly, where they are further processed as received signals sigRX12 and sigRX21,
- a comparison signal (sigC12) from the first signal (sigTXl) and from such from the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigRTX2) is formed and -
- a further comparison signal (sigC21) from the first signal (sigTX2) and from such from the first transceiver unit (NKSE1) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigTXl) is formed .
- the further comparison signal (sigC21) is transmitted, in particular communicated, from the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) to the first transceiver unit (NKSE1),
- sigC12 which are caused by systematic deviations in the transceiver units (NKSE2, NKSE1), are compensated
- FIG. 1 shows two mutually communicating transceiver units and individual components thereof;
- Fig. 2 shows the components of Fig. 1 with an illustration of a
- Fig. 5 is a schematic representation of an arrangement of several
- FIGS. 6A-6C show various embodiments of a motor vehicle
- Fig. 8 is a schematic illustration of SAR imaging
- FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of a vehicle with
- Fig. Ia is a spectrogram for the first radar module, wherein the horizontal
- Axis indicates a distance in meters and the vertical axis indicates a Ch or ramp number
- Fig. I Ib a spectrogram for the second radar module, wherein the horizontal
- Axis indicates a distance in meters and the vertical axis indicates a chirp or ramp number; 12a shows another spectrogram for the first radar module, wherein only one primary response was evaluated, the horizontal axis indicating a distance in meters and the vertical axis indicating a chirp number;
- FIG. 12b shows another spectrogram for the second radar module, wherein only one primary response was evaluated, the horizontal axis indicating a distance in meters and the vertical axis indicating a chirp number;
- FIG. 13a shows another spectrogram for the first radar module, after one
- Fig. 13b shows another spectrogram for the second radar module, after one
- Fig. 14b is another spectrogram for the second radar module, after one
- Fig. 15a shows a phase profile for the first radar module, without correction of a
- FIG. 15b shows a phase characteristic for the second radar module without correction of a phase deviation, wherein the horizontal axis indicates a chirp number and the vertical axis indicates a phase in radians;
- 16a shows a phase profile for the first radar module, with correction of a
- Phase deviation where the horizontal axis indicates a chirp number and the vertical axis indicates a phase in radians;
- Fig. 16b shows a phase characteristic for the second radar module, with correction of a
- Phase deviation where the horizontal axis indicates a chirp number and the vertical axis indicates a phase in radians;
- two transceiver units NKSE1, NKSE2 communicate with one another via a radio interface.
- a first or a second signal sigTXl, sigTX2 are sent.
- the transceiver units NKSE1, NKSE2 each have a signal source 1, a clock adaptation or comparison signal modification unit 2 and a transmission comparison unit (SigCompl, SigComp2).
- the (non-coherent) transceiver units are preferably formed by radar modules.
- NKSE1 may be regarded as a first radar module and NKSE2 as a second radar module.
- FIG. 2 additionally shows a unit for phase modification 4 in each case. A data exchange takes place between the two units for phase modification 4.
- a first signal (sigTXl) is generated and transmitted via a path (SP), in particular radiated.
- a second signal is generated and transmitted via the path (SP), in particular emitted.
- the radiation of the signals takes place here as possible at the same time but at least matched in time so that the two waveforms
- the signal sources may be completely or partially independent.
- the transmitted signals used can be represented as a decomposition into an equivalent baseband signal (bbTXl) and a carrier signal.
- signals with so-called good correlation properties are preferably used as baseband signals.
- Signals with good correlation properties are, for example, broadband pulses, noise signals, pseudo-random pulse trains (PN codes) such as M-sequences, Gold codes or Barker codes, Kasami sequences, Huffman sequences, chirps, linear frequency modulated signals (FMCW), chirp or FMCW sequences, etc.
- PN codes pseudo-random pulse trains
- Such waveforms have long been widely known in radar technology and communication technology (especially in the area of CDMA).
- the transmission signal (sigTXl) of the transceiver unit (NKSE1) can be represented as follows:
- the time offset TOI defines the transmission time of the signal sigTXl
- phase term includes a constant
- the angular frequency characterizes the frequency of the carrier signal of sigTXl.
- the transmission signal (sigTX2) of the transceiver unit (NKSE2) can be formed.
- the transmitted signals (sigTXl and sigTX2) are sent directly to the other transceiver stations and are then received and processed further as receive signals sigRX12 and sigRX21.
- the received signal received at the second non-coherent transceiver unit corresponds to the transmission signal (sigTXl), but this is changed in amplitude and delayed by the propagation time.
- sigTXl transmission signal
- all signals are to be represented below as complex-valued signals. It thus applies:
- the transmission signal (sigTXl) is transmitted to the second transceiver unit (NKSE2) on several transmission paths (a number of I) of different lengths
- the reception signal can be represented as a linear superposition of amplitude-weighted and time-delayed signals as follows:
- the transceiver units are designed so that they include signal comparison units SigCompl, SigComp2, in which the respective received signal of a transceiver unit is offset with its transmission signal - ie in NKSE1 the signal sigRX12 with the signal sigTXl and in NKSE2 the Signal sigRX21 with signal sigTX2.
- the signal comparison units SigCompl, SigComp2 are designed in the exemplary embodiment as a mixer mix. This means that signal sigRX12 is mixed with signal sigTXl in NKSE1 and sigRX21 with signal sigTX2 in NKSE2.
- NKSE1 does not mix signal sigRX12 with signal sigTXl but only with its carrier. So:
- data communication ensures that both comparison signals are transmitted to a common evaluation unit, where they are both available for evaluation.
- the common evaluation unit may be NKSE1, NKSE2 or another evaluation unit.
