WO2023178630A1 - 学术区块链平台及其运作方法 - Google Patents

学术区块链平台及其运作方法 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023178630A1
WO2023178630A1 PCT/CN2022/082913 CN2022082913W WO2023178630A1 WO 2023178630 A1 WO2023178630 A1 WO 2023178630A1 CN 2022082913 W CN2022082913 W CN 2022082913W WO 2023178630 A1 WO2023178630 A1 WO 2023178630A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
module
academic
user
paper
blockchain platform
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2022/082913
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
廖佑铭
陈映滕
刘又宁
李若宁
Original Assignee
廖佑铭
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 廖佑铭 filed Critical 廖佑铭
Priority to PCT/CN2022/082913 priority Critical patent/WO2023178630A1/zh
Publication of WO2023178630A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023178630A1/zh

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q90/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for administrative, commercial, financial, managerial or supervisory purposes, not involving significant data processing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a blockchain platform, and in particular to an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the user authentication module accepts the user information sent by the user. After authentication and verification, it generates a personal private key based on the user information. The personal private key is linked with the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded.
  • the article rating module provides at least one reviewer with The paper is rated, and the non-fungible token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploads the paper, the second non-fungible token parameter to the reviewer who reviews the paper, and the second non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.
  • the present invention can provide non-fungible token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.
  • An academic blockchain platform includes: a user authentication module, used to accept at least one user information sent by the user, and generate a personal private key based on the at least one user information after authentication and verification.
  • the user uses the personal private key and
  • the academic blockchain platform further uploads or downloads papers after linking signatures;
  • the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module, and the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and non-homogeneous communication
  • the certificate module is electrically coupled to the article rating module.
  • the non-fungible token module is used to provide the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploads the paper, and to provide the second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer who reviews the paper. ized token parameters and provide third non-fungible token parameters for academic blockchain platforms.
  • the above-mentioned academic blockchain platform further includes: a document comparison module, electrically coupled to a user authentication module, and the document comparison module is used to conduct academic plagiarism review of papers based on pre-stored historical documents. or error citation review; the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the literature comparison module and the article rating module. The paper revision module is used to revise the grammatical or semantic fluency of the paper uploaded by the user.
  • the above-mentioned academic blockchain platform further includes: a review matching module, electrically coupled to an article rating module, and the review matching module is used to invite papers with research topics based on pre-stored historical documents. Highly relevant scholars assist in reviewing papers; the opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The opinion rating module is used to evaluate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for papers uploaded by users.
  • An operating method provided by the invention is suitable for an academic blockchain platform.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module. and a non-fungible token module.
  • the operation method includes: the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by the user, and after authentication and verification, generates a personal private key based on at least one user information.
  • the user uses the personal private key to communicate with the academic blockchain
  • the platform further uploads or downloads papers after linking signatures; the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and the non-fungible token module provides the first non-fungible to users who upload papers.
  • a token parameter, a second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer of the review paper and a third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.
  • the academic blockchain platform to which the above-mentioned operating method is applicable further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module.
  • the document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module
  • the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module.
  • Coupling the literature comparison module and the article rating module, the operation method further includes: the literature comparison module conducts academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of papers based on pre-stored historical documents; the paper revision module conducts refined papers uploaded by users. Revise the thesis for grammar or semantic fluency.
  • the academic blockchain platform applicable to the above operation method further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module.
  • the review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module, and the opinion rating module is electrically coupled.
  • the operation method further includes: the review matching module invites scholars who are highly related to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the opinion rating module evaluates the papers uploaded by the user, and the reviewer's remuneration or Reviewer credibility rating.
  • the above-mentioned operating method and the first non-fungible token parameter of the academic blockchain platform are greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter Greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.
  • the above-mentioned operating method and the user authentication module of the academic blockchain platform accept at least one user information sent by the user, including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or other combination.
  • the present invention proposes an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the user authentication module accepts the information sent by the user.
  • User information after authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the user information.
  • the personal private key is linked to the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded.
  • the article rating module provides at least one reviewer to rate the paper, which is non-homogeneous.
  • the token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to users who upload papers, the second non-fungible token parameter to reviewers who review papers, and the third non-fungible token parameter to academic blockchain platforms.
  • Token parameters through the above functions, the present invention can provide non-homogeneous token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic flowchart of an operation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes a user authentication module 110, an article rating module 120, and a non-fungible token module 130.
  • the user authentication module 110, the article rating module 120 and the non-fungible token module 130 can be implemented by one or more functional circuits (such as processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits or communication circuits).
  • the article rating module 120 is electrically coupled to the user authentication module 110 .
  • the non-fungible token module 130 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120.
  • the user authentication module 110 is used to accept at least one user information sent by the user.
  • the user authentication module 110 After the authentication check, the user authentication module 110 generates a personal private key based on at least one user information.
  • the user uses the personal private key to sign and connect with the academic blockchain platform 100. Further upload or download the paper after the operation.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 proposed in this application is mainly used to rate academic papers.
  • the user authentication module 110 accepts at least one user information sent by the user, which may include email information, Mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or a combination thereof.
  • the at least one user information received by the user authentication module 110 may also include fingerprint identification information, palmprint identification information, voice identification information, etc. This application is not limited to the type of user information.
  • the article rating module 120 is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper, and then uses the user authentication module 110 to evaluate email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information, fingerprint recognition information, After at least one of the palmprint recognition information and the voice recognition information is authenticated, the academic paper can be uploaded to the academic blockchain platform 100 for at least one reviewer to rate the academic paper.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 will use the weight ratio of the reviewer's past experience, such as the institution and title he works for, past academic publication ratings, patent certificates, award records, etc., to review and rate the reviewer, such as whether he is qualified as editor-in-chief. , weighting factors related to review opinions.
  • Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will provide each user with a set of personal private keys for verification and verification, providing important signatures for users to participate in the Academic Blockchain Platform 100 community, such as opening an encrypted wallet and participating in a double-blind Review (the reviewer and the user who uploaded the paper do not know each other's identity), so that both users and reviewers can join the academic blockchain platform 100 for discussion and participate in this signature linkage.
  • Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will adopt a bilateral blind review system. Reviewers only need to publish all review records of their user signatures and disclosure signatures. Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will not publish the entity name of the reviewer. At the same time, Reviewers are also unable to obtain the user information and signatures of the reviewed manuscripts during the review period.
  • the non-fungible token module 130 is configured to provide a first non-fungible token parameter to a user who uploads a paper, and to provide a second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer who reviews the paper. And provide third non-fungible token parameters for academic blockchain platform 100.
  • the non-fungible token module 130 may provide the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploaded the paper, such as 62.5%, and the non-fungible token module 130 may provide the reviewer with The second non-fungible token parameter is divided into 12.5%, for example, and the non-fungible token module 130 can provide the third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform 100 with the single action of uploading a paper, such as 12.5%. 25%.
  • the above values are not used to limit the scope of this application, but are merely examples.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 proposed in this application provides non-fungible token parameters for users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provides complete papers. Review mechanism to improve user experience.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 will use the non-fungible token module 130 to provide users with the ability to bid for transactions and donate sponsorship-related research results on the academic blockchain platform 100 .
  • the non-fungible token is the only certificate for the subsequent payment of royalties for manuscripts, increasing user experience.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 provides a fair and systematic proportional distribution of non-homogeneous token parameters among users, reviewers and platforms, which is used to improve the shortcomings of traditional academic article review costs and lengthy review times.
  • the data communication method of this application can use the Advanced Encryption Standard AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) encryption algorithm to perform encoding and decoding to randomly generate an unlocking key, and then send and receive data through a secure channel.
  • AES Advanced Encryption Standard
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the academic blockchain platform 200 further includes a document comparison module 213 and a paper revision module 215.
  • the document comparison module 213 is electrically coupled to the user authentication module 110
  • the paper revision module 215 is electrically coupled to the document comparison module 213 and the article rating module 120.
  • the document comparison module 213 and the paper revision module 215 can be implemented by one or more functional circuits (such as processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits or communication circuits).
  • the literature comparison module 213 is used to conduct academic plagiarism review or miscitation review on papers based on pre-stored historical documents.
  • the literature comparison module 213 is used to screen papers and check whether there are academic plagiarism, miscitations and other major academic issues in the documents. Ethical violations.
  • the paper revision module 215 is used to revise the paper uploaded by the user to improve its grammar or semantic fluency. Academic Blockchain Platform 200 will encrypt the private key for each academic article submitted to the platform and record it on the blockchain to facilitate the storage circuit to permanently record key data such as document version, document timestamp or document author ranking. .
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 further includes a review matching module 321 and an opinion rating module 325.
  • the review matching module 321 and the opinion rating module 325 may be implemented by one or more functional circuits (eg, processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits, or communication circuits).
  • the review matching module 321 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120.
  • the opinion rating module 325 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120.
  • the review matching module 321 is used to invite scholars who are highly relevant to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents.
  • the opinion rating module 325 is used to rate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for papers uploaded by users.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 invites scholars highly related to the research topic of the article through the review and matching module 321 to assist in reviewing the manuscript, and screens and excludes relevant scholars who need to avoid interests, such as long-term cooperative scholars, former teacher-student relationships, etc.
  • the article rating module 120 rates papers based on relevant review records such as the number of reviewers' endorsements, reviewer credibility, article citations, etc.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 will use the opinion rating module 325 to assess relevant contributions such as Reviewers review remuneration or review credibility ratings.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 uses a free value-added business model to provide users with free access including online reading of the full text, all manuscript version records, all review opinions and author responses, etc., and also provides Various subscription services such as ad removal, high-resolution data or various types of file output increase user experience.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 also includes a push matchmaking module, a knowledge consensus mechanism module and a token fundraising module (not shown).
  • the push matchmaking module is used to accurately place articles on academic blockchains with highly relevant research topics.
  • the knowledge consensus mechanism module is used to provide operating guidelines for platform knowledge mining
  • the token fundraising module is used to assist research projects in raising research funds, effectively increasing applicability.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic flowchart of an operation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention proposes an operation method, which is suitable for an academic blockchain platform.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-homogeneous token module.
  • the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user.
  • the operation method of the authentication module and the non-homogeneous certificate module includes: S410.
  • the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by a user. After authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the at least one user information.
  • the user passes the personal private key
  • the key is linked with the academic blockchain platform for signature and then a paper is further uploaded or downloaded;
  • S420 the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper;
  • S430 the non-fungible token module
  • the user uploading the paper provides a first non-fungible token parameter, a second non-fungible token parameter is provided to at least one reviewer of the paper and the academic blockchain platform is provided a third non-fungible token parameter.
  • Token parameters are interchangeable, and the order of the steps is not limited here.
  • the academic blockchain platform further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module.
  • the document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module
  • the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the document comparison module and Article rating module
  • the operation method includes: the literature comparison module conducts academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the paper revision module refines the paper uploaded by the user to revise the paper grammar or semantic fluency Revise.
  • the first non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter is greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.
  • the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by the user, including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information, or a combination thereof.
  • the academic blockchain platform further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module.
  • the review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module.
  • the opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module.
  • the operation method includes : The review matching module invites scholars highly related to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the opinion rating module evaluates the reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for the paper uploaded by the user.
  • the present invention proposes an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the user authentication module accepts the information sent by the user.
  • User information after authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the user information.
  • the personal private key is linked to the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded.
  • the article rating module provides at least one reviewer to rate the paper, which is non-homogeneous.
  • the token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to users who upload papers, the second non-fungible token parameter to reviewers who review papers, and the third non-fungible token parameter to academic blockchain platforms.
  • Token parameters through the above functions, the present invention can provide non-homogeneous token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

一种学术区块链平台及其运作方法，其中学术区块链平台包括用户认证模块、文章评级模块及非同质化通证模块。用户认证模块接受用户发送的用户信息，经过认证查核后根据用户信息产生个人私钥，通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后上传论文。文章评级模块提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级。非同质化通证模块对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供第三非同质化代币参数。本发明提出的学术区块链平台分别对用户、审查者和平台提供非同质化代币参数，并提供完善论文审查机制，提高用户体验。

Description

学术区块链平台及其运作方法 技术领域
本发明涉及一种区块链平台，尤其涉及一种学术区块链平台及其运作方法。
背景技术
一般而言，传统的学术期刊对于文章的审查时间过于冗长，审查费用、出版费用以及版权费用过于高昂。其中原因之一，由于投稿者、审稿者及学术平台之间并没有建立一个对学术文章完善的审核机制。
发明内容
为了解决上述先前技术对文章审核机制的不足，本申请提供了一种学术区块链平台及其运作方法，学术区块链平台包括用户认证模块、文章评级模块及非同质化通证模块，用户认证模块接受用户发送的用户信息，经过认证查核后根据用户信息产生个人私钥，通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后上传论文，文章评级模块提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级，非同质化通证模块对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供第三非同质化代币参数，借由上述功能，本发明可以分别对用户、审查者和平台提供非同质化代币参数，并提供完善论文审查机制，提高用户体验。另外，学术区块链平台在用户、审查者和平台之间提供公平且***性地非同质化代币参数比例分配。
本发明所提供的一种学术区块链平台，包括：用户认证模块，用于接受用户发送的至少一用户信息，经过认证查核后根据至少一用户信息产生个人私钥，用户通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后进一步上传或下 载论文；文章评级模块，电性耦接用户认证模块，文章评级模块用于提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级；及非同质化通证模块，电性耦接文章评级模块，非同质化通证模块用于对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的至少一审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供第三非同质化代币参数。
在本发明的一实施例中，上述的学术区块链平台更包括：文献比对模块，电性耦接用户认证模块，文献比对模块用于根据预先存储的历史文献对论文进行学术抄袭审查或错误引用审查；论文修稿模块，电性耦接文献比对模块和文章评级模块，论文修稿模块用于对用户上传的论文进行精修论文文法修改或语意流畅度修改。
在本发明的一实施例中，上述的学术区块链平台更包括：审查媒合模块，电性耦接文章评级模块，审查媒合模块用于根据预先存储的历史文献邀请与论文具有研究主题高度相关的学者协助审理论文；意见评级模块，电性耦接文章评级模块，意见评级模块用于对用户上传的论文进行评定审查者报酬或审查者公信力评级。
本发明所提供的一种运作方法，适用于学术区块链平台，学术区块链平台包括用户认证模块、文章评级模块和非同质化通证模块，文章评级模块电性耦接用户认证模块和非同质化通证模块，运作方法包括：由用户认证模块接受用户发送的至少一用户信息，经过认证查核后根据至少一用户信息产生个人私钥，用户通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后进一步上传或下载论文；由文章评级模块用于提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级；及由非同质化通证模块对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的至少一审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供第三非同质化代币参数。
在本发明的一实施例中，上述的运作方法适用的学术区块链平台更包括文献比对模块和论文修稿模块，文献比对模块电性耦接用户认证模块，论文修稿模块电性耦接文献比对模块和文章评级模块，运作方法更包括：由文献 比对模块根据预先存储的历史文献对论文进行学术抄袭审查或错误引用审查；由论文修稿模块对用户上传的论文进行精修论文文法修改或语意流畅度修改。
在本发明的一实施例中，上述的运作方法的适用的学术区块链平台更包括审查媒合模块和意见评级模块，审查媒合模块电性耦接文章评级模块，意见评级模块电性耦接文章评级模块，运作方法更包括：由审查媒合模块根据预先存储的历史文献邀请与论文具有研究主题高度相关的学者协助审理论文；由意见评级模块对用户上传的论文进行评定审查者报酬或审查者公信力评级。
在本发明的一实施例中，上述的运作方法以及学术区块链平台的第一非同质化代币参数大于第三非同质化代币参数，且第三非同质化代币参数大于第二非同质化代币参数。
在本发明的一实施例中，上述的运作方法以及学术区块链平台的用户认证模块接受用户发送的至少一用户信息包括电子邮件信息、手机号码信息、证件审核信息、脸部辨认信息或其组合。
综上所述，本发明提出了一种学术区块链平台及其运作方法，学术区块链平台包括用户认证模块、文章评级模块及非同质化通证模块，用户认证模块接受用户发送的用户信息，经过认证查核后根据用户信息产生个人私钥，通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后上传论文，文章评级模块提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级，非同质化通证模块对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供第三非同质化代币参数，借由上述功能，本发明可以分别对用户、审查者和平台提供非同质化代币参数，并提供完善论文审查机制，提高用户体验。另外，学术区块链平台在用户、审查者和平台之间提供公平且***性地非同质化代币参数比例分配。
为让本发明的上述和其他目的、特征和优点能更明显易懂，下文特举实施例，并配合所附图式，作详细说明如下。
附图说明
图1为本发明一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台的方块图；
图2为本发明另一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台的方块图；
图3为本发明又一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台的方块图；以及
图4为本发明一实施例所提供的运作方法的流程示意图。
具体实施方式
在下文中，将借由图式说明本发明的各种实施例来详细描述本发明。然而，本发明概念可能以许多不同形式来体现，且不应解释为限于本文中所阐述的例示性实施例。此外，在图式中相同参考数字可用以表示类似的组件。
请参照图1，图1为本发明一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台的方块图。本发明一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台100包括用户认证模块110、文章评级模块120及非同质化通证模块130。在一实施例中，用户认证模块110、文章评级模块120及非同质化通证模块130可以通过一个或多个功能电路(例如处理电路、比较电路、存储电路或通信电路)来实现。文章评级模块120电性耦接用户认证模块110。非同质化通证模块130电性耦接文章评级模块120。用户认证模块110用于接受用户发送的至少一用户信息，用户认证模块110经过认证查核后根据至少一用户信息产生个人私钥，此用户通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台100进行签章连动后进一步上传或下载论文，进一步来说，本申请提出的学术区块链平台100主要用于对学术性论文进行评级，用户认证模块110接受用户发送的至少一用户信息可以包括电子邮件信息、手机号码信息、证件审核信息、脸部辨认信息或其组合。在其他实施例中，用户认证模块110接受用户发送的至少一用户信息还可以包括指纹辨认信息、掌纹辨认信息、声音辨认信息等等，本申请不以用户信息的种类为限制。
在一实施例中，文章评级模块120用于提供至少一审查者对论文进行评 级，在通过用户认证模块110对电子邮件信息、手机号码信息、证件审核信息、脸部辨认信息、指纹辨认信息、掌纹辨认信息、声音辨认信息其中至少一进行认证后，即可将学术论文上传至学术区块链平台100，以供至少一审查者对此学术论文进行评级。另外，学术区块链平台100将借由审查者过往经历如任职机构及头衔、过往学术发表评级、专利证明、奖项纪录等等其中的权重比例，对审查者进行审核评级如是否具备主编的资格、有关审查意见的权重因子。值得注意的是，学术区块链平台100将为每一位认证查核的用户提供一组个人私钥，为用户参与学术区块链平台100社群的重要签章如开设加密钱包、参与双盲审查(审查者与上传论文的用户彼此不知道对方的身份)，使用户和审查者都可以加入学术区块链平台100进行讨论并都参与此签章连动。换言之，学术区块链平台100将采用双边盲审制度，审查者仅需公布其用户签章及揭露签章的所有审稿纪录，学术区块链平台100不会公布审查者的实体姓名，同时审查者于审查期间也无法取得审查稿件的用户信息及签章。
在一实施例中，非同质化通证模块130用于对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的至少一审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台100提供第三非同质化代币参数。例如，第一非同质化代币参数大于第三非同质化代币参数，且第三非同质化代币参数大于第二非同质化代币参数，对用户上传论文此单一动作视为100％，非同质化通证模块130可以将对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数分到如62.5％，非同质化通证模块130可以将为审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数分到如12.5％，非同质化通证模块130可以将上传论文此单一动作对学术区块链平台100提供第三非同质化代币参数分到如25％，上述数值并非用以限制本申请的范围，仅为举例说明，本申请提出的学术区块链平台100分别对用户、审查者和平台提供非同质化代币参数，并提供完善论文审查机制，提高用户体验。学术区块链平台100将借由非同质化通证模块130，提供用户在学术区块链平台100上竞标交易及捐献赞助相关研究成果。非同质化通证为论文 稿件后续版税发放的唯一凭证，增加用户体验。另外，学术区块链平台100在用户、审查者和平台之间提供公平且***性地非同质化代币参数比例分配，用于改善传统学术文章审查费用高昂及审查时间冗长的缺点。另外，本申请的数据通信方式可以采用高级加密标准AES(Advanced Encryption Standard)加密算法进行编码和译码方式随机生成解锁密钥，且接着通过安全信道收发数据。
在一实施例中，请同时参照图1和图2，图2为本发明另一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台的方块图。学术区块链平台200更包括文献比对模块213和论文修稿模块215。文献比对模块213电性耦接用户认证模块110，论文修稿模块215电性耦接文献比对模块213和文章评级模块120。文献比对模块213和论文修稿模块215可以通过一个或多个功能电路(例如处理电路、比较电路、存储电路或通信电路)来实现。文献比对模块213用于根据预先存储的历史文献对论文进行学术抄袭审查或错误引用审查，换言之，文献比对模块213用于对论文进行筛选及查核文献是否有学术抄袭、错误引用等重大学术伦理违反的行为。论文修稿模块215用于对用户上传的论文进行精修论文文法修改或语意流畅度修改。学术区块链平台200将为每一篇投稿论文至平台的学术文章，进行私钥加密后记录于区块链上，以利存储电路永久记录文献版本、文献时间戳或文献作者排等关键数据。
在一实施例中，请同时参照图1和图3，图3为本发明又一实施例所提供的学术区块链平台的方块图。学术区块链平台300更包括审查媒合模块321和意见评级模块325。审查媒合模块321和意见评级模块325可以通过一个或多个功能电路(例如处理电路、比较电路、存储电路或通信电路)来实现。审查媒合模块321电性耦接文章评级模块120。意见评级模块325电性耦接文章评级模块120。审查媒合模块321用于根据预先存储的历史文献邀请与论文具有研究主题高度相关的学者协助审理论文。意见评级模块325用于对用户上传的论文进行评定审查者报酬或审查者公信力评级。换言之，学术区块链平台300借由审查媒合模块321邀请与文章研究主题高度相关的 学者，协助审理稿件，并筛选并排除相关需利益回避的学者如长期合作学者、曾为师生关系等介入因素，文章评级模块120依照相关审查纪录如审查者背书人数、审查者公信力、文章引用量等对论文进行评级，另外，学术区块链平台300将借由意见评级模块325来评定相关贡献如审查者审查报酬或审查公信力评级，学术区块链平台300并借由免费加值的商业模式，提供用户***包含在线阅览全文、所有稿件版本纪录、所有审查意见及作者回复等等，同时提供各类加订阅服务如去广告、高分辨率数据或各类型档案输出，增加用户体验。学术区块链平台300还包括推播媒合模块、知识共识机制模块和通证募资模块(图未示)，推播媒合模块用于精准投放文章给研究主题高度相关的学术区块链平台300的用户，知识共识机制模块用于提供平台知识挖矿的运行准则，通证募资模块用于协助研究项目募集研究经费，有效增加应用性。
请参照图4所示，图4为本发明一实施例所提供的运作方法的流程示意图。本发明提出一种运作方法，适用于一学术区块链平台，学术区块链平台包括一用户认证模块、一文章评级模块和一非同质化通证模块，文章评级模块电性耦接用户认证模块和非同质化通证模块，运作方法包括：S410、由用户认证模块接受一用户发送的至少一用户信息，经过认证查核后根据至少一用户信息产生一个人私钥，用户通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后进一步上传或下载一论文；S420、由文章评级模块用于提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级；及S430、由非同质化通证模块对上传论文的用户提供一第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的至少一审查者提供一第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供一第三非同质化代币参数。另外，本申请提出的步骤S410～S430具可替换性，在此对步骤顺序并不加以限制。
在一实施例中，学术区块链平台更包括一文献比对模块和一论文修稿模块，文献比对模块电性耦接用户认证模块，论文修稿模块电性耦接文献比对模块和文章评级模块，运作方法包括：由文献比对模块根据预先存储的历史文献对论文进行学术抄袭审查或错误引用审查；由论文修稿模块对用户上传 的论文进行精修论文文法修改或语意流畅度修改。
在一实施例中，第一非同质化代币参数大于第三非同质化代币参数，且第三非同质化代币参数大于第二非同质化代币参数。
在一实施例中，用户认证模块接受用户发送的至少一用户信息包括电子邮件信息、手机号码信息、证件审核信息、脸部辨认信息或其组合。
在一实施例中，学术区块链平台更包括一审查媒合模块和一意见评级模块，审查媒合模块电性耦接文章评级模块，意见评级模块电性耦接文章评级模块，运作方法包括：由审查媒合模块根据预先存储的历史文献邀请与论文具有研究主题高度相关的学者协助审理论文；由意见评级模块对用户上传的论文进行评定审查者报酬或审查者公信力评级。
综上所述，本发明提出了一种学术区块链平台及其运作方法，学术区块链平台包括用户认证模块、文章评级模块及非同质化通证模块，用户认证模块接受用户发送的用户信息，经过认证查核后根据用户信息产生个人私钥，通过个人私钥与学术区块链平台进行签章连动后上传论文，文章评级模块提供至少一审查者对论文进行评级，非同质化通证模块对上传论文的用户提供第一非同质化代币参数、对审查论文的审查者提供第二非同质化代币参数和对学术区块链平台提供第三非同质化代币参数，借由上述功能，本发明可以分别对用户、审查者和平台提供非同质化代币参数，并提供完善论文审查机制，提高用户体验。另外，学术区块链平台在用户、审查者和平台之间提供公平且***性地非同质化代币参数比例分配。
以上所述，仅是本发明的较佳实施例而已，并非对本发明作任何形式上的限制，虽然本发明已以较佳实施例揭露如上，然而并非用以限定本发明,任何熟悉本专业的技术人员,在不脱离本发明技术方案范围内，当可利用上述揭示的方法及技术内容作出些许的更动或修饰为等同变化的等效实施例，但凡是未脱离本发明技术方案的内容，依据本发明的技术实质对以上实施例所作的任何简单修改、等同变化与修饰，均仍属于本发明技术方案的范围内。

Claims (10)

  1. 一种学术区块链平台，其特征在于，包括：
    一用户认证模块，用于接受一用户发送的至少一用户信息，经过认证查核后根据该至少一用户信息产生一个人私钥，该用户通过该个人私钥与该学术区块链平台进行签章连动后进一步上传或下载一论文；
    一文章评级模块，电性耦接该用户认证模块，该文章评级模块用于提供至少一审查者对该论文进行评级；及
    一非同质化通证模块，电性耦接该文章评级模块，该非同质化通证模块用于对上传该论文的该用户提供一第一非同质化代币参数、对审查该论文的该至少一审查者提供一第二非同质化代币参数和对该学术区块链平台提供一第三非同质化代币参数。
  2. 如权利要求1所述的学术区块链平台，其特征在于，所述学术区块链平台更包括：
    一文献比对模块，电性耦接该用户认证模块，该文献比对模块用于根据预先存储的历史文献对该论文进行学术抄袭审查或错误引用审查；
    一论文修稿模块，电性耦接该文献比对模块和该文章评级模块，该论文修稿模块用于对该用户上传的该论文进行精修论文文法修改或语意流畅度修改。
  3. 如权利要求1所述的学术区块链平台，其特征在于，该第一非同质化代币参数大于该第三非同质化代币参数，且该第三非同质化代币参数大于该第二非同质化代币参数。
  4. 如权利要求1所述的学术区块链平台，其特征在于，该用户认证模块接受该用户发送的该至少一用户信息包括电子邮件信息、手机号码信息、 证件审核信息、脸部辨认信息或其组合。
  5. 如权利要求1所述的学术区块链平台，其特征在于，所述学术区块链平台更包括：
    一审查媒合模块，电性耦接该文章评级模块，该审查媒合模块用于根据预先存储的历史文献邀请与该论文具有研究主题高度相关的学者协助审理该论文；
    一意见评级模块，电性耦接该文章评级模块，该意见评级模块用于对该用户上传的该论文进行评定审查者报酬或审查者公信力评级。
  6. 一种运作方法，适用于一学术区块链平台，该学术区块链平台包括一用户认证模块、一文章评级模块和一非同质化通证模块，该文章评级模块电性耦接该用户认证模块和该非同质化通证模块，其特征在于，该运作方法包括：
    由用户认证模块接受一用户发送的至少一用户信息，经过认证查核后根据该至少一用户信息产生一个人私钥，该用户通过该个人私钥与该学术区块链平台进行签章连动后进一步上传或下载一论文；
    由该文章评级模块用于提供至少一审查者对该论文进行评级；及
    由该非同质化通证模块对上传该论文的该用户提供一第一非同质化代币参数、对审查该论文的该至少一审查者提供一第二非同质化代币参数和对该学术区块链平台提供一第三非同质化代币参数。
  7. 如权利要求6所述的运作方法，其特征在于，该学术区块链平台更包括一文献比对模块和一论文修稿模块，该文献比对模块电性耦接该用户认证模块，该论文修稿模块电性耦接该文献比对模块和该文章评级模块，该运作方法包括：
    由该文献比对模块根据预先存储的历史文献对该论文进行学术抄袭审 查或错误引用审查；
    由该论文修稿模块对该用户上传的该论文进行精修论文文法修改或语意流畅度修改。
  8. 如权利要求6所述的运作方法，其特征在于，该第一非同质化代币参数大于该第三非同质化代币参数，且该第三非同质化代币参数大于该第二非同质化代币参数。
  9. 如权利要求6所述的运作方法，其特征在于，该用户认证模块接受该用户发送的该至少一用户信息包括电子邮件信息、手机号码信息、证件审核信息、脸部辨认信息或其组合。
  10. 如权利要求6所述的运作方法，其特征在于，该学术区块链平台更包括一审查媒合模块和一意见评级模块，该审查媒合模块电性耦接该文章评级模块，该意见评级模块电性耦接该文章评级模块，该运作方法包括：
    由该审查媒合模块根据预先存储的历史文献邀请与该论文具有研究主题高度相关的学者协助审理该论文；
    由该意见评级模块对该用户上传的该论文进行评定审查者报酬或审查者公信力评级。
PCT/CN2022/082913 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 学术区块链平台及其运作方法 WO2023178630A1 (zh)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2022/082913 WO2023178630A1 (zh) 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 学术区块链平台及其运作方法

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2022/082913 WO2023178630A1 (zh) 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 学术区块链平台及其运作方法

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023178630A1 true WO2023178630A1 (zh) 2023-09-28

Family

ID=88099540

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2022/082913 WO2023178630A1 (zh) 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 学术区块链平台及其运作方法

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2023178630A1 (zh)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140032573A1 (en) * 2010-05-01 2014-01-30 Adam Etkin System and method for evaluating the peer review process of scholarly journals
TW202004620A (zh) * 2018-05-23 2020-01-16 葉佰蒼 基於區塊鏈的數位文件發表系統及其實施方法
TWM607418U (zh) * 2020-08-26 2021-02-11 趙振宇 互動式智能文件審稿平台
CN113032827A (zh) * 2021-03-22 2021-06-25 东北大学 一种基于区块链技术的论文同行评审方法
CN114020839A (zh) * 2021-10-29 2022-02-08 哈尔滨工业大学 一种基于区块链的学术成果预发表及权利认证***及方法

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140032573A1 (en) * 2010-05-01 2014-01-30 Adam Etkin System and method for evaluating the peer review process of scholarly journals
TW202004620A (zh) * 2018-05-23 2020-01-16 葉佰蒼 基於區塊鏈的數位文件發表系統及其實施方法
TWM607418U (zh) * 2020-08-26 2021-02-11 趙振宇 互動式智能文件審稿平台
CN113032827A (zh) * 2021-03-22 2021-06-25 东北大学 一种基于区块链技术的论文同行评审方法
CN114020839A (zh) * 2021-10-29 2022-02-08 哈尔滨工业大学 一种基于区块链的学术成果预发表及权利认证***及方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sas et al. Exploring trust in Bitcoin technology: a framework for HCI research
US20190319948A1 (en) Remote authentication and identification proofing systems and methods
US20150278820A1 (en) Systems and methods for executing cryptographically secure transactions using voice and natural language processing
US20110270761A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for a financial document clearinghouse and secure delivery network
WO2014139556A1 (en) A method, a system, a computer system and a computer program product for certifying a procedure of signature of an electronic file relating to an agreement between at least two parties
Holt et al. Data thieves in action: Examining the international market for stolen personal information
Windley Sovrin: An identity metasystem for self-sovereign identity
Wang China's E-Justice Revolution
Mishra et al. Digital services and digital trade in the Asia pacific: an alternative model for digital integration?
WO2023178630A1 (zh) 学术区块链平台及其运作方法
TW202338645A (zh) 學術區塊鏈平台及運作方法
Bromby Identification, trust and privacy: How biometrics can aid certification of digital signatures
Dušek Data Boxes as a Part of the Strategic Concept of Computerization of Public Administration in the Czech Republic. Administrative Sciences, 13 (6), 1–18
Coggins et al. Authenticating Digital Government Information
Wong et al. Electronic signature and attestation in conveyancing practice: A Malaysian legal perspective
Rosca Exploring barriers to mobile e-id adoption: a government perspective on republic of moldova mobile e-ID
Kulehile An analysis of the regulatory principles of functional equivalence and technology neutrality in the context of electronic signatures in the formation of electronic transactions in Lesotho and the SADC region
Siong et al. Electronic signature and attestation in conveyancing practice: A Malaysian legal perspective [version 1; peer review
Ranyali Conceptual Framework for Multi-Factor Authentication for Mobile Money Systems in Lesotho
Zukarnain et al. IMPLEMENTATION OF ZCHAIN4U FOR CASHLESS PAYMENT AND DIGITAL CERTIFICATION VERIFICATION USING BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY
Herkommer et al. Blockchain for Education Records: An interpretive research on university students’ perceptions
Gorelashvili ELECTRONIC CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS ACTUALITY OF THE ISSUE
Tsai Research on the related issues about the service of mutual legal assistance documents through electronic delivery
Krasniqi et al. CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES OF LAW AND DIGITALIZATION: CASE STUDY OF CONTRACT LAW.
Vaughn RON, RON, RON Away: The New Frontier of Notarization.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22932695

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1