US3724173A - Pollution control process - Google Patents
Pollution control process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3724173A US3724173A US00127500A US3724173DA US3724173A US 3724173 A US3724173 A US 3724173A US 00127500 A US00127500 A US 00127500A US 3724173D A US3724173D A US 3724173DA US 3724173 A US3724173 A US 3724173A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- contacting
- odor
- zones
- free
- stream
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
Definitions
- ABSTRACT Process for substantially reducing the particulate emission, opacity and Odor of an asphalt saturator effluent to form a substantially odor-free gas stream using an exhaust stack stream that has previously been substantially purified for recycle to the process.
- the present invention thus is an improved process and method for performing the steps of reducing particulate emission, opacity and odor from a pollutantbear ing waste gas stream.
- asphalt saturator 101 represents the portion of the roofing preparation process utilizing felt saturators wherein an asphalt saturator effluent containing particulates, and having a high opacity and an objectionable odor are generated.
- the effluent from asphalt saturator 101 passes via line 102 into a first contacting zone 103, labeled contacting zone I wherein the effluent is contacted, at contacting conditions, with a contacting fluid passing into contacting zone Ivia line 104.
- a fluid stream comprising hydrocarbonaceous particles and finely divided suspended particulates is withdrawn from contacting zone I via line 105 and introduced into a first separation zone, labeled separation zone I wherein the hydrocarbonaceous particles and suspended particulates are separated from the fluid stream at separation conditions so as to produce a hydrocarbonaceous particle-suspended particulate stream exiting from the process via line 106 for further treatment, not shown, and a hydrocarbonaceous partiole-suspended particulate-free gaseous stream which is pollution control process for substantially reducing the particulate emission, opacity and odor of an asphalt saturator effluent utilizing a particulate-free odor-free gas stream from exhaust stack means for recycle to the process to further insure an effective clean-up of undesirable materials in an asphalt saturator effluent from a normal processing operation.
- the present'invention provides a pollution control process for substantially reducing the particu-' late emission, opacity and odor of an asphalt saturator effluenLwhich comprisesthe steps of: (a) passing said effluent into a first contacting zone wherein said effluent is contacted with a contacting fluid at contacting conditions; (b) withdrawing from said first contacting zone a fluid stream comprising hydrocarbonaceous particles and finely divided suspended particulates and introducing said stream into a first separation zone wherein saidhydrocarbonaceous particles and said suspended particulates are separated from said stream withdrawn from separation zone I viz line 107 and passed to separation zone II. Separation zone II is maintained at separation conditions so as to produce a substantially odor-free gaseous stream.
- the substantially odor-free gaseous stream is removed from second separation zone II via line 109 and introduced into exhaust stack means 110 which may be an exhaust stack. At least a portion of the substantially odor-free gaseous stream is now recycled via-line 1 l l to a second contacting zone 112, labeled contacting zone II.
- the substantially odor-free gaseous stream is again contacted with contacting fluid via lines 104 and 113 at contacting conditions and the stream is then passed via line 114 to contacting zone 103, labeled contacting zone I for admixture with the untreated asphalt saturator effluent from asphalt saturator 101.
- the remaining portion of the substantially odor-free, low opacity and'unobjectionable gaseous stream is removed from the exhaust stack 1 10 via line 115 for passage to the atmosphere.
- both contacting zones I and II may comprise duct means containing a plurality of nozzle spray means and the contacting conditions would include contacting the effluent from the asphalt saturator and the odor-free gaseous stream, respectively, with a contacting fluid comprising water.
- the spray means cause the water exiting from the spray means to exit at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting fluid reaching the cross-sectional area of the duct means.
- the contacting fluid is maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0.
- fumes are generated from 480 F asphalt used to saturate felt for making composition asphalt roofing in a completely enclosed saturator and saturated felt looper l.
- the asphalt saturator effluent contains hydrocarbonaceous particles, finely divided particulates, has a high opacity and an objectionable odor.
- the asphalt saturator effluent in this preferred embodiment, is simultaneously passed via lines 2 by means of fans 3 and passed into a plurality of first contacting zones 4 wherein the effluent is contacted with contacting fluid entering first contacting zones 4 via lines 5 and lines 5a, 5b, 5c, and 54, as hereinafter described.
- contacting zones 4 are duct means containing a plurality of nozzle spray means 5a, 5b, 5c and 5d.
- the contacting fluid comprises treated water which is filtered and recycled'as hereinafter described and the contacting fluid exits from the nozzle spray means at super atmospheric pressure of about 70 psi so as to produce a curtain of contacting fluid reaching the cross sectional area of the duct means which are approximately 4 feet in diameter.
- the nozzle spray means are arranged so as to provide a 4.5 gallon per minute spray which creates a curtain reaching the cross sectional area of the ducts to condense the hydrocarbonaceous particles and other suspended particulates which then pass from contacting zones 4 through filters 6, if desired, through lines 7 into first separation zones 8 wherein the hydrocarbonaceous particles and suspended particulates are separated from the gaseous streams at separation conditions to produce hydrocarbonaceous particle suspended particulate free gaseous streams.
- first separation zones 8 are vessels having a diameter of approximately 12 feet and are approximately 12 feet high. Both separation zones 8 have a baffle plate 9 that is approximately 8 feet long and screening 10 wherein the hydrocarbonaceous particles and suspended particulates are separated from the gaseous streams and removed from the process as hereinafter described.
- a hydrocarbonaceous particle-suspended particulate-free gaseous stream is then withdrawn via lines 11 from first separation zones 8 and then introduced into second separation zones 12 which are maintained at separation conditions so as to produce substantially odor-free gaseous streams.
- second separation zones 12 are approximately 12 feet in diameter and 12 feet tall and contain an expanded metal screening support 13 which holds a paclced bed filter 14.
- the hydrocarbonaceous particlesuspended particulate-free gaseous stream pass countercurrently to typically, a spray of potassium permanganate solution entering the system, as hereinafter described via spray nozzles 31a and 32a.
- the substantially odor-free gaseous streams from separation zones 12 are removed from the second separation zones via lines 47 and 48, respectively, and introduced into exhaust stack means 49 so as to form a single substantially odor-free exhaust stream. At least a portion of the substantially odor-free exhaust stream is recycled via lines 51, and fan 52 into second contacting zone 53 wherein the stream is contacted with contacting fluid at contacting conditions via lines 5, 54, and 54a, 54b, 54c and 54d. The stream is then passed to the first contacting zones 4 via lines 53 and 55 for admixture with the effluent passing into the pollution control process via lines '2. The remaining portion of the substantially odor-free exhaust stream is removed from the process and passed into the atmosphere as a substantially particulate-free low opacity, non-objectionable exhaust stream.
- the contacting fluid enters the pollution control system, at start up, via line 15 which passes into filter system 16 which, after filtering the contacting fluid, furnishes the contacting fluid via lines 17 and 19 and pump 18 to heater 20.
- the contacting fluid then exits the heater 20 by lines 21 and 22 and pass, respectively, to separation zones 8 and 12 via lines 22 and 23 and 21 and 26.
- Contacting fluid levels 24, 25, 27 and 28 are so maintained as to remove the hydrocarbonaceous particle-suspended particulate matter from the separation zones so that these compounds may be removed by lines 39, 40, 41 and 42 and via lines 43, 44, 45 and 46 for recycle to filter system 16.
- the filter system 16 does not emit any contacting fluid into the sewer due to the filter means which, typically, are discarded after each run.
- separation zones 8 are so arranged that contacting fluid levels 24 and 27 via lines 34 and 33, respectively, and common header 35 and line 36 furnish-contacting fluid via pump 37 and line 38 to line 5 for the first contacting zones 4 and via lines 5 and 54 to the second contacting zone 53.
- contacting fluid levels 25 and 28, respectively, via lines 30 and 29 provide suction for pump 31 to pass contacting fluid via lines 31 and 32 to separation zones 12 via spray nozzle means 31a and 32a.
- the contacting fluid comprises water which is maintained at a pH of 8.0 to about 9.0 by means of sodium hydroxide.
- the contacting fluid entering the system via spray nozzles 31a and 32a perferably is a 1 percent solution of potassium permanganate spray water which is maintained by the use of sodium carbonate as abuffer to hold the pH to approximately 8.0 to about 9.0.
- the system does not emit any sulphur dioxide and any manganese dioxide that may be precipitated in the process is periodically removed from the potassium permanganate' solution by washing the same, by means not shown, with sodium bisulfite.
- the tests described in this example were conducted to determine whether the saturator effluent emissions on the asphalt saturator was in compliance with the applicable regulations of the Minnesota Air Pollution Control Agency Rules.
- the methods of testing employed were in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Power Test Code 27l957, Determining Dust Concentration in a Gas Stream.” The testing was accomplished by sampling simultaneously through two probes placed perpendicular to each other on a horizontal plane, about 60 feet up the stack. The cross sectional area of the circular stack was divided into concentric equal area zones and velocity pressure head readings (Pitot traverse) taken at the center of each zone. Sampling of the effluents was distributed in all of these points isokinetically, as far as possible.
- APC 5.B( 1 58(2) and 5.B(3) The applicable regulations on particulate emission control by the Minnesota Air Pollution Control Agency Rules are APC 5.B( 1 58(2) and 5.B(3).
- APC 5.B(l) specifies the emission limit based on process weight rate as E 4.10 P- for process weights up to 30 tons per hour where E is the allowable emissions, in pounds per hour and P equals the process weight rate in tons per hour.
- APC 5.B(2) specifies the emission limit based on Source Gas Volume rate as given in Table 2 of APC 5.4. Interpolation of data from the Table gives allowable emission of 0.08 grains per standard cubic feet for the gas volume flow of 14,800 standard cubic feet per minute for the operation considered. APC 5.B(3) sets a ceiling of 0.3 grains per standard cubic feet as the maximum allowable emission for any industrial process.
- the following Table summarizes the Pitot Tube and Dust Sampler Data:
- Run 1 Grains/sci" 0.0044 0.0037 Pounds/hour 0.56 0.47 Pounds/1000 lbs of gas flow 0.0084 0.0071
- the Minnesota Air Pollution Control Agency Rules APC 5.B(3) specifies the maximum allowable particulate concentration as 0.3 grains per standard cubic feet of exhaust gases. Based on a process weight rate of 4.7 tons per hour for the operation considered above, the maximum allowable emissions were 11.5 pounds per hour, in accordance with APC 5.B( l Based on Source Gas Volume, as per APC 5.B(2), the maximum allowable emissions are 0.08 grains per standard cubic feet for the 14,800 standard cubic feet per minute operation considered. Hence, the actual emission of 0.04 grains per standard cubic feet is in compliance with the maximum allowable limits as required by Minnesota Air Pollution Control Agency Rules.
- the odor emission rate was determined in ac- .cordance with ASTM Dl39l-57, Measurement of Odor and Atmospheres (Dilution Method), and were in compliance with Minnesota Air Pollution Control Agency Rule 9.B.
- the effluent gas samples of approximately 10 ccs each were collected in 50 cc sterile syringes and sealed. The samples were then taken to an isolated location which was deemed odor-free and a panel of six persons were subjected to various odor tests. The tests were conducted within two hours of collecting the samples in order to decrease the chances of deterioration. The panel was subjected to the odor test, one member at a time.
- the 10 ccs effluent samples were diluted with 40 ccs of odor-free air and. allowed to diffuse for ten minutes, before rendering the tests. Of the six persons tested, all except one could perceive an odor, but none deemed the odor objectionable. All of the six persons in the panel were deemed to possess normal olefactory senses.
- the State of Minnesota APC 9.A(3) and APC 9.8 specify that, for industrial zones, the odorous material is to be diluted with four volumes of odor-free air and tested with a panel of not less than five persons, the odor being deemed objectionable if 30 percent or more of the persons in the panel exposed to the odor believe it to be objectionable.
- a preferred embodiment of my invention provides a pollution control process for substantially reducing the particulate emission, opacity and odor of an asphalt saturator effluent which comprises the steps of: (a) simultaneously passingsaid effluent into a plurality of first contacting zones wherein said effluent is contacted with contacting fluid at contacting conditions; (b)
- a pollution control process for substantially reducing the particulate emission, opacity and odor of asphalt saturator effluent fumes which comprises the steps of:
- removing via said exhaust stack means the effluent of the first contacting zone of step (e).
- said first contacting zone contacting conditions include contacting said fumes with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 and exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure'so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- said second contacting zone contacting conditions include contacting said odor-free gaseous stream with acontacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 and exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- a pollution control process for substantially reducing the particulate emission, opacity and odor of asphalt saturator effluent fumes which comprises the steps of:
- removing via said exhaust stack means the effluent of the first contacting zones of step (e).
- said first contacting zones contacting conditions include contacting said fumes with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 which is filtered and recycled to said contacting zones, said contacting liquid exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- said second contacting zone contacting conditions include contacting said odor-free exhaust stream with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about-9.0 and which is filtered and recycled to said second contacting zone, said contacting liquid exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (7)
- 2. The process of claim 1 wherein said first contacting zone contacting conditions include contacting said fumes with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 and exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- 3. The process of claim 1 wherein said second contacting zone contacting conditions include contacting said odor-free gaseous stream with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 and exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtaIn of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- 4. A pollution control process for substantially reducing the particulate emission, opacity and odor of asphalt saturator effluent fumes which comprises the steps of: a. simultaneously passing said fumes into a plurality of first contacting zones comprising duct means containing a plurality of nozzle spray means wherein said effluent is contacted with contacting liquid maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 at contacting conditions; b. withdrawing from said first contacting zones gaseous streams comprising hydrocarbonaceous particles and finely divided suspended particulates and introducing said streams into a plurality of first separation zones wherein said hydrocarbonaceous particles and said suspended particulates are separated from said gaseous streams at separation conditions to produce hydrocarbonaceous particle-suspended particulate-free gaseous streams; c. withdrawing from said first separation zones said hydrocarbonaceous particle-suspended particulate-free gaseous streams and introducing said streams into a plurality of second separation zones maintained at separation conditions and removing odors from said gaseous streams so as to produce substantially odor-free gaseous streams; d. removing from said second separation zones said substantially odor-free gaseous streams and introducing said streams into exhaust stack means so as to form a single substantially odor-free exhaust stream; e. recycling from said exhaust stack means at least a portion of said substantially odor-free exhaust stream to a second contacting zone comprising duct means containing a plurality of nozzle spray means wherein said stream is contacted with contacting liquid maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 at contacting conditions and then passed to said first contacting zones for admixture with the effluent of Step (a); and, f. removing via said exhaust stack means the effluent of the first contacting zones of step (e).
- 5. The process of claim 4 wherein said first contacting zones contacting conditions include contacting said fumes with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 which is filtered and recycled to said contacting zones, said contacting liquid exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- 6. The process of claim 5 wherein said superatmospheric pressure is 70 psi.
- 7. The process of claim 4 wherein said second contacting zone contacting conditions include contacting said odor-free exhaust stream with a contacting liquid comprising water maintained at a pH of from about 8.0 to about 9.0 and which is filtered and recycled to said second contacting zone, said contacting liquid exiting from said spray means at superatmospheric pressure so as to produce a curtain of contacting liquid reaching the cross-sectional area of said duct means.
- 8. The process of claim 7 wherein said superatmospheric pressure is 70 psi.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12750071A | 1971-03-24 | 1971-03-24 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3724173A true US3724173A (en) | 1973-04-03 |
Family
ID=22430469
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US00127500A Expired - Lifetime US3724173A (en) | 1971-03-24 | 1971-03-24 | Pollution control process |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3724173A (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5634962A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-06-03 | Serv-Tech, In. | Method for removing hazardous gases from enclosed structures |
WO1997025125A1 (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-07-17 | Serv-Tech, Inc. | Method and apparatus for removal of hazardous gases from enclosed structures |
US5753012A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1998-05-19 | Krupp Koppers Gmbh | Method for the cleaning of flue gases with different contents of acidic components |
US5862819A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1999-01-26 | Cradeur; Robert R. | Mobile apparatus for removing hazardous gases from enclosed structures |
US20050058506A1 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-17 | Wills Michael K. | Controlling emissions during asphalt paving |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1182543A (en) * | 1914-10-17 | 1916-05-09 | Benjamin M Ferguson | Gas-purifying process and apparatus. |
AU221637A (en) * | 1937-06-02 | 1938-02-10 | Improved adjusting device for hospital andother bedsteads | |
US2668754A (en) * | 1950-02-23 | 1954-02-09 | Columbian Carbon | Process for recovering carbon black from a gaseous suspension |
DE1034147B (en) * | 1953-11-27 | 1958-07-17 | Bau Kompl Gasreinigungs Und Wa | Device for dedusting industrial gas |
CA630625A (en) * | 1961-11-07 | H. Mook Johan | Asphalt blowing | |
CA645383A (en) * | 1962-07-24 | W. Bennett Eugene | Removal of particulate material from tar vapors | |
US3520113A (en) * | 1968-01-08 | 1970-07-14 | Rufus Stokes | Air pollution control device |
US3522000A (en) * | 1967-09-06 | 1970-07-28 | Chillum Sheet Metal Inc | Method and apparatus for cooling and purifying gaseous products of combustion |
US3662695A (en) * | 1970-08-18 | 1972-05-16 | Gaf Corp | Roofing factory fume and solid waste disposal system |
-
1971
- 1971-03-24 US US00127500A patent/US3724173A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA630625A (en) * | 1961-11-07 | H. Mook Johan | Asphalt blowing | |
CA645383A (en) * | 1962-07-24 | W. Bennett Eugene | Removal of particulate material from tar vapors | |
US1182543A (en) * | 1914-10-17 | 1916-05-09 | Benjamin M Ferguson | Gas-purifying process and apparatus. |
AU221637A (en) * | 1937-06-02 | 1938-02-10 | Improved adjusting device for hospital andother bedsteads | |
US2668754A (en) * | 1950-02-23 | 1954-02-09 | Columbian Carbon | Process for recovering carbon black from a gaseous suspension |
DE1034147B (en) * | 1953-11-27 | 1958-07-17 | Bau Kompl Gasreinigungs Und Wa | Device for dedusting industrial gas |
US3522000A (en) * | 1967-09-06 | 1970-07-28 | Chillum Sheet Metal Inc | Method and apparatus for cooling and purifying gaseous products of combustion |
US3520113A (en) * | 1968-01-08 | 1970-07-14 | Rufus Stokes | Air pollution control device |
US3662695A (en) * | 1970-08-18 | 1972-05-16 | Gaf Corp | Roofing factory fume and solid waste disposal system |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5753012A (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1998-05-19 | Krupp Koppers Gmbh | Method for the cleaning of flue gases with different contents of acidic components |
US5634962A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-06-03 | Serv-Tech, In. | Method for removing hazardous gases from enclosed structures |
WO1997025125A1 (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-07-17 | Serv-Tech, Inc. | Method and apparatus for removal of hazardous gases from enclosed structures |
US5862819A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1999-01-26 | Cradeur; Robert R. | Mobile apparatus for removing hazardous gases from enclosed structures |
US20050058506A1 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-17 | Wills Michael K. | Controlling emissions during asphalt paving |
US7094001B2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2006-08-22 | Granite Construction Company | Controlling emissions during asphalt paving |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lewis et al. | Composition of size-fractionated aerosol in Charleston, West Virginia | |
US3997415A (en) | Process for removing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from effluent gases | |
US4273751A (en) | Removal of acidica contaminants from gas streams by caustic impregnated activated carbon | |
ATE58244T1 (en) | PROCEDURE FOR LONG-TERM DETERMINATION AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF THE POLLUTANT CONTENT OF SOLID-LOADED EXHAUST GAS FLOW. | |
US4915920A (en) | Dry method of purifying flue gas | |
US3724173A (en) | Pollution control process | |
US4210503A (en) | Emission control method and system | |
Lee Jr et al. | Concentration and particle size distribution of particulate emissions in automobile exhaust | |
Pimenta et al. | Determination of free and total carbon in suspended air particulate matter collected on glass fiber filters | |
JPS5976526A (en) | Method and apparatus for purifying waste gas | |
Bufalini et al. | Hydrogen peroxide formation from the photooxidation of formaldehyde and its presence in rainwater | |
CA1257458A (en) | Removal of hydrogen sulfide from air streams | |
Phalen | Cleaning the air | |
JPS63191059A (en) | Continuous analysis of mercury in gas | |
Wohlers | Odor intensity and odor travel from industrial sources | |
US3443363A (en) | Installation for purification of gas | |
JP2000512899A (en) | Method for controlling sulfuric acid aerosol formation in exhaust gas purification systems | |
ATE21885T1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECOVERING CALCIUM CHLORIDE FROM Spent ABSORPTION LIQUIDS IN EXHAUST GAS DESULPHURIZATION PROCESSES. | |
S⊘ strand et al. | A test chamber for experimental hydrogen fluoride exposure in humans | |
Valerio et al. | Correlations between PAHs and CO, NO, NO2, O3 along an urban street | |
Hemeon et al. | Atmospheric Pollution | |
Micheis et al. | PREPARATION OF REPLICAS FOR ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF IRRADIATED CERAMIC FUELS. | |
Costle | Visibility protection—a proposal | |
Boulaud et al. | SO 2 Transformation in controlled atmosphere leading to the production of aerosol particles | |
Witz et al. | A comparison of mass, lead, sulfate, and nitrate concentrations in a field study using dichotomous, size-selective, and standard hi-vol samplers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:L.A. F. DELAWARE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:003883/0817 Effective date: 19810702 Owner name: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:L.A. F. DELAWARE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:003883/0817 Effective date: 19810702 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WADE, WILLIAM, J., DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004652/0351 Effective date: 19861103 Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004652/0351 Effective date: 19861103 Owner name: WADE, WILLIAM, J., ONE RODNEY SQUARE NORTH, WILMIN Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004652/0351 Effective date: 19861103 Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, ONE RODNEY SQUARE NORTH, Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004652/0351 Effective date: 19861103 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE Free format text: TERMINATION OF SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED NOV. 13, 1986. REEL 4652 FRAMES 351-420;ASSIGNORS:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, A DE. BANKING CORPORATION;WADE, WILLIAM J. (TRUSTEES);REEL/FRAME:004903/0501 Effective date: 19870730 Owner name: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, FIBERGLAS TOW Free format text: TERMINATION OF SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED NOV. 13, 1986. REEL 4652 FRAMES 351-420;ASSIGNORS:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, A DE. BANKING CORPORATION;WADE, WILLIAM J. (TRUSTEES);REEL/FRAME:004903/0501 Effective date: 19870730 |