EP3612429A1 - Verfahren zum betreiben einer gleisanlage sowie stellwerk für eine gleisanlage - Google Patents
Verfahren zum betreiben einer gleisanlage sowie stellwerk für eine gleisanlageInfo
- Publication number
- EP3612429A1 EP3612429A1 EP18716947.9A EP18716947A EP3612429A1 EP 3612429 A1 EP3612429 A1 EP 3612429A1 EP 18716947 A EP18716947 A EP 18716947A EP 3612429 A1 EP3612429 A1 EP 3612429A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- route
- fefs
- fictitious
- rfs1
- substitute
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 101150055505 RFS1 gene Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 101100524546 Arabidopsis thaliana RFS4 gene Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 101100524548 Arabidopsis thaliana RFS6 gene Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 101100524545 Arabidopsis thaliana RFS2 gene Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 101100524547 Arabidopsis thaliana RFS5 gene Proteins 0.000 claims abstract 3
- -1 RFS3 Proteins 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 102100037642 Elongation factor G, mitochondrial Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 101000880344 Homo sapiens Elongation factor G, mitochondrial Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000905957 Channa melasoma Species 0.000 claims 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 101000828247 Mesostigma viride Protein Ycf2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L19/00—Arrangements for interlocking between points and signals by means of a single interlocking device, e.g. central control
- B61L19/06—Interlocking devices having electrical operation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L21/00—Station blocking between signal boxes in one yard
- B61L21/04—Electrical locking and release of the route; Electrical repeat locks
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L1/00—Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
- B61L1/16—Devices for counting axles; Devices for counting vehicles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L1/00—Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
- B61L1/18—Railway track circuits
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for operating a track system, wherein in the method real tracks of the track system are individually released or locked for driving depending on state reports that are transmitted from trackside facilities to an interlocking. Such methods are well known in the railway art.
- the invention has for its object to provide a method for operating a track system that allows continued operation of the track system in the event of interference.
- the invention provides that at least one fictitious alternative distance is defined, which is composed of two or more real routes, and Vorlie ⁇ conditions of a control command for activating the replacement route the fictitious alternative route is released for driving, even if one or more of the fictitious Substitute route forming real routes because of a failure of one or more of the trackside facilities and / or due
- a significant advantage of the method according to the invention is the fact that this allows a further use of real tracks of the track system, even if it actually ⁇ Necessary status messages are not present or different status messages have been received.
- a further operation of the track system is possible under ⁇ reference real distances, which are classified as such in normal operation of the interlocking as not passable.
- the method according to the invention makes it possible to operate the track system even if one or more track-side devices have failed or are working incorrectly.
- the release of the fictitious Reasonfahr ⁇ track takes place by a provided for driving on the fictitious substitute driving distance vehicle before, during or after entering the first real route of the fictitious Engineerfahrrange as the next track-side to be considered
- Signaling device is communicated to those who follows the En ⁇ de the fictitious alternative route.
- At least one of the trackside facilities is preferably
- a track-free signaling device which gives as a status message, the Bechesein an associated track section indicating busy message or the vacancy of the associated track section indicating free message ⁇ , or
- the control command to activate the substitute route can be generated externally if an external audit of Gleisanla ⁇ ge which, despite a lack of status reports or notwithstanding any status messages one or some of the trackside equipment ⁇ mobile actually all real driving routes that make up the fictional substitute route be, are.
- the setting command for activating the substitute driving route is generated if a plausibility check of the status messages of the trackside facilities shows that despite missing status messages or despite different status messages of one or more of the trackside facilities, all real driving lanes that have the fictitious Substitute driving route form, are passable.
- the plausibility check is preferably carried out internally or on the interlocking side.
- the fictitious Reasonfahr ⁇ route is preferably activated only after the course end ⁇ position has been fixed manually by means of a clamp or clamp.
- Signal devices which belong to the fictitious substitute travel route preferably indicate travel authorizations and entry prohibitions, stating the respective real travel route or the respective fictitious substitute travel route, to which the respective trip approval or the respective entry ban relates. This approach makes it possible in an advantageous manner to block real route and release fictitious Editfahr ⁇ routes.
- the signaling devices may be formed, for example, by balises arranged in the track, which transmit information such as travel permits or entry prohibitions by electromagnetic means.
- the invention also relates to an interlocking for controlling a track system, wherein the interlocking is formed ⁇ to real distances of the track system individually individually in response to status messages that are transmitted from trackside facilities to the interlocking to release for travel or to lock.
- the interlocking is designed so that it is the fictitious in the presence of a control command for activating the replacement route Replaces a substitute travel route for travel, even if one or more of the fictitious substitute travel route forming real routes is blocked because of a failure of one or more trackside facilities and / or Toovorgens the release erlau ⁇ benden status messages.
- the interlocking system has a plausibility check module which evaluates status messages of the trackside devices and outputs a trafficability signal for the dummy substitute driving route, if present status messages of some of the trackside devices for the notional substitute driving distance indicate that in fact all real driving routes that the form a fictitious alternative route, are passable and, if status messages from other trackside facilities are to be regarded as wrong.
- Figure 2 shows an embodiment of an inventive
- FIG. 3 shows a further exemplary embodiment of an inventive signal box for the track system according to FIG. 1.
- FIG. 1 shows a track system 10 which is managed or controlled by a control gear 20.
- the track system 10 comprises a large number of real environmentally routes to RFS1 RFS7, the directions through signal input, in the embodiment according to Figure 1, hereinafter briefly named signals Sl to S7 are isolated from each other ⁇ .
- the signals can be formed for example by arranged in the track, balises, the infor mation ⁇ as drive shares or entry prohibitions to transmit electromagnetic ⁇ magnetically.
- the information is preferably transmitted in each case stating the respective associated driving ⁇ route to which the information relates, be it a real existing and / or a fictitious driving ⁇ route.
- the track system 10 also has a plurality of trackside facilities, each transmitting status messages to the interlocking 20.
- Two of the stre ⁇ cken solutionen means are constituted by axle counter AZ1 and AZ2, which can transmit a Achs drunk to the interlocking 20 as status messages, respectively.
- the axle counting devices AZ1 and AZ2 can share a
- Track free reporting device GFM1 form, in turn, as a status message a busy message of the assigned track section RFS1 indicating occupancy message or the
- Unoccupied of the assigned track section RFS1 generates indicating free message.
- Another trackside device of the track system 10 is formed by an axle counter AZn, which is arranged in the illustration of Figure 1 at the right end of the track system 10 immediately before the signal S7 and can transmit an axle count to the signal box 20 as a state report.
- an axle counter AZn which is arranged in the illustration of Figure 1 at the right end of the track system 10 immediately before the signal S7 and can transmit an axle count to the signal box 20 as a state report.
- Two more of the trackside facilities of the trackside 10 are formed by two switches Wl and W2, which indicate their turnout end position as status message and thus ⁇ enable the interlocking 20 to verify the correct operation of each switch and the switches each in the desired Switch limit position.
- a notional substitute driving distance FEFS is stored in the interlocking 20. stores or deposited, the real does not exist, but only fictitious in the interlocking 20 is implemented. Since the fictitious substitute travel route FEFS is not present, driving on the substitute travel route FEFS can only be achieved by driving on the track system 10 actually existing
- Fi gur ⁇ 1 it is provided that the notional replacement route FEFs is formed in the case of activation or release by the four real distances RFS1, RFS2, RFS4 and RFS6.
- the signal box 20 le ⁇ diglich fall back on the real distances RFS1 to RFS7 and handle the driving on the basis of the real distances.
- the signal box 20 the status messages of the trackside facilities, so for example, the counts of Achsoutheastern wornen AZ1, AZ2 and AZn and take into account the notified of the two switches Wl and W2 course end positions, as is already known from the prior art.
- the interlocking 20 would, for example, drive the track system RFS1, RFS2, RFS4 and RFS6 for a left-to-right vehicle 30 entering the track system 10 at the signal S1 and leaving the track system 10 at the signal S7 set or release.
- the normal operation of the interlocking 20 requires that the stre ⁇ cken town facility work correctly and submit their status reports to the interlocking 20. If there is a failure of one or more of the trackside facilities, then a continued operation of the track system ⁇ 10 will not be possible in the rule. If, for example, the axle counting device AZ2 fails on the actual travel route RFS1, so that the track-free reporting device GFM1 permanently reports a busy state of the real route RFS1 to the signal box 20, then the signal box 20 can not move into the route in the direction of the signal Sl approaching vehicle 30 Retract RFS1, as it could possibly lead to a collision. In other words, a failure in ⁇ example, the axle counter AZ2 block any normal operation of the track system 10.
- the signal box 20 can let the travel route RFS1 be fictitiously bypassed by releasing the notional substitute travel distance FEFS for the vehicle 30 entering from the left in the illustration according to FIG ,
- the fictional substitute route FEF made it ⁇ light the vehicle 30 so fictitious sail past the route RFS1; Actually or real, the vehicle 30 will pass the signal S1 and enter the route RFS1, although this has not been recognized as free by the associated trackside facilities.
- a driving on the fictitious substitute driving distance FEFS by the vehicle 30 can be made possible, for example, such that the signal box 20 informs the vehicle 30 approaching the signal Sl that, after passing the signal S1, the next signal to be considered the signal S7 at the end of the fictitious ⁇ ven replacement route FEFS is.
- the vehicle 30 is thus communicated to ⁇ least implicitly, that all signals in between S2, S3 and S6 can be run over, regardless of the display.
- the vehicle 30 only the Sig ⁇ nal Sl and the signal S7 is relevant because only these two Signa ⁇ le are fictitious route FEF.
- the vehicle 10 the length of the fictitious route FEFs with- can be divided so that the vehicle side the relevance of Sig ⁇ nalan stretchen alone or based at least also based on the traveled after passing the signal Sl route can be checked.
- the signals ih ⁇ re information such as driving clearance or entry prohibition in each case by specifying the respective associated route to which the information relates, be it a real existing and / or a fictitious route.
- the signal Sl for the real route RFS1 transmits a prohibited entry and for the fictitious He ⁇ set route FEFs a trip release, when the fictitious He ⁇ set route FEFs is enabled.
- the other signals S2, S3, S6 lying on the fictitious substitute travel route FEFS can likewise transmit a travel authorization for the fictitious substitute travel route FEFS and a prohibition of entry for the real travel routes RF2, RFS4 and RFS6.
- the signals for driving the fictitious route FEFs prescribe a lower Ge ⁇ speed than otherwise for the real driving ⁇ stretch RFS1, RFS2, RFS4 and RFS6 is common.
- Switching to the fictitious substitute travel route FEFS can be done, for example, if an external control command ST for activating the substitute driving route is entered at a control signal input 20s of the signal box 20.
- a positioning command ST is preferably only generated when an external examination of the track system 10 reveals that, despite the absence of status messages of the trackside devices or despite different status messages, one or more of the trackside devices actually All real routes RFS1, RFS2, RFS4 and RFS6, which form the fictitious substitute route FEFS, are passable.
- the signal box 20 the control command for activating the fictitious substitute driving route
- FEFS itself generates, when a plausibility check of incoming or received status messages of the trackside facilities, that despite missing status messages or despite different status messages of one or some of the trackside facilities actually all real routes RFS1, RFS2, RFS4 and RFS6, the fictitious Substitute driving distance FEFS form, are passable.
- 2 shows an exemplary embodiment of a signal box, which can be used as a signal box 20 in the track system 10 according to FIG.
- the positioner 20 includes a computing device 21 and a memory 22.
- a control program module SPM is stored that causes at execution tion by the computing device 21, this to operate the track system 10 in such a way as above in together ⁇ menhang with Figure 1 has been explained.
- FIG. 3 shows another exemplary embodiment of a positioner 20, which is a ⁇ settable in the track system 10 of FIG. 1
- the memory 22 contains, in addition to the control program module SPM, a changeover module USM and a plausibility check module PPM.
- the plausibility check module PPM evaluates the status messages of the trackside devices and outputs a trafficability signal BS for the dummy substitute route if status messages of at least some of the trackside devices for the dummy substitute driving distance FEFS indicate that all real driving distances RFS1, RFS2 RFS4 and RFS6 are actually passable and possibly different status messages of other trackside facilities, such as the axle counter AZ2 according to FIG. 1, are to be regarded as incorrect.
- the Umstellmodul USM If real distances in normal operation are not releasably, but the Befahrhausenssignal BS is present, the Umstellmodul USM generates the control command ST to activate the replacement route FEFs and the control program module SPM be ⁇ drives this, as has been explained above in connection with FIG. 1
- the plausibility check module PPM can for example - in the event of failure of the axle counter AZ2 with correct operation or secured turnout of the switches Wl and W2 - output the trafficability signal BS and thus trigger the generation of the control command ST, if the two
- Achs drunken AZ1 and AZn indicate that all the axles that have retracted in the track system 10, these have also left, so that the track system 10 is actually free of vehicles or vehicle axles and thus can be driven without risk.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102017208490.1A DE102017208490A1 (de) | 2017-05-19 | 2017-05-19 | Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Gleisanlage sowie Stellwerk für eine Gleisanlage |
PCT/EP2018/058049 WO2018210475A1 (de) | 2017-05-19 | 2018-03-29 | Verfahren zum betreiben einer gleisanlage sowie stellwerk für eine gleisanlage |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3612429A1 true EP3612429A1 (de) | 2020-02-26 |
EP3612429B1 EP3612429B1 (de) | 2021-07-28 |
Family
ID=61952655
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP18716947.9A Active EP3612429B1 (de) | 2017-05-19 | 2018-03-29 | Verfahren zum betreiben einer gleisanlage sowie stellwerk für eine gleisanlage |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3612429B1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE102017208490A1 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2896174T3 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2018210475A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4169799A1 (de) * | 2021-10-21 | 2023-04-26 | Frauscher sensortechnik GmbH | Überwachungseinheit zur überwachung eines eisenbahngleises und verfahren zur überwachung eines eisenbahngleises |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3431171C2 (de) * | 1984-08-24 | 1986-11-27 | Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart | Gleisfreimeldeeinrichtung mit Achszählung |
DD278313A1 (de) * | 1988-12-19 | 1990-05-02 | Reichsbahn Wiss Techn Zentrum | Verfahren und anordnung zur kontrolle und korrektur von gleisfreimeldeeinrichtungen |
US5398894B1 (en) * | 1993-08-10 | 1998-09-29 | Union Switch & Signal Inc | Virtual block control system for railway vehicle |
DE19515345A1 (de) * | 1995-04-26 | 1996-10-31 | Sel Alcatel Ag | Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Verfügbarkeit von Mehrabschnitts-Achszähleinrichtungen |
DE10029124C2 (de) * | 2000-06-14 | 2002-05-02 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren zur Gleisfrei-und besetztmeldung |
DE10041173A1 (de) * | 2000-08-23 | 2002-03-07 | Alcatel Sa | Gleisfreimeldeeinrichtung |
DE102011081477A1 (de) * | 2011-08-24 | 2013-02-28 | Siemens Ag | Stellwerksrechner |
JP6041847B2 (ja) * | 2014-11-26 | 2016-12-14 | 大同信号株式会社 | 統合連動装置および統合連動システム |
DE102015004068A1 (de) * | 2015-03-30 | 2016-10-06 | PINTSCH TIEFENBACH GmbH | Verfahren und System zum Betrieb einer Gleisanlage |
-
2017
- 2017-05-19 DE DE102017208490.1A patent/DE102017208490A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2018
- 2018-03-29 EP EP18716947.9A patent/EP3612429B1/de active Active
- 2018-03-29 WO PCT/EP2018/058049 patent/WO2018210475A1/de unknown
- 2018-03-29 ES ES18716947T patent/ES2896174T3/es active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2896174T3 (es) | 2022-02-24 |
WO2018210475A1 (de) | 2018-11-22 |
EP3612429B1 (de) | 2021-07-28 |
DE102017208490A1 (de) | 2018-11-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102012217591A1 (de) | Verfahren und Anordnung zum Überwachen eines durch zwei Achszähl-Sensoreinheiten begrenzten Streckenabschnitts | |
EP2870047B1 (de) | Betrieb eines schienenfahrzeugs | |
DE102013101927A1 (de) | Vorrichtung, Zugendekontrollgerät, Schienenstrecke und Verfahren zur Datenübertragung | |
EP3782870B1 (de) | Verfahren und streckenzentrale zum betreiben einer schienenstrecke | |
EP3500475B1 (de) | Verfahren, zentraleinrichtung und fahrzeugseitige zugsicherungseinrichtung zum betreiben von schienenfahrzeugen | |
EP3782869B1 (de) | Verfahren zur steuerung eines zugs innerhalb eines zugsicherungssystems, zugsicherungssystem | |
DE102016217902A1 (de) | Überwachung eines Schienenfahrzeugs | |
DE102012202046A1 (de) | System zur Steuerung, Sicherung und/oder Überwachung von Fahrwegen spurgebundener Fahrzeuge sowie Verfahren zum Betreiben eines solchen Systems | |
DE19515345A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Verfügbarkeit von Mehrabschnitts-Achszähleinrichtungen | |
DE102018210326A1 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Erkennen hinterherfahrender Fahrzeuge | |
EP2819907B1 (de) | Verfahren zur hilfsbedienung eines fahrwegelements sowie betriebsleittechnisches system | |
EP3612429A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben einer gleisanlage sowie stellwerk für eine gleisanlage | |
EP2088051B1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur sicheren Einstellung von einer Fahrstrasse für ein Schienenfahrzeug | |
EP3400161A1 (de) | Bahntechnische anlage und verfahren zum betreiben einer bahntechnischen anlage | |
DE19535856A1 (de) | Rechnerstellwerk mit aufgabenverteilten, nicht synchronisierten Bereichs- und Stellrechnern | |
EP0920391B1 (de) | Verfahren zur steuerung und überwachung einer verkehrstechnischen anlage | |
EP1109709B1 (de) | Verfahren für die steuerung und überwachung einer verkehrstechnischen anlage | |
WO2018091231A1 (de) | Schienenfahrzeug und verfahren zu dessen betrieb | |
EP1498336B1 (de) | Verfahren und Zählpunkt zur Ermittlung des Belegungszustandes eines Gleisabschnittes | |
DE4423787C1 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung für zuggesteuerten Richtungswechsel bei eingleisigem Bahnbetrieb | |
EP3580114B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum einstellen wenigstens einer fahrstrasse einer eisenbahntechnischen anlage | |
DE10240376B4 (de) | Sicheres Zugmeldebuch | |
WO2017045863A1 (de) | Kommunikationseinrichtung und verfahren zum automatisierten austausch von nachrichten in einer eisenbahntechnischen anlage | |
EP3609763B1 (de) | Gleisanlage und verfahren zum betreiben derselben | |
DE102016210965A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines spurgebundenen Fahrzeugs sowie Verkehrssystem |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20191118 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20200703 |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20210329 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1414502 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502018006319 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211028 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211129 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211028 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2896174 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20220224 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211029 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502018006319 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20220429 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220329 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220329 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220331 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240304 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20240212 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210728 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20180329 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240319 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240409 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240517 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20240604 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20240620 Year of fee payment: 7 |