EP1777073A2 - Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse - Google Patents

Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1777073A2
EP1777073A2 EP06120504A EP06120504A EP1777073A2 EP 1777073 A2 EP1777073 A2 EP 1777073A2 EP 06120504 A EP06120504 A EP 06120504A EP 06120504 A EP06120504 A EP 06120504A EP 1777073 A2 EP1777073 A2 EP 1777073A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sheet
stack
faulty
error
sheets
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP06120504A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1777073A3 (fr
EP1777073B1 (fr
Inventor
Jörn SACHER
Harald Willeke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koenig and Bauer AG
Original Assignee
Koenig and Bauer AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37836993&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1777073(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Koenig and Bauer AG filed Critical Koenig and Bauer AG
Priority to EP08159478A priority Critical patent/EP2006110B1/fr
Priority to EP08159475A priority patent/EP2006109B1/fr
Publication of EP1777073A2 publication Critical patent/EP1777073A2/fr
Publication of EP1777073A3 publication Critical patent/EP1777073A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1777073B1 publication Critical patent/EP1777073B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41FPRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H35/00Delivering articles from cutting or line-perforating machines; Article or web delivery apparatus incorporating cutting or line-perforating devices, e.g. adhesive tape dispensers
    • B65H35/02Delivering articles from cutting or line-perforating machines; Article or web delivery apparatus incorporating cutting or line-perforating devices, e.g. adhesive tape dispensers from or with longitudinal slitters or perforators
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2301/00Handling processes for sheets or webs
    • B65H2301/50Auxiliary process performed during handling process
    • B65H2301/54Auxiliary process performed during handling process for managing processing of handled material
    • B65H2301/542Quality control

Definitions

  • the invention relates to methods for identifying or treating at least one faulty sheet according to the preamble of claim 1, 8 or 35.
  • a sheet stack marking device for a rotary printing machine wherein by using different markers, preferably colored strips, which are introduced by different, each of a sensor signal activatable marking devices in a stack printed sheet, on the stacked sheet error identification is possible, wherein as identifiable errors a misprint or an overshoot of an applied sheet as well as a passer difference or a chromatic aberration concerning the printed image are mentioned.
  • the invention has for its object to provide methods for marking or treatment of at least one faulty sheet, the marking or treatment facilitates sorting faulty sheet.
  • the advantages achieved by the invention are, in particular, that in a stack of sheets printed in a printing machine individual faulty sheets or areas with multiple faulty sheets can be identified quickly and reliably, so that faulty sheets are sorted out before further processing of the filed in the stack sheet can.
  • a printing press In a printing press, z.
  • at least one printing unit of this printing press sequentially fed sheet at least one ink, but preferably multicolored by several in the transport direction of the sheet in the printing press successively arranged printing units at least on one side, preferably in perfecting on both sides z.
  • a z. B. opto-electronically designed inspection system in particular a in the Press arranged inline inspection system with a preferably arranged in the transport direction of the sheet behind the last printing unit of the printing press camera, z. B. with at least one CCD chip having a semiconductor camera, said camera at least from a portion of a printed sheet, preferably of the entire sheet and / or of all printed in this printing machine in each case a picture, z. B. receives a color image and preferably in the form of digital data to an electronic evaluation unit, for. B.
  • an image processing computer wherein in the evaluation unit, a currently recorded image based on a reference image with respect to at least one print quality affecting error, z. B. with respect to a color error and / or a registration error is checked and wherein the evaluation unit in an insufficient match between the currently recorded image and the reference image, ie at a detection of a predetermined tolerance limit exceeding and thus no longer tolerable error, an error message in the form an electronic control signal outputs, with this control signal z. B.
  • the inspection system is preferably equipped with the function to determine the position of an error detected on a sheet and / or detected errors according to predetermined different types of errors, such as. B. color errors and register errors represent, to distinguish.
  • the control signal output by the evaluation unit of the inspection system to the at least one strip insertion system is preferably in the form of a digital, in particular electrical, signal, e.g. B. formed as a switching pulse, wherein each switching pulse correlates with at least one faulty arc. That of the evaluation of the inspection system to the at least one
  • the control signal output by the strip injection system may also be complex in nature and may include a plurality of information relevant to the control of the at least one strip insertion system.
  • a Striteinschusssystem has at least a Einsch manretemony and a strip holder, wherein the admirst manende in the stack of the deposited sheet strip z. B. held as a roll material in a trained as a roll holder strip holder and is cut to a roll of the role according to the required strip length with a cutter by a strip separating the strip from the roll. Triggered by a control signal indicative of an error detected by the inspection system in at least one of the printed sheets, the marker shoots a strip between an upper edge of the sheet already deposited in the stack and a sheet currently to be deposited on that stack, and thus the sheet already in the stack filed bow at least not yet fully touching bow. Once the newly deposited on the stack sheet rests on the stack so that thereby the shot strip is held in the stack, this z. B. unrolled from a roll strip cut off the roll.
  • the Einschman réelle can z. B. on a Sogradconvergeer belonging to the printing press display. It is also possible to mount the Einschman réelle on a tripod and to put next to the belonging to the printing press display.
  • the first variant is z. B. in a so-called large format printing machine, in which case z. B. an automatic format adjustment is provided.
  • the second variant mentioned above is z. B. realized on a medium format printing press, in which case an automatic, z. B. remote controlled format adjustment is not given. It is preferably provided that the position of the at least one at least one faulty sheet characterizing Einsch machines and thus the aforementioned format adjustment is set by the evaluation of the inspection system.
  • the printing press prints sheets with a production speed of z. B. 15,000 or more sheets per hour, z. 18,000 or 21,000 sheets per hour, d. H. every second, more than four printed sheets each arrive at the stack on the stack belonging to the printing press.
  • Strip insertion systems achieve this working speed i. d. R. not, but z. B. einsch manen at the earliest half a second again a strip in the pile.
  • the period of time required for the strip insertion system to re-insert a strip into the stack will be referred to as the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system, the dead time ⁇ t being a period duration as a result of the cyclic operation of the strip insertion system and a fastest possible working cycle of the strip insertion system
  • Strip Einschusssystems can be viewed.
  • the dead time .DELTA.t is z. B. on the order of at least about half a second and is thus much slower than the usual production speed of the printing press.
  • a sheet-fed printing press can therefore deposit a plurality of sheets on the stack because of its high production speed during a dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system.
  • a einz tellender in the stack strip can, for. B. may be formed as a flat, band-shaped material made of paper or plastic, with different colored or provided with different color material can be used. It can be provided that the strip insertion system is able to mark a strip to be inserted in dependence of a further control signal or of a specific information contained in the control signal in a specific manner. Additionally or alternatively, it may be provided that several Einsch manellates are arranged on the same belonging to a printing machine stack of sheets, wherein the plurality Einschmantechnik preferably einsch manen each other differing strips in the same stack. These stripes can z. B. in their color, in their material and / or in their marking differ from each other. The mark can z. B. be printed with an inkjet printer.