- the phases of the two comparison signals are added. If only the carrier phases with the phase noise component are considered here, since unknown phase contributions are present only in this component, and the two carrier phase terms are added together, the result is:
- Propagation speed of electromagnetic waves is usually very small and that the relevant phase noise components in an oscillator according to the known relationships of oscillator phase noise typically decrease sharply with increasing distance from the carrier and, respectively, have a pronounced low-pass behavior and indeed a low-pass behavior with a Cutoff frequency, which is usually much smaller than, follows as follows:
- Phase noise reduction leads to a better detectability of targets, to a larger measuring range and an improved measuring accuracy.
- phase terms shown above have different signs.
- the preferred combination of the phase terms is not necessarily an addition but possibly also a subtraction. It is crucial that the link leads to a reduction of the phase noise echo and the term-dependent phase term, i. H. one
- slightly different amplitudes of the signals sigC12 and sigC21 may occur despite a reciprocal radio channel due to different characteristics of the electronic components such as mixers or amplifiers, etc. If the amplitudes of the signals sigC12 and sigC21 are different, the signals in the preferred variant described here must first be normalized to the same amplitude.
- the process of forming the sigC12 and sigC21 signals may result in additional systematic phase offsets. If these phase offsets of the signals sigC12 and sigC21 are different, these phase offsets must first be compensated in the preferred variant described here.
- the signals sigC12 and sigC21 can be interpreted as complex pointers.
- the vector components of the phase terms with different signs cancel each other out in the same way as described above in the addition of the phase terms. Consequently, as a possible preferred variant for reducing the phase noise components, it is proposed to add the complex signals sigC12 and sigC21, ie to form a signal as follows:
- the sigCC signal then has significantly less phase noise than the sigC12 and sigC21 signals, respectively, and the sigCC signal is then further used for the purpose of range finding, angle measurement or imaging.
- At least one complex value should be used from a first of the two comparison signals or from a signal derived from this first comparison signal, at least one complex value of the second of the two comparison signals or a value of a signal from this second one
- Comparative signal has been derived, and thus to form at least one value of a signal (sigCC), wherein the adaptation is such that by a mathematical operation the vectorial sum or the difference of at least two sigC12 and sigC21 derived complex values is formed or the sum or the difference of the phases of these complex values is formed.
- sigCC signal
- Phase noise components could also be realized by alternative methods. For example, all high frequency signals could be digitized before mixing, i. H. sampled with an analog-to-digital converter, and all further operation could be done computationally or digitally, for example in a processor or FPGA (field-programmable gate array).
- FPGA field-programmable gate array
- the transmitted signals sigTXl and SigTX2 FMCW can be modulated.
- the transmitted signals sigTXl and SigTX2 FMCW can be modulated.
- Spectra of the comparison signals are normalized to the highest value.
- the NKSE send several N signals with linearly increasing or decreasing signals Frequency, hereinafter referred to as frequency ramps. From the received signals, the comparison signals are then generated in the N KSE and buffered for further processing.
- increasing and decreasing ramps are used, since hereby an accurate statement of the relative velocity is possible.
- the at least one reflector in the detection area must be identified in advance for this step and displayed as described above.
- the frequency band in which the beat signal is expected to be generously cut out is ensured by a rough presync.
- the spectrogram of the first N / 2 ramps is correlated with that of the second N / 2 ramps along the frequency axis (step 1).
- the maximum found in this case represents the relative time drift of the two N KSEs (this can be assumed to be a linear function).
- the identification of the targets via the opposing drift on both sides can take place by way of example.
- Primary radars also take place via a common bus system by the systems exchange their measuring signals or further synchronization signals via the cables of a bus system.
- the bus system is in particular a CAN, FlexRay, Most, Gigabyte Ethernet system, USB, Firewire or TTP system.
- the maximum is searched, which corresponds to the time offset (offset error).
- the selection of peaks can be done using the identification of the peaks belonging to each other in the previous step.
- a determination of the time offset can also take place via a common bus system, in particular by transmitting either the measurement data or suitable correlation sequences.
- T01-T02 i Tint + Tfrac) in order to obtain a uniform time base. Due to the common exact time base the phase noise is more correlated. The remaining, small time error Tfrac can now be compensated, for example by using a fractional delay filter.
- T01-T02 i Tint + Tfrac
- a peak is now searched in each case for an FFT of the beat signal for the channel impulse response.
- secondary radar it is preferable to take the strongest peak or, alternatively, the first peak; in the case of primary radar, one must choose a peak that is equally contained on both sides.
- Each ramp at both stations gives a maximum at the estimated distance with the associated phase angle.
- the remaining deviations are due to remaining frequency and phase differences between the two signal sources 1 of the N KSE, for example, the oscillators, which is based on phase noise as a cause.
- the exact frequency difference can now be determined absolutely and thus corrected (the phase difference can be up to 180 ° ambiguity (at IQ
- Mixers 360 ° can be determined). This ambiguity is resolved by ramping the ramp to +/- 90 ° from ramp to ramp, also known as unwrapping. After this precise correction of the
- Phase shift of the two beat signals deviates only by a small amount.
- a precise synchronization of the time and frequency base is achieved and on the other hand, the phase noise can be considered as an additive contribution and corrected by linear combination. This is done, for example, by means of 2D Fourier transformation of all N ramps on both NKSEs, whereupon the amplitude-normalized beat signals are finally added. Taking into account the system parameters (sampling rate,
- Fig. 5 shows schematically an arrangement of a plurality of radar modules RM 1, RM 2, ... RM N, each having a means for generating frequency (H F generator) 11, a device 12 for frequency conversion and an (optional) device 13 for Clock generation and have an (optional) device 14 for AD conversion.
- H F generator means for generating frequency
- FIG. 6 shows examples such as those shown schematically in FIG. 1 radar modules can be arranged on a motor vehicle (car).
- Fig. 6a are at the Motor vehicle four radar modules (front left, front right, rear left and rear right) arranged. This can be particularly advantageous a
- Fig. 6b Surround detection (in the present case with four sensors) done.
- Fig. 6b are three radar modules front (in this case, no rear) arranged, namely front left, front center and front right. This can be particularly advantageous environment detection in the direction of travel (in the present case with three sensors).
- Fig. 6c a particularly extensive environment detection, in the present case with eight Radarmodulen done (front left, front center, front right, rear left, center rear, right rear and one radar module on the two sides) are performed.
- holographic calculation can be carried out as follows.
- a room to be calculated can be displayed via individual room points.
- the arrangement of the transmitting and receiving antennas in the space to be calculated or relative to the space to be calculated is (usually) known.
- a synthetic signal amplitude, phase, frequency
- a propagation path from a
- Propagation paths are repeated for a point in space and each (complex) to the result of the previous calculation to be added.
- An absolute value of this sum then represents an occupancy probability for the spatial point. This method can be repeated over all n, m spatial points and thus the radar image can be generated.
- the holography method can be carried out as follows: First, a beat spectrum can be calculated for each channel. For each space point, a signal hypothesis regarding the phase position for each
- Transmit signal receive signal combination are set up so that this coincides with an expected phase shift on this propagation path (from an assumed transmission antenna a to an assumed
- An expected phase position can with a start frequency f u and a signal path length d of a FMCW system according to
- This signal hypothesis can then be compared to real measurement data (a precise amplitude and phase value can be obtained from the beat spectrum)
- Interpolation are multiplied for this transmission path (complex conjugate) and the (complex) intermediate result for this point in space is recorded. This procedure can be repeated for all k propagation paths for the point in space and each (complex) added to the result of the previous calculation. An absolute value of this sum then represents the occupancy probability for the spatial point. This method can be repeated for all n, m spatial points (in the two spatial dimensions) and thus a radar image can be generated.
- Calibration can be used.
- the one can, in particular iteratively, the one
- Correction vector can be determined, which represents a focused target.
- a point target is used in the far field, which in distributed radar modules, according to the above
- Determining the exact position of the radar assembly and the target can in particular, the amplitudes are adjusted and phase differences (according to the above holographic approach) are corrected.
- the holographic methods can also be performed on the speed and acceleration plane. Thus, for every pixel
- the velocity and acceleration vectors are determined. Suitable methods for speed and acceleration holography are described, for example, in DE 10 2009 030 076.
- an SAR imaging is illustrated below.
- radar measurements can be taken and recorded along a certain distance of movement. These can then be mathematically combined as if they were combined by an antenna array with elements at each location where a measurement was taken.
- a radar was used for this purpose and the synthetic aperture was generated over the entire movement length.
- the use of two radars, whose signals are coherent with each other, allows the radar data of both sensors and the additional paths between the radars to be used and reduces the process path required for illumination.
- the radar systems whose signals are corrected by post-processing as if they were generated by a coherent radar, spanned in a large aperture. Then the radar signals of both radar modules (a direct path and a cross path) can be used together in a SAR algorithm.
- Fig. 9 shows a schematic sketch of an interferometric SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar). 10 shows a schematic vehicle with an exemplary sensor arrangement (arrangement of modules).
- a comparatively high level of accuracy is in particular for distinguishing objects such as curbs, fences, delineators, traffic signs, manhole covers or garbage (here, for example, cans or small packages are not major obstacles on the road), which are on the road, but also for the detection and differentiation of people or animals in road traffic, advantageous. Furthermore, a height detection for automatic parking operations of (significant) importance. After MA
- the baseline B can be substantially increased, since further receiving elements (modules) can be arbitrarily (or at least substantially arbitrarily) positioned on the vehicle. This can be, for example, by the placement of a radar module in a bumper and a second radar module on the roof of the vehicle to increase the accuracy reach a factor of 10 (compared to a single, compact radar module with multiple receivers). Exemplary mounting positions are illustrated in FIG. 10, namely in a bumper 15, side mirrors 16 and / or in a roof (roof spar) 17.
- modules are mentioned in the following, these may in particular be the (non-coherent) transceiver units according to FIG. 1
- Process I or Process II act.
- the modules (transceiver units) therefore need not (necessarily) be arranged on a moving object (for example on the motor vehicle according to FIG. 8) or be configured for such an arrangement. This is possible.
- a spectrum of a first radar module is shown. Specifically, a course of several (here, for example, 128) ramps is given, if they are displayed side by side for a transmission channel. It can be seen that a cross-path is influenced firstly by a frequency offset ⁇ (selected here as 350 kHz), but also by an unknown drift Td and jitter Tj in such a way that a beat frequency lasts for one signal duration (that is to say, for example Ramps) changes.
- the unknown time offset between the modules T 0 ff, o can also influence. This offset is caused by the different starting points of the signal generation in the radar modules.
- FIG. Ia shows the spectrum of the first radar module.
- FIG. 1b shows a corresponding spectrum of a second radar module. If one evaluates (only) a primary radar response, a representation according to FIG. 12a (for the first radar module) and 12b (for the second radar module). These representations result in particular from a 2D FFT without pre-processing.
- Cross-path signals of the (two) radar modules after a mixing process influenced by (all) system variables for a signal path, are used for first
- the mixed signal thus consists of an amplitude
- the number of the station (for example, 1 or 2)
- Carrier frequency (eg about 78 GHz)
- Timing offset (eg due to cable length, jitter and / or drift)
- Sweep rate (eg 500GHz / s)
- This transit time change (with at least approximately uniform movement over the measurement time) is detected by a phase change of the beat frequency, which can be assumed to be at least approximately constant within the measurement time.
- Phase noise in the mixed signal of a station depends on the current phase position Both stations and thus results to
- phase noise of the local oscillators is (in contrast to
- a first step for example, from a Hilbert transform (which may be necessary if no I / Q data is available), the respective spectrum can be calculated by Fourier transformation.
- the change of beat frequency is denoted by and depends on
- Equation (2) in this case describes all relevant signal components.
- a beat frequency is the same for a target in all channels (an antenna position should vary only slightly here).
- N 128 is an example of the total number of transmitted ramps.
- D t can now be subdivided into three subsequences, denoted by c iU c 2l and c 3 l , which in turn match the jumps around 0, J 0f and -J 0 .
- a jump height due to jitter can be caused by expected value formation
- Figures 13a, 13b show spectrograms of both modules (Figure 13a for the first radar module, Figure 13b for the second radar module) after correction of drift and jitter.
- a system without jitter (on the order of the clock) can be realized. In this case, however, a significantly smaller amount of jitter can be left over, which is compensated in the other method steps.
- a synchronization, z. B. via a CAN bus can possibly prevent the drift of both modules.
- a synchronization of the clock signals and a common trigger an evaluation with the described method in a simple manner possible because no more jitter occurs and the drift (negligible) is low.
- Frequency offset (to separate the primary and secondary responses) may result in an (unknown) shift in the beat frequency, which is identical in both stations.
- the amplitude of the beat signal is given to both stations
- H (f) The maximum of H (f) can be determined, which can be used as a very accurate estimate of the virtual center.
- a previous correction of drift and jitter is advantageous at this point because it can (significantly) increase the overall SNR.
- the spectrum of one of the stations at this virtual center is mirrored, after which the amplitudes of the two spectra appear at the same positions and after a shift of the center of gravity to a beat frequency of 0 Hz (absolute position of the maxima now corresponds to the actual target distances)
- 14a, 14b show spectrograms of both modules after correction of time and frequency offset (Fig. 14a for the first module, Fig. 14b for the second module, both modules were in close proximity to each other, so some crosstalk as "target” recognizable at 0m.).
- Fig. 14a for the first module
- Fig. 14b for the second module
- both modules were in close proximity to each other, so some crosstalk as "target” recognizable at 0m.
- the phase characteristic of the two stations corresponds to one target (in this case the one with the largest amplitude), since in the present example 128
- FIGS. 15a, 15b FIGS. 15a, 15b (FIG. 15a for the first module, FIG. 15b for the second module).
- the spectrograms can be used as
- phase position can only be determined as a superimposition with closely adjacent targets; on the other hand, this variant only includes the information of a target, which is a general disadvantage
- Multipath propagation or multiple to be detected reflection points are Multipath propagation or multiple to be detected reflection points.
- phase jump between adjacent ramps may be too large for many measurements to perform a phase tracking.
- a maximum expected phase jump can limit the measuring range in the Doppler frequency and thus in the maximum speed which can be detected. This problem can be reduced by an improved synchronization of the two stations. A remaining deviation after an adaptation of the clock rates may not (more) cause phase jumps beyond a uniqueness range between adjacent sweeps.
- the following describes an adaptation and superposition of the spectra. Before the superimposition of the two spectra, an adjustment can still be made such that a possible phase shift of the strongest target is corrected in a non-reciprocal channel. Furthermore, the amplitudes of this target can be adjusted for both spectra and / or a standardization to a common or third size. After these two operations, the representation for a selected channel n may increase
- Phase noise can be approximated by Taylor development with termination after the linear term. After one of these
- an improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and increased reliability can be achieved.
- SNR signal-to-noise ratio
- the distance and velocity vector of a target can be estimated with comparatively high accuracy, since additional estimates are available and can be used.
- a (coherent) processing of a caused by a Doppler effect frequency shift can also be done easily via a cross-path.
- Phase information from a first radar module and a second radar module can thus be used to perform a precise measurement of the environment.
- SAR processing in particular in an automotive radar application, can be implemented to generate a high-resolution image of the environment.
- An application as a phase monopole with both stations can serve to estimate an azimuth angle very accurately. This estimate can also be used in conjunction with existing angle information to further increase accuracy.
- pre-synchronization By feeding an external, regulated clock could be recognized that a rough synchronization (pre-synchronization) is basically possible, which would be conceivable, for example via a CAN bus (a motor vehicle). As a result, a computational burden of the process can be reduced and it can lead to a lower error propagation.
- Reflections of complex objects can be detected relatively easily, even if they do not go in the direction of an incident wave (bistatic radar principle).
- a combination of several radar modules makes it possible to (significantly) improve an estimate of an intrinsic motion of the moving object (vehicle), since the accuracy of the angle measurement substantially influences them.
- a combination of several radar modules in the elevation direction allows a significant improvement in a height estimation, in particular by means of
- interferometric SAR ie an estimate of the height profile of a
- the transceiver units can be part of or form the radar module: 1st aspect: Method in a radar system, in which
- a first signal (sigTX1) is generated in a first (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE1) and transmitted, in particular transmitted, over a path (SP),
- a first signal (sigTX2) is generated in a further, in particular second (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE2) and is transmitted, in particular transmitted, via the path (SP),
- NKSE2 second (non-coherent) transceiver unit
- a comparison signal (sigC12) from the first signal (sigTXl) and from such from the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigTX2) is formed and
- a further comparison signal (sigC21) from the first signal (sigTX2) and from such from the first transceiver unit (NKSE1) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigTXl) is formed .
- Second aspect Method according to the first aspect, in which a comparison comparison signal (sigC21; sigC12) is formed from this comparison signal (sigC21) and the further comparison signal (sigC21).
- a comparison comparison signal sigC21; sigC12
- Aspect in which the comparison comparison signal (sigC21; sigC12), by the two comparison signals (sigC12, sigC21) being processed together - in particular conjugated complex multiplied - corresponds to a comparison signal generated with a coherent radar system.
- Aspect A method according to any preceding aspect, wherein at least one of the comparison signal (sigC12), the further comparison signal (sigC21) or the comparison comparison signal (sigC21; sigC12) is formed by at least one of mixing and correlation.
- At least one such further comparison signal (sigC21; sigC12) is arranged between the transmitting Receiving units (NKSE2, NKSE1) is transmitted as at least one of data, a data-containing signal or a data reconstructable signal containing.
- Sixth aspect A method according to any preceding aspect, wherein at least one of the first signals (sigTXl, sigTX2) is transmitted as a transmission signal via the air interface path (SP).
- SP air interface path
- a signal propagation time ( ⁇ 12), such a first signal (sigTXl, sigTX2) for the path between the transceiver units (NKSE1, NKSE2) is determined by at least one of a phase or a phase value ( ⁇ 12, ⁇ 13, ..., ⁇ , ⁇ 22, ⁇ 23, ⁇ 24, ... ⁇ 2 ⁇ , ..., ⁇ -1 ⁇ ) of a frequency, a Amplitude curve or a phase curve of the comparison comparison signal (sigCC12) is analyzed.
- Aspect A method according to any preceding aspect, wherein at least one of the first signals (sigTXl, sigTX2) is generated and transmitted as an FMCW or OFDM modulated signal.
- Aspect A method according to any preceding aspect, wherein at least one of the first signals (sigTXl, sigTX2) is generated and transmitted as a multi-ramp signal.
- a first (non-coherent) transceiver unit is designed to generate a first signal (sigTX1) and to transmit it via a path (SP), in particular to emit it,
- NKSE2 non-coherent transceiver unit
- the first transceiver unit (NKSEI) is formed, a comparison signal (sigC12) from the first signal (sigTXl) and from such from the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigTX2) form,
- the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) is formed, a further comparison signal (sigC21) from the first signal (sigTX2) and from such from the first transceiver unit (NKSEl) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigTXl) to form, and
- the further comparison signal (sigC21) from the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) to the first transceiver unit (NKSEl) is transmitted, in particular is communicated.
- Aspect Radar system according to aspect 12, in which a comparison comparison signal (sigCC21; sigCC12) is formed from this comparison signal (sigC21) and the further comparison signal (sigC21).
- a comparison comparison signal sigCC21; sigCC12
- a radar system comprising three or more spatially-spaced transceivers (NKSE1, NKSE2, NKSE3, NKSE-N), comprising two or more comparison comparison signals (sigCC12, sigCC12, sigCC13, sigCC22, sigCC32 ), which are measured with more than two pairs of each two of the spatially spaced ones of the transceiver units (NKSE1, NKSE2, NKSE-N, NKSE2), a distance, a position, a speed or the presence of one of the transceiver units (NKSE2 , NKSE1) or the presence of such a transceiver unit (NKSE2, NKSE1) or at least one of a distance, a position, a speed relative to an object (0) or the presence of an object (0).
- Aspect Radar system according to one of aspects 12 to 14, in which the first transceiver unit (NKSE1) and at least one such further transceiver unit (NKSE2) and / or an evaluation unit (P) are designed to perform a method according to one previous claims.
- NKSE1 first transceiver unit
- NKSE2 further transceiver unit
- P evaluation unit
- Aspect Device of a radar system, in particular for carrying out a method according to one of the aspects 1 to 11 and / or in one
- NKSE1 first (non-coherent) transceiver unit
- NKSE1 first (non-coherent) transceiver unit
- NKSE1 first (non-coherent) transceiver unit
- a signal generator and at least one antenna which are designed to generate a first signal (sigTX1) and to transmit them via a path (SP), in particular to emit them,
- Aspect Device according to aspect 16 with a further comparison unit (sigCompl2) which forms a comparison comparison signal (sigCC12) from the comparison signal (sigC21) formed in the same transceiver unit (NKSE1) and to this transceiver unit (NKSE1 ) transmitted comparison signal (sigC21).
- sigCompl2 a further comparison unit which forms a comparison comparison signal (sigCC12) from the comparison signal (sigC21) formed in the same transceiver unit (NKSE1) and to this transceiver unit (NKSE1 ) transmitted comparison signal (sigC21).
- Aspect Device according to aspect 16 or 17, in which the at least one interface (CommTX, CommRX) is a data interface. 19. Aspect: Device according to one of aspects 16 to 18, wherein between the arrangement which outputs the comparison signal (sigC12) and the other
- Comparing unit (sigCompl2) forming the comparison comparison signal (sigCC12), a filter (FLT) is arranged, wherein the filter (FLT) to the
- Comparing unit (sigCompl2) applies the comparison signal (sigC12), wherein the filter (FLT) another in the filter (FLT) upstream arrangement formed comparison signal (sigCl l) does not apply and the reference signal formed in the upstream arrangement (sigCl l) suppressed or at one
- Aspect Device according to one of the aspects 16 to 19, comprising a plurality of mutually spatially spaced receiving antennas (RA1,1, RA1, N; RA2,1,
- RA2, N to each of which an arrangement is assigned, which is designed to generate in each case one comparison signal (sigC21, l, sigC21,2, sigC21,3) from the first signal (sigTX2) and from one such from another such transmission signal.
- the transceiver units can be part of or form the radar module:
- Aspect A method for reducing phase noise interference in a radar system, in which
- a first signal (sigTXl) is generated in a first (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE1) and transmitted, in particular transmitted, over a path (SP),
- a first signal (sigTX2) is generated and transmitted, in particular transmitted, over the path (SP),
- the first signals (sigTXl and sigTX2) are received in the respective other transceiver unit directly or indirectly, where they are further processed as received signals (sigRX12 and sigRX21),
- a comparison signal from the first signal (sigTXl) thereof and from one of the further transmission signals (sigTXl) Receiving unit (NKSE2) via the path (SP) received first signal
- Comparative signal (sigC21) from the first signal (sigTX2) and from such from the first transceiver unit (NKSEl) via the path (SP) received first signal (sigTXl) is formed,
- the further comparison signal (sigC21) is transmitted, in particular communicated, from the further transceiver unit (NKSE2) to the first transceiver unit (NKSE1),
- a first step deviations of the comparison signals (sigC21 and sigC12) caused by systematic deviations in the transceiver units (NKSE2, NKSE1) are compensated, wherein in a second step at least one complex value from a first of the two comparison signals or a signal derived from this first comparison signal is used to adapt at least one complex value of the second of the two comparison signals or a value of a signal derived from this second comparison signal, and thus to form a matched signal (sigCC),
- the adaptation being such that the vectorial sum or the difference of the complex values is formed by a mathematical operation or the sum or the difference of the phases of the complex values is formed.
- a clock rate adjustment in particular of clock rates of signal sources of the first signals (sigTXl and sigTX2), via radio waves and / or via a
- an offset in particular a time offset and / or a frequency offset, is determined via a bus system, preferably when operating as a primary radar.
- Aspect Method according to one of the preceding aspects, wherein an offset, in particular a / the time offset and / or the / the frequency offset, via an evaluation of a position of, in particular corrected, maxima of the spectra of the comparison signals (sigC12 and sigC21) , is determined.
- a physically independent evaluation device which is connected to the respective transmitting and receiving unit or the other components of the respective transmitting and receiving unit or
- Receiving unit for example, in a common housing and / or as a unit, is integrated.
- comparison signals are transmitted to a, in particular common, evaluation unit and there for evaluation both exist, wherein the common evaluation unit, optionally, the first (non-coherent) Send Receiving unit (NKSE1) or, optionally, the second (non-coherent) Transceiver unit (NKSE2) or, optionally, another, especially separate, evaluation is.
- the common evaluation unit optionally, the first (non-coherent) Send Receiving unit (NKSE1) or, optionally, the second (non-coherent) Transceiver unit (NKSE2) or, optionally, another, especially separate, evaluation is.
- a further, in particular second, (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE2) for generating a first signal (sigTX2) and for transmitting
- a transmission unit is provided to the other
- Aspect System according to one of the aspects 11 or 12, wherein a common transmitting and receiving antenna in the first and / or the further (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE1 and / or N KSE2) is provided and / or wherein a transmission mixer in the path (SP) is provided.
- a common transmitting and receiving antenna in the first and / or the further (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE1 and / or N KSE2) is provided and / or wherein a transmission mixer in the path (SP) is provided.
- Aspect Use of the method according to one of the aspects 1 to 10 for a system with at least one common transmitting and receiving antenna in the first and / or second (non-coherent) transceiver unit (NKSE1 and / or NKSE2).
- Aspect 15 Use of the system according to any one of aspects 11 to 13 for reducing phase noise interference in a radar system.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19209160.1A EP3660537A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102017104377 | 2017-03-02 | ||
DE102017110063.6A DE102017110063A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2017-05-10 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Umfelderfassung |
PCT/EP2018/054861 WO2018158281A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19209160.1A Division-Into EP3660537A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
EP19209160.1A Division EP3660537A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3589971A1 true EP3589971A1 (de) | 2020-01-08 |
Family
ID=63171074
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP18708108.8A Pending EP3589971A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
EP19209160.1A Pending EP3660537A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19209160.1A Pending EP3660537A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-02-28 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11906655B2 (de) |
EP (2) | EP3589971A1 (de) |
JP (2) | JP2020509386A (de) |
KR (1) | KR102397235B1 (de) |
CN (1) | CN110622026B (de) |
DE (1) | DE102017110063A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2018158281A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102017110063A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-09-06 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Umfelderfassung |
JP7004520B2 (ja) * | 2017-07-05 | 2022-02-04 | 日本無線株式会社 | レーダ装置および高さ測定方法 |
DE102017215561A1 (de) * | 2017-09-05 | 2019-03-07 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | FMCW-Radarsensor mit synchronisierten Hochfrequenzbausteinen |
DE112019003435T5 (de) * | 2018-08-07 | 2021-04-01 | Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Radarvorrichtung |
US11656335B2 (en) * | 2019-03-05 | 2023-05-23 | Rohde & Schwarz Gmbh & Co. Kg | System and method for detecting aircraft signatures |
DE102019002662A1 (de) | 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-15 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Verfahren zur Auswertung von Radarsystemen |
EP3963363A4 (de) * | 2019-04-30 | 2023-08-02 | Zendar Inc. | Systeme und verfahren zur kombination von radardaten |
CN110379178B (zh) * | 2019-07-25 | 2021-11-02 | 电子科技大学 | 基于毫米波雷达成像的无人驾驶汽车智能泊车方法 |
RU2726188C1 (ru) * | 2019-08-21 | 2020-07-09 | Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военный учебно-научный центр Военно-воздушных сил "Военно-воздушная академия имени профессора Н.Е. Жуковского и Ю.А. Гагарина" (г. Воронеж) Министерства обороны Российской Федерации | Способ определения параметров частотно-кодированных сигналов в автокорреляционном приемнике |
DE102019124120A1 (de) | 2019-09-09 | 2021-03-11 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Radar-Verfahren sowie Radar-System |
WO2021053640A1 (en) * | 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-25 | University Of Kansas | Devoid clutter capture and filling (deccaf) to compensate for intra-cpi spectral notch variation |
DE102019126988A1 (de) * | 2019-10-08 | 2021-04-08 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Verfahren zur Reduzierung von Störeinflüssen in einem Radar-System |
DE102019128432A1 (de) * | 2019-10-22 | 2021-04-22 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Radarsensors für ein Fahrzeug mit Kompensation von Störungen im Nahbereich, Recheneinrichtung sowie Radarsensor |
CN111030683B (zh) * | 2019-12-31 | 2024-04-09 | 加特兰微电子科技(上海)有限公司 | 低通滤波器、锁相环以及雷达*** |
US11719786B2 (en) * | 2020-02-25 | 2023-08-08 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Asynchronous, coherent, radar transmitter-receiver system |
CN113391257B (zh) * | 2020-03-13 | 2023-04-18 | 光宝科技新加坡私人有限公司 | 用于物件的角度估测的运算装置及物件的角度估测方法 |
EP3883144B1 (de) * | 2020-03-18 | 2022-12-07 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Verfahren zur synchronisierung von drahtlosnetzwerkknoten und drahtloskommunikationsnetzwerk |
EP3913391A1 (de) * | 2020-05-20 | 2021-11-24 | Infineon Technologies AG | Verarbeitung von radarsignalen |
DE102020116236A1 (de) | 2020-06-19 | 2021-12-23 | Audi Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Geschwindigkeitsvektors eines Umfeldobjekts in einem Kraftfahrzeug und Kraftfahrzeug |
DE102020123293A1 (de) | 2020-09-07 | 2022-03-10 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Verfahren, Radarsystem und Fahrzeug zur Signalverarbeitung von Radarsignalen |
US11762079B2 (en) * | 2020-09-30 | 2023-09-19 | Aurora Operations, Inc. | Distributed radar antenna array aperture |
US20240125894A1 (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2024-04-18 | Symeo Gmbh | Radar system and corresponding method |
DE102021118076A1 (de) | 2021-02-08 | 2022-08-11 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts | Radar-System sowie entsprechendes Verfahren |
CN114722344B (zh) * | 2022-03-11 | 2023-10-20 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | 基于相位补偿的高精度数据拼接方法 |
DE102022131595A1 (de) * | 2022-03-14 | 2023-09-14 | Elmos Semiconductor Se | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Datenkommunikation in einem Fahrzeug zwischen einer Ansteuervorrichtung und mehreren Einheiten |
DE102022120258A1 (de) | 2022-08-11 | 2024-02-22 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Radareinrichtung zur radarbasierten Größeneinstufung von Objekten und entsprechend eingerichtetes Kraftfahrzeug |
DE102022127669A1 (de) | 2022-10-20 | 2024-04-25 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung der tangentialen Geschwindigkeit eines Objektes |
CN117805749A (zh) * | 2023-12-29 | 2024-04-02 | 上海保隆汽车科技股份有限公司 | 毫米波雷达阵元间距误差测量方法和校准方法 |
Family Cites Families (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4037725A1 (de) * | 1990-11-27 | 1992-06-11 | Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt | Verfahren zur digitalen generierung von sar-bildern und einrichtung zu dessen durchfuehrung |
WO2004077079A1 (ja) * | 1993-08-25 | 2004-09-10 | Hitoshi Ujiie | ジッタ解析装置 |
DK0809811T3 (da) * | 1995-12-19 | 2001-10-22 | Siemens Schweiz Ag | Fremgangsmåde og amplitude- eller fasemonopulsradarapparat til lokalisering af flyobjekter |
WO1998002760A1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1998-01-22 | Milkovich Systems Engineering | Improved fast fourier transform sensor processor using enhanced frequency domain principles |
FR2760536B1 (fr) * | 1997-03-04 | 1999-05-28 | Thomson Csf | Procede et dispositif de detection radar a modulation de frequence a onde continue presentant une levee d'ambiguite entre la distance et la vitesse |
DE59806556D1 (en) | 1997-08-27 | 2003-01-16 | Siemens Ag | Fmcw-sensor |
US7076227B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2006-07-11 | Apex/Eclipse Systems, Inc. | Receiving system with improved directivity and signal to noise ratio |
JP4509297B2 (ja) | 2000-04-26 | 2010-07-21 | 三菱電機株式会社 | スペクトル拡散受信装置 |
DE10157931C2 (de) | 2001-11-26 | 2003-12-11 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtungen zur Synchronisation von Funkstationen und zeitsynchrones Funkbussystem |
AU2003286083A1 (en) * | 2003-07-19 | 2005-02-04 | Gamma Remote Sensing Research And Consulting Ag | Method to improve interferometric signatures by coherent point scatterers |
US7821422B2 (en) * | 2003-08-18 | 2010-10-26 | Light Vision Systems, Inc. | Traffic light signal system using radar-based target detection and tracking |
US7183969B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2007-02-27 | Raytheon Company | System and technique for calibrating radar arrays |
KR101088053B1 (ko) * | 2005-04-04 | 2011-11-29 | 레이티언 캄파니 | 다수의 레이더를 가간섭적으로 결합하기 위한 시스템 및방법 |
EP1991887B1 (de) * | 2006-02-17 | 2018-10-17 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Hochfeld-magnetresonanz |
JP2007225442A (ja) * | 2006-02-23 | 2007-09-06 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | レーダ装置 |
JP4980129B2 (ja) * | 2007-04-26 | 2012-07-18 | 三菱電機株式会社 | 画像レーダ装置 |
DE102008010536A1 (de) | 2008-02-22 | 2009-08-27 | Symeo Gmbh | Schaltungsanordnung und Verfahren zur Synchronisation von Uhren in einem Netz |
US8477888B2 (en) * | 2008-06-24 | 2013-07-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Phase-noise resilient generation of a channel quality indicator |
DE102009030076A1 (de) | 2009-06-23 | 2010-12-30 | Symeo Gmbh | Abbildungsverfahren mittels synthetischer Apertur, Verfahren zur Bestimmung einer Relativgeschwindigkeit zwischen einem wellenbasierten Sensor und einem Objekt bzw. Vorrichtung zur Durchführung der Verfahren |
DE102009030075A1 (de) * | 2009-06-23 | 2010-12-30 | Symeo Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Abbildungsverfahren mit synthetischer Apertur zum Bestimmen eines Einfallwinkels und/oder einer Entfernung |
US8600606B2 (en) * | 2010-02-11 | 2013-12-03 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Vehicle safety systems and methods |
