LARGE-SCALE SYNTHESIS OF SINGLE-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES BY GROUP VIIIB CATALYSTS PROMOTED BY GROUP VIB METALS
This application is related to U.S. Provisional Patent
Application Serial No. 60/330,805, filed October 31, 2001, entitled "Large-scale synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes over MoOx-promoted Co/ gO and Fe/MgO catalysts", the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to the synthesis of single- walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), and to catalysts used in their synthesis.
Background of the Invention
Since carbon nanotubes were discovered by Iijiraa [Nature, 354 (1991) 56] , many studies on their synthesis and applications have been engaged in world-wide, due to their interesting characteristics, such as their unique electrical and mechanical properties [ Yakobson et al . , Am . Scl . 85 (1997) 324] . In other studies, a single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) was shown to be either metallic or semiconducting depending on its helicity and diameter [Hamada et al . , Phys . Rev. Lett . 68 (1992) 1579; Wildoer et al . r Na ture 391 (1998) 59] , a property which may lead to promising applications in molecular electronic devices. Having the highest Young's modulus and tensile strength among all known materials also makes carbon nanotubes ideal components for high strength composite materials [ Treacy et al . , Nature 381 (1996) 678; Wong et al . , Science 277 (1997) 1971 ] . In addition, it has been reported that SWNTs display
unusual hydrogen storage ability [Ye et al. , Appl. Phys . Lett. 74 (1999) 2307; Liu et al., Science 286 (1999) 1127] .
Three techniques have been employed for the synthesis of SWNTs: A) arc discharge between two graphite electrodes [Iijima et al., Nature 363 (1993) 603], B) laser ablation of a graphite target [Guo et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 243 (1995) 49] and C) catalytic decomposition of carbon-containing materials, such as carbon monoxide or hydrocarbons, over metal catalysts [Kong et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 292 (1998) 4] . Although the first two methods can produce high quality SWNTs, the quantities produced from both arc discharge and laser ablation are limited, and the associated production costs are high. Future industrial applications of SWNTs, such as hydrogen storage, will necessitate SWNTs in tens of grams, and even kilogram scale. Therefore, the catalytic method may be the best choice for the large-scale production of SWNTs as this method is known to successfully yield multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) in large-scale quantities [Tennent et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,578,584] . However, it is more difficult to produce high quality SWNTs with high yields using the catalytic route. Dai et al. [Chem. Phys. Lett. 260 (1996) 471] were first to report the synthesis of isolated single wall nanotubes from CO decomposition on Mo/Al203 nanoparticles and Peigney et al. [J. Mater. Res. 12 (1997) 613] subsequently produced a mixture of SWNTs and MWNTs by the decomposition of H2/CH4 on Fe/Al203 nano-co posites. SWNTs were also prepared by catalytic decomposition of benzene [Cheng et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 (1998) 3282] or ethylene [Hafnet et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 296 (1998) 195; Flahaut et al., Chem Phys. Lett. 300 (1999) 236] .
More recently, the synthesis of bulk amounts of high quality , SWNTs has been pursued by the decomposition of CH4 over
Fe/Mo/Si02-Al203 hybrid catalysts [ Cassell et al . , J. Phys . Chem . B 103 (1999) 6484] , aerogel Al03-supported Fe/Mo catalysts [Su et al . , Chem. Phys. Lett. 322 (2000) 321] and MxMgi_xO ( =Co, Fe) catalysts [ Colomer et al , Chem . Phys . Lett . 31 7 (2000) 83; Bacsa et al . , Chem . Phys . Lett. 323 (2000) 566] , and CO decomposition has been pursued using Co/Mo/Si02 catalysts [Ki tiyanan et al . , Chem . Phys . Lett . 31 7 (2000) 497] . As revealed in these studies, the quality and yield of SWNTs are very sensitive to catalyst supports, metal loading and reaction conditions. Among the various supports, MgO possesses the advantage of being easily removed. Flow rates as high as 6000 cm3/min for CH4 were used by Cassell et al . although it was not emphasized whether it was a key factor for their synthesis of SWNTs. Bacsa et al. adopted a moderate total flow rate of H2/CH4 (250 cm3/min) , but the yield of SWNTs was low.
Summary of the Invention
Single-walled carbon nanotubes or a mixture of single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes with high BET surface areas can be produced in accordance with the present invention. The invention also pertains to catalyst preparation and to the controlled growth of SWNTs by variations in catalyst composition.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for the synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes, which comprises contacting a carbon containing material with a catalyst comprising at least two transition metals and a support, wherein at least one transition metal is a group VIIIB element and at least one transition metal is a group VIB element.
Preferably, SWNTs are either prepared in a single step process or in a two-step process. In the single step
process, SWNTs are prepared by passing a gaseous mixture of a carbon-containing compound and of a reducing compound, at elevated temperature, over a catalyst comprising a group VIIIB metal, a group VIB metal and a support. Examples of suitable supports include MgO, Si02, Si02/Al2θ3, A1203, and aerogel A1203, of which MgO is preferred. The preferred VIIIB metals are Co, Fe and Ni . Of the VIB metals Cr, Mo and W, Mo is preferred. In the two-step process, the same catalyst is contacted with the reducing agent without a carbon-containing compound being present, and the reduced catalyst is contacted with the carbon-containing compound in a second, separate step.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 displays the schematic diagram of a fixed-bed reactor. Identification number 1 represents the entry flow of the carbon containing compound and of the gaseous reducing compound, for example CH4 and H2; 2 is the reactor tube; 3 is the catalyst; 4 is the furnace and 5 is the exit flow.
Figure 2 displays the Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) curves of the raw carbon nanotubes in 10% 02/Ar, synthesized on catalysts, (a) Coo.05Mgo.95O (comparative); (b) Moo.01Coo.05Mgo.94O; (c) Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O; (d) Moo.05Coo.05Mgo.9O
Figure 3 displays the Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR) spectra of MoxCoyMgι_x-y0 catalysts, (a) C00.05M00.95O (comparative) ; (b) Moo.01Mgo.99O (comparative) ; (c) O0.0iCO0.05 g0.94O ; ( d) Mθo . θ25Cθo . θ5Mgo .9250
Figure 4 displays the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images of roughly purified nanotubes synthesised on MoxCoyMgι_ x-yO catalysts. The images of Figure 4 display the effect that varying the catalyst has on the nanotubes formed. The scale is 100 nm/cm (a) Coo.05Mgo.95O (comparative); (b) and (c)
Moo.01Coo.05Mgo.94O; (d) and (e) Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O; (f) Moo.05Coo.05Mgo.9O; (g) Moo.075Coo.05Mgo.875O; (h) Moo.035Coo.07Mgo.895O
Figure 5 displays the low frequency Raman spectra of roughly purified materials synthesized on MoxCoyMgι_x_yO catalysts, (a) Coo.05Mgo.95O (comparative) ; (b) Moo.01Coo.05Mgo.94O; (c)
Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O; (d) Moo.05Coo.05Mgo.9O; (e) Moo.075Coo.05Mgo.375O; (f) Moo.035Coo.07Mgo.895O
Figure 6 displays the Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images of roughly purified materials synthesized on MoxFeyMgι_ x-yO catalysts. The scale is 100 nm/cm. (a) Feo.05Mgo.95O (comparative) ; (b) and (c) Moo.01Feo.05Mgo.094O; (d) Moo.025Feo.05Mgo.925O; (e) Moo.05Feo.05Mgo.09O
Figure 7 displays the low frequency Raman spectra of roughly purified materials synthesized on MoxFeyMgι-x_yO catalysts. (a) Feo.05Mgo.95O (comparative) and (b) Moo.01Feo.05Mgo.094O
Detailed Description of the Invention
Preparation of the single-wall carbon nanotubes
SWNTs are prepared by heating the catalyst, for example in an amount of from about 0.2 to 0.5g, which is preferably in powder form, under a flow of a gaseous mixture comprising one or more carbon containing compounds and, optionally, one or more reducing compounds, such as hydrogen or formaldehyde. The carbon containing compound and the reducing compounds are preferably present in a molar ratio of from 8:1 to 1:4 and total flow rate of the gaseous mixture is preferably about 250 cm3/min. Flow can be controlled by the use of flowmeters. Carbon nanotubes start growing as soon as the group VIIIB metal is reduced. The concentration of the reducing gaseous compound in the total feed gas is preferably at least 5%, more preferably at least 10% and most preferably at least 20%. There is no upper
limit to the concentration of the reducing gaseous compound as long as carbon-containing compounds still remain in the reactor. Preferably, the furnace temperature is linearly increased up to between 1198K and 1373K, at a rate between 1 and 40 K per minute. More preferably, the catalyst is heated to about 1273K at rate of about 5K/min. The reactor is held at the final temperature for 2 min. Subsequently, the flow of the gaseous mixture is stopped, and the resulting nanotube/catalyst product is optionally cooled down in a flow or under an atmosphere of an inert, oxygen- free gas, for example H2.
It is also possible to reduce the salts to form the catalyst before the catalyst is used in the production of SWNTs. This can be done by passing a reducing gas such as H2 or H2CO over the heated catalyst. Thereafter, nanotubes can be made by passing a carbon-containing gas over the heated catalyst without added hydrogen. This embodiment is less preferred, however, as the ratio of the desired SWNTs to MWNTs decreases .
The carbon source used for catalytic decomposition to form SWNTs can be selected from any organic carbon containing compounds, or certain oxides of carbons, that are in the gas phase under the reaction conditions. Preferably used are aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, oxygen containing hydrocarbons and mixtures thereof. The carbon source can be either saturated or unsaturated. Examples of appropriate carbon sources include methane, ethane, propane, butane, benzene, butene, cyclohexane, ethylene, acetylene, and carbon monoxide, of which methane is preferred.
Once the SWNT production is complete, acid can be used to remove the catalyst particles from the SWNTs formed. The acid reacts with the metallic catalyst, rendering it soluble. The raw nanotubes are preferably immersed and
stirred in the acid for 5 to 8 hours. The nanotubes can then be filtered, washed with water and dried in an oven. Inorganic acids are preferred. Suitable examples of acids include HN03, HC1, and H2SO4. Preferably, a 65% solution is used.
The growth of nanotubes can be carried out in either a fixed-bed or a fluidised-bed reactor. Both reactor types display similar quality and yield .of SWNTs. A plurality, say two or three or more, of these reactors can be linked in series. A standard reactor is depicted in Figure 1
The quantity of carbon nanotubes can be determined by Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) . The raw material (without acid purification) is calcined in a flow of 10% 02/Ar, with a heating rate of 4K/min. The yield of carbon materials is defined as:
Ycarbon nanotubes = (Wini ial~Wιef ) /Wιθft> 100%
where Winitiai and Wieft are the weight left at 473K and 1073K respectively. Wιβft is taken as the weight of the catalyst after carbon materials are burnt out in 02. As shown in Figure 2, the yield of carbon nanotubes obviously increases with the increase of molybdenum content.
The unrefined SWNTs can also be characterised by TEM, Raman spectrometry and BET surface area analysis.
The presence of the group VIB metal promoter remarkably increased the yield and improved the quality of the SWNTs obtained. The generation rate of SWNTs was raised in some instances at least 10 times and the formation of amorphous carbon was suppressed. There is an optimum content of group VIB and group VIIIB metals, beyond which multi-walled carbon nanotubes are formed. Other transition elements, alone or in mixtures, may also be added to Co/MgO, Fe/MgO or Ni/MgO
catalysts as promoters, in place of or in addition to Mo, to yield SWNTs. Examples include the other two stable group VIB metals, chromium and tungsten.
Preparation of the catalyst
The catalyst is preferably prepared by a wet mechanical mixing followed by combustion synthesis. One or more group VIB metal salts and one or more group VIIIB metal salts are weighed and mixed together with a salt of a catalyst support in the desired molar ratio as in, for example, MoxCoyMgι_x-yO or MoxFeyMgi_x_yO, when Mo is used as the Group VIB metal and Co or Fe are used as the Group VIIIB metal. The molar ratio of group VIIIB metal to group VIB metal is preferably in the range of 5:1 To 2:3, and the ratio of group VIIIB metal to catalyst support is preferably in the range of 1:10 to 1:100 Examples of suitable Group VIIIB metal salts include
Co (N03)2.6H20 and Fe (N03) 3.9H20. Examples of suitable Group VIB salts include (NH4) 6Mo024.4H20) , ammonium chromate, ammonium tungstate, ammonium heptamolybdate, and chromium nitrate. (Mg (N03) 2.6H20 is preferred as catalyst support salt. A swelling agent, for example citric acid or urea, and several drops of distilled water, whose amount depended on the weight of the mixture, can be added. Preferably, 2 to 3 ml of water is added per 10 grams of catalyst. The mixture is ground until it is uniform and it is then heated between 673 and 973K for a period of up to 10 minutes. The combustion synthesis is preferentially carried out at 823K for 5 minutes. The mixture is then cooled to room temperature and the obtained foamy material is ground once more to obtain a fine powder of the desire catalyst.
The catalyst can also be prepared without a swelling agent by mechanically mixing a group VIB salt with the salts of the group VIIIB metal and of the support, followed by
addition of water. The remaining steps of the process are then carried out as described above.
Discussion
The combination of Co or Ni with MgO supports in catalysts is advantageous for producing carbon nanotubes. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, this may be due to the easy formation of fine Co or Ni nanoparticles . A solid solution is easily formed between CoO and MgO due to the approximate equality of the radii of Co2+ and Mg2+ ions, which makes the reduction of CoO difficult, as shown in Figure 3a, as CoO is embedded inside the support. In Mo-containing catalysts, molybdenum may aggregate at the edges of the cobalt particles, as revealed in Co-Mo/A1203 catalyst studies by Niemantsverdriet [ Stud. Surf. Sci . Catal . 79 (1993) 387] , which studies were directed to purposes unrelated to the production of SWNTs. This may prevent the complete inlay of Co2+ into Mg2+ lattice and lead to an increase of Co2+ particles available for reduction. The reduction behavior of Mo-Co bimetallic catalysts is complex (Figures 3c and d) . However, the low temperature peak below 873K may be ascribed to the reduction of CoOx and the high temperature peaks to MoOx. It is obvious that with the addition of MoOx, the reduction peak of CoOx became stronger, especially for the Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O catalyst, indicating that more CoOx was reduced to metallic Co. As revealed in Table 1 below, the yield of carbon nanotubes over Coo.05Mgo.95O is only 11% while it reaches 114.3% over Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O.
Table 1: The yields and properties of carbon nanotubes over MoxCθyMgι-x-yO catalysts
The formation of SWNTs was confirmed by TEM image, as shown in Figure 4. Besides SWNT bundles, many individual tubes were also formed. The bundles of these SWNTs are not uniform and tight, compared to those synthesized by arc discharge or laser ablation. This results in the high BET surface areas, such as 685.2 m2/g in the roughly purified sample prepared from Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O, which is higher than that of SWNT samples prepared by laser ablation (285 m2/g) [Ye et al . , Appl . Phys . Lett . 74 (1999) 2307] . The low frequency Raman spectrum found in Figure 5 exhibits unambiguously the
characteristic frequencies of SWNTs, due to the Aιg radial breathing mode. It is interesting to note that the strong peak shifts to higher wavenumber when the Mo content is increased. This reveals that the tube diameter of SWNTs decreases with the increase of Mo content, according to the equation [Alvarez et al . , Chem . Phys . Lett . , 316 (2000) 186] :
v (cm-1) = 6.5 + 232/d (nm) .
The tube diameters calculated are in the range of 1.07-1.25 nm.
It should be mentioned that very few carbon nanotubes were formed over MoxMgι_xO catalysts under our synthesis conditions. The modification of Mo on Co will also isolate the metal Co particles and inhibit the aggregation of metal particles, as exists in other bimetallic catalysts [ Tang et al . , Catal . Lett . 59 (1999) 129] . It has been proposed that large metal particles would be inactive for the formation of SWNTs [ Su et al . , Chem . Phys . Lett . 322 (2000) 321 ] . The addition of appropriate amount of molybdenum to Co/MgO may thus increase the number of metal Co particles suitable for the growth of SWNTs. It is suggested that the SWNTs may be predominantly formed through the "base growth" mechanism, in which metal particles responsible for the nanotube nucleation and growth are attached to the support surfaces. The strong interaction between metal particles and support is thus believed to be beneficial to the growth of SWNTs [Su et al . , Chem . Phys . Lett . 322 (2000) 321 ] . Nevertheless, if the content of molybdenum is elevated too much, it may weaken the interaction between metallic Co and MgO support, and a larger metallic Co particles could easily be formed, leading to the growth of MWNTs. With the increase of cobalt content, the similar case occurred, so more and more MWNTs were formed, as observed by TEM in Figures 4 f) and g) .
Therefore, a limit to Co and Mo content exists for the growth of SWNTs. Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O is a good choice for the synthesis of SWNTs, with both good yield and good selectivity. With lower quality requirements, Moo.035Coo.07Mgo.895O can be used.
For Fe-based (MoxFeyMgι-x-y0) catalysts, the promotion function of Mo to the yield of SWNTs was also exhibited as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 : Yields of carbon nanotubes prepared with MoxFeyMgι-x- yO catalysts
Fewer SWNTs were formed over single Fe-based catalysts as revealed by the TEM and Raman spectra shown in Figures 6 and 7. SWNTs were mainly formed with the addition of small amounts of Mo. However, compared with Mo-Co catalysts, more MWNTs were observed over Mo-Fe catalysts.
Financial advantages
One of the advantages realised by the present synthesis route is that the costs associated with the production of the SWNTs is very low, estimated to be about S$2.5-10.0
(Singapore dollars) per gram of the roughly purified SWNTs.
If the effluent gas is recycled and large-scale reactors are used, it is believed that the cost could be further decreased. Compared with the average prices asked by suppliers -(S$180 per gram of the raw SWNTs and S$1800 per gram of highly purified SWNTs) , this method may be the most economical way to synthesize single-walled carbon nanotubes in large scale, and it should be useful for future industrial applications.
Economical estimation:
Sample Co (N03 ) 2 - 6H20 Mg (N03 ) 2 - 6H2 H24Mo7N5024 - 4H20 Citric
0 Acid
59.3S$
Price 110S$/kg 51.8S$/kg 323.9S$/kg /kg
Gas Methane Hydrogen
Price, 82.3S$/MJ 5.1S$/MJ
According to the above market price of each reagent and gas, we estimated the value of. per gram raw single-walled carbon nanotubes as following:
The price of lg Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O catalyst is S$0.433
The price of gas (methane and hydrogen) in above experiment is about S$1.15
The cost of raw single-walled carbon nanotubes prepared using this catalyst is thus about S$3.8 per gram. After purification, the cost of roughly purification SWNTs is about 7.1 S$/gram.
If the Moo.035Coo.07Mgo.895O catalyst is used to produce SWNTs with a little lower quality, such as in example 6, the cost of raw single-walled carbon nanotubes decreases to 2.7 S$/g. After purification, the cost of roughly purified SWNTs lowers to 4S$/g.
All documents cited or referred to above are to be hereby incorporated by reference.
Examples
The following specific examples are provided to illustrate the invention. It will be understood, however, that the specific details given in each example have been selected for purpose of illustration and are not to be construed as a limitation on the invention.
Example 1
lOg of (Mg(N03)2.6H20, 0.6g of Co (N03) 2.6H20, 0.073g of
(NH) 6Mo704.4H20 and 4g of citric acid were mixed with 2 ml of deionized water. The mixture was stirred, ground until it was uniform and subsequently placed in an oven held at 550°C for about 5 min. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature. A foamy material obtained was ground to a fine powder of Moo.01Coo.05Mgo.94O.
300mg of the Moo.01Coo.05Mgo.94O was placed in the centre of a quartz tube located in a tube furnace. A gas mixture of H2 and CH4 with molar ratio of H2:CH4 (4:1) and a total flow rate of 250 cm3/min was introduced through mass flowmeters. The furnace temperature was linearly increased up to 1000°C at rate of 5°C/min and held at 1000°C for 2 min. Then CH4 was turned off and the sample was cooled down to room temperature in a flow of H2.
Raw carbon nanotubes were obtained and were purified by immersing them in 150ml of 65% HN03 solution. The mixture was stirred for about 8 h to dissolve the catalyst. The solution was then filtered and washed with distilled water several times. It was dried for 6 hours in an oven at 120°C. Roughly purified single-walled carbon nanotubes were obtained. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) of the SWNT sample is shown in Figure 2.
Example 2
lOg of (Mg(N03)2.6H20, 0.614g of Co (N03) 2.6H20, 0.186g of
(NH4) 6Mo7024.4H20 and 4g of citric acid were mixed with 2 ml of de-ionized water. The mixture was stirred, ground until it was uniform, and subsequently placed into an oven held at 550°C for about 5 min. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature. The mixture was ground to a fine powder of Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O. Analysis of the catalyst before the production of nanotubes was made through Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR) , as shown in Figure 3. This information is used to qualify the availability of metal particles in the catalyst that can interact with reactants in the gas phase.
In the TPR who's results are shown in Figure 3, various catalyst samples were pretreated under argon at 973K for 30 minutes and then cooled down to 373K and kept at this temperature. The carrier gas was then replaced by 10%H2+argon mixture and the temperature was increased to 1273K at a rate of lOK/min. A gas chromatograph was used to measure the amount of consumed H2. This analysis displays the reduction of the group VIIIB metal by hydrogen at different temperatures.
Example 3
Following the same procedure of Example 2 and using lOg of (Mg (N03 ) 2 . 6H20, 0 . 887g of Co (N03 ) 2 . 6H20, 0 . 269g of (NH4 ) 6Mθ7θ2 . 4H 0 and 4g of citric acid and , the Moo .035Coo .07 go .895O catalyst was prepared .
Example 4
lOg of (Mg(N03)2.6H20, 0.838g of Fe (N03) 3.9H20, 0.073g of (NH) 6M07O24.4H20 and 4g of citric acid were mixed with about 2 ml of de-ionized water. Through the same procedure as in Example 1, Moo.01Feo.05Mgo.94O catalyst and single-walled carbon nanotubes were obtained.
Example 5
200mg of Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O as prepared in Example 2 was placed in the centre of a horizontal quartz reactor. A gas mixture of H2 and CH4 with a molar ratio of H2:CH4 (4:1) and a total flow rate of 250 cm3/min was introduced through mass flowmeters. The furnace temperature was linearly increased up to 1000°C at a rate of 5°C/min and held at 1000°C for 2 min. Then CH4 was turned off and the sample was cooled down in a flow of H2. About 0.324g of SWNTs were obtained. Tables 1 and 2 display the results obtained when the process above is carried out with various catalysts.
Example 6
Using 200mg of the Moo.035Coo.07Mgo.895O catalyst of Example 3 and following the same procedure of Example 5, 0.46g of raw single-walled carbon nanotubes were produced.
Example 7
Using 200mg of a Moo.025Feo.05Mgo.925O catalyst and following the same procedure of Example 5, 0.354g of raw single-walled carbon nanotubes were obtained.
Example 8
200mg of the Moo.025Coo.05Mgo.925O catalyst of Example 2, was put into the reactor for carbon nanotube fabrication. The flow rates of CH4 and H2 were 50 cm3/min and 200 cm3/min, respectively. The furnace temperature was linearly increased up to 1000°C at rate of 5°C/min and held at 1000°C for 2 min. Then CH4 was turned off and the sample was cooled down in a flow of H2. 0.324g of raw SWNTs were obtained.
Example 9
Other catalysts with different Mo, Co or Fe contents were prepared by the change of the amount of (NH) 6Mθ7θ24.4H20, Co (N03)2.6H20 or Fe (N03) 3.9H20, then following the same procedure in Example 2.
Example 10
Using different AxByMgι_x_y0 (A = Mo, B = Co or Fe) catalysts and following the same procedure of Example 5, single-walled carbon nanotubes can be produced with varying yields. Examples of these are illustrated in Tables 1 and 2