  • Differently formed strips which are injected by the Striteinschusssystem in the same stack, can be used to distinguish different types of errors, eg. B. for distinguishing a color error from a register error, and / or in particular for distinguishing between a single error and an error sequence can be used, wherein a training and / or marking the strip z. B. a single error or the beginning of an error sequence and another training and / or marking the strip z. B. identify the end of an error sequence.
  • a single error is an error event which triggers the shooting of a strip into the stack, wherein no further error event is detected at any other within the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system on the stack beginning with the insertion of the strip. The end of an error sequence is then reached as soon as a dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system commencing with the passage of a strip and after the laying off of one or more faulty sheets a faultless sheet is deposited on the stack.
  • the diagrams show in each case at least one error event detected by the print production in the printing press, ie in particular its inspection system, wherein the error events marked F1, F2 or F3 are respectively plotted over the time curve t, wherein each of these error events F1, F2 or F3 correlate with at least one arc detected as faulty.
  • the time relationship between the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip injection system and a respective pulse-shaped error event F1; F2 is selected, for example, such that within each of the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system shown there, six sheets are printed in the printing press and checked by the inspection system, so that within each dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system successively up to six error events F1; F2; F3 can occur.
  • the markings marked "A" or "B", respectively stripes, can be z. B. differ in their respective material and / or at least in their respective color and / or in their respective caption from each other.
  • FIG. 1 shows by way of example that at least one fault has been detected by the inspection system on a sheet to be deposited on the stack, as a result of which a first error event F1 is identified so that a control signal is output by the inspection system to the strip injection system. Since the diagram shown in FIG. 1 represents only a small portion of the production process, the illustrated time segment may have been preceded by an error-free production of printed sheets or the production of the printed sheets was just started at this time. Due to the detected error, the strip insertion system attaches an identifier marked "A" to the stack in conjunction with the arc detected as faulty.
  • the strip insertion system begins to count the duration of its dead time ⁇ t within which the strip insertion system is unable to apply further marking to the stack, since the stripline picking mechanism initially resumes firing a strip must return to a working condition that can be used again.
  • the inspection system does not detect the deposit within the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system at any other making an error so that it stays within that dead time ⁇ t at the single detected error.
  • the detected error is thus a single error with the singular error event F1, because in a sequence of z. B. six consecutively printed and to be deposited in the order of their production successive sheet only a single sheet has been found to be faulty.
  • FIG. 2 shows by way of example that-as explained with reference to FIG. 1-an error event F1 is detected by the inspection system in conjunction with a sheet to be deposited on the stack so that a strip corresponding to this error event F1 is injected into the stack by the strip insertion system.
  • the duration of the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system begins when the strip labeled "A" is fired.
  • at least one error occurs within the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system on at least one further sheet to be deposited on the stack, so that a further error event F2 has occurred within the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system.
  • FIG. 2 occur in a sequence of z. B.
  • F2 occurs by detecting at least one error on at least one further sheet to be deposited on the stack, at the end of this further second dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system, a further strip marked "B" is injected into the stack, as shown in FIG if the at least one detected within this further second dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system error event F1; 2 at the end of this second dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system, and the sequence of defective sheets within this second dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system has thus been terminated, because at least at the end of this second dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system again at least one error-free sheet has come to the filing.
  • more than two strips labeled "B" can be injected into the stack one after the other, namely if several times in succession within that dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system "B" marked strip in the stack begins, at least one error event F1; F2 is detected, but always at least one error-free arc between the in different periods of dead time .DELTA.t of Staccoseinschusssystems detected error events F1; F2 reaches the stack at least at the end of each dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system beginning with a strip labeled "B".
  • Fig. 4 shows the case that in the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system, which starts in the stack when the strip is marked with an "A", repeatedly error events F1; F2 be detected, which, unlike the examples shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, at the end of this dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system begun with the insertion of the strip marked "A", a faulty sheet is deposited on the stack, and therefore at the end of this no strip, in particular also no strip labeled "B", is injected into the stack when the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system begun with "A" is injected into the stack.
  • the error event F3 occurring at the end of the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system commenced with the insertion of the strip marked "A” continues beyond the end of the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system begun with the insertion of the strip marked "A", ie there are consecutively faulty sheets placed on the stack.
  • a special case of the example shown in FIG. 4 is that starting with the first arc detected as faulty, all further sheets reaching the stack on the stack are defective, whereby the error event F3 directly follows the first error event F1. Accordingly, after the dead time ⁇ t of the strip injection system commenced with the insertion of the strip marked with "A", no further period of the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system immediately follows.