US20110292371A1 (en) * | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | Optical Air Data Systems, Llc | Method and Apparatus for a Pulsed Coherent Laser Range Finder |
US10051643B2 (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2018-08-14 | Skyline Partners Technology Llc | Radio with interference measurement during a blanking interval |
JP6031267B2 (ja) * | 2012-06-21 | 2016-11-24 | 古野電気株式会社 | 干渉検出装置、干渉除去器、レーダ装置、干渉検出方法および干渉検出用プログラム |
CN105452898B (zh) | 2013-08-14 | 2018-02-13 | Iee国际电子工程股份公司 | 车辆乘用的雷达感测 |
DE102014104273A1 (de) * | 2014-03-26 | 2015-10-01 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Verfahren in einem Radarsystem, Radarsystem bzw. Vorrichtung eines Radarsystems |
CN103954944A (zh) * | 2014-05-14 | 2014-07-30 | 武汉大学 | 一种高频地波雷达射频干扰抑制的方法 |
US9057785B1 (en) * | 2014-05-29 | 2015-06-16 | Robert W. Lee | Radar operation with increased doppler capability |
US10168425B2 (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2019-01-01 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Centralized vehicle radar methods and systems |
US11100472B2 (en) * | 2014-10-23 | 2021-08-24 | South East Water Corporation | Systems and computer implemented methods for monitoring an activity at one or more facilities |
US10101438B2 (en) * | 2015-04-15 | 2018-10-16 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Noise mitigation in radar systems |
DE102015121724A1 (de) | 2015-12-14 | 2017-06-14 | Symeo Gmbh | System und Verfahren mit zumindest drei Signale empfangenden Stationen |
EP3400458B1 (de) | 2016-01-04 | 2021-10-13 | Symeo GmbH | Verfahren und system zur verringerung von störungen durch phasenrauschen in einem radarsystem |
DE102017110063A1 (de) | 2017-03-02 | 2018-09-06 | Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Umfelderfassung |
-
2017
- 2017-05-10 DE DE102017110063.6A patent/DE102017110063A1/de active Pending
-
2018
- 2018-02-28 EP EP18708108.8A patent/EP3589971A1/de active Pending
- 2018-02-28 US US16/490,476 patent/US11906655B2/en active Active
- 2018-02-28 KR KR1020197029132A patent/KR102397235B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2018-02-28 JP JP2019547513A patent/JP2020509386A/ja active Pending
- 2018-02-28 WO PCT/EP2018/054861 patent/WO2018158281A1/de unknown
- 2018-02-28 EP EP19209160.1A patent/EP3660537A1/de active Pending
- 2018-02-28 CN CN201880028424.5A patent/CN110622026B/zh active Active
-
2024
- 2024-01-25 JP JP2024009482A patent/JP2024042029A/ja active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102017110063A1 (de) | 2018-09-06 |
KR20190137801A (ko) | 2019-12-11 |
CN110622026A (zh) | 2019-12-27 |
JP2020509386A (ja) | 2020-03-26 |
KR102397235B1 (ko) | 2022-05-11 |
WO2018158281A1 (de) | 2018-09-07 |
US20210405183A1 (en) | 2021-12-30 |
JP2024042029A (ja) | 2024-03-27 |
US11906655B2 (en) | 2024-02-20 |
EP3660537A1 (de) | 2020-06-03 |
CN110622026B (zh) | 2024-03-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3589971A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur umfelderfassung | |
EP3400458B1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur verringerung von störungen durch phasenrauschen in einem radarsystem | |
DE102018127947B3 (de) | Mimo fmcw radarsystem | |
EP3377915B1 (de) | Radarsystem mit verschachtelt seriellem senden und parallelem empfangen | |
EP3123199B1 (de) | Verfahren in einem radarsystem, radarsystem und vorrichtung eines radarsystems | |
DE102020111533A1 (de) | Mimo-radar-vorrichtungen und mimo-radar-verfahren | |
DE102018108648B4 (de) | Fmcw radar mit störsignalunterdrückung | |
EP3161514B1 (de) | Mimo-radarmessverfahren | |
EP3014297B1 (de) | Winkelauflösender fmcw-radarsensor | |
DE102018132745B4 (de) | Fmcw radar mit störsignalunterdrückung im zeitbereich | |
DE102018100632A1 (de) | Radar-Verfahren und -System zur Bestimmung der Winkellage, des Ortes und/oder der, insbesondere vektoriellen, Geschwindigkeit eines Zieles | |
EP3803454B1 (de) | Synthetik-apertur-radarverfahren und synthetik-apertur-radarvorrichtung | |
DE102020107804A1 (de) | Radarvorrichtung und Verfahren zum Detektieren von Radarzielen | |
DE102012021973A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Radarsensors eines Kraftfahrzeugs, Fahrerassistenzeinrichtung und Kraftfahrzeug | |
WO2010000251A2 (de) | Radarsystem mit überlappenden sende- und empfangsantennen | |
DE102008054228A1 (de) | Fahrzeugseitige Richtungserkennungsvorrichtung zur genauen Erkennung von Zielkörperrichtungen ungeachtet der Fahrgeschwindigkeit | |
WO2021047844A1 (de) | Radar-verfahren sowie radar-system | |
DE102014218092A1 (de) | Erstellen eines Abbilds der Umgebung eines Kraftfahrzeugs und Bestimmen der relativen Geschwindigkeit zwischen dem Kraftfahrzeug und Objekten in der Umgebung | |
EP3470874A1 (de) | Radar-verfahren und -system zur bestimmung der winkellage, des ortes und/oder der, insbesondere vektoriellen, geschwindigkeit eines zieles | |
DE102017110404A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Kompensation von Störeinflüssen | |
DE112020001356T5 (de) | Radar-Vorrichtigung und Sende-/Empfangsgruppenantenne | |
DE102008011889A1 (de) | Digitale Strahlformung mit frequenzmodulierten Signalen | |
EP3589976A1 (de) | Radar-system sowie verfahren zum betreiben eines radar-systems | |
DE102014214498A1 (de) | Radarsystem mit Unterdrückung von negativen Effekten durch starke Nahbereichssignale | |
DE102004034429B4 (de) | Radar Front-End |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20190925 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP3 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SYMEO GMBH Owner name: FRIEDRICH-ALEXANDER-UNIVERSITAET ERLANGEN-NUERNBERG |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20211206 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SYMEO GMBH |