EP2399237A1 - Verfahren zum messen eines objekts - Google Patents
Verfahren zum messen eines objektsInfo
- Publication number
- EP2399237A1 EP2399237A1 EP10708956A EP10708956A EP2399237A1 EP 2399237 A1 EP2399237 A1 EP 2399237A1 EP 10708956 A EP10708956 A EP 10708956A EP 10708956 A EP10708956 A EP 10708956A EP 2399237 A1 EP2399237 A1 EP 2399237A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- workpiece
- detector
- rotation
- axis
- pixels
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 149
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 159
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 114
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims description 109
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 92
- 238000002591 computed tomography Methods 0.000 claims description 63
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 42
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000012952 Resampling Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000003325 tomography Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012067 mathematical method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000003702 image correction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005253 cladding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010438 granite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013208 measuring procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010972 statistical evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007306 turnover Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
- G01N23/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
- G01N23/046—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material using tomography, e.g. computed tomography [CT]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B15/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electromagnetic waves or particle radiation, e.g. by the use of microwaves, X-rays, gamma rays or electrons
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
- G06T11/005—Specific pre-processing for tomographic reconstruction, e.g. calibration, source positioning, rebinning, scatter correction, retrospective gating
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
- G01N2223/30—Accessories, mechanical or electrical features
- G01N2223/33—Accessories, mechanical or electrical features scanning, i.e. relative motion for measurement of successive object-parts
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
- G01N2223/40—Imaging
- G01N2223/419—Imaging computed tomograph
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2223/00—Investigating materials by wave or particle radiation
- G01N2223/60—Specific applications or type of materials
- G01N2223/66—Specific applications or type of materials multiple steps inspection, e.g. coarse/fine
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for determining structures and / or geometry of an object or measuring an object such as a workpiece by means of a measuring system, preferably computer tomographic measuring system and for correcting projection data for a CT reconstruction using a CT detector with pixels , In the CT measurement of a workpiece, it is arranged on an axis of rotation between an X-ray source emitting X-ray radiation and an X-ray detector receiving the X-ray radiation.
- the invention also relates to an arrangement for determining structures and / or geometry of an object by means of a measuring system, preferably a computed tomographic measuring system, comprising at least one radiation source, at least one radiation detector and at least one axis of rotation.
- EP 1415179 B1 describes a method in which the transmission lengths are determined iteratively from the artifact-laden 3D voxel data of a device under test resulting from complete projection data. All artefacts Facts are taken into account in the form of a beam hardening correction. A single characteristic curve is determined from the measurement results of all pixels of the detector.
- Object of the present invention is to develop a method of the type mentioned in such a way that an effective correction of artifacts in CT measurements.
- the object is essentially achieved by the measures of claim 1 in that different characteristic curves are used for the correction of the measured values of the individual pixels or groups of pixels of the CT detector used.
- the different metrological properties of the individual pixels of the detector used to determine the attenuation values during the irradiation of the test object are taken into account.
- a plurality of characteristic curves are determined which describe the relationship between irradiated component length and attenuation value on the detector.
- the geometry of the workpiece is additionally taken into account in the characteristic curves.
- the characteristics in the different rotational positions of the measurement object are adapted to the transmission geometry, ie not only the transmission length, but the sequence of the different materials in the transmission direction is taken into account.
- the Order of the characteristic curves to the individual detector pixels takes place on the workpiece introduced in the CT measuring system.
- the determination of the geometry of the workpiece which is necessary for determining the correction characteristics, can be performed, for example, by B. iteratively from the complete projection data or after alignment with CAD data using these can be determined, as already described in the prior art.
- the advantage of the procedure described lies in the consideration of the different metrological properties of the individual pixels of the detector, but also the differentiated consideration of beam hardening and scattered radiation, absorption in the component, as well as diffraction and refraction effects.
- the method makes it possible to carry the individual characteristic curves perpendicular to the direction of transmission (eg in spiral tomography) even during a lateral movement of the measurement object. It is taken into account that the line integrals characterizing the radiation absorption are determined by different pixels along a transmission direction in the different lateral positions.
- the consideration of the artifacts by scattered radiation, absorption, diffraction and refraction effects can, for example, take place in that the characteristic curves contain one or more parameters which take into account the geometry (material sequence) characteristic in the present transmission direction. This can be, for example, the weighted average transmission length of the individual material sections or another contrast ratio formed therefrom. Further analytical correction correlations can be determined, for example, with the aid of simulations.
- the different metrological properties of the individual pixels or groups of pixels and / or artifacts in the computertomographic image are determined to determine the individual characteristic curves.
- the metrological properties of the individual pixels or groups of pixels represent the relationship between the received beam power and the output beam This can vary for individual pixels or groups of pixels due to different offset values, ie sensor signals in the absence of irradiation, and / or different sensitivity.
- the influences of artifacts can be taken into account in the characteristic curves by determining the transmission lengths assigned to the individual pixels or groups of pixels and / or the geometry of the workpiece in the various rotational positions for recording the various projection data during the CT measurement.
- each measured beam intensity I is not only assigned a single transmission length L, but depending on the initially roughly known transmission length and / or geometry of the workpiece a correction is stored, which results from the measured intensity allows the determination of the correct radiographic length.
- the deposit can take the form of analytical descriptions or look-up tables.
- the determination of the transmission length and / or the geometry of the workpiece in the various rotational positions is based on almost completely present projection data and / or on the basis of a CAD model.
- the invention provides that the determination of the different metrological properties of the individual pixels or groups of pixels, in particular the sensitivity and the offset, takes place on the basis of the determination of radiographic images without and with measurement objects of known properties, in particular the geometry.
- one or more parameters are derived, which are taken into account in the characteristic curves.
- the parameters taken into account in the characteristic curves serve to adapt to the present characteristic geometry in the respective transmission direction. This is to take into account that a given workpiece has different directions of transmission in different rotational positions and thus the influencing of the characteristic imposed on the correction of artifacts takes place to different degrees.
- the aforementioned parameter can also take into account the material sequence.
- scattered radiation occurs increasingly when there is a frequent change between different materials.
- a contrast along the direction of transmission In order to analytically detect the number of subsequent materials, it is possible, for example, to determine a contrast along the direction of transmission. This is to record the number of material changes. If the frequency of the material changes is related to the overall transmission length, a conclusion can be drawn on the intensity of the influence of the measured beam intensity at the end of the irradiated length. In particular, stray radiation is distributed over a larger width, for example, and causes lower intensity changes for the pixels additionally exposed to the scattered radiation, the greater the transmission length. According to a development, it is provided that different correction characteristics are determined and used as a function of the rotational position and / or the position of the workpiece.
- the effects of artifacts are taken into account in the characteristic curves by determining common or different correction values for the individual pixels or groups of pixels of the inserted CT detector on the basis of at least one radiographic image of the workpiece in at least one rotational position and / or position.
- correction values for the individual pixels ie correction lengths, can be determined. In particular, for adjacent pixels, these correction lengths may be the same.
- the correction values for the then affected pixels can be taken over in part, but the potentially deviating physical or metrological properties of the then affected pixel must be taken into account.
- the measured values of pixels of the CT detector can be used to determine the correction, which are largely influenced by the parts of the emitted X-ray radiation of the X-ray source, which do not run on a direct, straight line path through the workpiece.
- the selection of the pixels whose measured values are used to determine the correction takes place in that at least one transmission image of the workpiece is compared with at least one transmission image without a workpiece and all or a part of the pixels are selected based on the comparison, which in the transmission image with the measurement object have higher measured intensity than in the transmission image without a measuring object, or that the selection of the pixels whose measured values are used for correction, within the transmission image with workpiece done by at least one pixel which is influenced solely by parts of the emitted X-radiation of the X-ray source, not pass through the workpiece is compared with at least one pixel having a higher measured intensity.
- correction values determined on the basis of the selected pixels are equally applied to the characteristics of all the pixels which receive x-ray radiation which passes directly from the x-ray source through the workpiece or which correction depends on the individual pixels or Groups of pixels associated radiographic lengths and / or geometry and / or material sequence of the workpiece in the various rotational position and / or positions takes place.
- This valid area is the area on the detector that contains those pixels that receive radiation that has passed directly through the object under test. For all these pixels an equal scattered radiation overlay is assumed, which is thus corrected equally for all these pixels. Lying within the valid range Liehe transmission lengths or material sequences, so the previously described and certain correction can still be adjusted accordingly.
- measured values of the pixels used to determine the correction are determined and / or combined in one or more different positions of the workpiece between the x-ray source and the x-ray detector, in particular in different magnification settings, and applied in different magnification settings , z. B. by the use of interpolation.
- measured values of the pixels which are used to determine the correction in one or more different positions of the workpiece between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector and a plurality of different positions of the X-ray source with respect to the X-ray detector S are determined and / or combined and applied in one or different magnification settings, for. B. by the use of interpolation.
- the cone beam angle, the radiation used to irradiate the workpiece is significantly reduced.
- a development of the invention provides that different correction characteristics in dependence on the rotational position of the workpiece and / or the position of the workpiece, wherein the position of the workpiece between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector in the direction of the main beam axis of the X-radiation may change and / or perpendicular to this can be determined and used to enable rasterization.
- the artifact correction determined for the original pixel can be transferred to the now affected pixel and superimposed with the correction correcting the deviating metrological properties.
- the selection and assignment of the respective characteristic curve for the individual detector pixels and / or groups of pixels can take place in the respective rotational positions or positions of the workpiece by alignment on the workpiece.
- the correction of the characteristic curves of the individual pixels or groups of pixels of the radiation detector during the development of take the different radiographic images in the different rotational positions and / or positions of the workpiece or after recording the complete set of radiographic images is done.
- CT reconstruction takes place for a CT measuring system which is part of a coordinate measuring machine.
- drift movements of the focal spot of the X-ray tube occurring due to heating of the X-ray tube are currently being reduced, in which a corresponding heating and thus shrinkage of the CT system must be awaited.
- methods are known in which a fixed additional measuring body is introduced into the X-ray path, on the basis of which imaging on the CT detector the drift of the focal spot can be corrected.
- a further aspect of the present invention is based on the object, a method of the type mentioned in such a way that with little metrological effort and basically without the use of calibration the projection data can be corrected.
- the invention essentially provides that relative movement occurring between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector during the measuring procedure is corrected by information obtained beforehand. It is hereby proposed in particular that a transmission image of the workpiece to be measured or a plurality of transmission images of the workpiece to be measured be recorded in different rotational positions and / or different positions with respect to the X-ray source and / or the X-ray detector as advance information.
- a correction is made on the basis of previously recorded radiographic images of a significantly smaller number than radiographic images used for the measurement directly on the same measurement object.
- a method for correcting the displacements occurring between the X-ray source and the focal spot of the X-ray source and the X-ray detector or the workpiece during the CT measurement is proposed.
- one or more pre-radiographic images of the workpiece or parts of the workpiece, such as individual features, are initially recorded.
- only a few radiographic images are recorded in the few different rotational position.
- a shift or scaling deviations can be detected and corrected, for example, with the aid of correlation methods. This can e.g.
- the transmission images used for the measurement, for which there is no pre-radiation image, are corrected by means of interpolation methods from pre-recorded radiographic images of adjacent rotational positions of the workpiece.
- the advantage of the procedure described lies in the saving of fixed additional radiographic bodies for determining the drift of the focal spot, since these drift bodies are subject to drift phenomena during the measurement and can also restrict the measuring range of the CT system. Due to the low The number of radiation images to be photographed in advance for the purpose of correcting the radiographic images determined during the actual measurement results in a very short measuring time in the preliminary recordings, as a result of which drifting phenomena of the focal spot are minimized. Compared to the actual measurement, in which between about 100 - 1600 radiographic images are distributed over a full or half circle, pre-radiographic images are recorded only in possibly also unevenly distributed steps of about 5 ° to 20 ° degree. Likewise, a correction of the drift can also be generated on the basis of a single radiographic image, for example by repeatedly determining a radiographic image in this position at the beginning and end, but also at any other arbitrary point in time during the measurement.
- the number of pre-recorded radiographic images will be significantly less, typically 20 to 70, than the number of radiographic images needed for the measurement, typically 100 to 1,600.
- the correction takes place on the basis of a pre-recorded radiographic image by taking place at one or more arbitrary during the measurement process time selectable re-measurement of the workpiece to be measured in the rotational position and position in which would take the advance on was determined.
- the invention is also characterized in that the determination of the correction data for the individual transmission images used for the measurement can be carried out by comparison, for example with the aid of correlation methods, with the previously recorded transmission images, and on the comparison based displacement and / or scaling, preferably by Re -Sampling method, the individual used for the measurement radiographic images, sharing these radiographic images or one or more features within these radiographic images.
- transmission images for which there is no pre-radiation image in the same rotational position of the workpiece can be corrected by using the information from pre-transmission images which have been recorded in adjacent rotational positions, preferably by the use of interpolation.
- the displacement and / or scaling based on the comparison of the previously determined radiographic images and the radiographic images used for the measurement is used to determine the relative position between the x-ray source and / or the x-ray detector and / or the workpiece during the To correct the measuring run by positioning.
- the correction method is used for a CT measuring system which is part of a coordinate measuring machine.
- This is in particular a multi-sensor coordinate measuring machine.
- EP-A-1 415 179 describes a method for the iterative correction of corresponding error influences, also called artifact.
- a first rough reconstruction is first generated from the still distorted radiographic images. From this, lengths are calculated with which a characteristic correction of the transmission images is carried out. Subsequently, an accurate reconstruction of the measurement results.
- the disadvantage of the first two methods is that no traceable measurement results are used in determining the correction values. The achievable accuracy is thereby severely limited.
- the disadvantage of the last-mentioned method is that all surfaces necessary for a subsequent evaluation must be additionally measured individually at least for one sample workpiece. This results in a considerable measurement effort, which limits the application for economic reasons only a few features to be measured with high accuracy.
- a further object of the present invention is, on the one hand, to avoid the disadvantages of the above-mentioned methods and, on the other hand, to achieve a considerable improvement in the accuracy of the reconstruction results obtained.
- the object is essentially achieved by correcting the radiographic images by subjecting the radiographic images to a characteristic correction in which calibrated lengths obtained by calibration measurements on the same workpiece are taken into account.
- the measurements for the calibration of the calibrated lengths are carried out with the aid of coordinate measuring machines.
- the measurements for the determination of the calibrated lengths are carried out by a multi-sensor coordinate measuring machine, in which a sensor system for X-ray computer tomography is integrated.
- a particularly noteworthy embodiment of the invention provides that the transmission lengths evaluated for determining the correction characteristic are distributed as evenly as possible from 0 to the maximum transmission length of the corresponding workpiece.
- the transmission lengths evaluated for determining the correction characteristic can be determined in different rotational positions of the workpiece in the computed tomography beam path.
- the characteristic correction be determined by comparison between the characteristic curve representing the relationship between transmission length and measured beam intensity and the transmission lengths assigned to the measured beam intensities and determined using the calibration measurements.
- the invention is characterized in that the correction characteristic curve is determined by interpolating the transmission lengths and associated transmission values between the calibrated values and / or by extrapolation above and / or below the calibrated values.
- the characteristic curve correction should be based on analytical functions and / or discrete look-up tables.
- the determination of the calibrated lengths by preferably optical or tactile measurements of the entry and exit point of a portion of the invasive radiation (beam) on the workpiece and / or by determining the entry and exit point by mathematical combination of preferably optically or tactilely measured Compensating elements, preferably planes or cylinders, takes place in the region of the respective puncture points through the workpiece surface.
- the orientation of the workpiece should be based on the measured rule geometry elements and / or by fitting parts of the workpiece and / or the entire workpiece.
- the solution of the object on which the invention is based can essentially be achieved by accurately measuring individual typical lengths on the workpiece to be measured by additional measurements with a coordinate measuring machine or additional sensors integrated into the coordinate measuring device with computed tomography.
- These individual "calibrated" lengths correspond to transmission lengths (on the connecting line between the X-ray source and the sensor element) using the 2D tomography and a first rough reconstruction of all transmission lengths using the calibrated transmission lengths Correction of the 2D transmission images describing the relationship between the attenuation values determined from the sensor signals of the 2D transmission images, for example in the form of gray values, and the irradiated component lengths Radiation lengths defined.
- the calibration of the corresponding transmission lengths can basically be done in two ways. On the one hand, it is possible to touch the imaginary entry and exit point of the corresponding beam on the workpiece optically or tactually directly. Alternatively, it is likewise conceivable to measure compensation elements in the region of the respective puncture points through the workpiece surface, for example planes or cylinders, and to ascertain therefrom by mathematical linkage of the puncture points.
- the present invention is therefore based on the object that for a computed tomography (CT) necessary parameters are selected so that a high-quality as possible high-contrast image is achieved on a detector, in particular independent of the rotational position of a workpiece to be measured, ie alone rotational positions.
- CT computed tomography
- the invention provides in particular that parameters for the computed tomography are selected on the basis of previously recorded radiographic images.
- the parameters to be used for computed tomography are determined from the preliminary radiation images by mathematical methods or by variations of the parameters.
- a self-inventive content results from the fact that the selection of the parameters to be varied and / or the variation range is fixed and / or determined by the operator and / or on the basis of at least one transmission image.
- the current and / or the acceleration voltage of the X-ray source and / or the exposure time on the detector and / or the number of averages per radiation image and / or the number of averages over pixels of the detector (Binning) and / or the number of rotational positions of the measurement object between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector and / or the position of the object between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector (magnification) are selected.
- Characteristic feature also has the suggestion that at least one of the parameters is automatically varied until an output variable, preferably the contrast in the radiographic images, assumes a maximum, and / or exceeds or falls below a predefined value.
- valid values of the contrast correspond to the difference between the gray value of the brightest and the darkest pixel of at least a part of the total transmission image per radiographic image and / or over all radiographic images, while the darkest detector pixel has a gray value greater than a predefined minimum and the brightest Pixel has a gray value smaller than a predefined maximum.
- teachings according to the invention are realized when measuring with a coordinate measuring machine, d. H. that the computer tomographic measuring system is part of a coordinate measuring device.
- an optima for a controlled variable such as image contrast is achieved in order to first use one of these parameters for computed tomography (CT).
- CT computed tomography
- a method for the automatic determination of at least one parameter of a computed tomography wherein one or more parameters for computed tomography are selected on the basis of previously recorded radiographic images.
- the invention provides that the maximum contrast is achieved when the difference of the gray value of the brightest and darkest pixel on the detector is as large as possible, wherein at the same time the gray value of the darkest pixel is greater than a minimum value and the gray value of the brightest pixel smaller than a Maximum value is.
- the radiographic images to be recorded should be significantly smaller than the number of radiographic images for the actual measurement.
- the pre-recorded rotational positions must be chosen so that the minimum and maximum transmission length of the component is included. This ensures that the brightest pixels do not outshine and the darkest pixels are not too dark.
- a corresponding arrangement for adjusting the workpiece to the center of the axis of rotation is already known as a measuring device of the series "primary" Mahr, Göttingen.
- Mahr Mahr
- Göttingen The otherwise resulting in rotation lateral movement of the workpiece provides especially for very small parts, which preferably in tomographic or optically high magnification, ensuring that the workpiece is not completely imaged on the detector in all rotational positions, but this is a prerequisite for an evaluable measurement.
- the use in the production line for example, connected with an automatic assembly, fast set-up and adjustment times.
- a disadvantage of previously known methods for computertomographic measurements is also that parts that have significantly different dimensions can not be sufficiently contrasted with the same beam energy in all rotational positions.
- the reason for this are the varying transmission lengths and the associated weakening of the measuring radiation.
- the radiation reaching the detector provides evaluable information only if all areas (pixels) of the line or area detector include intensities above a minimum and below a maximum value.
- the differences in the beam attenuation along the transmission lengths in the smallest and second largest dimension of the workpiece must not exceed a certain value.
- the largest workpiece dimension is usually advantageously arranged perpendicular to the transmission direction, as far as the measurement volume permits.
- a matching or normalization of the associated images to the same intensity level takes place beforehand, preferably on the basis of the intensities of the areas of the radiographic images that are neither overexposed nor too dark in all images at the same time. This is possible, for example, by so-called “downscaling", “upscaling” or by averaging and, in conjunction with the method according to the invention, is likewise part of the present invention.
- the present invention solves the problem, in particular the problem of workpiece alignment, in that measurement results, in particular images with an image processing sensor or radiographic images, which are determined in different rotational positions of the workpiece, are directly combined precisely by the combination of translational and rotational movements, without the previous one Alignment of the workpiece to the physical axis of rotation is necessary.
- the basic idea is that the measurement object is rotated about a virtual axis of rotation, which does not necessarily coincide with the physical axis of rotation and the physical axis of rotation in one or two axes and possibly the detector is moved in at least one axis during rotation of the physical axis of rotation.
- the rotation of the workpiece about a virtual axis of rotation ensures that the workpiece is always imaged at approximately the same position of the detector, regardless of the current rotational position.
- the lateral movement of the workpiece with respect to the detector is avoided by the following two options.
- a first possibility involves that the detector remains immobile, but that the object of measurement rotates about a rotational axis fixed relative to the detector. This is possible in particular even if the workpiece is not arranged centrally on the physical axis of rotation. This is achieved by positioning the physical axis of rotation on which the workpiece is fixed in two directions so that the workpiece rotates about a spatially fixed virtual axis of rotation. The physical axis of rotation moves during its rotation on a circular path around the virtual axis of rotation, but only in addition by the two translational movements.
- the translatory movement can be effected, for example, by means of a cross table, which has two translational degrees of freedom.
- a second possibility includes that targeted tracking of the detector in combination with at least one translational movement of the axis of rotation.
- the detector is tracked in this one direction of the virtual axis of rotation, which now moves in one direction during the rotation of the physical axis of rotation.
- This direction is perpendicular to the physical axis of rotation and perpendicular to the normal of the detector plane.
- the virtual axis of rotation is fixed, even if the measurement object is not arranged centrally on the physical axis of rotation. This is achieved by tracking the physical axis of rotation in the direction of the normal of the detector plane.
- the physical axis of rotation carries out a linear movement in order to keep the distance between the virtual axis of rotation and the detector plane constant in the direction of the normals of the detector plane.
- the lateral movement of the virtual axis of rotation and the detector in the imaging beam result in the same areas of the workpiece being imaged at different angles of the imaging beam.
- the resulting measurement deviations can be corrected by mathematical methods and possibly a tilt of the detector to a direction parallel to the axis of rotation direction.
- the corresponding methods are already described in DE-A-10 2008 044 437.
- Prerequisite for the application of the correction is that rotation center offset and the magnification, ie the position of the imaging beam, axis of rotation and detector are known to each other.
- the procedure necessary for the determination describes the EP 05750966.3.
- a control computer To control the combination of translational and rotational movements, a control computer is used. This must be known to the relative position between virtual axis of rotation and physical axis of rotation. This position is either known from previously described methods for aligning the workpiece or is determined by previously recorded in different rotational positions of the physical axis of rotation control measurements, preferably radiographic images are evaluated. The processes necessary for this are described in DE-A-10 2008 044 437 and EP 05750966.3. These methods can also be done during the actual measurements, between the measurements in the different rotational positions. If additional sensors are present in the device, they can be used in advance or during the measurement to determine the relative position between the virtual axis of rotation and the physical axis of rotation.
- Radiographic images for the actual measurement are preferably recorded only when the predefined angles around the virtual axis of rotation are reached. This enables a constant angle grid and the conventional reconstruction of the measuring volume.
- the used control computer recognizes when with the help of the combination of translational and rotary movement, the respective rotational position and lateral position is reached.
- the measurement of parts with significantly different dimensions, which can not be mapped sufficiently high contrast with the same beam energy in all rotational positions simplified.
- the beam energy and / or the wavelength range used preferably tube acceleration voltage, tube current and / or wavelength-limiting filters, are adapted to the respectively present geometry, preferably transmission length and / or the present material, preferably the material density. This is not the case for every rotational position a picture with all the beam energies.
- the selection of the beam energy to be used for each rotational position takes place on the basis of the previously recorded few radiographic images and / or based on the images recorded during the actual measurement in one or more of the previous rotational positions and / or on the basis of previously known geometry and / or material data, preferably the CAD model of the workpiece.
- a set of suitable beam energies preferably automatically, can be determined in a few rotational positions by varying the recording parameters such as the beam energy.
- the beam energies are interpolated. This is possible because sudden changes in the transmission lengths or materials from rotational position to rotational position can not be expected.
- the parameters for the current rotational position can therefore also be determined from the parameters describing the beam energy of the previous or several previous rotational positions of the actual measuring sequence, preferably by averaging or extrapolation.
- the adjustment of the beam energy for each current rotational position can be used to determine the beam energy to be used for each or individual ne rotary positions. Intermediate values can in turn be interpolated.
- the necessary beam energies for the respective rotational positions can be determined from the workpiece data so that the transmission images contain an evaluable contrast.
- the joint evaluation of measured values of computed tomographic measurements recorded at different locations and / or with different magnifications and thus pixel or voxel screens solves the present invention by merging and / or resampling the reconstructed volume data of the different measurements.
- the individual measurements can be spatially superimposed, whereby the reconstruction values, preferably gray values, are averaged weighted in the overlapping areas.
- the weighting takes place, for example, as a function of the distance to the overlap boundaries. Resampling to a consistent three-dimensional grid is necessary to allow the subsequent application of volume filters to the entire assembled measurement data set.
- the missing portions in the radiographic images are calculated from the measured values, preferably the radiographic images of the respective same rotational angle, at least one measurement with lower magnification. in which the corresponding part of the workpiece was imaged on the detector.
- the calculation of the respective radiographic values is preferably carried out using resampling methods and / or interpolation methods and / or extrapolation methods.
- the movement of the components for changing the measuring section of the workpiece and for changing the magnification, that is to say the axis of rotation carrying the workpiece, the x-ray source and the detector therefore take place with accurate coordinate measuring machine axes. In contrast to stitching methods, this does not necessarily mean that overlapping areas exist.
- the various sets of data are first placed in space according to their recording position. For this purpose, there is an x, y and z position for each gray value. Subsequently, a fixed x, y, z grid is set for all data sets for which the associated gray values are interpolated. This creates a uniformly representable and evaluable data record. Only then is it possible to determine distances between high-resolution features and apply volume-based filters.
- the method or methods is used in a coordinate measuring machine and / or the arrangement is integrated in a coordinate measuring machine.
- the invention is characterized, inter alia, by a method for determining structures and / or geometry of an object such as a workpiece by means of a measuring system, preferably a computer tomographic measuring system comprising at least one radiation source, at least one radiation detector and at least one axis of rotation characterized in that recordings, preferably radiographic images, originating from different rotational positions of the workpiece are combined, for the:
- the workpiece using a combination of rotational and translational relative movement between the workpiece and the detector is rotated about a different axis of rotation from the physical axis of rotation and / or
- the workpiece by means of a combination of rotational and translational movement, is rotated about a different axis of rotation from the physical axis of rotation, wherein the physical axis of rotation with respect to the detector and / or the radiation source is not fixed by the physical axis of rotation in at least one translational direction is adjusted and / or the detector is adjusted in at least one translational direction and / or at least one rotational direction or that the workpiece, using a combination of rotational and translational movement, is rotated about a different axis of rotation from the physical axis of rotation in that the detector is stationary and the physical axis of rotation is adjusted in two translational directions, the first direction being nearly perpendicular to the detector plane and the second direction being nearly perpendicular to the direction of the physical axis of rotation and close e is perpendicular to the normal of the detector plane.
- the workpiece be rotated about a physical axis of rotation not stationary with respect to the detector and / or the radiation source by adjusting the physical axis of rotation in a translational direction that is nearly perpendicular to the detector plane and the detector in a plane extending in the detector plane Direction is adjusted, which is perpendicular to the direction of the physical axis of rotation and preferably the detector is rotated by a direction which is almost parallel to the physical axis of rotation and / or the measurement results taking into account the off-center irradiation of the workpiece and / or. the illumination existing rotation of the detector can be corrected.
- the axis of rotation other than the physical axis of rotation can be the virtual axis of rotation of the workpiece, preferably the axis of symmetry.
- the physical axis of rotation moves on a closed smooth curve such as elliptical orbit, in particular circular orbit, about the virtual axis of rotation or on a straight line which is preferably perpendicular to the detector plane.
- a closed smooth curve such as elliptical orbit, in particular circular orbit
- structures and / or geometries of rotationally symmetrical parts and / or tools and / or tomographable parts can be determined.
- Self-protection enjoys the idea that a measurement takes place without prior alignment of the workpiece to the physical axis of rotation and during the rotational movement of the physical axis of rotation a translational movement of the physical axis of rotation and / or the detector takes place, the virtual axis of rotation by before and / or during the actual measurement is carried out alignment, preferably with the aid of a CNC-controlled coordinate axis, always arranged centrally to the detector remains.
- a control computer determines the relative position of the virtual axis of rotation to the physical axis of rotation in space and thus controls the combination of translational and rotational movements by
- radiographic images are recorded, from which each position of the virtual axis of rotation to the physical axis of rotation or to a position of the physical axis characterizing body, such as cylinders or mandrel, is determined in at least one coordinate and the results of the control measurements are combined and / or
- the position of the virtual axis of rotation to the physical axis of rotation is determined by further sensors integrated in the device in advance or during the measurement. Radiation images are preferably only taken in each case if predefined angles around the virtual axis of rotation are reached.
- the different beam energies are generated by changing the acceleration voltage and / or the tube current of the radiation-generating source, preferably an X-ray tube, and / or varying the beam filters used.
- the respectively used beam energy is selected as a function of the current maximum available and / or minimally present transmission length in the respective rotational position and / or the workpiece material.
- the workpiece data be determined from the workpiece data by means of simulation of the image, preferably by simulation of the beam attenuation, the scattering and / or the detector sensitivity.
- Radiographic images with the beam energies with which was not measured are generated by interpolation from the determined in adjacent rotational positions radiographic images of the same beam energy and / or
- Transformation equations are determined on the basis of selected associated image pairs of the same rotational position but different beam energies, which are preferably used for images of similar beam energies and / or similar intensity distributions present on the detector and preferably missing transformation equations for further beam energies or intensity distributions are interpolated.
- radiographic images recorded in the plurality of relative positions between the measurement object, radiation source and / or detector preferably different magnifications, to be initially reconstructed for each combination of relative positions to form a volume data set, these being able to partially overlap, in order subsequently to be displayed in a common grid in FIG Space to be presented and evaluated.
- a part of the workpiece does not completely open in at least one rotational position
- the representation and evaluation in the common grid in space taking into account the positions of the measurement object, radiation source and / or detector done, in particular, the determination of the common grid in space on the basis of the volume data, which were generated from the measurement with the highest magnification.
- the measured values are determined by merging and / or resampling methods, preferably using interpolation methods from the original measured data, wherein in overlapping areas preferably a weighted averaging of the measured values takes place, wherein the weighting preferably takes place depending on the distance to the overlap boundaries.
- the different relative positions between the measurement object, radiation source and / or detector produces a measurement range that is greater than the measurement range covered by a fixed detector, preferably by a relative movement between the measurement object and at least the detector in at least one direction that is nearly perpendicular to the imaging axis he follows.
- An arrangement for determining structures and / or geometry of an object by means of a measuring system preferably computer tomographic measuring system consisting of at least one radiation source, at least one radiation detector and at least one axis of rotation, is characterized in that the workpiece, using a combination of rotational and translational Relative movement between the workpiece and detector is rotatable about a different axis of rotation from the physical axis of rotation.
- the physical rotation axis can be adjustable in at least one translational direction and / or the measurement object can be arranged in at least one translational direction adjustable on the physical axis of rotation and / or the detector can be adjusted in at least one translational and or rotational axis.
- the physical axis of rotation is adjustable in two translational directions, wherein the first direction is nearly perpendicular to the detector plane and the second direction is nearly perpendicular to the direction of the physical axis of rotation and nearly perpendicular to the normal of the detector plane.
- the invention provides that the physical axis of rotation is adjustable almost perpendicular to the detector plane and the detector is adjustable in at least one direction extending in the detector plane, which is nearly perpendicular to the direction of the physical axis of rotation, and preferably the detector is rotatable about an axis, which runs almost parallel to the axis of rotation.
- Fig. 2 shows a measuring arrangement with a workpiece in two different
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the CT detector of FIG. 2,
- Fig. 4 characteristic curves of pixels or groups of pixels in principle Presentation
- FIG. 6 shows position coordinates of a workpiece according to FIG. 5, FIG.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a CT measuring arrangement with the workpiece according to FIG. 6, FIG.
- FIG. 8 shows a further basic illustration of a CT measuring arrangement with a
- Rotary axis of rotatable object, 16 shows a first arrangement of the workpiece for measuring it in its entirety or a detail of this and
- 17 shows an arrangement for the complete measurement of a workpiece in two successive measurements to be taken in the same magnification.
- FIG. 1 shows purely by way of example and in principle a CT measuring arrangement which should be part of a coordinate measuring machine in order to measure workpieces 4.
- the arrangement comprises an X-ray source 1 and an X-ray detector 5 having pixels, between which the workpiece or component 4 to be measured is arranged.
- the X-ray radiation 2 leaving the X-ray source 1 penetrates the component 4 in different ways, whereby scattered radiation or other artifacts can arise at the boundary surfaces of the component 4 - which differs depending on the geometry of the radiation lengths present in the radiation direction occur.
- the determination of the transmission lengths and / or the geometry of the workpiece 4 in the various rotational positions can be carried out on the basis of almost completely present projection data or on the basis of a CAD model.
- one or more parameters are derived, which are then taken into account in the characteristic curves.
- the parameters are derived from the characteristic geometry by detecting the irradiated distances per type of material and arrangement from the geometry and / or material sequence and from this it is concluded that artefacts such as scattered radiation and beam hardening artefacts are formed.
- the parameters can be derived from the characteristic geometry by using the geometry and / or material sequence a weighted average transmission length of the individual material sections or an otherwise analytically formed contrast ratio, eg. B. is determined by means of simulation and from this the formation of artifacts such as stray radiation and Strahlaushärtungsartefakten is inferred.
- a weighted average transmission length of the individual material sections or an otherwise analytically formed contrast ratio eg. B. is determined by means of simulation and from this the formation of artifacts such as stray radiation and Strahlaushmaschinetungsartefakten is inferred.
- different correction characteristics should be determined and used depending on the rotational position and / or position of the workpiece, ie the component 4.
- the selection and assignment of the respective characteristic curve for the individual detector pixels and / or groups of pixels of the X-ray detector 5 in the respective rotational positions and the position of the workpiece 4 takes place by alignment with the workpiece.
- a workpiece 203 is shown purely in principle, which is penetrated by the X-radiation 202 radiated from a CT tube (X-ray source) 200, the X-rays 202 impinging on a detector 205.
- X-rays penetrating a portion 213 of the workpiece 203 are detected by the detector pixel (X, Y) 207, while in a second deviating position of the workpiece 204, the same portion 213 transmits, but from the pixel (X + N, Y + M) 208 is detected.
- the detector pixel (X, Y) 207 detects X-ray radiation which has penetrated another region of the workpiece 203, 204, which in particular differs in the irradiated length and / or the continuous radiated material sequence differs.
- it is provided according to the invention inter alia, that different characteristics for the different pixels or groups of pixels, also in different rotational positions or positions of the workpiece are determined and taken into account, which determines the relationship between irradiated component length and / or material sequence and detected radiation intensity describe.
- FIG. 3 shows the CT detector 205 and a single pixel 207 or a group of pixels 209.
- different characteristic curves can be used for the individual pixels 207 or groups of pixels 208, which determine the relationship of the irradiated component length L or Material sequence and the detected radiation intensity I describe.
- three different characteristic curves 210, 211 and 212 are shown in FIG. These may be due to the physical properties of the individual pixels or groups of pixels and / or the irradiated path length of the workpiece or the material sequence within the workpiece, for example in the initial intensity 10/1 or 10/2 but also in their slewing behavior or linearity differ.
- FIG. 5 shows, by way of example, the course of the intensity I as a function of the location x for a cross section through a single radiographic image of a workpiece 310, which is shown in more detail in FIGS. 6 and 7.
- the workpiece 310 is arranged between the X-ray source 200 and the detector 205 in accordance with the drawing and is penetrated by the radiation 202 of the X-ray source 200.
- the workpiece 310 has the thickness d1 in the direction of transmission.
- Fig. 6 is again the thickness of the workpiece 310th represented as a function of the location x.
- FIGS. 1 the thickness of the workpiece 310th represented as a function of the location x.
- the edges of the workpiece 310 are in the region between the location al and a2 and the location bl and b2.
- a significantly lower intensity is present between the two edge locations than in the areas 304 and 305 far outside of the workpiece 310.
- the areas 300 and 301 are of increased intensity, which can be triggered, for example, by scattered radiation .
- the maxima 302 and 303 may be used to determine the intensity of the scattered radiation compared to the intensity of the unattenuated x-ray beam from the regions 304 and 305.
- Detector pixels located between the locations al and b2 can be corrected, for example reduced, by the scattered radiation amplitude. The correction can be applied uniformly to all pixels or depending on the available transmission lengths or the irradiated distance per type of material.
- a multisensor coordinate measuring machine for taking into account the tumbling movements during the rotation of the measurement object or displacements between the x-ray tube, in particular the focal spot of the x-ray tube, and the x-ray detector can be seen purely in principle from FIG. 8, with which a complete dimensional measurement of a workpiece 28 can be performed.
- the Z. B. consists of a core 30 and this surrounding cladding 32.
- the core 30 and cladding 32 materials deviate in densities.
- the core 30 z. B. made of metal and the envelope 32 made of plastic or other lighter material.
- the coordinate measuring machine is connected to an evaluation unit 34 with control, hardware and software as well as storage unit for storing measuring points. Furthermore, an input and output unit for an operator is present.
- the workpiece 28 is placed on a rotatable table 38.
- a carrier 40 Arranged on a carrier 40 are an X-ray source 42 and by way of example a tactile sensor 44 and a laser line sensor 46, which are displaceably arranged on the carrier 40 along traverse axes (double arrows 48, 50, 52).
- the carrier itself is adjustable along an axis 54 perpendicular to the axes 48, 50, 52 extending axes.
- an X-ray detector 56 is arranged on the opposite side of the workpiece 28 with respect to the X-ray source 42. In this case, depending on the measurement tasks, the detector 56 can be adjustable perpendicular to the travel axes 48, 50, 52, 54 and optionally parallel to the travel axis 54 of the carrier 40.
- the workpiece 28 is irradiated by the X-radiation emitted by the X-ray source 32.
- the radiation passing through the workpiece 28 is then detected by the detector 56.
- the detector 56 In order to unambiguously allocate the radiographic images serving for the reconstruction in the different rotational positions of the workpiece 28 in space, and thus preclude measurement inaccuracies due to possible tumbling movements during the rotation of the workpiece 28 or displacements between the X - ray source or X - ray tube 42, in particular its focal spot, and the X - ray detector 56 To minimize to the extent that the desired measurement accuracy is ensured, advance information is taken into account by means of which the radiographic images are corrected during the actual measurement process.
- one or more pre-radiation images of the workpiece 28 or parts thereof are first recorded.
- only a few radiographic images are recorded in the few different positions.
- z. B. By comparing between the previously recorded radiographic images or parts thereof and the radiographic images or parts thereof taken during the measurement, z. B. by means of correlation method, a shift or scale deviations are detected and corrected. This can be z. B. by re-sampling or positioning of the X-ray source 42 relative to the X-ray detector 56 and / or the workpiece 28 done.
- Transmitted images used for the measurement, for which no pre-radiographic image is present are corrected by means of interpolation methods from pre-recorded radiographic images of adjacent rotary positions of the workpiece 28.
- 20 to 70 pre-radiation images compared to 100 to 1,600 transmission images typically required to measure the workpiece 28.
- FIG. 9 purely in principle, a coordinate measuring machine for the optionally combined use of X-ray sensor system and optical and / or tactile sensor system is shown.
- a turntable 110 On a parallel to the X-axis of the coordinate measuring machine axis 118, a turntable 110 is arranged. On this there is a measurement object 103 and can thus be rotated about the rotation axis 118 and moved in the X direction through the axis 118 (double arrow). On a parallel to the Y-axis slide 104 two axes parallel to the Z axis extending axes 105, 106 are arranged. On the mechanical axis 105 is a sensor 107 for X-radiation and an image processing sensor 108. On the mechanical axis 106 is additionally a tactile sensor 109.
- an X-ray source 110 is arranged, which is either movable or fixedly mounted in the Y direction can be.
- the image processing sensor system 108 is a transmitted light source 111.
- the mechanical axes or slides, which run along the X, Y or Z axis of the coordinate measuring device, are designed so that the sensors installed in or on the coordinate measuring machine each can cover the entire measuring range on the turntable 102.
- CT computed tomography
- the X-ray sensor system sensor, radiation source
- the second sensor system eg image processing sensor, transmitted or reflected light beam source or tactile sensor, optionally with associated image processing sensor
- the X-ray sensor system with at least the tactile sensors and / or the optical sensors on a common mechanical Axis may be arranged or arranged on a separate mechanical axis, which operates in an analogous manner as the mechanical axes for the tactile and / or optical sensors.
- the design of the coordinate measuring machine as a multi-sensor coordinate measuring device to be taken from FIG. 9 is not necessary for the realization of all parts of the teaching according to the invention. Rather, it is only necessary to ensure that a computer tomography can be performed.
- a further embodiment of a multi-sensor coordinate measuring machine 130 is shown purely in principle.
- the sensors can either be mounted or disassembled or can be automatically switched on and off during operation by means of corresponding sensor change systems.
- the invention will not be abandoned if a corresponding number of selected sensors are permanently mounted on the device to measure objects in this configuration.
- a coordinate measuring machine 130 comprises a z. B. granite base frame 112 with measuring table 114 on which an object to be measured 116 is positioned to measure its surface properties.
- a portal 119 is adjustable in the Y direction.
- columns or uprights 120, 122 are slidably supported on the base frame 112.
- a cross member 124 extends, along which a carriage is movable, which in turn receives a quill or column 126 which is adjustable in the Z direction.
- a sensor 130 which may be designed as a tactile sensor, which tactile-optically measures when the sleeve 126 contains an image processing sensor, emanates from the sleeve 126 or, if appropriate, an exchange interface 128 connected to the sleeve 126.
- the coordinate measuring machine 130 can have a sensor changer.
- a plurality of sensors can each be optionally provided via an interface with the coordinate measuring machine 130 and replaced by hand or by automatic pickup from a parking station.
- FIG. 11 shows a schematic representation of a computed tomography sensor.
- the radiation 202 leaving the X-ray source 200 penetrates a workpiece 203 and then strikes a detector 205.
- puncture points 324, 325 for the beam 320 for example, with an optical or tactile sensor.
- Further supporting values for the correction characteristic, ie other transmission lengths can be determined, for example, by using a beam 321 and the measurement of puncture points 326, 327 or by using a beam 322 and puncture points 328, 329 through the measurement object when the rotational position 204 is changed.
- An alternative way to determine the transmission length between puncture points, z. B. 326 and 327 consists in the determination of the coordinates of the puncture points by mathematical combination of tactile and / or optically measured elements, eg. As planes or cylinders, and / or hand elements.
- the coordinate of the puncture point 327 can be determined by cutting a tactile and / or optical measured plane 330 with a hand straight line which runs along the beam 321.
- the lengths occurring between these transmission lengths can be determined by interpolation. It is also possible to use larger or smaller radiographic Lengths are determined by extrapolation and brought into functional correlation with the attenuation values of the detector.
- FIG. 12 shows the relationship between the irradiated length L and the intensity I determined by the detector.
- a characteristic curve 350 present analytically or in the form of a look-up table (LuT)
- first correction values for the discrete measured points 351 to 354 are obtained determined as difference length to the existing characteristic.
- the correction 357 is determined by interpolation of the point 355.
- the correction values assigned to the individual intensities are stored and applied in the form of analytical functions or value tables LuT.
- FIG. 13 which is identical to FIG. 2, further essential aspects of the teaching according to the invention for performing a computed tomography will be explained.
- an object or workpiece 203 is shown, which is penetrated by an X-ray radiation 202 emitted from a CT tube 200, wherein the X-ray radiation 202 impinges on a detector 205.
- the radiation received by the detector pixel 207 of the detector 205 penetrates the measuring object 203, a region 213 and generates a corresponding characteristic gray value on the detector pixel 207.
- a rotational position 204 further characteristic gray values for the various detector pixels, z.
- the detector pixel 207 or 208 As the detector pixel 207 or 208. If at least a range of 0 to 90 degrees covered in the various rotational positions, the shortest and the longest transmission length at least once in the figure on the detector 205 are included. This calculates a brightest and a darkest pixel and from this a contrast value or a histogram of the pixel gray values for the statistical evaluation. If the brightest pixel is larger than a predetermined maximum value, that is to say the image is partially overdriven, for example For example, automatically reduces parameters such as current of the CT tube 200 and / or integration time, to then again pre-scan radiographs.
- the parameter of the number of image averages is automatically increased, as a result of which the signal-to-noise ratio is increased, ie improved, in order then to again record pre-radiation images.
- the acceleration voltage of the CT tube 200 is increased automatically and then preliminary images are recorded again. The reverse is done with a very high number of very bright pixels.
- FIG. 14 shows an X-ray source 200 and a measuring radiation 202 emanating from it, an X-ray detector 205 and a workpiece 310 arranged between them in a first measuring position, which is firmly connected to the physical axis of rotation 400.
- the first measuring position is assumed by the virtual axis of rotation 405, which corresponds approximately to the axis of symmetry of the workpiece 310, is aligned approximately centrally to the detector 205 by moving the physical axis of rotation 400 in the direction of arrow 403 (vertically extending in the drawing), so with the central beam axis 404 approximately cuts.
- transillumination images of the workpiece 310 are taken in several, typically 100-1600, steps up to 360 °. So that the workpiece is completely imaged on the detector in all rotational positions, the axis of rotation 400 carrying the workpiece 310 is simultaneously moved in the direction of the arrows 402 (horizontally running in the drawing) and 403 so that the virtual axis of rotation 405 is in the same position in all rotational positions to the detector 205 occupies.
- the position of the physical axis of rotation 406 and of the workpiece 407 is shown for the 90 ° position.
- the movement of the physical axis of rotation in the direction of arrows 402 and 403 is performed by a cross table, which is part of a coordinate measuring machine, in which the arrangement is introduced, on the circular path 412th
- the physical rotation axis 400 is now moved only in the direction of the arrow 402, while at the same time the detector 205 is moved in the direction of the arrow 403 and preferably additionally tilted about an axis parallel to the physical rotation axis 400.
- the virtual axis of rotation 405 intersects the central beam axis 404.
- the changed position of the axis of rotation 409, the workpiece 410 and the detector 408 is shown.
- the virtual axis of rotation is now at the start position of the physical axis of rotation 400 and in turn intersects the now rotated with the detector 205, ie rotated central beam axis 411.
- the virtual axis of rotation 405 moves in the direction of arrow 403 ,
- FIG. 16 shows the workpiece 203 in a first position for detecting the complete geometry and in a second position 204 for the high-resolution determination of a detail 213 in high magnification.
- the rotation of the workpiece 203 takes place about the virtual axis of rotation 405a (in the drawing about an axis perpendicularly intersecting the plane of the drawing) and the workpiece is completely imaged on the detector 205 in all rotational positions.
- the rotation of the workpiece 204 is about the virtual axis of rotation 405b (in the drawing, about an axis perpendicularly intersecting the plane of the drawing).
- the part leaves in at least some rotational positions the beam region 202 formed by the X-ray source 200 in the plane of the drawing or at least one plane which is pierced perpendicularly by the virtual axis of rotation 405b.
- the workpiece is not completely imaged on the detector 205 in all rotational positions.
- the thus missing radiographic values on the detector 205 are then determined from the measurement in the first position of the workpiece 203 by resampling methods with the aid of interpolation methods and / or extrapolation methods.
- the results of both computed tomographic measurements are subsequently evaluated in a summarized way, in that the reconstructed gray values are based on a common three-dimensional sional grid using z. B. of resampling method with the aid of interpolation be converted.
- FIG. 17 shows the same procedure as FIG. 16, but with partially overlapping areas of the workpiece 203 accommodated in approximately the same magnification, which is measured successively in the positions 203 and 204.
- the workpiece 203 can be fully detected although it is larger than the measurement range formed by the detector 205.
- the virtual rotation axis 405 thereby rotates either about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the drawing or about the arrow 405 (vertical in the drawing).
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Pulmonology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
- Length-Measuring Devices Using Wave Or Particle Radiation (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13177263.4A EP2654017A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13180159.9A EP2665035A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13180158.1A EP2665034A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13177210.5A EP2654016A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
Applications Claiming Priority (9)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102009003514 | 2009-02-20 | ||
DE102009003597 | 2009-03-10 | ||
DE102009003826 | 2009-04-24 | ||
DE102009025846 | 2009-05-20 | ||
DE102009026198 | 2009-07-17 | ||
DE102009043838 | 2009-08-24 | ||
DE102009044476 | 2009-11-09 | ||
DE102009044580 | 2009-11-18 | ||
PCT/EP2010/052145 WO2010094774A2 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum messen eines objekts |
Related Child Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13180159.9A Division EP2665035A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13177263.4A Division EP2654017A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13177210.5A Division EP2654016A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13180158.1A Division EP2665034A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2399237A1 true EP2399237A1 (de) | 2011-12-28 |
EP2399237B1 EP2399237B1 (de) | 2013-08-14 |
Family
ID=42112283
Family Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13177263.4A Withdrawn EP2654017A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP10708956.7A Active EP2399237B1 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum messen eines objekts |
EP13180158.1A Withdrawn EP2665034A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13180159.9A Withdrawn EP2665035A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13177210.5A Withdrawn EP2654016A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13177263.4A Withdrawn EP2654017A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
Family Applications After (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13180158.1A Withdrawn EP2665034A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13180159.9A Withdrawn EP2665035A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
EP13177210.5A Withdrawn EP2654016A3 (de) | 2009-02-20 | 2010-02-19 | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9025855B1 (de) |
EP (5) | EP2654017A3 (de) |
CN (1) | CN102326182B (de) |
DE (1) | DE102010000473A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2010094774A2 (de) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102016101005A1 (de) | 2015-02-11 | 2016-08-11 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messung eines Werkstücks |
Families Citing this family (66)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SE533704C2 (sv) | 2008-12-05 | 2010-12-07 | Flatfrog Lab Ab | Pekkänslig apparat och förfarande för drivning av densamma |
WO2013095271A2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Touch determination with interaction compensation |
US10168835B2 (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2019-01-01 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Spatial resolution in touch displays |
BR112015012779A2 (pt) * | 2012-12-04 | 2017-07-11 | Koninklijke Philips Nv | método de correção de imagem das informações de imagens de raios x, aparelho para correção de imagem das informações de imagens de raios x, sistema de raios x, uso de um aparelho, meio legível por computador, e elemento de programa para correção de imagem das informações de imagens de raios x |
CN103901489B (zh) * | 2012-12-27 | 2017-07-21 | 清华大学 | 检查物体的方法、显示方法和设备 |
DE102013104490A1 (de) * | 2013-01-25 | 2014-07-31 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung der Geometrie von Strukturen mittels Computertomografie |
US20140270059A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | General Electric Company | High resolution models of a target object |
US9410905B2 (en) * | 2013-03-27 | 2016-08-09 | United Technologies Corporation | Non-destructive inspection of an article using cross-sections through internal feature |
US10247682B2 (en) * | 2013-04-04 | 2019-04-02 | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | Helical computed tomography |
WO2014168567A1 (en) | 2013-04-11 | 2014-10-16 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Tomographic processing for touch detection |
JP6147852B2 (ja) * | 2013-05-10 | 2017-06-14 | 株式会社ニコン | X線装置及び構造物の製造方法 |
DE102013209770B4 (de) | 2013-05-27 | 2015-02-05 | Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren zur Bestimmung von einstellbaren Parametern mehrerer Koordinatenmessgeräte sowie Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung mindestens eines virtuellen Abbilds eines Messobjekts |
US9874978B2 (en) | 2013-07-12 | 2018-01-23 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Partial detect mode |
DE102013108152A1 (de) | 2013-07-23 | 2015-01-29 | Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (Dkfz) | Computertomografie-Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Merkmalen an einem Messobjekt |
US9857163B2 (en) | 2013-10-31 | 2018-01-02 | Hexagon Metrology, Inc. | Parametric control of object scanning |
WO2015108479A1 (en) | 2014-01-16 | 2015-07-23 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Light coupling in tir-based optical touch systems |
WO2015108480A1 (en) | 2014-01-16 | 2015-07-23 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Improvements in tir-based optical touch systems of projection-type |
DE102015101378A1 (de) | 2014-01-30 | 2015-07-30 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Messung von Charakteristika an bzw. von Werkstücken mit Computertomografie |
DE102014210897B4 (de) * | 2014-06-06 | 2022-01-13 | Siemens Healthcare Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Strahlerpositionierung |
WO2015199602A1 (en) | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-30 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Detection of surface contamination |
GB2546208A (en) * | 2014-10-10 | 2017-07-12 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Method and device for the computer tomography of a workpiece |
PL230242B1 (pl) * | 2014-10-16 | 2018-10-31 | Samodzielna Katedra Inzynierii Procesowej Wydzial Przyrodniczo Techniczny Univ Opolskiego | Mobilny kompostownik modułowy |
DE102015121127A1 (de) | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Computertomografie eines Werkstücks |
CN104616251B (zh) * | 2014-12-31 | 2017-11-03 | 沈阳东软医疗***有限公司 | 一种数字x线图像散射修正的方法及装置 |
US11182023B2 (en) | 2015-01-28 | 2021-11-23 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Dynamic touch quarantine frames |
US10318074B2 (en) | 2015-01-30 | 2019-06-11 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Touch-sensing OLED display with tilted emitters |
WO2016130074A1 (en) | 2015-02-09 | 2016-08-18 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Optical touch system comprising means for projecting and detecting light beams above and inside a transmissive panel |
US10401546B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2019-09-03 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Optical component for light coupling |
DE102015111621A1 (de) | 2015-03-24 | 2016-09-29 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messung eines Werkstücks |
DE102015218155A1 (de) | 2015-09-22 | 2017-03-23 | Siemens Healthcare Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur bildgebenden Abtastung einer weiblichen Brust im Rahmen einer digitalen projektiven Mammographie oder einer Tomosynthese |
EP3387516B1 (de) | 2015-12-09 | 2022-04-20 | FlatFrog Laboratories AB | Verbesserte stiftidentifizierung |
DE102017100594A1 (de) | 2016-01-14 | 2017-07-20 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | CT-Parameter-Automat |
WO2017188559A1 (en) * | 2016-04-29 | 2017-11-02 | Im Technology.Co.,Ltd | Method of image reconstruction in computed tomography |
DE102016209557B4 (de) * | 2016-06-01 | 2022-03-31 | Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren zur Identifizierung eines Werkstücks, Ermitteln eines Messablaufs und Vermessung eines Werkstücks mit einem Messgerät |
US10288762B2 (en) * | 2016-06-21 | 2019-05-14 | Morpho Detection, Llc | Systems and methods for detecting luggage in an imaging system |
DE102016211294A1 (de) * | 2016-06-23 | 2017-12-28 | Carl Zeiss 3D Automation Gmbh | Träger für die computertomographische Werkstück-Untersuchung |
JP6711410B2 (ja) * | 2016-11-01 | 2020-06-17 | 株式会社島津製作所 | 放射線断層撮影装置の撮像倍率校正方法 |
EP3545392A4 (de) | 2016-11-24 | 2020-07-29 | FlatFrog Laboratories AB | Automatische optimierung von berührungssignalen |
EP4152132A1 (de) | 2016-12-07 | 2023-03-22 | FlatFrog Laboratories AB | Verbesserte berührungsvorrichtung |
US20180172425A1 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2018-06-21 | The Penn State Research Foundation | High definition optical coherence tomography imaging for non-invasive examination of heritage works |
WO2018141948A1 (en) | 2017-02-06 | 2018-08-09 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Optical coupling in touch-sensing systems |
DE102017103953A1 (de) * | 2017-02-24 | 2018-08-30 | Volume Graphics Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erkennung von Ecken |
DE102018105709A1 (de) | 2017-03-15 | 2018-09-20 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messungen von Werkstücken |
WO2018174787A1 (en) | 2017-03-22 | 2018-09-27 | Flatfrog Laboratories | Eraser for touch displays |
EP3602259A4 (de) | 2017-03-28 | 2021-01-20 | FlatFrog Laboratories AB | Berührungssensor und verfahren zur montage |
US20200037980A1 (en) * | 2017-04-18 | 2020-02-06 | Shimadzu Corporation | Photographing sequence determination supporting method, photographing sequence determination supporting program, and x-ray radiographic apparatus equipped therewith |
CN107328798B (zh) * | 2017-06-21 | 2020-02-11 | 重庆大学 | 一种新型icl***及实现方法 |
US11256371B2 (en) | 2017-09-01 | 2022-02-22 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Optical component |
JP6751062B2 (ja) * | 2017-09-13 | 2020-09-02 | 株式会社日立製作所 | 自動点検システムおよび自動点検方法 |
WO2019172826A1 (en) | 2018-03-05 | 2019-09-12 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Improved touch-sensing apparatus |
US10539515B2 (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2020-01-21 | Ge Inspection Technologies, Lp | Computed tomographic system calibration |
EP3569147B1 (de) * | 2018-05-16 | 2021-07-21 | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum bestimmen einer geometriekalib-rierung für eine bildgebende vorrichtung sowie verfahren zum bestimmen von zuordnungsdaten für die geometriekalibrierung |
JP7154535B2 (ja) * | 2018-07-04 | 2022-10-18 | 国立大学法人 東京大学 | X線ct装置により得られる投影像を用いた寸法測定方法 |
CN109323653B (zh) * | 2018-11-14 | 2024-03-08 | 江苏一六仪器有限公司 | 一种x光光斑定位仪及其定位方法 |
US11943563B2 (en) | 2019-01-25 | 2024-03-26 | FlatFrog Laboratories, AB | Videoconferencing terminal and method of operating the same |
US11408836B2 (en) * | 2019-04-01 | 2022-08-09 | General Electric Company | Method for inspecting components using computed tomography |
CN110099502B (zh) * | 2019-04-23 | 2021-01-08 | 上海联影医疗科技股份有限公司 | 一种x光成像设备的自适应控制方法及*** |
WO2020216307A1 (zh) | 2019-04-23 | 2020-10-29 | 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 | 一种获取放射图像方法、***、装置及存储介质 |
DE102019122655A1 (de) * | 2019-08-22 | 2021-02-25 | M & H Inprocess Messtechnik Gmbh | Messsystem |
US11893189B2 (en) | 2020-02-10 | 2024-02-06 | Flatfrog Laboratories Ab | Touch-sensing apparatus |
JP7437222B2 (ja) * | 2020-04-22 | 2024-02-22 | 株式会社サキコーポレーション | 検査装置 |
IT202000014239A1 (it) | 2020-06-15 | 2021-12-15 | Biometic S R L | Tomografo computerizzato a tunnel e metodo per l’esecuzione di una tomografia computerizzata di un oggetto |
JP2022191670A (ja) * | 2021-06-16 | 2022-12-28 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | X線ct装置及び画像生成方法 |
US20230010730A1 (en) * | 2021-07-08 | 2023-01-12 | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | Customizable axes of rotation for industrial radiography systems |
DE102023103165A1 (de) | 2022-02-14 | 2023-08-17 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Computertomografie oder Laminografie |
DE102022109902A1 (de) * | 2022-04-25 | 2023-10-26 | Carl Zeiss GOM Metrology GmbH | Verfahren zur Erstellung eines Volumenmodells eines Objektes, Computerprogramm und Messvorrichtung hierzu |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005036527A1 (de) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-02-15 | Yxlon International Ct Development Gmbh | Röntgen-CT-Prüfanlage sowie CT-Verfahren zur Prüfung von Objekten |
Family Cites Families (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4422177A (en) * | 1982-06-16 | 1983-12-20 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | CT Slice proximity rotary table and elevator for examining large objects |
US5032990A (en) * | 1989-05-30 | 1991-07-16 | General Electric Company | Translate rotate scanning method for x-ray imaging |
US5119408A (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1992-06-02 | General Electric Company | Rotate/rotate method and apparatus for computed tomography x-ray inspection of large objects |
JP2589613B2 (ja) * | 1991-09-17 | 1997-03-12 | 株式会社日立製作所 | X線ctの画像化方法及びx線ct装置 |
FR2692261B1 (fr) | 1992-06-15 | 1994-09-02 | Dow Corning | Procédé de préparation d'un télogène actif. |
DK146692D0 (da) | 1992-12-07 | 1992-12-07 | Petr Viscor | Fremgangsmaade og apparat til bestemmelse af karakteristiske elektriske materialeparametre for halvledende materialer |
US5319693A (en) * | 1992-12-30 | 1994-06-07 | General Electric Company | Three dimensional computerized tomography scanning configuration for imaging large objects with smaller area detectors |
DE19542762C2 (de) * | 1995-11-16 | 1998-01-22 | Joerg Dr Habersetzer | Tomographieverfahren und Anordnung zur Erzeugung von großflächigen Tomogrammen |
US6301324B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2001-10-09 | General Electric Company | RF slipring receiver for a computerized tomography system |
US20020009215A1 (en) | 2000-01-18 | 2002-01-24 | Arch Development Corporation | Automated method and system for the segmentation of lung regions in computed tomography scans |
DE10202732A1 (de) | 2002-01-24 | 2003-08-07 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Erstellen einer Korrekturkennlinie für eine Reduktion von Artefakten bei einer Tomographie |
US7001045B2 (en) * | 2002-06-11 | 2006-02-21 | Breakaway Imaging, Llc | Cantilevered gantry apparatus for x-ray imaging |
US7386090B2 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2008-06-10 | Mycrona Gesellschaft für innovative Messtechnik mbH | Processes and a device for determining the actual position of a structure of an object to be examined |
US6775352B2 (en) * | 2002-08-16 | 2004-08-10 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Method and system for implementing variable x-ray intensity modulation schemes for imaging systems |
JP2004180715A (ja) * | 2002-11-29 | 2004-07-02 | Toshiba Corp | X線コンピュータ断層撮影装置 |
CN2666355Y (zh) | 2003-04-30 | 2004-12-29 | 沈阳东软数字医疗***股份有限公司 | 一种ct机主机旋转传动装置 |
US20050084147A1 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2005-04-21 | Groszmann Daniel E. | Method and apparatus for image reconstruction with projection images acquired in a non-circular arc |
US7207762B2 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2007-04-24 | Federal-Mogul World Wide, Inc. | Push-on screw-off attachment device |
DE102004026357B4 (de) * | 2004-05-26 | 2022-11-17 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Messen eines Objektes |
EP2192380A3 (de) | 2004-05-26 | 2010-06-23 | Werth Messtechnik GmbH | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objektes mit einem Koordinatenmessgerät sowie Koordinatenmessgerät |
DE102005018447A1 (de) * | 2005-04-20 | 2006-10-26 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objektes |
US7840249B2 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2010-11-23 | University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Clinical micro-CT (CMCT) methods, techniques and apparatus |
WO2006090321A1 (en) * | 2005-02-23 | 2006-08-31 | Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh | Determination of the coverage of a ct scan |
DE112006001354A5 (de) | 2005-03-09 | 2008-03-06 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Korrektur von Nichtlinearitäten eines Abbildungssystems durch ein a-priori Wissen bei Durchstrahlungsaufnahmen |
JP4629519B2 (ja) * | 2005-07-12 | 2011-02-09 | ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー | 放射線撮影装置およびスキャン条件設定装置 |
KR100725617B1 (ko) * | 2005-07-13 | 2007-06-07 | (주)디알젬 | 직동회전형 볼륨 엑스선 단층촬영장치 |
DE102005039422A1 (de) * | 2005-08-16 | 2007-02-22 | Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh | Computertomografie-Messanordnung und Verfahren |
US7545902B2 (en) | 2006-09-18 | 2009-06-09 | General Electric Company | Received x-ray handling methods and apparatus |
DE102007021809A1 (de) | 2007-04-20 | 2008-10-23 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum dimensionellen Messen mit Koordinatenmessgeräten |
DE102008021639A1 (de) | 2008-04-30 | 2009-12-03 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Erzeugen einer CT-Rekonstruktion eines Objekts mit einem hochaufgelösten interessierenden Objektbereich |
DE102008044437A1 (de) | 2008-06-30 | 2009-12-31 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren zum Messen von Geometrien von Werkstücken |
-
2010
- 2010-02-19 US US13/202,476 patent/US9025855B1/en active Active
- 2010-02-19 WO PCT/EP2010/052145 patent/WO2010094774A2/de active Application Filing
- 2010-02-19 EP EP13177263.4A patent/EP2654017A3/de not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-02-19 EP EP10708956.7A patent/EP2399237B1/de active Active
- 2010-02-19 EP EP13180158.1A patent/EP2665034A3/de not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-02-19 EP EP13180159.9A patent/EP2665035A3/de not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-02-19 DE DE102010000473A patent/DE102010000473A1/de not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-02-19 CN CN201080008625.2A patent/CN102326182B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-02-19 EP EP13177210.5A patent/EP2654016A3/de not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005036527A1 (de) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-02-15 | Yxlon International Ct Development Gmbh | Röntgen-CT-Prüfanlage sowie CT-Verfahren zur Prüfung von Objekten |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2010094774A2 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102016101005A1 (de) | 2015-02-11 | 2016-08-11 | Werth Messtechnik Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messung eines Werkstücks |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2399237B1 (de) | 2013-08-14 |
EP2665034A3 (de) | 2017-03-15 |
EP2654017A3 (de) | 2016-12-07 |
EP2665035A3 (de) | 2016-12-07 |
CN102326182A (zh) | 2012-01-18 |
EP2665035A2 (de) | 2013-11-20 |
CN102326182B (zh) | 2016-05-18 |
EP2654016A2 (de) | 2013-10-23 |
EP2654017A2 (de) | 2013-10-23 |
EP2654016A3 (de) | 2017-03-22 |
WO2010094774A2 (de) | 2010-08-26 |
DE102010000473A1 (de) | 2010-08-26 |
US9025855B1 (en) | 2015-05-05 |
EP2665034A2 (de) | 2013-11-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2399237B1 (de) | Verfahren zum messen eines objekts | |
EP1749190B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Messen eines Objekts mit einem Koordinatenmessgerät, das einen Computer-Tomographen enthält | |
EP1915611B1 (de) | Computertomografie-messanordnung und verfahren | |
DE112010003822B4 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bildaufnahmne im Dentalbereich mittels Röntgenstrahlen | |
DE112006003039T5 (de) | Verfahren und Anordnung zur Röntgenbildgebung | |
WO2014037557A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur korrektur von computertomographiemessungen mit einem koordinatenmessgerät | |
DE102017100594A1 (de) | CT-Parameter-Automat | |
DE102017004705A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erzeugen eines in der Zentralschicht vollständigen 3D-Datensatzes zur Volumenrekonstruktion und Röntgensystem mit einem Kegelstrahl-C-Bogen-Röntgengerät zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
DE102016101005A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messung eines Werkstücks | |
DE102015111621A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messung eines Werkstücks | |
DE102006022104B4 (de) | Vorrichtung zur dreidimensionalen Vermessung eines Festkörpers | |
EP3992620A1 (de) | Computerimplementiertes verfahren zur ermittlung mindestens eines für eine auswertung von messdaten benötigten geometrischen parameters | |
EP2644095B1 (de) | Computertomographiesystem und Verfahren zur Datenermittlung für eine Störeinfluss-korrigierte Computertomographieaufnahme eines Untersuchungsobjekts | |
DE102007023925B4 (de) | Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Anordnung zur Kompensation der Auswirkungen von Brennfleckenwanderung bei der Aufnahme von Röntgenprojektionsbildern | |
DE102014116595A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Einsatz mehrerer Detektoren bei der dimensionellen Messung mit einer Computertomografiesensorik | |
WO2009036983A1 (de) | Verfahren zur bestimmung eines korrekturwerts einer brennfleckposition einer röntgenquelle einer messanordnung sowie eine messandordnung zum erzeugen von durchstrahlungsbildern | |
DE102021204628B3 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Computertomographen beim Vermessen einer Interessensregion eines Objekts und Computertomograph | |
DE102022103888A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Computertomografiemessung | |
DE102020130442A1 (de) | Einmessvorrichtung | |
DE102011101509C5 (de) | Verfahren zur optischen Vermessung einer Welle | |
DE202019003376U1 (de) | Röntgensystem zur iterativen Bestimmung einer optimalen Koordinatentransformation zwischen überlappenden Volumina, die aus Volumendatensätzen von diskret abgetasteten Objektbereichen rekonstruiert wurden | |
DE102020129792B4 (de) | Computerimplementiertes Verfahren zum Ermitteln eines Werts eines geometrischen Parameters | |
DE102012211998A1 (de) | Computertomograph und Verfahren zum Gewinnen eines Volumenmodells von einem Körper mittels des Computertomographen | |
WO2015063232A2 (de) | Blendensystem für eine strahlenquelle sowie vorrichtung und verfahren zum aufnehmen eines projektionsbilds und zum bestimmen einer relativposition zwischen einer strahlenquelle und einem strahlendetektor | |
DE102019107348A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur computertomografischen Messung von Werkstücken |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20110916 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20120618 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 502010004352 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G06T0005000000 Ipc: G01N0023040000 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G01N 23/04 20060101AFI20121016BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20130408 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 627118 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20130815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010004352 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20131010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: LUCHS AND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20130814 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130731 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131214 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131216 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131115 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: YXLON INTERNATIONAL GMBH Effective date: 20140514 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502010004352 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140514 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: WERTH MESSTECHNIK G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20140228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140219 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140219 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140228 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PLBP | Opposition withdrawn |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264 |
|
PLBD | Termination of opposition procedure: decision despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPC1 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R100 Ref document number: 502010004352 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PLBM | Termination of opposition procedure: date of legal effect published |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009276 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION PROCEDURE CLOSED |
|
27C | Opposition proceedings terminated |
Effective date: 20151128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20160223 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20160217 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160218 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20160218 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20100219 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 627118 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170219 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170219 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170219 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130814 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230821 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240226 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240219 Year of fee payment: 15 |