US20060035323A2 - Method for producing sweetners and alcohol - Google Patents

Method for producing sweetners and alcohol Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060035323A2
US20060035323A2 US10/779,418 US77941804A US2006035323A2 US 20060035323 A2 US20060035323 A2 US 20060035323A2 US 77941804 A US77941804 A US 77941804A US 2006035323 A2 US2006035323 A2 US 2006035323A2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
cancelled
bacillus
host cell
amylase
variant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/779,418
Other versions
US20040253676A1 (en
Inventor
Henrik Bisgard Frantzen
Allan Svendsen
Torben Borchert
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novozymes AS
Original Assignee
Novozymes AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=8155525&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20060035323(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from PCT/DK1996/000056 external-priority patent/WO1996023873A1/en
Application filed by Novozymes AS filed Critical Novozymes AS
Priority to US10/779,418 priority Critical patent/US20060035323A2/en
Publication of US20040253676A1 publication Critical patent/US20040253676A1/en
Publication of US20060035323A2 publication Critical patent/US20060035323A2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16—Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38—Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386—Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38618—Protease or amylase in liquid compositions only
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16—Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38—Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386—Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38681—Chemically modified or immobilised enzymes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16—Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38—Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386—Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38609—Protease or amylase in solid compositions only
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14—Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/24—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
    • C12N9/2402—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12N9/2405—Glucanases
    • C12N9/2408—Glucanases acting on alpha -1,4-glucosidic bonds
    • C12N9/2411—Amylases
    • C12N9/2414—Alpha-amylase (3.2.1.1.)
    • C12N9/2417—Alpha-amylase (3.2.1.1.) from microbiological source
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00—Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • C12Y302/01—Glycosidases, i.e. enzymes hydrolysing O- and S-glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C12Y302/01001—Alpha-amylase (3.2.1.1)
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06L—DRY-CLEANING, WASHING OR BLEACHING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR MADE-UP FIBROUS GOODS; BLEACHING LEATHER OR FURS
    • D06L1/00—Dry-cleaning or washing fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods
    • D06L1/12—Dry-cleaning or washing fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods using aqueous solvents
    • D06L1/14—De-sizing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to ⁇ -amylase variants having improved properties relative to the parent enzyme (e.g. improved thermal and/or oxidation stability and/or reduced calcium ion dependency), and thereby improved washing and/or dishwashing (and/or textile desizing) performance.
  • the invention also relates to DNA constructs encoding the variants, and to vectors and cells harboring the DNA constructs.
  • the invention further relates to methods of producing the amylase variants, and to detergent additives and detergent compositions comprising the amylase variants. Furthermore, the invention relates to the use of the amylase variants for textile desizing.
  • ⁇ -Amylase enzymes have been used industrially for a number of years and for a variety of different purposes, the most important of which are starch liquefaction, textile desizing, starch modification in the paper and pulp industry, and for brewing and baking.
  • a further use of ⁇ -amylases which is becoming increasingly important is the removal of starchy stains during washing or dishwashing.
  • US 5,093,257 discloses chimeric ⁇ -amylases comprising an N-terminal part of a B. stearothermophilus ⁇ -amylase and a C-terminal part of a B. licheniformis ⁇ -amylase.
  • the chimeric ⁇ -amylases are stated to have unique properties, such as a different thermostability, as compared to their parent ⁇ -amylase.
  • all of the specifically described chimeric ⁇ -amylases were shown to have a decreased enzymatic activity as compared to their parent ⁇ -amylases.
  • EP 252 666 describes hybrid amylases of the general formula Q-R-L, in which Q is a N-terminal polypeptide residue of from 55 to 60 amino acid residues which is at least 75% homologous to the 57 N-terminal amino acid residues of a specified ⁇ -amylase from B. amyloliquefaciens , R is a specified polypeptide, and L is a C-terminal polypeptide comprising
  • Suzuki et al. (1989) disclose chimeric ⁇ -amylases, in which specified regions of a B. amyloliquefaciens ⁇ -amylase have been substituted for the corresponding regions of a B. licheniformis ⁇ -amylase.
  • the chimeric ⁇ -amylases were constructed with the purpose of identifying regions responsible for thermostability. Such regions were found to include amino acid residues 177-186 and amino acid residues 255-270 of the B. amyloliquefaciens ⁇ -amylase.
  • the alterations of amino acid residues in the chimeric ⁇ -amylases did not seem to affect properties of the enzymes other than their thermostability.
  • WO 91/00353 discloses ⁇ -amylase mutants which differ from their parent ⁇ -amylase in at least one amino acid residue.
  • the ⁇ -amylase mutants disclosed in said patent application are stated to exhibit improved properties for application in the degradation of starch and/or textile desizing due to their amino acid substitutions. Some of the mutants exhibit improved stability, but no improvements in enzymatic activity were reported or indicated.
  • the only mutants exemplified are prepared from a parent B. licheniformis ⁇ -amylase and carry one of the following mutations: H133Y or H133Y + T149I. Another suggested mutation is A111T.
  • FR 2,676,456 discloses mutants of the B. licheniformis ⁇ -amylase, in which an amino acid residue in the proximity of His 133 and/or an amino acid residue in the proximity of Ala 209 have been replaced by a more hydrophobic amino acid residue.
  • the resulting ⁇ -amylase mutants are stated to have an improved thermostability and to be useful in the textile, paper, brewing and starch liquefaction industry.
  • EP 285 123 discloses a method of performing random mutagenesis of a nucleotide sequence.
  • a nucleotide sequence encoding a B. stearothermophilus ⁇ -amylase is mentioned.
  • an ⁇ -amylase variant having improved activity at low pH values is obtained.
  • ⁇ -amylase mutants may be constructed which have improved properties with respect to the detergent industry.
  • EP 525 610 relates to mutant enzymes having improved stability towards ionic tensides (surfactants).
  • the mutant enzymes have been produced by replacing an amino acid residue in the surface part of the parent enzyme with another amino acid residue.
  • the only mutant enzyme specifically described in EP 525 610 is a protease.
  • Amylase is mentioned as an example of an enzyme which may obtain an improved stability towards ionic tensides, but the type of amylase, its origin or specific mutations are not specified.
  • WO 94/02597 discloses ⁇ -amylase mutants which exhibit improved stability and activity in the presence of oxidizing agents.
  • the mutant ⁇ -amylases one or more methionine residues have been replaced with amino acid residues different from Cys and Met.
  • the ⁇ -amylase mutants are stated to be useful as detergent and/or dishwashing additives as well as for textile desizing.
  • WO 94/18314 discloses oxidatively stable ⁇ -amylase mutants, including mutations in the M197 position of B. licheniformis ⁇ -amylase.
  • EP 368 341 describes the use of pullulanase and other amylolytic enzymes optionally in combination with an ⁇ -amylase for washing and dishwashing.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide ⁇ -amylase variants which - relative to their parent ⁇ -amylase - possess improved properties of importance, inter alia , in relation to the washing and/or dishwashing performance of the variants in question, e.g. increased thermal stability, increased stability towards oxidation, reduced dependency on Ca 2+ ion and/or improved stability or activity in the pH region of relevance in, e.g., laundry washing or dishwashing.
  • Such variant ⁇ -amylases have the advantage, among others, that they may be employed in a lower dosage than their parent ⁇ -amylase.
  • the ⁇ -amylase variants may be able to remove starchy stains which cannot, or can only with difficulty, be removed by ⁇ -amylase detergent enzymes known today.
  • a goal of the work underlying the present invention was to improve, if possible, the stability of, inter alia , particular ⁇ -amylases which are obtainable from Bacillus strains and which themselves had been selected on the basis of their starch removal performance in alkaline media (such as in detergent solutions as typically employed in laundry washing or dishwashing) relative to many of the currently commercially available ⁇ -amylases.
  • the present inventors have surprisingly found that it is in fact possible to improve properties of the types mentioned earlier ( vide supra ) of such a parent ⁇ -amylase by judicial modification of one or more amino acid residues in various regions of the amino acid sequence of the parent ⁇ -amylase. The present invention is based on this finding.
  • the present invention relates to variants of a parent ⁇ -amylase, the parent ⁇ -amylase in question being one which:
  • i) has one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, herein; or
  • ii) displays at least 80% homology with one or more of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7; and/or displays immunological cross-reactivity with an antibody raised against an ⁇ -amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively; and/or is encoded by a DNA sequence which hybridizes with the same probe as a DNA sequence encoding an ⁇ -amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively.
  • An ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention is subject to the proviso that it is a variant which does not have an amino acid sequence identical to the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1, in SEQ ID No. 2, in SEQ ID No. 3 or in SEQ ID No. 7.
  • DNA sequences encoding the first three of the ⁇ -amylase amino acid sequences in question are shown in SEQ ID No. 4 (encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1), SEQ ID No. 5 (encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2) and SEQ ID No. 6 (encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3).
  • amino acid sequences of the SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2 parent ⁇ -amylases are also disclosed in WO 95/26397 (under the same SEQ ID Nos. as in the present application).
  • the variants of the invention are variants in which: (a) at least one amino acid residue of the parent ⁇ -amylase has been deleted; and/or (b) at least one amino acid residue of the parent ⁇ -amylase has been replaced (i.e. substituted) by a different amino acid residue; and/or (c) at least one amino acid residue has been inserted relative to the parent ⁇ -amylase.
  • the variants in question have themselves ⁇ -amylase activity and exhibit at least one of the following properties relative to the parent ⁇ -amylase:
  • thermostability i.e. satisfactory retention of enzymatic activity at a temperature higher than that suitable for use with the parent enzyme
  • oxidation stability i.e. increased resistance to degradation by oxidants (such as oxygen, oxidizing bleaching agents and the like);
  • ⁇ -Amylases with such reduced Ca 2+ dependency are highly desirable for use in detergent compositions, since such compositions typically contain relatively large amounts of substances (such as phosphates, EDTA and the like) which bind calcium ions strongly.
  • the isoelectric point (pI) so as to better match the pI value for the ⁇ -amylase variant in question to the pH of the medium (e.g. a laundry washing medium, dishwashing medium or textile-desizing medium) in which the variant is to be employed ( vide infra ); and
  • the medium e.g. a laundry washing medium, dishwashing medium or textile-desizing medium
  • An amino acid sequence is considered to be X% homologous to the parent ⁇ -amylase if a comparison of the respective amino acid sequences, performed via known algorithms, such as the one described by Lipman and Pearson in Science 227 (1985) p. 1435, reveals an identity of X%.
  • the GAP computer program from the GCG package, version 7.3 (June 1993) may suitably be used, employing default values for GAP penalties [Genetic Computer Group (1991) Programme Manual for the GCG Package, version 7, 575 Science Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, USA 53711].
  • improved performance as used in connection with washing and dishwashing is, as already indicated above, intended to mean improved removal of starchy stains, i.e. stains containing starch, during washing or dishwashing, respectively.
  • the performance may be determined in conventional washing and dishwashing experiments and the improvement evaluated as a comparison with the performance of the parent ⁇ -amylase in question.
  • An example of a small-scale "mini dishwashing test" which can be used an indicator of dishwashing performance is described in the Experimental section, below.
  • the invention relates to a DNA construct comprising a DNA sequence encoding an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention, a recombinant expression vector carrying the DNA construct, a cell which is transformed with the DNA construct or the vector, as well as a method of producing an ⁇ -amylase variant by culturing such a cell under conditions conducive to the production of the ⁇ -amylase variant, after which the ⁇ -amylase variant is recovered from the culture.
  • the invention relates to a method of preparing a variant of a parent ⁇ -amylase which by virtue of its improved properties as described above exhibits improved washing and/or dishwashing performance as compared to the parent ⁇ -amylase.
  • This method comprises
  • step b) isolating a cell from the population containing a gene encoding a variant of said parent ⁇ -amylase which has improved activity as compared with the parent ⁇ -amylase under the conditions selected in step b),
  • step c) culturing the cell isolated in step c) under suitable conditions in an appropriate culture medium
  • step d recovering the ⁇ -amylase variant from the culture obtained in step d).
  • the invention also relates to a variant (which is a variant according the invention) prepared by the latter method.
  • washing and/or dishwashing condition is intended to indicate a simulation of, e.g., the temperature or pH prevailing during washing or dishwashing, or of the chemical composition of a detergent composition to be used in the washing or dishwashing treatment.
  • chemical composition is intended to include one, or a combination of two or more, constituents of the detergent composition in question. The constituents of a number of different detergent compositions are listed further below.
  • the "population of cells” referred to in step a) may suitably be constructed by cloning a DNA sequence encoding a parent ⁇ -amylase and subjecting the DNA to site-directed or random mutagenesis as described herein.
  • variant is used interchangeably with the term “mutant”.
  • variant is intended to include hybrid ⁇ -amylases, i.e. ⁇ -amylases comprising parts of at least two different ⁇ -amylolytic enzymes.
  • hybrid may be constructed, e.g., from: one or more parts each deriving from a variant as already defined above; or one or more parts each deriving from a variant as already defined above, and one or more parts each deriving from an unmodified parent ⁇ -amylase.
  • the invention also relates to a method of producing such a hybrid ⁇ -amylase having improved washing and/or dishwashing performance as compared to any of its constituent enzymes (i.e. as compared to any of the enzymes which contribute a part to the hybrid), which method comprises:
  • step b) culturing recombinants selected in step b) under suitable conditions in an appropriate culture medium
  • step c) recovering the hybrid ⁇ -amylase from the culture obtained in step c).
  • the invention relates to the use of an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention [including any variant or hybrid prepared by one of the above mentioned methods] as a detergent enzyme, in particular for washing or dishwashing, to a detergent additive and a detergent composition comprising the ⁇ -amylase variant, and to the use of an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention for textile desizing.
  • Random mutagenesis may be used to generate variants according to the invention, and the invention further relates to a method of preparing a variant of a parent ⁇ -amylase, which method comprises
  • step (b) expressing the mutated DNA sequence obtained in step (a) in a host cell
  • any other amino acid residue may be substituted for the amino acid residue present in that position (i.e. any amino acid residue - other than that normally present in the position in question - chosen among A, R, N, D, C, Q, E, G, H, I, L, K, M, F, P, S, T, W, Y and V).
  • any of the other amino acids may be substituted for the methionine, i.e. any other amino acid chosen among A,R,N,D,C,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y and V.
  • an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention is very suitably prepared on the basis of a parent ⁇ -amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively ( vide infra ).
  • the parent ⁇ -amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2, respectively, are obtainable from alkalophilic Bacillus strains (strain NCIB 12512 and strain NCIB 12513, respectively), both of which are described in detail in EP 0 277 216 B1.
  • the preparation, purification and sequencing of these two parent ⁇ -amylases is described in WO 95/26397 [see the Experimental section herein ( vide infra )].
  • the parent ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 is obtainable from Bacillus stearothermophilus and is described in, inter alia , J. Bacteriol. 166 (1986) pp. 635-643.
  • the parent ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7 (which is the same sequence as that numbered 4 in Figure. 1) is obtainable from a " Bacillus sp. #707" and is described by Tsukamoto et al. in Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 151 (1988) pp. 25-31.
  • variants of the above-mentioned parent ⁇ -amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, other interesting variants according to the invention include variants of parent ⁇ -amylases which have amino acid sequences exhibiting a high degree of homology, such as at least 70% homology, preferably (as already indicated) at least 80% homology, desirably at least 85% homology, and more preferably at least 90% homology, e.g. 95% homology, with at least one of the latter four amino acid sequences.
  • a high degree of homology such as at least 70% homology, preferably (as already indicated) at least 80% homology, desirably at least 85% homology, and more preferably at least 90% homology, e.g. 95% homology, with at least one of the latter four amino acid sequences.
  • further criteria for identifying a suitable parent ⁇ -amylase are a) that the ⁇ -amylase displays an immunological cross-reaction with an antibody raised against an ⁇ -amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, and/or b) that the ⁇ -amylase is encoded by a DNA sequence which hybridizes with the same probe as a DNA sequence encoding an ⁇ -amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively.
  • amino acid sequence comparisons can be performed using known algorithms, such as the one described by Lipman and Pearson (1985).
  • Assays for immunological cross-reactivity may be carried out using an antibody raised against, or reactive with, at least one epitope of the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1, or of the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2, or of the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3, or of the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7.
  • the antibody which may either be monoclonal or polyclonal, may be produced by methods known in the art, e.g. as described by Hudson et al. (1989).
  • suitable assay techniques well known in the art include Western Blotting and Radial Immunodiffusion Assay, e.g. as described by Hudson et al. (1989).
  • the oligonucleotide probe for use in the identification of suitable parent ⁇ -amylases on the basis of probe hybridization [criterion b) above] may, by way of example, suitably be prepared on the basis of the full or partial amino acid sequence of an ⁇ -amylase having one of the sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, or on the basis of the full or partial nucleotide sequence corresponding thereto.
  • Suitable conditions for testing hybridization involve presoaking in 5xSSC and prehybridizing for 1 h at ⁇ 40 C in a solution of 20% formamide, 5xDenhardt's solution, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8, and 50 ⁇ g of denatured sonicated calf thymus DNA, followed by hybridization in the same solution supplemented with 100 ⁇ M ATP for 18 h at ⁇ 40 C, or using other methods described by, e.g., Sambrook et al. (1989).
  • Oxidation stability With respect to increasing the oxidation stability of an ⁇ -amylase variant relative to its parent ⁇ -amylase, it appears to be particularly desirable that at least one, and preferably multiple, oxidizable amino acid residue(s) of the parent has/have been deleted or replaced (i.e. substituted by) a different amino acid residue which is less susceptible to oxidation than the original oxidizable amino acid residue.
  • oxidizable amino acid residues in this connection are cysteine, methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine.
  • cysteine methionine
  • tryptophan oxidizable amino acid residues
  • tyrosine oxidizable amino acid residues
  • deletion or substitution of methionine residues is particularly relevant with respect to achieving improved oxidation stability of the resulting variants.
  • deletion or substitution [e.g. by threonine (T), or by one of the other amino acids listed above] of one or more of the methionine residues in positions M9, M10, M105, M202, M208, M261, M309, M382, M430 and M440 of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No.
  • SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7, and/or in position M323 of the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 appear to be particularly effective with respect to increasing the oxidation stability.
  • relevant amino acid residues which may be deleted or substituted with a view to improving the oxidation stability include the single cysteine residue (C363) and - by analogy with the sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 3 - the methionine residues located in positions M8, M9, M96, M200, M206, M284, M307, M311, M316 and M438.
  • the term "equivalent position” denotes a position which, on the basis of an alignment of the amino acid sequence of the parent ⁇ -amylase in question with the "reference" ⁇ -amylase amino acid sequence in question (for example the sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1) so as to achieve juxtapositioning of amino acid residues/regions which are common to both, corresponds most closely to (e.g. is occupied by the same amino acid residue as) a particular position in the reference sequence in question.
  • Particularly interesting mutations in connection with modification (improvement) of the oxidation stability of the ⁇ -amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, are one or more of the following methionine substitutions (or equivalents thereof in the amino acid sequences of other ⁇ -amylases meeting the requirements of a parent ⁇ -amylase in the context of the invention): M202A,R,N,D,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V.
  • Thermal stability With respect to increasing the thermal stability of an ⁇ -amylase variant relative to its parent ⁇ -amylase, it appears to be particularly desirable to delete at least one, and preferably two or even three, of the following amino acid residues in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 (or their equivalents): F180, R181, G182, T183, G184 and K185.
  • the corresponding, particularly relevant (and equivalent) amino acid residues in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, are: F180, R181, G182, D183, G184 and K185 (SEQ ID No. 2); F178, R179, G180, I181, G182 and K183 (SEQ ID No. 3); and F180, R181, G182, H183, G184 and K185 (SEQ ID No. 7).
  • Examples of specific mutations which appear to be of importance in connection with the thermal stability of an ⁇ -amylase variant relative to the parent ⁇ -amylase in question are one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 (or equivalents thereof in another parent ⁇ -amylase in the context of the invention): K269R; P260E; R124P; M105F,I,L,V; M208F,W,Y; L217I; V206I,L,F.
  • important further (equivalent) mutations are, correspondingly, one or more of the substitutions: M105F,I,L,V; M208F,W,Y; L217I; V206I,L,F; and K269R.
  • important further (equivalent) mutations are, correspondingly, one or both of the substitutions: M206F,W,Y; and L215I.
  • important further (equivalent) mutations are, correspondingly, one or more of the substitutions: M105F,I,L,V; M208F,W,Y; L217I; and K269R.
  • mutations which appear to be of importance, inter alia , in achieving improved thermal stability of an ⁇ -amylase variant relative to the parent ⁇ -amylase in question are one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7 (or equivalents thereof in another parent ⁇ -amylase in the context of the invention): A354C + V479C; L351C + M430C; N457D,E + K385R; L355D,E + M430R,K; L355D,E + I411R,K; and N457D,E.
  • Ca 2+ dependency With respect to achieving decreased Ca 2+ dependency of an ⁇ -amylase variant relative to its parent ⁇ -amylase [i.e. with respect to obtaining a variant which exhibits satisfactory amylolytic activity in the presence of a lower concentration of calcium ion in the extraneous medium than is necessary for the parent enzyme, and which, for example, therefore is less sensitive than the parent to calcium ion-depleting conditions such as those obtaining in media containing calcium-complexing agents (such as certain detergent builders)], it appears to be particularly desirable to incorporate one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No.
  • substitutions appear, correspondingly (equivalently), to be one or more of the following: K107R, K177R, K237R, K240R, D162N, D186N, D190N, D197N, D203N, D205N, D207N, E188Q and E192Q.
  • substitutions which appear to be of importance in the context of achieving reduced Ca 2+ dependency are pairwise substitutions of the amino acid residues present at: positions 113 and 151, and positions 351 and 430, in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7; and at: positions 112 and 150, and positions 349 and 428, in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 (or equivalent pairwise substitutions in another parent ⁇ -amylase in the context of the invention), i.e. pairwise substitutions of the following amino acid residues:
  • G113 + N151 in relation to SEQ ID No.1
  • A113 + T151 in relation to SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7
  • G112 + T150 in relation to SEQ ID No. 3
  • L351 + M430 in relation to SEQ ID No.1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7
  • L349 + I428 in relation to SEQ ID No. 3
  • G113T + N151I in relation to SEQ ID No.1
  • A113T + T151I in relation to SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7
  • G112T + T150I in relation to SEQ ID No. 3
  • L351C + M430C in relation to SEQ ID No.1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7
  • L349C + I428C in relation to SEQ ID No. 3
  • substitutions of relevance for Ca 2+ dependency are one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7 (or an equivalent substitution in another parent ⁇ -amylase in the context of the invention): G304W,F,Y,R,I,L,V,Q,N; G305A,S,N,D,Q,E,R,K; and H408Q,E.
  • substitutions in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 are: G302W,F,Y,R,I,L,V,Q,N; and G303A,S,N,D,Q,E,R,K.
  • pairwise deletions of amino acids i.e. deletion of two amino acids
  • amino acids i.e. deletion of two amino acids
  • positions selected among R181, G182, T183 and G184 in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 or equivalent positions in the amino acid sequence of another ⁇ -amylase meeting the requirements of a parent ⁇ -amylase in the context of the invention.
  • Isoelectric point (pI) Preliminary results indicate that the washing performance, e.g. the laundry washing performance, of an ⁇ -amylase is optimal when the pH of the washing liquor (washing medium) is close to the pI value for the ⁇ -amylase in question. It will thus be desirable, where appropriate, to produce an ⁇ -amylase variant having an isoelectric point (pI value) which is better matched to the pH of a medium (such as a washing medium) in which the enzyme is to be employed than the isoelectric point of the parent ⁇ -amylase in question.
  • a medium such as a washing medium
  • preferred mutations in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 include one or more of the following substitutions: Q86E, R124P, S154D, T183D, V222E, P260E, R310A, Q346E, Q391E, N437E, K444Q and R452H.
  • Appropriate combinations of these substitutions in the context of decreasing the isoelectric point include: Q391E + K444Q; and Q391E + K444Q + S154D.
  • preferred mutations in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 with respect to decreasing the isoelectric point include one or more of the substitutions: L85E, S153D, I181D, K220E, P258E, R308A, P344E, Q358E and S435E.
  • preferred mutations in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 include one or more of the following substitutions: E86Q,L; D154S; D183T,I; E222V,K; E260P; A310R; E346Q,P; E437N,S; and H452R.
  • ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention will, apart from having one or more improved properties as discussed above, preferably be such that they have a higher starch hydrolysis velocity at low substrate concentrations than the parent ⁇ -amylase.
  • an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention will preferably be one which has a higher V max and/or a lower K m than the parent ⁇ -amylase when tested under the same conditions.
  • the "parent ⁇ -amylase" to be used for the comparison should be the one of the constituent enzymes having the best performance.
  • V max and K m may be determined by well-known procedures.
  • DNA sequence encoding a parent ⁇ -amylase may be isolated from any cell or microorganism producing the ⁇ -amylase in question, using various methods well known in the art.
  • a genomic DNA and/or cDNA library should be constructed using chromosomal DNA or messenger RNA from the organism that produces the ⁇ -amylase to be studied.
  • homologous, labelled oligonucleotide probes may be synthesized and used to identify ⁇ -amylase-encoding clones from a genomic library prepared from the organism in question.
  • a labelled oligonucleotide probe containing sequences homologous to a known ⁇ -amylase gene could be used as a probe to identify ⁇ -amylase-encoding clones, using hybridization and washing conditions of lower stringency.
  • Yet another method for identifying ⁇ -amylase-encoding clones would involve inserting fragments of genomic DNA into an expression vector, such as a plasmid, transforming ⁇ -amylase-negative bacteria with the resulting genomic DNA library, and then plating the transformed bacteria onto agar containing a substrate for ⁇ -amylase, thereby allowing clones expressing the ⁇ -amylase to be identified.
  • an expression vector such as a plasmid
  • transforming ⁇ -amylase-negative bacteria with the resulting genomic DNA library
  • the DNA sequence encoding the enzyme may be prepared synthetically by established standard methods, e.g. the phosphoamidite method described by S.L. Beaucage and M.H. Caruthers (1981) or the method described by Matthes et al. (1984).
  • phosphoamidite method oligonucleotides are synthesized, e.g. in an automatic DNA synthesizer, purified, annealed, ligated and cloned in appropriate vectors.
  • the DNA sequence may be of mixed genomic and synthetic origin, mixed synthetic and cDNA origin or mixed genomic and cDNA origin, prepared by ligating fragments of synthetic, genomic or cDNA origin (as appropriate, the fragments corresponding to various parts of the entire DNA sequence), in accordance with standard techniques.
  • the DNA sequence may also be prepared by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers, for instance as described in US 4,683,202 or R.K. Saiki et al. (1988).
  • mutations may be introduced using synthetic oligonucleotides. These oligonucleotides contain nucleotide sequences flanking the desired mutation sites; mutant nucleotides are inserted during oligonucleotide synthesis.
  • a single-stranded gap of DNA, bridging the ⁇ -amylase-encoding sequence is created in a vector carrying the ⁇ -amylase gene.
  • the synthetic nucleotide, bearing the desired mutation is annealed to a homologous portion of the single-stranded DNA.
  • Random mutagenesis is suitably performed either as localized or region-specific random mutagenesis in at least three parts of the gene translating to the amino acid sequence shown in question, or within the whole gene.
  • codon positions may appropriately be targeted (using one-letter amino acid abbreviations and the numbering of the amino acid residues in the sequence in question):
  • codon positions in particular, may appropriately be targeted:
  • the random mutagenesis of a DNA sequence encoding a parent ⁇ -amylase to be performed in accordance with step a) of the above-described method of the invention may conveniently be performed by use of any method known in the art.
  • the random mutagenesis may be performed by use of a suitable physical or chemical mutagenizing agent, by use of a suitable oligonucleotide, or by subjecting the DNA sequence to PCR generated mutagenesis.
  • the random mutagenesis may be performed by use of any combination of these mutagenizing agents.
  • the mutagenizing agent may, e.g., be one which induces transitions, transversions, inversions, scrambling, deletions, and/or insertions.
  • Examples of a physical or chemical mutagenizing agent suitable for the present purpose include ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, hydroxylamine, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), O-methyl hydroxylamine, nitrous acid, ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS), sodium bisulphite, formic acid, and nucleotide analogues.
  • UV ultraviolet
  • MNNG N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
  • EMS ethyl methane sulphonate
  • sodium bisulphite formic acid
  • nucleotide analogues examples include ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, hydroxylamine, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), O-methyl hydroxylamine, nitrous acid, ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS), sodium bisulphite, formic acid, and nucleotide ana
  • the mutagenesis is typically performed by incubating the DNA sequence encoding the parent enzyme to be mutagenized in the presence of the mutagenizing agent of choice under suitable conditions for the mutagenesis to take place, and selecting for mutated DNA having the desired properties.
  • the oligonucleotide may be doped or spiked with the three non-parent nucleotides during the synthesis of the oligonucleotide at the positions which are to be changed.
  • the doping or spiking may be done so that codons for unwanted amino acids are avoided.
  • the doped or spiked oligonucleotide can be incorporated into the DNA encoding the amylolytic enzyme by any published technique, using e.g. PCR, LCR or any DNA polymerase and ligase.
  • PCR-generated mutagenesis When PCR-generated mutagenesis is used, either a chemically treated or non-treated gene encoding a parent ⁇ -amylase enzyme is subjected to PCR under conditions that increase the misincorporation of nucleotides (Deshler 1992; Leung et al., Technique, Vol.1, 1989, pp. 11-15).
  • a mutator strain of E. coli (Fowler et al., Molec. Gen. Genet., 133, 1974, pp. 179-191), S. cereviseae or any other microbial organism may be used for the random mutagenesis of the DNA encoding the amylolytic enzyme by e.g. transforming a plasmid containing the parent enzyme into the mutator strain, growing the mutator strain with the plasmid and isolating the mutated plasmid from the mutator strain. The mutated plasmid may subsequently be transformed into the expression organism.
  • the DNA sequence to be mutagenized may conveniently be present in a genomic or cDNA library prepared from an organism expressing the parent amylolytic enzyme.
  • the DNA sequence may be present on a suitable vector such as a plasmid or a bacteriophage, which as such may be incubated with or otherwise exposed to the mutagenizing agent.
  • the DNA to be mutagenized may also be present in a host cell either by being integrated in the genome of said cell or by being present on a vector harbored in the cell.
  • the DNA to be mutagenized may be in isolated form. It will be understood that the DNA sequence to be subjected to random mutagenesis is preferably a cDNA or a genomic DNA sequence.
  • the mutated DNA is expressed by culturing a suitable host cell carrying the DNA sequence under conditions allowing expression to take place.
  • the host cell used for this purpose may be one which has been transformed with the mutated DNA sequence, optionally present on a vector, or one which was carried the DNA sequence encoding the parent enzyme during the mutagenesis treatment.
  • suitable host cells are the following: gram positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis , Bacillus licheniformis , Bacillus lentus , Bacillus brevis , Bacillus stearothermophilus , Bacillus alkalophilus , Bacillus amyloliquefaciens , Bacillus coagulans , Bacillus circulans , Bacillus lautus , Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus thuringiensis , Streptomyces lividans or Streptomyces murinus ; and gram negative bacteria such as E. coli .
  • gram positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis , Bacillus licheniformis , Bacillus lentus , Bacillus brevis , Bacillus stearothermophilus , Bacillus alkalophilus , Bacillus amyloliquefaciens , Bacillus coagulans , Bacillus circulans , Bacillus lautus , Bac
  • the mutated DNA sequence may further comprise a DNA sequence encoding functions permitting expression of the mutated DNA sequence.
  • the random mutagenesis may advantageously be localized to a part of the parent ⁇ -amylase in question. This may, e.g., be advantageous when certain regions of the enzyme have been identified to be of particular importance for a given property of the enzyme, and when modified are expected to result in a variant having improved properties. Such regions may normally be identified when the tertiary structure of the parent enzyme has been elucidated and related to the function of the enzyme.
  • the localized random mutagenesis is conveniently performed by use of PCR- generated mutagenesis techniques as described above or any other suitable technique known in the art.
  • the DNA sequence encoding the part of the DNA sequence to be modified may be isolated, e.g. by being inserted into a suitable vector, and said part may subsequently be subjected to mutagenesis by use of any of the mutagenesis methods discussed above.
  • a microorganism capable of expressing the mutated amylolytic enzyme of interest is incubated on a suitable medium and under suitable conditions for the enzyme to be secreted, the medium being provided with a double filter comprising a first protein-binding filter and on top of that a second filter exhibiting a low protein binding capability.
  • the microorganism is located on the second filter.
  • the first filter comprising enzymes secreted from the microorganisms is separated from the second filter comprising the microorganisms.
  • the first filter is subjected to screening for the desired enzymatic activity and the corresponding microbial colonies present on the second filter are identified.
  • the filter used for binding the enzymatic activity may be any protein binding filter e.g. nylon or nitrocellulose.
  • the top filter carrying the colonies of the expression organism may be any filter that has no or low affinity for binding proteins e.g. cellulose acetate or Durapore TM .
  • the filter may be pretreated with any of the conditions to be used for screening or may be treated during the detection of enzymatic activity.
  • the enzymatic activity may be detected by a dye, flourescence, precipitation, pH indicator, IR-absorbance or any other known technique for detection of enzymatic activity.
  • the detecting compound may be immobilized by any immobilizing agent e.g. agarose, agar, gelatine, polyacrylamide, starch, filter paper, cloth; or any combination of immobilizing agents.
  • immobilizing agent e.g. agarose, agar, gelatine, polyacrylamide, starch, filter paper, cloth; or any combination of immobilizing agents.
  • ⁇ -Amylase activity is detected by Cibacron Red labelled amylopectin, which is immobilized on agarose.
  • Cibacron Red labelled amylopectin, which is immobilized on agarose.
  • the filter with bound ⁇ -amylase variants is incubated in a buffer at pH 10.5 and 60 or 65 C for a specified time, rinsed briefly in deionized water and placed on the amylopectin-agarose matrix for activity detection. Residual activity is seen as lysis of Cibacron Red by amylopectin degradation.
  • the conditions are chosen to be such that activity due to the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 can barely be detected.
  • Stabilized variants show, under the same conditions, increased color intensity due to increased liberation of Cibacron Red.
  • the filter with bound variants is placed directly on the amylopectin-Cibacron Red substrate plate and incubated at the desired temperature (e.g. 4 C, 10 C or 30 C) for a specified time. After this time activity due to the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 can barely be detected, whereas variants with optimum activity at a lower temperature will show increase amylopectin lysis.
  • desired media e.g. solutions containing Ca 2+ , detergents, EDTA or other relevant additives - can be carried out in order to screen for changed dependency or for reaction of the variants in question with such additives.
  • ⁇ -amylase variants which are hybrids of at least two constituent ⁇ -amylases may be prepared by combining the relevant parts of the respective genes in question.
  • Naturally occurring enzymes may be genetically modified by random or site directed mutagenesis as described above.
  • part of one enzyme may be replaced by a part of another to obtain a chimeric enzyme.
  • This replacement can be achieved either by conventional in vitro gene splicing techniques or by in vivo recombination or by combinations of both techniques.
  • a desired portion of the ⁇ -amylase gene coding sequence may be deleted using appropriate site-specific restriction enzymes; the deleted portion of the coding sequence may then be replaced by the insertion of a desired portion of a different ⁇ -amylase coding sequence so that a chimeric nucleotide sequence encoding a new ⁇ -amylase is produced.
  • ⁇ -amylase genes may be fused, e.g. by use of the PCR overlay extension method described by Higuchi et al. 1988.
  • the in vivo recombination techniques depend on the fact that different DNA segments with highly homologous regions (identity of DNA sequence) may recombine, i.e. break and exchange DNA, and establish new bonds in the homologous regions. Accordingly, when the coding sequences for two different but homologous amylase enzymes are used to transform a host cell, recombination of homologous sequences in vivo will result in the production of chimeric gene sequences. Translation of these coding sequences by the host cell will result in production of a chimeric amylase gene product. Specific in vivo recombination techniques are described in US 5,093,257 and EP 252 666.
  • hybrid enzyme may be synthesized by standard chemical methods known in the art. For example, see Hunkapiller et al. (1984). Accordingly, peptides having the appropriate amino acid sequences may be synthesized in whole or in part and joined to form hybrid enzymes (variants) of the invention.
  • a mutated ⁇ -amylase-encoding DNA sequence produced by methods described above, or by any alternative methods known in the art can be expressed, in enzyme form, using an expression vector which typically includes control sequences encoding a promoter, operator, ribosome binding site, translation initiation signal, and, optionally, a repressor gene or various activator genes.
  • the recombinant expression vector carrying the DNA sequence encoding an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention may be any vector which may conveniently be subjected to recombinant DNA procedures, and the choice of vector will often depend on the host cell into which it is to be introduced.
  • the vector may be an autonomously replicating vector, i.e. a vector which exists as an extrachromosomal entity, the replication of which is independent of chromosomal replication, e.g. a plasmid, a bacteriophage or an extrachromosomal element, minichromosome or an artificial chromosome.
  • the vector may be one which, when introduced into a host cell, is integrated into the host cell genome and replicated together with the chromosome(s) into which it has been integrated.
  • the DNA sequence should be operably connected to a suitable promoter sequence.
  • the promoter may be any DNA sequence which shows transcriptional activity in the host cell of choice and may be derived from genes encoding proteins either homologous or heterologous to the host cell.
  • suitable promoters for directing the transcription of the DNA sequence encoding an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention, especially in a bacterial host are the promoter of the lac operon of E.
  • the Streptomyces coelicolor agarase gene dag A promoters the promoters of the Bacillus licheniformis ⁇ -amylase gene ( amyL ), the promoters of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene ( amyM ), the promoters of the Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens ⁇ -amylase ( amyQ ), the promoters of the Bacillus subtilis xylA and xylB genes etc.
  • useful promoters are those derived from the gene encoding A.
  • oryzae TAKA amylase Rhizomucor miehei aspartic proteinase, A. niger neutral ⁇ -amylase, A. niger acid stable ⁇ -amylase, A. niger glucoamylase, Rhizomucor miehei lipase, A. oryzae alkaline protease, A. oryzae triose phosphate isomerase or A. nidulans acetamidase.
  • the expression vector of the invention may also comprise a suitable transcription terminator and, in eukaryotes, polyadenylation sequences operably connected to the DNA sequence encoding the ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention. Termination and polyadenylation sequences may suitably be derived from the same sources as the promoter.
  • the vector may further comprise a DNA sequence enabling the vector to replicate in the host cell in question.
  • a DNA sequence enabling the vector to replicate in the host cell in question. Examples of such sequences are the origins of replication of plasmids pUC19, pACYC177, pUB110, pE194, pAMB1 and pIJ702.
  • the vector may also comprise a selectable marker, e.g. a gene the product of which complements a defect in the host cell, such as the dal genes from B. subtilis or B. licheniformis , or one which confers antibiotic resistance such as ampicillin, kanamycin, chloramphenicol or tetracyclin resistance.
  • a selectable marker e.g. a gene the product of which complements a defect in the host cell, such as the dal genes from B. subtilis or B. licheniformis , or one which confers antibiotic resistance such as ampicillin, kanamycin, chloramphenicol or tetracyclin resistance.
  • the vector may comprise Aspergillus selection markers such as amdS, argB, niaD and sC, a marker giving rise to hygromycin resistance, or the selection may be accomplished by co-transformation, e.g. as described in WO 91/17243.
  • intracellular expression may be advantageous in some respects, e.g. when using certain bacteria as host cells, it is generally preferred that the expression is extracellular.
  • the cell of the invention is advantageously used as a host cell in the recombinant production of an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention.
  • the cell may be transformed with the DNA construct of the invention encoding the variant, conveniently by integrating the DNA construct (in one or more copies) in the host chromosome. This integration is generally considered to be an advantage as the DNA sequence is more likely to be stably maintained in the cell. Integration of the DNA constructs into the host chromosome may be performed according to conventional methods, e.g. by homologous or heterologous recombination. Alternatively, the cell may be transformed with an expression vector as described above in connection with the different types of host cells.
  • the cell of the invention may be a cell of a higher organism such as a mammal or an insect, but is preferably a microbial cell, e.g. a bacterial or a fungal (including yeast) cell.
  • a microbial cell e.g. a bacterial or a fungal (including yeast) cell.
  • suitable bacteria are gram positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis , Bacillus licheniformis , Bacillus lentus , Bacillus brevis , Bacillus stearothermophilus , Bacillus alkalophilus , Bacillus amyloliquefaciens , Bacillus coagulans , Bacillus circulans , Bacillus lautus , Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus thuringiensis , or Streptomyces lividans or Streptomyces murinus , or gram negative bacteria such as E. coli .
  • the transformation of the bacteria may, for instance, be effected by protoplast transformation or by using competent cells in a manner known per se .
  • the yeast organism may favorably be selected from a species of Saccharomyces or Schizosaccharomyces , e.g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae .
  • the filamentous fungus may advantageously belong to a species of Aspergillus , e.g. Aspergillus oryzae or Aspergillus niger .
  • Fungal cells may be transformed by a process involving protoplast formation and transformation of the protoplasts followed by regeneration of the cell wall in a manner known per se . A suitable procedure for transformation of Aspergillus host cells is described in EP 238 023.
  • the present invention relates to a method of producing an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention, which method comprises cultivating a host cell as described above under conditions conducive to the production of the variant and recovering the variant from the cells and/or culture medium.
  • the medium used to cultivate the cells may be any conventional medium suitable for growing the host cell in question and obtaining expression of the ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention. Suitable media are available from commercial suppliers or may be prepared according to published recipes (e.g. as described in catalogues of the American Type Culture Collection).
  • the ⁇ -amylase variant secreted from the host cells may conveniently be recovered from the culture medium by well-known procedures, including separating the cells from the medium by centrifugation or filtration, and precipitating proteinaceous components of the medium by means of a salt such as ammonium sulphate, followed by the use of chromatographic procedures such as ion exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography, or the like.
  • ⁇ -amylase variants of the invention are well suited for use in a variety of industrial processes. In particular, they find potential applications as a component in washing, dishwashing and hard surface cleaning detergent compositions ( vide infra ), but may also be useful in the production of sweeteners and ethanol from starch. Conditions for conventional starch-converting processes and liquefaction and/or saccharification processes are described in, for instance, US 3,912,590, EP 252,730 and EP 63,909.
  • ⁇ -amylase variants of the invention Some areas of application of ⁇ -amylase variants of the invention are outlined below.
  • ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention possess properties of value in the production of lignocellulosic materials, such as pulp, paper and cardboard, from starch-reinforced waste paper and waste cardboard, especially where repulping occurs at a pH above 7, and where amylases can facilitate the disintegration of the waste material through degradation of the reinforcing starch.
  • ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention are well suited for use in the deinking/recycling processes of making paper out of starch-coated or starch-containing waste printed paper. It is usually desirable to remove the printing ink in order to produce new paper of high brightness; examples of how the variants of the invention may be used in this way are described in PCT/DK94/00437.
  • ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention may also be very useful in modifying starch where enzymatically modified starch is used in papermaking together with alkaline fillers such as calcium carbonate, kaolin and clays. With alkaline ⁇ -amylase variants of the invention it is feasible to modify the starch in the presence of the filler, thus allowing for a simpler, integrated process.
  • ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention are also well suited for use in textile desizing.
  • ⁇ -amylases are traditionally used as auxiliaries in the desizing process to facilitate the removal of starch-containing size which has served as a protective coating on weft yarns during weaving.
  • non-enzymatic auxiliaries such as alkali or oxidation agents are typically used to break down the starch, because traditional ⁇ -amylases are not very compatible with high pH levels and bleaching agents.
  • alkali or oxidation agents are typically used to break down the starch, because traditional ⁇ -amylases are not very compatible with high pH levels and bleaching agents.
  • the non-enzymatic breakdown of the starch size does lead to some fibre damage because of the rather aggressive chemicals used.
  • ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention exhibiting improved starch-degrading performance at relatively high pH levels and in the presence of oxidizing (bleaching) agents are thus well suited for use in desizing processes as described above, in particular for replacement of non-enzymatic desizing agents currently used.
  • the ⁇ -amylase variant may be used alone, or in combination with a cellulase when desizing cellulose-containing fabric or textile.
  • Beer production ⁇ -Amylase variants of the invention are also believed to be very useful in beer-making processes; in such processes the variants will typically be added during the mashing process.
  • ⁇ -amylase variants are particularly well suited for incorporation into detergent compositions, e.g. detergent compositions intended for performance in the pH range of 7-13, particularly the pH range of 8-11.
  • the ⁇ -amylase variant may be added as a component of a detergent composition. As such, it may be included in the detergent composition in the form of a detergent additive.
  • a further aspect of the invention relates to a detergent additive comprising an ⁇ -amylase variant according to the invention.
  • the enzymes may be included in a detergent composition by adding separate additives containing one or more enzymes, or by adding a combined additive comprising all of these enzymes.
  • a detergent additive of the invention i.e. a separated additive or a combined additive, can be formulated, e.g., as a granulate, liquid, slurry, etc.
  • Preferred enzyme formulations for detergent additives are granulates (in particular non-dusting granulates), liquids (in particular stabilized liquids), slurries or protected enzymes ( vide infra ).
  • the detergent composition as well as the detergent additive may additionally comprise one or more other enzymes conventionally used in detergents, such as proteases, lipases, amylolytic enzymes, oxidases (including peroxidases), or cellulases.
  • enzymes conventionally used in detergents, such as proteases, lipases, amylolytic enzymes, oxidases (including peroxidases), or cellulases.
  • ⁇ -amylase is combined with another amylolytic enzyme, such as a pullulanase, an iso-amylase, a beta-amylase, an amyloglucosidase or a CGTase.
  • amylolytic enzymes suitable for the given purpose are AMG , Novamyl and Promozyme , all of which available from Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark.
  • a particular embodiment of the invention relates to a detergent additive comprising an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention in combination with at least one other amylolytic enzyme (e.g. chosen amongst those mentioned above).
  • Non-dusting granulates may be produced, e.g., as disclosed in US 4,106,991 and US 4,661,452, and may optionally be coated by methods known in the art; further details concerning coatings are given below.
  • the enzymes may be mixed before or after granulation.
  • Liquid enzyme preparations may, for instance, be stabilized by adding a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods. Other enzyme stabilizers are well known in the art. Protected enzymes may be prepared according to the method disclosed in EP 238 216.
  • a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods.
  • Other enzyme stabilizers are well known in the art.
  • Protected enzymes may be prepared according to the method disclosed in EP 238 216.
  • a still further aspect of the invention relates to a detergent composition, e.g. for laundry washing, for dishwashing or for hard-surface cleaning, comprising an ⁇ -amylase variant (including hybrid) of the invention, and a surfactant.
  • the detergent composition of the invention may be in any convenient form, e.g. as powder, granules or liquid.
  • a liquid detergent may be aqueous, typically containing up to 90% of water and 0-20% of organic solvent, or non-aqueous, e.g. as described in EP Patent 120,659.
  • an ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention when employed as a component of a detergent composition (e.g. a laundry washing detergent composition, or a dishwashing detergent composition), it may, for example, be included in the detergent composition in the form of a non-dusting granulate, a stabilized liquid, or a protected enzyme.
  • non-dusting granulates may be produced, e.g., as disclosed in US 4,106,991 and 4,661,452 (both to Novo Industri A/S) and may optionally be coated by methods known in the art.
  • waxy coating materials are poly(ethylene oxide) products (polyethyleneglycol, PEG) with mean molecular weights of 1000 to 20000; ethoxylated nonylphenols having from 16 to 50 ethylene oxide units; ethoxylated fatty alcohols in which the alcohol contains from 12 to 20 carbon atoms and in which there are 15 to 80 ethylene oxide units; fatty alcohols; fatty acids; and mono- and di- and triglycerides of fatty acids.
  • PEG poly(ethylene oxide) products
  • PEG polyethyleneglycol
  • Enzymes added in the form of liquid enzyme preparations may, as indicated above, be stabilized by, e.g., the addition of a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods.
  • a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods.
  • Other enzyme stabilizers are well known in the art.
  • Protected enzymes for inclusion in a detergent composition of the invention may be prepared, as mentioned above, according to the method disclosed in EP 238,216.
  • the detergent composition of the invention may be in any convenient form, e.g. as powder, granules, paste or liquid.
  • a liquid detergent may be aqueous, typically containing up to 70% water and 0-30% organic solvent, or nonaqueous.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more surfactants, each of which may be anionic, nonionic, cationic, or amphoteric (zwitterionic).
  • the detergent will usually contain 0-50% of anionic surfactant such as linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (LAS), alpha-olefinsulfonate (AOS), alkyl sulfate (fatty alcohol sulfate) (AS), alcohol ethoxysulfate (AEOS or AES), secondary alkanesulfonates (SAS), alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl esters, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, or soap.
  • anionic surfactant such as linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (LAS), alpha-olefinsulfonate (AOS), alkyl sulfate (fatty alcohol sulfate) (AS), alcohol ethoxysulfate (AEOS or AES), secondary alkanesulfonates (SAS
  • nonionic surfactant such as alcohol ethoxylate (AEO or AE), alcohol propoxylate, carboxylated alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenol ethoxylate, alkylpolyglycoside, alkyldimethylamine oxide, ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide, fatty acid monoethanolamide, or polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide (e.g. as described in WO 92/06154).
  • the detergent composition may additionally comprise one or more other enzymes, such as pullulanase, esterase, lipase, cutinase, protease, cellulase, peroxidase, or oxidase, e.g., laccase.
  • enzymes such as pullulanase, esterase, lipase, cutinase, protease, cellulase, peroxidase, or oxidase, e.g., laccase.
  • the detergent contains 1-65% of a detergent builder (although some dishwashing detergents may contain even up to 90% of a detergent builder) or complexing agent such as zeolite, diphosphate, triphosphate, phosphonate, citrate, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTMPA), alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, soluble silicates or layered silicates (e.g. SKS-6 from Hoechst).
  • zeolite zeolite
  • diphosphate triphosphate
  • phosphonate citrate
  • NTA nitrilotriacetic acid
  • EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
  • DTMPA diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
  • alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid soluble silicates or layered silicates (e.g. SKS-6 from Hoechst
  • the detergent builders may be subdivided into phosphorus-containing and non-phosphorous-containing types.
  • phosphorus-containing inorganic alkaline detergent builders include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates.
  • non-phosphorus-containing inorganic builders include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, borates and silicates, as well as layered disilicates and the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amorphous alumino silicates of which zeolites are the best known representatives.
  • suitable organic builders include alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium salts of succinates, malonates, fatty acid malonates, fatty acid sulphonates, carboxymethoxy succinates, polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, aminopolycarboxylates and polyacetyl carboxylates.
  • the detergent may also be unbuilt, i.e. essentially free of detergent builder.
  • the detergent may comprise one or more polymers.
  • examples are carboxymethylcellulose (CMC; typically in the form of the sodium salt), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), polyethyleneglycol (PEG), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), polycarboxylates such as polyacrylates, polymaleates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers and lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers.
  • CMC carboxymethylcellulose
  • PVP poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
  • PEG polyethyleneglycol
  • PVA poly(vinyl alcohol)
  • polycarboxylates such as polyacrylates, polymaleates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers and lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers.
  • the detergent composition may contain bleaching agents of the chlorine/bromine-type or the oxygen-type.
  • the bleaching agents may be coated or encapsulated.
  • examples of inorganic chlorine/bromine-type bleaches are lithium, sodium or calcium hypochlorite or hypobromite as well as chlorinated trisodium phosphate.
  • the bleaching system may also comprise a H 2 O 2 source such as perborate or percarbonate which may be combined with a peracid-forming bleach activator such as tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) or nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate (NOBS).
  • TAED tetraacetylethylenediamine
  • NOBS nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate
  • organic chlorine/bromine-type bleaches are heterocyclic N-bromo and N-chloro imides such as trichloroisocyanuric, tribromoisocyanuric, dibromoisocyanuric and dichloroisocyanuric acids, and salts thereof with water solubilizing cations such as potassium and sodium.
  • Hydantoin compounds are also suitable.
  • the bleaching system may also comprise peroxyacids of, e.g., the amide, imide, or sulfone type.
  • oxygen bleaches are preferred, for example in the form of an inorganic persalt, preferably with a bleach precursor or as a peroxy acid compound.
  • suitable peroxy bleach compounds are alkali metal perborates, both tetrahydrates and monohydrates, alkali metal percarbonates, persilicates and perphosphates.
  • Preferred activator materials are TAED or NOBS.
  • the enzymes of the detergent composition of the invention may be stabilized using conventional stabilizing agents, e.g. a polyol such as propylene glycol or glycerol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid, boric acid, or a boric acid derivative such as, e.g., an aromatic borate ester, and the composition may be formulated as described in, e.g., WO 92/19709 and WO 92/19708.
  • the enzymes of the invention may also be stabilized by adding reversible enzyme inhibitors, e.g., of the protein type (as described in EP 0 544 777 B1) or the boronic acid type.
  • the detergent may also contain other conventional detergent ingredients such as, e.g., fabric conditioners including clays, deflocculant material, foam boosters/foam depressors (in dishwashing detergents foam depressors), suds suppressors, anti-corrosion agents, soil-suspending agents, anti-soil-redeposition agents, dyes, dehydrating agents, bactericides, optical brighteners, or perfume.
  • fabric conditioners including clays, deflocculant material, foam boosters/foam depressors (in dishwashing detergents foam depressors), suds suppressors, anti-corrosion agents, soil-suspending agents, anti-soil-redeposition agents, dyes, dehydrating agents, bactericides, optical brighteners, or perfume.
  • the pH (measured in aqueous solution at use concentration) will usually be neutral or alkaline, e.g. in the range of 7-11.
  • laundry detergent compositions within the scope of the invention include:
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 7-12% Alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C 12-18 alcohol, 1-2 EO) or alkyl 1-4% sulfate (e.g. C 16-18) Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g.
  • Enzymes calculated as pure enzyme protein
  • Minor ingredients e.g. suds suppressors, perfume, optical 0-5% brightener, photobleach
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 6-11% Alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C 12-18 alcohol, 1-2 EO or alkyl 1-3% sulfate (e.g. C 16-18) Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g.
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 5-9% Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 7 EO) 7-14% Soap as fatty acid (e.g.
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 8-12% Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 7 EO) 10-25% Sodium carbonate (as Na 2CO 3) 14-22% Soluble silicate (as Na 2O, 2SiO 2) 1-5% Zeolite (as NaAlSiO 4) 25-35% Sodium sulfate (as Na 2SO 4) 0-10% Carboxymethylcellulose 0-2% Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG) 1-3% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume) 0-5%
  • Minor ingredients e.g. suds suppressors, perfume
  • An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 15-21% Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 7 EO or C 12-15 12-18% alcohol, 5 EO) Soap as fatty acid (e.g. oleic acid) 3-13% Alkenylsuccinic acid (C 12-14) 0-13% Aminoethanol 8-18% Citric acid 2-8% Phosphonate 0-3% Polymers (e.g.
  • An aqueous structured liquid detergent composition comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 15-21% Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12-15 3-9% alcohol, 5 EO) Soap as fatty acid (e.g. oleic acid) 3-10% Zeolite (as NaAlSiO 4) 14-22% Potassium citrate 9-18% Borate (as B 4O 7 2 ⁇ ) 0-2% Carboxybethylcellulose 0-2% Polymers (e.g.
  • Anchoring polymers such as, e.g., lauryl methacrylate/ 0-3% acrylic acid copolymer; molar ratio 25:1; MW 3800 Glycerol 0-5% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. dispersants, suds suppressors, 0-5% perfume, optical brighteners)
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising Fatty alcohol sulfate 5-10% Ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide 3-9% Soap as fatty acid 0-3% Sodium carbonate (as Na 2CO 3) 5-10% Soluble silicate (as Na 2O, 2SiO 2) 1-4% Zeolite (as NaAlSiO 4) 20-40% Sodium sulfate (as Na 2SO 4) 2-8% Sodium perborate (as NaBO 3.H 2O) 12-18% TAED 2-7% Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PEG) 1-5% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, suds suppressors, 0-5% perfume)
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 8-14% Ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide 5-11% Soap as fatty acid 0-3% Sodium carbonate (as Na 2CO 3) 4-10% Soluble silicate (as Na 2O, 2SiO 2) 1-4% Zeolite (as NaAlSiO 4) 30-50% Sodium sulfate (as Na 2SO 4) 3-11% Sodium citrate (as C 6H 5Na 3O 7) 5-12% Polymers (e.g. PVP, maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PEG) 1-5% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume) 0-5%
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 6-12% Nonionic surfactant 1-4% Soap as fatty acid 2-6% Sodium carbonate (as Na 2CO 3) 14-22% Zeolite (as NaAlSiO 4) 18-32% Sodium sulfate (as Na 2SO 4) 5-20% Sodium citrate (as C 6H 5Na 3O 7) 3-8% Sodium perborate (as NaBO 3.H 2O) 4-9% Bleach activator (e.g. NOBS or TAED) 1-5% Carboxymethylcellulose 0-2% Polymers (e.g. polycarboxylate or PEG) 1-5% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, perfume) 0-5%
  • An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 15-23% Alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 2-3 EO) 8-15% Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12-15 3-9% alcohol, 5 EO) Soap as fatty acid (e.g. lauric acid) 0-3% Aminoethanol 1-5% Sodium citrate 5-10% Hydrotrope (e.g.
  • An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid) 20-32% Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C 12-15 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12-15 6-12% alcohol, 5 EO) Aminoethanol 2-6% Citric acid 8-14% Borate (as B 4O 7 2 ⁇ ) 1-3% Polymer (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, anchoring 0-3% polymer such as, e.g., lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymer) Glycerol 3-8% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. hydrotropes, dispersants, perfume, 0-5% optical brighteners)
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising Anionic surfactant (linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, alkyl 25-40% sulfate, alpha-olefinsulfonate, alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl esters, alkanesulfonates, soap)
  • Anionic surfactant linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, alkyl 25-40% sulfate, alpha-olefinsulfonate, alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl esters, alkanesulfonates, soap
  • Nonionic surfactant e.g.
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising (C 12-C 18) alkyl sulfate 9-15% Alcohol ethoxylate 3-6% Polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide 1-5% Zeolite (as NaAlSiO 4) 10-20% Layered disilicate (e.g. SK56 from Hoechst) 10-20% Sodium carbonate (as Na 2CO 3) 3-12% Soluble silicate (as Na 2O, 2SiO 2) 0-6% Sodium citrate 4-8% odium percarbonate 13-22% TAED 3-8% Polymers (e.g. polycarboxylates and PVP) 0-5% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, photo bleach, 0-5% perfume, suds suppressors)
  • Minor ingredients e.g. optical brightener, photo bleach, 0-5% perfume, suds suppressors
  • a detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising (C 12-C 18) alkyl sulfate 4-8% Alcohol ethoxylate 11-15% Soap 1-4% Zeolite MAP or zeolite A 35-45% Sodium carbonate (as Na 2CO 3) 2-8% Soluble silicate (as Na 2O, 2SiO 2) 0-4% Sodium percarbonate 13-22% TAED 1-8% Carboxymethyl cellulose 0-3% Polymers (e.g. polycarboxylates and PVP) 0-3% Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1% Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, phosphonate, 0-3% perfume)
  • the manganese catalyst may, e.g., be one of the compounds described in "Efficient manganese catalysts for low-temperature bleaching", Nature 369, 1994, pp. 637-639.
  • Detergent composition formulated as a nonaqueous detergent liquid comprising a liquid nonionic surfactant such as, e.g., linear alkoxylated primary alcohol, a builder system (e.g. phosphate), enzyme and alkali.
  • a liquid nonionic surfactant such as, e.g., linear alkoxylated primary alcohol, a builder system (e.g. phosphate), enzyme and alkali.
  • the detergent may also comprise anionic surfactant and/or a bleach system.
  • dishwashing detergent compositions within the scope of the invention include:
  • Nonionic surfactant 0.4-2.5% Sodium metasilicate 0-20% Sodium disilicate 3-20% Sodium triphosphate 20-40% Sodium carbonate 0-20% Sodium perborate 2-9% Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) 1-4% Sodium sulphate 5-33% Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • Nonionic surfactant e.g. alcohol ethoxylate
  • Nonionic surfactant e.g. alcohol ethoxylate
  • Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) 1-2%
  • Polyacrylate polymer e.g. maleic acid/acrylic acid 6-25% copolymer
  • Enzymes 0.0001-0.1% Perfume 0.1-0.5% Water 5-10
  • Nonionic surfactant 0.5-2.0% Sodium disilicate 25-40% Sodium citrate 30-55% Sodium carbonate 0-29% Sodium bicarbonate 0-20% Sodium perborate monohydrate 0-15% Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) 0-6% Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer 0-5% Clay 1-3% Poly (amino acids) 0-20% Sodium polyacrylate 0-8% Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • Nonionic surfactant 1-2% Zeolite MAP 15-42% Sodium disilicate 30-34% Sodium citrate 0-12% Sodium carbonate 0-20% Sodium perborate monohydrate 7-15% Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) 0-3% Polymer 0-4% Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer 0-5% Organic phosphonate 0-4% Clay 1-2% Enzymes 0.0001-0.1% Sodium sulphate Balance
  • Nonionic surfactant 1-7% Sodium disilicate 18-30% Trisodium citrate 10-24% Sodium carbonate 12-20% Monopersulphate (2KHSO 5.KHSO 4.K 2SO 4) 15-21% Bleach stabilizer 0.1-2% Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer 0-6% Diethylenetriaminepentaacetate, pentasodium salt 0-2.5% Enzymes 0.0001-0.1% Sodium sulphate, water Balance
  • Liquid nonionic surfactant e.g. alcohol ethoxylates
  • Alkali metal silicate 3.0-15.0%
  • Alkali metal phosphate 20.0-40.0%
  • Liquid carrier selected from higher glycols, polyglycols, 25.0-45.0% polyoxides, glycolethers Stabilizer (e.g. a partial ester of phosphoric acid and a 0.5-7.0% C 16-C 18 alkanol)
  • Foam suppressor e.g. silicone 0-1.5%
  • Liquid nonionic surfactant e.g. alcohol ethoxylates
  • Liquid nonionic surfactant 2.0-10.0% Sodium silicate 3.0-15.0%
  • Stabilizing system e.g. mixtures of finely divided 0.5-7.0% silicone and low molecular weight dialkylpolyglycol ethers
  • Low molecule weight polyacrylate polymer 5.0-15.0%
  • Clay gel thickener e.g. bentonite
  • Liquid carrier selected from higher lycols, polyglycols, Balance polyoxides and glycol ethers
  • the manganese catalyst may, e.g., be one of the compounds described in "Efficient manganese catalysts for low-temperature bleaching", Nature 369, 1994, pp. 637-639.
  • An ⁇ -amylase variant of the invention may be incorporated in concentrations conventionally employed in detergents. It is at present contemplated that, in the detergent composition of the invention, the ⁇ -amylase variant may be added in an amount corresponding to 0.00001-1 mg (calculated as pure enzyme protein) of ⁇ -amylase per liter of wash/dishwash liquor.
  • Figure. 1 is an alignment of the amino acid sequences of four parent ⁇ -amylases in the context of the invention.
  • the numbers on the extreme left designate the respective amino acid sequences as follows:
  • Figure. 3 is a restriction map of plasmid pPM103.
  • Figure. 4 is a restriction map of plasmid pTVB112.
  • Figure. 5 is a restriction map of plasmid pTVB114.
  • SEQ ID No. 1 pI about 8.8-9.0 (determined by isoelectric focusing on LKB Ampholine PAG plates); molecular weight approximately 55 kD (determined by SDS-PAGE).
  • SEQ ID No. 2 pI about 5.8 (determined by isoelectric focusing on LKB Ampholine PAG plates); molecular weight approximately 55 kD (determined by SDS-PAGE).
  • SEQ ID No. 1 variants Purification of SEQ ID No. 1 variants (pI approx. 9.0): The fermentation liquid containing the expressed ⁇ -amylase variant is filtered, and ammonium sulfate is added to a concentration of 15% of saturation. The liquid is then applied onto a hydrophobic column (Toyopearl butyl/TOSOH). The column is washed with 20 mM dimethyl-glutaric acid buffer, pH 7.0. The ⁇ -amylase is bound very tightly, and is eluted with 25% w/w 2-propanol in 20 mM dimethylglutaric acid buffer, pH 7.0.
  • the 2-propanol is removed by evaporation and the concentrate is applied onto a cation exchanger (S-Sepharose FF, Pharmacia, Sweden) equilibrated with 20 mM dimethylglutaric acid buffer, pH 6.0.
  • a cation exchanger S-Sepharose FF, Pharmacia, Sweden
  • the amylase is eluted using a linear gradient of 0-250 mM NaCl in the same buffer. After dialysis against 10 mM borate/KCl buffer, pH 8.0, the sample is adjusted to pH 9.6 and applied to an anion exchanger (Q-Sepharose FF, Pharmacia) equilibrated with 10 mM borate/KCl buffer, pH 9.6. The amylase is eluted using a linear gradient of 0-250 mM NaCl. The pH is adjusted to 7.5. The ⁇ -amylase is pure as judged by rSDS-PAGE. All buffers contain 2 mM CaCl 2 in order to stabilize the amylase.
  • SEQ ID No. 2 variants Purification of SEQ ID No. 2 variants (pI approx. 5,8): The fermentation liquid containing the expressed ⁇ -amylase variant is filtered, and ammonium sulfate is added to a concentration of 15% of saturation. The liquid is then applied onto a hydrophobic column (Toyopearl butyl/TOSOH). The bound amylase is eluted with a linear gradient of 15%-0% w/w ammonium sulfate in 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0.
  • the liquid is adjusted to pH 9.6 and applied onto an anion exchanger (Q-Sepharose FF, Pharmacia) equilibrated with the same buffer.
  • the amylase is step-eluted using 150 mM NaCl.
  • the amylase sample is dialyzed against the same buffer, pH 8.0, in order to remove the NaCl.
  • pH 8.0 pH 8.0
  • the pH is adjusted to 9.6 and the amylase is bound once more onto the anion exchanger.
  • the amylase is eluted using a linear gradient of 0-250 mM NaCl.
  • the pH is adjusted to 7.5.
  • the amylase is pure as judged by rSDS-PAGE. All buffers contain 2 mM CaCl 2 in order to stabilize the amylase.
  • Phadebas® tablets Phadebas tablets (Phadebas® Amylase Test, supplied by Pharmacia Diagnostic) contain a cross-linked insoluble blue-colored starch polymer which has been mixed with bovine serum albumin and a buffer substance and tabletted.
  • one tablet is suspended in a tube containing 5 ml 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer (50 mM acetic acid, 50 mM phosphoric acid, 50 mM boric acid, 0.1 mM CaCl 2 , pH adjusted to the value of interest with NaOH).
  • the test is performed in a water bath at the temperature of interest.
  • the ⁇ -amylase to be tested is diluted in x ml of 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer. 1 ml of this ⁇ -amylase solution is added to the 5 ml 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer.
  • the starch is hydrolyzed by the ⁇ -amylase giving soluble blue fragments.
  • the absorbance of the resulting blue solution measured spectrophotometrically at 620 nm, is a function of the ⁇ -amylase activity.
  • the measured 620 nm absorbance after 15 minutes of incubation is in the range of 0.2 to 2.0 absorbance units at 620 nm. In this absorbance range there is linearity between activity and absorbance (Lambert-Beer law). The dilution of the enzyme must therefore be adjusted to fit this criterion.
  • the specific activity of each of the ⁇ -amylases at a given temperature and at a given pH can be compared directly, and the ratio of the specific activity of each of the ⁇ -amylases of interest relative to the specific activity of the reference ⁇ -amylase can be determined.
  • the following mini dishwashing assay was used: A suspension of starchy material was boiled and cooled to 20 C. The cooled starch suspension was applied on small, individually identified glass plates (approx. 2 x 2 cm) and dried at a temperature of ca. 140 C in a drying cabinet. The individual plates were then weighed. For assay purposes, a solution of standard European-type automatic dishwashing detergent (5 g/l) having a temperature of 55 C was prepared. The detergent was allowed a dissolution time of 1 minute, after which the ⁇ -amylase in question was added to the detergent solution (contained in a beaker equipped with magnetic stirring) so as to give an enzyme concentration of 0.5 mg/l.
  • standard European-type automatic dishwashing detergent (5 g/l) having a temperature of 55 C was prepared. The detergent was allowed a dissolution time of 1 minute, after which the ⁇ -amylase in question was added to the detergent solution (contained in a beaker equipped with magnetic stirring) so as to give an enzyme concentration of 0.5 mg/l.
  • the weighed glass plates held in small supporting clamps, were immersed in a substantially vertical position in the ⁇ -amylase/detergent solution, which was then stirred for 15 minutes at 55 C.
  • the glass plates were then removed from the ⁇ -amylase/detergent solution, rinsed with distilled water, dried at 60 C in a drying cabinet and re-weighed.
  • the performance of the ⁇ -amylase in question [expressed as an index relative to a chosen reference ⁇ -amylase (index 100) - in the example below (Example 1) the parent ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1] was then determined from the difference in weight of the glass plates before and after treatment, as follows:
  • plasmid pTVB106 The parent ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and variants thereof are expressed from a plasmid-borne gene, SF16, shown in Figure. 2.
  • the plasmid, pTVB106 contains an origin of replication obtained from plasmid pUB110 (Gryczan et al., 1978) and the cat gene conferring resistance towards chloramphenicol. Secretion of the amylase is aided by the Termamyl signal sequence that is fused precisely, i.e. codon No.1 of the mature protein, to the gene encoding the parent ⁇ -amylase having the nucleotide and amino acid sequence (mature protein) shown in SEQ ID No. 4 and SEQ ID No. 1, respectively.
  • the Termamyl promoter initiates transcription of the gene.
  • Plasmid pTVB106 is similar to pDN1528 (see laid-open Danish patent application No. 1155/94). Some unique restriction sites are indicated on the plasmid map in Figure. 2, including Bst BI, Bam HI, Bst EII, EcoN I, Drd I, Afl III, Dra III, Xma I, Sal I and Bgl II.
  • variant M202T The PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method is used to construct this variant (Higuchi et al., 1988). An approximately 350 bp DNA fragment of pTVB106 is amplified in a PCR reaction A using primers #7113 and mutagenic primer #6778. In a similar PCR reaction B, an approximately 300 bp DNA fragment is amplified using primers Y296 and #6779. The complete DNA fragment spanning the mutation site (M202) from primer #7113 to primer Y296 is amplified in PCR C using these primers and purified DNA fragments from reactions A and B.
  • PCR C DNA is digested with restriction endonucleases Bst EII and Afl III, and the 480 bp fragment is ligated with plasmid pTVB106 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into a low-protease and low-amylase Bacillus subtilis strain (e.g. strain SHA273 mentioned in WO 92/11357).
  • M202 variants are constructed in a similar manner.
  • variants T183* + G184* and R181* + G182* The PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method is used to construct these variants (Higuchi et al., 1988).
  • the mutagenic oligonucleotides are synthesized using a mixture (equal parts) of C and G in one position; two different mutations can therefore be constructed by this procedure.
  • An approximately 300 bp DNA fragment of pTVB106 is amplified in a PCR reaction A using primers #7113 and mutagenic primer #7449.
  • primers Y296 and #3811 an approximately 400 bp DNA fragment is amplified using primers Y296 and #3811.
  • the complete DNA fragment spanning the mutation site (amino acids 181-184) from primer #7113 to primer Y296 is amplified in PCR C using these primers and purified DNA fragments from reactions A and B.
  • PCR C DNA is digested with restriction endonucleases Bst EII and Afl III and the 480 bp fragment is ligated with plasmid pTVB106 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into a low-protease and low-amylase B. subtilis strain (e.g. strain SHA273 mentioned in WO 92/11357). Sequencing of plasmid DNA from these transformants identifies the two correct mutations: i.e. R181* + G182* and T183* + G184*.
  • variant R124P The PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method is used to construct this variant in a manner similar to the construction of variant M202T ( vide supra ).
  • PCR reaction A (with primers #3810 and B1) generates an approximately 500 bp fragment
  • PCR reaction B (primers 7450 and Y296) generates an approximately 550 bp fragment.
  • PCR reaction C based on the product of PCR reaction A and B and primers B1 and Y296 is digested with restriction endonucleases Bst EII and Afl III, and the resulting 480 bp fragment spanning amino acid position 124 is subcloned into pTVB106 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into B. subtilis as previously described.
  • variant R124P + T183* + G184* For the construction of the variant combining the R124P and the T183* + G184* mutations, two EcoN I restriction sites (one located at position 1.774 kb, i.e. between the R124P mutation and the T183* + G184* mutation, and one located at position 0.146 kb) were utilized. The approximately 1630 bp EcoN I fragment of the pTVB106-like plasmid containing the T183* + G184* mutation was subcloned into the vector part (approximately 3810 bp DNA fragment containing the origin of replication) of another pTVB106-like plasmid containing the R124P mutation digested with the same enzyme. Transformation into Bacillus subtilis was carried out as previously described.
  • a specific mutagenesis vector containing a major part of the coding region for the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 was prepared.
  • the important features of this vector include an origin of replication derived from the pUC plasmid, the cat gene conferring resistance towards chloramphenicol and a frameshift-mutation-containing version of the bla gene, the wild-type version of which normally confers resistance towards ampicillin (amp R phenotype).
  • This mutated version of the bla gene results in an amp S phenotype.
  • the plasmid pPM103 is shown in Figure. 3, and the E. coli origin of replication, the 5'-truncated version of the SF16 amylase gene, and ori , bla , cat and selected restriction sites are indicated on the plasmid.
  • Mutations are introduced in the gene of interest as described by Deng and Nickoloff [Anal. Biochem. 200 (1992), pp. 81-88], except that plasmids with the "selection primer" (#6616) incorporated are selected based on the amp R phenotype of transformed E. coli cells harboring a plasmid with a repaired bla gene instead of using the selection by restriction-enzyme digestion outlined by Deng and Nickoloff. Chemicals and enzymes used for the mutagenesis were obtained from the Chameleon mutagenesis kit from Stratagene (catalogue number 200509).
  • the truncated gene containing the desired alteration is subcloned from the pPM103-like plasmid into pTVB106 as an approximately 1440 bp Bst BI- Sal I fragment and transformed into Bacillus subtilis for expression of the variant enzyme.
  • variant L351C + M430C + T183* + G184* This variant was constructed by combining the L351C + M430C pairwise substitution mutation and the T183* + G184* pairwise deletion mutation by subcloning an approximately 1430 bp Hind III- Afl III fragment containing L351C + M430C into a pTVB106-like plasmid (with the T183* + G184* mutations) digested with the same enzymes.
  • variant Y243F + T183* + G184* This variant was constructed by combining the Y243F mutation and the T183* + G184* mutation by subcloning an approximately 1148 bp Drd I fragment containing T183* + G184* into a pTVB106-like plasmid (with the Y243 mutation) digested with the same enzyme.
  • Bacillus subtilis transformants were screened for ⁇ -amylase activity on starch-containing agar plates and the presence of the correct mutations was checked by DNA sequencing.
  • a pPM103-like vector containing the mutations Y243F + T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C was constructed by substituting the truncated version of SF16 in pPM103 with the approximately 1440 bp Bst B1- Sal I fragment of the pTVB106-like vector containing the five mutations in question.
  • the Q391E and K444Q mutations were introduced simultaneously into the pPM103-like vector (containing Y243F + T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C) by the use of the following two mutagenesis primers in a manner similar to the previously described mutagenesis on pPM103:
  • Plasmid pTVB112 A vector, denoted pTVB112, to be used for the expression in B. subtilis of the ⁇ -amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 was constructed. This vector is very similar to pTVB106 except that the gene encoding the mature ⁇ -amylase of SEQ ID No. 2 is inserted between the Pst I and the Hin dIII sites in pTVB106. Thus, the expression of this ⁇ -amylase (SEQ ID No. 2) is also directed by the amyL promoter and signal sequence.
  • the plasmid pTVB112 is shown in Figure. 4.
  • variant D183* + G184* The construction of this variant was achieved using the PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method referred to earlier ( vide supra ).
  • Primers #8573 and B1 were used in PCR reaction A, and primers #8569 and #8570 were used in PCR reaction B.
  • the purified fragments from reaction A and reaction B and primers 1B and #8570 were used in PCR reaction C, resulting in an approximately 1020 bp DNA fragment. This fragment was digested with restriction endonucleases Pst I and Mlu I, and subcloned into the expression vector and transformed into B. subtilis .
  • the presence of a mixture of two bases (T/C) at one position allows for the presence of two different deletion flanking amino acid based on one mutagenesis primer.
  • DNA sequencing of the resulting plasmids verifies the presence of either the one or the other mutation.
  • the mutated gene of interest is subcloned as a Pst I- Dra III fragment into pTVB112 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into B. subtilis .
  • mutated gene of interest is subcloned as a Pst I- Dra III fragment into pTVB112 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into B. subtilis .
  • the solutions were then incubated at 40 C in a water bath.
  • the residual ⁇ -amylase activity was measured using the Phadebas assay described above.
  • the residual activity in the samples was measured using 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer, pH 7.3, at 37 C (see Novo analytical publication AF207-1/1, available on request from Novo Nordisk A/S).
  • the decline in activity was measured relative to a corresponding reference solution of the same enzyme at 0 minutes which was not incubated with hydrogen peroxide (100% activity).
  • the percentage of initial activity as a function of time is shown in the table below for the parent enzyme (SEQ ID No. 1) and for the variants in question.
  • substitution + pairwise deletion variants tested (which both comprise an M202 substitution) clearly exhibit significantly improved stability towards oxidation relative to the parent ⁇ -amylase (SEQ ID No. 2).
  • thermostabilizing effect of multiple mutations is - at least qualitatively - cumulative.
  • Unfolding of amylases by exposure to heat or to denaturants such as guanidine hydrochloride is accompanied by a decrease in fluorescence.
  • Loss of calcium ions leads to unfolding, and the affinity of a series of ⁇ -amylases for calcium can be measured by fluorescence measurements before and after incubation of each ⁇ -amylase (e.g. at a concentration of 10 ⁇ g/ml) in a buffer (e.g. 50 mM HEPES, pH 7) with different concentrations of calcium (e.g. in the range of 1 ⁇ M-100 mM) or of EGTA (e.g.
  • the measured fluorescence F is composed of contributions form the folded and unfolded forms of the enzyme.
  • the following equation can be derived to describe the dependence of F on calcium concentration ([Ca]):
  • ⁇ N is the fluorescence of the native (folded) form of the enzyme
  • ⁇ N is the linear dependence of ⁇ N on the logarithm of the calcium concentration (as observed experimentally)
  • ⁇ U is the fluorescence of the unfolded form
  • ⁇ U is the linear dependence of ⁇ U on the logarithm of the calcium concentration.
  • K diss is the apparent calcium-binding constant for an equilibrium process as follows:

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure
The present invention relates to variants of a parent α-amylase, which parent α-amylase (i) has an amino acid sequence selected from the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3, and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively; or (ii) displays at least 80% homology with one or more of these amino acid sequences; and/or displays immunological cross-reactivity with an antibody raised against an α-amylase having one of these amino acid sequences; and/or is encoded by a DNA sequence which hybridizes with the same probe as a DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase having one of these amino acid sequences; in which variant:(a) at least one amino acid residue of the parent α-amylase has been deleted; and/or(b) at least one amino acid residue of the parent α-amylase has been replaced by a different amino acid residue; and/or(c) at least one amino acid residue has been inserted relative to the parent α-amylase;the variant having α-amylase activity and exhibiting at least one of the following properties relative to the parent α-amylase: increased thermostability; increased stability towards oxidation; and reduced Ca2+ dependency;with the proviso that the amino acid sequence of the variant is not identical to any of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively.

Description

    Detailed Description of the Invention CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a division of U.S. application 10/025,648, filed December 19, 2001, now allowed, which is a division of U.S. patent application 09/902,188, filed on July 10, 2001, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application no. 09/354,191, now U.S. patent no. 6,297,038, filed on July 15, 1999, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application no. 08/600,656, now U.S. patent no. 6,093,562, filed on February 13, 1996, which is a continuation of application serial no. PCT/DK96/00056, filed on February 5, 1996, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 of Danish application serial nos. 0126/95, filed on February 3, 1995, 0336/95, filed on March 29, 1995, 1097/95, filed on September 29, 1995, and 1121/95, filed on October 6, 1995, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
    • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to α-amylase variants having improved properties relative to the parent enzyme (e.g. improved thermal and/or oxidation stability and/or reduced calcium ion dependency), and thereby improved washing and/or dishwashing (and/or textile desizing) performance. The invention also relates to DNA constructs encoding the variants, and to vectors and cells harboring the DNA constructs. The invention further relates to methods of producing the amylase variants, and to detergent additives and detergent compositions comprising the amylase variants. Furthermore, the invention relates to the use of the amylase variants for textile desizing.
    • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • α-Amylase enzymes have been used industrially for a number of years and for a variety of different purposes, the most important of which are starch liquefaction, textile desizing, starch modification in the paper and pulp industry, and for brewing and baking. A further use of α-amylases which is becoming increasingly important is the removal of starchy stains during washing or dishwashing.
  • In recent years attempts have been made to construct α-amylase variants having improved properties with respect to specific uses such as starch liquefaction and textile desizing.
  • For instance, US 5,093,257 discloses chimeric α-amylases comprising an N-terminal part of a B. stearothermophilus α-amylase and a C-terminal part of a B. licheniformis α-amylase. The chimeric α-amylases are stated to have unique properties, such as a different thermostability, as compared to their parent α-amylase. However, all of the specifically described chimeric α-amylases were shown to have a decreased enzymatic activity as compared to their parent α-amylases.
  • EP 252 666 describes hybrid amylases of the general formula Q-R-L, in which Q is a N-terminal polypeptide residue of from 55 to 60 amino acid residues which is at least 75% homologous to the 57 N-terminal amino acid residues of a specified α-amylase from B. amyloliquefaciens, R is a specified polypeptide, and L is a C-terminal polypeptide comprising
  • from 390 to 400 amino acid residues which is at least 75% homologous to the 395 C-terminal amino acid residues of a specified B. licheniformis α-amylase.
  • Suzuki et al. (1989) disclose chimeric α-amylases, in which specified regions of a B. amyloliquefaciens α-amylase have been substituted for the corresponding regions of a B. licheniformis α-amylase. The chimeric α-amylases were constructed with the purpose of identifying regions responsible for thermostability. Such regions were found to include amino acid residues 177-186 and amino acid residues 255-270 of the B. amyloliquefaciens α-amylase. The alterations of amino acid residues in the chimeric α-amylases did not seem to affect properties of the enzymes other than their thermostability.
  • WO 91/00353 discloses α-amylase mutants which differ from their parent α-amylase in at least one amino acid residue. The α-amylase mutants disclosed in said patent application are stated to exhibit improved properties for application in the degradation of starch and/or textile desizing due to their amino acid substitutions. Some of the mutants exhibit improved stability, but no improvements in enzymatic activity were reported or indicated. The only mutants exemplified are prepared from a parent B. licheniformis α-amylase and carry one of the following mutations: H133Y or H133Y + T149I. Another suggested mutation is A111T.
  • FR 2,676,456 discloses mutants of the B. licheniformis α-amylase, in which an amino acid residue in the proximity of His 133 and/or an amino acid residue in the proximity of Ala 209 have been replaced by a more hydrophobic amino acid residue. The resulting α-amylase mutants are stated to have an improved thermostability and to be useful in the textile, paper, brewing and starch liquefaction industry.
  • EP 285 123 discloses a method of performing random mutagenesis of a nucleotide sequence. As an example of such sequence a nucleotide sequence encoding a B. stearothermophilus α-amylase is mentioned. When mutated, an α-amylase variant having improved activity at low pH values is obtained.
  • In none of the above references is it mentioned or even suggested that α-amylase mutants may be constructed which have improved properties with respect to the detergent industry.
  • EP 525 610 relates to mutant enzymes having improved stability towards ionic tensides (surfactants). The mutant enzymes have been produced by replacing an amino acid residue in the surface part of the parent enzyme with another amino acid residue. The only mutant enzyme specifically described in EP 525 610 is a protease. Amylase is mentioned as an example of an enzyme which may obtain an improved stability towards ionic tensides, but the type of amylase, its origin or specific mutations are not specified.
  • WO 94/02597 discloses α-amylase mutants which exhibit improved stability and activity in the presence of oxidizing agents. In the mutant α-amylases, one or more methionine residues have been replaced with amino acid residues different from Cys and Met. The α-amylase mutants are stated to be useful as detergent and/or dishwashing additives as well as for textile desizing.
  • WO 94/18314 discloses oxidatively stable α-amylase mutants, including mutations in the M197 position of B. licheniformis α-amylase.
  • EP 368 341 describes the use of pullulanase and other amylolytic enzymes optionally in combination with an α-amylase for washing and dishwashing.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide α-amylase variants which - relative to their parent α-amylase - possess improved properties of importance, inter alia, in relation to the washing and/or dishwashing performance of the variants in question, e.g. increased thermal stability, increased stability towards oxidation, reduced dependency on Ca2+ ion and/or improved stability or activity in the pH region of relevance in, e.g., laundry washing or dishwashing. Such variant α-amylases have the advantage, among others, that they may be employed in a lower dosage than their parent α-amylase. Furthermore, the α-amylase variants may be able to remove starchy stains which cannot, or can only with difficulty, be removed by α-amylase detergent enzymes known today.
    • BRIEF DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • A goal of the work underlying the present invention was to improve, if possible, the stability of, inter alia, particular α-amylases which are obtainable from Bacillus strains and which themselves had been selected on the basis of their starch removal performance in alkaline media (such as in detergent solutions as typically employed in laundry washing or dishwashing) relative to many of the currently commercially available α-amylases. In this connection, the present inventors have surprisingly found that it is in fact possible to improve properties of the types mentioned earlier (vide supra) of such a parent α-amylase by judicial modification of one or more amino acid residues in various regions of the amino acid sequence of the parent α-amylase. The present invention is based on this finding.
  • Accordingly, in a first aspect the present invention relates to variants of a parent α-amylase, the parent α-amylase in question being one which:
  • i) has one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, herein; or
  • ii) displays at least 80% homology with one or more of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7; and/or displays immunological cross-reactivity with an antibody raised against an α-amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively; and/or is encoded by a DNA sequence which hybridizes with the same probe as a DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively.
  • An α-amylase variant of the invention is subject to the proviso that it is a variant which does not have an amino acid sequence identical to the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1, in SEQ ID No. 2, in SEQ ID No. 3 or in SEQ ID No. 7.
  • DNA sequences encoding the first three of the α-amylase amino acid sequences in question are shown in SEQ ID No. 4 (encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1), SEQ ID No. 5 (encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2) and SEQ ID No. 6 (encoding the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3).
  • The amino acid sequences of the SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2 parent α-amylases, and the corresponding DNA sequences (SEQ ID No. 4 and SEQ ID No. 5, respectively) are also disclosed in WO 95/26397 (under the same SEQ ID Nos. as in the present application).
  • The variants of the invention are variants in which: (a) at least one amino acid residue of the parent α-amylase has been deleted; and/or (b) at least one amino acid residue of the parent α-amylase has been replaced (i.e. substituted) by a different amino acid residue; and/or (c) at least one amino acid residue has been inserted relative to the parent α-amylase. The variants in question have themselves α-amylase activity and exhibit at least one of the following properties relative to the parent α-amylase:
  • increased thermostability, i.e. satisfactory retention of enzymatic activity at a temperature higher than that suitable for use with the parent enzyme;
  • increased oxidation stability, i.e. increased resistance to degradation by oxidants (such as oxygen, oxidizing bleaching agents and the like);
  • reduced Ca2+ dependency, i.e. the ability to function satisfactorily in the presence of a lower Ca2+ concentration than in the case of the parent α-amylase. α-Amylases with such reduced Ca2+ dependency are highly desirable for use in detergent compositions, since such compositions typically contain relatively large amounts of substances (such as phosphates, EDTA and the like) which bind calcium ions strongly.
  • Examples of other desirable improvements or modifications of properties (relative to the parent α-amylase in question) which may be achieved with a variant according to the invention are:
  • increased stability and/or α-amylolytic activity at neutral to relatively high pH values, e.g. at pH values in the range of 7-10.5, such as in the range of 8.5-10.5;
  • increased α-amylolytic activity at relatively high temperatures, e.g. temperatures in the range of 40-70
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C;
  • increase or decrease of the isoelectric point (pI) so as to better match the pI value for the α-amylase variant in question to the pH of the medium (e.g. a laundry washing medium, dishwashing medium or textile-desizing medium) in which the variant is to be employed (vide infra); and
  • improved binding of a particular type of substrate, improved specificity towards a substrate, and/or improved specificity with respect to cleavage (hydrolysis) of substrate.
  • An amino acid sequence is considered to be X% homologous to the parent α-amylase if a comparison of the respective amino acid sequences, performed via known algorithms, such as the one described by Lipman and Pearson in Science 227 (1985) p. 1435, reveals an identity of X%. The GAP computer program from the GCG package, version 7.3 (June 1993), may suitably be used, employing default values for GAP penalties [Genetic Computer Group (1991) Programme Manual for the GCG Package, version 7, 575 Science Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, USA 53711].
  • In the context of the present invention, "improved performance" as used in connection with washing and dishwashing is, as already indicated above, intended to mean improved removal of starchy stains, i.e. stains containing starch, during washing or dishwashing, respectively. The performance may be determined in conventional washing and dishwashing experiments and the improvement evaluated as a comparison with the performance of the parent α-amylase in question. An example of a small-scale "mini dishwashing test" which can be used an indicator of dishwashing performance is described in the Experimental section, below.
  • It will be understood that a variety of different characteristics of an α-amylase variant, including specific activity, substrate specificity, Km (the so-called "Michaelis constant" in the Michaelis-Menten equation), Vmax [the maximum rate (plateau value) of conversion of a given substrate determined on the basis of the Michaelis-Menten equation], pI, pH optimum, temperature optimum, thermoactivation, stability towards oxidants or surfactants (e.g. in detergents), etc., taken alone or in combination, can contribute to improved performance. The skilled person will be aware that the performance of the variant cannot, alone, be predicted on the basis of the above characteristics, but would have to be accompanied by washing and/or dishwashing performance tests.
  • In further aspects the invention relates to a DNA construct comprising a DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase variant of the invention, a recombinant expression vector carrying the DNA construct, a cell which is transformed with the DNA construct or the vector, as well as a method of producing an α-amylase variant by culturing such a cell under conditions conducive to the production of the α-amylase variant, after which the α-amylase variant is recovered from the culture.
  • In a further aspect the invention relates to a method of preparing a variant of a parent α-amylase which by virtue of its improved properties as described above exhibits improved washing and/or dishwashing performance as compared to the parent α-amylase. This method comprises
  • a) constructing a population of cells containing genes encoding variants of said parent α-amylase,
  • b) screening the population of cells for α-amylase activity under conditions simulating at least one washing and/or dishwashing condition,
  • c) isolating a cell from the population containing a gene encoding a variant of said parent α-amylase which has improved activity as compared with the parent α-amylase under the conditions selected in step b),
  • d) culturing the cell isolated in step c) under suitable conditions in an appropriate culture medium, and
  • e) recovering the α-amylase variant from the culture obtained in step d).
  • The invention also relates to a variant (which is a variant according the invention) prepared by the latter method.
  • In the present context, the term "simulating at least one washing and/or dishwashing condition" is intended to indicate a simulation of, e.g., the temperature or pH prevailing during washing or dishwashing, or of the chemical composition of a detergent composition to be used in the washing or dishwashing treatment. The term "chemical composition" is intended to include one, or a combination of two or more, constituents of the detergent composition in question. The constituents of a number of different detergent compositions are listed further below.
  • The "population of cells" referred to in step a) may suitably be constructed by cloning a DNA sequence encoding a parent α-amylase and subjecting the DNA to site-directed or random mutagenesis as described herein.
  • In the present context the term "variant" is used interchangeably with the term "mutant". The term "variant" is intended to include hybrid α-amylases, i.e. α-amylases comprising parts of at least two different α-amylolytic enzymes. Thus, such a hybrid may be constructed, e.g., from: one or more parts each deriving from a variant as already defined above; or one or more parts each deriving from a variant as already defined above, and one or more parts each deriving from an unmodified parent α-amylase. In this connection, the invention also relates to a method of producing such a hybrid α-amylase having improved washing and/or dishwashing performance as compared to any of its constituent enzymes (i.e. as compared to any of the enzymes which contribute a part to the hybrid), which method comprises:
  • a) recombining in vivo or in vitro the N-terminal coding region of an α-amylase gene or corresponding cDNA of one of the constituent α-amylases with the C-terminal coding region of an α-amylase gene or corresponding cDNA of another constituent α-amylase to form recombinants,
  • b) selecting recombinants that produce a hybrid α-amylase having improved washing and/or dishwashing performance as compared to any of its constituent α-amylases,
  • c) culturing recombinants selected in step b) under suitable conditions in an appropriate culture medium, and
  • d) recovering the hybrid α-amylase from the culture obtained in step c).
  • In further aspects the invention relates to the use of an α-amylase variant of the invention [including any variant or hybrid prepared by one of the above mentioned methods] as a detergent enzyme, in particular for washing or dishwashing, to a detergent additive and a detergent composition comprising the α-amylase variant, and to the use of an α-amylase variant of the invention for textile desizing.
  • Random mutagenesis may be used to generate variants according to the invention, and the invention further relates to a method of preparing a variant of a parent α-amylase, which method comprises
  • (a) subjecting a DNA sequence encoding the parent α-amylase to random mutagenesis,
  • (b) expressing the mutated DNA sequence obtained in step (a) in a host cell, and
  • (c) screening for host cells expressing a mutated amylolytic enzyme which has improved properties as described above (e.g. properties such as decreased calcium dependency, increased oxidation stability, increased thermostability, and/or improved activity at relatively high pH) as compared to the parent α-amylase.
    • DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • Nomenclature
  • In the present description and claims, the conventional one-letter codes for nucleotides and the conventional one-letter and three-letter codes for amino acid residues are used. For ease of reference, α-amylase variants of the invention are described by use of the following nomenclature:
  • Original amino acid(s):position(s):substituted amino acid(s)
  • According to this nomenclature, and by way of example, the substitution of alanine for asparagine in position 30 is shown as:
  • Ala 30 Asn or A30N
  • a deletion of alanine in the same position is shown as:
  • Ala 30 * or A30*
  • and insertion of an additional amino acid residue, such as lysine, is shown as:
  • Ala 30 AlaLys or A30AK
  • A deletion of a consecutive stretch of amino acid residues, exemplified by amino acid residues 30-33, is indicated as (30-33)*.
  • Where a specific α-amylase contains a "deletion" (i.e. lacks an amino acid residue) in comparison with other α-amylases and an insertion is made in such a position, this is indicated as:
  • * 36 Asp or *36D
  • for insertion of an aspartic acid in position 36.
  • Multiple mutations are separated by plus signs, i.e.:
  • Ala 30 Asp + Glu 34 Ser or A30N+E34S
  • representing mutations in positions 30 and 34 (in which alanine and glutamic acid replace, i.e. are substituted for, asparagine and serine, respectively).
  • When one or more alternative amino acid residues may be inserted in a given position this is indicated as:
  • A30N,E or
  • A30N or A30E
  • Furthermore, when a position suitable for modification is identified herein without any specific modification being suggested, it is to be understood that any other amino acid residue may be substituted for the amino acid residue present in that position (i.e. any amino acid residue - other than that normally present in the position in question - chosen among A, R, N, D, C, Q, E, G, H, I, L, K, M, F, P, S, T, W, Y and V). Thus, for instance, when a modification (replacement) of a methionine in position 202 is mentioned, but not specified, it is to be understood that any of the other amino acids may be substituted for the methionine, i.e. any other amino acid chosen among A,R,N,D,C,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y and V.
  • The parent α-amylase
  • As already indicated, an α-amylase variant of the invention is very suitably prepared on the basis of a parent α-amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively (vide infra).
  • The parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2, respectively, are obtainable from alkalophilic Bacillus strains (strain NCIB 12512 and strain NCIB 12513, respectively), both of which are described in detail in EP 0 277 216 B1. The preparation, purification and sequencing of these two parent α-amylases is described in WO 95/26397 [see the Experimental section herein (vide infra)].
  • The parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 is obtainable from Bacillus stearothermophilus and is described in, inter alia, J. Bacteriol. 166 (1986) pp. 635-643.
  • The parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7 (which is the same sequence as that numbered 4 in Figure. 1) is obtainable from a "Bacillus sp. #707" and is described by Tsukamoto et al. in Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 151 (1988) pp. 25-31.
  • Apart from variants of the above-mentioned parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, other interesting variants according to the invention include variants of parent α-amylases which have amino acid sequences exhibiting a high degree of homology, such as at least 70% homology, preferably (as already indicated) at least 80% homology, desirably at least 85% homology, and more preferably at least 90% homology, e.g.
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    95% homology, with at least one of the latter four amino acid sequences.
  • As also already indicated above, further criteria for identifying a suitable parent α-amylase are a) that the α-amylase displays an immunological cross-reaction with an antibody raised against an α-amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, and/or b) that the α-amylase is encoded by a DNA sequence which hybridizes with the same probe as a DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase having one of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively.
  • As already mentioned, with regard to determination of the degree of homology of polypeptides (such as enzymes), amino acid sequence comparisons can be performed using known algorithms, such as the one described by Lipman and Pearson (1985).
  • Assays for immunological cross-reactivity may be carried out using an antibody raised against, or reactive with, at least one epitope of the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1, or of the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2, or of the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3, or of the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7.
  • The antibody, which may either be monoclonal or polyclonal, may be produced by methods known in the art, e.g. as described by Hudson et al. (1989). Examples of suitable assay techniques well known in the art include Western Blotting and Radial Immunodiffusion Assay, e.g. as described by Hudson et al. (1989).
  • The oligonucleotide probe for use in the identification of suitable parent α-amylases on the basis of probe hybridization [criterion b) above] may, by way of example, suitably be prepared on the basis of the full or partial amino acid sequence of an α-amylase having one of the sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, or on the basis of the full or partial nucleotide sequence corresponding thereto.
  • Suitable conditions for testing hybridization involve presoaking in 5xSSC and prehybridizing for 1 h at ~40
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C in a solution of 20% formamide, 5xDenhardt's solution, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8, and 50 μg of denatured sonicated calf thymus DNA, followed by hybridization in the same solution supplemented with 100 μM ATP for 18 h at ~40
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C, or using other methods described by, e.g., Sambrook et al. (1989).
  • Influence of mutations on particular properties
  • From the results obtained by the present inventors it appears that changes in a particular property, e.g. thermal stability or oxidation stability, exhibited by a variant relative to the parent α-amylase in question can to a considerable extent be correlated with the type of, and positioning of, mutation(s) (amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions) in the variant. It is to be understood, however, that the observation that a particular mutation or pattern of mutations leads to changes in a given property in no way excludes the possibility that the mutation(s) in question can also influence other properties.
  • Oxidation stability: With respect to increasing the oxidation stability of an α-amylase variant relative to its parent α-amylase, it appears to be particularly desirable that at least one, and preferably multiple, oxidizable amino acid residue(s) of the parent has/have been deleted or replaced (i.e. substituted by) a different amino acid residue which is less susceptible to oxidation than the original oxidizable amino acid residue.
  • Particularly relevant oxidizable amino acid residues in this connection are cysteine, methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine. Thus, for example, in the case of parent α-amylases containing cysteine it is anticipated that deletion of cysteine residues, or substitution thereof by less oxidizable amino acid residues, will be of importance in obtaining variants with improved oxidation stability relative to the parent α-amylase.
  • In the case of the above-mentioned parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, all of which contain no cysteine residues but have a significant methionine content, the deletion or substitution of methionine residues is particularly relevant with respect to achieving improved oxidation stability of the resulting variants. Thus, deletion or substitution [e.g. by threonine (T), or by one of the other amino acids listed above] of one or more of the methionine residues in positions M9, M10, M105, M202, M208, M261, M309, M382, M430 and M440 of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7, and/or in position M323 of the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 (or deletion or substitution of methionine residues in equivalent positions in the sequence of another α-amylase meeting one of the other criteria for a parent α-amylase mentioned above) appear to be particularly effective with respect to increasing the oxidation stability.
  • In the case of the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3, relevant amino acid residues which may be deleted or substituted with a view to improving the oxidation stability include the single cysteine residue (C363) and - by analogy with the sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 3 - the methionine residues located in positions M8, M9, M96, M200, M206, M284, M307, M311, M316 and M438.
  • In this connection, the term "equivalent position" denotes a position which, on the basis of an alignment of the amino acid sequence of the parent α-amylase in question with the "reference" α-amylase amino acid sequence in question (for example the sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1) so as to achieve juxtapositioning of amino acid residues/regions which are common to both, corresponds most closely to (e.g. is occupied by the same amino acid residue as) a particular position in the reference sequence in question.
  • Particularly interesting mutations in connection with modification (improvement) of the oxidation stability of the α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, are one or more of the following methionine substitutions (or equivalents thereof in the amino acid sequences of other α-amylases meeting the requirements of a parent α-amylase in the context of the invention): M202A,R,N,D,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V.
  • Further relevant methionine substitutions in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 are: M323A,R,N,D,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V.
  • Particularly interesting mutations in connection with modification (improvement) of the oxidation stability of the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 are one or more of the following methionine substitutions:
  • M200A,R,N,D,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V;
  • M311A,R,N,D,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V; and
  • M316A,R,N,D,Q,E,G,H,I,L,K,F,P,S,T,W,Y,V.
  • Thermal stability: With respect to increasing the thermal stability of an α-amylase variant relative to its parent α-amylase, it appears to be particularly desirable to delete at least one, and preferably two or even three, of the following amino acid residues in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 (or their equivalents): F180, R181, G182, T183, G184 and K185. The corresponding, particularly relevant (and equivalent) amino acid residues in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 2, SEQ ID No. 3 and SEQ ID No. 7, respectively, are: F180, R181, G182, D183, G184 and K185 (SEQ ID No. 2); F178, R179, G180, I181, G182 and K183 (SEQ ID No. 3); and F180, R181, G182, H183, G184 and K185 (SEQ ID No. 7).
  • Particularly interesting pairwise deletions of this type are as follows:
  • R181* + G182*; and T183* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 1);
  • R181* + G182*; and D183* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 2);
  • R179* + G180*; and I181* + G182* (SEQ ID No. 3); and
  • R181* + G182*; and H183* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 7)
  • (or equivalents of these pairwise deletions in another α-amylase meeting the requirements of a parent α-amylase in the context of the present invention).
  • Other mutations which appear to be of importance in connection with thermal stability are substitutions of one or more of the amino acid residues from P260 to I275 in the sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 (or equivalents thereof in another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention), such as substitution of the lysine residue in position 269.
  • Examples of specific mutations which appear to be of importance in connection with the thermal stability of an α-amylase variant relative to the parent α-amylase in question are one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 (or equivalents thereof in another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention): K269R; P260E; R124P; M105F,I,L,V; M208F,W,Y; L217I; V206I,L,F.
  • For the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2, important further (equivalent) mutations are, correspondingly, one or more of the substitutions: M105F,I,L,V; M208F,W,Y; L217I; V206I,L,F; and K269R.
  • For the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3, important further (equivalent) mutations are, correspondingly, one or both of the substitutions: M206F,W,Y; and L215I.
  • For the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7, important further (equivalent) mutations are, correspondingly, one or more of the substitutions: M105F,I,L,V; M208F,W,Y; L217I; and K269R.
  • Still further examples of mutations which appear to be of importance, inter alia, in achieving improved thermal stability of an α-amylase variant relative to the parent α-amylase in question are one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7 (or equivalents thereof in another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention): A354C + V479C; L351C + M430C; N457D,E + K385R; L355D,E + M430R,K; L355D,E + I411R,K; and N457D,E.
  • Ca2+ dependency: With respect to achieving decreased Ca2+ dependency of an α-amylase variant relative to its parent α-amylase [i.e. with respect to obtaining a variant which exhibits satisfactory amylolytic activity in the presence of a lower concentration of calcium ion in the extraneous medium than is necessary for the parent enzyme, and which, for example, therefore is less sensitive than the parent to calcium ion-depleting conditions such as those obtaining in media containing calcium-complexing agents (such as certain detergent builders)], it appears to be particularly desirable to incorporate one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7 (or an equivalent substitution in another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention): Y243F, K108R, K179R, K239R, K242R, K269R, D163N, D188N, D192N, D199N, D205N, D207N, D209N, E190Q, E194Q and N106D.
  • In the case of the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3, particularly desirable substitutions appear, correspondingly (equivalently), to be one or more of the following: K107R, K177R, K237R, K240R, D162N, D186N, D190N, D197N, D203N, D205N, D207N, E188Q and E192Q.
  • As well as the above-mentioned replacements of D residues with N residues, or of E residues with Q residues, other relevant substitutions in the context of reducing Ca2+ dependency are replacement of the D and/or E residues in question with any other amino acid residue.
  • Further substitutions which appear to be of importance in the context of achieving reduced Ca2+ dependency are pairwise substitutions of the amino acid residues present at: positions 113 and 151, and positions 351 and 430, in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7; and at: positions 112 and 150, and positions 349 and 428, in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 (or equivalent pairwise substitutions in another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention), i.e. pairwise substitutions of the following amino acid residues:
  • G113 + N151 (in relation to SEQ ID No.1); A113 + T151 (in relation to SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7); and G112 + T150 (in relation to SEQ ID No. 3); and
  • L351 + M430 (in relation to SEQ ID No.1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7); and L349 + I428 (in relation to SEQ ID No. 3).
  • Particularly interesting pairwise substitutions of this type with respect to achieving decreased Ca2+ dependency are the following:
  • G113T + N151I (in relation to SEQ ID No.1); A113T + T151I (in relation to SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7); and G112T + T150I (in relation to SEQ ID No. 3); and L351C + M430C (in relation to SEQ ID No.1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7); and L349C + I428C (in relation to SEQ ID No. 3).
  • In connection with substitutions of relevance for Ca2+ dependency, some other substitutions which appear to be of importance in stabilizing the enzyme conformation, and which it is contemplated may achieve this by, e.g., enhancing the strength of binding or retention of calcium ion at or within a calcium binding site within the α-amylolytic enzyme, are one or more of the following substitutions in the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 7 (or an equivalent substitution in another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention): G304W,F,Y,R,I,L,V,Q,N; G305A,S,N,D,Q,E,R,K; and H408Q,E.
  • Corresponding (equivalent) substitutions in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 are: G302W,F,Y,R,I,L,V,Q,N; and G303A,S,N,D,Q,E,R,K.
  • Further mutations which appear to be of importance in the context of achieving reduced Ca2+ dependency are pairwise deletions of amino acids (i.e. deletion of two amino acids) at positions selected among R181, G182, T183 and G184 in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 (or equivalent positions in the amino acid sequence of another α-amylase meeting the requirements of a parent α-amylase in the context of the invention). Such pairwise deletions are thus the following:
  • R181* + G182*; T183* + G184*; R181* + T183*; G182* + T183*;
  • G182* + G184*; and R181* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 1);
  • R181* + G182*; D183* + G184*; R181* + D183*; G182* + D183*;
  • G182* + G184*; and R181* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 2);
  • R179* + G180*; I181* + G182*; R179* + I181*; G180* + I181*;
  • G180* + G182*; and R179* + G182* (SEQ ID No. 3); and
  • R181* + G182*; H183* + G184*; R181* + H183*; G182* + H183*;
  • G182* + G184*; and R181* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 7);
  • (or equivalents of these pairwise deletions in another α-amylase meeting the requirements of a parent α-amylase in the context of the present invention).
  • Isoelectric point (pI): Preliminary results indicate that the washing performance, e.g. the laundry washing performance, of an α-amylase is optimal when the pH of the washing liquor (washing medium) is close to the pI value for the α-amylase in question. It will thus be desirable, where appropriate, to produce an α-amylase variant having an isoelectric point (pI value) which is better matched to the pH of a medium (such as a washing medium) in which the enzyme is to be employed than the isoelectric point of the parent α-amylase in question.
  • With respect to decreasing the isoelectric point, preferred mutations in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 include one or more of the following substitutions: Q86E, R124P, S154D, T183D, V222E, P260E, R310A, Q346E, Q391E, N437E, K444Q and R452H. Appropriate combinations of these substitutions in the context of decreasing the isoelectric point include: Q391E + K444Q; and Q391E + K444Q + S154D.
  • Correspondingly, preferred mutations in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3 with respect to decreasing the isoelectric point include one or more of the substitutions: L85E, S153D, I181D, K220E, P258E, R308A, P344E, Q358E and S435E.
  • With respect to increasing the isoelectric point, preferred mutations in the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 include one or more of the following substitutions: E86Q,L; D154S; D183T,I; E222V,K; E260P; A310R; E346Q,P; E437N,S; and H452R.
  • In the Experimental section below, the construction of a number of variants according to the invention is described.
  • α-Amylase variants of the invention will, apart from having one or more improved properties as discussed above, preferably be such that they have a higher starch hydrolysis velocity at low substrate concentrations than the parent α-amylase. Alternatively, an α-amylase variant of the invention will preferably be one which has a higher Vmax and/or a lower Km than the parent α-amylase when tested under the same conditions. In the case of a hybrid α-amylase, the "parent α-amylase" to be used for the comparison should be the one of the constituent enzymes having the best performance.
  • Vmax and Km (parameters of the Michaelis-Menten equation) may be determined by well-known procedures.
  • Methods of preparing α-amylase variants
  • Several methods for introducing mutations into genes are known in the art. After a brief discussion of the cloning of α-amylase-encoding DNA sequences, methods for generating mutations at specific sites within the α-amylase-encoding sequence will be discussed.
  • Cloning a DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase
  • Cloning a DNA sequence encoding an α-amylaseThe DNA sequence encoding a parent α-amylase may be isolated from any cell or microorganism producing the α-amylase in question, using various methods well known in the art. First, a genomic DNA and/or cDNA library should be constructed using chromosomal DNA or messenger RNA from the organism that produces the α-amylase to be studied. Then, if the amino acid sequence of the α-amylase is known, homologous, labelled oligonucleotide probes may be synthesized and used to identify α-amylase-encoding clones from a genomic library prepared from the organism in question. Alternatively, a labelled oligonucleotide probe containing sequences homologous to a known α-amylase gene could be used as a probe to identify α-amylase-encoding clones, using hybridization and washing conditions of lower stringency.
  • Yet another method for identifying α-amylase-encoding clones would involve inserting fragments of genomic DNA into an expression vector, such as a plasmid, transforming α-amylase-negative bacteria with the resulting genomic DNA library, and then plating the transformed bacteria onto agar containing a substrate for α-amylase, thereby allowing clones expressing the α-amylase to be identified.
  • Alternatively, the DNA sequence encoding the enzyme may be prepared synthetically by established standard methods, e.g. the phosphoamidite method described by S.L. Beaucage and M.H. Caruthers (1981) or the method described by Matthes et al. (1984). In the phosphoamidite method, oligonucleotides are synthesized, e.g. in an automatic DNA synthesizer, purified, annealed, ligated and cloned in appropriate vectors.
  • Finally, the DNA sequence may be of mixed genomic and synthetic origin, mixed synthetic and cDNA origin or mixed genomic and cDNA origin, prepared by ligating fragments of synthetic, genomic or cDNA origin (as appropriate, the fragments corresponding to various parts of the entire DNA sequence), in accordance with standard techniques. The DNA sequence may also be prepared by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers, for instance as described in US 4,683,202 or R.K. Saiki et al. (1988).
  • Site-directed mutagenesis
  • Once an α-amylase-encoding DNA sequence has been isolated, and desirable sites for mutation identified, mutations may be introduced using synthetic oligonucleotides. These oligonucleotides contain nucleotide sequences flanking the desired mutation sites; mutant nucleotides are inserted during oligonucleotide synthesis. In a specific method, a single-stranded gap of DNA, bridging the α-amylase-encoding sequence, is created in a vector carrying the α-amylase gene. Then the synthetic nucleotide, bearing the desired mutation, is annealed to a homologous portion of the single-stranded DNA. The remaining gap is then filled in with DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) and the construct is ligated using T4 ligase. A specific example of this method is described in Morinaga et al. (1984). US 4,760,025 discloses the introduction of oligonucleotides encoding multiple mutations by performing minor alterations of the cassette. However, an even greater variety of mutations can be introduced at any one time by the Morinaga method, because a multitude of oligonucleotides, of various lengths, can be introduced.
  • Another method of introducing mutations into α-amylase-encoding DNA sequences is described in Nelson and Long (1989). It involves the 3-step generation of a PCR fragment containing the desired mutation introduced by using a chemically synthesized DNA strand as one of the primers in the PCR reactions. From the PCR-generated fragment, a DNA fragment carrying the mutation may be isolated by cleavage with restriction endonucleases and reinserted into an expression plasmid.
  • Random mutagenesis
  • Random mutagenesis is suitably performed either as localized or region-specific random mutagenesis in at least three parts of the gene translating to the amino acid sequence shown in question, or within the whole gene.
  • For region-specific random mutagenesis with a view to improving the thermal stability, the following codon positions, in particular, may appropriately be targeted (using one-letter amino acid abbreviations and the numbering of the amino acid residues in the sequence in question):
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1:
  • 120-140 = VEVNRSNRNQETSGEYAIEAW
  • 178-187 = YKFRGTGKAW
  • 264-277 = VAEFWKNDLGAIEN
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2:
  • 120-140 = VEVNPNNRNQEISGDYTIEAW
  • 178-187 = YKFRGDGKAW
  • 264-277 = VAEFWKNDLGALEN
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3:
  • 119-139 = VEVNPSDRNQEISGTYQIQAW
  • 176-185 = YKFRGIGKAW
  • 262-275 = VGEYWSYDINKLHN
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7:
  • 120-140 = VEVNPNNRNQEVTGEYTIEAW
  • 178-187 = YKFRGHGKAW
  • 264-277 = VAEFWKNDLGAIEN
  • With a view to achieving reduced Ca2+ dependency, the following codon positions, in particular, may appropriately be targeted:
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1:
  • 178-209 = YKFRGTGKAWDWEVDTENGNYDYLMYADVDMD
  • 237-246 = AVKHIKYSFT
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2:
  • 178-209 = YKFRGDGKAWDWEVDSENGNYDYLMYADVDMD
  • 237-246 = AVKHIKYSFT
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7:
  • 178-209 = YKFRGHGKAWDWEVDTENGNYDYLMYADIDMD
  • 237-246 = AVKHIKYSFT
  • With a view to achieving improved binding of a substrate (i.e. improved binding of a carbohydrate species - such as amylose or amylopectin - which is a substrate for α-amylolytic enzymes) by an α-amylase variant, modified (e.g. higher) substrate specificity and/or modified (e.g. higher) specificity with respect to cleavage (hydrolysis) of substrate, it appears that the following codon positions for the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 (or equivalent codon positions for another parent α-amylase in the context of the invention) may particularly appropriately be targeted:
  • In the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1:
  • 15-20 = WYLPND
  • 52-58 = SQNDVGY
  • 72-78 = KGTVRTK
  • 104-111 = VMNHKGGA
  • 165-174 = TDWDQSRQLQ
  • 194-204 = ENGNYDYLMYA
  • 234-240 = RIDAVKH
  • 332-340 = HDSQPGEAL
  • The random mutagenesis of a DNA sequence encoding a parent α-amylase to be performed in accordance with step a) of the above-described method of the invention may conveniently be performed by use of any method known in the art.
  • For instance, the random mutagenesis may be performed by use of a suitable physical or chemical mutagenizing agent, by use of a suitable oligonucleotide, or by subjecting the DNA sequence to PCR generated mutagenesis. Furthermore, the random mutagenesis may be performed by use of any combination of these mutagenizing agents.
  • The mutagenizing agent may, e.g., be one which induces transitions, transversions, inversions, scrambling, deletions, and/or insertions.
  • Examples of a physical or chemical mutagenizing agent suitable for the present purpose include ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, hydroxylamine, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), O-methyl hydroxylamine, nitrous acid, ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS), sodium bisulphite, formic acid, and nucleotide analogues.
  • When such agents are used, the mutagenesis is typically performed by incubating the DNA sequence encoding the parent enzyme to be mutagenized in the presence of the mutagenizing agent of choice under suitable conditions for the mutagenesis to take place, and selecting for mutated DNA having the desired properties.
  • When the mutagenesis is performed by the use of an oligonucleotide, the oligonucleotide may be doped or spiked with the three non-parent nucleotides during the synthesis of the oligonucleotide at the positions which are to be changed. The doping or spiking may be done so that codons for unwanted amino acids are avoided. The doped or spiked oligonucleotide can be incorporated into the DNA encoding the amylolytic enzyme by any published technique, using e.g. PCR, LCR or any DNA polymerase and ligase.
  • When PCR-generated mutagenesis is used, either a chemically treated or non-treated gene encoding a parent α-amylase enzyme is subjected to PCR under conditions that increase the misincorporation of nucleotides (Deshler 1992; Leung et al., Technique, Vol.1, 1989, pp. 11-15).
  • A mutator strain of E. coli (Fowler et al., Molec. Gen. Genet., 133, 1974, pp. 179-191), S. cereviseae or any other microbial organism may be used for the random mutagenesis of the DNA encoding the amylolytic enzyme by e.g. transforming a plasmid containing the parent enzyme into the mutator strain, growing the mutator strain with the plasmid and isolating the mutated plasmid from the mutator strain. The mutated plasmid may subsequently be transformed into the expression organism.
  • The DNA sequence to be mutagenized may conveniently be present in a genomic or cDNA library prepared from an organism expressing the parent amylolytic enzyme. Alternatively, the DNA sequence may be present on a suitable vector such as a plasmid or a bacteriophage, which as such may be incubated with or otherwise exposed to the mutagenizing agent. The DNA to be mutagenized may also be present in a host cell either by being integrated in the genome of said cell or by being present on a vector harbored in the cell. Finally, the DNA to be mutagenized may be in isolated form. It will be understood that the DNA sequence to be subjected to random mutagenesis is preferably a cDNA or a genomic DNA sequence.
  • In some cases it may be convenient to amplify the mutated DNA sequence prior to the expression step (b) or the screening step (c) being performed. Such amplification may be performed in accordance with methods known in the art, the presently preferred method being PCR-generated amplification using oligonucleotide primers prepared on the basis of the DNA or amino acid sequence of the parent enzyme.
  • Subsequent to the incubation with or exposure to the mutagenizing agent, the mutated DNA is expressed by culturing a suitable host cell carrying the DNA sequence under conditions allowing expression to take place. The host cell used for this purpose may be one which has been transformed with the mutated DNA sequence, optionally present on a vector, or one which was carried the DNA sequence encoding the parent enzyme during the mutagenesis treatment. Examples of suitable host cells are the following: gram positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans or Streptomyces murinus; and gram negative bacteria such as E. coli.
  • The mutated DNA sequence may further comprise a DNA sequence encoding functions permitting expression of the mutated DNA sequence.
  • Localized random mutagenesis: the random mutagenesis may advantageously be localized to a part of the parent α-amylase in question. This may, e.g., be advantageous when certain regions of the enzyme have been identified to be of particular importance for a given property of the enzyme, and when modified are expected to result in a variant having improved properties. Such regions may normally be identified when the tertiary structure of the parent enzyme has been elucidated and related to the function of the enzyme.
  • The localized random mutagenesis is conveniently performed by use of PCR- generated mutagenesis techniques as described above or any other suitable technique known in the art.
  • Alternatively, the DNA sequence encoding the part of the DNA sequence to be modified may be isolated, e.g. by being inserted into a suitable vector, and said part may subsequently be subjected to mutagenesis by use of any of the mutagenesis methods discussed above.
  • With respect to the screening step in the above-mentioned method of the invention, this may conveniently performed by use of a filter assay based on the following principle:
  • A microorganism capable of expressing the mutated amylolytic enzyme of interest is incubated on a suitable medium and under suitable conditions for the enzyme to be secreted, the medium being provided with a double filter comprising a first protein-binding filter and on top of that a second filter exhibiting a low protein binding capability. The microorganism is located on the second filter. Subsequent to the incubation, the first filter comprising enzymes secreted from the microorganisms is separated from the second filter comprising the microorganisms. The first filter is subjected to screening for the desired enzymatic activity and the corresponding microbial colonies present on the second filter are identified.
  • The filter used for binding the enzymatic activity may be any protein binding filter e.g. nylon or nitrocellulose. The top filter carrying the colonies of the expression organism may be any filter that has no or low affinity for binding proteins e.g. cellulose acetate or DuraporeTM. The filter may be pretreated with any of the conditions to be used for screening or may be treated during the detection of enzymatic activity.
  • The enzymatic activity may be detected by a dye, flourescence, precipitation, pH indicator, IR-absorbance or any other known technique for detection of enzymatic activity.
  • The detecting compound may be immobilized by any immobilizing agent e.g. agarose, agar, gelatine, polyacrylamide, starch, filter paper, cloth; or any combination of immobilizing agents.
  • α-Amylase activity is detected by Cibacron Red labelled amylopectin, which is immobilized on agarose. For screening for variants with increased thermal and high-pH stability, the filter with bound α-amylase variants is incubated in a buffer at pH 10.5 and 60
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    or 65
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C for a specified time, rinsed briefly in deionized water and placed on the amylopectin-agarose matrix for activity detection. Residual activity is seen as lysis of Cibacron Red by amylopectin degradation. The conditions are chosen to be such that activity due to the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 can barely be detected. Stabilized variants show, under the same conditions, increased color intensity due to increased liberation of Cibacron Red.
  • For screening for variants with an activity optimum at a lower temperature and/or over a broader temperature range, the filter with bound variants is placed directly on the amylopectin-Cibacron Red substrate plate and incubated at the desired temperature (e.g. 4
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C, 10
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C or 30
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C) for a specified time. After this time activity due to the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 can barely be detected, whereas variants with optimum activity at a lower temperature will show increase amylopectin lysis. Prior to incubation onto the amylopectin matrix, incubation in all kinds of desired media - e.g. solutions containing Ca2+, detergents, EDTA or other relevant additives - can be carried out in order to screen for changed dependency or for reaction of the variants in question with such additives.
  • Methods of preparing hybrid α-amylases
  • As an alternative to site-specific mutagenesis, α-amylase variants which are hybrids of at least two constituent α-amylases may be prepared by combining the relevant parts of the respective genes in question.
  • Naturally occurring enzymes may be genetically modified by random or site directed mutagenesis as described above. Alternatively, part of one enzyme may be replaced by a part of another to obtain a chimeric enzyme. This replacement can be achieved either by conventional in vitro gene splicing techniques or by in vivo recombination or by combinations of both techniques. When using conventional in vitro gene splicing techniques, a desired portion of the α-amylase gene coding sequence may be deleted using appropriate site-specific restriction enzymes; the deleted portion of the coding sequence may then be replaced by the insertion of a desired portion of a different α-amylase coding sequence so that a chimeric nucleotide sequence encoding a new α-amylase is produced. Alternatively, α-amylase genes may be fused, e.g. by use of the PCR overlay extension method described by Higuchi et al. 1988.
  • The in vivo recombination techniques depend on the fact that different DNA segments with highly homologous regions (identity of DNA sequence) may recombine, i.e. break and exchange DNA, and establish new bonds in the homologous regions. Accordingly, when the coding sequences for two different but homologous amylase enzymes are used to transform a host cell, recombination of homologous sequences in vivo will result in the production of chimeric gene sequences. Translation of these coding sequences by the host cell will result in production of a chimeric amylase gene product. Specific in vivo recombination techniques are described in US 5,093,257 and EP 252 666.
  • Alternatively, the hybrid enzyme may be synthesized by standard chemical methods known in the art. For example, see Hunkapiller et al. (1984). Accordingly, peptides having the appropriate amino acid sequences may be synthesized in whole or in part and joined to form hybrid enzymes (variants) of the invention.
  • Expression of α-amylase variants
  • Expression of α-amylase variantsAccording to the invention, a mutated α-amylase-encoding DNA sequence produced by methods described above, or by any alternative methods known in the art, can be expressed, in enzyme form, using an expression vector which typically includes control sequences encoding a promoter, operator, ribosome binding site, translation initiation signal, and, optionally, a repressor gene or various activator genes.
  • The recombinant expression vector carrying the DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase variant of the invention may be any vector which may conveniently be subjected to recombinant DNA procedures, and the choice of vector will often depend on the host cell into which it is to be introduced. Thus, the vector may be an autonomously replicating vector, i.e. a vector which exists as an extrachromosomal entity, the replication of which is independent of chromosomal replication, e.g. a plasmid, a bacteriophage or an extrachromosomal element, minichromosome or an artificial chromosome. Alternatively, the vector may be one which, when introduced into a host cell, is integrated into the host cell genome and replicated together with the chromosome(s) into which it has been integrated.
  • In the vector, the DNA sequence should be operably connected to a suitable promoter sequence. The promoter may be any DNA sequence which shows transcriptional activity in the host cell of choice and may be derived from genes encoding proteins either homologous or heterologous to the host cell. Examples of suitable promoters for directing the transcription of the DNA sequence encoding an α-amylase variant of the invention, especially in a bacterial host, are the promoter of the lac operon of E. coli, the Streptomyces coelicolor agarase gene dagA promoters, the promoters of the Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase gene (amyL), the promoters of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene (amyM), the promoters of the Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens α-amylase (amyQ), the promoters of the Bacillus subtilis xylA and xylB genes etc. For transcription in a fungal host, examples of useful promoters are those derived from the gene encoding A. oryzae TAKA amylase, Rhizomucor miehei aspartic proteinase, A. niger neutral α-amylase, A. niger acid stable α-amylase, A. niger glucoamylase, Rhizomucor miehei lipase, A. oryzae alkaline protease, A. oryzae triose phosphate isomerase or A. nidulans acetamidase.
  • The expression vector of the invention may also comprise a suitable transcription terminator and, in eukaryotes, polyadenylation sequences operably connected to the DNA sequence encoding the α-amylase variant of the invention. Termination and polyadenylation sequences may suitably be derived from the same sources as the promoter.
  • The vector may further comprise a DNA sequence enabling the vector to replicate in the host cell in question. Examples of such sequences are the origins of replication of plasmids pUC19, pACYC177, pUB110, pE194, pAMB1 and pIJ702.
  • The vector may also comprise a selectable marker, e.g. a gene the product of which complements a defect in the host cell, such as the dal genes from B. subtilis or B. licheniformis, or one which confers antibiotic resistance such as ampicillin, kanamycin, chloramphenicol or tetracyclin resistance. Furthermore, the vector may comprise Aspergillus selection markers such as amdS, argB, niaD and sC, a marker giving rise to hygromycin resistance, or the selection may be accomplished by co-transformation, e.g. as described in WO 91/17243.
  • While intracellular expression may be advantageous in some respects, e.g. when using certain bacteria as host cells, it is generally preferred that the expression is extracellular.
  • Procedures suitable for constructing vectors of the invention encoding an α-amylase variant, and containing the promoter, terminator and other elements, respectively, are well known to persons skilled in the art [cf., for instance, Sambrook et al. (1989)].
  • The cell of the invention, either comprising a DNA construct or an expression vector of the invention as defined above, is advantageously used as a host cell in the recombinant production of an α-amylase variant of the invention. The cell may be transformed with the DNA construct of the invention encoding the variant, conveniently by integrating the DNA construct (in one or more copies) in the host chromosome. This integration is generally considered to be an advantage as the DNA sequence is more likely to be stably maintained in the cell. Integration of the DNA constructs into the host chromosome may be performed according to conventional methods, e.g. by homologous or heterologous recombination. Alternatively, the cell may be transformed with an expression vector as described above in connection with the different types of host cells.
  • The cell of the invention may be a cell of a higher organism such as a mammal or an insect, but is preferably a microbial cell, e.g. a bacterial or a fungal (including yeast) cell.
  • Examples of suitable bacteria are gram positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, or Streptomyces lividans or Streptomyces murinus, or gram negative bacteria such as E. coli. The transformation of the bacteria may, for instance, be effected by protoplast transformation or by using competent cells in a manner known per se.
  • The yeast organism may favorably be selected from a species of Saccharomyces or Schizosaccharomyces, e.g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The filamentous fungus may advantageously belong to a species of Aspergillus, e.g. Aspergillus oryzae or Aspergillus niger. Fungal cells may be transformed by a process involving protoplast formation and transformation of the protoplasts followed by regeneration of the cell wall in a manner known per se. A suitable procedure for transformation of Aspergillus host cells is described in EP 238 023.
  • In a yet further aspect, the present invention relates to a method of producing an α-amylase variant of the invention, which method comprises cultivating a host cell as described above under conditions conducive to the production of the variant and recovering the variant from the cells and/or culture medium.
  • The medium used to cultivate the cells may be any conventional medium suitable for growing the host cell in question and obtaining expression of the α-amylase variant of the invention. Suitable media are available from commercial suppliers or may be prepared according to published recipes (e.g. as described in catalogues of the American Type Culture Collection).
  • The α-amylase variant secreted from the host cells may conveniently be recovered from the culture medium by well-known procedures, including separating the cells from the medium by centrifugation or filtration, and precipitating proteinaceous components of the medium by means of a salt such as ammonium sulphate, followed by the use of chromatographic procedures such as ion exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography, or the like.
  • Industrial Applications
  • Owing to their activity at alkaline pH values, α-amylase variants of the invention are well suited for use in a variety of industrial processes. In particular, they find potential applications as a component in washing, dishwashing and hard surface cleaning detergent compositions (vide infra), but may also be useful in the production of sweeteners and ethanol from starch. Conditions for conventional starch-converting processes and liquefaction and/or saccharification processes are described in, for instance, US 3,912,590, EP 252,730 and EP 63,909.
  • Some areas of application of α-amylase variants of the invention are outlined below.
  • Paper-related applications: α-Amylase variants of the invention possess properties of value in the production of lignocellulosic materials, such as pulp, paper and cardboard, from starch-reinforced waste paper and waste cardboard, especially where repulping occurs at a pH above 7, and where amylases can facilitate the disintegration of the waste material through degradation of the reinforcing starch.
  • α-Amylase variants of the invention are well suited for use in the deinking/recycling processes of making paper out of starch-coated or starch-containing waste printed paper. It is usually desirable to remove the printing ink in order to produce new paper of high brightness; examples of how the variants of the invention may be used in this way are described in PCT/DK94/00437.
  • α-Amylase variants of the invention may also be very useful in modifying starch where enzymatically modified starch is used in papermaking together with alkaline fillers such as calcium carbonate, kaolin and clays. With alkaline α-amylase variants of the invention it is feasible to modify the starch in the presence of the filler, thus allowing for a simpler, integrated process.
  • Textile desizing: α-Amylase variants of the invention are also well suited for use in textile desizing. In the textile processing industry, α-amylases are traditionally used as auxiliaries in the desizing process to facilitate the removal of starch-containing size which has served as a protective coating on weft yarns during weaving.
  • Complete removal of the size coating after weaving is important to ensure optimum results in subsequent processes in which the fabric is scoured, bleached and dyed. Enzymatic starch degradation is preferred because it does not harm the fibers of the textile or fabric.
  • In order to reduce processing costs and increase mill throughput, the desizing processing is sometimes combined with the scouring and bleaching steps. In such cases, non-enzymatic auxiliaries such as alkali or oxidation agents are typically used to break down the starch, because traditional α-amylases are not very compatible with high pH levels and bleaching agents. The non-enzymatic breakdown of the starch size does lead to some fibre damage because of the rather aggressive chemicals used.
  • α-Amylase variants of the invention exhibiting improved starch-degrading performance at relatively high pH levels and in the presence of oxidizing (bleaching) agents are thus well suited for use in desizing processes as described above, in particular for replacement of non-enzymatic desizing agents currently used. The α-amylase variant may be used alone, or in combination with a cellulase when desizing cellulose-containing fabric or textile.
  • Beer production: α-Amylase variants of the invention are also believed to be very useful in beer-making processes; in such processes the variants will typically be added during the mashing process.
  • Applications in detergent additives and detergent compositions for washing or dishwashing: Owing to the improved washing and/or dishwashing performance which will often be a consequence of improvements in properties as discussed above, numerous α-amylase variants (including hybrids) of the invention are particularly well suited for incorporation into detergent compositions, e.g. detergent compositions intended for performance in the pH range of 7-13, particularly the pH range of 8-11. According to the invention, the α-amylase variant may be added as a component of a detergent composition. As such, it may be included in the detergent composition in the form of a detergent additive.
  • Thus, a further aspect of the invention relates to a detergent additive comprising an α-amylase variant according to the invention. The enzymes may be included in a detergent composition by adding separate additives containing one or more enzymes, or by adding a combined additive comprising all of these enzymes. A detergent additive of the invention, i.e. a separated additive or a combined additive, can be formulated, e.g., as a granulate, liquid, slurry, etc. Preferred enzyme formulations for detergent additives are granulates (in particular non-dusting granulates), liquids (in particular stabilized liquids), slurries or protected enzymes (vide infra).
  • The detergent composition as well as the detergent additive may additionally comprise one or more other enzymes conventionally used in detergents, such as proteases, lipases, amylolytic enzymes, oxidases (including peroxidases), or cellulases.
  • It has been found that substantial improvements in washing and/or dishwashing performance may be obtained when α-amylase is combined with another amylolytic enzyme, such as a pullulanase, an iso-amylase, a beta-amylase, an amyloglucosidase or a CGTase. Examples of commercially available amylolytic enzymes suitable for the given purpose are AMG
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    , Novamyl
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    and Promozyme
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    , all of which available from Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark. Accordingly, a particular embodiment of the invention relates to a detergent additive comprising an α-amylase variant of the invention in combination with at least one other amylolytic enzyme (e.g. chosen amongst those mentioned above).
  • Non-dusting granulates may be produced, e.g., as disclosed in US 4,106,991 and US 4,661,452, and may optionally be coated by methods known in the art; further details concerning coatings are given below. When a combination of different detergent enzymes is to be employed, the enzymes may be mixed before or after granulation.
  • Liquid enzyme preparations may, for instance, be stabilized by adding a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods. Other enzyme stabilizers are well known in the art. Protected enzymes may be prepared according to the method disclosed in EP 238 216.
  • As already indicated, a still further aspect of the invention relates to a detergent composition, e.g. for laundry washing, for dishwashing or for hard-surface cleaning, comprising an α-amylase variant (including hybrid) of the invention, and a surfactant.
  • The detergent composition of the invention may be in any convenient form, e.g. as powder, granules or liquid. A liquid detergent may be aqueous, typically containing up to 90% of water and 0-20% of organic solvent, or non-aqueous, e.g. as described in EP Patent 120,659.
  • Detergent Compositions
  • When an α-amylase variant of the invention is employed as a component of a detergent composition (e.g. a laundry washing detergent composition, or a dishwashing detergent composition), it may, for example, be included in the detergent composition in the form of a non-dusting granulate, a stabilized liquid, or a protected enzyme. As mentioned above, non-dusting granulates may be produced, e.g., as disclosed in US 4,106,991 and 4,661,452 (both to Novo Industri A/S) and may optionally be coated by methods known in the art. Examples of waxy coating materials are poly(ethylene oxide) products (polyethyleneglycol, PEG) with mean molecular weights of 1000 to 20000; ethoxylated nonylphenols having from 16 to 50 ethylene oxide units; ethoxylated fatty alcohols in which the alcohol contains from 12 to 20 carbon atoms and in which there are 15 to 80 ethylene oxide units; fatty alcohols; fatty acids; and mono- and di- and triglycerides of fatty acids. Examples of film-forming coating materials suitable for application by fluid bed techniques are given in GB 1483591.
  • Enzymes added in the form of liquid enzyme preparations may, as indicated above, be stabilized by, e.g., the addition of a polyol such as propylene glycol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid or boric acid according to established methods. Other enzyme stabilizers are well known in the art.
  • Protected enzymes for inclusion in a detergent composition of the invention may be prepared, as mentioned above, according to the method disclosed in EP 238,216.
  • The detergent composition of the invention may be in any convenient form, e.g. as powder, granules, paste or liquid. A liquid detergent may be aqueous, typically containing up to 70% water and 0-30% organic solvent, or nonaqueous.
  • The detergent composition comprises one or more surfactants, each of which may be anionic, nonionic, cationic, or amphoteric (zwitterionic). The detergent will usually contain 0-50% of anionic surfactant such as linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (LAS), alpha-olefinsulfonate (AOS), alkyl sulfate (fatty alcohol sulfate) (AS), alcohol ethoxysulfate (AEOS or AES), secondary alkanesulfonates (SAS), alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl esters, alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, or soap. It may also contain 0-40% of nonionic surfactant such as alcohol ethoxylate (AEO or AE), alcohol propoxylate, carboxylated alcohol ethoxylates, nonylphenol ethoxylate, alkylpolyglycoside, alkyldimethylamine oxide, ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide, fatty acid monoethanolamide, or polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide (e.g. as described in WO 92/06154).
  • The detergent composition may additionally comprise one or more other enzymes, such as pullulanase, esterase, lipase, cutinase, protease, cellulase, peroxidase, or oxidase, e.g., laccase.
  • Normally the detergent contains 1-65% of a detergent builder (although some dishwashing detergents may contain even up to 90% of a detergent builder) or complexing agent such as zeolite, diphosphate, triphosphate, phosphonate, citrate, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTMPA), alkyl- or alkenylsuccinic acid, soluble silicates or layered silicates (e.g. SKS-6 from Hoechst).
  • The detergent builders may be subdivided into phosphorus-containing and non-phosphorous-containing types. Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic alkaline detergent builders include the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates, polyphosphates and phosphonates. Examples of non-phosphorus-containing inorganic builders include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, borates and silicates, as well as layered disilicates and the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amorphous alumino silicates of which zeolites are the best known representatives.
  • Examples of suitable organic builders include alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium salts of succinates, malonates, fatty acid malonates, fatty acid sulphonates, carboxymethoxy succinates, polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, aminopolycarboxylates and polyacetyl carboxylates.
  • The detergent may also be unbuilt, i.e. essentially free of detergent builder.
  • The detergent may comprise one or more polymers. Examples are carboxymethylcellulose (CMC; typically in the form of the sodium salt), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), polyethyleneglycol (PEG), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), polycarboxylates such as polyacrylates, polymaleates, maleic/acrylic acid copolymers and lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers.
  • The detergent composition may contain bleaching agents of the chlorine/bromine-type or the oxygen-type. The bleaching agents may be coated or encapsulated. Examples of inorganic chlorine/bromine-type bleaches are lithium, sodium or calcium hypochlorite or hypobromite as well as chlorinated trisodium phosphate. The bleaching system may also comprise a H2O2 source such as perborate or percarbonate which may be combined with a peracid-forming bleach activator such as tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED) or nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate (NOBS).
  • Examples of organic chlorine/bromine-type bleaches are heterocyclic N-bromo and N-chloro imides such as trichloroisocyanuric, tribromoisocyanuric, dibromoisocyanuric and dichloroisocyanuric acids, and salts thereof with water solubilizing cations such as potassium and sodium. Hydantoin compounds are also suitable. The bleaching system may also comprise peroxyacids of, e.g., the amide, imide, or sulfone type.
  • In dishwashing detergents the oxygen bleaches are preferred, for example in the form of an inorganic persalt, preferably with a bleach precursor or as a peroxy acid compound. Typical examples of suitable peroxy bleach compounds are alkali metal perborates, both tetrahydrates and monohydrates, alkali metal percarbonates, persilicates and perphosphates. Preferred activator materials are TAED or NOBS.
  • The enzymes of the detergent composition of the invention may be stabilized using conventional stabilizing agents, e.g. a polyol such as propylene glycol or glycerol, a sugar or sugar alcohol, lactic acid, boric acid, or a boric acid derivative such as, e.g., an aromatic borate ester, and the composition may be formulated as described in, e.g., WO 92/19709 and WO 92/19708. The enzymes of the invention may also be stabilized by adding reversible enzyme inhibitors, e.g., of the protein type (as described in EP 0 544 777 B1) or the boronic acid type.
  • The detergent may also contain other conventional detergent ingredients such as, e.g., fabric conditioners including clays, deflocculant material, foam boosters/foam depressors (in dishwashing detergents foam depressors), suds suppressors, anti-corrosion agents, soil-suspending agents, anti-soil-redeposition agents, dyes, dehydrating agents, bactericides, optical brighteners, or perfume.
  • The pH (measured in aqueous solution at use concentration) will usually be neutral or alkaline, e.g. in the range of 7-11.
  • Particular forms of laundry detergent compositions within the scope of the invention include:
  • 1) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    7-12%
    Alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C12-18 alcohol, 1-2 EO) or alkyl    1-4%
    sulfate (e.g. C16-18)
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C14-15 alcohol, 7 EO)    5-9%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    14-20%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    2-6%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    15-22%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    0-6%
    Sodium citrate/citric acid (as C6H 5Na 3O 7/C 6H 8O 7)    0-15%
    Sodium perborate (as NaBO3.H 2O)    11-18%
    TAED    2-6%
    Carboxymethylcellulose    0-2%
    Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG)    0-3%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume, optical    0-5%
    brightener, photobleach)
  • 2) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    6-11%
    Alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C12-18 alcohol, 1-2 EO or alkyl    1-3%
    sulfate (e.g. C16-18)
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C14-15 alcohol, 7 EO)    5-9%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    15-21%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    1-4%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    24-34%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    4-10%
    Sodium citrate/citric acid (as C6H 5Na 3O 7/C 6H 8O 7)    0-15%
    Carboxymethylcellulose    0-2%
    Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG)    1-6%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume)    0-5%
  • 3) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    5-9%
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 7 EO)    7-14%
    Soap as fatty acid (e.g. C16-22 fatty acid)    1-3%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    10-17%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    3-9%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    23-33%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO4)    0-4%
    Sodium perborate (as NaBO3.H 2O)    8-16%
    TAED    2-8%
    Phosphonate (e.g. EDTMPA)    0-1%
    Carboxymethylcellulose    0-2%
    Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG)    0-3%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume, optical    0-5%
    brightener)
  • 4) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    8-12%
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 7 EO)    10-25%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    14-22%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    1-5%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    25-35%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    0-10%
    Carboxymethylcellulose    0-2%
    Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PVP, PEG)    1-3%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume)    0-5%
  • 5) An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    15-21%
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 7 EO or C 12-15    12-18%
    alcohol, 5 EO)
    Soap as fatty acid (e.g. oleic acid)    3-13%
    Alkenylsuccinic acid (C12-14)    0-13%
    Aminoethanol    8-18%
    Citric acid    2-8%
    Phosphonate    0-3%
    Polymers (e.g. PVP, PEG)    0-3%
    Borate (as B4O 7 2−)    0-2%
    Ethanol    0-3%
    Propylene glycol    8-14%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. dispersants, suds suppressors,    0-5%
    perfume, optical brightener)
  • 6) An aqueous structured liquid detergent composition comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    15-21%
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12-15    3-9%
    alcohol, 5 EO)
    Soap as fatty acid (e.g. oleic acid)    3-10%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    14-22%
    Potassium citrate    9-18%
    Borate (as B4O 7 2−)    0-2%
    Carboxybethylcellulose    0-2%
    Polymers (e.g. PEG, PVP)    0-3%
    Anchoring polymers such as, e.g., lauryl methacrylate/    0-3%
    acrylic acid copolymer; molar ratio 25:1; MW 3800
    Glycerol    0-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. dispersants, suds suppressors,    0-5%
    perfume, optical brighteners)
  • 7) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    Fatty alcohol sulfate    5-10%
    Ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide    3-9%
    Soap as fatty acid    0-3%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    5-10%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    1-4%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    20-40%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    2-8%
    Sodium perborate (as NaBO3.H 2O)    12-18%
    TAED    2-7%
    Polymers (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PEG)    1-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, suds suppressors,    0-5%
    perfume)
  • 8) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    8-14%
    Ethoxylated fatty acid monoethanolamide    5-11%
    Soap as fatty acid    0-3%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    4-10%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    1-4%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    30-50%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    3-11%
    Sodium citrate (as C6H 5Na 3O 7)    5-12%
    Polymers (e.g. PVP, maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, PEG)    1-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. suds suppressors, perfume)    0-5%
  • 9) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    6-12%
    Nonionic surfactant    1-4%
    Soap as fatty acid    2-6%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    14-22%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    18-32%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    5-20%
    Sodium citrate (as C6H 5Na 3O 7)    3-8%
    Sodium perborate (as NaBO3.H 2O)    4-9%
    Bleach activator (e.g. NOBS or TAED)    1-5%
    Carboxymethylcellulose    0-2%
    Polymers (e.g. polycarboxylate or PEG)    1-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, perfume)    0-5%
  • 10) An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    15-23%
    Alcohol ethoxysulfate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 2-3 EO)    8-15%
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12-15    3-9%
    alcohol, 5 EO)
    Soap as fatty acid (e.g. lauric acid)    0-3%
    Aminoethanol    1-5%
    Sodium citrate    5-10%
    Hydrotrope (e.g. sodium toluene sulfonate)    2-6%
    Borate (as B4O 7 2−)    0-2%
    Carboxymethylcellulose    0-1%
    Ethanol    1-3%
    Propylene glycol    2-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. polymers, dispersants, perfume,    0-5%
    optical brighteners)
  • 11) An aqueous liquid detergent composition comprising
    Linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (calculated as acid)    20-32%
    Alcohol ethoxylate (e.g. C12-15 alcohol, 7 EO, or C 12-15    6-12%
    alcohol, 5 EO)
    Aminoethanol    2-6%
    Citric acid    8-14%
    Borate (as B4O 7 2−)    1-3%
    Polymer (e.g. maleic/acrylic acid copolymer, anchoring    0-3%
    polymer such as, e.g., lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid
    copolymer)
    Glycerol    3-8%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. hydrotropes, dispersants, perfume,    0-5%
    optical brighteners)
  • 12) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    Anionic surfactant (linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, alkyl    25-40%
    sulfate, alpha-olefinsulfonate, alpha-sulfo fatty acid methyl
    esters, alkanesulfonates, soap)
    Nonionic surfactant (e.g. alcohol ethoxylate)    1-10%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    8-25%
    Soluble silicates (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    5-15%
    Sodium sulfate (as Na2SO 4)    0-5%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    15-28%
    Sodium perborate (as NaBO3.4H 2O)    0-20%
    Bleach activator (TAED or NOBS)    0-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. perfume, optical brighteners)    0-3%
  • 13) Detergent formulations as described in 1) - 12) wherein all or part of the linear alkylbenzenesulfonate is replaced by (C12-C18) alkyl sulfate.
  • 14) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    (C12-C 18) alkyl sulfate    9-15%
    Alcohol ethoxylate    3-6%
    Polyhydroxy alkyl fatty acid amide    1-5%
    Zeolite (as NaAlSiO4)    10-20%
    Layered disilicate (e.g. SK56 from Hoechst)    10-20%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    3-12%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    0-6%
    Sodium citrate    4-8%
    odium percarbonate    13-22%
    TAED    3-8%
    Polymers (e.g. polycarboxylates and PVP)    0-5%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, photo bleach,    0-5%
    perfume, suds suppressors)
  • 15) A detergent composition formulated as a granulate having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l comprising
    (C12-C 18) alkyl sulfate    4-8%
    Alcohol ethoxylate    11-15%
    Soap    1-4%
    Zeolite MAP or zeolite A    35-45%
    Sodium carbonate (as Na2CO 3)    2-8%
    Soluble silicate (as Na2O, 2SiO 2)    0-4%
    Sodium percarbonate    13-22%
    TAED    1-8%
    Carboxymethyl cellulose    0-3%
    Polymers (e.g. polycarboxylates and PVP)    0-3%
    Enzymes (calculated as pure enzyme protein) 0.0001-0.1%
    Minor ingredients (e.g. optical brightener, phosphonate,    0-3%
    perfume)
  • 16) Detergent formulations as described in 1) - 15) which contain a stabilized or encapsulated peracid, either as an additional component or as a substitute for already specified bleach systems.
  • 17) Detergent compositions as described in 1), 3), 7), 9) and 12) wherein perborate is replaced by percarbonate.
  • 18) Detergent compositions as described in 1), 3), 7), 9), 12), 14) and 15) which additionally contain a manganese catalyst. The manganese catalyst may, e.g., be one of the compounds described in "Efficient manganese catalysts for low-temperature bleaching", Nature 369, 1994, pp. 637-639.
  • 19) Detergent composition formulated as a nonaqueous detergent liquid comprising a liquid nonionic surfactant such as, e.g., linear alkoxylated primary alcohol, a builder system (e.g. phosphate), enzyme and alkali. The detergent may also comprise anionic surfactant and/or a bleach system.
  • Particular forms of dishwashing detergent compositions within the scope of the invention include:
  • 1) POWDER AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Nonionic surfactant   0.4-2.5%
    Sodium metasilicate    0-20%
    Sodium disilicate    3-20%
    Sodium triphosphate    20-40%
    Sodium carbonate    0-20%
    Sodium perborate    2-9%
    Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED)    1-4%
    Sodium sulphate    5-33%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • 2) POWDER AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Nonionic surfactant (e.g. alcohol ethoxylate)    1-2%
    Sodium disilicate    2-30%
    Sodium carbonate    10-50%
    Sodium phosphonate    0-5%
    Trisodium citrate dihydrate    9-30%
    Nitrilotrisodium acetate (NTA)    0-20%
    Sodium perborate monohydrate    5-10%
    Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED)    1-2%
    Polyacrylate polymer (e.g. maleic acid/acrylic acid    6-25%
    copolymer)
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
    Perfume   0.1-0.5%
    Water    5-10
  • 3) POWDER AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Nonionic surfactant   0.5-2.0%
    Sodium disilicate    25-40%
    Sodium citrate    30-55%
    Sodium carbonate    0-29%
    Sodium bicarbonate    0-20%
    Sodium perborate monohydrate    0-15%
    Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED)    0-6%
    Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer    0-5%
    Clay    1-3%
    Poly (amino acids)    0-20%
    Sodium polyacrylate    0-8%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • 4) POWDER AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Nonionic surfactant    1-2%
    Zeolite MAP    15-42%
    Sodium disilicate    30-34%
    Sodium citrate    0-12%
    Sodium carbonate    0-20%
    Sodium perborate monohydrate    7-15%
    Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED)    0-3%
    Polymer    0-4%
    Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer    0-5%
    Organic phosphonate    0-4%
    Clay    1-2%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
    Sodium sulphate Balance
  • 5) POWDER AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Nonionic surfactant    1-7%
    Sodium disilicate    18-30%
    Trisodium citrate    10-24%
    Sodium carbonate    12-20%
    Monopersulphate (2KHSO5.KHSO 4.K 2SO 4)    15-21%
    Bleach stabilizer   0.1-2%
    Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer    0-6%
    Diethylenetriaminepentaacetate, pentasodium salt    0-2.5%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
    Sodium sulphate, water Balance
  • 6) POWDER AND LIQUID DISHWASHING COMPOSITION WITH CLEANING SURFACTANT SYSTEM
    Nonionic surfactant    0-1.5%
    Octadecyl dimethylamine N-oxide dihydrate    0-5%
    80:20 wt. C18/C16 blend of octadecyl dimethylamine N-    0-4%
    oxide dihydrate and hexadecyldimethyl amine N-oxide
    dihydrate
    70:30 wt. C18/C16 blend of octadecyl bis (hydroxyethyl)    0-5%
    amine N-oxide anhydrous and hexadecyl bis
    (hydroxyethyl)amine N-oxide anhydrous
    C13-C 15 alkyl ethoxysulfate with an average degree of    0-10%
    ethoxylation of 3
    C12-C 15 alkyl ethoxysulfate with an average degree of    0-5%
    ethoxylation of 3
    C13-C 15 ethoxylated alcohol with an average degree of    0-5%
    ethoxylation of 12
    A blend of C12-C 15 ethoxylated alcohols with an average    0-6.5%
    degree of ethoxylation of 9
    A blend of C13-C 15 ethoxylated alcohols with an average    0-4%
    degree of ethoxylation of 30
    Sodium disilicate    0-33%
    Sodium tripolyphosphate    0-46%
    Sodium citrate    0-28%
    Citric acid    0-29%
    Sodium carbonate    0-20%
    Sodium perborate monohydrate    0-11.5%
    Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED)    0-4%
    Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer    0-7.5%
    Sodium sulphate    0-12.5%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • 7) NON-AQUEOUS LIQUID AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Liquid nonionic surfactant (e.g. alcohol ethoxylates)   2.0-10.0%
    Alkali metal silicate   3.0-15.0%
    Alkali metal phosphate  20.0-40.0%
    Liquid carrier selected from higher glycols, polyglycols,  25.0-45.0%
    polyoxides, glycolethers
    Stabilizer (e.g. a partial ester of phosphoric acid and a   0.5-7.0%
    C16-C 18 alkanol)
    Foam suppressor (e.g. silicone)    0-1.5%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • 8) NON-AQUEOUS LIQUID DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Liquid nonionic surfactant (e.g. alcohol ethoxylates)   2.0-10.0%
    Sodium silicate   3.0-15.0%
    Alkali metal carbonate   7.0-20.0%
    Sodium citrate   0.0-1.5%
    Stabilizing system (e.g. mixtures of finely divided   0.5-7.0%
    silicone and low molecular weight dialkylpolyglycol
    ethers)
    Low molecule weight polyacrylate polymer   5.0-15.0%
    Clay gel thickener (e.g. bentonite)   0.0-10.0%
    Hydroxypropyl cellulose polymer   0.0-0.6%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
    Liquid carrier selected from higher lycols, polyglycols, Balance
    polyoxides and glycol ethers
  • 9) THIXOTROPIC LIQUID AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    C12-C 14 fatty acid    0-0.5%
    Block co-polymer surfactant   1.5-15.0%
    Sodium citrate    0-12%
    Sodium tripolyphosphate    0-15%
    Sodium carbonate    0-8%
    Aluminum tristearate    0-0.1%
    Sodium cumene sulphonate    0-1.7%
    Polyacrylate thickener  1.32-2.5%
    Sodium polyacrylate   2.4-6.0%
    Boric acid    0-4.0%
    Sodium formate    0-0.45%
    Calcium formate    0-0.2%
    Sodium n-decydiphenyl oxide disulphonate    0-4.0%
    Monoethanol amine (MEA)    0-1.86%
    Sodium hydroxide (50%)   1.9-9.3%
    1,2-Propanediol    0-9.4%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
    Suds suppressor, dye, perfumes, water Balance
  • 10) LIQUID AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION
    Alcohol ethoxylate    0-20%
    Fatty acid ester sulphonate    0-30%
    Sodium dodecyl sulphate    0-20%
    Alkyl polyglycoside    0-21%
    Oleic acid    0-10%
    Sodium disilicate monohydrate    18-33%
    Sodium citrate dihydrate    18-33%
    Sodium stearate    0-2.5%
    Sodium perborate monohydrate    0-13%
    Tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED)    0-8%
    Maleic acid/acrylic acid copolymer    4-8%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
  • 11) LIQUID AUTOMATIC DISHWASHING COMPOSITION CONTAINING PROTECTED BLEACH PARTICLES
    Sodium silicate    5-10%
    Tetrapotassium pyrophosphate    15-25%
    Sodium triphosphate    0-2%
    Potassium carbonate    4-8%
    Protected bleach particles, e.g. chlorine    5-10%
    Polymeric thickener   0.7-1.5%
    Potassium hydroxide    0-2%
    Enzymes 0.0001-0.1%
    Water Balance
  • 11) Automatic dishwashing compositions as described in 1), 2), 3), 4), 6) and 10), wherein perborate is replaced by percarbonate.
  • 12) Automatic dishwashing compositions as described in 1) - 6) which additionally contain a manganese catalyst. The manganese catalyst may, e.g., be one of the compounds described in "Efficient manganese catalysts for low-temperature bleaching", Nature 369, 1994, pp. 637-639.
  • An α-amylase variant of the invention may be incorporated in concentrations conventionally employed in detergents. It is at present contemplated that, in the detergent composition of the invention, the α-amylase variant may be added in an amount corresponding to 0.00001-1 mg (calculated as pure enzyme protein) of α-amylase per liter of wash/dishwash liquor.
  • The present invention is further described with reference to the appended drawing, in which:
  • Figure. 1 is an alignment of the amino acid sequences of four parent α-amylases in the context of the invention. The numbers on the extreme left designate the respective amino acid sequences as follows:
  • 1: the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1;
  • 2: the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2;
  • 3: the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3; and
  • 4: the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 7.
  • The numbers on the extreme right of the figure give the running total number of amino acids for each of the sequences in question. It should be noted that for the sequence numbered 3 (corresponding to the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 3), the alignment results in "gaps" at the positions corresponding to amino acid No. 1 and amino acid No. 175, respectively, in the sequences numbered 1 (SEQ ID No. 1), 2 (SEQ ID No. 2) and 4 (SEQ ID No. 7).Figure. 2 is a restriction map of plasmid pTVB106.
  • Figure. 3 is a restriction map of plasmid pPM103.
  • Figure. 4 is a restriction map of plasmid pTVB112.
  • Figure. 5 is a restriction map of plasmid pTVB114.
  • EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
  • The preparation, purification and sequencing of the parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2 (from Bacillus strains NCIB 12512 and NCIB 12513, respectively) is described in WO 95/26397. The pI values and molecular weights of these two parent α-amylases (given in WO 95/26397) are as follows:
  • SEQ ID No. 1: pI about 8.8-9.0 (determined by isoelectric focusing on LKB Ampholine
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    PAG plates); molecular weight approximately 55 kD (determined by SDS-PAGE).
  • SEQ ID No. 2: pI about 5.8 (determined by isoelectric focusing on LKB Ampholine
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    PAG plates); molecular weight approximately 55 kD (determined by SDS-PAGE).
  • Purification of α-amylase variants of the invention
  • The construction and expression of variants according to the invention is described in Example 2, below. The purification of variants of the invention is illustrated here with reference to variants of the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2, respectively:
  • Purification of SEQ ID No. 1 variants (pI approx. 9.0): The fermentation liquid containing the expressed α-amylase variant is filtered, and ammonium sulfate is added to a concentration of 15% of saturation. The liquid is then applied onto a hydrophobic column (Toyopearl butyl/TOSOH). The column is washed with 20 mM dimethyl-glutaric acid buffer, pH 7.0. The α-amylase is bound very tightly, and is eluted with 25% w/w 2-propanol in 20 mM dimethylglutaric acid buffer, pH 7.0. After elution, the 2-propanol is removed by evaporation and the concentrate is applied onto a cation exchanger (S-Sepharose
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    FF, Pharmacia, Sweden) equilibrated with 20 mM dimethylglutaric acid buffer, pH 6.0.
  • The amylase is eluted using a linear gradient of 0-250 mM NaCl in the same buffer. After dialysis against 10 mM borate/KCl buffer, pH 8.0, the sample is adjusted to pH 9.6 and applied to an anion exchanger (Q-Sepharose
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    FF, Pharmacia) equilibrated with 10 mM borate/KCl buffer, pH 9.6. The amylase is eluted using a linear gradient of 0-250 mM NaCl. The pH is adjusted to 7.5. The α-amylase is pure as judged by rSDS-PAGE. All buffers contain 2 mM CaCl2 in order to stabilize the amylase.
  • Purification of SEQ ID No. 2 variants (pI approx. 5,8): The fermentation liquid containing the expressed α-amylase variant is filtered, and ammonium sulfate is added to a concentration of 15% of saturation. The liquid is then applied onto a hydrophobic column (Toyopearl butyl/TOSOH). The bound amylase is eluted with a linear gradient of 15%-0% w/w ammonium sulfate in 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0. After dialysis of the eluate against 10 mM borate/KCl buffer, pH 8.0, the liquid is adjusted to pH 9.6 and applied onto an anion exchanger (Q-Sepharose
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    FF, Pharmacia) equilibrated with the same buffer. The amylase is step-eluted using 150 mM NaCl.
  • After elution the amylase sample is dialyzed against the same buffer, pH 8.0, in order to remove the NaCl. After dialysis, the pH is adjusted to 9.6 and the amylase is bound once more onto the anion exchanger. The amylase is eluted using a linear gradient of 0-250 mM NaCl. The pH is adjusted to 7.5. The amylase is pure as judged by rSDS-PAGE. All buffers contain 2 mM CaCl2 in order to stabilize the amylase.
  • Determination of α-amylase activity
  • α-Amylase activity is determined by a method employing Phadebas® tablets as substrate. Phadebas tablets (Phadebas® Amylase Test, supplied by Pharmacia Diagnostic) contain a cross-linked insoluble blue-colored starch polymer which has been mixed with bovine serum albumin and a buffer substance and tabletted.
  • For the determination of every single measurement one tablet is suspended in a tube containing 5 ml 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer (50 mM acetic acid, 50 mM phosphoric acid, 50 mM boric acid, 0.1 mM CaCl2, pH adjusted to the value of interest with NaOH). The test is performed in a water bath at the temperature of interest. The α-amylase to be tested is diluted in x ml of 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer. 1 ml of this α-amylase solution is added to the 5 ml 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer. The starch is hydrolyzed by the α-amylase giving soluble blue fragments. The absorbance of the resulting blue solution, measured spectrophotometrically at 620 nm, is a function of the α-amylase activity.
  • It is important that the measured 620 nm absorbance after 15 minutes of incubation (testing time) is in the range of 0.2 to 2.0 absorbance units at 620 nm. In this absorbance range there is linearity between activity and absorbance (Lambert-Beer law). The dilution of the enzyme must therefore be adjusted to fit this criterion.
  • Under a specified set of conditions (temp., pH, reaction time, buffer conditions) 1 mg of a given α-amylase will hydrolyze a certain amount of substrate and a blue color will be produced. The color intensity is measured at 620 nm. The measured absorbance is directly proportional to the specific activity (activity/mg of pure α-amylase protein) of the α-amylase in question under the given set of conditions. Thus testing different α-amylases of interest (including a reference α-amylase, in this case the parent α-amylase in question) under identical conditions, the specific activity of each of the α-amylases at a given temperature and at a given pH can be compared directly, and the ratio of the specific activity of each of the α-amylases of interest relative to the specific activity of the reference α-amylase can be determined.
  • Mini dishwashing assay
  • The following mini dishwashing assay was used: A suspension of starchy material was boiled and cooled to 20
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C. The cooled starch suspension was applied on small, individually identified glass plates (approx. 2 x 2 cm) and dried at a temperature of ca. 140
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C in a drying cabinet. The individual plates were then weighed. For assay purposes, a solution of standard European-type automatic dishwashing detergent (5 g/l) having a temperature of 55
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C was prepared. The detergent was allowed a dissolution time of 1 minute, after which the α-amylase in question was added to the detergent solution (contained in a beaker equipped with magnetic stirring) so as to give an enzyme concentration of 0.5 mg/l. At the same time, the weighed glass plates, held in small supporting clamps, were immersed in a substantially vertical position in the α-amylase/detergent solution, which was then stirred for 15 minutes at 55
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C. The glass plates were then removed from the α-amylase/detergent solution, rinsed with distilled water, dried at 60
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C in a drying cabinet and re-weighed. The performance of the α-amylase in question [expressed as an index relative to a chosen reference α-amylase (index 100) - in the example below (Example 1) the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1] was then determined from the difference in weight of the glass plates before and after treatment, as follows:
  • Index = weight loss for plate treated with α-amylase
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    100
  • weight loss for plate treated with reference
  • The following examples further illustrate the present invention. They are not intended to be in any way limiting to the scope of the invention as claimed.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • Mini dishwashing test of variants of parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1
  • The above-described mini dishwashing test was performed at pH 10.5 with the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and the following variants thereof (the construction and purification of which is described below): T183* + G184*; Y243F; and K269R. The test gave the following results:
  • Parent (SEQ ID No. 1)Index: 100
  • T183* + G184*Index: 120
  • Y243FIndex: 120
  • K269RIndex: 131
  • It is apparent that the each of the tested variants T183* + G184* (which exhibits, inter alia, higher thermal stability than the parent α-amylase), Y243F (which exhibits lower calcium ion dependency than the parent α-amylase) and K269R (which exhibits lower calcium ion dependency and higher stability at high pH than the parent α-amylase) exhibits significantly improved dishwashing performance relative to the parent α-amylase.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • Construction of variants of the parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2, respectively
  • Primers: DNA primers employed in the construction of variants as described below include the following [all DNA primers are written in the direction from 5' to 3' (left to right); P denotes a 5' phosphate]:
  • #7113:
  • GCT GCG GTG ACC TCT TTA AAA AAT AAC GGC(SEQ ID NO:8)
  • Y296:
  • CC ACC GCT ATT AGA TGC ATT GTA C(SEQ ID NO:9)
  • #6779:
  • CTT ACG TAT GCA GAC GTC GAT ATG GAT CAC CC(SEQ ID NO:10)
  • #6778:
  • G ATC CAT ATC GAC GTC TGC ATA CGT AAG ATA GTC(SEQ ID NO:11)
  • #3811:
  • TT A(C/G)G GGC AAG GCC TGG GAC TGG(SEQ ID NO:12)
  • #7449:
  • C CCA GGC CTT GCC C(C/G)T AAA TTT ATA TAT TTT GTT TTG(SEQ ID NO:13)
  • #3810:
  • G GTT TCG GTT CGA AGG ATT CAC TTC TAC CGC(SEQ ID NO:14)
  • #7450:
  • GCG GTA GAA GTG AAT CCT TCG AAC CGA AAC CAG(SEQ ID NO:15)
  • B1:
  • GGT ACT ATC GTA ACA ATG GCC GAT TGC TGA CGC TGT TAT TTG C (SEQ ID NO:16)
  • #6616:
  • P CTG TGA CTG GTG AGT ACT CAA CCA AGT C(SEQ ID NO:17)
  • #8573:
  • CTA CTT CCC AAT CCC AAG CTT TAC CTC GGA ATT TG(SEQ ID NO:18)
  • #8569:
  • CAA ATT CCG AGG TAA AGC TTG GGA TTG GGA AGT AG(SEQ ID NO:19)
  • #8570:
  • TTG AAC AAC CGT TCC ATT AAG AAG(SEQ ID NO:20)
  • A: Construction of variants of the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1
  • Description of plasmid pTVB106: The parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and variants thereof are expressed from a plasmid-borne gene, SF16, shown in Figure. 2. The plasmid, pTVB106, contains an origin of replication obtained from plasmid pUB110 (Gryczan et al., 1978) and the cat gene conferring resistance towards chloramphenicol. Secretion of the amylase is aided by the Termamyl
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    signal sequence that is fused precisely, i.e. codon No.1 of the mature protein, to the gene encoding the parent α-amylase having the nucleotide and amino acid sequence (mature protein) shown in SEQ ID No. 4 and SEQ ID No. 1, respectively. The Termamyl promoter initiates transcription of the gene.
  • Plasmid pTVB106 is similar to pDN1528 (see laid-open Danish patent application No. 1155/94). Some unique restriction sites are indicated on the plasmid map in Figure. 2, including BstBI, BamHI, BstEII, EcoNI, DrdI, AflIII, DraIII, XmaI, SalI and BglII.
  • Construction of variant M202T: The PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method is used to construct this variant (Higuchi et al., 1988). An approximately 350 bp DNA fragment of pTVB106 is amplified in a PCR reaction A using primers #7113 and mutagenic primer #6778. In a similar PCR reaction B, an approximately 300 bp DNA fragment is amplified using primers Y296 and #6779. The complete DNA fragment spanning the mutation site (M202) from primer #7113 to primer Y296 is amplified in PCR C using these primers and purified DNA fragments from reactions A and B.
  • PCR C DNA is digested with restriction endonucleases BstEII and AflIII, and the 480 bp fragment is ligated with plasmid pTVB106 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into a low-protease and low-amylase Bacillus subtilis strain (e.g. strain SHA273 mentioned in WO 92/11357).
  • Other M202 variants are constructed in a similar manner.
  • Construction of variants T183* + G184* and R181* + G182*: The PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method is used to construct these variants (Higuchi et al., 1988). The mutagenic oligonucleotides are synthesized using a mixture (equal parts) of C and G in one position; two different mutations can therefore be constructed by this procedure. An approximately 300 bp DNA fragment of pTVB106 is amplified in a PCR reaction A using primers #7113 and mutagenic primer #7449. In a similar PCR reaction B, an approximately 400 bp DNA fragment is amplified using primers Y296 and #3811. The complete DNA fragment spanning the mutation site (amino acids 181-184) from primer #7113 to primer Y296 is amplified in PCR C using these primers and purified DNA fragments from reactions A and B.
  • PCR C DNA is digested with restriction endonucleases BstEII and AflIII and the 480 bp fragment is ligated with plasmid pTVB106 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into a low-protease and low-amylase B. subtilis strain (e.g. strain SHA273 mentioned in WO 92/11357). Sequencing of plasmid DNA from these transformants identifies the two correct mutations: i.e. R181* + G182* and T183* + G184*.
  • Construction of variant R124P: The PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method is used to construct this variant in a manner similar to the construction of variant M202T (vide supra). PCR reaction A (with primers #3810 and B1) generates an approximately 500 bp fragment, and PCR reaction B (primers 7450 and Y296) generates an approximately 550 bp fragment. PCR reaction C based on the product of PCR reaction A and B and primers B1 and Y296 is digested with restriction endonucleases BstEII and AflIII, and the resulting 480 bp fragment spanning amino acid position 124 is subcloned into pTVB106 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into B. subtilis as previously described.
  • Construction of variant R124P + T183* + G184*: For the construction of the variant combining the R124P and the T183* + G184* mutations, two EcoNI restriction sites (one located at position 1.774 kb, i.e. between the R124P mutation and the T183* + G184* mutation, and one located at position 0.146 kb) were utilized. The approximately 1630 bp EcoNI fragment of the pTVB106-like plasmid containing the T183* + G184* mutation was subcloned into the vector part (approximately 3810 bp DNA fragment containing the origin of replication) of another pTVB106-like plasmid containing the R124P mutation digested with the same enzyme. Transformation into Bacillus subtilis was carried out as previously described.
  • Construction of variants G182* + G184*; R181* + T183*; Y243F; K269R; and L351C + M430C: These variants were constructed as follows:
  • A specific mutagenesis vector containing a major part of the coding region for the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1 was prepared. The important features of this vector (which is denoted pPM103) include an origin of replication derived from the pUC plasmid, the cat gene conferring resistance towards chloramphenicol and a frameshift-mutation-containing version of the bla gene, the wild-type version of which normally confers resistance towards ampicillin (ampR phenotype). This mutated version of the bla gene results in an ampS phenotype. The plasmid pPM103 is shown in Figure. 3, and the E. coli origin of replication, the 5'-truncated version of the SF16 amylase gene, and ori, bla, cat and selected restriction sites are indicated on the plasmid.
  • Mutations are introduced in the gene of interest as described by Deng and Nickoloff [Anal. Biochem. 200 (1992), pp. 81-88], except that plasmids with the "selection primer" (#6616) incorporated are selected based on the ampR phenotype of transformed E. coli cells harboring a plasmid with a repaired bla gene instead of using the selection by restriction-enzyme digestion outlined by Deng and Nickoloff. Chemicals and enzymes used for the mutagenesis were obtained from the Chameleon
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    mutagenesis kit from Stratagene (catalogue number 200509).
  • After verification of the DNA sequence in variant plasmids, the truncated gene containing the desired alteration is subcloned from the pPM103-like plasmid into pTVB106 as an approximately 1440 bp BstBI-SalI fragment and transformed into Bacillus subtilis for expression of the variant enzyme.
  • For the construction of the pairwise deletion variant G182* + G184*, the following mutagenesis primer was used:
  • P CTC TGT ATC GAC TTC CCA GTC CCA AGC TTT TGT CCT GAA TTT ATA TAT TTT GTT TTG AAG(SEQ ID NO:21)
  • For the construction of the pairwise deletion variant R181* + T183*, the following mutagenesis primer was used:
  • P CTC TGT ATC GAC TTC CCA GTC CCA AGC TTT GCC TCC GAA TTT ATA TAT TTT GTT TTG AAG(SEQ ID NO:22)
  • For the construction of the substitution variant Y243F, the following mutagenesis primer was used:
  • P ATG TGT AAG CCA ATC GCG AGT AAA GCT AAA TTT TAT ATG TTT CAC TGC ATC(SEQ ID NO:23)
  • For the construction of the substitution variant K269R, the following mutagenesis primer was used:
  • P GC ACC AAG GTC ATT TCG CCA GAA TTC AGC CAC TG(SEQ ID NO:24)
  • For the construction of the pairwise substitution variant L351C + M430C, the following mutagenesis primers were used simultaneously:
  • 1) P TGT CAG AAC CAA CGC GTA TGC ACA TGG TTT AAA CCA TTG(SEQ ID NO:25)
  • 2) P ACC ACC TGG ACC ATC GCT GCA GAT GGT GGC AAG GCC TGA ATT (SEQ ID NO:26)
  • Construction of variant L351C + M430C + T183* + G184*: This variant was constructed by combining the L351C + M430C pairwise substitution mutation and the T183* + G184* pairwise deletion mutation by subcloning an approximately 1430 bp HindIII-AflIII fragment containing L351C + M430C into a pTVB106-like plasmid (with the T183* + G184* mutations) digested with the same enzymes.
  • Construction of variant Y243F + T183* + G184*: This variant was constructed by combining the Y243F mutation and the T183* + G184* mutation by subcloning an approximately 1148 bp DrdI fragment containing T183* + G184* into a pTVB106-like plasmid (with the Y243 mutation) digested with the same enzyme.
  • Bacillus subtilis transformants were screened for α-amylase activity on starch-containing agar plates and the presence of the correct mutations was checked by DNA sequencing.
  • Construction of variant Y243F + T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C: The L351C + M430C pairwise substitution mutation was subcloned as an approximately 470 bp XmaI-SalI fragment into a pTVB106-like vector (containing Y243F + T183* + G184*) digested with the same enzymes.
  • Construction of variant Y243F + T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C + Q391E + K444Q: A pPM103-like vector containing the mutations Y243F + T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C was constructed by substituting the truncated version of SF16 in pPM103 with the approximately 1440 bp BstB1-SalI fragment of the pTVB106-like vector containing the five mutations in question. The Q391E and K444Q mutations were introduced simultaneously into the pPM103-like vector (containing Y243F + T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C) by the use of the following two mutagenesis primers in a manner similar to the previously described mutagenesis on pPM103:
  • P GGC AAA AGT TTG ACG TGC CTC GAG AAG AGG GTC TAT(SEQ ID NO:27)
  • P TTG TCC CGC TTT ATT CTG GCC AAC ATA CAT CCA TTT(SEQ ID NO:28)
  • B: Construction of variants of the parent α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2
  • Description of plasmid pTVB112: A vector, denoted pTVB112, to be used for the expression in B. subtilis of the α-amylase having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 2 was constructed. This vector is very similar to pTVB106 except that the gene encoding the mature α-amylase of SEQ ID No. 2 is inserted between the PstI and the HindIII sites in pTVB106. Thus, the expression of this α-amylase (SEQ ID No. 2) is also directed by the amyL promoter and signal sequence. The plasmid pTVB112 is shown in Figure. 4.
  • Construction of variant D183* + G184*: The construction of this variant was achieved using the PCR overlap extension mutagenesis method referred to earlier (vide supra). Primers #8573 and B1 were used in PCR reaction A, and primers #8569 and #8570 were used in PCR reaction B. The purified fragments from reaction A and reaction B and primers 1B and #8570 were used in PCR reaction C, resulting in an approximately 1020 bp DNA fragment. This fragment was digested with restriction endonucleases PstI and MluI, and subcloned into the expression vector and transformed into B. subtilis.
  • Construction of further variants: By analogy with the construction (vide supra) of the plasmid pPM103 used in the production of mutants of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID No. 1, a plasmid (denoted pTVB114; shown in Figure. 5) was constructed for the continued mutagenesis on variant D183* + G184* (SEQ.ID No. 2). Mutations were introduced in pTVB114 (SEQ ID No. 2; D183*+G184*) in a manner similar to that for pPM103 (SEQ ID No. 1).
  • For the construction of the pairwise deletion variants R181* + D183* and R181* + G182*, it was chosen to alter the flanking amino acids in the variant D183* + G184* instead of deleting the specified amino acids in the wild type gene for SEQ ID No. 2. The following mutagenesis primer was used for the mutagenesis with pTVB114 as template:
  • PCC CAA TCC CAA GCT TTA CCA (T/C)CG AAC TTG TAG ATA CG(SEQ ID NO:29)
  • The presence of a mixture of two bases (T/C) at one position allows for the presence of two different deletion flanking amino acid based on one mutagenesis primer. DNA sequencing of the resulting plasmids verifies the presence of either the one or the other mutation. The mutated gene of interest is subcloned as a PstI-DraIII fragment into pTVB112 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into B. subtilis.
  • For the construction of G182* + G184* and R181* + G184*, the following mutagenesis primer was used with pTVB114 as template:
  • PCC CAA TCC CAA GCT TTA TCT C(C/G)G AAC TTG TAG ATA CG(SEQ ID NO:30)
  • As before, the presence of a mixture of two bases (C/G) at one position allows for the presence of two different deletion flanking amino acid based on one mutagenesis primer. DNA sequencing of the resulting plasmids verifies the presence of either the one or the other mutation. The mutated gene of interest is subcloned as a PstI-DraIII fragment into pTVB112 digested with the same enzymes and transformed into B. subtilis.
  • For the construction of D183* + G184* + M202L the following mutagenesis primer was used:
  • PGA TCC ATA TCG ACG TCT GCA TAC AGT AAA TAA TC(SEQ ID NO:31)
  • For the construction of D183* + G184* + M202I the following mutagenesis primer was used:
  • PGA TCC ATA TCG ACG TCT GCA TAA ATT AAA TAA TC(SEQ ID NO:32)
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • Determination of oxidation stability of M202 substitution variants of the parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2
  • A: Oxidation stability of variants of the sequence in SEQ ID No. 1
  • The measurements were made using solutions of the respective variants in 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer (50 mM acetic acid, 50 mM phosphoric acid, 50 mM boric acid, 0.1 mM CaCl2, pH adjusted to the value of interest with NaOH), pH 9.0, to which hydrogen peroxide was added (at time t = 0) to give a final concentration of 200 mM H2O2. The solutions were then incubated at 40
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C in a water bath.
  • After incubation for 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after addition of hydrogen peroxide, the residual α-amylase activity was measured using the Phadebas assay described above. The residual activity in the samples was measured using 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer, pH 7.3, at 37
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C (see Novo analytical publication AF207-1/1, available on request from Novo Nordisk A/S). The decline in activity was measured relative to a corresponding reference solution of the same enzyme at 0 minutes which was not incubated with hydrogen peroxide (100% activity).
  • The percentage of initial activity as a function of time is shown in the table below for the parent enzyme (SEQ ID No. 1) and for the variants in question.
  • _______________________________________________________ Variant % Activity after incubation for (minutes)05101520
  • _______________________________________________________ M202L10090725827
  • M202F100100877143
  • M202A10099826430
  • M202I10091755928
  • M2O2T10087654920
  • M202V100100877443
  • M202S100100856834
  • Parent1005126132
  • _______________________________________________________ All the M202 substitution variants tested clearly exhibit significantly improved stability towards oxidation relative to the parent α-amylase (SEQ ID No. 1).
  • B: Oxidation stability of variants of the sequence in SEQ ID No. 2
  • Measurements were made as described above using the parent α-amylase in question (SEQ ID No. 2), the variant M202L + D183* + G184* (designated L in the table below) and the variant M202I + D183* + G184* (designated I in the table below), respectively. In this case, incubation times (after addition of hydrogen peroxide) of 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes were employed. As in the table above, the percentage of initial activity as a function of time is shown in the table below for the parent enzyme and for the variants in question.
  • __________________________________________________________________
  • Variant% Activity after incubation for (minutes)
  • 05101530
  • __________________________________________________________________
  • L10091857143
  • I10081614418
  • Parent1005626144
  • __________________________________________________________________
  • The two "substitution + pairwise deletion" variants tested (which both comprise an M202 substitution) clearly exhibit significantly improved stability towards oxidation relative to the parent α-amylase (SEQ ID No. 2).
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • Determination of thermal stability of variants of the parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2
  • A: Thermal stability of pairwise deletion variants of the sequence in SEQ ID No. 1
  • Measurements were made using solutions of the respective variants in 50 mM Britton-Robinson buffer (vide supra), pH 9.0. The solutions were incubated at 65
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C in a water bath, and samples were withdrawn after incubation for the indicated periods of time. The residual α-amylase activity of each withdrawn sample was measured using the Phadebas assay, as described above. The decline in activity was measured relative to a corresponding reference solution of the same enzyme at 0 minutes which was not incubated (100% activity).
  • The percentage of initial activity as a function of time is shown in the table below for the parent enzyme (SEQ ID No. 1) and for the following pairwise deletion variants in question:
  • Variant 1: R181* + G182*
  • Variant 2: R181* + T183*
  • Variant 3: G182* + G184*
  • Variant 4: T183* + G184*
  • Variant 5: T183* + G184* + R124P
  • _________________________________________________________________ Variant% Activity after incubation for (minutes)
  • 051015304560
  • _________________________________________________________________ 110081664924148
  • 21008053391783
  • 31006440281042
  • 41006443342085
  • 5100787366574738
  • Parent1001320000
  • _________________________________________________________________ It is apparent that all of the pairwise deletion variants tested exhibit significantly improved thermal stability relative to the parent α-amylase (SEQ ID No. 1), and that the thermal stability of Variant 5, which in addition to the pairwise deletion mutation of Variant 4 comprises the substitution R124P, is markedly higher than that of the other variants. Since calorimetric results for the substitution variant R124P (comprising only the substitution R124P) reveal an approximately 7
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C thermostabilization thereof relative to the parent α-amylase, it appears that the thermostabilizing effects of the mutation R124P and the pairwise deletion, respectively, reinforce each other.
  • B: Thermal stability of pairwise deletion variants of the sequence in SEQ ID No. 2
  • Corresponding measurements were made for the parent enzyme (SEQ ID No. 2) and for the following pairwise deletion variants:
  • Variant A: D183* + G184*
  • Variant B: R181* + G182*
  • Variant C: G182* + G184*
  • _______________________________________________________
  • Variant% Activity after incubation for (minutes)
  • 05101530
  • _______________________________________________________
  • A10087716330
  • B100113857658
  • C10099766234
  • Parent10072554418
  • Again, it is apparent that the pairwise deletion variants in question exhibit significantly improved thermal stability relative to the parent α-amylase (SEQ ID No. 2).
  • C: Thermal stability of a multi-combination variant of the sequence in SEQ ID No. 1
  • Corresponding comparative measurements were also made for the following variants of the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1:
  • Variant 4: T183* + G184*
  • Variant 6: L351C + M430C
  • Variant 7: Y243F
  • Variant 8: Q391E + K444Q
  • Variant 9: T183* + G184* + L351C + M430C + Y243F + Q391E + K444Q
  • _______________________________________________________
  • Variant% Activity after incubation for (minutes)
  • 05101530
  • _______________________________________________________
  • 41006641227
  • 610087736543
  • 710014210
  • 810069463114
  • 910092938982
  • _______________________________________________________
  • Again, it appears that the thermostabilizing effect of multiple mutations, each of which has a thermostabilizing effect, is - at least qualitatively - cumulative.
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • Calcium-binding affinity of α-amylase variants of the invention
  • Unfolding of amylases by exposure to heat or to denaturants such as guanidine hydrochloride is accompanied by a decrease in fluorescence. Loss of calcium ions leads to unfolding, and the affinity of a series of α-amylases for calcium can be measured by fluorescence measurements before and after incubation of each α-amylase (e.g. at a concentration of 10 μg/ml) in a buffer (e.g. 50 mM HEPES, pH 7) with different concentrations of calcium (e.g. in the range of 1 μM-100 mM) or of EGTA (e.g. in the range of 1-1000 μM) [EGTA = 1,2-di(2-aminoethoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid] for a sufficiently long period of time (such as 22 hours at 55
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C).
  • The measured fluorescence F is composed of contributions form the folded and unfolded forms of the enzyme. The following equation can be derived to describe the dependence of F on calcium concentration ([Ca]):
  • F = [Ca]/(K diss + [Ca])(αN - βNlog([Ca])) + K diss/(K diss + [Ca])(αU - βUlog([Ca]))
  • where αN is the fluorescence of the native (folded) form of the enzyme, βN is the linear dependence of αN on the logarithm of the calcium concentration (as observed experimentally), αU is the fluorescence of the unfolded form and βU is the linear dependence of αU on the logarithm of the calcium concentration. K diss is the apparent calcium-binding constant for an equilibrium process as follows:
  • K diss
  • N-Ca
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    U + Ca(N = native enzyme; U = unfolded enzyme)
  • In fact, unfolding proceeds extremely slowly and is irreversible. The rate of unfolding is a dependent on calcium concentration, and the dependency for a given α-amylase provides a measure of the Ca-binding affinity of the enzyme. By defining a standard set of reaction conditions (e.g. 22 hours at 55
    Figure US20060035323A2-20060216-P00999
    C), a meaningful comparison of K diss for different α-amylases can be made. The calcium dissociation curves for α-amylases in general can be fitted to the equation above, allowing determination of the corresponding values of K diss.
  • The following values for K diss were obtained for the parent α-amylases having the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID No. 1 and SEQ ID No. 2, and for the indicated α-amylase variants according to the invention (the parent α-amylase being indicated in parentheses):
  • ___________________________________________________________________
  • VariantK diss (mol/l)
  • ___________________________________________________________________
  • D183* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 2)1.2 (±0.5) x 10-4
  • L351C + M430C + T183* + G184*
  • (SEQ ID No. 1)1.7 (±0.5) x 10-3
  • T183* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 1)4.3 (±0.7) x 10-3
  • SEQ ID No. 2 (parent)4.2 (±1.2) x 10-2
  • SEQ ID No. 1 (parent)3.5 (±1.1) x 10-1
  • ___________________________________________________________________
  • It is apparent from the above that the calcium-binding affinity of the latter α-amylolytic enzymes decreases in a downward direction through the above table, i.e. that the pairwise deletion variant D183* + G184* (SEQ ID No. 2) binds calcium most strongly (i.e. has the lowest calcium dependency) whilst the parent α-amylase of SEQ ID No. 1 binds calcium least strongly (i.e. has the highest calcium dependency).
  • REFERENCES CITED IN THE SPECIFICATION
  • Suzuki et al., the Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 264, No. 32, Issue of November 15, pp. 18933-18938 (1989).
  • Hudson et al., Practical Immunology, Third edition (1989), Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Lipman and Pearson (1985) Science 227, 1435.
  • Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor, 1989.
  • S.L. Beaucage and M.H. Caruthers, Tetrahedron Letters 22, 1981, pp. 1859-1869.
  • Matthes et al., The EMBO J. 3, 1984, pp. 801-805.
  • R.K. Saiki et al., Science 239, 1988, pp. 487-491.
  • Morinaga et al., 1984, Biotechnology 2, pp. 646-639.
  • Nelson and Long, Analytical Biochemistry 180, 1989, pp. 147-151.
  • Hunkapiller et al., 1984, Nature 310, pp. 105-111.
  • R. Higuchi, B. Krummel, and R.K. Saiki (1988). A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucl. Acids Res. 16, pp. 7351-7367.
  • Dubnau et al., 1971, J. Mol. Biol. 56, pp. 209-221.
  • Gryczan et al., 1978, J. Bacteriol. 134, pp. 318-329.
  • S.D. Erlich, 1977, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74, pp. 1680-1682.
  • Boel et al., 1990, Biochemistry 29, pp. 6244-6249.
  • Deng and Nickoloff, 1992, Anal. Biochem. 200, pp. 81-88.

Claims (179)

1. Cancelled.
2. Cancelled.
3. Cancelled.
4. Cancelled.
5. Cancelled.
6. Cancelled.
7. Cancelled.
8. Cancelled.
9. Cancelled.
10. Cancelled.
11. Cancelled.
12. Cancelled.
13. Cancelled.\
14. Cancelled.
15. Cancelled.
16. Cancelled.
17. Cancelled.
18. Cancelled.
19. Cancelled.
20. Cancelled.
21. Cancelled.
22. Cancelled.
23. Cancelled.
24. Cancelled.
25. Cancelled.
26. Cancelled.
27. Cancelled.
28. Cancelled.
29. Cancelled.
30. Cancelled.
31. Cancelled.
32. Cancelled.
33. Cancelled.
34. Cancelled.
35. Cancelled.
36. Cancelled.
37. Cancelled.
38. Cancelled.
39. Cancelled.
40. Cancelled.
41. Cancelled.
42. Cancelled.
43. Cancelled.
44. Cancelled.
45. Cancelled.
46. Cancelled.
47. Cancelled.
48. Cancelled.
49. Cancelled.
50. Cancelled.
51. Cancelled.
52. Cancelled.
53. Cancelled.
54. Cancelled.
55. Cancelled.
56. Cancelled.
57. Cancelled.
58. Cancelled.
59. Cancelled.
60. Cancelled.
61. Cancelled.
62. Cancelled.
63. Cancelled.
64. Cancelled.
65. Cancelled.
66. Cancelled.
67. Cancelled.
68. Cancelled.
69. Cancelled.
70. Cancelled.
71. Cancelled.
72. Cancelled.
73. Cancelled.
74. Cancelled.
75. Cancelled.
76. Cancelled.
77. Cancelled.
78. Cancelled.
79. Cancelled.
80. Cancelled.
81. Cancelled.
82. Cancelled.
83. Cancelled.
84. Cancelled.
85. Cancelled.
86. Cancelled.
87. Cancelled.
88. Cancelled.
89. Cancelled.
90. Cancelled.
91. Cancelled.
92. Cancelled.
93. Cancelled.
94. Cancelled.
95. Cancelled.
96. Cancelled.
97. Cancelled.
98. Cancelled.
99. Cancelled.
100. Cancelled.
101. Cancelled.
102. Cancelled.
103. Cancelled.
104. Cancelled.
105. Cancelled.
106. Cancelled.
107. Cancelled.
108. Cancelled.
109. Cancelled.
110. Cancelled.
111. Cancelled.
112. Cancelled.
113. Cancelled.
114. Cancelled.
115. Cancelled.
116. Cancelled.
117. Cancelled.
118. A nucleic acid encoding a variant of a parent Bacillus stearothermophilus alpha-amylase, wherein the variant has an amino acid sequence which has at least 95% homology to the parent Bacillus stearothermophilus alpha-amylase and comprises a deletion of amino acids 179 and 180, using SEQ ID NO:3 for numbering, and wherein the variant has alpha-amylase activity
119. The nucleic acid of claim 118, wherein the variant further comprises a substitution of a cysteine at amino acids 349 and 428, using SEQ ID NO:3 for numbering.
120. A nucleic acid construct comprising the nucleic acid of claim 118 operably linked to one or more control sequences that direct the production of the variant in a suitable expression host.
121. The nucleic acid construct of claim 120, wherein one or more control sequence directs the production of the variant in a bacterial host.
122. The nucleic acid construct of claim 120, wherein one or more control sequence directs the production of the variant in a fungal host.
123. A recombinant expression vector comprising the nucleic acid construct of claim 120.
124. A recombinant host cell comprising the nucleic acid construct of claim 120.
125. The recombinant host cell of claim 124, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
126. The recombinant host cell of claim 124, wherein the host cell is a fungal cell.
127. The recombinant host cell of claim 124, wherein the host cell is a yeast cell.
128. The recombinant host cell of claim 124, wherein the host cell is a species of Bacillus.
129. The recombinant host cell of claim 124, wherein the host cell is selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces murinus.
130. The recombinant host cell of claim 124, wherein the host cell is Bacillus licheniformis.
131. A method for producing a variant alpha-amylase, which method comprises: (a) cultivating a host cell comprising the nucleic acid of claim 118 and (b) recovering the variant alpha-amylase from the host cell.
132. The method of claim 131, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
133. The method of claim 131, wherein the host cell is a fungal cell.
134. The method of claim 131, wherein the host cell is a yeast cell.
135. The method of claim 131, wherein the host cell is a species of Bacillus.
136. The method of claim 131, wherein the host cell is selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces murinus.
137. The method of claim 131, wherein the host cell is Bacillus licheniformis.
138. The method of claim 131, wherein the variant alpha-amylase is secreted from the host cell.
139. A nucleic acid encoding a variant alpha-amylase, wherein the variant has at least 95% homology to SEQ ID NO:3 and comprises a deletion of amino acids 179 and 180, using SEQ ID NO:3 for numbering, and wherein the variant has alpha-amylase activity.
140. A nucleic acid of claim 139, wherein the variant further comprises a substitution of a cysteine at amino acids 349 and 428, using SEQ ID NO:3 for numbering.
141. A nucleic acid construct comprising the nucleic acid of claim 139 operably linked to one or more control sequences that direct the production of the variant in a suitable expression host.
142. A nucleic acid construct of claim 141, wherein one or more control sequence directs the production of the variant in a bacterial host.
143. A nucleic acid construct of claim 141, wherein one or more control sequence directs the production of the variant in a fungal host
144. A recombinant expression vector comprising the nucleic acid of claim 139.
145. A recombinant host cell comprising the nucleic acid construct of claim 141.
146. The recombinant host cell of claim 145, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
147. The recombinant host cell of claim 145, wherein the host cell is a fungal cell.
148. The recombinant host cell of claim 145, wherein the host cell is a yeast cell.
149. The recombinant host cell of claim 145, wherein the host cell is a species of Bacillus.
150. The recombinant host cell of claim 145, wherein the host cell is selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces murinus.
151. The recombinant host cell of claim 145, wherein the host cell is Bacillus licheniformis.
152. A method for expressing a variant alpha-amylase, which method comprises: (a) cultivating a host cell comprising the nucleic acid of claim 139 and (b) recovering the variant alpha-amylase from the host cell.
153. The method of claim 152, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
154. The method of claim 152, wherein the host cell is a fungal cell.
155. The method of claim 152, wherein the host cell is a yeast cell.
156. The method of claim 152, wherein the host cell is a species of Bacillus.
157. The method of claim 152, wherein the host cell is selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces murinus.
158. The method of claim 152, wherein the host cell is Bacillus licheniformis.
159. The method of claim 152, wherein the variant alpha-amylase is secreted from the host cell.
160. A nucleic acid sequence encoding a variant of a Bacillus stearothermophilus alpha-amylase, wherein the alpha-amylase variant consists of a deletion of amino acids 179 and 180, using SEQ ID NO:3 for numbering.
161. A nucleic construct comprising the nucleic sequence of claim 160 operably linked to one or more control sequence that direct the production of the variant in a suitable expression host.
162. The nucleic acid construct of claim 161, wherein one or more control sequences directs the production of the variant in a bacterial host.
163. The nucleic acid construct of claim 161, wherein one or more control sequence directs the production of the variant in a fungal host.
164. A recombinant expression vector comprising the nucleic acid construct of claim 161.
165. A recombinant host cell comprising the nucleic construct of claim 161.
166. The recombinant host cell of claim 165, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
167. The recombinant host cell of claim 165, wherein the host cell is a fungal cell.
168. The recombinant host cell of claim 165, wherein the host cell is a yeast cell.
169. The recombinant host cell of claim 165, wherein the host cell is a species of Bacillus.
170. The recombinant host cell of claim 165, wherein the host cell is selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces murinus.
171. The recombinant host cell of claim 165, wherein the host cell is Bacillus licheniformis.
172. A method for producing a variant alpha-amylase, which method comprises:
(a) cultivating a host cell comprising the nucleic acid of claim 160 and (b) recovering the variant alpha-amylase from the host cell.
173. The method of claim 172, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
174. The method of claim 172, wherein the host cell is a fungal cell.
175. The method of claim 172, wherein the host cell is a yeast cell.
176. The method of claim 172, wherein the host cell is a species of Bacillus.
177. The method of claim 172, wherein the host cell is selected from the group consisting of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces murinus.
178. The method of claim 172, wherein the host cell is Bacillus licheniformis.
179. The method of claim 172, wherein the variant alpha-amylase is secreted from the host cell.
US10/779,418 1995-02-03 2004-02-12 Method for producing sweetners and alcohol Abandoned US20060035323A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/779,418 US20060035323A2 (en) 1995-02-03 2004-02-12 Method for producing sweetners and alcohol

Applications Claiming Priority (14)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK0126/95 1995-02-03
DK12695 1995-02-03
DK0336/95 1995-03-29
DK33695 1995-03-29
DK1097/95 1995-09-29
DK109795 1995-09-29
DK112195 1995-10-06
DK1121/95 1995-10-06
PCT/DK1996/000056 WO1996023873A1 (en) 1995-02-03 1996-02-05 Amylase variants
US08/600,656 US6093562A (en) 1996-02-05 1996-02-13 Amylase variants
US09/354,191 US6297038B1 (en) 1995-02-03 1999-07-15 Amylase variants
US09/902,188 US20020098996A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-07-10 Amylase variants
US10/025,648 US6867031B2 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-12-19 Amylase variants
US10/779,418 US20060035323A2 (en) 1995-02-03 2004-02-12 Method for producing sweetners and alcohol

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/025,648 Division US6867031B2 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-12-19 Amylase variants

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040253676A1 US20040253676A1 (en) 2004-12-16
US20060035323A2 true US20060035323A2 (en) 2006-02-16

Family

ID=8155525

Family Applications (13)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/600,656 Expired - Lifetime US6093562A (en) 1995-02-03 1996-02-13 Amylase variants
US09/354,191 Expired - Lifetime US6297038B1 (en) 1995-02-03 1999-07-15 Amylase variants
US09/902,188 Abandoned US20020098996A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-07-10 Amylase variants
US10/025,648 Expired - Fee Related US6867031B2 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-12-19 Amylase variants
US10/779,418 Abandoned US20060035323A2 (en) 1995-02-03 2004-02-12 Method for producing sweetners and alcohol
US10/778,469 Abandoned US20050059131A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2004-02-12 Detergent compositions containing amylase variants
US11/103,037 Abandoned US20050250664A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2005-04-11 Method for producing sweetners and alcohol
US11/235,738 Abandoned US20090280527A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2005-09-21 Amylase variants
US12/180,687 Abandoned US20100099598A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2008-07-28 Amylase Variants
US12/180,684 Abandoned US20100099597A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2008-07-28 Amylase Variants
US13/023,029 Abandoned US20110177990A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2011-02-08 Amylase Variants
US14/246,909 Abandoned US20140242667A1 (en) 1995-03-29 2014-04-07 Amylase variants
US14/553,767 Abandoned US20150080283A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2014-11-25 Amylase variants

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/600,656 Expired - Lifetime US6093562A (en) 1995-02-03 1996-02-13 Amylase variants
US09/354,191 Expired - Lifetime US6297038B1 (en) 1995-02-03 1999-07-15 Amylase variants
US09/902,188 Abandoned US20020098996A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-07-10 Amylase variants
US10/025,648 Expired - Fee Related US6867031B2 (en) 1995-02-03 2001-12-19 Amylase variants

Family Applications After (8)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/778,469 Abandoned US20050059131A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2004-02-12 Detergent compositions containing amylase variants
US11/103,037 Abandoned US20050250664A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2005-04-11 Method for producing sweetners and alcohol
US11/235,738 Abandoned US20090280527A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2005-09-21 Amylase variants
US12/180,687 Abandoned US20100099598A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2008-07-28 Amylase Variants
US12/180,684 Abandoned US20100099597A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2008-07-28 Amylase Variants
US13/023,029 Abandoned US20110177990A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2011-02-08 Amylase Variants
US14/246,909 Abandoned US20140242667A1 (en) 1995-03-29 2014-04-07 Amylase variants
US14/553,767 Abandoned US20150080283A1 (en) 1995-02-03 2014-11-25 Amylase variants

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (13) US6093562A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080293607A1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-11-27 Jones Brian E Alkaliphilic Bacillus Species alpha-Amylase Variants, Compositions Comprising alpha-Amylase Variants, And Methods of Use
US20090209447A1 (en) * 2008-02-15 2009-08-20 Michelle Meek Cleaning compositions
US20090233830A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2009-09-17 Penny Sue Dirr Automatic detergent dishwashing composition
US20110086791A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2011-04-14 Dequest Ag Surface treatment composition containing phosphonic acid compounds
US20120282658A1 (en) * 2010-01-04 2012-11-08 Novozymes North America, Inc. Alpha-Amylase Variants and Polynucleotides Encoding Same
WO2013138288A1 (en) 2012-03-16 2013-09-19 Monosol, Llc. Water soluble compositions incorporating enzymes, and method of making same
WO2013158364A1 (en) 2012-04-16 2013-10-24 Monosol, Llc Powdered pouch and method of making same
US8680034B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2014-03-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
US9434932B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2016-09-06 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
US10655093B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-05-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
US10683474B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-06-16 The Procter & Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
US10711225B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-07-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
US11104497B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2021-08-31 Monosol, Llc Degradable materials and packaging made from same

Families Citing this family (326)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6936289B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2005-08-30 Danisco A/S Method of improving the properties of a flour dough, a flour dough improving composition and improved food products
EP0904360B1 (en) 1996-04-30 2013-07-31 Novozymes A/S alpha-AMYLASE MUTANTS
US6486113B1 (en) * 1997-03-31 2002-11-26 Kao Corporation Mutant α-amylases
ATE331793T1 (en) * 1997-04-09 2006-07-15 Danisco USE OF LIPASE TO IMPROVE DOUGHS AND BAKED PRODUCTS
CA2297160C (en) * 1997-07-29 2004-07-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Aqueous, gel laundry detergent composition
EP1027428B1 (en) * 1997-10-30 2010-12-01 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase mutants
ATE231186T1 (en) 1998-07-21 2003-02-15 Danisco GROCERIES
US6410295B1 (en) * 1999-03-30 2002-06-25 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
US6623948B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2003-09-23 Novozymes A/S Nucleic acid sequences encoding alkaline alpha-amylases
CN101532001A (en) * 2000-03-08 2009-09-16 诺维信公司 Variants with altered properties
RU2003105683A (en) * 2000-07-28 2004-08-20 Хенкель Кгаа (De) A NEW AMILOLYTIC ENZYME FROM BACILLUS SP.A7-7 (DSM12368), AND ALSO A CLEANING AND CLEANING AGENT WITH THIS NEW AMILOLYTIC ENZYME
US20020155574A1 (en) * 2000-08-01 2002-10-24 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase mutants with altered properties
US20020183226A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2002-12-05 Chandrika Kasturi Liquid detergent composition exhibiting enhanced alpha-amylase enzyme stability
DE60234523D1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2010-01-07 Novozymes As ALPHA AMYLASE VERSION WITH CHANGED PROPERTIES
BR0209154A (en) 2001-05-18 2004-07-20 Danisco Process of preparing a dough with an enzyme
DE10138753B4 (en) * 2001-08-07 2017-07-20 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Detergents and cleaners with hybrid alpha-amylases
US7226771B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2007-06-05 Diversa Corporation Phospholipases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
BRPI0309391B1 (en) 2002-04-19 2018-10-30 Dsm Food Specialties B V vector comprising nucleic acid encoding phospholipase activity polypeptide, transformed cell, protein preparation, preparation method and related methods
EP2298904B1 (en) 2002-06-14 2017-05-24 BP Corporation North America Inc. Xylanases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
WO2004033668A2 (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-22 Diversa Corporation Proteases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
US20050196766A1 (en) * 2003-12-24 2005-09-08 Soe Jorn B. Proteins
US7955814B2 (en) * 2003-01-17 2011-06-07 Danisco A/S Method
MXPA05007654A (en) * 2003-01-17 2005-09-30 Danisco Method.
EP3508578A1 (en) 2003-03-06 2019-07-10 BASF Enzymes, LLC Amylases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
EP2853593B1 (en) 2003-03-07 2017-10-04 DSM IP Assets B.V. Hydrolases, nucleic acids encoding them and mehods for making and using them
CA2519580A1 (en) * 2003-03-20 2004-10-07 Diversa Corporation Glucosidases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
HUE030493T2 (en) 2003-04-04 2017-05-29 Basf Enzymes Llc Pectate lyases, Nucleic Acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
EP1633878A1 (en) 2003-05-30 2006-03-15 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
DK1654355T3 (en) * 2003-06-13 2010-08-09 Danisco Pseudomonas polypeptide variants with non-maltogenic exoamylase activity and their use in food preparation
US7960148B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2011-06-14 Verenium Corporation Glucanases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
CN102796717A (en) * 2003-07-07 2012-11-28 金克克国际有限公司 Thermostable amylase polypeptides, nucleic acids encoding those polypeptides and uses thereof
US8143048B2 (en) * 2003-07-07 2012-03-27 Danisco A/S Exo-specific amylase polypeptides, nucleic acids encoding those polypeptides and uses thereof
CA2891101A1 (en) 2003-08-11 2005-03-10 Basf Enzymes Llc Laccases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
US7906307B2 (en) 2003-12-24 2011-03-15 Danisco A/S Variant lipid acyltransferases and methods of making
GB0716126D0 (en) 2007-08-17 2007-09-26 Danisco Process
US7718408B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2010-05-18 Danisco A/S Method
GB0405637D0 (en) * 2004-03-12 2004-04-21 Danisco Protein
BRPI0509671A (en) * 2004-04-08 2007-10-30 Genencor Internation Inc mutant alpha-amylases
US7332319B2 (en) * 2004-05-27 2008-02-19 Genencor International, Inc. Heterologous alpha amylase expression in Aspergillus
CN107151662B (en) 2004-07-05 2021-06-29 诺维信公司 Alpha-amylase variants with altered properties
DK2295557T3 (en) * 2004-07-07 2017-12-11 Genencor Int EXOAMYLASE VARIANTS
DK1776455T3 (en) 2004-07-16 2015-06-22 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps LIPOLYTIC ENZYM, APPLICATIONS THEREOF IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY
WO2006052787A2 (en) * 2004-11-08 2006-05-18 Novozymes North America, Inc. Liquefaction of starch-containing material
ES2543131T3 (en) 2004-12-22 2015-08-14 Novozymes North America, Inc. Enzymes for starch treatment
EP2363460A3 (en) * 2004-12-30 2011-12-28 Genencor International, Inc. Acid fungal proteases
CA2861310A1 (en) 2005-03-15 2006-09-28 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Cellulases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
US8030050B2 (en) * 2005-07-07 2011-10-04 Danisco A/S Modified amylases from Pseudomonas species
KR20080023746A (en) * 2005-07-07 2008-03-14 대니스코 에이/에스 Modified amylase from pseudomonas saccharophilia
EP1941049A4 (en) 2005-09-20 2011-12-21 Novozymes North America Inc Process of producing a fermentation product
EP1966386A4 (en) 2005-12-22 2009-06-17 Novozymes North America Inc Processes for producing a fermentation product
DE102005062984A1 (en) * 2005-12-28 2007-07-05 Henkel Kgaa Washing or cleaning composition containing specific amylase variants, useful for dishwashing and laundry compositions, have increased stability especially against oxidizing agents
US20090324574A1 (en) 2006-02-02 2009-12-31 Verenium Corporation Esterases and Related Nucleic Acids and Methods
NZ571087A (en) 2006-02-10 2012-04-27 Verenium Corp Cellulolytic enzymes, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
USRE45660E1 (en) 2006-02-14 2015-09-01 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Xylanases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
WO2007109750A2 (en) 2006-03-22 2007-09-27 Novozymes North America, Inc. Fermentation processes
US7968318B2 (en) 2006-06-06 2011-06-28 Genencor International, Inc. Process for conversion of granular starch to ethanol
ES2644745T3 (en) * 2006-06-19 2017-11-30 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Polypeptide
US20080035291A1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2008-02-14 Sonoco Development, Inc. Infrared-Absorbing Ticket Stock and Method of Making Same
DK2069389T3 (en) 2006-08-04 2015-01-12 Bp Corp North America Inc Glucanases, nucleic acids encoding them, and processes for their preparation and use
WO2008036863A2 (en) 2006-09-21 2008-03-27 Verenium Corporation Phospholipases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
WO2008040818A1 (en) 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Novozymes A/S Detergent compositions and the use of enzyme combinations therein
ES2620288T3 (en) 2006-12-21 2017-06-28 Basf Enzymes Llc Amylases and glucoamylases, nucleic acids that encode them and methods to form and use them
BRPI0720801A2 (en) * 2007-01-25 2014-09-16 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Production of an acyltransferase lipid from transformed cells of Bacillus licheniformis.
WO2008095033A2 (en) 2007-01-30 2008-08-07 Verenium Corporation Enzymes for the treatment of lignocellulosics, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
US20080184709A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-08-07 Rowell Dean W Turbine power generation using lignin-based fuel
US20080299622A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-12-04 Paulson Bradley A Starch Hydrolysis Using Phytase with an Alpha Amylase
EP2137317A1 (en) 2007-03-14 2009-12-30 Danisco US, INC., Genencor Division Production of ethanol from barley and ddgs containing reduced beta-glucan and phytic acid
MX2009009967A (en) * 2007-03-23 2009-10-07 Danisco Us Inc Genencor Div Enhanced amylase production by n-terminal addition to mature amylase protein.
BRPI0810687B1 (en) 2007-04-24 2018-02-06 Novozymes North America, Inc. PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A FERMENTATION PRODUCT FROM LIGNOCELLULOSE CONTAINING MATERIAL
MX2009012715A (en) * 2007-05-30 2009-12-16 Danisco Us Inc Genencor Div Variants of an alpha-amylase with improved production levels in fermentation processes.
EP2191061B1 (en) 2007-09-03 2013-05-22 Novozymes A/S Detoxifying and recycling of washing solution used in pretreatment of lignocellulose-containing materials
BRPI0817811A2 (en) 2007-10-03 2014-10-14 Verenium Corp Xylanases, nucleic acids that encode the same and methods for the manufacture and use of the same.
AR069167A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2010-01-06 Danisco Us Inc Genencor Div ALPHA-AMYLASE VARIANTS OF BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS WITH INCREASED THERMOSTABILITY AND / OR DEPENDENCE ON DECREASED CALCIUM
MX2010004670A (en) 2007-11-05 2010-05-20 Danisco Us Inc VARIANTS OF BACILLUS sp. TS-23 ALPHA-AMYLASE WITH ALTERED PROPERTIES.
AR069168A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2010-01-06 Danisco Us Inc Genencor Div ALFA VARIANTS -AMILASES WITH ALTERED PROPERTIES
WO2009100102A2 (en) 2008-02-04 2009-08-13 Danisco Us Inc., Genencor Division Ts23 alpha-amylase variants with altered properties
US20090215127A1 (en) * 2008-02-06 2009-08-27 Danisco Us Inc., Genencor Division ph Adjustment Free System For Producing Fermentable Sugars and Alcohol
US20090217463A1 (en) * 2008-02-29 2009-09-03 Philip Frank Souter Detergent composition comprising lipase
CN102112602A (en) * 2008-02-29 2011-06-29 宝洁公司 Detergent composition comprising lipase
WO2009149130A2 (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-12-10 Danisco Us Inc. Geobacillus stearothermophilus alpha-amylase (amys) variants with improved properties
CN102083991A (en) 2008-06-23 2011-06-01 诺维信公司 Processes for producing fermentation products
US8153391B2 (en) 2008-08-29 2012-04-10 Bunge Oils, Inc. Hydrolases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
US8198062B2 (en) 2008-08-29 2012-06-12 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Hydrolases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
US8357503B2 (en) 2008-08-29 2013-01-22 Bunge Oils, Inc. Hydrolases, nucleic acids encoding them and methods for making and using them
EP2166073A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-03-24 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning composition
EP2166075A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-03-24 The Procter and Gamble Company Cleaning composition
MX2011003178A (en) 2008-09-25 2011-04-21 Danisco Inc Alpha-amylase blends and methods for using said blends.
BRPI0919525A2 (en) 2008-09-30 2015-08-18 Novozymes North America Inc Methods for producing a fermentation product from a lignocellulose-containing material, for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis and for reducing the detrimental effect of lignin on hydrolysis of a lignocellulose-containing material, and fermentation product
EP2349595A4 (en) * 2008-10-16 2012-07-04 Advanced Biocatalytics Corp Enhanced performance hydrogen peroxide formulations comprising proteins and surfactants
EP2358878B1 (en) 2008-11-20 2014-10-15 Novozymes Inc. Polypeptides having amylolytic enhancing activity and polynucleotides encoding same
US20100125046A1 (en) 2008-11-20 2010-05-20 Denome Frank William Cleaning products
US20120028299A1 (en) 2008-12-30 2012-02-02 Novozymes North America, Inc. Enzymatic Hydrolysis Of Pretreated Lignocellulose-Containing Material With Dissolved Air Flotation Sludge
WO2010078392A2 (en) 2008-12-31 2010-07-08 Novozymes North America, Inc. Processes of producing fermentation products
US9546274B2 (en) * 2009-05-26 2017-01-17 The Armor All/Stp Products Company Automotive protectant compositions with improved vertical cling
US20100305019A1 (en) * 2009-06-01 2010-12-02 Lapinig Daniel Victoria Hand Fabric Laundering System
US8883436B2 (en) 2009-07-17 2014-11-11 Novozymes A/S Method of analyzing cellulose decay in lignocellulosic material hydrolysis
UA109884C2 (en) 2009-10-16 2015-10-26 A POLYPEPTIDE THAT HAS THE ACTIVITY OF THE PHOSPHATIDYLINOSYTOL-SPECIFIC PHOSPHOLIPASE C, NUCLEIC ACID, AND METHOD OF METHOD
UA111708C2 (en) 2009-10-16 2016-06-10 Бандж Ойлз, Інк. METHOD OF OIL REFINING
US8916359B2 (en) 2009-11-30 2014-12-23 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
MX2012006095A (en) 2009-11-30 2012-07-03 Novozymes North America Inc Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same.
WO2011068803A1 (en) 2009-12-01 2011-06-09 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
EP2510092A1 (en) 2009-12-09 2012-10-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Fabric and home care products
EP2333042B1 (en) 2009-12-10 2015-07-01 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing product and use thereof
EP2333040B2 (en) * 2009-12-10 2019-11-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition
ES2423580T5 (en) * 2009-12-10 2021-06-17 Procter & Gamble Method and use of a dishwashing composition
ES2581934T3 (en) * 2009-12-10 2016-09-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Method for measuring the dirt removal capacity of a cleaning product
EP2333041B1 (en) 2009-12-10 2013-05-15 The Procter & Gamble Company Method and use of a dishwasher composition
EP2515931A4 (en) 2009-12-22 2013-05-22 Novozymes As Compositions comprising boosting polypeptide and starch degrading enzyme and uses thereof
CA2788548A1 (en) 2010-01-29 2011-08-04 Novozymes A/S Biogas production process with enzymatic pre-treatment
WO2011100161A1 (en) 2010-02-09 2011-08-18 Novozymes North America, Inc. Addition of alpha - glucosidase and cobalt for producing fermentation products from starch
EP2357220A1 (en) * 2010-02-10 2011-08-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning composition comprising amylase variants with high stability in the presence of a chelating agent
MX369096B (en) 2010-02-10 2019-10-29 Novozymes As Variants and compositions comprising variants with high stability in presence of a chelating agent.
PL2361964T3 (en) 2010-02-25 2013-05-31 Procter & Gamble Detergent composition
ES2684760T3 (en) 2010-03-30 2018-10-04 Novozymes A/S Process for increasing products derived from fermentation processes
ES2565060T3 (en) 2010-04-14 2016-03-31 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding them
EP2380478A1 (en) 2010-04-23 2011-10-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing product
ES2565192T3 (en) 2010-04-23 2016-04-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Method to perfume
ES2533368T3 (en) 2010-04-23 2015-04-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Dishwasher product
EP2383329A1 (en) 2010-04-23 2011-11-02 The Procter & Gamble Company Particle
EP2380961B1 (en) 2010-04-23 2018-05-23 The Procter and Gamble Company Detergent composition
ES2579217T3 (en) 2010-04-23 2016-08-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Particle
CN105925556B (en) 2010-05-06 2020-11-13 丹尼斯科美国公司 Compositions and methods comprising subtilisin variants
CN103140586A (en) 2010-08-02 2013-06-05 诺维信北美公司 Process of producing a fermentation product
ES2643613T3 (en) 2010-08-17 2017-11-23 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergents for washing sustainable and stable dishes by hand
RU2552624C2 (en) 2010-08-17 2015-06-10 Дзе Проктер Энд Гэмбл Компани Method of hand-washing dishes with stable foam
CA2811789A1 (en) 2010-10-06 2012-04-12 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Variant cbh i polypeptides with reduced product inhibition
CA2822856A1 (en) 2010-11-08 2012-05-18 Novozymes North America, Inc. Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
US9732332B2 (en) 2010-11-08 2017-08-15 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
CN103797125B (en) 2010-11-19 2016-12-07 诺维信北美公司 For the method producing tunning in the presence of amino acid oxidase, arginase and/or asparaginase
WO2012093041A1 (en) 2011-01-04 2012-07-12 Novozymes A/S Process for producing biogas from pectin and lignocellulose containing material
ES2531247T3 (en) 2011-02-07 2015-03-12 Novozymes North America Inc Process for liquefaction of starch in the presence of pyridoxamine
JP5933688B2 (en) 2011-05-05 2016-06-15 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Compositions and methods comprising serine protease variants
CA3111256C (en) 2011-05-05 2023-05-09 Danisco Us Inc. Compositions and methods comprising serine protease variants
US20140371435A9 (en) 2011-06-03 2014-12-18 Eduardo Torres Laundry Care Compositions Containing Thiophene Azo Dyes
EP2537918A1 (en) 2011-06-20 2012-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Consumer products with lipase comprising coated particles
BR112013032543A2 (en) 2011-06-28 2017-01-17 Novozymes As biogas production process
EP2540824A1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2013-01-02 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions comprising amylase variants reference to a sequence listing
EA201490216A1 (en) 2011-07-06 2014-07-30 Новозимс А/С ALPHA-AMILASE VARIANTS AND THEIR POLYNUCLEOTIDE CODE
DK2734633T3 (en) 2011-07-22 2019-06-11 Novozymes North America Inc PROCEDURES FOR PREPARING CELLULOSE MATERIALS AND IMPROVING HYDROLYSIS THEREOF
EP2551335A1 (en) 2011-07-25 2013-01-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Enzyme stabilized liquid detergent composition
EP2748188A4 (en) 2011-08-26 2015-03-18 Novozymes As Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
EA201490568A1 (en) 2011-09-06 2014-06-30 Новозимс А/С GLUCOAMYLASE VARIANTS AND THEIR POLYNUCLEOTIDE CODE
IN2014CN03467A (en) 2011-10-11 2015-10-16 Novozymes North America Inc
ES2638669T3 (en) 2011-10-11 2017-10-23 Novozymes A/S Variants of glucoamylase and polynucleotides that encode them
PL2584028T3 (en) 2011-10-19 2017-10-31 Procter & Gamble Particle
EP2785847B1 (en) 2011-12-02 2017-07-26 Novozymes A/S Liquefaction process with selected alpha-amylases and proteases
WO2013083801A2 (en) 2011-12-09 2013-06-13 Novozymes A/S Biogas from substrates comprising animal manure and enzymes
US20150017670A1 (en) 2011-12-21 2015-01-15 Novozymes, Inc. Methods For Determining The Degradation Of A Biomass Material
DK2623586T3 (en) 2012-02-03 2017-11-13 Procter & Gamble COMPOSITIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR LIPASER SURFACE TREATMENT
MX2014011154A (en) 2012-03-19 2014-12-10 Procter & Gamble Laundry care compositions containing dyes.
EP4209595A1 (en) 2012-03-30 2023-07-12 Novozymes North America, Inc. A method of dewatering whole stillage
WO2013149858A1 (en) 2012-04-02 2013-10-10 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
ES2646416T3 (en) 2012-05-11 2017-12-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition
EP2674475A1 (en) 2012-06-11 2013-12-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition
US10246692B2 (en) 2012-07-12 2019-04-02 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having lipase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
WO2014018309A1 (en) 2012-07-26 2014-01-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Low ph liquid cleaning compositions with enzymes
US9828595B2 (en) 2012-08-17 2017-11-28 Novozymes A/S Thermostable asparaginase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
ES2677702T3 (en) 2012-08-24 2018-08-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Dishwashing method
EP2700704B1 (en) 2012-08-24 2018-05-09 The Procter and Gamble Company Dishwashing method
EP3321353A1 (en) 2012-12-11 2018-05-16 Danisco US Inc. Yeast host cells epxressing a glucoamylase from aspergillus fumigatus and methods of use thereof
EP2746381A1 (en) 2012-12-21 2014-06-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning pack
US9902946B2 (en) 2013-01-03 2018-02-27 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
BR112015021683A2 (en) 2013-03-05 2017-07-18 Procter & Gamble mixed sugar compositions
CN105051174B (en) 2013-03-21 2018-04-03 诺维信公司 Polypeptide and their polynucleotides of coding with lipase active
PL2978830T3 (en) 2013-03-28 2019-08-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions containing a polyetheramine
ES2835313T3 (en) 2013-04-30 2021-06-22 Novozymes As Glucoamylase variants and polynucleotides that encode them
US9963690B2 (en) 2013-04-30 2018-05-08 Novozymes A/S Glucoamylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
EP2808372A1 (en) 2013-05-28 2014-12-03 The Procter and Gamble Company Surface treatment compositions comprising photochromic dyes
HUE040545T2 (en) 2013-07-17 2019-03-28 Novozymes As Pullulanase chimeras and polynucleotides encoding same
EP3063282B1 (en) 2013-09-11 2020-03-25 Novozymes A/S Processes for producing fermentation products
CN105555936A (en) 2013-09-18 2016-05-04 宝洁公司 Laundry care composition comprising carboxylate dye
CA2920901A1 (en) 2013-09-18 2015-03-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Laundry care compositions containing thiophene azo carboxylate dyes
CN105555935A (en) 2013-09-18 2016-05-04 宝洁公司 Laundry care composition comprising carboxylate dye
US9834682B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-12-05 Milliken & Company Laundry care composition comprising carboxylate dye
WO2015112338A1 (en) 2014-01-22 2015-07-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of treating textile fabrics
WO2015112341A1 (en) 2014-01-22 2015-07-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Fabric treatment composition
EP3097174A1 (en) 2014-01-22 2016-11-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of treating textile fabrics
CA2932239C (en) 2014-01-22 2023-03-14 Novozymes A/S Pullulanase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
WO2015112339A1 (en) 2014-01-22 2015-07-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Fabric treatment composition
US10752562B2 (en) 2014-02-25 2020-08-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making renewable surfactant intermediates and surfactants from fats and oils and products thereof
US9994497B2 (en) 2014-02-25 2018-06-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making renewable surfactant intermediates and surfactants from fats and oils and products thereof
JP6342508B2 (en) 2014-02-26 2018-06-13 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Antifoam composition
WO2015143144A1 (en) 2014-03-19 2015-09-24 Novozymes A/S Method for enhancing activity of an x143 polypeptide
WO2015148361A1 (en) 2014-03-27 2015-10-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions containing a polyetheramine
WO2015148360A1 (en) 2014-03-27 2015-10-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions containing a polyetheramine
JP6262365B2 (en) 2014-03-27 2018-01-17 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Cleaning composition containing polyetheramine
EP2924107A1 (en) 2014-03-28 2015-09-30 The Procter and Gamble Company Water soluble unit dose article
EP2924105A1 (en) 2014-03-28 2015-09-30 The Procter and Gamble Company Water soluble unit dose article
CN106103708A (en) * 2014-04-01 2016-11-09 诺维信公司 There is the polypeptide of alpha amylase activity
JP2017518407A (en) 2014-05-06 2017-07-06 ミリケン・アンド・カンパニーＭｉｌｌｉｋｅｎ ＆ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ Laundry care composition
EP3152288A1 (en) 2014-06-06 2017-04-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition comprising polyalkyleneimine polymers
BR112017005767A2 (en) 2014-09-25 2017-12-12 Procter & Gamble cleaning compositions containing a polyetheramine
US20160090552A1 (en) 2014-09-25 2016-03-31 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing a polyetheramine and an anionic soil release polymer
US9388368B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2016-07-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions containing a polyetheramine
AR102419A1 (en) 2014-10-23 2017-03-01 Novozymes As GLUCOAMYLASE AND POLINUCLEOTIDE VARIANTS CODING THEM
US10590148B2 (en) 2014-11-14 2020-03-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Silicone compounds comprising a ketone or aldehyde benefit agent moiety
MX2017006377A (en) 2014-11-17 2017-08-21 Procter & Gamble Benefit agent delivery compositions.
US10287562B2 (en) * 2014-11-20 2019-05-14 Novoszymes A/S Alicyclobacillus variants and polynucleotides encoding same
ES2690336T3 (en) 2014-11-26 2018-11-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning bag
PL3026102T3 (en) 2014-11-26 2019-06-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning pouch
EP3026099B1 (en) 2014-11-26 2021-02-17 The Procter and Gamble Company Cleaning pouch
ES2690335T3 (en) 2014-11-26 2018-11-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning bag
ES2668504T3 (en) 2014-12-22 2018-05-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for recycling detergent bags
EP3050952A1 (en) 2015-02-02 2016-08-03 The Procter and Gamble Company Method of dishwashing
EP3050951A1 (en) 2015-02-02 2016-08-03 The Procter and Gamble Company Method of dishwashing
EP3050955B2 (en) 2015-02-02 2023-11-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent pack
EP3050948B1 (en) 2015-02-02 2018-09-19 The Procter and Gamble Company New use of complexing agent
EP3050950B1 (en) 2015-02-02 2018-09-19 The Procter and Gamble Company New use of sulfonated polymers
EP3050954A1 (en) 2015-02-02 2016-08-03 The Procter and Gamble Company New use of sulfonated polymers
EP3050947A1 (en) 2015-02-02 2016-08-03 The Procter and Gamble Company Detergent pack
PL3050953T3 (en) 2015-02-02 2019-07-31 The Procter And Gamble Company Detergent composition
US20160319227A1 (en) 2015-04-29 2016-11-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of treating a fabric
PL3088503T3 (en) 2015-04-29 2018-10-31 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of treating a fabric
HUE039245T2 (en) 2015-04-29 2018-12-28 Procter & Gamble Detergent composition
EP3088502B1 (en) 2015-04-29 2018-05-23 The Procter and Gamble Company Method of treating a fabric
DK3088505T3 (en) 2015-04-29 2020-08-03 Procter & Gamble PROCEDURE FOR TREATMENT OF A TEXTILE FABRIC
EP3292173A1 (en) 2015-05-04 2018-03-14 Milliken & Company Leuco triphenylmethane colorants as bluing agents in laundry care compositions
EP3964575A3 (en) 2015-05-08 2022-09-28 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
US10647946B2 (en) 2015-05-08 2020-05-12 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
EP3101103B1 (en) 2015-06-05 2019-04-24 The Procter and Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
CN108350442A (en) 2015-06-18 2018-07-31 诺维信公司 Polypeptide with trehalase activity and its purposes in the method for generating tunning
EP3124586A1 (en) 2015-07-29 2017-02-01 The Procter and Gamble Company Process for reducing malodour in a pack
EP3124587B1 (en) 2015-07-29 2019-03-20 The Procter and Gamble Company Multi-phase unit-dose cleaning product
JP2019502779A (en) 2015-11-26 2019-01-31 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Liquid detergent composition containing protease and encapsulated lipase
EP3178917A1 (en) 2015-12-08 2017-06-14 The Procter and Gamble Company Cleaning pouch
CA3006991A1 (en) 2015-12-22 2017-06-29 Novozymes A/S Process of extracting oil from thin stillage
EP3411465A1 (en) 2016-02-02 2018-12-12 The Procter and Gamble Company Compositions containing antifoams
EP3411425A1 (en) 2016-02-02 2018-12-12 The Procter and Gamble Company Antifoam molecules and compositions
WO2017176501A1 (en) 2016-04-08 2017-10-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing cleaning composition
EP3228686B1 (en) 2016-04-08 2021-10-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing
EP3228687B1 (en) 2016-04-08 2019-05-22 The Procter and Gamble Company Dishwashing cleaning composition
ES2802454T3 (en) 2016-04-08 2021-01-19 Procter & Gamble Dishwasher cleaning composition
EP3241891B1 (en) 2016-05-03 2019-04-03 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3452569A1 (en) 2016-05-03 2019-03-13 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3241889B1 (en) 2016-05-03 2019-03-20 The Procter and Gamble Company Cleaning composition
EP3455284A1 (en) 2016-05-13 2019-03-20 The Procter and Gamble Company Silicone compounds
US20170327647A1 (en) 2016-05-13 2017-11-16 The Procter & Gamble Company Silicone compounds
EP3266860B1 (en) 2016-07-08 2020-04-08 The Procter and Gamble Company Process for making a particle
EP3275987A1 (en) 2016-07-26 2018-01-31 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3275985A1 (en) 2016-07-26 2018-01-31 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3275988B1 (en) 2016-07-26 2020-07-08 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3275989A1 (en) 2016-07-26 2018-01-31 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3275986B1 (en) 2016-07-26 2020-07-08 The Procter and Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3290503A3 (en) 2016-09-01 2018-05-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing cleaning composition
EP3312265A1 (en) 2016-10-18 2018-04-25 The Procter and Gamble Company Detergent composition
BR112019008706A2 (en) 2016-11-01 2019-07-16 Procter & Gamble leucos dyes as bleaching agents in laundry care compositions
EP3535362A1 (en) 2016-11-01 2019-09-11 The Procter and Gamble Company Leuco colorants as bluing agents in laundry care compositions, packaging, kits and methods thereof
BR112019006576A2 (en) 2016-11-01 2019-07-02 Milliken & Co leuco dyes as bleaching agents in laundry care compositions
US20180119056A1 (en) 2016-11-03 2018-05-03 Milliken & Company Leuco Triphenylmethane Colorants As Bluing Agents in Laundry Care Compositions
US10889836B2 (en) 2016-11-23 2021-01-12 Novozymes A/S Yeast for ethanol production
US10550443B2 (en) 2016-12-02 2020-02-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions including enzymes
CA3044420C (en) 2016-12-02 2022-03-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions including enzymes
MX2019006421A (en) 2016-12-02 2019-08-01 Procter & Gamble Cleaning compositions including enzymes.
EP3339423A1 (en) 2016-12-22 2018-06-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3339410A1 (en) 2016-12-22 2018-06-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing composition
RU2019123965A (en) 2017-02-01 2021-02-01 Дзе Проктер Энд Гэмбл Компани CLEANING COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING AMYLASE VERSIONS
US20200157581A1 (en) 2017-06-02 2020-05-21 Novozymes A/S Improved Yeast For Ethanol Production
EP3415592A1 (en) 2017-06-15 2018-12-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Water-soluble unit dose article comprising a solid laundry detergent composition
EP3418364A1 (en) 2017-06-19 2018-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing cleaning composition
EP3418365A1 (en) 2017-06-19 2018-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing cleaning composition
EP3418366A1 (en) 2017-06-19 2018-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing cleaning composition
DK3645555T3 (en) 2017-06-28 2022-03-07 Novozymes As Polypeptides with trehalase activity and polynucleotides encoding them
BR112020002115A2 (en) 2017-08-08 2020-08-11 Novozymes A/S trehalase variant polypeptide, polynucleotide, nucleic acid construct, expression vector, host cell, composition, whole broth formulation or cell culture composition, method of producing a trehalase variant, and, production process of a product of fermentation
EP3441450A1 (en) 2017-08-11 2019-02-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing composition
EP3456808A1 (en) 2017-09-13 2019-03-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing cleaning composition
BR112020004476A2 (en) 2017-09-15 2020-09-08 Novozymes A/S process for producing a fermentation product, and using a combination of enzymes
EP3467085A1 (en) 2017-10-05 2019-04-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Dishwashing cleaning composition
EP3467086B1 (en) 2017-10-05 2021-03-24 The Procter & Gamble Company Dishwashing cleaning composition
CA3074613A1 (en) 2017-10-12 2019-04-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Leuco colorants in combination with a second whitening agent as bluing agents in laundry care compositions
CA3075090A1 (en) 2017-10-12 2019-04-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Leuco colorants as bluing agents in laundry care compositions
TWI715878B (en) 2017-10-12 2021-01-11 美商美力肯及公司 Leuco colorants and compositions
MX2020003103A (en) 2017-10-12 2020-07-28 Procter & Gamble Leuco colorants as bluing agents in laundry care composition.
CA3075907A1 (en) 2017-10-23 2019-05-02 Novozymes A/S Processes for reducing lactic acid in a biofuel fermentation system
BR112020008476B1 (en) 2017-11-01 2023-11-21 Milliken & Company LEUCO COMPOUND
EP3502245A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2019-06-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3502244A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2019-06-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3502246A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2019-06-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
EP3502227A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2019-06-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
CN113286871A (en) 2018-01-29 2021-08-20 诺维信公司 Microorganisms with enhanced nitrogen utilization for ethanol production
WO2019161227A1 (en) 2018-02-15 2019-08-22 Novozymes A/S Improved yeast for ethanol production
EP3530723B1 (en) 2018-02-21 2023-03-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing composition
US20190264140A1 (en) 2018-02-28 2019-08-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods of cleaning
EP3533859A1 (en) 2018-02-28 2019-09-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions
WO2019231944A2 (en) 2018-05-31 2019-12-05 Novozymes A/S Processes for enhancing yeast growth and productivity
EP3810769A1 (en) 2018-06-19 2021-04-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
US11866751B2 (en) 2018-07-25 2024-01-09 Novozymes A/S Yeast expressing a heterologous alpha-amylase for ethanol production
US11807889B2 (en) 2018-10-08 2023-11-07 Novozymes A/S Yeast expressing a heterologous phospholipase for ethanol production
WO2020160126A1 (en) 2019-01-31 2020-08-06 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having xylanase activity and use thereof for improving the nutritional quality of animal feed
MX2021011104A (en) 2019-03-14 2021-10-22 Procter & Gamble Cleaning compositions comprising enzymes.
JP7275297B2 (en) 2019-03-14 2023-05-17 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Cleaning composition containing enzymes
US10988715B2 (en) 2019-03-14 2021-04-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Method for treating cotton
BR112021017085A2 (en) 2019-04-02 2022-02-08 Novozymes As Process of producing a fermentation product
EP3741283A1 (en) 2019-05-22 2020-11-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing method
EP3976775A1 (en) 2019-05-24 2022-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
CN114040972A (en) 2019-06-24 2022-02-11 宝洁公司 Cleaning compositions comprising amylase variants
EP3760699A1 (en) 2019-07-02 2021-01-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
MX2021015821A (en) 2019-07-26 2022-02-03 Novozymes As Microorganisms with improved nitrogen transport for ethanol production.
BR112022002203A2 (en) 2019-08-05 2022-09-06 Novozymes As ENZYME MIXTURES AND PROCESSES FOR PRODUCTION OF A FOOD INGREDIENT WITH HIGH PROTEIN CONTENT FROM A COMPLETE VINAGE BY-PRODUCT
CA3143527A1 (en) 2019-08-06 2021-02-11 Novozymes A/S Fusion proteins for improved enzyme expression
CA3152952A1 (en) 2019-09-16 2021-03-25 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having beta-glucanase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
US11492571B2 (en) 2019-10-24 2022-11-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition comprising a protease
EP3835396A1 (en) 2019-12-09 2021-06-16 The Procter & Gamble Company A detergent composition comprising a polymer
BR112022011271A2 (en) 2019-12-10 2022-09-06 Novozymes As RECOMBINANT HOST CELL, COMPOSITION, METHODS FOR PRODUCING A CELL DERIVATIVE AND FERMENTATION PRODUCT, AND, USE OF A RECOMBINANT HOST CELL
CN114867860A (en) 2019-12-16 2022-08-05 诺维信公司 Process for producing a fermentation product
EP3862412A1 (en) 2020-02-04 2021-08-11 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition
EP4103709A2 (en) 2020-02-10 2022-12-21 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having alpha-amylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
EP4162016A1 (en) 2020-06-05 2023-04-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing a branched surfactant
CA3187735A1 (en) 2020-08-04 2022-02-10 Nina Elizabeth GRAY Automatic dishwashing method and pack
CA3186847A1 (en) 2020-08-04 2022-02-10 Nevena Lukic Automatic dishwashing method
WO2022031309A1 (en) 2020-08-04 2022-02-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing method
ES2956240T3 (en) 2020-09-29 2023-12-15 Procter & Gamble Dishwasher cleaning composition
WO2022093189A1 (en) 2020-10-27 2022-05-05 Milliken & Company Compositions comprising leuco compounds and colorants
CA3196371A1 (en) 2020-10-29 2022-05-05 Catherine Jones Cleaning composition comprising alginate lyase enzymes
CA3199315A1 (en) 2020-11-02 2022-05-05 Novozymes A/S Glucoamylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
JP2023551014A (en) 2020-12-23 2023-12-06 ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピア Amphiphilic alkoxylated polyamines and their uses
MX2023005793A (en) 2021-03-15 2023-05-29 Procter & Gamble Cleaning compositions containing polypeptide variants.
WO2022235720A1 (en) 2021-05-05 2022-11-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods for making cleaning compositions and detecting soils
AU2022288057A1 (en) 2021-06-07 2023-12-21 Novozymes A/S Engineered microorganism for improved ethanol fermentation
EP4108767A1 (en) 2021-06-22 2022-12-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning or treatment compositions containing nuclease enzymes
CA3228918A1 (en) 2021-08-10 2023-02-16 Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. Polyalkylene-oxide-containing compound
WO2023064749A1 (en) 2021-10-14 2023-04-20 The Procter & Gamble Company A fabric and home care product comprising cationic soil release polymer and lipase enzyme
WO2023114793A1 (en) 2021-12-16 2023-06-22 The Procter & Gamble Company Home care composition
EP4273209A1 (en) 2022-05-04 2023-11-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Machine-cleaning compositions containing enzymes
EP4273210A1 (en) 2022-05-04 2023-11-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions containing enzymes
EP4286499A1 (en) 2022-06-01 2023-12-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Dishwashing detergent composition comprising xylanase and sulphonated carboxylate polymer
EP4339269A1 (en) 2022-09-16 2024-03-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Methods and apparatuses for automatic dishwashing chemical distribution

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4284722A (en) * 1978-08-16 1981-08-18 Cpc International Inc. Heat and acid-stable alpha-amylase enzymes and processes for producing the same
US4600693A (en) * 1984-02-13 1986-07-15 Corning Glass Works Thermostable alpha amylase having a low requirement for calcium ions, derived from a bacillus microorganism
JPS63500215A (en) * 1985-06-24 1988-01-28 ザ　ヌトラスウイ−ト　カンパニ− Complex plasmid for amino acid synthesis
EP0208491B1 (en) * 1985-07-03 1993-08-25 Genencor International, Inc. Hybrid polypeptides and process for their preparation
DK0410498T3 (en) * 1989-06-29 1999-03-22 Genencor Int Mutant microbial alpha-amylases with increased thermal, acid and / or alkaline stability
DK97190D0 (en) * 1990-04-19 1990-04-19 Novo Nordisk As OXIDATION STABLE DETERGENT ENZYMER
FR2665178A1 (en) * 1990-07-30 1992-01-31 Agronomique Inst Nat Rech Heat-stable variants of the alpha-amylase of Bacillus licheniformis, process for their preparation and their use
US5733473A (en) * 1990-11-14 1998-03-31 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid detergent composition containing lipase and protease
FR2676456A1 (en) * 1991-05-13 1992-11-20 Agronomique Inst Nat Rech Thermostable variants of Bacillus licheniformis alpha -amylase, process for preparing them and their use
EP0995801A1 (en) * 1991-07-27 2000-04-26 Genencor International GmbH Process for increasing the stability of enzymes and stabilized enzymes
ATE444356T1 (en) * 1992-07-23 2009-10-15 Novozymes As MUTATED -G(A)-AMYLASE, DETERGENT AND DISHWASHING DETERGENT
CZ293163B6 (en) * 1993-02-11 2004-02-18 Genencor International, Inc. Alpha-amylase mutant, use thereof, encoded DNA for such mutant, expression vector, host cells, detergent composition and starch liquefying composition
CN1189558C (en) * 1993-10-08 2005-02-16 诺沃奇梅兹有限公司 Amylase variants
US5830837A (en) * 1994-11-22 1998-11-03 Novo Nordisk A/S Amylase variants
MY111537A (en) * 1994-02-02 2000-07-31 Novo Nordisk As A combined desizing and bleaching process.
CN1326994C (en) * 1994-03-29 2007-07-18 诺沃奇梅兹有限公司 Alkaling bacillus amylase
EP0772684B1 (en) * 1994-06-17 2005-08-10 Genencor International, Inc. Amylolytic enzymes derived from the b. licheniformis alpha-amylase, having improved characteristics

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2428572A2 (en) 2007-03-09 2012-03-14 Danisco US, Inc., Genencor Division Alkaliphilic Bacillus species alpha-amylase variants, compositions comprising alpha-amylase variants, and methods of use
US20080293607A1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-11-27 Jones Brian E Alkaliphilic Bacillus Species alpha-Amylase Variants, Compositions Comprising alpha-Amylase Variants, And Methods of Use
US20110086791A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2011-04-14 Dequest Ag Surface treatment composition containing phosphonic acid compounds
US8551931B2 (en) * 2008-01-22 2013-10-08 Dequest Ag Surface treatment composition containing phosphonic acid compounds
US20090209447A1 (en) * 2008-02-15 2009-08-20 Michelle Meek Cleaning compositions
US9334484B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2016-05-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic detergent dishwashing composition
US20090233830A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2009-09-17 Penny Sue Dirr Automatic detergent dishwashing composition
US10844327B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2020-11-24 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
US10538721B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2020-01-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic detergent dishwashing composition
US8680034B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2014-03-25 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
US8980814B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2015-03-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic dishwashing detergent composition
US9175251B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2015-11-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Automatic detergent dishwashing composition
US20120282658A1 (en) * 2010-01-04 2012-11-08 Novozymes North America, Inc. Alpha-Amylase Variants and Polynucleotides Encoding Same
US9416355B2 (en) * 2010-01-04 2016-08-16 Novozymes North America, Inc. Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
US11603522B2 (en) 2010-01-04 2023-03-14 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
US10550373B2 (en) 2010-01-04 2020-02-04 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
US11091748B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2021-08-17 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
US9434932B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2016-09-06 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
US10167458B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2019-01-01 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
US10752889B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2020-08-25 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
EP3354716A1 (en) 2012-03-16 2018-08-01 Monosol, LLC Water soluble compositions incorporating enzymes, and method of making same
US10087401B2 (en) 2012-03-16 2018-10-02 Monosol, Llc Water soluble compositions incorporating enzymes, and method of making same
WO2013138288A1 (en) 2012-03-16 2013-09-19 Monosol, Llc. Water soluble compositions incorporating enzymes, and method of making same
US9908675B2 (en) 2012-04-16 2018-03-06 Monosol, Llc Powdered pouch and method of making same
US10696460B2 (en) 2012-04-16 2020-06-30 Monosol, Llc Powdered pouch and method of making same
US9394092B2 (en) 2012-04-16 2016-07-19 Monosol, Llc Powdered pouch and method of making same
WO2013158364A1 (en) 2012-04-16 2013-10-24 Monosol, Llc Powdered pouch and method of making same
US11753222B2 (en) 2012-04-16 2023-09-12 Monosol, Llc Powdered pouch and method of making same
US11104497B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2021-08-31 Monosol, Llc Degradable materials and packaging made from same
US11884467B2 (en) 2014-10-03 2024-01-30 Monosol, Llc Degradable materials and packaging made from same
US10711225B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-07-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
US10683474B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-06-16 The Procter & Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition
US10655093B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2020-05-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Compacted liquid laundry detergent composition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20050250664A1 (en) 2005-11-10
US20030064908A1 (en) 2003-04-03
US20140242667A1 (en) 2014-08-28
US20100099597A1 (en) 2010-04-22
US20050059131A1 (en) 2005-03-17
US6867031B2 (en) 2005-03-15
US20110177990A1 (en) 2011-07-21
US6297038B1 (en) 2001-10-02
US20020098996A1 (en) 2002-07-25
US20150080283A1 (en) 2015-03-19
US20100099598A1 (en) 2010-04-22
US20040253676A1 (en) 2004-12-16
US6093562A (en) 2000-07-25
US20090280527A1 (en) 2009-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6867031B2 (en) Amylase variants
EP1538155B1 (en) Amylase variants
US5753460A (en) Amylase variants
US5830837A (en) Amylase variants
CN101117629B (en) Amylase variants
EP2199386A1 (en) Amylase variants
CA2173329C (en) Amylase variants

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION