JP2017023089A - Quality improver, firming agent, quality improvement method and firming method for seafood - Google Patents

Quality improver, firming agent, quality improvement method and firming method for seafood Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2017023089A
JP2017023089A JP2015147259A JP2015147259A JP2017023089A JP 2017023089 A JP2017023089 A JP 2017023089A JP 2015147259 A JP2015147259 A JP 2015147259A JP 2015147259 A JP2015147259 A JP 2015147259A JP 2017023089 A JP2017023089 A JP 2017023089A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
seafood
alum
gluconic acid
raw
quality
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2015147259A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP6697229B2 (en
Inventor
克則 千葉
Katsunori Chiba
克則 千葉
俊介 松本
Shunsuke Matsumoto
俊介 松本
友香里 鈴木
Yukari Suzuki
友香里 鈴木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Aoba Kasei Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Aoba Kasei Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aoba Kasei Co Ltd filed Critical Aoba Kasei Co Ltd
Priority to JP2015147259A priority Critical patent/JP6697229B2/en
Publication of JP2017023089A publication Critical patent/JP2017023089A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6697229B2 publication Critical patent/JP6697229B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Meat, Egg Or Seafood Products (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a quality improver, a firming agent, a quality improvement method and a firming method for seafood capable of obtaining slime removal effect, tightening effect and fastening preventive effect similar to alum, further, reduced in influence on taste, and applicable to the general of seafood.SOLUTION: Raw seafood is immersed into a gluconic acid aqueous solution. The concentration of the gluconic acid aqueous solution is 0.03 to 1.50 mass%. As the seafood, for example, octopus, jelly fish, sea urchin ovary, herring roe or the like can be given.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

本発明は、タコ、ウニ、クラゲ、数の子およびその他の魚介類の品質改良剤、身締め剤、品質改良方法および身締め方法に関する。   The present invention relates to an octopus, sea urchin, jellyfish, numbiko and other fish and shellfish quality improvers, cinching agents, quality improving methods and cinching methods.

古くからミョウバンは特定の水産加工品には欠かせないものである。例えば、タコ等頭足類では、ぬめりを落とし、表面を身締めし、皮剥がれを抑制し、発色しやすくする効果がある。ミョウバンは、数の子やウニ等でも身締めや煮崩れ防止に用いられ、クラゲでは脱水処理(脱塩後の処理も含む)に用いられている。   For a long time, alum has been indispensable for certain processed fishery products. For example, cephalopods such as octopuses have the effect of removing slime, tightening the surface, suppressing peeling and facilitating color development. Alum is used for the prevention of cramping and simmering even in pups and sea urchins, and in a jellyfish it is used for dehydration treatment (including treatment after desalting).

しかし、ミョウバンに含まれるアルミニウムを多量に摂取すると、腎臓等への影響があることが問題となっている。また、一時期、アルミニウムにはアルツハイマー病との因果関係があるとの情報が流れ、消費者はミョウバンが含まれる商品を避ける傾向にある。さらに、ミョウバンは特有の収れん味がするため、本来の食味を落とす原因となる。   However, when a large amount of aluminum contained in alum is ingested, there is a problem that it affects the kidneys and the like. Also, for some time, information that aluminum has a causal relationship with Alzheimer's disease has flowed, and consumers tend to avoid products that contain alum. In addition, alum has a unique astringent taste, which causes it to lose its original taste.

このため、水産加工品において、ミョウバンに替わる品質改良剤がいくつか使用されている。一般的なミョウバン代替として有機酸等による処理方法がすでに公開されている(例えば、特許文献1〜5参照)。   For this reason, some quality improvement agents that replace alum are used in processed fishery products. A treatment method using an organic acid or the like has already been published as a general alum alternative (see, for example, Patent Documents 1 to 5).

特開2005−168456号公報JP 2005-168456 A 特開2008−307039号公報JP 2008-307039 A 特開2009−055901号公報JP 2009-055901 A 特開2001−299285号公報JP 2001-299285 A 特公平7−75514号公報Japanese Patent Publication No. 7-75514

しかしながら、特許文献1の処理方法では、有機酸が冷凍魚介類用のヌメリとり剤として用いられるが、タコ、ウニで皮剥がれや身崩れが生じてしまい、ミョウバン同様のぬめり除去効果や、身締め効果、身崩れ防止効果は得られないという課題があった。特許文献2の処理方法では、有機酸水溶液にキトサンを溶解したものが用いられるが、生ウニへの使用に限定されるという課題があった。また、有機酸はキトサンを溶解させる目的で用いられ、有機酸自体には効果がないとされていた。   However, in the treatment method of Patent Document 1, an organic acid is used as a slime removing agent for frozen seafood, but octopus and sea urchin are peeled off and crumbled, and the same slime removal effect as that of alum. There was a problem that an effect and an effect of preventing collapse were not obtained. In the treatment method of Patent Document 2, a solution obtained by dissolving chitosan in an organic acid aqueous solution is used, but there is a problem that it is limited to use for raw sea urchins. Moreover, the organic acid was used for the purpose of dissolving chitosan, and the organic acid itself was not effective.

特許文献3のタコの加工用複合製剤は、タコに実施したところ、皮剥がれ等が生じてしまい、ミョウバン同等の効果は得られなかった。特許文献4についても、同様の方法をタコに実施したところ、身締め効果はミョウバンと比較すると不十分であった。また、魚卵(数の子)への試験では、ミョウバン同等の効果が得られたが、食味の点で劣るという課題があった。特許文献5の方法では、有機酸と糖質類、アルコール類が用いられるが、十分な身締め効果は得られなかった。   When the composite preparation for processing octopus of Patent Document 3 was applied to octopus, peeling and the like occurred, and an effect equivalent to alum could not be obtained. As for Patent Document 4, when the same method was applied to the octopus, the effect of tightening was insufficient compared with alum. In addition, in the test on fish eggs (number of pups), the same effect as alum was obtained, but there was a problem that the taste was inferior. In the method of Patent Document 5, an organic acid, a saccharide, and an alcohol are used, but a sufficient tightening effect cannot be obtained.

本発明は、このような課題に着目してなされたもので、ミョウバンを使用せずに、ミョウバン同様のぬめり除去効果や、身締め効果、身崩れ防止効果を得ることができ、また、食味への影響が小さく、魚介類全般に適用することができる魚介類の品質改良剤、身締め剤、品質改良方法および身締め方法を提供することを目的としている。   The present invention has been made paying attention to such problems, and without using alum, it is possible to obtain a slime removal effect, a tightening effect, an anti-collapse effect similar to alum, and to taste It is an object of the present invention to provide a seafood quality improver, body tightening agent, quality improving method and body tightening method that can be applied to all seafood.

本発明者らは鋭意検討した結果、有機酸にはミョウバン同等のぬめり除去効果や、身締め効果、身崩れ防止効果があるものは少ないが、グルコン酸にはミョウバン同等の効果があり、魚介類全般に効果があることを発見し、本発明を完成するに至った。   As a result of intensive studies, the present inventors have found that there are few organic acids that have an alum-removing effect, tightening effect, and anti-collapse effect, but gluconic acid has the same effect as alum, It discovered that it was effective in general and came to complete this invention.

すなわち、本発明に係る魚介類の品質改良剤は、グルコン酸を含むことを特徴とする。
本発明に係る魚介類の身締め剤は、グルコン酸を含むことを特徴とする。
本発明に係る魚介類の品質改良方法は、生の魚介類をグルコン酸水溶液に浸漬することを特徴とする。
本発明に係る魚介類の身締め方法は、生の魚介類をグルコン酸水溶液に浸漬することを特徴とする。
本発明に係る魚介類の品質改良方法または本発明に係る魚介類の身締め方法において、前記グルコン酸水溶液の濃度は0.03質量%以上1.50質量%以下であることが好ましい。グルコン酸水溶液の濃度は、0.14質量%より大きく0.25質量%以下が特に好ましい。
That is, the quality improving agent for seafood according to the present invention includes gluconic acid.
The seafood tightening agent according to the present invention is characterized by containing gluconic acid.
The method for improving the quality of seafood according to the present invention is characterized in that raw seafood is immersed in an aqueous gluconic acid solution.
The seafood tightening method according to the present invention is characterized in that raw seafood is immersed in an aqueous gluconic acid solution.
In the method for improving the quality of seafood according to the present invention or the method for tightening seafood according to the present invention, the concentration of the aqueous gluconic acid solution is preferably 0.03% by mass or more and 1.50% by mass or less. The concentration of the gluconic acid aqueous solution is particularly preferably larger than 0.14% by mass and not more than 0.25% by mass.

グルコン酸水溶液の濃度は、使用対象の魚介類の種類によって、好ましい濃度が多少異なる。使用対象がタコの場合、0.14質量%以上1.50質量%以下が好ましく、0.14質量%より大きく0.50質量%未満が特に好ましい。使用対象がクラゲの場合、0.03質量%以上0.25質量%以下が好ましく、0.06質量%以上0.13質量%以下が特に好ましい。使用対象がウニの卵巣の場合、0.07質量%以上0.50質量%以下が好ましく、0.14質量%以上0.25質量%以下が特に好ましい。使用対象が数の子の場合、0.07質量%以上0.50質量%以下が好ましく、0.14質量%以上0.24質量%以下が特に好ましい。   The preferred concentration of the gluconic acid aqueous solution is slightly different depending on the type of seafood to be used. When the object of use is an octopus, the amount is preferably 0.14% by mass or more and 1.50% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.14% by mass and less than 0.50% by mass. When the target of use is jellyfish, it is preferably 0.03% by mass or more and 0.25% by mass or less, and particularly preferably 0.06% by mass or more and 0.13% by mass or less. When the target of use is a sea urchin ovary, it is preferably 0.07% by mass or more and 0.50% by mass or less, and particularly preferably 0.14% by mass or more and 0.25% by mass or less. When the object of use is a number child, it is preferably 0.07% by mass or more and 0.50% by mass or less, and particularly preferably 0.14% by mass or more and 0.24% by mass or less.

使用対象の生の魚介類は、冷凍後、解凍したものであってもよい。本明細書において、生の魚介類とは、加熱処理していない魚介類を意味する。生の魚介類の範囲には、血抜き処理したものや、塩蔵品が含まれる。魚介類としては、例えば、タコ、クラゲ、ウニの卵巣、数の子などが挙げられるが、他の魚介類であってもよい。   Raw fish and shellfish to be used may be frozen and thawed. In the present specification, raw seafood means seafood that has not been heat-treated. The range of raw seafood includes processed blood and salted products. Examples of seafood include octopus, jellyfish, sea urchin ovaries, and number offspring, but may be other seafood.

生の魚介類をグルコン酸水溶液に浸漬することにより、ミョウバン同等のぬめり除去効果や、身締め効果、身崩れ防止効果が得られる。グルコン酸と同じ有機酸であっても、クエン酸やフマル酸ではミョウバンと比較すると、身質はやわらかくなり、皮剥がれ、身崩れ、酸味を感じやすい。グルコン酸では呈味に優れ、通常使用されるミョウバンのような収れん味はなく、クエン酸やフマル酸のように酸味は強くない。また、ミョウバンは安価であることから使用用途が幅広いが、グルコン酸も同様に安価であるため、ミョウバン代替として置き換えることが容易であり、幅広い用途に使用可能である。   By immersing raw fish and shellfish in an aqueous gluconic acid solution, it is possible to obtain a slime removal effect equivalent to alum, a tightening effect, and a collapse effect. Even if it is the same organic acid as gluconic acid, citric acid and fumaric acid tend to be softer than the alum. Gluconic acid is excellent in taste, does not have an astringent taste like alum that is usually used, and is not so strong like citric acid or fumaric acid. In addition, alum is inexpensive and therefore has a wide range of uses. Gluconic acid is also inexpensive, so it can be easily replaced as an alum substitute and can be used in a wide range of applications.

本発明に係る魚介類の品質改良方法で処理した生の魚介類は、加熱調理されてもよい。
グルコン酸水溶液への浸漬時間は、5分〜10時間が好ましい。
グルコン酸水溶液は、食塩・醤油・酢などの調味料、砂糖・蜂蜜・トレハロース・オリゴ糖などの甘味料、香料、保存料、着色料、その他の食品添加剤を含んでいてもよい。
The raw seafood processed by the method for improving the quality of seafood according to the present invention may be cooked.
The immersion time in the gluconic acid aqueous solution is preferably 5 minutes to 10 hours.
The gluconic acid aqueous solution may contain seasonings such as salt, soy sauce, and vinegar, sweeteners such as sugar, honey, trehalose, and oligosaccharide, flavorings, preservatives, coloring agents, and other food additives.

本発明によれば、ミョウバン同様のぬめり除去効果や、身締め効果、身崩れ防止効果を得ることができ、また、食味への影響が小さく、魚介類全般に適用することができる魚介類の品質改良剤、身締め剤、品質改良方法および身締め方法を提供することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a slime removal effect, a tightening effect, and a body collapse prevention effect similar to alum, and the quality of seafood that has little influence on taste and can be applied to all seafood An improving agent, a tightening agent, a quality improving method, and a tightening method can be provided.

水揚げ後に加熱せずに冷凍しておいたタコを使用して、実施した。
なお、以下の実施例1〜7において、「%」は「質量%」を示す。
解凍させたタコを5%塩化ナトリウム水溶液で満たした洗い機で30分間塩もみを実施した後、コントロール区では生ミョウバン0.5%水溶液に15分浸漬処理し、テスト区では各濃度0.07%、0.14%、0.28%、0.5%、1.0%、1.5%のグルコン酸水溶液にそれぞれ15分浸漬処理した。その後、各々、次亜硫酸ナトリウムを含むボイル剤(青葉化成(株)製品名「IKB」)で蒸煮、ボイルした後、氷水冷却し、発色、皮剥がれ、身の締まり、ぬめりの有無等を評価した。
It was carried out using octopuses that had been frozen without being heated after landing.
In Examples 1 to 7 below, “%” indicates “mass%”.
After thawed octopus was filled with 5% aqueous solution of sodium chloride and salted for 30 minutes, the control group was immersed in a fresh 0.5% aqueous solution of alum for 15 minutes, and the test group had a concentration of 0.07%. , 0.14%, 0.28%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% gluconic acid aqueous solution for 15 minutes. After that, each was boiled and boiled with a boil agent containing sodium hyposulfite (product name “IKB”, Aoba Kasei Co., Ltd.), then cooled with ice water, and evaluated for color development, skin peeling, tightness, sliminess, etc. .

<官能評価方法および評価基準>
5人で官能評価を実施した。評価基準は以下のとおりである。
ミョウバンよりも良好な効果が得られたもの…◎
ミョウバン同等の効果が得られたもの…○
ミョウバンに劣るが許容できるもの…△
ミョウバン同等の効果が得られなかったもの…×
<Sensory evaluation method and evaluation criteria>
Sensory evaluation was performed by five people. The evaluation criteria are as follows.
A better effect than alum… ◎
Those that have the same effect as alum… ○
Inferior to alum but acceptable… △
Those that did not achieve the same effect as alum… ×

その結果、グルコン酸0.28%では生ミョウバン同等の評価となった。グルコン酸0.5%以上では、効果が得られたものの、ミョウバン同等の効果は得られなかった。   As a result, the evaluation was equivalent to raw alum at 0.28% gluconic acid. When gluconic acid was 0.5% or more, an effect was obtained, but an effect equivalent to alum was not obtained.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

実施例1の生ミョウバンの代わりに、クエン酸0.28%、リンゴ酸0.28%、フマル酸一ナトリウム0.28%、リン酸二水素カルシウム0.28%、酸性ピロリン酸ナトリウム0.28%、酸性ヘキサメタリン酸ナトリウム0.28%、グルコン酸ナトリウム0.28%を用いて、実施例1と同様の試験を行い、同様に評価した。
その結果、生ミョウバンとグルコン酸を用いたもの以外は、いずれも、皮剥がれが生じたり、身質がやわらかくなりすぎたりしてしまい、生ミョウバン同様の効果は得られなかった。有機酸塩であるグルコン酸ナトリウムにおいても同様の効果は得られなかった。
Instead of the raw alum of Example 1, citric acid 0.28%, malic acid 0.28%, monosodium fumarate 0.28%, calcium dihydrogen phosphate 0.28%, acidic sodium pyrophosphate 0.28 %, Sodium hexametaphosphate 0.28%, and sodium gluconate 0.28% were tested in the same manner as in Example 1 and evaluated in the same manner.
As a result, except for those using raw alum and gluconic acid, peeling occurred or the body became too soft, and the same effect as raw alum could not be obtained. Similar effects were not obtained with sodium gluconate, which is an organic acid salt.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

塩蔵品のクラゲを使用して、実施した。
塩蔵品のクラゲを流水で30分脱塩した。脱塩したクラゲを、次亜硫酸ナトリウムを含む製剤(青葉化成(株)製品名「IKB」)で漂白した後、15分間流水処理した。無処理区では、何も添加しない水、原料対比1:1に一晩浸漬処理した。コントロール区では、生ミョウバン0.50%水溶液、原料対比1:1に一晩浸漬処理した。テスト区では、各濃度0.03%、0.06%、0.13%、0.25%のグルコン酸水溶液、原料対比1:1にそれぞれ一晩浸漬処理した。処理後のクラゲについて、実施例1と同様の評価基準で、ぬめり、身の締まり、味を評価した。
This was carried out using a salted jellyfish.
Salted jellyfish were desalted with running water for 30 minutes. The desalted jellyfish was bleached with a preparation containing sodium hyposulfite (Aoba Kasei Co., Ltd., product name “IKB”), and then treated with running water for 15 minutes. In the untreated section, immersion treatment was performed overnight in 1: 1 water and raw material to which nothing was added. In the control group, the raw alum 0.50% aqueous solution was immersed in a 1: 1 relative to the raw material overnight. In the test group, each was immersed overnight in a gluconic acid aqueous solution having a concentration of 0.03%, 0.06%, 0.13%, and 0.25%, respectively, relative to the raw material 1: 1. The jellyfish after the treatment were evaluated for slimeness, tightness and taste according to the same evaluation criteria as in Example 1.

その結果、グルコン酸0.06%、0.13%で処理したテスト区は、生ミョウバンで処理したコントロール区とぬめり、身の締まりでほぼ同等の効果となった。また、同様にグルコン酸0.25%水溶液で一晩処理したものは効果が得られたものの、生ミョウバン0.50%に比べて身質がやわらかくなった。食味に関しては、グルコン酸を使用した場合、生ミョウバンを使用した場合より、良好な結果となった。   As a result, the test group treated with 0.06% and 0.13% gluconic acid had almost the same effect as the control group treated with raw alum, and tightened. Similarly, treatment with an aqueous solution of 0.25% gluconic acid overnight gave an effect, but was softer than 0.50% fresh alum. Regarding taste, when gluconic acid was used, better results were obtained than when raw alum was used.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

実施例3の生ミョウバンの代わりに、酢酸90%水溶液0.5%、クエン酸0.5%、リンゴ酸0.5%を用いて、実施例3と同様の試験を行い、同様に評価した。
その結果、生ミョウバンとグルコン酸を用いたもの以外は、いずれも、生ミョウバンに比べて身質がやわらかくなりすぎ、生ミョウバン同様の効果は得られなかった。
In place of the raw alum of Example 3, the same test as in Example 3 was conducted using 0.5% acetic acid 0.5%, 0.5% citric acid, 0.5% malic acid, and evaluated in the same manner. .
As a result, except for those using raw alum and gluconic acid, all of them were too soft compared to raw alum, and the same effects as raw alum were not obtained.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

ムラサキウニの卵巣を使用して、実施した。
ムラサキウニの卵巣を無添加区では、2%食塩水に10分間浸漬処理した。コントロール区では、2%食塩水に生ミョウバン0.5%を溶解した溶液に10分間浸漬処理した。テスト区では、2%食塩水にグルコン酸0.07%、0.14%、0.25%、0.50%をそれぞれ溶解した溶液に10分間浸漬処理した。その後、処理した卵巣を10℃以下で保存し、実施例1と同様の評価基準で、一晩後の軟化・身崩れ、食味を評価した。
This was performed using the sea urchin ovary.
The sea urchin ovary was immersed in 2% saline for 10 minutes in the non-added group. In the control group, it was immersed in a solution of 0.5% raw alum in 2% saline for 10 minutes. In the test group, immersion treatment was performed for 10 minutes in a solution in which 0.07%, 0.14%, 0.25%, and 0.50% gluconic acid was dissolved in 2% saline. Then, the processed ovary was preserve | saved at 10 degrees C or less, and the softening and crumble and the taste after one night were evaluated on the same evaluation criteria as Example 1.

その結果、グルコン酸0.14%、0.25%で処理したテスト区では、生ミョウバンと軟化・身崩れで同等の効果が得られ、特にグルコン酸0.14%のテスト区ではミョウバンよりも良好な結果となった。食味に関しては、生ミョウバンは特有の収れん味がするのに対し、グルコン酸0.14%のテスト区では食味の違和感は感じられず、良好な食味であった。   As a result, in the test plots treated with 0.14% and 0.25% gluconic acid, the same effects were obtained with soft alum and soft alum, especially in the test plot with 0.14% gluconic acid, compared to alum. Good results. In terms of taste, raw alum had a unique astringent taste, whereas in the test area of 0.14% gluconic acid, there was no sense of incongruity in taste, and the taste was good.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

ロシア産の数の子を使用して、実施した。
冷凍したロシア産の数の子を解凍し、ボーメ5の塩化ナトリウム溶液と数の子を原料比1:1で混合し、5℃で一晩処理後、血抜きを行った。血抜きした数の子に対して、無添加区では、20%塩化ナトリウム水溶液、原料対比1:1に一晩浸漬処理した。コントロール区では、20%塩化ナトリウム水溶液に生ミョウバン0.50%を溶解した溶液、原料対比1:1に一晩浸漬処理した。テスト区では、20%塩化ナトリウム水溶液にグルコン酸0.07%、0.14%、0.24%、0.50%をそれぞれ溶解した溶液、原料対比1:1に一晩浸漬処理した。
Conducted using a number of Russian children.
A frozen number of Russian pups were thawed, a sodium chloride solution of Baume 5 and a number of pups were mixed at a raw material ratio of 1: 1, treated at 5 ° C. overnight, and then blood-bleeded. In the additive-free section, the blood-bleeded children were soaked overnight in a 20% aqueous sodium chloride solution and 1: 1 relative to the raw material. In the control group, the solution was immersed overnight in a solution prepared by dissolving 0.50% of raw alum in 20% aqueous sodium chloride solution and 1: 1 of the raw material. In the test group, immersion was carried out overnight in a solution prepared by dissolving 0.07%, 0.14%, 0.24%, and 0.50% gluconic acid in a 20% aqueous sodium chloride solution, and 1: 1 relative to the raw materials.

処理後の数の子について、実施例1と同様の評価基準で、身の締まり、味を評価した。
その結果、グルコン酸0.14%、0.24%のテスト区では、身の締まりで生ミョウバン同等の効果が得られた。また、グルコン酸0.24%以下のテスト区では、生ミョウバン特有の収れん味がせず、違和感がなく、良好な食味であった。
The number of children after the treatment was evaluated for tightness and taste according to the same evaluation criteria as in Example 1.
As a result, in the test areas of gluconic acid 0.14% and 0.24%, the same effect as raw alum was obtained by tightening. Further, in the test group of 0.24% or less of gluconic acid, the astringent taste peculiar to raw alum was not given, there was no sense of incongruity, and the taste was good.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

実施例6の生ミョウバンの代わりに、グルコン酸ナトリウム0.50%、リンゴ酸0.50%、リンゴ酸ナトリウム0.50%、クエン酸0.50%、クエン酸ナトリウム0.50%、リン酸二水素カルシウム0.50%を用いて、実施例6と同様の試験を行い、同様に評価した。   Instead of the raw alum of Example 6, sodium gluconate 0.50%, malic acid 0.50%, sodium malate 0.50%, citric acid 0.50%, sodium citrate 0.50%, phosphoric acid The same test as in Example 6 was performed using 0.50% calcium dihydrogen, and the same evaluation was performed.

その結果、生ミョウバンとグルコン酸とリン酸二水素カルシウムを用いたもの以外は、いずれも、生ミョウバンに比べて身質がやわらかくなりすぎ、生ミョウバン同様の効果は得られなかった。グルコン酸0.14%のテスト区では、生ミョウバン特有の収れん味がせず、生ミョウバンやリン酸二水素カルシウムを用いたものより食味が優れていた。   As a result, except for those using raw alum, gluconic acid, and calcium dihydrogen phosphate, all of them were too soft compared to raw alum, and the same effects as raw alum were not obtained. In the test group of 0.14% gluconic acid, there was no astringent taste peculiar to raw alum, and the taste was superior to that using raw alum or calcium dihydrogen phosphate.

Figure 2017023089
Figure 2017023089

Claims (5)

グルコン酸を含むことを特徴とする魚介類の品質改良剤。   A quality improving agent for seafood characterized by containing gluconic acid. グルコン酸を含むことを特徴とする魚介類の身締め剤。   A seafood tightening agent characterized by containing gluconic acid. 生の魚介類をグルコン酸水溶液に浸漬することを特徴とする魚介類の品質改良方法。   A method for improving the quality of seafood, characterized by immersing raw seafood in an aqueous gluconic acid solution. 生の魚介類をグルコン酸水溶液に浸漬することを特徴とする魚介類の身締め方法。   A method for tightening seafood, comprising immersing raw seafood in an aqueous gluconic acid solution. 前記グルコン酸水溶液の濃度は0.03質量%以上1.50質量%以下であることを特徴とする請求項3記載の魚介類の品質改良方法または請求項4記載の魚介類の身締め方法。
The method for improving the quality of fish and shellfish according to claim 3 or the method for tightening fish and shellfish according to claim 4, wherein the concentration of the gluconic acid aqueous solution is 0.03% by mass or more and 1.50% by mass or less.
JP2015147259A 2015-07-24 2015-07-24 How to improve the quality of sea urchin ovaries Active JP6697229B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015147259A JP6697229B2 (en) 2015-07-24 2015-07-24 How to improve the quality of sea urchin ovaries

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015147259A JP6697229B2 (en) 2015-07-24 2015-07-24 How to improve the quality of sea urchin ovaries

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2017023089A true JP2017023089A (en) 2017-02-02
JP6697229B2 JP6697229B2 (en) 2020-05-20

Family

ID=57944729

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2015147259A Active JP6697229B2 (en) 2015-07-24 2015-07-24 How to improve the quality of sea urchin ovaries

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6697229B2 (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52125664A (en) * 1976-04-12 1977-10-21 Hokkaido Giyogiyou Kiyoudoukum Method of producing salted cod roe
JPS5618537A (en) * 1979-07-25 1981-02-21 Mitsubishi Chem Ind Treatment of fish meat
JPS61177938A (en) * 1985-01-28 1986-08-09 アメリカン・ナショナル・キャン・カンパニー Hermetically sealed package containing heat treated marine foods
JPH1057017A (en) * 1996-08-14 1998-03-03 Nisshin Flour Milling Co Ltd Cod roe-containing processed food and its production
JP2000175619A (en) * 1998-12-18 2000-06-27 Kiyokuyou:Kk Coloring crustacean such as shrimp or crab in red
JP2001333744A (en) * 2000-05-30 2001-12-04 Okuno Chem Ind Co Ltd Method for color developing crustacean
JP2013179907A (en) * 2012-03-02 2013-09-12 Chiba Flour Milling Co Ltd Formulation for treating marine product or meat, method for treating the marine product or meat using the same, and marine product or meat
JP2014100138A (en) * 2012-10-24 2014-06-05 Ajinomoto Co Inc Manufacturing method of protein-containing food product, and enzyme preparation for modifying protein-containing food product

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52125664A (en) * 1976-04-12 1977-10-21 Hokkaido Giyogiyou Kiyoudoukum Method of producing salted cod roe
JPS5618537A (en) * 1979-07-25 1981-02-21 Mitsubishi Chem Ind Treatment of fish meat
JPS61177938A (en) * 1985-01-28 1986-08-09 アメリカン・ナショナル・キャン・カンパニー Hermetically sealed package containing heat treated marine foods
JPH1057017A (en) * 1996-08-14 1998-03-03 Nisshin Flour Milling Co Ltd Cod roe-containing processed food and its production
JP2000175619A (en) * 1998-12-18 2000-06-27 Kiyokuyou:Kk Coloring crustacean such as shrimp or crab in red
JP2001333744A (en) * 2000-05-30 2001-12-04 Okuno Chem Ind Co Ltd Method for color developing crustacean
JP2013179907A (en) * 2012-03-02 2013-09-12 Chiba Flour Milling Co Ltd Formulation for treating marine product or meat, method for treating the marine product or meat using the same, and marine product or meat
JP2014100138A (en) * 2012-10-24 2014-06-05 Ajinomoto Co Inc Manufacturing method of protein-containing food product, and enzyme preparation for modifying protein-containing food product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6697229B2 (en) 2020-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5882792B2 (en) Preparations for processing marine products or livestock meat, and methods for processing marine products or livestock meat using the same
JP6654752B2 (en) Formulation for stabilizing moisture in muscle food
JP4763315B2 (en) Quality improver for processed meat for retort
JP6417552B2 (en) Lifetime and yield improver, method for improving shelf life and yield, method for producing livestock and processed fishery products with improved shelf life and yield, and processed meat and fishery products processed with shelf life and yield improver
JP2006304671A (en) Food processing agent and fish roe food
JP6397519B2 (en) Antibacterial method and manufacturing method for heated seafood
JP2017023089A (en) Quality improver, firming agent, quality improvement method and firming method for seafood
JP6844989B2 (en) Aqueous immersion liquid for improving the flavor of raw edible meat and preventing deterioration, and a method for improving the flavor of raw edible meat using it
JP4615851B2 (en) Fish quality improver
KR101359002B1 (en) Manufacturing method of giant squid meat
JP2525154B2 (en) Fish egg processing method
JP3377141B2 (en) Manufacturing method of processed food
JP2000325015A (en) Agent for preventing black discoloration of crustaceans and method for preventing black discoloration
JP2004350666A (en) Frozen ground fish meat and method for producing the same
JP3713485B2 (en) Processing method of fresh fish
CN106615041A (en) Squid tube body fresh-keeping agent
JP3404478B2 (en) Meat-containing foods
KR20190126209A (en) Fish sauce mixed with saury, jukkumi, crayfish
JP3083821B1 (en) Foods containing raw small fish
JP2005168456A (en) Slime-removing agent
JPWO2002154861A1 (en) How to process fresh fish
JP5945305B2 (en) Improvement of flavor and quality of raw meat
DK2854566T3 (en) METHOD AND APPLICATION OF A COMPOSITION FOR THE MARKETING OF FISH PRODUCTS
JP2020150932A (en) Method for immersing marine product
JP2814097B2 (en) Jelly Meat Prevention Agent, Jelly Meat Prevention Law, and Method for Producing Surimi or Paste

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20150727

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20180605

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20180606

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20190319

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20190326

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20190515

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20190516

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20190903

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20191101

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20191105

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20191203

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200228

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20200228

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20200309

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20200407

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20200424

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6697229

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250