EP3800483A1 - Alignement d'un détecteur d'un module dircm sur une cible - Google Patents

Alignement d'un détecteur d'un module dircm sur une cible Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3800483A1
EP3800483A1 EP20196593.6A EP20196593A EP3800483A1 EP 3800483 A1 EP3800483 A1 EP 3800483A1 EP 20196593 A EP20196593 A EP 20196593A EP 3800483 A1 EP3800483 A1 EP 3800483A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
target
area
dircm
detector
instruction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP20196593.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Markus Mauder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Diehl Defence GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Diehl Defence GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Diehl Defence GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Diehl Defence GmbH and Co KG
Publication of EP3800483A1 publication Critical patent/EP3800483A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
    • F41G7/22—Homing guidance systems
    • F41G7/224—Deceiving or protecting means
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/02—Aiming or laying means using an independent line of sight
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00—Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F41H13/0043—Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target

Definitions

  • the invention relates to DIRCMs (Directed Infrared Counter Measures) or corresponding DIRCM systems.
  • a laser-based DIRCM Directed Infrared Counter Measure
  • the protection system uses high-tech sensors from Elbit Systems to fend off seeker-controlled guided missiles. Such missiles, used by portable air defense systems, are particularly dangerous during take-off and landing.
  • Diehl Defense integrates three of the tried and tested J-MUSIC (Multi-Spectral Infrared Countermeasure) laser devices from Elbit into an extended overall system, a complete To ensure 360 ° all-round protection for the aircraft.
  • the new DIRCM system works in conjunction with the on-board missile warning system and focuses the highly dynamic and precisely guided laser beam directly on the infrared seeker head of the attacking object.
  • Such a DIRCM system contains at least one DIRCM module. These modules contain a detector for detection, i. H. Location of the destination. If the target is detected, the target is tracked and the laser beam is emitted to the target (jamming). This is how the laser beam reaches the target with the help of the detector.
  • the detector must be instructed towards the target, ie roughly oriented towards this, so that the target is in the detection area (target area) of the detector in which this can then successfully and accurately capture the target.
  • a warning system e.g. B. a missile warning system (MWS: Missile Warning System).
  • the object of the invention is to propose improvements with regard to the instruction of the detector for the approaching target.
  • the object is achieved by a method according to claim 1.
  • the method is used to instruct a movable detector of a DIRCM module of a DIRCM system on an approaching target.
  • the invention is based on a DIRCM system that contains an interface to a warning system. The interface is used to receive a briefing position for the target from the warning system.
  • the DIRCM system also contains at least one DIRCM module. This contains the detector that is used to detect the target.
  • the detector has a target position for alignment with the target. By moving the detector, in particular pivoting it (e.g. gimbal), the target position is also pivoted. The target position is therefore firmly connected to the detector and is moved or pivoted together with it.
  • the target position indicates the direction in which the laser beam of the associated DIRCM module is emitted and should therefore be aimed at the target as precisely as possible. Tracking or tracking of the target also takes place at the target position. For example, the detector is moved and tracked to the target in such a way that the target is held in the target position as far as possible.
  • Positions and “areas” in the context of the present application are, in particular, pairs of azimuth and elevation values or areas.
  • Target / instruction position denotes in particular values or areas or areas of azimuth and elevation of a beam, solid angle, etc. emanating from a pivot / pivot point of the detector.
  • the instruction position is first received via the interface.
  • a briefing area is assigned to the briefing position. The reason for this is that the detection itself and the determined position of a recognized target by the warning system is associated with uncertainties.
  • the briefing area therefore describes the area in which the target or a target is actually located with a first minimum probability.
  • a target area is also assigned to the target position. Detection of a target by the detector is also fraught with uncertainties.
  • the target area is that area in which a (actually present) target is detected with a second minimum probability.
  • the target area is smaller than the instruction area.
  • a search area is also provided in accordance with a search strategy.
  • the search area is chosen to be larger than the target area.
  • the search area is also chosen so that it covers at least the briefing area.
  • the search area is then searched for the target.
  • the target position and thus the target area - by or with the aid of the movement of the detector - are moved over the search area.
  • the target is always searched for in the target area.
  • the search area is searched until either the target has been successfully detected or until the entire search area has been searched for the target without success; H. no target was found.
  • the "mobility" of the detector is therefore, in particular, the ability to pivot about at least one, in particular two or three axes, which in particular are perpendicular to one another.
  • An “area” in the sense of the present application is therefore in particular a pair of an azimuth interval and an elevation interval. Starting from a central point (pivot point of the detector), these are in particular areas on a concentric spherical surface. The areas in particular have a circular shape or represent a spherical cap.
  • the "inaccuracy” arises as follows: The instruction area in which the target should be located according to the instruction position of the warning system is larger than the target area in which a target can be detected (given the orientation of the detector at a certain target position). In the case of concentric alignment of the target area with the instruction position, targets that are on the edge of the instruction area could therefore lie outside the target area and thus no longer be detected.
  • a search area is created which covers at least the instruction area and this search area is "scanned" for the target by moving / pivoting the detector and thus the target area.
  • a target can be detected by the detector within the framework of the first and second minimum probabilities in the entire instruction area.
  • search strategies A search strategy is developed especially application-specifically with regard to the individual object to be protected by the DIRCM system, the individual, expected threat in the form of the target, expected individual tactical measures of the target, etc.
  • a general characteristic of the search strategy is therefore, in particular, to adapt it as case-specifically / empirically / tactically / etc. to the expected characteristics of a threat from an approaching target as well as to the object to be protected, in order to align the detector as quickly and safely as possible on the target can.
  • this unsuccessful instruction is reported to a recipient, in particular the warning system or a higher-level DIRCM control system, etc.
  • a message is also understood to mean, in particular, the request for a new instruction position for the approaching destination.
  • the target position is (precisely) aligned with the target with the aid of the detector.
  • This is precisely one of the core properties of the detector / DIRCM module: the so-called “tracking", i. This means that the detector aligns itself exactly and centrally, i.e. with the target position, to the target and dynamically maintains this alignment on the target. As a result, targeted irradiation (jamming) with tracking of the target can take place.
  • a three-sigma range is selected as the instruction area with regard to the presence of the target in the instruction area.
  • a three-sigma range is selected as the target area with regard to the successful detection of the target in the target area.
  • the ranges are chosen so large that a 3-sigma probability (three times the standard deviation) of approx. 99.7% applies for the first and second probability.
  • the target is then located within the instruction area with a sufficiently high probability for practice, and it is equally likely to be detected within the target area. The successful instruction of the detector on a target recognized by the warning system will thus take place with sufficient probability.
  • the search area is formed by joining and / or superimposing the target areas for at least two orientations of the detector to different target positions.
  • the target areas (different, because they are located in other locations or areas - azimuth / elevation -) are searched at least partially or completely at the correspondingly recorded alignment of the detector at the respective target position. Only then is the detector switched to a new, different one Target position moved and held there. The next target area is then searched again, etc.
  • the search area can be searched particularly easily.
  • a search strategy is selected which avoids multiple searches for the destination at the same locations in the search area.
  • the overlap area is searched only once.
  • Target areas are then only partially searched and not in an overlapping area with a previously searched (part of) another target area. In this way, the search for the target is accelerated overall.
  • a search strategy is selected that takes into account a movement of the target and / or a movement of the DIRCM system. For example, given a certain predicted trajectory of the target relative to the DIRCM system, certain sections of the search area in which the target is particularly likely to be found can first be searched in order to be able to detect the target as quickly as possible. It is thus also to be avoided that the target is located at a first point in time in a first target area, which is only searched later, since the second target area is currently being searched. Later, however, when the first target area is searched, the target has then moved to the second target area, which has already been searched. So the target would only not be detected because of the "wrong" search order.
  • a movement of the DIRCM system can arise, for example, because it is attached to a flying aircraft and the aircraft is performing a flight maneuver relative to the target.
  • the movement of the aircraft can be obtained from sensors or flight computer data from the aircraft, for example. This can also increase the speed or quality of the detection of the target.
  • a search strategy is used which takes into account a distance between the warning system and the detector and / or a relative movement between the warning system and the detector.
  • a corresponding distance is created, for example, by installing a warning system on the bow and a detector on the rear of an aircraft.
  • a corresponding distance creates a parallax error between the two components, which can then be compensated in the process.
  • a corresponding relative movement can take place in the same example situation by twisting an aircraft fuselage between the bow and the stern. Lost warning system and detector then their mutually coordinated spatial orientation.
  • Such a corresponding error can also be recorded using data from a flight computer, sensors, etc. and compensated for in the process. This can also increase the speed or quality of the detection of the target.
  • a search strategy is selected according to which the detector is gradually aligned to at least two target positions and the target area is searched at least partially or completely (in particular depending on the overlap, see above) at the respective fixed target position.
  • the search area is processed step-by-step or successive, alternating between holding the detector at a position, searching the target area, changing position, holding on, searching, etc.
  • the placement / sequence of the target positions in the search area enables a favorable location for the search be established in the search area, e.g. searched first in the places where the target is most likely to be suspected.
  • a search strategy is selected in which three or four target positions are selected that lie on rays (half-straight lines) that start from the orientation position and that extend over a circumference by 120 ° (with three) or 90 ° (with four). are twisted against each other. According to the corresponding formation law (360 ° divided by the number of rays), more than four or less than three rays can be selected and corresponding target positions can be distributed over them. This makes it possible to find search areas and search strategies that are particularly effective.
  • the target positions on the beams are at a distance from the instruction position.
  • the distances between the three or four (or more or less) target positions on the beams are selected to be equidistant from the instruction position. This creates - in connection with the same target areas) symmetrical search areas. So the target positions lie on a circle around the instruction position.
  • the distances between the three or four (or more or less) target positions on the beams are selected to be different distances from the instruction position. This means that search areas that deviate from the circular shape can also be implemented.
  • the object of the invention is also achieved by a DIRCM system according to claim 11.
  • the DIRCM system corresponds to that already explained above and contains the interface to the warning system for receiving the instruction position for the approaching target from the warning system.
  • the DIRCM system further includes the at least one DIRCM module with the movable detector for detecting the target, the detector having the target position for alignment with the target.
  • the DIRCM system also contains a control and evaluation unit for carrying out the method according to the invention.
  • the DIRCM system contains a combat module for tracking and combating the target on the basis of the target position supplied by the detector.
  • the detector is part of the control module.
  • the DIRCM module is also designed to track and / or irradiate the target. With such a DIRCM system, in addition to instruction or alignment with the target or its detection, it is also possible to combat and pursue it.
  • the object of the invention is also achieved by a DIRCM system according to patent claim 13.
  • An object can be completely protected with the warning system.
  • the object of the invention is also achieved by such an object according to patent claim 14, with a DIRCM system according to the invention protecting the object, the DIRCM system being mounted on the object.
  • the object is in particular an aircraft, land or water vehicle, an aircraft, airplane, helicopter, ship or land vehicle, but can also be a fixed device on the ground.
  • the warning system is arranged remotely from at least one of the DIRCM modules on the object. This results in the above-mentioned parallax errors, torsion errors, etc. This applies in particular if the warning system and DIRCM modules or detectors are on z.
  • the invention is based on the following findings, observations and considerations and also has the following embodiments.
  • the embodiments are sometimes also referred to as "the invention” for the sake of simplicity.
  • the embodiments can here also contain parts or combinations of the above-mentioned embodiments or correspond to them and / or optionally also include embodiments not mentioned so far.
  • the invention is based on the consideration that for a successful connection (instruction) of the DIRCM interference module (contains the detector) to the target, the inaccuracy of the MWS instruction data (Missile Warning System / warning system / instruction position / area), quantified by the three -Sigma error, must not exceed a certain threshold.
  • the accuracy must be less than a degree (a °) azimuth / elevation, the three sigma target range of the detector. In the case of a large transport aircraft, this threshold cannot be met under certain conditions, e.g. B. due to elastic deformations of the aircraft fuselage. Nevertheless, the activation of the DIRCM interference module on the threat (target) must take place within a short time with high probability for successful combat.
  • the invention is based on the knowledge that until now the instruction of a DIRCM interfering module was only possible with data from a MWS whose sensor (IR camera) is located directly next to the DIRCM interfering module (and thus the detector), so that through elastic deformations of the aircraft fuselage prevent the MWS data from being too inaccurate.
  • very high requirements were previously applied with regard to the assembly and the subsequent measurement and calibration of the MWS sensors and DIRCM interference modules (their sensors) relative to the aircraft.
  • a detector works in a detection range of b degrees (b °; where b °> a °) azimuth / elevation.
  • reliable target detection (with a 3-sigma probability) is only given within a range of a degree (a °).
  • a warning system usually provides instruction data in the accuracy range of c degrees (c °; where c ° ⁇ a °) (instruction range, three-sigma probability). If the two systems are mounted remotely, for example on the bow and stern of a large aircraft, parallax errors, deformation errors and structural adjustment errors worsen this value, so that only instruction data in the accuracy range of d degrees (d °; where d °> a °) (instruction area, three- Sigma probability). A safe instruction is therefore no longer possible because the required a degree (a °) (of the target area of the detector in the DIRCM module) has been exceeded.
  • the invention is based on the following idea: Instead of aligning the DIRCM interference module (or its detector / target position of the detector) exactly to the nominal position of the threat (instruction position), which may be so error-prone due to excessive inaccuracy of the MWS data, that no intrusion is possible there, the DIRCM interference module (detector) runs through a search pattern (search strategy).
  • the inaccuracy is e.g. B. from the object to be protected (z. B. aircraft or its manufacturer) and is added in particular from the parallax error, the deformation of the object between the warning system and detector and fundamental alignment inaccuracies between the warning system and detector.
  • This search pattern is either generated in the DIRCM interference module itself or by a superimposed DIRCM control software.
  • the search pattern covers a search area around the nominal position of the threat (briefing position), the size of the search area depending on the expected inaccuracy of the MWS data (i.e. at least covering the briefing area).
  • the search pattern is optimized in such a way that it completely covers the search area resulting from the instruction accuracy of the MWS data with as few search positions as possible, with possible movements of the threat (target) and aircraft (object to be protected) during the execution of the search pattern (execution of the search strategy ) must be taken into account.
  • the possible Movements affect z. B. the sequence of alignment of the detector to different target positions.
  • the invention is also based on the following knowledge: At the moment when the detection of a threat (target) recognized by the warning system fails by the detector at the instruction position transmitted by the warning system, the DIRCM module (jamming turret) ends its acquisition (search for the Target in target area) without further searching for the target with the help of the detector and reports the failed acquisition to the DIRCM control system.
  • the DIRCM module jamming turret
  • the invention is thus also based on the following improvement idea:
  • a threat target
  • the detector does not move exactly to the transmitted target position (instruction position), but moves - on the basis of a suitable search pattern (search strategy) - one after the other to one or more neighboring positions (target positions for the detector) which surround the transmitted instruction position.
  • search strategy search strategy
  • neighboring positions target positions for the detector
  • three or four neighboring target positions are conceivable, which are evenly distributed on a circular path around the instruction position.
  • the detector starts an acquisition at each of these neighboring positions (target positions according to the search pattern). H. searches for the target within the target area. If the target is successfully registered, the DIRCM module starts target tracking. Otherwise, if the acquisition fails, the detector (jamming turret) moves to the next neighboring position until the target has been successfully acquired or all neighboring positions have been processed without successful acquisition. Only in this case does the DIRCM module (Jamming Turret) report the failed acquisition back to a recipient, e.g. B. the DIRCM control system.
  • the current search pattern (search strategy, e.g. how many target positions, what sequence of target positions, ...) can be used depending on the specific boundary conditions of the DIRCM module (jamming turret) and the data supplied by the warning system (instruction data, MWS data) To be defined.
  • additional boundary conditions can be taken into account, such as the possible movement of the aircraft (on which the DIRCM system is mounted) and the approaching threat (Target, rocket) take into account the time for processing the complete search pattern.
  • the search pattern search strategy
  • less stringent requirements for the accuracy of the MWS instruction data instruction position / instruction area
  • instruction of a DIRCM interference module at the tail of the aircraft with data from an MWS sensor at the front of the aircraft is possible. This is necessary, for example, if the threat flies in from below during the approach and is detected by an MWS sensor at the front of the aircraft, but only a DIRCM jamming module is available at the rear for combat purposes.
  • search pattern search strategy
  • lower requirements apply e.g. B. on the assembly and subsequent measurement and calibration of the MWS sensors and DIRCM interference modules relative to the aircraft as well as the maximum permissible parallax error when transferring between two DIRCM interference modules at the front and rear of the aircraft.
  • a “DIRCM jamming turret search pattern” thus results.
  • the result is a search pattern for a DIRCM jamming module (detector), which enables the approaching threat (target) to be activated (instructed) even in the case of imprecise instruction data (instruction position / area) of the missile warning device (warning system, missile warning system, MWS).
  • FIG. 1 shows only symbolically indicated an object 2, here a military transport aircraft or its fuselage.
  • a DIRCM system 4 is attached to the fuselage, here at the rear of the aircraft, and a warning system 6, here an MWS (Missile Warning System), is attached to the bow of the aircraft.
  • the DIRCM system 4 contains two DIRCM modules 8 a, b, each of which contains a movable detector 10. Each of the detectors 10 is movable in the sense that it can be gimbaled about a pivot point 12.
  • the DIRCM system 4 also contains an interface 14 to the warning system 6.
  • Figure 1 shows a situation in which the object 2 is in flight and a threat in the form of a target 16, here an enemy surface-to-air missile, is approaching the object 2 in order to destroy it.
  • a target 16 is to be rendered harmless in the usual manner, which is not explained in detail here, i.e. by target tracking and illuminating the IR (infrared) seeker head of the rocket with a laser beam 18 (jamming).
  • the laser beam 18 must first be aimed at the target 16.
  • the target 16 must be detected or located by the detector 10 and then tracked.
  • the detector 10 must again be aligned or instructed at least roughly towards the target 16.
  • the target 16 is first noticed and recorded by the warning system 6 and its determined position is transmitted as a briefing position EP from the warning system 6 via the interface 14 to the DIRCM system 4 or received by it.
  • the interface 14 is therefore used by the DIRCM system 4 to receive the instruction position EP for the target 16.
  • the corresponding instruction position EP is subject to inaccuracies.
  • a training area EB is assigned to the training position EP.
  • the instruction area ensures that the target 16 is actually located in the instruction area EB with a first minimum probability. This probability is a so-called 3-sigma probability of approx. 99.7%.
  • the target 16 is actually remote from the instruction position EP.
  • the goal 16, as well as positions and areas etc. are in Figure 1 symbolically represented in an azimuth (A) / elevation (E) representation of a spherical environment of the object 2.
  • a target position ZP is assigned to the detector 10 or the detector 10 has such a target position ZP.
  • the detection by the detector 10 is also fraught with uncertainty.
  • a target area ZB is therefore also assigned to this target position ZP. If the target 16 is actually located in the target area ZB, it is actually detected by the detector 10 with a second minimum probability. This probability is also a 3-sigma probability of approx. 99.7%.
  • a search area 20 is now provided.
  • the target 16 is now to be searched for with the aid of the detector 10.
  • the search area 20 is selected to be larger than the target area ZB in order to be able to expand the search compared to the target area ZB.
  • the search area 20 is selected such that it covers or includes at least the instruction area EB. This ensures that the entire instruction area EB is also searched for target 16.
  • the search strategy consists in making the search area 20 circular with 1.2 times the radius of the instruction area EB concentric to the instruction position EP.
  • the search area 20 is now searched for the target 16 by moving the target area ZB over the search area 20 by moving the detector 10.
  • the target 16 is searched for within the target area ZB.
  • a first target position ZP1 is initially positioned 45 ° to the right below the instruction position at 75% of the radius of the instruction area EB. With the target area ZB1 held at this target position ZP1, it is searched for the target 16 - here unsuccessfully. A location 45 ° to the left below the instruction position at 75% of the radius of the instruction area EB is selected as the second target position ZP2. When the corresponding target area ZB2 is held, it is searched for target 16 - here successfully. The detector 10 is thus successfully instructed on the target 16 at the target position ZP2, and a successful instruction is therefore determined.
  • the usual automatic tracking of the target 16 in the detector 10 is now activated and the latter is accordingly aligned with its target position ZP3 exactly on the target 16.
  • the irradiation of the target 16 by the laser beam 18 is now started and the target 16 is thus successfully fought.
  • the target 16 is not detected by the detector 10 in accordance with the above procedure in the entire search area 20: By successively displacing the target position ZP and searching the respective target area ZB, the entire search area 20 is searched for the target 16 without success . As a result, the unsuccessful instruction of the detector 10 to the target 16 is determined and reported to the warning system 6. The warning system then delivers a new instruction position EP and the above procedure is repeated.
  • the entire method described is carried out with the aid of or by a control and evaluation unit 22 of the DIRCM system 4.
  • the target 16 is tracked and irradiated or controlled with the aid or by a conventional control module 24, not shown in detail in the figures, in the DIRCM modules 8a, b.
  • the DIRCM modules 8a, b are therefore also designed for tracking the target 16 with the detector 10 and irradiating the target 16 with the laser beam 18.
  • the DIRCM system 4 forms a DIRCM system 26.
  • the Figures 2 and 3 show possible alternative search areas 20 or search patterns that arise from the superposition of the target areas ZB of three or four target positions ZP, the target positions ZP being adjacent to the instruction position EP.
  • Azimuth A and elevation E are shown again or - starting from the instruction position EP as the zero point - azimuth and elevation errors during instruction.
  • Figure 2 goes from three, Figure 3 from four neighboring target positions ZP1-3 / ZP1-4.
  • the instruction position EP and the instruction area EB with radius r around this represent the maximum possible three-sigma error of the ice instruction accuracy of the warning system 6 relative to the installation level of the DIRCM module 8a, b (jamming turret).
  • the three or four target areas ZB1-3 / ZB1-4 around the selected target positions ZP1-3 / ZP1-4 have the same radius r.
  • each search pattern here clockwise, starting from the target area ZB1 there is a respective search area 20 in which the detection of a target 16 is ensured with a three-sigma probability. That is to say, the interior of the search area 20 is completely covered by target areas ZB around the respective target positions ZP.
  • the three-sigma error range is therefore correspondingly larger in each case compared to the target area ZB or the instruction area EB.
  • Figure 2 shows an alternative search area 20. This is represented by a total of three target positions ZP1-3 and the associated target areas ZB1-3.
  • the target positions ZP1-3 are adjacent to the instruction position EP or lie on beams 28 at angles of 0 °, 120 ° and 240 ° on a circle around the instruction position EP.
  • the distances to the instruction position EP are the same and amount to two thirds of the radius of the target area ZB.
  • Figure 2 shows the size of the search area 20 in comparison to the instruction area EB.
  • FIG 3 a total of four target positions ZP1-4 with associated target areas ZB1-4 are selected.
  • the target positions ZP1-4 lie on corresponding beams 28 at 0 °, 90 °, 180 ° and 270 °. In each case at the radius r of the target areas ZB.
  • the size of the search area 20 is shown in comparison to the instruction area EB.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
EP20196593.6A 2019-10-04 2020-09-17 Alignement d'un détecteur d'un module dircm sur une cible Pending EP3800483A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102019006925.0A DE102019006925A1 (de) 2019-10-04 2019-10-04 Ausrichtung eines Detektors eines DIRCM-Moduls auf ein Ziel

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3800483A1 true EP3800483A1 (fr) 2021-04-07

Family

ID=72560413

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20196593.6A Pending EP3800483A1 (fr) 2019-10-04 2020-09-17 Alignement d'un détecteur d'un module dircm sur une cible

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3800483A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102019006925A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4339548A1 (fr) 2022-09-16 2024-03-20 Diehl Defence GmbH & Co. KG Diccm avec prédiction de données de type mws

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10148071A1 (de) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-17 Ibeo Automobile Sensor Gmbh Verfahren zur Erkennung und Verfolgung von Objekten
EP2527865A1 (fr) * 2011-05-24 2012-11-28 Bird Aerosystems Ltd. Système, dispositif et procédé de protection des avions contre l'arrivée de missiles et de menaces
EP3081895A1 (fr) * 2015-04-17 2016-10-19 Elettronica S.p.A. Système dircm à tourelles multiples et procédé de fonctionnement associé
WO2019077572A1 (fr) * 2017-10-20 2019-04-25 Elettronica S.P.A. Système réparti de détection et de contre-mesure de missiles guidés par infrarouges (ir)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006083278A2 (fr) * 2004-05-26 2006-08-10 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration, Inc. Systeme et procede permettant de passer d'un systeme de detection de missiles a un systeme de poursuite de precision dans un systeme de contre-mesure infrarouge dirige
US7378626B2 (en) * 2005-10-04 2008-05-27 Raytheon Company Directed infrared countermeasures (DIRCM) system and method
EP3728984B1 (fr) * 2017-12-21 2022-01-26 Elettronica S.p.A. Système ircm basé sur la gestion coordonnée de fusées lumineuses et du système dircm pour la protection contre les missiles guidés par ir

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10148071A1 (de) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-17 Ibeo Automobile Sensor Gmbh Verfahren zur Erkennung und Verfolgung von Objekten
EP2527865A1 (fr) * 2011-05-24 2012-11-28 Bird Aerosystems Ltd. Système, dispositif et procédé de protection des avions contre l'arrivée de missiles et de menaces
EP3081895A1 (fr) * 2015-04-17 2016-10-19 Elettronica S.p.A. Système dircm à tourelles multiples et procédé de fonctionnement associé
WO2019077572A1 (fr) * 2017-10-20 2019-04-25 Elettronica S.P.A. Système réparti de détection et de contre-mesure de missiles guidés par infrarouges (ir)

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
LASER SOLL TRANSPORTFLUGZEUGE DER BUNDESWEHR SCHÜTZEN, 2 April 2019 (2019-04-02), Retrieved from the Internet <URL:httpsmedien/themen-im-fokus>

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4339548A1 (fr) 2022-09-16 2024-03-20 Diehl Defence GmbH & Co. KG Diccm avec prédiction de données de type mws
DE102022003403A1 (de) 2022-09-16 2024-03-21 Diehl Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg DIRCM mit Prädiktion von MWS-Daten

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102019006925A1 (de) 2021-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE4444635A1 (de) Einrichtung zur Selbstverteidigung gegen Flugkörper
EP2348328A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de localisation d&#39;une cible volante
DE19828644C2 (de) Verfahren zum ferngesteuerten Bekämpfen bodennaher und/oder bodengebundener Ziele
DE69410376T2 (de) Waffensystem für die verteidigung eines gebietes
EP2482025B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de défense contre l&#39;attaque d&#39;un missile
DE102015002737B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bereitstellen eines Scheinzieles zum Schutz eines Fahrzeuges und/oder Objektes vor radargelenkten Suchköpfen
EP3800483A1 (fr) Alignement d&#39;un détecteur d&#39;un module dircm sur une cible
EP3751226B1 (fr) Dircm à transfert prédictif entre les modules
EP0547391A1 (fr) Procédé pour élever la probabilité de succès pour une défence anti-aérienne utilisant des projectiles à dispersion télé-commandée
EP3118561B1 (fr) Systeme a energie dirigee et systeme d&#39;arme
EP3376154B1 (fr) Procédé de protection d&#39;un missile de croisière
DE19729483A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Beseitigung von Landminen
EP3118567B1 (fr) Procede de protection d&#39;un vehicule contre une attaque par un rayon laser
EP3702720B1 (fr) Dircm à transfert simplifié entre les modules
EP3699544B1 (fr) Dircm à double suivi d&#39;une cible
DE2922592C2 (de) Verfahren zur Abwehr von Flugkörpern
EP0281675A2 (fr) Capteur pour l&#39;attaque d&#39;hélicoptères
DE3343604C2 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Bekämpfen von Bodenzielen mittels eines radargelenkten Flugkörpers
EP2840414B1 (fr) Procédé destiné à protéger un objet
EP3894779A1 (fr) Procédé de protection d&#39;objets mobiles ou immobiles contre des menaces guidées par laser qui s&#39;approchent
DE60023007T2 (de) Geschosslenkung mittels einer ringanordnung und optisch ausgelösten ablenkvorrichtungen
EP3954964B1 (fr) Dircm à transfert autonome sans chevauchement entre les modules
EP2526367A1 (fr) Missile et procédé pour détecter une cible
DE102020002555B4 (de) Verfahren zur Wirkoptimierung mittels iterativer Zielerkennung eines Zielobjekts während eines Zielanflugs mit einem Lenkflugkörper
EP3118566B1 (fr) Procede de protection d&#39;un vehicule contre une attaque par un rayon laser

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210930

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20240531