EP1755998A1 - Kraftreduziertes messverfahren für traktionsantriebe, insbesondere treibscheibenantriebe von aufzügen - Google Patents
Kraftreduziertes messverfahren für traktionsantriebe, insbesondere treibscheibenantriebe von aufzügenInfo
- Publication number
- EP1755998A1 EP1755998A1 EP05750236A EP05750236A EP1755998A1 EP 1755998 A1 EP1755998 A1 EP 1755998A1 EP 05750236 A EP05750236 A EP 05750236A EP 05750236 A EP05750236 A EP 05750236A EP 1755998 A1 EP1755998 A1 EP 1755998A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- suspension
- test lever
- test
- force
- fastening device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 107
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 claims description 92
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 abstract 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003380 propellant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0037—Performance analysers
Definitions
- Reduced-force measuring method for traction drives in particular traction sheave drives for elevators
- the present invention relates to a test lever system for checking a traction behavior of a conveyor system, in particular an elevator system.
- the object of the present invention is to enable the traction behavior of a conveyor system, in particular an elevator system, with a test lever system.
- a test lever system for checking a traction behavior of a conveyor system in particular an elevator system
- the test lever system having a test lever that has a load and a power arm, a suspension cable fastening device with a receptacle for the load arm of the test lever and with a support for Support of the test lever is equipped in such a way that when a test force is applied to the power arm, a relief can be introduced into the suspension means to be tested, for example a rope, by the interaction of the load arm and the suspension cable fastening device.
- similar propellants such as chains, belts, belts or the like can be checked.
- the test lever system is used to relieve the load as a test force in the suspension element.
- the support for supporting the test lever is used in particular to create a fixed point.
- This fixed point is at least in connection with an articulation point
- the test lever can have an element compatible with the support, via which a connection between the support and the test lever is not only created, but preferably is also secured.
- the support can also be a pivot point or pivot point at the same time.
- test lever system can be used on an elevator which has a traction sheave around which a suspension element, in particular one or more ropes, is at least partially guided, a car hanging on one end of the suspension element (s) and a counterweight hanging on the other end.
- the test lever system can also be used on machines with an endless suspension element which is guided and driven by rollers.
- the suspension cable fastening device comprises a plurality of suspension cables at the same time. In this way, the overall function of all suspension cables can be checked. There is also the alternative of checking a single suspension cable or only a limited number of all suspension cables at the same time.
- the suspension cable fastening device can preferably be detachably attached to the rope to be tested.
- the suspension cable fastening device can, however, also be permanently, in particular permanently, connected to the rope to be checked.
- the suspension cable fastening device in particular allows such a force to be exerted on the ropes to be checked that all ropes are evenly relieved.
- a parallel relief of the supporting cables is made possible via the supporting cable fastening device.
- the suspension cable fastening device can be constructed in several parts, for example. This makes it possible, depending on the installation conditions, for the suspension cable fastening device to be used differently and fastened with the suspension cables.
- the support which, for example, provides a fulcrum for the test lever, is preferably part of a telescopic support. This way it is possible to use a
- the telescopic support enables a change in height of the support.
- the height of the support can be adjusted to the installation conditions of the conveyor system on the one hand and on the other hand for reasons of ease of use.
- the telescopic support can, for example, have a foot area that provides three-point support, each of these support points being individually adjustable.
- the telescopic support can be attached to internals or similar stationary areas. This is possible, for example, by means of screwing, clamping or the like.
- test lever that can be used can be found, for example, in DE 103 231 75, the content of which is referred to in full in this disclosure with regard to the structure of the test lever, with regard to sensors there, with regard to attachments to the test lever and with regard to devices connected to the test lever ,
- the test lever system is particularly suitable for mobile use. It can preferably be stowed in a single transport case. This enables a single tester to bring the test lever system on site. On the other hand, a single inspector can inspect such a conveyor system without additional help.
- the carrying case fastening device as well as a telescopic support and tools required for assembly are accommodated in the transport case in addition to the test lever.
- a receiving / transmitting unit, a data storage unit and / or a mobile computer can also be accommodated in the transport case.
- the dimensions of the test lever can be changed. This change enables a test force to be set to be adaptable to the tester using the test lever. This makes it possible that no large test forces are required for the driving ability measurement. Rather, the hand forces that can be applied by one person and that can be transmitted via the test lever are sufficient.
- a method for testing a traction behavior of a conveyor system is made available.
- the method is carried out with a test lever which is attached to at least one suspension cable on a suspension element side and which relieves the suspension cable by applying a test force to the inspection lever.
- the suspension element side is the side to which a cabin, a conveyor basket or another device for transporting a load is connected.
- a support cable fastening device, into which the test lever engages to initiate the test lever force, is preferably attached to the support cable which is to be checked.
- the test lever force relieves the load on the suspension cable. It can be determined whether there is sufficient traction behavior when a test force reaches a minimum value without the suspension cable to be checked slipping.
- suspension cables can be checked at once in this way.
- the suspension cable fastening device is attached to a plurality of suspension ropes and a simultaneous relief of these suspension ropes is then carried out via the test lever.
- the supporting cables are preferably relieved in equal parts. However, there is also the possibility that different relief can take place through different application of force to the suspension cables.
- test force is measured and that at least a predeterminable test force is reached, an automatic confirmation of a positive measurement takes place.
- a positive measurement is defined in such a way that a minimum force that can be entered or calculated beforehand is determined. If this is reached or exceeded during the measuring process, there is sufficient traction behavior of the conveyor system and thus a positive measurement. Before a test, it is therefore preferably determined which minimum force is to be applied by the test lever in a system-specific manner.
- a data carrier with a computer program for a method for testing a traction behavior of a conveyor system, in particular an elevator system, and / or for a test lever as described above.
- the data carrier is preferably part of a data processing unit, in particular part of a mobile computer.
- the computer program has an algorithm with which the driving ability can be determined via at least one of the following parameters: safety constant, load capacity of a car, counterweight, number of suspension elements, in particular suspension cables, and / or transmission ratio of the suspension, for determining the minimum force with which a relief of at least one suspension cable is to be carried out to check the tractive ability.
- the transmission ratio of the suspension describes the arrangement of suspension elements, in particular suspension cables for a drive and their attachment with stationary components.
- a corresponding safety margin can be used to determine in advance for each conveyor system the minimum force with which either a suspension cable or all suspension cables must be relieved.
- this value of the minimum force can be input into the test lever, in particular be automatically transferable, for example over a radio link.
- a safety surcharge can also be applied to the minimum force. It can also be provided that a minimum time must be applied via the minimum force. (see script, page 4 below).
- the examiner to be able to estimate on site when he can cancel an exam.
- information about the measurement can be recorded and stored, in particular via the test lever.
- these measured values can also be evaluated directly or transmitted to an evaluation unit.
- the transmission is possible, for example, via a corresponding interface on the test lever or via a radio link.
- this enables automatic evaluation, which makes it possible to correlate an individual measurement, but in particular also a large number of individual measurements. It is also possible to generate long-term behavior from this mass of data.
- FIG. 2 shows an enlarged detail from FIG. 1 with a first rope fastening device
- FIG. 3 shows a second rope fastening device
- Fig. 5 shows a section of a test lever
- the conveyor system 2 has a traction sheave 3, on one side of which a counterweight 4 and on the other side a basket 5 to be moved via a suspension element, in particular in the form of a Carrier cables 6 are attached.
- a fixing element in the form of a first suspension cable fastening device 7 is arranged on the suspension cable 6 on a suspension element side.
- the first suspension cable fastening device 7 on the suspension cable 6 can preferably be attached and removed again in a non-destructive manner.
- a test lever 8 can engage in the first suspension cable fastening device 7. The test lever 8 can do this have the appropriate shape.
- the test lever 8 is supported on a support 9 for the test lever 8, which forms a fulcrum for the test lever 8.
- the support 9 is preferably made available by means of a telescopic support 10, the telescopic support 10 having a foot region 12 which can be adapted to the respective floor 11.
- the test lever 8 can have a geometry so that the support 9 cannot slip in relation to the test lever 8.
- the test lever 8 is divided into a load arm 14 and a power arm 13 via the support 9.
- FIG. 2 shows an enlargement of a detail from FIG. 1, in which the test lever 8 rests on the support 9.
- the force arm 13 and the load arm 14 enable the test lever 8 to be divided into a load lever a and a force lever b.
- the test lever 8 has, in particular, a test lever head part 15, as can be seen, for example, from DE 103 23 175 and to which reference is made in full in the context of this disclosure.
- the first suspension cable fastening device 7 has a receptacle 16 for the load arm 14.
- the load arm 14 is preferably designed geometrically in such a way that an intervention in the receptacle 16 is made possible.
- the load arm 14 can in particular also be releasably connected to the first suspension cable fastening device 7, for example via a screw, clamp or snap connection.
- the first suspension cable fastening device 7 can also serve as a guide, preferably a bearing, for the test lever 8.
- the first suspension cable fastening device 7 can be used as a clamping system or as
- Screw system to be constructed and is composed for example of a first component 17 and a second component 18. These can be connected to one another, for example, by a screw system 19 and thereby exert a clamping force on the supporting cable 6.
- a hand force F1 By applying a hand force F1, a lever force F2 is introduced into the suspension cable 6.
- the support 9 forms a fulcrum for the test lever 8 and the attached test lever head part 15.
- the manual force F1 is increased via the transmission ratio b / a and introduced into the supporting cable 6.
- the test lever detects the momentary force in the load arm, preferably by means of integrated evaluation electronics. However, measured values can also be forwarded via an interface to an evaluation unit separated from test lever 8 in order to obtain information about the measurement or other parameters.
- FIG. 3 shows a second suspension cable fastening device 20 which has been mounted on a plurality of suspension cables 6.
- a bridge element 21 extends over the support cables 6, each support cable 6 being individually connected to the bridge element 21. This is preferably done using a screw system, as can be seen, for example, from FIG. 2.
- the bridge element 21 can be balanced such that when force is applied Uniform relief of all suspension cables 6 takes place via the bridge element 21.
- the bridge element 21 has a coupling element 22, which can be arranged in a displaceable or variable manner.
- the coupling element 22 has, for example, a receptacle 16 for a load arm of a test lever.
- the receptacle 16 can allow, for example, tine-like engagement of the test lever.
- the coupling element 22 is displaced, for example in height as well as along the bridge element 21, in such a way that a uniform introduction of force is made possible.
- the coupling element 22 can also be arranged on a different side of the bridge element 21 than the support ropes 6. This makes it possible that with an odd number of support ropes that are equally spaced, a central engagement of the test lever is still possible.
- FIG. 4 shows a third suspension cable fastening device 24.
- Three suspension cables 6 are coupled to one another via the bridge element 21.
- the bridge element 21 serves as a force transmission means, since it absorbs transverse forces and allows force to be released to relieve the load-bearing ropes 6 only via the connecting means 26, which in particular clamp the load-bearing ropes 6 for force transmission and relief.
- test lever 8 shows a section of a test lever 8.
- Signal means 27 are arranged in the test lever 8, for example. These can be LEDs, for example. These can be used to indicate whether a minimum force that is applied to the test lever is sufficient or whether a minimum force has not yet been reached to ensure traction behavior.
- the test lever 8 can also provide an input option 28. An entry can be made, for example, using a keyboard or other control panels.
- a pre-set menu can be selected, in particular a menu pre-set for specific conveyor systems with corresponding predetermined minimum forces that can be achieved.
- the test lever 8 can have one or more interfaces for wired or wireless data transmission.
- FIG. 6 shows, by way of example, a schematic view of a transport case 29.
- the components belonging to the test lever system can be accommodated in the transport case 29 in such a way that an individual operator is able to bring the test lever system on site, to set it up and then only to check the functionality of a To be able to perform traction behavior of the conveyor system.
- a support for the support in particular in the form of a telescopic support, at least one suspension cable fastening device, corresponding tool and other material can be accommodated.
- a mobile data processing device 30 can be included, for example.
- a radio transmission device 31 can be assigned to it. This enables the remote transmission of data that is recorded with the test lever system on the conveyor system.
- the invention can be used to check the traction behavior of various mechanical systems, in particular conveyor systems or elevator systems, which move the system parts by means of one or more driving elements in a horizontal, vertical or any direction.
- the present invention enables, in particular, the checking of conveyor systems or working machines, in particular elevator systems, which have significantly higher load capacities or tensile forces and which until now could only be checked using extremely large and therefore heavy test equipment.
- testing individual suspension elements such as suspension cables or an entire suspension element suspension at the same time enables time-efficient checking.
Landscapes
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Escalators And Moving Walkways (AREA)
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
- Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
- Devices Affording Protection Of Roads Or Walls For Sound Insulation (AREA)
- Elevator Control (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004029133A DE102004029133A1 (de) | 2004-06-17 | 2004-06-17 | Kraftreduziertes Messverfahren für Traktionsantriebe, insbesondere Treibscheibenantriebe von Aufzügen |
PCT/EP2005/006332 WO2005123561A1 (de) | 2004-06-17 | 2005-06-14 | Kraftreduziertes messverfahren für traktionsantriebe, insbesondere treibscheibenantriebe von aufzügen |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1755998A1 true EP1755998A1 (de) | 2007-02-28 |
EP1755998B1 EP1755998B1 (de) | 2014-05-07 |
Family
ID=35044845
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05750236.1A Active EP1755998B1 (de) | 2004-06-17 | 2005-06-14 | Kraftreduziertes messverfahren für traktionsantriebe, insbesondere treibscheibenantriebe von aufzügen |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7673522B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1755998B1 (de) |
CN (1) | CN101031492B (de) |
BR (1) | BRPI0512107A (de) |
CA (1) | CA2570943C (de) |
DE (1) | DE102004029133A1 (de) |
MX (1) | MXPA06013238A (de) |
RU (1) | RU2372271C2 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2005123561A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10323175A1 (de) * | 2003-05-22 | 2004-12-23 | TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group | Prüfhebel |
DE102006011092A1 (de) * | 2006-03-08 | 2007-09-13 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Prüfhebel mit Auflager |
DE102006011395B4 (de) * | 2006-03-09 | 2014-12-31 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Messvorrichtung für eine Treibfähigkeitsmessung |
DE102006050570B4 (de) * | 2006-10-26 | 2016-08-18 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Prüfhebelsystem |
DE102007009602A1 (de) * | 2007-02-26 | 2008-08-28 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Treibfähigkeitsmessung an Treibscheibenaufzugsanlagen |
DE102009038497A1 (de) | 2009-08-21 | 2011-02-24 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Treibfähigkeitsmessung |
DE102009038498A1 (de) | 2009-08-21 | 2011-02-24 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung von Zustandsgrößen einer Aufzugsanlage |
DE102009042033A1 (de) | 2009-09-17 | 2011-03-24 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Aufzugsprüfsystem und Aufzugsprüfsystem-Aktualisierungsverfahren für ein Aufzugsprüfsystem |
ITUB20154273A1 (it) * | 2015-10-09 | 2017-04-09 | Nuova Brunengo S R L | Dispositivo per la diagnosi e la ricerca dei guasti negli impianti di sollevamento come ascensori, montacarichi o simili |
CN109724878B (zh) * | 2017-10-30 | 2024-02-09 | 核工业北京地质研究院 | 一种用于高压固结仪的杠杆固定装置 |
CN109991087A (zh) * | 2019-04-30 | 2019-07-09 | 广东省特种设备检测研究院(广东省特种设备事故调查中心) | 一种便携式多功能电梯加载测试装置及其使用方法 |
CN117561208A (zh) * | 2021-07-05 | 2024-02-13 | 三菱电机楼宇解决方案株式会社 | 测定方法和测定用装置 |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT313363B (de) * | 1969-02-03 | 1974-01-15 | Ceretti & Tanfani Spa | Vorrichtung zum pruefen der klemmkraft der kuppelgeraete bei seilbahnen |
FR2188687A6 (de) * | 1972-06-01 | 1974-01-18 | Peugeot & Renault | |
US4145963A (en) * | 1976-11-03 | 1979-03-27 | Signode Corporation | Jam-clearing and torque sensing traction wheel assembly and strap feed stopping mechanism |
US4555091A (en) * | 1983-06-23 | 1985-11-26 | Power Climber, Inc. | Efficient lightweight hoist with multiple-cable-size traction and safety systems |
US4850242A (en) * | 1988-07-19 | 1989-07-25 | Orscheln Co. | Soft-release cable operating means |
DE3911391C5 (de) * | 1989-04-07 | 2010-04-29 | TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überprüfen der Treibfähigkeit |
DE4211289C2 (de) * | 1992-04-03 | 1994-01-05 | Tech Ueberwachungs Verein Hann | Verfahren zum Messen der Treibfähigkeit eines Antriebs einer Förderanlage |
DE4311011C2 (de) * | 1992-07-24 | 1994-07-14 | Arno John | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Aufzugs mit Treibscheibenantrieb |
JP3188833B2 (ja) * | 1995-11-17 | 2001-07-16 | 三菱電機株式会社 | エレベータのロープテンション測定装置 |
US5832784A (en) * | 1997-03-18 | 1998-11-10 | Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. | Variable ratio parking brake control with enhanced cable take-up |
EP1195511A1 (de) * | 1999-06-15 | 2002-04-10 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Luftmengenmessvorrictung, die mit einer elektronisch gesteuerten drosselklappe eine einheit formt |
US6206053B1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2001-03-27 | Panduit Corp. | Cable tie tensioning and severing tool |
GB2364288A (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2002-01-23 | Ford New Holland Nv | Elevator for bulk material and related apparatus |
DE10323175A1 (de) * | 2003-05-22 | 2004-12-23 | TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group | Prüfhebel |
-
2004
- 2004-06-17 DE DE102004029133A patent/DE102004029133A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-06-14 US US11/570,644 patent/US7673522B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-14 BR BRPI0512107-8A patent/BRPI0512107A/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-06-14 EP EP05750236.1A patent/EP1755998B1/de active Active
- 2005-06-14 WO PCT/EP2005/006332 patent/WO2005123561A1/de active Application Filing
- 2005-06-14 CA CA2570943A patent/CA2570943C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-14 CN CN2005800200469A patent/CN101031492B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-14 MX MXPA06013238A patent/MXPA06013238A/es active IP Right Grant
- 2005-06-14 RU RU2007101523/11A patent/RU2372271C2/ru not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005123561A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20080271547A1 (en) | 2008-11-06 |
EP1755998B1 (de) | 2014-05-07 |
DE102004029133A1 (de) | 2006-01-05 |
CN101031492B (zh) | 2010-11-03 |
US7673522B2 (en) | 2010-03-09 |
CA2570943A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
WO2005123561A1 (de) | 2005-12-29 |
RU2372271C2 (ru) | 2009-11-10 |
RU2007101523A (ru) | 2008-08-10 |
MXPA06013238A (es) | 2007-02-28 |
BRPI0512107A (pt) | 2008-02-06 |
CN101031492A (zh) | 2007-09-05 |
CA2570943C (en) | 2010-08-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1755998B1 (de) | Kraftreduziertes messverfahren für traktionsantriebe, insbesondere treibscheibenantriebe von aufzügen | |
EP0390972B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erfassen von physikalischen Kenngrössen eines Aufzuges | |
DE69930426T2 (de) | Messung der Last in einer Aufzugskabine | |
DE102009002678B4 (de) | Prüfverfahren für Drehgestelle sowie Prüf- und Montagestand | |
EP1847501B1 (de) | Aufzugsanlage mit einer Tragmittelüberwachungseinrichtung zur Überwachung des Zustandes des Tragmittels und Verfahren zur Prüfung des Tragmittels | |
DE8904375U1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Erfassen von physikalischen Kenngrößen eines Aufzugs | |
EP2935071A1 (de) | Aufzugsanlage mit überwachtungsvorrichtung und verfahren zur üerwachtung einer aufzugsanlage | |
DE10144913B4 (de) | Aufzugbremslast-Wägesystem | |
EP1628900B1 (de) | PRüFHEBEL | |
DE102014220445B4 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Überprüfung von Führungen | |
WO2019185695A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum überwachen von eigenschaften einer tragmittelanordnung in einer aufzuganlage | |
EP2492661A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Testen von Seilwinden | |
EP1832540B1 (de) | Messvorrichtung für eine Treibfähigkeitsmessung | |
DE4311011A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Aufzuges mit Treibscheibenantrieb auf Schlupfbeginn | |
EP1832541A1 (de) | Prüfhobel mit Auflager | |
DE202009016760U1 (de) | Windenprüfsystem | |
AT503455B1 (de) | Statische treibfähigkeitsprüfung | |
EP1931890B1 (de) | Lebensdauerüberwachungssystem | |
DE102017202589A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung der Treibfähigkeit einer Förderanlage über eine Drehmomentmessung | |
DE10042724A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Messung der Bremskraft | |
DE102007009602A1 (de) | Treibfähigkeitsmessung an Treibscheibenaufzugsanlagen | |
EP3764075B1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum messen einer kraft in verschieberichtung eines in die verschieberichtung verschiebbaren trittbretts eines schienenfahrzeugs | |
DE102022104832A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Überprüfung wenigstens eines sicherheitsrelevanten Kennwerts einer Aufzugsanlage | |
EP3103537B1 (de) | Verfahren und messsystem zur diagnose von einrichtungen zum befördern von lasten, verwendung des messsystems | |
DE102023117848A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Überprüfung einer Aufzugsanlage auf der Grundlage von elektrischen Messwerten eines Antriebsmotors |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20061102 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100811 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20131016 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 666483 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140515 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140618 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20140507 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140808 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140907 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140908 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20150227 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNERSCHAFT VO, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DOMPATENT VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNE, DE |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20150210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNERSCHAFT VO, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DOMPATENT VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNE, DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20140807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140630 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140614 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502005014341 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20150210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140707 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 666483 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140614 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140507 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20050614 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240617 Year of fee payment: 20 |