EP2535262A1 - A propulsion arrangement in a ship - Google Patents

A propulsion arrangement in a ship Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2535262A1
EP2535262A1 EP20110169720 EP11169720A EP2535262A1 EP 2535262 A1 EP2535262 A1 EP 2535262A1 EP 20110169720 EP20110169720 EP 20110169720 EP 11169720 A EP11169720 A EP 11169720A EP 2535262 A1 EP2535262 A1 EP 2535262A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chamber
ship
propulsion
shaft
hull
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP20110169720
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2535262B1 (en
Inventor
Kimmo KOKKILA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ABB Oy
Original Assignee
ABB Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to EP11169720.7A priority Critical patent/EP2535262B1/en
Application filed by ABB Oy filed Critical ABB Oy
Priority to SG2013089453A priority patent/SG195282A1/en
Priority to KR1020137032897A priority patent/KR20140007013A/en
Priority to JP2014515175A priority patent/JP2014516865A/en
Priority to CA2838782A priority patent/CA2838782A1/en
Priority to PCT/EP2012/061190 priority patent/WO2012171952A1/en
Priority to BR112013031988A priority patent/BR112013031988A2/en
Priority to CN201280029078.5A priority patent/CN103596839A/en
Priority to RU2014100896/11A priority patent/RU2544250C1/en
Publication of EP2535262A1 publication Critical patent/EP2535262A1/en
Priority to US14/107,469 priority patent/US20140179178A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2535262B1 publication Critical patent/EP2535262B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63H—MARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
    • B63H5/00—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water
    • B63H5/07—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water of propellers
    • B63H5/16—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water of propellers characterised by being mounted in recesses; with stationary water-guiding elements; Means to prevent fouling of the propeller, e.g. guards, cages or screens
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63H—MARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
    • B63H5/00—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water
    • B63H5/07—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water of propellers
    • B63H5/125—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water of propellers movably mounted with respect to hull, e.g. adjustable in direction, e.g. podded azimuthing thrusters
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63H—MARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
    • B63H5/00—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water
    • B63H5/07—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water of propellers
    • B63H5/08—Arrangements on vessels of propulsion elements directly acting on water of propellers of more than one propeller
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63H—MARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
    • B63H21/00—Use of propulsion power plant or units on vessels
    • B63H21/12—Use of propulsion power plant or units on vessels the vessels being motor-driven
    • B63H21/17—Use of propulsion power plant or units on vessels the vessels being motor-driven by electric motor

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a propulsion arrangement in a ship according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • the arrangement is intended to be used in ships provided with at least one propulsion unit situated at the stem of the ship.
  • the ship can either have only one propulsion unit situated at the stem of the ship or two parallel propulsion units situated at the stem of the ship on opposite sides of the center line of the hull of the ship.
  • Propulsion units are used especially in large ships e.g. cruisers, tankers transporting oil or liquefied natural gas, vehicle carriers, container ships and ferries.
  • WO publication 98/54052 discloses a ship with twin propellers and twin Schilling rudders i.e. a respective rudder for each propeller.
  • Each rudder is pivotably mounted by a respective shaft, has a bulbous nose portion, a waisted mid-portion and a flared tail.
  • the flared tail flares outwardly substantially only on the inner side of each rudder i.e. the side which faces the other rudder pair.
  • Each rudder has an upper plate and a lower plate with the plates much more extensive on the inner side than on the outer side, the plates being aligned with streamlines from the respective propeller and the lower plate having a downwardly angled portion on the inner side.
  • the rudders seem to form some kind of a toe-out angle in relation to the centerline of the hull.
  • US patent 7,033,234 discloses a method for steering a planning V-bottomed boat with double individually steerable drive units with underwater housings, which extend down from the bottom of the boat.
  • the underwater housings are set with a so called toe-in angle, i.e. inclined towards each other with opposite angels of equal magnitude relative to the boat center line.
  • the inner drive unit is set with a greater steering angle than the outer drive unit.
  • JP patent publication 2006007937 discloses an arrangement in a ship with two pods with contra-rotating propellers situated at the stem of the ship.
  • the first pod is in a first embodiment mounted stationary into the skeg so that the shaft line is inclined upwards.
  • the second pod is fastened by means of a horizontal axis to a steering table, which steering table rotates around a vertical axis and which steering table can be lowered and raised by means of hydraulic cylinders.
  • the shaft line of the second pod is aligned with the shaft line of the first pod.
  • the rear end of the first pod is in a second embodiment fastened with a horizontal axis to the skeg and the front end of the first pod is fastened to a vertical cylinder.
  • Both pods are in a third embodiment fastened to opposite ends of a common frame, which frame is supported from the middle part a horizontal axis to a steering table, which steering table rotates around a vertical axis and which steering table can be lowered and raised by means of hydraulic cylinders.
  • a steering table which steering table rotates around a vertical axis and which steering table can be lowered and raised by means of hydraulic cylinders.
  • the object of the invention is to improve prior art propulsion arrangements in ships.
  • the propulsion arrangement according to the invention is characterized by the features in the characterizing portion of claim 1.
  • the propulsion arrangement comprises at least one propulsion unit situated at the stem of the ship.
  • the ship comprises a hull having a horizontal water line.
  • the at least one propulsion unit comprises a hollow support structure attached to the hull, a chamber attached to the support structure, an electric motor within the chamber, a propeller at the front end of the chamber, said propeller being connected by means of a shaft to the electric motor, and a pivotably supported rudder at the rear end of the chamber.
  • the at least one propulsion unit is according to the invention mounted so that the shaft line forms a vertical tilt angle in the range of 1 to 8 degrees in relation to the water line so that the front end of the chamber is lower than the rear end of the chamber in relation to the water line.
  • the vertical tilt angle of the at least one propulsion unit improves the water inflow angle to the propeller, which improves the efficiency of the propeller.
  • the vertical tilt angle of the at least one propulsion unit also reduces noise and vibrations in the hull of the ship, which are due to cavitation as the improved inflow angle to the propeller reduces cavitation.
  • the vertical tilt angle of the at least one propulsion unit also reduces shaft line vibrations and forces. This is due to the fact that there are less asymmetric forces acting on the propeller when the water inflow angle to the propeller is improved. Reduced loads and vibrations will increase the lifetime of the bearings of the shaft as well as other components affected by these vibrations and forces.
  • the invention can advantageously be used in a ship having two propulsion units situated side by side at opposite sides of the center line of the ship at the stem of the ship.
  • Each propulsion unit is advantageously mounted in a toe-out position forming a horizontal tilt angle in the range of 0.5 to 6 degrees in relation to the center line of the hull.
  • the front end of the chamber is thus inclined away from the center line of the hull of the ship and the rear end of the chamber is inclined towards the center line of the hull of the ship.
  • This toe-out arrangement of the propulsion units will further improve the efficiency of the propellers and reduce noise and vibrations in the hull of the ship.
  • the invention can be used in large ships provided with at least one propulsion unit at the stem of the ship, e.g. cruisers, tankers transporting oil or liquefied natural gas, vehicle carriers, container ships and ferries.
  • the power of the propulsion unit in such large ships is in the order of at least 1 MW.
  • FIG 1 shows a prior art propulsion arrangement.
  • the arrangement comprises a propulsion unit 10 situated at the stem of the ship.
  • the propulsion unit 10 comprises a support structure 11, a chamber 12, an electric motor 13, a shaft 14, a propeller 15 and a rudder 16.
  • the chamber 12 is connected with the hollow support structure 11 to the hull 100 of the ship.
  • the shaft 14 has a first end which is connected to the electric motor 13 and a second end protruding from the front end of the chamber 12 and being connected to the propeller 15.
  • the propeller 15 is thus situated at the front end of the chamber 12.
  • the electric motor 13 can be an induction motor or a synchronous motor.
  • the propulsion unit 10 is fixed to the hull 100 of the vessel with the support structure 12.
  • a rudder 16 is situated at the back end of the chamber 12.
  • the rudder 16 is pivotably connected to the hull 100 and the chamber 12 by means of an axis 17.
  • the rudder 16 is formed so that it forms a smooth continuation of the support structure 11 and the chamber 12.
  • the lower part of the rudder 16 extends at a distance below the chamber 12.
  • a steering gear which is not shown in the figure, rotates the rudder 16 based on the commands from the navigation bridge.
  • the figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • the shaft 14 forms a shaft line SL of the propulsion unit 10.
  • the shaft line SL and the water line WL are parallel, which means that the angle ⁇ between them is 0 degrees.
  • the angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the shaft line SL i.e. the angle ⁇ is 90 degrees.
  • the angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the water line WL i.e. the angle ⁇ is also 90 degrees.
  • Figure 1 also shows the flow lines F of the water flowing to the propulsion unit 10. It can be seen from the figure that the flow lines F do not enter the propeller 15 of the propulsion unit 10 at an optimum angle. This weakens the hydrodynamic efficiency of the propeller 15.
  • FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention.
  • the propulsion unit 10 corresponds as such to the propulsion unit shown in Fig. 1 .
  • the difference compared to the arrangement shown in Fig. 1 is that the shaft line SL of the propulsion unit 10 forms a vertical tilt angle ⁇ in relation to the water line WL.
  • the angle of the water flow F entering the propeller 15 will be improved when the propulsion unit 10 is vertically tilted. This means that the hydrodynamic efficiency of the propeller 15 will be improved.
  • the angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the water line WL i.e.
  • the angle ⁇ is still 90 degrees as in figure 1 .
  • the angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the shaft line SL i.e. the angle ⁇ is, however, less than 90 degrees in this embodiment due to the vertical tilting of the propulsion unit 10.
  • the figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • Figure 3 shows another embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention.
  • This arrangement corresponds as such to that of Fig. 2 i.e. the propulsion unit 10 is tilted at an angle ⁇ in relation to the water line WL.
  • the difference is in the arrangement of the rudder 16.
  • the angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the shaft line SL i.e. the angle ⁇ is 90 degrees in this embodiment, which corresponds to the situation in Fig. 1 .
  • This means that the axis 17 of the rudder 16 has been tilted in relation to the water line WL, i.e. the angle ⁇ is more than 90 degrees.
  • the arrangement where the rudder 16 axis 17 forms a right angle with the shaft line SL is advantageous in respect of the flow generated by the propeller 15.
  • the figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • FIG. 4 shows a top view of a further embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention.
  • Each propulsion unit 10, 20 comprises a chamber 12, 22 connected with a support structure to the hull 100 of the ship, a propeller 15, 25 situated at the front end of the chamber 12, 22 being driven by an electric motor 13, 23 positioned in the chamber 12, 22.
  • a rudder 16, 26 is further situated at the rear end of the chamber 12, 22.
  • Each propulsion unit 10, 20 can either correspond to the propulsion unit shown in Fig. 2 or Fig. 3 .
  • each propulsion unit 10, 20 is vertically tilted in relation to the water line WL with the angle ⁇ as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 .
  • the arrangement of the rudder 16, 26 can be either that shown in Fig. 2 or that shown in Fig. 3 .
  • the figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • the shaft lines SL of the propulsion units 10, 20 are in this embodiment arranged in a toe-out position in relation to the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship.
  • the shaft lines SL form a horizontal tilt angle ⁇ with the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship so that the shaft lines SL will cross each other at a point on the center line CL of the hull of the ship, said crossing point being situated after the ship.
  • the front end of the chambers 12, 22 is inclined outwards (toe-out position) in relation to the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship and the back end of the chambers 12, 22 is inclined inwards in relation to the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship.
  • the toe-out angle ⁇ is in the range of 0.5 to 6 degrees.
  • the figure also shows a cargo tank 200 for liquefied natural gas (LNG) on the ship.
  • LNG liquefied natural gas
  • This toe-out arrangement of the propulsion units 10, 20 will further improve the water inflow angle to the propellers 15, 25.
  • This toe-out arrangement will improve efficiency and reduce vibrations in the hull and in the shaft.
  • the efficiency of the embodiment shown in fig. 2 is probably the same as that of the embodiment shown in fig. 3 .
  • the steerability of the ship might be a little bit better with the embodiment shown in fig. 2 compared to the embodiment shown in fig. 3 .
  • the embodiment shown in fig. 3 might on the other hand be better in view of processibility and product architecture as the tilt angle ⁇ is regulated with the installation angle of the product, but there is no need to modify the product itself in each project.
  • the product could on the other hand have a predetermined vertical tilt angle ⁇ of e.g. 4 degrees according to the arrangement shown in fig. 2 and the rest e.g. 2 degrees in a situation where the total vertical tilt angle ⁇ should be 6 degrees would then be achieved according to the arrangement shown in fig. 3 .
  • the vertical tilt angle ⁇ and the horizontal tilt angle ⁇ i.e. the toe-out angle have to be determined separately for each ship or series of ships.
  • the optimization of the vertical tilt angle ⁇ and the horizontal tilt angle ⁇ is done based on model test for each ship or series of ships. The optimization is done separately for the vertical tilt angle ⁇ and the horizontal tilt angle ⁇ .
  • the goal in the optimization is to minimize the fuel consumption i.e. to increase the efficiency. The best efficiency is normally achieved when the water inflow to the propeller is straight.
  • At least one generator (not shown in the figures) is provided within the hull 100 of the ship providing electric power to the electric motors 13, 23 in the propulsion units 10, 20 through an electric network (not shown in the figures).
  • the separate rudder 26 is in the figures pivotably supported at the hull 100 and at the chamber 22 of the propulsion unit 20.
  • the rudder 26 can be pivotably supported at the hull 100 and/or at the propulsion unit 20.
  • the rudder 26 can thus be pivotably supported only at the hollow support structure 21, or at the hull 100 and the hollow support structure 21, or at the hull 100 and the chamber 22, or at the chamber 21 and the hollow support structure 21.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Other Liquid Machine Or Engine Such As Wave Power Use (AREA)
  • Excavating Of Shafts Or Tunnels (AREA)
  • Actuator (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
  • Prevention Of Electric Corrosion (AREA)

Abstract

The propulsion arrangement comprises at least one propulsion unit (10) situated at the stem of the ship comprising a hull (100) having a horizontal water line (WL) and a center line (CL). The at least one propulsion unit (10) comprises a hollow support structure (11) attached to the hull, a chamber (12) attached to the support structure, an electric motor (13) within the chamber (12), a propeller (15) at the front end of the chamber (12), said propeller (15) being connected through a shaft to the electric motor (13), and a pivotably supported rudder (16) at the rear end of the chamber (12). The at least one propulsion unit (10) is mounted so that the shaft line (SL) forms a vertical tilt angle (α) in the range of 1 to 8 degrees in relation to the water line (WL) so that the front end of the chamber (22) is lower than the rear end of the chamber (22) in relation to the water line (WL).

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The invention relates to a propulsion arrangement in a ship according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • The arrangement is intended to be used in ships provided with at least one propulsion unit situated at the stem of the ship. The ship can either have only one propulsion unit situated at the stem of the ship or two parallel propulsion units situated at the stem of the ship on opposite sides of the center line of the hull of the ship. Propulsion units are used especially in large ships e.g. cruisers, tankers transporting oil or liquefied natural gas, vehicle carriers, container ships and ferries.
    • BACKGROUND ART
  • WO publication 98/54052 discloses a ship with twin propellers and twin Schilling rudders i.e. a respective rudder for each propeller. Each rudder is pivotably mounted by a respective shaft, has a bulbous nose portion, a waisted mid-portion and a flared tail. The flared tail flares outwardly substantially only on the inner side of each rudder i.e. the side which faces the other rudder pair. Each rudder has an upper plate and a lower plate with the plates much more extensive on the inner side than on the outer side, the plates being aligned with streamlines from the respective propeller and the lower plate having a downwardly angled portion on the inner side. The rudders seem to form some kind of a toe-out angle in relation to the centerline of the hull.
  • US patent 7,033,234 discloses a method for steering a planning V-bottomed boat with double individually steerable drive units with underwater housings, which extend down from the bottom of the boat. When running at planning speed straight ahead, the underwater housings are set with a so called toe-in angle, i.e. inclined towards each other with opposite angels of equal magnitude relative to the boat center line. When turning the boat, the inner drive unit is set with a greater steering angle than the outer drive unit.
  • JP patent publication 2006007937 discloses an arrangement in a ship with two pods with contra-rotating propellers situated at the stem of the ship. The first pod is in a first embodiment mounted stationary into the skeg so that the shaft line is inclined upwards. The second pod is fastened by means of a horizontal axis to a steering table, which steering table rotates around a vertical axis and which steering table can be lowered and raised by means of hydraulic cylinders. The shaft line of the second pod is aligned with the shaft line of the first pod. The rear end of the first pod is in a second embodiment fastened with a horizontal axis to the skeg and the front end of the first pod is fastened to a vertical cylinder. The inclination of the first pod can thus be adjusted with the cylinder. Both pods are in a third embodiment fastened to opposite ends of a common frame, which frame is supported from the middle part a horizontal axis to a steering table, which steering table rotates around a vertical axis and which steering table can be lowered and raised by means of hydraulic cylinders. There is no separate rudder in this arrangement and the steering of the ship is done by rotating either only the second pod situated after the first pod in the driving direction of the ship around a vertical axis or by rotating both pods around a vertical axis.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The object of the invention is to improve prior art propulsion arrangements in ships.
  • The propulsion arrangement according to the invention is characterized by the features in the characterizing portion of claim 1.
  • The propulsion arrangement comprises at least one propulsion unit situated at the stem of the ship. The ship comprises a hull having a horizontal water line. The at least one propulsion unit comprises a hollow support structure attached to the hull, a chamber attached to the support structure, an electric motor within the chamber, a propeller at the front end of the chamber, said propeller being connected by means of a shaft to the electric motor, and a pivotably supported rudder at the rear end of the chamber.
  • The at least one propulsion unit is according to the invention mounted so that the shaft line forms a vertical tilt angle in the range of 1 to 8 degrees in relation to the water line so that the front end of the chamber is lower than the rear end of the chamber in relation to the water line.
  • The vertical tilt angle of the at least one propulsion unit improves the water inflow angle to the propeller, which improves the efficiency of the propeller.
  • The vertical tilt angle of the at least one propulsion unit also reduces noise and vibrations in the hull of the ship, which are due to cavitation as the improved inflow angle to the propeller reduces cavitation.
  • The vertical tilt angle of the at least one propulsion unit also reduces shaft line vibrations and forces. This is due to the fact that there are less asymmetric forces acting on the propeller when the water inflow angle to the propeller is improved. Reduced loads and vibrations will increase the lifetime of the bearings of the shaft as well as other components affected by these vibrations and forces.
  • The invention can advantageously be used in a ship having two propulsion units situated side by side at opposite sides of the center line of the ship at the stem of the ship. Each propulsion unit is advantageously mounted in a toe-out position forming a horizontal tilt angle in the range of 0.5 to 6 degrees in relation to the center line of the hull. The front end of the chamber is thus inclined away from the center line of the hull of the ship and the rear end of the chamber is inclined towards the center line of the hull of the ship.
  • This toe-out arrangement of the propulsion units will further improve the efficiency of the propellers and reduce noise and vibrations in the hull of the ship.
  • The invention can be used in large ships provided with at least one propulsion unit at the stem of the ship, e.g. cruisers, tankers transporting oil or liquefied natural gas, vehicle carriers, container ships and ferries. The power of the propulsion unit in such large ships is in the order of at least 1 MW.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Some specific embodiments of the invention are described in the following in detail with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
    • Figure 1 shows a prior art propulsion arrangement.
    • Figure 2 shows one embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention.
    • Figure 3 shows another embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention.
    • Figure 4 shows a top view of a further embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SOME SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
  • Figure 1 shows a prior art propulsion arrangement. The arrangement comprises a propulsion unit 10 situated at the stem of the ship. The propulsion unit 10 comprises a support structure 11, a chamber 12, an electric motor 13, a shaft 14, a propeller 15 and a rudder 16. The chamber 12 is connected with the hollow support structure 11 to the hull 100 of the ship. The shaft 14 has a first end which is connected to the electric motor 13 and a second end protruding from the front end of the chamber 12 and being connected to the propeller 15. The propeller 15 is thus situated at the front end of the chamber 12. The electric motor 13 can be an induction motor or a synchronous motor. The propulsion unit 10 is fixed to the hull 100 of the vessel with the support structure 12. This means that the propeller 15 will remain in a fixed position in relation the hull 100 of the vessel all the time. A rudder 16 is situated at the back end of the chamber 12. The rudder 16 is pivotably connected to the hull 100 and the chamber 12 by means of an axis 17. The rudder 16 is formed so that it forms a smooth continuation of the support structure 11 and the chamber 12. The lower part of the rudder 16 extends at a distance below the chamber 12. A steering gear, which is not shown in the figure, rotates the rudder 16 based on the commands from the navigation bridge. The figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • The shaft 14 forms a shaft line SL of the propulsion unit 10. The shaft line SL and the water line WL are parallel, which means that the angle α between them is 0 degrees. The angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the shaft line SL i.e. the angle γ is 90 degrees. The angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the water line WL i.e. the angle δ is also 90 degrees.
  • Figure 1 also shows the flow lines F of the water flowing to the propulsion unit 10. It can be seen from the figure that the flow lines F do not enter the propeller 15 of the propulsion unit 10 at an optimum angle. This weakens the hydrodynamic efficiency of the propeller 15.
  • Figure 2 shows one embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention. The propulsion unit 10 corresponds as such to the propulsion unit shown in Fig. 1. The difference compared to the arrangement shown in Fig. 1 is that the shaft line SL of the propulsion unit 10 forms a vertical tilt angle α in relation to the water line WL. This means that the front end of the chamber 12 is lower than the back end of the chamber 12 in relation to the water line WL. The angle of the water flow F entering the propeller 15 will be improved when the propulsion unit 10 is vertically tilted. This means that the hydrodynamic efficiency of the propeller 15 will be improved. The angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the water line WL i.e. the angle δ is still 90 degrees as in figure 1. The angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the shaft line SL i.e. the angle γ is, however, less than 90 degrees in this embodiment due to the vertical tilting of the propulsion unit 10. The figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • Figure 3 shows another embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention. This arrangement corresponds as such to that of Fig. 2 i.e. the propulsion unit 10 is tilted at an angle α in relation to the water line WL. The difference is in the arrangement of the rudder 16. The angle between the axis 17 of the rudder 16 and the shaft line SL i.e. the angle γ is 90 degrees in this embodiment, which corresponds to the situation in Fig. 1. This means that the axis 17 of the rudder 16 has been tilted in relation to the water line WL, i.e. the angle δ is more than 90 degrees. The arrangement where the rudder 16 axis 17 forms a right angle with the shaft line SL is advantageous in respect of the flow generated by the propeller 15. The figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • Figure 4 shows a top view of a further embodiment of a propulsion arrangement according to the invention. There are two propulsion units 10, 20 situated side by side at each side of the center line CL of the hull 100 at the stem of the ship. Each propulsion unit 10, 20 comprises a chamber 12, 22 connected with a support structure to the hull 100 of the ship, a propeller 15, 25 situated at the front end of the chamber 12, 22 being driven by an electric motor 13, 23 positioned in the chamber 12, 22. A rudder 16, 26 is further situated at the rear end of the chamber 12, 22. Each propulsion unit 10, 20 can either correspond to the propulsion unit shown in Fig. 2 or Fig. 3. This means that each propulsion unit 10, 20 is vertically tilted in relation to the water line WL with the angle α as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The arrangement of the rudder 16, 26 can be either that shown in Fig. 2 or that shown in Fig. 3. The figure also shows the driving direction S of the ship.
  • The shaft lines SL of the propulsion units 10, 20 are in this embodiment arranged in a toe-out position in relation to the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship. The shaft lines SL form a horizontal tilt angle β with the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship so that the shaft lines SL will cross each other at a point on the center line CL of the hull of the ship, said crossing point being situated after the ship. The front end of the chambers 12, 22 is inclined outwards (toe-out position) in relation to the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship and the back end of the chambers 12, 22 is inclined inwards in relation to the center line CL of the hull 100 of the ship. The toe-out angle β is in the range of 0.5 to 6 degrees. The figure also shows a cargo tank 200 for liquefied natural gas (LNG) on the ship.
  • This toe-out arrangement of the propulsion units 10, 20 will further improve the water inflow angle to the propellers 15, 25. This toe-out arrangement will improve efficiency and reduce vibrations in the hull and in the shaft.
  • The efficiency of the embodiment shown in fig. 2 is probably the same as that of the embodiment shown in fig. 3. The steerability of the ship might be a little bit better with the embodiment shown in fig. 2 compared to the embodiment shown in fig. 3. The embodiment shown in fig. 3 might on the other hand be better in view of processibility and product architecture as the tilt angle α is regulated with the installation angle of the product, but there is no need to modify the product itself in each project. The product could on the other hand have a predetermined vertical tilt angle α of e.g. 4 degrees according to the arrangement shown in fig. 2 and the rest e.g. 2 degrees in a situation where the total vertical tilt angle α should be 6 degrees would then be achieved according to the arrangement shown in fig. 3.
  • The vertical tilt angle α and the horizontal tilt angle β i.e. the toe-out angle have to be determined separately for each ship or series of ships. The optimization of the vertical tilt angle α and the horizontal tilt angle β is done based on model test for each ship or series of ships. The optimization is done separately for the vertical tilt angle α and the horizontal tilt angle β. The goal in the optimization is to minimize the fuel consumption i.e. to increase the efficiency. The best efficiency is normally achieved when the water inflow to the propeller is straight.
  • At least one generator (not shown in the figures) is provided within the hull 100 of the ship providing electric power to the electric motors 13, 23 in the propulsion units 10, 20 through an electric network (not shown in the figures).
  • The separate rudder 26 is in the figures pivotably supported at the hull 100 and at the chamber 22 of the propulsion unit 20. The rudder 26 can be pivotably supported at the hull 100 and/or at the propulsion unit 20. The rudder 26 can thus be pivotably supported only at the hollow support structure 21, or at the hull 100 and the hollow support structure 21, or at the hull 100 and the chamber 22, or at the chamber 21 and the hollow support structure 21.
  • The examples of the embodiments of the present invention presented above are not intended to limit the scope of the invention only to these embodiments. Several modifications can be made to the invention within the scope of the claims.

Claims (4)

  1. A propulsion arrangement in a ship comprising a hull (100) having a horizontal water line (WL) and a center line (CL), said propulsion arrangement comprising:
    - at least one stationary propulsion unit (10, 20) situated at the stem of the hull (100),
    - said at least one propulsion unit (10, 20) comprising:
    - a hollow support structure (11) being attached to the hull (100),
    - a chamber (12) having a front end and a rear end, said chamber (12) being attached to the support structure (11),
    - an electric motor (13) within the chamber (12),
    - a shaft (14) having a first end and a second end, said first end of the shaft (14) being connected to the electric motor (13) and said second end of the shaft (14) protruding from the front end of the chamber (12) and being connected to a propeller (15), the centre axis of said shaft (14) forming a shaft line (SL), and
    - a pivotably supported rudder (16) at the rear end of the chamber (12), characterized in that:
    - the at least one propulsion unit (10, 20) is mounted so that the shaft line (SL) forms a vertical tilt angle (α) in the range of 1 to 8 degrees in relation to the water line (WL) so that the front end of the chamber (22) is lower than the rear end of the chamber (22) in relation to the water line (WL).
  2. A propulsion arrangement according to claim 1, characterized in that the propulsion arrangement comprises two stationary propulsion units (10, 20) situated side by side on opposite sides of the center line (CL) of the hull (100) of the ship at the stem of the ship, each propulsion unit (10, 20) being mounted so that:
    - the shaft line (SL) forms a vertical tilt angle (α) in the range of 1 to 8 degrees in relation to the water line (WL) so that the front end of the chamber (22) is lower than the rear end of the chamber (22) in relation to the water line (WL), and
    - the shaft line (SL) forms a horizontal tilt angle (β) in the range of 0.5 to 6 degrees in relation to the center line (CL) of the hull (100) of the ship so that the front end of the chamber (22) is inclined away from the center line (CL) and the rear end of the chamber (22) is inclined towards the center line (CL).
  3. A propulsion arrangement according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the ship is a cruiser, a tanker transporting oil or liquefied natural gas, a vehicle carrier, a container ship or a ferry.
  4. A propulsion arrangement according to any of claims 1-3, characterized in that the power of the at least one propulsion unit (10, 20) is at least 1MW.
EP11169720.7A 2011-06-14 2011-06-14 A propulsion arrangement in a ship Active EP2535262B1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11169720.7A EP2535262B1 (en) 2011-06-14 2011-06-14 A propulsion arrangement in a ship
RU2014100896/11A RU2544250C1 (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 Ship propulsion unit
JP2014515175A JP2014516865A (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 Ship propulsion configuration
CA2838782A CA2838782A1 (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 A propulsion arrangement in a ship
PCT/EP2012/061190 WO2012171952A1 (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 A propulsion arrangement in a ship
BR112013031988A BR112013031988A2 (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 propulsion arrangement on a ship
SG2013089453A SG195282A1 (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 A propulsion arrangement in a ship
KR1020137032897A KR20140007013A (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 A propulsion arrangement in a ship
CN201280029078.5A CN103596839A (en) 2011-06-14 2012-06-13 A propulsion arrangement in a ship
US14/107,469 US20140179178A1 (en) 2011-06-14 2013-12-16 Propulsion arrangement in a ship

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11169720.7A EP2535262B1 (en) 2011-06-14 2011-06-14 A propulsion arrangement in a ship

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2535262A1 true EP2535262A1 (en) 2012-12-19
EP2535262B1 EP2535262B1 (en) 2015-12-30

Family

ID=44904676

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11169720.7A Active EP2535262B1 (en) 2011-06-14 2011-06-14 A propulsion arrangement in a ship

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US20140179178A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2535262B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2014516865A (en)
KR (1) KR20140007013A (en)
CN (1) CN103596839A (en)
BR (1) BR112013031988A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2838782A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2544250C1 (en)
SG (1) SG195282A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012171952A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014121928A (en) * 2012-12-20 2014-07-03 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Swinging propeller and marine vessel
CN105584586A (en) * 2016-03-08 2016-05-18 上海船舶研究设计院 Small-size LNG transport ship tail structure propelled by double full-circle-swinging rotary pull type propellers

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104386231A (en) * 2014-11-05 2015-03-04 上海船舶研究设计院 Rudder-pod ship electric propulsion system
US10894590B2 (en) * 2016-05-18 2021-01-19 Abb Oy Method and a control arrangement for controlling vibrations of a propulsion unit of a vessel
EP3478569B1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2020-09-02 ABB Oy A propulsion unit provided with a steering arrangement
CN109436269A (en) * 2018-12-06 2019-03-08 无锡瑞风船用推进器有限公司 A kind of full circle swinging steering engine paddle for wind-powered electricity generation O&M ship
US11208190B1 (en) 2020-06-23 2021-12-28 Brunswick Corporation Stern drives having breakaway lower gearcase
USD1026955S1 (en) 2020-06-23 2024-05-14 Brunswick Corporation Stern drive
CN112124543B (en) * 2020-09-23 2021-10-22 宜昌一凡船舶设计有限公司 Ship propeller-rudder combined vortex-eliminating energy-saving device and installation method
CN112124542B (en) * 2020-09-23 2022-04-15 宜昌一凡船舶设计有限公司 Ship hydrodynamic comprehensive energy-saving device and installation method
CN112141291B (en) * 2020-10-09 2022-05-06 中船澄西扬州船舶有限公司 Flange machining and mounting process of ship full-rotation pod propeller
CN116748725A (en) * 2023-05-26 2023-09-15 南通中远海运船务工程有限公司 Processing and mounting method for offshore wind power operation and maintenance stern propeller base

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5632658A (en) * 1996-05-21 1997-05-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Tractor podded propulsor for surface ships
WO1998054052A1 (en) 1997-05-28 1998-12-03 Hamworthy Marine Technology Ltd. Propulsion and steering arrangements of ships
US6322406B1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2001-11-27 Bombardier Motor Corporation Of America Dual electric motor marine propulsion system
EP1574425A2 (en) * 2000-01-28 2005-09-14 ABB Oy A motor unit for a ship
JP2006007937A (en) 2004-06-24 2006-01-12 National Maritime Research Institute Contra-rotating pod propeller ship
US7033234B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2006-04-25 Ab Volvo Penta Method of steering a boat with double outboard drives and boat having double outboard drives
WO2009126096A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-15 Rolls-Royce Aktiebolag A method of providing a ship with a large diameter screw propeller and a ship having a large diameter screw propeller
US20100064959A1 (en) * 2008-09-16 2010-03-18 Bill Wen-Chang Huang Ship hull structure and a method of operating the ship

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB703777A (en) * 1951-05-10 1954-02-10 Pleuger K G Improvements in driving mechanism for ships and the like
DE2439974A1 (en) * 1974-08-21 1976-03-04 Tt Linie Gmbh & Co Twin screw marine propulsion - with converging shafts and rear mounted thrust bearings with lateral stability
US4550673A (en) * 1983-06-02 1985-11-05 Sigurdur Ingvason Hull construction for seagoing vessels
JPS6052198U (en) * 1983-09-20 1985-04-12 三井造船株式会社 Marine propulsion device
SE459249B (en) * 1987-12-09 1989-06-19 Kamewa Ab COMBINED ROOTER AND PROPELLER DEVICE
JPH07121717B2 (en) * 1992-08-07 1995-12-25 川崎重工業株式会社 Marine counter-rotating propeller
FI96590B (en) * 1992-09-28 1996-04-15 Kvaerner Masa Yards Oy Ship's propulsion device
US5417597A (en) * 1994-04-28 1995-05-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Vessel with machinery modules outside watertight hull
FI107042B (en) * 1998-09-14 2001-05-31 Abb Azipod Oy Turning a propulsion unit
FI110254B (en) * 2000-09-25 2002-12-31 Abb Oy Arrangement of the installation of the ship's propulsion system and its associated method and equipment
NO317226B1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2004-09-20 Moss Maritime As Propeller shaft arrangement
FI116129B (en) * 2003-04-07 2005-09-30 Waertsilae Finland Oy Watercraft Propulsion Unit
JP2005178721A (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-07-07 Asakawa Zosen Kk Stern shape with stern-up type propeller shaft
RU2276040C1 (en) * 2004-11-29 2006-05-10 Анатолий Александрович Кеслер Ship's propulsor-rudder complex
US20110223818A1 (en) * 2008-08-27 2011-09-15 Rollsroyce Ab Bearings for Pod Propulsion System
EP2163472B1 (en) * 2008-09-12 2015-08-26 Wärtsilä Netherlands B.V. Propulsion and steering arrangement
EP2535263B1 (en) * 2011-06-14 2014-10-29 ABB Oy A propulsion arrangement in a ship

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5632658A (en) * 1996-05-21 1997-05-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Tractor podded propulsor for surface ships
WO1998054052A1 (en) 1997-05-28 1998-12-03 Hamworthy Marine Technology Ltd. Propulsion and steering arrangements of ships
EP1574425A2 (en) * 2000-01-28 2005-09-14 ABB Oy A motor unit for a ship
US6322406B1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2001-11-27 Bombardier Motor Corporation Of America Dual electric motor marine propulsion system
US7033234B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2006-04-25 Ab Volvo Penta Method of steering a boat with double outboard drives and boat having double outboard drives
JP2006007937A (en) 2004-06-24 2006-01-12 National Maritime Research Institute Contra-rotating pod propeller ship
WO2009126096A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-15 Rolls-Royce Aktiebolag A method of providing a ship with a large diameter screw propeller and a ship having a large diameter screw propeller
US20100064959A1 (en) * 2008-09-16 2010-03-18 Bill Wen-Chang Huang Ship hull structure and a method of operating the ship

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014121928A (en) * 2012-12-20 2014-07-03 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Swinging propeller and marine vessel
CN105584586A (en) * 2016-03-08 2016-05-18 上海船舶研究设计院 Small-size LNG transport ship tail structure propelled by double full-circle-swinging rotary pull type propellers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112013031988A2 (en) 2016-12-20
US20140179178A1 (en) 2014-06-26
EP2535262B1 (en) 2015-12-30
CN103596839A (en) 2014-02-19
CA2838782A1 (en) 2012-12-20
RU2544250C1 (en) 2015-03-20
SG195282A1 (en) 2013-12-30
WO2012171952A1 (en) 2012-12-20
KR20140007013A (en) 2014-01-16
JP2014516865A (en) 2014-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2535262B1 (en) A propulsion arrangement in a ship
US9073615B2 (en) Propulsion arrangement in a ship
US7452253B2 (en) Propulsion system of marine vessel
US8459198B2 (en) Bouyant hull extension providing lateral and longitudinal control for lightweight hulls
CA2735041C (en) Single drive catamaran hull
CN101559828B (en) Finned rudder
CN102015438B (en) A method of providing a ship with a large diameter screw propeller and a ship having a large diameter screw propeller
CN101389529A (en) Semi-submerged propeller propulsion system of displacement and semi-diplacement crafts
EP2259963B1 (en) A method of providing a ship with a large diameter screw propeller and a ship having a large diameter screw propeller
KR20140038217A (en) Propeller system for vessel
EP3424809B1 (en) Large displacement hull ship
AU2012269115A1 (en) A propulsion arrangement in a ship
CN105730603A (en) Stern structure for internal rotation double-paddle ship
US20220250717A1 (en) Pontoon boat with hull extension
CN102398671A (en) Lift propeller ship
EP2626290B1 (en) Propulsion arrangement in a ship
Yun et al. Catamarans and Multihull Craft
House Ship Handling: Equipment
CN101962071A (en) Nozzle propeller for ships
JP2019098804A (en) Rudder
JPH0510190U (en) Composite support type super high speed ship

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130618

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20130808

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150630

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 767321

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011022197

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160330

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 767321

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160331

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160430

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160502

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011022197

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20161003

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160614

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160614

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230620

Year of fee payment: 13