WO2023178630A1 - Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement - Google Patents

Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023178630A1
WO2023178630A1 PCT/CN2022/082913 CN2022082913W WO2023178630A1 WO 2023178630 A1 WO2023178630 A1 WO 2023178630A1 CN 2022082913 W CN2022082913 W CN 2022082913W WO 2023178630 A1 WO2023178630 A1 WO 2023178630A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
module
academic
user
paper
blockchain platform
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2022/082913
Other languages
English (en)
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
廖佑铭
陈映滕
刘又宁
李若宁
Original Assignee
廖佑铭
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 廖佑铭 filed Critical 廖佑铭
Priority to PCT/CN2022/082913 priority Critical patent/WO2023178630A1/fr
Publication of WO2023178630A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023178630A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q90/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for administrative, commercial, financial, managerial or supervisory purposes, not involving significant data processing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a blockchain platform, and in particular to an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the user authentication module accepts the user information sent by the user. After authentication and verification, it generates a personal private key based on the user information. The personal private key is linked with the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded.
  • the article rating module provides at least one reviewer with The paper is rated, and the non-fungible token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploads the paper, the second non-fungible token parameter to the reviewer who reviews the paper, and the second non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.
  • the present invention can provide non-fungible token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.
  • An academic blockchain platform includes: a user authentication module, used to accept at least one user information sent by the user, and generate a personal private key based on the at least one user information after authentication and verification.
  • the user uses the personal private key and
  • the academic blockchain platform further uploads or downloads papers after linking signatures;
  • the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module, and the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and non-homogeneous communication
  • the certificate module is electrically coupled to the article rating module.
  • the non-fungible token module is used to provide the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploads the paper, and to provide the second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer who reviews the paper. ized token parameters and provide third non-fungible token parameters for academic blockchain platforms.
  • the above-mentioned academic blockchain platform further includes: a document comparison module, electrically coupled to a user authentication module, and the document comparison module is used to conduct academic plagiarism review of papers based on pre-stored historical documents. or error citation review; the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the literature comparison module and the article rating module. The paper revision module is used to revise the grammatical or semantic fluency of the paper uploaded by the user.
  • the above-mentioned academic blockchain platform further includes: a review matching module, electrically coupled to an article rating module, and the review matching module is used to invite papers with research topics based on pre-stored historical documents. Highly relevant scholars assist in reviewing papers; the opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module. The opinion rating module is used to evaluate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for papers uploaded by users.
  • An operating method provided by the invention is suitable for an academic blockchain platform.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module. and a non-fungible token module.
  • the operation method includes: the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by the user, and after authentication and verification, generates a personal private key based on at least one user information.
  • the user uses the personal private key to communicate with the academic blockchain
  • the platform further uploads or downloads papers after linking signatures; the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper; and the non-fungible token module provides the first non-fungible to users who upload papers.
  • a token parameter, a second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer of the review paper and a third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform.
  • the academic blockchain platform to which the above-mentioned operating method is applicable further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module.
  • the document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module
  • the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module.
  • Coupling the literature comparison module and the article rating module, the operation method further includes: the literature comparison module conducts academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of papers based on pre-stored historical documents; the paper revision module conducts refined papers uploaded by users. Revise the thesis for grammar or semantic fluency.
  • the academic blockchain platform applicable to the above operation method further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module.
  • the review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module, and the opinion rating module is electrically coupled.
  • the operation method further includes: the review matching module invites scholars who are highly related to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the opinion rating module evaluates the papers uploaded by the user, and the reviewer's remuneration or Reviewer credibility rating.
  • the above-mentioned operating method and the first non-fungible token parameter of the academic blockchain platform are greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter Greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.
  • the above-mentioned operating method and the user authentication module of the academic blockchain platform accept at least one user information sent by the user, including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or other combination.
  • the present invention proposes an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the user authentication module accepts the information sent by the user.
  • User information after authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the user information.
  • the personal private key is linked to the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded.
  • the article rating module provides at least one reviewer to rate the paper, which is non-homogeneous.
  • the token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to users who upload papers, the second non-fungible token parameter to reviewers who review papers, and the third non-fungible token parameter to academic blockchain platforms.
  • Token parameters through the above functions, the present invention can provide non-homogeneous token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic flowchart of an operation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes a user authentication module 110, an article rating module 120, and a non-fungible token module 130.
  • the user authentication module 110, the article rating module 120 and the non-fungible token module 130 can be implemented by one or more functional circuits (such as processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits or communication circuits).
  • the article rating module 120 is electrically coupled to the user authentication module 110 .
  • the non-fungible token module 130 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120.
  • the user authentication module 110 is used to accept at least one user information sent by the user.
  • the user authentication module 110 After the authentication check, the user authentication module 110 generates a personal private key based on at least one user information.
  • the user uses the personal private key to sign and connect with the academic blockchain platform 100. Further upload or download the paper after the operation.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 proposed in this application is mainly used to rate academic papers.
  • the user authentication module 110 accepts at least one user information sent by the user, which may include email information, Mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information or a combination thereof.
  • the at least one user information received by the user authentication module 110 may also include fingerprint identification information, palmprint identification information, voice identification information, etc. This application is not limited to the type of user information.
  • the article rating module 120 is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper, and then uses the user authentication module 110 to evaluate email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information, fingerprint recognition information, After at least one of the palmprint recognition information and the voice recognition information is authenticated, the academic paper can be uploaded to the academic blockchain platform 100 for at least one reviewer to rate the academic paper.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 will use the weight ratio of the reviewer's past experience, such as the institution and title he works for, past academic publication ratings, patent certificates, award records, etc., to review and rate the reviewer, such as whether he is qualified as editor-in-chief. , weighting factors related to review opinions.
  • Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will provide each user with a set of personal private keys for verification and verification, providing important signatures for users to participate in the Academic Blockchain Platform 100 community, such as opening an encrypted wallet and participating in a double-blind Review (the reviewer and the user who uploaded the paper do not know each other's identity), so that both users and reviewers can join the academic blockchain platform 100 for discussion and participate in this signature linkage.
  • Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will adopt a bilateral blind review system. Reviewers only need to publish all review records of their user signatures and disclosure signatures. Academic Blockchain Platform 100 will not publish the entity name of the reviewer. At the same time, Reviewers are also unable to obtain the user information and signatures of the reviewed manuscripts during the review period.
  • the non-fungible token module 130 is configured to provide a first non-fungible token parameter to a user who uploads a paper, and to provide a second non-fungible token parameter to at least one reviewer who reviews the paper. And provide third non-fungible token parameters for academic blockchain platform 100.
  • the non-fungible token module 130 may provide the first non-fungible token parameter to the user who uploaded the paper, such as 62.5%, and the non-fungible token module 130 may provide the reviewer with The second non-fungible token parameter is divided into 12.5%, for example, and the non-fungible token module 130 can provide the third non-fungible token parameter to the academic blockchain platform 100 with the single action of uploading a paper, such as 12.5%. 25%.
  • the above values are not used to limit the scope of this application, but are merely examples.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 proposed in this application provides non-fungible token parameters for users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provides complete papers. Review mechanism to improve user experience.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 will use the non-fungible token module 130 to provide users with the ability to bid for transactions and donate sponsorship-related research results on the academic blockchain platform 100 .
  • the non-fungible token is the only certificate for the subsequent payment of royalties for manuscripts, increasing user experience.
  • the academic blockchain platform 100 provides a fair and systematic proportional distribution of non-homogeneous token parameters among users, reviewers and platforms, which is used to improve the shortcomings of traditional academic article review costs and lengthy review times.
  • the data communication method of this application can use the Advanced Encryption Standard AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) encryption algorithm to perform encoding and decoding to randomly generate an unlocking key, and then send and receive data through a secure channel.
  • AES Advanced Encryption Standard
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the academic blockchain platform 200 further includes a document comparison module 213 and a paper revision module 215.
  • the document comparison module 213 is electrically coupled to the user authentication module 110
  • the paper revision module 215 is electrically coupled to the document comparison module 213 and the article rating module 120.
  • the document comparison module 213 and the paper revision module 215 can be implemented by one or more functional circuits (such as processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits or communication circuits).
  • the literature comparison module 213 is used to conduct academic plagiarism review or miscitation review on papers based on pre-stored historical documents.
  • the literature comparison module 213 is used to screen papers and check whether there are academic plagiarism, miscitations and other major academic issues in the documents. Ethical violations.
  • the paper revision module 215 is used to revise the paper uploaded by the user to improve its grammar or semantic fluency. Academic Blockchain Platform 200 will encrypt the private key for each academic article submitted to the platform and record it on the blockchain to facilitate the storage circuit to permanently record key data such as document version, document timestamp or document author ranking. .
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an academic blockchain platform provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 further includes a review matching module 321 and an opinion rating module 325.
  • the review matching module 321 and the opinion rating module 325 may be implemented by one or more functional circuits (eg, processing circuits, comparison circuits, storage circuits, or communication circuits).
  • the review matching module 321 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120.
  • the opinion rating module 325 is electrically coupled to the article rating module 120.
  • the review matching module 321 is used to invite scholars who are highly relevant to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents.
  • the opinion rating module 325 is used to rate reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for papers uploaded by users.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 invites scholars highly related to the research topic of the article through the review and matching module 321 to assist in reviewing the manuscript, and screens and excludes relevant scholars who need to avoid interests, such as long-term cooperative scholars, former teacher-student relationships, etc.
  • the article rating module 120 rates papers based on relevant review records such as the number of reviewers' endorsements, reviewer credibility, article citations, etc.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 will use the opinion rating module 325 to assess relevant contributions such as Reviewers review remuneration or review credibility ratings.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 uses a free value-added business model to provide users with free access including online reading of the full text, all manuscript version records, all review opinions and author responses, etc., and also provides Various subscription services such as ad removal, high-resolution data or various types of file output increase user experience.
  • the academic blockchain platform 300 also includes a push matchmaking module, a knowledge consensus mechanism module and a token fundraising module (not shown).
  • the push matchmaking module is used to accurately place articles on academic blockchains with highly relevant research topics.
  • the knowledge consensus mechanism module is used to provide operating guidelines for platform knowledge mining
  • the token fundraising module is used to assist research projects in raising research funds, effectively increasing applicability.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic flowchart of an operation method provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention proposes an operation method, which is suitable for an academic blockchain platform.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-homogeneous token module.
  • the article rating module is electrically coupled to the user.
  • the operation method of the authentication module and the non-homogeneous certificate module includes: S410.
  • the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by a user. After authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the at least one user information.
  • the user passes the personal private key
  • the key is linked with the academic blockchain platform for signature and then a paper is further uploaded or downloaded;
  • S420 the article rating module is used to provide at least one reviewer to rate the paper;
  • S430 the non-fungible token module
  • the user uploading the paper provides a first non-fungible token parameter, a second non-fungible token parameter is provided to at least one reviewer of the paper and the academic blockchain platform is provided a third non-fungible token parameter.
  • Token parameters are interchangeable, and the order of the steps is not limited here.
  • the academic blockchain platform further includes a document comparison module and a paper revision module.
  • the document comparison module is electrically coupled to the user authentication module
  • the paper revision module is electrically coupled to the document comparison module and Article rating module
  • the operation method includes: the literature comparison module conducts academic plagiarism review or miscitation review of the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the paper revision module refines the paper uploaded by the user to revise the paper grammar or semantic fluency Revise.
  • the first non-fungible token parameter is greater than the third non-fungible token parameter, and the third non-fungible token parameter is greater than the second non-fungible token parameter.
  • the user authentication module accepts at least one user information sent by the user, including email information, mobile phone number information, document review information, facial recognition information, or a combination thereof.
  • the academic blockchain platform further includes a review matching module and an opinion rating module.
  • the review matching module is electrically coupled to the article rating module.
  • the opinion rating module is electrically coupled to the article rating module.
  • the operation method includes : The review matching module invites scholars highly related to the research topic of the paper to assist in reviewing the paper based on pre-stored historical documents; the opinion rating module evaluates the reviewer remuneration or reviewer credibility rating for the paper uploaded by the user.
  • the present invention proposes an academic blockchain platform and its operation method.
  • the academic blockchain platform includes a user authentication module, an article rating module and a non-fungible token module.
  • the user authentication module accepts the information sent by the user.
  • User information after authentication and verification, a personal private key is generated based on the user information.
  • the personal private key is linked to the academic blockchain platform for signature and then the paper is uploaded.
  • the article rating module provides at least one reviewer to rate the paper, which is non-homogeneous.
  • the token module provides the first non-fungible token parameter to users who upload papers, the second non-fungible token parameter to reviewers who review papers, and the third non-fungible token parameter to academic blockchain platforms.
  • Token parameters through the above functions, the present invention can provide non-homogeneous token parameters to users, reviewers and platforms respectively, and provide a complete paper review mechanism to improve user experience. Additionally, academic blockchain platforms provide a fair and systematic non-fungible proportional distribution of token parameters among users, reviewers, and platforms.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

Chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement. La plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique comprend un module d'authentification d'utilisateur, un module d'évaluation d'article et un module de jeton non fongible. Le module d'authentification d'utilisateur reçoit des informations d'utilisateur envoyées par un utilisateur, génère une clé privée personnelle selon les informations d'utilisateur après la réussite d'un contrôle d'authentification, et télécharge une thèse après la réalisation d'une signature et d'une liaison avec la plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique au moyen de la clé privée personnelle. Le module d'évaluation d'article fournit au moins un examinateur pour évaluer la thèse. Le module de jeton non fongible fournit un premier paramètre de jeton non fongible à l'utilisateur téléchargeant la thèse, fournit un deuxième paramètre de jeton non fongible à l'examinateur de la thèse, et fournit un troisième paramètre de jeton non fongible à la plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique. La plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique fournie par la présente invention fournit des paramètres de jeton non fongible à l'utilisateur, l'examinateur et la plateforme, et fournit un mécanisme d'examen de thèse optimisé, améliorant l'expérience de l'utilisateur.
PCT/CN2022/082913 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement WO2023178630A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2022/082913 WO2023178630A1 (fr) 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2022/082913 WO2023178630A1 (fr) 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023178630A1 true WO2023178630A1 (fr) 2023-09-28

Family

ID=88099540

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2022/082913 WO2023178630A1 (fr) 2022-03-25 2022-03-25 Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2023178630A1 (fr)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140032573A1 (en) * 2010-05-01 2014-01-30 Adam Etkin System and method for evaluating the peer review process of scholarly journals
TW202004620A (zh) * 2018-05-23 2020-01-16 葉佰蒼 基於區塊鏈的數位文件發表系統及其實施方法
TWM607418U (zh) * 2020-08-26 2021-02-11 趙振宇 互動式智能文件審稿平台
CN113032827A (zh) * 2021-03-22 2021-06-25 东北大学 一种基于区块链技术的论文同行评审方法
CN114020839A (zh) * 2021-10-29 2022-02-08 哈尔滨工业大学 一种基于区块链的学术成果预发表及权利认证***及方法

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140032573A1 (en) * 2010-05-01 2014-01-30 Adam Etkin System and method for evaluating the peer review process of scholarly journals
TW202004620A (zh) * 2018-05-23 2020-01-16 葉佰蒼 基於區塊鏈的數位文件發表系統及其實施方法
TWM607418U (zh) * 2020-08-26 2021-02-11 趙振宇 互動式智能文件審稿平台
CN113032827A (zh) * 2021-03-22 2021-06-25 东北大学 一种基于区块链技术的论文同行评审方法
CN114020839A (zh) * 2021-10-29 2022-02-08 哈尔滨工业大学 一种基于区块链的学术成果预发表及权利认证***及方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sas et al. Exploring trust in Bitcoin technology: a framework for HCI research
US11210379B1 (en) Virtual notarization using cryptographic techniques and biometric information
US20190319948A1 (en) Remote authentication and identification proofing systems and methods
US20150278820A1 (en) Systems and methods for executing cryptographically secure transactions using voice and natural language processing
US20110270761A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for a financial document clearinghouse and secure delivery network
Kotka et al. Estonian e-Residency: Redefining the nation-state in the digital era
EP2973193A1 (fr) Procédé, système, système informatique et produit programme d'ordinateur pour certifier une procédure de signature d'un fichier électronique lié à un accord entre au moins deux parties
Windley Sovrin: An identity metasystem for self-sovereign identity
Wang China's E-Justice Revolution
CN113761597B (zh) 一种基于可验证凭证vc和区块链签章的合同签署方法
Mishra et al. Digital services and digital trade in the Asia pacific: an alternative model for digital integration?
WO2023178630A1 (fr) Plateforme de chaîne de blocs académique et son procédé de fonctionnement
TW202338645A (zh) 學術區塊鏈平台及運作方法
Bromby Identification, trust and privacy: How biometrics can aid certification of digital signatures
Fredrick CRYPTOCURRENCY AND BLOCKCHAIN: HERE WE GO DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE.
Dušek Data Boxes as a Part of the Strategic Concept of Computerization of Public Administration in the Czech Republic. Administrative Sciences, 13 (6), 1–18
Coggins et al. Authenticating Digital Government Information
Wong et al. Electronic signature and attestation in conveyancing practice: A Malaysian legal perspective
Kulehile An analysis of the regulatory principles of functional equivalence and technology neutrality in the context of electronic signatures in the formation of electronic transactions in Lesotho and the SADC region
Siong et al. Electronic signature and attestation in conveyancing practice: A Malaysian legal perspective [version 1; peer review
Ranyali Conceptual Framework for Multi-Factor Authentication for Mobile Money Systems in Lesotho
Zukarnain et al. IMPLEMENTATION OF ZCHAIN4U FOR CASHLESS PAYMENT AND DIGITAL CERTIFICATION VERIFICATION USING BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY
Herkommer et al. Blockchain for Education Records: An interpretive research on university students’ perceptions
Gorelashvili ELECTRONIC CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS ACTUALITY OF THE ISSUE
Tsai Research on the related issues about the service of mutual legal assistance documents through electronic delivery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 22932695

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1