EP1574864A1 - Verfahren zum Testen der Funktion von in einem Kraftfahrzeug eines bestimmten Typs verbauten, über einen Kommunikationsbus adressierbaren elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten - Google Patents
Verfahren zum Testen der Funktion von in einem Kraftfahrzeug eines bestimmten Typs verbauten, über einen Kommunikationsbus adressierbaren elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1574864A1 EP1574864A1 EP05003555A EP05003555A EP1574864A1 EP 1574864 A1 EP1574864 A1 EP 1574864A1 EP 05003555 A EP05003555 A EP 05003555A EP 05003555 A EP05003555 A EP 05003555A EP 1574864 A1 EP1574864 A1 EP 1574864A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- real
- real data
- motor vehicle
- test
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/005—Testing of electric installations on transport means
- G01R31/006—Testing of electric installations on transport means on road vehicles, e.g. automobiles or trucks
- G01R31/007—Testing of electric installations on transport means on road vehicles, e.g. automobiles or trucks using microprocessors or computers
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for testing the function of in one Motor vehicle of a certain type installed, via a communication bus addressable electronic and electrical components.
- the complexity of the vehicle electrical system is increasing, after On the vehicle side, more and more functions that are electronically controlled be provided or signals. This is especially evident in the increasing number of separate controllers that have different Control complex.
- the electrical or electronic Components via a central vehicle bus, z. B. CAN bus with each other connected so that they can be addressed directly, as well communicate with each other and exchange data or signals. Since such a system is somewhat error-prone, it is necessary to to perform various tests to ensure proper functioning To check, so to see to what extent the integrated into the bus system Devices communicate with each other, record data or on the Give bus, etc.
- the invention is therefore based on the problem of specifying a method This is a functional test of a variety of built-electronic and electrical Components and their interaction under as real as possible Test conditions allows.
- the test a type-specific Real stylistsatz is used, whose real data in real rides of a Motor vehicle of the same type as the one under test, wherein the real data is given to the communication bus and that of the addressed components in response to the real data be recorded on the communication bus given reaction data, the be compared as actual data with the target data representing real data and based on the comparison, the function of verifiable components is determined, and / or in response to the on the communication bus given real data in component-side memory devices entered error memory data and to determine the Function of the checked components are evaluated.
- the basis for the method according to the invention is the acquisition of data from arbitrary real road trips with a vehicle of the same Type, mainly with a maximum of electrical equipment and electronic components.
- the data is from the communication bus tapped, that is, it will be during the road trip the entire Data communication on the bus detected.
- This data is to any data. They can be integrated into the electronic system Sensors that provide readings and put on the bus, from controllers, which give some information to the bus or the one on given signal given a reaction signal on the bus, or any other components. These data are based on real occurrences generated while driving. For example, during the drive switched on the air conditioner, a corresponding signal given to the bus, which causes the climate control unit accordingly and in turn gives signals to the bus to control corresponding actuators or the like.
- the recorded real data z. B. taken during a test drive of 60 minutes or more given the bus the data in terms of their recording time in time compressed, but clearly time-resolved to be given to the bus.
- a sensor signal contained within the real data of a Sensors which also within the real data to a reaction on the part of a Control signal in the form of a response signal leads, also in the test Motor vehicle ideally for the same reaction of the control unit, the means, it would have an identical within the recorded test data Reaction signal of the controller present.
- Performs a signal within the real data is given from one controller to another, to one Reaction signal of this controller, would ideally have this reaction signal identical within the recorded test data of the to be checked Vehicle can be mapped.
- the equipment variant is taken into account and the real data record primarily taken with a vehicle with maximum equipment becomes.
- the evaluation of the reaction data is also an analysis based on the type-specific real data input generated and in component-side memories, eg. B. store controller, Stored error memory data that can be read, possible.
- the comparison of the actual data with desired states or target data based on an analysis of the fault memory entries.
- test depth is therefore much greater than in the previously known separate Testing of individual components when not installed.
- the real data are expediently at their inclusion in the frame cleared up the real trips resulting error data to avoid that erroneous test data is given to the bus of the vehicle to be tested become.
- the real date to be compared with the comparison is the real data expediently, as already described time-resolved, that is, it For example, there may be a specific time-delayed reaction to each real date associated with the corresponding response date so that it can be checked, for example, if one has a real date addressed control unit actually responded to this date has, so the reaction date has been on the bus.
- the real data is provided with a time stamp, which is a corresponding one Illustration and assignment of the reaction data to the real data in the frame the actual-target data comparison allows.
- the reaction data expediently becomes during the administration of the real data continuously recorded and also continuously compared with the real data, so that at the end of the test cycle the evaluation ends very promptly can be.
- the real data is expediently used in one in comparison to the speed or duration of their real Recording higher speed or shorter time on the communication bus Given thereby, any reaction times of the controllers of the vehicle under test to ensure that that an addressed control unit has actually been able to react.
- the entries of the error memory can also be used the control units for the analysis / testing of the electrical / electronic Systems are used. These are the error memory entries read out within the finish line.
- a functional test after completion of the motor vehicle so if this is completely assembled is and all components are integrated, performed. It would be so provided within and / or at the end of the finish line a test station in which the motor vehicle is being tested. This test may, for. B. 5 minutes depending on how fast the real data on the Bus can be given and the actual data recorded and evaluated can be.
- the Functional test also performed several times during assembly be, that is, that the motor vehicle during assembly z. B. intermittently or after installation of certain components or the like is checked. As part of this functional test will be expediently all real data is given to the communication bus. Those Real data, which already includes, for example, corresponding control devices and the like were installed, so they can find their addressees and are processed or treated accordingly, while real data concerning components that are not yet installed, do not disturb, since they do not find an addressee.
- a mobile, portable data processing device which is connected to the communication bus, no matter if now the function test carried out at the end or during assembly.
- One such data processing device remains in a multiple test during the assembly expediently during the whole time on the vehicle and draws all in the context of the meantime Functional tests resulting reaction data ordered on.
- the functional tests can if the vehicle has been tested several times during assembly is as described either at predetermined times or at Reaching a predetermined assembly stage are performed. For this purpose, if necessary, certain components automatically on it Presence detected. It turns out that z. B. the entire dashboard was used with all its controllers and other components, can this, for example, give a corresponding signal to the bus, which is detected by the data processing device and so the function test abuts.
- the real data also contains data from or concerning components which are not installed at least at the time of testing. These data, when placed on the bus, do not find an addressee, So trigger no reaction, but are for the other functional test not a hindrance. This has the advantage that no different real data sets for different test times, in particular at one Testing on the line, need to be kept.
- reaction data will be advantageous not only Communication data recorded on the communication bus, but also possible entries in error memory of components, in particular the control units read and recorded, which also for the evaluation is beneficial.
- the real data record advantageously contains real data related to a type-specific one maximum level of installation on electronic or electrical Components, which is advantageous to the effect, as ideally only one the only type-specific real data set must be kept in stock, after it contained "surplus data" concerning unused Components etc. are not disturbing.
- portable Data processing device several type-specific real data sets for store different types of vehicles, where the real data set to be used is selected depending on the vehicle to be tested. That is, there are specific sets for different vehicle types, wherein the real data set to be used at the given time is selected and read. Furthermore, it can be provided that in the functional test used, if necessary, portable data processing device several type-specific real data sets for different Equipment variants of the motor vehicle are stored, wherein the real data set to be used as a function of the motor vehicle to be tested is selected. It is done according to this invention embodiment also an additional variant specification.
- the real data record to be used is selected depending on the motor vehicle to be tested.
- This embodiment of the invention takes into account the fact that the real Driving conditions sometimes from the country in which the motor vehicle to be delivered are dependent. A motor vehicle in a very hot climate zone is exposed to other real conditions, as a motor vehicle that shipped to Scandinavia or even more northern becomes. If corresponding real data on test drives to such different Conditions were recorded, so can accordingly even more specific tests are performed.
- the comparison of the actual data with the desired data can in the data processing device itself or in a separate computing device that the from the data processing device recorded actual data and, where appropriate also the nominal data are given, done.
- the target data can already exist on the part of this external computing device.
- the computing device then only requires information regarding the using the desired data record, which information from the data processing device itself can be handed over. On the other hand, it is conceivable that the computing device all information about the vehicle to be tested knows, and on the basis of this select the correct target record itself can.
- test report created and output. This can be done in writing to documentation documents to hold on, but also purely electronically Output to a terminal or the like, or by output the fault memory entries via the installed test systems.
- the method according to the invention offers a number of advantages.
- the electronic or electrical systems can be fast tested under real conditions or on the basis of real communication data become.
- Real test drives can therefore be reduced to a minimum be a test of the electronic system during these test drives can largely be omitted.
- a direct assignment of an error, an error symptom or an error description for a triggering one Event is possible after the "trigger data", so the real data be given time-resolved on the bus.
- any combinability of operating states from, for example, different real ones Road trips possible after the separate real data becomes an overall record can be combined.
- the invention further relates to a Device for testing electronic devices installed in a motor vehicle or electrical components, designed to carry out the described Process.
- Fig. 1 shows in the form of a schematic diagram of the central process steps of inventive method.
- Fig. 1 first using different finished motor vehicles different Type and different vehicle equipment real road trips made to record different real data sets, which are type and equipment specific.
- motor vehicles namely the Type I motor vehicles and Type II motor vehicles.
- equipment variants used within the different types, namely a minimum trim level a and a maximum Equipment variant b.
- a minimum trim level a is a specific one Number or are specific types of electrical or electronic Components, but not all maximum buildable, while in the maximum trim level b all to this type maximum buildable components are present.
- Vehicle types in two different equipment variants used namely the vehicle la and Ib and the vehicles IIa and IIb.
- any real road trips are carried out, that is, at any time, under any environmental conditions and performing any actions, taking as part of data generation as many different situations are played through should be as large as possible and as versatile as possible to the real data set shape.
- a real record is added to each motor vehicle by including the entire bus communication traffic, So all on the communication bus of the motor vehicle, z. B. the CAN bus existing information or data. Im shown For example, this results in four different real data sets, namely the real data sets RDIa and RDIIb for the motor vehicle type I and the two different ones Equipment variants a and b as well as the real data records RDIIa and RDIIb for the motor vehicle type II and the two equipment variants a and b.
- the data processing device is located in the example shown in a Test station at the end of the vehicle production line.
- a newly assembled motor vehicle from Type I in an upscale equipment variant the maximum equipment variant b equals or comes close.
- a represented, for example, a vehicle identification number in the inspection station recorded and given to the data processing device DV.
- This identification number indicates that this is a vehicle Type I in an upscale trim level, which is why a Maximum equipment data record, namely the real data record RDIb for test purposes to use.
- the gift is this selection information represented by "Ib" at the arrow a. It is also possible from the Production process using touching record selection data after yes it is known at any time to which type in which equipment it is located at any in the production line Vehicle acts.
- the data processing device with a communication bus of the motor vehicle, z. B. the CAN bus (It can also be another vehicle bus, eg MOST bus Act), after which the real data in time compressed form be given to the communication bus.
- the data acquisition begins all on the communication bus with regard to the given Real data, which is more or less the action data, transported data, the on the part of the control units or other components attached to the bus be given in response to the action or real data.
- Both Real data is any date that belongs to any one When it was transported to the bus during its recording, its sensor signals, control unit information, etc.
- the data processing device DV performs a comparison between the target data, formed by the real data set RDIb, and the recorded Actual data.
- the components of which are also to be tested Vehicle are present have been given or a reference to have this, and the itself a reaction date to a previously given Are "real-date trigger", must be correspondingly mapped, quasi-identical Actual data will be present within the actual data pool after the "Real-time trigger" is included in the real record and given to the bus has to lead to the identical actual reaction date. this will recorded and evaluated as part of the target / actual comparison.
- Real data of Components that are not present on the vehicle to be tested lead to no response after the component address on the bus of the to be tested Vehicle is not found. This is inevitable also no corresponding actual date, what on the part of the data processing device DV is recognized, however, after this the equipment of the to be tested Vehicle is known.
- the type Ib vehicle exits the testing station, when the exam is over. Then the next vehicle drives Type I in equipment variant a in the test station.
- the data processing device receives again a corresponding information about the real data set to be selected, in this case the real data set RDIa and checks this vehicle in a similar manner.
- Fig. 2 shows in the form of a schematic diagram of the communication bus 1 of a Motor vehicle according to the invention, to which a number of control units SG1, SG2, SG3, ... SGn-1, SGn are provided at which any Number of sensors or actuators 2 are provided, which in any Way communicate with the controller and exchange data.
- Fig. 3 shows an alternative to the described embodiment according to Fig. 1 with a central, arranged at the end of the production line test station.
- a multiple functional test takes place at the line during the progressive assembly of the Motor vehicle.
- a motor vehicle made of type I in the equipment variant b is progressively a motor vehicle made of type I in the equipment variant b.
- the Data processing device DV will now be a test data processing device 3 with the corresponding real data set RDIb, the for the motor vehicle 4 is selected, the data is stored there. Subsequently, the test data processing device 3 on the motor vehicle 4 at a suitable interface S with the already installed Communication bus 1 connected. The data processing device 3 remains during the entire assembly on the motor vehicle.
- the progressive assembly represented by the respective progressive Arrows P, is at different times, eg. B. after installation of a certain number or type of control devices or the like, several times a functional test of the already existing components carried out.
- the data processing device 3 plays the complete Real data on the communication bus 1, takes the actual data and stores this time-related.
- the data processing device removed again is supplied to the data processing device DV, where the data be read out and then evaluated. This is done by Target-actual comparison, in this case also production-stage-related.
- Test data processing device 3 It is also conceivable that all possible real data sets already in Test data processing device 3 are present and the one to be used Record after connecting the data processing device 3 with the Motor vehicle bus is selected. For this purpose, the data processing device reads z. B. a corresponding identification number of the motor vehicle, via which information about the vehicle type and the equipment variant are given, after which the record to be used is read out.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Fig. 1
- eine Prinzipdarstellung zur Beschreibung des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens nach einer ersten Ausführungsvariante,
- Fig. 1
- eine Prinzipdarstellung mit exemplarisch angedeutetem Kommunikationsbus und verschiedenen Komponenten, und
- Fig. 3
- eine Prinzipdarstellung zur Erläuterung des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens nach einer zweiten Ausführungsform.
Claims (22)
- Verfahren zum Testen der Funktion von in einem Kraftfahrzeug eines bestimmten Typs verbauten, über einen Kommunikationsbus adressierbaren elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass zum Test ein typenspezifischer Realdatensatz verwendet wird, dessen Realdaten bei realen Fahrten eines Kraftfahrzeugs des gleichen Typs wie das zu testende aufgenommen wurden, wobei die Realdaten auf den Kommunikationsbus gegeben werden, und die von den angesprochenen Komponenten als Reaktion auf die Realdaten auf den Kommunikationsbus gegebenen Reaktionsdaten erfasst werden, die als Ist-Daten mit den Soll-Daten darstellenden Realdaten verglichen werden und anhand des Vergleichs die Funktion der überprüfbaren Komponenten bestimmt wird, und/oder die als Reaktion auf die auf den Kommunikationsbus gegebenen Realdaten in komponentenseitige Speichereinrichtungen eingetragenen Fehlerspeicherdaten ausgelesen und zur Bestimmung der Funktion der überprüfbaren Komponenten ausgewertet werden. - Verfahren nach Anspruch 1,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Realdaten um bei ihrer Aufnahme im Rahmen der realen Fahrten entstanden Fehlerdaten bereinigt sind. - Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass zur Ermöglichung der Zuordnung eines Reaktionsdatums zu seinem im Rahmen des Vergleichs gegenüberzustellenden Realdatum die Realdaten zeitaufgelöst sind. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Reaktionsdaten während der Gabe der Realdaten laufend erfasst und mit den Realdaten verglichen werden. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Realdaten in einer im Vergleich zur Geschwindigkeit oder Zeitdauer ihrer realen Aufnahme höheren Geschwindigkeit oder kürzeren Zeit auf den Kommunikationsbus gegeben werden. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Funktionstest nach Fertigstellung des Kraftfahrzeugs durchgeführt wird. - Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Funktionstest mehrmals während des Zusammenbaus des Kraftfahrzeugs durchgeführt wird. - Verfahren nach Anspruch 7,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass im Rahmen jedes Funktionstests alle Realdaten auf den Kommunikationsbus gegeben werden. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass zur Gabe der Realdaten und zur Aufnahme der Reaktionsdaten ein mobiles, tragbares Datenverarbeitungsgerät verwendet wird, das mit dem Kommunikationsbus verbunden wird. - Verfahren nach Anspruch 9,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Datenverarbeitungsgerät während des Zusammenbaus im Kraftfahrzeug verbleibt und alle im Rahmen der währenddessen durchgeführten Funktionstest anfallenden Reaktionsdaten geordnet aufzeichnet. - Verfahren nach Anspruch 10,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Funktionstests zu vorgegebenen Zeitpunkten oder bei Erreichen einer vorbestimmten Zusammenbaustufe durchgeführt werden. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Realdaten auch Daten von oder betreffend Komponenten, die zumindest im Testzeitpunkt nicht verbaut sind, enthalten. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass im Rahmen der Aufnahme der Reaktionsdaten auch etwaige Einträge in Fehlerspeicher von Komponenten, insbesondere Steuergeräten ausgelesen und aufgenommen werden. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Realdatensatz Realdaten bezogen auf einen typenspezifischen maximalen Verbaugrad an elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten enthält. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass in dem zum Funktionstest verwendeten, gegebenenfalls tragbaren Datenverarbeitungsgerät mehrere typenspezifische Realdatensätze für verschiedene Kraftfahrzeugtypen abgelegt sind, wobei der zu verwendende Realdatensatz in Abhängigkeit des zu prüfenden Kraftfahrzeugs ausgewählt wird. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass in dem zum Funktionstest verwendeten, gegebenenfalls tragbaren Datenverarbeitungsgerät mehrere typenspezifische Realdatensätze für verschiedene Ausstattungsvarianten des Kraftfahrzeugs abgelegt sind, wobei der zu verwendende Realdatensatz in Abhängigkeit des zu prüfenden Kraftfahrzeugs ausgewählt wird. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass in dem zum Funktionstest verwendeten, gegebenenfalls tragbaren Datenverarbeitungsgerät mehrere länderspezifische Realdatensätze abgelegt sind, wobei der zu verwendende Realdatensatz in Abhängigkeit des zu prüfenden Kraftfahrzeugs ausgewählt wird. - Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 15 bis 17,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Datensatzauswahl anhand einer den Kraftfahrzeugtyp und gegebenenfalls die Ausstattungsvariante und gegebenenfalls das Einsatzland angebenden Information betreffend den Produktionsvorgang des Kraftfahrzeugs oder anhand einer vom Kraftfahrzeug gegeben oder erfassten Identifikationsinformation erfolgt. - Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 14,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der zu verwendende Realdatensatz für den oder die durchzuführenden Funktionstests in dem zu verwendenden Datenverarbeitungsgerät zeitnah eingespeichert wird. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Vergleich der Ist-Daten mit den Soll-Daten in dem Datenverarbeitungsgerät selbst oder in einer separaten Recheneinrichtung, der die vom Datenverarbeitungsgerät aufgenommenen Ist-Daten und gegebenenfalls die Soll-Daten gegeben werden, erfolgt. - Verfahren nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass anhand des Vergleichsergebnisses ein Testbericht erstellt und ausgegeben wird. - Einrichtung zum Testen von in einem Kraftfahrzeug verbauten elektronischen oder elektrischen Komponenten, ausgebildet zur Durchführung des Verfahrens nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 21.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE200410012143 DE102004012143B3 (de) | 2004-03-12 | 2004-03-12 | Verfahren zum Testen der Funktion von in einem Kraftfahrzeug eines bestimmten Typs verbauten, über einen Kommunikationsbus adressierbaren elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten |
DE102004012143 | 2004-03-12 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1574864A1 true EP1574864A1 (de) | 2005-09-14 |
EP1574864B1 EP1574864B1 (de) | 2008-05-07 |
Family
ID=34813680
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP20050003555 Expired - Fee Related EP1574864B1 (de) | 2004-03-12 | 2005-02-18 | Verfahren zum Testen der Funktion von in einem Kraftfahrzeug eines bestimmten Typs verbauten, über einen Kommunikationsbus adressierbaren elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1574864B1 (de) |
DE (2) | DE102004012143B3 (de) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008003615A1 (de) * | 2006-07-06 | 2008-01-10 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Verfahren zum durchführen eines tests |
EP2772886A1 (de) * | 2013-02-28 | 2014-09-03 | Kapsch TrafficCom AG | Elektronisches Fahrzeug-Bordsystem und Prüfverfahren hierfür |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102008008012A1 (de) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-10-15 | It-Designers Gmbh | Vorrichtung zur Funktionsüberprüfung eines Fahrzeugs |
DE102009037497B4 (de) * | 2009-08-13 | 2012-04-12 | Predrag Stevanovic | Diagnosevorrichtung für schlüsselloses Zugangssystem |
DE102010030829A1 (de) | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | Fahrzeugsystemdaten Gmbh | Anordnung und Verfahren zur Fahrzeugzustandsuntersuchung |
US8352791B2 (en) | 2010-06-04 | 2013-01-08 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Configurable test suite |
DE102012200194A1 (de) | 2011-03-16 | 2012-09-20 | Fahrzeugsystemdaten Gmbh | Anordnung und Verfahren zur Baugruppenprüfung, insbesondere zur Achsdämpfungsprüfung, in Fahrzeugen |
CN104240334A (zh) * | 2014-09-30 | 2014-12-24 | 长城汽车股份有限公司 | 汽车脉冲信号记录仪及车辆检测设备 |
CN104614609B (zh) * | 2015-01-27 | 2017-06-27 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | 一种超级电容的测试方法 |
DE102017100075B4 (de) * | 2017-01-04 | 2018-09-27 | Iav Gmbh Ingenieurgesellschaft Auto Und Verkehr | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betreiben eines Fahrzeuges während einer Entwicklungsphase |
DE102017207014A1 (de) * | 2017-04-26 | 2018-10-31 | Audi Ag | Verfahren zur Datenerhebung |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5041976A (en) * | 1989-05-18 | 1991-08-20 | Ford Motor Company | Diagnostic system using pattern recognition for electronic automotive control systems |
DE19857462A1 (de) * | 1998-12-12 | 2000-06-15 | Volkswagen Ag | Verfahren zur Prüfung von Einzelkomponenten eines Kraftfahrzeuges |
US6233509B1 (en) * | 1995-08-10 | 2001-05-15 | Genrad Limited | Electronic diagnostic system |
DE10032080A1 (de) * | 2000-07-01 | 2002-01-10 | Volkswagen Ag | Verfahren und Prüfsteuergerät zur Einbaukontrolle von elektrischen Komponenten in einem Kraftfahrzeug |
DE10236620A1 (de) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-19 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Kraftfahrzeug, Fahrprüfeinrichtung, Fahrprüfprogramm und Prüfstand |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3232416A1 (de) * | 1982-09-01 | 1984-03-01 | Kienzle Apparate Gmbh, 7730 Villingen-Schwenningen | Datenerfassungssystem fuer fahrzeuge |
DE4330312C3 (de) * | 1993-09-08 | 2000-10-05 | Daimler Chrysler Ag | Verfahren zur Überprüfung von Anordnungen vernetzter Steuergeräte in der Entwicklungsphase von Kraftfahrzeugen |
DE19722188A1 (de) * | 1997-05-27 | 1998-12-03 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Ag | Vorrichtung zur Funktionsüberprüfung eines elektronisch gesteuerten Regelsystems in einem Kraftfahrzeug nach einem Fertigungsvorgang |
DE19961589A1 (de) * | 1999-12-21 | 2001-07-05 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Serviceelement in verteilten Systemen |
US6609051B2 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2003-08-19 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method and system for condition monitoring of vehicles |
-
2004
- 2004-03-12 DE DE200410012143 patent/DE102004012143B3/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-02-18 EP EP20050003555 patent/EP1574864B1/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-02-18 DE DE200550003937 patent/DE502005003937D1/de active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5041976A (en) * | 1989-05-18 | 1991-08-20 | Ford Motor Company | Diagnostic system using pattern recognition for electronic automotive control systems |
US6233509B1 (en) * | 1995-08-10 | 2001-05-15 | Genrad Limited | Electronic diagnostic system |
DE19857462A1 (de) * | 1998-12-12 | 2000-06-15 | Volkswagen Ag | Verfahren zur Prüfung von Einzelkomponenten eines Kraftfahrzeuges |
DE10032080A1 (de) * | 2000-07-01 | 2002-01-10 | Volkswagen Ag | Verfahren und Prüfsteuergerät zur Einbaukontrolle von elektrischen Komponenten in einem Kraftfahrzeug |
DE10236620A1 (de) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-19 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Kraftfahrzeug, Fahrprüfeinrichtung, Fahrprüfprogramm und Prüfstand |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008003615A1 (de) * | 2006-07-06 | 2008-01-10 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Verfahren zum durchführen eines tests |
EP2772886A1 (de) * | 2013-02-28 | 2014-09-03 | Kapsch TrafficCom AG | Elektronisches Fahrzeug-Bordsystem und Prüfverfahren hierfür |
EP2772886B1 (de) | 2013-02-28 | 2015-04-01 | Kapsch TrafficCom AG | Elektronisches Fahrzeug-Bordsystem und Prüfverfahren hierfür |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1574864B1 (de) | 2008-05-07 |
DE102004012143B3 (de) | 2005-09-15 |
DE502005003937D1 (de) | 2008-06-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1574864B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Testen der Funktion von in einem Kraftfahrzeug eines bestimmten Typs verbauten, über einen Kommunikationsbus adressierbaren elektronischen und elektrischen Komponenten | |
DE102008015352B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Aufzeichnen von Daten und Datenaufzeichnungssystem | |
EP1597643B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur modellbasierten on-board-diagnose | |
WO2010012351A1 (de) | Verfahren zum programmiern von daten in mindestens zwei steuergeräte eines kraftfahrzeugs | |
DE102005038183A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Netzwerks | |
DE102013002648B3 (de) | Master-Busgerät für einen Fahrzeugkommunikationsbus eines Kraftwagens | |
WO2008119444A1 (de) | Datenaufzeichnungssystem und verfahren zur erfassung von daten mittels eines datenaufzeichnungssystems | |
DE10307343B4 (de) | On-Board-Diagnosevorrichtung und On-Board-Diagnoseverfahren für Kraftfahrzeuge | |
EP3399425A1 (de) | Verfahren zur erkennung einer verdrahtungstopologie | |
DE102010056232A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Speichern von Diagnosedaten für ein Steuergerät eines Fahrzeugs sowie entsprechende Vorrichtung | |
DE102012007321A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Diagnosesystems und Diagnosesystem | |
DE102012015783A1 (de) | Diagnoseverfahren und Diagnosesystem für ein Kraftfahrzeug | |
EP3720056B1 (de) | Verfahren und system zur parallelen echtzeitanalyse bei funktionsprüfungen von hardware und software von steuergeräten | |
DE102014207282A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Diagnose eines Kraftfahrzeugsystems, Diagnosegerät für ein Kraftfahrzeugsystem, Steuergerät für ein Kraftfahrzeugsystem und Kraftfahrzeug | |
DE102009053751B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Diagnostizieren eines Fehlers an einem Kraftfahrzeug | |
DE102008047561A1 (de) | Steuergerätesystem mit dezentraler Datenaufzeichnung und Verfahren zum Protokollieren von Daten | |
DE102004013253A1 (de) | Einrichutng zum Sammeln, Bereitstellen und/oder Speichern von insbesondere auslesbaren Stell- und/oder Betriebsgrößen | |
DE102023100382A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Bereitstellen von Daten von Steuergeräten einer Mehrzahl von Kraftfahrzeugen, Verfahren zum Überprüfen von Steuergeräten, Steuergerät, Kraftfahrzeug und Vorrichtung zum Überprüfen von Steuergeräten | |
DE102016003013A1 (de) | Überwachungsvorrichtung und Verfahren zum Überwachen eines Betriebs eines Steuergeräts eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
DE19748181B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Prüfen einer Funktion oder Einrichtung eines Fahrzeugs | |
WO2018219647A1 (de) | Fehlerspeicher, insbesondere für ein kraftfahrzeug | |
DE102010039780B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung der Arbeitsweise eines kraftfahrzeugähnlichen Systems | |
BE1026507A1 (de) | Bürstenherstellungsmaschine und Verfahren zum Einrichten einer Bürstenherstellungsmaschine | |
DE102021125498A1 (de) | Systemvalidierung mit verbesserter Handhabung von Protokollierungsdaten | |
DE102022118676A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Bremsanlage für ein Kraftfahrzeug sowie entsprechende Bremsanlage |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060314 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502005003937 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080619 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20160229 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20160226 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20160223 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160224 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502005003937 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20170218 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170901 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170218 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170218 |