EP0825022B1 - Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien - Google Patents

Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0825022B1
EP0825022B1 EP19960202333 EP96202333A EP0825022B1 EP 0825022 B1 EP0825022 B1 EP 0825022B1 EP 19960202333 EP19960202333 EP 19960202333 EP 96202333 A EP96202333 A EP 96202333A EP 0825022 B1 EP0825022 B1 EP 0825022B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
control strip
field
digital control
fields
strip according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19960202333
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0825022A1 (de
Inventor
Karel c/o Agfa-Gevaert N.V. IIE3800 De Bie
Peter Agfa-Gevaert N.V. IIE3800 Schellekens
Johan Agfa-Gevaert N.V. IIE3800 Van Hunsel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Agfa Gevaert NV
Original Assignee
Agfa Gevaert NV
Agfa Gevaert AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agfa Gevaert NV, Agfa Gevaert AG filed Critical Agfa Gevaert NV
Priority to DE1996625809 priority Critical patent/DE69625809T2/de
Priority to EP19960202333 priority patent/EP0825022B1/de
Priority to JP23782697A priority patent/JPH10115906A/ja
Publication of EP0825022A1 publication Critical patent/EP0825022A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0825022B1 publication Critical patent/EP0825022B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41FPRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO PRINTING, LINING MACHINES, TYPEWRITERS, AND TO STAMPS
    • B41P2233/00Arrangements for the operation of printing presses
    • B41P2233/50Marks on printed material
    • B41P2233/51Marks on printed material for colour quality control

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to devices and methods for exposure and photographic control of imageable media including photographic film and printing plates. More specifically the present invention relates to a digital control strip suitable for quality control of imaging devices, proofing devices, printing devices and imaged media.
  • control strips As described in US-4,852,485, analogue control strips have been used, which consist of a piece of patterned film which could be attached onto a lithographic film before contacting it to a printing plate.
  • CH-A-681 929 describes a test "wedge" or control strip which is stored as a digital quantity on a storage medium such as a "floppy disk” or in a computer and is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the control strip consists of a variety of control fields. Each control field contains a pattern, e.g. a star target, types, a line series, which may contain elements, e.g. checker-board squares, lines or dots.
  • the control strip is of a fixed size having the dimensions 17 mm by 161 mm or 17 mm by 191 mm including colour fields.
  • the system parameters interrogated by this known system are recording density and dots per inch (dpi).
  • EP-A-0 518 559 describes a method and apparatus for creating a control strip.
  • a digital representation of the control strip is printed to form a visible, analogue representation of the control strip.
  • the control strip may be printed at the same time as a main coloured image to be reproduced.
  • the control strip consists of control fields and the elements of the control fields can be user defined.
  • the control strip is 12 mm wide.
  • PostScriptTM is a programming language created by Adobe Systems Inc., California, USA for defining page, lettering, colour and graphics parameters of images to be output by a raster output device such as a printer, an imagesetter or a platesetter.
  • PostScriptTM is described in the "PostScript Language Reference Manual", second edition, Addison-Wesley, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as "AdobeRef”).
  • PostScriptTM files may be incorporated in the file for a main image as an encapsulated PostScript file (EPS file), as described in Appendix H, pages 709-736 in AdobeRef.
  • EPS file encapsulated PostScript file
  • control strip according to the present invention is described by PostScriptTM commands. This gives the freedom to incorporate the strip in computer-to-plate and computer-to-film applications even in the last stage of printing plate production.
  • the digital control strip according to the present invention is preferably described as a set of PostScriptTM commands but the invention is not limited thereto.
  • control strip in accordance with the present invention is its ability to be scaled to a small size.
  • the width may preferably be less than 12 mm, more preferably less than 10 mm, down to 5 mm, whereas its length may be, for example, 145 mm for an imagesetter or platesetter having a spatial resolution of 2400 or 3600 dpi, which corresponds to 94 to 142 dots per millimetre.
  • control strip in accordance with the present invention is placed at a location on the imageable medium which is image-wise functionally irrelevant.
  • it may be placed on a printing plate at a location which remains ink-free during the subsequent printing process.
  • a preferred arrangement of control fields in accordance with the present invention is that a field with a high probability of 50% image density is located closely, preferably directly adjacent to other control fields of higher resolution and the comparison is, thus, easier and more reliable.
  • the claim 11 and 12 also include a method for obtaining an image medium having a control strip according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of such a system 1.
  • a computer 2 or similar device is used to create a digital representation of an image optionally using a scanner 3 to scan in an image or a store 4 of pre-recorded images which may be accessible optionally via a network 5 such as the Internet.
  • Digital representations of images may be created by graphics software such as Quark XPressTM, Adobe PhotoShopTM, Adobe IllustratorTM, AldusTM PagemakerTM, Corel DrawTM or similar.
  • the digital representation is preferably stored as an output file 6 in a graphics software and output device independent programming language such as PostScriptTM.
  • the present invention is not limited thereto.
  • the output file 6 is transferred to a raster output device 10 such as an imagesetter, optionally via a LAN or network 7. Either in the raster output device 10 or elsewhere, an interpreter 8 is provided for conversion (raster image processing) of the output file 6 into an output device specific raster data file 9 which can be processed by the raster output device 10 by scan conversion. It is understood that the raster output device 10 may include further separate or integrated devices necessary for the development of the imageable medium, e.g. the developer and fixer for the photographic film or printing plate. The output of the raster output device is an imaged medium 11, e.g. a photographic film or a printing plate.
  • the imaging system 1 may be a computer-to-plate system.
  • An example of a suitable raster output device 10 may be a Creo PlateMaster controller linked to a Creo 3244 platesetter with plate conveyor, plate processor and plate stacker all supplied by Creo Products Inc. Bunaby, B.C., Canada.
  • the interpreter 8 may include a Creo Allegro RIP station supplied by the same company compatible with PostScriptTM Level 2.
  • Suitable imageable media may be N90a printing plates provided by Agfa-Gevaert AG, Wiesbaden, Germany or Lithostar LAP-0 printing plates supplied by Agfa-Gevaert N.V., Mortsel, Belgium.
  • the printing plates may be based on a thin metal sheet such as electrochemically roughened and anodized aluminium (most common plate thicknesses are 6 mil, 8 mil and 12 mil, i.e. respectively 0.15 mm, 0.20 mm, 0.30 mm) or have a polymeric base such as polyester.
  • a set of colour separated printing plates e.g. cyan, yellow, magenta or cyan, yellow, magenta and black.
  • the same control strip may be used independent of the colour to be used with the printing plate.
  • a suitable raster output device 10 also may be an imager for photographic film such as the SelectSet Avantra44TM supplied by Bayer Inc., Agfa Division, Wilmington, USA.
  • a further suitable raster output device 10 may be a printer such as an ink jet, thermal transfer or electrostatic printer. Examples are : a DesignJetTM 750C supplied by Hewlett-Packard Corp., USA ; a SummachromeTM Imaging system supplied Summagraphics Inc., USA ; or a ChromapressTM system supplied by Agfa-Gevaert N.V., Mortsel, Belgium.
  • Raster output devices 10 are usually calibrated in accordance with the relevant manufacturer's instructions at regular intervals. Such complex procedures are not suitable for routine production control of imaging quality.
  • the digital control strip in accordance with the present invention has been designed to provide rapid, direct and reliable routine control of imaging quality , in the case of printing plates preferably before the actual printing on the plate starts, while taking up the minimum of space on the imaged substrate.
  • the digital control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention is shown in Fig. 2. It comprises a plurality of control fields 30 to 62 preferably arranged pairwise such as fields 30 to 33 and 34 ; 35, 36 ; 37, 38 ; etc. and preferably also text 63, 64.
  • the outer dimensions of the digital control strip 20 (called the bounding box, 65) are typically 12 mm or more preferably 10 mm or less in width and 145 mm in length. Fields may be grouped together for comparison purpose, e.g. checker board fields 30 to 34, line fields 35 to 50, raster fields 51 to 62. In accordance with the present application these groups of related fields are described as a "field set".
  • the control strip 20 shown in Fig. 2 has three main field sets :
  • the elements (66, 67, 68) may make up a pattern (33, 35, 61) with a repetitive pattern cell which is tiled in order to fill up the area of the relevant control field.
  • the control field may include a series of lines or larger dots arranged in a predetermined pattern.
  • One larger dot preferably comprises an integer number of pixels or microdots.
  • the digital control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention is scalable.
  • Scalability refers to the ability of the digital control strip to be transformed, i.e. resized to a different physical size, e.g. smaller or larger in one or two dimensions.
  • the strip is designed such that the integrity of the pattern within the fields is maintained. This means that scaling has no influence on the number of pixels in an element (66, 67, 68) of a pattern, nor on the relative location of the device pixels or microdots in the element.
  • the outer dimensions of a field are altered differently in two orthogonal directions, the field is deformed but the elements (66, 67, 68) within the field are not deformed.
  • the undeformed elements fill the deformed field - if the field has become smaller, the number of elements in the field reduces.
  • This property of the digital strip in accordance with the present invention may be achieved by defining the elements of a field in device space and the size of the fields themselves in user space.
  • Device space is the internal co-ordinate system used by the raster output device 10 for scan conversion of the raster data file 9 and is usually expressed or "measured" in "pixel” units.
  • User space is the internal co-ordinate system used to create the output file 6 in the device independent language, such as PostScriptTM and is usually expressed in units of length such as 1/72 of an inch (see AdobeRef, page 151) or millimetre.
  • a current transformation matrix (CTM) may be used (see AdobeRef, 4.3.2 Transformations, pages 152-154).
  • This matrix converts the data in the output file 6 into data in raster data file 9 taking into account any difference in resolution between the co-ordinate systems of the user space (the device independent language) and the device space (raster output device 10).
  • a distance of X units in the user space defined in output file 6 is converted by the CTM into the appropriate number of pixels Y in the device space which result in the same physical distance in device space as is represented by X units in the user space.
  • the distance produced by the output device 10 is independent of the resolution of the output device 10.
  • X distance units of device space defined in output file 6 result in X distance units in device space.
  • the actual size, in metric units, of elements defined in the device space is device dependent - the size depends on the number of dpi (microdots per inch) of the output device 10. For instance, the device space distance X printed by a 300 dpi printer would be 10 times larger than by a 3000 dpi printer. In general, specifying data in device space is discouraged as the appearance of the data is device dependent and may seem to be deformed relative to user space.
  • Fig. 3 shows a checkerboard field 33 in accordance with the present invention. It is made up of a repetitive element 66 or pattern cell of 4 by 4 black device pixels combined with 4x4 white or transparent pixels resulting in a theoretical (perfect set-up) 50% density pattern. If the dot gain on the imageable medium 11 in the output device 10 is greater than desired, the area of the black square increases with respect'to the white square and the density is above 50%.
  • the dot spacing and the element spacing are defined in device space, whereas the dimensions of the field 33 are defined in user space.
  • Field 33 is scalable and its size may be defined by the user. Depending on its size, the field 33 is filled up with as many elements 66 as required, the elements 66 being clipped at the boundaries of field 33. As the pattern elements 66 are defined in device space, their actual size on the imaged substrate is dependent on the resolution of the output device. On the other hand the size of the field itself is set by the user.
  • Fields 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 have checkerboard patterns with 1x1, 2x2, 3x3, 4x4 and 8x8 microdots or device pixels and each has a theoretical (perfect set-up) optical density of 50% on average.
  • the checkerboard patterns may be adjusted in size, e.g. perhaps 3x3, 4x4, 5x5, 6x6 and 11x11, as appropriate for the particular application. Once the suitable sizes have been established for this particular application, they are preferably kept constant.
  • a particular aspect of the present invention is to place a reference pattern of one of the checkerboard patterns along the complete length of the other checkerboard patterns.
  • the reference pattern is the pattern (the 8x8 pattern 34 as shown in Fig. 2) which has a high probability of providing an optical density close to 50% even if the output device 10 is not set up correctly.
  • the close proximity of the reference pattern 34 and the other patterns (30, 31, 32, 33) allows easy comparison there between. If on using a specific film or plate material on a given raster output device 10, it turns out that one particular field, e.g. the checkerboard 2x2 field 31, has the same density as the 8x8 field 34, a comparison of only these two fields is necessary to check continued quality during the current production run.
  • FIG. 4 shows two adjacent line fields 35, 36 in accordance with the present invention.
  • Field 35 has a white background with a series of black lines 67.
  • Field 36 has a black background and the lines 67 of field 35 are represented in white.
  • the thickness of the lines 67 is determined in device space whereas the distance between the lines 67 is determined in user space. Accordingly, the thickness of the lines 67 is output device dependent whereas the distance between the lines 67 is output device independent.
  • Fields 35, 36 ; 39, 40 ; 43, 44 and 47, 48 have horizontal lines with thicknesses of 1, 2, 3, and 4 device pixels respectively, whereas fields 37, 38 : 41, 42 ; 45, 46 ; and 49, 50 have vertical lines with thicknesses of 1, 2, 3, and 4 device pixels respectively.
  • Fig. 5 shows a pair of raster fields 61, 62 in accordance with the present invention.
  • Field 61 has a density of 10%, i.e. 10% of the area 61 is filled with black microdots, while 90% is filled with white microdots.
  • Black microdots are clustered in halftone dots 68. These halftone dots 68 are arranged along a regular quadratic grid, called halftone raster of screen, having a screen angle and a screen ruling.
  • the screen angle of the halftone dots 68 in Fig. 5 is actually 45°.
  • the screen ruling is given by the multiplicative inverse of the period of the halftone dots 68.
  • the period is the shortest distance between the centres of two different halftone dots, and is measured along a line parallel to the screen angle.
  • the clustering of microdots into halftone dots i.e. the relative position of black microdots in the neighbourhood of the halftone dot centre 68, in order to achieve a 10% density, is dictated by the "screening type", usually given by a "screen function” or "spot function".
  • the screening type used in the preferred embodiment shown in Fig. 2 is Agfa Balanced Screening.
  • Field 62 has a density of 90%. This is achieved by a black background, having 10% of the area filled with white halftone dots, thus leaving black 90% of the microdots.
  • the white halftone dots are also arranged on a regular grid, having a screen angle and a screen ruling.
  • the shape of the white halftone dots i.e. the relative position of the clustered white microdots with respect to the centre of each halftone dot, is dictated again by the spot function.
  • the size and shape of the halftone dots 68 in the raster fields 61 and 62, along with the screen angle and line ruling, are determined in device space, i.e. are output device dependent.
  • the size of the halftone fields 61 and 62 is determined in user space, i.e. is output device independent.
  • Fields 53 and 54 have a dot percentage of 1% and 99% respectively.
  • Fields 55 and 56 have a dot percentage of 2% and 98% respectively.
  • Fields 57 and 58 have a dot percentage of 3% and 97% respectively.
  • Fields 59 and 60 have a dot percentage of 5% and 95% respectively.
  • the fields are arranged pair-wise, having complementary dot percentages, although another arrangement may also be suitable.
  • the screen angle, the screen ruling, the spot function and the various dot percentages may be selected appropriately depending upon the application.
  • Fields such as field 33 ; 35, 36 ; 61 or 62 may be generated in PostScriptTM in the following manner with reference to Fig. 6 :
  • This program listing fragment defines a pattern "OnePixelLinesVer" which is 8x1 pixels in a matrix 81 of 8x8 pixels in the device space.
  • the pattern consists of a vertical line having a thickness of one microdot or pixel in the device space.
  • the pattern is defined in an 8x8 matrix 81 so that the line width may be amended to be up to 8 pixels in thickness in other fields.
  • the repetition distance between two matrices 88, X_StepL is defined in user space (not listed above) so this repetition distance is output device independent.
  • the complete field is defined in user space : 0 0 X_field Y_field 1.0 /PixelLinesVer setpattern rectfill which generates a field of the required size which is filled by the pattern OnePixelLinesVer and is clipped at the boundaries of the field. Note also that the field is scalable in user space without altering or deforming the pattern of the element OnePixelLinesVer which is defined in device space.
  • the above script may be amended to create four alternating 4x4 device pixel black and white squares in the 8x8 matrix 82 as shown in Fig. 7.
  • the distance X_StepL is not defined.
  • the 8x8 matrix 82 is specified as the pattern cell and tiled within the field by means of the rectfill command. This generates a pattern of black and white, 4x4 device pixel squares which is device dependent and non-scalable.
  • the field dimensions are again specified in user space using scalable dimensions.
  • FIG. 8 A portion of a raster field 55 is shown in Fig. 8.
  • the Agfa Balanced Screening having a screen angle of 45° is used with the digital control strip.
  • the Agfa Balanced Screening is described in EP-A-0 525 520.
  • the fundamental pattern of a raster field consists of two groups - referred to as clusters of halftone dots - of device pixels or microdots in a 22x22 matrix 83 in device space.
  • the 22x22 matrix 83 forms the pattern cell and is tiled within the field and clipped at its edges.
  • the invention is not limited to a 22x22 matrix as is explained below.
  • the number of device pixels which are coded "1" i.e. would print colour, e.g. black in fields 53, 55, 57, 59, 61 ; or would be coded "0" and would print white in fields 54, 56, 58, 60 and 62
  • the invention is not limited thereto.
  • pairs of fields 53, 54 ; 55, 56 ; 57, 58 ; 59, 60 ; and 61, 62 have 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 coded pixels "1" or "0" respectively.
  • the imaginary line 84 joining two halftone dots is oriented at 45° with respect to the vertical axis of the page, this angle being known as the screen angle.
  • the ratio of screen ruling to resolution may be altered, in accordance with the present invention preferably in the range 10 to 20. For instance to obtain a ratio of 10, a 14x14 matrix 83 with two halftone dots should be used, and for a ratio of 20, a 28x28 matrix 83.
  • the field sets are individually scalable and also may be located independently of each other.
  • the control strip 20 is not limited to the linear arrangement shown in Fig. 2.
  • the checkerboard, pixel line and raster field sets may be stacked upon each other or may be separated from each other and located in three separate portions of the imageable substrate.
  • the digital control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention may be used in the following way.
  • the digital representation of the strip 20 is incorporated into a digital representation of a normal page in the computer 2 as, for instance, an EPS file. This file is imaged directly onto a printing plate.
  • the control strip is preferably located in an image-wise functionally irrelevant part of the page layout.
  • the control strip when used to check the quality of the imager used to image an offset printing plate without mounting the plate on the press and producing a proof print, the control strip may be located in an area of the plate which is outside the zone to be inked.
  • a flexible offset printing plate 90 is shown schematically in Fig. 9 and comprises a substrate 91, e.g. aluminium or polyester on which an image has been formed after imaging in a raster output device and possibly a subsequent developing step.
  • Printing press location or registration holes 92 may be provided. Within the confines of the location holes 92, an inkable area 93 is defined. It is within this area 93 that the normal pages or graphic images have been imaged onto the plate 90. There are many arrangements for securing the printing plate 90 to the plate cylinder, as e.g. described in US-4,643,063 as but one example (plate securing on web offset presses). When mounted on the offset printing press, the inkable area 93 will be subjected to the ink roller. Outside the inkable area 93, there is a perimeter area 94 which is not inked and serves no image-wise purpose.
  • This area has the mechanical function of locating and securing the plate to the press but has no function with respect to the reproduction of the image itself, i.e. no image-wise functionality. It is in this area 94 that the control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention may preferably be placed. It is particularly preferred if the control strip 20 is placed in the plate portion of zone 94 which is received in the plate locking or clamping device of the printing plate cylinder.
  • control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention is scalable, it can be fitted to the available space in ink-free zone 94.
  • field sets in accordance with the present invention may be treated independently, each field set as well as the text may be located at a different position of ink-free zone 94. Because the field elements are not scalable, they remain suitable for quality control purposes independently of the size of the fields provided these are each greater than a minimum size of preferably 2 mm.
  • certain parameters of the control strip are pre-determined and not user definable. These include : the screen angle, screen type and screen ruling.
  • Screen angle is the angle of the rows of halftone dots with respect to the vertical or horizontal direction on the page as described above and is preferably fixed to a certain angle, such as 45°.
  • the screening type is predetermined, e.g. a certain type of frequency modulated screening (FM screening) or a certain type of amplitude modulated screening (AM screening / autotypical screening).
  • FM screening frequency modulated screening
  • AM screening / autotypical screening amplitude modulated screening
  • the screen ruling of a specific AM screening is proportional to the inverse of the distance between the centres of two different halftone dots and is usually expressed in lines per inch.
  • the screen ruling for the raster fields in the control strip is preferably in a fixed relation to the addressability of the device space, typically at a value between 1/10 and 1/20, e.g. 1/15.6 of the addressability.
  • the screen ruling is thus fixed to the addressability of the output device divided by a fixed value between 10 and 20.
  • the halftone dots are the elements of the pattern.
  • the number of '1' microdots in a halftone dot and the relative position of the '1' microdots, nor the distance between the dot centres of the halftone dots, will not be influenced by the field size.
  • control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention is realised in device space in accordance with a fixed set of parameters which may be different from the parameters used to create the text or graphic image on the same page.
  • the control strip may comprise raster fields having a line ruling of 154 lpi
  • the image data may be screened with a line ruling of 120 lpi.
  • the screen angle, e.g. 45°, of the control strip 20 may differ from the individual screen angles on colour separated printing plates, e.g. cyan, magenta, yellow or cyan, magenta, yellow, and black, usually at 75°, 15°, 0° and 45° respectively.
  • the control strip is still suitable for quality control of these colour separated plates within one batch produced on the same platesetter as only the relative change within a batch is of importance. This can be assessed quickly and accurately with the control strip in accordance with the present invention.
  • the predetermination of the various parameters of the control strip 20, make determination of the imaging quality independent of the user, of the type of data to be imaged and of the imaging method and the raster output device. This results in the digital control strip 20 in accordance with the present invention being consistent and reliable in use.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Manufacture Or Reproduction Of Printing Formes (AREA)
  • Preparing Plates And Mask In Photomechanical Process (AREA)
  • Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen, der sich durch eine Rasterausgabeeinrichtung auf ein belichtbares Medium wie eine Druckplatte oder einen fotografischen Film anwenden läßt, umfassend:
    mindestens ein Kontrollfeld, wobei jedes Feld mindestens ein Element enthält, wobei jedes derartige Element nicht skaliert werden kann und jedes derartige Feld unabhängig von den Elementen skaliert werden kann.
  2. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach Anspruch 1, mit einem Autotypieraster mit einer Rasterweite, einem Rasterwinkel und einer Rasterungsart, wobei mindestens die Rasterweite, der Rasterwinkel oder der Rasterungstyp vorbestimmt sind und nicht vom Benutzer definiert werden können.
  3. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach Anspruch 2, wobei die Rasterweite R (lpi) ein festes Verhältnis r/R zur Auflösung r (dpi) der Rasterausgabeeinrichtung aufweist.
  4. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach Anspruch 3, wobei das feste Verhältnis r/R zwischen 10 und 20 und bevorzugt 15,6 beträgt.
  5. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Felder in Feldsätzen organisiert sind, wobei jeder Feldsatz mindestens ein Feld umfaßt.
  6. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach Anspruch 5, wobei jeder Feldsatz unabhängig skaliert und auf dem belichtbaren Medium positioniert werden kann.
  7. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Felder Raster-, Linien-Pixel- und Schachbrettfelder beinhalten.
  8. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Kontrollfelder ein pxp-Schachbrettfeld und mindestens ein mxm- und ein nxn-Schachbrettfeld enthalten, wobei m, n, p ganze Zahlen sind, die definiert sind durch m<n<p, und wobei die mxm- und nxn-Felder sich direkt neben dem pxp-Feld befinden.
  9. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die digitale Darstellung des Streifens in einer ausgabeeinrichtungsunabhängigen Sprache gespeichert wird und die Elemente im Einrichtungsraum und die Felder im Benutzerraum definiert sind.
  10. Digitaler Kontrollstreifen nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei der Begrenzungskasten der Felder auf eine Abmessung unter 12 mm, bevorzugt unter 10 mm, skaliert werden kann.
  11. Verfahren zum Erhalten eines belichteten Mediums mit einem Kontrollstreifen, mit den folgenden Schritten:
    Erzeugen eines digitalen Kontrollstreifens nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 10 und Anwenden des digitalen Kontrollstreifens auf das Bildmedium in einem bildmäßig irrelevanten Teil.
  12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 11, wobei das belichtete Medium eine Druckplatte für eine Druckpresse ist und wobei der bildmäßig irrelevante Teil sich in der Sperreinrichtung der Druckpresse befindet.
  13. Verfahren zum Beurteilen der Belichtungsqualität eines Belichtungssystems unter Verwendung des digitalen Kontrollstreifens gemäß einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 10.
  14. Verfahren nach Anspruch 13, wobei das Belichtungssystem ein System zum Produzieren belichteter Druckplatten ist.
  15. Verfahren nach Anspruch 14, wobei das Belichtungssystem ein Computer-To-Plate-System ist.
EP19960202333 1996-08-23 1996-08-23 Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien Expired - Lifetime EP0825022B1 (de)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE1996625809 DE69625809T2 (de) 1996-08-23 1996-08-23 Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien
EP19960202333 EP0825022B1 (de) 1996-08-23 1996-08-23 Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien
JP23782697A JPH10115906A (ja) 1996-08-23 1997-08-20 画像形成媒体のためのデイジタル制御条片

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19960202333 EP0825022B1 (de) 1996-08-23 1996-08-23 Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0825022A1 EP0825022A1 (de) 1998-02-25
EP0825022B1 true EP0825022B1 (de) 2003-01-15

Family

ID=8224305

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19960202333 Expired - Lifetime EP0825022B1 (de) 1996-08-23 1996-08-23 Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0825022B1 (de)
JP (1) JPH10115906A (de)
DE (1) DE69625809T2 (de)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6219154B1 (en) * 1997-02-13 2001-04-17 David J. Romano Exposure control technique for imagesetting applications
SE9903174D0 (sv) * 1999-09-08 1999-09-08 Skogsind Tekn Foskningsinst Test-printing method and test-printing form for use in the method
JP2004333875A (ja) * 2003-05-08 2004-11-25 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd 平版印刷版の画像評価方法及び品質管理方法
DE102004009390B4 (de) * 2004-02-24 2006-04-06 Brüder Neumeister GmbH Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung der Qualität der Bebilderung von Druckplatten
DE102006011140A1 (de) * 2006-03-10 2007-09-13 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Prozesskontrollstreifen und Verfahren zur Aufzeichnung
DE102008025417A1 (de) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-03 Manroland Ag Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Parametern eines Druckprozesses
DE102008057951A1 (de) * 2008-11-19 2010-05-20 Manroland Ag Verfahren zum Bedrucken von Druckbogen in einer Bogendruckmaschine
CN102615958A (zh) * 2012-03-20 2012-08-01 辅讯光电工业(苏州)有限公司 导光板、印刷模板和导光板制造及检测方法
CN111806088A (zh) * 2020-06-30 2020-10-23 湖北合信智能包装科技有限公司 宽幅彩色瓦楞纸箱柔版预印测控条的制作方法及其测控条
US11813840B2 (en) 2020-10-15 2023-11-14 Koenig & Bauer Ag Print control strip, substrate, and method for controlling by open-loop control and/or closed-loop control at least one component of a processing machine

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1012822A (en) * 1972-11-13 1977-06-28 American Hoechst Corporation Test film and method of using same
US4310248A (en) * 1980-04-24 1982-01-12 Meredith Nolan J Color control system
DE3687074D1 (de) * 1985-03-21 1992-12-17 Felix Brunner Verfahren, regelvorrichtung und hilfsmittel zur erzielung eines gleichfoermigen druckresultats an einer autotypisch arbeitenden mehrfarbenoffsetdruckmaschine.
DE3830121A1 (de) * 1988-09-05 1990-03-15 Felix Brunner Verfahren und vorrichtung zur einstellung eines vorgegebenen, durch ein wertepaar volltondichte/rasterpunktaenderung definierten druckstandards bei einem autotypischen druckvorgang
CH681929A5 (en) * 1990-06-08 1993-06-15 Ugra Verein Zur Foerderung Wis Quality control testing of printing processes - uses test pattern consisting of mixt. of line dot and chess board patterns
US5185673A (en) * 1991-06-12 1993-02-09 Hewlett-Packard Company Automated image calibration

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69625809D1 (de) 2003-02-20
JPH10115906A (ja) 1998-05-06
DE69625809T2 (de) 2003-09-04
EP0825022A1 (de) 1998-02-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6535307B1 (en) Method and apparatus for display of imaging parameters
US6128090A (en) Visual control strip for imageable media
US5884013A (en) Autotypical screening with optimised dotshape
US20040200369A1 (en) Method and system for printing press image distortion compensation
US20070013923A1 (en) Corresponding Lenticular Imaging
EP0734147B1 (de) Intensitätsmodulierte stochastische Rasterung zur Herstellung lithographischer Druckplatten
EP0825022B1 (de) Digitaler Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien
US6532082B1 (en) Halftone printing plates containing microscopic perforations and methods for producing same
EP0847858B1 (de) Sichtbarer Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien
EP0734151B1 (de) Grössenmodulierte stochastische Rasterung
EP0620673B1 (de) Verfahren zur Herstellung lithographischer Druckformen
US8493627B2 (en) Method for the digital screening of halftone images
US7440141B2 (en) Method for generating a dither mask
DE69525534T2 (de) Autotypische Rasterung mit optimierten Punktformen
EP0734148B1 (de) Zeitmodulierte stochastische Halbtonrasterung
EP0620674B1 (de) Verfahren zur Herstellung lithographischer Druckformen
DE69714197T2 (de) Sichtbarer Kontrollstreifen für Abbildungsmedien
EP1367812B1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Vermeidung von Nähten in gerasterten Bilddaten für Endlosdruckverfahren
US6049395A (en) Method and system for achieving enhanced gray levels in a screen cell array
US20050243377A1 (en) Method for generating non-printing dots in a screened representation of an image
US7394570B2 (en) Method and apparatus for eliminating seams in screened image data for repetitive printing
JP3897947B2 (ja) 画像データ処理方法
EP1608146B1 (de) Verfahren für das Erzeugen einer Zittermatrix
US6961146B1 (en) Method for homogenizing the exposure of the different beams in a multi beam plotter
US20030142356A1 (en) Method for reducing perceivable artifacts in a printed image

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19980825

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: BE DE FR GB NL

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL

D17P Request for examination filed (deleted)
R17P Request for examination filed (corrected)

Effective date: 19980825

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19991223

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: AGFA-GEVAERT

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030115

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69625809

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030220

Kind code of ref document: P

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20031016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20120618

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120706

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120618

Year of fee payment: 17

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69625809

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140301

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130902