WO2015161763A1 - 脑功能障碍评价装置 - Google Patents
脑功能障碍评价装置 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2015161763A1 WO2015161763A1 PCT/CN2015/076965 CN2015076965W WO2015161763A1 WO 2015161763 A1 WO2015161763 A1 WO 2015161763A1 CN 2015076965 W CN2015076965 W CN 2015076965W WO 2015161763 A1 WO2015161763 A1 WO 2015161763A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- unit
- body motion
- period
- accuracy
- adjustment
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/40—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
- A61B5/4058—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system for evaluating the central nervous system
- A61B5/4064—Evaluating the brain
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/40—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
- A61B5/4076—Diagnosing or monitoring particular conditions of the nervous system
- A61B5/4088—Diagnosing of monitoring cognitive diseases, e.g. Alzheimer, prion diseases or dementia
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H20/00—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
- G16H20/30—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H20/00—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
- G16H20/70—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to mental therapies, e.g. psychological therapy or autogenous training
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H40/00—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
- G16H40/60—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices
- G16H40/63—ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices for local operation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/70—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B2562/00—Details of sensors; Constructional details of sensor housings or probes; Accessories for sensors
- A61B2562/02—Details of sensors specially adapted for in-vivo measurements
- A61B2562/0219—Inertial sensors, e.g. accelerometers, gyroscopes, tilt switches
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a brain dysfunction evaluation device, and more particularly to a brain dysfunction evaluation device capable of adjusting a presentation period.
- Brain dysfunction such as dementia symptoms
- Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and is likely to cause up to 70% of cases of dementia.
- the World Health Organization released in 2012 that there are nearly 35.6 million people with dementia worldwide.
- the number of people with dementia is expected to double by 2030 (65.7 million) and will triple by 2050.
- Dementia patients are present in all countries, but more than half (58%) live in low- and middle-income countries. By 2050, the ratio will rise to over 70%.
- the annual cost of treating and caring for people with dementia is more than $604 billion worldwide, including the cost of providing health and social care and the loss of income for people with dementia and their caregivers.
- the international application (application number: PCT/JP2013/074582; invention name: brain dysfunction evaluation method, brain dysfunction evaluation device and its code) disclosed in the brain dysfunction evaluation device is aimed at this problem, allowing the subject to follow the system
- the indicated series of body movement tasks perform body movement, and the body movement detecting element detects the reaction speed of the subject and the accuracy of the reaction position, and compares with the accuracy of the prepared health person in advance, and evaluates the subject's accuracy.
- Physical exercise capacity application number: PCT/JP2013/074582; invention name: brain dysfunction evaluation method, brain dysfunction evaluation device and its code
- the interval of the body movement task indication issued by the brain dysfunction evaluation device is The display period is set in advance.
- the interval between the body movement task indications may be too short, such that Some elderly people with simple exercise retardation may be misjudged as dementia; or the interval is too long, causing the subject to feel bored during the test and unable to measure continuously.
- a brain dysfunction evaluation device capable of adjusting a reminder cycle of a body exercise task according to individual differences.
- a brain dysfunction evaluation apparatus includes: a body motion presentation unit that presents a body motion task to a subject; and a body motion detecting unit that detects a body motion of the subject according to the presented body motion task Related body motion data; an operation input unit that receives input information, an output unit that outputs information to the outside, a storage unit that is capable of storing various data from other units, and a data processing unit, the data processing unit a body motion task selection unit that selects a body motion task input through the operation input unit or a body motion task that is set in advance; a data acquisition unit that acquires information input through the operation input unit, Body motion data of the body motion detected by the body motion detecting unit and body motion accuracy from the body motion accuracy calculating unit; and an instruction data generating unit that performs the operation based on the data acquisition unit
- the information input by the input unit and the body movement are positive
- the body motion correctness calculated by the degree calculation unit generates an instruction period, and generates instruction data according to the body cycle task selected by the body motion task selection
- the generation of the indication period is obtained according to the body motion accuracy obtained by the body motion accuracy calculation unit, the size of the body movement can be adjusted according to the body movement level of the different groups of people, thereby obtaining the compliance detection.
- the appropriate indication period for the crowd is obtained according to the body motion accuracy obtained by the body motion accuracy calculation unit.
- Fig. 1 is a functional block diagram showing an overall configuration of a brain dysfunction evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Fig. 2 is a functional block diagram of an instruction data generating unit in the brain dysfunction evaluation device according to the embodiment of the present invention.
- Fig. 3 is a flow chart showing the operation of the presentation cycle generation unit according to the embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a body movement issued by a body motion prompting unit of a brain dysfunction evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention; Schematic diagram of the task.
- the brain dysfunction evaluation apparatus 100 includes a data processing unit 1, a body motion presentation unit 2, a body motion detection unit 3, an operation input unit 4, an output unit 5, and a storage unit 6.
- the data processing unit 1 usually contains a CPU and a memory.
- the body motion prompting unit 2 can be constituted by a display, a sounder or the like.
- the body motion detecting unit 3 is configured to detect a motion of the subject, and can be realized by a touch panel, an acceleration sensor, a magnetic sensor, a gyro device, a motion capture device, a video capture device, and the like.
- the operation input unit 4 may be constituted by a keyboard or a mouse, or may be the same unit as the body motion detecting unit 3.
- the output unit 5 may be constituted by a display, a printer or the like, or may be realized by the same device as the body motion presentation unit 2.
- the storage unit 6 is composed of a hard disk, an SSD (Solid State Disk), or the like for storing data and programs.
- the data processing unit 1 may be integrally formed with the body motion presentation unit 2, the body motion detecting unit 3, the operation input unit 4, the output unit 5, and the storage unit 6.
- the data processing unit 1 includes a body motion task selection unit 10, a data acquisition unit 20, an instruction data generation unit 30, a body motion accuracy calculation unit 40, and a cognitive impairment evaluation unit 50.
- the body motion task selection unit 10 may select a test item implementation sequence stored in advance by the storage unit 6, or may display a body motion task list in the output unit 5 or the body motion presentation unit 2, and the subject or the caregiver passes the operation input unit 4 Select the tests you need to perform.
- the data acquisition unit 20 acquires the information input by the operation input unit 4, the body motion data of the subject's body motion detected by the body motion detecting unit 3, and the body motion calculated by the body motion accuracy calculation unit 40. Correctness.
- the instruction data generating unit 30 generates body motion instruction data for presenting the subject, and the body motion presenting unit 2 presents the subject with the instruction data generated by the instruction data generating unit 30 of the data processing unit 1.
- the indication data may be an image prompt, a text prompt, a light prompt, or an audible prompt on the LCD screen.
- a prompt on the LCD screen can prompt a specific image at a specific location, or it can prompt a random image at a random location.
- the body cueing unit 2 can be constituted by a display unit, a sound output unit, and the like.
- the body motion accuracy calculation unit 40 calculates the body motion accuracy based on the body motion data and the body motion presentation data.
- the prior application PCT/JP2013/074582
- a weighting operation on the positional correctness ie, the degree of coincidence of the motion position
- the timing accuracy ie, the speed of the reaction time
- the cognitive impairment degree evaluation unit 50 evaluates the cognitive impairment degree based on the body motion accuracy calculated by the body motion accuracy calculation unit 40.
- the instruction data generated by the instruction data generation unit is generated in a predetermined instruction cycle.
- the indication interval of the body movement task cannot be adjusted for each case in which each subject is different. If the interval is too short, the simple exercise retardation of the elderly may be misjudged as dementia; or the interval is too long, causing the subject to feel bored during the test and unable to continuously measure.
- the instruction data generating unit 30 in the present embodiment can generate the instruction period based on the information input by the operation input unit 4 and the body motion accuracy calculated by the body motion accuracy calculating unit 40, which is acquired by the data acquiring unit 20.
- the body motion task selected by the body motion task selecting section 10 generates the instruction data in the above-described instruction period.
- the subject information input through the operation input unit 4 may include data of the age, sex, health status, and the like of the subject.
- the instruction period can be adjusted by evaluating the subject's body motion accuracy calculated by the subject information and the body motion accuracy calculating unit 40.
- the indication period may be decreased; if the subject's body movement accuracy is lower than the average level of the subject's age group, The indication period is increased.
- the indication period may be decreased by a prescribed value; when the subject's body movement accuracy is continuous If the predetermined number of times or more (for example, five or more times) is lower than the predetermined body motion accuracy, the instruction period may be increased by a prescribed value.
- the present invention also gives the following specific embodiments, which will be described in detail below with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.
- Fig. 2 is a block diagram showing a specific function of the instruction data generating unit 30 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the examples are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
- the instruction data generating unit 30 includes an initial setting unit 31, a body motion accuracy comparing unit 32, and an adjusting unit 33.
- the initial setting unit 31 mainly presets the following data: initial presentation period T 0 , maximum presentation period Tmax, minimum presentation period Tmin, adjustment degree t, and reference motion accuracy. M 0 .
- the initial presentation period T 0 is obtained by comprehensively estimating personal information such as the name, sex, and age of the subject input by the subject or the caregiver through the operation input unit 4.
- the following method can be exemplified as a method of setting the initial presentation period T 0 .
- the subjects in different age groups are selected in the healthy population in advance to perform the same test, and the average period T AV of the healthy population around 20 years old is used as the reference reminder period.
- the relationship coefficient K of the subject's age Y and the cueing period is set, and the magnitude of the relationship coefficient can be estimated by the relationship between the actual test age and the exercise ability. Then, the initial setting unit 122 calculates the initial prompt period as follows:
- the maximum cueing period Tmax can be set by the designer based on the experimental data, for example, can be set to a citation cycle that is suitable for those who have a brain dysfunction.
- the minimum prompt period Tmin can be set, for example, to be the same as T AV , or can be set to a reminder period applicable to other people with good exercise ability.
- the adjustment degree t refers to the amplitude of the adjustment period each time.
- the smaller the adjustment t value the higher the accuracy of each adjustment, but it may result in more adjustments required to achieve the desired cue cycle.
- the larger the value of t the lower the accuracy of each adjustment, but the fewer the number of adjustments. Specifically, it can be set according to actual needs.
- the baseline motion accuracy M 0 can be set as an average of the normal population test results obtained after a large number of experiments, and an appropriate value can be set for the elderly population.
- the body motion accuracy comparison unit 32 compares the body accuracy calculated by the body motion accuracy calculation unit 40 with the reference motion accuracy M 0 .
- the presentation period is subtracted and adjusted.
- the prompt period is the value after the adjustment degree t is added, and the value after the adjustment degree t is greater than or equal to the minimum prompt period Tmax, so that the prompt The period is Tmax.
- the instruction data generating unit 30 generates the instruction data based on the body motion task selected by the body motion task selecting unit 10 in the instruction cycle obtained by the above adjustment.
- each piece of data is acquired, and this step can be implemented in the data acquisition unit 20 in the data processing unit 1 of the brain dysfunction evaluation device 100.
- Each piece of data includes, for example, personal information (age, gender, health condition, etc.) of the subject input by the subject or the caregiver through the operation input unit 4.
- the initial setting unit 31 of the instruction data generating unit 30 performs the following presets: initial presentation period T 0 , maximum presentation period Tmax, minimum presentation period Tmin, adjustment degree t, and reference motion accuracy M. 0 .
- the specific setting is as described above.
- step S13 the instruction data generating unit 30 generates the instruction data.
- the generated instruction data is displayed on the body motion presentation unit 2, and the subject completes the exercise task based on the instruction data. If the indication data is generated for the first time, it is generated with the initial prompt period T 0 .
- the body motion detecting unit 3 acquires motion data of the subject.
- the body motion accuracy calculation unit 40 of the data processing unit 1 calculates the motion accuracy of the subject based on the motion data acquired by the body motion detecting unit 3.
- step S16 the body motion accuracy comparison unit 32 in the instruction data generating unit 30 compares the motion accuracy of the subject calculated in step 15 with the reference motion accuracy M 0 set in step A12, It is judged whether or not the body motion accuracy obtained by the body motion detecting unit 3 is greater than or equal to the reference motion accuracy.
- the judgment result is YES, it indicates that the test result of the subject is good, and it can be considered that the prompt period (if the first adjustment is the initial prompt period T 0 ) is adjusted to the decreasing trend.
- the process proceeds to step S17.
- the prompt period minus whether the adjustment value t is less than or equal to Tmin.
- step S17 If the result of the determination in step S17 is YES, that is, the value after the presentation period minus the adjustment degree t is less than or equal to Tmin, the process proceeds to step S19 so that the presentation period is Tmin. If the result of the determination in step S17 is NO, the process proceeds to step S20 so that the presentation period is the value after the adjustment degree t is subtracted.
- step 16 If the result of the determination in step 16 is no, the description indicates that the test result (correctness) of the subject is less than the reference value. In this case, it may be considered to increase the prompt period (if the first adjustment is the initial prompt period T 0 )
- the trend adjustment proceeds to step S18, and it is judged whether or not the value after the adjustment value t is added to the presentation period is greater than or equal to Tmax. If the result of the determination in step S18 is YES, that is, the value after the presentation period plus the adjustment degree t is greater than or equal to Tmax, the process proceeds to step S21 so that the presentation period is Tmax. If the result of the determination in step S18 is NO, the process proceeds to step S22 so that the presentation period is the value after the adjustment degree t is added.
- steps S19, S20, S21, and S22 are followed by the process of step S13, that is, in step S13, the instruction data generating unit 30 generates the presentation data based on the adjusted presentation cycle.
- the difference from the above embodiment is that the instruction data generating unit 30 can also Further, the adjustment count counting unit 34 (not shown) is provided, and the adjustment count unit 34 sets the number of adjustments N of the presentation period in advance, and when the adjustment unit 32 adjusts the number of presentation periods to the adjustment number N, the adjustment of the presentation period is stopped. .
- the number of times of adjustment of the presentation period by the presentation data generating unit 30 can be controlled, thereby reducing the data processing load of the device, that is, after the adjustment period of the presentation period is N times becomes a relatively appropriate value, the prompt period is always used to prompt .
- the number of adjustments N can be modified if the user (the subject or the caregiver) considers it necessary.
- the number of adjustments N of the adjustment unit 32 may be reset, so that the adjustment of the new round of the cueing cycle can be performed again.
- the difference from the above embodiment is that, in the embodiment, when the value after the prompt period minus the adjustment degree t is smaller than the minimum presentation period Tmin, the prompt period is equal to Tmin; or when the prompt period plus the adjustment value t is greater than or equal to the minimum prompt period Tmax, so that the prompt period is equal to Tmax, and in the variation 2, the adjustment degree t can also be adjusted to increase the prompt period After the adjustment t is reduced, it still falls within the range of Tmin to Tmax.
- the prompt period is decreased after the adjustment degree t
- Tmin the minimum prompt period
- the prompt period is the value after the adjustment degree t is added, and the value after the adjustment degree t is added is greater than or equal to the minimum value.
- the preset amplitude of the adjustment itself may be preset according to requirements. For example, if fine adjustment is needed, it may be set to 25% or less, or may be set to 50%, etc., and there is no specific limitation, and may be The designer considers or needs to be set by the user.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a body movement task issued by a body motion presentation unit of the brain dysfunction evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the body motion presentation unit 2 of the brain dysfunction evaluation device 100 is implemented as a touch screen.
- the instruction data generating unit 30 of the data processing unit 1 generates the presentation data in the presentation cycle and displays it in the body motion presentation unit 2.
- the task picture 231 shown on the body motion prompting unit 2 displays the task pattern 231, and simultaneously emits an instruction sound through a device such as a speaker for prompting the tester to click on the timing of the circular task pattern 231. Tester The cycle is repeated, and the task graph 231 is repeatedly clicked.
- the body motion accuracy calculation unit 40 calculates the body motion accuracy based on the position at which the subject clicks (for example, X, Y in the coordinate system) and the timing at which the subject clicks.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Psychology (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Psychiatry (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
- Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Social Psychology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (6)
- 一种脑功能障碍评价装置,其特征在于,包括:身体运动提示单元,其向被检者提示身体运动任务;身体运动检测单元,其检测被检者根据被提示的身体运动任务作出的身体运动相关的身体运动数据;操作输入单元,其接收被输入的信息,输出单元,其向外部输出信息,存储单元,其能够存储来自其他各单元的各项数据,以及数据处理单元,该数据处理单元包括有:身体运动任务选择部,其选择通过所述操作输入单元输入的身体运动任务、或预先设置的身体运动任务;数据取得部,其取得通过所述操作输入单元输入的信息、由所述身体运动检测单元检测到的被检者进行身体运动的身体运动数据、以及来自身体运动正确度计算部的身体运动正确度;指示数据生成部,其根据所述数据取得部取得的通过所述操作输入单元输入的信息与所述身体运动正确度计算部计算得到的身体运动正确度,生成指示周期,并根据所述身体运动任务选择部选择的身体运动任务以上述指示周期生成指示数据,身体运动正确度计算部,其根据所述身体运动数据与身体运动提示数据,计算身体运动正确度;认知障碍度评价部,其根据所述身体运动正确度评价认知障碍度。
- 如权利要求1所述的脑功能障碍评价装置,其特征在于,所述指示数据生成部中,当所述被检者的身体运动正确度连续规定次数以上大于等于预定的身体运动正确度则将所述指示周期减去规定值;当所述被检者的身体运动正确度连续规定次数以上小于预定的身体运动正确度则将所述指示周期加上规定值。
- 如权利要求1所述的脑功能障碍评价装置,其特征在于,所述指示数据生成部包括:初设部,其根据所述数据取得部取得的通过所述操作输入单元输入的信息,进行初 始提示周期T0、最大提示周期Tmax、最小提示周期Tmin、调整度t、以及基准运动正确度M0的设置;身体运动正确度比较部,其比较所述身体运动正确度计算部计算得到的身体正确度与在所述初设部中设置的基准运动正确度M0,调整部,其对指示周期进行调整,当身体运动正确度比较部中的比较结果为所述身体运动正确度计算部计算得到的身体正确度大于等于基准运动正确度M0时,使得提示周期为减去调整度t后的值,且当减去调整度t之后的值小于最小提示周期Tmin时,则使得提示周期为Tmin;当所述身体运动正确度比较部中的比较结果为所述身体运动正确度计算部计算得到的身体正确度小于基准运动正确度M0时,使得提示周期为加上调整度t后的值,且当加上调整度t之后的值大于等于最小提示周期Tmax,使得提示周期为Tmax。
- 如权利要求3所述的脑功能障碍评价装置,其特征在于,所述指示数据生成部进一步包括调整次数计数部,该调整次数计数部预先设置提示周期的调整次数N,并对所述调整部调整所述提示周期的次数进行计数,当所述调整次数计数部的计数达到所述调整次数N时,使得所述调整部停止对提示周期的调整。
- 如权利要求3所述的脑功能障碍评价装置,其特征在于,所述调整部中,当身体运动正确度比较部中的比较结果为所述身体运动正确度计算部计算得到的身体正确度大于等于基准运动正确度M0时,使得提示周期为减去调整度t后的值,且当减去调整度t之后的值小于最小提示周期Tmin时,使得调整度t减小预定幅度并重新计算提示周期直到提示周期大于Tmin;当所述身体运动正确度比较部中的比较结果为所述身体运动正确度计算部计算得到的身体正确度小于基准运动正确度M0时,使得提示周期为加上调整度t后的值,且当加上调整度t之后的值大于等于最小提示周期Tmax时,使得调整度t减小预定幅度并重新计算提示周期直到周期小于Tmax。
- 如权利要求5所述的脑功能障碍评价装置,其特征在于,所述调整度减小的预定幅度为25%~50%。
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/305,509 US10736556B2 (en) | 2014-04-21 | 2015-04-20 | Brain disorder evaluation apparatus |
JP2016563782A JP6291083B2 (ja) | 2014-04-21 | 2015-04-20 | 脳機能障害評価装置 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410160814.1A CN105078479B (zh) | 2014-04-21 | 2014-04-21 | 脑功能障碍评价装置 |
CN201410160814.1 | 2014-04-21 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2015161763A1 true WO2015161763A1 (zh) | 2015-10-29 |
Family
ID=54331741
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2015/076965 WO2015161763A1 (zh) | 2014-04-21 | 2015-04-20 | 脑功能障碍评价装置 |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10736556B2 (zh) |
JP (1) | JP6291083B2 (zh) |
CN (1) | CN105078479B (zh) |
WO (1) | WO2015161763A1 (zh) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6653222B2 (ja) * | 2016-06-06 | 2020-02-26 | マクセル株式会社 | 手指運動練習メニュー生成システム、方法、及びプログラム |
JP6888095B2 (ja) * | 2016-09-14 | 2021-06-16 | エフ ホフマン−ラ ロッシュ アクチェン ゲゼルシャフト | 認知および動作の疾患もしくは障害についてのデジタルバイオマーカー |
CN109461503B (zh) * | 2018-11-14 | 2020-12-18 | 科大讯飞股份有限公司 | 题目得分评估方法及认知评估装置、设备、可读存储介质 |
JP7135887B2 (ja) * | 2019-01-24 | 2022-09-13 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 促し発話装置、促し発話方法及びプログラム |
KR102604559B1 (ko) * | 2020-07-20 | 2023-11-20 | 연세대학교 산학협력단 | 약물 부작용에 대한 정보 제공 방법 및 이를 이용한 디바이스 |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030233032A1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2003-12-18 | Teicher Martin H. | Methods for continuous performance testing |
CN1521683A (zh) * | 2003-01-27 | 2004-08-18 | 汤一平 | 老年性痴呆防止方法 |
CA2461272A1 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-17 | Katsuya Urakami | Self-diagnostic system for forgetfulness and apparatus |
CN1835714A (zh) * | 2003-07-28 | 2006-09-20 | 学校法人东海大学 | 痴呆检查装置、痴呆检查服务器及客户机、痴呆检查*** |
US20090130640A1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-21 | Posit Science Corporation | N-back exercise for training cognition |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000339074A (ja) * | 1999-05-26 | 2000-12-08 | Sony Corp | プレファレンス検出装置および方法、並びに媒体 |
US20020103429A1 (en) * | 2001-01-30 | 2002-08-01 | Decharms R. Christopher | Methods for physiological monitoring, training, exercise and regulation |
US6475161B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-11-05 | The Mclean Hospital Corporation | Methods for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia |
JP4524054B2 (ja) * | 2001-06-14 | 2010-08-11 | 株式会社ユニメック | 脳・神経系疾患の病状診断、投薬処方及び機能回復訓練のための支援システム |
JP2006158944A (ja) * | 2005-05-30 | 2006-06-22 | Hq Research Japan:Kk | 脳機能測定システム及び方法、並びにコンピュータプログラム |
US8013837B1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2011-09-06 | James Ernest Schroeder | Process and apparatus for providing a one-dimensional computer input interface allowing movement in one or two directions to conduct pointer operations usually performed with a mouse and character input usually performed with a keyboard |
CN201200401Y (zh) * | 2008-01-31 | 2009-03-04 | 中国人民解放军第三军医大学第三附属医院 | 一种老年性痴呆的诊断装置 |
US8634638B2 (en) * | 2008-06-20 | 2014-01-21 | Sri International | Real-time action detection and classification |
WO2013071285A1 (en) * | 2011-11-11 | 2013-05-16 | Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey | Methods for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders |
WO2013120075A1 (en) * | 2012-02-09 | 2013-08-15 | Anthrotronix, Inc. | Performance assessment tool |
JP2014041314A (ja) * | 2012-08-24 | 2014-03-06 | Suzuki Motor Corp | 電動車いす運転者評価装置及び電動車いす運転者評価プログラム |
US20140257141A1 (en) * | 2013-03-05 | 2014-09-11 | Great Lakes Neurotechnologies Inc. | Movement disorder monitoring and symptom quantification system and method |
JP6122130B2 (ja) * | 2013-09-11 | 2017-04-26 | 日立マクセル株式会社 | 脳機能障害評価方法、脳機能障害評価装置およびそのプログラム |
-
2014
- 2014-04-21 CN CN201410160814.1A patent/CN105078479B/zh active Active
-
2015
- 2015-04-20 US US15/305,509 patent/US10736556B2/en active Active
- 2015-04-20 JP JP2016563782A patent/JP6291083B2/ja active Active
- 2015-04-20 WO PCT/CN2015/076965 patent/WO2015161763A1/zh active Application Filing
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030233032A1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2003-12-18 | Teicher Martin H. | Methods for continuous performance testing |
CN1521683A (zh) * | 2003-01-27 | 2004-08-18 | 汤一平 | 老年性痴呆防止方法 |
CN1835714A (zh) * | 2003-07-28 | 2006-09-20 | 学校法人东海大学 | 痴呆检查装置、痴呆检查服务器及客户机、痴呆检查*** |
CA2461272A1 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-17 | Katsuya Urakami | Self-diagnostic system for forgetfulness and apparatus |
US20090130640A1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-21 | Posit Science Corporation | N-back exercise for training cognition |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2017515543A (ja) | 2017-06-15 |
CN105078479B (zh) | 2021-05-28 |
CN105078479A (zh) | 2015-11-25 |
JP6291083B2 (ja) | 2018-03-14 |
US20170112426A1 (en) | 2017-04-27 |
US10736556B2 (en) | 2020-08-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ellis et al. | A validated smartphone-based assessment of gait and gait variability in Parkinson’s disease | |
Arora et al. | Smartphone motor testing to distinguish idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder, controls, and PD | |
WO2015161763A1 (zh) | 脑功能障碍评价装置 | |
WO2015037089A1 (ja) | 脳機能障害評価方法、脳機能障害評価装置およびそのプログラム | |
KR102477327B1 (ko) | 인지 능력 측정을 위한 프로세서 구현 시스템 및 방법 | |
ES2957212T3 (es) | Aparato y método para la caracterización de la función motora | |
CN106256312B (zh) | 认知功能障碍评价装置 | |
US11141095B2 (en) | Method and system for detecting concussion | |
Tieges et al. | Development of a smartphone application for the objective detection of attentional deficits in delirium | |
JP2017500927A (ja) | 睡眠モニタリングデバイス | |
JP2017524426A (ja) | 睡眠回復レベルを決定し、表示するシステムおよび方法 | |
JP2017140424A (ja) | 脳機能障害評価方法、脳機能障害評価装置およびそのプログラム | |
JP6385470B2 (ja) | 対象の健康状態を検出するデバイス、システム及びコンピュータプログラム | |
Greene et al. | Quantitative assessment of multiple sclerosis using inertial sensors and the TUG test | |
Ben Mansour et al. | The Multifeature Gait Score: An accurate way to assess gait quality | |
KR20200128900A (ko) | 학습 집중도 개선 및 디지털 디톡스를 위한 뉴로 피드백 시스템 및 그 방법 | |
JP6518056B2 (ja) | 睡眠状態判定装置、睡眠状態判定方法及びプログラム | |
Zhu et al. | Validating an iOS-based rhythmic auditory cueing evaluation (iRACE) for Parkinson's disease | |
KR20200128906A (ko) | 학습 집중도 개선을 위한 뉴로 피드백 시스템 및 그 방법 | |
Perumal et al. | Digital measures of respiratory and upper limb function in spinal muscular atrophy: design, feasibility, reliability, and preliminary validity of a smartphone sensor-based assessment suite | |
KR20170087863A (ko) | 유아 검사 방법 및 그 검사 방법을 구현하기 위한 적합한 검사 장치 | |
Goubault et al. | Remnants of cardinal symptoms of Parkinson's disease, not dyskinesia, are problematic for dyskinetic patients performing activities of daily living | |
JP2015085036A (ja) | 診断装置 | |
WO2021063937A1 (en) | Means and methods for assessing huntington´s disease (hd) | |
Almajid et al. | Assessment of dual-tasking during a dynamic balance task using a smartphone app: a pilot study |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 15782726 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2016563782 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 15305509 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 15782726 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |