ZA200306289B - Multipotent adult stem cells sources thereof methods of obtaining and maintaining same methods of differentiation thereof methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof - Google Patents
Multipotent adult stem cells sources thereof methods of obtaining and maintaining same methods of differentiation thereof methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- ZA200306289B ZA200306289B ZA2003/06289A ZA200306289A ZA200306289B ZA 200306289 B ZA200306289 B ZA 200306289B ZA 2003/06289 A ZA2003/06289 A ZA 2003/06289A ZA 200306289 A ZA200306289 A ZA 200306289A ZA 200306289 B ZA200306289 B ZA 200306289B
- Authority
- ZA
- South Africa
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- masc
- cell
- composition
- substance
- Prior art date
Links
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 title claims description 599
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 title claims description 111
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 87
- 210000004504 adult stem cell Anatomy 0.000 title claims description 11
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 claims description 105
- 210000001185 bone marrow Anatomy 0.000 claims description 73
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 claims description 65
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 claims description 47
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 46
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 40
- 101000738771 Homo sapiens Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C Proteins 0.000 claims description 37
- 102100037422 Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C Human genes 0.000 claims description 37
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 claims description 36
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 claims description 32
- 230000003511 endothelial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 31
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims description 29
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims description 28
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 claims description 27
- 210000004248 oligodendroglia Anatomy 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000003394 haemopoietic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 210000002459 blastocyst Anatomy 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 210000002027 skeletal muscle Anatomy 0.000 claims description 15
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dimethylsulphoxide Chemical compound CS(C)=O IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000002440 hepatic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 210000004602 germ cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 10
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 claims description 10
- 210000004165 myocardium Anatomy 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000306 component Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000004700 fetal blood Anatomy 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 102100032912 CD44 antigen Human genes 0.000 claims description 7
- 101000868273 Homo sapiens CD44 antigen Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 108010017842 Telomerase Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 210000001789 adipocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 210000001612 chondrocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002518 glial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 210000000963 osteoblast Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 210000002826 placenta Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000012503 blood component Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000747 cardiac effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000007911 parenteral administration Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000002460 smooth muscle Anatomy 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 claims description 4
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000779 depleting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 102000043129 MHC class I family Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108091054437 MHC class I family Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 102000043131 MHC class II family Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108091054438 MHC class II family Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000003743 erythrocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000028867 ischemia Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000000265 leukocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical group 0.000 claims description 3
- JWZZKOKVBUJMES-UHFFFAOYSA-N (+-)-Isoprenaline Chemical compound CC(C)NCC(O)C1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 JWZZKOKVBUJMES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000001772 blood platelet Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000003937 drug carrier Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000008194 pharmaceutical composition Substances 0.000 claims 4
- 206010002329 Aneurysm Diseases 0.000 claims 2
- 208000018262 Peripheral vascular disease Diseases 0.000 claims 2
- 230000003187 abdominal effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 210000004400 mucous membrane Anatomy 0.000 claims 2
- 208000019553 vascular disease Diseases 0.000 claims 2
- 210000001671 embryonic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 229940039009 isoproterenol Drugs 0.000 claims 1
- 210000001778 pluripotent stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 230000035935 pregnancy Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 210000003494 hepatocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 105
- 210000002889 endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 82
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 59
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 57
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 53
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 52
- 210000002569 neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 49
- 102000009027 Albumins Human genes 0.000 description 48
- 108010088751 Albumins Proteins 0.000 description 48
- 102100028072 Fibroblast growth factor 4 Human genes 0.000 description 47
- 108090000381 Fibroblast growth factor 4 Proteins 0.000 description 47
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 41
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 39
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 38
- 108090000100 Hepatocyte Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 37
- 102000003745 Hepatocyte Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 37
- 210000003038 endothelium Anatomy 0.000 description 37
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 36
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 36
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 35
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 34
- 102000003974 Fibroblast growth factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 33
- 108090000379 Fibroblast growth factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 33
- 108010073929 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Proteins 0.000 description 31
- 102000005789 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Human genes 0.000 description 31
- 108010019530 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Proteins 0.000 description 31
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 30
- VBEQCZHXXJYVRD-GACYYNSASA-N uroanthelone Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(O)=O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCSC)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(N)=O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)CC)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 VBEQCZHXXJYVRD-GACYYNSASA-N 0.000 description 29
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 27
- 101800003838 Epidermal growth factor Proteins 0.000 description 26
- 102100037362 Fibronectin Human genes 0.000 description 26
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 description 26
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 26
- 102100033237 Pro-epidermal growth factor Human genes 0.000 description 26
- 229940116977 epidermal growth factor Drugs 0.000 description 26
- 108010047303 von Willebrand Factor Proteins 0.000 description 26
- 102100036537 von Willebrand factor Human genes 0.000 description 26
- 101001027406 Danio rerio Fibroblast growth factor 8b Proteins 0.000 description 25
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 24
- 210000003958 hematopoietic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 23
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 23
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 21
- 102000011782 Keratins Human genes 0.000 description 20
- 108010076876 Keratins Proteins 0.000 description 20
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 20
- 210000001130 astrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 20
- 210000001178 neural stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 20
- 230000001177 retroviral effect Effects 0.000 description 20
- 239000012894 fetal calf serum Substances 0.000 description 19
- 210000003716 mesoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 19
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 18
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 18
- 210000001900 endoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 17
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 17
- 210000000952 spleen Anatomy 0.000 description 17
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 16
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 16
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 102100039289 Glial fibrillary acidic protein Human genes 0.000 description 14
- 101710193519 Glial fibrillary acidic protein Proteins 0.000 description 14
- 229930193140 Neomycin Natural products 0.000 description 14
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 14
- BTCSSZJGUNDROE-UHFFFAOYSA-N gamma-aminobutyric acid Chemical compound NCCCC(O)=O BTCSSZJGUNDROE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 210000005046 glial fibrillary acidic protein Anatomy 0.000 description 14
- 229960004927 neomycin Drugs 0.000 description 14
- -1 small molecule organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 14
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 13
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 210000001020 neural plate Anatomy 0.000 description 13
- 102100031573 Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 Human genes 0.000 description 12
- NTYJJOPFIAHURM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Histamine Chemical compound NCCC1=CN=CN1 NTYJJOPFIAHURM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 101000777663 Homo sapiens Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 Proteins 0.000 description 12
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 101710126211 POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 210000002919 epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 210000000936 intestine Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000012679 serum free medium Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000012421 spiking Methods 0.000 description 12
- 108010020076 Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B1 Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 108010015742 Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 102000002004 Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 101000819074 Homo sapiens Transcription factor GATA-4 Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 102000004058 Leukemia inhibitory factor Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108090000581 Leukemia inhibitory factor Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 102100035423 POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 238000001190 Q-PCR Methods 0.000 description 11
- 102100021380 Transcription factor GATA-4 Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 11
- 210000003237 epithelioid cell Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate Chemical compound O1C(=O)C2=CC(N=C=S)=CC=C2C21C1=CC=C(O)C=C1OC1=CC(O)=CC=C21 MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 210000002216 heart Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 11
- 210000002901 mesenchymal stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 description 11
- 101000998011 Homo sapiens Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19 Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 102100033420 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 19 Human genes 0.000 description 10
- 238000003364 immunohistochemistry Methods 0.000 description 10
- 210000004498 neuroglial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 10
- QZAYGJVTTNCVMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N serotonin Chemical compound C1=C(O)C=C2C(CCN)=CNC2=C1 QZAYGJVTTNCVMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetone Chemical compound CC(C)=O CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 108010081589 Becaplermin Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 9
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000009762 endothelial cell differentiation Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000000799 fluorescence microscopy Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 9
- DDBREPKUVSBGFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenobarbital Chemical compound C=1C=CC=CC=1C1(CC)C(=O)NC(=O)NC1=O DDBREPKUVSBGFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 229960002695 phenobarbital Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 9
- 206010068051 Chimerism Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 206010021143 Hypoxia Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 108060008487 Myosin Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 102000003505 Myosin Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 206010029113 Neovascularisation Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 102100024616 Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 108010038512 Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 102000010780 Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 102000016549 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 230000033115 angiogenesis Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 210000004204 blood vessel Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 229940098773 bovine serum albumin Drugs 0.000 description 8
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- OGNSCSPNOLGXSM-UHFFFAOYSA-N (+/-)-DABA Natural products NCCC(N)C(O)=O OGNSCSPNOLGXSM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 7
- OPIFSICVWOWJMJ-AEOCFKNESA-N 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta-D-galactoside Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1OC1=CNC2=CC=C(Br)C(Cl)=C12 OPIFSICVWOWJMJ-AEOCFKNESA-N 0.000 description 7
- 108091006146 Channels Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 102000010834 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108010037362 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 229920002527 Glycogen Polymers 0.000 description 7
- 101150088608 Kdr gene Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 101100440874 Mus musculus Cyp2b9 gene Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 238000011789 NOD SCID mouse Methods 0.000 description 7
- 102000008730 Nestin Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108010088225 Nestin Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 229930040373 Paraformaldehyde Natural products 0.000 description 7
- 108010000134 Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 7
- 210000000349 chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 210000002744 extracellular matrix Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 229960003692 gamma aminobutyric acid Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 229940096919 glycogen Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 7
- 210000005055 nestin Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 229920002866 paraformaldehyde Polymers 0.000 description 7
- 238000003757 reverse transcription PCR Methods 0.000 description 7
- 108091035539 telomere Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 210000003411 telomere Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 102000055501 telomere Human genes 0.000 description 7
- CFMYXEVWODSLAX-QOZOJKKESA-N tetrodotoxin Chemical compound O([C@@]([C@H]1O)(O)O[C@H]2[C@@]3(O)CO)[C@H]3[C@@H](O)[C@]11[C@H]2[C@@H](O)N=C(N)N1 CFMYXEVWODSLAX-QOZOJKKESA-N 0.000 description 7
- 229950010357 tetrodotoxin Drugs 0.000 description 7
- CFMYXEVWODSLAX-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrodotoxin Natural products C12C(O)NC(=N)NC2(C2O)C(O)C3C(CO)(O)C1OC2(O)O3 CFMYXEVWODSLAX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 102000004219 Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 108090000715 Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 108010020070 Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B6 Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102000009666 Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B6 Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 6
- 102100029284 Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3-beta Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 101001062347 Homo sapiens Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3-beta Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 208000026350 Inborn Genetic disease Diseases 0.000 description 6
- WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(O)=O WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 6
- 102000008790 VE-cadherin Human genes 0.000 description 6
- LEBBDRXHHNYZIA-LDUWYPJVSA-N [(2s,3r,4s,5r,6r)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl] n-[(z)-1,3-dihydroxyoctadec-4-en-2-yl]carbamate Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCC\C=C/C(O)C(CO)NC(=O)O[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O LEBBDRXHHNYZIA-LDUWYPJVSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 229940077737 brain-derived neurotrophic factor Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 108010018828 cadherin 5 Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 210000003169 central nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 238000001218 confocal laser scanning microscopy Methods 0.000 description 6
- 206010012601 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 210000005064 dopaminergic neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000003291 dopaminomimetic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000000981 epithelium Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 208000016361 genetic disease Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 229930195712 glutamate Natural products 0.000 description 6
- 210000003566 hemangioblast Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 229960001340 histamine Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 230000007954 hypoxia Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000000987 immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000003491 skin Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 6
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- NMUSYJAQQFHJEW-KVTDHHQDSA-N 5-azacytidine Chemical compound O=C1N=C(N)N=CN1[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 NMUSYJAQQFHJEW-KVTDHHQDSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 101000981881 Brevibacillus parabrevis ATP-dependent glycine adenylase Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 101000981889 Brevibacillus parabrevis Linear gramicidin-PCP reductase Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102000049320 CD36 Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108010045374 CD36 Antigens Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102000018233 Fibroblast Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108050007372 Fibroblast Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 101710197836 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, alpha chain G Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102100028967 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, alpha chain G Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 102000004140 Oncostatin M Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108090000630 Oncostatin M Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102100023472 P-selectin Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 101150053185 P450 gene Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 101710150336 Protein Rex Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 208000037919 acquired disease Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229960002756 azacitidine Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004624 confocal microscopy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 5
- UREBDLICKHMUKA-CXSFZGCWSA-N dexamethasone Chemical compound C1CC2=CC(=O)C=C[C@]2(C)[C@]2(F)[C@@H]1[C@@H]1C[C@@H](C)[C@@](C(=O)CO)(O)[C@@]1(C)C[C@@H]2O UREBDLICKHMUKA-CXSFZGCWSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000013020 embryo development Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229940126864 fibroblast growth factor Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 238000001943 fluorescence-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003371 gabaergic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 210000000777 hematopoietic system Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 5
- 208000019423 liver disease Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000001259 mesencephalon Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 210000000496 pancreas Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000000862 serotonergic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229940076279 serotonin Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229960001134 von willebrand factor Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 5
- FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4',6-Diamino-2-phenylindol Chemical compound C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=C(C(N)=N)C=C2N1 FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102100022749 Aminopeptidase N Human genes 0.000 description 4
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000011740 C57BL/6 mouse Methods 0.000 description 4
- 108090000386 Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100031706 Fibroblast growth factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 101150048336 Flt1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000012413 Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis Methods 0.000 description 4
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102000018899 Glutamate Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010027915 Glutamate Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 101000757160 Homo sapiens Aminopeptidase N Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108091006905 Human Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000007330 LDL Lipoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010007622 LDL Lipoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 4
- 108060005874 Parvalbumin Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000001675 Parvalbumin Human genes 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 206010043276 Teratoma Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 230000000735 allogeneic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000003995 blood forming stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000000805 cytoplasm Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229960003957 dexamethasone Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 238000007876 drug discovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 4
- 208000005017 glioblastoma Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000004524 haematopoietic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000002055 immunohistochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 230000003834 intracellular effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 4
- 108010062847 neurofilament protein NF 68 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003753 real-time PCR Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010361 transduction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000026683 transduction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000005747 tumor angiogenesis Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003827 upregulation Effects 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Chemical compound O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000029663 wound healing Effects 0.000 description 4
- 102100038238 Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 208000023275 Autoimmune disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 102000018832 Cytochromes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010052832 Cytochromes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100023471 E-selectin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 102000003951 Erythropoietin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000394 Erythropoietin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100028071 Fibroblast growth factor 7 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycine Chemical compound NCC(O)=O DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 208000031220 Hemophilia Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000009292 Hemophilia A Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000005176 Hepatitis C Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 101000622123 Homo sapiens E-selectin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101001060261 Homo sapiens Fibroblast growth factor 7 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101000872458 Homo sapiens Huntingtin-interacting protein 1-related protein Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101000622137 Homo sapiens P-selectin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100034773 Huntingtin-interacting protein 1-related protein Human genes 0.000 description 3
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 3
- WTDRDQBEARUVNC-UHFFFAOYSA-N L-Dopa Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 WTDRDQBEARUVNC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- MIJPAVRNWPDMOR-ZAFYKAAXSA-N L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@H]1OC(=O)C(OP(O)(O)=O)=C1O MIJPAVRNWPDMOR-ZAFYKAAXSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108010085895 Laminin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000007547 Laminin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 101000930477 Mus musculus Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- HOKKHZGPKSLGJE-GSVOUGTGSA-N N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid Chemical compound CN[C@@H](C(O)=O)CC(O)=O HOKKHZGPKSLGJE-GSVOUGTGSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108010069196 Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 3
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 102000004278 Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000873 Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 3
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 description 3
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 206010052779 Transplant rejections Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 108010035075 Tyrosine decarboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000000648 angioblast Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000002491 angiogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000032823 cell division Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003412 degenerative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004925 denaturation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000036425 denaturation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- MHUWZNTUIIFHAS-CLFAGFIQSA-N dioleoyl phosphatidic acid Chemical compound CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC(=O)OCC(COP(O)(O)=O)OC(=O)CCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC MHUWZNTUIIFHAS-CLFAGFIQSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000975 dye Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940105423 erythropoietin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007850 fluorescent dye Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000001320 hippocampus Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000000642 iatrogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010166 immunofluorescence Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229960004502 levodopa Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000003908 liver function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003068 molecular probe Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000003061 neural cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000001272 neurogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000000633 nuclear envelope Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000004940 nucleus Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 229920002113 octoxynol Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000005868 ontogenesis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 3
- OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium;[2-butyl-5-chloro-3-[[4-[2-(1,2,4-triaza-3-azanidacyclopenta-1,4-dien-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazol-4-yl]methanol Chemical compound [K+].CCCCC1=NC(Cl)=C(CO)N1CC1=CC=C(C=2C(=CC=CC=2)C2=N[N-]N=N2)C=C1 OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011535 reaction buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 210000003518 stress fiber Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000472 traumatic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241001430294 unidentified retrovirus Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000004862 vasculogenesis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007998 vessel formation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002689 xenotransplantation Methods 0.000 description 3
- YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N (+)-Biotin Chemical compound N1C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CCCCC(=O)O)SC[C@@H]21 YBJHBAHKTGYVGT-ZKWXMUAHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NMUSYJAQQFHJEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5-Azacytidine Natural products O=C1N=C(N)N=CN1C1C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 NMUSYJAQQFHJEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NLXLAEXVIDQMFP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia chloride Chemical compound [NH4+].[Cl-] NLXLAEXVIDQMFP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102100024222 B-lymphocyte antigen CD19 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101100257359 Caenorhabditis elegans sox-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000024172 Cardiovascular disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000035473 Communicable disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102100027417 Cytochrome P450 1B1 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101100481404 Danio rerio tie1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000016911 Deoxyribonucleases Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010053770 Deoxyribonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000283074 Equus asinus Species 0.000 description 2
- 108700039887 Essential Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108090000385 Fibroblast growth factor 7 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000003972 Fibroblast growth factor 7 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102100030540 Gap junction alpha-5 protein Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 208000032612 Glial tumor Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010018338 Glioma Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108091005250 Glycophorins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000007995 HEPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- WZUVPPKBWHMQCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Haematoxylin Chemical compound C12=CC(O)=C(O)C=C2CC2(O)C1C1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1OC2 WZUVPPKBWHMQCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 206010019663 Hepatic failure Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102100022054 Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-alpha Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101000980825 Homo sapiens B-lymphocyte antigen CD19 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000725164 Homo sapiens Cytochrome P450 1B1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101001045740 Homo sapiens Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-alpha Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000008100 Human Serum Albumin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102100033421 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 18 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090001030 Lipoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004895 Lipoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101100350576 Mus musculus Otx1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101100257363 Mus musculus Sox2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101100481406 Mus musculus Tie1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000001068 Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102100023057 Neurofilament light polypeptide Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101150092239 OTX2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010035766 P-Selectin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101150044441 PECAM1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108090000184 Selectins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000003800 Selectins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102000019208 Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010012996 Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102000036693 Thrombopoietin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010041111 Thrombopoietin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- QHNORJFCVHUPNH-UHFFFAOYSA-L To-Pro-3 Chemical compound [I-].[I-].S1C2=CC=CC=C2[N+](C)=C1C=CC=C1C2=CC=CC=C2N(CCC[N+](C)(C)C)C=C1 QHNORJFCVHUPNH-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 108091008605 VEGF receptors Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010073925 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor B Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000009484 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102100038217 Vascular endothelial growth factor B Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000007488 abnormal function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036982 action potential Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000019997 adhesion receptor Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010013985 adhesion receptor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 208000007502 anemia Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010083526 asialo-von Willebrand Factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003050 axon Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008499 blood brain barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000601 blood cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000001218 blood-brain barrier Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004271 bone marrow stromal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000005013 brain tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 210000000845 cartilage Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000003915 cell function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000006285 cell suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 210000002808 connective tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 208000018631 connective tissue disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108010014510 connexin 40 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036461 convulsion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012228 culture supernatant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002559 cytogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003436 cytoskeletal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004292 cytoskeleton Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229960001760 dimethyl sulfoxide Drugs 0.000 description 2
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 2
- 208000016097 disease of metabolism Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000000925 erythroid effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003953 foreskin Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000011990 functional testing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003976 gap junction Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000002496 gastric effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001415 gene therapy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001654 germ layer Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004907 gland Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- RWSXRVCMGQZWBV-WDSKDSINSA-N glutathione Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)NCC(O)=O RWSXRVCMGQZWBV-WDSKDSINSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000011132 hemopoiesis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003209 hepatic oval cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000003897 hepatic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 208000006454 hepatitis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 231100000283 hepatitis Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001744 histochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001146 hypoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001900 immune effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010820 immunofluorescence microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001506 immunosuppresive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002757 inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001802 infusion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000006495 integrins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010044426 integrins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000005229 liver cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 208000007903 liver failure Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 231100000835 liver failure Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000030159 metabolic disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000609 methyl cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000001923 methylcellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004264 monolayer culture Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003098 myoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000002241 neurite Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000000926 neurological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 2
- KHIWWQKSHDUIBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N periodic acid Chemical compound OI(=O)(=O)=O KHIWWQKSHDUIBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 210000005259 peripheral blood Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011886 peripheral blood Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008823 permeabilization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000013415 peroxidase activity proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108040007629 peroxidase activity proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004129 prosencephalon Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011536 re-plating Methods 0.000 description 2
- HSSLDCABUXLXKM-UHFFFAOYSA-N resorufin Chemical compound C1=CC(=O)C=C2OC3=CC(O)=CC=C3N=C21 HSSLDCABUXLXKM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000004761 scalp Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002295 serotoninergic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- MFBOGIVSZKQAPD-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium butyrate Chemical compound [Na+].CCCC([O-])=O MFBOGIVSZKQAPD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000013222 sprague-dawley male rat Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012453 sprague-dawley rat model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003319 supportive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940124597 therapeutic agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 210000001541 thymus gland Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 201000002341 thymus lymphoma Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 210000002303 tibia Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004881 tumor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000000689 upper leg Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000005166 vasculature Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009278 visceral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001325 yolk sac Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- NNJPGOLRFBJNIW-HNNXBMFYSA-N (-)-demecolcine Chemical compound C1=C(OC)C(=O)C=C2[C@@H](NC)CCC3=CC(OC)=C(OC)C(OC)=C3C2=C1 NNJPGOLRFBJNIW-HNNXBMFYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OYHQOLUKZRVURQ-NTGFUMLPSA-N (9Z,12Z)-9,10,12,13-tetratritiooctadeca-9,12-dienoic acid Chemical compound C(CCCCCCC\C(=C(/C\C(=C(/CCCCC)\[3H])\[3H])\[3H])\[3H])(=O)O OYHQOLUKZRVURQ-NTGFUMLPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011714 129 mouse Methods 0.000 description 1
- LDCYZAJDBXYCGN-VIFPVBQESA-N 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan Chemical compound C1=C(O)C=C2C(C[C@H](N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 LDCYZAJDBXYCGN-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 1
- BZTDTCNHAFUJOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-carboxyfluorescein Chemical compound C12=CC=C(O)C=C2OC2=CC(O)=CC=C2C11OC(=O)C2=CC=C(C(=O)O)C=C21 BZTDTCNHAFUJOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZPSOKQFFOYYPKC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 7-pentoxyphenoxazin-3-one Chemical compound C1=CC(=O)C=C2OC3=CC(OCCCCC)=CC=C3N=C21 ZPSOKQFFOYYPKC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102100022142 Achaete-scute homolog 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710165190 Achaete-scute homolog 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010085238 Actins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007469 Actins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 240000000662 Anethum graveolens Species 0.000 description 1
- 101100137548 Arabidopsis thaliana PRF4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100152731 Arabidopsis thaliana TH2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000003950 B-cell lymphoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000035143 Bacterial infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000014644 Brain disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100381481 Caenorhabditis elegans baz-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000005623 Carcinogenesis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000009030 Carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100023126 Cell surface glycoprotein MUC18 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 208000018380 Chemical injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010009685 Cholinergic Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000252203 Clupea harengus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010022452 Collagen Type I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000012422 Collagen Type I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010042086 Collagen Type IV Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004266 Collagen Type IV Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000029816 Collagenase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108060005980 Collagenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010009944 Colon cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010069241 Connexin 43 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710101758 Cytochrome P450 2A2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- NNJPGOLRFBJNIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Demecolcine Natural products C1=C(OC)C(=O)C=C2C(NC)CCC3=CC(OC)=C(OC)C(OC)=C3C2=C1 NNJPGOLRFBJNIW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010012689 Diabetic retinopathy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000012983 Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000001039 Dystrophin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010069091 Dystrophin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000008157 ELISA kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010043939 Ephrin-A5 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100033941 Ephrin-A5 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710100588 Erythroid transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100031690 Erythroid transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101000799969 Escherichia coli (strain K12) Alpha-2-macroglobulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710086766 FP protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010016275 Fear Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010016654 Fibrosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010017533 Fungal infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000005915 GABA Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010005551 GABA Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004300 GABA-A Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000839 GABA-A Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710082961 GATA-binding factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010052320 GATA4 Transcription Factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000018715 GATA4 Transcription Factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100021337 Gap junction alpha-1 protein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000034615 Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091010837 Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010024636 Glutathione Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100031181 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000010726 Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010063380 Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000011714 Glycine Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010076533 Glycine Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100035716 Glycophorin-A Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000028180 Glycophorins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 208000032843 Hemorrhage Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000893570 Hendra henipavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010061414 Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100022123 Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-beta Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000454273 Hirashima Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010088652 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000008949 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010027412 Histocompatibility Antigens Class II Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000018713 Histocompatibility Antigens Class II Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101000623903 Homo sapiens Cell surface glycoprotein MUC18 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001078133 Homo sapiens Integrin alpha-2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000979001 Homo sapiens Methionine aminopeptidase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000969087 Homo sapiens Microtubule-associated protein 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001092197 Homo sapiens RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016252 Huntingtin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050004784 Huntingtin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010062016 Immunosuppression Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100025305 Integrin alpha-2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010066327 Keratin-18 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000844802 Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Teichoic acid D-alanyltransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000006552 Lewis Lung Carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- OYHQOLUKZRVURQ-HZJYTTRNSA-N Linoleic acid Chemical compound CCCCC\C=C/C\C=C/CCCCCCCC(O)=O OYHQOLUKZRVURQ-HZJYTTRNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010025323 Lymphomas Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108700018351 Major Histocompatibility Complex Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100025818 Major prion protein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100023174 Methionine aminopeptidase 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710167839 Morphogenetic protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010068052 Mosaicism Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000002678 Mucopolysaccharidoses Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000699660 Mus musculus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101100440875 Mus musculus Cyp2b10 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000854961 Mus musculus WD repeat and HMG-box DNA-binding protein 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000031888 Mycoses Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000055325 Myelin P0 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050003852 Myelin protein P0 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010000123 Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100023302 Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241001045988 Neogene Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010025020 Nerve Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007072 Nerve Growth Factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100023616 Neural cell adhesion molecule L1-like protein Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050000588 Neurogenic differentiation factor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100032063 Neurogenic differentiation factor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000019040 Nuclear Antigens Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010051791 Nuclear Antigens Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091034117 Oligonucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000010222 PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101150066369 PRO3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000609499 Palicourea Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010061902 Pancreatic neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000018737 Parkinson disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000010752 Plasminogen Inactivators Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010077971 Plasminogen Inactivators Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000029797 Prion Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091000054 Prion Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007327 Protamines Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010007568 Protamines Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100023088 Protein S100-A5 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000052575 Proto-Oncogene Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108700020978 Proto-Oncogene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000813 Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010001648 Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010005730 R-SNARE Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100035530 RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 3 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000011530 RNeasy Mini Kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011529 RT qPCR Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010240 RT-PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000700157 Rattus norvegicus Species 0.000 description 1
- 101000930457 Rattus norvegicus Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100440868 Rattus norvegicus Cyp2b1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100372762 Rattus norvegicus Flt1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000011449 Rosa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N Selenium Chemical compound [Se] BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010072170 Skin wound Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000002105 Southern blotting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010090804 Streptavidin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- ZSJLQEPLLKMAKR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Streptozotocin Natural products O=NN(C)C(=O)NC1C(O)OC(CO)C(O)C1O ZSJLQEPLLKMAKR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000002215 Synaptobrevin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710137500 T7 RNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150052863 THY1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010000499 Thromboplastin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000037432 Thymic tumor Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000000728 Thymus Neoplasms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100030859 Tissue factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101001023030 Toxoplasma gondii Myosin-D Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004338 Transferrin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000901 Transferrin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000005506 Tryptophan Hydroxylase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010031944 Tryptophan Hydroxylase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010067584 Type 1 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108091000117 Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000048218 Tyrosine 3-monooxygenases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010046334 Urease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000036142 Viral infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010052428 Wound Diseases 0.000 description 1
- IZOBIZVXEKNCNN-ZNQIEUMMSA-N [(1r,2r,3's,4e,5s)-4-hexa-2,4-diynylidenespiro[3,6-dioxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6'-oxane]-3'-yl] 3-methylbutanoate Chemical compound CC#CC#C\C=C([C@H]1O[C@H]11)\O[C@@]21CC[C@H](OC(=O)CC(C)C)CO2 IZOBIZVXEKNCNN-ZNQIEUMMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-hydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methyl [5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-3-yl] hydrogen phosphate Polymers Cc1cn(C2CC(OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)C(COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3CO)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)O2)c(=O)[nH]c1=O JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PNNCWTXUWKENPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [N].NC(N)=O Chemical compound [N].NC(N)=O PNNCWTXUWKENPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000034337 acetylcholine receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002867 adherens junction Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002821 alveolar epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000019270 ammonium chloride Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004037 angiogenesis inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002482 anti-endothelial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002246 antineoplastic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001367 artery Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000022362 bacterial infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000000227 basophil cell of anterior lobe of hypophysis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- HFACYLZERDEVSX-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzidine Chemical compound C1=CC(N)=CC=C1C1=CC=C(N)C=C1 HFACYLZERDEVSX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000005936 beta-Galactosidase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010005774 beta-Galactosidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000000941 bile Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003445 biliary tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002685 biotin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000020958 biotin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011616 biotin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002298 blastodisc Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000740 bleeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010836 blood and blood product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005388 borosilicate glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000621 bronchi Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036952 cancer formation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229960004424 carbon dioxide Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000011089 carbon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 231100000504 carcinogenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 210000004413 cardiac myocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000021164 cell adhesion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000025084 cell cycle arrest Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000024245 cell differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002659 cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003822 cell turnover Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000973 chemotherapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002512 chemotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003837 chick embryo Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- RNFNDJAIBTYOQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N chloral hydrate Chemical compound OC(O)C(Cl)(Cl)Cl RNFNDJAIBTYOQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960002327 chloral hydrate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000007882 cirrhosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000019425 cirrhosis of liver Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003776 cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011281 clinical therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003501 co-culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004186 co-expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940096422 collagen type i Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960002424 collagenase Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000007398 colorimetric assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005574 cross-species transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012136 culture method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940127089 cytotoxic agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- SUYVUBYJARFZHO-RRKCRQDMSA-N dATP Chemical compound C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1[C@H]1C[C@H](O)[C@@H](COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)O1 SUYVUBYJARFZHO-RRKCRQDMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SUYVUBYJARFZHO-UHFFFAOYSA-N dATP Natural products C1=NC=2C(N)=NC=NC=2N1C1CC(O)C(COP(O)(=O)OP(O)(=O)OP(O)(O)=O)O1 SUYVUBYJARFZHO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002498 deadly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000432 density-gradient centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002999 depolarising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004207 dermis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101150108726 dex gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012137 double-staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001755 duct epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000005069 ears Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003981 ectoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002526 effect on cardiovascular system Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007831 electrophysiology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002001 electrophysiology Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002242 embryoid body Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002124 endocrine Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002472 endoplasmic reticulum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003059 ependyma Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002514 epidermal stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000010437 erythropoiesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- DEFVIWRASFVYLL-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethylene glycol bis(2-aminoethyl)tetraacetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCOCCOCCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O DEFVIWRASFVYLL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000763 evoking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003414 extremity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000019197 fats Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012997 ficoll-paque Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000005714 functional activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001222 gaba-ergic neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007045 gastrulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 101150003286 gata4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000003500 gene array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004110 gluconeogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003180 glutathione Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108020004445 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012835 hanging drop method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003128 head Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000004 hemodynamic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002607 hemopoietic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010019692 hepatic necrosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000002672 hepatitis B Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000019514 herring Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000028996 humoral immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000984 immunochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002991 immunohistochemical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013388 immunohistochemistry analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003018 immunosuppressive agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940125721 immunosuppressive agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012678 infectious agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008611 intercellular interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004692 intercellular junction Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002490 intestinal epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004347 intestinal mucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000302 ischemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004153 islets of langerhan Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003292 kidney cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000017169 kidney disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003140 lateral ventricle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000032839 leukemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000000982 limb bud Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960004232 linoleic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OYHQOLUKZRVURQ-IXWMQOLASA-N linoleic acid Natural products CCCCC\C=C/C\C=C\CCCCCCCC(O)=O OYHQOLUKZRVURQ-IXWMQOLASA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000020778 linoleic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004636 liver morphogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000149 liver necrosis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003141 lower extremity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000002780 macular degeneration Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 159000000003 magnesium salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006249 magnetic particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003211 malignant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005171 mammalian brain Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002483 medication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003593 megakaryocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- MIKKOBKEXMRYFQ-WZTVWXICSA-N meglumine amidotrizoate Chemical compound C[NH2+]C[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO.CC(=O)NC1=C(I)C(NC(C)=O)=C(I)C(C([O-])=O)=C1I MIKKOBKEXMRYFQ-WZTVWXICSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007102 metabolic function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010208 microarray analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004925 microvascular endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000022256 midbrain development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000329 molecular dynamics simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005087 mononuclear cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000921 morphogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010028093 mucopolysaccharidosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000002894 multi-fate stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003643 myeloid progenitor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002107 myocardial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101150091879 neo gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000007857 nested PCR Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005155 neural progenitor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004770 neurodegeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000015122 neurodegenerative disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010091047 neurofilament protein H Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000004031 neuronal differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009207 neuronal maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003900 neurotrophic factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002547 new drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000956 olfactory bulb Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 201000002528 pancreatic cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000008506 pathogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001428 peripheral nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002797 plasminogen activator inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000029279 positive regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002996 primitive erythroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940048914 protamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000004252 protein component Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000004853 protein function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009145 protein modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003331 prothrombotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005180 public health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002685 pulmonary effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009256 replacement therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036390 resting membrane potential Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001525 retina Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001202 rhombencephalon Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000007017 scission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000007056 sickle cell anemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000002363 skeletal muscle cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004683 skeletal myoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003625 skull Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001057 smooth muscle myoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000329 smooth muscle myocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 150000003385 sodium Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 159000000000 sodium salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 210000001082 somatic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000392 somatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZSJLQEPLLKMAKR-GKHCUFPYSA-N streptozocin Chemical compound O=NN(C)C(=O)N[C@H]1[C@@H](O)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O ZSJLQEPLLKMAKR-GKHCUFPYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001052 streptozocin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960005404 sulfamethoxazole Drugs 0.000 description 1
- JLKIGFTWXXRPMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulphamethoxazole Chemical compound O1C(C)=CC(NS(=O)(=O)C=2C=CC(N)=CC=2)=N1 JLKIGFTWXXRPMT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000946 synaptic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002435 tendon Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008719 thickening Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000009377 thymus cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037816 tissue injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012581 transferrin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011830 transgenic mouse model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- IEDVJHCEMCRBQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N trimethoprim Chemical compound COC1=C(OC)C(OC)=CC(CC=2C(=NC(N)=NC=2)N)=C1 IEDVJHCEMCRBQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001082 trimethoprim Drugs 0.000 description 1
- RVCSYOQWLPPAOA-DHWZJIOFSA-M trospium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[N+]12([C@@H]3CC[C@H]2CC(C3)OC(=O)C(O)(C=2C=CC=CC=2)C=2C=CC=CC=2)CCCC1 RVCSYOQWLPPAOA-DHWZJIOFSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000007306 turnover Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001364 upper extremity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002438 upper gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003932 urinary bladder Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004291 uterus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006711 vascular endothelial growth factor production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002550 vasoactive agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003981 vehicle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0607—Non-embryonic pluripotent stem cells, e.g. MASC
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/87—Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
- C12N15/873—Techniques for producing new embryos, e.g. nuclear transfer, manipulation of totipotent cells or production of chimeric embryos
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0618—Cells of the nervous system
- C12N5/0619—Neurons
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0618—Cells of the nervous system
- C12N5/0622—Glial cells, e.g. astrocytes, oligodendrocytes; Schwann cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/067—Hepatocytes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
- A61K35/12—Materials from mammals; Compositions comprising non-specified tissues or cells; Compositions comprising non-embryonic stem cells; Genetically modified cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/11—Epidermal growth factor [EGF]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/115—Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/119—Other fibroblast growth factors, e.g. FGF-4, FGF-8, FGF-10
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/12—Hepatocyte growth factor [HGF]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/10—Growth factors
- C12N2501/135—Platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/20—Cytokines; Chemokines
- C12N2501/23—Interleukins [IL]
- C12N2501/235—Leukemia inhibitory factor [LIF]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2502/00—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by
- C12N2502/08—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by cells of the nervous system
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2502/00—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by
- C12N2502/30—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by tumour cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2503/00—Use of cells in diagnostics
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2506/00—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells
- C12N2506/03—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells from non-embryonic pluripotent stem cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2517/00—Cells related to new breeds of animals
- C12N2517/02—Cells from transgenic animals
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
Description
MULTIPOTENT ADULT STEM CELLS, SOURCES THEREOF, METHODS
OF OBTAINING AND MAINTAINING SAME, METHODS OF . DIFFERENTIATION THEREOF, METHODS OF USE THEREOF AND
CELLS DERIVED THEREOF
' i RELATED CASES
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/343,386, filed October 25, 2001, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/310,625, filed August 7, 2001, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/269,062, filed February 15,2001, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/268,786, filed February 14, 2001, which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. Applicants also claim priority of WO 01/11011, 60/147,324 and 60/164,650 and these applications are hereby incorporated by reference into this text; any teachings therein may be used in the practice of this invention. The present application is a continuation-in-part of
WO 01/11011, which is attached herein at Appendix 1 and is part of the present application. Documents incorporated by reference into this text are not admitted to be prior art.
The present invention relates generally to mammalian multipotent adult stem cells (MASC), and more specifically to methods for obtaining, maintaining and differentiating MASC. Uses of MASC in the therapeutic treatment of disease are also provided.
Organ and tissue generation from stem cells, and their subsequent transplantation provide promising treatments for a number of pathologies, making stem cells a central focus of research in many fields. Stem cell technology provides a promising alternative therapy for diabetes, Parkinson's disease, liver disease, heart > 30 disease, and autoimmune disorders, to name a few. However, there are at least two major problems associated with organ and tissue transplantation. : First, there is a shortage of donor organs and tissues. As few as 5 percent of the organs needed for transplant in the United States alone ever become available to a recipient (Evans, ef al. 1992). According to the American Heart Association, only 2,300 of the 40,000 Americans who needed a new heart in 1997 received one. The
American Liver Foundation reports that there are fewer than 3,000 donors for the nearly 30,000 patients who die each year from liver failure.
The second major problem is the potential incompatibility of the transplanted tissue with the immune system of the recipient. Because the donated organ or tissue . isrecognized by the host immune system as foreign, immunosuppressive medications must be provided to the patient at a significant cost-both financially and physically.
Xenotransplantation, or transplantation of tissue or organs from another species, could provide an alternative means to overcome the shortage of human organs and tissues. Xenotransplantation would offer the advantage of advanced planning. The organ could be harvested while still healthy and the patient could undergo any beneficial pretreatment prior to transplant surgery. Unfortunately, xenotranspiantation does not overcome the probiem of tissue incompaiibiiity, bui instead exacerbates it. Furthermore, according to the Centers for Disease Control, there is evidence that damaging viruses cross species barriers. Pigs have become likely candidates as organ and tissue donors, yet cross-species transmission of more than one virus from pigs to humans has been documented. For example, over a million pigs were recently slaughtered in Malaysia in an effort to contain an outbreak of Hendra virus, a disease that was transmitted to more than 70 humans with deadly results (Butler, D. 1999).
Stem cells: Definition and use
The most promising source of organs and tissues for transplantation, therefore, lies in the development of stem cell technology. Theoretically, stem cells can undergo self-renewing cell division to give rise to phenotypically and genotypically identical daughters for an indefinite time and ultimately can differentiate into at least one final cell type. By generating tissues or organs from a patient's own stem cells, or by genetically altering heterologous cells so that the recipient immune system does not recognize them as foreign, transplant tissues can be generated to provide the advantages associated with xenotransplantation without . the associated risk of infection or tissue rejection.
Stem cells also provide promise for improving the results of gene therapy. A patient's own stem cells could be genetically altered in vitro, then reintroduced in vivo to produce a desired gene product. These genetically altered stem cells would have the potential to be induced to differentiate to form a multitude of cell types for i implantation at specific sites in the body, or for systemic application. Alternately, heterologous stem cells could be genetically altered to express the recipient's major . histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen, or no MHC antigen, allowing transplantion of cells from donor to recipient without the associated risk of rejection.
Stem cells are defined as cells that have extensive proliferation potential, differentiate into several cell lineages, and repopulate tissues upon transplantation.
The quintessential stem cell is the embryonic stem (ES) cell, as it has unlimited self- renewal and multipotent differentiation potential (Thomson, J. et al. 1995; Thomson,
J.A. et al. 1998; Shamblott, M. ef al. 1998; Williams, R.L. er al. 1988; Orkin, S. 1998; Reubinoff, B.E., er al. 2000). These cells are derived from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst (Thomson, J. et al. 1995; Thomson, J.A. et al. 1998; Martin, G.R. 1981), or can be derived from the primordial germ cells from a post-implantation embryo (embryonal germ cells or EG cells). ES and EG cells have been derived from mouse, and more recently also from non-human primates and humans. When introduced into mouse blastocysts, ES cells can contribute to all tissues of the mouse (animal) (Orkin, S. 1998). Murine ES cells are therefore pluripotent. When transplanted in post-natal animals, ES and EG cells generate teratomas, which again demonstrates their multipotency. ES (and EG) cells can be identified by positive staining with the antibodies to stage-specific embryonic antigens (SSEA) 1 and 4.
At the molecular level, ES and EG cells express a number of transcription factors highly specific for these undifferentiated cells. These include oct-4 and Rex- 1, leukemia inhbitory factor receptor (LIF-R). The transcription factors sox-2 and
Rox-1 are expressed in both ES and non-ES cells. Oct-4 is expressed in the pregastrulation embryo, early cleavage stage embryo, cells of the inner cell mass of the blastocyst, and embryonic carcinoma (EC) cells. In the adult animal, oct-4 is only found in germ cells.
Oct-4, in combination with Rox-1, causes transcriptional activation of the . Zn-finger protein Rex-1, and is also required for maintaining ES in an undifferentiated state. The oct-4 gene is down-regulated when cells are induced to differentiate in vitro. Several studies have shown that oct-4 is required for maintaining the undifferentiated phenotype of ES cells, and that it plays a major role - in determining early steps in embryogenesis and differentiation. Sox-2, is required with oct-4 to retain the undifferentiated state of ES/EC and to maintain murine, but ~ not human, ES cells. Human or murine primordial germ cells require presence of
LIF. Another hallmark of ES cells is presence of high levels of telomerase, which provides these cells with an unlimited self-renewal potential in vitro. .
Stem cells have been identified in most organs or tissues. The best characterized is the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC). This mesoderm-derived cell has : been purified based on cell surface markers and functional characteristics. The
HSC, isolated from bone marrow (BM), blood, cord blood, fetal liver and yolk sac, is the progenitor cell that generates blood cells or following translation reinitiates multiple hematopoietic lineages and can reinitiate hematopoiesis for the life of a recipient. (See Fei, R., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,635,387; McGlave, et al, U.S.
Patent No. 5,460,964; Simmons, P., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,677,136; Tsukamoto, et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,750,397; Schwartz, et al, U.S. Patent No. ,759,793; DiGuisto, et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,681,599; Tsukamoto, ef al., U.S. Patent No. 5,716,827; Hill,
B, etal 1996.) When transplanted into lethally irradiated animals or humans,
HSCs can repopulate the erythroid, neutrophil-macrophage, megakaryocyte and lymphoid hemopoietic cell pool. In vitro, hemopoietic stem cells can be induced to undergo at least some self-renewing cell divisions and can be induced to differentiate to the same lineages as is seen in vivo. Therefore, this cell fulfills the criteria of a stem cell. Stem cells which differentiate only to form cells of hematopoietic lineage, however, are unable to provide a source of cells for repair of other damaged tissues, for example, heart or lung tissue damaged by high-dose chemotherapeutic agents.
A second stem cell that has been studied extensively is the neural stem cell (NSC) (Gage F.H. 2000; Svendsen C.N. et al, 1999; Okabe S. et al. 1996). NSCs were initially identified in the subventricular zone and the olfactory bulb of fetal brain. Until recently, it was believed that the adult brain no longer contained cells with stem cell potential. However, several studies in rodents, and more recently also non-human primates and humans, have shown that stem cells continue to be present ; in adult brain. These stem cells can proliferate in vivo and continuously regenerate at least some neuronal cells in vivo. When cultured ex vivo, NSCs can be induced to proliferate, as well as to differentiate into different types of neurons and glial cells.
When transplanted into the brain, NSCs can engraft and generate neural cells and glial cells. Therefore, this cell too fulfills the definition of a stem cell, albeit a ) hematopoetic stem cell.
Clarke et al. reported that NSCs from Lac-Z transgenic mice injected into : murine blastocysts or in chick embryos contribute to a number of tissues of the 5 chimeric mouse or chicken embryo (Clarke, D. L. ef al. 2000). LacZ-expressing cells were found with varying degree of mosaicism, not only in the central nervous system, but also in mesodermal derivatives as well as in epithelial cells of the liver and intestine but not in other tissues, including the hematopoietic system. These studies therefore suggested that adult NSCs may have significantly greater differentiation potential than previously realized but still do not have the pluripotent capability of ES or of the adult derived multipotent adult stem cells (MASC) described in Furcht ef al. (International Application No. PCT/US00/21387) and herein. The terms MASC, MAPC and MPC can also be used interchagably to describe adult derived multipotent adult stem cells.
Therapies for degenerative and traumatic brain disorders would be significantly furthered with cellular replacement therapies. NSC have been identified in the sub-ventricular zone (SVZ) and the hippocampus of the adult mammalian brain (Ciccolini ef al., 1998; Morrison et al., 1999; Palmer et al., 1997;
Reynolds and Weiss, 1992; Vescovi et al., 1999) and may also be present in the ependyma and other presumed non-neurogenic areas of the brain (Doetsch ef al., 1999; Johansson ef al., 1999; Palmer ef al., 1999). Fetal or adult brain-derived NSC can be expanded ex vivo and induced to differentiate into astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and functional neurons (Ciccolini ef al., 1998; Johansson et al, 1999; Palmer et al., 1999;- Reynolds et al., 1996; Ryder et al., 1990; Studer ef al., 1996; Vescovi et al., 1993). In vivo, undifferentiated NSC cultured for variable amounts of time differentiate into glial cells, GABAergic and dopaminergic neurons (Flax et al., 1998; Gage et al., 1995; Suhonen ef al., 1996). The most commonly used source of NSC is allogeneic fetal brain, which poses both immunological and . ethical problems. Alternatively, NSC could be harvested from the autologous brain.
As it is not known whether pre-existing neural pathology will affect the ability of
NSC to be cultured and induced to differentiate into neuronal and glial cells ex vivo, and because additional surgery in an already diseased brain may aggravate the underlying disease, this approach is less attractive.
The ideal source of neurons and glia for replacement strategies would be cells harvestable from adult, autologous tissue different than the brain that was readily accessible and that can be expanded in vitro and differentiated ex vivo or in vivo to the cell type that is deficient in the patient. Recent reports have suggested . that BM derived cells acquire phenotypic characteristics of neuroectodermal cells when cultured in vitro under NSC conditions, or when they enter the central nervous system (Sanchez-Ramos et al., 2000; Woodbury ef al., 2000). The phenotype of the
BM cells with this capability is not known. The capacity for differentiation of cells that acquire neuroectodermal features to other cell types is also unknown.
A third tissue specific cell with stem cell properties is the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC), initially described by Fridenshtein (1982). MSC, originally derived from the embryonal mesoderm and isolated from adult BM, can differentiate to form muscle, bone, carillage, fai, marrow siroima, aid tendon. During embryogenesis, the mesoderm develops into limb-bud mesoderm, tissue that generates bone, cartilage, fat, skeletal muscle and possibly endothelium. Mesoderm also differentiates to visceral mesoderm, which can give rise to cardiac muscle, smooth muscle, or blood islands consisting of endothelium and hematopoietic progenitor cells. Primitive mesodermal or MSCs, therefore, could provide a source for a number of cell and tissue types. A number of MSCs have been isolated. (See, for example, Caplan, A., etal, U.S. Patent No. 5,486,359; Young, H., ef al, U.S. Patent No. 5,827,735;
Caplan, A., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,811,094; Bruder, S., et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,736,396; Caplan, A., et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,837,539; Masinovsky, B., U.S.
Patent No. 5,837,670; Pittenger, M., U.S. Patent No. 5,827,740; Jaiswal, N., et al., 1997,; Cassiede P., ef al, 1996; Johnstone, B., et al., 1998; Yoo, et al., 1998; Gronthos, S., 1994).
Of the many MSC that have been described, all have demonstrated limited differentiation to form cells generally considered to be of mesenchymal origin. To } date, the most multipotent MSC reported is the cell isolated by Pittenger, et al., which expresses the SH2* SH4* CD29" CD44" CD71* CD90" CD106* CD120a*
CDI124 CD 14° CD34 CD45 phenotype. This cell is capable of differentiating to form a number of cell types of mesenchymal origin, but is apparently limited in differentiation potential to cells of the mesenchymal lineage, as the team who isolated it noted that hematopoietic cells were never identified in the expanded . cultures (Pittenger, ef al., 1999).
Other tissue-specific stem cells have been identified, including . gastrointestinal stem cells (Potten, C. 1998), epidermal stem cells (Watt, F. 1997),
S and hepatic stem cells, also termed oval cells (Alison, M. er al. 1998). Most of these are less well characterized.
Compared with ES cells, tissue specific stem cells have less self-renewal ability and, although they differentiate into multiple lineages, they are not pluripotent. No studies have addressed whether tissue specific cells express the markers described above as seen in ES cells. In addition, the degree of telomerase activity in tissue specific or lineage comitted stem cells has not been fully explored, in part because large numbers of highly enriched populations of these cells are difficult to obtain.
Until recently, it was thought that tissue specific stem cells could only differentiate into cells of the same tissue. A number of recent publications have suggested that adult organ specific stem cells may be capable of differentiation into cells of different tissues. However, the true nature of these types of cells has not been fully discerned. A number of studies have shown that cells transplanted at the time of a BM transplant can differentiate into skeletal muscle (Ferrari 1998; Gussoni 1999). This could be considered within the realm of possible differentiation potential of mesenchymal cells that are present in marrow. Jackson published that muscle satellite cells can differentiate into hemopoietic cells, again a switch in phenotype within the splanchnic mesoderm of the embryo (Jackson 1999). Other studies have shown that stem cells from one embryonic layer (for instance splanchnic mesoderm) can differentiate into tissues thought to be derived during embryogenesis from a different embryonic layer. For instance, endothelial cells or their precursors detected in humans or animals that underwent marrow transplantation are at least in part derived from the marrow donor (Takahashi, 1999; . Lin, 2000). Thus, visceral mesoderm and not splanchnic mesoderm, capabilities such as MSC, derived progeny are transferred with the infused marrow. Even more surprising are the reports demonstrating both in rodents and humans that hepatic epithelial cells and biliary duct epithelial cells can be seen in recipients that are derived from the donor marrow (Petersen, 1999; Theise, 2000; Theise, 2000).
Likewise, three groups have shown that NSCs can differentiate into hemopoietic cells. Finally, Clarke ef al. reported that cells be termed NSCs when injected into blastocysts can contribute to all tissues of the chimeric mouse (Clarke et al., 2000).
It is necessary to point out that most of these studies have not conclusively . demonstrated that a single cell can differentiate into tissues of different organs.
Also, stem cells isolated from a given organ may not necessarily be a lineage committed cell. Indeed most investigators did not identify the phenotype of the initiating cell. An exception is the study by Weissman and Grompe, who showed that cells that repopulated the liver were present in Lin Thy; LowSca;” marrow cells, which are highly enriched in HSCs. Likewise, the Mulligan group showed that marrow Sp cells, highly enriched for HSC, can differentiate into muscle and endothelium, and Jackson ef al. showed that muscle Sp cells are responsible for hemopoietic reconsiituiion (Gussoni ei ai., 1959).
Transplantation of tissues and organs generated from heterologous ES cells requires either that the cells be further genetically modified to inhibit expression of certain cell surface markers, or that the use of chemotherapeutic immune suppressors continue in order to protect against transplant rejection. Thus, although
ES cell research provides a promising alternative solution to the problem of a limited supply of organs for transplantation, the problems and risks associated with the need for immunosuppression to sustain transplantation of heterologous cells or tissue would remain. An estimated 20 immunologically different lines of ES cells would need to be established in order to provide immunocompatible cells for therapies directed to the majority of the population.
Using cells from the developed individual, rather than an embryo, as a source of autologous or from tissue typing matched allogeneic stem cells would mitigate or overcome the problem of tissue incompatibility associated with the use of transplanted ES cells, as well as solve the ethical dilemma associated with ES cell research. The greatest disadvantage associated with the use of autologous stem cells for tissue transplant thus far lies in their relatively limited differentiation potential. .
A number of stem cells have been isolated from fully-developed organisms, particularly humans, but these cells, although reported to be multipotent, have demonstrated limited potential to differentiate to multiple cell types.
Thus, even though stem cells with multiple differentiation potential have i been isolated previously by others and by the present inventors, a progenitor cell with the potential to differentiate into a wide variety of cell types of different . lineages, including fibroblasts, hepatic, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, skeletal muscle, endothelium, stroma, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle and hemopoietic cells, has not been described. If cell and tissue transplant and gene therapy are to provide the therapeutic advances expected, a stem cell or progenitor cell with the greatest or most extensive differentiation potential is needed. What is needed is the adult equivalent of an ES cell.
BM, muscle and brain are the three tissues in which cells with apparent greater plasticity than previously thought have been identified. BM contains cells that can contribute to a number of mesodermal (Ferrari G. ef al., 1998; Gussoni E. ef al., 1999; Rafii S. et al., 1994; Asahara T. ef al., 1997; Lin Y. et al., 2000; Orlic D. et al., 2001; Jackson K. et al., 2001) endodermal (Petersen B.E. et al., 1999; Theise,
N.D. etal, 2000; Lagasse E. et al., 2000; Krause D. et al., 2001) and neuroectodermal (Mezey D.S. er al., 2000; Brazelton T.R., er al., 2000, Sanchez-
Ramos J. et al., 2000; Kopen G. et al., 1999) and skin (Krause, D. et al., 2001) structures. Cells from muscle may contribute to the hematopoietic system (Jackson
K. et al., 1999; Seale P. et al., 2000). There is also evidence that NSC may differentiate into hematopoietic cells (Bjornson C. et al., 1999; Shih C. er al., 2001), smooth muscle myoblasts (Tsai R.Y. et al., 2000) and that NSC give rise to several cell types when injected in a mouse blastocyst (Clarke, D.L. et al., 2000).
The present study demonstrates that cells with multipotent adult progenitor characteristics can be culture-isolated from multiple different organs, namely BM, muscle and the brain. The cells have the same morphology, phenotype, in vitro differentiation ability and have a highly similar expressed gene profile. ’ SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a multipotent adult stem cell (MASC) isolated from a mammal, preferably mouse, rat or human. The cell is derived from a non- embryonic organ or tissue and has the capacity to be induced to differentiate to form at least one differentiated cell type of mesodermal, ectodermal and endodermal origin. In a preferred embodiment, the organ or tissue from which the MASC are isolated is bone marrow, muscle, brain, umbilical cord blood or placenta.
Examples of differentiated cells that can be derived from MASC are osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, fibroblasts, marrow stroma, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, occular, endothehal, epithelial, hepatic, pancreatic, hematopoietic, glial, neuronal or oligodendrocytes. Differentiation can be induced in vivo or ex vivo.
The MASC of the present invention is also summarized as a cell that constitutively expresses oct4 and high levels of telomerase and is negative for CD44,
MHC class I and MHC class II expression. As a method of treatment, this cell administered to a patient in a therapeutically effective amount. A surprising benefit of this treatment is that no teratomas are formed in vivo.
An object of the invention is to produce a normal, non-human animal comprising MASC. Preferably, the animal is chimeric.
Another embodiment of the invention is a composition comprising a population of MASC and a culture medium that expands the MASC population. It is advantageous in some cases for the medium to contain epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF).
The present invention also provides a composition comprising a population of fully or partially purified MASC progeny. The progeny can have the capacity to be further differentiated, or can be terminally differentiated.
In a preferable embodiment, the progeny are of the osteoblast, chondrocyte, adipocyte, fibroblast, marrow stroma, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, occular, endothelial, epithelial, hepatic, pancreatic, hematopoietic, glial, neuronal or oligodendrocyte cell type.
The present invention also provides a method for isolating and propagating
MASC by obtaining tissue from a mammal, establishing a population of adherent } cells, depleting the population of CD45" cells, recovering CD45" cells and culturing them under expansion conditions to produce an expanded cell population. An object ) of the present invention, therefore, is to produce an expanded cell population obtained by this method.
An aspect of the invention is a method for differentiating MASC ex vivo by isolating and propagating them, and then culturing the propagated cells in the presence of desired differentiation factors. The preferred differentiation factors are ) basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and isoproterenol; or fibroblast growth factor4 (FGF4) . and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Another aspect of the invention is the differentiated cell itself.
The invention includes a method for differentiating MASC in vivo, by isolating and expanding them, and then administering the expanded cell population to a mammalian host, wherein said cell population is engrafted and differentiated in vivo in tissue specific cells, such that the function of a cell or organ, defective due to injury, genetic disease, acquired disease or iatrogenic treatments, is augmented, reconstituted or provided for the first time. Using this method, the MASC can undergo self-renewal in vivo.
A further aspect of the invention is a differentiated cell obtained by ex vivo or in vivo differentiation. In a preferred embodiment, the differentiated cell is ectoderm, mesoderm or endoderm. In another preferred embodiment, the differentiated cell is of the osteoblast, chondrocyte, adipocyte, fibroblast, marrow stroma, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, occular, endothelial, epithelial, hepatic, pancreatic, hematopoietic, glial, neuronal or oligodendrocyte cell type.
An important application of this technology is the method of treating a patient by administering a therapeutically effective amount of MASC or their progeny. The progeny can either have the capacity to be further differentiated, or can be terminally differentiated. An unexpected benefit of this approach is that the need for pretreatment and/or post treatment of the patient with irradiation, chemotherapy, immunosuppressive agents or other drugs or treatments is reduced or eliminated. The induction of tolerance before or during treatment is also not required.
Such treatment can treat a variety of diseases and conditions, including . cancer, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, liver disease, diabetes, hepatitis, hemophilia, degenerative or traumatic neurological conditions, autoimmune disease, genetic deficiency, connective tissue disorders, anemia, infectious disease and transplant rejection.
MASC or their progeny are administered via localized injection, including catheter administration, systemic injection, parenteral administration, oral administration, or intrauterine injection into an embryo. Administration can be in conjunction with a pharmaceutically acceptable matrix, which may be . biodegradable.
MASC or their progeny, administered to a patient, alter the immune system to resist viral, bacterial or fungal infection.
Surprisingly, teratomas are not formed when MASC or their progeny are adminstered to a patient.
When administered to a patient, MASC or their progeny also are able to augment, reconstitute or provide for the first time the function of a cell or organ defective due to injury, genetic disease, acquired disease or iatrogenic treatments.
The organ is any of bone marrow, blood, spleen, liver, lung, intestinal tract, brain, immune system, circulatory system, bone, connective tissue, muscle, heart, blood vessels, pancreas, central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, kidney, bladder, skin, epithelial appendages, breast-mammary glands, fat tissue, and mucosal surfaces including oral esophageal, vaginal and anal. Examples of diseases treatable by this method are cancer, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, liver disease, diabetes, hepatitis, hemophilia, degenerative or traumatic neurological conditions, autoimmune disease, genetic deficiency, connective tissue disorders, anemia, infectious disease and transplant rejection.
The MASC or their progeny home to one or more organs in the patient and are engrafted therein such that the function of a cell or organ, defective due to injury, genetic disease, acquired disease or iatrogenic treatments, is augmented, reconstituted or provided for the first time, which is surprising and unexpected. In a preferred embodiment, the injury is ischemia or inflammation.
In another preferred embodiment, the MASC or their progeny enhance angiogenesis. )
In an additional aspect of the invnetion, MASC or their progeny are . genetically transformed to deliver a therapeutic agent, preferably an antiangiogenic agent.
The invention provides a therapeutic composition comprising MASC and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, wherein the MASC are present in an amount effective to produce tissue selected from the group consisting of bone marrow, blood, spleen, liver, lung, intestinal tract, brain, immune system, bone, connective tissue, muscle, heart, blood vessels, pancreas, central nervous system, kidney, . bladder, skin, epithelial appendages, breast-mammary glands, fat tissue, and mucosal surfaces including oral esophageal, vaginal and anal.
The invention further provides a therapeutic method for restoring organ, tissue or cellular function to a patient comprising the steps of removing MASC from a mammalian donor, expanding MASC to form an expanded population of undifferentiatied cells, and adminstering the expanded cells to the patient, wherein organ, tissue or cellular function is restored. The restored function may be enzymatic or genetic. In a preferred embodiment, the mammalian donor is the patient.
The invention provides a method of inhibiting the rejection of a heterologous
MASC transplanted into a patient comprising the steps of introducing into the
MASC, ex vivo, a nucleic acid sequence encoding the recipient’s MHC antigen operably linked to a promotor, wherein the MHC antigen is expressed by the MASC and transplanting the MASC into the patient, wherein MHC antigen is expressed at a level sufficient to inhibit the rejection of the transplanted MASC. The patient is of the same species or another mammalian species as the donor of the MASC.
An alternative method of inhibiting the rejection of a heterologous MASC transplanted into a patient comprises transgenically knocking out expression of
MHC antigen in the MASC and transplanting the transgenic MASC into the patient
MHC antigen is not expressed by the MASC and rejection of the transplanted cells is inhibited.
An object of the invention is a method of generating blood or individual blood components ex vivo by the process of isolating MASC and differentiating the
MASC to form blood or blood components. Preferably, the individual blood components are red blood cells, white blood cells or platelets. ) Another aspect of the invention is a method of drug discovery comprising the steps of analyzing the genomic or proteomic makeup of MASC or their progeny, employing analysis thereof via bioinformatics and/or computer analysis using algorithms, and assembling and comparing new data with known databases to compare and contrast these.
A further aspect is a method of identifying the components of a differentiation pathway comprising the steps of analyzing the genomic or proteomic makeup of MASC, inducing differentiation of MASC in vitro or in vivo, analyzing the genomic or proteomic makeup of intermediary cells in the differentiation . pathway, analyzing the genomic or proteomic makeup of terminally differentiated cells in the differentiation pathway, using bioinformatics and/or algorithms to characterize the genomic or proteomic makeup of MASC and their progeny, and comparing the data obtained in (e) to identify the components of the pathway. Using this method, differentiation that occurs in vitro can be compared with differentiation that occurs in vivo such that fundamental differences between the two systems can be characterized.
The invention provides a method of generating products in vitro that have therapeutic, diagnostic or research uiility by identifying the products in MASC and isolating the products from MASC. In a preferred embodiment, the products are proteins, lipids, complex carbohydrates, DNA or RNA.
Included in the invention is a method of inducing, in a mammal, tolerance to an antigen administered to said mammal, the method comprising the step of administering to said mammal, after or simultaneously with the administration of said antigen, an effective amount of MASC or their progeny so that said mammal's humoral immune response to a subsequent challenge with said antigen is suppressed.
Also included is a method for removing toxins from the blood of a patient comprising contacting blood ex vivo with MASC derived cells, wherein said cells line a hollow, fiber based device. In a preferred embodiment, the cells are kidney or liver cells.
An object of the invention is a method for delivering therapeutic products to a patient comprising contacting the blood of said patient ex vivo with MASC or their progeny, wherein said MASC or their progeny are genetically transformed to deliver a therapeutic agent. : A further object is a method for testing the toxicity of a drug comprising . contacting MASC or their progeny ex vivo with said drug and monitoring cell survival. In a preferred embodiment, the progeny are selected from the group consisting of hepatic, endothelial, epithelial and kidney.
The following Detailed Description, given by way of example, but not intended to limit the invention to specific embodiments described, may be } understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, incorporated herein by reference, in which:
Fig. 1 shows a graphical illustration of the expansion potential of of bone marrow (BM), muscle and brain derived MASC.
Fig. 2 shows a scatter plot representing gene expression in (A) muscle and brain MASC and (B) bone marrow and muscle MASC.
Fig. 3 shows a graphical illustration of FACS analysis of undifferentiated
MASC and MASC cultured with VEGF. The plots show isotype control IgG staining profile (thin line) vs. specific antibody staining profile (thick line). Panel A shows the phenotype of undifferentiated MASC. MASC express low levels of $2- microglobulin, FIkl, Flt 1 and AC 133, but do not stain with any of the other anti- endothelial markers; panel B shows the phenotype of MASC cultured for 14 days with 10 ng/mL VEGF. MASC express low levels most markers associated with endothelial cells, but lost expression of AC 133; and panel C shows phenotype of
MASC cultured or 3-9 days with 10 ng/mL VEGF. MASC lose expression of AC 133 by day 3 of culture with VEGF, acquire expression of Tek and VE-cadherin by day 3, Tie, vWF, CD34 and HIP12 by day 9.
Fig. 4 shows a photomicrograph of engraftment and in vivo differentiation of mMASC. Slides were examined by fluorescence or confocal microscopy. Panels A,
G, J, N, Q and S represent identically stained tissues of control NOD-SCID animals that were not injected with mMASC. Panels A-F show a photomicrograph of bone marrow (BM) cytospin from a control (A) and study (B-F) animal stained with antif-gal-FITC antibody and PE-conjugated antibodies to various hematopoietic antigens. A-B: CD45, C: CD19, D: MAC], E: GR1, F:TER119 and DAPI; panels G- ’ I shows a photomicrograph of a spleen section from a control (G) and study animal (H, 1) stained with anti-B-gal-FITC antibody and anti-CD45-PE antibody. Donor derived anti-B-gal® cells are seen in clusters. H is 10X and I are 60X magnifications; panels J-M shows a photomicrograph of a liver section from a control mouse (J) and study animal (K-M) stained with anti-B-gal-FITC. J-L are co-stained with mouse- anti-CK-18 / anti-mouse-Cy5 plus CD45-PE and M with mouse anti-albumin / anti-
mouse Cy3 antibodies. J-K, L and M are 20X, 60X and 10X magnifications respectively; panels N-P show a photomicrograph of an intestine section from a control mouse and study animal (O-P), stained with anti-B-gal-FITC plus mouse- anti-pan-CK / anti-mouse-CyS5 antibodies (N-P). N and P are costained with CD45- .
PE antibodies. B-gal’ Pan-CK'CD45" epithelial cells covered 50% (solid arrow, panel P) of the circumference of villi. Pan-CK™/ B-gal” cells in the core of the villi (open arrow-panel O) co-stained for CD45 (P); panels Q-R show a photomicrograph of a lung section from a control mouse (Q) and study animal (R) stained with anti-p- gal-FITC plus mouse-anti-pan-CK / anti-mouse-CyS5 plus CD45-PE antibodies.
Several B-gal” pan-CK” donor cells are seen lining the alveoli of the recipient animal (R). CD45" / pan-CK cells of hematopoietic origin are seen distinctly from the epithelial cells; and panels S-T show a photomicrograph of a blood vessel section from a controi mouse (S) and thymic lymphoma that developed in a study animal 16 weeks after transplantation (T) stained with anti-B-gal-FITC, anti-vWF-PE and TO-
PRO3. B-gal” donor cells differentiated into VWF" endothelial cells in the thymic lymphoma which is of recipient origin, as the tumor cells did not stain with anti-B-
Gal antibodies.
Fig. 5 shows immunohistochemical evaluation of MASC-derived endothelial cells using confocal fluorescence microscopy. (a) MASC grown for 14 days in
VEGF. Typical membrane staining is seen for the adhesion receptor, avp3, and for the adherens junction proteins, ZO-1, B- and y-catenin. Scale bar = 50 um. (b)
Morphology in bright field of MASC at day 0 (upper panel) and day 21 (lower panel) after VEGF treatment. Bar = 25 pm.
Fig. 6 shows a photomicrograph of MASC derived endothelial cells. Panel
A shows histamine-mediated release of vWF from MASC-derived endothelium.
Staining with antibodies against myosin shows cytoskeletal changes with increased numbers of myosin stress fibers, and widening of gap junctions (Arrows) . (Representative example of 3 experiments). Scale bar = 60 um; panel B shows
MASC-derived endothelium takes up a-LDL. After 7 days, cells expressed Tie-1, but again did not take up a-LDL. However, acquisition of expression of vV WF on day 9 was associated with uptake of aLDL (representative example of 10 . experiments). Scale bar = 100 pm; and panel C shows vascular tube formation by
MASC-derived endothelium. After 6h, typical vascular tubes could be seen. } (Representative example of 6 experiments). Scale bar = 200 um
Fig. 7 shows a graphical illustration of FACS analysis of MASC derived . endothelial cells. The Plots show isotype control IgG staining profile (thin line) vs. specific antibody staining profile (thick line) (Representative example of >3 experiments). Number above plots is the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) for the control IgG staining and the specific antibody staining. Panel A shows hypoxia upregulates Flkl and Tek expression on MASC-derived endothelial cells analyzed by flow cytometry; panel B shows that hypoxia upregulates VEGF production by
MASC-derived endothelial cells. VEGF levels were measured by ELISA and the results are shown as Mean + SEM of 6 experiments; and panel C shows that IL-1a induces expression of class II HLA antigens and increases expression of adhesion receptors. Plots show isotype control IgG staining profile (thin line) vs. specific antibody staining profile (thick line) (Representative example of 3 experiments).
Number above plots shows MFI for the control IgG staining and the specific antibody staining.
Fig. 8 shows a photomicrograph of human MASC derived endothelial cells.
Panels C-F show the 3-D reconstructed figures for either anti-human f2- microglobulin-FITC (panel C) or anti-mouse-CD31-FITC (panel D) and merging of the two (Panel E), anti-vWF-Cy3 (panel F), and merging of the three staining patterns (Panel G). Panels A and B show the confocal image of a single slice stained with either anti-human B2-microglobulin-FITC and anti-vWF-Cy3, or anti-mouse-
CD31-Cy5 and anti-vWF-Cy3. Scale bar = 100 um. Panel H shows wound healing resulting in a highly vascularized area in the punched ear stained with anti-p2- microglobulin-FITC and anti-vWF in mice injected with human MASC-derived endothelial cells (Top panel) or human foreskin fibroblasts (Bottom panel). Scale bar = 20 pm. C= Cartilage. D= dermis. Panel I shows that tumor angiogenesis is derived from endothelial cells generated in vivo from MASC resulting in a highly : vascularized area in the tumor stained with anti-X32-microglobulin-FITC, anti-vWF and TOPRO-3. Scale bar = 20 pm.
Fig. 9 shows spiking behavior and expressed voltage-gated sodium currents in hMSC derived neuron-like cells. Panel A shows a photomicrograph of cultured hMSC-derived neurons that showed spiking behavior and expressed voltage-gated sodium currents (the shadow of the pipette points to the cell). Panel B shows graphical illustrations of current-clamp recordings from a hMSC derived neuron.
Panel C shows graphical illustrations of leak-subtracted current traces from the same hMSC derived neuron.
Fig. 10 shows quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis confirming the hepatocyte-like phenotype. Panels A and B show mMASC (A) and hMASC (B) cultured on Matrigel™ with FGF4 and HGF or FGF4 alone for 21 and 28 days respectively. For aFP, Cyp2b9 and Cyp2bl3, numbers under the blots are relative to mRNA from liver, as no transcripts were detected in undifferentiated MASC. Li = mouse or human liver mRNA; NT = no-template. Representative example of 5 mouse and 1 human studies, Panel C shows hMASC (B) cultured on Matrigel™ with
FGF4 and HGF or FGF4 alone for 21 days. FH= FGF4 and HGF-induced hMASC on Matrigei™, Huh= Huh?7 ceili iine used as control.
Fig. 11 shows a photomicrograph of hepatocyte-like cells. MASC induced by FGF4 produce glycogen. Glycogen storage is seen as accumulation of dark staining (Representative example of 3 studies). Scale bar = 25 pm.
Defifnitions
As used herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings: “Expansion” shall mean the propogation of a cell without differentiation. “Intermediary cells” are cells produced during differentiation of a MASC that have some, but not all, of the characteristics of MASC or their terminally differentiated progeny. Intermediary cells may be progenitor cells which are committed to a specific pathway, but not to a specific cell type. “Normal” shall mean an animal that is not diseased, mutated or malformed, i.e., healthy animals. “Self-renewal” shall mean the ability of cells to propagate without the addition of external stimulation. The presence of cytokines or other growth factors produced locally in the tissue or organ shall not constitute external stimulation. “Home” shall mean the ability of certain MASC or their progeny to migrate specifically to sites where additional cells may be needed.
“Knocking out expression” shall mean the elimination of the function of a particular gene.
As used herein, “genomic or proteomic makeup” shall mean the gene or . protein components of a given cell. “High levels of telomerase activity” can be correlated to the two-fold level observed in the immortal human cell line MCF7. Soule et al. (1973) J. Cancer Inst. 51:1409-1416.
Application of this Technology
MASC technology could be used to replace damaged, diseased, dysfunctional or dead cells in the body of a mammal. Furthermore these cells could be injected into the host using autologous or allogeneic cells with or without nature or artificial supports, matrices or polymers to correct for loss of cells, abnormal function or cells or organs e.g. genetic such as mutations of genes affecting a protein function such as sickle cell disease, hemophilia or "storage diseases" where products accumulate in the body because of faulty processing, e.g. Guacher's, Neiman Pick's, mucopolysaccharidosis etc. Examples of restitution of dying or dead cells would be the use of MASC or their differentiated progeny in the treatment of macular degeneration and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Given the ability to have these MASC to "home" to and incorporate into organs/tissues of a host animal proliferate and differentiation they could potentially be used to provide new endothelial cells to an ischemic heart and also myocardial cells themselves, numerous other examples exist.
There may be medical circumstances where transient benefits to a tissue or organs function could have desirable effects. For example, there are now cases with liver failure patients hooked up to a bioartificial liver, which was sufficient to allow for the recovery of normal liver function, obviating the need for a liver transplant.
This is a serious unmet medical need, for example in one liver disease alone - hepatitis C. There are 4-5 million Americans currently infected with hepatitis C and there are estimates that 50% of these people will get cirrhosis and need a liver transplant. This is a huge public health problem that is begging for a remedy.
Hepatocytes, derived from autologous or allogeneic MASC, can be transplanted in this or other liver diseases. Such transplants may either transiently provide liver function to allow recovery of the recipient's own liver cells or permanently repopulate a damaged liver to allow recovery of normal liver function via the donor cells.
In addition to many cell therapies where the undifferentiated MASC are administered to a human or other mammal to then differentiate into specific cells in ; the donor, the progeny of the MASC could be differentiated ex vivo and then be administered as purified or even mixtures of cells to provide a therapeutic benefit.
These MASC in the undifferentiated state could also be used as carriers or vehicles to deliver drugs or molecules of therapeutic benefit. This could be to treat any one of a number of diseases including but not limited to cancer, cardiovascular, inflammatory, immunologic, infections, etc. So by example, a cell perhaps an endothelial cell expressing a novel or high levels of an angiogenic molecule could be administered to a patient which would be incorporated into existing blood vessels to promote angiogenesis, for example in the heart; correspondingly one could have endothelial cells producing molecules that might suppress angiogenesis that would be incorporated into blood cells and inhibit their further formation for example in diabetic retinopathy or in cancer where new blood vessel formation is key to the pathogenesis, spread and extent of the disease.
The ability to populate the BM and to form blood ex vivo has an untold use for important medical applications. For example regarding ex vivo production of blood, the transfusion of blood and blood products around the world is still performed with variable safety because of transmission of infectious agents. Blood transfusions have lead to HIV, hepatitis C and B, and now the impending threat of
Mad Cow or CJD, Creuzfeldt-Jakob disease. The ability to produce blood in vitro, especially red blood cells, could provide a safe and reliable alternative to collection of blood from people. It might never fully replace blood collection from donors. hMASC or their hematopoietic progeny could be placed in animals in utero such as sheep which could form human hematopoietic cells and serve as a source for human blood components or proteins of therapeutic utility. The same could be true for hepatocytes, islets or many other cell types but would provide an alternative to producing human cells in vitro and use the animals as factories for the cells. It could also assist in blood shortages that are predicted to occur. hMASC could also conceivably be transplanted into a human embryo to correct any one of a number of defects.
Because these MASC can give rise to clonal populations of specifically differentiated cells they are a rich platform for drug discovery. This would involve doing gene expression, analyzing gene expression, discovery of new genes activated } patterns of activation, proteomics and patterns of protein expression and modification surrounding this. This would be analyzed with bioinformatics, using data bases and algorithms for analyzing these data compared to publicly available or proprietary data bases. The information of how known drugs or agents might act could be compared to information derived from MASC, their differentiated progeny and from a population of people which could be available. Pathways, targets, and receptors could be identified. New drugs, antibodies or other compounds could be found to produce a biologically desirable responses. Correspondingly, the MASC and their differentiated progeny could be used as monitors for undesirable responses, : coupled with databases, bioinformatics and algorithms.
These MASC derived from human, mouse, rat or other mammals appear to be the only normal, non-malignant, somatic cell (non germ cell) known to date to express very high levels of telomerase even in late passage cells. The telomeres are extended in MASC and they are karyotypically normal. Because MASC injected into a mammal, home to multiple organs, there is the likelihood that newly arrived
MASC in a particular organ could be self renewing. As such, they have the potential to repopulate an organ not only with themselves but also with self renewing differentiated cell types that could have been damaged, died, or otherwise might have an abnormal function because of genetic or acquired disease.
For example in type I diabetes there is a progressive loss of insulin producing beta cells in the pancreatic islets. In various renal diseases there is progressive loss of function and in some cases obliteration of glomerulus. If in the case of diabetes, MASC or differentiated progeny might home to the pancreas and themselves or via interaction with endogenous cells within the pancreas, induce islets to be formed. This would have an ameliorating impact on diabetes.
Ultimately conditions, agents or drugs might be found to in vivo control, i.e. promote or inhibit their self renewing capability of the MASC and control, or enhance or inhibit the movement to differentiated progeny, e.g., islet precursors, hepatocyte precursors, blood precursors, neural and/or cardiac precursors using
MASC one will likely find pathways, methods of activation and control that might induce endogenous precursor cells within an organ to proliferate and differentiation.
This same ability to repopulate a cellular tissue or organ compartment and self renew and also differentiate could have numerous uses and be of unprecedented usefulness to meet profound unmet medical needs. So for example certain genetic diseases where there are enzyme deficiencies have been treated by BM transplantation. Often times this may help but not cure the complications of the disease where residual effects of the disease might persist in the brain or bones or elsewhere, MASC and genetically engineered MASC offer the hope to ameliorate numerous genetic and acquired diseases. They will also be useful for diagnostic and research purposes and drug discovery.
The present invention also provides methods for drug discovery, genomics, proteomics, and pathway identification; comprising analyzing the genomic or proteomic makeup of a MASC, coupled with analysis thereof via bioinformatics, computer analysis via algorithms, to assemble and compare new with known databases and compare and contract these. This will identify key components, pathways, new genes and/or new patterns of gene and protein expression and protein modification (proteomics) that could lead to the definition of targets for new compounds, antibodies, proteins, small molecule organic compounds, or other biologically active molecules that would have therapeutic benefit.
The following examples are provided to illustrate but not limit the invention.
Example 1. Selection, Culture and Characterization of
Mouse Multipotent Adult Stem Cells (mMASC)
Cell Isolation and Expansion
All tissues were obtained according to guidelines from the University of
Minnesota IACUC. BM mononuclear cells (BMMNC) were obtained by ficoll- . hypaque separation of BM was obtained from 5-6 week old ROSA26 mice or
C57/BL6 mice. Alternatively, muscle and brain tissue was obtained from 3-day old 129 mice. Muscles from the proximal parts of fore and hind limbs were excised from and thoroughly minced. The tissue was treated with 0.2% collagenase (Sigma
Chemical Co, St Louis, MO) for 1 hour at 37°C, followed by 0.1% trypsin (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 45 minutes. Cells were then triturated vigorously and passed through a 70-um filter. Cell suspensions were collected and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1600 rpm. Brain tissues was dissected and minced thoroughly.
Cells were dissociated by incubation with 0.1% trypsin and 0.1% DNAse (Sigma) : for 30 minutes at 37 °C. Cells were then triturated vigorously and passed through a 70-um filter. Cell suspension was collected and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1600 rpm.
BMMNC or muscle or brain suspensions were plated at 1x10°/cm? in expansion medium [2% FCS in low glucose Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (LG-DMEM), 10 ng/mL each platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)] and maintained at 5x10%/cm?. After 3-4 weeks, cells recovered by trypsin/EDTA were depleted of
CD45" /glycophorin (Gly)-A" cells with micromagnetic beads. Resulting CD45 /Gly-A” cells were replated at 10 cells/well in 96-well plates coated with FN and were expanded at cell densities between 0.5 and 1.5x 10°/cm®. The expansion potential of MASC was similar regardless of the tissue from which they were derived (Fig. 1).
Characterization of MASC
Phenotypically, mMASC derived from BM, muscle and brain and cultured on FN were CD13", CD44", CD45", class-I and class-II histocompatibility antigen’, FIkI'" and cKit, identical to the characteristics of hMASC, as described in
Internation Application No. PCT/US00/21387. Although cell expansion during the initial 2-3 months was greater when cells were cultured on collagen type IV, laminin or Matrigel™, cells had phenotypic characteristics of MSC, i.e., expressed CD44 and did not express CD13. As with human cells, mMASC cultured on FN expressed transcripts for oct-4, and the LIF-R.
Approximately 1 % of wells seeded with 10 CD457/G1yA" cells yielded } continuous growing cultures. This suggests that the cells capable of initiating
MASC cultures are rare and likely less that 1/1,000 of CD45/G1yA cells. mMASC cultured on FN were 8-10 um in diameter with a large nucleus and scant cytoplasm.
Several populations have been cultured for > 100 PDs. The morphology and phenotype of cells remained unchanged throughout culture. mMASC that had undergone 40 and 102 PDs were harvested and telomere lengths evaluated. Telomere length was measured using the Telomere Length Assay
Kit from Pharmingen (New Jersey, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Average telomere length (ATL) of mMASC cultured for 40 PDs was 27 Kb. When re-tested after 102 PDs, ATL remained unchanged. For karyotyping of mMASC, cells were subcultured at a 1:2 dilution 12h before . harvesting, collected with trypsin-EDTA, and subjected to a 1.5h colcemid incubation followed by lysis with hypotonic KCl and fixation in acid/alcohol as previously described (Verfaillie ef al., 1992). Cytogenic analysis was conducted on a monthly basis and showed a normal karyotype, except for a single.population that became hyperdiploid after 45 PDs, which was no longer used for studies.
Murine MASC obtained after 46 to >80 PDs were tested by Quantitative (Q)-
RT-PCR for expression levels of Oct4 and Rexl, two transcription factors important in maintaining an undifferentiated status of ES cells. RNA was extracted from mouse MASC, neuroectodermal differentiated progeny (day 1- 7 after addition of bFGF) and mouse ES cells. RNA was reverse transcribed and the resulting cDNA underwent 40 rounds of amplification (ABI PRISM 7700, Perkin Elmer/Applied
Biosystems) with the following reaction conditions: 40 cycles of a two step PCR (95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 60 seconds) after initial denaturation (95°C for 10 minutes) with 2 pl of DNA solution, 1X TagMan SYBR Green Universal Mix PCR reaction buffer. Primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Primers used
NEO 5-TGGATTGCACGCAGGTTCT-3'
S"TTCGCTTGGTGGTCGAATG-3' 5-GAAGCGTTITCTCCCTGGATT-3' 5'-GTGTAGGATTGGGTGCGTT-3'
Rex 1 5'-GAAGCGTTCTCCCTGGAATTTC-3' 5'-GTGTAGGATTGGGTGCGTTT-3' otx 1 5-GCTGTTCGCAAAGACTCGCTAC-3' 5'-ATGGCTCTGGCACTGATACGGATG-3' otx2 5'-CCATGACCTATACTCAGGCTTCAGG-3' 5-GAAGCTCCATATCCCTGGGTGGAAAG-3' :
Nestin 5' 5’-GGAGTGTCGCTTAGAGGTGC-3' 5'“TCCAGAAAGCCAAGAGAAGC-3' mRNA levels were normalized using GAPDH as housekeeping gene, and compared with levels in mouse ES cells. Oct4 and Rex 1 mRNA were present at similar levels in BM, muscle and brain derived MASC. Rex] mRNA levels were similar in mMASC and mES cells, while Oct4 mRNA levels were about 1,000 fold lower in MASC than in ES cells.
Expressed gene profile of mouse BM, muscle and brain derived MASC is highly : similar
To further evaluate whether MASC derived from different tissues were similar, the expressed gene profile of BM, muscle and brain derived MASC was examined using U74A Affimetrix gene array. Briefly, mRNA was extracted from 2- 3x10° BM, muscle or brain derived-MASC, cultured for 45 population doublings.
Preparation of cDNA, hybridization to the U74A array containing 6,000 murine genes and 6,000 EST clusters, and data acquisition were done per manufacturer’s recommendations (all from Affimetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Data analysis was done using GeneChip® software (Affimetrix). Increased or decreased expression by a factor of 2.2 fold (Iyer V.R. et al., 1999; Scherf U. et al., 2000; Alizadeh A.A. et al., 2000) was considered significant. r’ value was determined using linear regression analysis (Fig.2).
Comparison between the expressed gene profile in MASC from the three tissues showed that <1% of genes were expressed at >2.2-fold different levels in
MASC from BM than muscle. Likewise, only <1% of genes were expressed > 2.2- fold different level in BM than brain derived MASC. As the correlation coefficient between the different MASC populations was > 0.975, it was concluded that MASC derived from the different tissues are highly homologous, in line with the phenotypic described above and the differentiation characteristics described in Example 5.
Using the mouse-specific culture conditions, mMASC cultures have been maintained for more than 100 cell doublings. mMASC cultures have been initiated with marrow from C57B1/6 mice, ROSA26 mice and C57BL/6 mice transgenic for the -HMG-LacZ.
Example 2. Selection and Culture of : Rat Multipotent Adult Stem Cells (rMASC)
BM and MNC from Sprague Dawley or Wistar rats were obtained and plated under conditions similar for mMASC. After 21-28 days, cells were depleted of
CD45" cells, and the resulting CD45" cells were subcultured at 10 cells/well.
Similar to mMASC, rMASC have been culture expanded for >100 PDs.
Expansion conditions of rat MASC culture required the addition of EGF, PDGF-BB and LIF and culture on FN, but not collagen type I, laminin or Matrigel™. rMASC were CD44, CD45 and MHC class I and II negative, and expressed high levels of telomerase. The ability of a normal cell to grow over 100 cell doublings is unprecedented, unexpected and goes against conventional dogma of more than two 5S decades.
Rat MASC that had undergone 42 PDs, 72 PDs, 80 PDs, and 100 PDs, were harvested and telomere lengths evaluated. Telomeres did not shorten in culture, as was determined by Southern blot analysis after 42 PDs, 72 PDs, 80 PDs, and 100
PDs. Monthly cytogenetic analysis of rat MASC revealed normal karyotype.
Example 3. Selection and Culture of
Human Multipotent Adult Stem Cells (hMASC)
BM was obtained from healthy volunteer donors (age 2-50 years) after informed consent using guidelines from the University of Minnesota Committee on the use of Human Subject in Research. BMMNC were obtained by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation and depleted of CD45" and glycophorin-A* cells using micromagnetic beads (Miltenyii Biotec, Sunnyvale, CA).
Expansion conditions: 5x 10° CD457/GlyA” cells were diluted in 200 pL expansion medium [58% DMEM-LG, 40% MCDB-201 (Sigma Chemical Co, St
Louis, MO), supplemented with 1X insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS), 1X linoleic- acid bovine serum albumin (LA-BSA), 10* M Dexamethasone, 10” M ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (all from Sigma), 100 U penicillin and 1,000 U streptomycin (Gibco)] and 0-10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT) with 10 ng/ml of EGF (Sigma) and 10 ng/ml PDGF-BB (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN)] and plated in wells of 96 well plates that had been coated with 5 ng/ml of FN (Sigma).
Medium was exchanged every 4-6 days. Once wells were >40-50% confluent, adherent cells were detached with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Sigma) and replated at 1:4 dilution in MASC expansion medium and bigger culture vessels coated with 5 ng/ml
FN to maintain cell densities between 2 and 8x10? cells/cm’.
Undifferentiated MASC did not express CD31, CD34, CD36, CD44, CD45,
CD62-E, CD62-L, CD62-P, HLA-class I and II, cKit, Tie, Tek, a,p3, VE-cadherin, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM), intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)- 1. MASC expressed low/very low levels of B2-microglobulin, a.ps, CDW90,
AC133, FIk1 and Flt1, and high levels of CD13 and CD49b (Fig. 3).
Example 4. Immunophenotypic Analysis
Immunofluorescence 1. Cultured cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and methanol at room temperature, and incubated sequentially for 30 min each with primary antibody, and with or without secondary antibody. Between steps, slides were washed with PBS/BSA. Cells were examined by fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss
Axiovert; Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY) and confocal fluorescence microscopy (Confocal 1024 microscope; Olympus AX70, Olympus Optical Co. LTD, Japan).
To assess the frequency of different cell types in a given culture, the number of cells were counted that stained positive with a given antibody in four visual fields (50-200 cells per field). : : 2. Harvested tissues: Cytospin specimens of blood and BM were fixed with acetone (Fisher Chemicals) for 10 min at room temperature. For solid organs, 5 ym thick fresh frozen sections of tissues were mounted on glass slides and immediately fixed in acetone for 10 min at room temperature. Following incubation with isotype sera for 20 min, cytospin preparations or tissue sections were serially stained for tissue specific antigens, B-gal and a nuclear counter stain (DAPI or TO-PRO-3).
Cover slips were mounted using Slowfade-antifade kit (Molecular Probes Inc.,
Eugene, OR, USA). Slides were examined by fluorescence microscopy and confocal fluorescence microscopy. 3. Antibodies: Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature or methanol at -20°C, and incubated sequentially for 30 min each with primary Ab, and FITC or Cy3 coupled anti-mouse- or anti-rabbit-IgG Ab. Between each step slides were washed with PBS+1 %BSA. PE or FITC-coupled anti-CD45, anti-CD31, anti-CD62E, anti-Macl, anti-Gr1, anti-CD19, anti-CD3, and anti-Ter119 antibodies were obtained from BD Pharmingen. Abs against GFAP (clone G-A-5, 1:400), galactocerebroside (GalC) (polyclonal, 1:50), MBP (polyclonal, 1:50),
GABA (clone GB-69, 1:100), parvalbumin (clone PARV-19, 1:2000), Tull (clone
SDL.3D10, 1:400), NF-68 (clone NR4, 1:400), NF-160 (clone NN 18, 1:40), and
NF-200 (clone N52, 1:400), NSE (polyclonal, 1:50), MAP2-AB (clone AP20, 1:400), Tau (polyclonal, 1:400), TH (clone TH-2, 1:1000), DDC (clone DDC-109, 1:100), TrH (clone WH-3, 1:1000), serotonin (polyclonal, 1:2000), glutamate (clone
GLU-4, 1:400), fast twitch myosin (clone MY-32; 1:400 dilution) were from Sigma.
DAPI and TOPRO-3 were from Molecular Probes. Abs against vWF (polyclonal; 1:50) Neuro-D (polyclonal, 1:50), c-ret (polyclonal, 1:50) and Nurrl (polyclonal, 1:50) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA. Abs against PSA-
NCAM (polyclonal, 1:500) from Phanmingen, San Diego, CA and against serotonin transporter (clone MAB 1564, 1:400), DTP (polyclonal, 1:200), Na-gated voltage channel (polyclonal, 1:100), glutamate-receptors-35, -6 and -7 (clone 3711:500) and
NMDA (polyclonal 1:400) receptor from Chemicon International, Temecula, CA.
Anti-nestin (1:400) Abs were a kind gift from Dr. U. Lendahl, University of Lund,
Sweden. Antibodies against NSE (1:50) pan-cytokeratin (catalog number C-2562; 1:100), CK-18 (C-8541; 1:300), albumin (A-6684; 1:100) were all obtained from
Sigma. Polyclonal antibodies against Flk1, Flt1, Tek, HNF-1B were obtained from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA. Anti-nestin (1:400) antibodies were a kind gift from Dr. U. Lendahl, University of Lund, Sweden. Control-mouse, - rabbit or,-rat IgGs and FITC/PE/Cy3- and Cy5-labeled secondary antibodies were obtained from Sigma. Rabbit anti-B-gal-FITC antibody was obtained from
Rockland Immunochemicals, USA. TO-PRO-3 was obtained from Molecular
Probes Inc. and DAPI was obtained from Sigma.
B. X-GAL staining: Tissue sections were stained by for B-galactosidase enzyme activity using B-gal staining kit from Invitrogen, pH 7.4. Manufacturer's instructions were followed except for the fixation step, during which the tissue sections were incubated for 5 min instead of 10 min.
C. FACS: For FACS, undifferentiated MASC were detached and stained sequentially with anti-CD44, CD45, CD13, cKit, MHC-class I and II, or b2- microglobulin (BD Pharmingen) and secondary FITC or PE coupled antibodies, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde until analysis using a FACS-Calibur (Becton-
Dickinson).
Example 5. Single Cell Origin of Differentiated Lineages from MASC
The differentiation ability of mMASC or IMASC was tested by adding : differentiation factors (cytokines) chosen based on what has been described for differentiation of hMASC or ES cells to mesoderm, neuroectoderm, and endoderm.
Differentiation required that cells were replated at 1-2x10* cells/cm’ in serum free medium, without EGF, PDGF-BB and LIF, but with lineage specific cytokines.
Differentiation was determined by immunohistology for tissue specific markers [slow twitch myosin and MyoD (muscle), von-Willebrand factor (VWF) and Tek (endothelium), NF200 and MAP? (ncuroectodermal), and cytokeratin-18 and albumin (endodermal)], RT-PCR, and functional studies.
MASC Differentiation into Neuroectodermal Cells
Palmer ef al. showed that neuroprogenitors can be culture expanded with
PDGF-BB and induced to differentiate by removal of PDGF and addition of bFGF as a differentiation factor. Based on those studies and studies conducted using hMASC, mMASC and rMASC were plated in FN coated wells without PDGF-BB and EGF but with 100 ng/mL bFGF. Progressive maturation of neuron-like cells was seen throughout culture. After 7 days, the majority of cells expressed nestin.
After 14 days, 15-20% of MASC acquired morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of astrocytes (GFAP), 15-20% of oligodendrocytes (galactocerebroside (GalC)") and 50-60% of neurons (neurofilament-200 (NF- 200)"). NF200, GFAP or GalC were never found in the same cell, suggesting that it is unlikely that neuron-like cells were hMASC or glial cells that inappropriately expressed neuronal markers. Neuron-like cells also expressed Tau, MAP2 and NSE.
Approximately 50% of neurons expressed gamma-amino-butyric-acid (GABA) and parvalbumin, 30% tyrosine hydroxylase and dopa-decarboxylase (DDC), and 20% serotonin and tryptophan hydroxylase. Differentiation was similar when MASC had been expanded for 40 or >90 PDs. Q-RT-PCR, performed as described in Example 1, confirmed expression of neuroectodermal markers: on day 2 MASC expressed otx] and otx2 mRNA, and after 7 days nestin mRNA was detected.
The effect of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-8b as a differentiation factor was tested next. This is important in vivo for midbrain development and used in vitro to induce dopaminergic and serotoninergic neurons from murine ES cells on hMASC. When confluent h(MASC (n=8) were cultured with 10 ng/mL FGF-8b +
EGF, differentiation into cells staining positive for neuronal markers but not oligodendrocytes and astrocytes was seen. Neurons had characteristics of
GABAergic (GABA"; 40+4%), dopaminergic (DOPA, TH, DCC and DTP", 265%) and serotoninergic (TrH, serotonin and serotonin-transporter’, 34+6%) neurons.
DOPA" neurons stained with Abs against Nurrl suggesting differentiation to midbrain DA neurons. FGF-8b induced neurons did not have electrophysiological characteristics of mature neurons. Therefore, cocultured cells from 3-week old
FGF-8b supported cultures with the glioblastoma cell line, U-87, and FGF-8b for an additional 2-3 weeks.
Neurons acquired a more mature morphology with increased cell size and . number, length and complexity of the neurites, and acquired electrophysiological characteristics of mature neurons (a transient inward current, blocked reversibly by 1 nM tetrodotoxin (TTX) together with the transient time course and the voltage- dependent activation of the inward current is typical for voltage-activated sodium currents, found only in mature neurons).
When hMASC (n=13) were cultured with 10 ng/m brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) + EGF, differentiation was to exclusively DOPA, TH,
DCC, DTP and Nurrl positive neurons. Although BDNF supports neural differentiation from ES cells and NSC (Peault, 1996; Choi ef al. 1998), no studies have shown exclusive differentiation to DA-like neurons.
Similar results were seen for mMASC induced with bFGF and tMASC with bFGF and BDNF. Further studies on MASC-derived neuronal cells are presented in
Example 10.
MASC Differentiation into Endothelial Cells
As an example of mesoderm, differentiation was induced to endothelium.
Undifferentiated mMASC or rMASC did not express the endothelial markers CD31,
CD62E, Tek or vWF, but expressed low levels of Flkl. mMASC or rMASC were cultured in FN-coated wells with 10 ng/mL of the endothelial differentiation factor
VEGEF-B. Following treatment with VEGF for 14 days, >90% of MASC, irrespective of the number of PDs they had undergone, expressed Fltl, CD31, vWF or CD62, consistent with endothelial differentiation. Like primary endothelial cells,
MASC-derived endothelial cells formed vascular tubes within 6 hours after replating in Matrigel™.
Similarly, h(MASC express Flk1 and Fit] but not CD34, Mucl8 (P1H12),
PECAM, E- and P-selectin, CD36, or Tie/Tek. When hMASC 2x10" cells/cm” were cultured in serum free medium with 20 ng/mL vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cells expressed CD34, VE-cadherin, VCAM and Muc-18 from day 7 on.
On day 14, they also expressed Tie, Tek, Flkl and Flt1, PECAM, P-selectin and E- selectin, CD36, vWF, and connexin-40. Furthermore, cells could uptake low-
density lipoproteins (LDL). Results from the histochemical staining were confirmed by Western blot. To induce vascular tube formation, MASC cultured for 14 days with VEGF were replated on Matrigel™ with 10 ng/mL VEGF-B for 6h. : Endothelial differentiation was not seen when hMASC cultured in >2% FCS were used. In addition, when FCS was left in the media during differentiation, no endothelial cells were generated.
At least 1000-fold expansion was obtained when hMASC were sub-cultured, suggesting that endothelial precursors generated from hMASC continue to have significant proliferative potential. Cell expansion was even greater when FCS was added to the cultures after day 7.
When hMASC derived endothelial cells were administered intravenously (I.V.) in NOD-SCI mice who have a human colon-carcinoma implanted under the skin, contribution of the human endothelial cells could be seen to the neovascularization in the tumors. It may therefore be possible to incorporate genetically modified endothelial cells to derive a therapeutic benefit, i.e., to inhibit angiogenesis in for example cancer or to promote it to enhance vascularization in limbs or other organs such as the heart. Further studies on MASC-derived endothelial cells are presented in Example 9.
MASC Differentiation into Endoderm
Whether mMASC or tMASC could differentiate to endodermal cells was tested. A number of different culture conditions were tested including culture with the diffentiation factors keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and FGF-4, either on laminin, collagen, FN or Matrigel™ coated wells.
When re-plated on Matrigel™ with 10 ng/mL FGF4 + 10 ng/mL HGF, approximately 70% of MASC acquired morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of hepatocyte-like cells. Cells became epithelioid, approximately 10% of cells became binucleated, and about 70% of cells stained positive for albumin, cytokeratin (CK)-18, and HNF-1P. . Endodermal-like cells generated in FGF4 and HGF containing cultures also had functional characteristics of hepatocytes, determined by measuring urea levels in supernatants of undifferentiated MASC and FGF4 and HGF-induced MASC using the Sigma Urea Nitrogen Kit 640 according to the manufacturer's recommendations.. : No urea was detected in undifferentiated MASC cultures. Urea production was 10 ug/cell/hr 14 days after adding FGF4 and HGF and remained detectable at similar levels until day 25. This is comparable to primary rat hepatocytes grown in monolayer. Presence of albumin together with urea production supports the notion of hepatic differentiation from MASC in vitro. Further studies on MASC-derived . hepatocytes are presented in Example 11.
Given the likely existence of an endodermal lineage precursor cell, MASC likely give rise to a cell that forms various cells in the liver in the pancreas both exocrine and endocrine components and other endodermal derived cell tissue lineages.
MASC derived from muscle or brain were induced to differentiate to mesoderm (endothelial cells), neuroectoderm (astrocytes and neurons) and endoderm (hepatocyte-like cells) using the methods described above for BM-derived
MASC.
Transduction
To demonstrate that differentiated cells were single cell derived and MASC are indeed "clonal" multipotent cells, cultures were made in which MASC had been transduced with a retroviral vector and undifferentiated cells and their progeny were found to have the retrovirus inserted in the same site in the genome.
Studies were done using two independently derived ROSA26 MASC, two
C57BL/6 MASC and one rMASC population expanded for 40 to >90PDs, as well as with the eGFP transduced "clonal" mouse and "clonal" rMASC. No differences were seen between eGFP transduced and untransduced cells. Of note, eGFP expression persisted in differentiated MASC.
Specifically, murine and rat BMMNC cultured on FN with EGF, PDGF-BB and LIF for three weeks were transduced on two sequential days with an eGFP oncoretroviral vector. Afterwards, CD45" and G1yA” cells were depleted and cells sub-cultured at 10 cells/well. eGFP-transduced rat BMMNC were expanded for 85
PDs. Alternatively, mouse MASC expanded for 80 PDS were used. Subcultures of undifferentiated MASC were generated by plating 100 MASC from cultures . maintained for 75 PDs and re-expanding them to > 5x10° cells. Expanded MASC were induced to differentiate in vitro to endothelium, neuroectoderm and endoderm.
Lineage differentiation was shown by staining with antibodies specific for these cell types, as described in Example 4.
Single cell origin of mesodermal and neuroectodermal progeny
To prove single cell origin of mesodermal and neuroectodermal differentiated progeny retroviral marking was used (Jordan ef al., 1990; Nolta ef al., : 1996). A fraction of hMASC obtained after 20 PDs was transduced with an MFG- eGFP retrovirus. eGFP" hMASC were diluted in non-transduced MASC from the same donors to obtain a final concentration of ~5% transduced cells. These mixtures were plated at 100 cells/well and culture expanded until >2x10’ cells were obtained. 5x10° MASC each were induced to differentiate to skeletal myoblasts, endothelium and neuroectodermal lineages. After 14 days under differentiation conditions, cells were harvested and used to identify the retroviral integration site and co-expression of eGFP and neuroectodermal, muscle and endothelial markers.
For myoblast differentiation, htMASC were plated at 2x10* cells/cm? in 2%
FCS, EGF and PDGF containing expansion medium and treated with 3 pM 5- azacytidine in the same medium for 24h. Afterwards, cells were maintained in expansion medium with 2% FCS, EGF and PDGF-BB. For endothelial differentiation, h(MASC were replated at 2x10* cells/cm? in serum-free expansion medium without EGF and PDGF but with 10 ng/ml VEGF-B for 14 days.
Immunofluorescence evaluation showed that 5-10% of cells in cultures induced to differentiate with 5-azacytidine stained positive for eGFP and skeletal actin, 5-10% of cells induced to differentiate to endothelium costained for eGFP and vWF, and 5-10% of cells induced to differentiate to neuroectoderm costained for eGFP and either NF-200, GFAP or MBP. To define the retroviral insertion site, the host genomic flanking region in MASC and differentiated progeny was sequenced.
The number of retroviral inserts in the different populations was between one and seven. As shown in Table 2, a single, identical sequence flanking the retroviral insert in muscle, endothelium and neuroectodermal cells in population A16 that mapped to chromosome 7 was identified.
Table 2: Single cell origin of endothelium, muscle and neuroectodermal cells : ] Sequence: 3’-LTR-ccaaatt
Clone A16 TAG CGGCCGCTTG AATTCGAACG CGAGACTACT GTGACTCACA CT (Chrom. 7) 5- TAG CGGCCGCTTG AATTCGAACG CGAGACTACT GTGACTCACA CT
Azacytidine
TAG CGGCCGCTTG AATTCGAACG CGAGACTACT GTGACTCACA CT
TAG CGGCCGCTTG AATTCGAACG CGAGACTACT GTGACTCACA CT
Clone A12- ATTTATA TTCTAGTTTAT TTGTGTTTGGG GCAGACGAGG
A (Chrom. 9) 5- ATTTATA TTCTAGTTTAT TTGTGTTTGGG GCAGACGAGG
Azacytidine
ATTTATA TTCTAGTTTAT TTGTGTTTGGG GCAGACGAGG
LFGF ATTTATA TTCTAGTTTAT TTGTGTTTGGG GCAGACGAGG
Clone A12- TCCTGTCTCA TTCAAGCCAC ATCAGTTACA TCTGCATTTT
A (Chrom. 12)
TCCTGTCTCA TTCAAGCCAC ATCAGTTACA TCTGCATTTT
Azacytidine
TCCTGTCTCA TTCAAGCCAC ATCAGTTACA TCTGCATTTT
TCCTGTCTCA TTCAAGCCAC ATCAGTTACA TCTGCATTTT
Primers specific for the 3° LTR were designed and for the flanking genomic 5 sequence are shown in Table 3 and using Real-time PCR, it was confirmed that the retroviral insert site was identical in undifferentiated and differentiated cells. These results proved that the flanking sequence and the eGFP DNA sequence was present in similar quantities. Clone A12 contained two retroviral inserts, located on chromosome 1 and 7 respectively, and both flanking sequences could be detected not only in hMASC but also muscle, endothelium and neuroectodermal lineages. To determine whether this represented progeny of a single cell with two retroviral . integrants or progeny of two cells, Real-Time PCR was used to compare the relative amount of the chromosome 1 and 7 flanking sequence to eGFP. It was found that similar amounts of both flanking regions were present in hMASC, muscle, endothelium and neuroectodermal cells, suggesting that a single cell with two retroviral inserts was likely responsible for the eGFP positive hMASC and differentiated progeny. In the other populations containing 3 or more retroviral inserts we were not able to determine whether the inserts were due to multiple insertion sites in a single cells or multiple cells contributing to the eGFP positive fraction. Nevertheless, our finding that in 2 populations, progeny differentiated into : muscle, endothelium and neuroectoderm are derived from a single BM derived progenitor cell definitively proves for the first time that primitive cells can be cultured from BM that differentiate at the single cell level in cells of mesodermal lineage as well as the three different lineages of the neuroectoderm.
Table 3: Flanking regions and primers
Rat flanking GATCCTTIGGGAGGGTCTCCTCAGATTGATTGACTGCCCACCT sequence CGGGGGTCTTTCAAAGTAACTCCAAAAGAAGAATGGGTTGTTAGTTAT
TAAACGGTTCTTAGTAAAGT TTTGGTITTGGGAATCACAGTAACAACT
CACATCACAACTCCAATCGTTCCGTGAAA
Mouse flanking | GATCCTTGGGAGGGTCTCCTCAGATTGATTGACTGCCCATAAGTTA sequence TAAGCTGGCATGACTGTGTIGCTAAGGACACTGGTGAAAGC
Bold: MSCV LTR; Bold and underlined: MSCV LTR primer used for Q-PCR
Italics and underlined: Flanking sequence primers used for Q-PCR.
Example 6. Homing and Engraftment of Mammalian MASC into Numerous Organs in the Body mMASC were tested to determine whether they had the ability to engraft and differentiate in vivo into tissue specific cells. mMASC were grown as described in
Example 1 from a LacZ transgenic C57 Black 6, ROSA 26 mouse. 10° mMASC from the LacZ mouse were 1.V. injected into NOD-SCID mice tail veins with or without 250 Rads of total body radiation 4-6 hrs prior to the injection. The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation at 4-24 weeks after the injections.
Tissue Harvest
Blood and bone marrow: 0.5-1 ml of blood was obtained at the time animals were sacrificed. BM was collected by flushing femurs and tibias. For phenotyping, red cells in blood and BM were depleted using ice cold ammonium chloride (Stem : 25 Cell Technologies Inc., Vancouver, Canada) and 10° cells used for cytospin centrifugation. For serial transplantation, 5x10’ cells from 2 femurs and 2 tibias were transplanted into individual secondary recipients via tail vein injection.
Secondary recipients were sacrificed after 7-10 weeks.
Solid organs: Lungs were inflated with 1 ml 1:4 dilution of OCT compound (Sakura-Finetek Inc, USA) in PBS. Specimens of spleen, liver, lung, intestine, skeletal muscle, myocardium, kidney and brain of the recipient animals were harvested and cryopreserved in OCT at -80°C and in RNA Later (Ambion Inc., .
Austin, TX, USA) at -20°C for quantitative PCR. mMASC engraft and differentiate in tissue specific cells in vivo
Engraftment of the B-gal/neomycin (NEO) transgene-containing cells (Zambrowicz et al., 1997) was tested by immunohistochemistry for B-gal and by Q-
PCR for NEO. Immunohistochemistry and Q-PCR were performed as described in
Examples 5 and 1 respectively. Primers are listed in Table 1.
Engraftment, defined as detection of >1% anti-B-gal cells, was seen in hematopoietic tissues (blood, BM and spleen) as well as epithelium of lung, liver, and intestine of all recipient animals as shown in Table 4 and Fig 4.
Table 4: Engraftment levels in NOD-SCID mice transplanted with ROSA26
MASC.
Engraftment levels (%) determined by
Animal Time immunofluorescence or (Q-PCR) (Weeks) ti | siren | tos | spon | uve | ng | ie r] 4] Ne Jeo | 2 [0s | 7] 4] 2 2 | os | Ne [3 | 4] 5 [0] 5] 3
IEE EC IRE I RE EA ER
¢ [©] NM J] 4 J 2] 3 [4] 3 [469
S| # | N J 3 J 2 J 3 J 6] 4] 6 | 8 | vs [s® [6 | 4 [5s Jean] 7 7 | 8 [vs | ww | 8 [TON] 4] 6] 8
IEE EE RC BEE ER ER A
0 | 8 [ve | 7 5s [se] 4] &
ICI ISA CO C0 A 8 I NC LN
J LL BC FNC IC ICA EI HC I
Yes 5 8(6.2) 10 (12.3) :
BCE A AC CA SC) EI EO [ska] 0 [ve [5 J e834] ©
B-gal” cells in BM (Fig. 4B-F) and spleen (Fig. 4H-1) co-labeled with anti-
CD45, anti-CD19, anti-Macl, anti-Grl and anti-TER119 Abs. Similar results were seen for peripheral blood. Of note, no B-gal*CD3" T cells were seen in either blood, : BM or spleen even though B-gal" CD3" T-cells were seen in chimeric mice. The reason for this is currently not known. g
Engraftment in the spleen occurred mostly as clusters of donor cells, consistent with the hypothesis that when MASC home to the spleen, they proliferate locally and differentiate to form a colony of donor cells, similar to CFU-S. It is not believed that differentiation of mMASC into hematopoietic cells in vivo can by attributed to contamination of the mMASC with HSC. First, BMMNC are depleted of CD45 cells by column selection before mMASC cultures are initiated. Second, early mesodermal or hematopoietic transcription factors, including brachyury (Robertson et al., 2000), GATA-2 and GATA-1 (Weiss et al., 1995), are not expressed in undifferentiated mMASC, as shown by cDNA array analysis. Third, the culture conditions used for mMASC are not supportive for HCS. Fourth all attempts at inducing hematopoietic differentiation from hMASC in vitro, by co- culturing hMASC with hematopoietic supportive feeders and cytokines, have been unsuccessful (Reyes et al., 2001).
Significant levels of mMASC engraftment were also seen in liver, intestine and lung. Triple-color immunohistochemistry was used to identify epithelial (CK™) and hematopoietic (CD45") cells in the same tissue sections of the liver, intestine and lung. In the liver, B-gal’ donor-derived cells formed cords of hepatocytes (CK18"CD45" or albumin™), occupying about 5-10% of a given Sum section (Fig. 4K-M). Several CK18'CD45"B-gal” hematopoietic cells of recipient origin were distinctly identified from the epithelial cells. Albumin’p-gal’ and CK18B-gal” cells engrafted in cords of hepatocytes surrounding portal tracts, a pattern seen in hepatic regeneration from hepatic stem cells and oval cells (Alison ef al., 1998; Petersen et al., 1999). This and the fact that only 5/20 sections contained donor cells, is consistent with the notion that stem cells engraft in some but not all areas of the liver, where they proliferate and differentiate into hepatocytes.
Engraftment in the intestine was also consistent with what is known about intestinal epithelial stem cells. In the gut, each crypt contains a population of 4-5 long-lived stem cells (Potten, 1998). Progeny of these stem cells undergo several rounds of division in the middle and upper portions of cypts and give rise to epithelial cells that migrate upwards, out of the crypt, onto adjacent villi. Donor derived, B-gal'panCK*CD45" epithelial cells entirely covered several villi (Fig. 40-
P). In some villi, B-gal panCK*CD45 cells constituted only 50% of the i circumference (solid arrows, Fig. 4P) suggesting engraftment in one but not both crypts. Several B-gal panCK' cells were distinctly seen in the core of intestinal villi (open arrow, Fig. 40). These cells co-stained for CD45 (Fig. 4P), indicating that they were donor-derived hematopoietic cells. In the lung, the majority of donor cells gave rise to p-gal'panCK'CD45" alveolar epithelial cells whereas, most hematopoietic cells were of recipient-origin (panCK CD45" B-gal’) (Fig. 4R).
Levels of engraftment detected by immunohistochemistry were concordant with levels determined by Q-PCR for NEO (Table 4). Engraftment levels were similar in animals analyzed after 4 to 24 weeks following 1.V_ injection of MASC (Table 4).
No contribution was seen to skeletal or cardiac muscle. In contrast to epithelial tissues and the hematopoietic system, little to no cell turnover is seen in skeletal or cardiac muscle in the absence of tissue injury. Therefore, one may not expect significant contribution of stem cells to these tissues. However, engraftment was not found in skin and kidney, two organs in which epithelial cells undergo rapid turnover. It is shown in the blastocyst injection experiments (Example 8) that mMASC can differentiate into these cell types; one possible explanation for the lack of engraftment in these organs in post-natal recipients is that mMASC do not home to these organs, a hypothesis that is currently being evaluated. Although mMASC differentiated into neuroectoderm-like cells ex vivo, no significant engraftment of mMASC was seen in the brain, and rare donor cells found in the brain did not co- label with neuroectodermal markers. Two recent publications demonstrated that donor derived cells with neuroectodermal characteristics can be detected in the brain of animals that underwent BM transplantation. However, a fully ablative preparative regimen prior to transplantation or transplantation in newborn animals was used, conditions associated with break-down of the blood-brain barrier. Cells were infused in non-irradiated adult animals, or animals treated with low dose radiation, where the blood-brain barrier is intact or only minimally damaged. This may explain the lack of mMASC engraftment in the CNS.
Confluent MASCdo not differentiate in vivo
As control, ROSA26-MASC were infused and grown to confluence prior injection. MASC allowed to become confluent lose their ability to differentiate ex vivo in cells outside of the mesoderm, and behave like classical MSC (Reyes, M. ef
S al. 2001). Infusion of 10° confluent mMASC did not yield significant levels of ~ donor cell engraftment. Although few B-gal® cells were seen in BM, these cells did not co-label with anti-CD45 Abs, indicating that MSC may engraft in tissues, but are no longer able to differentiate into tissue specific cells in response to local cues.
MASC derived cells in bone marrow of mice can be serially transferred
BM from mouse engrafted with ROSA26 MASC was tested to determine whether they contained cells that would engraft in secondary recipients. 1.5x107
BM cells, recovered from primary recipients 11 weeks after 1.V. infusion of mMASC, were transferred to secondary irradiated NOD-SCID recipients (Table 4: animal SR-1 and SR-2). After 7 and 10 weeks, secondary recipients were sacrificed, and blood, BM, spleen, liver, lung and intestines of the recipient animal were analyzed for engraftment of ROSA26 donor cells by immunohistochemistry and Q-
PCR for the NEO gene. A similar pattern of engraftment was seen in secondary recipients as in the primary recipients. Four-8% of BM, spleen and PB cells were B- gal’'CD45"; six and 8% of intestinal epithelial cells were p-gal ‘pan-CK", and 4 and 5% of lung epithelial cells were B-gal'pan-CK”. Levels of engraftment in the liver of secondary recipients were lower than in the primary recipients (1 and 3% vs. 5 and 8% B-gal’'CK 18"). This suggests that mMASC may persist in the BM of the primary recipient and differentiate into hematopoietic cells as well as epithelial cells when transferred to a second recipient.
MASC derived cells can produce insulin in vivo. MASC from ROSA26 mice were injected into irradiated NOD-SCID mice as described herein. The resulting MASC derived cells co-stain for LacZ and insulin in a model of streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
One of the critical questions in “stem cell plasticity” is whether the engrafted and differentiated donor mMASC are functional. The results described herein show that one animal developed a lymphoma in thymus and spleen after 16 weeks, as is commonly see in aging NOD-SCID mice (Prochazka et al., 1992). Phenotypic analysis showed that this B-cell lymphoma was host-derived: CD19" cells were p- gal”. Approximately 40% of CD45"vWF" cells in the vasculasture of the tumor stained with anti- $-gal Abs, indicating that neoangiogenesis in the tumor was in part derived from donor mMASC (Fig. 4T). This suggests that MASC give rise to . functioning progeny in vivo. Likewise, higher levels of mMASC engraftment and differentiation in radiosensitive organs, such as the hematopoietic system and intestinal epithelium (Table 4, p<0.001), following low dose irradiation suggests that mMASC may contribute functionally to host tissues.
These results showed that mammalian MASC can be purified, expanded ex vivo, and infused 1.V., homed to various sites in the body, engraft into numerous organs, and that the cells are alive in these various organs one month or longer.
Such donor cells, undifferentiated, and differentiated progeny are found, by virtue of the fluorescent marker, in organs including, but not limited to, the BM, spleen, liver and lung. These cells can be used to repopulate one or more compartment(s) to augment or restore cell or organ function.
Example 7. Demonstration of in vitro Hematopoiesis and Erythropoiesis
MASC from, human BM differentiate at the single cell level into neuroectodermal, endodermal and many mesodermal lineages, including endothelial cells. Because endothelium and blood are very closely related in ontogeny, it can be hypothesized that MASC can differentiate into hematopoietic cells. eGFP transduced human MASC, that are GlyA, CD45 and CD34 negative (n=20), were cocultured with the mouse yolk sac mesodermal cell line, YSMS5, as suspension cell aggregates for 6 days in serum free medium supplemented with 10 ng/mL bFGF and
VEGF. After six days, only eGFP" cells (i.e., MASC progeny) remained and YSM5 cells had died.
Remaining cells were transferred to methylcellulose cultures containing 10% fetal calf serum supplemented with 10 ng/mL bone morphogenic protein (BMP)4,
VEGF, bFGF, stem cell factor (SCF), FIt3L, hyper IL6, thrombopoietin (TPO), and erythropoietin (EPO) for 2 weeks. In these cultures, both adherent eGFP" cells and : small, round non-adherent cells, which formed many colonies attached to the adherent cells were detected. The non- adherent and adherent fractions were collected separately and cultured in 10%FCS containing medium with 10 ng/mL
VEGF and bFGF for 7 days. Adherent cells stained positive for vWF, formed vascular tubes when plated on ECM, and were able to uptake a-LDL, indicating their endothelial nature. 5-50% of the non-adherent cells stained positive for human specific GlyA and HLA-class I by flow cytometry. Gly-A*/HLA-class-I' cells were selected by FACS. On Wright -Giemsa, these cells exhibited the characteristic morphology and staining pattern of primitive erythroblasts. Cells were benzidine" and human Hb" by immunoperoxidase. By RT-PCR these cells expressed human specific Hb-e, but not Hb-a.
When replated in methylcellulose assay with 20%FCS and EPO, small erythroid colonies were seen after 10 days, and 100% of these colonies stained positive for human specific GlyA and Hb. As selection of MASC depends on the depletion of CD45" and Gly A” cells from BM, and cultured MASC are CD45" and
GlyA at all times examined using both FACS and cDNA array analysis, contamination of MASC with hematopoietic cells is very unlikely.
Example 8. In vivo proof of the Multipotent Nature of MASC as Shown by Multiple Organ Chimerism following Blastocyst Injections of the Cells
Important for therapeutic applications of these cells is the ability of MASC to proliferate and differentiate into the appropriate cell types in vivo. Up until this point the only cells that should be capable of contributing to the full constellation of tissues and organs in the body are ES cells. In order to analyze whether MASC could show the full capability of ES cells, they were assayed to determine their contribution to the formation of various tissues by introducing them into the early blastocyst and observing the fate of their progeny.
MASC were generated from marrow of ROSA26 mice that are transgenic for the B-galactosidase (B-gal) gene (Rafii, S., ef al. 1994, Blood. 84:10-13) and expanded as described in Example 1. One or 10-12 ROSA26 MASC obtained after 55-65 PDs were microinjected into 88 and 40 3.5-day C57BL/6 blastocysts, respectively. Blastocysts (8/mother) were transferred to 16 foster mothers and mice allowed to develop and be born as shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Degree of chimerism following MASC injection in blastocyst blastocyst | born | pups born 0% 1-10% 10-20% 20-40% >40% 10-12 411 22 5/22 13/22 2/22 1/22 122 ) (23%) (59%) (9%) (4.5%) (4.5%) 53% 33% 0% 0% 13%
Seven litters were born, in line with the birth rate seen in other studies during this period. The number of mice per litter varied between 1 and 8, for a total of 37 mice. Animals born from microinjected blastocysts were of similar size as normal animals and did not display any overt abnormalities.
After four weeks, animals were evaluated for chimerism by clipping their tails and assessing the contribution of B-gal/NEO transgene containing cells to the tails by Q-PCR for NEO. Percent chimerism was determined by comparing the number of NEO copies in test samples with that in tissue from ROSA26 mice according to manufacturer's recommendations (7700 ABI PRISM Detector Software 1.6). Chimerism could be detected in 70% of mice derived from blastocysts in which 10 to 12 MASC had been injected and 50% of mice derived from blastocysts microinjected with 1 MASC (Table 5). The degree of chimerism ranged between 0.1 % to >45%. After 6 to 20 weeks, animals were sacrificed. Some mice were frozen in liquid nitrogen and thin sections were cut as described. Whole-mouse sections were stained with X-Gal. One thousand sets of digital images covering completely each section were then assembled to create a composite image of each whole-mouse section. In a representative non-chimeric animal (by Q-PCR for NEO) derived from a blastocyst in which a single MASC was injected, no X-Gal staining was seen. In contrast, the animal was 45% chimeric by R-PCR for NEO by tail clip analysis and had contribution of a single ROSA26-derived MASC to all somatic . tissues.
For other animals, multiple organs were harvested and analyzed for the presence of MASC derived cells by X-GAL staining, staining with an anti-p-gal-
FITC antibody, and Q-PCR for NEO. Animals that had NEO" cells in tail-clippings had contribution of the ROSA26-derived MASC in all tissues, including the brain,
retina, lung, cardiac and skeletal muscle, liver, intestine, kidney, spleen, BM, blood, and skin as shown by X-GAL staining and staining with an anti-p-gal-FITC antibody. : Chimerism was detected by X-Gal staining and anti-B-gal staining in the animals generated from blastocysts microinjected with ROSA26 MASC. B-gal’ cells expressed markers typical for the tissue in which they had incorporated. p-gal cells co-stained with anti-B-gal” FITC and anti-NF200 or GFAP and TOPRO3 (observed at 20X magnification)for NF200 and GFAP in the central nervous system and for dystrophin in the skeletal muscle. Lung tissue was stained for anti-B-gal-
FITC and pan-CK in alveoli and bronchi (also TOPRO3) (observed at 20X magnification). Skeletal muscle was stained with anti-B-gal-FITC, dystrophin-PE, and TOPRO3 was observed at 20X magnification. Heart was stained with anti-§- gal-FITC and cardiac troponin-I-Cy3, TOPRO3 was observed at 20X magnification.
Liver was stained with anti-B-gal-FITC and pan-CK-PE and TOPRO3 (was observed with 40X magnification and 10X magnification). Intestine was stained with anti-B-gal-FITC, pan-CK-PE, and TOPRO3 was observed at 20X magnification.
Kidney was stained with anti--gal-FITC (glomerulus, tubulus) was observed at 20X magnification. Marrow staining was observed with anti-B-gal-FITC and CD45-PE,
GR1-PE and MAC1-PE. Spleen staining was observed with anti-p-gal-FITC and
CD45-PE, CD3-PE and CD 19-PE. Levels of engraftment estimated by Q-PCR for
NEO were concordant with those estimated by X-GAL and anti-p-gal-FITC staining.
These data demonstrate for the first time that BM derived single MASC integrate into the developing mouse, giving rise to cells of various fates, and contributing to the generation of all tissues and organs of the three germ layers of the mouse. As all live animals, irrespective of the degree of chimerism, had normal functioning organs, these studies also suggest that MASC can differentiate in vivo in functional cells of the three germ layers. Whether MASC contribute to germ cells, when injected in a blastocyst or when injected postnatally, has not yet been tested.
Example 9. Origin of Endothelial Progenitors
Vasculogenesis, the in situ differentiation of primitive endothelial progenitors, termed angioblasts, into endothelial cells that aggregate into a primary capillary plexus is responsible for the development of the vascular system during embryogenesis (Hirashima er al., 1999). In contrast, angiogenesis, defined as the formation of new blood vessels by a process of sprouting from preexisting vessels, occurs both during development and in postnatal life (Holash er al., 1999; Yang et i al,2001). Until recently, it was thought that blood vessel formation in post-natal life was mediated by sprouting of endothelial cells from existing vessels. However, recent studies have suggested that endothelial "stem cells" may persist into adult life, where they contribute to the formation of new blood vessels (Peichev ef al., 2000;
Lin et al., 2000; Gehling et al., 2000; Asahara ef al., 1997; Shi et al., 1998), suggesting that like during development neoangiogenesis in the adult may at least in part depend on a process of vasculogenesis. Precursors for endothelial cells have been isolated from BM and peripheral blood (Peichev et al., 2000; Watt ef al., 1005), The ontogeny of these endothelial progenitors is unknown.
During development, endothelial cells are derived from mesoderm. The
VEGF receptor 2, Flk1, characterizes the hemangioblasts, a bipotent stem cell found in the aorto-gonad-mesonephros region (Medvinsky et al., 1996; Fong et al., 1999;
Peault, 1996) and in fetal liver (Fong ef al., 1999), and commitment of embryoid bodies to hemangioblasts is accompanied with expression of Flkl (Choi ef al., 1998,
Choi, 1998). Whether hemangioblasts persist in adult life is not known, and only
HSC and endothelial progenitors have,been documented. Like hemangioblasts, endothelial progenitors express Flk1 (Peichev ef al., 2000) and one report suggested that HSC in post-natal life express Flk1 (Ziegler et al., 1999). During embryology, commitment of the hemangioblast to the endothelial lineage is characterized by the sequential expression of VE-cadherin, CD31, and shortly afterwards CD34 (Nishikawa ef al., 1998; Yamashita er al., 2000). In post-natal life, endothelial progenitors have been selected from BM and blood using Abs against AC133, Flk1,
CD34, and the H1P12 Ab (Peichev et al., 2000; Lin er al., 2000; Gehling ef al., 2000). AC133 has also been found on other cells, including NSCs (Uchida et al., 2000) and gastrointestinal epithelial cells (Corbeil ef al., 2000). Upon differentiation to mature endothelium, the AC133 receptor is quickly lost (Peichev ef al., 2000; Gehling et al., 2000). Another receptor found on circulating endothelial : cells is a mucin, MUCI18, recognized by the H1P12 Ab (Lin et al., 2000). MUCI18 is lost upon differentiation of endothelial progenitors to endothelium. CD34 is expressed on endothelial progenitors, as well as on hematopoietic progenitors (Peichev er al., 2000; Baumhueter ef al., 1994) and hepatic oval cells (Crosby ef al., 2001). This antigen is also lost upon differentiation of endothelial progenitors to endothelium. Most mature endothelial cells, but microvascular endothelial cells, no longer express CD34.
It is described here for the first time, the in vitro generation of vast numbers of endothelial cells that engraft in vivo and contribute to neoangiogenesis from a
MASC. MASC can be culture expanded for >80 PDs and endothelial cells generated from MASC can be expanded for at least and additional 20 PDs. MASC may therefore be an ideal source of endothelial cells for clinical therapies. In addition, as MASC are ontogenically less mature than the "angioblast", this model should be useful to characterize endothelial commitment and differentiation. hMASC differentiate into cells with phenotypic characteristics of endothelium
MASC were obtained and cultured as described in Example 3. To induce endothelial differentiation, MASC were replated at 2x10* cells/cm’ in FN-coated wells in serum-free expansion medium without EGF and PDGF-BB but with 10 ng/mL VEGF. In some instances, FCS was added. Cultures were maintained by media exchange every 4-5 days. In some instances, cells were subcultured after day 9 at a 1:4 dilution under the same culture conditions for 20+ PDs.
In order to define endothelial differentiation from MASC more extensively,
FACS and immunohistochemical analysis of cells after 3-18 days was performed.
Expression of Flk1 and Flt1 on undifferentiated MASC was low, was maximal at day 9, and persisted until day 18. VE-cadherin, present on BM or blood endothelial progenitors (Peichev ef al., 2000; Nishikawa et al., 1998), was not expressed on undifferentiated MASC, but was expressed after 3 days of culture with VEGF and persisted until day 18. MASC expressed low levels of AC133, found on endothelial as well as hematopoietic progenitors (Peichev et al., 2000; Gehling ef al., 2000) but was no longer detectable after day 3. CD34, present on endothelial and hematopoietic progenitors (Peichev et al., 2000; Asahara et al., 1997; Rafii et al, 1994), was not present on undifferentiated MASC (Fig. 4A) but was expressed from day 9 until day 18. The mucin, MUCI18, recognized by the Ab H1P12 has been used to purify endothelial progenitors from blood (Lin ef al., 2000). Although MASC did not stain with HIP12 MASC treated with VEGF for 9 days stained positive, but expression was lost by day 18.
The endothelium specific integrin, avp3, (Eliceiri ef al., 2000) was not present on undifferentiated MASC, whereas avB5 was expressed at very low levels. .
Expression of integrins increased progressively during differentiation and was maximal by day 14 (Fig. 5). The tyrosine kinase receptors, Tie and Tek, important for angiogenesis but not endothelial cell differentiation (Partanen et al., 1999), were not expressed on MASC. Expression of Tek could be seen after day 3 and Tie after day 7 (Fig. 6). MASC also do not express vWF, but vWF was expressed from day 9 on (Rosenberg et al., 1998; Wagner et al., 1982). More mature endothelial markers, including CD31, CD36, CD62-P (Tedder et al., 1995) (Fig. 7), and the adhesion junction proteins ZO-1, B-catenin, and y-catenin (Fig. 5) were detected after day 14 (Li et al, 1990; Van Rijen et al_, 1997; Petzelbauer et al.. 2000). VCAM or CD62-
E were not expressed at high level at any time point during differentiation, unless endothelium was activated with IL-1a, as described below. Differentiation to endothelium was associated with acquisition of p2-microgiobulin and low levels of
HLA-class I antigens, but not HLA-class II.
It has been reported previously, that endothelial differentiation can only be obtained from MASC expanded with 2% FCS or less, but not when expanded with 10% FCS (Reyes et al., 2001) as higher concentrations of FCS supports growth of classical MSC that differentiate only into osteoblasts, chondroblasts and adipocytes (Reyes et al., 2001; Pittenger et al., 1999). When FCS was present during the initial 7 days of differentiation, endothelial differentiation could not be induced. When non-confluent MASC (<1x10* cells/cm?) were induced to differentiate, endothelial was not seen. When MASC were subcultured 9-days after exposure to VEGF using serum free medium with 10 ng/mL VEGF, cells could undergo at least an additional 12 PDs. When 10% FCS and 10 ng/mL VEGF was added to the medium for subculturing, MASC-derived endothelial cells could undergo an additional 20+ PDs, irrespective of the number of PDs that MASC had undergone.
Compared with undifferentiated MASC, endothelial cells were larger, and had a lower nuclear/cytoplasm ratio. Results were similar when MASC were used from cultures that had undergone 20 (n=30) or 50+ (n=25) PDs.
Functional characteristics of MASC-derived endothelium
It was tested whether VEGF-induced differentiated progeny of hMASC had functional characteristics of endothelial cells. Endothelial cells respond to hypoxia : by upregulating expression of VEGF as well as the VEGF receptors Flk1 and the angiogenesis receptors, Tie-l and Tek (Kourembanas er al., 1998). hMASC and hMASC-derived endothelial cells were incubated at 37°C in 20% or 10% O, for 24h. Cells were stained with Abs against Flkl, Fitl, Tek and IgG control, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and analyzed by flow cytometry. In addition, VEGF concentrations in the culture supernatants was measured using an ELISA kit (AP biotech, Piscataway, NJ). MASC-derived endothelial cells and undifferentiated
MASC were exposed to hypoxic conditions for 24h.
Expression of Flkl and Tek was significantly increased on MASC-derived endothelial cells exposed to hypoxia (Fig. 7), while the levels of these receptors remained unchanged on undifferentiated MASC. In addition, levels of VEGF in culture supernatants of hypoxic endothelial cultures was increased by 4 fold (Fig. 7B) whereas VEGF levels in MASC cultures exposed to hypoxia remained unchanged.
It was next tested whether MASC-derived endothelial cells would upregulate expression of HLA-antigens and cell adhesion ligands in response to inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-la (Meager, 1999; Steeber et al., 2001). 10° MASC and
MASC-derived endothelial cells were incubated with 75 ng/ml IL-1a (R&D
Systems) in serum-free medium for 24h. Cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and stained with Abs against HLA-class I, class II, B2-microglobulin, vWF, CD31,
VCAM, CD62E and CD62P, or control Abs, and analyzed using a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson).
Significantly increased levels of HLA-Class I and II, f2-microglobulin,
VCAM, ECAM, CD62E, CD62P were seen by FACS analysis (Fig. 7C) on endothelial cells. In contrast, on undifferentiated MASC only upregulation of Flk was seen.
Another characteristic of endothelial cells is that they take up LDL (Steinberg et al., 1985). This was tested by incubating MASC induced to differentiate with VEGF for 2, 3, 5, 7,9, 12 and 15 and 21 with LDL-dil-acil. The dil-Ac-LDL staining kit was purchased from Biomedical Technologies (Stoughton,
MA). The assay was performed as per manufactures recommendations. Cells were co-labeled either with anti-Tek, -Tie-1 or -vWF Abs. After 3 days, expression of
Tek was detected but no uptake of a-LDL. After 7 days, cells expressed Tie-1, but did not take up significant amounts of a-LDL. However, acquisition of expression of vWF on day 9 was associated with uptake of aLDL (Fig. 6B).
Endothelial cells contain vWF stored in Weibel Pallade bodies that is released in vivo when endothelium is activated (Wagner ef al., 1982). This can be induced in vitro by stimulating cells with histamine (Rosenberg ef al., 1998), which also results in activation of the cell cytoskeleton (Vischer et al., 2000). MASC- derived endothelial cells were plated at high confluency (10* cells/cm?) in FN-coated chamber slides. After 24h, cells were treated with 10 uM histamine (Sigma) in serum free medium for 25min. and stained with Abs against vWF and myosin.
Untreated and treated cells were fixed with methanol at -20°C for 2 min, stained with Abs against VWF and myosin, and analyzed using fluorescence and/or confocal microscopy. vWF was present throughout the cytoplasm of untreated endothelial cells. Cytoplasm of endothelial cells treated with histamine contained significantly less VWF and vWF was only detectable in the perinuclear region, likely representing vWF present in the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 6A). Histamine treatment caused widening of gap junctions and cytoskeletal changes with increased numbers of myosin stress fibers (Fig. 6A).
Finally, endothelial cells were tested to determine if they could form "vascular tubes" when plated on Matrigel™ or extracellular matrix (ECM) (Haralabopoulos et al., 1997). 0.5 ml extracellular matrix (Sigma) was added per well of a 24 well plate, incubated for 3h at 37°C. 10* MASC and MASC-derived endothelial cells were added per well in 0.5 ml of serum free plus VEGF medium and incubated at 37°C. As shown in Fig. 6C, culture of MASC derived endothelial cells on ECM resulted in vascular tube formation within 6 hours. hMASC-derived endothelial cells contribute to tumor-angiogenesis in vivo
A breeding colony of NOD-SCID mice was established from mice obtained : from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were kept in specific pathogen free conditions and maintained on acidified water and autoclaved food.
Trimethoprim 60 mg and sulphamethoxazole 300 mg (Hoffmann-La Roche Inc,
Nutley, NJ) per 100 ml water was given twice weekly.
Three Lewis lung carcinoma spheroids were implanted subcutaneously in the shoulder. 3 and 5 days after implantation of the tumor, mice were injected with 0.25x10° human MASC-derived endothelial cells or human foreskin fibroblasts via . tail vein injection. After 14 days, animals were sacrificed, tumors removed and cryopreserved using OTC compound (Santura Finetek USA Inc, Torrance, CA) at - 80°C. In addition, the ears that were clipped to tag the mouse were also removed and cryopreserved using OTC compound at -80°C. Five um thick sections of the tissues were mounted on glass slides and were fixed and stained as described below.
Computer-aided analysis of length and number of branches counted on five sections of each tumor showed that tumors in mice that received human MASC- derived endothelial cells had a 1.45+0.04 fold greater vascular mass than tumors in control mice that did with anti-human-p2-microglobulin or HLA-Class I Abs, combined with anti-mouse-anti-CD31 Abs and anti-vWF, anti-Tek or anti-Tie-1
Abs, which recognize both human and mouse endothelial cells. These initial studies showed that some blood vessels in the tumor contained anti-human-32- microglobulin or HLA-Class I positive cells that co-labeled for either vWF, Tie or
Tek, but not with mouse-CD31, indicating that human MASC-derived endothelial cells contributed to tumor neoangiogenesis in vivo.
To better address the degree of contribution, 35 sequential 5 pm slides were obtained and were stained in an alternate fashion with either anti-human (32- microglobulin-FITC or anti-mouse-CD31-CyS5 and anti-vWF-Cy3. All slides were examined by confocal microscopy. The different figures were then assembled in 3-
D to determine the relative contribution of human and murine endothelial cells to the tumor vessels. When tumors obtained from animals injected with human-MASC derived endothelial cells were analyzed approximately 35% of the tumor vessels were positive for anti-human B2-microglobulin as well as vWF whereas approximately 40% of endothelial cells stained positive with anti-mouse CD31 Abs (Fig. 8A-G). Tumors in animals that did not receive endothelial cells or received human fibroblasts did not contain endothelial cells that stained positive with the anti-B2-microglobulin or anti-HLA-class-1 Abs Abs.
MASC-derived endothelial cells were also analyzed whether they contribute to wound healing angiogenesis. The area of the ear that had been clipped to tag the mouse was then examined. Neoangiogenesis in the ear wounds was in part derived from the MASC derived endothelial cells. Similar to blood vessels in the tumor the percent human endothelial cells present in the healed skin wound was 30-45% (Fig. 9H).
Undifferentiated hMASC differentiate in endothelial cells in vivo 10° undifferentiated MA SC were injected 1.V. in 6-week old NOD-SCID mice. Animals were maintained for 12 weeks and then sacrificed. In one animal, a thymic tumor was detected, which is commonly seen in aging NOD-SCID mice (Prochazka et al., 1992).. The thymus was removed and cryopreserved in OTC compound at -80°C. Ten um thick sections of the tissues were mounted on glass slides and were fixed and stained as described below.
All hematopoietic cells stained positive for mouse CD45 but not human
CD45, indicating that they were murine in origin. The tumor was then stained with an anti-human B2-microglobulin-FITC Ab and an anti-vWF-Cy3 Ab that recognizes both human and mouse endothelial cells. Approximately 12% of the vasculature was derived from hMASC (Fig. 91). These studies further confirmed that the hematopoietic elements were not of human origin, as no human p2-microglobulin was detected outside of the vascular structures.
Immunohistochemistry and Data Analysis
In vitro cultures: Undifferentiated MASC or MASC induced to differentiate to endothelium for 2-18 days, plated in FN coated chamber slides were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 4 min at room temperature. For cytoskeleton staining chamber slides were fixed with methanol for 2 min at -20°C. For intracellular ligands, cells were permeabilized with 0.1 Triton-X (Sigma) for 10min and incubated sequentially for 30h in each with primary antibody (Ab), and FITC,
PE or CyS5 coupled anti-mouse-, goat- or rabbit-IgG Ab. Between each step, slides were washed with PBS+1%BSA. Primary Abs against CD31, CD34, CD36, CD44,
HLA-class I and -II,B2-microglobulin were used at a 1:50 dilution. Primary Abs against VCAM, ICAM, VE-cadherin, selectins, HIP12, ZO-1, connexin-40, connexin-43, MUC18, a,bs, a,bs, B-catenin and y-catenin (Chemicon) and Tek, Tie, i vWF (Santa Cruz) were used at a 1:50 dilution. Stress fibers were stained with Abs against myosin (light chain 20kD, clone no. MY-21; 1:200). Secondary Abs were purchased from Sigma and used at the following dilutions: anti-goat IgG-Cy-3 (1:40), anti-goat 1gG-FITC (1:160), anti-mouse IgG-Cy-3 (1:150) and anti-mouse
IgG-FITC (1:320), anti-rabbit-FITC (1:160) and anti-rabbit-Cy-3 (1:30). TOPRO-3 was purchased from Sigma. Cells were examined by fluorescence microscopy using ‘ a Zeiss Axiovert scope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thomwood, NY) as well as by confocal fluorescence microscopy using a Confocal 1024 microscope (Olympus AX70,
Olympus Optical Co. LTD, Japan).
Tumors or normal tissue: The tissue was sliced using a cryostat in 5-10 pm thick slices. Slices were fixed with acetone for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.1 Triton X for 5 min. Slides were incubated overnight for vWF, Tie or Tek, followed by secondary incubation with FITC, PE or CyS5 coupled anti-mouse-, goat- or rabbit-IgG Abs and sequential incubation with Abs against mouse CD45-PE or human CD45-FITC, human B2-microglobulin-FITC, mouse
CD31-FITC or TOPRO-3 for 60min. Between each step, slides were washed with
PBS + 1% BSA. Slides were examined by fluorescence microscopy using a Zeiss
Axiovert scope as well as by confocal fluorescence microscopy using a Confocal 1024 microscope. 3D-reconstruction consisted of the collection of sequential 0.5 um confocal photos from 35 slides of Sum thick to a total of 350 photos. Slides were stained with vWF-Cy3 and alternately double stained with humanf2- microglobulin-FITC or mouse CD31-FITC. The photos from each slide were aligned with the next slide in Metamorph software (Universal Imaging Corp) and the 3D reconstruction was made in 3D Doctor Software (Able software Corp).
Volume of relative contribution of human (green) and murine endothelial cells (false colored as blue) to the 3D vessel was calculated as cubic pixels of each color. The area of each color was also calculated as square pixels in 4 vessels through the 35 slides to obtain an accurate percentage of contribution. The area of each color was also calculated in alternate slides of four different tumors.
The central finding of this study is that cells that co-purify with MSC from : BM have the ability to differentiate to endothelial cells that have in vitro functional characteristics indistinguishable from mature endothelial cells. It is also showv that such endothelial cells contribute to neoangiogenesis in vivo in the setting of wound healing and tumorigenesis, and that undifferentiated MASC can respond to local cues in vivo to differentiate into endothelial cells contributing to tumor angiogenesis.
As the same cell that differentiates to endothelium also differentiates to other mesodermal cell types, as well as cells of non-mesodermal origin, the cell defined here precedes the angioblast, and even the hemangioblast in ontogeny.
It has also been shown that MASC differentiate into cells that express markers of endothelial cells, but proved that VEGF induced MASC function like endothelial cells. Endothelial cells modify lipoproteins during transport in the artery wall (Adams ef al., 2000). Endothelial cells maintain a permeability barrier through intercellular junctions that widen when exposed to hemodynamic forces or vasoactive agents, such as histamine (Rosenberg ef al., 1998; Li ef al., 1990; Van
Rijen er al., 1997; Vischer et al., 2000). Endothelial cells release prothrombotic molecules such as vWF, tissue factor, and plasminogen activator inhibitor to prevent bleeding (Vischer et al., 2000), and regulate egress of leukocytes by changing expression levels of adhesion molecules in response to inflammation (Meager, 1999;
Steeber ef al., 2001). Endothelium also reacts to hypoxia by producing VEGF and expressing VEGF receptor aimed at increasing vascular density (Kourembanas et al. 1998). Therefore it has been demonstrated that endothelial cells generated. from
MASC can perform all of these tasks when tested in vitro.
Finally it has been proved that in vitro generated MASC-derived endothelial cells respond to angiogenic stimuli by migrating to the tumor site and contributing to tumor vascularization as well as wound healing in vivo. This finding confirms. that endothelial cells generated from MASC have all the functional characteristics of mature endothelium. The degree of contribution of endothelial cells to tumor angiogenesis and neo-angiogenesis was 35-45%, levels similar to what has been described for other sources of endothelial cells (Conway ef al., 2001; Ribatti er al., 2001). In addition, it has been found that angiogenic stimuli in vivo provided in a tumor microenvironment are sufficient to recruit MASC to the tumor bed and induce their differentiation into endothelial cells that contribute to the tumor vasculature.
These studies therefore extend studies reported by other groups demonstrating that cells present in marrow can contribute to new blood vessel formation (Peichev et al., : 2000; Lin et al., 2000; Gehling et al., 2000; Asahara ef al., 1997), in a process similar to vasculogenesis, precursor responsible for this process has been identified the. This is to our knowledge the first report that identifies a cell present in post- natal BM as a very early progenitor for endothelial cells.
Example 10. Derivation of Neurons
Single adult BM-derived hMASC or mMASC were tested to determine whether they can differentiate ex vivo to functional neurons, as well astrocytes and oligodendrocytes aside from mesodermal cell types. mMASC and hMASC were selected and culture expanded as previously described in Examples 1 and 3, respectively. Human neural progenitor cells (WNPC) were purchased from Clonetics (San Diego, CA). hNPC were cultured and differentiated per manufactures’ recommendations.
Electrophysiology: Standard whole-cell patch-clamp recording was used to examine the physiological properties of MASC-derived neurons. Voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings were obtained using a Dagan 3900A patch-clamp amplifier (Dagan Corporation, Minneapolis) which was retrofitted with a Dagan 3911 expander unit. Patch pipettes, made from borosilicate glass, were pulled on a
Narishige pipette puller (model PP-83), and polished using a Narishige microforge (model MF-83). Patch pipettes were filled with an intracellular saline consisting of (in mM) 142.0 KF, 7.0 Na,;S04, 3.0 MgS04, 1.0 CaCl,, 5.0 HEPES, 11.0 EGTA, 1.0 glutathione, 2.0 glucose, 1.0 ATP (magnesium salt), 0.5 GTP (sodium salt). For most recordings, the fluorescent dye 5,6-carboxyfluorescein (0.5 mm; Eastman
Kodak Chemicals) was also added to the pipette solution to confirm visually, using fluorescence microscopy, that the whole-cell patch recording configuration had been achieved. Pipette resistances ranged from 11 to 24 Mohm. The standard extracellular recording saline was comprised of the following (in mM): 155 NaCl, 5.0 KCl, CaCl,, 1.0 MgCl,, 10 HEPES, 5 glucose. For some experiments 1 pM
TTX was added to the standard control solution. The pH of the intracellular and extracellular recording solutions was adjusted to 7.4 and 7.8, respectively, using
NaOH. All chemicals were from Sigma. PClamp 8.0 (Axon Instruments, Foster
City) was used to run experiments, and to collect and store data. The data presented were corrected for a 8.4 mV liquid junctional potential, which was calculated using the JPCALC software package. Off-line analyses and graphical representations of the data were constructed using Clampfit 8.0 (Axon Instruments, Foster City) and
Prism (Graphpad, San Diego).
Transduction: Retroviral supernatant was produced by incubating MFG- eGFP-containing PG13 cells, provided by Dr. G.Wagemaker, U. of Rotterdam,
Netherlands (Bierhuizen et al., 1997), with MASC expansion medium for 48h, filtered and frozen at -80°C. MASC were incubated with retroviral supernatants and 8 ng/ml protamine (Sigma) for 6h. This was repeated 24h later. Transduction efficiency was analyzed by FACS.
Gene microarray analysis: RNA was isolated from hMASC, bFGF or FGF- 8b+EGF induced cells using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagene), digested with DNase 1 (Promega) at 37°C for lh and re-purified using the RNeasy. The [*2P] dATP labeled cDNA probe, generated according to the manufacturers recommendations, was hybridzed to the Human Neurobiology Atlas Array (Clonetech # 7736-1, Clonetech
Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 68°C for 18-20h, followed by 4 washes in 2x
SSC, 1% SDS at 68°C for 30min each time, 0.Ix SSC, 0.5% SDS at 68°C for 30 min, and once in 2x SSC at room temperature for 5 min. The arrays were read by a phosphorimager screen scanner {Molecular Dynamics, Storm 860) and analyzed using Atlas Image 1.0 (Clontech). Differences between undifferentiated and differentiated cells greater than 2-fold were considered significant.
PCR analysis for retroviral insert: PCR was used o amplify the flanking sequence 3' from the 3' LTR of the MFG vector in the human genomic DNA. DNA from 10° MASC or endothelial, myoblast or neuroectodermal differentiated progeny was prepared from cells by standard methods. 300 ng of genomic DNA was digested with Ascl and a splinkerette linker was ligated to the 5' end (Devon R. S. ef al., 1995). The two oligonucleotides used for the splinkerette linker were as follows: aatt TAGCGGCCGCTTGAAT Ttttttttgcaaaaa, (the hairpin loop forming sequence is in lower case and the upper case is the reverse complement of the second splinkerette oligo), and agtgtgagtcacagtagtctcgegtic gAATTAAGCGGCCGCTA, (the underlined sequence is also the sequence of the linker-specific primer (LS Primer) used for the PCR and RT steps). A 5'-biotin-T7 coupled primer was used that recognizes a sequence in the eGFP gene [Biotin-ggc- cag-tga-att-gta-ata-cga-cte-act-ata-ggc-tgg-CAC-ATG-GTC-CTG-CTG-GAG-TTC-
GTG-AC; underlined portion shows the minimum promoter sequence needed for efficient in vitro transcription and the upper case is the eGFP specific sequence] and
LS primer to amplify the flanking regions for 10 rounds using Advantage 2 polymerase (Clontech). The biotin labeled amplified product was captured using streptavidin-magnetic beads (Streptavidin Magnetic Particles; Roche) and the resultant product was further amplified using the T7 RNA polymerase an approximately 1,000 fold and then DNAase 1 treated. The resultant product was reverse transcribed using the agtgtgagtcacagtagtctcgcgtte splinkerette primer according to the superscript II protocol (Gibco), and subsequently amplified by 30 rounds of nested PCR using the primer for the 3’LTR [ggc caa gaa cag atg gaa cag ctg aat atg]. The flanking sequence in the human genome from endothelium, muscle, and neuroectodermal differentiated cells and undifferentiated MASC was : sequenced.
To demonstrate that the same insertion site was present in multiple differentiated progeny, specific primers were generated in the host-flanking genome.
Real time PCR amplification (ABI PRISM 7700, Perkin Elmer/Applied Biosystems) was used to quantitate the flanking sequence compared to the eGFP sequence.
Reaction conditions for amplification were as follows: 40 cycles of a two step PCR (95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 60 sec) after initial denaturation (95°C for 10 min.) with 2 ul of DNA solution, 1X TagMan SYBR GreenUniversal Mix (Perkin Elmer/Applied
Biosystems) PCR reaction buffer. Primers used were as follows: Clone A16: LTR primer = CCA-ATA-AAC-CCT-CTT-GCA-GTT-G; Flanking sequence chromosome 7 = TCC-TGC-CAC-CAG-AAA-TAA-CC; Clone A 12 chromosome 7 sequence: LTR primer = GGA-GGG-TCT-CCT-CTG-AGT-GAT-T, Flanking sequence = CAG-TGG-CCA-GAT-CTC-ATC-TCA-C; Clone A12 chromosome 1 sequence: LTR = GGA-GGG-TCT-CCT-CTG-AGT-GAT-T; Flanking sequence =
GCA-GAC-GAG-GTA-GGC-ACT-TG. The relative amount of the flanking sequence was calculated in comparison with eGFP sequence according to manufacturer's recommendations using the 7700 ABI PRISM Detector Software 1.6.
Neural transplantation: Newborn (P1-P3) male Sprague Dawley rats (Charles
River Laboratories) were used in this study. The rats were anaesthetized by cryoanesthesia. The cranium was immobilized using a modified stereotaxic head holder and the scalp reflected to expose the skull. hMASC were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, washed twice, and resuspended in PBS. The viability of the hMASC was more than 85%. A 2 ul volume of hMASC suspended in phosphate buffered saline at a concentration of 0.7x10* cells/ ul was stereotaxically injected intracerebroventricularly with a tapered glass micropipette attached to a Hamilton syringe using the following coordinates (mm from bregma): AP -0.6, ML 0.8, DV
2.1, toothbar was set at -1. Following the injections, the scalp was sutured and the pups allowed to recover.
Four and 12 weeks after transplantation, the rats were anaesthetized with chloral hydrate (350mg/kg, i.p.), decapitated the brains removed, frozen in powered dryice, and stored at -80°C. Fresh frozen brains were sectioned using a cryostat and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min immediately before staining. Sections were incubated for one hour at room temperature with blocking/permeabilization solution consisting of 2% normal donkey serum (Jackson Immuno Labs) and 0.3% triton X. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in the same blocking/permeabilization solution for subsequent steps. Primary antibodies (mouse anti human nuclei (1:25), anti human nuclear membrane (1:25) and anti NeuN (1:200) from Chemicon; rabbit anti GFAP (1:250) from DAKO, rabbit anti NF200 (1:300) from Sigma were incubated overnight at 4°C rinsed 3x10 minutes each in
PBS and followed by secondary Cy3 (1:200) anti and FITC (1:100) antibodies (all from Jackson Immuno Labs) for two hours at room temperature. Slides were examined by fluorescence microscopy using a Zeiss Axiovert scope as well as by confocal fluorescence microscopy using a Confocal 1024 microscope. hMASC acquire a neuron, astrocyte and oligodendrocyte phenotype when cultured - with bFGF.
Neuroectodermal differentiation was done as described in Example 5.
Briefly, cells were cultured in FN-coated chamberslides or culture plates with serum-free medium consisting of 60% DMEM-LG, 40% MCDB-201 (Sigma
Chemical Co, St Louis, MO), supplemented with 1X ITS, 1X LA-BSA, 10M dexamethasone, 10™ M ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AA) (all from Sigma), 100 U penicillin and 1,000 U streptomycin (Gibco). In some cultures, we added 100ng/mL bFGF whereas in other cultures 10 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL FGF-8b were added (all from R&D Systems). Cells were not subcultured, but media was exchanged every 3-5 days.
Two weeks after re-plating with bFGF, 26+4% of cells expressed astrocyte (GFAP+), 28+3% oligodendrocyte (MBP+) and 46+5% neuron (NF200+) markers as shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Differentiation markers on bFGF and FGF-8b induced hMSC bFGF bFGF bFGF FGF-8b | FGF-8b | FGF-8b day 7 day 14 day 21 day 7 day 14 day 21
GFAP 36+4% 264% 0 0 0 0
MBP [| 35:3% | 2843% | 4%2% | 0 | 0 [ 0 |]
GalC | 30+x% | 26+5% | 8#3% | 0 | 0 | 0
NCAM
NF68 | 0 | 26+7%
NF160 | 0 | 46+5% | 5043% | 0 | 653% | Nottested
NF200 | 0 | 150% 9246%
NSE [0 | 40+4% | 825% | 0 | 78+3% | 8048%
MAP2-AB | 0 | 406% | 80+2% | 0 | 95:4% | 9543%
Taw [0 | 28+2% [ 787% | 0 | 93+2% [ 92+4% - GaBa | 0 [oo bo 1 oo | 394% | 40:2%
FH I A Ml iil in tH [0 [| oo fT 0 1 2045% [ 2345% | 2546% bcc [oo | oo | oo f 0 [| 256% ore | 06 [| oo | 0 | 0 | 357% [ 3843%
TH | oo [| oo [oI 0 [ 266% | 25¢4%
Serotonin | 0 | 0 [0 I 0 | 3045% [ 3543%
Neen | 0 fF 0 [0 [0 | 2064% [ 2342% [cree [| 0 f 0 Fo | 0 [| 333% | 35+5%
When hMASC were replated at higher cell densities (2x1 0* cells/cm?) to induce differentiation, no cells with neuroectodermal phenotype could be detected, suggesting that cell-cell interactions prevent bFGF-induced neuroectodermal differentiation.
The distribution of astrocyte-, oligodendrocyte- and neuron-like cells did not differ when differentiation was induced with hMASC that had undergone 20 or 60
PDs. However, when hMASC expanded for 20 PDs were cultured with bFGF, >50% of cells died while >70% of hMASC culture expanded for >30 PDs survived and acquired a neuron-, astrocyte- or oligodendrocyte-like phenotype. This suggests that not all hAMASC can be induced to acquire neural characteristics but that a subpopulation of hMASC that survives long-term in vitro may be responsible for . neuronal differentiation. It has been shown that the karyotype of AMASC is normal irrespective of culture duration (Reyes et al., 2001). Differentiation of hMASC into : neuroectodermal-like cells is therefore not likely due to transformation of MASC following long-term culture.
Most astrocyte- and oligodendrocyte-like cells died after 3 weeks.
Progressive maturation of neuron-like cells was seen throughout culture. After 1 week, bFGF treated hMASC stained positive for NeuroD, Nestin, polysialated neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM), and tubulin-B-I1I (TuJI) (Table 6).
After 2 weeks, bFGF treated cells stained positive for NF68, -160, and -200, NSE,
MAP2-AB, and Tau. bFGF-induced neurons did not express markers of GABA- ergic, serotonergic or dopaminergic neurons, but expressed glutamate as well as the . glutamate-receptors-3, -6 and -7 and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor, and
Na'-gated voltage channels.
Further confirmation of neuroectodermal differentiation was obtained from cDNA array analysis of two independent h(MASC populations induced to differentiate for 14 days with 100 ng/mL bFGF. Expression levels of nestin, otx 1 and otx2Consistent with the immunohistochemical characterization, a >2 fold increase in mRNA for nestin was detected, GFAP, glutamate-receptors 4, 5, and 6, and glutamate, and several sodium-gated voltage channels, but did not detect increases in TH or TrH mRNA levels. A >2 fold increase in mRNA levels was also found for mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 (MASH I) mRNA, a transcription factor found only in brain (Franco Del Arno ef al., 1993) and ephrin-A5 mRNA (O'Leary and Wilkinson, 1999). The astrocyte specific markers GFAP and S100A5, and oligodendrocyte specific markers, myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein precursor and myelin protein zero (PMZ), as well as Huntingtin, and major prion protein precursor mRNA were expressed >2-fold higher after exposure to bFGF. A greater than 2 fold increase was also seen for several glycine receptors, GABA- receptors, the hydroxytryptophan receptor-A and neuronal acetylcholine receptor, glycine transporter proteins, synaptobrevin and synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP)25. Finally, bFGF induced expression of BDNF and glia-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF).
Like hMASC. mMASC acquire a neuron, astrocyte and oligodendrocyte phenotype when cultured with bFGF.
MASC derived from other species was tested to determine whether similar results could be obtained. mMASC expanded for 40-90 PDs were replated at 10* cells/cm? in conditions identical to those used for h(MASC. After 14 days, mMASC acquired morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of astrocytes (GFAPY), oligodendrocytes (MBP") and neurons (NF-200", NSE" and Tau). NF200 and
GFAP or MBP were never found in the same cell. In contrast to undifferentiated mMASC, mMASC treated with bFGF were significantly larger and extended } processes for >40 pm.
To determine whether neuron-like cells had functional characteristics of : neurons, and if bFGF-induced cells showed evidence of voltage-gated Na* currents a patch clamp was used. No sodium currents or fast spiking behavior was seen in any of the mMASC derived neuron-like cells (n=59), even though some . cells expressed calcium currents, and in 4 cells there was evidence of spiking behavior mediated by calcium currents. Thus, bFGF induced cells did not have functional voltage-gated
Na" currents, despite expression of sodium-gated voltage channel mRNA and protein. hMASC acquire a midbrain dopaminergic, serotonergic and GABAergic phenotype when cultured with EGF and FGF-8b.
FGF-8b, expressed at the mid-hindbrain boundary and by the rostral forebrain, induces differentiation of dopaminergic neurons in midbrain and forebrain and serotonergic neurons in the hindbrain (Ye et al., 1998). In vitro, FGF-8b has been used to induce dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons from murine ES cells (Lee et al., 2000). hMASC (n=8), expanded = for 20 to 60 PDs, were replated at 2x10* cells/cm? on FN in serum free medium with ITS and AA and with 10 ng/mL FGF-8b and IOng/mL EGF. More than 80% of cells survived for 3 weeks. FGF-8b and EGF induced differentiation into cells staining positive for neuronal markers (Table 6) (day 7: PSA-NCAM, Nestin and Tull; day 14: NF-68, NF-160, NF-200; and day 21: MAP2-AB, NSE, Tau, and Na'-gated voltage channels) but not oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. In contrast to our observation for bFGF induced differentiation, cells plated at 10* cells/cm® with EGF and FGF-8b did not lead to differentiation. After 2-3 weeks, cells had characteristics of GABAergic (GABA”, parvalbumin’), dopaminergic (TH*, DCC", and DTP") and serotonergic (TrH" and serotonin’) neurons (Table 6). Cells also expressed the GABA-A-receptor and glutamate receptors. Cells with a dopaminergic phenotype also stained positive with
Abs against the nuclear transcription factor, Nurrl, expressed only in midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Saucedo-Cardenas et al., 1998) as well as the proto- oncogene cRet, a membrane-associated receptor protein tyrosine kinase, which is a component of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) receptor complex expressed on dopaminergic neurons (Trupp et al., 1996). This suggests that FGF-8b induces a phenotype consistent with midbrain dopaminergic neurons.
Again, results from immunohistochemical studies were confirmed by cDNA array analysis on hMASC induced to differentiate for 14 days with FGF-8b+EGF. :
Consistent with the immunohistochemical characterization, a >2 fold increase in mRNA for TH, TrH, glutamate, several glutamate-receptors, and sodium-gated voltage channels was detected. As parvalbumin and GABA are not present on the array, their expression could not be confirmed by mRNA analysis. Consistent with the almost exclusive neural differentiation seen by immunhistochemnistry, there was no increase in expression of GFAP, SI00A5 mRNA nor mRNA for the oligodendrocyte specific marker, PMZ. FGF-8b+EGF induced cells expressed >2 fold more tyrosine kinase receptor (Trk)A, BDNF and GDNF, several glycine-,
GABA -and hydroxytryptamine-receptors, and. several synaptic proteins.
Coculture with the glioblastoma cell line U87 enhances neuron maturation.
Irrespective of the culture conditions used, hMASC-derived neurons did not survive more than 3-4 weeks in culture. As neither culture contained glial cells after 3 weeks, it is possible that neuronal cells that express both glutamate and glutamate- receptors died due to glutamate toxicity (Anderson and Swanson, 2000).
Alternatively, factors required for neural cell survival, differentiation and maturation provided by glial cells might not be present in the cultures (Blondel et al., 2000;
Daadi and Weiss, 1999; Wagner et al., 1999). To test this hypothesis, cells from 3- week old FGF-8b+EGF cultures were cocultured with the glioblastoma cell line, U- 87, in serum-free medium supplemented with FGF-8b+EGF for an additional 2 weeks.
The glioma cell line, U-87, [American Tissue Cell Collection (Rockville,
MD)] was maintained in DMEM+10% FCS (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT).
Cells from 3-week old FGF-8b+EGF containing cultures were labeled with the lipophylic dye, PKH26 (Sigma), as per manufacturer's recommendations. Labeled cells were replated in FN coated chamber slides in FGF-8b+EGF containing serum free medium together with 1,000 U-87 cells and maintained an additional 2-3 weeks with media changes every 3-5 days. To assure that PKH26 present in MASC- derived cells did not transfer to the U-87 cell line, U-87 cells were cultured in BSA-
containing medium and 20 pl PKH26 dye for 7 days. No labeling of glioma cells was detected.
Under these serum-free conditions, U-87 cells ceased to proliferate but : survived. hMASC derived neurons were labeled with the membrane dye, PKH26, prior to coculture with U-87 cells to allow us to identify the hMASC-derived cells by fluorescence microscopy. FGF-8b+EGF induced neurons cocultured after 3 weeks with U-87 cells and the same cytokines survived for at least 2 additional weeks. Neurons acquired a more mature morphology with increased cell size as well increased number, length and complexity of the neurites.
The electrophysiological characteristics of PKH26 labeled neural cells derived from hMASC after coculture with U-87 cells by whole-cell current clamp and voltage-clamp after current-injection was evaluated (Fig. 9B). Current-clamp demonstrated spiking behavior in response to injected current in 4/8 of PKH26 labeled hMASC-derived cells present in FGF-8b+EGF/U-87 cultures. The resting membrane potential of spiking and non-spiking cells was -64.9+5.5mV and - 29.7+£12.4mV, respectively. For each cell studied, input resistance of spiking and non-spiking cells was 194.3 (37.3) and 216.3 (52.5) Mohm, respectively. An example of one of the cells in which w observed spiking behavior is shown in Fig. 9B. The top panel shows a family of voltage traces which was elicited from a spiking cell under control conditions. A DC current was first injected in the cell to hold them in the range of -100 to -120 mV. A current injection protocol, as shown in the middle panel, was then used to drive the membrane potential to different levels. As shown in this example, depolarizing current steps that were sufficiently large to bring the cell to threshold for action potential, evoked a single spike. The lower panel shows that the spiking behavior of the cells could be blocked by 1 uM
TTX, suggesting that the action potentials are mediated by Na-gated voltage channels. Leak-subtracted current records, obtained in voltage-clamp mode from the same cells (Fig. 9C), demonstrated an inward current that was transient in time course and activated at voltages more positive than -58 mV, as well as outward currents. The transient inward current was blocked reversibly by 1 uM TTX. This pharmacology, together with the transient time course and the voltage-dependent activation of the inward current is typical for voltage-gated Na" currents, found only in mature neurons and skeletal muscle cells (Sah et al., 1997; Whittemore ef al.,
1999). Skeletal muscle markers in these neuron-like cells was not detected. These studies suggest that treatment with FGF-8b+EGF and co-culture with glioblastoma cellsfresults ininaturation to cells with the fundamental characteristics of excitable neurons, TTX-sensitive voltage-gated Na* currents. } hMASC transplanted in ventricles of newborn rats differentiate in cells expressing astrocyte and neuronal markers 1.4x10* hMASC were stereotactically injected in the lateral ventricles of Pl-
P3 Sprague Dawley rats. After 4 and 12 weeks, animals were sacrificed and analyzed for presence of human cells and evidence of differentiation of h(MASC to neuroectoderm. Human cells, identified by staining with a antibodies against human nuclei or human nuclear membrane could be seen in the SVZ up to 400 um away from the ventricle in animals analyzed after 4 weeks, and after 12 weeks, human cells could also be seen deeper in the brain parenchyma such as in the hippocampus and along the fornix. Some human cells had typical astrocyte morphology and stained positive with anti-GFAP antibodies, whereas other cells stained positive with anti-Neu-N antibodies, NF-200 and anti-human nuclear membrane antibodies.
Triple staining showed that human nuclear antigen positive Neu-N positive cells did not coexpress and GFAP.
The central finding of this work is that single post-natal BM-derived MASC can be induced to differentiate not only into mesodermal cell types but also cells with mature neuronal characteristics, as well as astrocyte and oligodendrocyte characteristics. Time-dependent as well as culture-method-dependent maturation of
MASOC to cells with neuroectodermal features was shown. Double staining definitively demonstrated that neuronal or glial cells were authentic and results were not due to inappropriately expressed neuronal or glial markers. These results were confirmed at the mRNA level. Retroviral marking studies were used to demonstrate that the neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes were derived from a single MASC that also differentiates into muscle and endothelium, as the sequence of the host cell genomic region flanking the retroviral vector was identical in all lineages. hMASC did not only acquire phenotypic but also electrophysiological characteristics of mature neurons, namely TTX-sensitive voltage-gated Na* currents. Finally, it was also shown that MASC can differentiate in vivo into cells expressing neuronal and astrocyte markers.
Using retroviral marking of hMASC combined with PCR-based sequencing . of the genomic sequence flanking the 3-LTR of the retroviral insert, it was shown that neurons are derived from the same hMASC that differentiate into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, as well as into endothelium and muscle (Jordan ef al., 1990). This conclusively demonstrates that MASC can, at the single cell level, differentiate to cells of mesodermal and neuroectodermal lineages. The cells with the ability to differentiate not only into mesodermal cell types but also neuroectodermal cell types multipotent adult stem cells, or MASC were re-named. Sanchez-Ramos et al. (Sanchez-Ramos et al., 2000) and Woodbury et al. (Woodbury ef al., 2000) showed that populations of human or rodent MSC can express markers of astrocytes and neurons, but not oligodendrocytes in vitro. However, neither study provided evidence that the same cell that acquired neuroectodermal markers could also differentiate into mesodermal cells. Furthermore, neither study showed that cells expressing neuronal markers also acquired functional neuronal characteristics.
Thus, although suggestive for neural differentiation, these reports did not conclusively demonstrate neural and glial differentiation from MSC.
It was also shown that h(MASC transplanted in the ventricle of newborn rats can migrate in the neurogenic subventricular zone and into the hippocampus where they respond to local cues to differentiate into cells expressing astrocyte and neuronal markers. This model was chosen because migration and differentiation of
NSC to specific neuronal phenotypes occurs to a much greater extent when transplantation is done in germinal areas of the brain than in non-neurogenic areas, and when transplants are done in newborn animals compared with adult animals (Bjorklund and Lindvall, 2000; Svendsen and Caldwell, 2000). Although hMASC are multipotent and differentiate into cells outside of the neuroectoderm, hMASC did not form teratomas. The number of cells that had migrated outside the subventricular area was low after 4 weeks, but increased after 12 weeks.
The ease with which MASC can be isolated from post-natal BM, expanded and induced to differentiate in vitro to astrocytes, oligodendrocytes or neuronal cell types may circumvent one of the key problems in NSC transplantation, namely the availability of suitable donor tissue.
Example 11. MASC Differentiation into Hepatocyte-like Cells
During embryogenesis, the first sign of liver morphogenesis is a thickening of the ventral endodermal epithelium, which occurs between €7.5 and €8.5 in the mouse (Zaret K.S., 2001). Little is known about the signals involved in initial . endoderm formation and subsequent endoderm specification. Early in gastrulation (e6-¢7) endoderm is not specified, not even in an anterior/posterior direction (Melton D., 1997). However, recent studies showed that ex vivo exposure of endoderm to FGF4 posteriorizes the early endoderm, which is now competent to express hepatic markers (Wells J.M. et al., 1999). By e8.5 in the mouse, definitive endoderm has formed the gut tube and expresses HNF3B (Zaret K.S., 2000). The foregut endoderm is induced to the hepatocyte lineage by acidic (a)FGF and bFGF, both produced by the adjacent cardiac mesoderm (Zaret K.S., 2001), which are required to induce a hepatic fate and not the default pancreatic fate (Zarct K.S., 2001). Basic morphogenetic proteins (BMP’s) produced by the transversum mesenchyme are also required as they increase levels of the GATA4 transcription factor which promote the ability of endoderm to respond to FGF’s (Zaret K.S., 2001). GATA4 and HNF3p are required for hepatic specification and are important effectors of downstream events leading to hepatocyte differentiation, as they upregulate markers of hepatocyte specific expression such as albumin, among others.
In most instances, mature hepatocytes can undergo several cell divisions and are responsible for hepatic cell replacement. As a result, there has been great controversy about the existence and function of a liver stem cell. During extensive liver necrosis due to chemical injury or when hepatocytes are treated with chemicals that block their proliferation, a population of smaller cells with oval shape, termed oval cells, emerges and proliferates (Petersen, B.E., 2001). These oval cells may constitute the "stem cell" compartment in the liver. Oval cells reside in the smallest units of the biliary tree, called the canals of Herring, from where they migrate into the liver parenchyma (Theise N.D., et al., 1999). Oval cells are bi-potential, giving rise in vitro and in vivo to both hepatocytes and bile ductular epithelium. Oval cells express several hematopoietic markers such as Thyl1.1, CD34, Flt3-receptor, and c-
Kit, and also express oFP, CK 19, y-glutamyl-transferase, and OV-6. The origin of oval cells is not known (Petersen, B.E., 2001; Kim T.H. er al, 1997; Petersen, B.E.,
Until recently, it was believed that hepatocytes could only be derived from cells of endodermal origin and their progenitors. However, recent studies suggest that non-endodermal cells may also form hepatocytes in vivo and in vitro (Petersen,
B.E., 2001; Pittenger M.F. et al., 1999). Following bone marrow (BM) transplantation, oval cells are derived from the donor BM (Theise N.D., et al., 1999). Transplantation of enriched hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in FAH ” mice, an animal model of tyrosenimia type I, resulted in the proliferation of large numbers of donor LacZ" hepatocytes and animals had restored biochemical function of the liver (Lagasse E. ef al., 2000). Furthermore, single HSC may not only repopulate the hematopoietic system but also contribute to epithelium of lung, skin, liver and gut (Krause D.S. er al., 2001). Exocrine pancreatic tumor cells treated in vitro with dexamethasone (Dex) with or without oncostatin M (OSM) may acquire a hepatocyte phenotype (Shen C.N. ef al., 2000). Finally, mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells spontaneously acquire a hepatocyte phenotype, a process that is enhanced by treatment with aFGF, HGF, OSM, and Dex (Hamazaki T. ef al., 2001).
It was demonstrated here that single MASC not only differentiate into mesodermal and neuroectodermal cells, but also into cells with morphological, phenotypic and functional characteristics of hepatocytes in vitro. mMASC, rMASC, and hMASC acquire a hepatocyte-like phenotype when cultured with FGF4 and/or HGF. mMASC, rMASC and hMASC were selected and cultured as described. To determine optimal conditions for MASC differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells, the effect of different extracellular matrix (ECM) components was tested and cytokines known to induce hepatocyte differentiation in vivo or from ES cells (Zaret
K.S., 2001) on mMASC or rMASC differentiation to hepatocytes. As differentiation requires cell cycle arrest, the effect of cell density was also tested. To demonstrate differentiation to hepatocyte like cells, cells were stained after 14 days with Abs against albumin, CK 18, and HNF3p.
Optimal differentiation of mMASC or rMASC to albumin, CK18 and
HNF3B positive epithelioid cells was seen when MASC were plated at 21.5x1 0* cells/cm’ in the presence of 10 ng/ml FGF4 and 20 ng/ml HGF on Matrigel™ as shown in Table 7A. After 14 days, the percent albumin, CK 18 and HNF3p positive epithelioid cells was 61.4+4.7%, and 17.3% of cells were binucleated. When plated on FN, differentiation to CK18 and HNF3 positive epithelioid cells was also seen, even though only 53.1+6.3% of cells stained and fewer (10.9%) binucleated cells . were seen.
Culture with either FGF4 or HGF yielded albumin, CK18 and HNF3p positive epithelioid cells, but the percent albumin, CK18 and HNF3p positive cells was higher when mMASC or rMASC were treated with both FGF4 and HGF as shown in Table 7A. Addition of aFGF, bFGF, FGF7, BMP’s, or OSM did not increase the percent cells positive for hepatocyte markers, while 1% DMSO and 0.1 mM-10 mM Sodium Butyrate did not support differentiation of mMASC or rMASC to cells positive for hepatocyte markers.
When cell densities between 2.5 and 25x 10° cells/cm? were iesied, ihe highest percent cells with hepatocyte markers was seen in cultures seeded at 21.5x10° cells/em®. No hepatocyte differentiation was seen when cells were plated at <12.5x10° cells/cm’. hMASC were plated at 3-30x10° cells/cm” on 10ng/mL FN or 1% Matrigel™ with aFGF, bFGF, FGF7, 1% DMSO, HGF, and / or FGF4. Only cells treated with 10ng/ml FGF4 alone, 20ng/ml HGF alone, or a combination of both differentiated into epithelioid cells that expressed albumin, CK 18 and HNF3p. hMASC plated at 15-30x10’ cell/cm’ differentiated into epithelioid cells whereas h(MASC plated at 3x10’ cell/cm® died. Like mMASC or rMASC, the percent albumin, CK 18 and
HNF3p positive epithelioid cells was higher when hMASC were cultured on
Matrigel™ (91.3% + 4.4) than on FN (89.5% + 5.4), and the percent binucleated cells was higher on Matrigel™ (31.3%) than on FN (28.7%) as shown in Table 7B.
Table 7: Optimization of MASC differentiation into hepatocyte like cells.
TT
IS A I I I
CK18 H+ +++ +H SE Fo TES
HNF3B | ++er | rb HHH NT FE
I I I
: CKI18 +H +/+ Ft rr NT SEE
HNF3p aacana dill IEESSVISEE BRSSRVISSSS a NT PE
Ill I I
HEE
CKI8 NT NT NT
HNF3p NT NT NT -= 0% + = 20%, ++ = 30%, +++ = 40%, ++++ = 60%, +++++ = 80% cells staining positive for specific markers and NT = not tested.
Phenotypic characterization of MASC differentiation to hepatocyte-like cells
Hepatocyte differentiation was further evaluated over time by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy for early (HNF3p, GATA4, CK19, oFP) and late (CK18, albumin, HNF1a) markers of hepatocyte differentiation. mMASC or rMASC plated on Matrigel™ with FGF4 and HGF enlarged from 8um to 15um diameter as shown in Table 8A. On d21-d28, approximately 60% of cells were epithelioid and surrounded by smaller round or spindle shaped cells.
Undifferentiated mMASC or rMASC did not express any of the liver specific transcription factors or cytoplasmic markers. After 4 days, cells expressed HNF3p,
GATAA4 and oFP, low levels of CK 19, and very rare cells stained positive for
HNF 1a, albumin or CK18. At seven days, the large epithelioid cells stained positive for HNF3B, GATA4, HNFla with increasing staining for albumin and CK 18. Only rare cells expressed oFP. After 14, 21 and 28 days, the large epithelioid cells stained positive for GATA4, HNF3, HNFla, CK18 and albumin, but not aFP or
CK19. The smaller cells surrounding the nodules of epithelioid cells stained positive for CK19 and oFP. hMASC was plated on Matrigel™ with FGF4 and HGF or FGF4 alone enlarged from 10—12um to 20-30um diameter by d21. After 7 days, cells expressed
HNF38, GATA4 and low levels of CK 19, while few cells stained positive for albumin or CK18. After 14 and 21 days, >90% of epithelioid cells stained positive for GATA4, HNF3p, HNF1a, HNF4, CK18 and albumin, while only rare cells stained positive for aFP or CK19 as shown in Figure 10B.
Table 8: Immunohistochemistry Pattern of Hepatocyte Marker Expression
I LT LU
[5 [or [ow [ow Joa | ov Tor [oo [ou] oar] = TFET
Gata4 ++ +/+ +/+ ++ +/+ NT + NT + + o-FP ++ | ++ |NTNT| -/- NT + NT . -
HNFla -/- +/+ JI NT/NT +/+ +/+ NT - NT + +
Albumin ~f- ++ +/+ +/+ +/+ NT + NT + +
CK18 -/- +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ NT - NT + + + = Marker is expressed, - = Marker is not expressed and NT = not tested :
Hepatocyte-like cells are derived from the same single hMASC that differentiated into neuroectoderm and endoderm
It has been shown that single mMASC or rMASC differentiate into endothelium, neuroectoderm and CK 18 and albumin positive endodermal cells. It has also been shown that single hMASC differentiate into mesoderm and neuroectoderm. The same single hMASC was tested to determine whether they can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells. MASC were obtained, cultured and expanded as described. For differentiation, mMASC or rMASC were plated at 5- 25x10? cells/cm’ on 0.01-10pg/ml fibronectin (FN), 0.01-8ug/ml collagen (Sigma
Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO), or 1% Matrigel™ (Becton-Dickinson) in serum-free medium [60% low glucose DMEM (DMEM-LG; Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY), 40% MCDB-201 (Sigma), supplemented with 1X insulin/transferrin/selenium, 4.7 pg/ml linoleic acid, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), 10® M dexamethasone, 10M ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (all from Sigma), 100U/ml penicillin, 100/ml U streptomycin (Gibco)], with 2% FCS (Hyclone, Logan Utah) and 10 ng/mL each epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Sigma), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF; Chemicon,
Temecula, CA), and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF-BB; R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN). hMASC were plated at 15-30x10° cells/cm” on 0.1 pg/ml FN, or 1% Matrigel™ in the same medium without LIF (Reyes M., 2002). After 8-12h, media were removed, cells washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS)
(Fischer) and cultured in serum-free medium supplemented with 5-50ng/ml HGF, aFGF, bFGF, FGF4, FGF7, or OSM; or 10 mg/ml dimethyl-sulphoxide (DMSO), or 0.1-1mM sodium butyrate.
Transduction of hMASC with eGFP was performed using an eGFP-cDNA containing retrovirus and expanded to >5X10° cells. Twenty percent was induced to differentiate into muscle, endothelium, neuroectoderm and endoderm. For clone
A16 a single retroviral insertion site was present in undifferentiated MASC as well as mesodermal and neuroectodermal differentiated cells and eGFP”* clone A16
MASC differentiated into CK 18 and albumin positive cells. The same insertion site was present in FGF4-treated MASC generated from the same cell population (5°-
TAG CGGCCGCTTGAATTCGAACGCGAGACTACTGTGACT CACACT-3’,
Chromosome 7), proving that single hMASC differentiate into endoderm aside from mesoderm and neuroectoderm.
Quantitative RT-PCR demonstrates that FGF4 and HGF induces hepatocyte specification and differentiation.
Hepatocyte differentiation by quantitative RT-PCR was confirmed for early (HNF3B, GATA4, CK19, oFP) and late (CK 18, albumin, HNF1a, cytochrome P450) markers of hepatocyte differentiation. RNA was extracted from 3x10° MASC or
MASC induced to differentiate to hepatocytes. mRNA was reverse transcribed and cDNA was amplified as follows: 40 cycles of a two step PCR (95°C for 15", 60°C for 60") after initial denaturation (95°C for 10") with 2ul of DNA solution, 1X
TaqMan SYBR Green Universal Mix PCR reaction buffer using a ABI PRISM 7700 (Perkin Elmer/Applied Biosystems). Primers used for amplification are listed in
Table 9.
Table 9: Primers used
Eo i
Name wove |__
A: 5’-GCTGAGGTTCTCCGGCTCTTTCAGA-3
HNF3p S: 5-CCAACATAGGATCAGATG-3’ ‘ A: 5’-ACTGGAGCAGCTACTACG-3’
A: 5’-CTGTGGCCTCTATCACAAGATG-3’
A: 5’-CTCTGGATTGACTGTGGAAGTG-3’
A: 5’- GCTGCAGATGACTTCAGAACC -3’ :
[TT A:5-AGACTGCCTTGTGTGGAAGACT-3’ aFP S: 5-GTGAAACAGACTTCCTGGTCCT-3"
A: 5’-GCCCTACAGACCATGAAACAAG-3’
TTR S: 5-TCTCTCAATTCTGGGGGTTG-3
A: S-TTTCACAGCCAACGACTCTG-3’
Cyp2b9 S: 5’-GATGATGTTGGCTGTGATGC-3’
A: 5’-CTGGCCACCATGAAAGAGTT-3’ }
Cyp2bi3 S: 5-CTGCATCAGTGTATGGCATTTT-3’
A: 5’-TTTGCTGGAACTGAGACTACCA-3’ wow |__|] oFP S: 5’-TGCAGCCAAAGTGAAGAGGGAAGA-3’
A: 5’-CATAGCGAGCAGCCCAAAGAAGAA-3’
Albumin S: 5’- TGC TTG AATGTGCTGATGACAGGG -3’
A: 5’-AAGGCAAGTCAGCAGGCATCTCATC-3’
CK19 S: 5’-ATGGCCGAGCAGAACCGGAA-3’
A: 5’-CCATGAGCCGCTGGTACTCC-3’
CK18 S: 5’-TGGTACTCTCCTCAATCTGCTG-3’
A: 5’-CTCTGGATTGACTGTGGAAGT-3’ : CYPIBI S: 5"-GAGAACGTACCGGCCACTATCACT-3’
A: 5’-GTTAGGCCACTTCAGTGGGTCATGAT-3’
CYP2B6 S: 5’-GATCACACCATATCCCCGGA-3’
A: 5’-CACCCTACCACCCATGACCG-3'
RAT
HNFla S: 5-AGCTGCTCCTCCATCATCAGA-3’
A: 5’-TGTTCCAAGCATTAAGTTTTCTATTCTAA-3
HNEF38 S: 5’-CCTACTCGTACATCTCGCTCATCA-3’
A: 5’-CGCTCAGCGTCAGCATCTT-3’
CK18 S: 5°-GCCCTGGACTCCAGCAACT-3’
A: 5’-ACTTTGCCATCCACGACCTT-3’
CK19 S: 5’-ACCATGCAGAACCTGAACGAT-3’
A: 5'-CACCTCCAGCTCGCCATTAG-3’
Albumin S: 5°-CTGGGAGTGTGCAGATATCAGAGT-3’
A: 5'-GAGAAGGTCACCAAGTGCTGTAGT-3’ oFP S: 5-GTCCTTTCTTCCTCCTGGAGAT-3’
A: 5'-CTGTCACTGCTGATTTCTCTGG-3’
TTR S: 5°-CAGCAGTGGTGCTGTAGGAGTA-3’
A: 5’-GGGTAGAACTGGACACCAAATC-3’
Cyp2bl S: $’-GAGTTCTTCTCTGGGTTCCTG-3’
A: 5’- ACTGTGGGTCATGGAGAGCTG -3° mRNA levels were normalized using B-actin (mouse and human) or 18S (rat) as housekeeping genes and compared with mRNA levels in freshly isolated rat or mouse hepatocytes, rat hepatocytes cultured for 7 days, or mRNA from human adult liver RNA purchased from Clontech, Palo Alto, California.
On d0, mMASC and rMASC expressed low levels of albumin oFP, CK18, :
CK19, TTR, HNF3B, HNF1la and GATA4 mRNA, but no CYP2B9 and CYP2B13 (mouse) or CYP2BI (rat) mRNA (Fig. 10). Following treatment of mMASC or rMASC with FGF4 and HGF, expression of HNF3p and GATA4 mRNA increased on d2, became maximal by d4, decreasing slightly and leveling off by d14. mRNA for aFP, and CK19 increased after d2, and became maximal by d4 and decreased thereafter. TTR mRNA increased after d4, was maximal by d7 and leveled off.
CK18, Albumin, HNF la and P450 enzyme mRNA increased after d7 and was maximal on d14. Between d14 and d21, FGF4 and HGF induced MASC expressed : albumin, TTR, CK 18, CYP2B9 and CYP2B13 (mouse) and CYP2B1 (rat) mRNA.
Undifferentiated hMASC expressed low levels of albumin, CK18, and
CK 19, CYP1BI, but not oFP (Fig. 10) and CYP2B6 mRNA. Levels of albumin,
CK18, CK19, CYP1B1 mRNA increased significantly in h(MASC cultured with
FGF4 alone or with FGF4 and HGF for 14 days compared to day 0 (MASC) cultures. Levels of albumin, CK18 and CYP1B1 mRNA continued to increase and were higher on d28. Although, CYP1BI is not a specific hepatocyte marker, its upregulation suggests hepatocyte commitment and maturation. Low levels of
CYP2B6, 0.5% to 1.0% of fresh liver mRNA’s could be seen on d14 and d21 but not d0. mRNA levels of immature hepatocyte markers (CK 19 and aFP) decreased as differentiation progressed and were higher in cultures induced with FGF4 alone, whereas mRNA levels for mature hepatocytes (CK 18 and albumin) were higher in
FGF4 and HGF-induced hMASC.
Western Blot demonstrates that FGF4+HGF induces hepatocyte specification and differentiation
Expression of hepatocyte-specific genes was also confirmed by Western Blot and performed as described by Reyes et al. (2000). Abs to aFP, human albumin,
CK 18 were diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer. Goat anti- B-actin (1:1000) was from
Santa Cruz. Secondary Abs were HRP-linked goat anti-mouse and HRP-linked donkey anti-goat (Amersham, Arlington Heights). ECL was performed according to manufacturers instructions (Amersham). Undifferentiated hMASC did not express CK18, albumin, or FP protein (Fig. 10B). After treatment for 35 days with FGF4 alone or FGF4 and HGF, hMASC expressed albumin and CK18, but not aFP, consistent with the histochemical analysis. mMASC, tMASC and hMASC acquire hepatocyte functional activity
Five different assays were used to determine whether cells with morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of hepatocytes also had functional hepatocyte attributes.
Urea production and secretion by hepatocyte-like cells was measured at various time points throughout differentiation. Urea concentrations were determined by colorimetric assay (Sigma Cat. 640-1) per manufacturer's instructions. Rat hepatocytes grown in monolayer and fetal mouse liver buds were used as positive controls, and culture medium as negative control. The assay can detect urea concentrations as low as 10 mg/ml. As the assay also measures ammonia, samples were assessed before and after urease addition.
No urea or ammonia was detected in culture medium alone. Undifferentiated
MASC did not produce urea. Following treatment with FGF4 and HGF, urea production by MASC increased in a time dependent manner. The time course for urea production in mouse and rat cultures was similar. For h(MASC treated with
FGF4 and HGF, urea was not detected on d4, was similar to mouse and rat cultures by d12, and exceeded that in mouse or rat cultures on d21. Levels of urea produced by MASC-derived hepatocytes were similar to that in monolayer cultures of primary rat hepatocytes. For all three species, significantly more urea was produced by cells differentiated on Matrigel™ compared to FN.
Albumin production was measured at various time points throughout the differentiation. Rat albumin concentrations were determined by a competitive : enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA) described previously (Tzanakakis E.S., ez al., 2001; Wells J.M. et al., 2000). Human and mouse albumin concentrations were determined using a similar ELISA method with substitution of human or mouse albumin and anti-human or anti-mouse albumin Abs for the rat components where appropriate. Peroxidase conjugated anti-human-albumin and reference human albumin were from Cappel. Peroxidase conjugated and affinity purified anti-mouse albumin and reference mouse albumin were from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery,
Texas). To ensure specificity of the ELISA, human, mouse, and rat Abs were incubated for 2 hrs at 37°C with 3% BSA in distilled water (dH,0). ELISA’s had a sensitivity of at least 1 ng/ml.
Undifferentiated MASC did not secrete albumin. Following treatment with
FGF4 and HGF, mMASC, rMASC and hMASC produced albumin in a time dependent manner. As was seen for urea production, MASC differentiated on Matrigel™ produced higher amounts of albumin than when cultured on FN. Mouse, rat, and human cells secreted similar levels of albumin, even though albumin was not detected in human cultures on d3. Levels of albumin produced by mouse, rat and human MASC-derived hepatocytes were similar to those seen in monolayer cultures of primary rat hepatocytes.
Cytochrome P450 activity was next assessed in aggregates of MASC-derived . hepatocytes and primary rat liver hepatocyte spheroids using the PROD assay. mMASC-hepatocyte aggregates were formed by plating d14 FGF4 and HGF treated mMASC at 5x10? cells/cm? on non-tissue culture plates, which were placed on a shaker at 10 revolutions per minute for Sh. Cell aggregates were transferred to
Primaria™ dishes and allowed to compact for 4 days in the presence or absence of 1mM phenobarbital. hMASC-hepatocyte aggregates were formed by hanging drop method. Briefly, 10° h(MASC treated for 24 days with FGF4 and HGF were placed into 100pL drops with or without ImM phenobarbital. After 4 days, aggregates were collected and cytochrome P450 activity assessed by PROD assay.
Pentoxyresorufin (PROD) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon) is O-dealkylated by
Cytochrome P450, changing a non-fluorescent compound into a fluorescent compound, resorufin (Tzanakakis E.S. er al., 2001). Fluorescence intensity caused by PROD metabolism consequently estimates cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity.
Assessment and detection of resorufin in situ was performed using confocal microscopy as described (Tzanakakis E.S. et al., 2001).
No PROD activity was seen in aggregates of undifferentiated mMASC or hMASC. However, nMASC (18 days with FGF4 and HGF) and hMASC (28 days,
FGF4 alone) induced to form aggregates had significant PROD activity. PROD activity in MASC-derived hepatocyte aggregates was similar to that of primary rat hepatocyte aggregates. A number of different cells have P450 activity, but P450 activity up-regulation by phenobarbital is only seen in hepatocytes. Therefore, P450 was also tested in the presence or absence of phenobarbital. Without phenobarbital, several P450 enzymes partially participate in PROD metabolism giving an inflated fluorescence value for those samples. In contrast, in the phenobarbital induced aggregates, PROD activity is almost wholly metabolized by mouse cytochromes
Cyp2b9, Cyp2bl10, and Cyp2b13, rat cytochrome Cyp2b1/2 (Tzanakakis E.S. et al., 2001), and in human, by CYP2B6. Therefore increased fluorescent activity is smaller than the actual increase in the protein expression of the stated cytochrome
P450 enzymes. When aggregates were cultured for 96 hours with phenobarbital, a 32% to 39% increase in PROD activity was seen, suggesting presence of functional hepatocyte specific Cyp2b9, Cyp2b10, and Cyp2b13 in mMASC and CYP2B6 in hMASC-derived hepatocytes.
MASC-derived hepatocytes were also assessed for their ability to take up
LDL by incubating FGF4 treated hMASC with LDL-dil-acil. Cells were co-labeled either with anti-CK 18 or anti-Pan-CK and HNF-38 or GATA4 Abs. After 7 days, low level uptake of a-LDL was detected, which increased to become maximal on d21.
Another metabolic function of hepatocytes is glycogen production or gluconeogenesis. The levels of glycogen storage were analyzed by periodic acid
Schiff (PAS) staining of FGF4 and HGF induced mouse MASC and FGF induced hMASC at d3, d7, d14, and d21. For PAS, slides were oxidized in 1% periodic acid for 5° and rinsed 3 times in dH,O. Afterwards slides were treated with Schiff's rcagent for 15°, rinsed in AHO for 5-107, stained with Mayer's hematoxylin for I and rinsed in dH,0. Glycogen storage was first seen by d14 and maximum levels were seen after d21 (Fig. 11).
Hepatocyte Isolation and Culture
Hepatocytes were harvested from 4-6 week old male Sprague-Dawley rats as described (Seglen P.O., 1976). Hepatocyte viability after the harvest ranged from 90-95%. Hepatocytes were cultured as described (Tzanakakis E.S. et al., 2001;
Tzanakakis E.S. et al., 2001). To form a monolayer, hepatocytes were cultured on 35 mM Fischer culture plates (Fischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) coated with 8pg/cm’ collagen (Cohesion Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). To form spheroids, hepatocytes were cultured on 35-mm Primaria™ dishes (Becton Dickinson). Under both conditions, seeding density was 5x10* cells/cm? 12h after initial plating, medium was changed to remove dead and unattached cells. Medium was replaced every 48 hours thereafter.
It has been shown that a single post-natal mouse, rat and human BM-derived
MASC can differentiate in vitro into an endodermal cell type with hepatocyte phenotype and function. MASC, cultured under hepatocyte differentiation conditions, expressed in a time-dependent fashion primitive and mature hepatocyte markers, shown by immunofluorescence microscopy of double and triple labeled cells. The protein expression profile was hepatocyte specific and not spurious, as non-hepatocyte markers were not co-expressed with hepatocyte antigens. Results from immunohistochemistry were confirmed by Western blot. In addition, RT-PCR corroborated upregulation of the transcription factors HNF3pB and GATA4 known to . be important in endoderm specification and transcription factors required for subsequent hepatocyte differentiation, such as HNF3, and cytoplasmic proteins such as CK 19, CK18, FP and albumin.
Although it was shown that FGF4 alone or both FGF4 and HGF induced
MASC into cells with morphological and phenotypic characteristics of hepatocytes, this alone does not prove that cells have differentiated into hepatocytes unless one can demonstrate acquisition of functional characteristics of hepatocytes. Therefore, several functional tests were done in combination to identify functional hepatocytes. mMASC, rMASC or hMASC produced urea and albumin, contained phenobarbital inducible cytochrome P450 activity, could take up Dil-acil-LDL, and contained glycogen granules. Although urea production is characteristic of hepatocyte activity, kidney tubular epithelium also produces urea (Hedlund E. ef al., 2001). In contrast, albumin production is a specific test for the presence and metabolic activity of hepatocytes (Hedlund E. ef al., 2001). Cytochrome P450, although found in hepatocytes, is also present in many other cell types (Jarukamjorn K. ef al., 1999).
However, Cyp2bl activity in rat (Tzanakakis E.S. ef al., 2001), Cyp2b9 and Cyp2bl3 in mouse (Li-Masters T. et al., 2001; Zelko I. Et al., 2000), and CYP2B6 in human is considered relatively hepatocyte specific. Presence of these forms of P450 was shown by RT-PCR. The specificity for hepatocytes is enhanced further when
P450 activity is inducible by phenobarbital (Rader D.J. et al., 2000), as shown.
Although LDL uptake is seen in hepatocytes (Oh S.H. et al., 2000), other cells such as endothelium have a similar capability (Avital I. ez al., 2001). Finally, only hepatocytes can generate and store glycogen. When taken together, these functional tests demonstrate that MASC from mouse, rat or humans treated in vitro with FGF4 and HGF not only express hepatocyte markers but also have functional characteristics consistent with hepatocyte metabolic activities.
Several studies have shown that BM derived cells may differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells in vivo and in vitro (Petersen B.E. et al., 1999; Theise N.D. et al., 2000; Krause D.S. ef al, 2001; Pittenger MF. et al., 1999; Wang S. et al., 2001; Lagasse E. et al., 2000). However, most studies have not addressed the phenotype of the BM cell that differentiates into cells with hepatocyte phenotype. It is unknown whether the cells staining positive for hepatocyte markers had functional characteristics of hepatocytes, and whether cells that differentiate into hepatocytes can also differentiate into mesodermal cells, such as hematopoietic cells. Lagasse ef al. : demonstrated that cKit Thy, Scal* Lin*" cells present in murine BM differentiate into cells with not only hepatocyte phenotype but also hepatocyte function (Lagasse
E. et al., 2000). Even though such results could be seen when as few as 50 cells were transplanted, this study did not prove that the same cell that differentiates into hematopoietic cells also differentiates into hepatocytes. Krause et al showed that a single cell can repopulate the hematopoietic system and give rise to rare hepatocytes.
However, no functional assessment of the hepatocytes was done (Krause D.S. et al, 2001). Avital et al recently published that Bm", Thy-1* cells in mouse BM express : albumin, HNF4, C/EBPg, and Cytochrome P450 2A2 mRNA and protein (Wilmut 1, et al., 1997), a phenotype of hepatocyte progenitors usually found in the liver. Thus, presence of such hepatocyte progenitor cells in BM could explain the in vivo differentiation of bone marrow into hepatocytes noted in recent studies (Krause D.S. et al., 2001; Lagasse E. et al., 2000).
To address the question whether cells giving rise to functional hepatocyte- like cells also give rise to other cell types, retroviral marking was used (Reyes M. et al, 2001; Jiang Y., 2002). It has been recently shown that cells expressing albumin,
CK18 and HNF1a can be generated from the same mMASC and rMASC that differentiate into cells with endothelial and neuroectodermal phenotype (Jiang Y., 2002). It is confirmed that similar results are seen for h(MASC. Extending recently published studies demonstrating derivation of cells with mesodermal and neuroectodermal phenotype and function from single hMASC (Reyes M., 2002), it is shown here that the same single h(MASC also differentiates into cells with hepatocyte morphology and phenotype. Thus, it is demonstrated for the first time that MASC that do not express hepatocyte markers and have no functional hepatocyte activity exist in BM, which depending on the culture conditions, acquire . a hepatocyte phenotype and functional characteristics of hepatocytes, or phenotypic and functional characteristics of mesodermal and neuroectodermal cells.
Example 12. Transplantation of LacZ Transgenic MASC to Treat Hemophiliac
Mice
MASC were derived from ROSA26 mice containing the -gal/NEO . transgene (10° cells/mouse) and were 1.V. injected into hemophiliac mice (N=5) without prior irradiation. The animals were sacrificed at 1 (N=2) and 2 months (N=3) post-MASC transplantation. Bone marrow cytospins and frozen sections of liver, spleen, skeletal muscle, heart, lung and intestine were stained for presence of
B-gal antigen using a FITC-conjugated anti-B-gal antibody and pan-cytokeratin or
CD45. Tissues were also analyzed by Q-PCR for the B-gal gene as described in
Example 6.
Preliminary analysis indicates that one of the three animals (M3) analyzed at 2 months post-injection had 0.1% of pulmonary epithelial cells derived from the donor cells by immunohistochemistry and Q-PCR. Immunohistochemistry also showed that animal M5 had <1% engraftment of CD45" donor cells in the spleen, marrow and intestine. Tissues of the animal M4 had some donor derived cells on immunohistochemistry; PCR data on this animal is pending.
All publications, patents and patent applications are incorporated herein by reference as though individually incorporated by reference. While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for purposes of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein may be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.
Adams, R.H., and Klein, R. (2000). Eph receptors and ephrin ligands.
Essential mediators of vascular development. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 10:183-188.
Alison, M., and Sarraf, C. (1998). Hepatic stem cells. J Hepatol 29: 678-83. .
Alizadeh, A.A., M.B. Eisen, R.E. Davis, C. Ma, LS. Lossos, A. Rosenwald,
J.C. Boldrick, H. Sabet, T. Tran, X. Yu, J.I. Powell, L. Yang, G.E. Marti, T. Moore,
J.J. Hudson, L. LU. D.B. Lewis, R. Tibshirani, G. Sherlock, W.C. Chan, T.C.
Greiner, D.D. Weisenburger, J.O. Armitage, R. Warnke, and L.M. Staudt. 2000.
Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 403:503-511.
Anderson, C. M,, and Swanson, R. A. (2000). Astrocyte glutamate transport: review of properties, regulation, and physiological functions. Glia 31:1-14. : Anderson, D. J. Gage. F. H.. and Weissman, I. L. (2001). Can stem cells cross lineage boundaries? Nat Med., 393-5.
Arsenijevic, Y., and Weiss, S. (1998). Insulin-like growth facor-I is a differentiation factor for postmitotic CNS stem cell-derived neuronal precursors: distinct actions from those of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 18:118- 28.
Asahara, T., Masuda, H., Takahashi, T., Kalka, C., Pastore, C., Silver; M.,
Kearne, M., Magner, M., and Isner, J. M. (1999). Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res 85:221-8.
Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Sullivan, A., Silver, M., van der Zee, R., Li, T.,
Witzenbichler, B., Schatteman, G., and Isner, J. (1997). Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 275, 964-967.
Avital, I, Inderbitzin, D., Aoki, T., Tyan, D.B., Cohen, A.H., Ferraresso, C.,
Baumbhueter, S., Dybdal, N., Kyle, C., and Lasky, L. (1994). Global vascular expression of murine CD34 a sialomucin-like endothelial ligand for L-selectin.
Blood 84:2554.
Ben-Shushan, E., Thompson, J. R., Gudas, L. J., and Bergman, Y. (1998).
Rex- 1, a gene encoding a transcription factor expressed in the early embryo, is regulated via Oct-3/4 and Oct-6 binding to an octamer site and a novel protein, Rox- 1, binding to an adjacent site. Mol Cell Biol 18:1866-78.
Bierhuizen, M. F., Westerman, Y., Visser, T. P., Dimjati, W., Wognum, A.
W., and Wagemaker , G. (1997). Enhanced green fluorescent protein as selectable marker of retroviral-mediated gene transfer in immature hematopoictic bone marrow . cells. Blood 90:3304-15.
Bjorklund, A., and Lindvall, O. (2000). Cell replacement therapies for central nervous system disorders. Nat Neurosci 3: 537-44.
Bjornson, C., R. Rietze, B. Reynolds, M. Magli, and A. Vescovi. (1999).
Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science. 283:354-357.
Blondel, O., Collin, C., McCarran, W. J., Zhu, S., Zamostiano, R., Gozes, 1.,
Brenneman, D. E., and McKay, R. D. (2000). A glia-derived signal regulating neuronal differentiation. J Neurosci. 20:8012-20.
Bradley, A. (1987). Production and analysis of chimaeric mice. In
Teratocarcinomas and ES Cells: A Practical Approach. E.J. Robertson, ed. Oxford:
IRL Press, 113-151.
Brazelton, T. R., Rossi, F. M. V., Keshet, G. 1., and Blau, H. E. (2000). From
Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice. Science 290:1775-1779.
Bruder, S., ef al., U.S. Patent No. 5,736,396
Brustle, O., Jones, K., Learish, R., Karram, K., Choudhary, K., Wiestler, O.,
Duncan, I., and McKay, R. (1999). ES Cell-Derived Glial Precursors: A Source of
Myelinating Transplants. Science 285:754-6.
Brustle, O., Spiro, A. C., Karram, K., Choudhary, K., Okabe, S., and McKay,
R. D. (1997). ES cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes and myelinate in culture and after spinal cord transplantation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14809-14814.
Butler, D., (1999) FDA warns on primate xenotransplants. Nature 398:549.
Caplan, A, et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,486,359
Caplan, A., et al,, U.S. Patent No. 5,811,094
Caplan, A., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,837,539
Cassiede P., Dennis, J. E., Ma, F., Caplan, A. I., (1996). Osteochondrogenic potential of marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells exposed to TGF-beta 1 or PDGF-
BB as assayed in vivo and in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1264-73.
Cereghini, S. (1996). Liver-enriched transcription factors and hepatocyte differentiation. FASEB J.10:267-82.
Choi, K. (1998). Hemangioblast development and regulation. Biochem Cell
Biol. 76:947-956. .
Choi, K., M. Kennedy, A. Kazarov, J.C. Papadimitriou, and G. Keller. (1998). A common precursor for hematopoietic and endothelial cells. Development. 125:725-732.
Ciccolini, F., and Svendsen, C. N. (1998). Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF- 2) promotes acquisition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) reponsiveness in mouse striata] precursor cells: Identification of neural precursors responding to both EGF and FGF-2. J Neuroscience 18:7869-7880.
Clarke, D. L., Johansson, C. B., Wilbertz, J., Veress, B., Nilsson, E.,
Karlstrom, H,, Lendahl, U_ and Frisen I (2000). Generalized notential of adult
NSCs. Science 288:1660-3.
Conway, E.M., Collen, D., and Carmeliet, P. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth. Cardiovasc Res. 49:507-521.
Corbeil, D., Roper, K., Hellwig, A., Tavian, M., Miraglia, S,. Watt, S.M.,
Simmons, P.J., Peault, B., Buck, D.W., and Huttner, W.B. (2000). The human AC 133 HSC antigen is also expressed in epithelial cells and targeted to plasma membrane protrusions. J Biol Chem. 275:5512-5530.
Crosby, H.A., Kelly, D.A., and Strain, A.J. 2001. Human hepatic stem-like cells isolated using c-kit or CD34 can differentiate into biliary epithelium.
Gastroenterology. 120:534-544.
Daadi, M. M,, and Weiss, S. (1999). Generation of tyrosine hydroxylase- producing neurons from precursors of the embryonic and adult forebrain. J
Neurosci. 19:4484-97.
Dahlstrand, J., Lardelli, M., and Lendahl, U. (1995). Nestin mRNA expression correlates with the central nervous system progenitor cell state in many, but not all, regions of developing central nervous system. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 84:109-29.
Devon R. S., Porteous D. J, and J., B. A. (1995). Splink-erettes improved vectorettes for greater efficiency in PCR walking. Nucleic Acids Res 23:1644-1645.
DiGuisto, et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,681,599
Doetsch, F., Caille, I., Lim, D. A., Garcia-Verdugo, J. M., and Alvarez-
Buylla, A. (1999). Subventricular zone astrocytes are NSCs in the adult mammalian brain. Cell 97:703-716. . Eliceiri, B.P., and Cheresh, D.A. (2000). Role of alpha v integrins during angiogenesis. Cancer J Sci Am. 6, Suppl 13:5245-249.
Evans, et al., (1992). J. Am. Med. Assoc.,267:239-246.
Faloon, P., Arentson, E., Kazarov, A., Deng, C. X., Porcher, C., Orkin, S., and Choi, K. (2000). Basic fibroblast growth factor positively regulates hematopoietic development. Development. 127:1931-1941.
Fei, R., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,635,387
Ferrari, G., Cusella-De Angelis, G., Coletta, M., Paolucci, E., Stornaiuolo,
A., Cossu, G., and Mavilio, F. (1998). Muscle regeneration by bone marrow- derived myogenic progenitors. Science 279:528-30.
Flax, J. D., Sanjay, A., Yang, C., Simonin, C., Wills, A. M., Billinghurst, L.
L., Jendoubi, M., Sidman, R. L., Wolfe, J. H,, Kim, S. E., and Snyder, E. Y. (1998).
Engraftable human NSCs respond to developmental cues replace neurons and express foreign genes. Nature Biotech 16:1033-1038.
Fong, G. H., Zhang, L., Bryce, D. M,, and Peng, J. (1999). Increased hemangioblast commitment, not vascular disorganization, is the primary defect in flt-1 knock-out mice. Development. 126:3015-3025.
Franco Del Amo, F., Gendron-Maguire, M., Swiatek, P. J., and Gridley, T. (1993). Cloning, sequencing and expression pf the mouse mammalian achaete-scute homolog a (MASH 1). Biochem Biophys Acta 1171:323-7.
Frankel, M. S. (2000). In Search of Stem Cell Policy. Science 298:1397.
Fridenshtein, A. (1982). Stromal bone marrow cells and the hematopoietic microenvironment. Arkh Patol 44:3-11.
Furcht et al. International Application No. PCT/US00/21387.
Gage, F. H. (2000). Mammalian NSCs. Science 287:1433-1438.
Gage, F., Coates, P., Palmer, T., Kuhn, H., Fisher, L., Suhonen, J., Peterson,
D., Suhr, S., and Ray, J. (1995). Survival and differentiation of adult neuronal progenitor cells transplanted to the adult brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A 92:11879- 83. oo ee a
Gehling, U.M., Ergun, S., Schumacher, U., Wagener, C., Pantel , K_, Otte,
M., Schuch, G., Schathausen, P., Mende, T., Kilic, N., Kluge, K., Schafer, B.,
Hossfeld, D.K. and Fiedler, W. (2000). In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from AC I33-positive progenitor cells. Blood. 95:3106-3112. ,
Gritti, A., Frolichsthal-Schoeller, P., Galli, R., Parati, E. A., Cova, L.,
Pagano, S. F., Bjornson, C. R., and Vescovi, A. L. (1999). Epidermal and fibroblast growth factors behave as mitogenic regulators for a single multipotent stem cell-like population from the subventricular region of the adult mouse forebrain. J Neurosci. 19:3287-97.
Gronthos, S., Graves, S., Ohta, S., and Simmons, P. (1994). The STRO-1+ fraction of adult human bone marrow contains the osteogenic precursors. Blood 84: 4164-73.
Guenechea G Gan O Darrell Cand Dick J E_ (2001) Distinct classes of human stem cells that differ in proliferative and self-renewal potential. Nat
Immunol 2:75-82.
Gussoni, E., Soneoka, Y., Strickland, C., Buzney, E., Khan, M., Flint, A.,
Kunkel, L., and Mulligan, R. (1999). Dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse restored by stem cell transplantation. Nature 401:390-4.
Hamazaki, T., liboshi, Y., Oka, M., Papst, P.J., Meacham, A.M., Zon, L.1., and Terada, N. 2001. Hepatic maturation in differentiating embryonic stem cells in vitro. FEBS Lett 497:15-19.
Haralabopoulos, G.C., D.S. Grant, H.K. Kleinman, and M.E. Maragoudakis. (1997). Thrombin promotes endothelial cell alignment in Matrigel in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo. Am J Physiol. 273:C239-245.
Hedlund, E., Gustafsson, J.A., and Warner, M. (2001). Cytochrome P450 in the brain; a review. Curr Drug Metab 2:245-263.
Hill, B., Rozler, E., Travis, M., Chen, S., Zannetino, A., Simmons, P., Galy,
A., Chen, B., Hoffman, R. (1996). High-level expression of a novel epitope of CD59 identifies a subset of CD34+ bone marrow cells highly enriched for pluripotent stem cells. Exp Hematol. 8:936-43.
Hirashima, M., H. Kataoka, S. Nishikawa, N. Matsuyoshi , and S.Nishikawa. (1999). Maturation of ES cells into endothelial cells in an invitro model of vasculogenesis. Blood. 93:1253-1263.
Holash, J., Maisonpierre, P.C., Compton, D., Boland, P., Alexander, CR,
Zagzag, D., Yancopoulos, G.D., and Wiegand, S.J. (1999). Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. Science. 284:994-998.
Hu, Z., Evarts, R. P., Fujio, K., Marsden, E. R., and Thorgeirsson, S. S. (1993). Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-met genes during hepatic differentiation and liver development in the rat. Am J Pathol. 142:1823-30.
Iyer, V.R., Eisen, M.B., Ross, D.T., Schuler, G., Moore, T., Lee, J.C.F.,
Trent, J.M., Staudt, L.M., Hudson, J.J., Boguski, M.S., Lashkari, D., Shalon, D.,
Botstein, D., and Brown, P.O. (1999). The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science. 283:83-87.
Jackson, K., Majka, S. M., Wang, H., Pocius, J., Hartley, C., Majesky, M.
W., Entman, M. L., Michael, L., Hirschi, K. K., and M.A, G. (2001). Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin
Invest 107:1395-1402.
Jackson, K., Mi, T., and Goodell, M. A. (1999). Hematopoietic potential of stem cells isolated from murine skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14482-6.
Jaiswal, N., et al., (1997). J. Cell Biochem. 64(2):295-312.
Jarukamjorn, K., Sakuma, T., Miyaura, J., and Nemoto, N. (1999). Different regulation of the expression of mouse hepatic cytochrome P450 2B enzymes by glucocorticoid and phenobarbital. Arch Biochem Biophys 369:89-99.
Jiang, Y. 2002. Submitted.
Johansson, C. B., Momma, S., Clarke, D. L., Risling, M., Lendahl, U., and Frisen, J. (1999). Identification of a NSC in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Cell. 96:25-34.
Johnstone, B., Hering, T. M., Caplan, A. I., Goldgberg, V.M,, Yoo, J. U. (1998). In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res. 1:265-72.
Jordan, C. T., and Van Zant, G. (1998). Recent progress in identifying genes regulating HSC function and fate. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 10:716-20.
Jordan, C., McKearn, J., and Lemischka, 1. (1990). Cellular and developmental properties of fetal HSCs. Cell 61:953-963.
Kim, T.H., Mars, W.M,, Stolz, D.B., Petersen, B.E., and Michalopoulos,
G.K. (1997). Extracellular matrix remodeling at the early stages of liver regeneration in the rat. Hepatology 26:896-904.
Kopen, G., D. Prockop, and D. Phinney. 1999. Marrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellum, and they differentiate into astrocytes after injection into neonatal mouse brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96:10711-10716.
Kourembanas, S., Morita, T., Christou, H., Liu, Y., Koike, H., Brodsky, D.,
Arthur, V., and Mitsial, S.A. (1998). Hypoxic responses of vascular cells. Chest. 11 (Suppl 1):255-28S.
Krause, D. S., Theise, N. D., Collector, M. 1., Henegariu, O., Hwang, S.,
Gardner, R., Neutzel, S., and Sharkis, S. I. (2001). Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell 105:369-77.
Lagassc, E., Connors, 11., Al-Dhalimy, M., Reitsma, M., Dohse, M.,
Osborne, L., Wang, X., Finegold, M., Weissman, I.L., and Grompe, M. (2000).
Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat
Med. 6:1229-1234.
Larsson, J., Goumans, M.J., Sjostrand, L.J., van Rooijen, M.A., Ward, D.,
Leveen, P., Xu, X,, ten Dijke, P., Mummery, C.L., and Karlsson, S. (2001).
Abnormal angiogenesis but intact hematopoietic potential in TGF-beta type I receptor-deficient mice. EMBO J. 20:1663-1673.
Lazar, A., Peshwa, M. V., Wu, F. J, Chi, C. M,, Cerra, F. B., and Hu, W. S. (1995). Formation of porcine hepatocyte spheroids for use in a bioartificial liver.
Cell Transplant 4:259-68.
Lee, S. H., Lumelsky, N., Studer, L., Auerbach, J. M., and McKay, R. D. (2000). Efficient generation of midbrain and hindbrain neurons from mouse ES cells. Nat Biotechnol 18:675-9.
Lewis, 1. D., Almeida-Porada, G., Du, J., Lemischka, I. R., Moore, K. A.,
Zanjani, E. D., and Verfaillie, C. M. (2001). Long-term repopulating cord blood stem cells are preserved after ex-vivo culture in a non-contact system. Blood 97:441- 9.
Li, C.X., and Poznansky, M.J. (1990). Characterization of the ZO-1 protein in endothelial and other cell lines. J Cell Sci. 2:231-7.97:231-237.
Li-Masters, T., and Morgan, E.T. 2001. Effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on Phenobarbital-induced CYP2B expression in mice. Drug
Metab Dispos 29:252-257. . Lin, Y., Weisdorf, D. J, Solovey, A., and Hebbel, R. P. (2000). Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood. J Clin Inves.t 105:71-7.
Liu, S., Qu, Y., Stewart, T. J., Howard, M. J., Chakrabortty, S., Holekamp,
T. F., and McDonald, J. W. (2000). ES cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes and myelinate in culture and after spinal cord transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 4 97:6126-31.
Mahley, R.W., and Ji, Z.S. (1999). Remnant lipoprotein metabolism: key pathways involving cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans and apolipoprotein E.
J Lipid Res 40:1-16.
Martin, G.R. (1981). Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocaracinoma stem cells. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U.S.A. 12:7634-8.
Masinovsky, B., U.S. Patent No. 5,837,670
Mathon, N. F., Malcolm, D. S., Harrisingh, M. C., Cheng, L., and Lloyd, A.
C. (2001). Lack of Replicative Senescence in Normal Rodent Glia. Science 291:872- : 20 875.
McGlave, et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,460,964
Meager, A. (1999). Cytokine regulation of cellular adhesion molecule expression in inflammation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 10:27-39.
Medvinsky, A., and Dzierzak, E. (1996). Definitive hematopoiesis is autonomously initiated by the AGM region. Cell. 86:897.
Melton, D. (1997). Signals for tissue induction and organ formation in vertebrate embryos. Harvey Lect 93:49-64.
Mezey, E., Chandross, K. J., Harta, G., Maki, R.A., and McKercher, S. R. (2000). Turning Blood into Brain: Cells Bearing Neuronal Antigens Generated in vivo from Bone Marrow. Science 290:1779-1782.
Miyajima, A., Kinoshita, T., Tanaka, M., Kamiya, A., Mukouyama, Y., arid
Hara, T. (2000). Role of Oncostatin M in hematopoiesis and liver development.
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11:177-183.
Morrison, S. J., White, P. M., Zock, C., and Anderson, D. J. (1999).
Prospective identification isolation by flow cytometry and in vivo self-renewal of multipotent mammalian neural crest stem cells. Cell. 96:737-749.
Nichols, J., Zevnik, B., Anastassiadis, K., Niwa, H., Klewe-Nebenius, D., \
Chambers, I., Scholer, H., and Smith, A. (1998). Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct 4. Cell 95:379-91.
Nishikawa, S., Nishikawa, S., Hirashima, M., Matsuyoshi, N., and Kodama,
H. (1998). Progressive lineage analysis by cell sorting and culture identifies
FLKI+VEcadherin+ cells at a diverging point of endothelial and hemopoietic lineages. Development. 125:1747-1757.
Nishikawa, S.I., Nishikawa, S., Kawamoto, H., Yoshida, H., Kizumoto, M.,
Kataoka, H and Katsura, Y_ (1998) I» vitro generation of lymphohematonaietic cells from endothelial cells purified from murine embryos. Immunity. 8:761-769.
Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J., and Smith, A. G. (2000). Quantitative expression of
Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat
Genet 24:372-6.
Nolta, J., Dao, M., Wells, S., Smogorzewska, E., and Kohn, D. (1996).
Transduction of pluripotent human HSCs demonstrated by clonal analysis after engraftment in immune-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2414-9.
Odorico, J. S., Kaufman, D. S., and Thomson, J. A. (200 1). Multilineage differentiation from human ES cell lines. Stem Cells 19: 193-204.
Oh, S.H., Miyazaki, M., Kouchi, H., Inoue, Y., Sakaguchi, M., Tsuji, T.,
Shima, N., Higashio, K., and Namba, M. (2000). Hepatocyte growth factor induces differentiation of adult rat bone marrow cells into a hepatocyte lineage in vitro.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279:500-504.
Okabe, S., Forsberg-Nilsson, K., Spiro, A. C., Segal, M., and McKay,-R. D. (1996). Development of neuronal precursor cells and functional postmitotic neurons from ES cells in vitro. Mech Dev 59:89-102. :
O'Leary, D. D., and Wilkinson, D. G. (1999). Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Cuff Opin Neurobiol 9:65-73.
Orkin, S. (1998). Embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice in the study of hematopoiesis. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42:927-34.
Orlic, D., Kajstura, J., Chimenti, S., Jakoniuk, I., Anderson, S. M,, Li, B,,
Pickel, J., McKay, R., Nadal-Ginard, B., Bodine, D. M,, Leri, A., and Anversa, P. (2001). Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 410:701-5. : O'Shea, K. (1999). ES cell models of development. Anat Rec 15:32-41.
S Palmer, T. D., Markakis, E. A., Willhoite, A. R., Safar, F., and Gage, F. H. (1999). Fibroblast growth factor-2 activates a latent neurogenic program in NSCs from diverse regions of the adult CNS. J Neurosci 19:8487-97.
Palmer, T. D., Takahashi, J., and Gage, F. H. (1997). The adult rat hippocampus contains primordial NSCs. Mol Cell Neurosci 8:389-404.
Partanen, J., and D.J. Dumont. (1999). Functions of Tie | and Tie2 receptor tyrosine kinases in vascular development. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 237:159- 172.
Peault, B. 1996. Hematopoiedc stem cell emergence in embryonic life: developmental hematology revisited. J. Hematother. 5:369.
Peichev, M., Naiyer, A.J, Pereira, D., Zhu, Z., Lane, W.J., Williams, M., Oz,
M.C., Hicklin, D.J., Witte, L., Moore, M.A, and Rafii, S. (2000). Expression of
VEGFR 2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood. 95:952-958.
Peshwa MV, WU FJ, Follstad BD, Cerra, F.B., and Hu, W.S. 1994. Kinetics of hepatocyte spheroid formation. Biotechnology Progress 10:460-466.
Petersen, B. E., Bowen, W. C., Patrene, K. D., Mars, W. M,, Sullivan, A. K.,
Murase, N., Boggs, S. S., Greenberger, J. S., and Goff, J. P. (1999). Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science 284:1168-1170. :
Petersen, B.E. 2001. Hepatic "stem" cells: coming full circle. Blood Cells
Mol Dis 27:590-600.
Petersen, B.E., Bowen, W.C., Patrene, K.D., Mars, W.M., Sullivan, AK.,
Murase, N., Boggs, S.S., Greenberger, J.S., and Goff, J.P. 1999. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science 284:1168-1170.
Petzelbauer, P., Halama, T., and Groger, M. (2000). Endothelial adherens junctions. Jinvestig Dermatol Symp Proc. 5:10-13.
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R.,
Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., and Marshak, D. R. (1999). Multilineage potential of adult human MSCs. Science 284:143-147.
Pittenger, M., U.S. Patent No. 5,827,740
Ploemacher, R. E., and Brons, N. H. (1988). Isolation of hemopoietic stem cell subsets from murine bone marrow: I. Radioprotective ability of purified cell suspensions differing in the proportion of day-7 and day-12 CFU-S. Exp Hematol . 16:21-6.
Potten, C. (1998). Stem cells in gastrointestinal epithelium: numbers, characteristics and death. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:821-30.
Prochazka, M., H.R. Gaskins, L.D. Shultz, and E.H. Leiter. (1992). The nonobese diabetic scid mouse: model for spontaneous thymomagenesis associated with immunodeficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 89:3290-3294.
Rader, D.J., and Dugi, K.A. (2000). The endothelium and lipoproteins: insights from recent cell biology and animal studies. Semin Thromb Hemost 26:521-528.
Rafii, S., F. Shapiro, J. Rimarachin, R. Nachman, B. Ferris, B. Weksler, M.
Moore, arid A. Asch. (1994). Isolation and characterization of human bone marrow microvascular endothelial cells: hematopoietic progenitor cell adhesion. Blood. 84:10-20.
Rafii, S., Shapiro, F., Pettengell, R., Ferris, B., Nachman, R., Moore, M., and
Asch, A. (1995). Human bone marrow microvascular endothelial cells support long- term proliferation and differentiation of myeloid and megakaryocytic progenitors.
Blood 86:3353-61.
Reinhardt, R. L., Khoruts, A., Merica, R., Zell, T., and Jenkins, M. K. (2001). Visualizing the generation of memory CD4 T cells in the whole body.
Nature 401:101-105.
Reubinoff, B. E., Pera, M. F., Fong, C. Y., Trounson, A., and Bongso, A. (2000). ES cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat
Biotech 18:399-404.
Reyes, M., and Verfaillie, C.M. (2001). Characterization of multipotent adult progenitor cells, a subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 938:231-233; discussion 233-235.
Reyes, M., Lund, T., Lenvik, T., Aguiar, D., Koodie, L., and Verfaillie, C.M. (2001). Purification and ex vivo expansion of postnatal human marrow mesodermal ’ progenitor cells. Blood. 98:2615-2625.
Reynolds, B., and Weiss, S. (1992). Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255:1707-10. ‘ Reynolds, B., and Weiss, S. (1996). Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev Biol 175:1-13
Ribatti, D., A. Vacca, B. Nico, L. Roncali, and F. Dammacco. (2001).
Postnatal vasculogenesis. Mech Dev. 100:157-163.
Richards, L. J., Kilpatrick, T. J., and Bartlett, P. F. (1992). De novo generation of neuronal cells from the adult mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA 89:8591-5.
Rideout, W. M., 3rd, Wakayama, T., Wutz, A., Eggan, K., Jackson-Grusby,
L., Dausman, J., Yanagimachi, R., and Jaenisch, R. (2000). Generation of mice from wild-type and targeted ES cells by nuclear cloning. Nat Genet 24:109-10.
Robertson, S. M., Kennedy, M., Shannon, J. M., Keller, G. (2000). A transitional stage in the commitment of mesoderm to hematopoiesis requiring the transcription factor SCL/tal-1. Development. 11:2447-59.
Rosenberg, J.B, P.A. Foster, R.J. Kaufman, E.A. Vokac, M. Moussalli, P.A.
Kroner, and R.R. Montgomery. (1998). Intracellular trafficking of factor VIII to von
Willebrand factor storage granules. J Clin Invest. 101:613-624.
Rozga, J., Amaout, W.S., and Demetriou, A.A. (2001). Isolation, characterization, -derived hepatocyte stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 288:156-164.
Ryder, E. F., Snyder, E. Y., and Cepko, C. L. (1990). Establishment and characterization of multipotent neural cell lines using retrovirus vector-mediated oncogene transfer. J Neurobiol 21:356-375.
Sah, D. W., Ray, J, and Gage, F. H. (1997). Regulation of voltage- and ligand-gated currents in rat hippocampal progenitor cells in vitro. J Neurobiol 32:95- 110.
Sanchez-Ramos, J., Song, S., Cardozo-Pelaez, F., Hazzi, C., Stedeford, T.,
Willing, A., Freeman, T. B., Saporta, S., Janssen, W., Patel, N., Cooper, D.R., and
Sanberg, P. R. (2000). Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro. Exp Neurol. 164:247-56.
Saucedo-Cardenas, O., Quintana-Hau, J. D., Le, W. D., Smidt, M. P., Cox, J.
J., De Mayo, F., Burbach, J. P., and Conneely, O. M. (1998). Nurrl is essential for the induction of the dopaminergic phenotype and the survival of ventral mesencephalic late dopaminergic precursor neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S 4 95: N 4013-8.
Scherf, U., D.T. Ross, M. Waltham, L.H. Smith, J.K. Lee, L. Tanabe, K.W.
Kohn, W.C. Reinhold, T.G. Myers, D.T. Andrews, D.A. Scudiero, M.B. Eisen, E.A.
Sausville, Y. Pommier, D. Botstein, P.O. Brown, and J.N. Weinstein. (2000). A gene expression database for the molecular phafmacology of cancer. Nar Biotech. 24:236-244.
Scholer, H. R., Hatzopoulos, A. K., Balling, R., Suzuki, N., and Gruss, P. (1989). A family of octamer-specific proteins present during mouse embryogenesis: evidence for germline-specific expression of an Oct factor. EMBO J 8:2543-50.
Schuldiner, M., Yanuka, O., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Melton, D. A., and
Benvenisty, N. (2000). From the cover: effects of eight growth factors on the differentiation of cells derived from human ES cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:11307-12.
Schwartz, et al., U.S. Patent No. ,759,793
Seglen, P.O. (1976). Preparation of isolated rat liver cells. Methods Cell Biol 13:29-83.
Shamblott, M., Axelman, J., Wang, S., Bugg, E., Littlefield, J., Donovan, P.,
Blumenthal, P., Huggins, G., Gearhart, J.: (1998) Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:13726-31.
Shen, C.N., Slack, J.M., and Tosh, D. (2000). Molecular basis of transdifferentiation of pancreas to liver. Nat Cell Biol. 2:879-887.
Shi, Q., S. Rafii, M. Hong-De Wu, E.S. Wijelath, C. Yu, A. Ishida, Y. Fujita,
S. Kothari, R. Mohle, L.R. Sauvage, M.A.S. Moore, R.F. Storb, and W.P.
Hammond. (1998). Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. }
Blood. 92:362-367.
Shih, C.C., Y. Weng, A. Mamelak, T. LeBon, M.C. Hu, and S. Forman. (2001). Identification of a candidate human neurohematopoietic stem-cell population. Blood. 98:2412-2422.
Simeone, A. (1998). Otxl and Otx2 in the development and evolutionof the mammalian brain. EMBO 117:6790-8.
Simmons, P., et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,677,136 . Soule HD, et al. (1973) A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma.) Natl Cancer Inst; 51(5):1409-16.
Southern, P. J., Blount, P., and Oldstone, M. B. (1984). Analysis of persistent virus infections by in situ hybridization to whole-mouse sections. Nature 312:555-8.
Steeber, D.A., and T. Tedder, F. (2001). Adhesion molecule cascades direct lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte migration during inflammation. Immunol
Res. 22:299-317.
Steinberg, D., Pittman, R.C. and Carew, T.E. (1985). Mechanisms involved in the uptake and degradation of low density lipoprotein by the artery wall in vivo.
Ann N'Y Acad Sci. 454:195-206.
Studer, L., Spenger, C., Seiler, R., Othberg, A., Lindvall, O., and Odin, P. (1996). Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on neuronal structure of dopaminergic neurons in dissociated cultures of human fetal mesencephalon. Exp
Brain Res 108:328-36.
Suhonen, J., Peterson, D., Ray, J., and Gage, F. (1996). Differentiation of adult hippocampus-derived progenitors into olfactory neurons in vivo. Nature 383:624-7.
Svendsen, C. N., and Caldwell, M. A. (2000). NSCs in the developing central nervous system: implications for cell therapy through transplantation. Prog
Brain Res. 127:13-34.
Svendsen, C. N., Caldwell, M. A., Ostenfeld, T. (1999). Human neural stem cells: Isolation, expansion and transplantation. Brain Path 9:499-513.
Tang, D. G., Tokumoto, Y. M., Apperly, J. A, Lloyd, A. C., and Raff, M. C. (2001). Lack of replicative senescence in cultured rat oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Science 291:868-71.
Tedder, T., Steeber, D., Chen, A., and Engel, P. (1995). The selections: vascular adhesion molecules. FASEB J. 9:866.
Theise, N. D., Badve, S., Saxena, R., Henegariu, O., Sell, S., Crawford, J.
M., and Krause, D. S. (2000). Derivation of hepatocytes from bone marrow cells in mice after radiation-induced myeloablation. Hepatology 31:235-40.
Theise, N.D., Saxena, R., Portmann, B.C., Thung, S.N., Yee, H., Chiriboga, .
L., Kumar, A., and Crawford, J.M. (1999). The canals of Hering and hepatic stem cells in humans. Hepatology 30:1425-1433.
Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A,
Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., and Jones, J. M. (1998). ES cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:114-7.
Thomson, J., Kalisman J., Golos, J., Durning, M., Harris, C., Becker, R.,
Hearn, J. (1995) Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 92:7844-8,
Trupp, M., Arcaas, ., Fainzilber, M., Nilsson, A. S., Sicher, B.A,
Grigoriou, M., Kilkenny, C., Salazar-Grueso, E., Pachnis, V., and Arumae, U. (1996). Functional receptor for GDNF encoded by the c-ret proto-oncogene. Nature 381:785-9.
Tsai, R.Y. and McKay, R.D. (2000). Cell contact regulates fate choice by cortical stem cells. J Neurosci. 20:3725-35.
Tsukamoto, ef al., U.S. Patent No. 5,750,397
Tsukamoto, et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,716,827
Tzanakakis, E.S., Hansen, L.K., and Hu, W.S. (2001). The role of actin filaments and microtubules in hepatocyte spheroid self-assembly. Cell Motil
Cytoskeleton 48:175-189.
Tzanakakis, E.S., Hsiao, C.C., Matsushita, T., Remmel, R.P., and Hu, W.S. (2001). Probing enhanced cytochrome P450 2B1/2 activity in rat hepatocyte spheroids through confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cell Transplant. 10:329342.
Uchida, N., Buck, D.W., He, D., Reitsma, M.J., Masek, M., Phan, T.V.,
Tsukamoto, A.S., Gage, F.H., and Weissman, I.L. (2000). Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:14720-14725.
Van Rijen, H., van Kempen, M.J., Analbers, L.J., Rook, M.B., van
Ginneken, A.C., Gros, D., and Jongsma, H.J. (1997). Gap junctions in human umbilical cord endothelial cells contain multiple connexins. Am J Physiol. 272:C117-130.
Vertfaillie, C., Miller, W., Boylan, K., McGlave, P. (1992). Selection of } benign primitive hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia on the basis of HLA-DR antigen expression. Blood. 79:1003-1010.
Vescovi, A. L., Paraati, E. A., Gritti, A., Poulin, P., Ferrario, M., Wanke, E., Frolichsthal-Schoeller, P., Cova, L., Arcellana-Panlilio, M., Colombo, A., and Galli,
R. (1999). Isolation and cloning of multipotential stem cells from the embryonic human CNS and establishment of transplantable human NSC lines by epigenetic stimulation. Exp Neurol 156:71-83.
Vescovi, A., Reynolds, B., Fraser, D., and Weiss, S. (1993). bFGF regulates the proliferative fate of unipotent (neuronal) and bipotent (neuronal/astroglial) EGF- generated CNS progenitor cells. Neuron 11: 951-66.
Vischer, U.M., H. Barth, and C.B. Wollheim. (2000). Regulated von
Willebrand factor secretion is associated with agonist-specific patterns of cytoskeletal remodeling in cultured endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 20:883-891.
Wagner, D.D., Olmsted, J.B., and Marder, V.J. (1982). Immunolocalization of von Willebrand protein in Weibel-Palade bodies of human endothelial cells. J.
Cell Biol. 95:355-360.
Wagner, J., Akerud, P., Castro, D. S., Holm, P. C., Canals, J. M., Snyder, E.
Y., Perlmann, T., and Arenas, E. (1999). Induction of a midbrain dopaminergic phenotype in Nurrl-overexpressing NSCs by type 1 astrocytes. Nat Biotech 17:653- 9.
Wakitani, S., Saito, T., and Caplan, A. (1995). Myogenic cells derived from rat bone marrow MSCs exposed to 5-azacytidine. Muscle Nerve 18:1417-26.
Wang, X., Al-Dhalimy, M., Lagasse, E., Finegold, M., and Grompe, M. (2001). Liver repopulation and correction of metabolic liver disease by transplanted adult mouse pancreatic cells. Am J Pathol 158:571-579.
Watt, F. (1997). Epidermal stem cells: markers patterning and the control of stem cell fate. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 831-6.
Watt, S., Gschmeissner, S., and Bates, P. (1995). PECAM-1: its expression and function as a cell adhesion molecule on hemopoietic and endothelial cells. Leuk
Lymph. 17:229.
Weiss, M. J, Orkin, S. H. (1995) GATA transcription factors: key regulators of hematopoiesis. Exp Hematol. 2:99-107.
Weissman, I. L. (2000). Translating stem and progenitor cell biology to the clinic: barriers and opportunities. Science 287:1442-6.
Wells, J. M., and Melton, D. A. (2000). Early mouse endoderm is patterned by soluble factors from adjacent germ layers. Development. 127:1563-72.
Wells, J.M., and Melton, D.A. (1999). Vertebrate endoderm development.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15:393-410.
Whittemore, S. R., Morassutti, D. J., Walters, W. M,, Liu, R. H,, and
Magnuson, D. S. (1999). Mitogen and substrate differentially affect the lineage restriction of adult rat subventricular zone neural precursor cell populations. Exp
Cell Res 252:75-95.
Williams, R_T.., Hilton, D: J, Pease, S.. Willson, T. A., Stewart, C. If,
Gearing, D. P., Wagner, E. F., Metcalf, D., Nicola, N. A,, and Gough, N. M. (1988).
Myeloid leukemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of ES cells. Nature 336:684-7.
Wilmut, L, Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J., and Campbell, K. H. (1997). Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-3.
Woodbury, D., Schwarz, E. J., Prockop, D. J., and Black, I. B. (2000). Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res 15:364-70.
Yamashita, J., Itoh, H., Hirashima, M., Ogawa, M., Nishikawa, S., Yurugi,
T., Naito, M., Nakao, K., and Nishikawa, S. (2000). Flkl-positive cells derived from
ES cells serve as vascular progenitors. Nature. 408:92-96.
Yang, J., Nagavarapu, U., Relloma, K., Sjaastad, M.D, Moss, W.C.,
Passaniti, A., and Herron, G.S. (2001). Telomerized human microvasculature is functional in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 19:219-224.
Ye, W., Shimamura, K., Rubenstein, J., Hynes, M., and Rosenthal, A. (1998). FGF and Shh signals control dopaminergic and serotonergic cell fate in the anterior neural plate. Cell 93:755-66.
b
Yoneya, T., Tahara, T., Nagao, K., Yamada, Y., Yamamoto, T., Osawa, M., . Miyatani, S., and Nishikawa, M. (2001). Molecular cloning of delta-4, a new mouse and human Notch ligand. J Biochem. 129:27-34.
Yoo, J. U.,, Barthel, T. S., Nishimura, K., Solchaga, L., Caplan, A. 1.,
Goldberg, V. M., Johnstone, B. (1998). Then chondrogenic potential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 12:1745-57.
Young, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,827,735
Zambrowicz, B. P., Imamoto, A., Hering, S., Herzenberg, L. A., Kerr, W. G., and Soriano, P. (1997). Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94:3789-94.
Zaret, K.S. (2000). Liver specification and early morphogenesis. Mech Dev 92:83- 88.
Zaret, K.S. (2001). Hepatocyte differentiation: from the endoderm and beyond. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 11:568-574.
Zelko, I., and Negishi, M. (2000). Phenobarbital-elicited activation of nuclear receptor CAR in induction of cytochrome P450 genes. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun. 277:1-6.
Zhao, R. C. H,, Jiang, Y., and Verfaillie, C. M. (2000). A model of human p210BCW"BL mediated CML by transducing primary normal human CD34+ cells with a BCR/ABL containing retroviral vector. Blood. 97:2406-12.
Ziegler, B., M. Valtieri, G. Porada, R. De Maria, R. Muller, B. Masella, M.
Gabbianelli, 1. Casella, E. Pelosi, T. Bock, E. Zanjani, and C. Peschle. (1999). KDR
Receptor: A Key Marker Defining HSCs. Science. 285:1553 1558.
Claims (64)
- ® PCT/US02/04652 WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:I. An isolated ceil, that is not an embryonic siem cell, embryonic germ cell of germ cell, positive for oct 3/4 and can differentiate into at least one cell type of each of the endodermal, ectodermal and mesodermal embryonic lineages and wherein the cell is obtained from umbilical cord blood or placenta.
- 2. An isolated cell, that is not an embryonic stem cell, embryonic germ cell or germ cell, positive for oct 3/4 and a pluripotent stem cell-specific SSEA, and can differentiate into at least one cell type of each of the endodermal, ectodermal and mesodermal lineages and wherein the cell is obtained from umbilical cord blood or placenta.
- 3. The cell of claim 1 or 2, wherein said cell is derived from a mammal.
- 4. The cell of claim 1 or 2, wherein the cell can differentiate into cells selected from the group consisting of osteoblast, chondrocyte, adipocyte, fibroblast, marrow stroma, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, ocular, endothelial, epithelial, hepatic, pancreatic, hematopoietic, glial, neuronal and oligodendrocyte cell type.
- 5. The cell of claim 3, wherein the mammal is a mouse.
- 6. The cell of claim 3, wherein the mammal is a rat. AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652
- 7. The cell of claim 3, wherein the mammal is a human.
- &. The cell of claim 1 or 2, wherein differentiation is induced in vivo or ex vivo.
- 9. The cell of claim 4, wherein differentiation is induced in vivo or ex vivo.
- 10. The cell of claim 1 or 2, wherein the cell constitutively expresses oct 3/4 and high levels of telomerase.
- 11. The cell of claim 1 or 2, wherein the cell is negative for CD44, MHC class I and MHC class II expression.
- 12. A method for isolating a multipotent adult stem cell (MASC) comprising the steps of: (ap) depleting a tissue derived from mammalian umbilical cord blood or placenta of cells that express one or more cell surface markers not expressed by MASCs; or (a9) selecting cells from a tissue derived from mammalian umbilical cord blood or placenta that express one of more cell surface markers expressed by MASCs; or (a3) performing a combination of steps (a;) and (a,); and (b) culturing cells to produce a MASC cell population. AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652
- 13. A method of creating a non-human animal comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a MASC with a blastocyst; (b) implanting the blastocyst of step (1) into a pseudopregnant female such that there is gestation of an embryo for a suitable period that can be extended until birth.
- 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said embryo is chimeric.
- 15. A method of differentiating a MASC comprising the steps of: (ag) depleting a mammalian tissue of cells that express one or more cell surface markers not expressed by MASCs; or (a9) selecting cells from a mammalian tissue that express one or more cell surface markers expressed by MASCs; or (az) performing a combination of steps (aj) and (a); (b) culturing cells to produce a MASC cell population; and (©) culturing the cell population in the presence of dimethylsulfoxide and isoproterenol.
- 16. A use of a MASC produced by a process of claim 12, wherein the cell population is engrated and optionally differentiated in vivo in the preparation of a medicament formulated for parenteral administration, oral administration, catheter administration for AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652 treating a patient in need of MASC therapy.
- 17. A use as claimed in claim 16, wherein the medicament further comprises 2a pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable matrix.
- 18. A use of MASC or their progeny in the preparation of a medicament for treating a patient in need of MASC therapy, wherein the medicament is formulated for parenteral administration, oral administration, or catheter administration.
- 19. A use as claimed in claim 18, wherein the medicament further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable matrix.
- 20. A use of MASC or their progeny in the preparation of a medicament for contributing to the cellular composition of a mucosal tissue including oral, esophageal, vaginal and tissues in a patient in need thereof.
- 21. A use of MASC or their progeny in the preparation of a medicament for treating ischemia in a patient in need thereof.
- 22. A use of MASC in the preparation of a medicament further comprising a three dimensional matrix comprising an artificial vein for treating a patient in need thereof. AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652
- 23. A use of claim 22, wherein the treatment is directed to abdominal aortic, aneurysm, cardiac bypass surgery, peripheral vascular disease or coronary vascular disease.
- 24. A therapeutic composition comprising the cell of claim 1 or 2 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
- 25. A pharmaceutical composition comprising MASC, wherein said MASC comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding MHC antigens operably linked to a promoter, wherein the MHC antigens are expressed by the MASC; and wherein said MHC antigens match an intended patient’s antigens, wherein said composition is formulated for parenteral administration, oral administration, catheter administration or in conjunction with a pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable matrix.
- 26. A process for producing a pharmaceutical composition useful in inhibiting the rejection of a heterologous MASC transplanted into a patient comprising introducing into the MASC, ex vivo, a nucleic acid sequence encoding the recipient's MHC antigens operably linked to a promoter, wherein the MHC antigens are expressed by the MASC at a level sufficient to inhibit the rejection of the transplanted MASC.
- 27. A pharmaceutical composition useful in inhibiting the rejection of a heterologous MASC transplanted into a patient comprising a MASC transgenically altered by knocking out expression of MHC antigens wherein said MHC antigens are not expressed AMENDED SHEET@ PCT/US02/04652 by the MASC such that rejection of the transplanted MASC is inhibited, wherein said composition is formulated for parenteral administration, oral administration, catheter administration or in conjunction with a pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable matrix.
- 28. A process for producing a pharmaceutical composition useful in inhibiting the rejection of a heterologous MASC transplanted into a patient comprising transgenically knocking out expression of MHC antigens in the MASC ex vivo, wherein said MHC antigens are not expressed by the MASC such that rejection of the transplanted MASC is inhibited.
- 29. A method of generating blood or individual components ex vivo comprising the steps of: (a) isolating MASC from an ex vivo tissue sample comprising umbilical cord blood or placenta; and (b) differentiating the MASC to form blood or blood components wherein the blood components are red blood cells, white blood cells or platelets.
- 30. A use of MASC or their progeny in the preparation of a medicament for treating inflammation in a patient in need thereof.
- 31. An isolated rat MASC, wherein the cell can differentiate to form at least one cell type of mesodermal, ectodermal and endodermal origin. AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652
- 32. The cell of claim 31, wherein the cell can differentiate into cells selected from the group consisting of osteoblast, chondrocyte, adipocyte, fibroblast, marrow stroma, skeletal muscie, smooth muscle, cardiac muscle, ocular, endothelial, epithelial, hepatic, pancreatic, hematopoietic, glial neuronal, and oligodendrocyte cell type.
- 33. A method for isolating a rat MASC, said method comprising the steps of: (ap depleting a rat tissue of cells that express one or more cell surface markers not expressed by MASCs; or (as) selecting cells from a rat tissue that express one or more cell surface markers expressed by MASCs; or (ag) performing a combination of steps (aj) and (ay); and (b) culturing cells to produce a MASC cell population.
- 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the rat tissue is selected from the group consisting of bone marrow, muscle, brain, umbilical cord blood and placenta.
- 35. A method of differentiation the cell of claim 1 or 2 ex vivo, comprising culturing the cell in the presence of desired differentiation factors.
- 36. A method of differentiating the cell of claim 1 or 2 in vivo, comprising administering the cell to a mammalian host, wherein the cells are engrafted and differentiated. AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652
- 37. A differentiated cell produced by the method of claim 36.
- 38. A differentiated cell produced by the method of claim 35.
- 39. The cell of claim 1 or 2, wherein the cell is genetically modified.
- 40. The method of claims 12, 15 or 33, wherein the cells that express one or more cell surface markers not expressed by MASCs are CD45" cells.
- 41. A substance or composition for use in method for treating a patient in need of MASC therapy, said substance or composition comprising a MASC produced by a process of claim 12, wherein the cell population is engrated and optionally differentiated in vivo, and said method comprising administering said substance or composition to said patient via parenteral administration, oral administration, or catheter administration.
- 42. A substance or composition for use in method of a treatment as claimed in claim 41, wherein said substance or composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable matrix.
- 43. A substance or composition for use in method for treating a patient in need of MASC therapy, said substance or composition comprising MASC or their progeny, and said method comprising administering said substance or composition to said patient via parenteral AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652 administration, oral administration, or catheter administration.
- 44. A substance or composition for use in a method of treatment as claimed in claim 43, wherein said substance or composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable biodegradable matrix.
- 45. A substance or composition for use in method for contributing to the cellular composition of a mucosal tissue including oral, esophageal, vaginal and tissues in a patient in need thereof, said substance or composition comprising MASC or their progeny, and said method comprising administering said substance or composition to said patient.
- 46. A substance or composition for use in a method for treating ischemia in a patient in need thereof, said substance or composition comprising MASC or their progeny, and said method comprising administering said substance or composition to said patient.
- 47. A substance or composition for use in a method for treating a patient, said substance or composition comprising MASC and a three dimensional matrix comprising an artificial vein, and said method comprising administering said substance or composition to said patient.
- 48. A substance or composition for use in a method of treatment of claim 47, wherein the treatment is directed to abdominal aortic, aneurysm, cardiac bypass surgery, AMENDED SHEET9 PCT/US02/04652 peripheral vascular disease or coronary vascular disease.
- 49. A substance or composition for use in a method for treating inflammation in a patient in need thereof, said substance or composition comprising MASC or their progeny, and said method comprising administering said substance or composition to said patient.
- 50. A cell of any one of claims 1 to 11, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 51. A method of claim 12, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 52. A method of claim 13 or claim 14, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 53. A method of claim 15, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 54. Use of any one of claims 16 to 23 or 30, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 55. A composition of claim 24 or claim 25, substantially as herein described and illustrated. AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652
- 56. A process of claims 26 or claim 28, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 57. A composition of claim 27, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 58. A method of claim 29, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 59. MASC of claim 31 or claim 32, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 60. A method of claim 33 or claim 34, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 61. A method of claim 36, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 62. A cell of any one of claims 37 to 39, substantially as herein described and ilustrated.
- 63. A substance or composition for use in a method of treatment of any one of claims 41 to 49, substantially as herein described and illustrated.
- 64. A new cell, a new method for isolating a cell, a new creation method, a new AMENDED SHEET® PCT/US02/04652 method for differentiating a MASC, a new use of MASC produced by the process of claim 12, a new use of MASC or their progeny, a new composition, a new process for producing a composition, a new method of generating blood or components, a new MASC, a new method for isolating a rat MASC, a new method of differentiation of a cell, or a substance or composition for a new use in a method of treatment, substantially as herein described.AMENDED SHEET 107 Cg
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US26878601P | 2001-02-14 | 2001-02-14 | |
US26906201P | 2001-02-15 | 2001-02-15 | |
US31062501P | 2001-08-07 | 2001-08-07 | |
US34383601P | 2001-10-25 | 2001-10-25 | |
PCT/US2002/004652 WO2002064748A2 (en) | 2001-02-14 | 2002-02-14 | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
ZA200306289B true ZA200306289B (en) | 2005-02-23 |
Family
ID=34865378
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
ZA2003/06289A ZA200306289B (en) | 2001-02-14 | 2003-08-13 | Multipotent adult stem cells sources thereof methods of obtaining and maintaining same methods of differentiation thereof methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (4) | JP2007295931A (en) |
DK (1) | DK1491093T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2432118T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1068227A1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ527527A (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200306289B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2138053B1 (en) | 2007-04-09 | 2014-09-10 | Japan Tobacco Inc. | Method for enhancing salty taste-like taste of food and drink |
WO2010117464A1 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2010-10-14 | Sangamo Biosciences, Inc. | Targeted integration into stem cells |
WO2014130706A1 (en) * | 2013-02-20 | 2014-08-28 | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Genetic modification of rats |
HUE056903T2 (en) | 2013-04-16 | 2022-04-28 | Regeneron Pharma | Targeted modification of rat genome |
CN105765059B (en) * | 2013-11-04 | 2021-05-25 | 伊索波根控股公司 | Cell culture method |
JP2019134682A (en) * | 2016-06-01 | 2019-08-15 | 国立研究開発法人医薬基盤・健康・栄養研究所 | Method for preparing hepatic stem cell-like cell |
KR102572595B1 (en) * | 2020-12-02 | 2023-08-31 | 충북대학교 산학협력단 | Composition for preventing or treating anti-inflammatory diseases comprising immortalized feline mesenchymal stem cells and their exosome-rich conditoned medium |
-
2002
- 2002-02-14 NZ NZ527527A patent/NZ527527A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-02-14 ES ES04023157T patent/ES2432118T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-14 DK DK04023157.3T patent/DK1491093T3/en active
-
2003
- 2003-08-13 ZA ZA2003/06289A patent/ZA200306289B/en unknown
-
2005
- 2005-01-24 HK HK05100618.7A patent/HK1068227A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2007
- 2007-06-06 JP JP2007151050A patent/JP2007295931A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2007-06-06 JP JP2007151048A patent/JP2007325593A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2007-06-06 JP JP2007151049A patent/JP2007289197A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2008
- 2008-10-08 JP JP2008262289A patent/JP2009017891A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2007289197A (en) | 2007-11-08 |
JP2007295931A (en) | 2007-11-15 |
JP2009017891A (en) | 2009-01-29 |
NZ527527A (en) | 2005-08-26 |
HK1068227A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 |
JP2007325593A (en) | 2007-12-20 |
ES2432118T3 (en) | 2013-11-29 |
DK1491093T3 (en) | 2013-10-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1491093B1 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
US10638734B2 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
WO2002064748A9 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
Stocum | Stem cells in regenerative biology and medicine | |
US7160724B2 (en) | Human cord blood as a source of neural tissue for repair of the brain and spinal cord | |
US10226485B2 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells and methods for isolation | |
JP2004529621A5 (en) | ||
Dabeva et al. | Hepatic stem cells and liver repopulation | |
AU2001243464A1 (en) | Human cord blood as a source of neural tissue for repair of the brain and spinal cord | |
Sell | Stem cells: What are they? Where do they come from? Why are they here? When do they go wrong? Where are they going? | |
JP2009017891A (en) | Multipotent adult stem cell, source thereof, method of obtaining and maintaining the same, method of differentiation thereof, method of use thereof, and cells derived therefrom | |
Bunnell et al. | Potential application for mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases | |
AU2011203281B2 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
AU2008201936B2 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
Furcht | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
Class et al. | Patent application title: Multipotent Adult Stem Cells, Sources Thereof, Methods of Obtaining and Maintaining Same, Methods of Differentiation Thereof, Methods of Use Thereof and Cells Derived Thereof Inventors: Leo T. Furcht (Minneapolis, MN, US) Catherine M. Verfaillie (Leuven, BE) Morayma Reyes (Minneapolis, MN, US) Assignees: ABT Holding Company Regents of the University of Minnesota | |
AU2002250106A1 (en) | Multipotent adult stem cells, sources thereof, methods of obtaining and maintaining same, methods of differentiation thereof, methods of use thereof and cells derived thereof | |
Tweedell | Embryos, clones, and stem cells: a scientific primer | |
YIJUN | Generation of hepatocyte-like cells from mouse embryonic stem (ES) and bone marrow (BM) cells | |
Taupin | Adult neurogenesis and neural stem cells in mammals | |
ES2368809T3 (en) | MULTIPOTENT ADULT MOTHER CELLS AND PROCEDURES FOR ISOLATION. |