  • the error event F3 ends with the fact that after the sequence of faulty sheets again at least one error-free sheet is stored on the stack.
  • a strip marked "B" is injected into the stack in correlation with the first defect-free sheet, whereby the end the sequence of erroneous sheets is marked.
  • a strip marked "A” may be extended by several, e.g. B. premature by up to three sheets and marked with "B” strip to several, z. B. be delayed by up to three sheets late in the stack.
  • a longitudinal cutting device When in transit on the printed sheet in the printing on their way to the press belonging to the delivery a longitudinal cutting device is arranged, wherein the longitudinal cutting device divided along its guided arc by a longitudinal section, for. B. divides into two equal halves, then arise z. B. on the support surface of the stack to be formed in the stack in correlation to the number of longitudinal sections performed the otherwise divide a stack partial stack, namely always a total of a partial stack more than longitudinal cuts are performed, each of these partial stacks individually and separately from the or other sub-stack (s) can be further processed.
  • the intersection between two sub-sheets correlates within the stack formed by depositing a plurality of divided sheets between two adjacent sub-stacks with an interface passing vertically through the stack.
  • a plurality of strip-insertion systems corresponding to the number of individual partial stacks or at least insertion devices are provided on the delivery of the printing press. If the slitter halves printed sheets, z. B. be provided by the same St considerably nor electrically interconnected, but at least independently controllable and thus self-sufficient, each having at least one Einsch mangoose one of the sub-stack is assigned.
  • Information about the printed sheet on the relative position of the cutting line executed by the longitudinal cutting device is preferably stored in the inspection system, so that the inspection system z. B. the multiple Einschmantechnik controlling strip Einschusssystem can control differentiated. Depending on which part of the arc the inspection system detects an error, then the respective sub-stack, in which this sub-sheet is stored, associated Einschmanêt is activated and activated. It may also be provided to print information on the position of the error detected by the inspection system on the strip to be buried, wherein the position z. B. may be indicated by referenced on the unbroken arc coordinates.
  • Fig. 5 shows a plan view of a section of a printing machine, wherein in the transport direction T of the printing material, in particular the succession of sheets to be printed, several, preferably each other printing ink verdruckende printing units 01 are arranged. Behind the last in the transport direction T printing unit 01 is a belonging to the printing press display 02, wherein the printed in the printing machine sheets are stored in a stack 03 to each other. On one side of the stack 03, z. B. at a transversely to the transport direction T of the sheet-facing side, a St considerably more Einschmanêt 04, which einschitt a strip 06 in the stack 03.
  • Fig. 6 shows a side view along a line XX extending section through the stack 03 shown in FIG. 5, wherein the line XX extends transversely to the transport direction T of the arc.
  • the Einschman choir 04 rolls due to its activation by a control signal, this control signal is preferably generated by an arranged in the printing machine inspection system, eg. B. strip-shaped material from a roller holder 07 and performs an unrolled from the roller holder 07 end of the material to the upper edge 08 of the stack 03, whereby a strip 06 sufficient length of this material is placed on the uppermost in the stack 03 arc.
  • FIG. 7 shows a plan view of a section of a printing press, wherein the illustrated arrangement is substantially similar to that in FIG. 5.
  • Each sub-stack 03 is in each case a Einschmanêt 04 arranged, which each einschmannt a strip 06 in the respective sub-stack 03.
  • Fig. 8 shows - similar to Fig. 6 - in a side view along a line YY extending section through the partial stack 03 shown in FIG. 7, wherein the line YY transverse to the transport direction T of the arc.
  • Both Einschmanieri 04 roll in their activation in each case by a control signal, each of these control signals is preferably generated by an inspection system arranged in the printing press, z.
  • the two partial stacks 03 adjoin one another in the stack considered externally as a single stack, they are mechanically separated from one another at the interface 11 passing through the stack. After at least one more of the delivery 02 supplied partial sheet has been placed on the part stack 03 and thereby the respective strip 06 is sufficiently retained, this strip 06 is cut off from the roll of material.
  • a writing or arc-marking device may be used in a stack of sheets placed on top of each other according to the purpose of the invention preferably used Einsch manellas makes a single faulty sheet or a region with several faulty bow by a unique, outside the stack preferably easily perceptible marking or marking identifiable.
  • the proposed method may also be described as a method for treating at least one defective sheet, wherein at least one defective sheet is treated in a stream of sheets printed in a printing press with a device, the printed sheets being sequentially fed to at least one printing press-related delivery be, with the treatment of at least the one faulty sheet is carried out on its transport to the delivery.
  • the treatment on a sequence of sheets following the selected sheet begins with a selection of a faulty sheet from the sheet being delivered, the treatment starting from the sequence of sheets beginning with the selected sheet until the expiration of a selection made the dead time .DELTA.t of the apparatus is continued, and at the earliest on expiry of the dead time .DELTA.t started with the selected sheet, the treatment of another sheet selected from the sheets fed in the sheet for display is carried out by the apparatus.
  • the selected arc which is considered to be defective, together with the sequence of sheets following it during the dead time, is preferably discharged from the device for disposal or reworking from the stream of sheets guided to the delivery.
  • the selection of a sheet out of the stream of sheets delivered to the display is in particular with a z.
  • B. at least one CCD camera having carried inspection system, wherein the inspection system at least a subset of the outfeed sheet an image is taken, wherein a currently recorded image based on a reference image in terms of at least one of the print quality of the printed sheet impairing error or a type of error is checked, with an insufficient match between the currently recorded image and the reference image an error message z.
  • B. is generated in the form of a control signal.

Landscapes

  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
  • Forming Counted Batches (AREA)
  • Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
  • Control Or Security For Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Processing And Handling Of Plastics And Other Materials For Molding In General (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Fiber Materials (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Treatments Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)
  • Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
EP06120504A 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse Not-in-force EP1777073B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08159478A EP2006110B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'exclusion d'au moins une feuille défectueuse d'un traitement prévu pour une feuille non défectueuse
EP08159475A EP2006109B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005045498A DE102005045498B4 (de) 2005-09-23 2005-09-23 Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung oder Behandlung zumindest eines fehlerbehafteten Bogens

Related Child Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08159478A Division EP2006110B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'exclusion d'au moins une feuille défectueuse d'un traitement prévu pour une feuille non défectueuse
EP08159475A Division EP2006109B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur
EP08159475.6 Division-Into 2008-07-02
EP08159478.0 Division-Into 2008-07-02

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1777073A2 true EP1777073A2 (fr) 2007-04-25
EP1777073A3 EP1777073A3 (fr) 2008-07-23
EP1777073B1 EP1777073B1 (fr) 2010-08-25

Family

ID=37836993

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06120504A Not-in-force EP1777073B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse
EP08159478A Not-in-force EP2006110B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'exclusion d'au moins une feuille défectueuse d'un traitement prévu pour une feuille non défectueuse
EP08159475A Not-in-force EP2006109B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08159478A Not-in-force EP2006110B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'exclusion d'au moins une feuille défectueuse d'un traitement prévu pour une feuille non défectueuse
EP08159475A Not-in-force EP2006109B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (3) EP1777073B1 (fr)
AT (3) ATE441525T1 (fr)
DE (4) DE102005045498B4 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3456535B1 (fr) 2017-09-14 2021-04-21 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG Inspection d'image des produits imprimés avec des classes d'erreur
CN113299003A (zh) * 2020-04-29 2021-08-24 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 一种调整介质承载组件的方法和装置

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009023963A1 (de) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Qualitätsmaßes für ein von einer Bearbeitungsmaschine bearbeitetes Produkt
DE102011106805A1 (de) 2010-07-29 2012-02-02 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Vorrichtung zum Ausgeben von Bogen aus einer Druckmaschine
DE102016226171A1 (de) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 Koenig & Bauer Ag Auslage und Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung von Bogen in der Auslage einer bogenverarbeitenden Maschine

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3034212A1 (de) 1980-09-11 1982-03-18 M.A.N.- Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 6050 Offenbach Rotationsdruckmaschine mit einer bogenstapelmarkierungsvorrichtung
GB2109775A (en) 1981-11-12 1983-06-08 Jack Evans Thompson Inserting tabs into sheet stack at different positions
WO1996007609A2 (fr) 1994-09-09 1996-03-14 Pelcombe Limited Dispositif d'insertion d'onglet
DE19653403C2 (de) 1996-10-21 2001-05-10 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zum Transport von Bogen
WO2002014197A2 (fr) 2000-08-10 2002-02-21 Vacuumatic Limited Appareil de contage et d'insertion de cavaliers

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1252708B (de) * 1967-10-26 VEB Druckmaschmenwerk Leip ziq, Leipzig Vorrichtung zum Einlegen von Markierungsstreifen in sich bil dende Stapel einer Druckmaschine
US3138048A (en) * 1963-09-24 1964-06-23 Nat Steel Corp Classification of sheet material
US3375744A (en) * 1966-03-08 1968-04-02 Eastman Kodak Co Cutting, counting and classifying apparatus
JPS61209899A (ja) * 1985-03-09 1986-09-18 明産株式会社 長尺状シ−トのマ−キング装置
DE4127102C2 (de) * 1991-08-16 1994-05-19 Friedrich Elmpt Verfahren zum Einbringen eines Zählstreifens in einen Bogenstapel sowie Vorrichtung zur Durchführung dieses Verfahrens

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3034212A1 (de) 1980-09-11 1982-03-18 M.A.N.- Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 6050 Offenbach Rotationsdruckmaschine mit einer bogenstapelmarkierungsvorrichtung
GB2109775A (en) 1981-11-12 1983-06-08 Jack Evans Thompson Inserting tabs into sheet stack at different positions
WO1996007609A2 (fr) 1994-09-09 1996-03-14 Pelcombe Limited Dispositif d'insertion d'onglet
DE19653403C2 (de) 1996-10-21 2001-05-10 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zum Transport von Bogen
WO2002014197A2 (fr) 2000-08-10 2002-02-21 Vacuumatic Limited Appareil de contage et d'insertion de cavaliers

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3456535B1 (fr) 2017-09-14 2021-04-21 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG Inspection d'image des produits imprimés avec des classes d'erreur
CN113299003A (zh) * 2020-04-29 2021-08-24 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 一种调整介质承载组件的方法和装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2006109B1 (fr) 2009-12-23
ATE478766T1 (de) 2010-09-15
ATE441525T1 (de) 2009-09-15
DE502006007720D1 (de) 2010-10-07
EP1777073A3 (fr) 2008-07-23
EP2006110B1 (fr) 2009-09-02
EP1777073B1 (fr) 2010-08-25
ATE452760T1 (de) 2010-01-15
DE502006004766D1 (de) 2009-10-15
DE102005045498B4 (de) 2007-06-21
EP2006110A2 (fr) 2008-12-24
DE502006005756D1 (de) 2010-02-04
DE102005045498A1 (de) 2007-04-12
EP2006109A1 (fr) 2008-12-24
EP2006110A3 (fr) 2008-12-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1454746B1 (fr) Système d'inspection d'images pour une machine d'impression
EP0167196A1 (fr) Procédé pour transformer des bandes ou des feuilles de valeur en liasses
EP1777073B1 (fr) Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse
EP0685420A1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle pour la fabrication de produits imprimés et ensemble pour la mise en oeuvre du procédé
EP2107023A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour la production d'un courant de produits plats dans une séquence prédéterminée
DE102006015828A1 (de) Gewichtete Bogeninspektion
DE19939164B4 (de) Verfahren zur Verarbeitung von Bedruckstoffen
DE102015116030A1 (de) Einrichtung zum Codieren von Druckbogen in einer Bogendruckmaschine
EP3251852B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé destinés à la transformation de produits imprimés
EP3322658A1 (fr) Dispositif de traitement d'une bande et procédé de transport d'au moins une bande de matériau le long d'au moins un trajet de tansport de bande d'un dispositif de traitement de bande
EP1206402B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour distribuer un nombre predetermine de feuilles faisant partie d'un groupe de feuilles
DE102009027861A1 (de) Verfahren zur Seitenkantenausrichtung von Druckbogen
EP1447364B1 (fr) Dispositif permettant la séparation individuelle de flans d'une feuille imprimée
DE3020117C2 (de) Einrichtung zur Kontrolle und zum Sortieren von mit Aufdrücken versehenen Bogen, insbesondere Banknoten
DE2445999A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schneiden und sortieren von fotografischen aufzeichnungstraegern
DE102009009543A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Einführen von Makierstreifen in einen Druckerzeugnisstapel
EP1652806A1 (fr) Dispositif pour détecter des units successives d'une bande sans fin
DE102004060019B4 (de) Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung von Druckexemplaren sowie Druckmaschine
DE102009051637A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen einer endlosen Papierbahn mit Wasserzeichenmarken
DE102013209772B4 (de) Verfahren zum Nachdrucken mindestens eines individualisierten Druckexemplars
DE102006012330C5 (de) Bogendruckmaschine mit Nachverarbeitungseinheit
DE102022111571A1 (de) Falzapparat einer Offset-Rollendruckmaschine und Offset-Rollendruckmaschine
DE10303374A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern einer papierverarbeitenden Maschine
DE102008006462B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtungen zur Druckbildabtastung mit einer Führungseinrichtung
CH711135B1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines Druckprodukts.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080704

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502006007720

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101007

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20100825

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20100825

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101225

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101227

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101125

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER A.G.

Effective date: 20100930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101126

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100930

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

Effective date: 20110525

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101206

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100930

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502006007720

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110525

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110226

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100825

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20121001

Year of fee payment: 7

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20120924

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20130222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 502006007720

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 478766

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130912

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502006007720

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: KOENIG BAUER AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: KOENIG BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 97080 WUERZBURG, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502006007720

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 97080 WUERZBURG, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20170922

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG, DE

Effective date: 20170922

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190925

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190827

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190926

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190930

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502006007720

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200912