WO1998009753A9 - Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique - Google Patents

Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique

Info

Publication number
WO1998009753A9
WO1998009753A9 PCT/US1997/015463 US9715463W WO9809753A9 WO 1998009753 A9 WO1998009753 A9 WO 1998009753A9 US 9715463 W US9715463 W US 9715463W WO 9809753 A9 WO9809753 A9 WO 9809753A9
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
internal surface
vapor
produced
precursor material
powder
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1997/015463
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO1998009753A1 (fr
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/707,341 external-priority patent/US5788738A/en
Priority claimed from US08/706,819 external-priority patent/US5851507A/en
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to CA002263902A priority Critical patent/CA2263902A1/fr
Publication of WO1998009753A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998009753A1/fr
Publication of WO1998009753A9 publication Critical patent/WO1998009753A9/fr

Links

Definitions

  • This invention pertains in general to a process and apparatus for the synthesis of submicron particles.
  • the invention relates to a novel approach utilizing vaporization and ultra-rapid thermal quenching based on adiabatic expansion of the vapor through a boundary layer converging-diverging nozzle to produce submicron particles under controlled operating conditions.
  • submicron powders are materials having average grain size below 1 micrometer.
  • nanoscale powders namely, submicron powders with grain size less than 100 nanometers and with a significant fraction of interfacial atoms.
  • powders with grain size of less than 50 nanometers Of greater interest are powders with grain size less than 20 nanometers.
  • powders with grain size less than 10 nanometers It is known that within these size ranges a variety of confinement effects occur that dramatically change the properties of the material. A property will be altered when the entity or mechanism responsible for that property is confined within a space smaller than some critical length associated with that entity or mechanism. See H. Gleiter.
  • Nanopowders may indeed represent the threshold of a new era in materials technology, but the key to their full utilization depends on the development of new processes for producing nanopowders economically and in commercially viable quantities under controlled operating conditions.
  • nanopowders possess important technical properties that show the potential for becoming commercially significant.
  • all known production methods consist of batch processes that are too expensive to yield commercially affordable materials for bulk applications (current production costs for these processes are orders of magnitude higher than the $10.00/lb target price considered economical for bulk applications of these materials). Therefore, the commercial future of nanopowders depends on the development of a process that can produce nanopowders with predetermined properties, in commercially viable quantities, and at an affordable cost.
  • the synthesis and processing technology for nanopowders should allow control of the size and size distribution of the constituent structures and phases (this is critical to the mechanistic performance of nanopowders); allow control of the composition of the phases in the nanomaterial (critical to define the property domain of the nanomaterial); allow control over the nature of interfaces (e.g. purity) and the interaction between interfaces (critical to the interface-based characteristics of the nanopowders); and minimize the use of environmentally undesirable solvents and additives. None of the known processes for the synthesis of nanomaterials possesses these characteristics; therefore, none is suitable for bulk commercialization of nanopowders.
  • prior-art processes are all batch, and have high energy or solvent processing requirements, which are all inherent limitations to the cost-effective and large-scale production of nanopowders.
  • the processes currently in use can be classified into three general groups: chemical, mechanical-attrition, and gas- condensation methods.
  • the chemical methods include precipitation techniques, sol- gel processes, and inverse-micelle methods. See Beck and Siegel, "The Dissociative Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide over Nanophase Titanium Dioxide," J. Mater. Res., 7, 2840 (1992), and Steigerwald and Brus, “Synthesis, Stabilization, and Electronic Structure of Quantum Semiconductor Nanoclusters," 1 1 Ann. Rev. Mater.
  • the mechanical attrition methods rely on the physical decomposition of coarser grains through severe mechanical deformation. Such processing methods are energy intensive, have low flexibility, are susceptible to contamination by attrition tools or media, and afford little control over the quality and consistency of the final product.
  • the gas condensation methods essentially involve the evaporation of a coarse (at least micron size) source of precursor material, such as a metal, inorganic, etc., in an inert gas at a low pressure.
  • a coarse (at least micron size) source of precursor material such as a metal, inorganic, etc.
  • the evaporated source atoms or molecules collide with the gas atoms or molecules and lose energy, thereby causing a homogeneous condensation of atom or molecule clusters in the supersaturated vicinity of the precursor source.
  • the further accretion and/or coalescence of the nucleated particles is minimized by rapid removal of the nanometer-sized powders so formed from the region of supersaturation. See R. Uyeda, "Studies of Ultrafine Particles in Japan: Crystallography, Methods of Preparation and Technological Applications," 11 Prog. Mater.
  • gas condensation processes may involve gas-phase reactions, some of the known gas condensation processes have produced nanomaterials of acceptable size distribution, but they are all batch operations and are not readily scaleable for commercial exploitation.
  • submicron powders are materials having average grain size below 1 micrometer.
  • nanoscale powders namely, submicron powders with grain size less than 100 nanometers. Finer domain sizes are desirable because the physiochemical properties of materials are remarkably different and commercially useful when the domain size is reduced below 100 nanometers. Nanoscale powders also exhibit very high surface areas and enhanced surface activity for physical and chemical reactions.
  • a flow optimized hot wall reactor is used as the source because it is believed by K ⁇ nig et al that other sources such as a plasma flame or laser beam result in uncontrollable reaction conditions prevailing in various parts of the reaction zone with very steep temperature gradients and/or turbulent flow conditions, resulting in the powders having broad particle size distribution.
  • the nozzle in the Konig et al. process relates to feed system of the process and does not mechanistically participate with the evaporation, reactions, condensation or growth of fine powders. Most notably, because the process described by K ⁇ nig et al. is a reactive process, byproducts such as HCl are formed, which ultimately affect the purity of the nanomaterials.
  • Konig et al. teach a laminar flow technique that would face scale up limitations. This is so because the powder characteristics are related to residence time of gases in the reactor, which in turn is related to the parabolic flow associated with laminar flow. In other words, in the K ⁇ nig et al. process, there is a radially varying profile in residence time (the gas at the center is moving faster than the gas near the wall). As the reactor is scaled up, the powder size will get more broad in distribution.
  • the present invention discloses a pioneering and unique thermal condensation process. This process can be a strictly physical process which starts with a material, vaporizes it at very high temperatures (above 2000 degrees C), then very rapidly recondenses it to produce nanoscale powders, thus eliminating the formation of undesirable byproducts. This process satisfies these requirements for the continuous production of nanopowders in bulk quantities, and additionally discloses a Joule-Thompson nozzle that is particularly suited for ultra-rapid quenching and condensation of vaporized material described above.
  • One of the objectives of this invention is a low capital-cost process for the production of quantum confined and nanometer cluster materials of various inorganic compositions including but not limited to carbides, nitrides, oxides, chalcogenides, halogenides, alloys, metals, complex compositions, and composites in bulk quantities.
  • Another objective of this invention is to develop techniques to control the size, shape, surface area, morphology, surface characteristics, surface composition, distribution, and degree of agglomeration.
  • Another objective is to develop a process which allows vaporization of ingredients at very high temperatures (> 2000 degrees C) yet permits quenching at very high rates.
  • Yet another objective is to develop a process which produces product but generates no byproduct.
  • a further objective of this invention is to develop a method of ensuring high yield and high selectivity, including but not limited to harvesting 95% + of the quantum confined and nanometer cluster material produced.
  • Yet another objective of this invention is to prevent the damage of the quantum confined and nanometer cluster materials during and after their synthesis.
  • Another objective is a device that is simple, easy to operate, and flexible with respect to operating parameters, so as to allow the production of multiple products.
  • Another objective is a device that prevents contamination of the quenched product from the materials of construction used for the quench equipment.
  • Yet another objective is a device that allows flexibility in the composition of the vapor quenched, in quench rates and quench volume.
  • Another objective of the invention is a process and device that can be carried out with low utility costs (that is, low energy input, energy output, and maintenance expenses).
  • Another objective is a process and device with low operating costs (i.e., labor, recycling, raw materials, plant space, etc.); accordingly, the invention aims at a process and device with high yield per pass and high product selectivity.
  • Another objective is a process that is continuous and suitable for scaling up to production rates in the order of tons per day.
  • Yet another objective is a process that is simple, easy to operate, and flexible, so as to allow the production of multiple products with relatively simple operating changes.
  • Still another objective is a process and device that are safe and environmentally benign.
  • Another objective is an operationally stable process that requires a minimal external-control structure for steady-state operation.
  • one aspect of the this invention involves the continuous vaporization at very high temperatures of commercially- available, coarse precursor material suspended in a carrier gas in a thermal reaction chamber under conditions that minimize superheating and favor nucleation of the resulting vapor.
  • a kinetic gas feed may be mixed with the vapor in the reactor to reach a thermokinetic state of the vapor that may be required to produce controlled nucleation of solid powders from the vapor stream.
  • the vapor stream is rapidly and uniformly quenched at rates of at least 1,000 K per second, preferably greater than 1,000,000 K per second, to block the continued growth of the nucleated particles and produce a nanosize powder suspension of narrow particle-size distribution.
  • the nanopowder is then harvested by filtration from the quenched vapor stream and the carrier medium is purified, compressed and recycled for mixing with new precursor material in the feed stream.
  • the thermal quenching is carried out in a converging-diverging expansion nozzle that exploits the Joule-Thompson principle of adiabatic expansion of high-temperature vapors. Since the physical characteristics of the nozzle determine the extent of cooling, pressure drop and density drop, the condensation process can be advantageously controlled by utilizing a nozzle of predetermined key dimensions to fit the requirements of the material being condensed.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the adiabatic-expansion, thermal quenching process of the present invention.
  • Figure 2a is a sketch of a converging-diverging nozzle illustrating the relationship between critical parameters of the process and of the nozzle used to carry out the invention.
  • Figure 2b is a sketch of a converging-diverging nozzle illustrating the key design parameters of the device.
  • Figure 3a, 3b and 3c are cross-sectional elevational, top, and cross-sectional elevational drawings, respectively of a converging-diverging, adiabatic expansion nozzle according to the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 4 is a schematic illustration of a pilot-plant process according to the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • Figures 5a, 5b, 5c, and 5d are drawings of the preferred embodiment of the present invention for a scaled up process.
  • Figure 6 is the transmission electron micrograph of the zinc nanosize powder produced by the invention.
  • Figure 7 is an X-ray diffraction patters of the product of Example 1, indicating that the only phase present was zinc.
  • Figure 8 is a SEM micrograph of the feed powders iron and titanium used, showing that they were greater than 1 micrometer when fed.
  • Figure 9 is a transmission electron microscope image of the iron-titanium alloy nanopowders produced in Example 2, showing them to be in the 10-45 manometer range.
  • Figure 10 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 2, indicating that the phases formed were titanium, iron and iron-titanium intermetallic.
  • Figure 11 is a transmission electron microscope image of the nickel aluminide nanopowder produced in Example 3.
  • Figure 12 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 3, indicating that the phase formed was NiAl.
  • Figure 13 is a transmission electron microscope image of the tungsten oxide nanopowder produced in Example 4.
  • Figure 14 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 4, indicating that the phase formed was WO 3 .
  • Figure 15 is a transmission electron microscope image of the cerium oxide nanopowder produced in Example 5.
  • Figure 16 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 5, indicating that the phase formed was CeO 2 .
  • Figure 17 is a transmission electron microscope image of the silicon carbide nanopowder produced in Example 6.
  • Figure 18 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 6, indicating that the phase formed was SiC.
  • Figure 19 is a transmission electron microscope image of the molybdenum nitride nanopowder produced in Example 7.
  • Figure 20 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 7, indicating that the phase formed was Mo 2 N.
  • Figure 21 is a scanning electron microscope image of the nickel boride ceramic used in Example 8, showing that the feed powder was greater than 1 micrometer.
  • Figure 22 is a transmission electron microscope image of the Ni and Ni 3 B nanopowders produced in Example 8, showing them to be in the 10-30 manometer range.
  • Figure 23 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 8, indicating that the phases formed were Ni and Ni 3 B.
  • Figure 24 is a transmission electron microscope image of the calcium-oxide nanopowders produced in Example 9, showing them to be in the 5-20 manometer range.
  • Figure 25 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 9, indicating that the phase formed was CaO.
  • Figures 26a and 26b are transmission electron microscope micrographs of barium titanate produced in Example 10.
  • Figure 27 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of barium titanate produced in Example 10.
  • Figures 28a and 28b are transmission electron microscope micrographs of strontium titanate produced in Example 10.
  • Figure 29 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of strontium titanate produced in Example 10.
  • Figures 30a and 30b are transmission electron microscope micrographs of barium titante produced in Example 10.
  • Figure 31 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of barium titanate produced in Example 10.
  • Figure 32 is a transmission electron microscope micrograph of nickel zinc ferrite produced in Example 11.
  • Figure 33 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of nickel zinc ferrite produced in Example 11.
  • Figures 34a and 34b are transmission electron micrographs of Ni/Cr/Co/Mo alloy produced in Example 12.
  • Figure 35 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of Ni/Cr/Co/Mo alloy produced in Example 12.
  • Figure 36 is a transmission electron micrograph of bismuth telluride produced in Example 13.
  • Figure 37 is an X-ray diffraction pattern of bismuth telluride produced in Example 13.
  • a primary aspect of this invention lies in the discovery that the size and size distribution of nanopowders produced by vapor condensation can be controlled by interrupting the growth process through ultra-rapid thermal quenching of the condensing vapor.
  • Another critical aspect of the invention is the realization that Joule-Thompson adiabatic expansion provides a controllable process for quenching such condensing vapor at predetermined rates as high as 10 6 °C/sec, or greater, as required for producing nanopowders of desired properties.
  • a third, important aspect of the invention is the development of a converging-diverging nozzle to implement the adiabatic expansion process of the invention under predictable conditions for a variety of precursor materials and operating conditions.
  • Fig. 1 shows the process flow diagram and a schematic representation of the apparatus of the invention as applied to solid precursors, such as metals, alloys, ceramics, composites, and combinations thereof. It is understood that the process applies equivalently to other forms of precursors such as liquid, gaseous, slurry, and combinations thereof.
  • a feed stream 10 of such a precursor material in powder form is premixed with a feed gas stream 12 (such as argon, helium, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, water vapor, methane, air, or a combination thereof, depending on the particular precursor being processed and the corresponding atmosphere - inert, oxidizing, or reducing - required for the process) in mixing apparatus 14 appropriate to create a suspension.
  • a feed gas stream 12 such as argon, helium, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, water vapor, methane, air, or a combination thereof, depending on the particular precursor being processed and the corresponding atmosphere - inert, oxidizing, or reducing - required for the process
  • the feed be a low-cost, coarser form of composition desired. However, if the coarse form is expensive, it is equally feasible to use a mix of low-cost precursors that when combined reflect the composition desired.
  • non-stoichiometric feed ratios can be used if the non-stoichiometric feed is less expensive or if the final product streams have the properties as desired.
  • the feed can be a pure composition, a mix of solids and reactant gases, a mix of solids and reactant liquids, a mix of solids, a mix of liquids and gases, a mix of liquids, a mix of gases, a mix of solids, liquids and gases, or combinations thereof.
  • essentially the only constituent atoms present in the feed other than inert components are the constituent atoms present in the desired solid product.
  • the feed would be micron scale zinc oxide.
  • the desired product is indium tin oxide (ITO) the feed would be indium oxide and tin oxide.
  • the desired product is nonstoichiometric titanium dioxide, the feed would be titanium dioxide and the process would be run to produce a non-stoichiometric product.
  • An example of a system which would not represent this embodiment would be the reaction of titanium tetrachloride with water to produce titanium dioxide and hydrogen chloride as follows:
  • constituent atoms present in the feed namely hydrogen and chlorine, which are not present in the desired solid product.
  • the preferred method is premixing the feed to as homogeneous levels as possible. However, heterogeneous, series, or parallel feeds are suitable for certain applications.
  • the feed precursors are preferably carried in a gas or a mix of gases that does not possess or can contribute an element that is not desired in the final composition.
  • a preferred carrier stream are inert gases such as argon, helium, neon and xenon.
  • the powder 10 is then suspended in the gas 12, preferably in a continuous operation, using fluidized beds, spouting beds, hoppers, or combinations thereof, as best suited to the nature of the precursor.
  • the test runs performed to reduce the invention to practice were conducted with precursor feeds having particle size greater than 1 micrometer, but the process could be used with any size suitable for its continuous vaporization in a gas stream.
  • the resulting gas-stream suspension 16 is advantageously preheated in a heat exchanger 18 and then is fed into a thermal reactor 20 where the suspended powder particles preferably completely evaporated in a thermal evaporation zone 22 by the input of thermal energy.
  • the dimensions of the hot zone are established based on energy balance equations derived from basic principles of transport phenomena.
  • the temperature histories of the feed material depend upon the enthalpy of the plasma discharge and the thermodynamic properties of the feed material.
  • the times required for heating the particulate material to the melting point, melting, heating to the vaporization point and vaporization are calculated using heat transfer equations. Additionally, the steps of heating up to the melting temperature and boiling point, and melting and vaporization can be described using appropriate heat transfer equations. These equations can be found in the U.S. Provisional patent application Express Mail number EI813191155US dated August 26, 1997, and in Transport Phenomena in Mettalurgy, G.H. Geiger and D. R. Pourier, Addison- Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, USA (1973) both of which are included herein by reference.
  • the source 24 of such thermal energy can be accomplished by external heat transfer or by internal heat or both.
  • Examples of external heat include but are not limited to induction, d.c. arc, plasma and radiation.
  • Examples of internal heat include, but are not limited to reaction heat such as combustion and latent heats of phase transformation. Any of these may be used so long as they are sufficient to cause the rapid vaporization of the powder suspension being processed. It is desirable that the temperature in the thermal evaporation zone be in excess of 2000 degrees C. It is preferred that the temperature in the thermal evaporation zone be in excess of 3000 degrees K. It is more preferred that the temperature in the thermal evaporation zone be in excess of 4000 degrees K. It is most preferred that the T in the thermal evaporation zone be in excess of 5000 degrees K.
  • the temperature in the thermal evaporation zone be above the vaporization temperature of all constituent species.
  • they may be pre-coated with the same material being processed. Additionally, this problem can be prevented most preferably by actively cooling the reactor walls and by using a confinement gas stream, i.e. a blanket of the inert gases along the walls of the reactor.
  • the vaporized gas-stream suspension next enters an extended reaction zone 26 of the thermal reactor that provides additional residence time, as needed to complete the evaporation of the feed material and to provide additional reaction time (if necessary). It is desirable that the temperature in the extended reaction zone be in excess of 2000 degrees C. It is preferred that the temperature in the extended reaction zone be in excess of 2500 degrees K. It is more preferred that the temperature in the extended reaction zone be in excess of 3000 degrees K. It is necessary that the temperature in the extended reaction zone be above the vaporization temperature of all constituent species. In some cases, this may mandate a temperature in excess of 3000 degrees K. As the stream leaves the reactor, it passes through a zone 56 where the thermokinetic conditions favor the nucleation of solid powders from the vaporized precursor.
  • ⁇ is the surface free energy
  • V is the molecular volume of the condensed phase
  • k is Boltzman's constant
  • P is the pressure of the vapor in the system
  • P ⁇ is the vapor pressure of the condensed phase.
  • a kinetic gas feed 28 (such as argon, helium, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, water vapor, methane, air, or combinations thereof) can also be mixed with the precursor vapor to reach the desired thermokinetic state.
  • a converging- diverging nozzle-driven adiabatic expansion chamber 30 at rates at least exceeding 10 3 K/sec, preferably greater than 10 6 K/sec, or as high as possible.
  • a cooling medium 32 is utilized for the converging-diverging nozzle to prevent contamination of the product and damage to the expansion chamber 30.
  • the use of a confinement blanket gas stream all along the periphery of the product stream also prevents the deposition of nanometer clusters to the walls of the reactor from thermophoresis. Rapid quenching ensures that the powder produced is homogeneous, its size is uniform and the mean powder size remains in submicron scale.
  • the quenching of the product gas can be accomplished in numerous ways and combinations thereof. Some additional examples include, but are not limited to, addition of coolant gases or liquids, addition of materials which absorb heat, radiative cooling, conductive cooling, convective cooling, application of a cooled surface, impinging into liquid such as but not limited to water.
  • the preferred method however, is gas expansion as is described in detail below. The theoretical behavior of the Joule-Thompson adiabatic expansion process is described by the well-known equation:
  • T 2 /T (P 2 /P,) (k - 1)/k , (3)
  • T, and T 2 are the temperatures before and after expansion, respectively; P, and P 2 are the pressures before and after expansion, respectively; and k is the ratio of specific heats at constant pressure and constant volume (Cp/C v ).
  • Equation 2 Equation 2 to a temperature change occurring during adiabatic expansion, ⁇ T,
  • dT/dt T, d[(P 2 /P,) (k -
  • the quench rate can be changed by changing the rate of expansion, which provides a much-sought form of control over the nucleation process of nanopowders produced by vapor condensation.
  • the adiabatic expansion approach of the present invention provides an invaluable tool, missing in all prior-art processes, for controlling the quality of the resulting nanopowders.
  • the process can be carried out stably in continuous fashion, it provides a suitable vehicle for large scale applications and commercial production of bulk nanomaterials.
  • Figure 2a is a sketch of a converging-diverging nozzle 50 to illustrate the relationship between critical parameters of the process and of the nozzle used to carry out the invention. It consists of an optimally-shaped combination of a convergent section 52, a throat section 54, and a divergent section 56.
  • the condensing fluid is restricted through a uniformly decreasing cross-section A, from an initial cross-section A, at pressure P, and temperature T, it is passed through the cross-section A* of the throat 54, and then it is expanded through a final cross-section A 2 at pressure P 2 and temperature T 2 .
  • the process is carried out through a cross- section A that is first uniformly decreasing and then uniformly increasing through the device.
  • the Mach number M for the nozzle is less than 1, while it is equal to 1 in the throat 54, and greater than 1 in the diverging section 56. (Mach number is defined as the ratio of the hydrodynamic flow velocity to the local speed of sound.) Therefore, the initial subsonic flow is accelerated in the converging section of the nozzle, and the flow expands supersonically in the divergent section of the nozzle.
  • T 2 /T [l + (k-l)M 2 /2]-' (6)
  • P 2 /P [l + (k-l)M 2 /2] k (k"1) (7)
  • T 2 , P 2 and p 2 are the flow temperature, pressure and density of the condensing fluid after the divergent section, T,, P, and p,, are at the inlet section of the nozzle
  • M is the Mach number
  • K is the ratio of heat capacities at constant pressure and constant volume (Cp/C v ).
  • a temperature drop of T 2 /T, 0.54 can be expected across the nozzle.
  • nozzle 50 of the invention As adapted to a process for rapidly quenching condensing vapors to produce nanopowders, are illustrated in sectional-elevational and top views.
  • the temperature of the nozzle is maintained low with a coolant stream 32, such as cooling water, circulating in a cooling jacket 29 surrounding the nozzle's interior wall 58 between inlet and outlet ports 60 and 62.
  • the cooling medium is preferably circulated in countercurrent flow to optimize uniform cooling of the wall.
  • lower nozzle-wall temperatures improve the contamination and failure problems, such lower temperatures can also lead to vapor condensation on the nozzle walls because of mechanisms such as thermophoresis. Vapor condensation can, in turn, lead to increasing restriction in the nozzle throat diameter, with subsequent closure of the throat and failure of the nozzle.
  • a gaseous boundary-layer stream 33 to form a blanket over the internal surface of the nozzle.
  • the blanket gases can be introduced into the nozzle' s interior wall axially, radially or tangentially, through an inlet port 31 , and can be inert, such as argon or helium when metals and alloys are being processed; or reactive, such as nitrogen, when nitrides are being synthesized; or oxygen or air, when oxides are being processed; methane and hydrocarbons, when carbides are being processed; halogens when halides are being synthesized; or combinations thereof, depending on the ultimate material being synthesized.
  • inert such as argon or helium when metals and alloys are being processed
  • reactive such as nitrogen, when nitrides are being synthesized
  • oxygen or air when oxides are being processed
  • methane and hydrocarbons when carbides are being processed
  • halogens when halides are being synthesized
  • reactive gases can participate in heat transfer with the nucleation process, or reactively on powder surface to selectively modify the composition of the surface (coated powders), or reactively to transform the bulk composition of the powder, or in combinations to achieve multiple functions.
  • This secondary gas feed 33 can help engineer the product nucleation process and the resultant characteristics of the powder.
  • Such nanosize powders will be passivated by precision controlled exposure to N 2 , 0 2 , CH 4 or NH 3 .
  • the quenched gas stream 34 is then filtered in appropriate separation equipment 36 to remove the submicron powder product 38 from the gas stream.
  • the separation can be accomplished using various methods including, but not limited to, bag houses containing polymeric or inorganic filters, electrostatic filtration, surface deposition on cold surfaces followed by scraping with a ⁇ blade, centrifugal separation, in situ deposition in porous media, adsorption in liquids or solids.
  • the preferred method for use in the present invention is the use of bag houses.
  • the filtration can be accomplished by single stage or multistage impingement filters, electrostatic filters, screen filters, fabric filters, cyclones, scrubbers, magnetic filters, or combinations thereof.
  • the filtered nanopowder product 38 is then harvested from the filter 36 either in batch mode or continuously using screw conveyors or phase solid transport and the product stream is conveyed to powder processing or packaging unit operations (not shown in the drawings).
  • the filtered gas stream 40 is compressed in a vacuum- pump/compressor unit 42 and cooled by preheating the gas-stream suspension 16 in heat exchanger 18.
  • the enthalpy of compression can be utilized by the process as process heat through heat integration.
  • Stream 40 is then treated in a gas cleaning unit 44 to remove impurities and any undesirable process product gases (such as CO, CO 2 , H 2 0, HCl , NH 3 , etc).
  • the gas treatment can be accomplished by single stage or multistage gas-gas separation unit operations such as absorption, adsorption, extraction, condensation, membrane separation, fractional diffusion, reactive separation, fractional separation, and combinations thereof.
  • the treated gases 46 are recycled back to be reused with the feed gas stream 12.
  • a small split stream 48 of the compressed treated gas 46 is purged to ensure steady state operation of the continuous thermal process.
  • This thermal reactor, system consists of an upper, cylindrical, thermal evaporation chamber 22 made of quartz and cooled by circulating water (not shown).
  • the gas-stream suspension 16 is formed by mixing the solid feed material 10 fed by a powder feeder 11 with an inert gas stream 12, such as argon.
  • the suspension 16 is injected continuously from the top of the thermal evaporation chamber 22 through a water-cooled injection probe 23 and it is heated inductively by means of a DC plasma torch.
  • a DC plasma torch Note that for the smaller scale process an ICP torch was used as the heat torch. However, one problem associated with the ICP torch is its low thermal efficiency.
  • a DC plasma torch For scaled up processes, the use of a DC plasma torch is more advantageous because it enables better thermal efficiency, higher feed rates, no RF radiation shielding is required, and it is easily positionable as compared to the ICP ⁇ ⁇ torch.
  • plasma is produced by electrical discharge between two electrodes in the presence of a gas.
  • the classifications of plasma torches are based on the position of electrodes, for example, non-transferred or transferred arc modes.
  • the non-transferred arc mode both the anode and the cathode are located in the torch and the arc is established between these electrodes.
  • the transferred arc mode one electrode is located outside the torch, which may be the workpiece or material to be heated.
  • the reactor also comprises another, cylindrical, extended reaction zone 26 made of stainless steel, water cooled, positioned downstream of the thermal evaporation zone 22, and sufficiently large to give the feed stream the residence time required to complete the vaporization and reaction.
  • the reaction zone 26 is lined with a zirconia refractory felt and a layer of silicon-carbide refractory material to reduce heat losses from the hot reaction zone. If necessary to prevent contamination of the reacting fluid by the reactor or refractory material, the reactor's interior walls (and refractory lining) may be further lined with the same material constituting the solid feed.
  • the adiabatic expansion chamber 30 consists of a converging-diverging nozzle, as illustrated in Fig. 3 a, operated with a pressure drop (created by the vacuum pump 42 operated at 50 to 650 Torr) sufficient for quenching the high-temperature vapors produced by plasma induction upstream in the reactor.
  • a pressure drop created by the vacuum pump 42 operated at 50 to 650 Torr
  • the theoretical behavior or the Joule Thompson adiabatic expansion process has already been described above. After rapid quenching leading to homogeneous nucleation and nanosized powders, the powders are passivated by precision controlled exposure to N 2 , O 2 , CH 4 or NH 3 .
  • the separation system of the invention is realized by means of a collection chamber 35, attached to the outlet of the expansion chamber 30, where the very fine particles entrained in the gaseous stream are collected on a water-cooled metallic coil 37 (copper was used successfully for the test runs detailed below) and periodically extracted. It is anticipated that commercial-scale equipment would incorporate a screw or similar conveyor for the continuous removal of the nanopowder product from the collection chamber 35.
  • the gas stream 40 out of the collection chamber is further passed through a filter 39 and trap 41 to thoroughly clean it prior to passage through the vacuum pump 42.
  • a monitor and fluid-control panel 43 is utilized to ⁇ monitor process variables (temperatures, pressures, water and gas flow rates), record them, and control all water and gas streams to maintain steady-state operation.
  • Figures 5a, 5b, 5c, and 5d show the preferred embodiment of the present invention for a scaled up process.
  • Fig. 2 to produce nanosize powders of several different materials.
  • the powders harvested were characterized for phases, size, morphology, and size distribution.
  • X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the phases present in the samples using a Siemens D5000 diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu K radiation. The peak widths for average grain size analysis were determined by a least-square fit of a Cauchy function. The average size of the powder produced was estimated by Scherrer's method. Transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi TEM H-8100 equipped with a Kevex® EDX) was used for size, morphology, and size distribution. The particle size of the powders produced was in the manometer range. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for the coarser size feed powders.
  • SEM Scanning electron microscopy
  • Zinc Commercially available zinc powder (-325 mesh) was used as the precursor to produce nanosize zinc powder. Feed zinc powder was fed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream (argon was used as the plasma gas; the total argon flow rate was 2.5 ft 3 /min). The reactor was inductively heated with 16 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging-diverging nozzle. The preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250-Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 550 Torr.
  • Fig. 6 is the TEM micrograph (or nanograph) of the nanosize powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 5-25 manometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of approximately 15 nm and a standard deviation of about 7.5 nm. Variations in the operating variables (such as power input, gas pressure, gas flow rates, and nozzle throat size) affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig.
  • Iron-Titanium Intermetallic 2-5 micron powders of iron and 1025 micron powders of titanium were mixed in 1 : 1 molar ratio and fed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream (total gas flow rate, including plasma gas, was 2.75 ft 3 /min).
  • the reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and above 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle.
  • the vaporized stream was quenched through the converging- diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 550 Torr.
  • Fig. 8 is the SEM micrograph of the feed powders used, showing that they were greater than 1 micrometer when fed.
  • Fig. 9 is a TEM image of nanopowders produced by the invention, showing them to be in the 10-45 nanometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of approximately 32 nm and a standard deviation of about 13.3 nm. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • the XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig.
  • phase 10 which indicates that the phases formed were titanium, iron and iron-titanium intermetallic (FeTi).
  • the phases present illustrate that the invention can produce nanoscale powders of metals and intermetallics.
  • argon was introduced tangentially (radial or axial injections have also been proven to be effective) at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Nickel-Aluminum Intermetallic 1-4 micron powders of nickel and 10-30 micron powders of aluminum were mixed in 1 : 1 molar ratio and fed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream (total feed, including plasma gas, at 2.75 ft 3 /min).
  • the reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and above 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle.
  • the vaporized stream was quenched through the converging- diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 550 Torr.
  • Fig. 11 is a TEM image of the nanopowder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 10-30 nanometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of approximately 16.4 nm and a standard deviation of about nm. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • the XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig. 12, which indicates that the phase formed was NiAl.
  • the phases present illustrate that the invention can produce nanoscale powders of metals and intermetallics.
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Tungsten Oxide Commercially available tungsten oxide powder (-325 mesh size) was used as the precursor to produce nanosize W0 3 .
  • the tungsten oxide powder was suspended in a mixture of argon and oxygen as the feed stream (flow rates were 2.25 ftVmin for argon and 0.25 ft 3 /min for oxygen).
  • the reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle.
  • the vaporized stream was quenched through the converging-diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 550 Torr.
  • Fig. 13 is the TEM nanograph of the WO 3 powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 10-25 manometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of about 16.1 nm and a standard deviation of about 6.3 nm. Variations in the operating variables (such as power input, gas pressure, gas flow rates, and nozzle throat size) affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig. 14, which indicates that the phase present was WO 3 .
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Cerium Oxide Commercially available cerium oxide powder (5-10 micron size) was used as the precursor to produce nanosize CeO 2 .
  • the cerium oxide powder was suspended in a mixture of argon and oxygen as the feed stream (at total rates of 2.25 ft 3 /Min for argon and 0.25 ft 3 /min for oxygen).
  • the reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle.
  • the vaporized stream was quenched through the converging-diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 650 Torr.
  • Fig. 15 is the TEM nanograph of the CeO 2 , powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 5-25 manometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of about 18.6 nm and a standard deviation of about 5.8 nm. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig. 16, which indicates that the phase present was Ce0 2 .
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls. The inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Silicon Carbide Commercially available silicon carbide powder (-325 mesh size) was used as the precursor to produce nanosize SiC.
  • the powder was suspended in argon as the feed stream (total argon flow rate of 2.5 ftVmin).
  • the reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle.
  • the vaporized stream was quenched through the converging diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 550 Torr.
  • the powder produced was separated from the gas by means of a cooled copper coil based impact filter followed by a screen filter. Fig.
  • FIG. 17 is the TEM nanograph of the SiC powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 10-40 manometer range.
  • the size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of approximately 28 nm and a standard deviation of about 8.4 nm. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig. 18, which indicates that the phase present was SiC.
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Molybdenum Nitride Commercially available molybdenum oxide (MoO 3 ) powder ( 325 mesh size) was used as the precursor to produce nanosize Mo 2 N. Argon was used as the plasma gas at a feed rate of 2.5 ftVmin. A mixture of ammonia and hydrogen was used as the reactant gases (NH 3 at 0.1 ftVmin; H 2 at 0.1 ftVmin). The reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging diverging nozzle.
  • MoO 3 molybdenum oxide
  • Fig. 19 is the TEM nanograph of the Mo 2 N powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 5-30 manometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of about 14 nm and a standard deviation of about 4.6 nm. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig. 20, which indicates that the phase present was Mo 2 N.
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Nickel Boride Ceramic 10 50 micron powder of nickel boride were fed into the thermal reactor with argon (fed at a total rate, including plasma gas, of 2.75 ftVmin). once again, the reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging diverging nozzle. The preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from " ⁇ 100 to 550 Torr. The powder produced was separated from the gas by means of a cooled copper coil based impact filter followed by a screen filter. Fig.
  • Fig 21 shows the SEM micrograph of the feed powders used, demonstrating that they were greater than 1 micrometer when fed.
  • Fig 22 is the TEM nanograph of the Ni 3 B powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 10 to 30 manometer range. The size distribution was narrow, with a mean size of about 12.8 nm and a standard deviation of about 4.2 nm. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Fig. 23, which indicates that the phase present were Ni and Ni 3 B.
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls. The inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer to act as a barrier for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Oxide Ceramics 5-10 micron powders of calcium carbonate were fed into the thermal reactor with argon (at 2.5 ftVmin). The reactor was inductively heated with 16 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 2,500 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched by thermal expansion to about 100 Torr. The pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 50 to 550 Torr. The powder produced was separated from the gas by means of a cooled copper coil based impact filter followed by a screen filter.
  • Fig. 24 is the TEM image of powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 5 to 20 manometer range.
  • the XRD data (shown in Fig. 25) established that the main phase of the nanopowder was CaO. Some other phases, such as Ca(OH) 2 , were also present due to exposure to atmospheric moisture. The size distribution of the CaO was narrow, with a mean size of about 14.8 nm and standard deviation of about 3.8 nm.
  • Barium titanate (BaTiO 3 ): Commerically available barium titanate, micron size (5-10 micron) was used as the precursor to produce nanosize barium titanate powder. The feeding was calibrated to this required feed rate by adjusting the power feeder and the flow rate of the carrier gas. The reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RFplasma to a thermal steady state. Thermal steady state was established by monitoring the temperature in the reactor. Feed barium titanate powder was feed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream at a gas flow rate of 1.0 ft.Vmin. The power was turned off and the system allowed to cool down under inert conditions by keeping some flow of argon in the reactor. The product was collected from the quench section and filter, weighed and saved for analysis and performance testing. TEM images of the powder produced are shown in Figures 26a and 26b. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the powder produced is shown in Figure 27.
  • strontium titanate SrTiO 3
  • the feed precursor for strontium titanate was micron size (5-10 microns) SrTiO 3 powder.
  • TEM images of the produced powder are shown in Figures 28a and 28b.
  • X-ray diffraction pattern of the powder produced is shown in Figure 29, which reveals that the main phase present is SrTi0 3 .
  • the surface area of the powder produced was 22.3 mVg. Most of the produced powder ranged from 10- 40 nm.
  • BaCO 3 + TiO, BaTiO 3 + CO 2 (g) using commercially available barium carbonate (BaC0 3 ) and titanium oxide (Ti0 2 ) powders. Both precursors had a size of -325 mesh and were obtained from a commercial supplier.
  • nanosize powder of barium titanate was produced.
  • TEM images of the powder produced are shown in Figures 30a and 30b.
  • Figure 31 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of the powder produced, which shows that the main phase present is BaTiO 3 .
  • the surface area of the produced powder was 1 1.9 mVg.
  • the powder produced was in the nanosize range (10-75 nm).
  • Nickel Zinc Ferrite Commercially available nickel zinc ferrite powder (-325 mesh) was used as a precursor to produce nanosize NiZnFe-,0 4 powder. Feed NiZnFe 2 0 4 powder was fed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream (argon and helium were used as the plasma gases; the total argon flow rate was 1.6ftVmin and the helium flow rate was 0.57 ftVmin). The reactor was heated with a 25 kW DC plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging-diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 650 Torr.
  • the powder produced was separated from the gas by means of a cooled copper coil-based impact filter followed by a screen filter.
  • Figure 32 is the TEM nanograph of the NiZnFe 2 O 4 powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 5-50 nanometer range. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Figure 33 , which indicates that the main phase present was NiZnFe 2 0 4 .
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Nickel-Chromium-Cobalt-Molybdenum Alloy Commercially available nickel- chromium-cobalt-molybdenum alloy powder (-325 mesh) was used as a precursor to produce nanosize Ni-Cr-Co-Mo powder. Feed Ni-Cr-Co-Mo powder was fed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream (argon was used as the plasma gas; the total argon flow rate was 2.5 ftVmin). The reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging-diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 650 Torr.
  • the powder produced was separated from the gas by means of a cooled copper-coil-based impact filter followed by a screen filter.
  • Figure 34 is the TEM nanograph of the Ni-Cr-Co-Mo powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 5-100 nanometer range. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Figure 35 , which indicates that the main phase present was Ni-Cr-Co-Mo with minor amounts of NiCr 2 0 4 and Ni 3 Ti0 5 .
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • Bismuth Telluride Commercially available bismuth telluride powder (-325 mesh) was used as a precursor to produce nanosize Bi 2 Te 3 powder. Feed Bi 2 Te 3 powder was fed into the thermal reactor suspended in an argon stream (argon was used as the plasma gas; the total argon flow rate was 2.5 ftVmin). The reactor was inductively heated with 18 kW of RF plasma to over 5,000 K in the plasma zone and about 3,000 K in the extended reactor zone adjacent the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging portion of the nozzle. The vaporized stream was quenched through the converging-diverging nozzle.
  • the preferred pressure drop across the nozzle was 250 Torr, but useful results were obtained at different pressure drops, ranging from 100 to 650 Ton.
  • the powder produced was separated from the gas by means of a cooled copper-coil-based impact filter followed by a screen filter.
  • Figure 36 is the TEM nanograph of the Bi 2 Te 3 powder produced by the invention, showing it to be in the 20-100 nanometer range. Variations in the operating variables affected the size of the powder produced.
  • An XRD pattern of the product is shown in Figure 37, which indicates that the phase present was Bi 2 Te 3 .
  • argon was introduced tangentially at the nozzle walls.
  • the inert gas provided cooling as well as a boundary layer for any condensation on the nozzle walls.
  • the process can utilize feeds of reactive components and produce submicron powders of corresponding thermodynamically stable or metastable product species at high temperatures; that it is suitable for recycling and reusing product gases as feed gases; and for recycling and reusing any unseparated product powders as feed material.
  • the method and apparatus of the invention solve many problems unresolved by existing processes to produce submicron powders in general and nanostructured materials in particular.
  • the process is scaleable; it is solvent free and therefore inherently non polluting and of low cost; it is flexible in relation to processing different feed materials; it allows simple control of product powder size and size distribution; and it does not utilize contaminating components in the feed or for processing, therefore yielding product powders that are as pure as the powders fed to the process.
  • the process is applicable to liquid or gaseous precursors that are combined with one or more reactive gases in a reactor and then quenched ultra rapidly according to the invention to produce nanosize particles with a narrow size distribution.
  • silicon tetrachloride normally liquid at room temperature
  • methane can be reacted with methane to produce a silicon carbide vapor which, rapidly quenched according to the invention, can produce a nanosize SiC powder.
  • silane SiH 4 , normally gaseous at room temperature

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé continu permettant de produire des poudres à l'échelle nanométrique à partir de différents types de matériaux précurseurs en évaporant le matériau et en trempant la phase vaporisée de préférence dans une buse d'expansion convergente-divergente. Le matériau précurseur en suspension dans un gaz vecteur est vaporisé continûment à de très hautes températures, de préférence supérieures à 2000 degrés C, et idéalement supérieures à 5000 degrés K, dans une chambre de réaction thermique dans des conditions favorisant la nucléation de la vapeur résultante. Immédiatement après les étapes de nucléation initiale, le flux de vapeur est rapidement et uniformément trempé à des cadences d'au moins 1,000 K/seconde, de préférence supérieures à 1,000,000 K/seconde, pour bloquer la croissance continue des particules nucléées et pour produire une suspension pulvérulente présentant une taille de l'ordre du nanomètre de répartition granulométrique étroite. La poudre de taille nanométrique est ensuite recueillie par filtration à partir du flux de vapeur trempé et le support est purifié, comprimé et recyclé pour être mélangé à un nouveau matériau précurseur dans le flux d'alimentation.
PCT/US1997/015463 1996-09-03 1997-09-03 Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique WO1998009753A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002263902A CA2263902A1 (fr) 1996-09-03 1997-09-03 Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/707,341 US5788738A (en) 1996-09-03 1996-09-03 Method of producing nanoscale powders by quenching of vapors
US08/706,819 1996-09-03
US08/707,341 1996-09-03
US08/706,819 US5851507A (en) 1996-09-03 1996-09-03 Integrated thermal process for the continuous synthesis of nanoscale powders

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998009753A1 WO1998009753A1 (fr) 1998-03-12
WO1998009753A9 true WO1998009753A9 (fr) 1998-05-14

Family

ID=27107768

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1997/015463 WO1998009753A1 (fr) 1996-09-03 1997-09-03 Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2263902A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1998009753A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6569397B1 (en) * 2000-02-15 2003-05-27 Tapesh Yadav Very high purity fine powders and methods to produce such powders
AU2003291166A1 (en) * 2002-11-26 2004-06-18 Cabot Corporation Fumed metal oxide particles and process for producing the same
WO2007087708A1 (fr) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-09 Mcgill University Nanofluides organiques, procédé et réacteur pour leur synthèse
US8038971B2 (en) * 2008-09-05 2011-10-18 Cabot Corporation Fumed silica of controlled aggregate size and processes for manufacturing the same
US8729158B2 (en) 2008-09-05 2014-05-20 Cabot Corporation Fumed silica of controlled aggregate size and processes for manufacturing the same

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5322810A (en) * 1976-08-16 1978-03-02 Fumio Hori Method and apparatus for producing metal mg or ca by carbon reduction
DE3371295D1 (en) * 1982-03-01 1987-06-11 Toyota Motor Co Ltd A method and apparatus for making a fine powder compound of a metal and another element
US4851262A (en) * 1987-05-27 1989-07-25 Carnegie-Mellon University Method of making carbide, nitride and boride powders
US4892579A (en) * 1988-04-21 1990-01-09 The Dow Chemical Company Process for preparing an amorphous alloy body from mixed crystalline elemental metal powders

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5851507A (en) Integrated thermal process for the continuous synthesis of nanoscale powders
US5788738A (en) Method of producing nanoscale powders by quenching of vapors
US7547431B2 (en) High purity nanoscale metal oxide powders and methods to produce such powders
US5486675A (en) Plasma production of ultra-fine ceramic carbides
KR960002416B1 (ko) 나노상 복합 분말의 제조를 위한 분무변환 방법
US5403375A (en) Fine-particle metal powders
Ishigaki et al. Controlling the synthesis of TaC nanopowders by injecting liquid precursor into RF induction plasma
JP4139435B2 (ja) 高速冷却反応器及び方法
US5472477A (en) Process for the preparation of finely divided metal and ceramic powders
Hahn Gas phase synthesis of nanocrystalline materials
JPH0625701A (ja) 微粒子金属粉末
Helble Combustion aerosol synthesis of nanoscale ceramic powders
Xia et al. Low temperature vapor-phase preparation of TiO2 nanopowders
RU2406592C2 (ru) Способ и установка для получения нанопорошков с использованием трансформаторного плазмотрона
US5384306A (en) Fine-particle oxide ceramic powders
Haas et al. Synthesis of nanostructured powders in an aerosol flow condenser
WO1998009753A9 (fr) Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique
WO1998009753A1 (fr) Procede thermique integre et appareil permettant la synthese continue de poudres a l'echelle nanometrique
Samokhin et al. Nanopowders production and micron-sized powders spheroidization in dc plasma reactors
Subramanian et al. A novel technique for synthesis of silver nanoparticles by laser-liquid interaction
Sung et al. Two-stage plasma nitridation approach for rapidly synthesizing aluminum nitride powders
Brewster et al. Generation of unagglomerated, Dense, BaTiO3 particles by flame‐spray pyrolysis
Chazelas et al. Synthesis of nanometer alumina particles by plasma transferred arc alternative
Shim et al. Restructuring of alumina particles using a plasma torch
Okuyama et al. Preparation of micro controlled particles using aerosol process technology