EP0894158A1 - Decalaminage de surfaces metalliques - Google Patents

Decalaminage de surfaces metalliques

Info

Publication number
EP0894158A1
EP0894158A1 EP97916580A EP97916580A EP0894158A1 EP 0894158 A1 EP0894158 A1 EP 0894158A1 EP 97916580 A EP97916580 A EP 97916580A EP 97916580 A EP97916580 A EP 97916580A EP 0894158 A1 EP0894158 A1 EP 0894158A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
process according
electrolysis
bath
anodic
metal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP97916580A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Neil Mcmurray
John Mcdonald Duncan
Sandy Francoise Lancelot
Edward Pugh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maysonic Ultrasonics Ltd
Original Assignee
Maysonic Ultrasonics Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Maysonic Ultrasonics Ltd filed Critical Maysonic Ultrasonics Ltd
Publication of EP0894158A1 publication Critical patent/EP0894158A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM OBJECTS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F1/00—Electrolytic cleaning, degreasing, pickling or descaling
    • C25F1/02—Pickling; Descaling
    • C25F1/04—Pickling; Descaling in solution
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM OBJECTS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F1/00—Electrolytic cleaning, degreasing, pickling or descaling
    • C25F1/02—Pickling; Descaling
    • C25F1/04—Pickling; Descaling in solution
    • C25F1/06—Iron or steel

Definitions

  • the present invention is concerned with the removal of scale from surfaces of metal bodies, such as steel, in the form of steel wires, rods or the like.
  • oxide scale When mild steel is in air at a temperature in the range 575 to 1370C, a surface scale in the form of oxide scale (or heat scale) results on the steel surface. Before steel wires can be drawn or surface treated (such as by tinning or galvanising), such oxide scale must be removed.
  • the most common method for removal of heat scale is to "pickle" the wire in dilute (5 to 40%) mineral acid, such as sulfuric acid or hydrochloric acid. Similar pickling methods are used for removal of surface co ⁇ iaminants from other metals (such as brass).
  • This pickling method has several drawbacks, including slow speed (pickling times of up to several minutes), the possibility of hydrogen evolved during pickling diffusing into the metal and causing embrittlement, and the rapid consumption of acid through the dissolution of scale (with simultaneous production of high concentrations of water-soluble heavy metal salts), causing a significant effluent problem.
  • Electrolytic pickling was first introduced in the 1930's, and originally the aim was to use electrolysis as a way to enhance conventional acid pickling techniques. Consequently, the electrolytes used have always tended to be derivatives of the main mineral acids used during the conventional pickling processes (sulfuric and hydrochloric acid).
  • an applied electric potential causes a current to flow between a pickling solution and a metal surface.
  • the current may be anodic or cathodic and will typically be of a density of 1 to 200 amps dm 2 .
  • Electrolytic pickling has several advantages over acid pickling, namely shorter pickling times, minimisation of hydrogen embrittlement, and removal of heat scale without dissolution, with consequent lower consumption of pickling solution and less heavy metal contaminated effluent. Another significant advantage of using an electrolytic process over more traditional methods is that the reactions involved are much more controllable.
  • the pickling time is minimised when the scale is porous or cracked (either initially or following pickling).
  • the pickling time can also be lowered by agitation of the pickle liquor, as this can loosen insoluble scale and increase the rate at which solution at the scale surface is replenished.
  • Graphite is an effective die lubricant for wire drawing, but the subsequent removal of a compacted solid graphite layer from a metal surface is difficult.
  • the currently preferred method is generally wet shot blasting or acid pickling.
  • a process of descaling the surface of a metal body in which said metal body is subjected to electrolysis in a bath of an electrolyte and also to ultrasonic agitation, the electrolysis comprising applying a pulsed electric potential to the metal body while the latter is present in the bath, and the ultrasonic agitation being carried out while the body is still wet.
  • the body may still be wet from the electrolyte or from another suitable intermediate solution. It is advantageous that the body is not allowed to dry prior to ultrasonic agitation, as drying hardens the scale and hinders successful descaling.
  • the electrolysis and the ultrasonic agitation may be carried out simultaneously or the electrolysis may be followed by a separate ultrasonic agitation step.
  • the process is carried out with the electrolyte bath at a substantially neutral pH.
  • the process is typically used for removal of scale from steel, which is typically in the form of wire, rod or other continuously formed article.
  • the pulsed electric potential has a current density is in the range 0.1 to 10 amp cm 2 , more preferably in the range 0.5 to 5 amp cm 2 .
  • the electrolysis is carried out in a substantially aggressive electrolyte bath (that is a bath containing anions of a strong acid, such as a chloride, sulfate, nitrate or the like).
  • a substantially aggressive electrolyte bath that is a bath containing anions of a strong acid, such as a chloride, sulfate, nitrate or the like.
  • the aggressive bath comprises a solution of an ammonium or alkali metal chloride or sulfate.
  • the alkali metal is typically sodium.
  • the electric potential is predominantly anodic, with the anodic pulse duty cycle being preferably at least 67% (such as at least 75%). It is particularly preferred for the anodic pulse duty cycle to be at least 90%.
  • the process is carried out in a substantially non-aggressive electrolyte.
  • the non-aggressive electrolyte comprises a solution of an ammonium or alkali metal tripolyphosphate; typically, the alkali metal is sodium.
  • the electric potential may be predominantly anodic or cathodic, typically with an anodic pulse duty cycle of 5 to 95% such as 45 to 75%.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of an exemplary process and apparatus according to the invention
  • Figure 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a typical pulsed current waveform used for electrolytic current in a process according to the invention (preferably in the first embodiment of the invention);
  • Figure 3 is a graph showing cleaning times for removal of oxide from heat scaled carbon steel wire as a function of pH and current density in a process according to the first embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 4 is a graph showing cleaning times for removal of oxide from heat scaled carbon steel wire as a function of pH and current density in a process, not according to the invention, involving no ultrasonic treatment
  • Figure 5 is a 3-dimensional plot showing cleaning times for the same wire in 10% aqueous NaCl solution at 65'C, as a function of the frequency and the anodic duty cycle;
  • Figure 6 is a graph showing the percentage of scale (graphite) remaining at the wire surface, as a function of time, for current densities of 0.5 and 2.5 amps cm" 2 , according to the first embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 7 is a graph showing the time to clean as a function of current density at pH's of 0, 1 and 7, respectively;
  • Figure 8 is a graph showing the influence of anodic duty cycle on the time- dependent cleaning at pH 7 with a current density of percentage of scale (graphite) remaining at the wire surface, as a function of time, for current densities of 1 amp cm'*;
  • Figure 9 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time as a function of current density and temperature in neutral sodium chloride solution with an anode duty cycle of 95%;
  • Figure 10 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time as a function of current density and pH in sodium chloride solution with an anode duty cycle of 95% and interspersed ultrasound;
  • Figure 11 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time as a function of current density and temperature in neutral sodium chloride solution with an anode duty cycle of 95% and interspersed ultrasound;
  • Figure 12 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time for removal of graphite scale as a function of anodic duty cycle and frequency at 60°C in neutral sodium sulfate with a current density of 1 Acm 2 ;
  • Figure 13 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time for removal of graphite scale as a function of current density and pH at 60°C in sodium sulfate with an anode duty cycle of 95% and interspersed ultrasound;
  • Figure 14 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time for removal of graphite scale as a function of current density and pH at 60°C and 1Hz in sodium sulfate with an anode duty cycle of 95% and continuous ultrasound
  • Figure 15 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of the descaling time for oxide heat scale as a function of the anodic duty cycle and frequency at 60°C and 1 Hz in a 10% sodium tripolyphosphate solution at pH7 and 1.6 Acm 2 current density;
  • Figure 16 is a 3-dimensional surface plot of descaling time again for oxide heat scale as a function of current density and pH at 60°C and 1Hz in a 10% sodium tripolyphosphate solution with an anodic duty cycle of 95% and interspersed ultrasound;
  • Figure 17 is a 3-dimensional representation of the descaling time (again for oxide heat scale) vs electrolyte concentration and solution temperature, with data collected under the conditions of pH7, 1Hz at 95% anodic duty cycle;
  • Figure 18 is a 2-dimensional graph of descaling time (again for oxide heat scale)vs anodic duty cycle at 1Hz frequency (for which the cleaning conditions were pH7, adjusted using orthophosphoricacid, 60°C, 10% sodium tripolyphosphate, samples being high carbon Si-Mn wire, pickled and subsequently scaled in air and 900°C for various times);
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a computer 1 which is operatively connected to a voltage waveform controller 11 to generate a voltage waveform with an amplitude not greater than ⁇ _ one volt.
  • This voltage waveform was used to control the galvanostat 2 which passed a current of proportionate amplitude between respective electrodes 3 and 4.
  • Electrode 3 (in the form of wire) is the sample to be cleaned and electrode 4 is a graphitic carbon counter electrode. Both electrodes were mounted in a beaker 5 of electrolyte 6 which was in turn placed in an ultrasonic bath 7 containing water 10. The bath itself is thermostatically controlled in order to maintain a constant temperature. During the testing, the exposed area of the electrode 3 is submerged in the electrolyte 6. A Luggin capillary 8 was placed in contact with electrode 3 so that a reference electrode 9 could be used to measure the potential of electrode 3. This potential data was fed back to the Data Acquisition card in the computer 1 and recorded continuously.
  • the electrolytic current was applied to the cell using a pulsatile alternating current (a typical waveform being shown schematically in Figure 2).
  • the combined ultrasonic-electrolytic surface cleaning of wires was carried out using the cleaning cell apparatus shown schematically in Figure 1.
  • the wire 3 to be cleaned was suspended in a volume of electrolyte 6 contained within a thermostated ultrasonic agitation bath 7.
  • Electrolytic current was passed between the electrode wire 3 and a graphite counter electrode 4; in all cases the area of the electrode wire exposed to electrolyte was determined, in order to calculate surface current density.
  • the flow of electrolytic current was established using a voltage controlled current source (galvanostat) 2 which was in turn actuated by voltage waveform controller 11.
  • the electrolytic current passed in the cleaning cell was usually in the form of a pulsatile alternating current and a typical current waveform is shown schematically in Figure 2.
  • the ultrasonic agitation was either carried out continuously and simultaneously with the electrolytic current (referred to as simultaneous electrolysis-ultrasonication) or intermittently and in alternation with periods of electrolysis (referred to as interspersed electrolysis-ultrasonication): the object of these procedures was to determine whether or not any synergistic effects could be detected in the case of simultaneously applied ultrasound and electrolysis.
  • the progress of cleaning was followed by the periodic withdrawal of the wire sample and visual examination of the surface. Two types of estimate of surface cleanliness were made:
  • time is the total time for which the electrolytic current is flowing at the sample surface.
  • electrolytic current was interrupted and followed by a period of ultrasonication to remove any loosened scale immediately prior to visual evaluation of surface cleanliness.
  • anodic duty cycle as defined with reference to Figure 2
  • Figure 3 shows cleaning times for oxide removal from heat scaled carbon steel wire in 10% aqueous sodium sulfate solution at 65°C as a function of pH and current density.
  • Figure 4 shows cleaning times for the same system subject to ultrasound electrolysis.
  • Figure 5 show cleaning times for the same wire in 10% aqueous sodium chloride solution at 65°C as a function of frequency and anodic duty cycle (duty cycle shown as a percentage figure); identical cleaning times were measured for the same system subject to interspersed ultrasound-electrolysis.
  • pH7 neutral conditions
  • Figures 3 and 4 may be seen from Figures 3 and 4 that cleaning time in the sulfate medium decreases with increasing current density and decreasing pH; cleaning times at pH3 were immeasurably long (> 30 minutes).
  • Figures 3 and 4 also show that a synergistic effect exists between ultrasound and electrolysis, in that cleaning times are about 30% shorter in the case of simultaneous electrolysis-ultrasonication.
  • the rate determining step for oxide scale removal was the anodic dissolution of underlying metal.
  • Oxide scale removal, leaving a clean, satin textured, metal surface is possible using combined ultrasound and anodic d.c. electrolysis in aqueous sodium sulfate solutions at pH ⁇ 3.
  • Oxide scale removal, leaving a clean, satin textured, metal surface is possible using combined ultrasound and anodic d.c. electrolysis in aqueous sodium chloride solutions at pH7 but with significant anodic chlorine evolution.
  • Pulsing the electrolytic current gives significantly faster cleaning than the d.c. method and greatly reduced the amount of chlorine evolved in aqueous sodium chloride.
  • Oxide detachment appears to occur by the anodic dissolution of a thin layer of the underlying metal.
  • Graphite drawing lubricant (aqueous sodium sulfate).
  • Figure 6 shows the percentage of scale (graphite) remaining at the wire surface as a function of time, for current densities of 0.5 and 2.5 amps cm 2 , with and without simultaneous ultrasound.
  • Figure 7 shows time to clean as a function of current density at pH 0, 1 and 7; and Figure 8 shows the influence of anodic duty cycle on the time dependent cleaning curve at pH7 with a current density of 1 amp cm 2 .
  • Figure 6 shows that, although the shapes of the cleaning curves are different for the cases of simultaneous electrolysis-ultrasonication and interspersed electrolysis- ultrasonication, there is no significant influence of simultaneous ultrasonication on time to clean (also see Figure 7).
  • Figure 7 reveals that graphite removal is most rapidly accomplished at low pH but that the influence of pH is reduced a higher current densities.
  • Figure 8 shows that cleaning rates increase markedly with increasing anodic duty cycle; however, it was also found that making the electrolytic current entirely anodic i.e. d.c. resulted in large increases in cleaning time together with significant amounts of anodic oxygen evolution due to water electrolysis.
  • the rate determining step for graphite removal was the anodic dissolution of underlying metal.
  • Oxide heat scale sodium tripolyphosphate
  • a 10% sodium tripolyphosphate bath adjusted to pH 7 and raised to 60°C was set up.
  • the current density for each sample was 1.6 Acm '2 , representing lcm length of metal surface exposed for descaling.
  • the electrical properties were methodically varied, the anodic city cycle adjusted from 5 to 95% and the frequency of pulsed ranging from 0.3 to 1000 Hz.
  • Descaling times obtained were compiled and arranged into a 3-dimensional graph shown in Figure 15. Optimum conditions appear to be obtained with an anodic duty cycle of 45-75% and frequencies 0.3 to 100 Hz. For these particular set of conditions, fastest cleaning times are achieved at an anodic duty cycle of 75% and at the lowest frequency of 0.3 or 1 Hz.
  • Figure 16 shows a 3-dimensional plot of the results compiled from a 10% sodium tripolyphosphate bath raised to 60°C and the potentiostat set at an anodic duty cycle of 95% with a frequency of 1 Hz.
  • the acidity of the solution was varied from pH 3 to 12 and the current density adjusted systematically from 0.5 to 2.5 Acm' 2 .
  • Orthophosphoric acid was used to adjust the pH.
  • Figure 17 shows a 3-dimensional representation of the descaling time results vs the tripolyphosphate concentration and solution temperature.
  • the tripolyphosphate concentration was varied from 1-15% and the temperature of the bath adjusted at 20-60°C.
  • the pH value was kept constant at 7 and the anodic duty cycle fixed at 95 % with a frequency of 1 Hz.
  • Figure 18 visually summarises results obtained on descaling times using sodium tripolyphosphate with varying heat scale thickness.
  • a furnace was allowed to reach the temperature of 900°C before being filled with argon gas. Samples were laid out flat on a ceramic boat, separated from each other, and subsequently left in the furnace for 15 minutes so as to allow them to reach 900°C. The furnace was subsequently flushed through with a fast stream of air for a period of 20 seconds and the samples were left to oxidise for 1-60 minutes. Once sealed for the required period of time, the boat was removed from the furnace and placed on a ceramic fibre mat to cool in air at room temperature. Samples were left to oxidise for 1,5, 10,15,30,45 and 60 minutes, to ensure a considerable increase in the scale thickness obtained.
  • the cleaning solution was raised to 60°C and exposed to ultrasound for a minimum period of 15 minutes prior to experimentation. Electrical properties were set at IA and the current pulse fixed at 1 Hz. The anodic duty cycle was varied between 5-95% and its efficiency testing for the descaling of wire of various oxide thicknesses.
  • Optimum descaling conditions for fastest descaling the metal samples were obtained at high electrolyte concentrations (10-15%) and high temperatures of 50-60°C.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cleaning And De-Greasing Of Metallic Materials By Chemical Methods (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne le décalaminage de la surface d'un corps métallique. Le corps métallique est soumis à une électrolyse dans un bain électrolytique et à une agitation par ultrasons. L'électrolyse consiste à appliquer un potentiel électrique pulsé sur le corps métallique immergé dans le bain; l'agitation par ultrasons est effectuée à la suite de l'électrolyse, le corps étant encore mouillé.
EP97916580A 1996-04-15 1997-04-15 Decalaminage de surfaces metalliques Withdrawn EP0894158A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9607810 1996-04-15
GBGB9607810.0A GB9607810D0 (en) 1996-04-15 1996-04-15 Removal of contaminants from steel surfaces
PCT/GB1997/001045 WO1997039167A1 (fr) 1996-04-15 1997-04-15 Decalaminage de surfaces metalliques

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0894158A1 true EP0894158A1 (fr) 1999-02-03

Family

ID=10792109

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97916580A Withdrawn EP0894158A1 (fr) 1996-04-15 1997-04-15 Decalaminage de surfaces metalliques

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0894158A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2000508711A (fr)
KR (1) KR20000005451A (fr)
AU (1) AU2519097A (fr)
CA (1) CA2251782A1 (fr)
GB (1) GB9607810D0 (fr)
PL (1) PL329292A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1997039167A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2358194B (en) * 2000-01-17 2004-07-21 Ea Tech Ltd Electrolytic treatment
GB2386907B (en) 2002-03-27 2005-10-26 Isle Coat Ltd Process and device for forming ceramic coatings on metals and alloys, and coatings produced by this process
JP6256399B2 (ja) * 2015-03-26 2018-01-10 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 電解研磨装置および電解研磨方法
ITPD20150095A1 (it) * 2015-05-08 2016-11-08 Ricerca Chimica S R L Apparecchiatura per il decapaggio elettrochimico di superfici in acciaio inox e procedimento di decapaggio elettrochimico di dette superfici
CN106929907B (zh) * 2017-03-30 2018-11-06 浙江康盛股份有限公司 一种在线钢管表面除锈工艺

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1090071A (en) * 1963-04-02 1967-11-08 Burndept Ltd Cleaning by use of ultrasonic vibrations
JPS5075530A (fr) * 1973-11-09 1975-06-20
US4206028A (en) * 1976-12-14 1980-06-03 Inoue-Japax Research Incorporated Electrochemical polishing system
IL110297A0 (en) * 1993-07-21 1994-10-21 Dynamotive Corp A method for removal of certain oxide films from metal surfaces
US5409594A (en) * 1993-11-23 1995-04-25 Dynamotive Corporation Ultrasonic agitator

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9739167A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL329292A1 (en) 1999-03-15
CA2251782A1 (fr) 1997-10-23
KR20000005451A (ko) 2000-01-25
AU2519097A (en) 1997-11-07
JP2000508711A (ja) 2000-07-11
WO1997039167A1 (fr) 1997-10-23
GB9607810D0 (en) 1996-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2208109C (fr) Nettoyage de pieces en aluminium
ugli Mukhtorov et al. IMPROVING THE STRENGTH OF DETAILS BY CHROMING THE SURFACES
US6645365B2 (en) Chemical milling
US6235180B1 (en) Method for forming phosphate film on the steel wires and apparatus used therefore
US5853561A (en) Method for surface texturing titanium products
JP2000508380A (ja) 電気分解及びキャビテーション作用を用いて金属表面から膜を除去する方法
JP2002525429A (ja) 無硝酸溶液を用いる電解酸洗い方法
CN1451058A (zh) 使用交流电源电解池的用于金属产品的连续电解酸洗方法
US6837985B2 (en) External counter electrode
GB2078783A (en) Method of descaling metal sheets
US4148707A (en) Electrochemical finishing of stainless steel
EP0894158A1 (fr) Decalaminage de surfaces metalliques
US4269677A (en) Anodic deburring or brightening of steel articles
Xue et al. Effect of fluoride ions on the corrosion of aluminium in sulphuric acid and zinc electrolyte
US5141563A (en) Molten salt stripping of electrode coatings
US4118301A (en) Apparatus for electrochemical finishing of stainless steel
US4148699A (en) Electropolishing of stainless steel
MXPA98008506A (en) Descascarillado of metali surfaces
US3425920A (en) Electrolytic method of regenerating organic acid cleaning solution for ferrous metals
JP4678612B2 (ja) 表面改質ステンレス鋼及び表面改質ステンレス鋼の処理方法
US1885602A (en) Process of cleaning scale from bars
JPH0548317B2 (fr)
JP2517353B2 (ja) ステンレス鋼帯の脱スケ―ル方法
JPH04311598A (ja) 金属表面の陽極溶解処理方法
JP2989067B2 (ja) ステンレス鋼帯脱スケール用の中性塩電解処理装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19981103

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT DE ES FI FR GB IE IT NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990301

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19990713