EP0452676B1 - Reinigungskennfeld - Google Patents
Reinigungskennfeld Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0452676B1 EP0452676B1 EP91103936A EP91103936A EP0452676B1 EP 0452676 B1 EP0452676 B1 EP 0452676B1 EP 91103936 A EP91103936 A EP 91103936A EP 91103936 A EP91103936 A EP 91103936A EP 0452676 B1 EP0452676 B1 EP 0452676B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- machine
- group
- setting values
- cleaning
- setting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01G—PRELIMINARY TREATMENT OF FIBRES, e.g. FOR SPINNING
- D01G9/00—Opening or cleaning fibres, e.g. scutching cotton
- D01G9/14—Details of machines or apparatus
- D01G9/18—Arrangements for discharging fibres
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01G—PRELIMINARY TREATMENT OF FIBRES, e.g. FOR SPINNING
- D01G15/00—Carding machines or accessories; Card clothing; Burr-crushing or removing arrangements associated with carding or other preliminary-treatment machines
- D01G15/02—Carding machines
- D01G15/12—Details
- D01G15/36—Driving or speed control arrangements
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01G—PRELIMINARY TREATMENT OF FIBRES, e.g. FOR SPINNING
- D01G7/00—Breaking or opening fibre bales
- D01G7/06—Details of apparatus or machines
- D01G7/10—Arrangements for discharging fibres
Definitions
- the invention lies in the field of textile technology and relates to a method for jointly controlling setting means on one or more related Flake opening and fiber cleaning machines, as well as one Device for performing the method.
- the flake dissolving and Fiber cleaning functions in textile cleaning machines controlled by means of variable parameters, according to their values appropriate setting means during operation of the machine be set, if possible so that none Machine parts (tools) must be replaced.
- Such settings according to the parameter values can either manually on specially designed adjustment devices (e.g. a dial) showing the position a value or value related to the setting or automatically and remotely controlled via an appropriate actuator be adjustable.
- the parameters of a fine cleaning machine in which one intensive flake dissolution takes place for example the distance between the terminal point and the takeover point at the Feed roller, the distance from the knife edge to the impact circle, the Relocation of the guide plate to the knife and the speed of the Opening roller and possibly the tip density, provided that these tips are adjusted (and not only by Replace) are changeable.
- the card comes along in this process line their multitude of parameters for combing out short fibers and parallelization of the cleaned fibers, for example Clamping distance of the trough feed to the set of Briseurwalze, the Briseurwalze and drum speed that Settings of the lid, carding elements, tray knife and so on, which is also strongly interdependent can have.
- GB-A-2210907 describes a method - or an apparatus wherein the degree of contamination of the fiber material is continuous monitored and cleaning depending on the results of the Monitoring is controlled. Monitoring is between the Supply and the cleaning elements provided. This is supposed to the cleaning immediately the condition of the to be cleaned Material. But it is missing in this document Details of the operation of the system.
- the invention provides a method for common Control of setting elements on at least one machine for the fiber processing in the blow room or card shop one Spinning by the characteristics in the characteristic part of the Claim 1 is characterized.
- the invention also sees one corresponding machine according to claim 11 or Claim 21 before.
- Each group can regulate the process in one Control loop integrated, electronically operated control element be assigned.
- Means can also be provided with which the Indicators in setpoints to control or regulate the Machine positions are implemented.
- a fine cleaning machine For example, it has settings on machine elements, which are mainly the Intensity of cleaning, including mechanical stress of the fibers affect.
- this is the distance P4 in Fig. 6, i.e. the distance between the clamping line on the Dish and the takeover line of the set of Opening roller, which distance P4 depending on the Fiber provenance is discontinued.
- It is also the distance d (Fig. 5, labeled P7 in Fig. 6) of the release agent (Knife) to the impact circle of the set of the opening roller.
- the tip density z of the carding element, as well the speed n of the opening roller that means cleaning under load on the fibers with as little loss as possible Fiber.
- these two groups of parameters differ by the following characteristics. Which influence one parameter mostly the mechanical stress on the fiber, which is proportional to cleaning intensity. The more intense is cleaned, the more fiber damage occurs on. This gives you the choice between fiber load and Degree of purity. Most of the other parameters influence the departure from the fiber material, which is proportional to fiber loss (even if later in another Cleaning cycle a recuperation should take place). This results in the compromise between the degree of purity Loss of fiber and degree of purity with fiber load.
- the operator therefore has to start the cleaning process the choice, the desired degree of purity with more fiber loss or to achieve with more mechanical damage and During the process, depending on the result, he can only use two, the control elements controlling the overall actuation at any time To bring about change. In a further expansion stage these two controls can also be controlled by a computer be activated, the computer also the "Tables" from the library selects, fetches and controls puts. As I said, it is very possible complex, machine-functional relationships through such easy to master pre-networking.
- Adjustment means can be manipulated: groups of Adjustment means according to a "working together" function summarized.
- the setting parameters of these setting means are entered as parameters in a table, for example into the column of a table. From the lines of the Vectors (columns) are formed which Receive code numbers. This gives you a number of Indicators, which are based on the effectiveness of the common Function.
- These tables (with their vector set) can interact with each other according to their respective function a higher-level function.
- One out of two Tables formed function defines a two-dimensional Parameter field, with three tables it is three-dimensional.
- the values in the tables are determined experimentally, they are characteristic for a machine or for a networked machine group.
- 1 shows such an abstract representation of two tables T 1 and T 2 , which represent two parameter groups M 1 , M 2 , M 3 with one characteristic and P 1 , P 2 , P 3 with the other characteristic.
- the parameters are arranged in the table column.
- the table rows, each with a value x of all the parameters involved in a table, form the parameter vectors, which are mapped onto an axis of a diagram f 1 and f 2 in the order in which they appear in the table. Since it is a networked system (either a machine or a machine group), these axes can be understood as variables or better as functions that are functionally dependent on each other.
- this is symbolically represented by a group of parameters f 2 (f 1 ).
- the intersection points of the parameter vectors of both axes form a matrix of operating points of the machine or machine group and thus define a parameter field or operating point field within which any position can be selected with the aid of a setting of f 1 and f 2 .
- This with the setting of only two sizes, namely the vector parameters of one and the other group or table. No other working points can be set outside the given working point field; the field delimits all sensible or possible settings in connection with the tables used.
- Such parameter groupings i.e. the determination of the values x, once (for example at the very beginning of a task for the machine) by means of test series on the Machine or a machine type or a machine group determined. It shows the results of the different Parameters, i.e. the setting parameters on the machine once so that a cleaning program can be created by means of which the brightness (the brighter the more good fibers in the finish) of the finish composition and the Cleaning intensity (the more intensive the more fiber damage possible) is primarily selectable. Show such an example the tables of Figures 2 and 3. This is a suggestion to summarize group parameters and finally to form a two-dimensional map that the adjustable operating conditions, being irrelevant is whether the setting is manual or by means of a Actuator is executed.
- the criterion for forming a first group of setting parameters is the cleaning intensity (table Fig. 2).
- St is the classification stack length which factor K goes from 0.1 to 0.4 (P23)
- the speed n 1500 to 500 (P24).
- Above in the column are the values of the higher intensity, after below the intensity becomes weaker.
- the respective row of all four columns form a common one Cleaning number. Every ten lines form a series of values between 0 and 1. These values are allocations and represent just one line with four parameter values, similar a vector (you could use the values 0; 0.1; ... 0.5 ... 1.0 also call line number or vector number).
- the criterion for forming a second group of setting parameters is the exit (table of Fig. 3).
- the second group includes all setting operations on one machine summarized, which determine the departure.
- the table shows two columns with the boundary values of two different ones Parameters P31, P32: Displacement s (mm) from baffle to Knives from 0 to 5 (P31); Length l (mm) of the Elimination gap from 15 to 30 (P32).
- the two group parameters then each form a group of Setting parameters (setting process) with which the cleaning intensity influenced and with which the finish influences can be.
- Each group has a set of adjustment vectors, which are determined in test series. Any one Assignment of two setting vectors from each group results a working point within the entire cleaning program, which is set with only two adjustment devices can be.
- Such a "cleaning program” is shown here in the diagram by Fig. 4 shown.
- Such a diagram can either be for a machine, or for a machine group, or for a whole plant are created, with increasing Networking the individual machine types does not add complexity will increase linearly.
- the diagram shown here is divided by two Group parameters, namely the group of cleaning intensive Adjustment variables and the group of departure-intensive Adjustment variables defines which variables in different vectors Efficacies are classified.
- Crossing points correspond to working points and the hatched area describes a field of all possible working points, which at the Machine are adjustable.
- a possible limitation of the work area to prevent possible malfunctions on the machine is in the upper right Area of the work area.
- the no adjustment limit is
- It is also shown how to choose Cleaning intensity 0.4 the finish between 1.8 and 3.6 can be varied. The exit setting of 1.3 would at the cleaning intensity 0.4 a drop of approximately 2.4 effect.
- the Boundary lines of the hatched diagram can be used as the Extreme positions of the adjustable elements, i.e. as their Adjustment range, and the in-between accordingly as intermediate positions of these elements, so that the production result with two indicators or setting elements can be adjusted.
- the procedure for selecting and using such a cleaning program could then proceed as follows.
- the user of the tool or the system selects the table based on the previously determined mean value of the Klassierstapels (BW-fibers, for example, of 7/8 "to 1 1/2" 1/16 "increments what mm of a fiber length of 22 to 38 mm From this, the clamping distance is determined.
- BW-fibers Klassierstapels
- the degree of soiling of the cotton to be cleaned he selects a degree of cleaning intensity within the hatched program field that is considered correct for the fibers to be cleaned (mechanical stress on the fiber). Then he chooses the relative number for the exit, ie it determines how great the good fiber loss is.
- a working point is set within the hatched area that fulfills these conditions.
- a correction can be made in both dimensions of the Parameters, i.e. carried out in a two-dimensional direction, ie in the effective range of the setting field It is understood that this point in the corresponding machine or in the various machines of a plant or machine group, according to the program, causes certain settings of the aforementioned cleaning elements, so that due to such positions or. Speeds a result of cotton to be assessed later by the user arises.
- This assessment can be carried out with the aid of a sensor and control device on the computer, but is not provided on-line in this variant, so that the operator or the user must select a new starting point in the map if the cleaning is insufficient.
- Figures 5 and 6 show the adjustable individual functions on a fine cleaning machine.
- Each of the parameters P 1 to P 11 relates to an adjustable machine element within the cleaning stage (see also the CH patent application 3452 / 89-8).
- a light arrow for the outlet and a dark arrow for the material passage are shown at each cleaning stage.
- the parameters which have an "intensive" effect on the fibers can be found, for example, in stages 2, 3, 4, 6 and the parameters which have an "intensive" effect on the exit can be found in stages 3, 7, for example. It can be seen that both parameter types can be present in the same cleaning level and that it is important to combine the settings of the same (desired) function type and not the cleaning levels.
- FIG. 7 shows a cleaning program on a coarse cleaning machine. This type of machine works in terms of cleaning intensity (compared to a fine cleaning machine) Relatively gentle over its entire setting range, however but with a certain intensity, so that with the Coarse cleaning machine a two-dimensional parameter field applies.
- the cleaning intensity group includes one parameter P71, namely the drum speed in rpm from 600 to 1000.
- the group of the waste quantity also includes a parameter P72, namely the grate bar angle ⁇ ° from 0 to 20.
- An example would be a table that Provenances.
- This three-dimensional parameter map (Provenance / Intensity / Departure) would be on one Provenance and the other two parameters that define a two-dimensional field with the working points, would be set via one control element each. But it left change quickly and safely to another provenance and the associated tables for the other two controls or indicators would be assigned accordingly.
- bale opener An example of a bale opener
- bale opener although technically assigned to the blow room, none Cleaning machine but a dissolving machine.
- the card (not shown here) can be made using a three-dimensional Parameter field, i.e. with the same table technique as with the machines discussed above (also valid for machine groups) in a "room" with working points are shown in which the cleaning intensity, the relative amount of waste and the carding intensity one each Property group with the associated parameter vectors represents.
- the cleaning intensity is determined, for example, by a Clamping distance analogous to the clamping distance designated P4 in FIG. 6 and / or given by the speed of the beater roller, while the delivery quantity, for example, by the position of the cleaning knives on the beater roller and the Card intensity e.g. by the distance between the Carding elements and the drum set, as well as where changeable present by changing the tooth density of the Carding elements is given.
- These setting options in the three groups are only examples; it can of course, much more of these can be summarized.
- the nit level can be predetermined and then, analogous to the procedure on a two-dimensional Parameter field the cleaning intensity or the Outlet can be selected.
- Such attitudes are, despite the possible variety of setting sizes, simple and manageable.
- a complex process can be involved simple means can be made optimally usable.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Preliminary Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
Description
- Fig. 1
- in abstrakter Darstellung das Prinzip des erfinderischen Verfahrens,
- Fig. 2
- in einer Tabelle, wie einzelne Parameter zusammengefasst sein können, um als Gruppenparameter weiterverwendet zu werden,
- Fig. 3
- in einer anderen Tabelle, wie weitere Parameter zusammengefasst sein können, um als Gruppenparameter weiterverwendet zu werden,
- Fig. 4
- wie solche Gruppenparameter ihrerseits zusammengefasst ein Kennfeld definieren, in welchem die mechanischen und damit auch funktionellen Randbedingungen eingegrenzt sind,
- Fig. 5
- schematisch dargestellt die Kennwerte an einer Feinreinigungsmaschine,
- Fig. 6
- zeigt die einzelnen Funktionen, die von Fasern in einer Feinreinigungsmaschine durchlaufen werden, und
- Fig. 7
- zeigt ein Diagramm, in welchem die Gruppenparameter für eine Grobreinigungsmaschine zusammengefasst werden.
- Eindimensional
- Ballenabtragung mit dem Gruppenparameter
Ballenhärte.
Grobreinigung mit dem Gruppenparameter Abgangsmenge (sofern die Reinigungsintensität keine Rolle spielt). - Zweidimensional
- Grobreinigung mit den Gruppenparametern
Reinigungsintensität und Abgangsmenge
(sofern die Reinigungsintensität keine
Rolle spielt
Feinreinigung mit den Gruppenparametern Reinigungsintensität und Abgangsmenge. - Dreidimensional
- Kardierung mit den Gruppenparametern Reinigungsintensität, relative Abgangsmenge und Kardierintensität (Nissenniveau).
Claims (25)
- Verfahren zum gemeinsamen Steuern von Einstellelementen an mindestens einer Maschine für die Faserverarbeitung in der Putzerei bzw. Karderie einer Spinnerei,
dadurch gekennzeichnet,dass einerseits Maschineneinstellwerte, welche vorgegebene Einstellmöglichkeiten von Einstellelementen der Maschine wiedergeben, in einer Steuerung erfasst werden,und dass andererseits dieser Steuerung Steuerbefehle eingegeben werden, die diese Einstellmöglichkeiten in Gruppen mit gleichem Wirkungscharakter zusammengefasst enthalten, wobei aus mindestens einer Gruppe satzweiseMaschineneinstellwerte und entsprechende Steuerbefehle ausgewählt werden, mit welchen das Einstellen der Maschine bewirkt werden soll undwobei ein Satz von Maschineneistellwerten bzw. Sätze von Maschineneistellwerten gemeinsam einen möglichen Arbeitspunkt der Maschine definiert bzw. definieren. - Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass Maschineneinstellwerte als Gruppe in einer Einstellwerttabelle zusammengefasst sind.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für jede Gruppe eine Einstellwerttabelle gebildet wird und beim Auswählen von Maschineneinstellwerten aus den Tabellen je ein Parametervektor gewonnen wird, wobei die Parametervektoren zusammen den Arbeitspunkt definieren.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für jede Gruppe ein Indikator oder Bedienorgan vorhanden ist und die Auswahl der Maschineneinstellwerte aus einer Gruppe mittels des jeweiligen Indikators bzw. Bedienorgans erfolgt.
- Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass nur eine Gruppe gebildet wird.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass mehrere Gruppen gebildet werden.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass zwei oder drei Gruppen gebildet werden.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für die Gruppenbildung Einstellwerte von reinigungsintensiv auf die Faser wirkenden Einstellelemente und Einstellwerte von abgangsintensiven Einstellelementen in je einer Gruppe zusammengefasst sind.
- Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die satzweise als Steuerbefehle gewonnenen Maschineneinstellwerte als ablesbare Werte dargestellt werden.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 8, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die satzweise als Steuerbefehle gewonnenen Maschineneinstellwerte als Aktorik-Sollwerte dargestellt werden.
- Maschine für die Faserverarbeitung in der Putzerei bzw. Karderie einer Spinnerei mit einer Steuerung und mit steuerbaren Einstellelementen für Maschinenelemente,dadurch gekennzeichnet,dass Steuerbefehle für die Einstellelemente in der Steuerung eingegeben worden sind,dass Maschineneinstellwerte, welche vorgegebene Einstellmöglichkeiten von den Einstellelementen wiedergeben, ebenfalls in der Steuerung erfasst sind,dass die Steuerbefehle diese Einstellmöglichkeiten in Gruppen mit gleichem Wirkungscharakter zusammengefasst enthalten, unddass Mittel vorhanden sind, um aus mindestens einer Gruppe satzweise Maschineneinstellwerte auszuwählen, mit welchen die Maschine eingestellt werden soll,wobei ein Satz von Maschineneinstellwerten bzw. Sätze von Maschineneinstellwerte gemeinsam einen Arbeitspunkt definiert bzw. definieren.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 11, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass Maschineneinstellwerte als Gruppe in einer Einstellwerttabelle zusammengefasst sind.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 11 oder 12, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass jeder Gruppe zur Regelung des Prozesses ein in einen Regelkreis eingebundenes, elektronisch betätigtes Bedienorgan zugeordnet ist.
- Maschine nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 13, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für jede Gruppe ein Indikator oder Bedienorgan vorhanden ist und die Auswahl der Maschineneinstellwerte aus einer Gruppe mittels des jeweiligen Indikators bzw. Bedienorgans erfolgt.
- Maschine nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 14, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Maschine eine Grobreinigungsmaschine oder ein Ballenöffner ist und dass nur eine Gruppe vorhanden ist.
- Maschine nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 14, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass für die Gruppenbildung Einstellwerte von reinigungsintensiv auf die Faser wirkenden Einstellelemente und Einstellwerte von abgangsintensiven Einstellelementen in je einer Gruppe zusammengefasst sind.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 16, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Maschine ein Feinreiniger oder eine Karde ist.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 17, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Maschine eine Karde ist und dass mindestens eine zusätzliche Gruppe von Einstellwerten der kardierintensiv auf die Faser wirkenden Einstellelemente gebildet ist.
- Maschine nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 18, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Steuerung ein Computer umfasst, die Steuerbefehle in der Form von Aktorik-Sollwerten erzeugt.
- Maschine nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 19, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Gesamtheit der in der Steuerung erfassten Maschineneinstellwerte für eine vorbestimmte Faservorlage ein Reinigungsprogramm für diese Vorlage darstellt und die Steuerung eine Bibliothek von Reinigungsprogrammen für verschiedene Faservorlagen enthält.
- Maschine für die Faserverarbeitung in der Putzerei bzw. Karderie mit einer Steuerung und mit steuerbaren Einstellelementen, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie Indikatoren oder Bedienorgane aufweist, deren Skalierung Kennziffern von Parametervektoren entsprechen, die aus Gruppen von Einstellwerten für die Einstellelemente gebildet sind, wobei die Einstellwerte einer Gruppe das gleiche Wirkungscharakter aufweisen.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 21, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie Mittel aufweist, mit welchen die Indikatoren in Sollwerte zur Steuerung oder Regelung der Maschineneinstellungen umgesetzt werden können.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 21 oder 22, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass eine Gruppe aus Einstellwerten gebildet ist, die für reinigungsintensive Einstellelemente vorgesehen sind.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 21, 22 oder 23, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass eine Gruppe aus Einstellwerten gebildet ist, die für abgangsintensive Einstellelemente vorgesehen sind.
- Maschine nach Anspruch 21, 22, 23 oder 24, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass eine Gruppe aus Einstellwerten gebildet ist, die für kardierintensive Einstellelemente vorgesehen sind.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH95790 | 1990-03-22 | ||
CH957/90 | 1990-03-22 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0452676A1 EP0452676A1 (de) | 1991-10-23 |
EP0452676B1 true EP0452676B1 (de) | 1998-12-16 |
Family
ID=4199109
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP91103936A Expired - Lifetime EP0452676B1 (de) | 1990-03-22 | 1991-03-14 | Reinigungskennfeld |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5181295A (de) |
EP (1) | EP0452676B1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE59109076D1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE59109076D1 (de) * | 1990-03-22 | 1999-01-28 | Rieter Ag Maschf | Reinigungskennfeld |
US5926919A (en) * | 1994-10-10 | 1999-07-27 | Carding Specialist Limited | Card waste monitoring |
EP1158078B1 (de) * | 1996-04-12 | 2004-01-07 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Sensor für den Kardierspalt beziehungsweise Nachstellen des Kardierspaltes |
EP0810309B1 (de) | 1996-05-20 | 2004-09-29 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Anlage zum Verarbeiten von Fasern |
DE19630018A1 (de) * | 1996-07-25 | 1998-01-29 | Rieter Ag Maschf | Anlage zum Verarbeiten von Fasern |
DE19651893B4 (de) * | 1996-12-13 | 2006-10-05 | TRüTZSCHLER GMBH & CO. KG | Verfahren und Vorrichtung an einer Karde zur Verarbeitung von Textilfasern z. B. Baumwolle, Chemiefasern u. dgl. |
US6145166A (en) * | 1997-07-30 | 2000-11-14 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Trash elimination apparatuses for fiber cleaning aggregates |
EP0894878A3 (de) | 1997-07-30 | 2000-04-19 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Flockenreiniger |
EP1103640B1 (de) | 1999-11-24 | 2004-03-03 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Selektive Reinigungslinie |
EP1167590A3 (de) | 2000-06-23 | 2002-09-11 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Faserlängenmessung |
DE10230603B4 (de) * | 2002-07-08 | 2017-06-14 | Trützschler GmbH & Co Kommanditgesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung an einer Spinnereivorbereitungsmaschine, z.B. Reiniger, Öffner, Karde o. dgl., zur Reinigung von Fasergut |
DE10231829B4 (de) * | 2002-07-15 | 2019-12-12 | Trützschler GmbH & Co Kommanditgesellschaft | Vorrichtung an einer Karde, Krempel, Reinigungsmaschine o. dgl. für Baumwolle mit mindestens einem Abscheidemesser |
CH697063A5 (de) * | 2003-04-03 | 2008-04-15 | Truetzschler Gmbh & Co Kg | Vorrichtung an einer Spinnereivorbereitungsmaschine, z.B. Reiniger, Öffner oder Karde, zur Erfassung von aus Fasermaterial, z. B. Baumwolle, ausgeschiedenem, aus Fremdstoffen und Gutfasern b |
BRPI0508907A (pt) * | 2004-03-18 | 2007-08-07 | Rieter Ag Maschf | poço de limpeza |
US20050217076A1 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2005-10-06 | Gvili Michael E | Apparatus and method for controlling the amount of trash in lint |
ITUB20160392A1 (it) * | 2016-01-26 | 2017-07-26 | Saldarini 1882 S R L | Metodo di riempimento di un capo di abbigliamento imbottito e giubbotto imbottito |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2944428C2 (de) * | 1979-11-03 | 1984-08-30 | Trützschler GmbH & Co KG, 4050 Mönchengladbach | Vorrichtung zur Produktionssteuerung und Bandregulierung einer Karde |
DE3708211C2 (de) * | 1987-03-13 | 1998-05-07 | Truetzschler Gmbh & Co Kg | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Verbesserung des Kardierprozesses einer Karde oder Krempel |
DE3734145A1 (de) * | 1987-10-09 | 1989-04-27 | Hollingsworth Gmbh | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum reinigen und oeffnen von in flockenform befindlichem fasergut, z. b. baumwolle |
JPH0720800B2 (ja) * | 1988-03-01 | 1995-03-08 | 村田機械株式会社 | 紡績工場における品質管理システム |
CH669401A5 (de) * | 1988-03-02 | 1989-03-15 | Loepfe Ag Geb | |
AU636884B2 (en) * | 1989-05-23 | 1993-05-13 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter A.G. | Optimisation of cleaning |
EP0409772A1 (de) * | 1989-07-18 | 1991-01-23 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag | Verfahren zur optimierten Aufbereitung von Textilfasern verschiedener Provenienzen |
DD299322A5 (de) * | 1989-09-21 | 1992-04-09 | Maschinenfabrik Rieter Ag,Ch | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur feinreinigung von textilfasern |
DE59109076D1 (de) * | 1990-03-22 | 1999-01-28 | Rieter Ag Maschf | Reinigungskennfeld |
-
1991
- 1991-03-14 DE DE59109076T patent/DE59109076D1/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1991-03-14 EP EP91103936A patent/EP0452676B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-03-22 US US07/673,418 patent/US5181295A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1992
- 1992-11-12 US US07/974,936 patent/US5361458A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US5361458A (en) | 1994-11-08 |
DE59109076D1 (de) | 1999-01-28 |
US5181295A (en) | 1993-01-26 |
EP0452676A1 (de) | 1991-10-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0452676B1 (de) | Reinigungskennfeld | |
DE19822886B4 (de) | Regulierstreckwerk für einen Faserverband, z. B. Baumwolle, Chemiefasern o. dgl. mit mindestens einem Verzugsfeld | |
DE3924779A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum betrieb einer spinnereilinie | |
DE3530905C2 (de) | ||
DE102006002390A1 (de) | Einstellvorrichtung für eine Textilmaterial verarbeitende Maschine | |
DE4235082C2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern der Fadenzufuhr bei einer Kettenwirkmaschine | |
EP3760772A1 (de) | Optimierung des betriebes einer spinnmaschine | |
DE3336368A1 (de) | Flachstrickmaschine mit einer elektronischen steuerung fuer die nadelsenkerverstellung | |
EP0641876A1 (de) | Reinigungs-Optimierung | |
DE3043525A1 (de) | Automatisches naehmaschine | |
DE4321332C2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum kontinuierlichen Einfärben von Textilfäden | |
DD297463A5 (de) | Verfahren zum mischen von textilfasern | |
DE10230603A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung an einer Spinnereivorbereitungsmaschine, z.B. Reiniger, Öffner, Karde o. dgl., zur Reinigung von Fasergut | |
DE4041301A1 (de) | Spinnmaschine fuer und verfahren zum spinnen von effektgarn | |
EP3460113B1 (de) | Verfahren zum einarbeiten einer kettenwirkmaschine und kettenwirkmaschine | |
DD295673A5 (de) | Kardierelement | |
DE3244619A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung und regelung der maschinen einer spinnereivorbereitungsanlage | |
EP0431379A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Reinigen oder Kardieren von Textilfasern | |
DE10327370A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Anspinnen eines Fadens in einer Offenend-Spinnvorrichtung | |
EP1917388A1 (de) | Flockenbeschickungssystem. | |
EP0312805B1 (de) | Produktionssteuerung | |
DE3904853C2 (de) | ||
EP3751027A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben einer karde und zur einstellung eines kardierspaltes der karde und karde | |
EP0384551B2 (de) | Krempel zur Herstellung von wirr- oder längsorientiertem Faservlies | |
DE102005037124A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Steuerung des Verzugs eines Verzugsfeldes einer Textilmaschine sowie Textilmaschine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19910819 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19930826 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19981216 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59109076 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19990128 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: GUZZI E RAVIZZA S.R.L. |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 19990225 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20010222 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020314 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20020314 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: RN |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20070314 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080331 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20090320 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090325 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100314 |