CN115291022A - Quality control method for batch products - Google Patents

Quality control method for batch products Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115291022A
CN115291022A CN202210989504.5A CN202210989504A CN115291022A CN 115291022 A CN115291022 A CN 115291022A CN 202210989504 A CN202210989504 A CN 202210989504A CN 115291022 A CN115291022 A CN 115291022A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
product
products
batch
electromagnetic interference
spectrum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210989504.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
吴伟
吴跃佳
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to CN202210989504.5A priority Critical patent/CN115291022A/en
Publication of CN115291022A publication Critical patent/CN115291022A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/001Measuring interference from external sources to, or emission from, the device under test, e.g. EMC, EMI, EMP or ESD testing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/01Subjecting similar articles in turn to test, e.g. "go/no-go" tests in mass production; Testing objects at points as they pass through a testing station
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

A quality control method for batch products. The method comprises the following steps: giving an arbitrary line segment; selecting an evaluated batch of products and acquiring a frequency spectrum of the products; comparing the frequency spectrums of any line segment and batch products and observing the fluctuation of the difference value of the two; and if the difference value fluctuation is abnormal, checking whether quality factors except the electromagnetic interference characteristics of the product with the abnormal difference value fluctuation meet the design requirements. The advantages are that: the EMC condition of the product can be quickly evaluated in a production workshop, so that the evaluation cost is saved; each necessary inspection of the product in the production process of the batch product is beneficial to the quality control; the evaluation result not only reflects the EMC condition of the batch products, but also reflects the product quality except the electromagnetic interference characteristic of the products, and a new means is provided for the quality control of the batch products.

