EP1614802B1 - Procédé et appareil pour le traitement d' une bande de papier ou carton - Google Patents
Procédé et appareil pour le traitement d' une bande de papier ou carton Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1614802B1 EP1614802B1 EP05104603A EP05104603A EP1614802B1 EP 1614802 B1 EP1614802 B1 EP 1614802B1 EP 05104603 A EP05104603 A EP 05104603A EP 05104603 A EP05104603 A EP 05104603A EP 1614802 B1 EP1614802 B1 EP 1614802B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- web
- calender
- drying
- moisture
- moisture content
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21G—CALENDERS; ACCESSORIES FOR PAPER-MAKING MACHINES
- D21G1/00—Calenders; Smoothing apparatus
- D21G1/0073—Accessories for calenders
- D21G1/0093—Web conditioning devices
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method of treating a web of paper or paperboard, in which the web is moistened on at least one side and then passed through a calender, the web being dried between the moistening and the passing through the calender. Furthermore, the invention relates to an apparatus for treating a web of paper or cardboard with a calender and a moistening in the direction of the web in front of the calender and arranged between the moistening device and the calender drying device.
- the disadvantage is that the further processability of the web is not optimal.
- the color absorption during printing occasionally leaves something to be desired.
- the flatness of the web is not optimal. Rather, the web tends to curl up, which can be particularly troublesome if the web is later processed into sheets.
- the invention has for its object to improve the processability of the web.
- This object is achieved in a method of the type mentioned in that the web is passed in the calender through a plurality of soft nips, which are bounded by a hard and a soft roll with an elastic surface and limited drying to a surface layer of the web.
- the moisture content of the web is adjusted by drying to a value which is 0.5 to 3%, in particular 0.5 to 1%, lower than the moisture content before drying.
- a value which is 0.5 to 3%, in particular 0.5 to 1% lower than the moisture content before drying.
- the moisture content of the web is lowered again by drying after wetting. However, this reduction is not as pronounced as over drying the web before applying the moisture.
- a moisture profile is obtained in which the moisture has a maximum below the surface, ie when the moisture is applied to both sides and dried on both sides, an M or W profile is obtained.
- the compressibility of a central region of the web is practically unaffected.
- the compressibility of the outer layers of the web is retained. Only in a region between the outer layer and the middle layer is the web more compacted. However, the good surface properties of the web are retained. It should be noted that even after drying, the surface of the web is not complete dry or overdried, such as at the exit of a dryer section.
- the web is adjusted to a moisture content of not more than 7%, in particular not more than 4%.
- This setting can be made in the dryer section. The train is so overdried so to speak. This not only makes it easier to keep the middle area of the track dry after wetting. Also, the setting of the above-mentioned moisture profile, in which the maximum of the moisture is not on, but below the surface, is facilitated.
- the web is moistened to a moisture content of at least 8%, in particular at least 10%. These values have been found to be optimal for the subsequent calendering. This also applies if the web is dried again on the surface after moistening.
- the web is moistened so close to the calender that the moisture content in the web center when passing through the first nip of the calender is at most 1.3 times the moisture content of the web before wetting. It prevents so that the moisture spreads evenly in the web.
- the middle part of the track should stay relatively dry. This has, as is known, the effect of compressing the middle region less strongly.
- the web is preferably dried by infrared radiation, contact drying or suspension drying after wetting. These drying methods have the advantage of acting only on the surface of the web. This achieves that only the surface area of the web is dried and possibly a small area below the surface. This results in having a relatively large area within the web which still has some moisture. Only this area is not on, but below the surface.
- the calender has a plurality of soft nips, which are each formed between a hard roller and a soft roller with an elastic surface and the drying device is arranged so close to the calender that in one Layer below the surface of the web higher humidity prevails than in a layer on the surface.
- the web After applying the moisture, the web is dried again. This has the positive effect that in any case the surface is provided with a lower humidity. The compressibility of the surface is thus retained, so that later the printability is improved. In addition, the flatness improves.
- the drying device is designed as a surface-drying device.
- the web is thus heated only on its surface and dried there.
- this has the additional effect that it is no longer necessary to pay so much attention to the application of moisture that the applied moisture can be completely absorbed by the web. A small excess of moisture is quite permissible. This is removed in the surface drying device. Surface damage, which could occur, for example, by rapid evaporation of the free water on contact of the web with a hot roller in the calender, is avoided with relatively high reliability.
- the drying device is designed as an infrared dryer, contact dryer or floating dryer. All three drying devices act on the web over the surface, thus leading to the fact that first a layer is dried on the surface of the web, without a corresponding drying takes place directly in deeper areas of the web.
- the moistening device is arranged so close to the calender that the moisture content in the web center when passing through the first nip of the calender is at most 1.3 times the moisture content of the web before the moistening device. It is therefore admitted that some moisture is also in the middle Area of the railway arrives. However, complete moisture balance over the web has not yet occurred.
- the web center thus remains substantially drier than the rest of the web, so that the web center is also less compressed when the web is pressurized in the nips of the calender.
- Fig. 1 shows a device 1 for treating a paper or board web 2, which is also referred to below as "web" 2.
- the web 2 comes from a paper or board machine, then passes through a moistening device 4, a drying device 5 and a calender 6, before being wound up in a winding 7 on a winding roll 8 or a drum. Between the calender 6 and the winding 7, a treatment device 9 shown schematically may be provided. In the treatment device 9, the web 2, for example, be moistened again.
- the web 2 is relatively strongly dried in the paper or board machine 3, more precisely in its drying section. It is overdried, i. their moisture is reduced to a value that is no longer sufficient for the satinization of the web 2 in the calender 6.
- the web 2 has, for example, a moisture content of at most 7%, preferably even a maximum of 4%.
- the web 2 After leaving the drying section of the paper or board machine 3, the web 2 then passes through the moistening device 4, in which it is moistened from the surface. In other words, you wear in the humidifier 4 moisture in the form of vapor or a spray on the surface of the web 2 on.
- the moisture application can be done on two sides, so that both sides of the web 2 are provided with an increased humidity.
- the surface layers of the web 2 are designed with a higher moisture content than the middle of the web 2. Since the compression of the web 2 in the calender 6 also depends on the moisture content of the web 2, the middle layer of the web 2 is correspondingly less compressed than the outer layers of the web 2. For this purpose, the surface of the web 2 is better smoothed.
- the calender 6 consists in a conventional manner of a plurality of rollers 10-17, which form between them nips 18-24.
- the two end rollers 10, 17 and the intermediate rollers 12, 14 and 15 are formed as soft rollers with an elastic coating 25 on the surface.
- the remaining rollers 11, 13 and 16 are formed as hard rollers whose surface is not as resilient as the surfaces of the soft rollers 10, 12, 14, 15, 17.
- the hard rollers 11, 13, 16 be heated.
- the nips 18-21, 23, 24 are formed as soft nips.
- the nip 22 is designed as a changeover tip, which is bounded by two soft rollers 14, 15 is. With such a calender 6, it is possible to rest both sides of the web in at least two nips each on a hard and heated roller 11, 13, 16.
- a drying device 5 is provided between the moistening device 4 and the calender 6, which is designed as a surface-drying device.
- the web 2 is dried from the surface.
- the drying device 5 has the advantage that one removes part of the moisture from the surface of the web 2. Although this has a small detrimental effect on the calender 6 forming smoothness. But also the surface of the web 2 is less compressed, which later has a positive effect on the processability. In particular, the ink absorption of the web during printing is better. This is especially true for gravure printing. Since the near-surface layers can still have a considerable moisture, good smoothness and a sufficient gloss continue to result. By drying the Surface results in an improvement in the uniformity of the moisture in the lying parallel to the surface plane of the paper and thus an improved flatness and improved uniformity of gloss and smoothness after passing through the calender 6, so after the calendering.
- the web 2 has previously been moistened on both sides, then it is also dried on both sides in the drying device 5. If only one side has been moistened then drying of the moistened side is sufficient.
- the further explanation is made on an embodiment in which both sides of the web 2 have been moistened. However, the skilled person will be able to make a one-sided moistening and a one-sided drying according to the method described here without difficulty.
- the moisture content of the web 2 after leaving the paper or board machine 3 is then at least 8%, preferably even at least 10%. This moisture content is again slightly reduced when passing through the drying device 5.
- the moisture content after the drying device should be at least 0.5 to 3%, preferably 0.5 to 1%, lower than before the drying device 5.
- the moisture content of the web 2, after passing through the moistening device 4, for example 10% located has, after passing through the drying device 5 at 7 to 9.5%, preferably 9 to 9.5%.
- the moistening of the web in the moistening device 4 and the drying of the web 2 in the drying device 5 must take place relatively shortly before the calender.
- the time between the passage of the moistening device 4 and the passage of the first nip 18 of the calender 6 should be a maximum of 2 seconds, preferably even a maximum of 1 second, to prevent the moisture from being equalized across the thickness of the web.
- the middle of the web should therefore preferably remain relatively dry. It should not be greater than 30% above the moisture of the web when leaving the paper or board machine 3. If the moisture there was set at 4%, then the moisture content of the center of the web 2 should be in the first nip 18 of the calender at a maximum of 5.3%.
- the drying device 5 must be positioned relatively close to the calender to prevent the moisture from the inside of the web 2 back to the surface compensates before the web 2 passes through the first nip 18 of the calender 6.
- the Fig. 2 to 4 now show different embodiments of the drying device. 5
- the drying device 5 is formed by an infrared dryer 26, which is arranged on both sides of the web 2.
- An infrared dryer operates with an infrared radiation, which acts on the surface of the web 2.
- the dryer 5 is designed as a contact dryer.
- the web 2 wraps around two heated rollers 27, 28, so it is also heated in this embodiment of the surface.
- the drying device 5 is designed as a floating dryer.
- Two blowing devices 29, 30 blow heated air on both sides of the web 2.
- the web is held on the one hand in the air, that is guided without contact.
- moisture is also removed from the web, on the one hand by the supply of heat and on the other hand by the supply of dry air.
- the drying device 5 acts only on the surface of the web 2, so that areas below the surface of the web 2 remain moister and thus can be compressed more. The deeper you get into the thickness of the web, the lower the moisture content. Accordingly, the Web 2 in the calender 6 total satellites relatively volume-saving.
Landscapes
- Paper (AREA)
- Making Paper Articles (AREA)
Claims (10)
- Procédé de traitement d'une nappe (2) de papier ou de carton, dans lequel la nappe (2) est humidifiée au moins d'un côté et est ensuite guidée à travers une calandre (6), la nappe étant séchée entre l'humidification et le passage à travers la calandre (6), caractérisé en ce que la nappe (2) est guidée dans la calandre par plusieurs pinces souples (18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24) qui sont limitées par un rouleau dur (11, 13, 16) et un rouleau souple (10, 12, 14 ,15, 17) avec une surface élastique, et le séchage est limité à une couche de surface de la nappe (2).
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'on ajuste le taux d'humidité de la nappe (2) par le séchage à une valeur qui est inférieure de 0,5 à 3%, notamment de 0,5 à 1%, au taux d'humidité avant le séchage.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que l'on ajuste la nappe (2) avant l'humidification à un taux d'humidité de 7 % maximum, notamment de 4 % maximum.
- Procédé selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que l'on humidifie la nappe (2) à un taux d'humidité d'au moins 8 %, notamment d'au moins 10 %.
- Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que l'on humidifie la nappe (2) juste avant la calandre (6) de telle sorte que le taux d'humidité au milieu de la nappe lors du passage à travers la première pince (18) de la calandre (6) soit au maximum de 1,3 fois le taux d'humidité de la nappe (2) avant l'humidification.
- Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que l'on sèche la nappe (2) par rayonnement infrarouge, par séchage par contact ou par séchage par mise en suspension après l'humidification.
- Dispositif de traitement d'une nappe (2) de papier ou de carton avec une calandre (6) et un dispositif d'humidification dans la direction d'avance de la nappe (2) avant la calandre (6) ainsi qu'un dispositif de séchage (5) disposé entre le dispositif d'humidification (4) et la calandre (6), caractérisé en ce que la calandre (6) présente plusieurs pinces souples (18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24) qui sont à chaque fois formées entre un rouleau dur (11, 13, 16) et un rouleau souple (10, 12, 14 ,15, 17) avec une surface élastique, et le dispositif de séchage (5) est disposé si étroitement avant la calandre (6) qu'il règne dans une couche sous la surface de la nappe (2) une humidité supérieure à celle régnant dans une couche sur la surface.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 7, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de séchage (5) est réalisé sous forme de dispositif de séchage de surface.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 7 ou 8, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de séchage (5) est réalisé sous forme de sécheur à infrarouge (26), de sécheur par contact (27, 28) ou de sécheur par mise en suspension (29, 30).
- Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 9, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif d'humidification (4) est disposé juste avant la calandre (6) de telle sorte que le taux d'humidité au milieu de la nappe lors du passage à travers la première pince (18) de la calandre (6) soit au maximum de 1,3 fois le taux d'humidité de la nappe (2) avant le dispositif d'humidification (4).
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004032507A DE102004032507A1 (de) | 2004-07-06 | 2004-07-06 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Behandeln einer Bahn aus Papier oder Karton |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1614802A1 EP1614802A1 (fr) | 2006-01-11 |
EP1614802B1 true EP1614802B1 (fr) | 2008-02-20 |
Family
ID=35056936
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05104603A Expired - Fee Related EP1614802B1 (fr) | 2004-07-06 | 2005-05-30 | Procédé et appareil pour le traitement d' une bande de papier ou carton |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1614802B1 (fr) |
AT (1) | ATE386840T1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE102004032507A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FI117679B (fi) * | 2005-06-16 | 2007-01-15 | Metso Paper Inc | Menetelmä ja järjestely paperin valmistamiseksi |
FI120368B (fi) * | 2007-10-25 | 2009-09-30 | Metso Paper Inc | Menetelmä ja järjestely kuiturainan ominaisuuksien säätämiseksi |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3815463A1 (de) * | 1988-05-06 | 1989-11-16 | Kuesters Eduard Maschf | Verfahren zur erzeugung von glaette und glanz auf einer papierbahn und entsprechende kalanderanordnung |
DE4112537C2 (de) * | 1991-04-17 | 1994-06-01 | Escher Wyss Gmbh | Vorrichtung zur Glätteerzeugung |
FI2664U1 (fi) * | 1996-07-16 | 1996-11-29 | Valmet Corp | Laitteisto kartonkirainan kalanteroimiseksi |
US6401355B1 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2002-06-11 | Metso Paper, Inc. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing calendered paper |
-
2004
- 2004-07-06 DE DE102004032507A patent/DE102004032507A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-05-30 AT AT05104603T patent/ATE386840T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-05-30 EP EP05104603A patent/EP1614802B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-05-30 DE DE502005002878T patent/DE502005002878D1/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE502005002878D1 (de) | 2008-04-03 |
DE102004032507A1 (de) | 2006-02-16 |
EP1614802A1 (fr) | 2006-01-11 |
ATE386840T1 (de) | 2008-03-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE69716634T3 (de) | Verfahren zur trocknung von papier und trockenpartie einer papiermaschine | |
DE19826899A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Online-Herstellung von SC-A-Papier | |
DE202013011389U1 (de) | Herstelllinie für das Herstellen von Faserbahnen | |
DE29815847U1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Online-Herstellung von Papier | |
DE19901400A1 (de) | Trocknungs- und Glättungseinheit für Faserstoffbahnen | |
EP1614802B1 (fr) | Procédé et appareil pour le traitement d' une bande de papier ou carton | |
DE10116840A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Glätten einer Materialbahn | |
DE112008002205T5 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Beschichten einer Bahn eines Fasermaterials mit wenigstens zwei Schichten einer Beschichtung | |
EP0957202B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour la fabrication de papier SC-A online | |
EP2295632B1 (fr) | Calendre | |
EP4347949A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif | |
WO2007003504A1 (fr) | Procede de fabrication d'une bande continue de papier, en particulier de papier heliographique | |
DE10206333C1 (de) | Breitnip-Kalander-Anordnung und Verfahren zum Satinieren einer Papier- oder Karrtonbahn | |
EP1586697A1 (fr) | Machine à papier | |
EP1357225B1 (fr) | Procédé pour traiter un matériau en bande et calandre | |
DE102004017808A1 (de) | Maschine und Verfahren zur Herstellung einer Faserstoffbahn | |
EP1541757B1 (fr) | Procédé de satinage d'une bande de papier ou carton couchée et calandre | |
DE10232550C5 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Imprägnieren einer Papier- oder Kartonbahn | |
EP1314818B1 (fr) | Appareil et procédé pour lisser une bande de papier ou de carton | |
EP4234809A2 (fr) | Traitement de bande continue | |
DE102006051537A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Bearbeiten einer Bahn aus Papier oder Karton | |
AT506010B1 (de) | Verfahren und anordnung zur einflussnahme auf die eigenschaften einer faserbahn | |
DE102004020069B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Satinieren einer Papierbahn | |
DE10358189B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Behandeln einer Bahn aus Papier oder Karton | |
EP1876294B1 (fr) | Procédé destiné au traitement d'une bande de papier brut ou de carton brut |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060711 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT DE FI SE |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: VOITH PATENT GMBH |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070315 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT DE FI SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502005002878 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080403 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: METSO PAPER, INC. Effective date: 20081028 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20090515 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20090525 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20090515 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20090514 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PLCK | Communication despatched that opposition was rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100530 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100530 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
PLBN | Opposition rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100531 |
|
27O | Opposition rejected |
Effective date: 20101128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101201 |