US20020160014A1

US20020160014A1 - Immunotherapeutic combination for the treatment of tumors that over-express receptors with tyrosine kinase activity

Info

Publication number: US20020160014A1
Application number: US10/005,341
Authority: US
Inventors: Rolando Rodriguez; Gisela Marinello; Tania Ramos; Irene Del Gado
Original assignee: Centro de Immunologia Molecular
Current assignee: Centro de Immunologia Molecular
Priority date: 2000-12-08
Filing date: 2001-12-07
Publication date: 2002-10-31
Also published as: HK1073244A1; ATE403438T1; CY1108474T1; AR031641A1; SI1350521T1; EP1350521B1; KR20030064416A; EA200300646A1; DE60135248D1; PT1350521E; UY27058A1; US20060188497A1; CA2431199C; ES2311036T3; EP2005996A3; AU2152102A; BR0116010A; MXPA03005030A; CN1592636A; JP2005519023A

Abstract

The present invention is related to the field of immunology and more specifically to cancer immunotherapy, particularly with immunotherapeutic combinations and treatment methods to prevent tumor cell growth and/or to eliminate those cells.

The methods described in the present invention are based on the blockade of receptors with protein kinase activity in tyrosine residues (Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, RTK) and of ligands for those receptors.

Immunotherapeutic combinations are described that cause the blockade of RTK receptors and/or their ligands, by means of a combination of passive and active immunotherapy. The referenced procedures can be applied to patients in different clinical stages with tumors of epithelial origin that over-express those receptors. The combination of active and passive immunotherapy can be simultaneous or sequential independent of whether the therapeutic procedure will be used in patients with advanced disease or as adjuvant therapy.

Description

The system of the EGF receptor (EGF-R) and its ligands constitutes a molecular complex whose interaction regulates in a specific way cellular growth and its impact has been demonstrated in the uncontrolled growth of tumors of epithelial cell origin. During tumorigenesis the paracrine and autocrine control of EGF-R activation is deregulated, due to growth factor over-production, because of the high rate of synthesis and/or receptor mutations.

The EGF-R is a transmembrane glycoprotein with 1186 amino acids and 170 kD molecular weight that it is broadly expressed in normal tissues. It has been implicated in several stages of embryogenic development.

The binding of its specific ligands, EGF or TGF-alpha, induces receptor dimerization, as well as heterodimerization with other members of the ErbB family, like HER-2 (Cohen B D et al. (1996) J Biol Chem 271:7620-7629). The binding of ligand to receptors releases a cascade of intracellular signals (Ullrich T O and Schlessinger J (1990) Cell 61:203-212) that drives cellular growth and differentiation. Overexpression of the receptor occurs in some types of cancers, mainly of epithelial origin, which has been a target for cancer immunotherapy. Such is the case for breast, bladder, ovary, uterine, colon, lung, brain, prostate and head and neck tumors. EGF-R expression has proven to be an indication of bad prognosis in breast cancer (Pérez R et al. (1984) Breast Cancer and Treatment 4:189-193). While the role of EGFR and its ligands in tumor growth is not yet known, there are suggestions that EGF-R expression in tumor cells induces a mechanism for autocrine stimulation that leads to uncontrolled proliferation of those cells (Schlessinger J et al. (1983) Crit Rev Biochem 14 (2):93-111).

The main ligands of this system are the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) and the Transforming Growth Factor alpha type (TGFalpha). There are other ligands belonging to the EGF superfamily, like: amphireguline (AR), cryto-1 (CR1), Heparin Growth Factor, betacellulin, epiregulin, and others. EGF is a 53 amino acid polypeptide with a molecular weight of 6045 Da, which is mitogenic for cells of epithelial origin. Its action is mainly paracrine through its binding to EGF-R.

TGF alpha is a 50 amino acid polypeptide able to compete with EGF for binding to EGF-R. Anti-EGF antibodies are not able to recognize TGF alpha (Todaro G J et al. (1976), Nature 264:26-31), meaning that both growth factors are two immunologically different entities.

The EGFR—ligand system has been the target of passive immunotherapy (PI) using monoclonal antibodies(Mab) against EGF-R, in native form, associated with drugs, toxins, or radioactive isotopes (Vollmar A M et al. (1987) J Cell Physiol 131:418-425) in tumors with high expression of this receptor. These antibodies have been selected by their capacity to inhibit the binding of EGF to it receptor (neutralizing antibodies). Several clinical trials with Mabs are being carried out and some have shown promising results as it is the case of Phase II clinical trials with the Mab C225 in breast, pancreatic and renal cancer, in addition to Phase III trials in head and neck cancer (Mendelsohn, J et al. (1999) American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting). Other Phase II clinical trials showing good results have been carried out with the Mab IOR-R3 in lung tumors (Crombet T et al. (2000) Cancer Biotherapy and Biopharmaceutical, manuscript accepted for publication).

Passive immunotherapy with the IOR-R3 Mab (EP586002B1), specific against the EGF-R, has demonstrated that the specific binding of the IOR-R3 to the receptor inhibits EGF/EGF-R binding, with subsequent inhibition of EGFR autophosphorylation. In turn, passive immunotherapy with IOR-R3 inhibited the growth of human tumor cells in nude mice, and it has reduced the rate of tumor growth in some patients in clinical trials. This system has also been target of specific active cancer immunotherapy. One example is the use of a vaccine composed one of the main ligands of EGF-R, EGF, coupled to a carrier protein (U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,018). This vaccine is able to induce a specific antibody response against autologus EGF, to inhibit EGF/EGF-R binding, thus blocking proliferation mechanisms induced by this binding. Pre-clinical studies have shown that mice immunized with autologus EGF coupled to a carrier protein and administered with a useful adjuvant, increases survival of mice transplanted with Ehrlich Ascitic Tumor (EAT) cells (González G et al. (1996) Vaccine Research 5(4):233-243; Gonzáalez G et al (1997) Vaccine Research 6(2):9 1-100).

Results from a Phase I clinical trial have been reported for a vaccine containing human recombinant EGF, demonstrating the immunogenicity and safety of vaccination (Gonzáalez G et al (1998), Annals of Oncology 9:1-5).

Another example of active specific immunotherapy of cancer in this system is a vaccine composition containing EGF-R, proteoliposomes derived from an external membrane protein complex of Neisseria meningitidis and a ganglioside that associate specifically with this receptor forming membrane molecular complexes (Patent deposited in Cuba, priority date Jun. 12, 2000).

Likewise, vaccines containing other EGF-R ligands, such as TGF alpha alone or combined with EGF and coupled to a carrier protein, have been developed ( Patents Requested in Cuba, priority date Jun. 12, 2000).

In the present invention the use of combined immunotherapies is proposed, directed either against receptors with tyrosine kinase activity (RTK) or against their ligands,. This combination has the object of potentiating the observed effect when applying, in an independent way, different forms of immunotherapy described in the state of the art, directed alone against some of the receptor/ligand systems. This potentiation is justified for the combined blockade of both, ligands and receptor, in a treatment method that includes both principles.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related to immunotherapeutic combinations and treatment methods to inhibit growth of tumor cells to eliminate those cells, based on the blockade of RTK receptors and its ligands. This blockade can be achieved, among other approaches, using combination, simultaneous or sequential, of active immunotherapies (therapeutic vaccines) and passive immunotherapies (Mab) directed to growth factors (i.e. EGF, TGFa) and its receptors (i.e. EGF-R).

The blockade of growth factors or of their receptors causes inhibition of cellular proliferation. In this invention we show that simultaneous blockade of ligands and/or receptors potentiate the inhibition effect on cellular proliferation. This therapeutic concept is of great importance for treatment of malignant tumors, which are fundamentally caused by an increase in the rate of cellular proliferation.

Immunotherapeutic combinations are described that cause the blockade of RTK receptors and/or their ligands, by means of active and passive immunotherapeutical combinations. The referred procedures can be applied to patients with tumors of epithelial origin that over-express EGF-R, in different clinical stages.

The combination of active and passive immunotherapy can be simultaneous or sequential, independent of the therapeutic procedure used in patients with advanced disease, or as adjuvant therapy.

In cases of advanced disease, the proposed therapeutic combination is passive immunotherapy with Mab that recognizes the RTK receptor and/or Mab that recognizes ligands of this receptor, in combination with an onco-specific therapy of choice, as first line therapy, followed by active immunotherapy using vaccines directed against the ligands of the receptor and/or to the receptor, to maintain the theraputic effect. In cases of adjuvant therapy the proposed therapeutical combinations are:

1. Passive immunotherapy with Mab that recognize either, the RTK receptor and/or its ligands with active immunotherapy using vaccines directed to the receptor's ligands or to the receptor itself.

2. Passive immunotherapy with Mab that recognize either, the RTK receptor or its ligands as attack therapy, followed by active immunotherapy with vaccines directed to the receptor's ligands or to the receptor itself, as maintenance treatment.

PROCEDURE 1: Therapeutic combination including passive immunotherapy with Mab that recognize the RTK receptor (i.e.EGF-R) and/or the receptor's ligands (i.e.EGF, TGF alpha), followed by active therapy with vaccines directed to the receptor and/or its ligands, to be applied in patients with advanced stage epithelial tumors.

This will be administered to patients with advanced cancer who are not eligible for any other onco-specific therapy.

The first treatment step will be passive immunotherapy with Mab that recognizes the RTK receptor (i.e.EGF-R), with the property of inhibiting this receptor and/or Mab that recognize the receptors ligands (i.e. EGF, TGF alpha). This will be an acute therapy aimed at the goal of tumor remission, and can be used together with the established onco-specific treatment for this stage of disease.

This will be followed by active immunotherapy using vaccines that induce receptor blocking antibodies (i.e.anti-EGF-R) and/or ligand blocking antibodies (i.e.anti-EGF anti-TGF alpha), with the objective of maintaining disease stabilization for longer periods, to avoid new metastates.

The procedure consists of administration to patients in advanced stages of tumors of epithelial origin, of between 4 and 20 doses , ranging between 100 and 400 mg of a Mab that recognizes and inhibits EGF-R, and/or MAb that recognizes the receptor's ligands. The time between doses will be between 6 to 10 days. The complete treatment can last between 1 to 24 months, concomitant with the established onco-especific therapy. The treatment will continue up to partial or complete tumor regression or up to the point where an adverse reaction occurs that requires treatment cessation.

Between 1 and 4 weeks after this treatment, immunization schedules will be initiated with vaccines directed against EGF-R or its ligands (i.e.EGF , TGFalpha) coupled to a carrier protein (i.e.P64K Neisseria meningitides recombinant protein) and administered in an adequate adjuvant i.e alum (between 1 and 2 mg/dose) or Montanide ISA 51 (between 0.6 and 1.2 ml/dose). Each dose contains between 50 and 800 ug of active ingredient (receptor or ligand) coupled to the carrier protein, in a final volume of between 0.6 and 5 mL. The immunization schedule is 5 to 8 initial immunizations for response induction, given every 7 to 14 days. Immunizations can be preceded by administration of cyclophosphamide , between 100 and 500 mg/m²of body weight, administered 2 to 4 days before the 1^rstimmunization. Vaccines can be formulated in any other vaccine vehicle (i.e.liposomes, DNA vaccines, viral vectors).

Vaccines can be formulated as independent products or as a unique vaccine formulation. In this period, blood will be extracted from patients in order to measure biochemical blood markers and specific antibody titers against the ligand or receptor to which the vaccine is directed. Extractions will be done weekly or monthly.

Subsequently, re-immunizations will be done if antibody titers decrease, every 1 to 4 months for a period of 1 to 2 years.

PROCEDURE 2: Immunotherapeutic combination including passive immunotherapy with Mab that recognizes a RTK receptor (i.e.EGF-R) and/or it ligands (i.e. EGF, TGF alpha) together with active immunotherapy with vaccines directed against the receptor and/or its ligands, as adjuvant treatment.

Passive treatment with Mab recognizing a RTK receptor (i.e.EGF-R) inhibiting its activity and/or Mab recognizing receptor's ligands (i.e.EGF, TGF alpha), together with an active treatment with vaccines that induces an antibody response that blocks the receptor and/or its ligands, will be administered to patients immediately after diagnosis and/or surgical treatment.

Those treatments, administered together, will have a synergistic effect, enabling a higher percentage of regression and/or clinical disease stabilization.

Patients with tumors of epithelial origin are amenable to this treatment, that consists of between 4 to 20 doses, ranging between 100 and 400 mg, of Mab recognizing and inhibiting RTK receptors and/or it ligands. The time between doses will be between 6 to 10 days and the treatment can last between 1 to 24 months. The treatment will continue until partial or complete tumor regression or up to the point where an adverse reaction occurs that requires treatment cessation.

Concomitant immunizations will be administered with vaccines according to the schedule described in procedure #1.

PROCEDURE 3:

Immunotherapeutic combination including passive immunotherapy with Mab recognizing RTK receptors (i.e.EGF-R) and/or its ligands (i.e. EGF, TGF alpha), followed by active immunotherapy with vaccines directed against the receptor and/or it ligands, to be applied as adjuvant therapy.

This will be applied to patients immediately after diagnosis and/or surgical treatment. The goal of this treatment is to use acute therapy to obtain tumor remission, via initial passive immunotherary with Mab recognizing and inhibiting RTK receptors (i.e.EGF-R) and/or Mab recognizing its ligands (i.e. EGF, TGF alpha).Subsequently, active immunotherapy will be initiated using vaccines inducing blocking antibodies against the receptor (i.e.EGF-R) or it ligands (i.e.EGF, TGF alpha). The aim of the 2 ^ndtreatment is to obtain a longer period of freedom from disease, to avoid the appearance of new metastates.

The procedure consists of administration to patients at advanced stages of cancer of epithelial origin, from 4 to 20 doses of between 100 and 400 mg of Mab that recognizes and inhibits the EGF-R and/or its ligands. The time between doses will be between 6 to 10 days and the treatment duration can be between 1 to 24 months. The treatment will continue until partial or complete tumor regression, or until any adverse reaction occurs that requires treatment cessation.

Between 1 to 4 weeks after the end of treatment, immunization schedules will begin with vaccines directed against the EGF-R or some EGF-R ligand (i.e. EGF, TGF alpha), according to the schedule described in procedure #1.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Immunization Schedule with EGF Vaccine in Cancer Patients, Using Alum as Adjuvant

With the main goal of demonstrating immunogenicity and safety of EGF, a clinical trial was performed in which 10 patients were immunized with an EGF Vaccine (U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,018), using P64K as carrier protein and alum as adjuvant,. [0037]
Patient 1.1 (MMG) was included in the trial with a diagnosis of metastasic epidermoid carcinoma of the lung, with progressive disease, and not eligible for any other onco-specific treatment. [0038]
The patient was immunized following a schedule of 5 initial dose of the vaccine, containing 50ug of EGF and 2 mg alum, administered on [0039] days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 51.
Blood extraction was performed on [0040] days 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and monthly thereafter for blood biochemical measurements and for EGF-specific antibodies. Antibody titers were measured by means of an ELISA test, antibody titers being determined as the maximal sera dilution that gives a positive result in the ELISA test. (O.D values equal or higher 2 times the blank).
Re-immunization was performed using the same vaccine dose when a decrease in antibody titers was detected. [0041]
Patient MMG developed an anti-EGF antibody response with maximum titers up to 1:8000. The kinetics of the antibody response is shown in FIG. 1. [0042]
After the beginning of the vaccination schedule the patient showed clinical and radiological stabilization of disease for 15 months. The patient died 23.2 months after the first vaccination. [0043]

Example 2

Immunization Schedule with EGF Vaccine in Cancer Patients, Using Montanide ISA 51 as Adjuvant

With the main goal of demonstrating immunogenicity and safety of EGF using P64K as a carrier protein and Montanide ISA 51 as an adjuvant, a clinical trial was performed in which 10 patients were immunized. [0044]
Patient 2.1 (AMG) was included in the trial with a diagnosis of epidermoid carcinoma of the lung, with progressive disease, being ineligible for any other onco-specific treatment. The patient was immunized according to a schedule of 5 initial doses of the vaccine containing 50 ug of EGF in 0.6 mL total volume, emulsified with 0.6 mL of Montanide ISA 51 immediately before use, and administered on [0045] days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 51.
Blood extractions were performed on [0046] days 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and monthly thereafter for blood biochemical measurements and measurement of specific anti-EGF antibodies.
The antibody titers were measured by means of an ELISA test, antibody titers being determined as the maximal sera dilution that gives a positive result in the ELISA test. (O.D values equal or higher 2 times the blank). [0047]
Re-immunization was performed using the same vaccine dose when a decrease in antibody titers was detected. [0048]
Patient AMG developed an anti-EGF antibody response with maximum titers of up to 1: 32000, with a kinetics of response shown in FIG. 2. [0049]
After the beginning of the vaccination schedule, the patient showed stabilization of disease for 12 months, at which point clinical and radiological tumor regression was diagnosed. [0050]
On the 14[0051] ^thmonth after the beginning of vaccination, a 2^ndprimary tumor appeared. The patient died 18 months after inclusion from a surgical complication of this 2^ndtumor.

Example 3

Immunization Schedule in Cancer Patients, with EGF Vaccine, Using Alum as Adjuvant and Low Dose Cyclophosphamide Pre-treatment

A clinical trial was carried out in which 10 patients were immunized with the main goal of demonstrating immunogenicity and safety of the EGF Vaccine using P64K as carrier protein and alum as adjuvant after cyclophosphamide pre-treatment. [0052]
Patient 3.1, FNR, was included in the trial with a diagnosis of epidermoid carcinoma of the lung, with progressive disease, being ineligible for any other onco-specific treatment. The patient was treated with cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m[0053] ²of body surface), 3 days before the first immunization of the EGF Vaccine. The vaccination schedule was 5 doses of the vaccine composition, containing 50 ug of EGF and 2 mg of alum, administered on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 51.
Blood extractions were performed on [0054] days 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and then monthly for blood chemistry and specific anti-EGF antibody determinations.
Antibody titers were measured by means of an ELISA test, antibody titers being determined as the maximal sera dilution that gives a positive result in the ELISA test. (O.D values equal or higher 2 times the blank). [0055]
Re-immunization was performed using the same vaccine dose, when a decrease in antibody titers were detected. [0056]
The patient developed an anti-EGF antibody response with maximum titers up to 1:8000, as shown in FIG. 4. [0057]
After the beginning of the vaccination schedule, the patient showed disease stabilization for 19 months. [0058]

Example 4

Immunization Schedule with EGF Vaccine in Cancer Patients, Using Montanide ISA 51 as Adjuvant and Cyclophosphamide Pre-treatment

A clinical trial was carried out in which 10 patients were immunized with the main goal of demonstrating immunogenicity and safety of the EGF Vaccine, using P64K as carrier protein and and Montanide ISA 51 as adjuvant after cyclophosphamide pre-treatment. Patient 4.1, JPG, was included in the trial with a diagnosis of non small cell lung adenocarcinoma, with progressive disease, being ineligible for any other onco-specific treatment. [0059]
The patient was treated with cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m[0060] ²of body surface), 3 days before the first immunization of the EGF Vaccine. The vaccination schedule was 5 doses of the vaccine composition, containing 50 ug of EGF in 0.6 mL total volume, emulsified with 0.6 mL of Montanide ISA 51 immediately before use, administered on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 51.
Blood extractions were performed on [0061] days 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and then monthly for blood chemistry and specific anti-EGF antibody determinations. Antibody titers were measured by means of an ELISA test, antibody titers being determined as the maximal sera dilution that gives a positive result in the ELISA test. (O.D values equal or higher 2 times the blank).
Re-immunization was performed , using the same vaccine dose, when a decrease in antibody titers was detected. [0062]
Patient JPG developed an anti-EGF antibody response with maximum titers up to 1:400000, as shown in FIG. 5. [0063]
After the beginning of the vaccination schedule the patient showed disease stabilization for 6 months. [0064]

Example 5

Immunogenicity of EGF Vaccination and its Relationship to Disease Stabilization in Patients with Cancer

A Phase I trial in 20 patients was performed in which patients were randomized to one of two groups using different adjuvants.. [0065]
Ten patients at stages III or IV of Non Small Cell Lung cancer (NSCLC), were treated with 5 initial doses of vaccine composition containing 50ug of EGF and 2 mg of alum, administered on [0066] days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 51.
The other 10 patients (NSCLC, stages III or IV), were immunized with 5 doses of the vaccine composition containing 50 ug of EGF, in a total volume of 0.6 mls, emulsified with the same volume (0.6 mL) of Montanide ISA 51. [0067]
Antibody titers were measured by means of an ELISA test, with antibody titers determined as the maximal sera dilution that gives a positive result in the ELISA test. (O.D values equal or higher 2 times the blank). [0068]
In this trial, 50% of patients developed an anti-EGF antibody response with antibody titers of 1:4000 or higher (, Good Antibody Responders, GAR group) and 50% antibody titers below 1:4000 (Bad Antibody Responders, BAR group). [0069]
In the GAR group, 87.5% of patients showed clinical and radiological disease stabilization for at least3 months after the beginning of treatment. [0070]
In the BAR group, only 11,1% of patients showed this stabilization profile (Table 1). [0071]
These data demonstrate the relationship between anti-EGF antibody levels and tumor stabilization. [0072]

CHART 1

Relationship of antibody responses and clinical and

radiological disease stabilization.

Disease stabilization for at

least 3 months after

% of patients beginning treatment.

GAR 50% 87.5%

BAR

50% 11.1%

Example 6

Immunogenicity of EGF Vaccination and Relationship to Survival of Cancer Patient Subjected to This Treatment

Forty stage III /IV NSCLC patients were treated, in groups of 10, with the schedules detailed in examples 1,2,3 and 4. [0073]
They were characterized as GAR and BAR according to criteria exposed in example 6. Of the total of patients treated with the previously described schedules, 50% turned out to be GAR and 50% BAR. [0074]
When survival patterns were compared between GAR and BAR patients, a statistically significant difference was observed, with a mean survival of 9.1 months for GAR and a mean survival of 4.5 months for BAR (p <0.02). This result is showed in FIG. 6. [0075]

Example 7

Therapeutic Effect of the Combination of Radiotherapy and Mab IOR-R3

Patient RML, diagnosed with stage IV language base epidermoid carcinoma, was included in the clinical trial using the combination of radiotherapy (RTP) and IOR-R3. [0076]
The patient received 200 mg of Mab once a week for 6 weeks. The accumulated dose of Mab was 1200mg and the total radiation dose was 60 Gy. [0077]
When the combination therapy was complete the patient showed complete remission of the primary tumor and its metastases (FIG. 7). This response was maintained for more than 13 months. [0078]

Example 8

Therapeutic Effect of the Combination of Radiotherapy and Mab IOR-R3

Patient EPG, diagnosed with stage III tonsil epidermoid carcinoma with cervical adenopathies, was included in the clinical trial using the combination of radiotherapy (RTP) and IOR-R3. The patient received 200mg of Mab once a week for 6 weeks and a total radiation dose of 64 Gy. [0079]
After treatment, this patient showed complete remission of the tumor lesion (FIG. 8). [0080]
The response was maintained for more than 13 months. [0081]

Example 9

Therapeutic Effect of the Combination of Radiotherapy and Mab IOR-R3

Patient CHA, diagnosed with a stage IV tonsil tumor, with bilateral cervical adenopathies, was included in the clinical trial using a combination of radiotherapy (RTP) and IOR-R3. The patient received 400 mg of Mab once a week for 6 weeks, for an accumulated dose of 2400 mg. Concomitantly, the patient received a total radiation dose of 64 Gy. [0082]
When concluding the treatment this patient was in complete remission of the primary tumor and the loco-regional metastasis (FIG. 9). The response was maintained for 12 months. [0083]

Example 10

Evaluation, in Nude Mice, of Passive Therapy Using a Combination of Anti-EGF-R Antibody (IOR-R3) and an Anti-EGF-R Ligand Monoclonal (EGF-1)

Evaluation of the anti-tumor effect in relation to the administered doses. [0084]
This experiment also simulates the possible effect of combined administration of the anti-EGF-R Mab and an EGF vaccine. The vaccine causes an anti-EGF antibody response with the same effect of passive administration of Mab with that specificity, with the additional advantage that, the achieved antibody response can be maintained over time, as shown in examples 1, 2, 3 and 4 (kinetics of anti-EGF antibody titers in immunized patients) [0085]
Seven different groups of athymic mice, with NMRI genetic origin (outbred population), were immunized with: [0086]
Group 1:10 doses of 0.5 mg of the EGF-1 Mab, intraperitoneal route, daily frequency. [0087]
Group 2: 10 doses of 1 mg of the EGF-1 Mab, intraperitoneal route, daily frequency. [0088]
Group 3: 10 doses of 0.5 mg of the IOR-R3 Mab, intraperitoneal route, daily frequency. [0089]
Group 4: 10 doses of 1 mg of the IOR-R3 Mab, intraperitoneal route, daily frequency. [0090]
Group 5: 10 doses of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), intraperitoneal route, daily frequency (negative control). [0091]
Group 6: 10 doses of 0.5 m g EGF-1 Mab combined with 0.5 mg IOR-R3 Mab, intraperitoneal route, daily frequency. [0092]
Group 7: 10 doses of 1 m g EGF-1 Mab combined with 1 mg IOR-R3 Mab, intraperitoneal route, daily frequency. [0093]
On the day of initiation of treatment with Mabs mice were transplanted with 1 ×10[0094] ⁶H125 human tumor cells. This cell line over-expresses the EGF-R.
Results are shown in FIGS. [0095] 10 and 11. The anti-tumor effect was potentiated when both treatments were combined, increasing with increased doses.

Example 11

Schedule of Combined Mab IOR-R3/EGF Vaccine Treatments in Patients With Advanced Stage Tumors

Patient ARP, diagnosed with epidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck, received sequential treatment of Mab IOR-R3 and EGF Vaccine. [0096]
The patient received 200 mg of Mab once a week for 6 weeks, in combination with a total of 30 doses of radiotherapy , 5 doses per week for 6 weeks, for an accumulated radiation dose of 60 Gy. [0097]
When concluding the treatment, the patient was in complete remission of the primary tumor. [0098]
An immunization schedule with the EGF Vaccine began one month after conclusion of the treatment with the Mab. The patient received 5 doses of 50 ug of EGF conjugated to protein P64k, in a total volume of 0.6 mls, emulsified with 0.6 ml of Montanide ISA 51 immediately before use. The immunizations were carried out on [0099] days 1,7,14,21 and 51.
The patient remains in the follow-up period. [0100]

Example 12

Schedule of Combined Mab IOR-R3/EGF Vaccine Treatments in Patients With Advanced Stages Tumors

Patient MRM, diagnosed with epidermoid carcinoma of the lung, was subjected to surgical intervention. One month after the surgery the patient began a combined treatment of passive immunotherapy with Mab IOR-R3 concomitantly with the EGF vaccine. [0101]
FIG. 12 details the schedule of dose intervals. The patient is in follow up. [0102]

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

FIG. 1: Kinetics of anti-EGF antibody response in patient MMG, immunized as detailed in example 1. Arrows indicate times of re-immunizations. [0103]
FIG. 2: Kinetics of anti-EGF antibody response in patient AMC, immunized as detailed in example 2. Arrows indicate times of re-immunizations. [0104]
FIG. 3: Tumor regression observed in patient AMC. The tumor mass is seen on the left at the start of treatment. On the right of the figure it can be seen that 12 months after the start of treatment the tumor mass disappeared. [0105]
FIG. 4: Kinetics of anti-EGF antibody response in patient FNR, immunized as detailed in example 3. Arrows indicate times of re-immunizations. [0106]
FIG. 5: Kinetics of anti-EGF antibody response in patient JPG, immunized as detailed in example 4. Arrows indicate times of re-immunizations. [0107]
FIG. 6: Kaplan-Maier survival curves of groups of patients with high anti-EGF antibody response (GAR) and with low anti-EGF antibody responses (BAR), as well as that of a historical control group. As can beseen, GAR is associated with a significant increase in survival compared with either BAR or with historical controls. [0108]
FIG. 7: Graphic demonstration of tumor remission in patient RML, treated as detailed in example 7. [0109]
FIG. 8: Graphic demonstration of tumor regression in patient EPG, treated as detailed in example 8. [0110]
FIG. 9: Graphic demonstration of the tumor in patient CHA, treated as detailed in example 9. [0111]
FIG. 10: Groups of mice immunized with 0.5 mg of both Mabs IOR-R3 and EGF-1, and with the combination of 0.5 mg of IOR-R3+0.5 mg of EGF1, as detailed in example 10. A synergistic effect on decreased tumor growth was observed in the group treated with the combination of both Mabs. [0112]
FIG. 11: Groups of mice immunized with 1 mg of both Mabs IOR-R3 and EGF-1, and with the combination of 1 mg of IOR-R3+1 mg of EGF1, as detailed in example 10. A synergistic effect on decreased tumor growth was observed in the group treated with the combination of both Mabs. [0113]
FIG. 12: Combined treatment of Mab IOR-R3 and the EGF Vaccine: Arrows above the time axis indicate the day of Mab administration ([0114] days 1,7,14,21,28 and 35) and arrows below the time axis indicate the day of immunization with the EGF Vaccine ( days 2,8,15,22, and 52).

Claims

1. A combination useful for immunotherapy, where this combination has an effect on growth and/or proliferation of cells, whose growth is dependent on the interaction between a receptor and its ligand, in the receptor tyrosine kinase system (RTK), this combination includes:

a. —An antibody against a RTK receptor.

b. —A vaccine in which the active principle is the RTK receptor, and that induces antibodies against this receptor.

2. Immunotherapy combination according to claim 1 where the RTK is the EGF receptor.

3. Immunotherapy combination according to claim 2 where the vaccine is directed against the EGF receptor.

4. Immunotherapy combination according to claim 2 where the antibody against the RTK receptor is an antibody against the EGF receptor.

5. Immunotherapy combination according to claim 4 where the antibody against the RTK receptor is a humanized antibody against the EGF receptor.

6. Immunotherapy combination according to claim 5 where the humanized antibody against the EGF receptor is IOR R3.

7. A treatment combination useful for immunotherapy, where this combination has an effect on growth and/or proliferation of cells, whose growth is dependent on the interaction between a receptor and its ligand, in the system of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), this combination including:

a. —An antibody against the ligands of the RTK receptor and

b. —A vaccine whose active principle is (are) the RTK receptor's ligand(s) and that induces antibodies against this (those) ligand(s).

8. A therapeutic combination according to claim 7 where the RTK receptor's ligand is EGF.

9. A therapeutic combination according to claim 8 where the vaccine is composed of conjugated proteins P64K and EGF.

10. A therapeutic combination according to claim 7 where the RTK receptor ligand is TGF-alpha.

11. A therapeutic combination according to claim 10 where the vaccine is composed of conjugated proteins P64K and TGF alpha.

12. A combination useful for immunotherapy, where this combination has an effect on growth and/or proliferation of cells, whose growth is dependent on the interaction between a receptor and its ligand, in the system of receptor protein tyrosine kinases (RTK), this combination includes:

a. —A first agent selected from one of the antibodies against the RTK receptor and of a vaccine where the active principle is the RTK receptor that induces antibodies against this receptor, and

b. —A second agent selected from of one of the antibodies against the ligands of the RTK receptor and of a vaccine where the active principle is this ligand, which induces antibodies against said ligand.

13. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 12, where the first agent is an antibody against the RTK receptor.

14. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 13 where the antibody against the RTK receptor is an antibody against the EGF receptor.

15. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 14 where the antibody against the EGF receptor is a monoclonal antibody.

16. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 15 where the antibody against the EGF receptor is a humanized antibody.

17. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 16 where the antibody against the EGF receptor is IOR R3.

18. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 12, where the first agent is a vaccine whose active principle is an RTK receptor.

19. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 18, where the first agent is a vaccine whose active principle is the EGF receptor.

20. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 12 where the second agent is an antibody against an RTK receptor ligand.

21. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 20 where the antibody against the RTK receptor's ligand is an antibody against EGF.

22. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 20 where the antibody against the RTK receptor is an antibody against TGF-alpha.

23. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 12, where the second agent is a vaccine whose active principle is an RTK receptor's ligand.

24. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 23 where the vaccine contains EGF as active principle.

25. An immunotherapy combination according claim to 24 where the vaccine contains conjugated proteins p64K and EGF as active principle.

26. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 23 where the vaccine contains TGF-alpha as active principle.

27. An immunotherapy combination according to claims 1 to 26 inclusive, whose combination consists of a mixture of reagents containing independent doses of effective formulations, either of Mab or vaccines, where the combination of those independent formulations induces decreased growth of tumors that over-express EGF-R.

28. An immunotherapy combination according to claim 27, whose combination consists of a mixture of reagents containing independent doses of effective formulations, either of Mab against the EGF receptor and its ligands or of vaccines with EGF-R and its ligands (EGF, TGF alpha) as active principle, and where the combination of those independent formulations induces decreased growth of tumors that over-express EGF-R.

29. A method to control growth and/or proliferation of cells whose growth is dependent on the interaction between a receptor and its ligand, in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) system, this method including the treatment with one of the therapeutic combinations defined in any one of the preceding claims.

30. A method according to claim 29 that includes the simultaneous treatment with agents against RTK receptors and their ligands.

31. A method according to claim 29 that includes the simultaneous treatment with vaccines and antibodies.

32. A method according to claim 29 that includes the treatment at the first stage with this antibody and at a second stage with this vaccine.

33. A method according to claim 29 that includes the treatment at a first stage with this vaccine and at a second stage with this antibody.