EP2572805A1 - Method and system for conveying and merging two or more groups of shingled mail items - Google Patents
Method and system for conveying and merging two or more groups of shingled mail items Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2572805A1 EP2572805A1 EP12185556A EP12185556A EP2572805A1 EP 2572805 A1 EP2572805 A1 EP 2572805A1 EP 12185556 A EP12185556 A EP 12185556A EP 12185556 A EP12185556 A EP 12185556A EP 2572805 A1 EP2572805 A1 EP 2572805A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- group
- groups
- time
- ith
- head
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000007665 sagging Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000854350 Enicospilus group Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001595 contractor effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005693 optoelectronics Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H29/00—Delivering or advancing articles from machines; Advancing articles to or into piles
- B65H29/66—Advancing articles in overlapping streams
- B65H29/6654—Advancing articles in overlapping streams changing the overlapping figure
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C1/00—Measures preceding sorting according to destination
- B07C1/02—Forming articles into a stream; Arranging articles in a stream, e.g. spacing, orientating
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H29/00—Delivering or advancing articles from machines; Advancing articles to or into piles
- B65H29/66—Advancing articles in overlapping streams
- B65H29/6681—Advancing articles in overlapping streams merging two or more streams into an overlapping stream
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2301/00—Handling processes for sheets or webs
- B65H2301/30—Orientation, displacement, position of the handled material
- B65H2301/34—Modifying, selecting, changing direction of displacement
- B65H2301/342—Modifying, selecting, changing direction of displacement with change of plane of displacement
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2404/00—Parts for transporting or guiding the handled material
- B65H2404/20—Belts
- B65H2404/26—Particular arrangement of belt, or belts
- B65H2404/261—Arrangement of belts, or belt(s) / roller(s) facing each other for forming a transport nip
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2511/00—Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
- B65H2511/10—Size; Dimensions
- B65H2511/11—Length
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2511/00—Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
- B65H2511/20—Location in space
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2513/00—Dynamic entities; Timing aspects
- B65H2513/10—Speed
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2513/00—Dynamic entities; Timing aspects
- B65H2513/50—Timing
- B65H2513/512—Starting; Stopping
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2701/00—Handled material; Storage means
- B65H2701/10—Handled articles or webs
- B65H2701/19—Specific article or web
- B65H2701/1916—Envelopes and articles of mail
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and system for conveying and merging two or more groups of shingled mail items.
- Forming and conveying groups of shingled items is known, i.e. groups of items aligned in a preferably straight direction, partly overlapping and with respective edges spaced a constant or variable distance apart.
- Shingled groups are typically conveyed by means of conveyor belt systems with either one single belt defining a supporting surface for the shingled groups or a pair of opposite belts, which exert pressure on opposite sides of the shingled groups.
- the groups are normally fed along respective separate conveyor belt systems, and made to converge at an area common to both systems and at which merging of the two into one is obtained.
- Figures 1A and 1B show consecutive stages in the operation of a conveying system for moving groups of shingled mail items along respective advancement paths. More specifically, each advancement path comprises a number of segments, each at least partly defined by a respective one- or two-belt conveyor system.
- two-belt systems are normally used along segments of an advancement path arranged vertically or, however, steeply sloping.
- At least one of the groups of shingled items invariably has to travel along a curved path or, at any rate, along a path involving a change in the advancement direction.
- merging of groups of shingled items is made necessary by processing requirements, e.g. by the presence, along the advancement path, of mail processing (e.g. sorting) devices, or particular conveying or direction-change devices, which demand that the incoming supply of mail items be as constant and homogeneous as possible, so as to both ensure steady operation of the individual devices and, more generally speaking, to achieve high throughput of the conveying system as a whole.
- mail processing e.g. sorting
- conveying or direction-change devices which demand that the incoming supply of mail items be as constant and homogeneous as possible, so as to both ensure steady operation of the individual devices and, more generally speaking, to achieve high throughput of the conveying system as a whole.
- the group resulting from the merging of two groups of shingled items may, for example, end up being thinner, at the area where the two groups are joined, with respect to the average thickness of either group of shingled items (see Figure 2 ).
- This is to be avoided at all cost, because it may eventually result in the merged group parting altogether, e.g. as it is transferred to another part of the conveyor system, and especially in the event of two consecutive path segments at different levels.
- the merged group being longer than it should be (by sagging at the join) may impair the efficiency of the conveyor system as a whole.
- the unevenness described above may impair overall performance of the mail processing (e.g. sorting) devices, thus resulting in errors in the mail conveying and handling sequence.
- the area in the merged group where the two groups join may swell with respect to the average thickness of either group of shingled items (as shown in Figure 3 ).
- the correct sequence of the mail items in the merged group is no longer guaranteed, i.e. items originally in the second group may be located further forward than items originally in the first group.
- the type of unevenness described above may cause a blockage of the mail processing (e.g. sorting) devices.
- Another factor affecting the merging of two groups of shingled mail items is a direct consequence of at least one of the groups having to travel along a curved path or, at any rate, change direction on its way to the intersection.
- Each group of shingled mail items is fairly thick, so, as it travels along a curve or changes direction, the surface of the group on the inside of the curve travels at a different speed (speed v i ) from the surface on the outside of the curve (speed v e ) as shown in Figure 4 .
- This difference in speed has the effect of altering, i.e. increasing or decreasing, the mean spacing of the mail items in the group, depending on the geometry of the conveyor system and relative paths.
- a simple, effective method is therefore needed to compensate for this group stretching/contracting effect as the group travels along a curved path or, at any rate, a path involving a change in direction.
- a need is felt for a system of conveying and merging groups of shingled mail items of the type comprising a number of conveyor belt systems defining one or more advancement paths for the groups, which provides for effectively merging the groups with no sagging or swelling, and, when necessary, compensates for any stretching or contraction of the groups.
- the above object is achieved by the present invention, in that it provides a method of conveying and merging groups of shingled mail items as claimed in Claim 1, and a system as claimed in Claim 8.
- Number 1 in Figures 1A, 1B and 1C indicates as a whole a system for conveying and merging groups 2, 2' of shingled mail items at consecutive operating stages.
- Each group 2, 2' comprises a number of mail items aligned in a preferably straight direction, partly overlapping, with respective edges spaced a constant or variable distance apart. More specifically, each group 2, 2' has a head 2H, 2H' (or front portion in the travelling direction of the group), and a tail 2T, 2T' (or rear portion in the travelling direction of the group); and the total distance between the head and tail of each group 2, 2' defines its length.
- System 1 is, in particular, designed to move groups 2, 2' of shingled mail items - formed in known manner - along respective advancement paths, each at least partly defined by one or more powered, one- or two-belt conveyor systems 3, 3', 31, 31'.
- System 1 typically comprises a number of conveyor belt systems 3, 3', 31, 31', which extend between respective end pulleys arranged to define supporting surfaces, on which the shingled groups travel at a speed v from respective inputs I to a shared output U.
- system 1 preferably comprises two-belt systems 31, 31'.
- system 1 is configured to merge at least one (i-1) th group 2 of shingled mail items with an i th group 2' of shingled mail, at an intersection zone CZ i , to which the ( i -1)th and ith groups 2, 2' are conveyed along respective paths.
- system 1 conveys an (i-1)th group 2 of length L i-1 , whose head 2H is initially located at a point P (i-1)0 on a first conveyor belt system 3; and an ith group 2' of length L i , whose head 2H' is located at a point P i0 on a second conveyor belt system 3'.
- the (i-1)th group 2 At the time to which Figure 1A refers, to reach intersection zone CZ i , the (i-1)th group 2 must travel along a path portion of length D (i-1) and which involves a change in direction. So, in addition to first system 3, on which it is located at the start time shown in Figure 1A , the (i-1)th group 2 will therefore also be conveyed by a first two-belt conveyor system 31 adjacent to first system 3 and extending in a substantially vertical direction.
- the ith group 2' must travel along a path portion of length D i followed by a change in direction. So, in addition to second system 3', on which it is located at the time shown in Figure 1A , the ith group 2' will therefore also be conveyed by a second two-belt conveyor system 31' adjacent to second system 3' and extending in a substantially vertical direction.
- System 1 advantageously comprises first sensor means S1, e.g. photocells, laser sensors, proximity sensors, etc., located along the paths of the (i-1)th and ith groups 2, 2' to detect passage of heads 2H, 2H'.
- first sensor means S1 e.g. photocells, laser sensors, proximity sensors, etc.
- the exact initial positions P (i-1)0 , P i0 of groups 2, 2' may thus conveniently be determined using motion models (e.g. space motion vs time equations), preferably on the basis of signals from sensor means S1 upon passage of heads 2H, 2H'.
- motion models e.g. space motion vs time equations
- the exact lengths L i-1 , L i of groups 2, 2' may conveniently be determined on the basis of known parameters (means size, mean spacing, etc.) of the mail items in the groups.
- System 1 preferably also comprises second sensor means S2, e.g. photocells, laser sensors, proximity sensors, etc., located along the paths of groups 2, 2' to detect passage of tails 2T, 2T'.
- second sensor means S2 e.g. photocells, laser sensors, proximity sensors, etc.
- System 1 preferably also comprises further sensor means (not shown), e.g. optical barriers, photocells, laser sensors, etc., for determining the length L U of the last mail item in each group 2, 2'.
- sensor means e.g. optical barriers, photocells, laser sensors, etc.
- the length L U of the last mail item in each group may be assumed substantially constant and equal to a predetermined value.
- System 1 advantageously comprises a control unit 4 connected functionally to at least first sensor means S1 and the respective drive means (not shown) of conveyor belt systems 3, 3', 31, 31', and which is designed to start and stop conveyor belt systems 3, 3', 31, 31' on the basis of at least the initial positions P (i-1)0 , P i0 of heads 2H, 2H', and the lengths L i-1 , L i of the (i-1)th and ith groups 2, 2' of shingled mail items, so that the leading edge of the (i-1)th group 2 at least overlaps the trailing edge of the ith group 2' in a single merged group 30 of shingled mail items at relative intersection CZ i .
- Control unit 4 preferably also starts and stops conveyor belt systems 3, 3', 31, 31' on the basis of lengths L U(i-1) , L Ui of the respective last items in the (i-1)th and ith groups.
- Control unit 4 is preferably also connected functionally to second sensor means S2.
- Figure 5C shows the target overlap and merge condition of a number of groups of shingled mail items into one merged group 30 substantially comprising adjacent groups 2, 2', 2" merged two by two, with the leading edge of the (i-1)th group at least overlapping the trailing edge of the ith group.
- each group is characterized by a length L i and an initial position P i0 of its head, and is initially separated by a distance D i from a relative intersection CZ i with the (i-1)th group.
- Figure 6 shows in greater detail the operations performed by control unit 4 to convey two or more groups 2, 2' of shingled mail items to respective intersections zones CZ i , i.e. to control starting and stopping of group conveyor belt systems 3.
- control unit 4 determines at least the initial position P i0 of the head 2H' of each i th group of shingled mail items to be conveyed and merged, and accordingly determines the length L i of the i th group and the distance D i from the relative intersection CZ i with a respective (i-1)th group.
- control unit 4 preferably determines the actual initial position of tail 2T', and accordingly also calculates length L i .
- groups 2, 2' are assumed to be initially motionless on the respective conveyor belt systems.
- control unit temporarily zeroes the start-off time t 1 of the first group.
- block 101 basically assumes that the first group in the sequence of groups to be merged is the one to be set in motion first.
- the method according to the invention provides for (indirectly) determining the truth of this assumption, and, if it is disproved, for correcting the sequence in which the various groups are set in motion.
- control unit 4 sets a counter i to 2, and, at block 103, resolves, with respect to variable t i , a motion equation of the ith and (i-1)th groups, which defines the conditions by which, at a given following time t merge , to overlap/merge the two groups at intersection CZ i as shown in Figure 1C (or Figure 5C in the case of more than two groups).
- control unit 4 takes into account the values of the variables determined at block 100.
- the groups to be conveyed and merged are preferably imposed a target overlap/merge condition, in which the head 2H of the (i-1)th group overlaps the tail 2T' of the ith group in such a manner as to trail behind the head of the last mail item in the ith group by a distance S equal to the mean spacing of the shingled mail items in each group.
- Equations for calculating the position of the head/tail of each group at the merge time may be substituted in equation (1).
- the mean spacing of the shingled mail items in groups 2, 2' may normally be used for S, but, in some cases - for example, when groups 2, 2' also contain particularly thick items - this may prove inaccurate and impair the efficiency of the method.
- system 1 may advantageously comprise third sensor means (not shown) for determining the actual thickness of head 2H, 2H' and/or tail 2T, 2T' of the (i-1)th and ith groups.
- equation (2) is easily resolvable with respect to variable t i .
- each t i represents the start-off time of an ith group, determined with respect to the previously determined start-off time t i-1 of the (i-1)th group, i.e. the absolute algebraic difference between them represents the time lag with which the ith group must start off with respect to start-off of the (i-1)th group to merge the two groups correctly as designed by the present invention.
- equation (2) is preferably modified (see equation (3) below) by inserting a correction term to compensate for stretching, as typically occurs when a group changes direction.
- the initial position of tail 2T' of the ith group is given, not by P i0 - L i + L Ui , but by a respective modified term (P i0 - L i + L Ui ) MOD .
- group stretch/contraction coefficient K S substantially depends on the geometry of system 1 and the thickness of the group. For example, a coefficient K S value of roughly 1.05 - 1.10 may be assumed when the geometry of system 1 causes the group to stretch.
- control unit determines whether there are any other groups for conveying and merging. This is done in known manner, e.g. using an optoelectronic sensor (S1) defining an optical path that is interrupted by any mail items.
- S1 optoelectronic sensor
- block 104 goes on to a block 105, where control unit 4 increments counter i by one unit, and then returns to block 103.
- control unit 4 goes on to a block 106, where it searches for the minimum start-off time t i_MIN of all the start-off times t i determined.
- each start-off time t i may be greater than, less than, or equal to zero. More specifically, t i_MIN may be greater than, less than, or equal to zero, so the operation performed in block 107 is an algebraic subtraction (which takes into account the sign of t i_MIN ).
- control unit 4 determines the negative start-off time with the highest absolute value, and subtracts it algebraically from all the start-off times to 'normalize' them. In other words, after block 107, all the start-off times t i are 'corrected' so that none have a negative sign. In fact, the minimum start-off time t i determined is replaced with a corresponding zero start-off time t i , and the group of mail items associated with this start-off time is moved first, as explained below.
- control unit 4 carries out the conveying and merging procedure by moving each ith group off at the corrected start-off times t i * calculated in block 107.
- each ith group is started off with a time lag, equal to the respective modified start-off time t i *, with respect to the start time t START of the conveying and merging procedure.
- control unit starts a number of timers, each associated with starting off an i th group of shingled mail items.
- control unit 4 moves conveyor belt systems 3, 3' along respective paths to respective intersections with respective time lags, equal to corrected start-off times t i *, with respect to the start time of the conveying and merging procedure.
- equations (1) and (2) may obviously be corrected to allow for movement at a non-constant speed.
- the constant v term in equations (1) and (2) may be replaced with a predetermined function v i (t) describing, or at least approximating, the speed-time pattern of head 2H' of each ith group, to take into account acceleration and deceleration of the group along the respective path.
- each group particularly the one with the lowest corrected start-off time t i *, is set in motion with a time lag r i with respect to the relative corrected start-off time, to allow the relative path to clear.
- system 1 may advantageously comprise access sensor means (not shown), e.g. photocells, for instantly determining the engaged/free status of critical path portions, and which are preferably located at the intersections CZ i defined by system 1.
- access sensor means e.g. photocells
- the method according to the invention clearly provides, in a simple, low-cost manner, for merging two or more groups of shingled mail items into one with a high degree of precision, reliability and repeatability, as typically required in the mail processing sector.
- the method according to the invention prevents sagging and swelling of merged groups at the join, as frequently occurs in less precise systems.
- conveying and merging method and system according to the invention also take into account the geometry of system 1, and in particular any change in direction and consequent stretching of the groups, which may conveniently be compensated by adapting the motion equation of the groups to the actual characteristics of the respective paths.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
- Separation, Sorting, Adjustment, Or Bending Of Sheets To Be Conveyed (AREA)
Abstract
a) conveying the (i-1)th and ith groups (2, 2'), as of a start time (tSTART), along respective paths to the intersection zone (CZi);
the method also including the steps of :
b) determining, for each group (2, 2') of shingled mail items to be conveyed and merged, at least the position (P(i-1)0, Pi0) of its head (2H, 2H') at the start time (TSTART) ; and
c) controlling start-off of each group (2, 2') to the intersection zone (CZi) on the basis of at least the position (P(i-1)0, Pi0) of its head (2H, 2H') at the start time (tSTART).
Description
- The present invention relates to a method and system for conveying and merging two or more groups of shingled mail items.
- Forming and conveying groups of shingled items is known, i.e. groups of items aligned in a preferably straight direction, partly overlapping and with respective edges spaced a constant or variable distance apart.
- Shingled groups are typically conveyed by means of conveyor belt systems with either one single belt defining a supporting surface for the shingled groups or a pair of opposite belts, which exert pressure on opposite sides of the shingled groups.
- To merge two shingled groups, the groups are normally fed along respective separate conveyor belt systems, and made to converge at an area common to both systems and at which merging of the two into one is obtained.
- For example,
Figures 1A and 1B show consecutive stages in the operation of a conveying system for moving groups of shingled mail items along respective advancement paths. More specifically, each advancement path comprises a number of segments, each at least partly defined by a respective one- or two-belt conveyor system. - As in the example shown, two-belt systems are normally used along segments of an advancement path arranged vertically or, however, steeply sloping.
- When dealing with groups of shingled mail items, it is normally necessary to merge two groups into a larger one. In practice, then, two or more paths converge at a given intersection zone, and therefore are, from that point on, coincident, regardless of the geometry of the paths. In any case, the converging-path axes being incident, at least one of the groups of shingled items invariably has to travel along a curved path or, at any rate, along a path involving a change in the advancement direction.
- In particular, merging of groups of shingled items is made necessary by processing requirements, e.g. by the presence, along the advancement path, of mail processing (e.g. sorting) devices, or particular conveying or direction-change devices, which demand that the incoming supply of mail items be as constant and homogeneous as possible, so as to both ensure steady operation of the individual devices and, more generally speaking, to achieve high throughput of the conveying system as a whole.
- Merging two groups of shingled mail items poses, on a practical level, various potential problems.
- The group resulting from the merging of two groups of shingled items may, for example, end up being thinner, at the area where the two groups are joined, with respect to the average thickness of either group of shingled items (see
Figure 2 ).
This is to be avoided at all cost, because it may eventually result in the merged group parting altogether, e.g. as it is transferred to another part of the conveyor system, and especially in the event of two consecutive path segments at different levels. Moreover, the merged group being longer than it should be (by sagging at the join) may impair the efficiency of the conveyor system as a whole. Finally, the unevenness described above may impair overall performance of the mail processing (e.g. sorting) devices, thus resulting in errors in the mail conveying and handling sequence. - Conversely, the area in the merged group where the two groups join may swell with respect to the average thickness of either group of shingled items (as shown in
Figure 3 ). - This too is to be avoided, as it results in distension of the retaining surfaces (i.e. the opposite surfaces of the two-belt conveyor system between which the group travels). When the retaining surfaces move apart, contact between the retaining surfaces and the thinner portions of the group may be lost, with the result that the mail items in these portions collapse and are no longer conveyed steadily and in controlled manner by the conveyor belt system.
- Consequently, the correct sequence of the mail items in the merged group is no longer guaranteed, i.e. items originally in the second group may be located further forward than items originally in the first group. Furthermore, the type of unevenness described above may cause a blockage of the mail processing (e.g. sorting) devices.
- Another factor affecting the merging of two groups of shingled mail items is a direct consequence of at least one of the groups having to travel along a curved path or, at any rate, change direction on its way to the intersection.
- Each group of shingled mail items is fairly thick, so, as it travels along a curve or changes direction, the surface of the group on the inside of the curve travels at a different speed (speed vi) from the surface on the outside of the curve (speed ve) as shown in
Figure 4 . - This difference in speed has the effect of altering, i.e. increasing or decreasing, the mean spacing of the mail items in the group, depending on the geometry of the conveyor system and relative paths.
- Because this change in spacing is not normally fully corrected when the group gets back onto a straight course, a slight increase or decrease in the length of the group is often observed. If not compensated for, this group length alteration may impair the accuracy with which the longer/shorter group merges with the other group.
- A simple, effective method is therefore needed to compensate for this group stretching/contracting effect as the group travels along a curved path or, at any rate, a path involving a change in direction.
- Demand therefore exists within the sector for a method and system of conveying and merging converging groups of shingled mail items, which makes it possible to eliminate, in general, the above drawbacks.
- More specifically, a need is felt for a system of conveying and merging groups of shingled mail items of the type comprising a number of conveyor belt systems defining one or more advancement paths for the groups, which provides for effectively merging the groups with no sagging or swelling, and, when necessary, compensates for any stretching or contraction of the groups.
- It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a simple, low-cost method and system of conveying and merging groups of shingled mail items, which enables achieving at least one of the above demands.
- The above object is achieved by the present invention, in that it provides a method of conveying and merging groups of shingled mail items as claimed in
Claim 1, and a system as claimed in Claim 8. - A preferred, non-limiting embodiment of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
Figures 1A, 1B and1C show schematics of a system for conveying groups of shingled mail items at three consecutive stages; -
Figures 2 and 3 show schematics of two phenomena (sagging and swelling of a group formed by merging two groups of shingled mail items) which the method according to the present invention is designed to eliminate; -
Figure 4 shows a schematic of a disturbance phenomenon (stretching/contraction of a group of shingled mail items) which the method according to the present invention is designed to compensate; -
Figures 5A, 5B, 5C show schematics of three consecutive stages in merging more than two groups of shingled mail items using the method according to the present invention; -
Figure 6 shows one embodiment of the method of conveying and merging groups of shingled mail items according to the present invention. -
Number 1 inFigures 1A, 1B and1C indicates as a whole a system for conveying and merginggroups 2, 2' of shingled mail items at consecutive operating stages. - Each
group 2, 2' comprises a number of mail items aligned in a preferably straight direction, partly overlapping, with respective edges spaced a constant or variable distance apart. More specifically, eachgroup 2, 2' has ahead tail group 2, 2' defines its length. -
System 1 is, in particular, designed to movegroups 2, 2' of shingled mail items - formed in known manner - along respective advancement paths, each at least partly defined by one or more powered, one- or two-belt conveyor systems -
System 1 typically comprises a number ofconveyor belt systems system 1 preferably comprises two-belt systems 31, 31'. - The known electric motors and transmissions powering
conveyor belt systems 3, 3' are not shown for the sake of simplicity. - More specifically,
system 1 is configured to merge at least one (i-1)thgroup 2 of shingled mail items with an ith group 2' of shingled mail, at an intersection zone CZi, to which the (i-1)th andith groups 2, 2' are conveyed along respective paths. - In the
Figure 1A example,system 1 conveys an (i-1)th group 2 of length Li-1, whosehead 2H is initially located at a point P(i-1)0 on a firstconveyor belt system 3; and an ith group 2' of length Li, whosehead 2H' is located at a point Pi0 on a second conveyor belt system 3'. - At the time to which
Figure 1A refers, to reach intersection zone CZi, the (i-1)th group 2 must travel along a path portion of length D(i-1) and which involves a change in direction. So, in addition tofirst system 3, on which it is located at the start time shown inFigure 1A , the (i-1)th group 2 will therefore also be conveyed by a first two-belt conveyor system 31 adjacent tofirst system 3 and extending in a substantially vertical direction. - Similarly, to reach intersection zone CZi, the ith group 2' must travel along a path portion of length Di followed by a change in direction. So, in addition to second system 3', on which it is located at the time shown in
Figure 1A , the ith group 2' will therefore also be conveyed by a second two-belt conveyor system 31' adjacent to second system 3' and extending in a substantially vertical direction. -
System 1 advantageously comprises first sensor means S1, e.g. photocells, laser sensors, proximity sensors, etc., located along the paths of the (i-1)th andith groups 2, 2' to detect passage ofheads - The exact initial positions P(i-1)0, Pi0 of
groups 2, 2' may thus conveniently be determined using motion models (e.g. space motion vs time equations), preferably on the basis of signals from sensor means S1 upon passage ofheads - The exact lengths Li-1, Li of
groups 2, 2' may conveniently be determined on the basis of known parameters (means size, mean spacing, etc.) of the mail items in the groups. -
System 1 preferably also comprises second sensor means S2, e.g. photocells, laser sensors, proximity sensors, etc., located along the paths ofgroups 2, 2' to detect passage oftails - On the basis of signals from sensor means S2 indicating passage of
tails heads groups 2, 2' along respectiveconveyor belt systems 3, 3', the exact length Li-1, Li of eachgroup 2, 2' can be determined at any time. -
System 1 preferably also comprises further sensor means (not shown), e.g. optical barriers, photocells, laser sensors, etc., for determining the length LU of the last mail item in eachgroup 2, 2'. Alternatively, the length LU of the last mail item in each group may be assumed substantially constant and equal to a predetermined value. -
System 1 advantageously comprises acontrol unit 4 connected functionally to at least first sensor means S1 and the respective drive means (not shown) ofconveyor belt systems conveyor belt systems heads ith groups 2, 2' of shingled mail items, so that the leading edge of the (i-1)th group 2 at least overlaps the trailing edge of the ith group 2' in a single mergedgroup 30 of shingled mail items at relative intersection CZi.Control unit 4 preferably also starts and stopsconveyor belt systems -
Control unit 4 is preferably also connected functionally to second sensor means S2. - The target condition, in which two groups of shingled mail items are overlapped and merged perfectly as described above, is shown in
Figure 1C . - Similarly,
Figure 5C shows the target overlap and merge condition of a number of groups of shingled mail items into one mergedgroup 30 substantially comprisingadjacent groups - As will be obvious from the following description, by applying the method according to the invention to ultimately adjacent pairs of groups of shingled mail items, it is possible to form a multiple merged
group 30 of the type shown inFigure 5C . -
Figure 6 shows in greater detail the operations performed bycontrol unit 4 to convey two ormore groups 2, 2' of shingled mail items to respective intersections zones CZi, i.e. to control starting and stopping of groupconveyor belt systems 3. - Firstly,
block 100,control unit 4 determines at least the initial position Pi0 of thehead 2H' of each i th group of shingled mail items to be conveyed and merged, and accordingly determines the length Li of the i th group and the distance Di from the relative intersection CZi with a respective (i-1)th group. - Similarly,
control unit 4 preferably determines the actual initial position oftail 2T', and accordingly also calculates length Li. - In other words,
groups 2, 2' are assumed to be initially motionless on the respective conveyor belt systems. - Next, block 101, the control unit temporarily zeroes the start-off time t1 of the first group.
- In other words, block 101 basically assumes that the first group in the sequence of groups to be merged is the one to be set in motion first. As explained below, the method according to the invention provides for (indirectly) determining the truth of this assumption, and, if it is disproved, for correcting the sequence in which the various groups are set in motion.
- Next, block 102,
control unit 4 sets a counter i to 2, and, atblock 103, resolves, with respect to variable ti, a motion equation of the ith and (i-1)th groups, which defines the conditions by which, at a given following time tmerge, to overlap/merge the two groups at intersection CZi as shown inFigure 1C (orFigure 5C in the case of more than two groups). For which purpose,control unit 4 takes into account the values of the variables determined atblock 100. - The groups to be conveyed and merged are preferably imposed a target overlap/merge condition, in which the
head 2H of the (i-1)th group overlaps thetail 2T' of the ith group in such a manner as to trail behind the head of the last mail item in the ith group by a distance S equal to the mean spacing of the shingled mail items in each group. -
- P(i-1)_merge is the position of the head of the (i-1)th group at the merge time;
- pi_merge is the position of the tail of the ith group at the merge time;
- S is the mean spacing (known beforehand) of the shingled mail items in each group.
- Equations for calculating the position of the head/tail of each group at the merge time may be substituted in equation (1).
-
- P(i-1)0 is the initial position of
head 2H of the (i-1)th group; - D(i-1) is the initial distance between
head 2H of the (i-1)th group and the intersection zone CZi with the ith group; - t(i-1) is the start-off time of the (i-1)th group;
- Pi0 is the initial position of the
head 2H' of the ith group; - Li is the length of the ith group;
- LU(i-1) is the length of the last item in the (i-1)th group;
- Di is the initial distance between
head 2H' of the ith group and the intersection zone CZi with the (i-1)th group;
ti is the start-off time of the ith group; - v is the travelling speed of
conveyor belt systems 3, 3'; - S is the mean spacing of the shingled mail items in
groups 2, 2'. - The mean spacing of the shingled mail items in
groups 2, 2' may normally be used for S, but, in some cases - for example, whengroups 2, 2' also contain particularly thick items - this may prove inaccurate and impair the efficiency of the method. - To prevent this, an alternative embodiment imposes a target overlap/merge condition, in which the
head 2H of the (i-1)th group overlaps thetail 2T' of the ith group in such a manner as to trail behind the head of the last mail item in the ith group by a distance S* based on measured dimensions (typically length and thickness) of the two items eventually contacting directly at the join. Accordingly,system 1 may advantageously comprise third sensor means (not shown) for determining the actual thickness ofhead tail - It should be noted that the term Pi0 - Li + LUi in equation (2) expresses the initial position of the head of the last item in the ith group.
- The t(i-1) value being imposed or calculated beforehand, and all the other quantities being known (i.e. imposed beforehand as operating parameters of
system 1, or measured by the sensors described, or calculated/estimated on the basis of acquired quantities), equation (2) is easily resolvable with respect to variable ti. - In other words, each ti represents the start-off time of an ith group, determined with respect to the previously determined start-off time ti-1 of the (i-1)th group, i.e. the absolute algebraic difference between them represents the time lag with which the ith group must start off with respect to start-off of the (i-1)th group to merge the two groups correctly as designed by the present invention.
- When the advancement path of the ith group involves a change in direction, equation (2) is preferably modified (see equation (3) below) by inserting a correction term to compensate for stretching, as typically occurs when a group changes direction. In which case, the initial position of
tail 2T' of the ith group is given, not by Pi0 - Li + LUi, but by a respective modified term (Pi0 - Li + LUi)MOD. -
- Li is the initial length of the ith group;
- LUi is the length of the last item in the ith group;
- KS is the group stretch/contraction coefficient.
- The value of group stretch/contraction coefficient KS substantially depends on the geometry of
system 1 and the thickness of the group. For example, a coefficient KS value of roughly 1.05 - 1.10 may be assumed when the geometry ofsystem 1 causes the group to stretch. - At
block 104, the control unit determines whether there are any other groups for conveying and merging. This is done in known manner, e.g. using an optoelectronic sensor (S1) defining an optical path that is interrupted by any mail items. - In the event of an affirmative response, block 104 goes on to a
block 105, wherecontrol unit 4 increments counter i by one unit, and then returns to block 103. - Conversely, in the event of a negative response,
control unit 4 goes on to ablock 106, where it searches for the minimum start-off time ti_MIN of all the start-off times ti determined. -
- It should be noted that each start-off time ti may be greater than, less than, or equal to zero. More specifically, ti_MIN may be greater than, less than, or equal to zero, so the operation performed in
block 107 is an algebraic subtraction (which takes into account the sign of ti_MIN). - In other words, if start-off times ti are all positive or zero, block 107 leaves them unchanged, i.e. each ti* = ti.
- Alternatively, if at least one of start-off times ti is negative,
control unit 4 determines the negative start-off time with the highest absolute value, and subtracts it algebraically from all the start-off times to 'normalize' them. In other words, afterblock 107, all the start-off times ti are 'corrected' so that none have a negative sign. In fact, the minimum start-off time ti determined is replaced with a corresponding zero start-off time ti, and the group of mail items associated with this start-off time is moved first, as explained below. - Finally, at
block 108,control unit 4 carries out the conveying and merging procedure by moving each ith group off at the corrected start-off times ti* calculated inblock 107. In other words, each ith group is started off with a time lag, equal to the respective modified start-off time ti*, with respect to the start time tSTART of the conveying and merging procedure. - In other words, the control unit starts a number of timers, each associated with starting off an ith group of shingled mail items.
- Accordingly,
control unit 4 movesconveyor belt systems 3, 3' along respective paths to respective intersections with respective time lags, equal to corrected start-off times ti*, with respect to the start time of the conveying and merging procedure. - It should be noted that, in the example described with reference to the drawings and motion equations (1) and (2) - possibly with the correction in equation (3) -
conveyor belt systems 3, 3' move respective groups of shingled mail items all at the same constant speed v. - However, equations (1) and (2) may obviously be corrected to allow for movement at a non-constant speed.
- For example, the constant v term in equations (1) and (2) may be replaced with a predetermined function vi(t) describing, or at least approximating, the speed-time pattern of
head 2H' of each ith group, to take into account acceleration and deceleration of the group along the respective path. - In the above description, all the path portions - each defined by one or more powered, single- or two-
belt conveyor systems powered systems - This can be taken into account in a variation of the method according to the invention, in which an access time lag ri is added to the corrected start-off times ti* calculated in
block 107, depending on the engaged/free status of a relative path portion, i.e. of a corresponding powered, single- or two-belt conveyor system - In other words, each group, particularly the one with the lowest corrected start-off time ti*, is set in motion with a time lag ri with respect to the relative corrected start-off time, to allow the relative path to clear.
- Accordingly,
system 1 according to the invention may advantageously comprise access sensor means (not shown), e.g. photocells, for instantly determining the engaged/free status of critical path portions, and which are preferably located at the intersections CZi defined bysystem 1. - The advantages of the conveying and merging method and system according to the invention will be clear from the above description.
- In particular, the method according to the invention clearly provides, in a simple, low-cost manner, for merging two or more groups of shingled mail items into one with a high degree of precision, reliability and repeatability, as typically required in the mail processing sector.
- Moreover, because the groups of shingled mail items to be merged are set in motion in a start-off time sequence that takes into account at least the initial position and actual length of the groups, the method according to the invention prevents sagging and swelling of merged groups at the join, as frequently occurs in less precise systems.
- Another important point to note is how the conveying and merging method and system according to the invention also take into account the geometry of
system 1, and in particular any change in direction and consequent stretching of the groups, which may conveniently be compensated by adapting the motion equation of the groups to the actual characteristics of the respective paths. - Clearly, changes may be made to the conveying and merging method and system as described and illustrated herein without, however, departing from the protective scope of the accompanying independent Claims.
Claims (13)
- A method of conveying and merging, at a relative intersection zone (CZi), at least one (i-1)th group (2) of shingled mail items with an ith group (2') of shingled mail items, the method comprising the step of :a) conveying said (i-1)th and ith groups (2, 2'), as of a start time (tSTART), along respective advancement paths to said intersection zone (CZi);
the method being characterized by comprising the steps of :b) determining, for each group (2, 2') of shingled mail items to be conveyed and merged, at least the position (P(i-1)0, Pi0) of its head (2H, 2H') at said start time (tSTART), and the length Li of the ith group (2'); andc) controlling start-off of each group (2, 2') to said intersection zone (CZi) on the basis of at least said position (P(i-1)0, Pi0) of its head (2H, 2H') at said start time (tSTART), and said length Li-1, Li so that a leading edge of said (i-1)th group (2) overlaps at least partially a trailing edge of said ith group (2') to form a single merged group (30) of shingled mail items at said intersection zone (CZi). - A method as claimed in Claim 1, wherein step c) of controlling start-off of each group (2, 2') to the intersection zone (CZi) comprises the steps of :d) calculating (103) a start-off time (ti) for each group (2, 2') at least on the basis of said position (P(i-1)0, Pi0); ande) starting off each group (2, 2') with a time lag (ti*), with respect to said start time (tSTART), calculated on the basis of said start-off time (ti).
- A method as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, wherein, to merge the groups, said step a) comprises the step of overlapping the head (2H) of the (i-1)th group (2) on the tail (2T') of the ith group (2'), so that said head (2H) trails behind the head of the last mail item in the ith group (2') by a distance (S) equal to the mean spacing of the shingled mail items in each group.
- A method as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, wherein, to merge the groups, said step a) comprises the step of overlapping the head (2H) of the (i-1)th group (2) on the tail (2T') of the ith group (2'), so that said head (2H) trails behind the leading edge of the last mail item in the ith group (2') by a distance (S*) based on the measured dimensions of the head (2H) of the (i-1)th group (2) and the tail (2T') of the ith group (2').
- A method as claimed in any one of Claims 2 to 4, wherein said start-off time (ti) of the ith group is also calculated on the basis of :- the position (P(i-1)0) of the head (2H) of the (i-1)th group at said start time (tSTART) ;- the distance D(i-1), at said start time (tSTART), between the head (2H) of the (i-1)th group and said intersection zone (CZi) with the ith group;- the start-off time (t(i-1) of the (i-1)th group;- the distance Di, at said start time (Tstart), between the head (2H') of the ith group and said intersection zone (CZi) with the (i-1)th group;- the travelling speed (v) of said groups along their respective paths; and- the mean spacing (S) of the shingled mail items in each group (2, 2').
- A method as claimed in any one of Claims 2 to 6, wherein said step e) of starting off each ith group comprises the steps of :f) determining the minimum start-off time (ti_MIN) of all the start-off times (ti) calculated; andg) calculating a corrected start-off time (ti*) for each ith group by subtracting said minimum start-off time (ti_MIN) algebraically from the relative start-off time (ti).
- A method as claimed in any one of Claims 2 to 7, wherein said step e) of starting off each group (2, 2') commences with a time lag ri with respect to the relative corrected start-off time (ti*), so as to allow the relative path to clear.
- A method as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 8, wherein, for each ith group whose path involves a change in direction, the value of said position (Pi0) of the head (2H') of the ith group at said start time (tSTART) is corrected on the basis of a stretch coefficient KS of the group.
- A conveying and merging system comprising :- a number of conveyor systems (3, 3'; 31, 31') for conveying at least one (i-1)th and one ith group (2, 2') of shingled mail items along respective paths, and merging them at a relative intersection (CZi);- first sensor means (S1) located along the paths of said groups (2, 2') to detect passage of the respective heads (2H, 2H') of the groups (2, 2') and determine the respective positions (P(i-1)0, Pi0) of the heads at a start time (tSTART) ; and- a control unit (4) connected functionally to at least the first sensor means (S1) and to drive means of the conveyor systems (3, 3'; 31, 31'), and programmed to control travel of each group (2, 2') to said intersection (CZi) using the method as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 9.
- A system as claimed in Claim 10, and comprising second sensor means (S2) located along the paths of said groups (2, 2') to detect passage of the respective tails (2T, 2T') of the groups (2, 2').
- A system as claimed in Claim 10 or 11, and comprising third sensor means located along the paths of said groups (2, 2') to determine the thickness of the respective tails (2T, 2T') and/or heads (2H, 2H') of the groups (2, 2').
- A system as claimed in Claim 10 or 12, and comprising access sensor means located along the paths of said groups (2, 2') to instantly determine the engaged/free status of relative portions of said paths.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IT000851A ITTO20110851A1 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2011-09-23 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE HANDLING AND MERGER OF TWO OR MORE GROUPS OF POSTAL ITEMS PARTIALLY OVERLAPPED (SHINGLED) |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2572805A1 true EP2572805A1 (en) | 2013-03-27 |
EP2572805B1 EP2572805B1 (en) | 2014-08-13 |
Family
ID=45315971
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12185556.3A Active EP2572805B1 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2012-09-21 | Method and system for conveying and merging two or more groups of shingled mail items |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2572805B1 (en) |
IT (1) | ITTO20110851A1 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5433325A (en) * | 1993-11-23 | 1995-07-18 | Finmeccanica S.P.A. | Mail accumulating device |
EP0804975A2 (en) * | 1996-05-03 | 1997-11-05 | FINMECCANICA S.p.A. | Mail accumulating device |
EP0923997A2 (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 1999-06-23 | Elsag Spa | A method for collecting and transporting groups of partly superimposed postal objects |
EP2213603A2 (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2010-08-04 | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | Method for feeding a shingled stack of sheet material |
-
2011
- 2011-09-23 IT IT000851A patent/ITTO20110851A1/en unknown
-
2012
- 2012-09-21 EP EP12185556.3A patent/EP2572805B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5433325A (en) * | 1993-11-23 | 1995-07-18 | Finmeccanica S.P.A. | Mail accumulating device |
EP0804975A2 (en) * | 1996-05-03 | 1997-11-05 | FINMECCANICA S.p.A. | Mail accumulating device |
EP0923997A2 (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 1999-06-23 | Elsag Spa | A method for collecting and transporting groups of partly superimposed postal objects |
EP2213603A2 (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2010-08-04 | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | Method for feeding a shingled stack of sheet material |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
RU2012140510A (en) | 2014-03-27 |
EP2572805B1 (en) | 2014-08-13 |
ITTO20110851A1 (en) | 2013-03-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9790035B2 (en) | Gapping systems and methods | |
WO2007055112A1 (en) | Arranged conveyer system | |
KR102127304B1 (en) | Tape feeder | |
JP5246161B2 (en) | Tracking device | |
CN108455219B (en) | Method and device for detecting and adjusting skew of object on conveyor belt | |
CN110821490B (en) | Shearing system for longwall mining | |
JP5040779B2 (en) | Method for sorting articles in sorting equipment | |
US20230348200A1 (en) | Conveyor device for the distanceless and pressureless, or low-pressure, accumulation of objects, and operating method therefor | |
US9517893B2 (en) | Method and device for feeding products to a processing station | |
US11693397B2 (en) | Method and conveying apparatus for the improved determination of the position of an object transported on the conveying apparatus | |
EP2572805A1 (en) | Method and system for conveying and merging two or more groups of shingled mail items | |
JP2012111577A (en) | Conveying device | |
US6378859B1 (en) | Method for controlling a device used to remove packages from a pile | |
US10538403B2 (en) | Belt-form body conveyor | |
US20160167889A1 (en) | Method for detecting the fill level of a transport section | |
EP3067301B1 (en) | Conveying apparatus | |
JPH03111324A (en) | Transferring and distributing apparatus of articles and its operating and controlling method | |
JP2015089842A (en) | Transport device | |
RU2588431C2 (en) | Method and system for transportation and combination of two or more groups of stepwise laid mail units | |
JP2009179438A (en) | Article direction changing device and direction changing method | |
JP5573717B2 (en) | Web transport device | |
US10919708B2 (en) | Indexing and auto-spacing system | |
KR101304634B1 (en) | Apparatus and method of reducing end mark of steel plate strip | |
JP2016095543A5 (en) | ||
JP2017007821A (en) | Transportation device and transportation method of lengthy article |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130927 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B65H 29/66 20060101ALI20140214BHEP Ipc: B07C 1/02 20060101AFI20140214BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20140306 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SELEX ES S.P.A. |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 681875 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602012002723 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20141002 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 681875 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141113 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141113 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141114 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141215 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602012002723 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140930 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20150515 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140921 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20120921 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150930 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150930 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140921 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160816 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160921 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160921 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171002 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230928 Year of fee payment: 12 |