EP3230189A1 - Aufzugsystem mit sicherheitsüberwachungssystem mit einer master-slave-hierarchie - Google Patents
Aufzugsystem mit sicherheitsüberwachungssystem mit einer master-slave-hierarchieInfo
- Publication number
- EP3230189A1 EP3230189A1 EP15804827.2A EP15804827A EP3230189A1 EP 3230189 A1 EP3230189 A1 EP 3230189A1 EP 15804827 A EP15804827 A EP 15804827A EP 3230189 A1 EP3230189 A1 EP 3230189A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- unit
- elevator system
- signals
- safety
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 106
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004148 unit process Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
- B66B1/3415—Control system configuration and the data transmission or communication within the control system
- B66B1/3423—Control system configuration, i.e. lay-out
- B66B1/3438—Master-slave control system configuration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
- B66B5/0031—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system for safety reasons
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
- B66B1/3415—Control system configuration and the data transmission or communication within the control system
- B66B1/3446—Data transmission or communication within the control system
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B9/00—Kinds or types of lifts in, or associated with, buildings or other structures
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an elevator system, in particular an elevator system with a safety monitoring system.
- Elevator systems generally serve to transport persons or objects in a vertical direction. To this endanger the person or the
- Safety function components i. For example, based on data or signals from sensors or control units, current operating conditions of the elevator system. For example, a speed of an elevator car or a closed state of doors of the elevator system are monitored. When a critical operating condition is detected, the safety monitoring system activates suitable activatable
- Safety function components such as a braking device or a catch device for braking or stopping the elevator car.
- the highest demands are placed on safety monitoring systems with regard to their
- a detecting safety function component can be understood as meaning, for example, a sensor or an output interface of a control device which determines and outputs signals or data which indicate information about a current operating state within the elevator system.
- an activatable safety function component for example, an actuator, motor or the like can be understood, which can actively influence a current operating state within the elevator system. Signals or data e.g. Sensors were each transmitted to the central security monitoring unit and processed there. If it has been recognized on the basis of processing results that, for example, a safety-critical operating state prevails in the elevator system, the central safety monitoring unit controlled one or more of the activatable ones
- Safety function components suitable to ensure the safety of the elevator system and particular of the persons transported. For example, upon detection of excessive speed of the elevator car, a brake or catcher has been activated. Signals or data generated by sensors were transmitted unprocessed to the central security monitoring unit, processed exclusively there, and then based on the processing results generated control signals which were sent to the activatable safety function components in order to activate them appropriately.
- Safety monitoring unit which can significantly increase the time it takes for the safety monitoring system to adequately respond to a critical situation that has occurred.
- the decentralized control system has several evaluation units, wherein signals via bus connections between the
- Evaluation units can be transferred. Compared with centralized systems can be reduced in this way a wiring effort and response times are shortened.
- US 2011302466 AI describes an elevator system with a
- the security monitoring system has a
- the Master unit and many slave units.
- the slave units are each associated with sensors and switches and receive signals which they transmit to the master unit in a particularly secure process.
- the master unit processes these data and, if necessary, activates suitable safety function components, for example for stopping the elevator car.
- suitable safety function components for example for stopping the elevator car.
- Advantageous embodiments are in the dependent
- an elevator system which includes a drive, a cab, a plurality of safety function components for providing safety functions at different positions within the elevator system, and a safety monitoring system for controlling all
- the security monitoring system has several security monitoring units.
- the cab is operatively connected to the drive and moved by the drive along a travel path.
- Elevator system is characterized in that at least some, preferably each of the security monitoring units has an input interface for reading in data or signals. At least some of the security monitoring units of the security monitoring system are connected to one another via data exchange channels.
- the security monitoring units of the security monitoring system are here organized in the form of a master-slave hierarchy, one of the
- Safety monitoring units is designed as a master unit and at least one of the safety monitoring units as a slave unit.
- at least one slave unit has a data processing unit for processing the data or signals into control signals and an output interface for outputting the data
- a security monitoring system of an elevator system can be configured particularly safely and efficiently if a plurality of security surveillance units are arranged locally, at least some of which signals z. B. be provided by sensors or other control devices, not only can forward to a central unit, but can process these signals themselves and as a result can control safety function components. These decentralized security monitoring units are thus able to provide local data z. B. read from sensors or control units to process and then control associated safety function components.
- Security monitoring units can thus communicate with each other. In this way, multiple safety monitoring units can be combined to form an overall safety monitoring system that allows an overall safety monitoring system
- Elevator system can be monitored.
- One of the security monitoring units is designed as a master unit, whereas at least one further security monitoring unit is designed as a slave unit.
- a master-slave hierarchy is the
- the master unit may cause a slave unit to assume a particular mode of operation in which the slave unit forwards only signals or data from sensors or devices associated therewith to the master unit.
- the master unit may process these signals and then instruct the slave unit to drive its associated safety function components in a manner determined by the master unit.
- the master unit may authorize the slave unit to process such signals or data itself and based thereon
- slave unit it is also possible for a slave unit to have only one input interface and to pass on signals or data from sensors or devices assigned to it only to the master unit or to other slave units. Such slave units can be simpler and thus less expensive. According to one embodiment of the invention, all slave units can have one
- Data processing unit for processing the data or signals to control signals and an output interface for outputting the control signals to at least one of the respective security monitoring unit associated safety function component.
- At least one slave unit may be configured to read in data and signals indicative of a security status within the elevator system via the input interfaces and to process them by means of the data processing unit and based on a
- At least this one slave unit is thus able, for. B. independently supplied by sensors signals or data to process and independently one
- the slave unit can thus carry out a part of the safety monitoring necessary in the elevator system actively and independently.
- the slave unit can in this case be connected to its associated detecting and / or activatable safety function components and preferably be arranged in local proximity to these. This proximity allows times for transmission of data and signals to be kept short.
- data can be locally processed locally in the slave unit and do not need to be transmitted over long distances to a centrally arranged data processing device.
- the same slave unit may be in another operating mode according to a
- Embodiment of the invention be adapted to read data or signals indicating a security state within the elevator system, via the input interface and to transfer over the data exchange channel to the master unit.
- the master unit can then be designed to process the transmitted data or signals by means of its data processing unit, and to process the results of the processing via the data processing unit
- the slave unit may eventually be configured to control an associated safety function component based on the transmitted processing results.
- the slave unit behaves passively and forwards signals or data only from sensors or other devices to the master unit and forwards control commands of the master unit to its associated safety function components.
- the actual data processing is not in the case in this case passive slave unit but in the
- one or more slave units which are designed exclusively for this passive operating mode can also be provided in the elevator system.
- at least one of the slave units present in the elevator system should be able to operate actively, i. independently to process signals or data and from it
- Safety function component directly i. without involvement of the master unit, can be controlled.
- this slave unit is further subordinate to the master unit and thus according to one embodiment of the invention can be designed to independently control the assigned safety function component only if it has been previously authorized for this purpose by the master unit.
- the master unit can control the slave unit accordingly, so that it either assumes an operating mode in which it autonomously controls its assigned safety function components, or that it assumes a mode of operation in which it does not operate independently but z. B. only passively pass data.
- the master unit can thus decide whether it executes certain control functions centrally itself or whether these functions are decentralized by subordinate ones
- Security monitoring units are to be performed in the form of slave units.
- the master unit may also instruct the slave unit as to how to perform a control function.
- At least one slave unit is designed to read in data or signals which indicate a security state within the elevator system via the input interface and to monitor it continuously independently by means of the data processing unit
- Data exchange channel only to transmit data or signals to the master unit, if based on the data or signals a specifiable critical
- the slave unit can thus carry out a considerable portion of the monitoring effort independently and thus relieve the master unit, for example. Only if the slave unit z. B. recognizes that because of the read-in and continuously monitored signals or data thereof assume that the elevator system is not in a normal state, the slave unit reports this to the master unit. For this purpose, the slave unit can forward the signals or data read by it directly to the master unit or, alternatively, preprocess these and forward the preprocessed result to the master unit. Also, only the transmission of a kind of warning signal to the master unit is conceivable. The master unit can then decide how to proceed further and instruct, for example, the slave unit, by suitable control of
- Safety function components to effect measures that bring the elevator system back to normal or at least to a safe state.
- each slave unit may exchange signals or data with the master unit via a communication channel.
- each of the slave units is connected to the master unit in such a way that signals or data can be transmitted between the two units.
- Data exchange channel from the master unit to a plurality of slave units is possible.
- a release of the data exchange channel for a data transmission is preferably coordinated by the master unit.
- the data exchange channel can be designed as desired and can be adapted in particular for a specific type of data transmission or for a specific application.
- the data exchange channel can be designed as desired and can be adapted in particular for a specific type of data transmission or for a specific application.
- the data exchange channel can be designed as desired and can be adapted in particular for a specific type of data transmission or for a specific application.
- Data transmission to be designed via the data exchange channels can be designed via the data exchange channels.
- a security protocol can be used for data transmission.
- data transmission can be regarded as "safe” if, for example, it conforms to DIN ISO 61508 or the standardized Safety Integrity Level 3 (Safety
- a secured data transfer can for
- Bus systems can provide controllable, fast, and / or reliable data transmission without the need for each unit to be wired directly to any other unit. Instead, the bus system, for example, a common data connection controllable
- bus systems can be provided for the data transmission between master and slave units, which allow particularly fast data transmission in order to be able to ensure short transmission times and thus fast reaction possibilities within the security monitoring system.
- the data exchange channels can be designed for wireless data or signal transmission.
- a wireless data or signal transmission For example,
- WLAN wireless local area network
- RF data transmission radio frequency
- optical data transmission for example by means of modulated laser radiation done.
- a wireless data transmission, for example, between an elevator car and a hoistway could, for. B. allow an elevator system without hanging cable.
- signals or data can also be transmitted by cable, for example by means of technologies such as Ethernet, UART (Universal Asynchronous Receiver Transmitted) or the like. Also a data transfer through a
- Modulating information on a power line which actually serves, for example, to supply energy within the elevator system, is conceivable.
- the data processing unit of the master unit has a faster data processing rate than the data processing unit
- a slave unit may only be configured to receive and process data or signals from specific sensors associated with it and then to control their associated actuators.
- the master unit should be able to receive and process data and signals from various sources and from it to pass resulting control signals to actuators.
- Data volume can therefore be much higher in the master unit than in a slave unit.
- the master unit should preferably be able to control or coordinate rights and tasks of the slave units.
- the master unit is arranged on a central component such as a machine room, an elevator shaft, an elevator car, a counterweight or elevator pit, and at least one slave unit is disposed on another peripheral component of said group.
- the master unit may thus be spaced apart from one or each of the
- a distance between master and slave unit can be several meters, for example, more than 2m or 10m, up to a few hundred meters, for example, up to 200m, 500m or even 2000m amount.
- the master or slave unit can in this case be arranged directly on or close to one of the components mentioned, in order, for. B. to monitor their functions.
- a distance between master and slave unit can be significantly greater than a distance between the slave unit and its associated safety function components, i. Sensors and actuators. In this way, data transmission times
- Embodiments of the invention allow a variety of advantages.
- the decentralized one proposed herein for an elevator system
- Sub-security components (sometimes referred to as SSUs, Safety Supervision Units) is divided to allow secure monitoring of distributed systems. This can be a particularly good suitability for very long lifts, so-called high-rise elevators, caused. This can be used to advantage that the
- Master unit and at least one slave unit are interconnected via a communication channel and can exchange information with each other, each of these master and slave units can have its own sensor system, which is monitored by this.
- each of these master and slave units can have its own sensor system, which is monitored by this.
- the distributed, distributed arrangement of the system can result in smaller sections or sensor systems that can operate at a higher data transfer rate or higher data processing rate. Furthermore, due to the subdivision into several subsystems with own
- Security monitoring units also a number of subscribers, i. z. A number of total monitored in the elevator system
- Safety feature components are increased.
- a security of the elevator system can be increased.
- a plurality of interdependent security monitoring units with a master unit and one or more slave units may be provided.
- the master unit can actively intervene, i. For example, influence a safety circuit of the elevator system.
- All slave units communicate their status to the master unit, which then z. B. can decide whether there is currently a security risk, and can trigger appropriate reactions.
- the master unit is allowed to
- a plurality of independent security monitoring units may be provided. Any or some of these units may be able to intervene and respond to a security risk.
- Fig. 1 shows a functional diagram of an elevator system according to an embodiment of the invention. The figure is merely schematic and not to scale.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an elevator system 1 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the elevator system 1 has a drive 3 and a car 5.
- the car 5 can be moved by the drive 3 along a travel path within a hoistway 7.
- Cable 21 connects the car 5 with a counterweight 17.
- the elevator system 1 has a plurality of detecting and / or
- activatable security monitoring components 9a - 9p which are distributed over the entire elevator system and at different positions z. B. within the Elevator shaft 7, are arranged on the drive 3 or doors of the elevator shaft 7 or the car 5.
- a security monitoring system 11 is used to monitor the elevator system, for. B. safety-critical states and possibly appropriate
- the security monitoring system 11 serves to control or coordinate the various security function components 9a-9p.
- the security monitoring system 11 comprises a plurality of
- Security monitoring units 13a to 13e are arranged at different positions within the elevator system 1.
- a first security monitoring unit 13a is arranged on the cabin 5 and arranged with a plurality likewise there
- Safety function components 9c, 9d, 9e, 91, 9k, 9j connected.
- the connection can be wired or wireless and allow the exchange of data or signals.
- the safety function components may be detecting and z. Example, as sensors, detectors, actuatable contacts or the like to be operating conditions within the elevator system 1, d. H. in this case on the car 5, to be able to determine.
- the safety function components can also be activated and z. B. as actuators, motors or the like to effect certain functions within the elevator system 1.
- the safety function components 9c, 9d, 9e, 91, 9k, 9j can be designed as a detecting component in the form of a catch contact, emergency stop contact, emergency brake switch, car door contact or the like or as an activatable component in the form of an actuator activating a brake device or a catch device.
- a second security monitoring unit 13b can, for example, at the
- Counterweight 17 may be arranged.
- a third security monitoring unit 13c can be arranged, for example, in a hoistway pit 19.
- a fourth security monitoring unit 13c can be arranged, for example, in a hoistway pit 19.
- Security monitoring unit 13d can serve, for example, for monitoring doors of the elevator shaft 7. Each of these security monitoring units 13b, 13c, 13d may be provided with one or more locally designated and assigned ones
- Safety function components 9f, 9g, 9h, 9i, 9m for example in the form of a Slack rope contact, an emergency brake switch of the pit, a slack rope contact of a speed limiter or the like may be connected.
- a fifth security monitoring unit 13e is arranged on the drive 3 provided, for example, in a machine room.
- Safety monitoring unit 13e is located nearby
- Safety function components 9a, 9b, 9n, 9o, 9p for example in the form of a contact of a safety catch for the counterweight, a contact of a
- Speed limiter an emergency brake switch in the engine room or the like connected.
- Each or at least some of the security monitoring units 13a-13e has its own data processing unit 20 (shown only for security monitoring unit 13a).
- the data processing unit may include, for example, a processor, a CPU or the like and possibly a storage medium for data storage.
- the security monitoring units 13a-13e can also have a
- Input interface 21 and an output editing parts 22 (only for
- detecting safety function components 9a - 9p for example, be read by one of the detecting safety function components 9a - 9p or output to one of the activatable safety function components 9a - 9p.
- At least some of the security monitoring units 13a-13e are thus able to carry out security monitoring tasks at least locally independently, for example by reading in data or signals from sensors in which
- the security monitoring units 13a-13e are interconnected by data exchange channels 15.
- the data exchange channels 15 can in this case be wired or wireless. Distances over which the security monitoring units 13a-13e are interconnected.
- Security monitoring units 13a-13e are interconnected via the data exchange channels, are typically significantly larger than distances between one of the security monitoring units 13a-13e and their associated
- the data exchange channels 15 may have bus systems by means of which a data transmission or a data flow can be controlled.
- the fifth security monitoring unit 13e is as
- Safety monitoring unit 13a - 13d are each designed as slave units.
- the master unit is to be regarded as superordinate to the slave units. All
- Slave units are directly or indirectly via data exchange channels 15 with the
- the master unit can thus receive data or signals from the slave units as well as send data or signals to them.
- the master unit can also specify whether or in which way data or signals from one of the slave units should be transmitted to the master unit or whether the slave unit should operate independently.
- the master unit can specify to each of the slave units whether they have the data or signals they receive from their associated detecting units
- Safety function components receives, only to forward to the master unit or whether they should process these data or signals partially or completely independently. Also mixed operations can be taken, in which z. For example, some data may be evaluated by the slave unit itself, but other data should be forwarded to the master unit unprocessed. Also, a partial preprocessing of the received data from the slave unit within the slave unit and subsequent forwarding of the preprocessed data to the
- the master unit may also be connected to bus systems provided in the data exchange channels 15 and may be authorized to use these, inter alia, one
- the proposed elevator system due to its nature with a decentralized safety monitoring system 1 1 with many on the
- Elevator system 1 arranged distributed sesame, which are organized in a master-slave hierarchy, a highly flexible and
- monitoring tasks can be performed over several
- the master unit is in principle always in control of the nature and extent of the
- Slave units can keep tasks completed. This can be a high security of the system. At the same time, however, the master unit does not necessarily have to have a very high data processing capacity, since it can leave some of the security monitoring tasks to the slave units. This can, among other things, contribute to a reduction in costs. In addition, the monitoring tasks performed directly by the slave units can be performed very quickly, since data transmission distances can be kept short. This in turn can contribute to fast reaction times and thus, for example, to increased safety of the elevator system, for example if a critical one
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Elevator Control (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL15804827T PL3230189T3 (pl) | 2014-12-10 | 2015-12-07 | Układ windy z systemem monitorowania bezpieczeństwa z hierarchią master-slave |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14197111 | 2014-12-10 | ||
PCT/EP2015/078771 WO2016091779A1 (de) | 2014-12-10 | 2015-12-07 | Aufzugsystem mit sicherheitsüberwachungssystem mit einer master-slave-hierarchie |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3230189A1 true EP3230189A1 (de) | 2017-10-18 |
EP3230189B1 EP3230189B1 (de) | 2020-06-24 |
Family
ID=52021066
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15804827.2A Active EP3230189B1 (de) | 2014-12-10 | 2015-12-07 | Aufzugsystem mit sicherheitsüberwachungssystem mit einer master-slave-hierarchie |
Country Status (12)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10562738B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP3230189B1 (de) |
KR (1) | KR102518003B1 (de) |
CN (1) | CN107000965B (de) |
AU (1) | AU2015359629B2 (de) |
BR (1) | BR112017010771B1 (de) |
CA (1) | CA2967545C (de) |
MX (1) | MX371433B (de) |
MY (1) | MY185020A (de) |
PL (1) | PL3230189T3 (de) |
RU (1) | RU2700236C2 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2016091779A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102014017486A1 (de) * | 2014-11-27 | 2016-06-02 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Aufzuganlage mit einer Mehrzahl von Fahrkörben sowie einem dezentralen Sicherheitssystem |
US10501287B2 (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2019-12-10 | Inventio Ag | Damper unit for an elevator |
WO2017191186A1 (de) * | 2016-05-04 | 2017-11-09 | Inventio Ag | Personentransportanlage mit zentraler steuereinheit und mehreren feldgeräten mit optimiertem fehlfunktionserkennungsverfahren |
AU2017327417B2 (en) * | 2016-09-13 | 2020-07-09 | Inventio Ag | Method for monitoring an elevator system |
EP3519338B1 (de) * | 2016-09-29 | 2021-03-10 | Inventio AG | Aufzugssicherheitsüberwachungsentität mit zwei einheiten mit einer option wie z. b. zur autonomen fahrgastevakuierung |
DE102016220197A1 (de) * | 2016-10-17 | 2018-04-19 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Verfahren zum Verarbeiten von Daten für ein automatisiertes Fahrzeug |
EP3336032B1 (de) * | 2016-12-14 | 2020-10-14 | Otis Elevator Company | Aufzugssicherheitssystem und verfahren zum betrieb eines aufzugssystems |
AT520189B1 (de) * | 2018-04-17 | 2019-02-15 | Weigl Liftsysteme Gmbh | Aufzugssicherheitseinrichtung |
CN108910637A (zh) * | 2018-07-18 | 2018-11-30 | 迅达(中国)电梯有限公司 | 安全*** |
PL3997580T3 (pl) * | 2019-07-11 | 2023-09-04 | Inventio Ag | Sposób i sieć danych do przesyłania treści danych, w szczególności w instalacji dźwigowej |
EP3905606A1 (de) * | 2020-04-30 | 2021-11-03 | KONE Corporation | Sicherheitskommunikation in einem aufzugkommunikationssystem |
DE102020127515A1 (de) * | 2020-10-19 | 2022-04-21 | Pilz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Vorrichtung zum Steuern eines sicherheitskritischen Prozesses |
AU2021405615A1 (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2023-07-06 | Inventio Ag | Elevator, method for controlling an elevator |
DE102022111441A1 (de) | 2022-05-09 | 2023-11-09 | Tk Elevator Innovation And Operations Gmbh | Aufzugsanlage mit Aufzugsschacht und Schott zum Unterteilen des Aufzugsschacht |
EP4289775A1 (de) * | 2022-06-08 | 2023-12-13 | Otis Elevator Company | Stimulationssystem und verfahren zur überwachung einer aufzugsanlage |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1850554A3 (de) * | 2006-04-21 | 2010-03-17 | LONMARK Deutschland e.V. | Sichere Kommunikationen in einem Netzwerk |
FI125141B (fi) * | 2007-01-03 | 2015-06-15 | Kone Corp | Hissin turvalaite |
FI120088B (fi) * | 2007-03-01 | 2009-06-30 | Kone Corp | Järjestely ja menetelmä turvapiirin valvomiseksi |
CN201077702Y (zh) | 2007-06-16 | 2008-06-25 | 重庆永旺科技发展有限公司 | 电梯安全运行动态监测管理***终端 |
AU2008277777B2 (en) * | 2007-07-17 | 2014-01-16 | Inventio Ag | Method for monitoring a lift system |
ES2499340T3 (es) * | 2007-08-07 | 2014-09-29 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Ag | Sistema de elevador |
WO2009024853A1 (en) * | 2007-08-21 | 2009-02-26 | De Groot Pieter J | Intelligent destination elevator control system |
EP2367746B1 (de) * | 2008-12-23 | 2013-05-08 | Inventio AG | Aufzuganlage |
BRPI0923698B1 (pt) * | 2008-12-26 | 2020-01-14 | Inventio Ag | instalação de elevador com pelo menos duas cabines de elevador, método de monitoramento de uma instalação de elevador e dispositivo de segurança |
JP5523443B2 (ja) * | 2009-03-25 | 2014-06-18 | 三菱電機株式会社 | エレベータの信号伝送装置 |
JP5876881B2 (ja) * | 2010-09-13 | 2016-03-02 | オーチス エレベータ カンパニーOtis Elevator Company | エレベータ安全システムおよび方法 |
EP2594519A1 (de) * | 2011-11-15 | 2013-05-22 | Inventio AG | Aufzug mit Sicherheitseinrichtung |
DE112013006482B4 (de) * | 2013-01-23 | 2019-05-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Aufzugsvorrichtung |
EP2886500B1 (de) * | 2013-12-17 | 2021-06-16 | KONE Corporation | Aufzug |
WO2016126688A1 (en) * | 2015-02-05 | 2016-08-11 | Otis Elevator Company | Operational modes for multicar hoistway systems |
-
2015
- 2015-12-07 AU AU2015359629A patent/AU2015359629B2/en active Active
- 2015-12-07 EP EP15804827.2A patent/EP3230189B1/de active Active
- 2015-12-07 CA CA2967545A patent/CA2967545C/en active Active
- 2015-12-07 MY MYPI2017701999A patent/MY185020A/en unknown
- 2015-12-07 WO PCT/EP2015/078771 patent/WO2016091779A1/de active Application Filing
- 2015-12-07 BR BR112017010771-6A patent/BR112017010771B1/pt active IP Right Grant
- 2015-12-07 CN CN201580066901.3A patent/CN107000965B/zh active Active
- 2015-12-07 PL PL15804827T patent/PL3230189T3/pl unknown
- 2015-12-07 US US15/533,734 patent/US10562738B2/en active Active
- 2015-12-07 RU RU2017123769A patent/RU2700236C2/ru active
- 2015-12-07 KR KR1020177015895A patent/KR102518003B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2015-12-07 MX MX2017007512A patent/MX371433B/es active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2016091779A1 (de) | 2016-06-16 |
EP3230189B1 (de) | 2020-06-24 |
CA2967545C (en) | 2023-09-05 |
AU2015359629A1 (en) | 2017-06-29 |
RU2700236C2 (ru) | 2019-09-13 |
AU2015359629B2 (en) | 2018-12-06 |
CA2967545A1 (en) | 2016-06-16 |
BR112017010771B1 (pt) | 2022-02-22 |
BR112017010771A2 (pt) | 2018-01-09 |
US20170334678A1 (en) | 2017-11-23 |
MX371433B (es) | 2020-01-30 |
RU2017123769A (ru) | 2019-01-11 |
CN107000965A (zh) | 2017-08-01 |
CN107000965B (zh) | 2019-04-12 |
KR102518003B1 (ko) | 2023-04-04 |
US10562738B2 (en) | 2020-02-18 |
PL3230189T3 (pl) | 2020-10-19 |
MY185020A (en) | 2021-04-30 |
MX2017007512A (es) | 2017-08-22 |
RU2017123769A3 (de) | 2019-07-17 |
KR20170095220A (ko) | 2017-08-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3230189B1 (de) | Aufzugsystem mit sicherheitsüberwachungssystem mit einer master-slave-hierarchie | |
EP3224174B1 (de) | Aufzuganlage mit einer mehrzahl von fahrkörben sowie einem dezentralen sicherheitssystem | |
EP2022742B1 (de) | Aufzugsystem | |
EP2284110B1 (de) | Elektronisches Sicherheitsystem für einen Aufzug | |
EP3145787B1 (de) | Schienenfahrzeug | |
EP3452397B1 (de) | Personentransportanlage mit zentraler steuereinheit und mehreren feldgeräten mit optimiertem fehlfunktionserkennungsverfahren | |
EP3436384B1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben einer aufzuganlage sowie zur ausführung des verfahrens ausgebildete aufzuganlage | |
DE102017205354A1 (de) | Mehrkabinenaufzuganlage sowie Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Mehrkabinenaufzuganlage | |
DE112013007449T5 (de) | Aufzugvorrichtung | |
DE102016100175A1 (de) | Robotersystem und Verdrahtungsverfahren für Robotersystem | |
EP3455153A1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur vermeidung von kollisionen bei kränen | |
EP2946256A2 (de) | Anlage, insbesondere fertigungsanlage | |
DE102015211587A1 (de) | Steueranordnung für ein Fahrzeug | |
EP4267503A1 (de) | Aufzug, verfahren zur steuerung eines aufzuges | |
DE112014006106T5 (de) | Sicherheitssteuersystem und Sicherheitssteuergerät | |
EP3049289A1 (de) | Integriertes und kombiniertes türbetriebssystem für nutzfahrzeuge | |
WO2022058276A1 (de) | Sicherheitsvorrichtung zum steuern sicherheitsrelevanter ucm- und udm-funktionen in einer aufzuganlage | |
DE102020207960B4 (de) | Autonom führbarer Fahrzeugzug | |
DE202022102601U1 (de) | Multirobotersystem | |
DE112021007441T5 (de) | Übertragungssystem | |
EP3693821A1 (de) | Drahtlose informationsübermittlung zwischen einer robotergruppe und einer stationären kommunikationseinheit | |
EP3647246A1 (de) | Modulare aufzugsteuerung und verfahren zum steuern eines betriebs von aktuatorischen komponenten einer aufzuganlage |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170524 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: SONNENMOSER, ASTRID Inventor name: MICHEL, DAVID Inventor name: TSCHUPPERT, RETO |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20190410 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200226 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502015012880 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1283710 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20200715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FI Ref legal event code: FGE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200924 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200925 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200924 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20200624 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201026 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20201218 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201024 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502015012880 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20210325 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20201231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201207 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201207 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1283710 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201207 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20211124 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201207 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200624 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FI Ref legal event code: MAE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211207 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231219 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231221 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231226 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231227 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20240101 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221207 |