CN104679633B - Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process - Google Patents
Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104679633B CN104679633B CN201510082016.6A CN201510082016A CN104679633B CN 104679633 B CN104679633 B CN 104679633B CN 201510082016 A CN201510082016 A CN 201510082016A CN 104679633 B CN104679633 B CN 104679633B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- activity
- test activity
- resource
- directed acyclic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to an effectiveness evaluation method of a multi-aircraft parallel test process. The method comprises the steps of converting the multi-aircraft parallel test process into an aircraft test activity set, acquiring a consumption time, ending time constraint and occupied resource set of each test activity, creating a directed acyclic graph by adopting each test activity as a node and the consumption time of each test activity as an edge, acquiring a preset test activity set of each test activity according to the directed acyclic graph, and then calculating the test efficiency, the test activity coverage rate and the utilization rate of each resource; and finally calculating a process evaluation index and judging the test process according to the test efficiency, the test activity coverage rate and the gross resource utilization rate. Compared with the prior art, the method is indicative for quantitatively evaluating the index, the evidence for comparing the multi-aircraft parallel test process can be provided, an orientation can be provided for continuously optimizing the subsequent test process, and the multi-aircraft parallel test process efficiency can be integrally improved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Space Vehicle System level integration test process evaluation, particularly a kind of many spacecraft parallel test processes
Efficiency evaluation method.
Background technology
Space Vehicle System level integration test be spacecraft and experimental stage carry out on tested spacecraft electrically
The comprehensive verification of functions of the equipments and performance, including test a series of engineerings such as design, test preparation, test implementation and test summary
Activity, is to ensure that the key link of spacecraft mass.Test period is general longer, and process management is extremely complex.All the time, pass
The spacecraft integration test field of system lacks effective quantizing process evaluation method, when spacecraft parallel test task is few,
It is unobvious for the demand of single spacecraft-testing process and optimizing resource allocation, judge to can be carried out decision-making by intuition,
It is also not urgent to the quantitatively evaluating demand of test process.
With sharply increasing for space launch mission, under many spacecraft parallel test patterns, test site, personnel, equipment
Pool Deng test resource is allocated, and the requirement of time-constrain exacerbates the difficulty of test process management, therefore just urgent need one kind can
In many spacecraft parallel test process efficiency evaluation methods for quantifying, instruct many spacecraft parallel test processes Continuous optimization and
Resource distribution is planned as a whole, and provides data for science decision and supports.
The content of the invention
Present invention solves the technical problem that being:Spacecraft system level synthesis field tests in prior art are overcome to lack effective
Quantizing process evaluation method deficiency, there is provided one kind meets science decision to many spacecraft parallel test course quantization efficiency
The efficiency evaluation method of many spacecraft parallel test processes of the requirement of evaluation.
The present invention technical solution be:A kind of efficiency evaluation method of many spacecraft parallel test processes, including such as
Lower step:
(1) many spacecraft parallel test processes are changed into into spacecraft-testing active set, and are designated as { P }, each test
Activity is designated as pi, wherein, i=1,2,3,, n, n are the number of the test activity of spacecraft;Described test activity is included to boat
The checking engineering activity of its device function, performance indications;
(2) each test activity p is obtainediElapsed time ti, the end time constraint FiAnd resource collection { the R for takingi,
Then with each test activity piFor node, with each test activity piElapsed time tiDirected acyclic graph, and root are constructed for side
Test activity p is set up according to the sequencing of test activityiTesting advanced active set { Bi};Described testing advanced active set
Close { BiIt is the sensing test activity p in directed acyclic graphiAnd be test activity piThe test activity set of upper level;
(3) find in directed acyclic graph after longest path using the test activity p on longest pathjSet { L } is constituted,
The testing efficiency for calculating many spacecraft parallel test processes is
Wherein j is for positive integer and less than n;
(4) test activity p is calculatediEnd time be
Ti={ Tk|pk∈{Bi}}max+ti,
Then calculating test activity coverage rate is
Wherein, k is for positive integer and less than n, the testing advanced active set of the test activity started at first in directed acyclic graph
Close { BiIt is empty set, | { pi|Ti≤Fi| constrain F less than the end time for the end time in test activity set { P }iTest live
Dynamic number;
(5) according to each test activity piResource collection { the R of occupancyiObtain resource total collection { R }, using resource rf's
Test activity setCalculate each resource rfUtilization rateFor
Obtaining total resources utilization rate is
Wherein, rfFor f-th resource in resource total collection { R }, f=1,2,3,, m, m are resource in resource total collection { R }
Number, e is positive integer and less than n;
(6) according to testing efficiency, test activity coverage rate and total resources utilization rate calculating process evaluation number E and judge,
If between value threshold value, test process passes through process evaluation index E, otherwise test process does not pass through;Wherein, process is commented
Valency index be E=α G+ β C+ γ U, alpha+beta+γ=1.
Described value threshold value is [70%, 100%].
Present invention advantage compared with prior art is
(1) the inventive method is compared with the test process evaluation that current subjectivity is carried out, it is proposed that the parallel survey of objective quantification
Examination process evaluation method, can solve the problem that current space mission quantity carries out objective amount under increasing sharply to many spacecraft parallel test processes
Change an urgent demand evaluated;
(2) present invention is compared with prior art, it is proposed that quantitatively evaluating index have indicative, can be many spacecrafts
Concurrent testing process compares offer foundation, and for follow-up test process Continuous optimization direction is provided, and it is parallel that entirety lifts many spacecrafts
Test process efficiency;
(3) present invention compared with prior art, can provide index, for lifting for the resource distribution of space flight enterprises and institutions
Space flight enterprises and institutions resource distribution benefit is significant.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the directed acyclic graph of many spacecraft parallel test processes in the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a kind of efficiency evaluation method flow diagram of many spacecraft parallel test processes of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
The present invention proposes a kind of efficiency evaluation method of many spacecraft parallel test processes, mainly by the test of spacecraft
Process model building, quantizating index are calculated and evaluation number synthesizes three key links and completes, and wherein test process modeling is to set up many
The mathematical description of spacecraft parallel test process, it is by campaign definitions in test process and constrained attributes, many spacecrafts are parallel
Test process formalized description is a directed acyclic graph, as shown in figure 1, calculate for subsequent quantizatiion index laying the foundation, is quantified
Index is calculated based on describing the directed acyclic graph of many spacecraft parallel test processes, calculates many spacecraft parallel test processes
Testing efficiency, test coverage and resource utilization, evaluation number synthesis is by test coverage, resource utilization and test
Efficiency is normalized calculating, carries out testing after the good and bad index of many spacecraft parallel test processes of one visual representations of formation
Journey judges.
A kind of efficiency evaluation method flow diagram of many spacecraft parallel test processes of the present invention is illustrated in figure 2, is tied below
The present invention will be further described to close Fig. 2, and it is as follows that the inventive method implements step:
(1) test process activity recognition:Space Vehicle System level integration test process is to spacecraft function, property by a series of
The checking engineering activity of energy index is constituted, to each test activity p during many spacecraft parallel testsiIt is identified, structure
Into test activity set { P }, wherein, i=1,2,3,, n, n is the number of the test activity of spacecraft, and test activity includes right
The checking engineering activity of spacecraft function, performance indications.
(2) test activity Attribute Recognition:Recognize and define each movable piAttribute, including the resource that test activity is occupied
Set { Ri, the elapsed time t of test activityi, the end time constraint F of test activityi。
(3) directed acyclic graph construction:As shown in figure 1, adding " beginning " and " end " activity in test activity set, make
For the beginning and end " node " of whole directed acyclic graph, each " node " is during many spacecraft parallel tests in remaining figure
Test activity, " node " " side " in front represent test activity elapsed time ti, the movable elapsed time on " beginning " summit is
0, i.e., with each test activity piFor node, with each test activity piElapsed time tiDirected acyclic graph, and root are constructed for side
Test activity p is set up according to the sequencing of test activityiTesting advanced active set { Bi, testing advanced active set { Bi}
It is the sensing test activity p in directed acyclic graphiAnd be test activity piThe test activity set of upper level.
(4) testing efficiency is calculated:Using longest path finding algorithm in graph theory, one can be found in directed acyclic graph
Longest path, the set that node is constituted on path is designated as { L }, then the time that whole many spacecraft parallel test processes are consumed is for most
Each movable time consuming summation on long path, the testing efficiency G of many spacecraft parallel test processes can be as follows
Calculate:
Wherein j can be seen that the time that whole test process is consumed is fewer, testing efficiency for positive integer and less than n by above formula
It is higher.
(5) test coverage is calculated:Movable piEnd time TiCan calculate in the following way:
Ti={ Tk|pk∈{Bi}}max+ti ②
For each movable pi, have the end time to constrain FiIf, activity end time Ti≤Fi, then activity is timely completed.
Test coverage C just refers to that the test activity quantity being timely completed in test process accounts for the percentage of total activity quantity,
Wherein, k is for positive integer and less than n, the testing advanced active set of the test activity started at first in directed acyclic graph
Close { BiIt is empty set, | { pi|Ti≤Fi| for activity end time T in test activity set { P }iLess than or equal to end time constraint
FiTest activity number.
(6) resource utilization is calculated:According to each test activity piResource collection { the R of occupancyiCarry out deduplication and obtain institute
Some resources rf, and then resource total collection { R } is obtained, while according to each test activity piResource collection { the R of occupancyiObtain
Each resource rfCorresponding test activity, and then it is obtained by each resource rfTest activity setCalculate each money
Source rfUtilization rateFor
Obtaining total resources utilization rate is
Wherein, rfFor f-th resource in resource total collection { R }, f=1,2,3,, m, m are resource in resource total collection { R }
Number, e is positive integer and less than n.
(7) evaluation number synthesis:Can by the computing formula of testing efficiency, three indexs of test coverage and resource utilization
To find out, three index values are higher, and test process is more excellent, and total process evaluation index E can synthesize according to equation below,
E=α G+ β C+ γ U alpha+betas+γ=1 is 6.
Judge total process evaluation index E, if 100% >=E >=70%, test process passes through, otherwise test process
Do not pass through and retest, so far the quantization efficiency evaluation index of many spacecraft parallel test processes is calculated and completed.
The content not being described in detail in description of the invention belongs to the known technology of those skilled in the art.
Claims (2)
1. a kind of efficiency evaluation method of many spacecraft parallel test processes, it is characterised in that comprise the steps:
(1) many spacecraft parallel test processes are changed into into spacecraft-testing active set, and are designated as { P }, each test activity
It is designated as pi, wherein, i=1,2,3 ..., n, n are the number of the test activity of spacecraft;Described test activity is included to space flight
The checking engineering activity of device function, performance indications;
(2) each test activity p is obtainediElapsed time ti, the end time constraint FiAnd resource collection { the R for takingi, then with
Each test activity piFor node, with each test activity piElapsed time tiDirected acyclic graph is constructed for side, and according to test
The sequencing of activity sets up test activity piTesting advanced active set { Bi};Described testing advanced active set { Bi}
It is the sensing test activity p in directed acyclic graphiAnd be test activity piThe test activity set of upper level;
(3) find in directed acyclic graph after longest path using the test activity p on longest pathjSet { L } is constituted, is calculated
The testing efficiency of many spacecraft parallel test processes is
Wherein, j is for positive integer and less than n;Described ∑ tiFor each test activity piCorresponding elapsed time tiSum;It is described
'sEach test activity p in gather { L }jCorresponding elapsed time tjSum;
(4) test activity p is calculatediEnd time be
Ti={ Tk|pk∈{Bi}}max+ti,
Then calculating test activity coverage rate is
Wherein, k is for positive integer and less than n, the testing advanced active set { B of the test activity started at first in directed acyclic graphi}
For empty set, | { pi|Ti≤Fi| constrain F less than the end time for the end time in test activity set { P }iTest activity
Number;
(5) according to each test activity piResource collection { the R of occupancyiObtain resource total collection { R }, using resource rfTest
Active set { Prf, calculate each resource rfUtilization rate UrfFor
Obtaining total resources utilization rate is
Wherein, rfFor f-th resource in resource total collection { R }, f=1,2,3 ..., m, m are the individual of resource in resource total collection { R }
Number, e is positive integer and less than n,For test activity setIn each test activity peCorresponding elapsed time te's
With,For each resource r in resource total collection { R }fCorresponding utilization rateSum;
(6) according to testing efficiency, test activity coverage rate and total resources utilization rate calculating process evaluation number E and judge, if
Between value threshold value, then test process passes through process evaluation index E, and otherwise test process does not pass through;Wherein, process evaluation refers to
It is E=α G+ β C+ γ U to count, alpha+beta+γ=1.
2. the efficiency evaluation method of a kind of many spacecraft parallel test processes according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:Institute
The value threshold value stated is [70%, 100%].
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510082016.6A CN104679633B (en) | 2015-02-15 | 2015-02-15 | Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510082016.6A CN104679633B (en) | 2015-02-15 | 2015-02-15 | Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104679633A CN104679633A (en) | 2015-06-03 |
CN104679633B true CN104679633B (en) | 2017-05-03 |
Family
ID=53314719
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510082016.6A Active CN104679633B (en) | 2015-02-15 | 2015-02-15 | Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104679633B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110968507B (en) * | 2019-11-20 | 2023-07-25 | 北京创鑫旅程网络技术有限公司 | Coverage rate statistics method and coverage rate statistics device |
CN112257909B (en) * | 2020-09-30 | 2024-05-07 | 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 | Multi-layer architecture scheduling method for rapid testing of batched satellites |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104239213B (en) * | 2014-09-29 | 2017-04-12 | 北京航空航天大学 | Two-stage scheduling method of parallel test tasks facing spacecraft automation test |
-
2015
- 2015-02-15 CN CN201510082016.6A patent/CN104679633B/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
The study of spacecraft parallel testing;Zhongwenli等;《Telecommunication Systems》;20130621;第53卷(第1期);第69-76页 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104679633A (en) | 2015-06-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11544522B2 (en) | Methods, systems, and computer readable mediums for determining a system state of a power system using a convolutional neural network | |
CN103293014B (en) | Bridge fatigue damage state and residual life evaluating method | |
Cui et al. | Estimating ramping requirements with solar-friendly flexible ramping product in multi-timescale power system operations | |
CN108375808A (en) | Dense fog forecasting procedures of the NRIET based on machine learning | |
CN102902882A (en) | Method for evaluating operation quality of information systems | |
CN104123680A (en) | Post-evaluation method for comprehensively evaluating power grid science and technology projects | |
CN106548272A (en) | A kind of electric automobile fills the evaluation methodology of facility combination property soon | |
CN104700222A (en) | Nuclear power plant large break accident uncertainty analysis method | |
CN106228403A (en) | A kind of user based on step analysis algorithm is worth methods of marking and system | |
CN106096847A (en) | A kind of fuzzy change weighs Engineering-geological environmental quality method | |
CN103018063A (en) | Bridge random fatigue life prediction method based on Mittag-Leffler distribution | |
CN105046453A (en) | Construction engineering project cluster establishment method introducing cloud model for evaluation and selection | |
CN104679633B (en) | Effectiveness evaluation method of multi-aircraft parallel test process | |
Jiang et al. | Transportation system evaluation model based on DEA | |
CN104898039B (en) | Fault mode method for optimizing based on probability of failure propagation model | |
CN104218571A (en) | Running state evaluation method for wind power generation equipment | |
Turan et al. | Simulation-based analysis of military workforce planning strategies | |
CN101807227A (en) | Method for calculating damage effect of target of conventional facility | |
CN106296023A (en) | Uranium tailings pond Environmental Improvement of Decommissioning effect evaluation methods based on three scales analytic hierarchy process | |
CN105184496A (en) | Integrated evaluation method of health index of mine ventilation system | |
Heairet et al. | Beyond life cycle analysis: Using an agent-based approach to model the emerging bio-energy industry | |
Nutkiewicz et al. | Exploring the integration of simulation and deep learning models for urban building energy modeling and retrofit analysis | |
CN107730121A (en) | The technological transformation overhaul state monitoring method and system of power equipment | |
Liu et al. | Improved design of risk assessment model for PPP project under the development of marine architecture | |
Babaev et al. | Improving the processes of cost management in the construction and energy projects |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |