US20210363608A1 - Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets - Google Patents

Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20210363608A1
US20210363608A1 US17/397,612 US202117397612A US2021363608A1 US 20210363608 A1 US20210363608 A1 US 20210363608A1 US 202117397612 A US202117397612 A US 202117397612A US 2021363608 A1 US2021363608 A1 US 2021363608A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
process according
organic acid
earth elements
iron
rare
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US17/397,612
Inventor
Alain Seron
Nour-Eddine Menad
Dominique Breeze
Marc Gamet
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BRGM SA
Original Assignee
BRGM SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BRGM SA filed Critical BRGM SA
Priority to US17/397,612 priority Critical patent/US20210363608A1/en
Assigned to BRGM reassignment BRGM ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GAMET, Marc, BREEZE, Dominique, MENAD, Nour-Eddine, SERON, ALAIN
Publication of US20210363608A1 publication Critical patent/US20210363608A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B59/00Obtaining rare earth metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/02Roasting processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B7/00Working up raw materials other than ores, e.g. scrap, to produce non-ferrous metals and compounds thereof; Methods of a general interest or applied to the winning of more than two metals
    • C22B7/006Wet processes
    • C22B7/007Wet processes by acid leaching
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/04Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching
    • C22B3/16Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching in organic solutions
    • C22B3/1608Leaching with acyclic or carbocyclic agents
    • C22B3/1616Leaching with acyclic or carbocyclic agents of a single type
    • C22B3/165Leaching with acyclic or carbocyclic agents of a single type with organic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/20Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching
    • C22B3/22Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by physical processes, e.g. by filtration, by magnetic means, or by thermal decomposition
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for extracting the rare-earth elements contained in permanent magnets originating in particular from waste electrical and electronic equipment (W3E or WEEE).
  • W3E or WEEE waste electrical and electronic equipment
  • WEEE forms the waste stream that is currently experiencing the greatest growth, between 2% and 3% each year. It has a high potential for recycling of the materials that make it up (ferrous and nonferrous metals, precious metals, glass, plastic, etc.). These economic and environmental challenges have justified the setting up of a specific management system for this waste, based on the principle of extended producer responsibility (EPR) for the producers of this equipment.
  • EPR extended producer responsibility
  • Permanent magnets based on rare-earth elements present in many everyday objects, such as computers, televisions or cell phones. These permanent magnets mainly contain neodymium (Nd) alloyed with iron and boron. They may also comprise dysprosium (Dy) and praseodymium (Pr).
  • Document CN101817547 proposes to recover the rare-earth elements from a magnet via a process consisting in grinding the magnet, in adding carbon to the powder obtained then in placing this mixture in contact with a stream of chlorine gas in order to produce rare-earth element chlorides and a volatile iron chloride.
  • the rare-earth elements are then purified by oxalic precipitation.
  • a second recycling method uses a fusion process.
  • Document JP 2001-335852 is based on the mixing of a powder of magnets and a fluorinated agent such as NH 4 F. The assembly is heated until the fusion thereof. The rare-earth elements are found, after cooling, as a mixture with a slag and can be separated by the difference in density.
  • Document JP 2010-199110 uses the same process of recycling by heating until fusion occurs and separation of the molten and nonmolten fractions.
  • the latter fraction is rich in Nd alloy.
  • the third method of recycling is based on an extraction of rare-earth elements by a molten metal.
  • the process of document WO 2007/119846 uses the oxidation of the magnets then the bringing into contact with molten aluminum resulting in the formation of a rare-earth element oxide as a mixture with a slag and an Fe—B alloy which must be separated subsequently.
  • the difficulty lies in the delicate management of the aluminothermic reaction.
  • Another process takes advantage of the strong affinity of molten magnesium for neodymium, unlike iron.
  • the limits here are linked to the management of a metal in the gaseous state, and to the energy expenditure that is associated with the process.
  • This treatment method is not suitable for the bulky shapes of magnets and is very expensive from an energy point of view.
  • the objective of the invention is to propose an alternative process that has none or only some of these drawbacks and that enables the extraction of rare-earth elements contained in rare-earth element permanent magnets, more particularly of NdFeB type, which are optionally doped, i.e. to which other rare-earth elements such as Dy and/or Pr have been added.
  • This objective is achieved by provision of a process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in a permanent magnet, more particularly of NdFeB type, optionally to which rare-earth elements have been added, comprising the steps of:
  • the magnet particles resulting from the grinding having a size of less than 2 mm for 80% thereof.
  • the organic acid is acetic acid, oxalic acid or citric acid, or a mixture thereof.
  • the solution containing an organic acid is at a concentration ranging from 5% to 30% by volume, and for example at a concentration of 10%.
  • the step of treating with a solution containing the organic acid is carried out for a minimum duration of 1 hour, preferentially less than 24 hours, more preferentially ranging from 100 to 420 minutes, for example around 420 minutes.
  • the iron is separated by precipitation, for example due to the introduction of oxygen, for example by bubbling or mixing of an oxygen-containing gas, such as air, or pure oxygen.
  • the iron is separated by being brought into contact with at least one material of biological origin.
  • the material of biological origin is oyster shell powder.
  • the material of biological origin is pine bark powder.
  • the invention also provides a recycling process incorporating the inventive extraction processes where the permanent magnet originates from industrial waste.
  • FIG. 1 depicts the process for extracting, according to one embodiment of the invention, rare-earth elements present in permanent magnets, which is similar to the embodiments exemplified in examples 2 to 4.
  • FIG. 2 a is a photograph taken with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) of a permanent magnet according to control example 1.
  • FIGS. 2 b and 2 c collate the results of qualitative chemical analysis by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM EDS) carried out on the magnet from example 1, during the visualisation thereof with SEM.
  • SEM EDS scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy
  • FIG. 3 presents the dissolution rates over time of Fe, Nd, Dy and Ni during the step of dissolution by acid attack of a process according to the invention that is the subject of example 2.
  • FIG. 4 presents the dissolution rates with respect to time of Fe, Nd and Dy during the iron precipitation step of a process according to the invention that is the subject of example 3.
  • FIG. 5 presents the dissolution rates with respect to time of Fe, Nd and Dy during the iron precipitation step of a process according to the invention that is the subject of example 4.
  • the magnets are characterized by the fact that they possess magnetic moments.
  • Permanent magnets are magnets which have a remanence or persistence of their magnetic moments, that is to say that they retain their magnetic properties after the removal of a magnetizing field.
  • a permanent magnet generally consists of a manufactured hard magnetic material, the remnant field and the coercive excitation of which are large. Permanent magnets nearly always contain atoms of at least one of the following chemical elements: iron, cobalt or nickel, or from the family of lanthanides (rare-earth elements).
  • the synthetic magnets used in the present invention are produced by sintering an alloy containing powders of rare-earth elements which then forms a polarized alloy under an intense field of an electromagnet. Such materials are particularly used in the process according to the invention.
  • Magnets of NdFeB type are also known under the name of neodymium magnets. They are predominantly composed of an alloy of neodymium, iron and boron (Nd 2 Fe 14 B) making it possible to form a tetragonal crystalline system.
  • Permanent magnets of NdFeB type when used in the process according to the invention, may be contained in industrial waste originating for example from the recycling of hard drives of central processing units of PC or laptop computer type, loudspeakers, for example of cell phones or computers, small electric motors or else be composed of waste from the production of permanent magnets.
  • Such magnets are often surrounded by a layer of nickel. Nevertheless, the coating thereof may be based on other metals such as cobalt, a copper-cobalt alloy, zinc, etc. The same process can be applied to epoxy-coated magnets.
  • one subject of the invention is a process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in a permanent magnet, more particularly of NdFeB type, optionally to which rare-earth elements have been added, comprising the steps of:
  • the liquid phase contains more than 70% by weight of the rare-earth elements from the permanent magnet that have undergone the preceding steps of the process.
  • the treatment above the Curie temperature i.e. at a temperature generally greater than 300° C., preferentially between 300° C. and 400° C., and preferably around 350° C., enables the permanent demagnetization of the magnets, which is advantageous for the remainder of the process which is not disrupted by the magnetic properties of the magnets.
  • the heat treatment is carried out at a temperature below 600° C.
  • the sole objective of this heat treatment is the demagnetization. It does not have the objective of improving the dissolution of the metals in the solution containing the organic acid.
  • the heat treatment is preferentially carried out over a period of at least 10 minutes, and preferentially of between 10 and 40 minutes.
  • Grinding is understood to mean the fragmentation of the magnet by subjecting it to an impact or to a pressure.
  • the grinding step makes it possible to obtain magnet powder, the particle size of which is selected so as to favor the acid attack and the dissolution of the rare-earth elements. Specifically, the size of the particles influences the physicochemical properties of the substrate. The finer the product, the faster the dissolution, but the handling of excessively fine powders can in certain cases present disadvantages at various steps of the process.
  • the grinding is a controlled grinding, for example broken down into at least two grinding steps where the discharges from the first grinding are subjected to a second grinding as described in FIG. 1 :
  • controlled grinding is carried out so as to obtain precisely the desired particle size.
  • the controlled grinding in several steps avoids the production of fine particles that volatilize, which leads to a loss of material. Furthermore, it involves a lower energy expenditure than thorough grinding.
  • the controlled grinding may be carried out in a single step.
  • the particles are selected by screening.
  • screening oversize particles not selected at the end of the grinding
  • the particles on which the acid attack is carried out have a size of less than 2 mm for 80% thereof, and preferentially for 90% thereof.
  • the particles on which the acid attack is carried out have a size of greater than 0.2 mm for 80% thereof, and preferentially for 90% thereof.
  • the particles on which the acid attack is carried out have a size of greater than 0.5 mm. These particle sizes are compatible with an industrial process since they require a limited energy expenditure during their production.
  • the grinding is carried out with the aid of a shredder, for example a cutting mill.
  • the classification is carried out with the aid of a screen according to standard methods.
  • the heat treatment step a) and grinding step b) may be replaced by the provision of demagnetized particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm.
  • Such particles may be derived from ground demagnetized magnets.
  • the treatment of the particles with the solution containing an organic acid, or acid attack makes it possible to dissolve the constituents of the magnet and in particular the rare-earth elements in the solution. It may also lead to a more or less partial dissolution of a coating present on the surface of the magnet. In the case of nickel-based coatings, the dissolution is very limited which makes it possible to separate it, in the form of a solid nickel residue, at the end of the process.
  • This attack is carried out by a solution of organic acid, in particular C1-C10, preferably C1-C5, carboxylic acids having at least one or two carboxyl functions (or radicals).
  • organic acid in particular C1-C10, preferably C1-C5
  • carboxylic acids having at least one or two carboxyl functions (or radicals).
  • acetic acid, oxalic acid or citric acid, or a mixture thereof are acids which are particularly advantageous to use in the process according to the invention.
  • the solvent of the acid is generally water.
  • the acid solution has a concentration ranging from 5% to 30% by volume, and for example a concentration of around 10%.
  • concentration ranging from 0.8 to 2.4 M.
  • the solution has an acetic acid concentration of greater than 1 M, and preferably of 1.6 M.
  • the magnet powder corresponding to particles selected at the end of the heat treatment and grinding steps is added to the acid solution in a proportion of 150 g of powder per liter of acid solution.
  • the acid attack is preferably carried out for a minimum duration of 1 hour, preferentially less than 24 hours, more preferentially ranging from 100 to 550 minutes, for example around 420 minutes.
  • the acid attack (or leaching) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 10 to 50° C., more preferentially from 10 to 30° C., and more preferentially still at ambient temperature, i.e. 20° C. It may be carried out in a static air or nitrogen atmosphere, in a stream of air or in a stream of nitrogen.
  • the acid attack brings the pH of the solution to a pH of less than 2.
  • the amount of acid to be added is therefore advantageously an amount of acid that makes it possible to achieve such a pH.
  • a low pH value increases the kinetics of the dissolution.
  • the liquid phase containing the rare-earth elements is then separated from the solid phase if not all of the compounds of the powder are dissolved.
  • This is for example the case for magnets surrounded by a layer of nickel, particularly in the presence of an acetic acid solution.
  • the nickel optionally combined with iron, remains in solid form and can therefore be recovered by simple solid/liquid separation.
  • This solid/liquid separation may be carried out by any known methods such as centrifugation (for example at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes), filtration or decantation.
  • At the end of the acid attack at least one portion of the ferrous fraction of the magnets has passed into solution.
  • the iron is separated from the rare-earth elements, optionally during an additional step.
  • the iron may be precipitated whilst the rare-earth elements remain, at least partially, in the liquid phase.
  • oxygen may be introduced into the solution for example by bubbling or mixing with an oxygen-containing gas, such as air, or pure oxygen.
  • an oxygen-containing gas such as air, or pure oxygen.
  • hydrogen peroxide H 2 O 2
  • This mixture promotes the oxidation of the iron from the degree of oxidation 2 to the degree 3 and therefore the precipitation of iron III oxide or oxyhydroxide compounds at low pH (i.e. at a pH generally of less than 4).
  • the pH is preferably measured using a pH meter with a pH measurement resolution of 0.01 unit, voltage measurement resolution of 1 mV and temperature measurement resolution of 0.1° C., such as the Heitolab P310 pH meter from Heito.
  • the electrode is of Heito brand.
  • the iron is thus precipitated and can be separated from the rare-earth elements by a phase separation step such as a filtration, a centrifugation or a decantation.
  • the pH is kept below 4 by the addition of acid.
  • the solution is kept at a pH that enables the selective precipitation of the iron.
  • the pH is chosen between 3 and 4.
  • the inventors have shown that the separation of the iron is obtained by bringing the solution rich in rare-earth elements and in iron into contact with a material of biological origin such as oyster shell powder or pine bark powder.
  • a material of biological origin such as oyster shell powder or pine bark powder.
  • Many other biological materials are known for influencing the behavior of the metals in solution. This is for example the case of dried algae.
  • oyster shell powder and pine bark powder have displayed a particularly surprising efficacy for abatement of the iron with respect to the rare-earth elements.
  • calcined bone powder tends to trap all of the metals including the iron and the rare-earth elements.
  • These biological materials are advantageously used in the form of fine powder.
  • Such a powder may essentially comprise particles having a size of from 0.5 to 5 mm, preferably from 0.6 to 2 mm, for example 1.25 mm.
  • the step of separating the iron may be carried out prior to the liquid/solid separation described in step d) of the process, or else after the liquid/solid separation and may be followed by a second liquid/solid separation step.
  • the rare-earth elements extracted by this process are chosen from Nd, Dy and Pr, and a mixture thereof.
  • the extraction process is carried out on magnets that are coated, for example with nickel, cobalt, a copper-cobalt alloy, zinc, epoxy or a mixture of these compounds.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in demagnetized particles originating from a permanent magnet, more particularly of NdFeB type, optionally to which other rare-earth elements have been added, the process comprising the steps of:
  • the conditions and steps of demagnetization, and of obtaining the particles, for example by grinding, the size of the particles, the treatment with an acid solution and the separation steps leading to the extraction of the rare-earth elements may advantageously be as described above. Similarly, the steps of extracting the iron may also be applied to this process.
  • the invention also relates to a recycling process incorporating an extraction process according to the invention where the permanent magnet originates from industrial waste.
  • the invention also relates to the products obtained directly from the process according to the invention and the subsequent use thereof in particular in the electronics field.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process as described above that does not comprise any chemical reaction steps between the steps of providing demagnetized and ground magnet particles and the acid attack step.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process as described above that does not comprise any chemical reaction steps between the steps of acid attack and of solid/liquid separation and/or of precipitation and/or of fixation of the iron.
  • FIG. 1 Another subject of the invention is a process as described in FIG. 1 . This process may incorporate one or more of the features described above.
  • Example 1 (Control): Analysis of a Permanent Magnet with No Coating
  • FIGS. 2 a to 2 c show the results of characterization by SEM imagery of a permanent magnet of NdFeB type, with no coating, which has not been subjected to the process according to the invention.
  • the analysis makes it possible to demonstrate the granular structure of these magnets consisting of sintered crystals of Nd 2 Fe 14 B phase (bottom arrow toward FIG. 2 c ) in the presence of an intergranular phase rich in rare-earth elements (top arrow toward FIG. 2 b ).
  • the characteristic line of Fe is identified, which is predominant, and the characteristic line of Nd which is well represented.
  • the emission lines of Nd, Pr and Dy are in particular identified.
  • NdFeB nickel-coated neodymium-iron-boron
  • magnets were heat-treated for 20 minutes at a temperature of 350° C. in a muffled furnace, i.e. above their Curie temperature, with a view to permanently demagnetizing them (step 2 of the process described in FIG. 1 ), in order not to be disrupted in the remainder of the process by their magnetic properties.
  • the samples were ground so as to obtain a particle size of less than 2 mm.
  • the screening oversize i.e. the particles having a particle size greater than the desired particle size, were subjected to a second grinding step (step 4).
  • This two-step grinding is a controlled grinding.
  • Steps 3 and 4 from FIG. 1 were carried out using a shredder-type grinder (RETSCH SM100 cutting mill—from Retsch GmbH, Retsch-Allee 1-5, 42781 Haan, Germany) with a 2 mm screen.
  • the particles having a size greater than or equal to 2 mm were then subjected to a second grinding step using the same grinder with a 2 mm screen.
  • the powder was automatically classified on the 2 mm screen, resulting in a powder such that 100% of the particles had a size of less than 2 mm (quartile 10 or d100).
  • a sample of 15 g magnet powder resulting from this treatment was dispersed in 100 ml of a solution of acetic acid diluted to 10% in order to be subjected to a step of acid attack, or leaching (step 5).
  • the mixture was left stirring for a period of 24 h, at a temperature of 30° C., in a static (ambient) air atmosphere.
  • a kinetic study of the dissolution of the rare-earth elements, the iron and the nickel was carried out. Samples of the acid attack solution were drawn off during the reaction at the following times: 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h and 7 h.
  • the samples were subjected to a centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes.
  • the supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22 ⁇ m syringe filter (step 6), so as to separate the solid phase from the liquid phase.
  • the metallic solutions obtained were then subjected to an atomic absorption analysis in order to determine the concentration of the various dissolved metals.
  • the iron was precipitated. This precipitation was carried out by bringing the solution into contact with oxygen which is introduced into the solution by air bubbling.
  • the pH was adjusted to a pH ranging from 3 to 4 by addition of a supplementary amount of acetic acid, in order to selectively precipitate iron III without precipitating the rare-earth elements.
  • the pH was measured using a model P 310 Heito brand pH meter combined with a Heito electrode.
  • a magnet powder identical to that used in example 2 was treated according to the same methods as in example 2, except that the acid treatment step was carried out under nitrogen and the separation of the iron from the rare-earth elements is not carried out by placing in contact with oxygen.
  • the metallic solutions rich in rare-earth elements obtained after dissolution by acid attack were treated with materials of biological origin that make it possible to optimize the separation of the rare-earth elements and of the iron.
  • FIG. 4 The results of the atomic absorption analysis of the concentrations of Fe, Nd and Dy present in the successive samplings taken over time during this precipitation step are presented in FIG. 4 .
  • This figure shows that the iron (bottom curve), the Nd (top curve) and the Dy (intermediate curve) are fixed by the bark powder in proportions that are different from one another.
  • the iron is removed from the solution in its entirety, whereas less than 50% of the rare-earth elements are removed. This process makes it possible to capture, and therefore to separate more particularly the Fe II from the solution. This process therefore makes it possible to extract the iron from the solution and to keep a large portion of the rare-earth elements in solution.
  • FIG. 5 The results of the atomic absorption analysis of the concentrations of Fe, Nd and Dy present in the successive samplings taken over time during this precipitation step are presented in FIG. 5 .
  • This figure shows that the iron (bottom curve), the Nd (top curve) and the Dy (intermediate curve) are fixed by the oyster shell powder in proportions that are different from one another.
  • the iron is removed from the solution (precipitated) in its entirety, whereas less than 35% of the rare-earth elements are removed. This process makes it possible to capture, and therefore to separate more particularly the Fe II from the solution. This process therefore makes it possible to extract the iron from the solution and to keep a large portion of the rare-earth elements in solution.

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for extracting rare earth elements contained in permanent magnets, which includes the steps of thermal treatment of the permanent magnet, crushing at the end of the thermal treatment in order to obtain particles with a size smaller than 2 mm, treatment by agitation of the particles in a solution containing an organic acid, and separation of the liquid phase from the solid phase.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a process for extracting the rare-earth elements contained in permanent magnets originating in particular from waste electrical and electronic equipment (W3E or WEEE).
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • WEEE forms the waste stream that is currently experiencing the greatest growth, between 2% and 3% each year. It has a high potential for recycling of the materials that make it up (ferrous and nonferrous metals, precious metals, glass, plastic, etc.). These economic and environmental challenges have justified the setting up of a specific management system for this waste, based on the principle of extended producer responsibility (EPR) for the producers of this equipment. Thus, the WEEE collection and recycling system has been operational in France since 22 Jul. 2005 for professional or non-household WEEE, and since 15 Nov. 2006 for household WEEE.
  • For all that, certain components are poorly recycled or are not recycled. This is the case for permanent magnets based on rare-earth elements present in many everyday objects, such as computers, televisions or cell phones. These permanent magnets mainly contain neodymium (Nd) alloyed with iron and boron. They may also comprise dysprosium (Dy) and praseodymium (Pr).
  • Numerous methods have already been proposed for recycling the rare-earth elements present in magnetic or nonmagnetic used products. However, these recycling methods are not completely satisfactory.
  • The following documents describe the recovery of the rare-earth elements contained in permanent magnets by direct chlorination or fluorination.
  • Document CN101817547 proposes to recover the rare-earth elements from a magnet via a process consisting in grinding the magnet, in adding carbon to the powder obtained then in placing this mixture in contact with a stream of chlorine gas in order to produce rare-earth element chlorides and a volatile iron chloride. The rare-earth elements are then purified by oxalic precipitation.
  • Document WO 2009/119720 uses a process by immersion of the alloy of rare-earth elements in a halogenated molten salt at high temperature that makes it possible to extract the rare-earth elements in the form of gaseous rare-earth element halides.
  • These two techniques are not very attractive considering the hazardous nature of the circulation of chlorinated or fluorinated gas.
  • A second recycling method uses a fusion process.
  • Document JP 2001-335852 is based on the mixing of a powder of magnets and a fluorinated agent such as NH4F. The assembly is heated until the fusion thereof. The rare-earth elements are found, after cooling, as a mixture with a slag and can be separated by the difference in density.
  • Document JP 2010-199110 uses the same process of recycling by heating until fusion occurs and separation of the molten and nonmolten fractions. The latter fraction is rich in Nd alloy.
  • The major drawback of this type of fusion process is linked to the energy expenditure which leads to a high cost.
  • The third method of recycling is based on an extraction of rare-earth elements by a molten metal.
  • By way of example, the process of document WO 2007/119846 uses the oxidation of the magnets then the bringing into contact with molten aluminum resulting in the formation of a rare-earth element oxide as a mixture with a slag and an Fe—B alloy which must be separated subsequently. In this case, the difficulty lies in the delicate management of the aluminothermic reaction.
  • Another process, for its part, takes advantage of the strong affinity of molten magnesium for neodymium, unlike iron. The limits here are linked to the management of a metal in the gaseous state, and to the energy expenditure that is associated with the process.
  • Within the context of hydrometallurgical recycling, the process developed in document U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,459 consists in dissolving a slag originating from the preparation of an NdFeB alloy by electrolysis in a sulfamic acid bath, the bath then being mixed with hydrofluoric acid in order to precipitate neodymium fluoride.
  • This treatment method is not suitable for the bulky shapes of magnets and is very expensive from an energy point of view.
  • A process is already known from the document by Ho-Sung Yoon et al., J. of Korean Inst. of Resources Recycling (2004) vol. 13, no. 6, p. 43-48, for extracting the rare-earth elements contained in a permanent magnet. This process does not however comprise a separation step with respect to iron.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The objective of the invention is to propose an alternative process that has none or only some of these drawbacks and that enables the extraction of rare-earth elements contained in rare-earth element permanent magnets, more particularly of NdFeB type, which are optionally doped, i.e. to which other rare-earth elements such as Dy and/or Pr have been added.
  • This objective is achieved by provision of a process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in a permanent magnet, more particularly of NdFeB type, optionally to which rare-earth elements have been added, comprising the steps of:
      • a) heat treating the permanent magnet at a temperature greater than or equal to its Curie temperature,
      • b) grinding of the magnet resulting from the heat treatment step, the particles resulting from the grinding being classified in order to select the particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm,
      • c) treating, with stirring, the particles selected at the end of the grinding step with a solution containing an organic acid,
      • d) separating a liquid phase from an optional solid phase at the end of the treatment with the solution containing the acid,
      • e) separating the iron.
  • In some embodiments, the magnet particles resulting from the grinding having a size of less than 2 mm for 80% thereof.
  • In certain embodiments, the organic acid is acetic acid, oxalic acid or citric acid, or a mixture thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the solution containing an organic acid is at a concentration ranging from 5% to 30% by volume, and for example at a concentration of 10%.
  • In certain embodiments, the step of treating with a solution containing the organic acid is carried out for a minimum duration of 1 hour, preferentially less than 24 hours, more preferentially ranging from 100 to 420 minutes, for example around 420 minutes.
  • In some embodiments, the iron is separated by precipitation, for example due to the introduction of oxygen, for example by bubbling or mixing of an oxygen-containing gas, such as air, or pure oxygen.
  • In certain embodiments, the iron is separated by being brought into contact with at least one material of biological origin. In some of those embodiments, the material of biological origin is oyster shell powder. In other of those embodiments, the material of biological origin is pine bark powder.
  • The invention also provides a recycling process incorporating the inventive extraction processes where the permanent magnet originates from industrial waste.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 depicts the process for extracting, according to one embodiment of the invention, rare-earth elements present in permanent magnets, which is similar to the embodiments exemplified in examples 2 to 4.
  • FIG. 2a is a photograph taken with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) of a permanent magnet according to control example 1.
  • FIGS. 2b and 2c collate the results of qualitative chemical analysis by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM EDS) carried out on the magnet from example 1, during the visualisation thereof with SEM.
  • FIG. 3 presents the dissolution rates over time of Fe, Nd, Dy and Ni during the step of dissolution by acid attack of a process according to the invention that is the subject of example 2.
  • FIG. 4 presents the dissolution rates with respect to time of Fe, Nd and Dy during the iron precipitation step of a process according to the invention that is the subject of example 3.
  • FIG. 5 presents the dissolution rates with respect to time of Fe, Nd and Dy during the iron precipitation step of a process according to the invention that is the subject of example 4.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The magnets are characterized by the fact that they possess magnetic moments. Permanent magnets are magnets which have a remanence or persistence of their magnetic moments, that is to say that they retain their magnetic properties after the removal of a magnetizing field. A permanent magnet generally consists of a manufactured hard magnetic material, the remnant field and the coercive excitation of which are large. Permanent magnets nearly always contain atoms of at least one of the following chemical elements: iron, cobalt or nickel, or from the family of lanthanides (rare-earth elements). The synthetic magnets used in the present invention are produced by sintering an alloy containing powders of rare-earth elements which then forms a polarized alloy under an intense field of an electromagnet. Such materials are particularly used in the process according to the invention.
  • Magnets of NdFeB type are also known under the name of neodymium magnets. They are predominantly composed of an alloy of neodymium, iron and boron (Nd2Fe14B) making it possible to form a tetragonal crystalline system.
  • Permanent magnets of NdFeB type, when used in the process according to the invention, may be contained in industrial waste originating for example from the recycling of hard drives of central processing units of PC or laptop computer type, loudspeakers, for example of cell phones or computers, small electric motors or else be composed of waste from the production of permanent magnets. Such magnets are often surrounded by a layer of nickel. Nevertheless, the coating thereof may be based on other metals such as cobalt, a copper-cobalt alloy, zinc, etc. The same process can be applied to epoxy-coated magnets.
  • For this purpose, one subject of the invention is a process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in a permanent magnet, more particularly of NdFeB type, optionally to which rare-earth elements have been added, comprising the steps of:
      • a) heat treating the permanent magnet at a temperature greater than or equal to the Curie temperature thereof,
      • b) grinding of the magnet resulting from the heat treatment step, the particles resulting from the grinding being classified in order to select the particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm,
      • c) treating, with stirring, the particles selected at the end of the grinding step with a solution containing an organic acid,
      • d) separating the liquid phase from an optional solid phase at the end of the treatment with the solution containing the acid.
  • Advantageously, the liquid phase contains more than 70% by weight of the rare-earth elements from the permanent magnet that have undergone the preceding steps of the process.
  • The treatment above the Curie temperature, i.e. at a temperature generally greater than 300° C., preferentially between 300° C. and 400° C., and preferably around 350° C., enables the permanent demagnetization of the magnets, which is advantageous for the remainder of the process which is not disrupted by the magnetic properties of the magnets.
  • Preferentially, the heat treatment is carried out at a temperature below 600° C. Preferably, the sole objective of this heat treatment is the demagnetization. It does not have the objective of improving the dissolution of the metals in the solution containing the organic acid.
  • The heat treatment is preferentially carried out over a period of at least 10 minutes, and preferentially of between 10 and 40 minutes.
  • Grinding is understood to mean the fragmentation of the magnet by subjecting it to an impact or to a pressure.
  • The grinding step makes it possible to obtain magnet powder, the particle size of which is selected so as to favor the acid attack and the dissolution of the rare-earth elements. Specifically, the size of the particles influences the physicochemical properties of the substrate. The finer the product, the faster the dissolution, but the handling of excessively fine powders can in certain cases present disadvantages at various steps of the process.
  • Preferentially, the grinding is a controlled grinding, for example broken down into at least two grinding steps where the discharges from the first grinding are subjected to a second grinding as described in FIG. 1:
      • a first step at the end of which magnet particles resulting from the grinding are classified in order to select particles having a size of less than 4 or 2 mm,
      • a second step of grinding the particles not selected at the end of the first grinding step, the particles resulting from the second grinding being classified in order to select the particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm.
  • Unlike thorough grinding, which is excessive because it produces more ultrafine particles than it should or because it gives a product that is generally finer than the desired product, controlled grinding is carried out so as to obtain precisely the desired particle size.
  • The controlled grinding in several steps avoids the production of fine particles that volatilize, which leads to a loss of material. Furthermore, it involves a lower energy expenditure than thorough grinding.
  • The controlled grinding may be carried out in a single step.
  • Preferentially, the particles are selected by screening.
  • Additional screening steps may be added to the process, the screening oversize (particles not selected at the end of the grinding) being ground again until the whole of the magnet has reached the particle size required for the next step of the process.
  • Preferentially, the particles on which the acid attack is carried out have a size of less than 2 mm for 80% thereof, and preferentially for 90% thereof.
  • Preferentially, the particles on which the acid attack is carried out have a size of greater than 0.2 mm for 80% thereof, and preferentially for 90% thereof.
  • More preferentially still, the particles on which the acid attack is carried out have a size of greater than 0.5 mm. These particle sizes are compatible with an industrial process since they require a limited energy expenditure during their production.
  • Advantageously, the grinding is carried out with the aid of a shredder, for example a cutting mill. The classification is carried out with the aid of a screen according to standard methods.
  • According to one alternative embodiment of the invention, the heat treatment step a) and grinding step b) may be replaced by the provision of demagnetized particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm. Such particles may be derived from ground demagnetized magnets.
  • The treatment of the particles with the solution containing an organic acid, or acid attack, makes it possible to dissolve the constituents of the magnet and in particular the rare-earth elements in the solution. It may also lead to a more or less partial dissolution of a coating present on the surface of the magnet. In the case of nickel-based coatings, the dissolution is very limited which makes it possible to separate it, in the form of a solid nickel residue, at the end of the process.
  • This attack is carried out by a solution of organic acid, in particular C1-C10, preferably C1-C5, carboxylic acids having at least one or two carboxyl functions (or radicals). For example acetic acid, oxalic acid or citric acid, or a mixture thereof, are acids which are particularly advantageous to use in the process according to the invention.
  • The solvent of the acid is generally water.
  • Preferably, the acid solution has a concentration ranging from 5% to 30% by volume, and for example a concentration of around 10%. For acetic acid, this corresponds to a solution ranging from 0.8 to 2.4 M. Preferentially, the solution has an acetic acid concentration of greater than 1 M, and preferably of 1.6 M.
  • This may lead to complete or partial dissolving of the magnet powders and to an advantageous division between residual solid and solution of the various constituent elements of the permanent magnets.
  • Preferably, during the acid attack, the magnet powder corresponding to particles selected at the end of the heat treatment and grinding steps is added to the acid solution in a proportion of 150 g of powder per liter of acid solution.
  • The acid attack is preferably carried out for a minimum duration of 1 hour, preferentially less than 24 hours, more preferentially ranging from 100 to 550 minutes, for example around 420 minutes.
  • Preferably, the acid attack (or leaching) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 10 to 50° C., more preferentially from 10 to 30° C., and more preferentially still at ambient temperature, i.e. 20° C. It may be carried out in a static air or nitrogen atmosphere, in a stream of air or in a stream of nitrogen. Preferentially, the acid attack brings the pH of the solution to a pH of less than 2. The amount of acid to be added is therefore advantageously an amount of acid that makes it possible to achieve such a pH.
  • A low pH value increases the kinetics of the dissolution.
  • The liquid phase containing the rare-earth elements is then separated from the solid phase if not all of the compounds of the powder are dissolved. This is for example the case for magnets surrounded by a layer of nickel, particularly in the presence of an acetic acid solution. In this case the nickel, optionally combined with iron, remains in solid form and can therefore be recovered by simple solid/liquid separation.
  • This solid/liquid separation may be carried out by any known methods such as centrifugation (for example at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes), filtration or decantation.
  • At the end of the acid attack, at least one portion of the ferrous fraction of the magnets has passed into solution.
  • Preferably, the iron is separated from the rare-earth elements, optionally during an additional step. In this step, the iron may be precipitated whilst the rare-earth elements remain, at least partially, in the liquid phase.
  • In order to do this, oxygen may be introduced into the solution for example by bubbling or mixing with an oxygen-containing gas, such as air, or pure oxygen. Alternatively, it is also possible to envisage the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). This mixture promotes the oxidation of the iron from the degree of oxidation 2 to the degree 3 and therefore the precipitation of iron III oxide or oxyhydroxide compounds at low pH (i.e. at a pH generally of less than 4). The pH is preferably measured using a pH meter with a pH measurement resolution of 0.01 unit, voltage measurement resolution of 1 mV and temperature measurement resolution of 0.1° C., such as the Heitolab P310 pH meter from Heito. Preferentially, for the measurement of the pH, the electrode is of Heito brand. The iron is thus precipitated and can be separated from the rare-earth elements by a phase separation step such as a filtration, a centrifugation or a decantation. Advantageously, the pH is kept below 4 by the addition of acid. Preferably, the solution is kept at a pH that enables the selective precipitation of the iron. For example, the pH is chosen between 3 and 4.
  • Alternatively or additionally, the inventors have shown that the separation of the iron is obtained by bringing the solution rich in rare-earth elements and in iron into contact with a material of biological origin such as oyster shell powder or pine bark powder. Many other biological materials are known for influencing the behavior of the metals in solution. This is for example the case of dried algae. However, oyster shell powder and pine bark powder have displayed a particularly surprising efficacy for abatement of the iron with respect to the rare-earth elements. On the contrary, calcined bone powder tends to trap all of the metals including the iron and the rare-earth elements. These biological materials are advantageously used in the form of fine powder. Such a powder may essentially comprise particles having a size of from 0.5 to 5 mm, preferably from 0.6 to 2 mm, for example 1.25 mm.
  • The step of separating the iron may be carried out prior to the liquid/solid separation described in step d) of the process, or else after the liquid/solid separation and may be followed by a second liquid/solid separation step.
  • Preferentially, the rare-earth elements extracted by this process are chosen from Nd, Dy and Pr, and a mixture thereof.
  • Optionally, the extraction process is carried out on magnets that are coated, for example with nickel, cobalt, a copper-cobalt alloy, zinc, epoxy or a mixture of these compounds.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in demagnetized particles originating from a permanent magnet, more particularly of NdFeB type, optionally to which other rare-earth elements have been added, the process comprising the steps of:
      • treating, with stirring, the particles with a solution containing an organic acid,
      • separating the liquid phase from an optional solid phase at the end of the treatment with the solution containing the acid, the liquid phase advantageously containing more than 70% of the rare-earth elements of the permanent magnet that has undergone the preceding steps of the process.
  • The conditions and steps of demagnetization, and of obtaining the particles, for example by grinding, the size of the particles, the treatment with an acid solution and the separation steps leading to the extraction of the rare-earth elements may advantageously be as described above. Similarly, the steps of extracting the iron may also be applied to this process.
  • The invention also relates to a recycling process incorporating an extraction process according to the invention where the permanent magnet originates from industrial waste.
  • The invention also relates to the products obtained directly from the process according to the invention and the subsequent use thereof in particular in the electronics field.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process as described above that does not comprise any chemical reaction steps between the steps of providing demagnetized and ground magnet particles and the acid attack step.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process as described above that does not comprise any chemical reaction steps between the steps of acid attack and of solid/liquid separation and/or of precipitation and/or of fixation of the iron.
  • Another subject of the invention is a process as described in FIG. 1. This process may incorporate one or more of the features described above.
  • The invention will be better understood on reading the following examples, including figures, which are given solely by way of example.
  • Example 1 (Control): Analysis of a Permanent Magnet with No Coating
  • FIGS. 2a to 2c show the results of characterization by SEM imagery of a permanent magnet of NdFeB type, with no coating, which has not been subjected to the process according to the invention. The analysis makes it possible to demonstrate the granular structure of these magnets consisting of sintered crystals of Nd2Fe14B phase (bottom arrow toward FIG. 2c ) in the presence of an intergranular phase rich in rare-earth elements (top arrow toward FIG. 2b ). In the SEM EDS analysis of a sintered crystal of Nd2Fe14B phase (FIG. 2c ), the characteristic line of Fe is identified, which is predominant, and the characteristic line of Nd which is well represented. In the intergranular phase rich in rare-earth elements (FIG. 2b ), the emission lines of Nd, Pr and Dy are in particular identified.
  • Example 2: Extraction of the Rare-Earth Elements of Nickel-Coated Permanent Magnets
  • Samples of permanent magnets resulting from laptop or desktop computers (step 1 of the process depicted in FIG. 1) of nickel-coated neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) type magnets were used. The chemical composition of the NdFeB alloy making up the core of the magnets is the following: iron 61.3%, neodymium 35%, dysprosium 1.8% and boron 1.4%.
  • These magnets were heat-treated for 20 minutes at a temperature of 350° C. in a muffled furnace, i.e. above their Curie temperature, with a view to permanently demagnetizing them (step 2 of the process described in FIG. 1), in order not to be disrupted in the remainder of the process by their magnetic properties.
  • At the end of this heat treatment, the samples were ground so as to obtain a particle size of less than 2 mm.
  • The screening oversize, i.e. the particles having a particle size greater than the desired particle size, were subjected to a second grinding step (step 4). This two-step grinding is a controlled grinding.
  • Steps 3 and 4 from FIG. 1 were carried out using a shredder-type grinder (RETSCH SM100 cutting mill—from Retsch GmbH, Retsch-Allee 1-5, 42781 Haan, Germany) with a 2 mm screen. The particles having a size greater than or equal to 2 mm were then subjected to a second grinding step using the same grinder with a 2 mm screen. In each of the steps 3 and 4, the powder was automatically classified on the 2 mm screen, resulting in a powder such that 100% of the particles had a size of less than 2 mm (quartile 10 or d100).
  • Subsequently, a sample of 15 g magnet powder resulting from this treatment was dispersed in 100 ml of a solution of acetic acid diluted to 10% in order to be subjected to a step of acid attack, or leaching (step 5). The mixture was left stirring for a period of 24 h, at a temperature of 30° C., in a static (ambient) air atmosphere. A kinetic study of the dissolution of the rare-earth elements, the iron and the nickel was carried out. Samples of the acid attack solution were drawn off during the reaction at the following times: 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h and 7 h. The samples were subjected to a centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was then filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (step 6), so as to separate the solid phase from the liquid phase. The metallic solutions obtained were then subjected to an atomic absorption analysis in order to determine the concentration of the various dissolved metals.
  • The results of the atomic absorption analyses of the concentration of Fe, Ni, Nd and Dy of the solutions resulting from the acid attacks of the various samples drawn off are illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • This kinetic study shows that the dissolution of the rare-earth elements in a diluted weak acid of acetic acid type is virtually complete after 420 minutes of treatment. In the case of nickel which forms the coating of the magnet, the dissolution remains very limited.
  • At the end of the step of acid solubilization by the acetic acid, the iron was precipitated. This precipitation was carried out by bringing the solution into contact with oxygen which is introduced into the solution by air bubbling. In order to promote the oxidation of the iron from the degree of oxidation 2 to the degree 3 and thus to bring about the precipitation of iron oxide or oxyhydroxide compounds, the pH was adjusted to a pH ranging from 3 to 4 by addition of a supplementary amount of acetic acid, in order to selectively precipitate iron III without precipitating the rare-earth elements. The pH was measured using a model P 310 Heito brand pH meter combined with a Heito electrode.
  • Examples 3 and 4
  • A magnet powder identical to that used in example 2 was treated according to the same methods as in example 2, except that the acid treatment step was carried out under nitrogen and the separation of the iron from the rare-earth elements is not carried out by placing in contact with oxygen. The metallic solutions rich in rare-earth elements obtained after dissolution by acid attack were treated with materials of biological origin that make it possible to optimize the separation of the rare-earth elements and of the iron.
  • Example 3
  • 2.5 g of powder obtained by grinding, with the aid of a jaw crusher, fragments of maritime pine bark with a length or 20 to 40 mm sold by the company Castorama and of Verve brand (Kingfisher, 3 Sheldon Square, Paddington London W2 6PX), which was screened at 1.25 mm, were mixed with 50 ml of solution containing the iron and the rare-earth elements obtained after 420 minutes of reaction. The suspension of powder in the acid solution of rare-earth elements thus obtained was maintained under permanent stirring using an oscillating shaker, at 30° C. for 24 h.
  • The results of the atomic absorption analysis of the concentrations of Fe, Nd and Dy present in the successive samplings taken over time during this precipitation step are presented in FIG. 4. This figure shows that the iron (bottom curve), the Nd (top curve) and the Dy (intermediate curve) are fixed by the bark powder in proportions that are different from one another. The iron is removed from the solution in its entirety, whereas less than 50% of the rare-earth elements are removed. This process makes it possible to capture, and therefore to separate more particularly the FeII from the solution. This process therefore makes it possible to extract the iron from the solution and to keep a large portion of the rare-earth elements in solution.
  • Example 4
  • 2.5 g of a powder of oyster shells from Marenne Oléron (protected geographical indication—PGI) resulting from food consumption and obtained by grinding with the aid of a jaw crusher, which was screened at 1.25 mm, were mixed with 50 ml of solution containing the iron and the rare-earth elements obtained. The suspension of powder in the acid solution of rare-earth elements thus obtained was maintained under permanent stirring using an oscillating shaker, at 30° C. for 24 h.
  • The results of the atomic absorption analysis of the concentrations of Fe, Nd and Dy present in the successive samplings taken over time during this precipitation step are presented in FIG. 5. This figure shows that the iron (bottom curve), the Nd (top curve) and the Dy (intermediate curve) are fixed by the oyster shell powder in proportions that are different from one another. The iron is removed from the solution (precipitated) in its entirety, whereas less than 35% of the rare-earth elements are removed. This process makes it possible to capture, and therefore to separate more particularly the FeII from the solution. This process therefore makes it possible to extract the iron from the solution and to keep a large portion of the rare-earth elements in solution.
  • The invention is not limited to the embodiments presented and other embodiments will be clearly apparent to a person skilled in the art.

Claims (16)

What is claimed is:
1. A process for extracting rare-earth elements contained in a permanent magnet of NdFeB type comprising the steps of:
a) heat treating the permanent magnet at a temperature greater than or equal to its Curie temperature,
b) grinding of the magnet resulting from the heat treatment step to obtain particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm,
c) treating, with stirring, the particles having, for 80% to 90% thereof, a size of less than 2 mm with a solution containing an organic acid,
d) separating a liquid phase from an optional solid phase at the end of the treatment with the solution containing the organic acid, and
e) separating the iron from rare-earth elements in said liquid phase by precipitating the iron.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the magnet particles resulting from the grinding have a size of less than 2 mm for 80% thereof and the particles having a size of less than 2 mm for 80% thereof are treated in step c).
3. The process according to claim 1, the organic acid being acetic acid, oxalic acid or citric acid, or a mixture thereof.
4. The process according to claim 1, the solution containing an organic acid has a concentration of organic acid ranging from 5% to 30% by volume.
5. The process according to claim 1, the treating with a solution containing the organic acid being carried out for a minimum duration of 1 hour.
6. The process according to claim 1, wherein other rare earth elements have been added to the permanent magnet.
7. A recycling process incorporating the extraction process according to claim 1, wherein the permanent magnet originates from industrial waste.
8. The process according to claim 2, wherein the magnet particles resulting from the grinding have a size of less than 2 mm for 90% thereof and the particles having a size of less than 2 mm for 90% thereof are treated in step c).
9. The process according to claim 4, wherein the solution containing an organic acid has a concentration of organic acid of 10% by volume.
10. The process according to claim 5, wherein the treating with a solution containing an organic acid is carried out for less than 24 hours.
11. The process according to claim 10, wherein the treating with a solution containing an organic acid is carried out for 100 to 420 minutes.
12. The process according to claim 11, wherein the treating with a solution containing an organic acid is carried out for 420 minutes.
13. The process according to claim 1, wherein the iron is separated using introduction of oxygen or an oxygen containing gas.
14. The process according to claim 13, wherein the iron is separated using bubbling or mixing of oxygen or an oxygen containing gas.
15. The process according to claim 13, wherein the oxygen containing gas is air.
16. The process according to claim 13, wherein the iron is separated using pure oxygen.
US17/397,612 2016-06-03 2021-08-09 Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets Pending US20210363608A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/397,612 US20210363608A1 (en) 2016-06-03 2021-08-09 Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1655059A FR3052171B1 (en) 2016-06-03 2016-06-03 PROCESS FOR EXTRACTING RARE EARTHS CONTAINED IN PERMANENT MAGNETS
FR1655059 2016-06-03
PCT/FR2017/051399 WO2017207947A1 (en) 2016-06-03 2017-06-02 Method for extracting rare earth elements contained in permanent magnets
US201816306612A 2018-12-03 2018-12-03
US17/397,612 US20210363608A1 (en) 2016-06-03 2021-08-09 Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/306,612 Continuation US11155898B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2017-06-02 Method for extracting rare earth elements contained in permanent magnets
PCT/FR2017/051399 Continuation WO2017207947A1 (en) 2016-06-03 2017-06-02 Method for extracting rare earth elements contained in permanent magnets

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20210363608A1 true US20210363608A1 (en) 2021-11-25

Family

ID=56684066

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/306,612 Active 2037-11-26 US11155898B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2017-06-02 Method for extracting rare earth elements contained in permanent magnets
US17/397,612 Pending US20210363608A1 (en) 2016-06-03 2021-08-09 Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/306,612 Active 2037-11-26 US11155898B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2017-06-02 Method for extracting rare earth elements contained in permanent magnets

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US11155898B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3464655B1 (en)
CA (1) CA3022190C (en)
DK (1) DK3464655T3 (en)
FR (1) FR3052171B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2017207947A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3064496A1 (en) * 2017-03-31 2018-10-05 Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique USE OF NATURAL MATERIALS OF VEGETABLE ORIGIN RICH IN PHENOLIC ACIDS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ORGANIC CHEMICAL REACTION AND RECYCLING OF CATALYSTS
IT201800005178A1 (en) * 2018-05-08 2019-11-08 Hydrometallurgical process for the treatment of permanent magnets
CN108823436A (en) * 2018-07-05 2018-11-16 武汉工程大学 A kind of compound leaching agent of the formates of weathered superficial leaching rare-earth ore
EP3715482A1 (en) * 2019-03-29 2020-09-30 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Method and system for separation of rare earth elements from secondary sources
FR3121686B1 (en) * 2021-04-09 2023-11-10 Brgm Process for the selective extraction of rare earths in the form of oxides
EP4177365A1 (en) * 2021-11-05 2023-05-10 Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives A green process for the extraction of lanthanide elements

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1255560C (en) * 2004-06-28 2006-05-10 辽宁美宝稀土材料有限公司 Process for recovering rare earth from neodymium-ion-boron waste materials

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5362459A (en) * 1993-05-17 1994-11-08 Pure-Etch Co. Neodymium recovery process
US5429887A (en) * 1994-05-16 1995-07-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior Process for treating AB5 nickel-metal hydride battery scrap
US5728355A (en) * 1995-09-27 1998-03-17 Santoku Metal Industry Co., Ltd. Method for recovering reusable rare earth compounds
JP2001335852A (en) 2000-05-25 2001-12-04 Shin Etsu Chem Co Ltd METHOD FOR RECOVERING Nd-BASED RARE EARTH MAGNET ALLOY WASTE POWDER
WO2003078671A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2003-09-25 Santoku Corporation Method for recovering useful element from rare earth - transition metal alloy scrap
KR100578712B1 (en) * 2004-11-04 2006-05-12 한국지질자원연구원 Recovery of Neodymium from NdFeB Oxidation-Roasted Scrap by Acetic Acid Leaching
WO2007119846A1 (en) 2006-04-17 2007-10-25 Santoku Corporation Method of recovering useful materials from scrap of rare earth-iron-boron magnet
WO2009119720A1 (en) 2008-03-26 2009-10-01 財団法人生産技術研究奨励会 Method and apparatus for collection of rare earth element
JP4820423B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2011-11-24 有限会社レアメタルズ21 Method of recovering neodymium magnet from used equipment and neodymium magnet recovered or recycled by the method
CN101817547B (en) 2010-05-07 2011-10-05 沈阳工业大学 Method for recovering mixed rare earth chlorides from neodymium iron boron permanent magnet material scraps
FR2997095B1 (en) * 2012-10-24 2014-11-28 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD FOR ISOLATING RARE EARTHS AND / OR APPROPRIATE METAL ELEMENT (S) CONTAINED IN THE MAGNETIC PHASE OF PERMANENT MAGNETS.
US9376735B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-06-28 University Of Houston System Methods and systems for recovering rare earth elements
US10577677B2 (en) * 2015-07-10 2020-03-03 University Of Houston System Process for the recovery of rare earth metals from permanent magnets

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1255560C (en) * 2004-06-28 2006-05-10 辽宁美宝稀土材料有限公司 Process for recovering rare earth from neodymium-ion-boron waste materials

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Lenntech; "Iron Removal by Physical-Chemical ways", retrieved from internet on 6-1-23, https://www.lenntech.com/processes/iron-manganese/iron/iron-removal-physical-chemical-way.htm; wayback machine 2/28/2015. (Year: 2015) *
Yoon H., et al.; The Effect of Grinding and Roasting Conditions on the Selective Leaching of Nd and Dy from NdFeB Magnet Scraps; retrieved from wayback on 1/24/24; reference date 9/26/2015; internet url: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/5/3/1306# (Year: 2015) *
Yoon H.S. et al; "The Effect of Grinding and Roasting Conditions on the Selective Leaching of Nd and Dy from NdFeB Magnet Scraps", J. Metals, pg 1306-1314, (Year: 2015) *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11155898B2 (en) 2021-10-26
FR3052171B1 (en) 2021-01-01
CA3022190C (en) 2023-10-10
FR3052171A1 (en) 2017-12-08
US20190169710A1 (en) 2019-06-06
WO2017207947A1 (en) 2017-12-07
CA3022190A1 (en) 2017-12-07
EP3464655A1 (en) 2019-04-10
DK3464655T3 (en) 2022-07-18
EP3464655B1 (en) 2022-05-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210363608A1 (en) Method For Extracting Rare Earth Elements Contained In Permanent Magnets
Yang et al. REE recovery from end-of-life NdFeB permanent magnet scrap: a critical review
EP2646584B1 (en) Magnet recycling
WO2018139445A1 (en) Method for recovering valuable material from used lithium-ion battery
EP3715482A1 (en) Method and system for separation of rare earth elements from secondary sources
US10167532B2 (en) Method for isolating rare earths and/or adjacent metal element(s) contained in the magnetic phase of permanent magnets
US10648063B2 (en) Dissolution and separation of rare earth metals
US8961910B2 (en) Tantalum recovery method
Tanvar et al. Characterization and evaluation of discarded hard disc drives for recovery of copper and rare earth values
JP2010199110A (en) Method of recovering neodymium magnet from used equipment, and neodymium magnet collected or recycled by the method
Eduafo et al. Leaching kinetics of yttrium and europium oxides from waste phosphor powder
US11148957B2 (en) Method and system for recovering rare earth elements from within an object
WO2007099714A1 (en) Method of recovering metal and high-gradient magnetic separator
JP7268382B2 (en) How to dispose of used lithium-ion batteries
US11905573B2 (en) Alkaline solution method for recovering rare earth elements
CN117940594A (en) Electrolytic atomic hydrogen explosion of rare earth-containing material
JPS5967326A (en) Recovery method of valuable metal from alloy containing rare earth elements
JP6423300B2 (en) Separation and recovery of yttrium and nickel from solid oxide fuel cell scrap
JP2000144275A (en) Method for recovering rare earth element
Menad et al. Recovery of permanent magnets type NdFeB from WEEE
Barnwal et al. Comparison of different routes for recovery of metals from electronic scrap
JP2012224938A (en) Method for recovering neodymium
Kaya An overview of NdFeB magnets recycling technologies
Kaya Urban mining of rare earth elements from e-waste: progress, challenges, and perspectives
Hino et al. Ferritization of waste printed circuit boards for magnetic separation of common metals

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

AS Assignment

Owner name: BRGM, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SERON, ALAIN;MENAD, NOUR-EDDINE;BREEZE, DOMINIQUE;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20181214 TO 20181218;REEL/FRAME:057791/0400

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED