WO2020211111A1 - 一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法 - Google Patents

一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020211111A1
WO2020211111A1 PCT/CN2019/084453 CN2019084453W WO2020211111A1 WO 2020211111 A1 WO2020211111 A1 WO 2020211111A1 CN 2019084453 W CN2019084453 W CN 2019084453W WO 2020211111 A1 WO2020211111 A1 WO 2020211111A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
responsibility
acyclic graph
directed acyclic
job
post
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2019/084453
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
裘炅
谢彐平
Original Assignee
杭州全视软件有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 杭州全视软件有限公司 filed Critical 杭州全视软件有限公司
Publication of WO2020211111A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020211111A1/zh

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of responsibility management, and in particular to a method of responsibility management based on a directed acyclic graph.
  • Role responsibility refers to the common responsibility category of the same role, which can be simply understood as "things that should and must be done under the common rules of roles"; ability responsibility refers to the performance of responsibility that exceeds the responsibility requirements of the common role, which is obviously evaluative.
  • obligation responsibility refers to responsibility that is not within the scope of role responsibility, and can be understood as “things that can be done or not done”
  • cause responsibility refers to the direct cause Due to various reasons, these reasons can bear the corresponding role responsibility, ability responsibility and obligation responsibility.
  • responsibility is an important part of management with rights, responsibilities and interests as the core.
  • responsibility management requires refined management to be effective. For example, divide the responsibility list of positions into main responsibility, supervisory responsibility, and leadership responsibility. The above-mentioned responsibilities are interrelated. How can we ensure that the relationship between the responsibility lists is clear when designing the responsibility, so that the accountability of the incident can be investigated and monitored? Whether the responsibility data is in place to determine whether it is caused by weak supervision.
  • the patent with publication number CN109102172A discloses an evaluation method and system of responsible units based on urban management, including: obtaining all responsibilities Unit’s basic case data; calculate quantity evaluation index, quality evaluation index, efficiency evaluation index and benchmark evaluation index based on basic case data; set index weights, and base on index weights, quantity evaluation indexes, quality evaluation indexes, efficiency evaluation indexes and benchmark evaluations The index calculates the comprehensive evaluation score to evaluate the city management performance of the responsible unit.
  • the invention starts from the perspective of urban basic management, applies fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate urban management, determines the weight of each evaluation index, thereby obtains relatively accurate performance evaluation results, and realizes multiple perspectives on the responsible unit of urban management , All-round, fair and objective evaluations point out a new direction for urban management.
  • the purpose of the present invention is to provide a responsibility management method based on a directed acyclic graph in view of the defects of the prior art, which realizes the management between responsibilities, and also realizes the management of the responsibility process, so as to facilitate the management of responsibility events. Accountability of personnel.
  • the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
  • a method of responsibility management based on directed acyclic graph including:
  • step S1 also includes:
  • the job responsibility list includes job responsibility nodes.
  • step S2 specifically includes: taking the post responsibility node as a number of vertices in a directed acyclic graph, and taking the direction relationship between the post responsibility nodes as a number of directed edges connecting the vertices in the directed acyclic graph;
  • the post responsibility node corresponds to the vertex of a directed acyclic graph.
  • step S1 it further includes the following steps:
  • the same post corresponds to one or more post responsibilities.
  • job responsibility data includes time, position, location, and task.
  • the method includes:
  • the execution result is evaluated, an evaluation result is generated, and the evaluation result is displayed through a weighted directed acyclic graph.
  • the responsibility is performed by humans and/or intelligent robots.
  • Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a method of responsibility management based on a directed acyclic graph provided by the first embodiment
  • Fig. 2 is a flowchart of a method of responsibility management based on a directed acyclic graph provided by the second embodiment.
  • the purpose of the present invention is to provide a responsibility management method based on a directed acyclic graph in view of the defects of the prior art, which realizes the management between responsibilities, and also realizes the management of the responsibility process, so as to facilitate the management of responsibility events. Accountability of personnel.
  • This embodiment provides a method of responsibility management based on a directed acyclic graph, as shown in FIG. 1, including the steps:
  • the responsibility is performed by humans and/or intelligent robots.
  • responsibility is completed by human execution.
  • step S11 a list of job responsibilities corresponding to the job is obtained, where the same job corresponds to one or more job responsibilities.
  • step S11 it also includes the steps of: modifying the job responsibility list; and/or adding the job responsibility list.
  • step S12 the job responsibility list is arranged according to the directed acyclic graph topology; the job responsibility list includes job responsibility nodes.
  • the post responsibility nodes are regarded as several vertices in a directed acyclic graph, and the direction relations between the post responsibility nodes are regarded as several directed edges connecting the vertices in the directed acyclic graph.
  • a post responsibility node corresponds to a vertex of a directed acyclic graph.
  • step S13 a post responsibility management method is generated based on the directed acyclic graph. Specifically, the directed acyclic graph of post responsibility management formed in step S12 is used to generate a post responsibility management method that is convenient for management and accountability.
  • a directed acyclic graph is used to generate a post responsibility management method through the post responsibility list, which realizes the responsibility management and the responsibility process management.
  • This embodiment provides a method of responsibility management based on a directed acyclic graph, as shown in FIG. 2, including the steps:
  • the responsibility is performed by humans and/or intelligent robots.
  • responsibility is completed by human execution.
  • step S11 a list of job responsibilities corresponding to the job is obtained, where the same job corresponds to one or more job responsibilities.
  • Step S11 also includes the steps of: modifying the list of job responsibilities; and/or adding the list of job responsibilities.
  • step S12 the job responsibility list is arranged according to the directed acyclic graph topology; the job responsibility list includes job responsibility nodes.
  • the post responsibility nodes are regarded as several vertices in a directed acyclic graph, and the direction relations between the post responsibility nodes are regarded as several directed edges connecting the vertices in the directed acyclic graph.
  • a post responsibility node corresponds to a vertex of a directed acyclic graph.
  • step S13 a post responsibility management method is generated based on the directed acyclic graph. Specifically, the directed acyclic graph of post responsibility management formed in step S12 is used to generate a post responsibility management method that is convenient for management and accountability.
  • step S14 the job responsibility data is acquired according to the job responsibility management method.
  • the post responsibility data corresponding to the post is obtained according to the post responsibility management method, where the post responsibility data includes time, post, location, and task.
  • the person responsible for each position is set by the position responsibility
  • step S15 the job responsibility is executed according to the job responsibility data.
  • step S15 it also includes:
  • the relevant personnel can be held accountable according to the post responsibility management method. For example, when a supervisor sees a responsible accident, he will be held accountable to the position and staff related to the responsibility; or when a responsible accident occurs, the relevant position, staff, and supervisor are held accountable.
  • the execution result is evaluated, the evaluation result is generated, and the evaluation result is displayed through a weighted directed acyclic graph.
  • the display method can be displayed by different colors. For example, dark red indicates that the evaluation result is excellent and related personnel; red indicates that the evaluation result is good and related personnel; light red indicates that the evaluation result is poor and related personnel personnel.
  • the evaluation result is directly displayed through the directed acyclic graph, so that the user can intuitively understand the evaluation result.
  • the display mode is not limited to the mode mentioned in this embodiment.
  • This embodiment realizes the management of the responsibility items and the responsibility process through a directed acyclic graph, which facilitates the accountability of positions and personnel for responsible events; this embodiment passes the evaluation results through the directed The acyclic graph is displayed directly, allowing users to intuitively understand the evaluation results.
  • This embodiment provides a method of responsibility management based on a directed acyclic graph, as shown in FIG. 2, including the steps:
  • the responsibility is performed by humans and/or intelligent robots.
  • responsibility is completed by human execution.
  • step S11 a list of job responsibilities corresponding to the job is obtained, where the same job corresponds to one or more job responsibilities.
  • the school management is taken as an example for specific description.
  • Fire-fighting duty staff in the chemical building morning shift 1, mid shift 2, evening shift 3;
  • the first floor is the laboratory; the second floor is the organic chemical research institute; the third floor is the chemical materials research institute; the fourth floor is the office area of Director Yan; the fifth floor is the administration.
  • the same post corresponds to one or more post responsibilities.
  • the posts are numbered, the post responsibilities are generated through the posts, the post responsibilities are generated into the post responsibilities list item, and the related supervisory posts are generated according to the posts.
  • the post personnel include Zhang San, Li Si, and Wang Wu; among them, Zhang San works in the morning shift and is responsible for patrolling the chemical building; Li Si works in the afternoon shift and is responsible for patrolling the chemical building; Wang Wu works in the evening shift and is responsible for patrolling the chemical building. Another example is the fire patrol.
  • the position personnel include Zhang San, Li Si, and Wang Wu; among them, Zhang San, Li Si, and Wang Wu work all day, and Zhang San is responsible for patrolling the 1-2 floors of the chemical building; Li Si Responsible for patrolling the 3-4 floors of the chemical building; Wang Wu is responsible for patrolling the 5th floor of the chemical building. It should be noted that the arrangement of personnel depends on the actual situation.
  • step S11 it also includes the steps of: modifying the job responsibility list; and/or adding the job responsibility list.
  • the content to be added is added to the post responsibility list.
  • step S12 the job responsibility list is arranged according to the directed acyclic graph topology; the job responsibility list includes job responsibility nodes.
  • the post responsibility nodes are regarded as several vertices in a directed acyclic graph, and the direction relations between the post responsibility nodes are regarded as several directed edges connecting the vertices in the directed acyclic graph.
  • a post responsibility node corresponds to a vertex of a directed acyclic graph.
  • the post responsibility nodes are represented by numbers, and the directional relationship between the numbers is the post supervision directional relationship, as shown in Figure a:
  • the post responsibility with the number 0101 supervision number 0201 specifically, the post is in charge of the school leadership and supervision post is the post responsibility of the head of the security department.
  • the list of job responsibilities in step S11 is arranged according to the directed acyclic graph topology to form a directed acyclic graph of job responsibility management.
  • step S13 a post responsibility management method is generated based on the directed acyclic graph. Specifically, the directed acyclic graph of post responsibility management formed in step S12 is used to generate a post responsibility management method that is convenient for management and accountability.
  • step S14 the job responsibility data is acquired according to the job responsibility management method.
  • the post responsibility data corresponding to the post is obtained according to the post responsibility management method, where the post responsibility data includes time, post, location, and task.
  • the person responsible for each position is set by the position responsibility.
  • the acquired position responsibility data the position is a fire patrol officer in the chemical building; the position is responsible for receiving alarm dispatch processing and on-site confirmation; the time is the morning shift and the location is the 1-5 floors of the chemical building.
  • step S15 the job responsibility is executed according to the job responsibility data.
  • step S15 it also includes:
  • the relevant personnel can be held accountable according to the post responsibility management method. For example, when a supervisor sees a responsible accident, he will be held accountable to the position and staff related to the responsibility; or when a responsible accident occurs, the relevant position, staff, and supervisor are held accountable.
  • the supervisor of its supervisor finds that there are still problems.
  • the post responsibility management method generated by the directed acyclic graph of responsibility management pursues the fire patrolman 1 of the chemical building; or the dean of the school of chemical engineering finds that the problem handled by the fire patrolman 1 of the chemical building has not been solved, then the fire control of the chemical building Patrolman 1 and his supervisors, the director of the Institute of Organic Chemical Engineering, the security officer of the School of Chemical Engineering, and the fire-fighting duty officer of the Chemical Building, held accountable.
  • the execution result is evaluated, the evaluation result is generated, and the evaluation result is displayed through a weighted directed acyclic graph.
  • the display method can be displayed by different colors. For example, dark red indicates that the evaluation result is excellent and related personnel; red indicates that the evaluation result is good and related personnel; light red indicates that the evaluation result is poor and related personnel personnel.
  • the evaluation result is directly displayed through the directed acyclic graph, so that the user can intuitively understand the evaluation result.
  • the position of the fire patrolman 1 in the chemical building is displayed in light red in the directed acyclic graph.
  • the display mode is not limited to the mode mentioned in this embodiment.
  • This embodiment realizes the management of the responsibility items and the responsibility process through a directed acyclic graph, which facilitates the accountability of positions and personnel for responsible events; this embodiment passes the evaluation results through the directed The acyclic graph is displayed directly, allowing users to intuitively understand the evaluation results.
  • This embodiment provides a responsibility management method based on a directed acyclic graph, which differs from the third embodiment in:
  • the responsibility is performed by intelligent robots.
  • intelligent robots are used to replace humans to complete the corresponding post responsibilities, which realizes the entire intelligent process, realizes the management of the responsibility items, and also realizes the management of the responsibility process, which facilitates the accountability of the responsible events.
  • This embodiment provides a responsibility management method based on a directed acyclic graph, which differs from the third embodiment in:
  • This embodiment uses actual events to illustrate the evaluation situation.
  • the chemical building fire patrolman 2 performs inspection tasks in different time periods and submits the inspection results; the security officer of the Organic Chemical Research Institute performs weekly inspection tasks and finds problems and submits the discovered problems ;
  • the security officer 1 of the School of Chemical Engineering scored the fire patrolman 2 of the chemical building and the fire patrolman 2 of the chemical building, and the score was 3 points deducted.
  • the safety officer of the Institute of Organic Chemical Engineering was scored, and the score was not deducted. Submit;
  • the director of the Institute of Organic Chemical Engineering agrees with the scoring results of Security Officer 1 of the Institute of Chemical Engineering, and no points will be deducted from the Security Officer of the Institute of Organic Chemical Engineering, and 3 points will be deducted from the Fire Patrol Officer 2 of the Chemical Building, and submit the results.
  • the system automatically checks and records, forms the assessment result into a post responsibility management method that is convenient for management and accountability, and displays the generated assessment result through a directed acyclic graph with power. Further, if the dean of the School of Chemical Engineering agrees with the above scoring situation, the responsibility will be sealed in a directed acyclic graph.
  • the method of displaying through the weighted directed acyclic graph can be displayed by different colors, such as dark red indicates that the evaluation result is excellent positions and related personnel; red indicates that the evaluation result is good positions and related personnel; light red indicates Posts and related personnel with poor evaluation results.
  • the evaluation result is directly displayed through the directed acyclic graph, so that the user can intuitively understand the evaluation result.
  • the display mode is not limited to the mode mentioned in this embodiment.
  • This embodiment realizes the management of the responsibility items and the responsibility process through a directed acyclic graph, which facilitates the accountability of positions and personnel for responsible events; this embodiment passes the evaluation results through the directed The acyclic graph is displayed directly, allowing users to intuitively understand the evaluation results.
  • This embodiment provides a responsibility management method based on a directed acyclic graph, which differs from the third embodiment in:
  • This embodiment takes the school security office as an example for specific description. Examples include positions: Director of School Security Office, Deputy Director of School Security Office, Chief of Fire Department of School Security Office.
  • association number in Table 3 is associated with the job responsibilities serial number and task number of number 0101.
  • association number in Table 4 is associated with the job responsibilities serial number and task number of 0102.
  • the posts are numbered, the post responsibilities are generated through the posts, the post responsibilities are generated into the post responsibilities list item, and the related supervisory posts are generated according to the post. If the position is the deputy director of the school security department, the supervisory position is the director of the school security department.
  • multiple groups of directed acyclic graphs can be formed.
  • the number of the post is taken as the vertex of the directed acyclic graph
  • the directional relationship between the responsibilities of the post is taken as the number of connected vertices in the directed acyclic graph. All-in-one directions create a job responsibility management method that is convenient for management and accountability.
  • job responsibilities the serial number of job responsibilities is regarded as the apex of a directed acyclic graph, and the directional relationship between job responsibilities is regarded as several directed edges connecting vertices in a directed acyclic graph, which is easy to manage and accountable. Management method of job responsibility.
  • take the job responsibility task as an example, take the task number as the apex of the directed acyclic graph, and regard the directional relationship between the job responsibilities and tasks as several directed edges connecting the vertices in the directed acyclic graph, which is easy to manage and hold accountable.
  • Management method of job responsibility In practical applications, a post responsibility management method that is convenient for management and accountability can be generated according to actual needs.
  • the job responsibility is executed according to the job responsibility data, and the execution result is generated; the execution result is evaluated according to the job responsibility management method.
  • the executed post responsibilities are evaluated, an evaluation result is generated, and the evaluation result is displayed through a weighted directed acyclic graph.
  • the specific display method can be displayed by different colors. For example, dark red means posts and related personnel with excellent evaluation results; red means posts and related personnel with good evaluation results; light red means posts and related personnel with poor evaluation results .
  • the evaluation result is directly displayed through the directed acyclic graph, so that the user can intuitively understand the evaluation result.
  • the display mode is not limited to the mode mentioned in this embodiment.
  • This embodiment realizes the management of the responsibility items and the responsibility process through a directed acyclic graph, which facilitates the accountability of positions and personnel for responsible events; this embodiment passes the evaluation results through the directed The acyclic graph is displayed directly, allowing users to intuitively understand the evaluation results.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

本发明公开了一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，S11.获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单；S12.将所述岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；S13.基于所述有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。实现了上下级岗位的责任清单之间的关联关系，从而实现了上级对下级责任的有效监管，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责。

Description

一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法 技术领域
本发明涉及责任管理的领域，尤其涉及一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法。
背景技术
责任是一种责任和任务。身处社会的个体成员必须遵守的规则和条文，带有强制性。它伴随着人类社会的出现而出现，有社会就有责任。责任感是衡量一个人精神素质的重要指标。责任产生于社会关系中的相互承诺。在社会的舞台上，每种角色往往意味着一种责任。当我们在承担一项责任的时候，要付出一定的代价，但也意味着获得回报的权利。
责任就是担当，就是付出。责任是分内应做的事情。也就是承担应当承担的任务，完成应当完成的使命，做好应当做好的工作。责任感是衡量一个人精神素质的重要指标。责任按照其内在的属性可以分为：角色责任、能力责任、义务责任和原因责任。角色责任指相同角色共性的责任范畴，可以简单理解为“在角色共性规则下应该做、必须做的事情”；能力责任指的是，超出共性角色责任要求的责任表现，具有明显的评价性，可以理解为“努力并结合能力做的事情”；义务责任指的是，没有在角色责任限定范围的责任，可以理解为“可做、可不做的事情”；原因责任指的是，原因直接导致的责任，由于存在各种原因，这些原因可以承担相应的角色责任、能力责任和义务责任。
责任是权责利为核心的管理中重要的环节，责任管理需要精细化管理才能有效果。例如，将岗位的责任清单分为：主体责任、监管责任和领导责任，上述各种责任之间有相互联系，可如何确保责任设计时责任清单间的关系清晰，便于事件的责任追究,被监管的责任数据是否到位，从而判断是不是监管不力造成的。
目前只有对责任清单和过程数据的结构化管理，并未找到其他有效的管理方式，如：公开号为CN109102172A的专利公开了一种基于城市管理的责任单位评价方法和***，包括：获取所有责任单位的基础案件数据；根据基础案件 数据计算量评价指标、质评价指标、效率评价指标和基准评价指标；设置指标权重，并根据指标权重、量评价指标、质评价指标、效率评价指标和基准评价指标计算综合评价得分以对责任单位进行城市管理绩效评价。本发明从城市基础管理的角度出发，应用模糊层次分析法对城市管理进行各项评估，确定各项评价指标的权重，从而得到相对准确的绩效评估结果，实现了对城市管理的责任单位多角度、全方位公正客观的评价，为城市管理指明了新方向。
但是上述专利还是很难理清楚各责任之间的关系，这样导致岗位间责任关系比较模糊，无法对岗位、人员进行追责。
发明内容
本发明的目的是针对现有技术的缺陷，提供了一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，实现了责任之间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责。为了实现以上目的，本发明采用以下技术方案：
一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，包括：
S1.获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单；
S2.将所述岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；
S3.基于所述有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。
进一步的，所述步骤S1还包括：
所述岗位责任清单包括岗位责任节点。
进一步的，步骤S2具体包括：将所述岗位责任节点作为有向无环图中的若干顶点，将岗位责任节点间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边；一个岗位责任节点与一个有向无环图顶点对应。
进一步的，所述步骤S1之后还包括步骤：
修改所述岗位责任清单；
和/或新增所述岗位责任清单。进一步的，同一岗位对应一种或多种岗位责任。
进一步的，其特征在于，还包括步骤：
S4.根据所述岗位责任管理方式，获取岗位责任数据；
S5.根据所述岗位责任数据执行岗位责任。
进一步的，所述岗位责任数据包括时间、岗位、地点、任务。
进一步的，所述步骤S5之后包括：
执行所述岗位责任，生成执行结果；根据所述岗位责任管理方式，对所述执行结果进行评估。
进一步的，对所述执行结果进行评估，生成评估结果，将所述评估结果通过带权的有向无环图显示。
进一步的，所述责任是通过人和/或智能机器人执行完成。
与现有技术相比，实现了上下级岗位的责任清单之间的关联关系，从而实现了上级对下级责任的有效监管，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责。
附图说明
图1是实施例一提供的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法的流程图；
图2是实施例二提供的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法的流程图。
具体实施方式
以下通过特定的具体实例说明本发明的实施方式，本领域技术人员可由本说明书所揭露的内容轻易地了解本发明的其他优点与功效。本发明还可以通过另外不同的具体实施方式加以实施或应用，本说明书中的各项细节也可以基于不同观点与应用，在没有背离本发明的精神下进行各种修饰或改变。需说明的是，在不冲突的情况下，以下实施例及实施例中的特征可以相互组合。
本发明的目的是针对现有技术的缺陷，提供了一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，实现了责任之间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责。
实施例一
本实施例提供一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，如图1所示，包括步骤：
S11.获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单；
S12.将所述岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；
S13.基于所述有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。
其中，责任是通过人和/或智能机器人执行完成。
在本实施中，责任通过人执行完成。
在步骤S11中，获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单，其中，同一岗位对应一种或多种岗位责任。
步骤S11后还包括步骤：修改所述岗位责任清单；和/或新增所述岗位责任清单。
在步骤S12中，将岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；其中，岗位责任清单包括岗位责任节点。
具体为，将岗位责任节点作为有向无环图中的若干顶点，将岗位责任节点间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边。其中，一个岗位责任节点与一个有向无环图顶点对应。
在步骤S13中，基于有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。具体为，根据步骤S12形成的岗位责任管理的有向无环图，以生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。
本实施例通过岗位责任清单，生成了有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式，实现了对责任的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理。
实施例二
本实施例提供一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，如图2所示，包括步骤：
S11.获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单；
S12.将所述岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；
S13.基于所述有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式；
S14.根据所述岗位责任管理方式，获取岗位责任数据；
S15.根据所述岗位责任数据执行岗位责任。
其中，责任是通过人和/或智能机器人执行完成。
在本实施中，责任通过人执行完成。
在步骤S11中，获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单，其中，同一岗位对应一种或多种岗位责任。
步骤S11后还包括步骤：修改所述岗位责任清单；和/或新增所述岗位责 任清单。
在步骤S12中，将岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；其中，岗位责任清单包括岗位责任节点。
具体为，将岗位责任节点作为有向无环图中的若干顶点，将岗位责任节点间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边。其中，一个岗位责任节点与一个有向无环图顶点对应。
在步骤S13中，基于有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。具体为，根据步骤S12形成的岗位责任管理的有向无环图，以生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。
在步骤S14中，根据岗位责任管理方式，获取岗位责任数据。
具体为，当生成岗位责任管理的方式后，根据岗位责任管理方式，对获取岗位相对应的岗位责任数据，其中，岗位责任数据包括时间、岗位、地点、任务。各岗位责任人通过岗位责任设定
在步骤S15中，根据岗位责任数据执行岗位责任。
具体为，当工作人员获取到岗位责任数据后执行相关的岗位责任。
步骤S15后还包括：
执行岗位责任，生成执行结果；根据岗位责任管理方式，对执行结果进行评估。
具体为，当发生责任事故时，可根据岗位责任管理方式对相关人员进行追责。例如，监管人员查看到有责任事故时，对责任相关的岗位及工作人员追责；或当发生责任事故时，对相关的岗位及工作人员、相关的监管人员追责。
在本实施例中，对所述执行结果进行评估，生成评估结果，将所述评估结果通过带权的有向无环图显示。
具体的，显示方式可通过颜色的不同来显示，如深红色表示评估结果为优秀的岗位及相关人员；红色表示评估结果为良好的岗位及相关人员；浅红色表示评估结果为差的岗位及相关人员。将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
需要说明的，显示的方式不仅局限于本实施例中所提到的方式。
本实施例通过有向无环图的方式，实现了对责任项间的管理，也实现了责 任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责；本实施例将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
实施例三
本实施例提供一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，如图2所示，包括步骤：
S11.获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单；
S12.将所述岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；
S13.基于所述有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式；
S14.根据所述岗位责任管理方式，获取岗位责任数据；
S15.根据所述岗位责任数据执行岗位责任。
其中，责任是通过人和/或智能机器人执行完成。
在本实施中，责任通过人执行完成。
在步骤S11中，获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单，其中，同一岗位对应一种或多种岗位责任。
在本实施例中，以学校管理为例具体说明。例如有以下岗位：
(1)分管校领导：李副校长；
(2)保卫处处长：林处长；
(3)消防科科长：朱科长；
(4)化工学院院长：陈院长；
(5)化工学院安全员：吕主任、张主任；
(6)有机化工研究所所长：严所长；
(7)有机化工研究所安全员：张安全
(8)化工大楼消防值班人员：早班值1、中班值2、晚班值3；
(9)化工大楼消防巡逻员：早班巡1、中班巡2、晚班巡3。
其中，在化工大楼中：1楼是实验室；2楼是有机化工研究所；3楼是化工材料研究所；4楼是严所长的办公区域；5楼是行政。
在本实施中，岗位责任清单如表1：
其中，同一岗位对应一种或多种岗位责任。
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000001
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000002
表1
在本实施例中，对岗位进行编号，通过岗位产生岗位责任，将岗位责任生 成岗位责任清单项,并根据岗位生成相关联的监管岗位。
在实际工作中，包括一人对应多岗位或一个岗位对应多个人，因此，可根据实际情况对岗位安排相对应的人员，如消防巡逻员，岗位人员包括张三、李四、王五；其中，张三的工作时间为早班，负责对化工大楼巡逻；李四的工作时间为午班，负责对化工大楼巡逻；王五的工作时间为晚班，负责对化工大楼巡逻。又如消防巡逻员，岗位人员包括张三、李四、王五；其中，张三、李四、王五的工作时间为全天，其中张三负责对化工大楼1-2楼巡逻；李四负责对化工大楼3-4楼巡逻；王五负责对化工大楼5楼巡逻。需要说明的是，对于人员的安排根据实际情况而定。
步骤S11后还包括步骤：修改所述岗位责任清单；和/或新增所述岗位责任清单。
在本实施例中，若化工安全员2的责任发生了变化，则修改化工安全员2的责任清单项。
在本实施例中，若新增岗位和/或新增责任，则在岗位责任清单中添加所要新增的内容。
在步骤S12中，将岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；其中，岗位责任清单包括岗位责任节点。
具体为，将岗位责任节点作为有向无环图中的若干顶点，将岗位责任节点间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边。其中，一个岗位责任节点与一个有向无环图顶点对应。
在本实施例中，岗位责任节点以编号表示，编号间的指向关系为岗位监管指向关系，如图a：
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000003
图a
在本实施例中，如：编号0101监管编号0201的岗位责任；具体为，岗位为分管校领导监管岗位为保卫处处长的岗位责任。通过步骤S11中的岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列，形成岗位责任管理的有向无环图。
在步骤S13中，基于有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。具体为，根据步骤S12形成的岗位责任管理的有向无环图，以生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。
在实际应用中，通过有向无环图的方式，实现了对责任项之间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责。
在步骤S14中，根据岗位责任管理方式，获取岗位责任数据。
具体为，当生成岗位责任管理的方式后，根据岗位责任管理方式，对获取岗位相对应的岗位责任数据，其中，岗位责任数据包括时间、岗位、地点、任务。各岗位责任人通过岗位责任设定。
在本实施例中，例如，获取到的岗位责任数据：岗位为化工大楼消防巡逻员；岗位责任为接收报警调度处理，现场确认；时间为早班，地点为化工大楼1-5楼。
在步骤S15中，根据岗位责任数据执行岗位责任。
具体为，当工作人员获取到岗位责任数据后执行相关的岗位责任。
步骤S15后还包括：
执行岗位责任，生成执行结果；根据岗位责任管理方式，对执行结果进行评估。
具体为，当发生责任事故时，可根据岗位责任管理方式对相关人员进行追责。例如，监管人员查看到有责任事故时，对责任相关的岗位及工作人员追责；或当发生责任事故时，对相关的岗位及工作人员、相关的监管人员追责。
在本实施例中，例如，化工大楼消防巡逻员1执行完成岗位工作后，其监管人员有机化工研究所所长、化工学院安全员1、化工大楼消防值班人员发现仍有问题存在，则根据岗位责任管理的有向无环图生成的岗位责任管理方式对化工大楼消防巡逻员1进行追责；或化工学院院长发现化工大楼消防巡逻员1处理的问题仍未得到解决，则对化工大楼消防巡逻员1及其监管人员有机化工研究所所长、化工学院安全员1、化工大楼消防值班人员进行追责。
在本实施例中，对所述执行结果进行评估，生成评估结果，将所述评估结果通过带权的有向无环图显示。
具体的，显示方式可通过颜色的不同来显示，如深红色表示评估结果为优秀的岗位及相关人员；红色表示评估结果为良好的岗位及相关人员；浅红色表示评估结果为差的岗位及相关人员。将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
在本实施例中，如对化工大楼消防巡逻员1的评估结果为差，则在有向无环图中化工大楼消防巡逻员1所在的位置用浅红色显示。
需要说明的，显示的方式不仅局限于本实施例中所提到的方式。
本实施例通过有向无环图的方式，实现了对责任项间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责；本实施例将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
实施例四
本实施例提供一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法与实施例三的不同之处在于：
本实施中责任通过智能机器人执行完成。
本实施例采用智能机器人代替人来完成相应的岗位责任，实现了全程智能化的流程，实现了对责任项间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行追责。
实施例五
本实施例提供一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法与实施例三的不同之处在于：
本实施例以实际事件说明评估情况。
需要说明的是，本实施例中的序号、责任、关联与实施例三相对应。
具体评估方式如表2：
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000004
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000005
表2
需要说明的是，本实施例的操作均在***中完成。
在本实施例中，化工大楼消防巡逻员2在不同的时间段内执行巡查任务，且将巡查结果提交；有机化工研究所安全员执行每周检查的任务，发现存在问题，将发现的问题提交；化工学院安全员1针对化工大楼消防巡逻员2，对化工大楼消防巡逻员2评分，评分结果为扣3分，对有机化工研究所安全员评分，评分结果为不扣分，并将评分结果提交；有机化工研究所所长同意化工学院安全员1的评分结果，对有机化工研究所安全员不扣分，对化工大楼消防巡逻员2扣3分，并将结果提交。***自动检查并记录，将评估结果形成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式，且将生成评估结果通过带权的有向无环图显示。进一步，化工学院院长若同意以上打分情况，则将责任封存于有向无环图中。
其中，通过带权的有向无环图显示的方式可通过颜色不同来显示，如深红色表示评估结果为优秀的岗位及相关人员；红色表示评估结果为良好的岗位及相关人员；浅红色表示评估结果为差的岗位及相关人员。将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
在本实施例中，如化工大楼消防巡逻员2被扣3分，其评估结果为若为差，则在有向无环图中化工大楼消防巡逻员2所在的位置用浅红色显示。
需要说明的，显示的方式不仅局限于本实施例中所提到的方式。
本实施例通过有向无环图的方式，实现了对责任项间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责；本实施例将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
实施例六
本实施例提供一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法与实施例三的不同之处在于：
本实施例以学校保卫处为例具体说明。例如包括岗位：学校保卫处处长、学校保卫处副处长、学校保卫处消防科科长。
在本实施中，学校保卫处处长(编号0101)的岗位责任清单如表3：
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000006
表3
学校保卫处副处长(编号0102)的岗位责任清单如表4：
值得注意的是，在表3中关联编号是与编号0101的岗位职责序号与任务编号关联的。
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000007
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000008
表4
学校保卫处消防科科长(编号0110)的岗位责任清单如表5：
值得注意的是，在表4中关联编号是与编号0102的岗位职责序号与任务编号关联的。
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000009
Figure PCTCN2019084453-appb-000010
表5
在本实施例中，对岗位进行编号，通过岗位产生岗位责任，将岗位责任生成岗位责任清单项,并根据岗位生成相关联的监管岗位。如岗位为学校保卫处副处长，其监管岗位为学校保卫处处长。
将岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列。
本实施例可形成多组有向无环图，如根据岗位为例，将岗位的编号作为有向无环图的顶点，将岗位责任间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边，生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。如根据岗位职责为例， 将岗位职责的序号作为有向无环图的顶点，将岗位职责间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边，生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。如根据岗位职责任务为例，将任务编号作为有向无环图的顶点，将岗位职责任务间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边，生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。在实际应用中，可根据实际需要生成便于管理和追责的岗位责任管理方式。
在本实施例中，根据岗位责任数据执行岗位责任，并生成执行结果；根据岗位责任管理方式，对执行结果进行评估。
在本实施例中，对所述执行的岗位责任进行评估，生成评估结果，将所述评估结果通过带权的有向无环图显示。
具体的显示方式可通过颜色的不同来显示，如深红色表示评估结果为优秀的岗位及相关人员；红色表示评估结果为良好的岗位及相关人员；浅红色表示评估结果为差的岗位及相关人员。将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
需要说明的，显示的方式不仅局限于本实施例中所提到的方式。
本实施例通过有向无环图的方式，实现了对责任项间的管理，也实现了责任过程的管理，方便对责任事件进行岗位、人员的追责；本实施例将评估结果通过有向无环图直接显示出来，使用户直观的了解到评估的结果。
本文中所描述的具体实施例仅仅是对本发明精神作举例说明。本发明所属技术领域的技术人员可以对所描述的具体实施例做各种各样的修改或补充或采用类似的方式替代，但并不会偏离本发明的精神或者超越所附权利要求书所定义的范围。

Claims (10)

  1. 一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，包括：
    S1.获取岗位相对应的岗位责任清单；
    S2.将所述岗位责任清单根据有向无环图拓扑排列；
    S3.基于所述有向无环图生成岗位责任管理方式。
  2. 根据权利要求1所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，所述步骤S1还包括：
    所述岗位责任清单包括岗位责任节点。
  3. 根据权利要求2所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，步骤S2具体包括：将所述岗位责任节点作为有向无环图中的若干顶点，将岗位责任节点间的指向关系作为有向无环图中连接顶点的若干条有向边；一个岗位责任节点与一个有向无环图顶点对应。
  4. 根据权利要求3所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，所述步骤S1之后还包括步骤：
    修改所述岗位责任清单；
    和/或新增所述岗位责任清单。
  5. 根据权利要求4所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，同一岗位对应一种或多种岗位责任。
  6. 根据权利要求1-5任一项所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，还包括步骤：
    S4.根据所述岗位责任管理方式，获取岗位责任数据；
    S5.根据所述岗位责任数据执行岗位责任。
  7. 根据权利要求6所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，所述岗位责任数据包括时间、岗位、地点、任务。
  8. 根据权利要求6所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，所述步骤S5之后包括：
    执行所述岗位责任，生成执行结果；根据所述岗位责任管理方式，对所述执行结果进行评估。
  9. 根据权利要求8所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，对所述执行结果进行评估，生成评估结果，将所述评估结果通过带权的 有向无环图显示。
  10. 根据权利要求9所述的一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法，其特征在于，所述责任是通过人和/或智能机器人执行完成。
PCT/CN2019/084453 2019-04-16 2019-04-26 一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法 WO2020211111A1 (zh)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910302042.3 2019-04-16
CN201910302042.3A CN110222917A (zh) 2019-04-16 2019-04-16 一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020211111A1 true WO2020211111A1 (zh) 2020-10-22

Family

ID=67822544

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2019/084453 WO2020211111A1 (zh) 2019-04-16 2019-04-26 一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110222917A (zh)
WO (1) WO2020211111A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111291992A (zh) * 2020-02-10 2020-06-16 杭州全视软件有限公司 一种基于终端的快速问责方法及***
CN111507613A (zh) * 2020-04-15 2020-08-07 杭州全视软件有限公司 一种基于责任的无漏洞的管理***及方法
CN111754089A (zh) * 2020-06-08 2020-10-09 杭州全视软件有限公司 一种岗位责任清单生成、调整的***及方法
CN113537690A (zh) * 2021-04-25 2021-10-22 杭州全视软件有限公司 一种新型责任分级评估***及方法
CN117151868B (zh) * 2023-10-25 2024-01-26 四川智筹科技有限公司 一种基于ai的分布式智能分案引擎的实现方法

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1674019A (zh) * 2004-12-29 2005-09-28 江苏省金思维信息技术有限公司 一种用于企业管理建模的原子任务方法
US20060106626A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Jun-Jang Jeng Method and apparatus of model driven business solution monitoring and control
US7908163B2 (en) * 2005-07-15 2011-03-15 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama Method and system for parallel scheduling of complex dags under uncertainty
CN102541875A (zh) * 2010-12-16 2012-07-04 北京大学 有向无环图的关系型节点数据的存取方法、装置及***
CN107480945A (zh) * 2017-08-10 2017-12-15 杭州全视软件有限公司 一种责任的区块链管理方法
CN107705001A (zh) * 2017-09-19 2018-02-16 西南交通大学 一种流域突发污染事故信息链建立的方法

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060106626A1 (en) * 2004-11-16 2006-05-18 Jun-Jang Jeng Method and apparatus of model driven business solution monitoring and control
CN1674019A (zh) * 2004-12-29 2005-09-28 江苏省金思维信息技术有限公司 一种用于企业管理建模的原子任务方法
US7908163B2 (en) * 2005-07-15 2011-03-15 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama Method and system for parallel scheduling of complex dags under uncertainty
CN102541875A (zh) * 2010-12-16 2012-07-04 北京大学 有向无环图的关系型节点数据的存取方法、装置及***
CN107480945A (zh) * 2017-08-10 2017-12-15 杭州全视软件有限公司 一种责任的区块链管理方法
CN107705001A (zh) * 2017-09-19 2018-02-16 西南交通大学 一种流域突发污染事故信息链建立的方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110222917A (zh) 2019-09-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2020211111A1 (zh) 一种基于有向无环图的责任管理方法
Cohen Defining and measuring effectiveness in public management
Fawcett et al. Some promising dimensions for behavioral community technology
Wernham Obstacles To Strategy Implementation In A Nationalized Industry [1]
CN102521685A (zh) 一种电子监察***
CN102521663A (zh) 一种电子监察方法
Morse et al. Regulation and control in hierarchical organizations
Al-Bayati et al. PPE non-compliance among construction workers: An assessment of contributing factors utilizing fuzzy theory
Yang et al. Analysis of factors influencing public employees' work cognition under a public health crisis: A survey of China's response to COVID-19
Covello Message mapping, risk and crisis communication
Holton et al. Locational process: Guidelines for locating mental health services
Jing et al. The Case of China: The Societal Impact of the “Whole of Government Approach”
Li Construction of university fire safety facilities management information system based on WebGis
CN111861284A (zh) 一种社会治理单元风险评估及预警方法
Costa et al. Guidelines for conception, implementation and use of performance measurement systems in construction companies
Campbell et al. Understanding the impact of a community-led HIV prevention program in South Africa: context, conceptual framework and methodology
Cao et al. Emergency crisis management
Jaya et al. Challenges of public administration reform in the industrial age 4.0
Parllaku et al. A critical review of the perception, awareness and implementation of the level 2 building information modelling (BIM) requirements by the UK AEC industry
Wang et al. The Case of China
Wang et al. Ability evaluation method of network security talents in power industry based on artificial intelligence
Li Optimal matching of urban emergency resources under major public health events by multi-expert decision model of grey situations
Rendall et al. Using quality circles in the health service
Savas Organizational strategy, performance, and management technology
Comfort et al. Designing and emergency information system: the Pittsburgh experience

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19925476

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19925476

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1