CN106777696B - Design Method of Flutter based on QMU - Google Patents

Design Method of Flutter based on QMU Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106777696B
CN106777696B CN201611174664.5A CN201611174664A CN106777696B CN 106777696 B CN106777696 B CN 106777696B CN 201611174664 A CN201611174664 A CN 201611174664A CN 106777696 B CN106777696 B CN 106777696B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
flutter
uncertainty
uncertain
factor
safety
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201611174664.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN106777696A (en
Inventor
杨婧
张保强
陈庆
苏国强
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xiamen University
Original Assignee
Xiamen University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xiamen University filed Critical Xiamen University
Priority to CN201611174664.5A priority Critical patent/CN106777696B/en
Publication of CN106777696A publication Critical patent/CN106777696A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN106777696B publication Critical patent/CN106777696B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/23Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/08Probabilistic or stochastic CAD

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Complex Calculations (AREA)

Abstract

Design Method of Flutter based on QMU is related to uncertain and nargin quantification technique.1) finite element model of structure is established;2) flutter speed of certainty condition flowering structure is calculated by commercial finite element software, and divided by certain safety coefficient as Flutter Boundaries;3) the flutter distribution under the influence of stochastic uncertainty is described by probability distribution;4) it is based on flutter speed probability distribution, quantifies the uncertain degree and nargin of flutter speed by QMU technology, and obtains confidence factor CR, as Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation;5) safe range of cognition uncertain factor is solved by confidence factor, take the probabilistic two parameter sections of cognition, it is divided into the section of n × n, m sample calculation is carried out to stochastic uncertainty parameter in each section and interpolation obtains the curve of CR=1 and CR=2, marks off the uncertain factor range for ensuring flutter safety and the influence of quantization uncertainty factor to a certain extent.

Description

Design Method of Flutter based on QMU
Technical field
The present invention relates to uncertain and nargin quantification techniques, more particularly, to a kind of Design Method of Flutter based on QMU.
Background technique
Uncertainty is widely present in actual engineering problem, is broadly divided into two classes, and one is stochastic uncertainty, is such as tied The parameter uncertainties such as the material load attribute during structure processing and manufacturing and use, mostly use probability distribution to describe;Two It is uncertain for cognition, it is that section distribution description is mostly used due to the uncertainty that knowledge is limited and generates.It is most of at present Research is just in stochastic uncertainty, and in fact the uncertain influence to result of cognition is equally very important.Flutter is The most noticeable problem of aeroelastic stability research field.Aircraft occur flutter be it is breakneck, when flying speed is super When crossing flutter critical speed, amplitude, which swashs to increase severely, to be added, it might even be possible to quickly destroy an airplane.Aircraft is in flight envelope Do not allow to occur any type of flutter, but Flutter Boundaries again cannot overly conservative influence flying quality, therefore according to performance and Index is reasonably designed containing probabilistic parameter is recognized, to guarantee that Flutter Boundaries i.e. safety is not again overly conservative to Guan Chong It wants.
QMU (quantification of margins and uncertainties, it is uncertain to quantify skill with nargin Art) it is that the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy subordinate in 2001 combines Los Alamos, Lao Lunsi Lawrence Livermore New method (Pilch M, Trucano T G, the Helton J C.Ideas proposed with the sub- three power laboratories in the Holy Land underlying quantification of margins and uncertainties(QMU):a white paper[J] .Unlimited Release SAND2006-5001,Sandia National Laboratory,Albuquerque,New Mexico, 2006,87185:2.), for assessing the reliability and safety of inventory's nuclear weapon in the insufficient situation of experimental data Property.QMU method is using product normal operation as research object, based on physics model of failure and margin design, it is believed that make be System reaches required performance, it is necessary to be directed to known potential failure mode, enough design margins be reserved for system, to ensure to be System is absolutely reliable, but when calculated performance allowance M, will receive a variety of random and cognition uncertain factor influence, Once these uncertain integrated values are greater than performance margin M, product may generate trouble or failure.Confidence is used in QMU The ratio of factor CR, i.e. performance margin M and not true foot U characterizes this relationship between performance margin and uncertainty, when When CR > 1, it is believed that system is safe.This method can be used as under condition of uncertainty, the peace of flight structure flutter margin Full property assesses foundation, and is designed based on this to cognition uncertain parameters.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the invention is to overcome deficiencies of the prior art, a kind of flutter based on QMU is provided and is set Meter method.
The present invention the following steps are included:
1) finite element model of structure is established;
2) flutter speed of certainty condition flowering structure is calculated by commercial finite element software, and is divided by certain safety Number is used as Flutter Boundaries;
3) the flutter distribution under the influence of stochastic uncertainty is described by probability distribution.Consider related ginseng in finite element model Several uncertainties, such as elasticity modulus, shearing rigidity is as stochastic uncertainty, and density of material, atmospheric density ratio is as cognition Uncertainty, using the probability distribution of Monte Carlo methods of sampling quantization stochastic uncertainty flutter speed.
4) it is based on flutter speed probability distribution, quantifies the uncertain degree and nargin of flutter speed by QMU technology, and obtain To confidence factor CR, as Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation;
5) safe range that cognition uncertain factor is solved by confidence factor takes probabilistic two parameters of cognition Section is divided into the section of n*n, carries out m sample calculation to stochastic uncertainty parameter in each section and interpolation obtains CR The curve of=1 and CR=2 marks off the uncertain factor range for ensuring flutter safety and quantifies to a certain extent uncertain The influence of sexual factor.
In step 4), uncertainty quantization and QMU appraisal procedure are as follows:
(1) stochastic uncertainty of flutter speed, uncertainty are indicated by probability distribution are as follows:
The flutter speed that Flutter Boundaries are obtained by deterministic parameters calculation is multiplied by obtained by certain safety coefficient K, it is assumed that there is also Stochastic uncertainty is described by probability distribution, the accounting equation of uncertainty are as follows:
The then uncertainty calculation equation of whole system are as follows:
Wherein, V indicates to consider the flutter speed probability distribution of stochastic uncertainty, and VL indicates quivering multiplied by safety coefficient K The Cumulative Distribution Function on vibration boundary, P indicate that probability, β indicate certain confidence level, generally take 0.95.
(2) nargin quantifies, safe distance of the nargin between Flutter Boundaries and the probability distribution of flutter speed, calculating side Journey are as follows:
(3) confidence factor is solved for judging flutter margin safety, the accounting equation of confidence factor are as follows:
In QMU technology, when CR is greater than 1, it is believed that system safety, then defined Flutter Boundaries have enough nargin to cover Uncertainty can be used as the criterion of Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation.
Under conditions of the present invention is existed simultaneously suitable for stochastic uncertainty and cognition uncertainty, to guarantee Flutter Boundaries The premise of safety, design contain the probabilistic parameter of cognition.Consider that various mixing present in structure and flying condition are not true It qualitatively influences, flutter safety is assessed based on QMU technology, further the safe edge of quantization cognition uncertain parameters Boundary, and Design cognition uncertain parameters.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the advantages that:
1) uncertain quantization is carried out based on finite element software, computational efficiency is high, easy to operate.
2) QMU considers the uncertainty of flutter speed and Flutter Boundaries simultaneously, and the safety criterion as Flutter Problem can Reliability is high.
3) can intuitively quantify to recognize probabilistic influence, and it is not true to provide on the basis of guarantee system safety cognition The scope of design of qualitative parameter.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is AGARD445.6 wing figure.
Fig. 2 is the flutter speed probability distribution considered under stochastic uncertainty.
Fig. 3 is the QMU considered under stochastic uncertainty.
Fig. 4 is cognition uncertain parameters and CR relational graph.
Specific embodiment
The stochastic uncertainty of flutter speed quantifies specific implementation step
1, the finite element mould of AGARD445.6 wing structure is established using commercial finite element software Patran and Nastran Type, for the model as shown in Figure 1, air-foil is NACA 65A004, relevant parameter is as shown in table 1, and deterministic parameter is calculated Under flutter speed VF, and Flutter Boundaries V is calculated according to required safety coefficient KF', and assume that it has certain do not know Property, it is described using random distribution, the VL curve on the left of Fig. 3.
Table 1
Elastic modulus E11 Elastic modulus E22 Shearing rigidity G12 Poisson's ratio υ Density of material φ Atmospheric density ratio r
4.16×108Pa 3.151×109Pa 4.392×108Pa 0.31 381.98Kg/m3 0.3486
2, consider to compile using Monte Carlo nesting circulation 10000 times based on Matlab such as the stochastic uncertainty in table 2 Journey reads in parameter information from the * .bdf file of Nastran and is modified to parameter to introduce uncertainty, called commercial Finite element software Nastran carries out FLUTTER CALCULATION;Flutter speed is read in from destination file * .f06, every circulation primary obtains one A flutter speed finally obtains the cumulative distribution function of a flutter speed, forms the probability distribution of Fig. 2 flutter speed.
Table 2
Parameter Distribution Uncertain type
Elastic modulus E11 Normal state At random
Elastic modulus E22 Normal state At random
Shearing rigidity G12 Normal state At random
Flutter parameters design method specific implementation process based on QMU includes:
1, QMU uncertainty quantization and nargin quantization as shown in figure 3, by formula (1) (2) be calculated uncertainty and The ratio C R of nargin and confidence factor, as CR > 1, it is believed that quivering under current level of uncertainty, safety coefficient K Vibration boundary is safe.
2, it will divide equally in atmospheric density ratio and the density of material two probabilistic ranges of variables of cognition and obtain 10 points, That is, a total of 100 variable combination uncertain for cognition.For each combination, other three random parameters are considered Uncertainty under the influence of CR value.100 laggard row interpolations of CR value are being obtained, the curve of CR=1 and CR=2 are obtained, 1 < CR < 2 are within the scope of this it is considered that current design is safety and not overly conservative, as shown in figure 4, and can therefrom determine Property judge influence of the uncertain amount of two cognitions for CR value and flutter safety, and measured under the premise of flutter safety The range for changing cognition uncertain parameters, to Design cognition uncertain parameters.

Claims (1)

1. the Design Method of Flutter based on QMU, it is characterised in that the following steps are included:
1) finite element model of structure is established;
2) flutter speed of certainty condition flowering structure is calculated by commercial finite element software, and is made divided by certain safety coefficient For Flutter Boundaries;
3) the flutter distribution under the influence of stochastic uncertainty is described by probability distribution, considers relevant parameter in finite element model Uncertainty, described uncertain uncertain including stochastic uncertainty and cognition, the stochastic uncertainty includes elastic Modulus and shearing rigidity;The uncertain cognition includes density of material and atmospheric density ratio;
4) it is based on flutter speed probability distribution, quantifies the uncertain degree and nargin of flutter speed by QMU technology, and is set Factor CR is believed, as Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation;Uncertainty quantization and QMU appraisal procedure are as follows:
(1) stochastic uncertainty of flutter speed, uncertainty are indicated by probability distribution are as follows:
The flutter speed that Flutter Boundaries are obtained by deterministic parameters calculation is multiplied by obtained by certain safety coefficient K, it is assumed that there is also random Uncertainty is described by probability distribution, the accounting equation of uncertainty are as follows:
The then uncertainty calculation equation of whole system are as follows:
Wherein, V indicates to consider the flutter speed probability distribution of stochastic uncertainty, and VL indicates the flutter side multiplied by safety coefficient K The Cumulative Distribution Function on boundary, P indicate that probability, β indicate certain confidence level, take 0.95;
(2) nargin quantifies, safe distance of the nargin between Flutter Boundaries and the probability distribution of flutter speed, accounting equation Are as follows:
(3) confidence factor is solved for judging flutter margin safety, the accounting equation of confidence factor are as follows:
In QMU technology, when CR is greater than 1, it is believed that system safety, then defined Flutter Boundaries have enough nargin to cover not really Fixed degree, the criterion as Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation;
5) safe range that cognition uncertain factor is solved by confidence factor takes probabilistic two parameter regions of cognition Between, it is divided into the section of n × n, m sample calculation is carried out to stochastic uncertainty parameter in each section and interpolation obtains CR= The curve of 1 and CR=2 marks off the uncertain factor range for ensuring flutter safety and to a certain extent quantization uncertainty The influence of factor.
CN201611174664.5A 2016-12-19 2016-12-19 Design Method of Flutter based on QMU Expired - Fee Related CN106777696B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611174664.5A CN106777696B (en) 2016-12-19 2016-12-19 Design Method of Flutter based on QMU

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611174664.5A CN106777696B (en) 2016-12-19 2016-12-19 Design Method of Flutter based on QMU

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106777696A CN106777696A (en) 2017-05-31
CN106777696B true CN106777696B (en) 2019-05-17

Family

ID=58889835

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201611174664.5A Expired - Fee Related CN106777696B (en) 2016-12-19 2016-12-19 Design Method of Flutter based on QMU

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106777696B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111797468B (en) * 2020-06-17 2022-12-02 江西洪都航空工业集团有限责任公司 Method for inhibiting flutter of rear edge strip dimensional frame wallboard

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104615863A (en) * 2015-01-14 2015-05-13 南京航空航天大学 Flutter border prediction method for 3-dof wing with control plane
CN104881585A (en) * 2015-03-24 2015-09-02 南京航空航天大学 Flutter boundary prediction method of two-degree-of-freedom wing
CN104899471A (en) * 2015-06-29 2015-09-09 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 Method for predicting test-flight fault load
CN105740541A (en) * 2016-01-29 2016-07-06 厦门大学 Structural dynamical model modification-based prestress recognition method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104615863A (en) * 2015-01-14 2015-05-13 南京航空航天大学 Flutter border prediction method for 3-dof wing with control plane
CN104881585A (en) * 2015-03-24 2015-09-02 南京航空航天大学 Flutter boundary prediction method of two-degree-of-freedom wing
CN104899471A (en) * 2015-06-29 2015-09-09 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 Method for predicting test-flight fault load
CN105740541A (en) * 2016-01-29 2016-07-06 厦门大学 Structural dynamical model modification-based prestress recognition method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A QMU approach for characterizing the operability limits of air-breathing hypersonic vehicles;Gianluca Iaccarino 等;《Reliability Engineering and System Safety》;20111231;第1151-1160页
热结构不确定性动力学仿真及模型确认方法研究;张保强;《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 基础科学辑》;20140615(第6期);第A004-1页

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN106777696A (en) 2017-05-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104899380B (en) A kind of Reliability of Slope Stability Sensitivity Analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation
CN103020423B (en) The method of output of wind electric field correlation properties is obtained based on copula function
CN103548093B (en) The LOCA evaluation model of full spectrum and the method for analysis
CN103942457A (en) Water quality parameter time series prediction method based on relevance vector machine regression
CN107358347A (en) Equipment cluster health state evaluation method based on industrial big data
CN107644694B (en) A kind of nuclear power plant&#39;s large break crash analysis method
CN105956336A (en) Static and dynamic hybrid uncertainty-oriented non-probabilistic reliability optimization design method for ready-built structure
CN105740596A (en) Method and system for analyzing atmospheric neutron single event effect of aviation electronic system
CN106294076A (en) A kind of server relevant fault Forecasting Methodology and system thereof
CN103984858B (en) Method for determining fatigue safety life of airplane structure based on inspection and repairing frequency
CN103823916B (en) A kind of arbitary Lagrangian-Eularian based on multidimensional Riemann Solution
CN104699595B (en) A kind of method for testing software of software-oriented upgrading
CN106777696B (en) Design Method of Flutter based on QMU
Wang et al. Cause mechanism study to human factors in maritime accidents: Towards a complex system brittleness analysis approach
CN102375937A (en) Method for quantitatively evaluating reliability of simulation model
CN106599491B (en) Flutter margin evaluation method based on QMU
CN104578050B (en) Transient stability strongly-correlated power transmission section identification method for power grid
CN105138766A (en) Adding method based on fuzzy clustering for hypersonic velocity aerodynamic heat reduced-order model
CN104933261A (en) High efficient sequential maximin latin hypercube design method
CN106599492B (en) A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence
Goh et al. Numerical simulation of a Savonius turbine above an infinite-width forward facing step
CN102662848B (en) Bayesian software reliability checking and testing method and computer aided tool thereof
Krynytzky et al. Computational modeling of a slotted wall test section
CN105760653A (en) System safety analyzing method based on random time Petri network
CN107784015A (en) A kind of Data Reduction method based on the online historical data of power system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20190517

Termination date: 20211219