EP0340649B1 - Method of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits which are essentially free of fissures - Google Patents

Method of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits which are essentially free of fissures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0340649B1
EP0340649B1 EP89107716A EP89107716A EP0340649B1 EP 0340649 B1 EP0340649 B1 EP 0340649B1 EP 89107716 A EP89107716 A EP 89107716A EP 89107716 A EP89107716 A EP 89107716A EP 0340649 B1 EP0340649 B1 EP 0340649B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
copper
solution
concentration
intrinsic
plating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89107716A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0340649A1 (en
Inventor
Rowan Hughes
Milan Paunovic
Rudolph J. Zeblisky
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AMP Akzo Corp
Original Assignee
AMP Akzo Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by AMP Akzo Corp filed Critical AMP Akzo Corp
Publication of EP0340649A1 publication Critical patent/EP0340649A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0340649B1 publication Critical patent/EP0340649B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C18/00Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating
    • C23C18/16Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating by reduction or substitution, e.g. electroless plating
    • C23C18/31Coating with metals
    • C23C18/38Coating with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C18/00Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating
    • C23C18/16Chemical coating by decomposition of either liquid compounds or solutions of the coating forming compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating; Contact plating by reduction or substitution, e.g. electroless plating
    • C23C18/31Coating with metals
    • C23C18/38Coating with copper
    • C23C18/40Coating with copper using reducing agents

Definitions

  • Copper deposits on substrates produced by electroless deposition or electroless deposition reinforced by electroplating are an important part of many processes for the manufacture of printed circuit boards. Fully additive printed circuit boards are made with the total copper deposit formed by electroless deposition.
  • citeria for such boards are based on the ability to meet the requirements of MIL Spec. P-55110-D stress test specification.
  • the plated-through hole wall plating would fracture during a 10 seconds exposure to molten solder, the fracture usually occurring at the intersection of the hole wall with the surface, the corners of the holes.
  • anodic reaction rate is meant the rate of oxidation of the reducing agent on a metal surface in an electroless metal deposition solution
  • cathodic reation rate is meant the rate of reduction of metallic ions to metal on a metallic surface in an electroless deposition solution
  • intrasic anodic reaction rate r a ′ is meant the anodic reaction rate as measured on a metallic surface in an electroless plating solution by imposing a potential slightly more positive than the mixed potential on the metallic surface
  • intrasic cathodic reaction rate r c ′
  • electroless plating reaction under cathodic control is meant that the cathodic reation controls the overall plating rate, i.e., the plating rate depends on the concentration of the cathodic reactants, the concentration of the metal ions,
  • fissure free copper deposits are meant electroless copper deposits free of internal cracks or fissures or internal defects capable of causing cracks or fissures when the copper is thermally stressed.
  • Fissure resistant copper means copper deposits that will not form fissures or cracks when exposed to thermal stress, thermal cycling or in use.
  • an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits being substantially free of fissures
  • said solution consisting essentially of copper ions, a complexing ligand for copper ions, a pH adjuster, a reducing agent, a stabilizer and/or ductility promoter, and having a desired initial ratio of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, characterized in that the influence of build-up of by-products being formed during bath operation is compensated for by raising the copper ion concentration and/or the pH value and/or decreasing the concentration of the reducing agent and thereby maintaining the ratio of intrinsic anodic reaction rate to intrinsic cathodic reaction rate and the original deposition rate as well as depositing substantially fissure free copper.
  • the copper ion concentration and pH are sufficiently increased and the reducing agent concentration is sufficiently decreased for substantially maintaining the original plating rate.
  • copper ion concentration and pH are sufficiently increased and the reducing agent concentration decreased for maintaining the ratio of intrinsic anodic to intrinsic cathodic reaction rates at or below the ratio originally selected for the plating bath solution.
  • the plating bath solution of the present invention is characterized in that the mole concentration of the reducing agent is no greater than 1,2 times the mole concentration of the copper ion and preferably equal to the latter.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of apparatus suitable for carrying out electrochemical measurements referred to in this invention.
  • Fig. 2 is the plot of the potential applied in making the measurements vs. time as described in Example 1.
  • Fig. 3 is the plot of the current produced vs. the potential applied as described in Example 1.
  • electroless copper plating bath solution formulations which will initially deposit high quality copper.
  • the age of an electroless plating solution is determined by buildup of plating reaction by-products and contaminants.
  • the buildup of by-products can be measured by the change in solution density or specific gravity. Only under fixed operating conditions, the contaminants also will build up in proportion to the change in solution density.
  • the teaching of this invention allows the extension of the useful life of such solutions by controlling the mole ratio of the reducing agent to copper, and increasing the copper concentrations and the pH of such solutions to obtain adequate plating rates at the desired mole ratio.
  • copper compounds that are suitable as sources of copper ions are copper sulfates, copper nitrates, copper halides, copper acetates, copper phosphates, copper oxides, copper hydroxides, basic copper sulfates, halides and carbonates and soluble copper complexes. Copper(II) sulfate and copper(II) chloride are commonly used.
  • Another source of copper ions is metallic copper which may be electrochemically dissolved into the electroless plating solution, or electrochemically dissolved into an electrolyte and diffused through a membrane into the electroless plating solution.
  • the lower limit for the concentration of the copper compound in the electroless plating solution should be high enough to maintain the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate greater than 90% of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate.
  • the upper limit is the concentration where copper metal precipitates homogeneously throughout the solution instead of only forming copper deposits on preselected catalytic surfaces.
  • the upper limit also depends on the stabilizer additive used to control homogeneous precipitation. For most electroless copper plating bath formulations, the concentration will be above 0,01 molar and below 0,2 molar.
  • the copper concentration and the pH of the electroless plating solution are increased as the by-products and contaminants build up in the solution.
  • the copper concentration is increased 20 to 200%, preferably 40 to 100%, while the pH is also increased.
  • suitable reducing agents are boron hyrides such as boranes and borohydrides such as alkali metal borohydrides.
  • the upper limit for the reducing agent in the electroless plating solution is the concentration at which the intrinsic anodic reation rate is 100% the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate.
  • the lower limit is the concentration at which copper plating on a clean copper surface does not occur, i.e., the plating solution is passive.
  • the lower limit is the concentration at which the intrinsic anodic reaction rate is 75% to 85% of the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate.
  • formaldehyde reducing agents the limits depend on additives, pH and very strongly on the temperature.
  • the concentration of formaldehyde will preferably be set above 0,01 molar and below 1,2 times the molar concentration of copper ions, and more preferably maintained at or below the molar concentration of the copper ions.
  • Suitable pH adjusting compounds include the alkali metal hydroxides and copper oxide.
  • the pH usually drops during plating, and hydroxides are added to raise or maintain pH. If the pH needs to be lowered, an acidic compound would be used as a pH adjusting ion.
  • a formaldehyde reducing agent When a formaldehyde reducing agent is used, the activity of the reducing agent depends on the pH as well as the concentration of the reducing agent. Therefore, to increase the activity of the reducing agent and thus increase the intrinsic anodic reaction rate as described hereinbelow, either the concentration of the formaldehyde reducing agent or the concentration of the hydroxide compound (i.e., pH) may be increased.
  • pH is increased and formaldehyde concentration is decreased.
  • the intrinsic cathodic reation rate is increased by raising the copper concentration by 40 to 100% and the anodic reaction rate is increased less than the cathodic raction rate by raising the pH 0.1 to 1 pH unit, more preferably by 0.2 to 0.6 pH unit.
  • the pH (measured at room temperature) is usually set between 9.5 and 14.
  • the pH is preferably greater than 11.9, more preferably greater than 12.2.
  • Suitable complexing agents for electroless copper plating solutions are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the complexing agents useful for electroless copper plating solutions are ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), diethylenetrinitrilopentaacetic acid (DTPA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), triethanolamine, tetrakis (2-hydroxypropyl)ethylenediamine (THPED), pentahydroxypropyldiethylenetriamine, and tartaric acid and its salts (Rochelle salts).
  • EDTA ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid
  • HEDTA hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid
  • DTPA diethylenetrinitrilopentaacetic acid
  • NTA nitrilotriacetic acid
  • TTPED triethanolamine
  • TTPED tetrakis (2-hydroxypropyl)ethylenediamine
  • additives have been proposed for use in electroless copper plating solutions. These additives may be classified by function into different groups. Most additives have more than a single effect on the electroless copper plating solutions, so classification of additives into groups may be somewhat arbitrary. Almost all the additives affect the rate of the oxidation of the reducing agent (the anodic reaction) or the reduction of the copper ion to metal (the cathodic reaction).
  • One group of additives are anionic, nonionic, amphoteric or cationic surfactants.
  • the choice of sufactants may vary depending on the operating temperature and the ionic strength of the electroless plating solution employed.
  • the surfactant is used at solution temperatures and ionic strengths below its cloud point.
  • Surfactants containing polyethoxy groups or fluorinated surfactants are preferred.
  • the preferred surfactants are alkylphenoxypolyethoxy phosphates, polyethoxy polypropoxy block copolymers, anionic perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and carboxylates, nonionic fluorinated alkyl alkoxylates and cationic fluorinated quaternary ammonium compounds.
  • a second group of additives are stabilizers which prevent the spontaneous decomposition of the plating solution and/or the indiscriminate formation of copper deposits outside of, or extraneous to, the desired deposit, so called "extraneous copper".
  • the additives that have found use as stabilizers and to inibit extraneous copper are oxygen (e.g., oxygen added to the plating solution by stirring or air agitation of the solution), divalent sulfur compounds (e.g., thiols, mercaptans, and thioethers), selenium compounds (e.g., selenocyanates).
  • covalent mercury compounds e.g., mercuric chloride and phenylmercury
  • copper(I) complexing agents e.g., cyanides, 2,2′-dipyridyl and 1,10-phenanthrolines).
  • a third group of additives may be classified as ductility promoters and/or additives to retard hydrogen inclusion in the deposit. This group would include polyalkylene ethers, cyanides, nitriles, compounds of vanadium, arsenic, antimony and bismuth, nickel salts, 2,2′-dipyridyl, 1,10-phenanthrolines and some organic silicones.
  • the ductility promoters also act as stabilizers and are used alone or in combination with other stabilizers.
  • the amount of stabilizer and/or ductility promotor in the electroless copper plating solution depends on the stabilizers or ductility promotors selected and on the concentration of copper ions, reducing agent and pH. In general, they should be present in an amount sufficient to prevent extraneous plating, i.e., plating on masks or resists, and substantially less than the amount that would cause passivation of metal surfaces being plated or that would stop the plating reaction.
  • a fourth class of additives is the group of plating rate accelerators (also known as depolarizers) as disclosed in US-A-4,301,196. These are compounds containing delocalized pi bonds such as heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen and sulfur compounds, aromatic amines and non-aromatic nitrogen compounds having at least one delocalized pi bond. Among such compounds are purines, pyrimidines, pyridines, thiazines, triazines, and thiol derivatives.
  • the depolarizing or accelerating agent will be present in a small effective amount, i.e., generally at least 0.0001 to 2.5 grams per liter, more specifically 0.0005 to 1. 5 grams per liter, and preferably from 0.001 to 0.5 grams per liter.
  • the amount of depolarizing or accelerating agent used will vary depending upon the particular agent employed and the formulation of the solution.
  • electrolessly deposited copper has been known for many years to be inferior to electrolytically deposited copper in resistance to thermal stress, ductility and other physical properties, surprisingly it has been found that if electroless copper deposition solutions are formulated and controlled to have an intrinsic anodic reaction rate less than 110% of the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, copper deposits with superior physical properties, including resistance to thermal stress, may be obtained.
  • the intrinsic rate ratio can be determined by measuring the reaction rates for the two half reactions in the neighborhood of the mixed potential, i.e., at +10 mV for the one and at -10 mV for the other half reaction; or by sweeping the potential on the one and the other side of the mixed potential and measuring the current.
  • the intrinsic anodic reaction rate at the mixed potential is estimated from the current required to vary the potential on a working electrode which is electrolessly depositing copper.
  • the potential between the working electrode and a reference electrode is varied in a potential ramp between the mixed potential (E mp ) and +/-30 mV from E mp by passing current between the working electrode and a counter electrode and simultaneously measuring the potential and the anodic current as the potential changes.
  • the counter electrode is at E mp and very much larger than the working electrode, it can also serve as a reference electrode since the current passed between it and the working electrode would be too small to shift the counter electrode potential.
  • the intrinsic anodic reaction rate at E mp may be determined from the slope of a current vs. voltage plot as it approaches E mp .
  • the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate may be determined from the slope of the current vs. voltage plot between -30 mV from E mp and E mp .
  • the intrinsic cathodic deposition rate is maintained greater than the intrinsic anodic deposition rate, or when the ratio of the intrinsic anodic deposition rate to the intrinsic cathodic deposition rate, r a ′ /r c ′, is less than 1.1 and preferably less than 1.05 and more preferably less than 1.0 it had been found that copper with superior physical properties is deposited.
  • the methods for increasing the rate of the intrinsic cathodic reaction are (1) raising the concentration of the cathodic constituent, i.e., the metal ion concentration; (2) addition of a catalyst or depolarizer to accelerate the cathodic reaction; and (3) increasing the surface area available for the cathodic reaction (e.g., by reducing the contaminants or the stabilizer concentration and the surface area blocked by contaminants or stabilizer; this may be accomplished by diluting the solution with fresh solution or by carbon treatment of the solution to remove contaminants blocking the surface area available for the cathodic reaction).
  • the metal ion concentration becomes too high, extraneous metal deposition in the bulk of the solution or outside the desired metal pattern may be observed. For many electroless copper plating solutions, this occurs at copper ion concentrations above the range of 0.08 to 0.12 moles per liter.
  • the ratio, r a /r c may be maintained less than 1 while increasing both the anodic and cathodic reaction rates, by increasing the rate of the intrinsic anodic reaction less than an increase in the rate of the cathodic reaction.
  • the rate of the intrinsic anodic reaction may be increased by (1) decreasing the concentration of the reducing agent (i.e., lower formaldehyde) while increasing the pH; or (2) increasing the concentration of anodic depolarizers such as heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen or sulfur compounds.
  • the concentration of the formaldehyde is lowered too much, the E mc of the solution may rise by 50-200 mV and the solution becomes passive, i.e., there is no electroless deposition. Frequently, the solution will become active again at a higher temperature.
  • the product of the formaldehyde concentration and the square root of the hydroxide ion concentration, (CH2O) (OH ⁇ ) 0.5 must be increased.
  • the formaldehyde concentration may be decreased, held constant, or even increased, the product, (CH2O) (OH ⁇ ) 0.5 , is increased to maintain the intrinsic anodic reaction rate less than the cathodic rate as the cathodic rate is increased.
  • the square root of the hydroxide ion concentration (OH ⁇ ) 0.5 may be conveniently estimated using the room temperature (25°C) pH of the solutions.
  • the condition must be compensated for by increasing the plating current produced by the anodic half-reaction, i.e., by increasing pH. Since this will increase intrinsic anodic reaction rate, the copper concentration must be increased to bring the ratio of r a /r c to the original value before the solution became contaminated, or a value below 1,1 and adequate for the resulting plating rate.
  • the intrinsic rates of the partial reactions are determined using the rate expression.
  • r′ is the partial rate
  • i j is the current density at an overpotential, ⁇ j (Eta), referenced to the mixed potential, E mp
  • the rate of the cathodic partial reaction, r c ′ is obtained, in this invention, by applying the above equation to a set of pairs of experimental values (i j , E j ) from the cathodic potential range which is, e.g., from -30 mV vs. E mp to E mp .
  • the currents used to calculate intrinsic raction rates are measured at potentials near E mp , e.g., 10-50 mV from E mp , which may introduce some errors in the determination of the intrinsic reaction rates.
  • the equations strictly apply only close to the mixed potential. If one examines both positive and negative overpotentials and currents for a particular solution, one will find near the mixed potential, the overpotential departs from the Tafel (semilogarithmic) relationship.
  • the current measurements for determination of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates must be in the range where the semilogarithmic relationship is non-linear. This range is often within +/-40 mV of the Emp, but can be larger or smaller depending on the electroless plating solution formulation. The admissible error depends on the set point of the ratio of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates and thus on the formulation of the electroless plating solution.
  • FIG. 1 An experimental setup for carrying out electrochemical measurements of r a , r a ′, r c and r c ′, according to this invention, is shown in Fig. 1.
  • the setup is composed of an electrochemical cell (100), a potentiostat with function generator (120) and a recorder (130).
  • test electrode was a platinum wire, 3,8 mm2 in area (length 2 mm, diameter 0,6 mm), and the auxiliary electrode a platinum cylinder (about 10 mm2 in area), both electroplated with copper.
  • Plating was done in an acid copper solution CuSO4.5H2O - 188 g/l, H2SO4 - 74 g/l) at 10 mA/cm2 for 1 to 5 minutes.
  • a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as a reference electrode.
  • the test electrode (111), an auxiliary electrode (112), and a reference electrode (113) are connected to the potentiostat (120).
  • the potentiostat with function generator was used in a DC operating mode, for linear sweep voltammetry (LSV).
  • the sweep waveform as shown in Fig. 2 is a linear ramp; the current is continuously sampled; when the potential reached a final value it is left at this value for a short period of time and then reset to the initial value, or an automatic can reversal to the initial value can be used.
  • An electroless copper plating solution was prepared with a high copper concentration and a correspondingly high specific gravity.
  • the ration of the mole concentration of the formaldehyde reducing agent to the mole concentration of the copper was 0,67.
  • the formulation was as follows:
  • Additive printed circuit boards were plated in this solution and after plating, tested by the thermal stress test at 288°C for 10 seconds. There were no cracks formed in the copper by the thermal stress test which confirmed the results from the ratio of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates.
  • a solution from a working, production, electroless copper plating bath was operated to the formulation below as far as its formulated bath constituents are concerned.
  • the formulation was known to be able to produce high quality copper.
  • the ratio of formaldehyde to copper was greater than 1.2 so the solution would not consistently deposit high quality copper as the by-products and contaminants built up and the ratio changed.
  • Electrochemical analysis of the solution gave a ratio of 1.1 and a ratio′ of 1.05, indicating borderline performance. The deviation of the electrochemical ratio results from the good ratio results indicates the presence of an unknown contaminant.
  • Fully additive printed wiring boards were prepared on adhesive coated, epoxy glass laminates in this electroless copper plating bath. Thermal stress testing showed cracks in 20% of the copper hole walls.
  • the solution had the following formulation:
  • the increase in the copper ion concentration to twice the concentration did not cause a corresponding increase in the plating rate.
  • the copper metal was deposited at approximately the same rate, and it required 17 hours to deposit 35 micrometers thick.
  • This solution deposited high quality copper 35 micrometers thick in less than 8 hours.
  • This example illustrates how the principles of the invention may be used to obtain copper with superior physical properties at fast plating rates.
  • test solution was deliberately contamined to show how the teaching of this invention may be used to adjust the formulation, or reset the control parameters, to obtain fissure free copper deposits from a solution in which contaminants have built up over a period of time as the solution is used.
  • An electroless copper plating test solution was prepared with a stabilizer system using both vanadium and cyanide addition agents. In the Table below, this solution is marked A.
  • 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (2-MBT) 1 mg/l was added to the test solution.
  • the addition of the contaminant turned the solution passive, i.e., stopped the electroless plating reaction, and the mixed potential of the copper electrode in the test solution was shifted outside the electroless plating range.
  • the solution was reformulated with the original formaldehyde concentration and a formaldehyde to copper ratio of 0,7; this is solution C.
  • the ratio′ was reduced to less than 1,1, so the solution would deposit copper resistant to fissures.
  • the concentration of the anodic reactant, formaldehyde was further reduced.
  • the formulation is listed as soluton D.
  • the ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate for this solution is less than 1,0 and thus the solution can provide a high quality, fissure free copper deposit.
  • Example 3 The procedure of Example 3 was repeated using a plating tank equipped with an electroless copper plating bath controller which continuously measured the solution parameters such as the copper and formaldehyde concentrations, the pH, the cyanide ion activity and the temperature.
  • the plating bath controller automatically compared the measured parameters to the set points and made additions to the solution to maintain the solution within the preset operating limits.
  • the plating solution was operated to deposit approximately 6 turnovers. (A turnover is replacing the copper salt content of the solution once). This raised the specific gravity of the solution due to the formation of by-product sodium sulfate and sodium formate.
  • the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates were measured by electrochemical analysis, and the ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate was found to be less than 1,1 which indicates that the copper deposit is resistant to fissures.
  • the soluton was used to made additive printed circuits by the electroless deposition of copper to form surface conductors and plated through holes. The printed circuits were thermally stressed by contact with molten solder at 288°C for 10 seconds. After thermal stress, the plates through holes were microsectioned and examined for cracks in the deposited copper. There was no evidence of cracks or fissures in the copper conductors or plated-through holes. The formulation tested in shown in the table below.
  • the operating solution found to deposit fissure free copper was then treated with 0.5 mg of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (2-MBT) as a deliberate contaminant to simulate the effect of contamination of the plating solution by organic compounds.
  • Organic contamination is a frequent problem in electroless copper plating, especially in solutions operated for five or more turnovers.
  • Sources of contamination include leaching from plastic substrates being electrolessly plated, from the plating resist, or from fortuitous contamination.
  • the plating solution became substantially passive.
  • the plating rate was about 0.03 micrometers of copper per hour and the solution would no longer deposit copper on the hole walls of the insulating base material.
  • the ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates was greater than 1.1, so even if copper would have deposited on the hole walls, the formed deposit, and thus the plated through holes, would fail the thermal stress test. This solution is more fully described below.
  • Example 3 Following the procedures of Example 3 in a sample of the solution, the pH was raised to provide a more active plating solution, and the copper concentration was increased to adjust the ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates to less than 1.1. The increase in the copper concentration reduced the ratio of formaldehyde to copper from 1.7 to 0.85.
  • the set points on the electroless plating bath controller for copper concentration and pH were reset. Additive printed circuit boards were plated in the contaminated electroless plating solution using the new set points. The copper deposited on these printed circuit boards was tested by thermal stress with molten solder at 288°C for 10 seonds and was found free of cracks of fissures.
  • the formulation, set points and test data for this solution are also given below.
  • fissure resistant copper was deposited from an electroless copper deposition solution operating at low temperature.
  • a first electroless copper plating solution was formulated to operate at 30°C.
  • the formaldehyde concentration was higher than similar solutions at 75°C as is the common practice in electroless copper solutions operating near room temperature.
  • the ratio of the formaldehyde concentration to copper concentration was 2.4.
  • This first solution composition is given in the table below. As reported in the table, the ratio of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate is greater than 1.1 and the additive printed circuit boards prepared in the solution failed the thermal stress test.
  • the concentration of the formaldehyde reducing agent was reduced to lower the anodic reaction rate relative to the cathodic reaction rate.
  • the ratio of the formaldehyde concentration to the copper concentration was reduced to 0,5.
  • the resulting solution is the second soluton in the table below.
  • the second solution is used to plate additive printed circuit boards with copper 25 micrometers thick. It is difficult to initiate electroless plating on catalytic adhesive and catalytic base materials at low temperatures and low formaldehyde concentration. Therefore, before plating the additive circuit boards, the conductive pattern including the plated through holes is covered with a thin layer of copper about 0.2 micrometer thick in an electroless strike solution which has a formaldehyde concentration of 0.13 moles/liter.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemically Coating (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Printed Wiring (AREA)

Description

  • Copper deposits on substrates produced by electroless deposition or electroless deposition reinforced by electroplating are an important part of many processes for the manufacture of printed circuit boards. Fully additive printed circuit boards are made with the total copper deposit formed by electroless deposition.
  • In order to provide reliable printed circuit boards for use in military and, increasingly, commercial applications the citeria for such boards are based on the ability to meet the requirements of MIL Spec. P-55110-D stress test specification.
  • Frequently, electrolessly formed copper deposits have been found not to pass this thermal stress test: the plated-through hole wall plating would fracture during a 10 seconds exposure to molten solder, the fracture usually occurring at the intersection of the hole wall with the surface, the corners of the holes.
  • It has been tried to influence metal deposition from electroless plating baths by certain additives. In FR-A-1522048, the addition of cyanide complexes with metals of Group VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements showed to be useful in accelerating metal deposition. It was also found that cyanide complexes have certain impact on the properties of the metal deposit. No teaching, however, is contained in FR-A-1522048 to ensure fissure free metal deposits when depositing metal at competitive rates. The deposits did not meet the requirements as lined out in MIL Spec. P 55110-D mentioned above.
  • It was found that the buildup of by-products and of trace contaminations in electroless copper deposition solutions has major detrimental effects on the quality of copper deposits. Contaminants can enter the plating solution through trace contaminants in chemical addition solutions, water supplies, air or from the work placed in the electroless copper bath solution. Many of the inorganic contaminants, such as cuprous ions, iron, silver, gold, antimony, arsenic and other metals and their compounds, as well as many organic species, can cause deleterious results for both bath operation and quality of copper deposits, even when only present in parts per million concentrations.
  • The following definitions are used herein:
  • By the term:
       "anodic reaction rate" is meant the rate of oxidation of the reducing agent on a metal surface in an electroless metal deposition solution;
       "cathodic reation rate" is meant the rate of reduction of metallic ions to metal on a metallic surface in an electroless deposition solution;
       "intrinsic anodic reaction rate", ra ′ is meant the anodic reaction rate as measured on a metallic surface in an electroless plating solution by imposing a potential slightly more positive than the mixed potential on the metallic surface;
       "intrinsic cathodic reaction rate", rc ′, is meant the cathodic reaction rate as measured on a metallic surface in an electroless plating solution by imposing a potential slightly more negative than the mixed potential on the metallic surface;
       "electroless plating reaction under cathodic control" is meant that the cathodic reation controls the overall plating rate, i.e., the plating rate depends on the concentration of the cathodic reactants, the concentration of the metal ions, or the concentration of depolarizers for the half reaction involving the metal ions;
       "electroless plating reaction under anodic control" is meant that the anodic reaction controls the overall plating rate, i.e., the plating rate depends on the concentration of the anodic reactants, the concentration of the reducing agents, or depolarizers for the half reaction involving the reducing agent;
       "thermal stress test" is meant a test of printed circuit specimens containing plated through holes wherein the specimens are conditioned at 120°C to 150°C for a minimum period of 2 hours to remove moisture; after conditioning, the specimens are placed in a desiccator on a ceramic plate to cool; the specimens are then fluxed (type RMA of MIL Spec. F-14256) and floated in a solder bath (Sn 63 +/- 5%), and maintained at 288°C +/- 5°C for a period of 19 seconds; subsequently, the specimens are placed on a plate to cool; then they are microsectioned in a vertical plane at the center of the hole and examined for cracks at 50 to 100 magnifications. A minimum of one microsection containing at least three holes is made for each sample tested. Any cracks forming in the copper deposit on the specimens will indicate thermal stress failure;
       "high quality copper" is meant copper that has small crystals with a grain size less than 10 µm and low frequency of crystal dislocations, defects and twinning. High quality copper on printed circuit boards will pass the thermal stress test. When referring to electrolessly deposited copper, by the term "satisfactory copper quality is meant also high quality copper.
       "fissure free copper deposits" are meant electroless copper deposits free of internal cracks or fissures or internal defects capable of causing cracks or fissures when the copper is thermally stressed. "Fissure resistant copper" means copper deposits that will not form fissures or cracks when exposed to thermal stress, thermal cycling or in use.
  • It is an object of the invention to provide a method of operating and maintaining an electroless copper plating solution which ensures the deposition of copper having good physical properties and being free of fissures.
  • It is a further object to provide a method for formulating electroless copper plating solutions that are capable of depositing copper free of fissures and resistant to cracking under thermal stress, and more specifically under thermal stress testing at 288°C.
  • The foregoing objects are achieved by the method of the invention of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits being substantially free of fissures, said solution consisting essentially of copper ions, a complexing ligand for copper ions, a pH adjuster, a reducing agent, a stabilizer and/or ductility promoter, and having a desired initial ratio of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, characterized in that the influence of build-up of by-products being formed during bath operation is compensated for by raising the copper ion concentration and/or the pH value and/or decreasing the concentration of the reducing agent and thereby maintaining the ratio of intrinsic anodic reaction rate to intrinsic cathodic reaction rate and the original deposition rate as well as depositing substantially fissure free copper.
  • In one aspect of the invention, the copper ion concentration and pH are sufficiently increased and the reducing agent concentration is sufficiently decreased for substantially maintaining the original plating rate.
  • In another aspect, copper ion concentration and pH are sufficiently increased and the reducing agent concentration decreased for maintaining the ratio of intrinsic anodic to intrinsic cathodic reaction rates at or below the ratio originally selected for the plating bath solution.
  • Further embodiments described hereinafter include methods of maintaining constant plating rates and methods for increasing plating rates.
  • The plating bath solution of the present invention is characterized in that the mole concentration of the reducing agent is no greater than 1,2 times the mole concentration of the copper ion and preferably equal to the latter.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of apparatus suitable for carrying out electrochemical measurements referred to in this invention.
  • Fig. 2 is the plot of the potential applied in making the measurements vs. time as described in Example 1.
  • Fig. 3 is the plot of the current produced vs. the potential applied as described in Example 1.
  • While the invention will be described in the context of alkaline electroless plating bath solutions, its scope is not limited to such solutions.
  • There are many electroless copper plating bath solution formulations which will initially deposit high quality copper. However, experience has shown that, as the plating baths age, the quality of the deposit deteriorates, and the bath must be replaced in whole or in part. The age of an electroless plating solution is determined by buildup of plating reaction by-products and contaminants. The buildup of by-products can be measured by the change in solution density or specific gravity. Only under fixed operating conditions, the contaminants also will build up in proportion to the change in solution density. The teaching of this invention allows the extension of the useful life of such solutions by controlling the mole ratio of the reducing agent to copper, and increasing the copper concentrations and the pH of such solutions to obtain adequate plating rates at the desired mole ratio.
  • Among copper compounds that are suitable as sources of copper ions are copper sulfates, copper nitrates, copper halides, copper acetates, copper phosphates, copper oxides, copper hydroxides, basic copper sulfates, halides and carbonates and soluble copper complexes. Copper(II) sulfate and copper(II) chloride are commonly used. Another source of copper ions is metallic copper which may be electrochemically dissolved into the electroless plating solution, or electrochemically dissolved into an electrolyte and diffused through a membrane into the electroless plating solution.
  • The lower limit for the concentration of the copper compound in the electroless plating solution should be high enough to maintain the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate greater than 90% of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate. The upper limit is the concentration where copper metal precipitates homogeneously throughout the solution instead of only forming copper deposits on preselected catalytic surfaces. The upper limit also depends on the stabilizer additive used to control homogeneous precipitation. For most electroless copper plating bath formulations, the concentration will be above 0,01 molar and below 0,2 molar.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the copper concentration and the pH of the electroless plating solution are increased as the by-products and contaminants build up in the solution. In this embodiment, in order to obtain fissure free copper deposits when contaminants and/or by-products build up in the solution the copper concentration is increased 20 to 200%, preferably 40 to 100%, while the pH is also increased.
  • Among the reducing agents that are suitable for the reduction of copper ions are formaldehyde reducing agents including compounds such as formaldehyde, formaldehyde bisulfite, paraformaldehyde, dimethylhydantoin, and trioxane. Other suitable reducing agents are boron hyrides such as boranes and borohydrides such as alkali metal borohydrides.
  • The upper limit for the reducing agent in the electroless plating solution is the concentration at which the intrinsic anodic reation rate is 100% the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate. The lower limit is the concentration at which copper plating on a clean copper surface does not occur, i.e., the plating solution is passive. Preferably, the lower limit is the concentration at which the intrinsic anodic reaction rate is 75% to 85% of the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate. For formaldehyde reducing agents, the limits depend on additives, pH and very strongly on the temperature. In solutions where the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates have not been determined, the concentration of formaldehyde will preferably be set above 0,01 molar and below 1,2 times the molar concentration of copper ions, and more preferably maintained at or below the molar concentration of the copper ions.
  • Suitable pH adjusting compounds include the alkali metal hydroxides and copper oxide. In the operation of an alkaline, electroless copper plating solution, the pH usually drops during plating, and hydroxides are added to raise or maintain pH. If the pH needs to be lowered, an acidic compound would be used as a pH adjusting ion. When a formaldehyde reducing agent is used, the activity of the reducing agent depends on the pH as well as the concentration of the reducing agent. Therefore, to increase the activity of the reducing agent and thus increase the intrinsic anodic reaction rate as described hereinbelow, either the concentration of the formaldehyde reducing agent or the concentration of the hydroxide compound (i.e., pH) may be increased. In operating an electroless copper solution when the intrinsic anodic reaction is to be increased, preferably pH is increased and formaldehyde concentration is decreased.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, as the solution ages, the intrinsic cathodic reation rate is increased by raising the copper concentration by 40 to 100% and the anodic reaction rate is increased less than the cathodic raction rate by raising the pH 0.1 to 1 pH unit, more preferably by 0.2 to 0.6 pH unit.
  • For formulations with formaldehyde type reducing agents, the pH (measured at room temperature) is usually set between 9.5 and 14. When the ratio of the mole concentration of the reducing agent to the mole concentration of the metal ion is less than about 1,2, the pH is preferably greater than 11.9, more preferably greater than 12.2.
  • Suitable complexing agents for electroless copper plating solutions are well known to those skilled in the art. Among the complexing agents useful for electroless copper plating solutions are ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), diethylenetrinitrilopentaacetic acid (DTPA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), triethanolamine, tetrakis (2-hydroxypropyl)ethylenediamine (THPED), pentahydroxypropyldiethylenetriamine, and tartaric acid and its salts (Rochelle salts).
  • Many additives have been proposed for use in electroless copper plating solutions. These additives may be classified by function into different groups. Most additives have more than a single effect on the electroless copper plating solutions, so classification of additives into groups may be somewhat arbitrary. Almost all the additives affect the rate of the oxidation of the reducing agent (the anodic reaction) or the reduction of the copper ion to metal (the cathodic reaction).
  • One group of additives are anionic, nonionic, amphoteric or cationic surfactants. The choice of sufactants may vary depending on the operating temperature and the ionic strength of the electroless plating solution employed. Preferably, the surfactant is used at solution temperatures and ionic strengths below its cloud point. Surfactants containing polyethoxy groups or fluorinated surfactants are preferred. Among the preferred surfactants are alkylphenoxypolyethoxy phosphates, polyethoxy polypropoxy block copolymers, anionic perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and carboxylates, nonionic fluorinated alkyl alkoxylates and cationic fluorinated quaternary ammonium compounds.
  • A second group of additives are stabilizers which prevent the spontaneous decomposition of the plating solution and/or the indiscriminate formation of copper deposits outside of, or extraneous to, the desired deposit, so called "extraneous copper". Among the additives that have found use as stabilizers and to inibit extraneous copper are oxygen (e.g., oxygen added to the plating solution by stirring or air agitation of the solution), divalent sulfur compounds (e.g., thiols, mercaptans, and thioethers), selenium compounds (e.g., selenocyanates). covalent mercury compounds (e.g., mercuric chloride and phenylmercury), and copper(I) complexing agents (e.g., cyanides, 2,2′-dipyridyl and 1,10-phenanthrolines).
  • A third group of additives may be classified as ductility promoters and/or additives to retard hydrogen inclusion in the deposit. This group would include polyalkylene ethers, cyanides, nitriles, compounds of vanadium, arsenic, antimony and bismuth, nickel salts, 2,2′-dipyridyl, 1,10-phenanthrolines and some organic silicones.
  • The ductility promoters also act as stabilizers and are used alone or in combination with other stabilizers. The amount of stabilizer and/or ductility promotor in the electroless copper plating solution depends on the stabilizers or ductility promotors selected and on the concentration of copper ions, reducing agent and pH. In general, they should be present in an amount sufficient to prevent extraneous plating, i.e., plating on masks or resists, and substantially less than the amount that would cause passivation of metal surfaces being plated or that would stop the plating reaction.
  • A fourth class of additives is the group of plating rate accelerators (also known as depolarizers) as disclosed in US-A-4,301,196. These are compounds containing delocalized pi bonds such as heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen and sulfur compounds, aromatic amines and non-aromatic nitrogen compounds having at least one delocalized pi bond. Among such compounds are purines, pyrimidines, pyridines, thiazines, triazines, and thiol derivatives.
  • Preferably, the depolarizing or accelerating agent will be present in a small effective amount, i.e., generally at least 0.0001 to 2.5 grams per liter, more specifically 0.0005 to 1. 5 grams per liter, and preferably from 0.001 to 0.5 grams per liter. In general, the amount of depolarizing or accelerating agent used will vary depending upon the particular agent employed and the formulation of the solution.
  • Although electrolessly deposited copper has been known for many years to be inferior to electrolytically deposited copper in resistance to thermal stress, ductility and other physical properties, surprisingly it has been found that if electroless copper deposition solutions are formulated and controlled to have an intrinsic anodic reaction rate less than 110% of the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, copper deposits with superior physical properties, including resistance to thermal stress, may be obtained.
  • The intrinsic rate ratio can be determined by measuring the reaction rates for the two half reactions in the neighborhood of the mixed potential, i.e., at +10 mV for the one and at -10 mV for the other half reaction; or by sweeping the potential on the one and the other side of the mixed potential and measuring the current.
  • In one method, the intrinsic anodic reaction rate at the mixed potential is estimated from the current required to vary the potential on a working electrode which is electrolessly depositing copper. The potential between the working electrode and a reference electrode is varied in a potential ramp between the mixed potential (Emp ) and +/-30 mV from Emp by passing current between the working electrode and a counter electrode and simultaneously measuring the potential and the anodic current as the potential changes. Alternatively, if the counter electrode is at Emp and very much larger than the working electrode, it can also serve as a reference electrode since the current passed between it and the working electrode would be too small to shift the counter electrode potential. The intrinsic anodic reaction rate at Emp may be determined from the slope of a current vs. voltage plot as it approaches Emp.
  • Similarly, the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate may be determined from the slope of the current vs. voltage plot between -30 mV from Emp and Emp.
  • When the intrinsic cathodic deposition rate is maintained greater than the intrinsic anodic deposition rate, or when the ratio of the intrinsic anodic deposition rate to the intrinsic cathodic deposition rate, ra ′ /rc ′, is less than 1.1 and preferably less than 1.05 and more preferably less than 1.0 it had been found that copper with superior physical properties is deposited. In order to maintain the desired ratio, it may be desirable to increase the rate of the intrinsic cathodic reaction, or increase the intrinsic cathodic rate more than an increase in the rate of the intrinsic anodic reaction.
  • Among the methods for increasing the rate of the intrinsic cathodic reaction are (1) raising the concentration of the cathodic constituent, i.e., the metal ion concentration; (2) addition of a catalyst or depolarizer to accelerate the cathodic reaction; and (3) increasing the surface area available for the cathodic reaction (e.g., by reducing the contaminants or the stabilizer concentration and the surface area blocked by contaminants or stabilizer; this may be accomplished by diluting the solution with fresh solution or by carbon treatment of the solution to remove contaminants blocking the surface area available for the cathodic reaction). When the metal ion concentration becomes too high, extraneous metal deposition in the bulk of the solution or outside the desired metal pattern may be observed. For many electroless copper plating solutions, this occurs at copper ion concentrations above the range of 0.08 to 0.12 moles per liter.
  • As electroless plating solutions build up by-products and contamination, the ratio usually will increase. The ratio, ra/rc, may be maintained less than 1 while increasing both the anodic and cathodic reaction rates, by increasing the rate of the intrinsic anodic reaction less than an increase in the rate of the cathodic reaction. The rate of the intrinsic anodic reaction may be increased by (1) decreasing the concentration of the reducing agent (i.e., lower formaldehyde) while increasing the pH; or (2) increasing the concentration of anodic depolarizers such as heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen or sulfur compounds. If the concentration of the formaldehyde is lowered too much, the Emc of the solution may rise by 50-200 mV and the solution becomes passive, i.e., there is no electroless deposition. Frequently, the solution will become active again at a higher temperature. It has been found that to increase the concentration of the anodic reactants, the product of the formaldehyde concentration and the square root of the hydroxide ion concentration, (CH₂O) (OH⁻ )0.5, must be increased. Although the formaldehyde concentration may be decreased, held constant, or even increased, the product, (CH₂O) (OH⁻) 0.5, is increased to maintain the intrinsic anodic reaction rate less than the cathodic rate as the cathodic rate is increased.
  • For plating solutions operating above room temperature, the square root of the hydroxide ion concentration (OH⁻)0.5 may be conveniently estimated using the room temperature (25°C) pH of the solutions.
  • In the event, that bath contaminants cause reduction of deposition rate and inadequate copper quality because of temporary, localized passivation of the plating surface, the condition must be compensated for by increasing the plating current produced by the anodic half-reaction, i.e., by increasing pH. Since this will increase intrinsic anodic reaction rate, the copper concentration must be increased to bring the ratio of ra/rc to the original value before the solution became contaminated, or a value below 1,1 and adequate for the resulting plating rate.
  • Measurement of the intrinsic rate of the partial reactions
  • We have determined the ratio of the intrinsic rate of the partial anodic and cathodic reactions from measurements of current-potential relationships in a narrow potential range (e.g., from -30 to +30 mV from the mixed potential, Emp). This relationship is used in two ways. Both methods give similar conclusions regarding conditions for producing copper of preferred qualities.
  • In one embodiment, the cathodic current, ic, at the potential which is 10 mV negative with respect to the Emp (i.e., the overpotential, Eta = -10 mV vs. Emp) is taken as the rate of the cathodic partial reaction, (rc)-10mv, or simplified rc; the anodic current ia at the potential which is 10 mV positive with respect to the mixed potential, Emp, (i.e., the overpotential, Eta = +10 mV vs. Emp) is taken as the rate of the anodic partial reaction, (ra)+10 mV, or simplified ra.
  • Alternatively, in a computerized method, the intrinsic rates of the partial reactions are determined using the rate expression.
    Figure imgb0001

    where r′ is the partial rate, ij is the current density at an overpotential, ηj (Eta), referenced to the mixed potential, Emp, and Ej is calculated from the overpotential vs. Emp, ηj (Eta), according to the equation E j =10 j /b a ) - 10 (-n j /b c )
    Figure imgb0002

    where ba and bc are the Tafel slopes. For an electrochemical reaction, a plot of the overpotential, η, from the thermodynamic equilibrium potential vs. logarithm of the current, log i, was found by Tafel to be of the form η = a - b (log i).
    Figure imgb0003
  • For many electroless solutions, the anodic reaction, CH₂ O + 2OH⁻ = HCOO- + H₂O + 1/2H₂ + e⁻
    Figure imgb0004

    the constant ba has the value 940 mV/decade, and for the cathodic reaction, CuL n+2 + 2e⁻ = Cu o + L n
    Figure imgb0005

    bc has the value 310 mV/decade.
  • The rate of the cathodic partial reaction, rc′, is obtained, in this invention, by applying the above equation to a set of pairs of experimental values (ij, Ej) from the cathodic potential range which is, e.g., from -30 mV vs. Emp to Emp. The rate of the partial anodic reaction, ra, is obtained by applying the above equation to a set of pairs of experimental values obtained from the anodic potential range which is, e.g., from Emp to E = +30 mV vs. Emp.
  • The currents used to calculate intrinsic raction rates are measured at potentials near Emp, e.g., 10-50 mV from Emp, which may introduce some errors in the determination of the intrinsic reaction rates. The equations strictly apply only close to the mixed potential. If one examines both positive and negative overpotentials and currents for a particular solution, one will find near the mixed potential, the overpotential departs from the Tafel (semilogarithmic) relationship. The current measurements for determination of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates must be in the range where the semilogarithmic relationship is non-linear. This range is often within +/-40 mV of the Emp, but can be larger or smaller depending on the electroless plating solution formulation. The admissible error depends on the set point of the ratio of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates and thus on the formulation of the electroless plating solution.
  • An experimental setup for carrying out electrochemical measurements of ra, ra′, rc and rc′, according to this invention, is shown in Fig. 1. The setup is composed of an electrochemical cell (100), a potentiostat with function generator (120) and a recorder (130).
  • In a typical test, an all-glass, single compartment cell with three electrodes was used. The test electrode was a platinum wire, 3,8 mm² in area (length 2 mm, diameter 0,6 mm), and the auxiliary electrode a platinum cylinder (about 10 mm² in area), both electroplated with copper. Plating was done in an acid copper solution CuSO₄.5H₂O - 188 g/l, H₂SO₄ - 74 g/l) at 10 mA/cm² for 1 to 5 minutes. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as a reference electrode.
  • The current potential curves where obtained with an IBM Instruments Inc. EC/225 Voltammetric AnalyzerTRADEMARK (120 in Fig. 1) and recorded on an IBM Instruments Inc. 7424 X-Y-T RecorderTRADEMARK (130).
  • The test electrode (111), an auxiliary electrode (112), and a reference electrode (113) are connected to the potentiostat (120). The potentiostat with function generator was used in a DC operating mode, for linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The sweep waveform as shown in Fig. 2 is a linear ramp; the current is continuously sampled; when the potential reached a final value it is left at this value for a short period of time and then reset to the initial value, or an automatic can reversal to the initial value can be used.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • An electroless copper plating solution was prepared with a high copper concentration and a correspondingly high specific gravity. The ration of the mole concentration of the formaldehyde reducing agent to the mole concentration of the copper was 0,67. The formulation was as follows:
    Figure imgb0006
  • Additive printed circuit boards were plated in this solution and after plating, tested by the thermal stress test at 288°C for 10 seconds. There were no cracks formed in the copper by the thermal stress test which confirmed the results from the ratio of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • A solution from a working, production, electroless copper plating bath was operated to the formulation below as far as its formulated bath constituents are concerned. The formulation was known to be able to produce high quality copper. However, the ratio of formaldehyde to copper was greater than 1.2 so the solution would not consistently deposit high quality copper as the by-products and contaminants built up and the ratio changed. Electrochemical analysis of the solution gave a ratio of 1.1 and a ratio′ of 1.05, indicating borderline performance. The deviation of the electrochemical ratio results from the good ratio results indicates the presence of an unknown contaminant. Fully additive printed wiring boards were prepared on adhesive coated, epoxy glass laminates in this electroless copper plating bath. Thermal stress testing showed cracks in 20% of the copper hole walls.
  • The solution had the following formulation:
    Figure imgb0007
  • In order to deposit copper that would pass the thermal stress test, a similar solution was prepared with a pH of 11.9 and a ratio of formaldehyde to copper of 0.84. The solution had the following formulation:
    Figure imgb0008
    Figure imgb0009
  • Because the solution was under anodic control and the anodic rate was only slightly increased, the increase in the copper ion concentration to twice the concentration did not cause a corresponding increase in the plating rate. The copper metal was deposited at approximately the same rate, and it required 17 hours to deposit 35 micrometers thick.
  • In order to accelerate the plating rate, since the concentration of the cathodic reactant had already been doubled, the pH was increased to 12,2. The changes in the formulation are shown below:
  • pH (at 25°C)
    12.2
    (CH₂O)(OH⁻)0.5
    0,006 (mol/l)1.5
    Sodium cyanide
    -110 mV vs, SCE
    Specific gravity
    1.070 (at 25°C)
    ra
    0.47 mA/cm²
    rc
    0.49 mA/cm²
    Ratio
    0.96
    ra
    5.02 mA/cm²
    rc
    5.30 mA/cm²
    Ratio′
    0.95
    Thermal stress
    no cracks
  • This solution deposited high quality copper 35 micrometers thick in less than 8 hours. This example illustrates how the principles of the invention may be used to obtain copper with superior physical properties at fast plating rates.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • In this example, a test solution was deliberately contamined to show how the teaching of this invention may be used to adjust the formulation, or reset the control parameters, to obtain fissure free copper deposits from a solution in which contaminants have built up over a period of time as the solution is used.
  • An electroless copper plating test solution was prepared with a stabilizer system using both vanadium and cyanide addition agents. In the Table below, this solution is marked A. The electrochemical analysis of the solution gave a ratio of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, Ratio′ = ra′/rc′, of less than 1,1 indicating the solution would deposit fissure free copper.
  • As a deliberate contaminant, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (2-MBT), 1 mg/l, was added to the test solution. The addition of the contaminant turned the solution passive, i.e., stopped the electroless plating reaction, and the mixed potential of the copper electrode in the test solution was shifted outside the electroless plating range.
  • The conventional practice in the prior art was to increase the formaldehyde and the pH in order to regain a mixed potential sufficient for electroless copper plating. Following this conventional procedure, formaldehyde was added to the solution to triple the concentration and enough sodium hydroxide was added to increase the pH by one pH unit. In addition, copper was added to increase the cathodic reaction rate. The modified formulation is listed in the Table as solution B. While these adjustments overcame the passivation and increased the rate of deposition, the ratio of formaldehyde to copper was 2,4, and thus greater than 1,2. As expected, the electrochemical analysis of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates gave a ratio′ greater than 1,1 indicating the copper deposits would be subject to fissures.
  • To lower the intrinsic anodic reaction rate relative to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, the solution was reformulated with the original formaldehyde concentration and a formaldehyde to copper ratio of 0,7; this is solution C. The ratio′ was reduced to less than 1,1, so the solution would deposit copper resistant to fissures.
  • To achieve a preferred ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, the concentration of the anodic reactant, formaldehyde, was further reduced. The formulation is listed as soluton D. The ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate for this solution is less than 1,0 and thus the solution can provide a high quality, fissure free copper deposit.
    Figure imgb0010
  • This example shows that under the given conditions mercaptobenzothiazole acts as an accelerator or depolarizing agent, and with increased copper concentration and pH, with the same or decreased formaldehyde concentration, leads to faster plating rates and high quality copper deposits. The plating rate of solution A without the accelerator or depolarizing agent was 1.4 micrometers per hour. The plating rates of solutions C and D with the accelerator or depolarizing agent were 4.0 and 3.3 micrometers per hours, respectively.
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • The procedure of Example 3 was repeated using a plating tank equipped with an electroless copper plating bath controller which continuously measured the solution parameters such as the copper and formaldehyde concentrations, the pH, the cyanide ion activity and the temperature. The plating bath controller automatically compared the measured parameters to the set points and made additions to the solution to maintain the solution within the preset operating limits.
  • The plating solution was operated to deposit approximately 6 turnovers. (A turnover is replacing the copper salt content of the solution once). This raised the specific gravity of the solution due to the formation of by-product sodium sulfate and sodium formate. The intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates were measured by electrochemical analysis, and the ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate was found to be less than 1,1 which indicates that the copper deposit is resistant to fissures. The soluton was used to made additive printed circuits by the electroless deposition of copper to form surface conductors and plated through holes. The printed circuits were thermally stressed by contact with molten solder at 288°C for 10 seconds. After thermal stress, the plates through holes were microsectioned and examined for cracks in the deposited copper. There was no evidence of cracks or fissures in the copper conductors or plated-through holes. The formulation tested in shown in the table below.
  • The operating solution found to deposit fissure free copper was then treated with 0.5 mg of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (2-MBT) as a deliberate contaminant to simulate the effect of contamination of the plating solution by organic compounds. Organic contamination is a frequent problem in electroless copper plating, especially in solutions operated for five or more turnovers. Sources of contamination include leaching from plastic substrates being electrolessly plated, from the plating resist, or from fortuitous contamination.
  • After the addition of the contaminant, the plating solution became substantially passive. The plating rate was about 0.03 micrometers of copper per hour and the solution would no longer deposit copper on the hole walls of the insulating base material. The ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates was greater than 1.1, so even if copper would have deposited on the hole walls, the formed deposit, and thus the plated through holes, would fail the thermal stress test. This solution is more fully described below.
  • Following the procedures of Example 3 in a sample of the solution, the pH was raised to provide a more active plating solution, and the copper concentration was increased to adjust the ratio′ of the intrinsic anodic and cathodic reaction rates to less than 1.1. The increase in the copper concentration reduced the ratio of formaldehyde to copper from 1.7 to 0.85. When the ratio′ of less than 1.1 was achieved with the sample solution, the set points on the electroless plating bath controller for copper concentration and pH were reset. Additive printed circuit boards were plated in the contaminated electroless plating solution using the new set points. The copper deposited on these printed circuit boards was tested by thermal stress with molten solder at 288°C for 10 seonds and was found free of cracks of fissures. The formulation, set points and test data for this solution are also given below.
    Figure imgb0011
  • In this example, a passive, contaminated solution was restored to active plating, and then by adjustment of the formulation, according to the teachings of this invention, the intrinsic anodic and intrinsic cathodic reaction rates of the contaminated solution were adjusted to deposit high quality copper. The addition of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, a heterocyclic nitrogen and sulfur compound, and increasing the copper concentration and pH resulted in a 70% increase in the plating rate.
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • In this example, fissure resistant copper was deposited from an electroless copper deposition solution operating at low temperature. A first electroless copper plating solution was formulated to operate at 30°C. The formaldehyde concentration was higher than similar solutions at 75°C as is the common practice in electroless copper solutions operating near room temperature. The ratio of the formaldehyde concentration to copper concentration was 2.4. The solution plated slowly, depositing 25 micrometers of copper in three days. This first solution composition is given in the table below. As reported in the table, the ratio of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate is greater than 1.1 and the additive printed circuit boards prepared in the solution failed the thermal stress test.
  • Following the teachings of this invention, the concentration of the formaldehyde reducing agent was reduced to lower the anodic reaction rate relative to the cathodic reaction rate. The ratio of the formaldehyde concentration to the copper concentration was reduced to 0,5. The resulting solution is the second soluton in the table below.
    Figure imgb0012
  • The second solution is used to plate additive printed circuit boards with copper 25 micrometers thick. It is difficult to initiate electroless plating on catalytic adhesive and catalytic base materials at low temperatures and low formaldehyde concentration. Therefore, before plating the additive circuit boards, the conductive pattern including the plated through holes is covered with a thin layer of copper about 0.2 micrometer thick in an electroless strike solution which has a formaldehyde concentration of 0.13 moles/liter.
  • These additive printed circuit boards from the second solution pass the thermal stress test, demonstrating that maintaining a formaldehyde to copper ratio in an electroless plating solution less than 1.2 can provide fissure free copper deposits.

Claims (5)

  1. A method of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits being substantially free of fissures, said solution consisting essentially of copper ions, a complexing ligand for copper ions, a pH adjuster, a reducing agent, a stabilizer and/or ductility promoter, and having a desired initial ratio of the intrinsic anodic reaction rate to the intrinsic cathodic reaction rate, characterized in that the influence of build-up of by-products being formed during bath operation is compensated for by raising the copper ion concentration and/or the pH value and/or decreasing the concentration of the reducing agent and thereby maintaining the ratio of intrinsic anodic reaction rate to intrinsic cathodic reaction rate and the original deposition rate as well as depositing substantially fissure free copper.
  2. The method of Claim 1, characterized in that the mole concentration of the reducing agent is no greater than 1.2 times the mole concentration of the copper ions.
  3. The method of claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the reducing agent is formaldehyde.
  4. The method of claims 1 - 3, characterized in that the bath solution further comprises an accelerator selected from (i) heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen compounds, (ii) non aromatic nitrogen compounds having at least one delocalized pi-bond, and (iii) aromatic amines and mixtures of the foregoing, and that the pH is adjusted to at least 11.9 and preferably to 12.5 measured at 25°C.
  5. An electroless copper plating bath solution consisting essentially of copper ions, a complexing ligand for copper, a pH adjustor, a stabilizer or ductility promoter and an accelerator containing a delocalized pi-bond, selected from (i) heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen and sulfur compounds, (ii) nonaromatic nitrogen compounds having at least one delocalized pi-bond, and (iii) aromatic amines and mixtures of the foregoing, characterized in that the mole concentration of the reducing agent is no greater than the mole concentration of the copper ions.
EP89107716A 1988-04-29 1989-04-28 Method of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits which are essentially free of fissures Expired - Lifetime EP0340649B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18782288A 1988-04-29 1988-04-29
US187822 1988-04-29

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0340649A1 EP0340649A1 (en) 1989-11-08
EP0340649B1 true EP0340649B1 (en) 1993-02-03

Family

ID=22690615

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89107716A Expired - Lifetime EP0340649B1 (en) 1988-04-29 1989-04-28 Method of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits which are essentially free of fissures

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0340649B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH07107193B2 (en)
KR (1) KR890016207A (en)
AU (1) AU3304389A (en)
BR (1) BR8901962A (en)
CA (1) CA1331420C (en)
DE (1) DE3914180A1 (en)
GB (2) GB2218714B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5526458B2 (en) * 2006-12-06 2014-06-18 上村工業株式会社 Electroless gold plating bath and electroless gold plating method
WO2012022660A1 (en) 2010-08-17 2012-02-23 Chemetall Gmbh Process for the electroless copper plating of metallic substrates

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1522048A (en) * 1966-05-06 1968-04-19 Photocircuits Corp Non-galvanic deposit of metals
FR1551275A (en) * 1966-12-19 1968-12-27
ZA775495B (en) * 1976-11-22 1978-07-26 Kollmorgen Tech Corp Method and apparatus for control of electroless plating solutions
CA1135903A (en) * 1978-09-13 1982-11-23 John F. Mccormack Electroless copper deposition process having faster plating rates
US4301196A (en) 1978-09-13 1981-11-17 Kollmorgen Technologies Corp. Electroless copper deposition process having faster plating rates
JPS5627594A (en) * 1979-08-10 1981-03-17 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Remote controller
JPS6016517B2 (en) * 1979-12-29 1985-04-25 上村工業株式会社 Electroless plating control method
JPS5927379A (en) * 1982-08-09 1984-02-13 Hitachi Ltd Pattern video signal processing system
JPH0247550B2 (en) * 1982-08-23 1990-10-22 Chusho Kigyo Jigyodan MUDENKAIDOMETSUKIEKINOKANRIHOHO
JPH0239596B2 (en) * 1983-03-25 1990-09-06 Uemura Kogyo Kk KAGAKUDOMETSUKINOKONTOROORUHOHO
KR920002710B1 (en) * 1984-06-18 1992-03-31 가부시기가이샤 히다찌세이사꾸쇼 Chemical copper plating method
US4692346A (en) * 1986-04-21 1987-09-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling the surface chemistry on objects plated in an electroless plating bath
ES2039403T3 (en) * 1986-10-31 1993-10-01 Amp-Akzo Corporation (A Delaware Corp.) METHOD FOR DEPOSITING WITHOUT ELECTRICITY HIGH QUALITY COPPER.
US4814197A (en) * 1986-10-31 1989-03-21 Kollmorgen Corporation Control of electroless plating baths

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Journal of Electrochemical Society, Vol 104, No.1, pages 56-63 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0340649A1 (en) 1989-11-08
GB8909623D0 (en) 1989-06-14
KR890016207A (en) 1989-11-28
BR8901962A (en) 1989-12-05
GB2218714B (en) 1992-10-14
AU3304389A (en) 1989-11-02
JPH07107193B2 (en) 1995-11-15
CA1331420C (en) 1994-08-16
DE3914180C2 (en) 1991-04-18
JPH0270070A (en) 1990-03-08
GB9220923D0 (en) 1992-11-18
GB2218714A (en) 1989-11-22
DE3914180A1 (en) 1989-11-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4908242A (en) Method of consistently producing a copper deposit on a substrate by electroless deposition which deposit is essentially free of fissures
KR19990081793A (en) Electro deposition chemistry
JP6903112B2 (en) Method of monitoring the total amount of sulfur-containing compounds in the metal plating bath
KR100292944B1 (en) How to substitute plating metal surface with support metal
KR101511408B1 (en) Method for control of stabilizer additives in electroless metal and metal alloy plating electroylytes
EP0221265B1 (en) Process for determining the plating activity of an electroless plating bath
EP0150402B1 (en) Method of depositing a metal from an electroless plating solution
GB2032462A (en) Electroless Copper Deposition at Faster Rates
US6875474B2 (en) Electroless copper plating solutions and methods of use thereof
EP0340649B1 (en) Method of formulating and operating an electroless plating bath solution for forming copper deposits which are essentially free of fissures
EP0265895B1 (en) Method for electrolessly depositing high quality copper
EP0319755B1 (en) Method for controlling plating on seeded surfaces
US3753818A (en) Ammoniacal etching solution and method utilizing same
Hung Kinetics of electroless copper deposition with hypophosphite as a reducing agenT
US4707377A (en) Copper plating
EP0150413A1 (en) Method for providing an electroless copper plating bath in the take mode
EP0144685B1 (en) Electroless copper plating process
JPH0798296A (en) Measuring method for concentration of additive in electroless copper plating liquid
JP2003096575A (en) Electroless gold plating liquid and electroless gold plating method
Wang et al. Au (III) in borate medium: Electrochemical behavior and application to electroplating
RU1775505C (en) Gold-plating electrolyte
JP2021063259A (en) Production method of metallic film

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900424

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910315

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: AMP-AKZO CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORP.)

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: AMP-AKZO CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORP.)

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): FR GB NL

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): FR GB NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19960301

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960304

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19970428

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19970428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20000320

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20011101

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20011101