US20100307645A1 - Aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle and process for producing the same - Google Patents

Aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle and process for producing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100307645A1
US20100307645A1 US12/746,127 US74612708A US2010307645A1 US 20100307645 A1 US20100307645 A1 US 20100307645A1 US 74612708 A US74612708 A US 74612708A US 2010307645 A1 US2010307645 A1 US 2010307645A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sheet
aluminum alloy
mass
alloy sheet
resistance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/746,127
Inventor
Pizhi Zhao
Toshiya Anami
Kazumitsu Mizushima
Akira Goto
Hitoshi Kazama
Kunihiro Yasunaga
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Light Metal Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nippon Light Metal Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Light Metal Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Light Metal Co Ltd
Assigned to HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD., NIPPON LIGHT METAL CO., LTD. reassignment HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KAZAMA, HITOSHI, GOTO, AKIRA, YASUNAGA, KUNIHIRO, MIZUSHIMA, KAZUMITSU, ANAMI, TOSHIYA, ZHAO, PIZHI
Publication of US20100307645A1 publication Critical patent/US20100307645A1/en
Assigned to NIPPON LIGHT METAL CO., LTD. reassignment NIPPON LIGHT METAL CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/04Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C22F1/047Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon of alloys with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/06Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths into moulds with travelling walls, e.g. with rolls, plates, belts, caterpillars
    • B22D11/0605Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths into moulds with travelling walls, e.g. with rolls, plates, belts, caterpillars formed by two belts, e.g. Hazelett-process
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/12Accessories for subsequent treating or working cast stock in situ
    • B22D11/124Accessories for subsequent treating or working cast stock in situ for cooling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/06Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/06Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • C22C21/08Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent with silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/04Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B1/00Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations
    • B21B1/22Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling plates, strips, bands or sheets of indefinite length
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B3/00Rolling materials of special alloys so far as the composition of the alloy requires or permits special rolling methods or sequences ; Rolling of aluminium, copper, zinc or other non-ferrous metals
    • B21B2003/001Aluminium or its alloys
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B27/00Rolls, roll alloys or roll fabrication; Lubricating, cooling or heating rolls while in use
    • B21B27/005Rolls with a roughened or textured surface; Methods for making same
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B3/00Rolling materials of special alloys so far as the composition of the alloy requires or permits special rolling methods or sequences ; Rolling of aluminium, copper, zinc or other non-ferrous metals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles and a process for producing the same, particularly to an aluminum alloy sheet suitable for forming a body sheet for motor vehicles and the like and a method for producing the same.
  • cold rolled steel sheets have been mainly used, for example, for automobile outer panels.
  • aluminum alloy sheets such as an Al—Mg-based alloy sheet and an Al—Mg—Si-based alloy sheet has been studied recently.
  • the Al—Mg-based alloy sheet has been proposed as a body sheet for motor vehicles because it is excellent in strength, formability and corrosion resistance.
  • Patent Document 2 a process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability and stress corrosion cracking resistance. This process comprises preparing a melt comprising 3.3-3.5 wt. % Mg and 0.1-0.2 wt. % Mn and further comprising at least one of 0.3 wt. % or less Fe and 0.15 wt.
  • Patent Document 3 a so-called stabilization treatment is proposed (Patent Document 3) in which a continuously cast and rolled sheet of an aluminum alloy containing 3-6 wt. % Mg is subjected to annealing treatment followed by straightening, heated at a predetermined temperature of 240 to 340° C. for 1 hour or more, and then slowly cooled.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Patent No. 3155678
  • Patent Document 2 International Publication No. WO 2006/011242
  • Patent Document 3 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-80913
  • the present invention has employed a process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability, the process comprising: casting a melt, comprising 3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, and further a limited amount of less than 0.1 mass % Mn, a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al, into a thin slab having a thickness of 5 to 15 mm in a twin-belt caster so that the cooling rate at 1 ⁇ 4 depth of the thickness of the thin slab is 20 to 200° C./sec; winding the cast thin slab into a coil; subjecting the coiled thin slab to cold rolling with a roll having a surface roughness of 0.2 to 0.7 ⁇ m Ra at a cold rolling reduction of 50 to 98%; subjecting the cold rolled thin sheet to final annealing continuously in a CAL at a holding temperature of 400 to 520° C.; and then subject
  • an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability the sheet comprising 3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, and further a limited amount of less than 0.1 mass % Mn, a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al, wherein the sheet has an intermetallic compound maximum size of 5 ⁇ m or less by circle-equivalent diameter in a region at 1 ⁇ 4 depth of the sheet thickness, an average recrystallized grain size of 15 ⁇ m or less, a surface roughness of 0.2-0.6 ⁇ m Ra, a yield strength of 145 MPa or less, and a tensile strength of 225 MPa or more.
  • an Al—Mg-based alloy sheet excellent in formability and shape fixability can be produced without subjecting a continuous cast and rolled sheet to stabilization treatment.
  • Mg is an element which increases strength by solid solution strengthening effect. If the Mg content is less than 3.0%, this effect cannot be exhibited, and tensile strength will be reduced. If the Mg content exceeds 3.5%, yield strength will be excessively high to result in reduction of shape fixability.
  • Fe is crystallized as fine grains of intermetallic compounds such as an Al—Fe—Si-based compound during casting and functions as a nucleation site of recrystallization during annealing after cold rolling. Therefore, the number of recrystallized nuclei to be produced will be increased with an increase in the number of grains of these intermetallic compounds, resulting in formation of a large number of fine recrystallized grains. Moreover, the fine grains of the intermetallic compounds have an effect of pinning the grain boundaries of produced recrystallized grains to suppress the growth of crystal grains by the coalescence thereof to stably maintain the fine recrystallized grains. For exhibiting this effect, the Fe content needs to be 0.05% or more.
  • the Fe content is limited to 0.05 to 0.3%.
  • a preferred range is from 0.05 to 0.25%.
  • Si is crystallized as fine grains of intermetallic compounds such as an Al—Fe—Si-based compound during casting and functions as a nucleation site of recrystallization during annealing after cold rolling. Therefore, the number of recrystallized nuclei to be produced will be increased with an increase in the number of grains of these intermetallic compounds, resulting in formation of a large number of fine recrystallized grains. Moreover, the fine grains of the intermetallic compounds have an effect of pinning the grain boundaries of produced recrystallized grains to suppress the growth of crystal grains by the coalescence thereof to stably maintain the fine recrystallized grains. For exhibiting this effect, the Si content needs to be 0.05% or more.
  • the Si content is limited to 0.05 to 0.15%.
  • a preferred range is from 0.05 to 0.1%.
  • the solidification cooling rate during casting is high. This high solidification cooling rate increases the amount of dissolved Mn in the matrix, which excessively increases the yield strength of the final sheet to result in the reduction of shape fixability.
  • the Mn content is preferably limited to less than 0.08%, more preferably to less than 0.06%.
  • Ti is preferably contained in the range of 0.001 to 0.1% for refining crystal grains of an ingot.
  • the Ti content needs to be 0.001% or more.
  • coarse intermetallic compounds such as TiAl 3 will be produced, leading to formation of voids during forming, which reduces formability.
  • a more preferred range of the Ti content is from 0.001 to 0.05%.
  • Ti may be added as a master alloy such as Al-10% Ti or may be added as a grain-refining agent (rod hardener) such as Al-5% Ti-1% B and Al-10% Ti-1% B.
  • B is preferably contained in the range of 0.0005 to 0.01% for refining crystal grains of an ingot.
  • B has the effect of producing nuclei (TiBx) which serve as starting points for forming ⁇ Al grains in the melt.
  • TiBx nuclei
  • a more preferred range of the B content is from 0.0005 to 0.005%.
  • B may be added as a master alloy such as Al-5% B or may be added as a grain-refining agent (rod hardener) such as Al-5% Ti-1% B and Al-10% Ti-1% B.
  • the process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet according to the present invention is not limited to the procedures to be described below.
  • the process includes casting conditions and a final annealing condition, whose significance and reasons for limitation will be described below.
  • the twin-belt casting process is a continuous casting process in which a melt is poured between two water-cooled rotating belts vertically facing each other and cooled from the belt surfaces to be solidified to form a slab, and the slab is continuously pulled out from the assembly of the belts opposite to the side where the melt is poured and wound into a coil.
  • the thickness of the slab to be cast is preferably from 5 to 15 mm. If the thickness of the thin slab is less than 5 mm, the amount of aluminum passing through the casting machine per unit time will be too small to cast the slab. Conversely, if the thickness exceeds 15 mm, the slab cannot be wound with a roll. Therefore, the thickness of the slab is limited to the range of 5 to 15 mm. This range of thickness allows a solidification cooling rate at 1 ⁇ 4 depth of the thickness of the slab during casting of 20 to 200° C./sec, which allows the control of the intermetallic compounds maximum size to 5 ⁇ m or less by circle-equivalent diameter.
  • the surface roughness of the cold rolling roll is limited to 0.2-0.7 ⁇ m Ra in order to adjust the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet. Since the shape of the roll surface is transferred to the rolled sheet surface in the cold rolling step, the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is 0.2-0.6 ⁇ m Ra. When the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is in the range of 0.2-0.6 ⁇ m Ra, the surface shape of the final sheet will act as a micro pool for uniformly holding a low viscosity lubricating oil used during forming, thus providing a sheet excellent in press formability.
  • the surface roughness of the cold rolling roll is preferably 0.3-0.7 ⁇ m Ra, and in this case, the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is 0.3-0.6 ⁇ m Ra.
  • the surface roughness of the cold rolling roll is more preferably 0.4-0.7 ⁇ m Ra, and in this case, the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is 0.4-0.6 ⁇ m Ra.
  • the maximum size by circle-equivalent diameter is limited to 5 ⁇ m or less.
  • very fine intermetallic compounds are dispersed in the matrix, so that the movement of dislocation in the aluminum sheet during forming thereof is suppressed to enhance the tensile strength thereof by solid solution strengthening effect by Mg and provide a sheet excellent in formability.
  • the average recrystallized grain size in the region at 1 ⁇ 4 depth of the thickness of the finally annealed sheet is limited to 15 ⁇ m or less. If this is exceeded, the level difference produced in the crystal grain boundaries during the deformation of material will be excessively large, and the orange peel after deformation will be remarkable, thus reducing the resistance to surface roughening.
  • the rolling reduction during cold rolling is preferably from 50 to 98%.
  • the dislocation generated by the plastic working by rolling is accumulated around the above fine crystallized products. Therefore, the dislocation is necessary to obtain a fine recrystallized structure during final annealing. If the rolling reduction during cold rolling is less than 50%, the accumulation of dislocation will not be enough to obtain a fine recrystallized structure. If the rolling reduction during cold rolling exceeds 98%, edge cracks during rolling will be remarkable, and the yield will be reduced.
  • a more preferred cold rolling reduction is in the range of 55 to 96%.
  • the temperature of the final annealing in a continuous annealing furnace is limited to 400 to 520° C. If the temperature is less than 400° C., the energy required for recrystallization will be insufficient. Therefore, a fine recrystallized structure cannot be obtained. If the holding temperature exceeds 520° C., the growth of recrystallized grains will be remarkable, and the average recrystallized grain size will exceed 15 ⁇ m, resulting in reduction of formability and resistance to surface roughening.
  • the holding time of the continuous annealing is preferably within 5 minutes. If the holding time of the continuous annealing exceeds 5 minutes, the growth of recrystallized grains will be remarkable, and the average recrystallized grain size will exceed 15 ⁇ m, resulting in reduction of formability and resistance to surface roughening.
  • the heating rate is preferably 100° C./min or more. If the heating rate during the continuous annealing treatment is less than 100° C./min, a fine recrystallized structure will not be obtained and formability and resistance to surface roughening will be reduced.
  • the temperature of the final annealing in a batch furnace is limited to 300 to 400° C. If the temperature is less than 300° C., the energy required for recrystallization will be insufficient. Therefore, a fine recrystallized structure cannot be obtained. If the holding temperature exceeds 400° C., the growth of recrystallized grains will be remarkable, and the average size of recrystallized grains will exceed 15 ⁇ m, resulting in reduction of formability and resistance to surface roughening.
  • the holding time of the final annealing in a batch furnace is not particularly limited, but it is preferably 1 to 8 hours. If it is less than 1 hour, the coil may not be uniformly heated. If the holding time exceeds 8 hours, the average size of recrystallized grains will exceed 15 ⁇ m, and formability and resistance to surface roughening will be reduced.
  • the sheet Since the sheet is deformed by thermal strain after the final annealing, it is subjected to straightening such as repetitive bending with a leveler roll in the state of a coil or a sheet to correct the shape and restore the flatness. This straightening enables the sheet to obtain a predetermined tensile strength and yield strength, thus providing an aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability.
  • a melt each having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 (alloy A, B, C, D, E, F, I) was degassed and settled, and the resulting melt was then fed to a twin-belt caster to continuously cast a thin slab having a thickness of 10 mm, which was directly wound into a coil.
  • a melt having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 (alloy G) was degassed and settled, and the resulting melt was then subjected to DC casting process to cast a slab of 1000 mm (width) ⁇ 500 mm (thickness) ⁇ 4000 mm (length).
  • the slab was subjected to face milling of both surfaces thereof and then subjected to homogenization of 450° C. ⁇ 8 hours in a soaking furnace followed by hot rolling to produce a hot-rolled sheet having a thickness of 6 mm, which was wound into a coil.
  • a melt having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 (alloy H) was degassed and settled, and the resulting melt was then fed to a twin-belt caster to continuously cast a thin slab having a thickness of 6 mm, which was directly wound into a coil.
  • these thin slabs and the hot rolled sheets were cold rolled with cold rolling rolls which were finished to a predetermined surface roughness (0.6 ⁇ m, 1.0 ⁇ m Ra) to form sheets having a thickness of 1 mm. Then, these sheets were passed through a CAL to undergo continuous annealing at a holding temperature of 460° C. Further, the finally annealed sheets were passed through a leveler to undergo straightening to remove thermal strain therefrom followed by cutting to obtain test specimens. Note that Table 2 shows production conditions of the test specimens in each production step in Examples and Comparative Examples.
  • Example 1 A Twin belt/10 100 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 2 B Twin belt/10 78 None 0.6 1.0 460° C. Comparative C Twin belt/10 85 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 1 Comparative D Twin belt/10 75 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 2 Comparative E Twin belt/10 76 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 3 Comparative F Twin belt/10 74 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 4 Comparative G DC/500 3 6 mm 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 5 Comparative H Twin roll/6 300 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 6 Comparative I Twin belt/10 78 None 1.0 1.0 460° C.
  • Example 7 Comparative C Twin belt/10 78 None 1.0 1.0 460° C.
  • test specimens were evaluated for the recrystallized grain size, the intermetallic compound maximum size by circle-equivalent diameter, surface roughness, 0.2% yield strength (0.2% YS), tensile strength (UTS), elongation (EL), and punch stretch height.
  • the recrystallized grain size (D) of a test specimen was measured by an cross-cut method.
  • the test specimen was cut, embedded in a resin, polished, and subjected to anodic coating in an aqueous fluoroboric acid solution to apply an anodic oxide film to the surface of the section of the test specimen.
  • a photograph (200 times) of grains in the section of the test specimen was taken with a polarizing microscope. On the photograph, three lines were drawn both in the vertical direction and in the horizontal direction. The number (n) of crystal grain boundaries crossing these lines was counted.
  • the average value (D) of the grain sizes determined by dividing the total length (L) of the lines by (n ⁇ 1) was defined as the average recrystallized grain size of the test specimen.
  • the intermetallic compound maximum size by circle-equivalent diameter was measured with an image analyzer (trade name: LUZEX).
  • the surface roughness of the test specimen was measured using a surface roughness meter according to JIS B0601, wherein the direction of measurement was perpendicular to the rolling direction; the measurement region was 4 mm; and the cutoff was 0.8 mm.
  • the resulting surface roughness was defined as the average roughness Ra.
  • surface roughness of the roll was measured in the same manner as in the measurement of the surface roughness of the test specimen using a surface roughness meter according to JIS B0601, wherein the direction of measurement was in the transverse direction of the roll; the measurement region was 4 mm; and the cutoff was 0.8 mm.
  • the resulting surface roughness was defined as the average roughness Ra.
  • the punch stretch height was measured using the following die assembly and indicates the critical forming height at break.
  • the resistance to surface roughening was evaluated at three stages ( ⁇ : excellent, ⁇ : a little poor, X: poor) by visually observing the surface condition near the broken part of the test piece after the tensile test.
  • Example 1 12 3.7 0.35 133 234 28 30 ⁇ Example 2 11 3.5 0.41 134 233 27 30 ⁇ Comparative 10 4 0.37 146 248 27 29 ⁇ Example 1 Comparative 11 4.2 0.42 121 209 26 30 ⁇ Example 2 Comparative 9 4.1 0.39 148 244 27 29 ⁇ Example 3 Comparative 8 4.5 0.38 155 265 27 28 ⁇ Example 4 Comparative 25 15 0.45 120 224 28 27 ⁇ Example 5 Comparative 54 2 0.35 115 222 26 26 X Example 6 Comparative 13 3.7 0.80 132 232 28 28 ⁇ Example 7
  • the Mg content is proper, and in addition, the Mn content is suppressed to less than 0.1%.
  • the test specimens in Examples 1 and 2 are excellent in shape fixability since they have a yield strength of 145 MPa or less; they are excellent in resistance to surface roughening since they have fine recrystallized grains; and they are excellent in formability to an extent of a punch stretch height of 29 mm or more since they have fine intermetallic compounds and have a proper surface roughness of 0.35 and 0.41 ⁇ m, respectively.
  • Comparative Example 1 since the Mg content is as high as 3.75%, the 0.2% yield strength is excessively increased to result in reduction of shape fixability. In Comparative Example 2, since the Mg content is as low as 2.5%, both the tensile strength and elongation are insufficient.
  • Comparative Example 5 since the solidification cooling rate during the slab casting by a DC casting process is low, the maximum size of the intermetallic compounds is excessively large, and the recrystallized grain size is also excessively large. As a result, the tensile strength is reduced, and the resistance to surface roughening and punch stretch formability are also reduced.
  • the cold rolling roll has a surface roughness of 1.0 ⁇ m Ra
  • the test specimen has a surface roughness of 0.8 ⁇ m Ra.
  • the punch stretch height is 28 mm, indicating a reduced formability.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metal Rolling (AREA)
  • Continuous Casting (AREA)

Abstract

An aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles is produced by casting a melt, containing 3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, and less than 0.1 mass % Mn, a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al, into a slab having a thickness of 5 to 15 mm in a twin-belt caster so that cooling rate at ¼ depth of thickness of the slab is 20 to 200° C./sec; winding the cast thin slab into a coiled thin slab subjected to cold rolling with a roll having a surface roughness of 0.2 to 0.7 μm Ra at a cold rolling reduction of 50 to 98%; subjecting the cold rolled sheet to final annealing either continuously in a CAL at a holding temperature of 400 to 520° C. or in a batch annealing furnace at a holding temperature of 300 to 400° C.; and subjecting the resulting sheet to straightening with a leveler.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles and a process for producing the same, particularly to an aluminum alloy sheet suitable for forming a body sheet for motor vehicles and the like and a method for producing the same.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Heretofore, cold rolled steel sheets have been mainly used, for example, for automobile outer panels. However, in accordance with the requirements for weight reduction of automobile bodies, the use of aluminum alloy sheets such as an Al—Mg-based alloy sheet and an Al—Mg—Si-based alloy sheet has been studied recently. Particularly, the Al—Mg-based alloy sheet has been proposed as a body sheet for motor vehicles because it is excellent in strength, formability and corrosion resistance.
  • Heretofore, as a process for producing such an aluminum alloy sheet, there has been employed a process including casting a slab by DC casting, face milling both surfaces of the slab, homogenizing the face-milled slab in a soaking furnace, and subjecting the homogenized face-milled slab to hot rolling, cold rolling, intermediate annealing, cold rolling, and final annealing to finish it to a predetermined sheet thickness (refer to Patent Document 1).
  • On the other hand, there has been proposed a process including continuously casting a thin slab with a belt caster, directly winding the resulting thin slab into a coil, subjecting the coiled thin slab to cold rolling and final annealing to finish it to a predetermined sheet thickness. For example, there is disclosed a process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability and stress corrosion cracking resistance (Patent Document 2). This process comprises preparing a melt comprising 3.3-3.5 wt. % Mg and 0.1-0.2 wt. % Mn and further comprising at least one of 0.3 wt. % or less Fe and 0.15 wt. % or less Si, a balance being ordinary impurities and Al; casting the melt into a thin slab having a thickness of 5 to 10 mm in a twin-belt caster at a speed of 5 to 15 m/min so that the cooling rate at ¼ depth of the thickness of the thin slab is 40 to 90° C./sec; winding the resulting thin slab into a roll; cold rolling the rolled thin slab with a roll having a surface roughness of 0.2 to 0.7 μm Ra; and annealing the cold rolled thin sheet.
  • However, in the above process, since 0.1-0.2 wt. % Mn is contained in the chemical composition of the melt for the purpose of refining the recrystallized grains and the solidification cooling rate is relatively fast, the size of intermetallic compounds such as Al—(Fe.Mn)—Si is reduced to resulting in excellent formability. On the other hand, there is a problem that, since the amount of dissolved Mn in the matrix is excessively high, yield strength is higher and spring back after forming is increased.
  • In order to solve this problem, for example, a so-called stabilization treatment is proposed (Patent Document 3) in which a continuously cast and rolled sheet of an aluminum alloy containing 3-6 wt. % Mg is subjected to annealing treatment followed by straightening, heated at a predetermined temperature of 240 to 340° C. for 1 hour or more, and then slowly cooled.
  • Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent No. 3155678
  • Patent Document 2: International Publication No. WO 2006/011242
  • Patent Document 3: Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-80913 DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • In order to solve the problems as described above, the present invention has employed a process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability, the process comprising: casting a melt, comprising 3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, and further a limited amount of less than 0.1 mass % Mn, a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al, into a thin slab having a thickness of 5 to 15 mm in a twin-belt caster so that the cooling rate at ¼ depth of the thickness of the thin slab is 20 to 200° C./sec; winding the cast thin slab into a coil; subjecting the coiled thin slab to cold rolling with a roll having a surface roughness of 0.2 to 0.7 μm Ra at a cold rolling reduction of 50 to 98%; subjecting the cold rolled thin sheet to final annealing continuously in a CAL at a holding temperature of 400 to 520° C.; and then subjecting the resulting sheet to straightening with a leveler. Alternatively, the cold rolled thin sheet may be subjected to final annealing in a batch annealing furnace at a holding temperature of 300 to 400° C.
  • Employing such a production process has made it possible to provide an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability, the sheet comprising 3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, and further a limited amount of less than 0.1 mass % Mn, a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al, wherein the sheet has an intermetallic compound maximum size of 5 μm or less by circle-equivalent diameter in a region at ¼ depth of the sheet thickness, an average recrystallized grain size of 15 μm or less, a surface roughness of 0.2-0.6 μm Ra, a yield strength of 145 MPa or less, and a tensile strength of 225 MPa or more.
  • According to the present invention, an Al—Mg-based alloy sheet excellent in formability and shape fixability can be produced without subjecting a continuous cast and rolled sheet to stabilization treatment.
  • BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
  • The reasons why the chemical composition of the alloy has been limited in the present invention will be described below. Herein, “%” indicating chemical composition means “% by mass”, unless otherwise specified.
  • [3.0-3.5% Mg]
  • Mg is an element which increases strength by solid solution strengthening effect. If the Mg content is less than 3.0%, this effect cannot be exhibited, and tensile strength will be reduced. If the Mg content exceeds 3.5%, yield strength will be excessively high to result in reduction of shape fixability.
  • [0.05-0.3% Fe]
  • Fe is crystallized as fine grains of intermetallic compounds such as an Al—Fe—Si-based compound during casting and functions as a nucleation site of recrystallization during annealing after cold rolling. Therefore, the number of recrystallized nuclei to be produced will be increased with an increase in the number of grains of these intermetallic compounds, resulting in formation of a large number of fine recrystallized grains. Moreover, the fine grains of the intermetallic compounds have an effect of pinning the grain boundaries of produced recrystallized grains to suppress the growth of crystal grains by the coalescence thereof to stably maintain the fine recrystallized grains. For exhibiting this effect, the Fe content needs to be 0.05% or more. However, if the Fe content exceeds 0.3%, the intermetallic compounds crystallized tend to be coarser, which leads to formation of voids with these intermetallic compounds as starting point during forming, resulting in inferior formability. Therefore, the Fe content is limited to 0.05 to 0.3%. A preferred range is from 0.05 to 0.25%.
  • [0.05-0.15% Si]
  • Si is crystallized as fine grains of intermetallic compounds such as an Al—Fe—Si-based compound during casting and functions as a nucleation site of recrystallization during annealing after cold rolling. Therefore, the number of recrystallized nuclei to be produced will be increased with an increase in the number of grains of these intermetallic compounds, resulting in formation of a large number of fine recrystallized grains. Moreover, the fine grains of the intermetallic compounds have an effect of pinning the grain boundaries of produced recrystallized grains to suppress the growth of crystal grains by the coalescence thereof to stably maintain the fine recrystallized grains. For exhibiting this effect, the Si content needs to be 0.05% or more. However, if the Si content exceeds 0.15%, the intermetallic compounds crystallized tend to be coarser, which leads to formation of voids with these intermetallic compounds as starting point during forming, resulting in inferior formability. Therefore, the Si content is limited to 0.05 to 0.15%. A preferred range is from 0.05 to 0.1%.
  • [Less than 0.1% Mn]
  • When Mn content is 0.1% or more, the solidification cooling rate during casting is high. This high solidification cooling rate increases the amount of dissolved Mn in the matrix, which excessively increases the yield strength of the final sheet to result in the reduction of shape fixability. Further, the Mn content is preferably limited to less than 0.08%, more preferably to less than 0.06%.
  • [0.001-0.1% Ti as an Optional Component]
  • In the present invention, Ti is preferably contained in the range of 0.001 to 0.1% for refining crystal grains of an ingot. For exhibiting this effect, the Ti content needs to be 0.001% or more. However, if the Ti content exceeds 0.1%, coarse intermetallic compounds such as TiAl3 will be produced, leading to formation of voids during forming, which reduces formability. A more preferred range of the Ti content is from 0.001 to 0.05%. Ti may be added as a master alloy such as Al-10% Ti or may be added as a grain-refining agent (rod hardener) such as Al-5% Ti-1% B and Al-10% Ti-1% B.
  • [0.0005-0.01% B as an Optional Component]
  • In the present invention, B is preferably contained in the range of 0.0005 to 0.01% for refining crystal grains of an ingot. When B coexists with Ti, B has the effect of producing nuclei (TiBx) which serve as starting points for forming αAl grains in the melt. A more preferred range of the B content is from 0.0005 to 0.005%. B may be added as a master alloy such as Al-5% B or may be added as a grain-refining agent (rod hardener) such as Al-5% Ti-1% B and Al-10% Ti-1% B.
  • The process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet according to the present invention is not limited to the procedures to be described below. The process includes casting conditions and a final annealing condition, whose significance and reasons for limitation will be described below.
  • [Casting Conditions of the Thin Slab]
  • The twin-belt casting process is a continuous casting process in which a melt is poured between two water-cooled rotating belts vertically facing each other and cooled from the belt surfaces to be solidified to form a slab, and the slab is continuously pulled out from the assembly of the belts opposite to the side where the melt is poured and wound into a coil.
  • In the present invention, the thickness of the slab to be cast is preferably from 5 to 15 mm. If the thickness of the thin slab is less than 5 mm, the amount of aluminum passing through the casting machine per unit time will be too small to cast the slab. Conversely, if the thickness exceeds 15 mm, the slab cannot be wound with a roll. Therefore, the thickness of the slab is limited to the range of 5 to 15 mm. This range of thickness allows a solidification cooling rate at ¼ depth of the thickness of the slab during casting of 20 to 200° C./sec, which allows the control of the intermetallic compounds maximum size to 5 μm or less by circle-equivalent diameter.
  • [Surface Roughness of the Cold Rolling Roll of 0.2-0.7 μm Ra]
  • The surface roughness of the cold rolling roll is limited to 0.2-0.7 μm Ra in order to adjust the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet. Since the shape of the roll surface is transferred to the rolled sheet surface in the cold rolling step, the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is 0.2-0.6 μm Ra. When the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is in the range of 0.2-0.6 μm Ra, the surface shape of the final sheet will act as a micro pool for uniformly holding a low viscosity lubricating oil used during forming, thus providing a sheet excellent in press formability. Note that the surface roughness of the cold rolling roll is preferably 0.3-0.7 μm Ra, and in this case, the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is 0.3-0.6 μm Ra. The surface roughness of the cold rolling roll is more preferably 0.4-0.7 μm Ra, and in this case, the surface roughness of the finally annealed sheet is 0.4-0.6 μm Ra.
  • [Intermetallic Compound Maximum Size of 5 μm or Less by Circle-Equivalent Diameter]
  • With respect to the intermetallic compounds in the metallographic structure in the region at ¼ depth of the thickness of the aluminum alloy sheet according to the present invention, the maximum size by circle-equivalent diameter is limited to 5 μm or less. Thus, very fine intermetallic compounds are dispersed in the matrix, so that the movement of dislocation in the aluminum sheet during forming thereof is suppressed to enhance the tensile strength thereof by solid solution strengthening effect by Mg and provide a sheet excellent in formability.
  • [Average Recrystallized Grain Size of 15 μm or Less]
  • The average recrystallized grain size in the region at ¼ depth of the thickness of the finally annealed sheet is limited to 15 μm or less. If this is exceeded, the level difference produced in the crystal grain boundaries during the deformation of material will be excessively large, and the orange peel after deformation will be remarkable, thus reducing the resistance to surface roughening.
  • [The Reason for Limiting the Cold Rolling Reduction to 50-98%]
  • The rolling reduction during cold rolling is preferably from 50 to 98%. The dislocation generated by the plastic working by rolling is accumulated around the above fine crystallized products. Therefore, the dislocation is necessary to obtain a fine recrystallized structure during final annealing. If the rolling reduction during cold rolling is less than 50%, the accumulation of dislocation will not be enough to obtain a fine recrystallized structure. If the rolling reduction during cold rolling exceeds 98%, edge cracks during rolling will be remarkable, and the yield will be reduced. A more preferred cold rolling reduction is in the range of 55 to 96%.
  • [Final Annealing Conditions in a Continuous Annealing Furnace]
  • The temperature of the final annealing in a continuous annealing furnace is limited to 400 to 520° C. If the temperature is less than 400° C., the energy required for recrystallization will be insufficient. Therefore, a fine recrystallized structure cannot be obtained. If the holding temperature exceeds 520° C., the growth of recrystallized grains will be remarkable, and the average recrystallized grain size will exceed 15 μm, resulting in reduction of formability and resistance to surface roughening.
  • The holding time of the continuous annealing is preferably within 5 minutes. If the holding time of the continuous annealing exceeds 5 minutes, the growth of recrystallized grains will be remarkable, and the average recrystallized grain size will exceed 15 μm, resulting in reduction of formability and resistance to surface roughening.
  • Regarding the heating rate and cooling rate during the continuous annealing treatment, the heating rate is preferably 100° C./min or more. If the heating rate during the continuous annealing treatment is less than 100° C./min, a fine recrystallized structure will not be obtained and formability and resistance to surface roughening will be reduced.
  • [Final Annealing Conditions in a Batch Furnace]
  • The temperature of the final annealing in a batch furnace is limited to 300 to 400° C. If the temperature is less than 300° C., the energy required for recrystallization will be insufficient. Therefore, a fine recrystallized structure cannot be obtained. If the holding temperature exceeds 400° C., the growth of recrystallized grains will be remarkable, and the average size of recrystallized grains will exceed 15 μm, resulting in reduction of formability and resistance to surface roughening.
  • The holding time of the final annealing in a batch furnace is not particularly limited, but it is preferably 1 to 8 hours. If it is less than 1 hour, the coil may not be uniformly heated. If the holding time exceeds 8 hours, the average size of recrystallized grains will exceed 15 μm, and formability and resistance to surface roughening will be reduced.
  • [Straightening with a Leveler]
  • Since the sheet is deformed by thermal strain after the final annealing, it is subjected to straightening such as repetitive bending with a leveler roll in the state of a coil or a sheet to correct the shape and restore the flatness. This straightening enables the sheet to obtain a predetermined tensile strength and yield strength, thus providing an aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability.
  • Examples
  • Hereinafter, Examples according to the present invention will be described as compared with Comparative Examples. A melt each having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 (alloy A, B, C, D, E, F, I) was degassed and settled, and the resulting melt was then fed to a twin-belt caster to continuously cast a thin slab having a thickness of 10 mm, which was directly wound into a coil. Similarly, a melt having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 (alloy G) was degassed and settled, and the resulting melt was then subjected to DC casting process to cast a slab of 1000 mm (width)×500 mm (thickness)×4000 mm (length). The slab was subjected to face milling of both surfaces thereof and then subjected to homogenization of 450° C.×8 hours in a soaking furnace followed by hot rolling to produce a hot-rolled sheet having a thickness of 6 mm, which was wound into a coil. Similarly, a melt having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 (alloy H) was degassed and settled, and the resulting melt was then fed to a twin-belt caster to continuously cast a thin slab having a thickness of 6 mm, which was directly wound into a coil.
  • TABLE 1
    Chemical composition of alloy
    Composition (mass %)
    Alloy symbol Mg Mn Fe Si
    A 3.35 0.00 0.2 0.08
    B 3.25 0.06 0.2 0.08
    C 3.75 0.05 0.2 0.08
    D 2.50 0.07 0.2 0.08
    E 3.45 0.20 0.2 0.08
    F 4.00 0.30 0.2 0.08
    G 3.35 0.00 0.2 0.08
    H 3.35 0.00 0.2 0.08
    I 3.25 0.06 0.2 0.08
  • Next, these thin slabs and the hot rolled sheets were cold rolled with cold rolling rolls which were finished to a predetermined surface roughness (0.6 μm, 1.0 μm Ra) to form sheets having a thickness of 1 mm. Then, these sheets were passed through a CAL to undergo continuous annealing at a holding temperature of 460° C. Further, the finally annealed sheets were passed through a leveler to undergo straightening to remove thermal strain therefrom followed by cutting to obtain test specimens. Note that Table 2 shows production conditions of the test specimens in each production step in Examples and Comparative Examples.
  • TABLE 2
    Production conditions
    Cold rolling
    Cooling roll surface
    Alloy Casting process/ rate roughness Ra Thickness Annealing
    symbol thickness (mm) (° C./s) Hot rolling (μm) (mm) temperature
    Example 1 A Twin belt/10 100 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 2 B Twin belt/10 78 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Comparative C Twin belt/10 85 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 1
    Comparative D Twin belt/10 75 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 2
    Comparative E Twin belt/10 76 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 3
    Comparative F Twin belt/10 74 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 4
    Comparative G DC/500 3 6 mm 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 5
    Comparative H Twin roll/6 300 None 0.6 1.0 460° C.
    Example 6
    Comparative I Twin belt/10 78 None 1.0 1.0 460° C.
    Example 7
  • Next, these test specimens were evaluated for the recrystallized grain size, the intermetallic compound maximum size by circle-equivalent diameter, surface roughness, 0.2% yield strength (0.2% YS), tensile strength (UTS), elongation (EL), and punch stretch height.
  • The recrystallized grain size (D) of a test specimen was measured by an cross-cut method. The test specimen was cut, embedded in a resin, polished, and subjected to anodic coating in an aqueous fluoroboric acid solution to apply an anodic oxide film to the surface of the section of the test specimen. A photograph (200 times) of grains in the section of the test specimen was taken with a polarizing microscope. On the photograph, three lines were drawn both in the vertical direction and in the horizontal direction. The number (n) of crystal grain boundaries crossing these lines was counted. The average value (D) of the grain sizes determined by dividing the total length (L) of the lines by (n−1) was defined as the average recrystallized grain size of the test specimen. The intermetallic compound maximum size by circle-equivalent diameter was measured with an image analyzer (trade name: LUZEX).

  • D=L/(n−1)
  • The surface roughness of the test specimen was measured using a surface roughness meter according to JIS B0601, wherein the direction of measurement was perpendicular to the rolling direction; the measurement region was 4 mm; and the cutoff was 0.8 mm. The resulting surface roughness was defined as the average roughness Ra. Note that surface roughness of the roll was measured in the same manner as in the measurement of the surface roughness of the test specimen using a surface roughness meter according to JIS B0601, wherein the direction of measurement was in the transverse direction of the roll; the measurement region was 4 mm; and the cutoff was 0.8 mm. The resulting surface roughness was defined as the average roughness Ra.
  • The punch stretch height was measured using the following die assembly and indicates the critical forming height at break.
  • (Punch: 100 mm in diameter, shoulder R: 50 mm, die: 105 mm in diameter, shoulder R: 4 mm)
  • The resistance to surface roughening was evaluated at three stages (◯: excellent, Δ: a little poor, X: poor) by visually observing the surface condition near the broken part of the test piece after the tensile test.
  • The results of Examples and Comparative Examples measured as described above are shown in Table 3.
  • TABLE 3
    Evaluation results of properties
    Evaluation of
    Average size of Maximum size Surface Punch resistance
    recrystallized of crystallized roughness YS UTS stretch to surface
    grains (μm) products (μm) Ra (μm) (Mpa) (Mpa) EL (%) height (mm) roughening
    Example 1 12 3.7 0.35 133 234 28 30
    Example 2 11 3.5 0.41 134 233 27 30
    Comparative 10 4 0.37 146 248 27 29
    Example 1
    Comparative 11 4.2 0.42 121 209 26 30
    Example 2
    Comparative 9 4.1 0.39 148 244 27 29
    Example 3
    Comparative 8 4.5 0.38 155 265 27 28
    Example 4
    Comparative 25 15 0.45 120 224 28 27 Δ
    Example 5
    Comparative 54 2 0.35 115 222 26 26 X
    Example 6
    Comparative 13 3.7 0.80 132 232 28 28
    Example 7
  • In Examples 1 and 2, the Mg content is proper, and in addition, the Mn content is suppressed to less than 0.1%. As a result, the test specimens in Examples 1 and 2 are excellent in shape fixability since they have a yield strength of 145 MPa or less; they are excellent in resistance to surface roughening since they have fine recrystallized grains; and they are excellent in formability to an extent of a punch stretch height of 29 mm or more since they have fine intermetallic compounds and have a proper surface roughness of 0.35 and 0.41 μm, respectively.
  • On the other hand, in Comparative Example 1, since the Mg content is as high as 3.75%, the 0.2% yield strength is excessively increased to result in reduction of shape fixability. In Comparative Example 2, since the Mg content is as low as 2.5%, both the tensile strength and elongation are insufficient.
  • In Comparative Example 3, the Mg content is proper, but the Mn content is as high as 0.2%. As a result, the 0.2% yield strength is excessively increased to result in reduction of shape fixability.
  • In Comparative Example 4, since the Mg content and the Mn content are as high as 4.0% and 0.3%, respectively, the 0.2% yield strength is excessively increased to result in reduction of shape fixability.
  • In Comparative Example 5, since the solidification cooling rate during the slab casting by a DC casting process is low, the maximum size of the intermetallic compounds is excessively large, and the recrystallized grain size is also excessively large. As a result, the tensile strength is reduced, and the resistance to surface roughening and punch stretch formability are also reduced.
  • In Comparative Example 6, since the solidification cooling rate of the cast rolled sheet by a twin-roll process is high, the number of the intermetallic compounds which serve as the nuclei of recrystallized grains during the final annealing is insufficient, and the number of the intermetallic compounds having so-called pinning effect that prevents the motion of the grain boundaries of recrystallized grains is also insufficient, thereby excessively increasing the size of the recrystallized grains. As a result, the tensile strength and elongation are insufficient, and the resistance to surface roughening and punch stretch formability are reduced.
  • In Comparative Examples 7, the cold rolling roll has a surface roughness of 1.0 μm Ra, and the test specimen has a surface roughness of 0.8 μm Ra. As a result, the punch stretch height is 28 mm, indicating a reduced formability.

Claims (6)

1. An aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability, the sheet comprising:
3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, and further a limited amount of less than 0.1 mass % Mn; and
a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al;
the sheet having an intermetallic compound maximum size of 5 μm or less by circle-equivalent diameter in a region at ¼ depth of the sheet thickness, an average recrystallized grain size of 15 μm or less, a surface roughness of 0.2-0.6 μm Ra, a yield strength of 145 MPa or less, and a tensile strength of 225 MPa or more.
2. The aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability according to claim 1, wherein the aluminum alloy sheet has a punch stretch forming height of 29 mm or more.
3. The aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability according to claim 1, wherein the aluminum alloy sheet further comprises 0.001-0.1% Ti.
4. A process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability, the process comprising:
casting a melt comprising 3.0-3.5 mass % Mg, 0.05-0.3 mass % Fe, 0.05-0.15 mass % Si, further a limited amount of less than 0.1 mass % Mn, and a balance substantially being inevitable impurities and Al, into a thin slab having a thickness of 5 to 15 mm in a twin-belt caster so that the cooling rate at ¼ depth of a thickness of the thin slab is 20 to 200° C./sec;
winding the cast thin slab into a coiled thin slab;
subjecting the coiled thin slab to cold rolling with a roll having a surface roughness of 0.2 to 0.7 μm Ra at a cold rolling reduction of 50 to 98% to produce a cold rolled thin sheet;
subjecting the cold rolled thin sheet to final annealing continuously in a CAL at a holding temperature of 400 to 520° C.; and
subjecting the resulting sheet to straightening with a leveler.
5. The process for producing the aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability according to claim 4, wherein the cold rolled thin sheet is subjected to final annealing in a batch annealing furnace at a holding temperature of 300 to 400° C.
6. The aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicles excellent in press formability, resistance to surface roughening and shape fixability according to claim 2, wherein the aluminum alloy sheet further comprises 0.001-0.1% Ti.
US12/746,127 2008-02-06 2008-02-06 Aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle and process for producing the same Abandoned US20100307645A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2008/000161 WO2009098732A1 (en) 2008-02-06 2008-02-06 Aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle and process for producing the same

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2008/000161 A-371-Of-International WO2009098732A1 (en) 2008-02-06 2008-02-06 Aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle and process for producing the same

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/584,317 Division US9695495B2 (en) 2008-02-06 2014-12-29 Process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100307645A1 true US20100307645A1 (en) 2010-12-09

Family

ID=40951821

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/746,127 Abandoned US20100307645A1 (en) 2008-02-06 2008-02-06 Aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle and process for producing the same
US14/584,317 Active 2028-10-23 US9695495B2 (en) 2008-02-06 2014-12-29 Process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/584,317 Active 2028-10-23 US9695495B2 (en) 2008-02-06 2014-12-29 Process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20100307645A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2239347A4 (en)
KR (1) KR20100108370A (en)
CN (1) CN101910435B (en)
CA (1) CA2706198C (en)
WO (1) WO2009098732A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140166162A1 (en) * 2011-07-25 2014-06-19 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet and method for manufacturing same
CN105451903A (en) * 2013-08-05 2016-03-30 东洋铝株式会社 Aluminum foil for visible-light-reflecting material and method for producing said foil

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5640399B2 (en) * 2010-03-03 2014-12-17 日本軽金属株式会社 Aluminum alloy plate with anodized film and method for producing the same
US20190381547A1 (en) * 2017-01-31 2019-12-19 Constellium Rolled Products Singen Gmbh & Co.Kg Method of making aluminium rolled product having at least one bright surface
EP3676032A4 (en) * 2017-08-31 2021-02-17 Arconic Technologies LLC Aluminum alloys for use in electrochemical cells and methods of making and using the same
CN111384414B (en) * 2018-12-28 2022-03-15 财团法人工业技术研究院 Bipolar plate of fuel cell and manufacturing method thereof
CN110777309B (en) * 2019-10-31 2020-11-06 重庆中铝华西铝业有限公司 Method for eliminating unevenness of surface of alloy aluminum coil
US20230039112A1 (en) * 2019-12-25 2023-02-09 Ma Aluminum Corporation Aluminum alloy foil
CN112458345B (en) * 2020-11-26 2021-10-01 东莞市灿煜金属制品有限公司 Manufacturing method of pen-level panel high-strength alumina 6S50
CN117321231A (en) * 2021-05-20 2023-12-29 住友电气工业株式会社 Aluminum alloy plate, terminal-attached electric wire, and bus bar

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6248193B1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2001-06-19 Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd. Process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet
US6369347B1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2002-04-09 Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet for spot welding
US20030164208A1 (en) * 2002-02-05 2003-09-04 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Process for producing aluminum alloy for automobile body, and aluminum alloy
WO2006011242A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Nippon Light Metal Co., Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet and method for manufacturing the same

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05320809A (en) * 1992-05-25 1993-12-07 Furukawa Alum Co Ltd Aluminum alloy sheet for automotive body sheet
JP3155678B2 (en) 1994-06-09 2001-04-16 古河電気工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy sheet for automobile body sheet
JP3685973B2 (en) * 2000-03-23 2005-08-24 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Al-Mg-based Al alloy plate with excellent formability
JP4001059B2 (en) * 2002-06-21 2007-10-31 日本軽金属株式会社 Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet with excellent bake resistance
JP4534573B2 (en) * 2004-04-23 2010-09-01 日本軽金属株式会社 Al-Mg alloy plate excellent in high-temperature high-speed formability and manufacturing method thereof
JP5135684B2 (en) * 2006-01-12 2013-02-06 日本軽金属株式会社 Aluminum alloy plate excellent in high-temperature high-speed formability and method for producing the same
JP2008024964A (en) * 2006-07-18 2008-02-07 Nippon Light Metal Co Ltd High-strength aluminum alloy sheet and producing method therefor
JP5320809B2 (en) 2008-05-08 2013-10-23 住友電装株式会社 Water stop structure of wire harness and method of forming water stop

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6248193B1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2001-06-19 Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd. Process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet
US6369347B1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2002-04-09 Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet for spot welding
US20030164208A1 (en) * 2002-02-05 2003-09-04 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Process for producing aluminum alloy for automobile body, and aluminum alloy
WO2006011242A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Nippon Light Metal Co., Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet and method for manufacturing the same
US20090007994A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2009-01-08 Novelis Inc. Aluminum Alloy Sheet and Method for Manufacturing the Same

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
'Effect of Thermomechanical Treatment on the Evolution of Rolling and Recrystallization Textures in Twin-Belt Cast AA5754 Aluminum Alloy' HN Azari, et al. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions; Jun 2004; 35A p 1839-1851. *
'International Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Wrought Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys', The Aluminum Association, April 2004, p 7, 13. *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140166162A1 (en) * 2011-07-25 2014-06-19 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet and method for manufacturing same
US10041154B2 (en) * 2011-07-25 2018-08-07 Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd. Aluminum alloy sheet and method for manufacturing same
CN105451903A (en) * 2013-08-05 2016-03-30 东洋铝株式会社 Aluminum foil for visible-light-reflecting material and method for producing said foil
TWI629117B (en) * 2013-08-05 2018-07-11 日商東洋鋁股份有限公司 Aluminum foil for visible light reflecting material and method of producing the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101910435B (en) 2013-04-24
EP2239347A4 (en) 2011-08-24
WO2009098732A1 (en) 2009-08-13
US20150114523A1 (en) 2015-04-30
CN101910435A (en) 2010-12-08
KR20100108370A (en) 2010-10-06
EP2239347A1 (en) 2010-10-13
US9695495B2 (en) 2017-07-04
CA2706198C (en) 2016-06-21
CA2706198A1 (en) 2009-08-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9695495B2 (en) Process for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for motor vehicle
JP4901757B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate and manufacturing method thereof
US8016958B2 (en) High strength aluminum alloy sheet and method of production of same
US20070217943A1 (en) Al-Mg Alloy Sheet with Excellent Formability at High Temperatures and High Speeds and Method of Production of Same
JP2007031819A (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet
KR101057264B1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet and manufacturing method
WO2013140826A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet having excellent press formability and shape fixability, and method for manufacturing same
WO2015155911A1 (en) High-strength aluminum alloy plate having exceptional bendability and shape fixability, and method for manufacturing same
JP3926934B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate
JP5220310B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for automobile and manufacturing method thereof
JP5059505B2 (en) Aluminum alloy cold-rolled sheet that can be formed with high strength
JP5813358B2 (en) Highly formable Al-Mg-Si alloy plate and method for producing the same
JP5050577B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for forming process excellent in deep drawability and bake-proof softening property and method for producing the same
WO2007052424A1 (en) Aluminum alloy foil excellent in strength and surface roughening resistance and method of production of the same
JP3498942B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate with excellent ridging mark resistance and method for evaluating the occurrence of ridging mark
JP3838504B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for panel forming and manufacturing method thereof
WO2008078399A1 (en) Method of producing aluminum alloy sheet
JP2012107339A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for automobile and manufacturing method therefor
JP3491819B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet having excellent surface properties after forming
WO2019189521A1 (en) High-strength aluminum alloy, and aluminum alloy sheet and aluminum alloy member using said aluminum alloy
TWI341870B (en) Aluminum alloy sheet and method for manufacturing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NIPPON LIGHT METAL CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZHAO, PIZHI;ANAMI, TOSHIYA;MIZUSHIMA, KAZUMITSU;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100617 TO 20100809;REEL/FRAME:024862/0268

Owner name: HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZHAO, PIZHI;ANAMI, TOSHIYA;MIZUSHIMA, KAZUMITSU;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100617 TO 20100809;REEL/FRAME:024862/0268

AS Assignment

Owner name: NIPPON LIGHT METAL CO., LTD., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.;REEL/FRAME:034785/0962

Effective date: 20150109

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION