EP2068291B1 - Procédé et dispositif de détermination différenciée d'infractions routières dans une zone de blocage commandé par feu de circulation - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif de détermination différenciée d'infractions routières dans une zone de blocage commandé par feu de circulation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2068291B1
EP2068291B1 EP08170628A EP08170628A EP2068291B1 EP 2068291 B1 EP2068291 B1 EP 2068291B1 EP 08170628 A EP08170628 A EP 08170628A EP 08170628 A EP08170628 A EP 08170628A EP 2068291 B1 EP2068291 B1 EP 2068291B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vehicle
signal
area
restricted area
entrance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08170628A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2068291A1 (fr
Inventor
Hans-Holger Küster
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Jenoptik Robot GmbH
Original Assignee
Jenoptik Robot GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Jenoptik Robot GmbH filed Critical Jenoptik Robot GmbH
Publication of EP2068291A1 publication Critical patent/EP2068291A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2068291B1 publication Critical patent/EP2068291B1/fr
Priority to CY20111100606T priority Critical patent/CY1111593T1/el
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
    • G08G1/042—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled using inductive or magnetic detectors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
    • G08G1/017—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled identifying vehicles
    • G08G1/0175—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled identifying vehicles by photographing vehicles, e.g. when violating traffic rules

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method as generically from the EP 1 486 928 A2 is known.
  • the blocking phase is usually the red-light phase, but it could also include the preceding yellow phase in part.
  • the restricted areas enclosing a pedestrian crossing or intersection can be defined differently in the individual national legislations. Within the restricted areas there may be zones in which a detected traffic violation is punished differently.
  • the blocking area or a first zone of the blocking area begins at a retaining strip applied on the roadway.
  • Non-invasive sensors are in particular radar sensors or laser sensors and are used in traffic monitoring in particular for speed measurement, wherein the speed during the passage of the vehicle through the measuring range is permanently measured or derived from a permanently measured distance to the measuring sensor.
  • the measuring range is limited by the marginal rays of the measuring radiation.
  • the invasive sensors use piezo strips or, in particular, induction loops.
  • the invasive sensors generate a signal when they are run over by a vehicle and thus indicate the presence of a vehicle at the location of the sensor at a specific time or in a specific time range.
  • DE 35 32 527 A1 is based on a state of the art, according to which a camera is triggered when passing over a recessed in the lane in front of the intersection area sensor, which generates a first photo of a vehicle passing over this sensor. The camera is then triggered a second time at a fixed time interval to photograph the vehicle in the intersection area. It is recognized as disadvantageous that both a very fast and a very slow moving vehicle with a second shot can not be detected proof. The vehicle driving too fast could have already driven out of the object field of the camera, the slow moving vehicle may not yet be in the intersection area.
  • the latter only detects the vehicle once. At this moment, the camera is triggered a first time and maps the vehicle at the detection location. Subsequent recordings may show the vehicle at additional locations, but it will be necessary to evaluate the recordings to determine this.
  • a second shot such as a first one, is created upon detecting a vehicle.
  • the mere fact that a second photo is taken is a sure indication that the vehicle has passed the detection site.
  • An induction loop is a coil with an air core.
  • They usually consist of one to three turns with a width less the road width and a depth of 1 m regularly.
  • An induction loop has a constant inductance, which increases when a metallic body, here a vehicle, enters the induction loop. As soon as the induction loop is covered by the vehicle over its depth, the inductance remains almost constant and then drops back to its original value when it is being moved out. According to the DE 35 32 527 A1 This inductance change is converted over time by signal processing means to a perfectly processable square pulse. For the further signal processing is only of interest, whether this square wave signal is present or not.
  • a device according to the DE 35 32 527 A1 and a method practiced hereby have the particular disadvantage that two induction loops are absolutely necessary.
  • the images whether as a frontal photography or rear photography, then triggered when a signal from the induction loops is effected and that occurs when the vehicle enters the induction loop.
  • frontal photography this means that at the time the camera is triggered, a vehicle front is always at the same distance from the camera.
  • the distance of the stern in a rear-view photograph may vary by the possible difference in length of the vehicles. There may be more than 10 m of difference in length between a motorcycle and a semi-trailer, ie the distance between the rear of the vehicle and the camera may vary by this difference in length.
  • the EP 1 486 928 A2 discloses a method for differential detection of traffic violations and represents the more obvious prior art.
  • the detection system is able to avoid detection of such vehicles.
  • the invention has for its object to provide a simple method for differentiated detection of traffic violations.
  • a method according to the invention differs essentially in that when crossing an induction loop two signals are derived and used for data acquisition and process control.
  • An entrance signal is derived when the vehicle enters its front in an induction loop.
  • An exit signal is diverted when the vehicle exits with its tail an induction loop.
  • a document signal can be limited, which occupies the presence of the vehicle within the induction loop.
  • the entry and exit signals and possibly document signals can be used for process control or data acquisition.
  • a first induction loop 1 the entry of the vehicle is detected in the restricted area.
  • the blocking area does not start here, for example, exactly with a holding strip 2 applied on the roadway, but just behind it.
  • the entrance signal E1 is used as a control signal for triggering a camera and thus creating a first frontal photo. Further front photos are released after fixed times.
  • the exit signal A1 With the exit signal A1, the presence of the vehicle after a travel L equal to the sum of the depth of the induction loop 1 and the vehicle length is detected. That is, since the position of the vehicle rear is detected, vehicles of different lengths can be located at different depths in the restricted area. It could be assumed that vehicles of greater length are better placed than vehicles of lesser length, since they can travel far into the second restricted area before they are detected here. Practically, however, this is not the case, since the vehicles either outside the restricted area, ie in the direction of travel substantially behind the retaining strip 1 or just behind the retaining strip 1 and thus in the restricted area to hold come.
  • the metrological recording of both events allows them to be distinguished without requiring a visual evaluation of the photos. At least they support an evaluation of the photos.
  • the described first embodiment of the method only allows a differentiated detection as to whether a vehicle passing over the retaining strip has come to a halt or not.
  • red light violation When detecting a red light violation, it can not be ruled out that further vehicles, traveling on the same roadway, also commit a holding light or red light violation, ie, further entry signals E or exit signals A could be detected.
  • the speed should also be recorded to z.
  • violations can be differentiated depending on the speed.
  • z. B. a right turn or crossing a pedestrian crossing to a predetermined speed is allowed, the arrest, however, is punished in the pedestrian area or too fast driving through.
  • the vehicle speed is determined from the time interval of the entry signal E1 of a first induction loop 1 and the entry signal E2 of a second induction loop and the knowledge of the distance between the two induction loops, and the second entry signal E2 triggers a camera as in the first embodiment to create a first front photo.
  • the time is determined at which the vehicle is at a predetermined distance from the camera, depending on the determined speed.
  • a camera with a smaller depth of focus range and thus with a larger aperture stop can be used, so that the range of variation of the possible distances between the vehicle fronts during the recording is lower.
  • the utilization of a second exit signal A2 is analogous to the exit signal A1 of the first embodiment.
  • a third embodiment is also based on Fig. 2a-d be explained, however, a first induction loop 1 is arranged in the direction of travel behind a second induction loop 2 so far that a first exit signal A1 is generated before the vehicle reaches the holding strip.
  • the vehicle speed can be determined.
  • the vehicle length can be determined. The knowledge about the vehicle length can serve as a decision criterion as to whether the vehicle in question drives on a lane permissible for the vehicle.
  • the vehicle length can also be used in conjunction with the vehicle speed to delay a triggered by the second entrance signal E2 camera so that in a rear-end photograph this comes in a predetermined distance from the camera.
  • two entry signals E1 and E2 and two exit signals A1 and A2 are generated after passing over a holding strip.
  • the position of the rear or the front of a vehicle is signaled in each case.
  • the entrance signal E1 indicates that the vehicle has run over the retaining strip.
  • the entrance signal E2 indicates that the vehicle has entered the area of a pedestrian crossing.
  • the first exit signal A1 could be used to trigger a camera to create a rear photo when exceeding a predetermined speed is detected.
  • the second exit signal A2 could trigger a second tail photo.
  • signals were also used as control signals for triggering a camera. This is necessary for the traffic guidance, which relies on a photographic detection of the violating vehicle.
  • a method according to the invention and a device suitable for this purpose can also be used for statistical purposes where a photograph of the detected vehicles is not required.
  • the detection area has been defined by an induction loop. It has proven to be a robust and inexpensive variant and is particularly suitable if more than two detection areas are to be created.
  • the detection region can also be defined by other sensors inserted in the roadway or by radiation sensors which direct a measuring radiation onto the roadway.
  • the marginal rays of the measuring beam then limit the detection range.
  • An entry signal is generated when the intensity of the radiation reflected on the vehicle exceeds a predetermined threshold for the first time, and an exit signal is generated when the intensity falls below this threshold.
  • the depth of the detection zone in the case of induction loops is generally 1 m
  • the depth at detection areas, determined by a measuring beam area can easily be changed by a change in the opening angle of the measuring beam or an altered alignment to the roadway, in order to adapt it to a concrete differentiation intention.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Procédé de détermination différenciée d'infractions routières dans une zone de blocage commandée par un feu de circulation, ledit procédé comprenant la formation d'une zone de détection d'une profondeur prédéfinie dans ladite zone de blocage, cette zone de détection étant activée pendant une phase de blocage commandée par un feu de circulation afin de détecter l'entrée d'un véhicule dans ladite zone de blocage pendant ladite phase de blocage, ledit procédé comprenant en outre
    la génération d'un signal d'entrée (E) lors de l'entrée du véhicule dans la zone de détection et la génération d'un signal de sortie (A) lors de la sortie du véhicule de la zone de détection,
    la déduction, dans le cas où un signal d'entrée (E) et un signal de sortie (A) ont été reçus, qu'un véhicule a traversé ladite zone de blocage et que la génération de signaux d'entrée (E) et de sortie (A) additionnels pendant cette même phase de blocage ne sera pas improbable,
    la déduction, dans le cas où seulement un signal d'entrée (E) a été reçu qui n'est pas suivi d'un signal de sortie (A) pendant un temps donné, que le véhicule est entré dans la zone de blocage et s'y est arrêté et qu'il n'y aura pas d'autres signaux d'entrée ou de sortie pendant cette même phase de blocage, et la prise d'au moins une image, ledit procédé étant caractérisé en ce que des codes différents sont insérés dans ladite image selon qu'un seul signal d'entrée a été généré ou un signal d'entrée et un signal de sortie ont été générés.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la zone de détection est déterminée par un capteur encastré dans la chaussée.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que ledit capteur est une boucle d'induction et que la profondeur prédéfinie est déterminée par l'écartement des segments de la boucle qui sont perpendiculaires à la direction de la chaussée.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la zone de détection correspond à l'étendue de mesure d'un faisceau de mesure et la profondeur prédéfinie est déterminée par l'écartement des rayons périphériques.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce que ledit faisceau de mesure est un faisceau radar.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce que ledit faisceau de mesure est un faisceau laser.
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'on forme plus d'une zone de détection pour réaliser une meilleure différenciation entre les infractions, telles qu'une distinction entre l'entrée dans la zone de blocage, l'entrée dans une zone déterminée dans la zone de blocage, tel qu'un passage pour piétons, et la traversée de la zone de blocage.
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les premières limites de la zone de blocage et de la zone de détection dans le sens de circulation coïncident.
EP08170628A 2007-12-03 2008-12-03 Procédé et dispositif de détermination différenciée d'infractions routières dans une zone de blocage commandé par feu de circulation Active EP2068291B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CY20111100606T CY1111593T1 (el) 2007-12-03 2011-06-27 Μεθοδος και διαταξη για διαφοροποιημενη διαπιστωση τροχαιων παραβασεων σε μια περιορισμενη περιοχη ελεγχομενη απο φωτα ρυθμισης κυκλοφοριας

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007058742A DE102007058742A1 (de) 2007-12-03 2007-12-03 Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum differenzierten Erfassen von Verkehrsverstößen in einem ampelgesteuerten Sperrbereich

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2068291A1 EP2068291A1 (fr) 2009-06-10
EP2068291B1 true EP2068291B1 (fr) 2011-03-30

Family

ID=40328963

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08170628A Active EP2068291B1 (fr) 2007-12-03 2008-12-03 Procédé et dispositif de détermination différenciée d'infractions routières dans une zone de blocage commandé par feu de circulation

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2068291B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE504055T1 (fr)
CY (1) CY1111593T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE102007058742A1 (fr)
HK (1) HK1134163A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009060499A1 (de) * 2009-12-22 2011-06-30 JENOPTIK Robot GmbH, 40789 Verfahren und Anordnung zur Erfassung von Verkehrsverstößen in einem Ampelbereich
CN103325252B (zh) * 2013-06-07 2015-07-15 太仓苏晟电气技术科技有限公司 一种太阳能闯红灯抓拍***及其工作方法
CN104732771B (zh) * 2015-04-08 2016-01-06 海安常大技术转移中心有限公司 交通路口抢行车辆识别方法
CN105160886A (zh) * 2015-04-08 2015-12-16 高萍 交通路口抢行车辆识别平台
CN111008609B (zh) * 2019-12-16 2023-05-19 北京迈格威科技有限公司 交通灯与车道的匹配方法、装置及电子设备

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1348895A (en) * 1971-03-19 1974-03-27 Marshall A N Vehicle interval detection and signalling system
DE2307217C3 (de) * 1973-02-14 1975-07-31 Robot, Foto Und Electronic Gmbh & Co Kg, 4000 Duesseldorf Vorrichtung zur photographischen Überwachung von ampelgesteuerten Kreuzungen
DE3532527A1 (de) 1985-09-12 1987-03-19 Robot Foto Electr Kg Vorrichtung zur photographischen ueberwachung von kreuzungen
DE3820520A1 (de) * 1988-06-16 1989-12-21 Arthur Fisser Ueberwachungsvorrichtung einer mittels einer verkehrsampelanlage gesteuerten strassensperre
AUPQ281299A0 (en) * 1999-09-14 1999-10-07 Locktronic Systems Pty. Ltd. Improvements in image recording apparatus
FR2835952B3 (fr) * 2002-02-11 2004-06-04 Electronique Controle Mesure Dispositif de detection de franchissement de feux de carrefour au rouge et d'enregistrement d'images numeriques servant de preuve
US7986339B2 (en) 2003-06-12 2011-07-26 Redflex Traffic Systems Pty Ltd Automated traffic violation monitoring and reporting system with combined video and still-image data
ITTO20060214A1 (it) * 2006-03-22 2007-09-23 Kria S R L Sistema di rilevamento di veicoli

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE504055T1 (de) 2011-04-15
DE102007058742A1 (de) 2009-06-04
HK1134163A1 (en) 2010-04-16
EP2068291A1 (fr) 2009-06-10
CY1111593T1 (el) 2015-10-07
DE502008003003D1 (de) 2011-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2048515B1 (fr) Procédé pour déterminer et documenter des infractions à un feux de signalisation
DE69720022T2 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur positions- und geschwindigkeitsbestimmung eines fahrzeugs
EP0236387B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance photographique de carrefours
EP1990655B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination appuyée par des preuves de la vitesse d'un véhicule
DE4230515C2 (de) Strahlenbündelanordnung zur Verkehrsüberwachung
EP1990654B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination de la classe de véhicules
EP2068291B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination différenciée d'infractions routières dans une zone de blocage commandé par feu de circulation
DE102011003881A1 (de) Verfahren zur Unterstützung eines Fahrers eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102004003850A1 (de) Verfahren zur Erkennung von Markierungen auf einer Fahrbahn
EP2701133B1 (fr) Procédés et dispositifs destinés à l'enregistrement d'image d'un véhicule en excès de vitesse
DE102013102683A1 (de) Verfahren zur Erfassung von Verkehrsverstößen in einem Ampelbereich durch Heckanmessung mit einem Radargerät
EP1446678B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour detecter et classifier des vehicules en deplacement
DE102018118150A1 (de) System zum Steuern einer Verkehrsführung an einer Kreuzung
EP2341367B1 (fr) Procédé et agencement de détection des infractions au code de la route dans une zone de feux de signalisation
EP2221640B1 (fr) Procédé de mesure de la vitesse d'un véhicule et affectation visible dans une documentation
DE102009043742B4 (de) Verfahren zur sofortigen Ahndung eines Verkehrsverstoßes
DE10200785B4 (de) Kraftfahrzeug
WO2012089206A1 (fr) Procédé pour établir un document image selon lequel un véhicule mesuré par un appareil radar peut être identifié et document image établi par ce procédé
EP3082119B1 (fr) Mesure d'intervalle pour véhicules
DE2307217C3 (de) Vorrichtung zur photographischen Überwachung von ampelgesteuerten Kreuzungen
EP1099960B1 (fr) Méthode de mesure de disposition et documentation de la distance entre deux véhicules
EP2075775B1 (fr) Procédé de documentation d'écarts au code de la route presque simultanés
EP2878971B1 (fr) Procédé de mesure de la vitesse d'un véhicule se déplaçant sur une route
EP3096305A1 (fr) Procédé de calcul de vitesse de véhicules et vérification autonome de plausibilité
DE102019006243A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Abbiegeassistenzsystems, Abbiegeassistenzsystem und Kraftfahrzeug mit einem derartigen Abbiegeassistenzsystem

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20091201

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20091230

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: DE

Ref document number: 1134163

Country of ref document: HK

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: JENOPTIK ROBOT GMBH

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502008003003

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20110512

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502008003003

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110512

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: GR

Ref document number: 1134163

Country of ref document: HK

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20110330

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20110401501

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20110714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110630

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110730

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110711

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502008003003

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: JENOPTIK ROBOT G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20111231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111203

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110330

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20131219

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20131219

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20131211

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20131219

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20131212

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20131220

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: CY

Payment date: 20131125

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141204

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 504055

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20141203

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20141203

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: ML

Ref document number: 20110401501

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20150722

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20150831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141203

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141231

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141231

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141203

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141231

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150722

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141203

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502008003003

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: GLEIM PETRI PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSPARTNERSC, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502008003003

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: GLEIM PETRI OEHMKE PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSPA, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502008003003

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: GLEIM PETRI PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSPARTNERSC, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231214

Year of fee payment: 16