CN106599491A - QMU-based flutter margin evaluation method - Google Patents
QMU-based flutter margin evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106599491A CN106599491A CN201611174665.XA CN201611174665A CN106599491A CN 106599491 A CN106599491 A CN 106599491A CN 201611174665 A CN201611174665 A CN 201611174665A CN 106599491 A CN106599491 A CN 106599491A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- flutter
- uncertainties
- qmu
- speed
- uncertainty
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Complex Calculations (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a QMU-based flutter margin evaluation method, and relates to a quantification technology of uncertainties and margins. The flutter margin evaluation method comprises the following steps of 1) establishing a finite element model of a structure; 2) calculating a flutter speed of the structure in a certainty condition through commercial finite element software, and reserving a certain margin K as a flutter border; 3) describing flutter distribution under influence of mixed uncertainties through a probability box, and considering uncertainties of related parameters in the finite element model, wherein the uncertainties comprise accidental uncertainties and epistemic uncertainties; the accidental uncertainties comprise elasticity modulus and shearing rigidity; the epistemic uncertainties comprise the ratio of a material density to an air density; and obtaining probability box distribution of the flutter speed by adopting a Monte Carlo sampling method, wherein a result under joint effect of two kinds of uncertainties is included; and 4) based on the probability box distribution, performing quantification on uncertainties and margins of the flutter speed through the QMU technology, and obtaining a confidence factor (CF) to be taken as the flutter border safety evaluation basis.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to uncertain and allowance quantification technique, assesses more particularly, to a kind of flutter margin based on QMU
Method.
Background technology
Uncertainty is widely present in actual engineering problem, is broadly divided into two classes, and one is accidentally uncertainty, also referred to as
For stochastic uncertainty, the material load attribute parameter uncertainty such as during structure processing and manufacturing and use is more
Described using probability distribution;Two is cognitive uncertain, is the uncertainty produced because knowledge is limited, more using interval point
Cloth is described.For the simultaneous situation of two kinds of uncertainties can be quantified using probability box.Flutter is dynamic aeroelastic
The most noticeable problem in stability study field.It is breakneck that aircraft occurs flutter, when flying speed is faced more than flutter
During boundary's speed, amplitude swashs sharp increase and adds, it might even be possible to quick to destroy an airplane.Aircraft does not allow to send out in flight envelope
Any type of flutter of life, therefore it is most important to determine suitable Flutter Boundaries how to quantify all kinds of uncertainties.It is beautiful at present
The military of state takes 15% nargin as Flutter Boundaries, and this standard is continued to use from modern from nineteen sixty, and in recent years aircraft mobility will
Ask and increasingly improve, this standard is unfavorable for the improvement in aircraft operation performance, thus how to obtain in safe and reliable premise
Under relax Flutter Boundaries and receive more and more attention.
QMU (quantification of margins and uncertainties, it is uncertain to quantify skill with allowance
Art) for calendar year 2001 USDOE subordinate National Nuclear Security Administration joint Los Alamos, Lao Lunsi Lawrence Livermores
New method (Pilch M, Trucano T G, the Helton J C.Ideas that three power laboratory sub- with the Holy Land proposes
underlying quantification of margins and uncertainties(QMU):a white paper[J]
.Unlimited Release SAND2006-5001,Sandia National Laboratory,Albuquerque,New
Mexico,2006,87185:2.), it is used to assess the reliability and safety of stock's nuclear weapon in the case of experimental data deficiency
Property.QMU methods normally operate to research object with product, based on physics model of failure and margin design, it is believed that to make be
System reaches required performance, it is necessary to be that system reserves enough design margins, to guarantee to be for known potential failure mode
System is definitely reliable, but when performance margin M is calculated, can be affected by various random and cognitive uncertain factors,
Once these uncertain integrated values are more than performance margin M, product may produce trouble or failure.Confidence is adopted in QMU
The ratio of factor CR, i.e. performance margin M and not true foot U characterizing this relation between performance margin and uncertainty, when
CR>When 1, it is believed that system is safe.The method can be used as under condition of uncertainty, the peace of flight structure flutter margin
Full property assessment, as the theoretical foundation for relaxing flutter margin border.
The content of the invention
The invention aims to overcome deficiencies of the prior art, there is provided a kind of flutter based on QMU is abundant
Degree appraisal procedure.
The present invention is comprised the following steps:
1) FEM model of structure is set up;
2) flutter speed of structure under the conditions of certainty is calculated by commercial finite element software, and leaves certain nargin K
As Flutter Boundaries;
3) the flutter distribution under the influence of Hybrid parameter matrix is described by probability box, it is considered to relevant parameter in FEM model
Uncertainty, it is described it is uncertain include that accidentally uncertain and cognition is uncertain, it is described accidental uncertain to include bullet
Property modulus and shearing rigidity;The cognitive uncertainty includes density of material and atmospheric density ratio;Using Monte Carlo sampling side
Method obtains the probability box distribution of flutter speed, wherein comprising the result under two kinds of uncertain collective effects;
4) it is distributed based on probability box, the uncertain degree and allowance of flutter speed is quantified by QMU technologies, and obtains confidence
Factor CR, as Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation.
In step 4) in, it is described based on probability box be distributed, by QMU technologies quantify flutter speed uncertain degree with it is abundant
Amount, and confidence factor CR is obtained, it is as follows as the concrete grammar of Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation:
(1) uncertainty quantifies:
The Hybrid parameter matrix of flutter speed is represented by probability box, its uncertainty is:
Flutter Boundaries are multiplied by certain safety coefficient by the flutter speed that deterministic parameters calculation is obtained, and (safety coefficient is according to nargin
K takes) gained, it is assumed that it there is also uncertainty, and the accounting equation of its uncertainty is:
Then the uncertainty calculation equation of whole system is:
Wherein, VrightRepresent the right margin in the distribution of flutter speed probability box, VleftRepresent the distribution of flutter speed probability box
In left margin, VL represents the Cumulative Distribution Function of Flutter Boundaries.P represents probability, and β represents certain confidence level, typically takes
0.95.
(2) quantization of allowance:Allowance is the safe distance between Flutter Boundaries and the probability box distribution of flutter speed, and it is counted
Calculating equation is:
(3) solving confidence factor is used to judge flutter margin security that the accounting equation of confidence factor to be:
In QMU technologies, when CR is more than 1, it is believed that system safety, then defined Flutter Boundaries have enough nargin to cover
Uncertainty, can be used as the criterion of Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation.
The impact of various Hybrid parameter matrix present in structure and flying condition is considered, based on QMU technologies, there is provided a kind of
Flutter margin security assessment method, further to relax Flutter Boundaries, improves the flying quality of flight structure.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the advantages that:
1) uncertain quantization is carried out based on finite element software, computational efficiency is high, easy to operate.
2) probability cassette method can simultaneously consider two kinds of uncertainties present in engineering, provide simple and clear quantization
As a result.
3) QMU considers the uncertainty of flutter speed and Flutter Boundaries simultaneously, with a high credibility, it is contemplated that Flutter Problem it is tight
Principal characteristic, the method is more insured as the security criterion for relaxing Flutter Boundaries.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is AGARD445.6 wing figures.
Fig. 2 is to consider the flutter speed probability box distribution under Hybrid parameter matrix.
Fig. 3 is to consider the QMU under Hybrid parameter matrix.
Specific embodiment
Hybrid parameter matrix based on probability box quantifies specific implementation step to be included:
1st, the finite element mould of AGARD445.6 wing structures is set up using commercialization finite element software Patran and Nastran
Type, the model is as shown in figure 1, wing wing root chord length 558.8mm, wing tip chord length 368.3mm, the long 762mm of the span, a quarter
String of a musical instrument wing setting is 45 degree, is NACA 65A004 along aerofoil profile is flowed to, and relevant parameter as shown in table 1, is calculated certainty
Flutter speed V under parameterF, and nargin K according to required checking is calculated Flutter Boundaries VF’。
Table 1
Elastic modulus E11 | Elastic modulus E22 | Shearing rigidity G12 | Poisson's ratio υ | Density of material φ | Atmospheric density compares r |
4.16×108Pa | 3.151×109Pa | 4.392×108Pa | 0.31 | 381.98Kg/m3 | 0.3486 |
2nd, consider the uncertainty such as table 2, sampled using the nested circulation 100 × 1000 in Monte Carlo, outer layer is recognized for 100 times
Know uncertainty, internal layer is sampled to stochastic uncertainty 1000 times, programmed based on Matlab, from the * .bdf files of Nastran
Read in parameter information and parameter is modified to introduce uncertainty, call commercial finite element software Nastran to carry out flutter
Calculate;Flutter speed is read in from destination file * .f06, internal layer obtains a flutter speed per circulation primary, and outer layer is often circulated
The cumulative distribution function of a flutter speed is once obtained, 100 Cumulative Distribution Functions are finally obtained, Fig. 2 flutter speeds are constituted
Probability box distribution.
Table 2
Parameter | Distribution | Uncertain type |
Elastic modulus E11 | Normal state | At random |
Elastic modulus E22 | Normal state | At random |
Shearing rigidity G12 | Normal state | At random |
Atmospheric density compares r | It is interval | It is cognitive |
Density of material φ | It is interval | It is cognitive |
Included based on the flutter margin appraisal procedure specific implementation process of QMU:
1st, assume that Flutter Boundaries there is also certain uncertainty, described using random distribution, such as the VL of Fig. 3 leftmost sides is bent
Line.
2nd, QMU uncertainty quantify and allowance quantify as shown in figure 3, by formula (1) (2) be calculated uncertainty with
Allowance, and ratio C R of confidence factor, work as CR>When 1, it is believed that in current level of uncertainty, take the Flutter Boundaries under nargin K
It is safe.
Claims (2)
1. a kind of flutter margin appraisal procedure based on QMU, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
1) FEM model of structure is set up;
2) flutter speed of structure under the conditions of certainty is calculated by commercial finite element software, and leaves certain nargin K conduct
Flutter Boundaries;
3) the flutter distribution under the influence of Hybrid parameter matrix is described by probability box, it is considered to which relevant parameter is not in FEM model
Certainty, described uncertain uncertain including accidentally uncertain and cognition, the accidental uncertainty includes springform
Amount and shearing rigidity;The cognitive uncertainty includes density of material and atmospheric density ratio;Obtained using the Monte Carlo methods of sampling
Probability box to flutter speed is distributed, wherein comprising the result under two kinds of uncertain collective effects;
4) it is distributed based on probability box, the uncertain degree and allowance of flutter speed is quantified by QMU technologies, and obtains confidence factor
CR, as Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation.
2. as claimed in claim 1 a kind of flutter margin appraisal procedure based on QMU, it is characterised in that in step 4) in, it is described
It is distributed based on probability box, the uncertain degree and allowance of flutter speed is quantified by QMU technologies, and obtain confidence factor CR, is made
Concrete grammar for Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation foundation is as follows:
(1) uncertainty quantifies:
The Hybrid parameter matrix of flutter speed is represented by probability box, its uncertainty is:
Flutter Boundaries are multiplied by certain safety coefficient by the flutter speed that deterministic parameters calculation is obtained (safety coefficient takes according to nargin K)
Gained, it is assumed that it there is also uncertainty, the accounting equation of its uncertainty is:
Then the uncertainty calculation equation of whole system is:
Wherein, VrightRepresent the right margin in the distribution of flutter speed probability box, VleftIn representing the distribution of flutter speed probability box
Left margin, VL represents the Cumulative Distribution Function of Flutter Boundaries;P represents probability, and β represents certain confidence level, typically takes 0.95.
(2) quantization of allowance:Allowance is the safe distance between the probability box distribution of Flutter Boundaries and flutter speed, its calculating side
Cheng Wei:
(3) solving confidence factor is used to judge flutter margin security that the accounting equation of confidence factor to be:
In QMU technologies, when CR is more than 1, it is believed that system safety, then to have enough nargin to cover not true for defined Flutter Boundaries
Fixed degree, can be used as the criterion of Flutter Boundaries safety evaluation.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611174665.XA CN106599491B (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2016-12-19 | Flutter margin evaluation method based on QMU |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611174665.XA CN106599491B (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2016-12-19 | Flutter margin evaluation method based on QMU |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106599491A true CN106599491A (en) | 2017-04-26 |
CN106599491B CN106599491B (en) | 2020-05-15 |
Family
ID=58601332
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611174665.XA Expired - Fee Related CN106599491B (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2016-12-19 | Flutter margin evaluation method based on QMU |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106599491B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107239621A (en) * | 2017-06-06 | 2017-10-10 | 厦门大学 | A kind of critical rotor speed analysis method based on probability box framework |
CN108427846A (en) * | 2018-03-16 | 2018-08-21 | 厦门大学 | A kind of multiple response model validation measure based on probability box framework |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102364477A (en) * | 2011-09-22 | 2012-02-29 | 西北工业大学 | Aircraft flutter characteristic analysis method with no additional aerodynamic damping |
CN104615863A (en) * | 2015-01-14 | 2015-05-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | Flutter border prediction method for 3-dof wing with control plane |
CN105843073A (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2016-08-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing wing structure aero-elasticity stability based on aerodynamic force uncertain order reduction |
-
2016
- 2016-12-19 CN CN201611174665.XA patent/CN106599491B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102364477A (en) * | 2011-09-22 | 2012-02-29 | 西北工业大学 | Aircraft flutter characteristic analysis method with no additional aerodynamic damping |
CN104615863A (en) * | 2015-01-14 | 2015-05-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | Flutter border prediction method for 3-dof wing with control plane |
CN105843073A (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2016-08-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing wing structure aero-elasticity stability based on aerodynamic force uncertain order reduction |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
张保强: "热结构不确定性动力学仿真及模型确认方法研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库基础科学辑》 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107239621A (en) * | 2017-06-06 | 2017-10-10 | 厦门大学 | A kind of critical rotor speed analysis method based on probability box framework |
CN107239621B (en) * | 2017-06-06 | 2019-07-02 | 厦门大学 | A kind of critical rotor speed analysis method based on probability box framework |
CN108427846A (en) * | 2018-03-16 | 2018-08-21 | 厦门大学 | A kind of multiple response model validation measure based on probability box framework |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106599491B (en) | 2020-05-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Levy et al. | Summary of data from the fifth AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop | |
Levy et al. | Summary of data from the first AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop | |
Vassberg et al. | Abridged summary of the third AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop | |
Levy et al. | Data summary from the first AIAA computational fluid dynamics drag prediction workshop | |
CN105115692A (en) | Pneumatic prediction method with combination of CFD numerical simulation and wind tunnel test | |
CN103020423A (en) | Copula-function-based method for acquiring relevant characteristic of wind power plant capacity | |
CN106599491A (en) | QMU-based flutter margin evaluation method | |
CN103984858B (en) | Method for determining fatigue safety life of airplane structure based on inspection and repairing frequency | |
Seo et al. | Performance improvement of airfoils for wind blade with the groove | |
CN105956336A (en) | Static and dynamic hybrid uncertainty-oriented non-probabilistic reliability optimization design method for ready-built structure | |
CN103246803B (en) | A kind of significance test method of rolling bearing performance variation process | |
CN109242316A (en) | Hydraulic system energy efficiency evaluating method based on Fuzzy AHP | |
Sclafani et al. | Extended OVERFLOW analysis of the NASA trap wing wind tunnel model | |
CN106777696A (en) | Design Method of Flutter based on QMU | |
CN105138766A (en) | Adding method based on fuzzy clustering for hypersonic velocity aerodynamic heat reduced-order model | |
CN106599492B (en) | A kind of the aircraft flutter analysis and its QMU appraisal procedure of logic-based recurrence | |
CN104933261A (en) | High efficient sequential maximin latin hypercube design method | |
Chaffin et al. | Unstructured navier-stokes high-lift computations on a trapezoidal wing | |
CN104679633B (en) | Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process | |
CN106447238A (en) | Assessment method for adapting in-depth peak load regulation needs of wind power integration | |
Jones et al. | A qualitative study on the effects of mesh guideline modification for unstructured mesh generation of the NASA high lift common research model (HL-CRM) | |
CN104899471B (en) | One kind is taken a flight test failure load method for predicting | |
Anemaat et al. | Comparison of aerodynamic analysis tools for rotorcraft in hover | |
Kumada et al. | Improvement in prediction capability of Transonic Buffet on NASA-CRM Using URANS | |
Hirato | Leading-Edge-Vortex Formation on Finite Wings in Unsteady Flow. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20200515 Termination date: 20211219 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |