EP0403537B1 - Ultrasonic polishing - Google Patents

Ultrasonic polishing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0403537B1
EP0403537B1 EP89903596A EP89903596A EP0403537B1 EP 0403537 B1 EP0403537 B1 EP 0403537B1 EP 89903596 A EP89903596 A EP 89903596A EP 89903596 A EP89903596 A EP 89903596A EP 0403537 B1 EP0403537 B1 EP 0403537B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
workpiece
tool
configuration
abrasive
slurry
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89903596A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0403537A4 (en
EP0403537A1 (en
Inventor
Lawrence J. Extrude Hone Corporation Rhoades
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Extrude Hone LLC
Original Assignee
Extrude Hone LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Extrude Hone LLC filed Critical Extrude Hone LLC
Priority to AT89903596T priority Critical patent/ATE96071T1/en
Publication of EP0403537A1 publication Critical patent/EP0403537A1/en
Publication of EP0403537A4 publication Critical patent/EP0403537A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0403537B1 publication Critical patent/EP0403537B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B1/00Processes of grinding or polishing; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such processes
    • B24B1/04Processes of grinding or polishing; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such processes subjecting the grinding or polishing tools, the abrading or polishing medium or work to vibration, e.g. grinding with ultrasonic frequency
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B35/00Machines or devices designed for superfinishing surfaces on work, i.e. by means of abrading blocks reciprocating with high frequency
    • B24B35/005Machines or devices designed for superfinishing surfaces on work, i.e. by means of abrading blocks reciprocating with high frequency for making three-dimensional objects

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of polishing a workpiece according to the preamble of claim 1 (see US-A-2 850 854).
  • the present invention is particularly adapted to polishing compound surfaces and complex shapes having fine or intricate detail where a reduction in surface roughness is needed without loss of resolution or detail.
  • Ultrasonic machining is a well known machining process whereby the surface of a workpiece is abraded by a grit contained in a slurry circulated between the workpiece surface and a vibrating tool adjacent thereto, vibrating at frequencies above the audible range, i.e. typically within the range 19,500 to 20,500 cycles per second.
  • the amplitude of vibration is less than 0.01 mm, and typically within the range 0.001 to 0.005 mm.
  • the tool is made of a material having high strength and good ductility, in order to impart a high degree of impact resistance to minimize abrasion of the tool itself.
  • the abrading tool face is provided with a three-dimensional form, while a negative compliment thereof is machined onto the workpiece surface.
  • the tool Since the tool does not contact the workpiece, the actual cutting is done by the abrasive particles suspended in the slurry. These particles are driven with a percussive impact against the workpiece surface by the tool, ultrasonically vibrating perpendicular to the workpiece surface.
  • This process finds particular utility in its ability to work difficult materials, such as glass, ceramics, calcined or vitrified refractory materials and hard and/or brittle metals, which are not susceptible to machining by any other traditional technique, or even such nontraditional techniques such as electrical discharge machining, electro-chemical machining or the like.
  • Ultrasonic machining has proved particularly advantageous for reproducing complex shapes which could not be obtained by traditional machining, or by non-traditional techniques such as electrical discharge machining, electro-chemical machining, or the like because of the nature of the materials to be worked.
  • Ultrasonic machining imparts some abrasive erosion of the tool as well as the workpiece, so that there is an ongoing and increasing loss of fine detail and resolution as the tool is used and worn. For this reason it has been considered rather important that the tool material be one that is comparatively tough and ductile, i.e. not readily abradable by ultrasonic machining, so as that the tool will be abraded to a much lesser degree than the workpiece.
  • tools are commonly made of materials such as cold rolled steel, austenitic stainless steel, copper, aluminum and the like.
  • ultrasonic machining in its normal practice, only abrades areas of the workpiece which are most adjacent to the tool face surfaces. Therefore, if ultrasonic machining is to be used on a workpiece that is already formed, or formed in part, as in a polishing operation, it is very important that the tool and workpiece be aligned and registered as accurately as possible, least the workpiece be abraded or polished nonuniformly and possibly even destroying the workpiece as desired. Setting-up the tool and workpiece with the necessarily accurate indexing and registration is a time consuming and laborious procedure .
  • polishing by any method requires the removal of a very small amount of workpiece material, and ideally a very uniform removal thereof. Manual polishing, vibratory finishing, buffing, brushing and even extrusion honing cannot remove the workpiece material to the extent of uniformity often desired, particularly in the case of complex workpiece surfaces. Burnishing, on the other hand, tends to redistribute the workpiece surface material causing dimensional changes.
  • the invention consists in the method of polishing a workpiece surface having a configuration preformed therein without adversely effecting the configuration detail and resolution, comprising:
  • U.S. Patent 2850854 shows a method for removing material by ultrasonic grinding.
  • the ratio of stock removed to tool wear shall be at least 1:1, varying up to 100:1.
  • the tool is abraded but only "polishing" amounts of material are removed from the workpiece, so that the ratio of "stock removed” to "tool wear” would be much less than 1 to 1, a difference of kind rather than mere degree.
  • Japanese Patent No. JP-A-54-133697 also relates to a grinding process, but in which a molded shaped head is utilised to grind a subsequent workpiece. Minimal tool wear for a given grinding performance is desired, the opposite of the present invention.
  • a method for ultrasonic polishing of a workpiece by means of a tool which is significantly more ultrasonically abradable than the workpiece and therefore, need not be preformed to provide a complement of the surface of the workpiece. Instead, a blank tool face can be used.
  • the tool When the tool is vibrated, imparting its vibrations to an abrasive slurry disposed in the gap between the tool and workpiece, the tool is quickly eroded in such a fashion that it quickly develops a complementary form of the workpiece with a high degree of resolution and detail.
  • the tool will continue to be abraded at a comparatively high rate while continuing to maintain its high degree of resolution and detail, while at the same time the surface of the workpiece is abraded to a much lesser degree so that it is merely polished while the tool is being progressively abraded down, but at all times maintaining its high resolution and detail complimentary work surface.
  • the present invention may be employed to polish any material more resistant to ultrasonic erosion than the material of which the tool is made.
  • the tool will be re-dressed continuously and inherently to the complementary form of the workpiece, by virtue of the fact that the tool will be eroded to a greater extent than the workpiece.
  • the preferential working of the tool results in a constant or even increasing conformity to the fine detail and resolution of the workpiece, so that as polishing of the workpiece occurs, there is no loss of resolution.
  • ultrasonic polishing is made applicable even to relatively soft and easy to work materials, such as bronze, brass, or gold, to polymeric materials, and a wide diversity of other materials which were not heretofore thought to be appropriate for ultrasonic techniques, in addition to very much harder materials, including those where ultrasonic machining techniques have been employed previously, as discussed above.
  • ultrasonic polishing in accordance with the present invention, surface finishes can be attained, depending on the extent of polishing, of substantially any desired degree, regardless of the material and in any degree of intricacy and fineness of detail without substantial change in detail or resolution.
  • Surface roughness can be reduced to as low as about 0.1 microns Ra, although such high degree of polish may not always be required and a lesser extent of polishing may often suffice for a given application.
  • the process of this invention does remove a very uniform layer of material from a workpiece surface, the process is also ideally suited to the removal of thin layers of unwanted material from a workpiece surface, such as an EDM recast layer of material which is normally 0.003 to 0.006 mm thick.
  • the process of this invention can be used to remove burrs from a workpiece surface or to radius the edges thereof.
  • FIG. 1 An ultrasonic machine tool as employed in the present invention is shown schematically in Fig. 1.
  • Figs. 2 and 3 are "before” and “after” photomicrographs of a carbide compacting die illustrating the effectiveness of this invention.
  • Ultrasonic machine tools are known to the art and the present invention is generally applicable for use with any such machine, utilizing typical parameters for vibrational frequency, amplitude and abrading particles.
  • such equipment comprises a frame 10 adapted to hold a workpiece 4 and a tool holder 1 including an ultrasonic driver which vibrates the tool 2 at a frequency typically of about 20 KHz but in some applications from 10 to 40 KHz, most often about 19 to 22 KHz.
  • the tool holder 1 is adapted at 11 to advance the tool from a retracted position into working position and, during working, into the workpiece.
  • the equipment will ordinarily be furnished with abrasive slurry handling means 6,7,8,9 so that the slurry can be disposed between the tool 2, and the workpiece 4.
  • the slurry will often be pumped through the gap between the tool and workpiece to continuously provide fresh, unworn abrasive to the working surface and to flush away eroded material and debris.
  • the slurry may be processed to remove debris and recirculated.
  • the transducer will most typically be an electronically driven stack of piezoelectric element or a magnetostrictive transducer.
  • the abrasive slurry will ordinarily be formed of hard abrasive particles disposed in a liquid carrier.
  • the abrasives are typically tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, aluminum oxide, boron carbide, boron nitride, diamond and the like, although it should be noted that when polishing softer materials in the present invention, softer abrasives may be used, such as alumina, corundum, garnet, and the like.
  • the liquid carrier must be one capable of transmitting ultrasonic vibrations and should be chosen to be compatible with the workpiece and the electrode materials. Water is the best such transmitters, although other liquids such as cutting oil or fluid and the like may be used. When water is used, it may be necessary to add rust inhibitors.
  • liquids other than water such as cutting oil, can be used to effect a low amplitude particle movement, or in the alternative a lower power can be used with the water as the transmitter.
  • the particle size of the abrasive is not critical as long as the particle size is such that it can be held in suspension. It is generally preferred, therefore, to use small particle sizes, less than 0.075 mm (200 mesh), and preferably, 0.025 to 0.015 mm (600 to 1000 mesh), with a particle concentration of from 10 to 20 volume percent of the fluid to attain the highest levels of polish.
  • the workpiece to be polished can be substantially any material which, contrary to prior art practices, is ultrasonically harder than the tool material, typically, a metallic workpiece.
  • the extent of polishing required will be determined by the initial surface roughness of the workpiece and the finish required after polishing. Both an advantage and a limitation of the procedure of the present invention resides in the fact that the configuration of the workpiece will not be altered during the polishing operation. It is thus important to recognize that the present invention will not improve resolution of fine detail, and the quality of the final product will, except for surface finish, be determined by the initial workpiece.
  • the tool must be formed of a material that is considerably more ultrasonically abradable than the workpiece material.
  • An ultrasonically more abradable material does not mean one that is softer, but usually one that is more brittle.
  • ultrasonic abradability it should be realized that in the ultrasonic machining of a surface, the tiny abrasive particles suspended in the fluid are impinged against the workpiece surface at an ultrasonic velocity, so that the tiny particles microscopically chip-away at the workpiece surface. To be chipped away in this fashion, the workpiece must have some degree of brittleness, whether or not the material is hard.
  • an ideal tool material would be a material having a significantly greater degree of ultrasonic abradability, such as graphite, glass, quartz and other such materials which have normally been considered ideal workpiece materials but not normally tool materials.
  • the tool When employed with suitable equipment, the tool may be provided with passages (5) communicating with the gap through which the abrasive slurry may be pumped to provide flushing of debris from the gap.
  • the debris will predominantly be tool material particles eroded from the tool combined with minor amounts of material polished from the surfaces of the workpiece.
  • the pumping will serve to provide fresh abrasive slurry to the gap so that cutting edges are not excessively worn during use.
  • the surface contour of the workpiece first serves to shape the tool surface into very exact registration therewith.
  • the tool is continually eroded and will perpetually generate and maintain very exact registration in situ .
  • the preferential erosion of the tool is the feature of the present invention which permits a high polish on the workpiece surface by a very thin, highly uniform surface removal.
  • the process of this invention is also ideally suited to the removal of any undesired layer of material from a workpiece surface.
  • an EDM recast layer typically from 0.003 to 0.006 mm (0.0001 to 0.0002 inch) thick can readily be removed by the practice of this process with the result that the recast layer is removed without any loss of resolution of detail in the workpiece surface.
  • workpieces coated with material such as ceramic can be processed as described herein to remove or selectively remove the ceramic coating therefrom without any loss of resolution of detail in the workpiece surface.
  • the process of this invention can be used to remove burrs which protrude from the workpiece surface, or to radius sharp corners on the edges of the workpiece. Either of these objects can be readily effected by using such an ultrasonically abradable tool without losing any of the workpiece detail.

Abstract

Ultrasonic polishing without substantial loss of fine resolution and detail is provided by employing a tool (2) of a more ultrasonically abradable material than the workpiece, (4) as the oscillating driver of a liquid abrasive slurry. The tool is preferentially eroded and conforms to the pattern of the workpiece continuous self-dressing during polishing.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method of polishing a workpiece according to the preamble of claim 1 (see US-A-2 850 854).
  • The present invention is particularly adapted to polishing compound surfaces and complex shapes having fine or intricate detail where a reduction in surface roughness is needed without loss of resolution or detail.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Ultrasonic machining is a well known machining process whereby the surface of a workpiece is abraded by a grit contained in a slurry circulated between the workpiece surface and a vibrating tool adjacent thereto, vibrating at frequencies above the audible range, i.e. typically within the range 19,500 to 20,500 cycles per second. The amplitude of vibration is less than 0.01 mm, and typically within the range 0.001 to 0.005 mm. The tool is made of a material having high strength and good ductility, in order to impart a high degree of impact resistance to minimize abrasion of the tool itself. The abrading tool face is provided with a three-dimensional form, while a negative compliment thereof is machined onto the workpiece surface. Since the tool does not contact the workpiece, the actual cutting is done by the abrasive particles suspended in the slurry. These particles are driven with a percussive impact against the workpiece surface by the tool, ultrasonically vibrating perpendicular to the workpiece surface. This process finds particular utility in its ability to work difficult materials, such as glass, ceramics, calcined or vitrified refractory materials and hard and/or brittle metals, which are not susceptible to machining by any other traditional technique, or even such nontraditional techniques such as electrical discharge machining, electro-chemical machining or the like.
  • Ultrasonic machining has proved particularly advantageous for reproducing complex shapes which could not be obtained by traditional machining, or by non-traditional techniques such as electrical discharge machining, electro-chemical machining, or the like because of the nature of the materials to be worked.
  • Ultrasonic machining imparts some abrasive erosion of the tool as well as the workpiece, so that there is an ongoing and increasing loss of fine detail and resolution as the tool is used and worn. For this reason it has been considered rather important that the tool material be one that is comparatively tough and ductile, i.e. not readily abradable by ultrasonic machining, so as that the tool will be abraded to a much lesser degree than the workpiece. For example, tools are commonly made of materials such as cold rolled steel, austenitic stainless steel, copper, aluminum and the like.
  • In addition to the above, ultrasonic machining in its normal practice, only abrades areas of the workpiece which are most adjacent to the tool face surfaces. Therefore, if ultrasonic machining is to be used on a workpiece that is already formed, or formed in part, as in a polishing operation, it is very important that the tool and workpiece be aligned and registered as accurately as possible, least the workpiece be abraded or polished nonuniformly and possibly even destroying the workpiece as desired. Setting-up the tool and workpiece with the necessarily accurate indexing and registration is a time consuming and laborious procedure .
  • The foregoing limitations have generally resulted in the choice of other machining techniques when the nature of the materials to be worked permit, and has generally required the use of other techniques for polishing operations. Any of the polishing techniques in common use are historically labor intensive, time consuming and expensive operations, and in addition typically require skilled workers and often produce rather inconsistent results. Polishing by any method requires the removal of a very small amount of workpiece material, and ideally a very uniform removal thereof. Manual polishing, vibratory finishing, buffing, brushing and even extrusion honing cannot remove the workpiece material to the extent of uniformity often desired, particularly in the case of complex workpiece surfaces. Burnishing, on the other hand, tends to redistribute the workpiece surface material causing dimensional changes.
  • The invention consists in the method of polishing a workpiece surface having a configuration preformed therein without adversely effecting the configuration detail and resolution, comprising:
    • A. forming a tool;
    • B. mounting said tool in a vibratable relationship to a workpiece so that a working surface of said tool is spaced from the workpiece surface having said configuration;
    • C. applying a liquid abrasive slurry between said tool and said workpiece;
    • D. causing a relative vibratory motion at an ultrasonic frequency between said tool and said workpiece; and
    • E. stopping the relative vibratory motion when the configuration on the surface of the workpiece has been polished;
       characterised in that the tool is formed in a material that is more ultrasonically abradable than the said workpiece, and in that the relative vibratory motion
    • (a) is effected at an ultrasonic frequency and amplitude sufficient to cause said working surface of said tool to be abraded into a negative complementary form of said configuration preformed on the surface of said workpiece; and
    • (b) is continued to abrade said tool as said tool continues to reform and maintain said negative complementary form of said configuration on the surface of said workpiece, while at the same time imparting a polishing action on the configuration on the surface of said workpiece.
  • U.S. Patent 2850854 shows a method for removing material by ultrasonic grinding. In contradistinction to the present method, it is envisaged that the ratio of stock removed to tool wear shall be at least 1:1, varying up to 100:1. In the present invention the tool is abraded but only "polishing" amounts of material are removed from the workpiece, so that the ratio of "stock removed" to "tool wear" would be much less than 1 to 1, a difference of kind rather than mere degree.
  • Japanese Patent No. JP-A-54-133697 also relates to a grinding process, but in which a molded shaped head is utilised to grind a subsequent workpiece. Minimal tool wear for a given grinding performance is desired, the opposite of the present invention.
  • According to the present invention, there is provided a method for ultrasonic polishing of a workpiece by means of a tool which is significantly more ultrasonically abradable than the workpiece and therefore, need not be preformed to provide a complement of the surface of the workpiece. Instead, a blank tool face can be used. When the tool is vibrated, imparting its vibrations to an abrasive slurry disposed in the gap between the tool and workpiece, the tool is quickly eroded in such a fashion that it quickly develops a complementary form of the workpiece with a high degree of resolution and detail. Thereafter, the tool will continue to be abraded at a comparatively high rate while continuing to maintain its high degree of resolution and detail, while at the same time the surface of the workpiece is abraded to a much lesser degree so that it is merely polished while the tool is being progressively abraded down, but at all times maintaining its high resolution and detail complimentary work surface.
  • The present invention may be employed to polish any material more resistant to ultrasonic erosion than the material of which the tool is made. In this fashion, the tool will be re-dressed continuously and inherently to the complementary form of the workpiece, by virtue of the fact that the tool will be eroded to a greater extent than the workpiece. The preferential working of the tool results in a constant or even increasing conformity to the fine detail and resolution of the workpiece, so that as polishing of the workpiece occurs, there is no loss of resolution.
  • By the present technique, ultrasonic polishing is made applicable even to relatively soft and easy to work materials, such as bronze, brass, or gold, to polymeric materials, and a wide diversity of other materials which were not heretofore thought to be appropriate for ultrasonic techniques, in addition to very much harder materials, including those where ultrasonic machining techniques have been employed previously, as discussed above.
  • With ultrasonic polishing in accordance with the present invention, surface finishes can be attained, depending on the extent of polishing, of substantially any desired degree, regardless of the material and in any degree of intricacy and fineness of detail without substantial change in detail or resolution. Surface roughness can be reduced to as low as about 0.1 microns Ra, although such high degree of polish may not always be required and a lesser extent of polishing may often suffice for a given application.
  • Because the process of this invention does remove a very uniform layer of material from a workpiece surface, the process is also ideally suited to the removal of thin layers of unwanted material from a workpiece surface, such as an EDM recast layer of material which is normally 0.003 to 0.006 mm thick. In addition, the process of this invention can be used to remove burrs from a workpiece surface or to radius the edges thereof.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • An ultrasonic machine tool as employed in the present invention is shown schematically in Fig. 1.
  • Figs. 2 and 3 are "before" and "after" photomicrographs of a carbide compacting die illustrating the effectiveness of this invention.
  • MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
  • Ultrasonic machine tools are known to the art and the present invention is generally applicable for use with any such machine, utilizing typical parameters for vibrational frequency, amplitude and abrading particles. Typically, such equipment comprises a frame 10 adapted to hold a workpiece 4 and a tool holder 1 including an ultrasonic driver which vibrates the tool 2 at a frequency typically of about 20 KHz but in some applications from 10 to 40 KHz, most often about 19 to 22 KHz. The tool holder 1 is adapted at 11 to advance the tool from a retracted position into working position and, during working, into the workpiece. The equipment will ordinarily be furnished with abrasive slurry handling means 6,7,8,9 so that the slurry can be disposed between the tool 2, and the workpiece 4. The slurry will often be pumped through the gap between the tool and workpiece to continuously provide fresh, unworn abrasive to the working surface and to flush away eroded material and debris. The slurry may be processed to remove debris and recirculated. The transducer will most typically be an electronically driven stack of piezoelectric element or a magnetostrictive transducer.
  • The abrasive slurry will ordinarily be formed of hard abrasive particles disposed in a liquid carrier. The abrasives are typically tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, aluminum oxide, boron carbide, boron nitride, diamond and the like, although it should be noted that when polishing softer materials in the present invention, softer abrasives may be used, such as alumina, corundum, garnet, and the like. The liquid carrier must be one capable of transmitting ultrasonic vibrations and should be chosen to be compatible with the workpiece and the electrode materials. Water is the best such transmitters, although other liquids such as cutting oil or fluid and the like may be used. When water is used, it may be necessary to add rust inhibitors. In polishing operations according to this invention, as opposed to machining according to the prior art, a relatively modest movement of the abrasive particles is preferred. Therefore, liquids other than water, such as cutting oil, can be used to effect a low amplitude particle movement, or in the alternative a lower power can be used with the water as the transmitter.
  • Generally, the particle size of the abrasive is not critical as long as the particle size is such that it can be held in suspension. It is generally preferred, therefore, to use small particle sizes, less than 0.075 mm (200 mesh), and preferably, 0.025 to 0.015 mm (600 to 1000 mesh), with a particle concentration of from 10 to 20 volume percent of the fluid to attain the highest levels of polish.
  • The workpiece to be polished can be substantially any material which, contrary to prior art practices, is ultrasonically harder than the tool material, typically, a metallic workpiece. The extent of polishing required will be determined by the initial surface roughness of the workpiece and the finish required after polishing. Both an advantage and a limitation of the procedure of the present invention resides in the fact that the configuration of the workpiece will not be altered during the polishing operation. It is thus important to recognize that the present invention will not improve resolution of fine detail, and the quality of the final product will, except for surface finish, be determined by the initial workpiece.
  • The tool, as previously noted, must be formed of a material that is considerably more ultrasonically abradable than the workpiece material. An ultrasonically more abradable material does not mean one that is softer, but usually one that is more brittle. To understand ultrasonic abradability, it should be realized that in the ultrasonic machining of a surface, the tiny abrasive particles suspended in the fluid are impinged against the workpiece surface at an ultrasonic velocity, so that the tiny particles microscopically chip-away at the workpiece surface. To be chipped away in this fashion, the workpiece must have some degree of brittleness, whether or not the material is hard. It should be apparent that soft or resilient materials such as tough and ductile steels could not be readily machined in this fashion because the tiny abrasive particles would merely bounce therefrom. Accordingly, for the polishing of most metal workpieces, which would include everything from mild steel to hardened alloys and refractory metals such as titanium and tungsten, an ideal tool material would be a material having a significantly greater degree of ultrasonic abradability, such as graphite, glass, quartz and other such materials which have normally been considered ideal workpiece materials but not normally tool materials.
  • When employed with suitable equipment, the tool may be provided with passages (5) communicating with the gap through which the abrasive slurry may be pumped to provide flushing of debris from the gap. In the present invention, the debris will predominantly be tool material particles eroded from the tool combined with minor amounts of material polished from the surfaces of the workpiece. In addition, the pumping will serve to provide fresh abrasive slurry to the gap so that cutting edges are not excessively worn during use.
  • Contrary to prior art practices, it is not necessary to start the polishing process of this invention with a pre-shaped tool, and accordingly, indexing and registration of the tool and workpiece is not required. In the process of this invention, the surface contour of the workpiece first serves to shape the tool surface into very exact registration therewith. During the subsequent polishing operation, the tool is continually eroded and will perpetually generate and maintain very exact registration in situ. The preferential erosion of the tool is the feature of the present invention which permits a high polish on the workpiece surface by a very thin, highly uniform surface removal. In some applications, particularly where the surface to be polished has deeply recessed portions, it may be desirable to utilize a pre-shaped or partially pre-shaped tool to speed up the operation by minimizing the amount of time it takes to shape the tool into registration with the workpiece, and to and avoid an excessive polishing action on the raised portions of the workpiece surface before the tool is worn sufficiently to start polishing the deeper recessed portions.
  • The relatively low mass of graphite or glass for examples, in relation to the materials most often employed for ultrasonic machining permits the employment of graphite tools of greater dimension than can be successfully driven by ultrasonic transducers.
  • As noted above, the process of this invention is also ideally suited to the removal of any undesired layer of material from a workpiece surface. For example, an EDM recast layer, typically from 0.003 to 0.006 mm (0.0001 to 0.0002 inch) thick can readily be removed by the practice of this process with the result that the recast layer is removed without any loss of resolution of detail in the workpiece surface. In a like manner, workpieces coated with material such as ceramic, can be processed as described herein to remove or selectively remove the ceramic coating therefrom without any loss of resolution of detail in the workpiece surface. In addition to these variations, the process of this invention can be used to remove burrs which protrude from the workpiece surface, or to radius sharp corners on the edges of the workpiece. Either of these objects can be readily effected by using such an ultrasonically abradable tool without losing any of the workpiece detail.

Claims (16)

  1. The method of polishing a workpiece (4) surface having a configuration preformed therein without adversely effecting the configuration detail and resolution, comprising:
    A. forming a tool (2);
    B. mounting said tool (2) in a vibratable relationship (1) to a workpiece so that a working surface of said tool is spaced from the workpiece surface having said configuration;
    C. applying a liquid abrasive slurry between said tool and said workpiece;
    D. causing a relative vibratory motion at an ultrasonic frequency between said tool and said workpiece; and
    E. stopping the relative vibratory motion when the configuration on the surface of the workpiece has been polished;
       characterised in that the tool (2) is formed in a material that is more ultrasonically abradable than the said workpiece, and in that the relative vibratory motion
    (a) is effected at an ultrasonic frequency and amplitude sufficient to cause said working surface of said tool to be abraded into a negative complementary form of said configuration preformed on the surface of said workpiece; and
    (b) is continued to abrade said tool as said tool continues to reform and maintain said negative complementary form of said configuration on the surface of said workpiece, while at the same time imparting a polishing action on the configuration on the surface of said workpiece.
  2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said vibratory motion is effected at a frequency of from about 10KHz to about 40 KHz.
  3. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the process is utilized to remove an unwanted layer of material from the workpiece surface.
  4. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the process is utilized to remove any unwanted burrs from the workpiece surface.
  5. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the process is utilized to radius the edges of the workpiece (4).
  6. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said tool (2) is preshaped to a form having a general conformance to the preshaped surface of the workpiece.
  7. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the abrasive in said slurry has a particle size less than about 0,075 mm (200 mesh).
  8. The method as claimed in claim 7 wherein said abrasive has a particle size of from 0,025 to 0,015 mm (600 to 100 mesh).
  9. The method as claimed in claim 7 wherein said abrasive is present in said slurry at a concentration of from 10 to 20 volume percent.
  10. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said tool material is selected from the group consisting of graphite, glass and quartz.
  11. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said tool material is an unformed block of graphite.
  12. The method of claim 1 wherein said tool material is an unformed block of glass.
  13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said liquid abrasive slurry flows continuously through the gap between said tool and said workpiece.
  14. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said liquid abrasive slurry flushes tool particles and particles abraded from said workpiece from said gap.
  15. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said abrasive in said slurry is a member selected from the group consisting of tungsten carbide, aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, boron carbide, boron nitride, alumina, corundum, diamond, and mixtures thereof.
  16. The method as claimed in claim 15 wherein said workpiece (4) is made of a material selected from the group consisting of bronze, brass, gold, and polymeric materials.
EP89903596A 1988-03-10 1989-03-10 Ultrasonic polishing Expired - Lifetime EP0403537B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT89903596T ATE96071T1 (en) 1988-03-10 1989-03-10 ULTRASONIC POLISHING.

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16650288A 1988-03-10 1988-03-10
US166502 1988-03-10
US30576889A 1989-02-03 1989-02-03
US305768 1989-02-03

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0403537A1 EP0403537A1 (en) 1990-12-27
EP0403537A4 EP0403537A4 (en) 1991-09-11
EP0403537B1 true EP0403537B1 (en) 1993-10-20

Family

ID=26862319

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89903596A Expired - Lifetime EP0403537B1 (en) 1988-03-10 1989-03-10 Ultrasonic polishing

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0403537B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2691787B2 (en)
KR (1) KR930012261B1 (en)
AU (1) AU619263B2 (en)
DE (1) DE68910115T2 (en)
RU (1) RU1836206C (en)
WO (1) WO1989008535A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5245796A (en) * 1992-04-02 1993-09-21 At&T Bell Laboratories Slurry polisher using ultrasonic agitation
DE4447669B4 (en) * 1994-02-27 2005-12-08 Hahn, Rainer, Dr.Med.Dent. Use of a suspension which serves to transmit sound between an ultrasonically stressed working tip and a material to be processed
KR100299975B1 (en) * 1998-02-19 2001-10-27 이정기 Method for manufacturing electrodes of plasma chamber
DE19817863A1 (en) * 1998-04-22 1999-11-04 Lzh Laserzentrum Hannover Ev Method for smoothing surface of workpiece, particularly optical functional surface
CN102615554B (en) * 2012-04-15 2014-08-20 长春中俄科技园股份有限公司 Processing method of miniature spherical or aspherical lens array
CN110509123A (en) * 2019-08-31 2019-11-29 巩义市宇通新材料科技有限公司 A kind of throwing device of ultrasonic wave grinder

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2774193A (en) * 1955-10-10 1956-12-18 Thatcher Tools for ultrasonic cutting
US2804724A (en) * 1956-02-24 1957-09-03 Charles J Thatcher High speed machining by ultrasonic impact abrasion
US2850854A (en) * 1956-08-20 1958-09-09 Levy Sidney Method for removing material
US3593410A (en) * 1967-11-21 1971-07-20 Robert A Taylor Method for casting and finishing tools or dies
US4071385A (en) * 1976-05-19 1978-01-31 Arthur Kuris Ultrasonic inlaid article
JPS54133697A (en) * 1978-04-07 1979-10-17 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Supersonic method
JPS5741151A (en) * 1980-08-25 1982-03-08 Nippon Steel Corp Process for machining injection nozzle of molten metal
DE3125316A1 (en) * 1981-06-27 1983-01-13 Volkswagenwerk Ag, 3180 Wolfsburg DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING A ROOM FORMULA ELECTRODE FROM GRAPHITE WITH THE AID OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPED FILE

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1989008535A1 (en) 1989-09-21
AU3219389A (en) 1989-10-05
DE68910115D1 (en) 1993-11-25
JP2691787B2 (en) 1997-12-17
KR930012261B1 (en) 1993-12-28
RU1836206C (en) 1993-08-23
EP0403537A4 (en) 1991-09-11
KR900700238A (en) 1990-08-11
JPH03504108A (en) 1991-09-12
DE68910115T2 (en) 1994-02-17
AU619263B2 (en) 1992-01-23
EP0403537A1 (en) 1990-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5187899A (en) High frequency vibrational polishing
US6273787B1 (en) Abrasive polishing method, apparatus and composition
WO2002006007A1 (en) Micro-burnishing apparatus using ultrasonic vibration
CA1250146A (en) Means and methods for abrading a work surface
EP0403537B1 (en) Ultrasonic polishing
CA1329988C (en) Ultrasonic polishing
Tawakoli et al. Dressing of grinding wheels
US5193311A (en) Tools for working non-metallic hard materials
JP2001025948A (en) Spherical grinding wheel
KR20230035762A (en) Ultrasonic vibration abrasions on workpiece surfaces
JPH0624692B2 (en) Precision groove grinding method by compound vibration of grindstone
Spur et al. Ultrasonic machining of ceramics
Azarhoushang Abrasive machining processes
EP0405640B1 (en) Tools for working non-metallic hard materials
WO1996011081A2 (en) Method and apparatus for ultrasonic working
Tawakoli et al. Advanced Grinding
JPS6362658A (en) Precise finishing method with complex vibration grinding wheel
JPS6362657A (en) Precise finishing method with complex vibration grinding wheel
SU541647A1 (en) Surface Treatment Method
CA2514652A1 (en) Abrasive polishing method
SU1673415A1 (en) Method for dressing of grinding wheel
Dröder et al. euspen’s 17 th International Conference & Exhibition, Hannover, DE, May 2017
Hahn et al. A new ultrasonic machining route to create complex ceramic components
JPH04135173A (en) Dressing method for grinding wheel and device thereof
JPH0780766A (en) Assembly jig

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900830

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19910722

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920507

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19931020

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19931020

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19931020

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19931020

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 96071

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19931115

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68910115

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931125

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: BUGNION S.P.A.

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19940331

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20070627

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20080228

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20080305

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: EXTRUDE HONE CORPORATION

Free format text: EXTRUDE HONE CORPORATION#8075 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE#IRWIN/PA (US) -TRANSFER TO- EXTRUDE HONE CORPORATION#8075 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE#IRWIN/PA (US)

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080311

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080306

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20090309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080310