US20140377127A9 - Copper alloy - Google Patents
Copper alloy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140377127A9 US20140377127A9 US14/235,884 US201214235884A US2014377127A9 US 20140377127 A9 US20140377127 A9 US 20140377127A9 US 201214235884 A US201214235884 A US 201214235884A US 2014377127 A9 US2014377127 A9 US 2014377127A9
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- alloy
- layer
- hours
- mpa
- copper
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 229910000881 Cu alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 229910052718 tin Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000000930 thermomechanical effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052738 indium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Substances [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 42
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 45
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 35
- 239000011135 tin Substances 0.000 description 28
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 description 26
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 24
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 23
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 23
- ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tin Chemical compound [Sn] ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 20
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 20
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 19
- 238000005242 forging Methods 0.000 description 16
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 16
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 15
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 12
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000005496 tempering Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 9
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000006101 laboratory sample Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910001297 Zn alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- RSWGJHLUYNHPMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Abietic-Saeure Natural products C12CCC(C(C)C)=CC2=CCC2C1(C)CCCC2(C)C(O)=O RSWGJHLUYNHPMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910000906 Bronze Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 241001275902 Parabramis pekinensis Species 0.000 description 2
- KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-HUOMCSJISA-N Rosin Natural products O(C/C=C/c1ccccc1)[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-HUOMCSJISA-N 0.000 description 2
- YWIHFOITAUYZBJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N [P].[Cu].[Sn] Chemical compound [P].[Cu].[Sn] YWIHFOITAUYZBJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000010974 bronze Substances 0.000 description 2
- KUNSUQLRTQLHQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper tin Chemical compound [Cu].[Sn] KUNSUQLRTQLHQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- TVZPLCNGKSPOJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper zinc Chemical compound [Cu].[Zn] TVZPLCNGKSPOJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000001953 recrystallisation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000679 solder Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005476 soldering Methods 0.000 description 2
- KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N trans-cinnamyl beta-D-glucopyranoside Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OCC=CC1=CC=CC=C1 KHPCPRHQVVSZAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910020900 Sn-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910019314 Sn—Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- UJUAHMSIDCTLHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Zn].[Sn].[Cu].[Fe] Chemical compound [Zn].[Sn].[Cu].[Fe] UJUAHMSIDCTLHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011362 coarse particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C9/00—Alloys based on copper
- C22C9/04—Alloys based on copper with zinc as the next major constituent
Definitions
- the invention relates to a copper alloy according to the preamble of claim 1 .
- Electronic components including terminal contacts, form the foundation of information technology.
- One of the most important considerations in each terminal contact is optimization of the embodiment at the lowest costs.
- Desired properties of an alloy are, for example, high electrical and thermal conductivity and also high stress relaxation resistance and tensile strength.
- copper alloys are used as terminal clamps and also for other electrical and thermal applications, because of the generally outstanding corrosion resistance thereof, the high electrical and thermal conductivity, and the good storage and wear qualities. Copper alloys are also suitable because of the good cold machining or hot machining properties thereof and the good deformation property thereof.
- a copper alloy is known from the publication EP 1 290 234 B1, which already displays a more cost-effective alternative to otherwise typical copper alloys having high electrical conductivity, high tensile strength, and high shaping strength.
- the alloy consists of 13 to 15% zinc, 0.7 to 0.9% tin, 0.7 to 0.9% iron, and a residual balance of copper.
- the zinc having a comparatively low metal value currently on the market, costs can be saved in the base material.
- a copper alloy which has a zinc proportion of at most 15.0%, is known from the patent specification U.S. Pat. No. 3,816,109.
- the iron content is between 1.0 and 2.0%. Using this composition, a comparatively good electrical conductivity is achieved in conjunction with sufficient tensile strength.
- copper-tin-iron-zinc alloys are known from the patent specification U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,528, which have a higher zinc content of up to 35.0%.
- the iron proportion is between 1.6 and 4.0%.
- the addition of iron has the function of achieving grain refinement already after the casting.
- the invention is based on the object of refining a copper alloy in such a manner as to refine it with respect to the stress relaxation resistance and further material properties.
- the alloy when processed as a strip material, the alloy is to be oriented to the technical properties of the bronzes CuSn4 (C51100) and CuSn6 (C51900), with a low metal value at the same time.
- the manufacturing pathway is to be made as simple as possible.
- values are to be 600 MPa
- the electrical conductivity is to be at least 20% IACS.
- the copper alloy processed as strip is to be well bendable and is to be able to be used as a spring material.
- the invention includes a copper alloy, which was subjected to a thermomechanical treatment, consisting of (in wt.-%):
- the microstructure of the alloy is characterized in that the proportions of the main texture layers are at least 10 vol.-% copper layer, at least 10 vol.-% S/R layer, at least 5 vol.-% brass layer, at least 2 vol.-% cast layer, at least 2 vol.-% 22RD cube layer, at least 0.5 vol.-% cube layer, and finely distributed ferrous particles are contained in the alloy matrix.
- the copper alloy according to the invention primarily relates to strip, wire, or tubular material, having the main components copper, zinc, tin, and iron.
- the zinc content between 15.5 and 36.0% is selected in the alloy in particular according to the criterion that a single-phase alloy which can be easily shaped is obtained.
- the single-phase base microstructure consists of alpha phase.
- the base microstructure must also be suitable for absorbing the finest possible precipitants of other elements. It has been shown that the zinc content should not exceed 36.0%, since otherwise a less favorable phase composition results in the alloy. In a preferred embodiment, the zinc content of at most 32.0% is not exceeded. In particular in the case of zinc contents which exceed the specified value, the brittle beta phase occurs, which is undesirable in this context.
- alloy variant having 30.0% zinc have shown that the desired properties are still ensured.
- An important property of the alloy is its resistance against stress relaxation and stress crack corrosion.
- economic aspects are also to be mentioned in the solution according to the invention.
- the element zinc can still currently be purchased at a reasonable price in the market and is available, in order to thus produce alloys which are more favorable in the metal price, the properties of which at least extend to heretofore known alloys.
- the alloys according to the invention have a lower metal value than conventional copper-tin-phosphor alloys.
- the material properties are also to be oriented to these alloys.
- a higher tin content in the alloy according to the invention affects the strength and the relaxation resistance.
- the tin content should not exceed 3.0%, since the conductivity and the bending ability are negatively influenced thereby.
- the tin concentration is to be kept as low as possible; however, no substantial influence on the alloy properties can still be expected at a proportion less than 0.3%.
- Iron is responsible for the formation of precipitation particles and therefore for an improvement of the relaxation properties in comparison to typical brasses.
- the precipitation formation can be controlled and optimized during the manufacturing process.
- precipitants form in this alloy during a hot rolling step with a following targeted cooling.
- the annealing mechanisms active in the alloy are primarily borne by the element iron.
- the ferrous particles present in the alloy matrix form in the submicrometer range.
- the further elements optionally contained in the alloy can cause a further property improvement of the alloy with respect to the process control or can also display the effect thereof during the production process in the molten phase.
- a further key property is the bending ability in strips, which is improved in particular at higher zinc contents. The experimental results showed that both for low and for high zinc contents, approximately equal levels of residual stresses occur in the alloy. It is essential that in the alloy according to the invention, the relaxation resistance is significantly improved in relation to the typical brasses and is only slightly below the typical values for bronze. The present brass alloy is therefore in the range of the commercially available tin bronzes with respect to the relaxation resistance.
- the microstructure thereof which displays a special combination of main texture layers as a result of the processing steps.
- the texture arises in the manufacturing during the thermomechanical treatment as a result of different rolling processes.
- Rolling shaping steps can comprise, on the one hand, cold rolling steps and intermediate annealing steps and, on the other hand, hot rolling processes in conjunction with further cold rolling steps and intermediate annealing steps.
- the formation of the alloy according to the invention having the specified main texture layers must be adapted in processing technology precisely to the formation of the finely distributed ferrous particles in conjunction with the respective degrees of rolling reduction. The optimum of the expected property combinations can only thus be achieved.
- the desired material parameters are of interest in particular for the design of spring elements, for example, because the stiffness of the spring and the carrying capacity thereof are thus determined.
- Cubic face-centered metals typically form two different texture types after a high degree of rolling deformation as a function of the stacking fault energy thereof.
- metals having moderate to high stacking fault energy such as aluminum and copper
- the so-called copper rolling texture is found, which is composed of the ideal layers, the so-called brass layer, and also the S layer and the copper layer.
- the second limiting type is the so-called alloy rolling texture, which is formed by metallic materials of low stacking fault energy, which also includes most copper alloys, and which substantially consists of the brass layer.
- the resistance of the alloy according to the invention with respect to stress relaxation is substantially better than tin-free and iron-free copper-zinc alloys and the alloy simultaneously has a lower metal value than copper-tin-phosphor alloys.
- the Cu—Zn—Sn—Fe materials according to the invention also display more favorable strength reduction behavior than the tin bronze used in comparable products. The strength loss resulting at the beginning of the recrystallization is less in any case.
- the ferrous particles present in the alloy matrix are certainly formed sufficiently small, in the submicrometer range, that good tin plating ability and processing ability to form a plug connector is ensured.
- the desired intermetallic phases may form with the copper of the alloy matrix during the hot-dip tin plating.
- the advantageous intermetallic phases also form uniformly on the entire surface in the case of galvanic tin plating with a following reflow treatment.
- An important requirement of the surface which can be uniformly tin plated is that the small particles do not experience any substantial elongation in the rolling direction in the matrix during mechanical shaping by means of hot rolling or cold rolling. In contrast to higher iron proportions lying outside the solution according to the invention, a line-shaped broadening of larger iron particles, which interferes with the tin plating, does not occur.
- the content of tin can be 0.7% to 1.5% and that of iron can be 0.5% to 0.7%.
- a lower tin content in the specified limits is therefore particularly advantageous, because in this way the conductivity and the bending ability of the alloy are further improved.
- the specified iron content is selected such that particularly fine ferrous particles form in the alloy matrix. However, these particles still have the size to substantially improve the mechanical properties.
- the zinc content can advantageously be between 21.5% and 31.5%. In particular in this range, it is still ensured that the desired single-phase alloy consisting of alpha phase can be produced. Such alloys can be shaped more easily and are still suitable for fine precipitation distribution of the ferrous particles. Furthermore, the zinc content can advantageously be between 28.5% and 31.5%.
- the ratio of the proportions of the main texture layers of brass layer and copper layer can be less than 1.
- this quotient displays the special features of this alloy. While in comparable experiments, pure CuZn30 alloys have a quotient of greater than 1.2, the desired mechanical properties form in the strip material at a smaller ratio of the brass layer to the copper layer. The level of the stiffness and the carrying capacity of spring materials is thus determined.
- the ratio of the proportions of the main texture layers of brass layer and copper layer can advantageously be between 0.4 and 0.90. Particularly favorable mechanical properties of the alloy are formed in the specified range.
- finely distributed ferrous particles having a diameter less than 1 ⁇ m can be provided at a density of at least 0.5 particles per ⁇ m 2 in the alloy matrix.
- the combination of the particle size and the distribution thereof in the alloy finally influences the mechanical properties.
- the described fine distribution having a diameter less than 1 ⁇ m is pronounced over 99% and is primarily defining for the advantageous properties.
- the mean particle diameter of the finely distributed ferrous particles is even less than 50 to 100 nm. If such small particles are subjected to mechanical forming by means of hot rolling or cold rolling, they do not experience any substantial stretching in the rolling direction, from which the good tin plating ability of the surface then results.
- the mean grain size of the alloy matrix can advantageously be less than 10 ⁇ m. However, the mean grain size is more preferably at most 5 ⁇ m.
- an optimum of the alloy properties may be achieved with respect to the mechanical carrying capacity, electrical conductivity, resistance against stress relaxation, and bending ability thereof.
- composition of the individual examples and comparative examples can be inferred from Table 1; the results of the final states are contained in Tables 2 and 3.
- the alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method.
- the composition of a laboratory block sample was Cu 75.47%—Zn 23.47%—Sn 1.06% (see Table 1). After the milling to 22 mm thickness, the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm.
- the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours.
- a yield strength of 109 MPa was achieved at a grain size of 30-35 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 26.5% IACS.
- the yield strength was 311 MPa at a grain size of 2-3 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 27.3% IACS.
- yield strengths were achieved of 541 MPa at an A10 elongation of 19.3% and a conductivity of 25.1% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius minBR in relation to the strip thickness t (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0.4/1.2.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 92.3% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 82.1% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 622 MPa at an A10 elongation of 4.6%, a conductivity of 24.8% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 1.5/7.5.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 90.2% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 79.8% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 586 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.8% and a conductivity of 25.3% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0.4/2.8.
- composition corresponds to that of comparative example 1, the manufacturing is the same as in comparative example 1 up to the cold rolling to 0.33 mm.
- second annealing in contrast to comparative example 1, is not performed at 320° C./3 hours, but rather at 520° C./3 hours.
- the yield strength was 106 MPa at a grain size of 45 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 27.9% IACS.
- yield strengths were achieved of 378 MPa at an A10 elongation of 33.7% and a conductivity of 26.9% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.4/1.6.
- the stress relaxation resistance is 94.7% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 93.0% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 503 MPa at an A10 elongation of 10.2%, a conductivity of 26.5% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 3.5/4.0.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 96.1% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 91.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 402 MPa at an A10 elongation of 29.5% and a conductivity of 27.3% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.8/2.8.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 98.7% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 93.5% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 517 MPa at an A10 elongation of 8.3%, a conductivity of 26.4% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.5/6.0.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 96.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 91.9% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- comparative example 1 shows, after the second annealing, a yield strength higher by 200 MPa of the fine-grained microstructure in comparison to the coarse-grained microstructure.
- the following cold deformation reduces this difference to still 160 MPa in the sample deformed by 24% and to 110 MPa in the sample deformed by 40%.
- a comparable yield strength of approximately 520 MPa can be achieved both of the coarse-grained manufacturing (503 MPa) with 40% rolling reduction and also of the fine-grained manufacturing (541 MPa) with 24% rolling reduction.
- the A10 elongations in the fine-grained manufacturing are more favorable with 19.3% in comparison to 10.2% in the coarse-grained manufacturing.
- the minimum bending radii in relation to the strip thickness for the fine-grained manufacturing at 0.4/1.2 are similarly favorable in comparison to the coarse-grained manufacturing at 3.5/4.
- Only the stress relaxation resistance is slightly more favorable for the coarse-grained microstructure with 96.1% residual stress (fine-grained: 92.3% residual stress) after 100° C./1000 hours and with 91.2% residual stress (fine-grained: 82.1% residual stress) after 120° C./1000 hours.
- the alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method.
- the composition of a laboratory block sample was Cu 74.95%—Zn 23.40%—Sn 1.06%—Fe 0.59% (see Table 1).
- the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm.
- the microstructure displayed smaller particles, ⁇ 1 ⁇ m, after the hot rolling.
- the ⁇ 1 ⁇ m particles were identified as ferrous by means of EDX.
- the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours.
- a yield strength of 304 MPa was achieved at a grain size of 5-15 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 24.2% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 520° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 339 MPa at a grain size of 3-4 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 24.3% IACS.
- yield strengths were achieved of 623 MPa at an A10 elongation of 10.5% and a conductivity of 22.9% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.4/3.6.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 90.7% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 79.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 686 MPa at an A10 elongation of 6.5%, a conductivity of 22.8% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4/10.
- yield strengths were achieved of 632 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.4% and a conductivity of 23.2% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 3.2/4.8.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 90.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 80.1% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 713 MPa at an A10 elongation of 2.8%, a conductivity of 23.0% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 5/10.
- the ferrous fine-grained variant after the final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, displays a higher yield strength by 82 MPa (24% rolling reduction) or 64 MPa (40% rolling reduction), respectively.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 The microstructure of a surface grind was shown by means of AsB detector on the scanning electron microscope.
- the diameter of the majority of the iron particles is less than 200 nm, particles greater than 200 nm and less than 1 ⁇ m exist in isolation.
- the particle density is on average 1.2/ ⁇ m 2 .
- the alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method.
- the composition of a laboratory block sample is Cu 74.77%—Zn 23.45%—Sn 1.04%—Fe 0.56%—P 0.19%, see Table 1.
- the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm.
- the microstructure displayed smaller particles, ⁇ 1 ⁇ m.
- several coarser particles, >1 ⁇ m are present in the matrix.
- the particles were identified as FeP-containing by means of EDX.
- the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours.
- a yield strength of 293 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 10 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 26.6% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 370° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 393 MPa at a grain size of 3-4 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 26.7% IACS.
- yield strengths were achieved of 633 MPa at an A10 elongation of 11.6% and a conductivity of 24.2% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/4.8.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 91.2% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 81.3% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 710 MPa at an A10 elongation of 3.1%, a conductivity of 23.7% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 3.5/11.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 90.1% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 79.6% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 641 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.5% and a conductivity of 23.6% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/6.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 93.5% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 81.0% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 723 MPa at an A10 elongation of 1.4%, a conductivity of 23.8% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.5/10.5.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 92.9% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 78.4% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- the FeP-containing fine-grained variant after the final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, displays a higher yield strength by 92 MPa (24% rolling reduction) or 88 MPa (40% rolling reduction), respectively.
- the A10 elongations in the FeP containing variant are higher at 11.6% in comparison to 4.6% with CuZn23.5Sn1.0.
- the minimum bending radii in relation to the strip thickness are similarly favorable for the FeP-containing variant at 2.0/4.8 in comparison to the nonferrous variant at 1.5/7.5.
- the stress relaxation resistance of both variants is similar.
- the composition corresponds to that of example 4, the manufacturing is the same as in example 4 up to the cold rolling to 0.33 mm.
- the second annealing in contrast to example 4, is not performed at 370° C./3 hours, but rather at 520° C./3 hours.
- a yield strength was achieved of 212 MPa in this case at a grain size of 10-25 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 26.7% IACS.
- yield strengths were achieved of 534 MPa at an A10 elongation of 23.1% and a conductivity of 24.5% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.4/3.2.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 95.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 90.9% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 634 MPa at an A10 elongation of 7.8%, a conductivity of 24.1% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 3.5/8.5.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 93.9% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 85.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 544 MPa at an A10 elongation of 17.8% and a conductivity of 24.7% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 3.2/4.0.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 95.1% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 90.1% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 642 MPa at an A10 elongation of 4.3%, a conductivity of 24.0% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.5/8.5.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 95.0% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 86.4% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- example 4 shows, after the second annealing, a yield strength higher by 180 MPa of the fine-grained microstructure in comparison to the coarse-grained microstructure.
- the following cold deformation reduces this difference to 60 MPa in the sample deformed by 24% and to 40 MPa in the sample deformed by 40%.
- the difference of the yield strength between coarse-grained and fine-grained is 100 MPa (degree of deformation 24%) and 75 MPa (degree of deformation 40%).
- the alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method.
- the composition of the laboratory block sample was Cu 68.26%—Zn 30.16%—Sn 1.03%—Fe 0.55%, see Table 1.
- the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm.
- the microstructure displayed smaller particles, ⁇ 1 ⁇ m, after the hot rolling.
- the ⁇ 1 ⁇ m particles were identified as ferrous by means of EDX.
- the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 339 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 5 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 23.1% IACS.
- Strip casting also comes into consideration in this context in particular.
- yield strengths were achieved of 486 MPa at an A10 elongation of 19.0% and a conductivity of 22.2% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0/0.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 88% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 76.7% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 550 MPa at an A10 elongation of 21.3%, a conductivity of 21.9% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 0.9/0.4.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 88.3% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 75.6% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 505 MPa at an A10 elongation of 18.5% and a conductivity of 22.6% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0/0.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 87.3% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 76.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 564 MPa at an A10 elongation of 19.9%, a conductivity of 22.2% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 0.9/0.6.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 88.4% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 77.6% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 649 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.0% and a conductivity of 21.8% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 1.6/6.4.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 77.9% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 61.0% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 704 MPa at an A10 elongation of 2.9%, a conductivity of 21.5% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 2/6.4.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 77.5% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 61.8% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 687 MPa at an A10 elongation of 3.9% and a conductivity of 21.9% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/4.8.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 77.4% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 61.5% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- yield strengths were achieved of 765 MPa at an A10 elongation of 1.5%, a conductivity of 21.6% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.0/9.2.
- the stress relaxation resistance was 76.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 59.9% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- the microstructure of a surface grind was shown by means of AsB detector on the scanning electron microscope. At an image enlargement of 5000:1 and 10,000:1, the number of particles per 1 ⁇ m 2 image detail was counted.
- the diameter of at least 90% of the iron particles is less than 200 nm. Iron particles having a diameter of 200 nm to 1 ⁇ m exist at less than 10%.
- the particle density is on average 0.9 particles per ⁇ m 2 .
- the main texture types were ascertained by x-ray diffractometry in all samples from Table 3 on the 18%, 24%, and 40% cold-deformed plate annealed at 300° C./5 minutes.
- the intensity distributions of the skeleton lines in Euler space and the orientation distribution functions were analyzed.
- the proportion of the copper layer, S/R layer, brass layer, cast layer, 22RD cube layer, and cube layer as the respective main texture layers is shown in Table 4.
- the ratio of the volumes of the brass layer to the copper layer is less than 1 in all cases.
- the ratio of the volume of the brass layer to the copper layer in the comparative alloy CuZn30 has a value of 1.38 at a degree of rolling reduction of 47% during the final shaping.
- S/R layer refers to the respective identical layers originating from the rolling texture or recrystallization texture in Euler space.
- the strips were hot-dip tin plated with a layer thickness of 2-3 ⁇ m.
- the tin plating result is flawed, pores and stripes occur.
- the linear irregularities on the tin plated surface originate from the elongated Fe lines, on which no Cu is present to form an intermetallic phase.
- the alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method.
- the composition of the laboratory block sample was Cu 73.82%—Zn 23.19% —Sn 1.04%—Fe 1.95%, see Table 1.
- the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm.
- the microstructure displayed smaller particles, less than 1 ⁇ m, similarly to CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6.
- coarse particles approximately 5 ⁇ m in size were present in CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe2.0. Both the particles smaller than 1 ⁇ m and the particles 5 ⁇ m in size were identified as ferrous by means of EDX.
- the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 362 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 2-3 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 24.2% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 520° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 386 MPa at a grain size of 2 ⁇ m and a conductivity of 24.0% IACS.
- yield strengths were achieved of 642 MPa at an A10 elongation of 8.4% and a conductivity of 23.1% IACS.
- the minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/5.
- yield strengths were achieved of 712 MPa at an A10 elongation of 5.0%, a conductivity of 22.4% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 2.5/9.
- a multiple wave soldering test was carried out according to DIN EN 60068-2-20 on the samples tempered at 300° C./5 minutes. The samples were pickled and brushed. The solder bath consisted of Sn60Pb40 at 235° C. The test was performed at an immersion speed of 25 mm/second and a dwell time of 5 seconds, wherein pure rosin at 260 g/L was used as a flux. The samples were evaluated as bad during the subsequent visual check as a result of strong dewetting.
- the elongated ferrous lines are the cause of the poor tin plating ability of the samples. No Cu is present thereon to form an intermetallic phase and undesired irregularities occur on the tin-plated strips.
- composition of the copper alloys in wt.-% Nominal composition Example Cu, % Zn, % Sn, % Fe, % P, % CuZn23.5Sn1.0 comparative 75.47 23.47 1.06 example 1 comparative example 2 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6 example 3 74.95 23.40 1.06 0.59 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 example 4 74.77 23.45 1.04 0.56 0.19 example 5 CuZn30Sn1Fe0.6 example 6 68.26 30.16 1.03 0.55 CuZn10Sn1.7Fe1.7P0.025 comparative 86.29 10.21 1.70 1.74 0.025 example 7 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe2.0 comparative 73.82 23.19 1.04 1.95 example 8
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Conductive Materials (AREA)
- Contacts (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates to a copper alloy according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Electronic components, including terminal contacts, form the foundation of information technology. One of the most important considerations in each terminal contact is optimization of the embodiment at the lowest costs. With the continuous price pressure, the demand exists in the electronics industry, inter alia, for alternative materials to such materials, which have the desired properties and which are also cost-effective. Desired properties of an alloy are, for example, high electrical and thermal conductivity and also high stress relaxation resistance and tensile strength. Typically, copper alloys are used as terminal clamps and also for other electrical and thermal applications, because of the generally outstanding corrosion resistance thereof, the high electrical and thermal conductivity, and the good storage and wear qualities. Copper alloys are also suitable because of the good cold machining or hot machining properties thereof and the good deformation property thereof.
- A copper alloy is known from the publication EP 1 290 234 B1, which already displays a more cost-effective alternative to otherwise typical copper alloys having high electrical conductivity, high tensile strength, and high shaping strength. The alloy consists of 13 to 15% zinc, 0.7 to 0.9% tin, 0.7 to 0.9% iron, and a residual balance of copper. As a result of the zinc, having a comparatively low metal value currently on the market, costs can be saved in the base material.
- A copper alloy, which has a zinc proportion of at most 15.0%, is known from the patent specification U.S. Pat. No. 3,816,109. The iron content is between 1.0 and 2.0%. Using this composition, a comparatively good electrical conductivity is achieved in conjunction with sufficient tensile strength.
- Furthermore, copper-tin-iron-zinc alloys are known from the patent specification U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,528, which have a higher zinc content of up to 35.0%. The iron proportion is between 1.6 and 4.0%. The addition of iron has the function of achieving grain refinement already after the casting.
- The invention is based on the object of refining a copper alloy in such a manner as to refine it with respect to the stress relaxation resistance and further material properties. In particular when processed as a strip material, the alloy is to be oriented to the technical properties of the bronzes CuSn4 (C51100) and CuSn6 (C51900), with a low metal value at the same time. In addition, the manufacturing pathway is to be made as simple as possible. With respect to the tensile strength, values are to be 600 MPa, the electrical conductivity is to be at least 20% IACS. In addition, the copper alloy processed as strip is to be well bendable and is to be able to be used as a spring material.
- The invention is represented by the features of claim 1. The further claims dependent thereon relate to advantageous embodiments and refinements of the invention.
- The invention includes a copper alloy, which was subjected to a thermomechanical treatment, consisting of (in wt.-%):
- optionally also 0.001 to 0.4% P,
optionally also 0.01 to 0.1% Al,
optionally also 0.01 to 0.3% Ag, Mg, Zr, In, Co, Cr, Ti, Mn,
optionally also 0.05 to 0.5% Ni,
the remainder copper and unavoidable impurities, wherein the microstructure of the alloy is characterized in that
the proportions of the main texture layers are
at least 10 vol.-% copper layer,
at least 10 vol.-% S/R layer,
at least 5 vol.-% brass layer,
at least 2 vol.-% cast layer,
at least 2 vol.-% 22RD cube layer,
at least 0.5 vol.-% cube layer, and
finely distributed ferrous particles are contained in the alloy matrix. - The copper alloy according to the invention primarily relates to strip, wire, or tubular material, having the main components copper, zinc, tin, and iron. The zinc content between 15.5 and 36.0% is selected in the alloy in particular according to the criterion that a single-phase alloy which can be easily shaped is obtained. The single-phase base microstructure consists of alpha phase. The base microstructure must also be suitable for absorbing the finest possible precipitants of other elements. It has been shown that the zinc content should not exceed 36.0%, since otherwise a less favorable phase composition results in the alloy. In a preferred embodiment, the zinc content of at most 32.0% is not exceeded. In particular in the case of zinc contents which exceed the specified value, the brittle beta phase occurs, which is undesirable in this context. On the other hand, extensive experimental results of an alloy variant having 30.0% zinc have shown that the desired properties are still ensured. An important property of the alloy is its resistance against stress relaxation and stress crack corrosion. On the other hand, economic aspects are also to be mentioned in the solution according to the invention. Thus, the element zinc can still currently be purchased at a reasonable price in the market and is available, in order to thus produce alloys which are more favorable in the metal price, the properties of which at least extend to heretofore known alloys. Thus, the alloys according to the invention have a lower metal value than conventional copper-tin-phosphor alloys. The material properties are also to be oriented to these alloys.
- From a technical aspect, a higher tin content in the alloy according to the invention affects the strength and the relaxation resistance. On the other hand, the tin content should not exceed 3.0%, since the conductivity and the bending ability are negatively influenced thereby. In principle, the tin concentration is to be kept as low as possible; however, no substantial influence on the alloy properties can still be expected at a proportion less than 0.3%.
- Iron is responsible for the formation of precipitation particles and therefore for an improvement of the relaxation properties in comparison to typical brasses. The precipitation formation can be controlled and optimized during the manufacturing process. In particular, precipitants form in this alloy during a hot rolling step with a following targeted cooling. The annealing mechanisms active in the alloy are primarily borne by the element iron.
- The ferrous particles present in the alloy matrix form in the submicrometer range. The further elements optionally contained in the alloy can cause a further property improvement of the alloy with respect to the process control or can also display the effect thereof during the production process in the molten phase. A further key property is the bending ability in strips, which is improved in particular at higher zinc contents. The experimental results showed that both for low and for high zinc contents, approximately equal levels of residual stresses occur in the alloy. It is essential that in the alloy according to the invention, the relaxation resistance is significantly improved in relation to the typical brasses and is only slightly below the typical values for bronze. The present brass alloy is therefore in the range of the commercially available tin bronzes with respect to the relaxation resistance.
- In the alloy according to the invention, particular weight is placed on the microstructure thereof, which displays a special combination of main texture layers as a result of the processing steps. The texture arises in the manufacturing during the thermomechanical treatment as a result of different rolling processes. Rolling shaping steps can comprise, on the one hand, cold rolling steps and intermediate annealing steps and, on the other hand, hot rolling processes in conjunction with further cold rolling steps and intermediate annealing steps. The formation of the alloy according to the invention having the specified main texture layers must be adapted in processing technology precisely to the formation of the finely distributed ferrous particles in conjunction with the respective degrees of rolling reduction. The optimum of the expected property combinations can only thus be achieved.
- The desired material parameters are of interest in particular for the design of spring elements, for example, because the stiffness of the spring and the carrying capacity thereof are thus determined. A close relationship exists between the resulting texture layers and the mechanical anisotropy resulting therefrom. Cubic face-centered metals typically form two different texture types after a high degree of rolling deformation as a function of the stacking fault energy thereof. In metals having moderate to high stacking fault energy, such as aluminum and copper, the so-called copper rolling texture is found, which is composed of the ideal layers, the so-called brass layer, and also the S layer and the copper layer. The second limiting type is the so-called alloy rolling texture, which is formed by metallic materials of low stacking fault energy, which also includes most copper alloys, and which substantially consists of the brass layer. Texture studies on copper and copper-zinc alloys and also electron-microscope studies of copper and CuZn30 in recent time have shown that CuZn30 behaves similarly at lower degrees of shaping with respect to the microstructure and the texture formation to copper and the typical brass rolling texture first results at moderate to high degrees of rolling as a result of the twin and shear band formations which then begin. At lower degrees of rolling, the occurrence of mixed texture types is accordingly also to be expected in copper alloys having lower stacking fault energy.
- Therefore, in strips of the alloy according to the invention, particularly advantageous textures and directional dependences of the mechanical properties result. Texture types as a mixed texture between the limiting cases of copper layer, on the one hand, and brass layer, on the other hand, are formed by comparatively low degrees of rolling reduction. The respective advantageous properties resulting are directly dependent thereon.
- The special advantage is that the resistance of the alloy according to the invention with respect to stress relaxation is substantially better than tin-free and iron-free copper-zinc alloys and the alloy simultaneously has a lower metal value than copper-tin-phosphor alloys. Surprisingly, the Cu—Zn—Sn—Fe materials according to the invention also display more favorable strength reduction behavior than the tin bronze used in comparable products. The strength loss resulting at the beginning of the recrystallization is less in any case. The ferrous particles present in the alloy matrix are certainly formed sufficiently small, in the submicrometer range, that good tin plating ability and processing ability to form a plug connector is ensured. In the present matrix composition, the desired intermetallic phases may form with the copper of the alloy matrix during the hot-dip tin plating. The advantageous intermetallic phases also form uniformly on the entire surface in the case of galvanic tin plating with a following reflow treatment. An important requirement of the surface which can be uniformly tin plated is that the small particles do not experience any substantial elongation in the rolling direction in the matrix during mechanical shaping by means of hot rolling or cold rolling. In contrast to higher iron proportions lying outside the solution according to the invention, a line-shaped broadening of larger iron particles, which interferes with the tin plating, does not occur.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the content of tin can be 0.7% to 1.5% and that of iron can be 0.5% to 0.7%. A lower tin content in the specified limits is therefore particularly advantageous, because in this way the conductivity and the bending ability of the alloy are further improved. The specified iron content is selected such that particularly fine ferrous particles form in the alloy matrix. However, these particles still have the size to substantially improve the mechanical properties.
- The zinc content can advantageously be between 21.5% and 31.5%. In particular in this range, it is still ensured that the desired single-phase alloy consisting of alpha phase can be produced. Such alloys can be shaped more easily and are still suitable for fine precipitation distribution of the ferrous particles. Furthermore, the zinc content can advantageously be between 28.5% and 31.5%.
- In a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the ratio of the proportions of the main texture layers of brass layer and copper layer can be less than 1. In relation to the known brass alloys of similar composition, but without iron precipitants, this quotient displays the special features of this alloy. While in comparable experiments, pure CuZn30 alloys have a quotient of greater than 1.2, the desired mechanical properties form in the strip material at a smaller ratio of the brass layer to the copper layer. The level of the stiffness and the carrying capacity of spring materials is thus determined.
- The ratio of the proportions of the main texture layers of brass layer and copper layer can advantageously be between 0.4 and 0.90. Particularly favorable mechanical properties of the alloy are formed in the specified range.
- In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, finely distributed ferrous particles having a diameter less than 1 μm can be provided at a density of at least 0.5 particles per μm2 in the alloy matrix. The combination of the particle size and the distribution thereof in the alloy finally influences the mechanical properties. The described fine distribution having a diameter less than 1 μm is pronounced over 99% and is primarily defining for the advantageous properties. In the typical case, the mean particle diameter of the finely distributed ferrous particles is even less than 50 to 100 nm. If such small particles are subjected to mechanical forming by means of hot rolling or cold rolling, they do not experience any substantial stretching in the rolling direction, from which the good tin plating ability of the surface then results.
- The mean grain size of the alloy matrix can advantageously be less than 10 μm. However, the mean grain size is more preferably at most 5 μm. By way of the combination of the grain size of the alloy matrix in conjunction with the size of the finely distributed ferrous particles and the distribution thereof, an optimum of the alloy properties may be achieved with respect to the mechanical carrying capacity, electrical conductivity, resistance against stress relaxation, and bending ability thereof.
- Further exemplary embodiments of the invention will be explained in greater detail on the basis of Tables 1 to 4.
- In the tables:
- Table 1 lists the composition of the examined copper alloys in wt.-%;
- Table 2 lists properties of the alloys according to Table 1 after the last cold rolling to final thickness and annealing for 250° C./3 hours;
- Table 3 lists properties of the alloys according to Table 1 after the last cold rolling to final thickness and annealing for 300° C./5 minutes;
- Table 4 lists main texture layers in volume-percent of the alloys from Table 3.
- The composition of the individual examples and comparative examples can be inferred from Table 1; the results of the final states are contained in Tables 2 and 3.
- The alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method. The composition of a laboratory block sample was Cu 75.47%—Zn 23.47%—Sn 1.06% (see Table 1). After the milling to 22 mm thickness, the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm.
- After the cold rolling to 1.8 mm, the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 109 MPa was achieved at a grain size of 30-35 μm and a conductivity of 26.5% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 320° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 311 MPa at a grain size of 2-3 μm and a conductivity of 27.3% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 541 MPa at an A10 elongation of 19.3% and a conductivity of 25.1% IACS. The minimum bending radius minBR in relation to the strip thickness t (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0.4/1.2. The stress relaxation resistance was 92.3% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 82.1% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 622 MPa at an A10 elongation of 4.6%, a conductivity of 24.8% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 1.5/7.5. The stress relaxation resistance was 90.2% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 79.8% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 250° C./3 hours, with 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 586 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.8% and a conductivity of 25.3% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0.4/2.8.
- The composition corresponds to that of comparative example 1, the manufacturing is the same as in comparative example 1 up to the cold rolling to 0.33 mm. However, the second annealing, in contrast to comparative example 1, is not performed at 320° C./3 hours, but rather at 520° C./3 hours.
- After the annealing at 520° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 106 MPa at a grain size of 45 μm and a conductivity of 27.9% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 378 MPa at an A10 elongation of 33.7% and a conductivity of 26.9% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.4/1.6. The stress relaxation resistance is 94.7% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 93.0% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 503 MPa at an A10 elongation of 10.2%, a conductivity of 26.5% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 3.5/4.0. The stress relaxation resistance was 96.1% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 91.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 250° C./3 hours, with 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 402 MPa at an A10 elongation of 29.5% and a conductivity of 27.3% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.8/2.8. The stress relaxation resistance was 98.7% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 93.5% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 517 MPa at an A10 elongation of 8.3%, a conductivity of 26.4% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.5/6.0. The stress relaxation resistance was 96.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 91.9% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- The comparison of comparative example 1 with comparative example 2 shows, after the second annealing, a yield strength higher by 200 MPa of the fine-grained microstructure in comparison to the coarse-grained microstructure. The following cold deformation reduces this difference to still 160 MPa in the sample deformed by 24% and to 110 MPa in the sample deformed by 40%. In the final state after annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, a comparable yield strength of approximately 520 MPa can be achieved both of the coarse-grained manufacturing (503 MPa) with 40% rolling reduction and also of the fine-grained manufacturing (541 MPa) with 24% rolling reduction. Simultaneously, however, the A10 elongations in the fine-grained manufacturing are more favorable with 19.3% in comparison to 10.2% in the coarse-grained manufacturing. The minimum bending radii in relation to the strip thickness for the fine-grained manufacturing at 0.4/1.2 are similarly favorable in comparison to the coarse-grained manufacturing at 3.5/4. Only the stress relaxation resistance is slightly more favorable for the coarse-grained microstructure with 96.1% residual stress (fine-grained: 92.3% residual stress) after 100° C./1000 hours and with 91.2% residual stress (fine-grained: 82.1% residual stress) after 120° C./1000 hours.
- The alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method. The composition of a laboratory block sample was Cu 74.95%—Zn 23.40%—Sn 1.06%—Fe 0.59% (see Table 1). After the milling to 22 mm thickness, the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm. The microstructure displayed smaller particles, <1 μm, after the hot rolling. The <1 μm particles were identified as ferrous by means of EDX. After the cold rolling to 1.8 mm, the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 304 MPa was achieved at a grain size of 5-15 μm and a conductivity of 24.2% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 520° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 339 MPa at a grain size of 3-4 μm and a conductivity of 24.3% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 623 MPa at an A10 elongation of 10.5% and a conductivity of 22.9% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.4/3.6. The stress relaxation resistance was 90.7% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 79.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 686 MPa at an A10 elongation of 6.5%, a conductivity of 22.8% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4/10.
- After the rolling to final thickness and annealing at 250° C./3 hours, with 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 632 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.4% and a conductivity of 23.2% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 3.2/4.8. The stress relaxation resistance was 90.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 80.1% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 713 MPa at an A10 elongation of 2.8%, a conductivity of 23.0% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 5/10.
- In comparison to the fine-grained variant without Fe in comparative example 1, the ferrous fine-grained variant, after the final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, displays a higher yield strength by 82 MPa (24% rolling reduction) or 64 MPa (40% rolling reduction), respectively.
- With both alloy variants, a comparable yield strength of 620 MPa can be achieved, with different manufacturing, however. Thus, CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6 achieves a yield strength of 623 MPa after 24% rolling reduction and final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes and CuZn23.5Sn1.0 achieves a yield strength of 622 MPa after 40% rolling reduction and final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes. However, the A10 elongations in the ferrous variant are higher at 10.5% in comparison to 4.6% with CuZn23.5Sn1.0. The minimum bending radii in relation to the strip thickness are similarly favorable for the ferrous variant at 2.4/3.6 in comparison to the nonferrous variant at 1.5/7.5. The stress relaxation resistance of both variants is similar, in contrast.
- At an image enlargement of 5000:1 and 10,000:1, the number of particles per 1 μm2 image detail was counted, see FIGS. 1 and 2. The microstructure of a surface grind was shown by means of AsB detector on the scanning electron microscope. The diameter of the majority of the iron particles is less than 200 nm, particles greater than 200 nm and less than 1 μm exist in isolation. The particle density is on average 1.2/μm2.
- The alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method. The composition of a laboratory block sample is Cu 74.77%—Zn 23.45%—Sn 1.04%—Fe 0.56%—P 0.19%, see Table 1. After the milling to 22 mm thickness, the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm. The microstructure displayed smaller particles, <1 μm. In addition, several coarser particles, >1 μm, are present in the matrix. The particles were identified as FeP-containing by means of EDX. After the cold rolling to 1.8 mm, the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 293 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 10 μm and a conductivity of 26.6% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 370° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 393 MPa at a grain size of 3-4 μm and a conductivity of 26.7% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./3 hours, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 633 MPa at an A10 elongation of 11.6% and a conductivity of 24.2% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/4.8. The stress relaxation resistance was 91.2% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 81.3% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 710 MPa at an A10 elongation of 3.1%, a conductivity of 23.7% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 3.5/11. The stress relaxation resistance was 90.1% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 79.6% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 250° C./3 hours, with 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 641 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.5% and a conductivity of 23.6% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/6. The stress relaxation resistance was 93.5% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 81.0% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 723 MPa at an A10 elongation of 1.4%, a conductivity of 23.8% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.5/10.5. The stress relaxation resistance was 92.9% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 78.4% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- In comparison to the fine-grained variant in comparative example 1, the FeP-containing fine-grained variant, after the final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, displays a higher yield strength by 92 MPa (24% rolling reduction) or 88 MPa (40% rolling reduction), respectively.
- Both fine-grained alloy variants achieved a comparable yield strength of 620-630 MPa in each case after 24% rolling reduction and final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes (CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2: Rp0.2=633 MPa) and after 40% rolling reduction and final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes (CuZn23.5Sn1.0: Rp0.2=622 MPa). However, the A10 elongations in the FeP containing variant are higher at 11.6% in comparison to 4.6% with CuZn23.5Sn1.0. The minimum bending radii in relation to the strip thickness are similarly favorable for the FeP-containing variant at 2.0/4.8 in comparison to the nonferrous variant at 1.5/7.5. The stress relaxation resistance of both variants is similar.
- The composition corresponds to that of example 4, the manufacturing is the same as in example 4 up to the cold rolling to 0.33 mm. However, the second annealing, in contrast to example 4, is not performed at 370° C./3 hours, but rather at 520° C./3 hours. A yield strength was achieved of 212 MPa in this case at a grain size of 10-25 μm and a conductivity of 26.7% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 534 MPa at an A10 elongation of 23.1% and a conductivity of 24.5% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2.4/3.2. The stress relaxation resistance was 95.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 90.9% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 634 MPa at an A10 elongation of 7.8%, a conductivity of 24.1% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 3.5/8.5. The stress relaxation resistance was 93.9% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 85.2% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the rolling to final thickness and annealing at 250° C./3 hours, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 544 MPa at an A10 elongation of 17.8% and a conductivity of 24.7% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 3.2/4.0. The stress relaxation resistance was 95.1% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 90.1% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 642 MPa at an A10 elongation of 4.3%, a conductivity of 24.0% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.5/8.5. The stress relaxation resistance was 95.0% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 86.4% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- The comparison of example 4 with example 5 shows, after the second annealing, a yield strength higher by 180 MPa of the fine-grained microstructure in comparison to the coarse-grained microstructure. The following cold deformation reduces this difference to 60 MPa in the sample deformed by 24% and to 40 MPa in the sample deformed by 40%. After the final annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, the difference of the yield strength between coarse-grained and fine-grained is 100 MPa (degree of deformation 24%) and 75 MPa (degree of deformation 40%).
- In the final state after the annealing at 300° C./5 minutes, a comparable yield strength of approximately 630 MPa can be achieved both of the coarse-grained manufacturing (634 MPa) with 40% rolling reduction and also of the fine-grained manufacturing (633 MPa) with 24% rolling reduction. Simultaneously, however, the A10 elongations in the fine-grained manufacturing are more favorable with 11.6% in comparison to 7.8% in the coarse-grained manufacturing. The minimum bending radii in relation to the strip thickness for the fine-grained manufacturing at 2.0/4.8 are similarly favorable in comparison to the coarse-grained manufacturing at 3.5/8.5. Only the stress relaxation resistance is slightly higher for the coarse-grained microstructure with 93.9% residual stress (fine-grained: 91.2% residual stress) after 100° C./1000 hours and with 85.2% residual stress (fine-grained: 81.3% residual stress) after 120° C./1000 hours.
- The alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method. The composition of the laboratory block sample was Cu 68.26%—Zn 30.16%—Sn 1.03%—Fe 0.55%, see Table 1. After the milling to 22 mm thickness, the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm and subsequently milled to 10 mm. The microstructure displayed smaller particles, <1 μm, after the hot rolling. The <1 μm particles were identified as ferrous by means of EDX. After the cold rolling to 1.8 mm, the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 339 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 5 μm and a conductivity of 23.1% IACS.
- In principle, in addition to the Tammann method mentioned in the examples, other suitable casting methods can also be used. Strip casting also comes into consideration in this context in particular.
- After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm, a part was annealed at 520° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 340 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 3-4 μm and a conductivity of 23% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 12% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 486 MPa at an A10 elongation of 19.0% and a conductivity of 22.2% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0/0. The stress relaxation resistance was 88% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 76.7% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- With preceding cold deformation of 18%, yield strengths were achieved of 550 MPa at an A10 elongation of 21.3%, a conductivity of 21.9% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 0.9/0.4. The stress relaxation resistance was 88.3% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 75.6% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the rolling to final thickness and annealing at 250° C./3 hours, with 12% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 505 MPa at an A10 elongation of 18.5% and a conductivity of 22.6% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 0/0. The stress relaxation resistance was 87.3% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 76.2% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 18%, yield strengths were achieved of 564 MPa at an A10 elongation of 19.9%, a conductivity of 22.2% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 0.9/0.6. The stress relaxation resistance was 88.4% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 77.6% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the cold rolling to 0.33 mm, a further part was annealed at 450° C./30 seconds. A yield strength of 460 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 1-2 μm and a conductivity of 22.6% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 649 MPa at an A10 elongation of 9.0% and a conductivity of 21.8% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 1.6/6.4. The stress relaxation resistance was 77.9% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 61.0% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 704 MPa at an A10 elongation of 2.9%, a conductivity of 21.5% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 2/6.4. The stress relaxation resistance was 77.5% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 61.8% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- After the rolling to final thickness and annealing at 250° C./3 hours, with 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 687 MPa at an A10 elongation of 3.9% and a conductivity of 21.9% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/4.8. The stress relaxation resistance was 77.4% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 61.5% after 120° C./1000 hours. With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 765 MPa at an A10 elongation of 1.5%, a conductivity of 21.6% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 4.0/9.2. The stress relaxation resistance was 76.8% of the initial stress after 100° C./1000 hours and 59.9% after 120° C./1000 hours.
- The microstructure of a surface grind was shown by means of AsB detector on the scanning electron microscope. At an image enlargement of 5000:1 and 10,000:1, the number of particles per 1 μm2 image detail was counted. The diameter of at least 90% of the iron particles is less than 200 nm. Iron particles having a diameter of 200 nm to 1 μm exist at less than 10%. The particle density is on average 0.9 particles per μm2.
- Further samples were also manufactured and tempered in the operating scale. To evaluate the tin plating ability, a multiple wave soldering test was carried out according to DIN EN 60068-2-20. The samples were pickled. The solder bath consisted of Sn60Pb40 at 235° C. The test was performed at an immersion speed of 25 mm/second and a dwell time of 5 seconds, wherein pure rosin at 260 g/L was used as a flux. The samples were evaluated as good during the subsequent visual check.
- By means of a Lücke-type goniometer, the main texture types were ascertained by x-ray diffractometry in all samples from Table 3 on the 18%, 24%, and 40% cold-deformed plate annealed at 300° C./5 minutes. For this purpose, the intensity distributions of the skeleton lines in Euler space and the orientation distribution functions were analyzed. The proportion of the copper layer, S/R layer, brass layer, cast layer, 22RD cube layer, and cube layer as the respective main texture layers is shown in Table 4. The ratio of the volumes of the brass layer to the copper layer is less than 1 in all cases. For comparison, the ratio of the volume of the brass layer to the copper layer in the comparative alloy CuZn30 has a value of 1.38 at a degree of rolling reduction of 47% during the final shaping. The designation S/R layer refers to the respective identical layers originating from the rolling texture or recrystallization texture in Euler space. The 22RD cube layer designates a cube layer rotated by φ=22° in Euler space. These designations have also become common for other specifications used in the literature in the meantime in practice for sample characterization.
- 127 mm×820 mm blocks of the composition Cu 86.29%—Zn 10.21%—Sn 1.70%—Fe 1.74%—P 0.025% were extruded and hot rolled to 14.7 mm at 890° C. After the cold rolling to 1.4 mm, annealing at 450° C./2 hours, cold rolling to 0.4 mm, annealing at 420° C./4 hours, rolling to 0.254 mm, and annealing at 280° C./4 hours, yield strengths of 633 MPa, an A10 elongation of 8.7% and a minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the v-forging die of 1.6/2.0 were achieved. Subsequently, the strips were hot-dip tin plated with a layer thickness of 2-3 μm. The tin plating result is flawed, pores and stripes occur. The linear irregularities on the tin plated surface originate from the elongated Fe lines, on which no Cu is present to form an intermetallic phase.
- The alloy components were melted in the graphite crucible and subsequently laboratory sample blocks were cast in steel ingot molds via the Tammann method. The composition of the laboratory block sample was Cu 73.82%—Zn 23.19% —Sn 1.04%—Fe 1.95%, see Table 1. After the milling to 22 mm thickness, the samples were hot rolled at 700-800° C. to 12 mm. The microstructure displayed smaller particles, less than 1 μm, similarly to CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6. In addition, coarse particles approximately 5 μm in size were present in CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe2.0. Both the particles smaller than 1 μm and the particles 5 μm in size were identified as ferrous by means of EDX.
- After the cold rolling to 1.8 mm, the alloy was annealed at 500° C./3 hours. A yield strength of 362 MPa was achieved in this case at a grain size of 2-3 μm and a conductivity of 24.2% IACS. After the subsequent cold rolling to 0.33 mm and annealing at 520° C./3 hours, the yield strength was 386 MPa at a grain size of 2 μm and a conductivity of 24.0% IACS.
- After the rolling to final thickness and tempering at 300° C./5 minutes, at 24% preceding cold deformation, yield strengths were achieved of 642 MPa at an A10 elongation of 8.4% and a conductivity of 23.1% IACS. The minimum bending radius in relation to the strip thickness (minBR/t perpendicular/parallel) in the V-forging die was 2/5.
- With preceding cold deformation of 40%, yield strengths were achieved of 712 MPa at an A10 elongation of 5.0%, a conductivity of 22.4% IACS, and minBR/t perpendicular/parallel of 2.5/9.
- Elongated lines having a length of greater than 20 μm developed in the course of the further manufacturing from the particles of approximately 5 μm in size present after the hot rolling.
- To evaluate the tin-plating ability, a multiple wave soldering test was carried out according to DIN EN 60068-2-20 on the samples tempered at 300° C./5 minutes. The samples were pickled and brushed. The solder bath consisted of Sn60Pb40 at 235° C. The test was performed at an immersion speed of 25 mm/second and a dwell time of 5 seconds, wherein pure rosin at 260 g/L was used as a flux. The samples were evaluated as bad during the subsequent visual check as a result of strong dewetting.
- The elongated ferrous lines are the cause of the poor tin plating ability of the samples. No Cu is present thereon to form an intermetallic phase and undesired irregularities occur on the tin-plated strips.
-
TABLE 1 composition of the copper alloys in wt.-% Nominal composition Example Cu, % Zn, % Sn, % Fe, % P, % CuZn23.5Sn1.0 comparative 75.47 23.47 1.06 example 1 comparative example 2 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6 example 3 74.95 23.40 1.06 0.59 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 example 4 74.77 23.45 1.04 0.56 0.19 example 5 CuZn30Sn1Fe0.6 example 6 68.26 30.16 1.03 0.55 CuZn10Sn1.7Fe1.7P0.025 comparative 86.29 10.21 1.70 1.74 0.025 example 7 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe2.0 comparative 73.82 23.19 1.04 1.95 example 8 -
TABLE 2 properties after the last cold rolling to final thickness and annealing 250° C./3 hours Hot rolling, 3 cold rolling steps, and final annealing 250° C./3 hours Degree of rolling reduction final shaping, % Rp0.2, Rm, Grain minBR/t minBR/t Example ID % IACS MPa MPa size, μm Q P Comparative CuZn23.5Sn1.0 24 25.3 586 641 2-3 0.4 2.8 example 1 Comparative CuZn23.5Sn1.0 24 27.3 402 468 50 2.8 2.8 example 2 40 26.4 517 566 45 4.5 6 Example 3 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6 24 23.2 632 674 Stretched 3.2 4.8 40 23 713 765 Stretched 5 10 Example 4 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 24 23.6 641 703 1-2 2 6 40 23.8 723 783 1-2 4.5 10.5 Example 5 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 24 24.7 544 592 10-15 3.2 4 40 24 642 689 5-10 4.5 8.5 Example 6 CuZn30.0Sn1.0Fe0.6 18 22.2 564 609 2 0.9 0.6 24 21.9 687 748 1-2 2 4.8 40 21.6 765 829 2 4 9.2 -
TABLE 3 properties after the last cold rolling to final thickness and annealing 300° C./5 minutes Hot rolling, 3 cold rolling steps, and final annealing 300° C./5 minutes Degree of rolling Grain reduction final % Rp0.2, Rm, size, minBR/t minBR/t Example ID shaping, % IACS MPa MPa μm Q P Comparative CuZn23.5Sn1.0 24 25.1 541 604 2-3 0.4 1.2 example 1 40 24.8 622 694 2-3 1.5 7.5 Comparative CuZn23.5Sn1.0 24 26.9 378 454 40-50 2.4 1.6 example 2 40 26.5 503 557 40 3.5 4 Example 3 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6 24 22.9 623 667 2-3 2.4 3.6 40 22.8 686 742 3 4 10 Example 4 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 24 24.2 633 699 1-2 2 4.8 40 23.7 710 756 1-2 3.5 11 Example 5 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 24 24.5 534 580 10-15 2.4 3.2 40 24.1 634 675 5-10 3.5 8.5 Example 6 CuZn30.0Sn1.0Fe0.6 18 21.9 550 606 2-3 0.9 0.4 24 21.8 649 720 1-2 1.6 6.4 40 21.5 704 782 2 2 6.4 -
TABLE 4 main texture layers in volume percent of the alloys from Table 3 Hot rolling, 3 cold rolling steps, and final annealing 300° C./5 minutes 22RD Degree of Copper S/R Brass Cast cube Cube rolling layer layer layer layer layer layer Brass/ reduction, vol.- vol.- vol.- vol.- vol.- vol.- Copper Example ID % % % % % % % layer Comparative CuZn23.5Sn1.0 24 14.7 15.4 8.8 4.4 5.3 2.0 0.60 example 1 40 14.5 16.0 10.0 5.0 4.7 1.4 0.69 Comparative CuZn23.5Sn1.0 24 14.9 15.0 7.9 4.1 5.2 1.8 0.53 example 2 40 12.1 18.2 9.7 7.5 4.7 0.9 0.80 Example 3 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6 24 17.8 19.8 9.4 4.5 4.0 1.2 0.53 Example 4 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 24 15.9 15.4 11.3 5.7 3.5 1.3 0.71 Example 5 CuZn23.5Sn1.0Fe0.6P0.2 24 17.7 17.3 8.8 7.5 4.4 1.0 0.50 Example 6 CuZn30.0Sn1.0Fe0.6 18 15.3 17.6 8.1 2.9 4.2 2.1 0.53 24 12.1 16.8 10.2 3.7 4.4 2.3 0.84
Claims (8)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102011110588 | 2011-08-13 | ||
DE102011110588.7 | 2011-08-13 | ||
DE102011110588 | 2011-08-13 | ||
PCT/EP2012/002523 WO2013023717A2 (en) | 2011-08-13 | 2012-06-15 | Copper alloy |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140161661A1 US20140161661A1 (en) | 2014-06-12 |
US20140377127A9 true US20140377127A9 (en) | 2014-12-25 |
US9493858B2 US9493858B2 (en) | 2016-11-15 |
Family
ID=46513683
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/235,884 Active 2032-06-30 US9493858B2 (en) | 2011-08-13 | 2012-06-15 | Copper alloy |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9493858B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2742161B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2014527578A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20140050003A (en) |
CN (1) | CN103732769B (en) |
BR (1) | BR112014003377A2 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2014000570A (en) |
TW (1) | TWI591192B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013023717A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140170016A1 (en) * | 2011-08-13 | 2014-06-19 | Andrea Kaeufler | Use of a copper alloy |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9080227B2 (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2015-07-14 | Mitsubishi Shindoh Co., Ltd. | Copper alloy sheet and method of manufacturing copper alloy sheet |
CN105579600B (en) * | 2013-09-26 | 2019-08-30 | 三菱伸铜株式会社 | Copper alloy and copper alloy plate |
CN104342578B (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2016-08-24 | 大丰市南亚阀门有限公司 | A kind of bronze alloy material for valve casting and process technique thereof |
CN106756222A (en) * | 2016-12-20 | 2017-05-31 | 薛亚红 | A kind of Copper-zinc alloy material |
CN109112351B (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2020-12-11 | 山东光韵智能科技有限公司 | High-elasticity-modulus brass alloy material and preparation method thereof |
MX2019000947A (en) * | 2019-01-22 | 2020-07-23 | Nac De Cobre S A De C V | Copper-zinc alloy free of lead and resistant to the marine environment. |
DE102021103686A1 (en) | 2021-02-17 | 2022-08-18 | Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. Kg | brass alloy |
CN113073229B (en) | 2021-03-25 | 2021-12-07 | 上海五星铜业股份有限公司 | Tin brass alloy and preparation method thereof |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5893953A (en) * | 1997-09-16 | 1999-04-13 | Waterbury Rolling Mills, Inc. | Copper alloy and process for obtaining same |
US20010001400A1 (en) * | 1997-04-18 | 2001-05-24 | Dennis R. Brauer Et Al | Grain refined tin brass |
US6627011B2 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2003-09-30 | Dowa Mining Co., Ltd. | Process for producing connector copper alloys |
US20140170016A1 (en) * | 2011-08-13 | 2014-06-19 | Andrea Kaeufler | Use of a copper alloy |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3816109A (en) | 1972-07-03 | 1974-06-11 | Olin Corp | Copper base alloy |
US4047978A (en) | 1975-04-17 | 1977-09-13 | Olin Corporation | Processing copper base alloys |
US4259124A (en) | 1978-06-28 | 1981-03-31 | Olin Corporation | Modified brass alloys with improved stress relaxation resistance |
JPS6326320A (en) | 1986-07-18 | 1988-02-03 | Nippon Mining Co Ltd | High power conductive copper alloy |
JPH01165734A (en) | 1987-09-21 | 1989-06-29 | Nippon Mining Co Ltd | Material for case of piezoelectric oscillator |
US5853505A (en) | 1997-04-18 | 1998-12-29 | Olin Corporation | Iron modified tin brass |
US6132528A (en) | 1997-04-18 | 2000-10-17 | Olin Corporation | Iron modified tin brass |
US6949150B2 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2005-09-27 | Dowa Mining Co., Ltd. | Connector copper alloys and a process for producing the same |
US6264764B1 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2001-07-24 | Outokumpu Oyj | Copper alloy and process for making same |
CN1177946C (en) * | 2001-09-07 | 2004-12-01 | 同和矿业株式会社 | Copper alloy for connector use and producing method thereof |
JP2005060773A (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2005-03-10 | Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co Ltd | Special brass and method for increasing strength of the special brass |
JP4584692B2 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2010-11-24 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | High-strength copper alloy sheet excellent in bending workability and manufacturing method thereof |
EP2045344B1 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2012-05-23 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho | Process for producing copper alloy sheets for electrical/electronic part |
JP5191725B2 (en) * | 2007-08-13 | 2013-05-08 | Dowaメタルテック株式会社 | Cu-Zn-Sn based copper alloy sheet, manufacturing method thereof, and connector |
WO2011019042A1 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2011-02-17 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Copper alloy material for electrical/electronic components |
-
2012
- 2012-04-26 TW TW101114884A patent/TWI591192B/en active
- 2012-06-15 EP EP12735197.1A patent/EP2742161B1/en active Active
- 2012-06-15 CN CN201280039553.7A patent/CN103732769B/en active Active
- 2012-06-15 US US14/235,884 patent/US9493858B2/en active Active
- 2012-06-15 KR KR1020147000034A patent/KR20140050003A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2012-06-15 MX MX2014000570A patent/MX2014000570A/en unknown
- 2012-06-15 BR BR112014003377A patent/BR112014003377A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2012-06-15 JP JP2014524282A patent/JP2014527578A/en active Pending
- 2012-06-15 WO PCT/EP2012/002523 patent/WO2013023717A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20010001400A1 (en) * | 1997-04-18 | 2001-05-24 | Dennis R. Brauer Et Al | Grain refined tin brass |
US5893953A (en) * | 1997-09-16 | 1999-04-13 | Waterbury Rolling Mills, Inc. | Copper alloy and process for obtaining same |
US6627011B2 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2003-09-30 | Dowa Mining Co., Ltd. | Process for producing connector copper alloys |
US20140170016A1 (en) * | 2011-08-13 | 2014-06-19 | Andrea Kaeufler | Use of a copper alloy |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Yamaguchi, JP Pub. No. 2005-060773 (machine translation) * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140170016A1 (en) * | 2011-08-13 | 2014-06-19 | Andrea Kaeufler | Use of a copper alloy |
US9702027B2 (en) * | 2011-08-13 | 2017-07-11 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Copper alloy |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103732769A (en) | 2014-04-16 |
TW201307585A (en) | 2013-02-16 |
WO2013023717A2 (en) | 2013-02-21 |
KR20140050003A (en) | 2014-04-28 |
EP2742161A2 (en) | 2014-06-18 |
EP2742161B1 (en) | 2016-12-07 |
CN103732769B (en) | 2016-08-17 |
TWI591192B (en) | 2017-07-11 |
MX2014000570A (en) | 2014-04-30 |
BR112014003377A2 (en) | 2017-03-01 |
US9493858B2 (en) | 2016-11-15 |
US20140161661A1 (en) | 2014-06-12 |
WO2013023717A3 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
JP2014527578A (en) | 2014-10-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9493858B2 (en) | Copper alloy | |
EP2508632B1 (en) | Copper alloy sheet material | |
KR101419147B1 (en) | Copper alloy sheet and process for producing same | |
JP5578827B2 (en) | High-strength copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
KR101113356B1 (en) | Copper alloy material, electric and electronic parts, and copper alloy material manufacturing method | |
US20120241056A1 (en) | Copper alloy sheet material having a low young's modulus and method of producing the same | |
JP3962751B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet for electric and electronic parts with bending workability | |
WO2011068121A1 (en) | Copper alloy sheet material, connector using same, and copper alloy sheet material production method for producing same | |
WO2010126046A1 (en) | Cu-Ni-Si-Mg-BASED ALLOY HAVING IMPROVED ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY AND BENDABILITY | |
JP4177104B2 (en) | High-strength copper alloy excellent in bending workability, manufacturing method thereof, and terminal / connector using the same | |
WO2015182776A1 (en) | Copper alloy sheet, connector comprising copper alloy sheet, and method for producing copper alloy sheet | |
KR20100113644A (en) | Cu-ni-si-co-cr alloy for electronic material | |
WO2015046459A1 (en) | Copper alloy and copper alloy sheet | |
KR20110088595A (en) | Cu-ni-si-co based copper ally for electronic materials and manufacturing method therefor | |
JP3977376B2 (en) | Copper alloy | |
JP5309271B1 (en) | Copper alloy plate and method for producing copper alloy plate | |
KR20110039372A (en) | Copper alloy material for electrical/electronic component | |
KR101803797B1 (en) | Cu-Ni-Si BASED COPPER ALLOY SHEET HAVING HIGH DIE ABRASION RESISTANCE AND GOOD SHEAR PROCESSABILITY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME | |
WO2010134210A1 (en) | Copper alloy material and manufacturing method therefor | |
KR20140002001A (en) | Cu-ni-si alloy wire having excellent bendability | |
KR20060130183A (en) | Copper alloy | |
US20010001400A1 (en) | Grain refined tin brass | |
US5853505A (en) | Iron modified tin brass | |
US20150348665A1 (en) | Copper alloy for electric and electronic device, copper alloy sheet for electric and electronic device, conductive component for electric and electronic device, and terminal | |
JP2009185375A (en) | Precipitation hardening type copper alloy strip strengthened utilizing recovery phenomenon |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WIELAND-WERKE AG, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KUHN, HANS-ACHIM;KAEUFLER, ANDREA;GROSS, STEFAN;REEL/FRAME:032077/0939 Effective date: 20131212 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PTGR); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |