WO2018122898A1 - Recovery support system - Google Patents
Recovery support system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2018122898A1 WO2018122898A1 PCT/JP2016/088632 JP2016088632W WO2018122898A1 WO 2018122898 A1 WO2018122898 A1 WO 2018122898A1 JP 2016088632 W JP2016088632 W JP 2016088632W WO 2018122898 A1 WO2018122898 A1 WO 2018122898A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- state data
- failure
- command
- unit
- state
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 26
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 29
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 21
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0037—Performance analysers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N20/00—Machine learning
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B21/00—Alarms responsive to a single specified undesired or abnormal condition and not otherwise provided for
- G08B21/18—Status alarms
- G08B21/187—Machine fault alarms
Definitions
- This invention relates to a recovery support system.
- Patent Document 1 describes a system for remotely restoring an elevator apparatus after an earthquake occurs.
- a signal indicating that the operation is stopped and a signal indicating the state of the car are transmitted to the monitoring center.
- the received signal is displayed on a display.
- the monitor at the monitoring center looks at the contents displayed on the display and transmits a signal for resetting the seismic detector.
- Patent Document 1 discloses a system for restoring an elevator apparatus that has been stopped due to an earthquake. When the operation is stopped by an earthquake, the elevator apparatus often has no failure. For this reason, an elevator apparatus can be easily restored by resetting an earthquake detector.
- a failure occurs in the elevator device.
- This work includes extremely simple work such as restarting the elevator apparatus.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a recovery support system capable of accurately determining whether or not it is necessary to dispatch a maintenance staff in order to correct a failure of the device when a failure occurs in the device.
- the first state data indicating the state at the time of failure of the apparatus in which the failure has occurred
- the second state data indicating the normal state before the failure occurs
- a storage means storing third state data indicating a normal state of the device, a learning means for machine learning of the first state data, the second state data, and the third state data stored in the storage means, and a failure has occurred
- Receiving means for receiving the first state data from the device, and when the receiving means receives the first state data, based on the second state data of the device that has transmitted the first state data and the learning result by the learning means.
- Determining means for determining whether or not it is necessary to dispatch a maintenance person to fix the failure of the apparatus.
- the recovery support system includes, for example, a learning unit and a determination unit.
- the learning unit performs machine learning on the first state data, the second state data, and the third state data stored in the storage unit.
- the determination unit performs maintenance to correct the failure of the device based on the second state data of the device that has transmitted the first state data and the learning result by the learning unit. Determine whether it is necessary to dispatch personnel.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a recovery support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- the monitoring center 1 can communicate with a number of remote elevator apparatuses.
- Each elevator device includes, for example, a car 2 and a counterweight 3.
- the car 2 and the counterweight 3 are suspended from the hoistway by the main rope 4.
- the hoisting machine includes, for example, a driving sheave 5 and an electric motor 6.
- the main rope 4 is wound around the driving sheave 5.
- the drive sheave 5 is driven by an electric motor 6.
- the electric motor 6 is controlled by the control device 7.
- a communication device 8 is connected to the control device 7.
- the communication device 8 communicates with an external device.
- Each elevator device communicates with the monitoring center 1 by the communication device 8.
- the trace data includes, for example, status data and operation data.
- the state data is data indicating the current state of the elevator apparatus. For example, a signal indicating the speed of the electric motor 6 is included in the trace data as state data. A signal indicating the torque of the electric motor 6 is included in the trace data as state data. A signal indicating the position of the car 2 is included in the trace data as state data. A signal indicating the temperature measured by the thermometer is included in the trace data as state data.
- the operation data is data indicating the content of the operation performed by the elevator apparatus.
- a signal indicating a command from the control device 7 to the electric motor 6 is included in the trace data as operation data.
- a signal indicating a command from the control device 7 to another driving machine is included in the trace data as operation data.
- the signal included in the trace data is not limited to the above example. Some of the exemplified signals may not be included in the trace data. Other signals may be included in the trace data.
- a signal represented by a bit string of 0 or 1 a signal represented by a hexadecimal numeric string, and a signal represented by a decimal numeric string may be mixed.
- Signals of various signal lengths may be mixed in the trace data.
- Digital values and analog values may be mixed in the trace data.
- the communication device 8 acquires trace data constantly or periodically. In addition, when a failure occurs in the elevator device, the communication device 8 acquires trace data when the failure occurs. When acquiring the trace data, the communication device 8 transmits the acquired trace data to the monitoring center 1.
- the monitoring center 1 includes a storage unit 9, a reception unit 10, a learning unit 11, a determination unit 12, a transmission unit 13, and a notification control unit 14, for example.
- the functions and operations of the recovery support system will be described in detail below with reference to FIGS.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an operation example of the recovery support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 shows an example of the learning function of the recovery support system.
- the monitoring center 1 determines whether or not the trace data has been received (S101). For example, trace data is periodically transmitted to the monitoring center 1 from an elevator apparatus that can communicate with the monitoring center 1. Further, when a failure occurs in any elevator device, trace data is transmitted from the elevator device to the monitoring center 1. The trace data transmitted from each elevator apparatus is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1 (Yes in S101). The trace data received by the receiving unit 10 is stored in the storage unit 9 (S102). The receiving unit 10 receives trace data from a number of elevator devices. Trace data is accumulated in the storage unit 9.
- FIG. 3 shows an example of the trace data stored in the storage unit 9.
- the black circles in FIG. 3 indicate the values of the status data x acquired when and before and after the failure A occurs in a certain elevator apparatus.
- the value of x may be one state data value or an evaluation value obtained from a plurality of state data.
- Black triangles in FIG. 3 indicate the values of the state data x acquired when and before and after the failure B occurs in a certain elevator apparatus.
- the storage unit 9 stores state data indicating a state when the elevator apparatus is out of order.
- the state data indicating the state at the time of failure of the elevator apparatus is also referred to as first state data.
- FIG. 3 shows an example in which a failure A occurs at time t1.
- FIG. 3 shows an example in which a failure B occurs at time t1 and thereafter time t2.
- the time when the failure A occurs and the time when the failure B occurs for the first time are set to the same time.
- the communication device 8 acquires trace data constantly or periodically. For this reason, when a failure occurs in the elevator apparatus, the storage unit 9 stores state data indicating a normal state before the failure occurs.
- the state data indicating the normal state before the failure occurs is also referred to as second state data.
- the state data acquired before time t1 is the second state data.
- FIG. 3 shows an example in which the elevator apparatus is restored immediately after the failure A occurs at time t1. Similarly, FIG. 3 shows an example in which the elevator apparatus is restored immediately after the failure B occurs at time t1.
- state data indicating a normal state after the failure is stored.
- the state data indicating the normal state after the failure has occurred is also referred to as third state data.
- the state data acquired after time t1 among the state data indicated by black circles is the third state data.
- the state data acquired after time t1 and before time t2 is the third state data.
- Fault B has also occurred at time t2.
- the state data acquired after time t1 and before time t2 is second state data.
- the learning unit 11 performs machine learning on the state data described in the storage unit 9. In the monitoring center 1, it is determined whether or not it is a learning timing (S103). The learning timing is set in advance. If it is determined in S103 that it is the learning timing, machine learning is performed by the learning unit 11 and a learning result is output (S104).
- the learning unit 11 performs machine learning on the first state data, the second state data, and the third state data described in the storage unit 9. For example, the learning unit 11 performs pattern classification of state data using a technique of unsupervised learning such as hierarchical clustering or k-means. In the example illustrated in FIG. 3, the learning unit 11 specifies a state data pattern when the failure A occurs and a state data pattern when the failure B occurs. The learning unit 11 may output, as a learning result, an average time until a failure occurs next time or a distribution of state data for each classified pattern.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing another example of operation of the recovery support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 shows an example of the determination function of the recovery support system.
- the monitoring center 1 determines whether or not the trace data has been received from the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred (S201).
- trace data is transmitted from the communication device 8 of the elevator device to the monitoring center 1.
- the trace data transmitted from the communication device 8 is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1 (Yes in S201).
- the trace data received by the receiving unit 10 in S201 includes first state data.
- the determination unit 12 determines whether or not it is necessary to dispatch a maintenance person to correct the failure of the elevator apparatus that has transmitted the trace data ( S202).
- the determination unit 12 performs the above determination based on the second state data of the elevator apparatus and the learning result by the learning unit 11.
- the second state data of the elevator device is stored in the storage unit 9 before a failure occurs in the device.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining the function of the determination unit 12.
- the state data acquired at time t1 is the first state data received by the receiving unit 10 in S201.
- the state data acquired before time t1 is second state data.
- the determination unit 12 specifies, for example, which pattern classified by the learning unit 11 is the closest to the pattern of the second state data of the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred this time.
- FIG. 5 corresponds to the example shown in FIG. 3 with the addition of state data indicated by black squares.
- the determination unit 12 determines that the second state data pattern of the elevator device in which the failure has occurred this time is the second state data pattern when the failure A occurs and the failure B occurs. It is determined which of the second state patterns is closer.
- the determination unit 12 determines that the pattern of the second state data of the elevator device in which the failure has occurred this time is close to the pattern of the second state data when the failure A has occurred.
- the value of the state data before the failure A occurs is between the value x1 and the value x2. Further, the value of the state data in the normal state after the failure A occurs and is automatically restored is also between the value x1 and the value x2. After the failure A occurs and is automatically recovered, the failure A has not occurred again. If the determination unit 12 can identify that the pattern of the second state data of the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred is close to the pattern of the second state data when the failure A occurs, the determination unit 12 can automatically recover and dispatch maintenance personnel. Determine that you do not need to.
- the value of the state data before the failure B occurs is larger than the value x1 at time t3, but falls below the value x1 at time t4.
- the value of the state data decreases as it approaches time t1 thereafter.
- the value of the normal state data immediately after the occurrence of the failure B and the automatic recovery has returned to a value lower than the value x1.
- the value of the state data continues to decrease as it approaches time t2. If the determination unit 12 can specify that the pattern of the second state data of the elevator device in which the failure has occurred is close to the pattern of the second state data when the failure B has occurred, a failure due to deterioration over time has occurred in the elevator device, for example. Because there is a possibility, it is determined that it is necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel.
- FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining another function of the determination unit 12. 6 corresponds to an example in which the value of the state data indicated by the black square is different from that in the example shown in FIG.
- the state data acquired at time t1 among the state data indicated by black squares in FIG. 6 is the first state data received by the receiving unit 10 in S201.
- the value of the second state data indicated by the black square does not fall between the value x1 and the value x2.
- the value of the second state data indicated by the black square does not decrease with the passage of time as the second state data indicated by the black triangle.
- the determination unit 12 may specify the probability that the pattern of the second state data of the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred this time belongs to each pattern classified by the learning unit 11.
- the determination unit 12 may determine whether or not it is necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel, and may output the specified probability.
- the determination unit 12 may output the time until the next failure occurs in the elevator apparatus or the probability that the failure will occur again within a certain time.
- T (A) P (A) ⁇ T (A) + P (B) ⁇ T (B)
- the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 12 in S202 (S203). For example, the alarm 17 is provided in the monitoring center 1.
- the transmission unit 13 sends an instruction for performing an operation necessary for correcting the failure to the elevator apparatus that has transmitted the trace data. Transmit (S204). In the elevator apparatus that has received the command, an operation necessary to correct the failure is performed. For example, in the elevator apparatus that has received the command, restart is performed.
- the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 12 in S202 (S205). If the determination unit 12 determines that a maintenance staff needs to be dispatched, the transmission section 13 transmits a maintenance staff dispatch command to the maintenance staff base or the like (S206).
- a command for performing an operation necessary for correcting the failure is automatically transmitted. This is an example. When it is determined No in S202, only the notification of the determination result may be performed. In such a case, the command is transmitted at the discretion of the supervisor.
- a maintenance staff dispatch request is automatically made in S206. This is an example. When it determines with Yes in S202, you may perform only alerting
- both the processing in S203 and the processing in S204 are performed. This is an example.
- the process of S203 may not be performed.
- both the processing in S205 and the processing in S206 are performed. This is an example. If a maintenance staff dispatch request is automatically made in S206, the process of S205 may not be performed.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing another example of the operation of the recovery support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 shows an example of the determination function of the recovery support system.
- the processing shown in S301 to S306 in FIG. 7 is the same as the processing shown in S201 to S206 in FIG.
- the transmission unit 13 sends an instruction for performing an operation necessary for correcting the failure to the elevator apparatus that has transmitted the trace data. Transmit (S304).
- an operation necessary to correct the failure is performed. For example, in the elevator apparatus that has received the command, restart is performed.
- the monitoring center 1 determines whether or not the trace data has been received from the restored elevator device (S307). That is, the monitoring center 1 determines whether or not the third state data has been received from the elevator apparatus to which the command has been transmitted in S304.
- the trace data is transmitted to the monitoring center 1 from the communication apparatus 8 of the elevator apparatus.
- the trace data transmitted from the communication device 8 is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1 (Yes in S307).
- the trace data received by the receiving unit 10 in S307 includes the third state data.
- the determination unit 12 re-determines whether it is necessary to dispatch a maintenance person to correct the failure of the elevator device that has transmitted the trace data (S308).
- the determination unit 12 performs the above determination based on the third state data received by the reception unit 10 in S307 and the learning result by the learning unit 11.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining another function of the determination unit 12.
- FIG. 8 corresponds to a case where one third state data indicated by a black square is added to the example shown in FIG. If re-determination is performed in S308, it is determined in S302 that it is not necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel before that.
- the third state data received by the receiving unit 10 in S ⁇ b> 307 is closer to the third data of the elevator device restored from the failure B than the third data of the elevator device restored from the failure A.
- the determination unit 12 determines that a failure due to, for example, aged deterioration may have occurred in the elevator apparatus at time t1. That is, the determination unit 12 determines in S308 that a maintenance person needs to be dispatched.
- the notification control unit 14 When it is determined in S308 that it is necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel, the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 12 in S308 (S305). If the determination unit 12 determines that a maintenance staff needs to be dispatched, the transmission section 13 transmits a maintenance staff dispatch command to the maintenance staff base or the like (S306). On the other hand, if it is determined in S308 that it is not necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel, the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 12 in S308 (S309).
- the determination accuracy can be further improved using the third state data after restoration.
- FIG. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a recovery support system according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
- the example shown in the present embodiment is different from the example disclosed in the first embodiment in that the recovery support system uses not only the state data but also the operation data.
- the monitoring center 1 shown in the present embodiment includes, for example, a storage unit 9, a receiving unit 10, a learning unit 11, a determining unit 12, a transmitting unit 13, and a notification control unit 14.
- the operation example of the recovery support system in the present embodiment is the same as the operation example shown in FIGS.
- FIG. 2 shows an example of the learning function of the recovery support system.
- the monitoring center 1 determines whether or not the trace data has been received (S101). For example, trace data is periodically transmitted to the monitoring center 1 from an elevator apparatus that can communicate with the monitoring center 1. Further, when a failure occurs in any elevator device, trace data is transmitted from the elevator device to the monitoring center 1. The trace data transmitted from each elevator apparatus is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1. The trace data received by the receiving unit 10 is stored in the storage unit 9 (S102). The receiving unit 10 receives trace data from a number of elevator devices. Trace data is accumulated in the storage unit 9.
- the trace data includes state data and operation data.
- the storage unit 9 stores first state data, second state data, and third state data.
- the storage unit 9 stores at least operation data indicating the operation content from when the failure occurs in the elevator apparatus until the failure occurs from the normal state before the failure.
- the storage unit 9 stores operation data indicating the operation content at the time of failure of the elevator apparatus.
- the storage unit 9 stores operation data indicating the normal operation content before the failure occurs.
- the storage unit 9 stores operation data indicating the normal operation content after the failure has occurred.
- the learning unit 11 performs machine learning on the state data and the operation data described in the storage unit 9. In the monitoring center 1, it is determined whether or not it is a learning timing (S103). If it is determined in S103 that it is the learning timing, machine learning is performed by the learning unit 11 and a learning result is output (S104).
- the learning unit 11 performs machine learning on the first state data, the second state data, the third state data, and the operation data described in the storage unit 9.
- the learning unit 11 uses an unsupervised learning technique such as hierarchical clustering or k-means to perform pattern classification of state data based on driving data.
- operation data for example, pattern classification of state data can be performed for each operation content. For this reason, a more detailed learning result can be obtained.
- FIG. 4 shows an example of the determination function of the recovery support system.
- the monitoring center 1 it is determined whether or not the trace data is received from the elevator device in which the failure has occurred (S201).
- trace data is transmitted from the communication device 8 of the elevator device to the monitoring center 1.
- Trace data transmitted from the communication device 8 is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1.
- the trace data received by the receiving unit 10 in S201 includes first state data and operation data at the time of failure.
- the determination unit 12 determines whether or not it is necessary to dispatch a maintenance person to correct the failure of the elevator apparatus that has transmitted the trace data ( S202).
- the determination unit 12 performs the above determination based on the second state data received by the receiving unit 10 in S201 and the learning result by the learning unit 11 as well as the operation data received by the receiving unit 10 in S201. For example, the determination unit 12 performs filtering of the state data based on the operation data, and then the pattern of the second state data of the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred this time is closest to any pattern classified by the learning unit 11 To identify.
- the determination unit 12 may also use operation data before failure of the elevator device stored in the storage unit 9.
- the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 12 in S202 (S203). For example, the alarm 17 is provided in the monitoring center 1.
- the transmission unit 13 sends the first command for performing the operation necessary to correct the failure to the elevator that has transmitted the trace data. The data is transmitted to the device (S204). In the elevator apparatus that has received the command, an operation necessary to correct the failure is performed. For example, in the elevator apparatus that has received the command, restart is performed.
- the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 12 in S202 (S205). If the determination unit 12 determines that a maintenance staff needs to be dispatched, the transmission section 13 transmits a maintenance staff dispatch command to the maintenance staff base or the like (S206).
- FIG. 10 is a diagram showing another example of the recovery support system according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 shows an example of the monitoring center 1.
- the monitoring center 1 further includes a determination unit 16 in addition to the storage unit 9, the reception unit 10, the learning unit 11, the determination unit 12, the transmission unit 13, and the notification control unit 14, for example.
- FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing another example of operation of the recovery support system according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 shows an example of the learning function of the recovery support system.
- the processing shown in S401 to S406 in FIG. 11 is the same as the processing shown in S201 to S206 in FIG.
- the transmission unit 13 sends the first command for performing the operation necessary for correcting the failure to the elevator that has transmitted the trace data.
- the data is transmitted to the device (S404).
- an operation necessary to correct the failure is performed. For example, in the elevator apparatus that has received the first command, restart is performed.
- the monitoring center 1 determines whether or not the elevator apparatus to which the first command is transmitted in S404 has been restored (S407).
- the transmission unit 13 transmits the second command to the elevator apparatus (S408).
- the second command is a command for causing the elevator apparatus to perform a predetermined operation.
- a predetermined operation is performed.
- the certain operation may be the same as the operation performed in the inspection operation.
- the second command may be a command for performing the same operation as that performed when a failure occurred in the elevator apparatus. In such a case, the second command is generated based on the operation data received by the receiving unit 10 in S401. In the elevator apparatus that has received the second command, the same operation as that performed when the failure occurred is performed.
- the communication device 8 acquires the trace data when the operation based on the second command is being performed.
- the trace data includes state data indicating a state when an operation based on the second command is performed.
- the state data indicating the state when the operation based on the second command is performed is also referred to as fourth state data.
- the communication device 8 transmits trace data including the fourth state data to the monitoring center 1.
- the trace data including the fourth state data transmitted from the communication device 8 is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1 (Yes in S409).
- the determination unit 16 determines whether or not the elevator apparatus that has transmitted the trace data is normal (S410). The determination unit 16 performs the above determination based on the fourth state data received by the reception unit 10 in S409 and the determination criterion.
- the determination criterion is a criterion for the determination unit 16 to determine whether or not the restored elevator apparatus is normal. If the second command is a command for performing a predetermined constant operation, the determination criterion may be a fixed value.
- the monitoring center 1 may further include a generation unit 15.
- the generation unit 15 generates the determination criterion for the determination unit 16 to perform the determination.
- FIG. 12 is a diagram for explaining the functions of the generation unit 15 and the determination unit 16.
- the receiving unit 10 receives state data indicating the state of the elevator apparatus when the operation is being performed in S409.
- the determination unit 16 determines whether or not the elevator apparatus is normal based on the fourth data.
- the inspection operation is periodically performed in the elevator apparatus. For this reason, it is easy to acquire the state data indicating the state of the elevator apparatus when the inspection operation is performed.
- the state data acquired during the inspection operation is stored in the storage unit 9.
- FIG. 12 shows a distribution of normal state data acquired in the past. Specifically, FIG. 12 shows the value of the state data acquired during the inspection operation and its ratio.
- generation part 15 may produce
- FIG. 12 illustrates an example in which the generation unit 15 calculates the threshold value Th1 as a determination criterion from past normal state data. For example, when the receiving unit 10 receives the fourth state data having the value V1 in S409, the determining unit 16 determines that the restored elevator device is normal. When the receiving unit 10 receives the fourth state data having the value V2 in S409, the determining unit 16 determines that the restored elevator apparatus is not normal.
- the generation unit 15 may generate the threshold Th3 shown in FIG. 12 as a determination criterion.
- the threshold value Th3 indicates an example in which a determination criterion is calculated based on the ratio from past normal state data.
- FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining other functions of the generation unit 15 and the determination unit 16.
- the example illustrated in FIG. 13 corresponds to the example illustrated in FIG. 12 in which a distribution of state data at the time of failure acquired in the past is added.
- the generation unit 15 may generate a determination criterion based on past normal state data and past fault state data.
- FIG. 13 shows an example in which the value corresponding to the intersection of the curves is calculated as the threshold Th2. For example, when the receiving unit 10 receives the fourth state data having the value V3 in S409, the determining unit 16 determines that the restored elevator device is normal. When the receiving unit 10 receives the fourth state data having the value V4 in S409, the determining unit 16 determines that the restored elevator apparatus is not normal.
- the method for generating the determination criterion is not limited to the above example.
- the determination criterion may be generated based on which one of the distribution ratio at the normal time and the distribution ratio at the failure time is larger.
- the notification control unit 14 causes the notification unit 17 to notify the result determined by the determination unit 16 in S410 (S411). ).
- the notification control unit 14 notifies the notification unit 17 of the result determined by the determination unit 16 in S410 ( S405). If the determination unit 16 determines in S410 that the elevator device that has transmitted the fourth state data is not normal, the transmission unit 13 transmits a maintenance staff dispatch command to the maintenance staff base or the like (S406). ).
- FIG. 14 and 15 are diagrams for explaining other functions of the generation unit 15.
- the generation unit 15 uses state data at the time of a past failure in order to generate a determination criterion.
- the generation unit 15 uses state data at the time of a past failure in order to generate a determination criterion.
- failure state data cannot be obtained unless a failure actually occurs.
- the elevator apparatus that has received the second command performs the same operation as that performed when a failure occurred.
- the same operation as that performed when the failure occurred this time has been performed in the past, and status data indicating the state when the failure occurred at that time is required.
- the generation unit 15 may generate state data corresponding to the state data at the time of the failure based on the plurality of state data received by the receiving unit 10 in the past from the elevator apparatus to which the transmission unit 13 has transmitted the second command. good. That is, the generation unit 15 performs the same operation as the operation based on the second command in the elevator apparatus and indicates the state data when the failure occurs from the plurality of state data stored in the storage unit 9. Generate.
- the generation unit 15 creates a determination criterion using the generated state data.
- FIG. 14A to FIG. 14C schematically show operation data stored in the storage unit 9.
- Fig.14 (a) shows the example of the operation data which show the operation content performed when a failure generate
- the car 2 in the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred, immediately before the failure occurs, the car 2 is stopped, the door is opened, the door is closed, the door is opened before the door is fully closed, the door is fully closed, the car 2 is lowered, The car 2 is stopped and the door is opened sequentially.
- FIG. 14 (b) and Fig. 14 (c) show examples of operation data.
- the operation data shown in FIG. 14 (b) and FIG. 14 (c) is operation data indicating the details of operation performed in the past by the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred. That is, the operation data shown in FIG. 14B and the operation data shown in FIG. 14C are already stored in the storage unit 9 before a failure occurs in the elevator apparatus.
- the door 2 is opened, the door is closed, the door is closed, and the door 2 is fully closed and the car 2 is lifted in sequence before the door is fully closed. No failure occurred during this time.
- FIG. 14C in the elevator apparatus, immediately before a failure occurs, the car 2 is stopped, the door is opened, the door is fully closed, the car 2 is lowered, the car 2 is stopped, and the door is opened. Yes.
- the generation unit 15 combines a part of the operation data shown in FIG. 14B and a part of the operation data shown in FIG. The operation data corresponding to the operation data is obtained.
- the storage unit 9 stores state data in association with the operation data shown in FIG.
- the storage unit 9 stores state data in association with the operation data shown in FIG.
- the generation unit 15 generates failure state data corresponding to the failure state data based on the state data.
- FIG. 15A schematically show operation data stored in the storage unit 9.
- FIG. 15A is the same as the operation data shown in FIG.
- the operation data shown in FIG. 15 (b) is the same as the operation data shown in FIG. 14 (b).
- FIG. 15C in the elevator apparatus, the car 2 is stopped, the door is opened, the door is fully closed, the car 2 is lowered, the car 2 is stopped, the door is opened, and the door is fully closed. No failure occurred during this time.
- the generation unit 15 combines a part of the operation data shown in FIG. 15B and a part of the operation data shown in FIG. Normal operation data corresponding to the operation data is obtained.
- the storage unit 9 stores state data in association with the operation data shown in FIG.
- the storage unit 9 stores state data in association with the operation data shown in FIG.
- the generation unit 15 may generate normal state data corresponding to the state data at the time of failure based on the state data.
- FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing another operation example of the recovery support system according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 16 shows an example of operations performed to obtain a normal distribution as shown in FIGS.
- the operation shown in FIG. 16 is processing subsequent to the processing shown in S408 of FIG.
- the transmission unit 13 transmits the second command to the elevator device (S408).
- the second command is a command for performing the same operation as that performed when a failure occurs in the elevator apparatus.
- the transmission part 13 transmits a 3rd instruction
- the third command is a command for causing the elevator apparatus to perform the same operation as the operation based on the second command. That is, in the elevator apparatus that has received the third command, the same operation as that performed by the elevator apparatus that has received the second command is performed.
- the transmission unit 13 transmits the third command to an elevator device other than the elevator device that has transmitted the second command, which is normal and does not have a person on the car 2.
- the transmission unit 13 may transmit the third command to the elevator apparatus that is at rest.
- the resting elevator device is an elevator device in a state where no person is on the car 2, no call is registered, and no operation command is assigned.
- the communication device 8 acquires the trace data when the operation based on the third command is being performed.
- the trace data includes state data indicating a state when an operation based on the third command is performed.
- the state data indicating the state when the operation based on the third command is performed is also referred to as fifth state data.
- the communication device 8 transmits trace data including the fifth state data to the monitoring center 1.
- the trace data including the fifth state data transmitted from the communication device 8 is received by the receiving unit 10 in the monitoring center 1 (Yes in S413).
- the generating unit 15 generates a determination criterion based on the fifth state data received by the receiving unit 10 in S413 (S414). For example, the generation unit 15 calculates a normal distribution as illustrated in FIG. 12 or 13 based on the fifth state data received by the reception unit 10 in S413.
- any of the functions and operations disclosed in the first embodiment may be adopted.
- Embodiments 1 and 2 the example in which the elevator apparatus is connected to the monitoring center 1 has been described.
- the device connected to the monitoring center 1 is not limited to the elevator device. Other devices maintained by maintenance personnel may be connected to the monitoring center 1.
- FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration of the monitoring center 1.
- the monitoring center 1 includes a processing circuit including, for example, a processor 18 and a memory 19 as hardware resources.
- the functions of the storage unit 9 are realized by the memory 19.
- the monitoring center 1 executes the program stored in the memory 19 by the processor 18, thereby realizing the functions of the units indicated by reference numerals 10 to 16.
- the processor 18 is also referred to as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a central processing unit, a processing unit, an arithmetic unit, a microprocessor, a microcomputer, or a DSP.
- a CPU Central Processing Unit
- a central processing unit a central processing unit
- a processing unit an arithmetic unit
- a microprocessor a microcomputer
- a DSP digital signal processor
- a semiconductor memory a magnetic disk, a flexible disk, an optical disk, a compact disk, a mini disk, or a DVD may be employed.
- Semiconductor memories that can be used include RAM, ROM, flash memory, EPROM, EEPROM, and the like.
- Some or all of the functions of the monitoring center 1 may be realized by hardware.
- a single circuit, a composite circuit, a programmed processor, a parallel programmed processor, an ASIC, an FPGA, or a combination thereof may be employed.
- the recovery support system according to the present invention can be used to determine whether or not it is necessary to dispatch a maintenance staff to fix a device failure.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
図1は、この発明の実施の形態1における復旧支援システムの例を示す図である。監視センター1は、遠隔の多数のエレベーター装置と通信が可能である。各エレベーター装置は、例えばかご2及びつり合いおもり3を備える。かご2及びつり合いおもり3は、主ロープ4によって昇降路に吊り下げられる。巻上機は、例えば駆動綱車5及び電動機6を備える。駆動綱車5に主ロープ4が巻き掛けられる。駆動綱車5は、電動機6によって駆動される。電動機6は、制御装置7によって制御される。制御装置7に通信装置8が接続される。通信装置8は外部の機器と通信する。各エレベーター装置は、通信装置8によって監視センター1と通信する。 Embodiment 1 FIG.
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a recovery support system according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. The monitoring center 1 can communicate with a number of remote elevator apparatuses. Each elevator device includes, for example, a
T(N)=P(A)×T(A)+P(B)×T(B) For example, in the example shown in FIG. 6, let P (A) be the probability that the second state data pattern of the elevator device in which the current failure has occurred belongs to the second state data pattern when the failure A occurs. Similarly, let P (B) be the probability that the pattern of the second state data of the elevator apparatus in which the failure has occurred belongs to the pattern of the second state data when the failure B occurs. Let T (A) be the average time from failure A to failure A again. An average time from the occurrence of the failure B to the occurrence of the failure B again is defined as T (B). The
T (N) = P (A) × T (A) + P (B) × T (B)
図9は、この発明の実施の形態2における復旧支援システムの例を示す図である。本実施の形態に示す例は、復旧支援システムが状態データだけでなく運転データも利用する点で実施の形態1で開示した例と相違する。
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a recovery support system according to
生成部15は、図12に示す閾値Th3を判定基準として生成しても良い。閾値Th3は、過去の正常時の状態データからその割合に基づいて判定基準が算出される例を示す。 FIG. 12 illustrates an example in which the
The
判定基準の生成方法は、上記例に限定されない。例えば、正常時の分布の割合と故障時の分布の割合のどちらが大きいかに基づいて判定基準を生成しても良い。また、判定結果についても正常か正常ではないかの2値ではなく、確率で求めても良い。例えば、図13に示すように、値がV3である時の正常時の分布の割合を(P3;正常)とし、故障時の分布の割合を(P3;故障)とする。この時、値V3が正常である確率を以下のように求めても良い。
(確率)=(P3;正常)/{(P3;正常)+(P3;故障)} FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining other functions of the
The method for generating the determination criterion is not limited to the above example. For example, the determination criterion may be generated based on which one of the distribution ratio at the normal time and the distribution ratio at the failure time is larger. Also, the determination result may be obtained by a probability instead of a binary value indicating whether it is normal or not. For example, as shown in FIG. 13, when the value is V3, the distribution ratio at normal time is (P3; normal), and the distribution ratio at failure is (P3; failure). At this time, the probability that the value V3 is normal may be obtained as follows.
(Probability) = (P3; Normal) / {(P3; Normal) + (P3; Failure)}
2 かご
3 つり合いおもり
4 主ロープ
5 駆動綱車
6 電動機
7 制御装置
8 通信装置
9 記憶部
10 受信部
11 学習部
12 判定部
13 送信部
14 報知制御部
15 生成部
16 判定部
17 報知器
18 プロセッサ
19 メモリ DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1
Claims (9)
- 故障が発生した装置について故障時の状態を示す第1状態データ、当該故障が発生する前の正常時の状態を示す第2状態データ及び当該故障が発生した後の正常時の状態を示す第3状態データが記憶された記憶手段と、
前記記憶手段に記憶された第1状態データ、第2状態データ及び第3状態データを機械学習する学習手段と、
故障が発生した装置から第1状態データを受信する受信手段と、
前記受信手段が第1状態データを受信すると、当該第1状態データを送信してきた装置の第2状態データと前記学習手段による学習結果とに基づいて、当該装置の故障を直すために保守員を派遣する必要があるか否かを判定する判定手段と、
を備えた復旧支援システム。 First state data indicating a state at the time of failure of the device in which the failure has occurred, second state data indicating a state at a normal time before the occurrence of the failure, and third state indicating a normal state after the failure has occurred Storage means for storing state data;
Learning means for machine learning the first state data, the second state data, and the third state data stored in the storage means;
Receiving means for receiving first state data from a device in which a failure has occurred;
When the receiving means receives the first state data, a maintenance staff is appointed to correct the failure of the apparatus based on the second state data of the apparatus that has transmitted the first state data and the learning result by the learning means. A determination means for determining whether or not it is necessary to dispatch;
Recovery support system with - 装置の故障を直すために保守員を派遣する必要がないと前記判定手段によって判定されると、当該故障を直すために必要な動作を行なわせるための指令を、当該装置に送信する送信手段を更に備えた請求項1に記載の復旧支援システム。 When the determination means determines that it is not necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel to correct the failure of the apparatus, a transmission means for transmitting an instruction for performing an operation necessary for correcting the failure to the apparatus The recovery support system according to claim 1, further comprising:
- 前記受信手段は、前記送信手段が指令を送信した装置から第3状態データを受信し、
前記判定手段は、前記学習手段による学習結果と前記送信手段が指令を送信した装置から前記受信手段が受信した第3状態データとに基づいて、当該装置の故障を直すために保守員を派遣する必要があるか否かを再判定する請求項2に記載の復旧支援システム。 The receiving means receives third state data from the device to which the transmitting means has transmitted a command,
The determination means dispatches maintenance personnel to correct the failure of the apparatus based on the learning result by the learning means and the third state data received by the receiving means from the apparatus to which the transmitting means has transmitted a command. The recovery support system according to claim 2, wherein it is determined again whether or not it is necessary. - 前記記憶手段に、故障が発生した装置について故障前の正常な状態から故障が発生するまでの運転内容を示す運転データが記憶され、
前記学習手段は、前記記憶手段に記憶された第1状態データ、第2状態データ、第3状態データ及び運転データを機械学習し、
前記受信手段は、故障が発生した装置から運転データを受信し、
前記判定手段は、前記受信手段が第1状態データを受信すると、当該第1状態データを送信してきた装置から前記受信手段が受信した運転データにも基づいて、当該装置の故障を直すために保守員を派遣する必要があるか否かを判定する請求項1に記載の復旧支援システム。 In the storage means, operation data indicating the operation content until a failure occurs from a normal state before the failure is stored for the device in which the failure has occurred,
The learning means performs machine learning on the first state data, the second state data, the third state data, and the operation data stored in the storage means,
The receiving means receives operation data from a device in which a failure has occurred,
When the receiving unit receives the first state data, the determination unit is maintained to correct the failure of the device based on the operation data received by the receiving unit from the device that has transmitted the first state data. The recovery support system according to claim 1, wherein it is determined whether or not a worker needs to be dispatched. - 装置の故障を直すために保守員を派遣する必要がないと前記判定手段によって判定されると、当該故障を直すために必要な動作を行なわせるための第1指令を、当該装置に送信する送信手段を更に備えた請求項4に記載の復旧支援システム。 When it is determined by the determining means that it is not necessary to dispatch maintenance personnel to correct the failure of the device, the first command for causing the device to perform an operation necessary to correct the failure is transmitted. The recovery support system according to claim 4, further comprising means.
- 第2判定手段を更に備え、
前記送信手段は、第1指令を送信した装置に対し、当該装置で故障発生時に行われた動作と同じ動作或いは予め定められた動作を行わせるための第2指令を送信し、
前記受信手段は、前記送信手段が第2指令を送信した装置から、第2指令に基づく動作が行われた時の状態を示す第4状態データを受信し、
前記第2判定手段は、前記受信手段が受信した第4状態データに基づいて、当該第4状態データを送信してきた装置が正常であるか否かを判定する請求項5に記載の復旧支援システム。 A second determination unit;
The transmission means transmits a second command for causing the device that has transmitted the first command to perform the same operation as that performed when a failure occurred in the device or a predetermined operation,
The receiving unit receives fourth state data indicating a state when an operation based on the second command is performed from the device from which the transmitting unit has transmitted the second command,
6. The recovery support system according to claim 5, wherein the second determination unit determines whether or not a device that has transmitted the fourth state data is normal based on the fourth state data received by the reception unit. . - 装置が正常であるか否かを前記第2判定手段が判定するための基準を生成する生成手段を更に備えた請求項6に記載の復旧支援システム。 The recovery support system according to claim 6, further comprising a generation unit that generates a reference for the second determination unit to determine whether or not the apparatus is normal.
- 前記送信手段は、第1指令を送信した装置に対し、当該装置で故障発生時に行われた動作と同じ動作を行わせるための第2指令を送信し、
前記生成手段は、前記送信手段が第2指令を送信した装置から前記受信手段が過去に受信した複数の状態データに基づいて、当該装置で第2指令に基づく動作と同じ動作が行われ且つ故障が発生した時の状態を示す状態データを生成する請求項7に記載の復旧支援システム。 The transmission means transmits a second command for causing the device that has transmitted the first command to perform the same operation as that performed when a failure occurred in the device,
The generating means performs the same operation as the operation based on the second command in the apparatus based on a plurality of status data received by the receiving means in the past from the apparatus to which the transmitting means has transmitted the second command, and has failed. The recovery support system according to claim 7, wherein state data indicating a state at the time of occurrence is generated. - 前記送信手段は、第2指令を送信した装置以外の装置に対し、第2指令に基づく動作と同じ動作を行わせるための第3指令を送信し、
前記受信手段は、前記送信手段が第3指令を送信した装置から、第3指令に基づく動作が行われた時の状態を示す第5状態データを受信し、
前記生成手段は、前記受信手段が受信した第5状態データに基づいて前記基準を生成する請求項7に記載の復旧支援システム。 The transmission means transmits a third command for causing a device other than the device that transmitted the second command to perform the same operation as the operation based on the second command,
The reception means receives fifth state data indicating a state when an operation based on the third command is performed from the device from which the transmission means transmits the third command,
The restoration support system according to claim 7, wherein the generation unit generates the reference based on fifth state data received by the reception unit.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2018558515A JP6620898B2 (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | Recovery support system |
KR1020197012711A KR102124994B1 (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | Recovery support system |
PCT/JP2016/088632 WO2018122898A1 (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | Recovery support system |
CN201680090517.1A CN110382389B (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | Recovery support system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2016/088632 WO2018122898A1 (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | Recovery support system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2018122898A1 true WO2018122898A1 (en) | 2018-07-05 |
Family
ID=62707076
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2016/088632 WO2018122898A1 (en) | 2016-12-26 | 2016-12-26 | Recovery support system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP6620898B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR102124994B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN110382389B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018122898A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2020083492A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2020-06-04 | 株式会社日立ビルシステム | Repeated failure prevention device, repeated failure prevention system and repeated failure prevention method |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH02300078A (en) * | 1989-05-12 | 1990-12-12 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Monitoring device for elevator |
JPH05221589A (en) * | 1992-02-13 | 1993-08-31 | Toshiba Erebeeta Technos Kk | Elevator monitoring device |
JP2001250008A (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2001-09-14 | Ricoh Co Ltd | System, method and center for supporting customer, customer information utilizing system, and equipment arranged at customer |
JP2011201336A (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-10-13 | Hitachi Ltd | System for supporting determination of abnormality of moving object |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2781489B2 (en) * | 1992-01-17 | 1998-07-30 | 株式会社日立ビルシステム | Fault response support device for elevator remote monitoring device |
JP2007254039A (en) | 2006-03-20 | 2007-10-04 | Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd | Restoration system for elevator |
JP2009053938A (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2009-03-12 | Toshiba Corp | Equipment diagnosing system and equipment-diagnosing method on the basis of multiple model |
JP5229696B2 (en) * | 2011-03-04 | 2013-07-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Information processing system, information processing apparatus, control method thereof, control program thereof, and communication environment monitoring and recovery method |
-
2016
- 2016-12-26 KR KR1020197012711A patent/KR102124994B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2016-12-26 CN CN201680090517.1A patent/CN110382389B/en active Active
- 2016-12-26 JP JP2018558515A patent/JP6620898B2/en active Active
- 2016-12-26 WO PCT/JP2016/088632 patent/WO2018122898A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH02300078A (en) * | 1989-05-12 | 1990-12-12 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Monitoring device for elevator |
JPH05221589A (en) * | 1992-02-13 | 1993-08-31 | Toshiba Erebeeta Technos Kk | Elevator monitoring device |
JP2001250008A (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2001-09-14 | Ricoh Co Ltd | System, method and center for supporting customer, customer information utilizing system, and equipment arranged at customer |
JP2011201336A (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2011-10-13 | Hitachi Ltd | System for supporting determination of abnormality of moving object |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2020083492A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2020-06-04 | 株式会社日立ビルシステム | Repeated failure prevention device, repeated failure prevention system and repeated failure prevention method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR20190061051A (en) | 2019-06-04 |
CN110382389A (en) | 2019-10-25 |
JPWO2018122898A1 (en) | 2019-06-24 |
CN110382389B (en) | 2020-08-14 |
KR102124994B1 (en) | 2020-06-19 |
JP6620898B2 (en) | 2019-12-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR102209015B1 (en) | Recovery support system | |
CN108689262B (en) | Passenger initiated dynamic elevator service request | |
CN109205430A (en) | Safety inspection device, system and the method for elevator | |
JP6510600B2 (en) | Remote diagnostic operation method of elevator, elevator control device, and remote diagnostic operation program of elevator | |
JP6620898B2 (en) | Recovery support system | |
JP6717390B2 (en) | Elevator automatic recovery system | |
JP6520539B2 (en) | Search system | |
JP2019028556A (en) | Work support system, work support device, and work support method | |
WO2019229946A1 (en) | Maintenance work assistance device for elevator | |
JP2008007308A (en) | Operation report system used when earthquake occurs | |
JP2009298546A (en) | Control system for elevator | |
JP6693576B2 (en) | Recovery system | |
JP2019099340A (en) | Elevator control device and elevator control method | |
JP2019156624A (en) | Elevator controller, remote diagnosis system of elevator door and remote diagnosis method of elevator door | |
WO2011161790A1 (en) | Elevator control system | |
CN109153530B (en) | Voice call registration device for elevator and self-diagnosis method for voice call registration function | |
KR20190116889A (en) | Elevator system with diagnostic function | |
JP7435910B2 (en) | elevator system | |
WO2020250617A1 (en) | Deterioration prediction device for magnetic material and deterioration prediction method for magnetic material | |
WO2018134894A1 (en) | Earthquake sensor for elevators | |
JP2021100871A (en) | Data collection device for ship elevator, ship elevator management system, data collection method for ship elevator, and ship elevator management method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 16925437 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2018558515 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20197012711 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 16925437 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |