CN106599492B - A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence - Google Patents
A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106599492B CN106599492B CN201611174672.XA CN201611174672A CN106599492B CN 106599492 B CN106599492 B CN 106599492B CN 201611174672 A CN201611174672 A CN 201611174672A CN 106599492 B CN106599492 B CN 106599492B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- flutter
- qmu
- aircraft
- design variable
- logic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence, are related to nargin and uncertain quantification technique.The following steps are included: 1) establish the database of existing flight test, i.e., in the case where certain organizes design parameter, whether flight test occurs flutter, and flutter is denoted as 1, not flutter and is denoted as 0;2) regressive prediction model is established;3) it is fitted regression coefficient;4) prediction model;5) QMU is assessed.Complicated finite element analysis process is crossed, computational efficiency is high, and it is easy to operate, the neighborhood carried out is difficult to suitable for numerical simulations such as hypersonic heat structure flutters.Analysis result is assessed using QMU, while considering the uncertainty of flutter speed and Flutter Boundaries, the safety criterion as Flutter Problem is with a high credibility.The probability that flutter occurs for aircraft under the conditions of a certain design variable can be predicted, can be used for the design of assisting in flying device.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to nargin and uncertain quantification technique, the aircraft returned more particularly, to a kind of logic-based quivers
Vibration analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure.
Background technique
Flutter is a kind of aeroelasticity instability generated by the effect of intercoupling of air force, inertia force and elastic force
Phenomenon.With the continuous promotion of contemporary aircraft speed, Flutter Problem also becomes to become increasingly conspicuous, the flutter analysis of Flight Vehicle Structure
Cause the extensive concern of researcher.And in hypersonic aircraft field, severe pneumatic thermal environment makes flutter analysis
It is encountered by new test, the important topic that hypersonic aircraft faces when flutter analysis of the structure under thermal environment.
Traditional aircraft Flutter Analysis Methods are will to test to combine with numerical simulation to analyze.But for number
For value emulation, on the one hand due to the complexity of Aeroelastic Problems, there is very big uncertainties for the result emulated;
COMPOSITE FINITE ELEMENT modeling method used by another aspect hypersonic aircraft is also immature, and finite element method is faced with
Stern challenge.And flutter test has the characteristics that cost is high, the period is long.Therefore how according to limited test data come
It is most important to accurate safe Flutter Boundaries.
Logistic regression is a kind of linear regression analysis model of broad sense, is usually used in data mining and economic forecasting field, together
When can be used for finding the risk factor of certain event.Aircraft flutter is used for based on limited test flight data, by logistic regression
Analysis can cross complicated simulation analysis process, analyze the Flutter Boundaries of aircraft well, and analysis result can be used for auxiliary
Help Flight Vehicle Design.
QMU (quantification of margins and uncertainties, nargin and uncertain quantization skill
Art) it is that the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy subordinate in 2001 combines Los Alamos, Lao Lunsi Lawrence Livermore
New method (Pilch M, Trucano T G, the Helton J C.Ideas proposed with the sub- three power laboratories in the Holy Land
underlying quantification of margins and uncertainties(QMU):a white paper[J]
.Unlimited Release SAND2006-5001,Sandia National Laboratory,Albuquerque,New
Mexico, 2006,87185:2.), for assessing the reliability and safety of inventory's nuclear weapon in the insufficient situation of experimental data
Property.QMU method is using product normal operation as research object, based on physics model of failure and margin design, it is believed that make be
System reaches required performance, it is necessary to be directed to known potential failure mode, enough design margins be reserved for system, to ensure to be
System is absolutely reliable, but when calculated performance allowance M, will receive a variety of random and cognition uncertain factor influence,
Once these uncertain integrated values are greater than performance margin M, product may generate trouble or failure.Confidence is used in QMU
The ratio of the factor (Confidence Factors) CF, i.e. performance margin M and not true foot U characterize performance margin and uncertain
This relationship between property, as CF > 1, it is believed that system is safe.This method can be used as under condition of uncertainty,
The safety evaluation foundation of flight structure flutter margin.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the invention is to overcome deficiencies of the prior art, a kind of flying for logic-based recurrence is provided
Row device flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure.
The present invention the following steps are included:
1) database of existing flight test is established, i.e., whether flight test occurs flutter in the case where certain organizes design parameter, quivers
Vibration is denoted as 1, not flutter and is denoted as 0;
2) regressive prediction model is established:
In formula (1), Y=1 indicates that flutter occurs, and flutter, Y do not occur for Y=0 expression*It is implicit defined in logic returns to
Variable
In formula (2), XiIt is the design variable that can observe, ε indicates the uncertain error of model, β0、βiIt is unknown intend
Collaboration number need to find out fitting coefficient using the method for maximal possibility estimation, be denoted as
Then the probability of generation flutter is under the design variable
F is the accumulated probability distribution function of ε in formula (4), is had for the Logic Regression Models of standard
F (η)=eη/(1+eη) (5)
By being distributed to becoming second nature it is found that the probability that flutter occurs is
P { Y=1 }=1-F (- η)=F (η) (6)
3) it is fitted regression coefficient:
It is illustrated by taking single design variable as an example, knows that regression model is by formula (2)
N is test data number in formula (7).Fitting coefficient β is found out using the method for maximal possibility estimationi.
4) prediction model:
Under the conditions of certain design variable, the probability of aircraft flutter is
The anti-solution equation, can be obtained the value of the design variable under a certain flutter probability, designs for assisting in flying device
For Logic Regression Models, take p=0.5 as Flutter Boundaries, p=0.05 is flutter threshold value, while can be analyzed
95% confidence interval of Flutter Boundaries and threshold value out.
5) QMU is assessed:
To a certain design variable x, the probability of aircraft flutter under this condition is analyzed using regression analysis software
pflutter, while providing its 95% confidence interval [pflutter,lower,pflutter,upper], and then regression curve is combined, it obtains and sets
Count 95% confidence interval of variable xTaking design variable corresponding to p=0.5 is flutter side
Boundary xflutter, can similarly obtain xflutter95% confidence intervalIt takes and is set corresponding to p=0.05
Meter variable is flutter threshold value xgate, can similarly obtain xgate95% confidence interval
Then flutter margin M:
M=xfluter-xgate (10)
Uncertain U is by Flutter Boundaries uncertainty UflutterWith flutter threshold value uncertainty UgateTwo parts composition:
To obtain confidence factor
The present invention, using limited test flight data, passes through logistic regression in the case where numerical simulation is difficult to be unfolded
Analysis method analyzes aircraft Flutter Boundaries, while can provide aircraft and design variable required by flutter does not occur
Value range is designed for assisting in flying device, is finally assessed using QMU appraisal procedure analysis result.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the advantages that:
1) logic-based returns and limited test data analyzes aircraft flutter, has crossed complicated finite element
Analytic process, computational efficiency is high, easy to operate, is difficult to the neighbour carried out suitable for numerical simulations such as hypersonic heat structure flutters
Domain.
2) analysis result is assessed using QMU, while considers the uncertainty of flutter speed and Flutter Boundaries, as
The safety criterion of Flutter Problem is with a high credibility.
3) probability that flutter occurs for aircraft under the conditions of a certain design variable can be predicted, can be used for assisting in flying device and set
Meter.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is prediction model of the logistic regression analysis to Flutter Boundaries.
Fig. 2 is Flutter Boundaries and flutter threshold value and its 95% confidence interval schematic diagram.
Fig. 3 is the nargin M and uncertainty U schematic diagram of QMU analysis.
Specific embodiment
Take below flying speed as unitary variant for, aircraft flutter is analyzed (if examining using logistic regression
Consider other design variables, then can obtain the value range of variable when flutter does not occur for aircraft), specific implementation step includes:
1, the input of experimental data is realized using matlab logistic regression tool box, and is fitted the recurrence for obtaining logistic regression
Factor betai.The test flight data of certain model aircraft is as shown in table 1.
2, linear logic regression fit is carried out using glmfit and glmval function in Matlab, obtaining regression coefficient isThen aircraft flutter anticipation function is
The test flight data of certain the model aircraft of table 1
Prediction model functional image using matlab as shown in Figure 1, also draw point of 95% confidence interval of p (x) simultaneously
Cloth.Soft dot indicates that test data point, solid line represent logistic regression anticipation function in figure, and dotted line is its 95% confidence interval
Distribution function.
3, flutter probability value p (x)=0.5 is taken, can obtain the aircraft flutter speed analyzed under this condition
And mode obtains the confidence interval [V of flutter speed 95% according to Fig.2,flutter,lower,Vflutter,upper]。
The flutter speed for taking 5% Probability Point is flutter threshold value Vgate=V (p=0.05), 95% confidence interval are
[Vgate,lower,Vgate,upper], it is believed that aircraft is less than threshold value V in flying speedgateFlutter occurs for Shi Buhui.
It is as follows to analyze result QMU assessment specific implementation process:
1, the uncertain U and nargin M of flutter speed threshold value and Flutter Boundaries are calculated according to formula (10) and (11).
2, confidence factor is calculated
If confidence factor is greater than 1.0, illustrate to analyze credible result to aircraft Flutter Boundaries by logistic regression analysis,
Aircraft is less than threshold value V in flying speed under this design conditiongateFlutter occurs for Shi Buhui.
The nargin M and uncertainty U schematic diagram of QMU analysis are referring to Fig. 3.
Claims (1)
1. aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure that a kind of logic-based returns, it is characterised in that the following steps are included:
1) regressive prediction model is established:
In formula (1), Y=1 indicates that flutter occurs, and flutter, Y do not occur for Y=0 expression*It is implicit variable defined in logistic regression:
Y*=β0+β1x+ε (2)
In formula (2), x is design variable, and ε indicates the uncertain error of model, β0And β1It is unknown fitting coefficient, according to
Some test flight datas are acquired using the method for maximal possibility estimation;
2) model based on step 1) is predicted:
Remember η=β0+β1The probability of flutter then occurs at design variable x for x are as follows:
F is the cumulative distribution function of ε in formula (3), is had for the Logic Regression Models of standard:
F (η)=eη/(1+eη) (4)
By the symmetry that is distributed it is found that the probability of flutter occurs are as follows:
P { Y=1 }=1-F (- η)=F (η) (5)
Inverse equation (5), obtains the value of design variable x under flutter probability P, designs for assisting in flying device;
3) QMU is assessed:
Taking design variable corresponding to P=0.5 is Flutter Boundaries xflutter, and provide xflutter95% confidence intervalSeparately taking design variable corresponding to P=0.05 is flutter threshold value xgate, and provide xgate95% confidence interval
Then flutter margin M:
M=xflutter-xgate (7)
Uncertain U is by Flutter Boundaries uncertainty UflutterWith flutter threshold value uncertainty UgateTwo parts composition:
To obtain confidence factor
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611174672.XA CN106599492B (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2016-12-19 | A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611174672.XA CN106599492B (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2016-12-19 | A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106599492A CN106599492A (en) | 2017-04-26 |
CN106599492B true CN106599492B (en) | 2019-08-13 |
Family
ID=58599261
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611174672.XA Expired - Fee Related CN106599492B (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2016-12-19 | A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106599492B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108829987B (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2022-10-11 | 中国核动力研究设计院 | Data driving type probability evaluation method |
CN111191187B (en) * | 2019-11-28 | 2023-03-21 | 北京机电工程研究所 | Novel supersonic aircraft vibration environment extrapolation method |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102364477A (en) * | 2011-09-22 | 2012-02-29 | 西北工业大学 | Aircraft flutter characteristic analysis method with no additional aerodynamic damping |
CN104881585A (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2015-09-02 | 南京航空航天大学 | Flutter boundary prediction method of two-degree-of-freedom wing |
CN105843073A (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2016-08-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing wing structure aero-elasticity stability based on aerodynamic force uncertain order reduction |
-
2016
- 2016-12-19 CN CN201611174672.XA patent/CN106599492B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102364477A (en) * | 2011-09-22 | 2012-02-29 | 西北工业大学 | Aircraft flutter characteristic analysis method with no additional aerodynamic damping |
CN104881585A (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2015-09-02 | 南京航空航天大学 | Flutter boundary prediction method of two-degree-of-freedom wing |
CN105843073A (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2016-08-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing wing structure aero-elasticity stability based on aerodynamic force uncertain order reduction |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
回归分析方法在气动弹性研究中的应用;李增文;《第九屇全国空气弹性学术交流会会议论文集》;20070130;第231-236页 |
热结构不确定性动力学仿真及模型确认方法研究;张保强;《中国博士学位论文全文数据库基础科学辑》;20140615;正文第121-139页 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106599492A (en) | 2017-04-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Levy et al. | Summary of data from the fifth computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop | |
Vassberg et al. | Summary of the fourth AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop | |
Campobasso et al. | Turbulent Navier–Stokes analysis of an oscillating wing in a power-extraction regime using the shear stress transport turbulence model | |
CN108829955A (en) | A kind of aero-engine seaworthiness security verification method | |
CN105740596A (en) | Method and system for analyzing atmospheric neutron single event effect of aviation electronic system | |
CN106599492B (en) | A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence | |
JP2023033239A (en) | Modeling new designs for electromagnetic effects | |
CN109657260B (en) | Turbine rotor system reliability distribution method considering failure correlation | |
CN102193858B (en) | Test case set generation method | |
CN105138766A (en) | Adding method based on fuzzy clustering for hypersonic velocity aerodynamic heat reduced-order model | |
Zhang et al. | Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows over airfoils | |
Li et al. | Hybrid central–WENO scheme for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks | |
Murayama et al. | Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Studies for the Fifth AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop | |
Tian et al. | Web service reliability test method based on log analysis | |
CN106777696B (en) | Design Method of Flutter based on QMU | |
Zhang | Reliability analysis of high voltage electric system of pure electric passenger car based on polymorphic fuzzy fault tree | |
Jun et al. | Reduced order model of three-dimensional Euler equations using proper orthogonal decomposition basis | |
Dutta et al. | In situ climate modeling for analyzing extreme weather events | |
Li et al. | Defect text analysis method of electric power equipment based on double-layer bidirectional LSTM model | |
CN106599491A (en) | QMU-based flutter margin evaluation method | |
Riddle et al. | Effects of Defects Part A: Stochastic Finite Element Modeling of Wind Turbine Blades with Manufacturing Defects for Reliability Estimation | |
CN104992012A (en) | Automobile rear door rigidity analysis method | |
Cunningham Jr et al. | A system analysis study comparing reverse engineered combinatorial testing to expert judgment | |
Bentaleb et al. | The structure of a three-dimensional boundary layer subjected to streamwise-varying spanwise-homogeneous pressure gradient | |
Gao et al. | Reliability assessment of slot-parachute inflation based on Bayes theory |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20190813 Termination date: 20211219 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |