CN105184306A - Power transmission tower material actual strength calculation method enabling evaluation indexes to reflect evaluation results - Google Patents
Power transmission tower material actual strength calculation method enabling evaluation indexes to reflect evaluation results Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105184306A CN105184306A CN201510422850.5A CN201510422850A CN105184306A CN 105184306 A CN105184306 A CN 105184306A CN 201510422850 A CN201510422850 A CN 201510422850A CN 105184306 A CN105184306 A CN 105184306A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- tower material
- actual strength
- factor
- tower
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 42
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 10
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000007418 data mining Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 241001269238 Data Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000011478 gradient descent method Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000017105 transposition Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010429 evolutionary process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001343 mnemonic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007794 visualization technique Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F18/00—Pattern recognition
- G06F18/20—Analysing
- G06F18/24—Classification techniques
- G06F18/241—Classification techniques relating to the classification model, e.g. parametric or non-parametric approaches
- G06F18/2413—Classification techniques relating to the classification model, e.g. parametric or non-parametric approaches based on distances to training or reference patterns
- G06F18/24133—Distances to prototypes
- G06F18/24143—Distances to neighbourhood prototypes, e.g. restricted Coulomb energy networks [RCEN]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2455—Query execution
- G06F16/24564—Applying rules; Deductive queries
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2458—Special types of queries, e.g. statistical queries, fuzzy queries or distributed queries
- G06F16/2465—Query processing support for facilitating data mining operations in structured databases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Fuzzy Systems (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a power transmission tower material actual strength calculation method enabling evaluation indexes to reflect evaluation results. The method includes the following steps that: the rough set theory is adopted to perform reduction on tower strength affecting factors; useful data are mined from a large quantity of historical data through adopting a data mining method and are adopted to construct a learning set; and a gradient descent method is adopted to continuously perform iterative learning according to the learning set, so that a factor weight set can be determined, and the obtained weights are adopted comprehensively evaluate and calculate the degradation rate of the actual strength of a tower material. With the method adopted, typical problems such as uncertainty and nonlinearity which bring about unclear validity and affect tower material strength factors in an evolution process can be solved, and an important scientific criterion can be provided for structural safety evaluation of a power transmission tower.
Description
The application is the divisional application of application number 201410424393.9, applying date 2014.8.26, title " a kind of transmission tower tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining ".
Technical field
The present invention relates to electric power pylon safety appraisement of structure field, be specially adapted to the transmission tower safety appraisement of structure of long-time running under Complex Natural Environment.
Background technology
The essence of line construction safety is a uncertainty, nonlinear state space evolutionary process, shape State evolution (transfer) process has randomness, the characteristic information wherein characterizing shaft tower tower material actual machine intensity has inexactness, the effect validity of influence factor is also unintelligible, definition and the extension of running status have ambiguity, the expertise of state-evaluation has incompleteness, so be a complicated uncertain problem to the evaluation of circuit tower material intensity with calculating.
Data mining can disclose implicit, previously unknown and have the non-trivial process of the information of potential value from the mass data of database.Data mining is a kind of decision support processes, it is mainly based on artificial intelligence, machine learning, pattern-recognition, statistics, database, visualization technique etc., analyze data increasingly automatedly, make the reasoning of inductive, therefrom excavate potential pattern, aid decision making person's adjustable strategies, reduces risks, and makes correct decision-making.
Because the factor affecting tower material intensity is a lot, and traditional evaluation method needs to calculate whole evaluation index, so calculate more complicated, and the serious distortion phenomenon that may cause because each factor weight is little or multi-peak phenomenon.The present invention proposes one and first carries out yojan based on rough set theory to index set, adopts the method for data mining to carry out the method for tower material actual strength calculating after yojan.Institute's extracting method effectively can solve the transmission tower safety appraisement of structure problem of long-time running under Complex Natural Environment.
Summary of the invention
The object of the invention is to: propose a kind of transmission tower tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining, can be assessment electric power line tower structure and necessary criterion is provided safely.
Step 1: index set yojan;
Step 2: the structure of data mining study collection;
Step 3: set of factors weight is determined;
Step 4: actual strength is assessed.
Index set yojan in described step 1, mainly to the index set by meteorologic district condition, sub-strength damage, the stress of conductor and mechanical vibration three major types factors composition, three class influence factor set representations are U={U
1, U
2, U
3.Wherein: U
1={ u
11, u
12, u
13, u
14, u
15, u
11for wind speed (most strong wind), u
12for atmospheric temperature (lowest temperature), u
13for average temperature of the whole year, u
14for ice covering thickness (the thickest icing), u
15for number of days in thunderstorm day in year.U
2={ u
21, u
22, u
23, u
24, u
25, u
26, u
21for working time, u
22for bending reparation number of times, u
23for slight crack repairs number of times, u
24for thunder and lightning or fault current damage number of times, u
25to attach most importance to icing times of fatigue, u
26for on average running stress/maximum operation stress.U
3={ u
31, u
32, u
33, u
34, u
31for wire division number, u
32for wind direction and circuit angle, u
33for ground surface degree of roughness, u
34for steel corrosion amount.Use rough set to carry out index set yojan, Attribute Significance is defined as:
U/R={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
11})={{1,3,5,7,8},{2,4}}
U/(R-{u
12})={{1,2,4,5,7},{3,6,8}}
U/(R-{u
13})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
14})={{1,5,7},{2,4},{3,6,8}}
U/(R-{u
15})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
13,u
15})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/R≠U/(R-{u
11})
U/R≠U/(R-{u
12})
U/R≠U/(R-{u
14})
U/R=U/(R-{u
13})=U/(R-{u
15})=U/(R-{u
13,u
15})
Wherein R is the set of the property value of factor.Known index u is calculated through Attribute Significance yojan
13, u
15be redundancy, in like manner, carry out Attribute Significance yojan to sub-strength damage factor and conductor galloping and aeolian vibration factor respectively, obtaining final evaluation index is: U={U
1, U
2, U
3, wherein U
1={ u
11, u
12, u
14, U
2={ u
21, u
22, u
23, u
24, u
25, U
3={ u
31, u
32, u
33, u
34.
The structure of the data mining study collection in described step 2, adopt K-VNN search strategy, in system existing N group data, find the most similar data (k<<N) of k group, the actual strength degradation ratio of the shaft tower tower material that the present invention proposes and influence factor collection U present nonlinear relationship:
η=f(U)+ε(t)
Wherein, η is degradation ratio, the white noise that ε (t) is zero-mean, and f () is unknown nonlinear function.For the data that there is N group influence factor and degradation ratio
in current t, there is influence factor information U (t), adopt K-VNN search strategy, in system existing N group data, find the most similar data (k<<N) of k group, specific as follows:
1, as cos β (U (i), U (t)) <0, then think that this U (i) deviates from current input U (t), be unfavorable for modeling, abandon this data;
2 otherwise, with the index core of U (i) and U (t) and included angle cosine weighting sum selection criterion, namely
D(U(i),U(t))=α·e
-d(U(i),U(t))+(1-α)·cosβ(U(i),U(t))
In formula:
α is weighting factor.Weighting selection criterion D (U (i), U (t)) directly reflects the similarity of U (i) and U (t).If two information vectors the closer to, then d is less, and cos β is also larger, thus D (U (i), U (t)) is also larger.Like this, in existing data message, the k group data selecting D () value maximum, by descending sort, learning of structure collection:
{(U(1),η(1)),…,(U(k),η(k))}
D(U(1),U(t))>…>D(U(k),U(t)).
Set of factors weight in described step 3 is determined to obtain the influence degree of certain factor to shaft tower tower material actual strength degradation ratio, by probabilistic factor sharpening, actual strength degradation ratio and the influence factor collection U local linear relation of the shaft tower tower material of the present invention's proposition are as follows:
η=f
θ(U)=U
Tθ
Wherein: θ represents set of factors weighted value, and T represents transposition.Because current and data are in different working points, the packing density meeting present operating point U (t) may be different, data amount check for modeling is also indefinite, that is: modeling neighborhood value size is variable, in order to obtain best set of factors weight vectors θ, reduce calculated amount simultaneously, the variation range k ∈ [k of neighborhood can be preset
m, k
m] (k
m<k
m), calculating the set of factors weight vectors θ of neighbour k+1
k+1time, directly utilize the set of factors weight vectors θ of neighbour k
k, first provide an error functions,
Adopt gradient descent method, calculate set of factors weight vectors as follows,
Obtaining is the model θ of neighbour k+1
k+1, meanwhile, what also can obtain neighbour k+1 goes a transposition error value:
In formula:
represent in k+1 group data, with removing a jth model that data gained arrives;
represent actual column material strength degradation rate η (j) and model
error between the predicted value obtained.
Like this, what can obtain neighbour k+1 removes a transposition error collection
all side and these
?
In formula: weighting factor
the each U (j) of direct reflection go a transposition error to E
loo(k+1) " contribution " size.The closer to the U (j) of U (t), its " contribution " is larger, otherwise less.Now, if
E
loo(k+1)>E
loo(k),k+1∈[k
m,k
M].
Then think and stop model " variation " returning calculating, and with model θ
kas the best model of system current time.Otherwise, by the model adopting gradient descent method to obtain, concentrate from study and choose the information vector made new advances, continue iteration, until k=k
mtill.Like this, the quality of partial model can be judged in time, obtain the best Local Linear Model meeting current time influence factor and degradation ratio relation.
Safety assessment in described step 4, according to the influence factor of foundation and the best Local Linear Model of degradation ratio relation, calculates the degradation ratio of tower material actual strength, and the degradation ratio of the calculating shaft tower tower material actual strength that the present invention proposes is as follows,
η(t)==U
T(t)θ
k。
Technique effect of the present invention:
The application is compared to classic method, not only make index be simplified, and make the weight allocation of each factor utilize a large amount of history image data, the discrimination of its evaluation result is obvious, result gears to actual circumstances more, the reflected appraisal result making evaluation index more effective.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the schematic diagram of the actual strength computing method of long-time running power transmission line column material.
Fig. 2 is that degradation ratio calculates comparative evaluation result figure.
Embodiment
As shown in Figure 1, the method mainly comprises the steps: the mentality of designing of a kind of transmission tower tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining of the present invention
Step 1: index set yojan;
Step 2: the structure of data mining study collection;
Step 3: set of factors weight is determined;
Step 4: actual strength is assessed.
The implementation process of each step is as follows:
Electric power line pole tower tower material long-term field runs, and bear nature invasion and attack, electric discharge and artificial outside destroy, wire actual machine intensity relative theory value can decline.Consider intensity effect factor and pass judgment on knowledge to present nonlinear relationship, based on data digging method, shaft tower tower material actual strength is evaluated and calculated.
The K-VNN method of one of data mining is based on " similar input produces similar output " principle, implementation is generally by sample data memory in memory, then according to input point, in sample data, find data similarly, obtain the corresponding output of this input according to these sample datas.Therefore, it is also referred to as " based on mnemonic learning ".The criterion describing input data and the sample data degree of association generally adopts distance function, and those namely nearest with input point data have the degree of association higher with it.The basic process of intensity evaluation as shown in Figure 1.The present invention establishes local strength's evaluation model, comprises the foundation of set of factors, weight study collection, evaluation model.Hereafter for strain resistant shaft tower tower material, provide its actual strength calculation method.
1) tower material intensity evaluation set of factors index system is set up;
By in power supply enterprise's investigation, according to the evaluation index affecting the various factors of tower material intensity that person skilled provides, in conjunction with a large amount of real data, draw 110kV electric pressure line steel tower intensity evaluation basic index system.Basic index system is primarily of meteorologic district condition, sub-strength damage, the stress of conductor and mechanical vibration three major types factors composition.
Set of factors is: U={U
1, U
2, U
3, wherein U
1={ u
11, u
12, u
13, u
14, u
15, U
2={ u
21, u
22, u
23, u
24, u
25, u
26, U
3={ u
31, u
32, u
33, u
34.
1. meteorologic district condition U
1:
Wind speed (most strong wind) u
11, atmospheric temperature (lowest temperature) u
12, average temperature of the whole year u
13, ice covering thickness (the thickest icing) u
14, thunderstorm day in year number of days u
15.
2. sub-strength damage U
2:
Working time u
21, bending reparation number of times u
22, slight crack repairs number of times u
23, thunder and lightning or fault current damage number of times u
24, re-cover ice times of fatigue u
25, on average run stress/maximum operation stress u
26.
3. the stress of conductor and mechanical vibration U
3:
Wire division number u
31, wind direction and circuit angle u
32, ground surface degree of roughness u
33, steel corrosion amount u
34.
Because the value of each factor is different, and comparatively complicated, in order to the convenience that further evaluation calculates, at this, data normalization is carried out to basic index.Five grades are divided into according to the influence degree difference of factor of evaluation to tower material intensity, be respectively I, II, III, IV, V, grade I represents very little on the impact of tower material actual strength, grade II represents less on the impact of tower material actual strength, grade III represents medium on the impact of tower material actual strength, grade IV represents comparatively large on the impact of tower material actual strength, and grade V represents very large on the impact of tower material actual strength.Set up meteorologic district for meteorologic district below and evaluate quantitative criteria.
Set up the evaluation criterion of meteorologic district condition by national typical meteorological condition area storehouse, show that quantitative criteria is evaluated in meteorologic district, in table 1.
Quantitative criteria is evaluated in table 1 meteorologic district
2) rough set carries out attribute reduction
The many factors of basic index system, may the problem of existing factor redundancy, on the basis of not effect appraise result, in order to not allow evaluation procedure complicated, will carry out yojan to basic index system.Test sample data are as shown in table 2, and for the ease of computational short cut, the desired value using II is as the threshold values of each initial evaluation index, the desired value meeting II is then 1, otherwise is 0, then carry out Data Discretization by table 2 and table 3 data, just initial evaluation indication information can be drawn, in table 3.
Table 2 test sample data
Table 3 sample data discretize
According to rough set theory, his-and-hers watches 4 carry out Attribute Significance yojan:
U/R={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
11})={{1,3,5,7,8},{2,4}}
U/(R-{u
12})={{1,2,4,5,7},{3,6,8}}
U/(R-{u
13})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
14})={{1,5,7},{2,4},{3,6,8}}
U/(R-{u
15})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
13,u
15})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/R≠U/(R-{u
11})
U/R≠U/(R-{u
12})
U/R≠U/(R-{u
14})
U/R=U/(R-{u
13})=U/(R-{u
15})=U/(R-{u
13,u
15})
Through Attribute Significance yojan, calculate known index u
13, u
15it is redundancy.In like manner, carry out Attribute Significance yojan to sub-strength damage factor and the stress of conductor and mechanical vibration factor respectively, obtaining final evaluation index is: U={U
1, U
2, U
3, wherein U
1={ u
11, u
12, u
14, U
2={ u
21, u
22, u
23, u
24, u
25, U
3={ u
31, u
32, u
33, u
34.
3) structure of study collection
Consider that unknown entering singly goes out Nonlinear Mapping f:R more
n→ R, assuming that the observable inputoutput data of system can be obtained:
and this group data existence function relation:
y
i=h(x
i)+ε
In formula: X ∈ R
nit is independent variable; y
i∈ R is dependent variable: ε
i∈ R is zero-mean and variance is σ
2independent random distribution variable.Problem is any vectorial XqX for the input space
q, according to the existing data set of system, a mapping can be set up, and by this mapping, the system that obtains is estimated to export accordingly
this problem can be summed up as the optimization problem solved below
In formula: Ω
kfor distance X
kthe local space that k nearest sample is formed; H () is the nonlinear mapping function describing input and output vector; w
ifor weights, the sample data in expression local space is to the influence degree of output vector, and the impact (or contribution degree) that sample datas different in local space exports system is different.Intuitively, the output vector value corresponding to vectorial those the nearest samples input of distance input can reflect the output of current input quantity, and this is in fact also the cardinal rule of Lazy learning method: similar input produces similar output.
Use above algorithm principle, adopt K-VNN search strategy, in system existing N group data, find the most similar data (k<<N) of k group, the actual strength degradation ratio of the shaft tower tower material that the present invention proposes and influence factor collection U present nonlinear relationship:
η=f(U)+ε(t)
Wherein, η is degradation ratio, the white noise that ε (t) is zero-mean, and f () is unknown nonlinear function.For the data that there is N group influence factor and degradation ratio
in current t, there is influence factor information U (t), adopt K-VNN search strategy, in system existing N group data, find the most similar data (k<<N) of k group, specific as follows:
2, as cos β (U (i), U (t)) <0, then think that this U (i) deviates from current input U (t), be unfavorable for modeling, abandon this data;
2 otherwise, with the index core of U (i) and U (t) and included angle cosine weighting sum selection criterion, namely
D(U(i),U(t))=α·e
-d(U(i),U(t))+(1-α)·cosβ(U(i),U(t))
In formula:
α is weighting factor.Weighting selection criterion D (U (i), U (t)) directly reflects the similarity of U (i) and U (t).If two information vectors the closer to, then d is less, and cos β is also larger, thus D (U (i), U (t)) is also larger.Like this, in existing data message, the k group data selecting D () value maximum, by descending sort, learning of structure collection:
{(U(1),η(1)),…,(U(k),η(k))}
D(U(1),U(t))>…>D(U(k),U(t)).
4) set of factors weight is determined
Actual strength degradation ratio and the influence factor collection U local linear relation of shaft tower tower material are as follows:
η=f
θ(U)=U
Tθ
Wherein: θ represents set of factors weighted value, and T represents transposition.Because current and data are in different working points, the packing density meeting present operating point U (t) may be different, data amount check for modeling is also indefinite, that is: modeling neighborhood value size is variable, in order to obtain best set of factors weight vectors θ, reduce calculated amount simultaneously, the variation range k ∈ [k of neighborhood can be preset
m, k
m] (k
m<k
m), calculating the set of factors weight vectors θ of neighbour k+1
k+1time, directly utilize the set of factors weight vectors θ of neighbour k
k, first provide an error functions,
Adopt gradient descent method, calculate set of factors weight vectors as follows,
Obtaining is the model θ of neighbour k+1
k+1, meanwhile, what also can obtain neighbour k+1 goes a transposition error value:
In formula:
represent in k+1 group data, with removing a jth model that data gained arrives;
represent actual column material strength degradation rate η (j) and model
error between the predicted value obtained.
Like this, what can obtain neighbour k+1 removes a transposition error collection
all side and these
?
In formula: weighting factor
the each U (j) of direct reflection go a transposition error to E
loo(k+1) " contribution " size.The closer to the U (j) of U (t), its " contribution " is larger, otherwise less.Now, if
E
loo(k+1)>E
loo(k),k+1∈[k
m,k
M].
Then think and stop model " variation " returning calculating, and with model θ
kas the best model of system current time.Otherwise, by the model adopting gradient descent method to obtain, concentrate from study and choose the information vector made new advances, continue iteration, until k=k
mtill.Like this, the quality of partial model can be judged in time, obtain the best Local Linear Model meeting current time influence factor and degradation ratio relation.So this Local Linear Model may be used for the degradation ratio calculating shaft tower tower material actual strength, i.e. η (t)==U
t(t) θ
k.
For the strain resistant steel tower of certain Utilities Electric Co., transfer the detailed weather data of nearly 5 years, and the detailed service data that steel tower puts into operation, through native system again inverse modeling, system security level is Failure risk state.In addition, can find out that the resultant error that the steel tower strength degradation rate that calculated by institute of the present invention extracting method and manual analysis obtain is less by emulation, may be used for replacing artificial calculating, its result of calculation as shown in Figure 2.
The content be not described in detail in this manual belongs to the known technology of those skilled in the art.
Claims (1)
1. transmission tower tower material actual strength computing method for evaluation index reflected appraisal result, is characterized in that: comprise the steps:
Step 1: index set yojan;
Step 2: the structure of data mining study collection;
Step 3: set of factors weight is determined;
Step 4: actual strength is assessed;
Index set yojan in described step 1, mainly to the index set by meteorologic district condition, sub-strength damage, the stress of conductor and mechanical vibration three major types factors composition, three class influence factor set representations are U={U
1, U
2, U
3, wherein: U
1={ u
11, u
12, u
13, u
14, u
15, u
11for wind speed (most strong wind), u
12for atmospheric temperature (lowest temperature), u
13for average temperature of the whole year, u
14for ice covering thickness (the thickest icing), u
15for number of days in thunderstorm day in year; U
2={ u
21, u
22, u
23, u
24, u
25, u
26, u
21for working time, u
22for bending reparation number of times, u
23for slight crack repairs number of times, u
24for thunder and lightning or fault current damage number of times, u
25to attach most importance to icing times of fatigue, u
26for on average running stress/maximum operation stress; U
3={ u
31, u
32, u
33, u
34, u
31for wire division number, u
32for wind direction and circuit angle, u
33for ground surface degree of roughness, u
34for steel corrosion amount;
Five grades are divided into according to the influence degree difference of factor of evaluation to tower material intensity, be respectively I, II, III, IV, V, grade I represents very little on the impact of tower material actual strength, grade II represents less on the impact of tower material actual strength, grade III represents medium on the impact of tower material actual strength, grade IV represents comparatively large on the impact of tower material actual strength, and grade V represents very large on the impact of tower material actual strength; Set up the evaluation criterion of meteorologic district condition by national typical meteorological condition area storehouse, show that quantitative criteria is evaluated in meteorologic district:
Rough set carries out attribute reduction:
The many factors of basic index system, may the problem of existing factor redundancy, on the basis of not effect appraise result, in order to not allow evaluation procedure complicated, will carry out yojan to basic index system; Desired value using II is as the threshold values of each initial evaluation index, and the desired value meeting II is then 1, otherwise is 0, carries out Data Discretization, just can draw initial evaluation indication information;
Test sample data
Sample data discretize
According to rough set theory, his-and-hers watches 4 carry out Attribute Significance yojan:
U/R={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
11})={{1,3,5,7,8},{2,4}}
U/(R-{u
12})={{1,2,4,5,7},{3,6,8}}
U/(R-{u
13})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
14})={{1,5,7},{2,4},{3,6,8}}
U/(R-{u
15})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/(R-{u
13,u
15})={{1,7},{2,4},{3,6,8},{5}}
U/R≠U/(R-{u
11})
U/R≠U/(R-{u
12})
U/R≠U/(R-{u
14})
U/R=U/(R-{u
13})=U/(R-{u
15})=U/(R-{u
13,u
15})
Through Attribute Significance yojan, calculate known index u
13, u
15it is redundancy; In like manner, carry out Attribute Significance yojan to sub-strength damage factor and the stress of conductor and mechanical vibration factor respectively, obtaining final evaluation index is: U={U
1, U
2, U
3, wherein U
1={ u
11, u
12, u
14, U
2={ u
21, u
22, u
23, u
24, u
25, U
3={ u
31, u
32, u
33, u
34; R is the set of the property value of factor;
The structure of its learning collection:
Consider that unknown entering singly goes out Nonlinear Mapping f:R more
n→ R, assuming that the observable inputoutput data of system can be obtained:
and this group data existence function relation:
y
i=h(x
i)+ε
In formula: X ∈ R
nit is independent variable; y
i∈ R is dependent variable: ε
i∈ R is zero-mean and variance is σ
2independent random distribution variable; Problem is any vectorial XqX for the input space
q, according to the existing data set of system, a mapping can be set up, and by this mapping, the system that obtains is estimated to export accordingly
this problem can be summed up as the optimization problem solved below
In formula: Ω
kfor distance X
kthe local space that k nearest sample is formed; H () is the nonlinear mapping function describing input and output vector; w
ifor weights, represent that sample data in local space is to the influence degree of output vector, the impact that sample datas different in local space exports system or contribution degree are different; Intuitively, the output vector value corresponding to vectorial those the nearest samples input of distance input can reflect the output of current input quantity, and this is in fact also the cardinal rule of Lazy learning method: similar input produces similar output;
Use above algorithm principle, adopt K-VNN search strategy, in system existing N group data, find the most similar data (k<<N) of k group, actual strength degradation ratio and the influence factor collection U of shaft tower tower material present nonlinear relationship:
η=f(U)+ε(t)
Wherein, η is degradation ratio, the white noise that ε (t) is zero-mean, and f () is unknown nonlinear function; For the data that there is N group influence factor and degradation ratio
in current t, there is influence factor information U (t), adopt K-VNN search strategy, in system existing N group data, find the most similar data (k<<N) of k group, specific as follows:
As cos β (U (i), U (t)) <0, then think that this U (i) deviates from current input U (t), be unfavorable for modeling, abandon this data;
Otherwise, with the index core of U (i) and U (t) and included angle cosine weighting sum selection criterion, namely
D(U(i),U(t))=α·e
-d(U(i),U(t))+(1-α)·cosβ(U(i),U(t))
In formula:
α is weighting factor; Weighting selection criterion D (U (i), U (t)) directly reflects the similarity of U (i) and U (t); If two information vectors the closer to, then d is less, and cos β is also larger, thus D (U (i), U (t)) is also larger; Like this, in existing data message, the k group data selecting D () value maximum, by descending sort, learning of structure collection:
{(U(1),η(1)),…,(U(k),η(k))}
D(U(1),U(t))>…>D(U(k),U(t)).。
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410424393.9A CN104298706A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Transmission tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410424393.9A Division CN104298706A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Transmission tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN105184306A true CN105184306A (en) | 2015-12-23 |
Family
ID=52318433
Family Applications (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510422943.8A Pending CN105005661A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Transmission tower material actual strength calculation method with practical result |
CN201410424393.9A Pending CN104298706A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Transmission tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining |
CN201510422985.1A Pending CN105117969A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Actual strength calculation method of tower materials of power transmission tower having obvious evaluation result distinction degree |
CN201510422850.5A Pending CN105184306A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Power transmission tower material actual strength calculation method enabling evaluation indexes to reflect evaluation results |
CN201510423506.8A Pending CN105069027A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Method used for calculating actual tower material strength of power transmission pole tower and capable of simplifying indexes |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510422943.8A Pending CN105005661A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Transmission tower material actual strength calculation method with practical result |
CN201410424393.9A Pending CN104298706A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Transmission tower material actual strength computing method based on data mining |
CN201510422985.1A Pending CN105117969A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Actual strength calculation method of tower materials of power transmission tower having obvious evaluation result distinction degree |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510423506.8A Pending CN105069027A (en) | 2014-08-26 | 2014-08-26 | Method used for calculating actual tower material strength of power transmission pole tower and capable of simplifying indexes |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (5) | CN105005661A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113158484A (en) * | 2021-05-07 | 2021-07-23 | 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 | Method and system for evaluating stability of transmission tower under geological disaster condition |
CN113762869A (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2021-12-07 | 北京京东振世信息技术有限公司 | Transportation task processing method and device |
CN117540008A (en) * | 2024-01-09 | 2024-02-09 | 中国邮电器材集团有限公司 | Contract abnormal data risk intelligent analysis method |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106326288B (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2019-12-03 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Image search method and device |
CN106920021B (en) * | 2015-12-25 | 2020-08-18 | 中国电力科学研究院 | Method for evaluating overall state of power transmission line iron tower |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103700030A (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2014-04-02 | 国家电网公司 | Grey rough set-based power grid construction project post-evaluation index weight assignment method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6321192B1 (en) * | 1998-10-22 | 2001-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive learning method and system that matches keywords using a parsed keyword data structure having a hash index based on an unicode value |
KR101059988B1 (en) * | 2009-07-30 | 2011-08-29 | 주식회사 바일테크놀러지 | Stacked common mode filter with impedance matching |
KR20110122776A (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-11 | 에스이테크놀로지(주) | Method and system for evaluate consistency index of ahp |
CN102970328B (en) * | 2012-10-25 | 2015-03-11 | 国家电网公司 | Data on-line migration method of typical production system in power industry |
-
2014
- 2014-08-26 CN CN201510422943.8A patent/CN105005661A/en active Pending
- 2014-08-26 CN CN201410424393.9A patent/CN104298706A/en active Pending
- 2014-08-26 CN CN201510422985.1A patent/CN105117969A/en active Pending
- 2014-08-26 CN CN201510422850.5A patent/CN105184306A/en active Pending
- 2014-08-26 CN CN201510423506.8A patent/CN105069027A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103700030A (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2014-04-02 | 国家电网公司 | Grey rough set-based power grid construction project post-evaluation index weight assignment method |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
李庆良等: ""一种基于即时学习的多模型在线建模方法"", 《四川大学学报(工程科学版)》 * |
潘天红 等: ""基于即时学习的非线性***优化控制"", 《控制与决策》 * |
葛乐等: ""面向复杂工况的输电线路本体结构安全评价"", 《电力***自动化》 * |
钟嘉鸣等: ""粗糙集与层次分析法集成的综合评价模型"", 《武汉大学学报(工学版)》 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113762869A (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2021-12-07 | 北京京东振世信息技术有限公司 | Transportation task processing method and device |
CN113158484A (en) * | 2021-05-07 | 2021-07-23 | 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 | Method and system for evaluating stability of transmission tower under geological disaster condition |
CN117540008A (en) * | 2024-01-09 | 2024-02-09 | 中国邮电器材集团有限公司 | Contract abnormal data risk intelligent analysis method |
CN117540008B (en) * | 2024-01-09 | 2024-04-05 | 中国邮电器材集团有限公司 | Contract abnormal data risk intelligent analysis method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN105069027A (en) | 2015-11-18 |
CN104298706A (en) | 2015-01-21 |
CN105117969A (en) | 2015-12-02 |
CN105005661A (en) | 2015-10-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wu et al. | Study of decision framework of offshore wind power station site selection based on ELECTRE-III under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case of China | |
CN106650767B (en) | Flood forecasting method based on cluster analysis and real-time correction | |
CN102722759B (en) | Method for predicting power supply reliability of power grid based on BP neural network | |
CN112749904B (en) | Power distribution network fault risk early warning method and system based on deep learning | |
CN115063020B (en) | Multi-dimensional safety scheduling device and method for cascade hydropower station based on risk monitoring fusion | |
CN105095574A (en) | Tower material strength assessment and calculation method for calculating actual strength of tower material by comprehensive evaluation | |
CN109146063B (en) | Multi-segment short-term load prediction method based on important point segmentation | |
CN105184306A (en) | Power transmission tower material actual strength calculation method enabling evaluation indexes to reflect evaluation results | |
CN107292478B (en) | Method for acquiring influence situation of disaster on power distribution network | |
CN105809287A (en) | High-voltage transmission line icing process integrated prediction method | |
CN108133225A (en) | A kind of icing flashover fault early warning method based on support vector machines | |
CN108537376B (en) | RS-PSO-GRNN-based buried oil and gas pipeline soil corrosion prediction method | |
CN106845080B (en) | Based on the modified Scene Tourist meteorological disaster intelligent Forecasting of difference | |
CN105095668B (en) | Electrical network icing Long-range Forecasting Methods based on whirlpool, pole, the Asia factor | |
CN103778305A (en) | k-VNN- and LS-SVM-based modelling method for icing of electric transmission line | |
CN112163371A (en) | Transformer bushing state evaluation method | |
CN111695666A (en) | Wind power ultra-short term conditional probability prediction method based on deep learning | |
CN110210670A (en) | A kind of prediction technique based on power-system short-term load | |
CN117009735A (en) | High-strength forest fire occurrence probability calculation method combining BiLSTM and nuclear density estimation | |
CN116796168A (en) | CNN-BiLSTM high-altitude multi-factor power transmission line audible noise prediction method based on multi-head attention mechanism | |
Hou et al. | Spatial distribution assessment of power outage under typhoon disasters | |
CN110929952A (en) | Optical cable fault probability prediction method based on circuit surrounding environment and laying type | |
CN112183805B (en) | Prediction method for online inspection result state of power transmission line | |
Alsumaiei | Short-term forecasting of monthly water consumption in hyper-arid climate using recurrent neural networks | |
Wei | Surface wind nowcasting in the Penghu Islands based on classified typhoon tracks and the effects of the Central Mountain Range of Taiwan |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20151223 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |