WO1991007906A1

WO1991007906A1 - Apparatus and process for dissolution of powder

Info

Publication number: WO1991007906A1
Application number: PCT/SE1990/000785
Authority: WO
Inventors: Lars Henrik BARKSTRÖM
Original assignee: Barkstroem Lars Henrik
Priority date: 1989-11-29
Filing date: 1990-11-28
Publication date: 1991-06-13
Also published as: SE8904029D0; SE467192B; SE8904029L

Abstract

Apparatus and process for dissolution of water soluble powder or granules and production of a concentrated solution, suitable for preparing or adjusting of a use solution. The apparatus consists of an exchangeable powder container (1) closed with a screen (3) stopping powder or granules from flowing out when the container is placed with the outlet facing downwards, a holding arrangement for the container, an upturned nozzle (4) connected to a pressure water tube (5) via a valve, which is controlled manually or automatically, and a second container (7), surrounding the nozzle and the lower part of the powder container and recovering formed solution. The openings of the screen are tapering conically in the direction from the nozzle to the powder face.

Description

Apparatus and process for dissolution of powder

Use solutions for automatic dishwashers, washing machines and solutions for automatic or manual cleaning may be prepared by dissolution of powders and pastes or dilution of liquid concentrates.

The concentrates and pastes are in several cases strongly alcaline or acid and their handling is not without risks. To this is added that certain components desirable in the final use solution cannot be stored together if not in water-free state and that the

preparation of pastes in itself may imply that valuable

components, as condensed phosphates, will be hydrolysed to less valuable or even detrimental components, as ortho phosphates.

The powder state gives the biggest freedom of formulation and opportunity to prepare the most suitable and most concentrated products with contents of active components that together make

90 weight-% or more. Powder is dusty and may cause respiratory irritations. Strongly alcaline or acid dust particles may cause lung and skin damages.

With respect to the safety of the operators it is desi rabl e to handle powder in a closed system to avoid dusting and eliminate the risk of splashes and squirts from the dissolved product. It is further desirable that packages that have kept strongl y alcaline or acid products will be emptied completely, as remains will not only mean economic losses for the consumer but big risks at the handling of the refuse too.

Equipments for dissolving powder and preparation of use solutions are known from for instance the Swedish lay open patent applications no 337 670 and 422 650, the American patent publication

3 850 344 and the European patent application 58 505. The first and the last two of these concern arrangements for dissolving powder in big containers, for instance 100 liters or more in upwards compl etely open papper drums. According to lay open patent application 357 670 the drum is opened and the lid covering the opening replaced with a screen curving inwards with respect to the drum. The drum is inverted and the powder disolved with the aid of water, which is ejected from a nozzle placed centrally and

designed to give an uniform wetting of the towards the nozzle facing concave surface.

According to the European patent application 59 507 one uses a plane screen and a horizontal tube rotating around a vertical shaft at the middle point of the tube. The shaft is hollow and the tube provided with several openings to bring about an uniform wetting of the lower face of the screen. For the rest the

arrangement corresponds to the Swedish lay open patent application mentioned above. The invention is a further development of the older invention and is founded upon the same principles.

According to the American patent application 3 850 344 the drum lid is replaced by a collar provided with a perforated support plate and an upon the support plate resting screen. The support plate is provided with a central opening allowing passage of a solid stream of cleaning solution. The arrangement requires a pump to recirculate the cleaning solution continuously.

All these arrangements eliminate the dust problems at the consumer level at least partly but substitute them with the problems associated with deficient compatibility between different

components and riskful handling of strongly alcaline solutions mentioned in connection with liquid products above. To this is added the problems of clogging the screen and wet strongly

alkaline remains in the emptied containers. The upwards curved screen as well as the rotating nozzle tube are meant to reduce the clogging problem.

Technically the arrangements mentioned above are space craving and complicated with demand on separate rooms and equipment for handling of the heavy containers and preparation of the con centrated solution and the dosing system with tubes, valves and pumps for supplying the concentrate to the separate machines.

The Swedish lay open patent application 422 650 concerns a further development of the system according to the earlier mentioned

Swedish publication (357 670). Here use is made of a powder container provided with a lid and meant for refill with powder. For the rest there are the same features concerning the upwards curved screen and the centrally placed nozzle giving a spray bringing about a uniform wetting of the entire surface of the screen, which occur in the lay open patent application 357 670 already. This type of equipment is meant for a relatively small powder quantity (a few kilos) which is dissolved at the rate needed to prepare or adjust the use solution. At this process the dust problem in connection with handling of powder remains largely unchanged and it cannot be di ssol ved but partly with the aid of portion bags or si mi l i ar methods.

Further development in the area has been casted solid blocks, pastes and powder in different types of small plastic contai ners. As for the blocks and pastes is valid what is said above concerning compatibility between the components and break down of components at the preparation of the compositions. As for cast blocks, pastes and powder it is true that any satisfactory solution of the problem to accomplice a complete emptying of the container has not been put forward so far.

The solution that could seem to be obvious with respect to the lay open patent applications mentioned above i.e. with an upwards curved screen and a centrally placed nozzle giving a uniform wetting of the entire surface of the screen is functioning with completely open containers only, where the open end of the powder container has approximately equally big area as a horizontal cross section through the midpoint of the container.

The arrangement according to the European patent application no 58 507 with plane screen and rotating nozzle arms requires a

completely open container, too. Practically useable small plastic containers have, however, outlets with an area which is just a fraction of the cross sectional area of the container. Small plastic containers with outlet openings the area of which are less than one half of the container area or less dominate.

The arrangement according to the American patent publication 3 850 344 could eventually be used for small plastic containers too. The system with a solid stream instead of spray gives, however, rise to extensive channel formation and bad powder contact. The dissolution at each passage of the cleaning solution is therefor extremely small and a intensive recirculation will be absolutely necessary.

Small plastic containers of principally the same design as those according to the actual application are used according to the European patent application no 238 918 for cast blocks of solid detergents. The detergents are dissolved by a water jet directed against the lower face of the block. For the dissolution to be successf ul the passage through the container opening must be completely free as screens or other closing arrangements will suppress the impact force of the water jets to much. The

completely free opening is a disadvantage as it is almost

impossible to bring about a casting not giving small amounts of loose particles in the upper part of the container. This is valid especially for strongly alcaline kompositions with high content of unorganic salts. At inverting of the containers the particles may fall out through the outlet and cause working environment

problems.

A satisfactory system for handling of powder in exchangeable small containers must fulfill the following requirements:

1. ergonomically satisfactory handling of the small containers with respect to weight, lifting height and working posture,

2. safety against spillage and dusting of frequently strongly alcaline or strongly acid products, 3. safety against drip from emptied containers in connection with taking out and handling,

4. safety against squirts from the dissolution apparatus,

5. to give a at least reasonably concentrated solution for preparing and completing use solutions without requirements of recirculation and without time delay during the entire use period,

6. to permit restarts of the system with partly consumed containers even after longer interruptions as weekends and long holydays without undue time delay with respect to dosing,

7. complete emptying of the container.

An use solution of the actual kind has a concentration of active material within the range .01 to 1 %, more often .05 to .5 % and most often .1 to .3 % . To make it possible to adjust the solutions fast enough the completing solutions should be at least one 10 power higher i.e. at least 1 to 10 % according to the area of use.

The inventor has studied the problem carefully and thereby

surprisingly found that dissolution of a mass of granules

consisting of mixed together active components kept in a container with a relatively seen narrow outlet opening closed with a screen will occur considerably more completely if one instead of the screen used according to the two lay open patent applications above uses a screen consisting of a lattice designed so that the openings facing the the nozzle are larger than and conically tapering in the direction of the openings facing the powder side.

Further advantages with respect to complete dissolution of powder and granules in the mentioned type of containers are obtained if one uses a nozzle designed or placed in order to give a non- uniform distribution of water at the lower surface of the screen.

Further advantages with respect to work conditions, safety against powder spillage etc. may be obtained if the lattice is completed with an overlying fine mesh screen.

An arrangement according to the invention thus in its primitive form consists of an exchangeable container with an outlet opening area which is less than one half of the cross sectional area of the container and closed with a screen provided with a multitude of openings designed with the inlet openings facing the nozzle considerably larger than the outlet openings facing the powder. The container is filled with a free flowing, water soluble granule mass or powder and placed with its outlet facing downwards over a nozzle connected to a pressure water tuibe via a valve that is controlled by a manual or automatic signal. The nozzle and the outlet part of the powder container are surrounded by a

cylindrical or funnel-shaped container for recovering the

concentrated solution formed when water through the nozzle is injected into the container and dissolving the water solvable granule mass. The solution container is provided with an outlet connected to a container for use solution.

If an automatic signal is used for controlling the water injection the coupling should be made in such way that the water supply becomes intermittent with for instance 5 seconds water supply, seconds run off, new water supply and run off etc. Suitable time intervals depend upon the water pressure, the type of use and the composition and may vary from 2 to 20 seconds water injection and 2 to 30 secoonds run off. Interval controlled water supply gives a smoother dosing as the run off period gives the concentrate time to flow into the container for use solution, mix with it and give a correct result from the measuring cell. Besides the interval coupling assists to make the signal "change powder container" not coming before the container is emptied. From a practical point of wiew it is desirable that the

concentrate from the dissolution apparatus is as highly

concentrated as possible. Interval control contributes to this end. Other possibilities of control are balancing the injected water quantity in relation to dissolution and run off rate

concerning the water soluble granule mass. At the same time the jet velocity after the nozzle must be high enough to make the jets, especially at the end of the use period, reach far enough into the container to flush the last remains forward to the screen and dissolving them. The nozzle is normally connected to a water tube containing heated water (20 to 60 °C) and with pressure within the range 2 to 5 kilos/cm². Suitable nozzles have

capacities within the range 3 to 15 liter per minute under these circumstances.

The spray pattern of the nozzle may be shaped in several different ways as long as the impact pattern at the screen clearly differs from a uniform pattern. Good results are thus obtained with askew or excentrically circular, oval, cross-formed, triangular etc.

spray patterns. Essential is that the patterns formed when the jets hit the screen shall be non-uniform i.e. not uniform and not such to enable remaining powder to occupy a dome formed or ring formed konfiguration.

The non-uniformity concerns the water distribution along the surface. The distribution shall be considered as non-uniform if the water quantity hitting the screen per unit area for instance mm² or cm² is at least 20 % , preferably at least 50 %, and

especially preferred at least 100 % larger in the areas getting the biggest water quantity compared to the area getting the smallest water quantity. Especially good results have been

obtained with a flat jet nozzle.

In preferred ways of carrying out the invention the exchangeable container is surrounded by a housing connected to the container for recovering of solution and provided with a combination of door and lid that at opening lets free one side of house together with the upward opening of the house. This is to provide for convenient putting in and taking out of the exchangeable

containers. It is preferred, too, that the arrangemant is provided with a safety system stopping water injection, when a powder container is not put in and/or when the door/lid-combination is in open position.

Fig. 1 shows a container with a screen stopper with a fine mesh screen and a lattice combined to screen stopper suitable for use in the apparatus according to the invention.

Fig 2. shows in its upper part a drawing of the upper surface of the screen stopper and thereunder a photocopy of part of a fine mesh screen.

Fig. 3. shows a flat jet nozzle suitable for use in the apparatus according to the invention.

Fig.4. shows the spray pattern of the nozzle in fig. 3.

Fig 5 shows in its upper part a vertical cross section of a

preferred design according to the invention and in its lower part a horizontal cross section through the apparatus in level with the bottom of the solution container.

In the figures (1) is the container, (2) the fine mesh screen, (3) the lattice designed as a screen stopper that fixes the fine mesh screen by squeze fit against the container neck, (4) designates the nozzle giving non-uniform spray pattern, (5) is the water supply tube of the nozzle, (6) stands for the tube connecting the solution container (7) to the container for use solution, (8) designates the surrounding housing.

The powder container (1) may be shaped in several different ways and be cylindrical, oval, rectangular etc. Cylinder form is

preferred. The inner walls should be straight and as smooth as possible. The container should be completed with a conical part connecting the straight sided part of the container with the outlet and with walls sloping at least 20°, preferably at least 30° against the horizontal plane to promote the sliding of wet or half dissolved powder that is a requirement for complete emptying of the container.

A preferred container is made of polyolefin plastic by so called blow forming and consists of a bottom which may be provided with a handle to facilitate the handling, a cylindrical part, a completing conical part and an outlet part carrying the earlier mentioned screen combination (2,3). The ratio between the height of the cylindrical part and the diameter of the container should lie between 2:1 to 1:2. Ratios of between 1:1 to 1:1. 5 are

especially suitable.

The ratio between the outlet diameter and the diameter of the contai ner may vary from 1:4 to 1:1.5. Especially suitable is a ratio around 1:2, which means a ratio between the areas of around 1:4.

From an ergonomical point of wiew it is suitable that container plus product is weighing between 2 and 8 kilo. Depending upon the volume weight of the product that may vary from 600 to 1500 grammes pro liter this gives a volume between 2 and 15 liters, Especially suitable volumes are between 2 and 5 liters. The screen with conically tapering openings may be manufatured in several different ways. A preferred method is to design it as a screen stopper, made out of thermoplastic material and shaped by press casting, i.e. by injecting plastic material in molten state into a cooled pressing tool. The openings in the screen may be

triangular, square, rektangular, round, oval or having any other geometrical form. The inlet area facing the nozzle shall be att least 20 %, preferably at least 40 % and especially at least 80 % larger than the outlet area calculated with the latter as base. The difference depends naturally upon, besides the conicity, the thickness of the lattice. The percent figures relate to a design where the thickness of the lattice is between 1 and 10 millimeters, preferably 1 to 5 millimeters. A preferred design of the lattice is as crossed triangular laths with one of the apexes of the triangle pointing towards the nozzle, It is preferred that the stopper is dimensioned to be pressed into the neck of the container and be kept there by squeze fitting, even when it is subjected to the pressure of the powder mass when the container is inverted.

The size of the openings of the screen must be such that the powder in the container cannot fall out when the container is inverted. At the same time the openings must not be too small. In this case the part of the jets that can penetrate without

influence of the lattice laths becomes to small. Suitable

dimensions at the powder face lies within the range .2 to 3 millimeters, preferably .5 to 2 millimeters if a single screen is used. In combination with an overlying fine mesh screen suitable dimensions are 1 to 20 millimeters, preferably 1 to 10

millimeters. The data concern side length of square and diameter of circular openings and corresponding lengths of other

geometrical forms. As for the fine mesh screen suitable mesh width lies within the range .01 to .8 millimeters and preferably within the range .02 to .5 millimeters.

If the lattice is used alone it is desirable that the sum of the areas of the openings compared to the total area is made as big as possible. This abject desired will, however, came into conflict with the need for stability of the screen. Ratios above 1:2 may hardly be had, typical ratios are sooner around 1:3 or lower especially around 1:4. If the lattice is completed with an

overlying fine mesh screen the problem of dimensioning of the area of the openings in relation to the total area is in big parts eliminated as run off then occurs over practically the whole area. In this situation ratios under 1:4 may advantageously be used.

If a separate support construction with coarser laths must be used to give the stopper acceptable stability it should be cared for that this support construction does not obstruct the jets

unnecessarily. The most obvious construction with support laths in shape of a cross with arms of equal length that is shown on the drawing demands in combination with a flat jet nozzle a special orientation of the container to give optimal penetration. More suitable in this case is that the support is designed with three equal arms or as a triangle, square, or circle leaving the central portion of the screen free. In an especially preferred way of carrying out the invention the screen stopper is combined with a fine mesh screen which is placed over and firmly kept by the screen stopper.

As mentioned already it is preferred to use the container closed by a stopper consisting of a lattice screen together with a nozzle giving irregular or non-uniform water distribution at the surface of the screen.

Though it is impossible without extensive measurements and

calculations to tell with certainty why a nozzle giving a nonuniform water distribution at the surface of the screen is totally superior to a nozzle giving an uniform distribution, when the opposite seems to be the case under the circumstanses prevailing according to the two lay open patent applications mentioned above one may on reasonable grounds suppose the following.

The relatively narrow outlet opening of the containers according to the invention compared with the large surfaces used according to older technic gives radically different flow conditions.

Probably for instance is some vault formation in the granule mass unavoidable. Vaults with a circular shape of the kind one gets with a nozzle with rotational symmetry are far more stabile than the non-circular vaults one gets with a nozzle giving a non- uniform spray pattern. This will be even more the case when the dissolution has proceeded to the point, where the upper surface of the powder is broken through and one has got a ring of undissolved material along the walls of the container. Support for this theory can be obtained from comparativ essays, where it has been shown that remains left in the container after the use of a nozzle with rotational symmetry are distributed as a generally uniform

coherent ring supporting itself against the walls of the container. If remains are left in the container after the use of a nozzle giving a non-uniform spray pattern they are considerably smaller and consist of randomly distributed powder accumulations without mutual connections.

The use of a screen stopper with a multitude of conically tapering openings will give a non-uniform water distribution at the upper face of the screen even if one uses a nozzle giving a uniform distribution at the lower face of the screen. The effect will, however, be far better if the screen is combined with a nozzle giving a non-uniform distribution.

The reason for this will appear if one makes a qualitative

analysis of the flow geometry in a vertical cross section through the screen stopper. The jets from the nozzle may be regarded as big numbers of drops thrown att high velocities against the screen. The drops differ with respect to masses and velocities hit the lower face of the screen under different angles. What is most important in this case is the velocity composant at right angle against the surface of the lattice laths. Principially one may separate four extremes:

1. the velocity of the drop at right angle to the surface is relatively low compared with the velocity at which the drop will let itself be deformed,

2. the velocity of the drop at right angle to the surface is high compared with the velocity at which the drop will let itself be deformed,

3. the drop will pass through the opening direktly into the container,

4. the flow through the opening is strong and the the drop cannot pass through the opening as a separate drop. In case 1 the drop will be flattened out and eventually together with other drops form a film, which depending upon the kinetic energy of the drop (drops) and the gravity will move upwards or downwards. At movement upwards the remaining kinetic energy will determine if the drop at the upper face of the screen will be reformed or if it will flow out over the sides of the opening. The preferred way of carrying out the invention with a overlaying fine mesh screen increases the probability of flowing out.

In case 2, which probably is rare in equipment of this kind but neverthel ess should be included to clearify the process, the drop will act as a non-deformable ball and the process may be described as an elastic impact. The hit angle will determine entirely in which direction the drop will rebound.

In case 3 the drop will not be influenced by the screen.

In case 4 one gets a continuous strong flow through the opening. As the inlet area is larger than the outlet area the velocity of the drops reformed after the passage will be larger than the velocity of the drops hitting the lower face of the screen.

As a result of the different processes above and transition forms between them one will have at the upper surface of the screen stopper areas where practically no water will penetrate from the lower face and wetting occur with water flowing in from other areas only, together with areas where water indeed penetrates but with such low velocity that the water will immediately flow out over the upper surface of the stopper and finally areas where water penetrates with large force and if not caught by the powder partly reaches up to and rebounds against the bottom of the

container and falls down as av heavy rain over the powder at the side walls of the container.

Besides the obvious advantage that a fine mesh screen minimizes the risk that extremely fine grained granules may flow out when the container is inverted the combination of a coarse mesh screen and a fine mesh screen gives advantages that cannot be obtaine either with a coarse screen alone or a fine mesh screen alone.

Through the space and the channel system that is formed by the combination of a coarse screen and a fine mesh screen the whole surface of the screen stopper is used to separate solution.

Without the fine mesh screen wet powder will rest directly upon the coarse screen and the real strainer area will be limited to the opening area plus its nearest surroundings.

The change of direction that is forced upon the drops from the nozzle gives rise to a very fine aerosol that is hardly acted upon by the gravity and therefor can rise and contact the powder from above making it dissolve to a concentrate flowing down to and through the screen combination. The concentrate will at the same time draw with it still undissolved powder to the screen surface where it is subjected to the direct water jets from the nozzle.

A fine mesh screen will break up the spray directed against it, too, but the breaking up will not be complete and the balancing between letting through and demand on breaking up the spray droplets will be very problematic. To this is added the purely practical problem of getting a satisfactory fixation and strength in a fine mesh screen without reducing the let through area to much. Fine mesh screen not subjected to the tension caused by the weight of the powder may vibrate at a larger amplitude and this is likely not to be an unimportant factor in this connection.

With a coarse mesh screen alone one gets immediately after change of container a very fast dissolution, which may even be so fast that not completely dissolved particles will follow the solution concentrate. This may give rise to a not desired overdosing as the measuring cell will not react fast enough.

After this fast dissolution period comes a more normal period, which, when the container is emptied to the point where the screen is not completely covered with falling down granules, is succeded with a period with rather long dosing time, as the liquid that is injected into the container flows back fast and then gives solution with low concentration of active material. The dosing time will be become longer and longer and it may occur that one gets signal for change of container before it is completely emptied. The combination of a coarse and a fine mesh screen eliminates or reduces both these problems, i.e. brings on that no or little overdosing in the use solution occurs as result of undissolved powder and that the dosing time will be within acceptable limits until the container is emptied making allowance for unaccessible small remains.

If lattice and screen is made of hydrophobic plastic material, which is a preferred design, the fine mesh screen will hinder big crystals or clustered particles from clogging the screen in connection with longer interruptions.

The process used according to the invention is the following after start with a new container. The jets from the nozzle giving a non- uniform water distribution at the screen hit its lower face and penetrate the screen some millimeter, at which the water comes into contact with granules which will be dissolved and leave place for new granules falling down from higher levels. Dissolution and falling down of powder continues in this way until a powder free cone like konfiguration is formed with its apex against the screen and with an upturned bottom surface that is dependent on, beside the dimensions of the container, the slide angle of the granules. When this is occuring an area free from granules or with a very thin layer of granules will form at the screen. In this area the jets penetrate and give rise to drops with high velocities that reaches high in the container and eventually rebound against the container bottom before falling down on remaining powder as a heavy rain.

At the same time an extremely fine aerosol is formed at the abrupt changes of direction at the passage of the screen. The aerosol will probably be further stabilized by a certain electrostatic loading. The aerosol rises upwards in the container and attaches to the remaining granules. The very concentrated solution formed flows down through the granule mass, mixes with the flow from above and transport remaining granules to the container outlet.

Experiment 1. At this experiment an arrangement according to the invention with a flat jet nozzle with towards the edges tapering spray pattern was compared with a corresponding arrangement equipped with a nozzle according to the two lay open patent applications mentioned above i.e. with the spray pattern that is ussually called filled cone. The exchangeable container in both apparatuses had an outlet the area of which was about one fourth of the cross sectional area of the container. The outlet was closed by a screen stopper consisting of a single relatively coarse lattice. The water supply to the nozzle had a pressure of about 4 kilos per cm². At this pressure the capacities of the nozzles were about 9 liters per minute. The water injection was interval controlled with 5 seconds injection and 5 seconds run off. To simulate the conditions att practical use at for instance a dish washer the expriment was interrupted after 10 dosings and restarted the following day when the powder had had time to run off and to a certain degree lump together.

When the apparatuses no longer gave solutions which were strong enough to be used for adjusting the concentration of use solutions just 15 grammes were left in the forst equipment distributed as small drenched powder accumulations sticking to the walls of the container especially at the transition from the cylindrcal to the conical part. In the apparatus equipped with the filled cone nozzle were left .4 kilos as a soaked ring coherent ring at the walls of the container. In both cases the orginal content in both containers was 4.0 kilos of a granulated mixture with the

composition:

30 % sodium tripolyphosphate,

40 % sodium meta silicate,

25 % sodium hydroxide,

4 % palyacrylate,

1 % chlorisocyanurate. Experiment 2. Experiment 1 was repeated with containers that were closed by a combination consisting of a lattice with square openings with a mesh width of 2 millimeters at the nozzle face and 1.2 millimeters at the powder face and an overlaying screen with a mesh width of .5 millimeters. In the arrangement with flat jet nozzle the container was completely emptied disregarding a few grains clinging to the container bottom surface. In the

arrangement with filled cone nozzle about .05 kilos product was left likevise in the shape of a soaked coherent ring. The double screen will thus bring on an amendment at the use of a nozzle with rotational symmetry, too, but the result is still not

satisfactory.

It should be observed that the experiments are typical examples and constitute a summary of trials which would take too long to be accounted for here.

Claims

Patent claims

1. Apparatus for dissolution of water soluble powder or granulate and production of a concentrated solution, suitable for preparing or adjusting a use solution, consisting of an exchangeable powder container (1) with an outlet area that is less than one half of the cross section of the container and closed with a screen (3) stopping powder or granules from flowing out when the container is placed with the outlet facing downwards, a holding arrangement for the container, an upturned nozzle (4) connected to a pressure water tube (5) via a valve, which is controlled manually or automatically, and a second container (7), surrounding the nozzle and the lower part of the powder container and recovering formed solution, characterized in that the openings of the screen are tapering conically in the direction from the nozzle to the powder face.

2. Apparatus according to claim 1 characterized in that the water supply to the nozzle is controlled by an automatic signal with interval coupling making periods of water supply alternate with run off periods.

3. Apparatus according to claim 1 and 2 characterized in that the powder container (1) is closed by a combination of a coarse mesh screen (3) with a mesh width at the powder face of 1 to 20 mmm, preferably 1 to 10 mm and a fine mesh screen (2) width a mesh width of .01 to .8 mm, preferably .02 to .5 mm.

4. Apparatus according to claim 1, 2 and 3 characterized in that the nozzle gives a non-uniform water distribution at lower surface of the screen.

5. Apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3 and 4 characterized in that the nozzle is a flat jet nozzle.

6. Apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 characterized in that the powder container (1) is a straight-walled, cylindrical container with a ratio between the height of the cylindrical part and the diameter within the range 1:2 to 2:1, a conical ending with a slope angle related to the horizontal plane of at least 20º and an outlet with a diameter the ratio of which to the diameter of the cylindrical part is between 1:4 and 1:1.5.

7. Apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 characterized in that the powder container (1) is surrounded by a housing (8) with a combination of door and lid opening forwards upwards and letting free one side and the upward opening of the house to provide for convinient putting in and taking out the exchangeable powder container.

8. Apparatus according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 characterized in that it is provided with a safety system stopping the nozzle from being activated if there is no powder container in the

apparatus.

9. Apparatus according to claim 7 characterized in that it is provided with a safety system stopping the nozzle from being activated if there is no powder container in the apparatus and/or the door/lid combination is standing in open position.

10. Process for dissolution of water solvable powder or granulate and producing a concentrated solution, suitable for preparing or adjusting a use solution with the aid of an apparatus consisting of an exchangeable powder container (1) closed with a screen (3) stopping powder or granules from flowing out when the container is placed with the outlet pointing downwards, a holding

arrangement, an upturned nozzle (4) connected to a pressure water tube (5) via a valve, which is controlled manually or

automatically, and a second container (7), surrounding the nozzle and the lower part of the powder container and recovering formed solution, characterized in that the openings of the screen are tapering conically in the direction from the nozzle to the powder face.

11. Process according to claim 10 characterized in that the water supply to the nozzle is controlled by an automatic signal with interval coupling making periods of water supply alternate with run off periods.

12. Process according to claim 10 and 11 characterized in that one uses a powder container closed by a combination of a coarse mesh screen (3) with a mesh width at the powder face of 1 to 20 mm, preferably 1 to 10 mm and a fine mesh screen (2) with a mesh width of .01 to .8 mm, preferably .02 to .5 mm.

13. Process according to claim 10, 11 and 12 characterized in that one uses a nozzle giving a non-uniform water distribution at the lower surface of the screen.

14. Process according to claim 10, 11, 12 and 13 characterized in that the nozzle used is a flat jet nozzle.

15. Process according to claim 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 characterized in that one uses a powder container (1) which is a straight- walled, cylindrical container with a ratio between the height of the cylindrical part and the diameter within the range 1:2 to 2:1, a conical ending with a slope angle related to the horizontal plane of at least 20° and an outlet with a diameter the ratio of which to the diameter of the cylindrical part is between 1:4 and 1:1.5.

16. Process according to claim 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

characterized in that the powder container (1) is surrounded by a housing (8) with a combination of door and lid opening forwards upwards and letting free one side and the upward opening of the house to provide for convenient putting in and taking out the exchangeable powder container.