Description

Quality control method for batch products
The application is a divisional application with the application date of 2018, month 01 and day 06, the application number of 201810012675.6 and the name of a method for rapidly evaluating the electromagnetic compatibility condition of a product and controlling the quality.
Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for quickly evaluating electromagnetic compatibility of a product, in particular to a method for quickly evaluating electromagnetic compatibility for controlling quality of the product.
Background
The electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) condition of a product is an important part of the product quality. The low EMC condition of the product can reduce the anti-interference capability of the product, thereby reducing the reliability of the product. However, since the EMC test of a product needs to be performed in a shielded room, which is expensive and time-consuming, the evaluation of the EMC performance of the product so far is limited to the type test of the product, i.e. the EMC test is performed on only one sample of the product, and it is assumed that the EMC characteristics of all subsequently produced mass products of the same type are the same as the sample. However, practically, due to variations in components of products, changes in production processes, and the like, the EMC condition of a batch product deviates from that of a sample.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method for quickly evaluating the electromagnetic compatibility condition of a product for controlling the quality of the product, which can quickly evaluate the EMC condition of each product in a batch of products. Since the electromagnetic interference (EMI) of the product is generated by the circuit of the product and is closely related to the operating condition of the circuit, the method can also be used for quality control of the batch product.
The invention provides a method for quickly evaluating the electromagnetic compatibility condition of a product, which is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
selecting a reference sample and obtaining a frequency spectrum of the reference sample;
selecting an evaluated product and acquiring a frequency spectrum of the evaluated product;
and comparing the frequency spectrums of the reference sample and the evaluation product, and judging the electromagnetic compatibility condition of the evaluation product.
The evaluation method is characterized in that the reference sample and the product to be evaluated belong to the same type of product, and the EMC state of the reference sample is known.
The method for evaluating is characterized in that the obtaining of the frequency spectrum of the reference sample and the obtaining of the frequency spectrum of the product to be evaluated can be realized by collecting the electric waveforms of the same part on the circuits of the reference sample and the product to be evaluated by an electric signal collecting instrument and obtaining the frequency spectrums through mathematical transformation.
The method for evaluating is characterized in that the obtaining of the frequency spectrum of the reference sample and the obtaining of the frequency spectrum of the product to be evaluated can be realized by measuring the same positions on the circuits of the reference sample and the product to be evaluated by using a frequency tester to obtain the frequency spectrums.
The evaluation method is characterized in that the judgment and evaluation of the electromagnetic compatibility condition of the product comprises the following criteria:
Figure 732154DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
(1)
Figure 882513DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
(2)
wherein R is a difference value, f is a certain frequency in the frequency spectrum, se is the frequency spectrum of the product to be evaluated, sr is the frequency spectrum of the reference sample, estatus is the product evaluation result, margin is the product interference, uncertaintiy is the measurement uncertainty, PASS is passed, FAIL is not passed, and UNCERTAIN is UNCERTAIN.
The evaluation method is characterized in that the reference sample is selected and the frequency spectrum of the reference sample is obtained, and the frequency spectrum of the reference sample can be directly replaced by any line segment.
The method and the calculation formulas (1) and (2) are based on the following basic principles:
product A and product B belong to the same type of product, and the EMI level is represented by frequency spectrum
Basic principle 1. Product B has a lower frequency spectrum than product a, and thus if the EMC standard laboratory tests that the frequency spectrum of product a is below the EMI limit lines specified by the EMC standard and thus meets the EMC standard.
Basic principle 2. Under the same environment, the same instrument is used for measuring the product A and the product B at the same test point to obtain frequency spectrums, and even if the environment and the instrument are different from the standard EMC test requirements, the basic principle 1 still holds.
And 3, measuring the product A and the product B at the same test point by using the same instrument under the same environment to obtain frequency spectrums, and calculating the difference value of the frequency spectrums of the product A and the product B to eliminate the influence of environmental interference.
In practical application, a sample with known EMC condition is selected as the product A, a batch product to be evaluated is selected as the product B, and the EMC condition of the batch product can be quickly evaluated according to the steps of the method and the formulas (1) and (2) of the method. Furthermore, as shown in the following embodiment, since the EMI level of the product is related to the operating condition of the product, the method of the present invention can also be used for quality control of mass production.
In production practice, samples with known EMC conditions are sometimes lacking; it is then possible to consider replacing the spectrum of the reference sample by an arbitrary line segment, for example by an interference-limited line of a standard EMC test or a combination of several line segments of different shapes, etc. In this case, when operating according to equations (1) and (2), margin may take any constant. Since all the products in the series to be evaluated are compared with the same arbitrary line segment to calculate the difference, the difference or the maximum value of the difference of all the products in the series to be evaluated should fluctuate in a narrow range under normal conditions, and if the difference of a certain product is obviously beyond the narrow fluctuation range, the product is indicated to be abnormal in operation, and further quality check is needed.
Advantageous effects
Compared with the prior art, the method has the beneficial effects that:
the EMC condition of the product can be quickly evaluated in a production workshop, and compared with a shielding room test of a standard EMC laboratory, the evaluation cost is saved; the rapid evaluation method enables each necessary inspection of products in the production process of batch products to be possible, and is beneficial to EMC quality control of the products; the evaluation result not only reflects the EMC condition of the batch products, but also reflects the product quality, and a new means is provided for the quality control of the batch products.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the steps of examples 1-3 of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of the conducted interference spectrum of a reference sample in example 1 of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is an EMC status evaluation diagram of the batch product in embodiment 1 of the invention.
Fig. 4 is an EMC condition evaluation diagram of a batch product according to embodiment 2 of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following detailed description of the present invention is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings and examples.
Example 1
In example 1, the mass-produced product is a USB dc charger, one product of the same type as a sample is subjected to a standard EMC laboratory conducted interference test with a test standard of EN61000-6-3 and a frequency range of 150 kHz-30MHz, and the test result is shown in fig. 2. In fig. 2, the distance from the standard line of the amplitude values of different frequency points in the sample spectrum is the EMI margin (margin) of the frequency point. The uncertainty (uncertainties) of the EMC laboratory test for this sample was + -1.66dB. In this case, a digital oscilloscope is used to measure the batch product and the reference sample at the power input end respectively to obtain a voltage signal, and the voltage signal is subjected to FFT conversion to obtain a spectrum Se of the batch product and a spectrum Sr of the reference sample. The difference of the spectrum from the frequencies 150 kHz-30MHz at the frequency points f was calculated for 50 batches of product and 1 reference sample according to the disclosure (1) in this case. According to the EMC test principle, if the frequency spectrum of a tested product exceeds the standard at any frequency point, the EMC of the product is unqualified; if the EMI amplitude of the frequency point corresponding to the maximum difference value of the tested product is still lower than the EMI limiting line specified by the EMC standard so as to meet the EMC standard, according to the basic principle 1, the EMI amplitudes of the rest frequency points of the product are necessarily lower than the EMI limiting line specified by the EMC standard because the difference value is smaller than the maximum difference value, so that the EMC of the product is qualified. The present case therefore only calculates the maximum value of the difference, the result of which is shown in fig. 3. Wherein the X-axis coordinates are numbers of the batch products, only the 1 st to 20 th batch products being labeled for clarity; the Y coordinate is the electromagnetic interference intensity; each point gives the calculation result in the format of (product number, maximum deviation value corresponding to frequency, maximum deviation value). FIG. 3 shows that the maximum deviation values for the batches other than batches 8 and 11 are both less than 1.9dB, and PASS was calculated according to equation (2). The maximum deviation of the batch product 8 reached 75.79dB, which was calculated as FAIL according to equation (2), and the reason for this was checked as the filter capacitor of the power supply section was disconnected; the maximum deviation of the batch product 11 reaches 19.96dB, which is calculated as FAIL according to equation (2), and the cause is abnormal operation of the oscillator circuit. The causes of EMC state failures of the batch products 8 and 11 are related to the quality of the products, so that the method can be used for quality control of the products.
Example 2
In example 2, a mass product was the same as in example 1 except that the frequency spectrum of the reference sample was replaced with an interference limiting line in the EMC test standard. When the method is operated according to the formulas (1) and (2), margin and uncertaintiy can take any values. The analysis results are shown in FIG. 4. Fig. 4 shows that the maximum values of the differences of the products other than the batches 8 and 11 fluctuate in a narrow region, and that the maximum values of the differences of the batches 8 and 11 fluctuate widely and beyond the narrow region, reflecting that the quality of both products may be problematic.
Example 3
In example 3, the evaluation method was similar to that of example 2, except that an arbitrary line segment was used instead of the spectrum of the reference sample. In the operation according to the formulas (1) and (2), margin is an arbitrary constant, and this embodiment is set to be slightly larger than the narrow region, so that the batch product with the difference value fluctuating in the narrow region is qualified by calculation according to the formula (2). The analysis also shows that the maximum of the difference between the products other than the batches 8 and 11 fluctuates in a narrow region, and that the maximum of the difference between the batches 8 and 11 fluctuates considerably beyond this narrow region, reflecting that the quality of both products may be problematic. The application of the embodiment focuses on finding batch products with abnormal work so as to realize the quality control of the products.
The above embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and functions of the present invention, and do not limit the present invention. There may be many variations to these diagrams or the steps (or operations) described therein associated with the embodiments without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order, or steps may be added, deleted or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the present invention. Therefore, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made in the above-described embodiments without departing from the spirit of the invention. The scope of the invention is to be determined by the claims appended hereto.

Claims (4)

1. A quality control method of batch products is characterized in that electromagnetic interference characteristics of products are taken as criteria for controlling quality factors except the electromagnetic interference characteristics of the products, and the method comprises the following steps:
giving an arbitrary line segment;
selecting an evaluated batch of products and acquiring a frequency spectrum of the products;
comparing the frequency spectrums of any line segment and batch products and observing the difference fluctuation of the two;
and if the difference value fluctuation is abnormal, checking whether quality factors except the electromagnetic interference characteristics of the product with the abnormal difference value fluctuation meet the design requirements.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the spectrum of the batch product with any of the line segments comprises:
Figure 444346DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Figure 908825DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
wherein, R is the difference between the electromagnetic interference spectrum and any line segment, f is a certain frequency in the spectrum, se is the electromagnetic interference spectrum of the product to be evaluated, sr is any line segment, estatus is the product quality evaluation result, margin is the specified difference fluctuation area, any constant can be taken, uncertaintiy is the measurement uncertainty, any constant can be taken, PASS is normal, FAIL is abnormal, and UNCERTAIN is UNCERTAIN.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein R is a maximum value of a difference between an electromagnetic interference spectrum and an arbitrary line segment.
4. The method for controlling the quality of a batch product according to claim 1, wherein the checking whether the quality factors other than the electromagnetic interference characteristics of the product with abnormal difference fluctuation meet the design requirements comprises: checking whether the product works abnormally.
CN202210989504.5A 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 Quality control method for batch products Pending CN115291022A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210989504.5A CN115291022A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 Quality control method for batch products

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210989504.5A CN115291022A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 Quality control method for batch products
CN201810012675.6A CN108562807A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 A kind of method of Electromagnetic Compatibility situation rapid evaluation and quality control

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810012675.6A Division CN108562807A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 A kind of method of Electromagnetic Compatibility situation rapid evaluation and quality control

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115291022A true CN115291022A (en) 2022-11-04

Family

ID=63529639

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810012675.6A Pending CN108562807A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 A kind of method of Electromagnetic Compatibility situation rapid evaluation and quality control
CN202210989504.5A Pending CN115291022A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 Quality control method for batch products

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810012675.6A Pending CN108562807A (en) 2018-01-06 2018-01-06 A kind of method of Electromagnetic Compatibility situation rapid evaluation and quality control

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (2) CN108562807A (en)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102749539B (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-06-18 北京航空航天大学 Fast electromagnetic compatibility test and diagnosis system with quantization electromagnetic interference
CN106526390A (en) * 2016-12-23 2017-03-22 安徽华东光电技术研究所 Electronic compatible EMC conduction simple test method
CN106932672B (en) * 2017-03-06 2019-06-07 吴伟 A kind of appraisal procedure of radiation of equipment interference

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108562807A (en) 2018-09-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8760171B2 (en) Device and method for determining partial discharges at an electrical component
FI126901B (en) Method and system for testing an electronic unit
US20210215750A1 (en) Method and system for fault detection
Farayola et al. Quantile–quantile fitting approach to detect site to site variations in massive multi-site testing
KR100259322B1 (en) Method for analyzing stability of semiconductor of semiconductor device tester
CN117452103A (en) EMI power supply filter reliability test system and method
JP2011202956A (en) Failure determination method of lightning arrester
CN115291022A (en) Quality control method for batch products
CN112345992A (en) Calibration method and system for partial discharge composite parameter by pulse current method
CN106932672A (en) A kind of appraisal procedure of radiation of equipment interference
CN112782559A (en) AD chip testing device and testing method thereof
CN210604796U (en) Electromagnetic noise test system
JP6965123B2 (en) Data processing equipment, measurement system and data processing program
CN104881551B (en) Electric and electronic product maturity appraisal procedure
Singh et al. Inter-laboratory comparison of S-parameter measurements with dynamic uncertainty evaluation
Kannan et al. Embedded RF circuit diagnostic technique with multi-tone dither scheme
CN108427086A (en) A kind of automatic gauge test system and method for electronic device
CN116609642B (en) Chip test error compensation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN118101084B (en) Performance detection method and system based on radio frequency device
CN118209797A (en) Method and system for testing electronic element
CN118130997A (en) Test method and system for operation of variable capacitance diode
Sanudo et al. Alternative Methodology to Evaluate the Performance of PQ monitors
CN114563637A (en) Method for determining conduction interference of wire harness and related equipment
CN116755014A (en) Error analysis method and system for power detection device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN118130902A (en) Structure and method for testing resistor and WAT testing device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination