US20010029879A1 - Mooring systems with active force reacting systems and passive damping - Google Patents
Mooring systems with active force reacting systems and passive damping Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010029879A1 US20010029879A1 US09/756,644 US75664401A US2001029879A1 US 20010029879 A1 US20010029879 A1 US 20010029879A1 US 75664401 A US75664401 A US 75664401A US 2001029879 A1 US2001029879 A1 US 2001029879A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- vessel
- arm
- coupled
- mooring system
- torque
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B22/00—Buoys
- B63B22/02—Buoys specially adapted for mooring a vessel
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B21/00—Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B21/00—Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
- B63B21/50—Anchoring arrangements or methods for special vessels, e.g. for floating drilling platforms or dredgers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B21/00—Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
- B63B2021/001—Mooring bars, yokes, or the like, e.g. comprising articulations on both ends
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B21/00—Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
- B63B2021/003—Mooring or anchoring equipment, not otherwise provided for
- B63B2021/008—Load monitors
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to the field of mooring arrangements for vessels, particularly offshore vessels such as Floating Production and Offloading Vessels (FPSOs) or Floating Storage and Offloading vessels (FSOs) used in offshore hydrocarbon production. Still more particularly, the invention concerns active and passive damping arrangements for yoke/spring systems and yoke/pendulum systems which are spring-like to restore a vessel toward an equilibrium position with respect to a generally stationary body such as a tower or an anchored buoy.
- FPSOs Floating Production and Offloading Vessels
- FSOs Floating Storage and Offloading vessels
- yoke arrangements that couple a vessel to a body such as a tower or an anchored buoy or other generally stationary body.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,290,158 shows a mooring yoke for a vessel which is coupled for rotation with a turntable on the top of the buoy.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,309,955 shows a mooring yoke having two outer ends pivotably coupled to a vessel and having a counter weight on the yoke ends positioned outwardly beyond the coupling point of the vessel.
- 4,396,046 illustrates a yoke coupled between a mooring buoy and a vessel, where the yoke provides a base for a fluid conduit between a swivel on the buoy and fluid conduits on the vessel.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,516,942 illustrates a yoke placed between a tower and a vessel, where ends of the two outer arms of the yoke are connected to the vessel by cables. Weights are positioned in the outer ends of the yoke arms, such that the yoke acts much like an undamped spring or a pendulum between the vessel and the tower.
- Dutch Patent 8602806 shows disconnectable yoke arms suspended from a tower.
- 4,530,302 shows a subsea yoke having its outer arms suspended by cables from the vessel. An enhanced pendulum effect is achieved by weight in the outer arms. The movement of the cables in the water increases damping of the spring effect of the weighted yoke arms.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,856 shows a yoke coupled between a vessel and a tower. Weights are suspended from yoke arms near the tower.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,694,771 also shows a yoke coupled between a vessel and a tower. Pendulum weights are provided on the yoke arms at their coupling to the tower.
- 4,568,295 shows a yoke positioned between an anchored buoy and a vessel, with the outer ends of the yoke arms suspended from the vessel and with a weight positioned on the yoke so that a pendulum arrangement is provided which acts like an undamped spring between the buoy and the vessel.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,784,079 shows a tower-supported yoke suspended from a frame of a vessel with a pendulum weight provided at the end of the yoke arms.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,038 shows a tower supported submerged yoke with quick-action couplings for disconnection.
- the prior art described above provides mooring systems for vessel position control by relying on the deflection of a mechanical system to generate a spring-like restoring force, especially for tower/yoke systems.
- the damping of the tower-yoke-vessel systems arises primarily through friction of the vessel as it moves through the water in an oscillatory manner when environmental forces cause the vessel to move against its yoke.
- mooring systems of course exist and all mooring systems can be generally categorized according to the type of restoring force produced as SALM or TLP systems, CALM systems or tower/yoke systems.
- SALM or TLP arrangement the angular deflection of mooring legs result in inward mooring leg tension and an included angle to create a restoring force.
- CALM system deflection of mooring legs increases mooring tension to produce a restoring force.
- a tower/yoke system deflection of pendular or spring systems results in a restoring force.
- the damping force in the system is a small percentage of the spring-like restoring force
- momentum load on the mooring system is often a significant component of peak restoring loads, especially in body-yoke-vessel systems such as tower/yoke mooring systems.
- a primary object of the invention is to provide an active “forcing system” or active damping system by which excursions of a vessel past a neutral point of a yoke of a stationary body-yoke-vessel system are opposed by an active controlled restoring force.
- active damping system or active damping system by which excursions of a vessel past a neutral point of a yoke of a stationary body-yoke-vessel system are opposed by an active controlled restoring force.
- Another object of the invention is to provide a passive damping system by which vessel oscillations past the neutral point are rapidly damped with the result that extreme displacement amplitudes of the vessel, that is amplitudes of the oscillation, are significantly reduced or even critically damped, with the result that a smaller system can be provided with reductions in size, weight and cost.
- Another object of the invention is to provide a tower-yoke-vessel arrangement in which maximum displacement amplitudes of the vessel are small enough so that a product flow line from the tower to the vessel needs no supporting frame such as the yoke itself, but rather can be run from the top of the tower to the vessel.
- Another object of the invention is to provide an arrangement by which forces are produced to control the motion of the vessel substantially independently of its displacement position magnitude from the mooring quiescent point.
- Another object of the invention is to provide damping in a body-arm-vessel system through the use of pressure control devices coupled between the body and the arm or between the arm and the vessel.
- An active damping system is provided in several embodiments where a signal is produced which is proportional to the displacement of the vessel from a neutral position of a body-yoke-vessel system.
- the signal controls the direction and magnitude of force of a cylinder linked to the yoke for applying a force to it in a direction opposite to that of its present motion.
- a passive damping system is provided in other embodiments by which a damping hydraulic cylinder is applied in the yoke arms or arm so as to provide automatic passive damping force to a yoke with its ends connected directly to the vessel.
- the invention includes arrangements with redundant cylinders by which both active and passive damping can be provided for a mooring arrangement.
- Components other than hydraulic cylinders can be used to achieve active and passive damping. Possible alternatives include brake shoes on linearly sliding structures or on rotating disks or drums all of which provide a damping force only. Cables from winches or drums are used in an active restoring force arrangement and/or a damping force.
- Electrical linear activators provide a restoring force and/or damping force.
- Elastomeric elements provide restoring and damping characteristics.
- One embodiment of the invention includes a tower with a submerged yoke coupled to the tower and to the vessel.
- the tower includes a top section with a fluid swivel mounted on its top. Fluid conduits extend to the vessel from the tower-mounted swivel without the benefit of support from the submerged yoke.
- FIG. 1 is a restoring force vs. displacement graph which illustrates the alternative arm/yoke mooring systems of the invention including a pendulum soft yoke system, a passive stiff spring system and an active system using a feedback control system and force producing cylinder or other mechanism to restore a vessel toward its mooring neutral point;
- FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate in side and top views a yoke mooring system including a feedback control system to actively force the vessel back to its neutral point;
- FIG. 2C is a more detailed schematic diagram of a PID feedback control system for actively forcing the vessel back to its neutral point
- FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate in side and top views a spring-damping system installed in the arms of a yoke between a tower and a vessel;
- FIG. 4 illustrates the hydraulic cylinder of FIGS. 3A, 3B and which includes a piston-rod arrangement including a spring for forcing the piston toward a neutral position and a hydraulic damping arrangement to minimize mooring system oscillations;
- FIG. 4A illustrates an alternative construction of the damping cylinder of FIG. 4
- FIGS. 5 and 6 are top and side views of a horizontal shaft axis stiff yoke mooring arrangement with a hydraulic cylinder and active damping system similar to that of FIG. 2A and a redundant hydraulic cylinder and passive damping system similar to that of FIG. 4;
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are top and side views of a vertical axis stiff yoke mooring arrangement with dual redundant hydraulic cylinders;
- FIGS. 9 and 10 are top and side views of a torque tube yoke mooring system
- FIGS. 11 and 12 are top and side views of a stiff strut mooring system
- FIG. 13 is a top view of a stiff strut mooring system with hydraulic cylinders acting directly on a central torque arm;
- FIG. 14 is a side view of a stiff strut mooring system with hydraulic cylinders acting on a lever arm on the center line of a vessel, but externally mounted;
- FIG. 15 is a side view of a stiff strut mooring system with one or more hydraulic cylinders acting on a lever arm on the center line of the vessel but with the mounting reversed from that of FIG. 14;
- FIGS. 16 and 17 are side and top views of a disconnectable mooring system arranged and designed for shallow water installations where the lever arms of FIGS. 14 and 15 are connected to the tower rather than to the vessel;
- FIG. 18 is a side view of a tower-yoke mooring system with ballast weights of a pendulum system and with active and/or passive damping;
- FIG. 18A is a schematic illustration similar to that of FIG. 18 but with a winch/tension element as the mechanism for providing active force restoration;
- FIGS. 19 and 20 are schematic illustrations of a yoke mooring system with torque arms which include hydraulic torque activators for actively or passively providing restoring force;
- FIGS. 21 and 22 are respectively active and passive hydraulic activators suitable for use with the system of FIGS. 19, 20;
- FIG. 23 illustrates an elastomeric damping mechanism which can be used in place of the torque activators of FIGS. 19 and 20 to provide both spring restoring and damping resistance to angular motion;
- FIGS. 24 and 25 illustrate a brake pad damping arrangement to provide damping resistance to angular motion in place of the torque activators of FIGS. 19 and 20;
- FIGS. 26 and 27 illustrate schematically hydraulic cylinders for active or passive damping torsion arms of a tower-yoke-vessel mooring system
- FIG. 28 illustrates schematically an arrangement with an arm which couples a vessel to a tower where the turntable is located along a line which runs through an average roll axis of the vessel and where the arrangement includes a passive damping element.
- FIG. 1 is a restoring force versus displacement diagram showing restoring force as a function of displacement of a yoke from a vessel.
- the neutral or quiescent point is the position of the yoke when the vessel is at rest.
- soft yoke systems i.e. pendular yoke systems as illustrated by curve A require relatively large displacements to generate the required restoring force and absorb kinetic energy. This characteristic requires large linkages and weights which implies high cost of steel structures.
- FIG. 1 shows in Curve “B” that if a linear spring were provided, rather than a pendulum yoke system, a linear force versus displacement relationship results.
- a linear restoring spring With a linear restoring spring, the area under the “B” curve from the neutral point to the ⁇ 3 point can equal the same area under the “A” curve but at a reduced displacement.
- the size of the mooring linkages can be reduced (with a reduction of the cost of steel structures) where a linear restoring spring is used as compared to a pendulum yoke system.
- the area under each of Curves A, B, C represents work or energy.
- the energy under the pendular Curve A and the spring Curve B is stored energy and can only be dissipated through vessel motion through the water and is zero at their neutral point.
- the invention is embodied not only in tower systems or submerged arm/yoke turntable assemblies at the structure or body, but also in mooring buoys coupled to above sea surface turntables.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate vessel 20 and a tower-submerged yoke arrangement 10 which includes rocker arms 12 from which the ends of the yoke arms 14 are pivotably suspended. Pendular weights 13 may be provided on the ends of yoke arms 14 .
- Each rocker arm 12 is pivotably coupled to a vessel support member 16 .
- the top extension 17 of the rocker arm 12 rotates toward the tower 5 when the vessel 20 moves toward the tower in response to an environmental disturbance (such as wind, current or waves) and vice versa.
- the angular position of the rocker arm top extension 17 is proportional to the vessel excursion from a neutral position.
- An angular position sensing device 22 is installed on the rocker arm 12 .
- the sensing device 22 generates a signal on lead 23 which is representative of the rocker arm 12 position measured from neutral position. That signal is applied to a Proportional Integral and Derivative Controller (PID Controller 24 ) which generates a control signal on lead 25 to a pressure source and logic circuit 26 for controlling application of pressurized hydraulic fluid to a cylinder-arm arrangement 28 coupled between the rocker arm top extension 17 and the vessel 20 .
- PID Controller 24 Proportional Integral and Derivative Controller
- the arrangement includes a cylinder/piston 30 and arm 32 .
- the PID Controller 24 acts to cause the hydraulic cylinder/piston 30 to move in a direction to push the arm 32 away from the vessel 20 in order to oppose clockwise motion of the top extension 17 of the rocker arm 12 .
- FIGS. 2A and 2B is an active force restoring system where a motion opposing force is applied to the yoke arms 14 when a position away from a neutral position is sensed.
- a PID Controller 24 (or any equivalent negative feedback automatic control system) provides a feed back signal to hydraulic cylinders to force the vessel back toward a neutral position.
- the pendular weight 13 is not necessary, because motion resistance is provided by the active negative feedback automatic control system with the hydraulic mechanisms described above.
- the arrangement of FIGS. 2A and 2B is preferred in that the weights 13 on the ends of the yoke arms provide a pendulum restoring force with natural damping due to their submerged position in the water. Such natural damping is in addition to the damping force of the vessel 20 moving in the water.
- the active damping system as described above adds active return force to the system such that with properly sized hydraulic piston/cylinders 30 and rocker arm 12 lengths and arm lengths 32 , only small excursions from the neutral position are experienced in response to environmental forces on the vessel.
- the arrangement of FIGS. 2A and 2B can alternatively be configured without active control so that passive damping is achieved by using a damping piston/cylinder 24 without a PID Controller or pressure source.
- FIG. 2C presents a more detailed description of the feedback system described above.
- the mathematical model of a mooring system between a geostationary point or axis includes a mechanism between a vessel and the geostationary point which is spring like. That mechanism may include a yoke-pendulum mass arrangement or a yoke-torsion spring arrangement and the like. A damping force is also associated with the spring. Such damping is inherently in any mechanical system, such as a yoke-pendulum system. Schematically, damping is modeled as a dash pot 1 which produces a restoring force as a linear function of velocity of the floating body with respect to the stationary point P.
- the spring force of the mechanism is modeled as a spring 3 between the floating body FB and the stationary point P.
- the spring 3 produces a restoring force which is linearly proportional to the displacement of the vessel from its neutral position.
- an active system for providing restoring force in the form of an actuator 5 placed between the vessel FB and the stationary point P is provided either in substitution for the spring 3 and dash pot 1 or in combination with same.
- a position sensor 6 measures displacement x from the vessel with respect to a neutral point NP from the geostationary point P.
- the displacement signal x(t) on lead 6 ′ is compared to the neutral or desired position x n by comparator 7 to produce an error signal e(t) for application to the PID controller 24 .
- the Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller 24 generates an output control signal u(t) on lead 9 as a function of constants K p , K I , K D which respectively multiple the error signal, its integral and its derivative with respect to time.
- a time modulated hydraulic pressure p(t) is generated on lines 2 A, 2 B as a function of the control signal u(t).
- a positive hydraulic pressure is applied via lead 2 A to one end of actuator 5 and a hydraulic pressure is applied to an opposite end of actuator 5 , when u(t) is a negative value.
- Active control forces applied to the vessel FB cause it to move only small distances in the face of disturbances of wind, waves and current which tend to move the vessel toward or away from the geostationary point.
- the actuator could be an electrical/mechanical actuator such as a motor driven screw or the like.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B The arrangement of FIGS. 3A and 3B provides a tower-submerged yoke combination 10 which couples a vessel 20 to a mooring body such as a tower 5 or anchored buoy (not illustrated) or the like.
- a submerged yoke Y the yoke Y can alternatively be arranged to be entirely above the water or partially above and partially below the water.
- the yoke Y includes yoke arms 14 .
- the ends of the yoke arms 14 are coupled to the vessel 20 by means of hydraulic cylinders 47 which are coupled to foam filled neutrally buoyant 48 struts which in turn are connected to the vessel by pivots 40 .
- the yoke arms are also pivotably connected by means of pivots 42 to a turntable 44 at the tower 5 .
- the yoke Y is free to rotate about the vertical axis 46 of the tower, and a universal pivot 42 is provided so that the yoke can pivot with respect to the tower due to surge and roll motions of the vessel.
- a hydraulic cylinder 47 assembly is placed in each yoke arm 14 to provide a direct spring restoring force and damping to reduce vessel motion due to environmental forces.
- a large spring and damper mechanism 47 is placed in each of the yoke legs 14 .
- cylinder 47 preferably include springs, and damping hydraulic pressure is passively applied through orifices and check valves as described below with reference to FIG. 4, or through PID Control over metering valves.
- PID Control arrangement is similar to that described above by reference to FIG. 2A.
- vessel position is maintained by hydraulic pressure only (i.e., without the arrangement of FIG. 4), controlled by a PID Controller which controls a pressure source and metering valves.
- PID Controller which controls a pressure source and metering valves.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the hydraulic cylinder 47 that is positioned in the yoke arms 14 as illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B.
- a hydraulic cylinder 47 having an outer housing 50 which is connectable via struts 48 to the vessel 20 is provided. (See FIG. 3A.)
- a spring loaded rod 46 runs through the cylinder with a piston 54 positioned at a neutral force position within the cylinder. Vessel roll is accommodated in that the rod 46 is free to rotate within the housing 50 .
- the left chamber 56 is expanding in volume which is fed by fluid through the damping orifice 60 . If the right relief valve 59 ′ has allowed the passage of fluid to reservoir 62 , the flow from the damping orifice 60 will not be sufficient to keep the left chamber 56 full of oil. The negative pressure created by this lack of oil will be compensated by flow from the reservoir tank 62 through the left check valve 58 and left line 57 into the left chamber 56 .
- FIG. 4A shows an alternative cylinder arrangement 47 ′ with a tube within a tube construction for lateral stiffness where a structural outer tube 50 ′ provides stiffness for a structural inner tube 46 ′ which reciprocates with the outer tube.
- the damping cylinder of FIG. 4A is suitable for connection at the tower 10 end, because the sleeve shown resists lateral load.
- Sliding rings 49 resist lateral loads and moments between the cylinder housing 50 ′ and the rod 46 ′.
- the spring/damping hydraulic cylinder 47 arrangement of FIG. 4 is provided in each of the yoke arms 14 of FIGS. 3A and 3B.
- Each hydraulic cylinder 47 is coupled to the vessel 20 by means of a foam filled neutrally buoyant strut 48 to reduce side loads on the hydraulic cylinder 47 .
- the piston rod 46 of the cylinder 47 is arranged to rotate about the longitudinal axis of the cylinder 47 to allow for rolling of the vessel due to environmental forces.
- the foam filled strut 48 is mounted below the water level of the vessel at an angle to match the wave induced pitch and heave motion of the vessel bow.
- a product swivel 60 is mounted on an above-water extension of the tower.
- Hydrocarbon fluid conduits 62 run from the product swivel 46 to the vessel 20 . Because vessel displacements from the tower are not great, due to the spring/damping system of FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 4 , and because the yoke Y is mounted below water with the fluid swivel above water, the fluid conduits 62 from the fluid swivel 60 to the vessel 20 do not have to be supported by a ship support superstructure, thereby reducing structure required on the vessel and the tower.
- FIGS. 5 and 6 show another arrangement of a yoke mooring system, but with dual redundant hydraulic cylinders 70 of the kind illustrated in FIG. 2A and in FIG. 4.
- cylinder 70 may be of the kind like cylinder 28 of FIG. 2A with active damping and including a PID Controller with error signal on deflection. It also may be a passive damping control like that of FIG. 4 with a spring centered damping mechanism with hydraulic pressure relief.
- each shaft 72 penetrates the hull through a water lubricated bearing/outboard 74 and stuffing gland/inboard 76 .
- Each shaft 72 is restrained from rotating by a hydraulic cylinder 70 acting on torque arms 78 attached to the shaft 72 .
- Each shaft 72 has a shaft bearing 80 at its inner most end which primarily resists the radial load of the hydraulic cylinder and secondarily maintains the horizontal position of the shaft 72 relative to the water lubricated bearing 74 at the hull.
- each shaft 72 connects to a strut 82 connected to goosenecks 84 which are in turn connected to a turntable 86 rotatably supported about vertical shaft 88 of the tower 10 .
- Each strut is coupled to a tower turntable 86 at the lowest practical point to minimize overturning moments and reduce the cost of the piles 88 and tower base 89 .
- the turntable 86 rests on the vertical central shaft 88 which extends upwardly to act as the base for swivel 46 , above any potential wave action.
- the hydraulic cylinders 70 alternatively can be mounted external to the hull via external torque arms 78 in a compact arrangement as illustrated in FIG. 6.
- Each of the hydraulic cylinders 70 can be configured in a number of ways.
- Single or double cylinder/systems may be provided for each cylinder 70 .
- a single active, or a single passive or a mixed active and passive cylinder may be provided.
- An active system with a PID Controller with error signal generation with vessel movement may be provided like that of FIG. 2A.
- a passive system like that of FIGS. 4 or 4 A may be provided with spring centered, damped and pressure relieved features.
- FIGS. 7 and 8 The mooring arrangement of FIGS. 7 and 8 is similar to that of FIGS. 5 and 6, but the shaft 72 ′ is mounted vertically.
- the hydraulic cylinders 70 can be mounted in plane with the strut 82 and connected torque arm 85 in a single cylinder system 70 , e.g., below the water line or a double cylindrical system 70 , 71 may be provided where one or both cylinders 70 or 71 are above water line or one is above, the other below or both below. Above water line cylinder systems are easier to maintain than those that are submerged.
- the shaft 72 could be internal to the hull with a hull trunk mounted horizontal as described below for alternative 6, or the shaft could protrude through the bottom of the hull similar to that of Embodiment 3 described above, with cylinders and bearings internal as well.
- the shaft 72 ′ torque arms 85 are journaled by water lubricated bearings 73 and bearings 73 ′ which need not be water lubricated.
- the tower 10 ′ with gooseneck connection to turntable 86 and fluid swivel may be substantially the same as in FIG. 6.
- FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate an embodiment similar to that of FIGS. 5 and 6.
- This arrangement there is a single “torque tube” or horizontal shaft 100 which controls both port and starboard external torque arms 106 .
- This provides additional yaw control and provides the advantage of eliminating one if not both inboard bearings.
- the water lubricated hull penetration bearings 104 are arranged and designed to provide a level of axial restraint, and the torque arms 106 are designed to accept out of plane loading along the axes of struts 82 .
- the shaft and torque arms are of greater section modulus to resist this additional component of bending moment.
- the cylinders 170 are redundant in that one hydraulic cylinder achieves active damping as described above by reference to FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2 C or the hydraulic cylinder 170 can be an arrangement for passive damping as described above by reference to FIGS. 4 and 4A. In other words, both an active damping arrangement and a passive damping arrangement are simultaneously provided.
- a significant advantage of the arrangement of FIGS. 9 and 10, however, is that due to activation through a common torque tube 100 , hydraulic cylinder redundancy can be achieved through two rather than four cylinders.
- FIGS. 11 and 12 The arrangement of FIGS. 11 and 12 is simplified from the arrangements described above by eliminating the yoke and struts and connecting the vessel 20 to the tower 10 ′ through a single arm 150 .
- Yaw of the vessel is either free or constrained by a torsionally elastic element at the vertical shaft 160 of the hull torque arm 162 .
- the hull torque arm 162 links the vertical shaft 160 to a horizontal shaft 164 .
- the hull torque arm 162 is mounted in a hull trunk 166 .
- the torque arm 162 is connected to shaft 164 which protrudes through the sides of the trunk 166 where water lubricated bearings 168 , backed by stuffing glands 170 support the horizontal shaft 164 .
- the shaft 164 includes torque arms 172 and bearings 174 outboard of the torque arms 172 . These outboard torque arms 172 are activated by one or two hydraulic cylinders port and starboard which can be either all active, all passive or mixed active and passive.
- the cylinders 175 connected between the hull of the vessel 20 and the torque arms 172 are dual redundant hydraulic cylinders 175 with one cylinder on each side being an active damping construction as described above by reference to FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3 C, or being a passive spring centered pressure relieved damping device as described above by reference to FIGS. 4 and 4A or mixed. If the shaft 164 is sufficiently strong, redundancy can be reduced by providing one cylinder 175 on the port side and another on the starboard side of the vessel 20 for redundancy.
- the cylinders can be either passive or active or one passive and the other active.
- FIG. 13 shows a horizontal shaft 184 that supports a central torque arm 180 but hydraulic activation is through direct action of cylinder 182 on the torque arm.
- trunk mounted elastic boots 187 are connected to the rods 183 to prevent seawater leakage.
- Water lubrication bearings 187 are provided to allow rotation of shaft 184 with respect to trunk 166 .
- the cylinder 182 may provide active forcing or passive damping as described above.
- FIG. 14 All of the compact configurations described above can be installed in the vessel fore peak space forward of the collision bulkhead.
- the arrangement of FIG. 14 is externally mounted.
- the configuration is similar to that of FIG. 13, but the lever or torque arm 188 is supported on a horizontal shaft 190 supported by externally mounted cheek plates 192 .
- At least one, preferably two hydraulic cylinders 194 are pivotably coupled between the torque arm 188 and the vessel 20 .
- the cylinders may be active forcing cylinders as described above, or a passive damping cylinder as described above or mixed.
- the lever rotation shaft axis is oversized (that is, the shaft 190 has an enlarged diameter), because the strut 150 and cylinders 194 have horizontal components of force which act in the same direction. Nevertheless, the hydraulic cylinders are above water, accessible and maintainable.
- FIG. 15 modifies the arrangement of FIG. 13 by reversing the cylinder 194 and mounts to the strut 150 , thereby canceling those horizontal components but requiring cylinders with twice the stroke to allow the same vessel translation.
- FIGS. 16 and 17 reverses the connection of the lever arm and combines some elements of previous Alternatives to offer a disconnectable single point mooring system for shuttle tankers.
- a mooring point is provided which can connect through pull-in couplings 200 to shuttle tankers 20 ′ minimally modified.
- the yoke arms or struts 150 ′′ can be made light enough to float after disconnection from the vessel, Dual redundancy damping cylinders 204 are coupled between the lever or torque arms 188 and the struts 150 ′′.
- the torque arms 188 ′ are also pivotably coupled to the turntable 44 of the tower 10 ′.
- FIG. 18 is a side view of a tower based mooring system with a yoke rotatably supported on a turntable 44 of the tower 10 ′′′.
- a ballast cylinder 302 is placed below tension members 304 which are coupled indirectly to the vessel 20 via a suspension frame 300 .
- a hydraulic cylinder 310 either like that of FIG. 2A (active forcing) or like that of FIG. 4 (passive damping), or both an active cylinder and passive cylinders, is placed between each yoke arm 311 and the frame 300 or alternatively between frame members and each of the tension members 304 .
- the alternative locations of the hydraulic cylinder 310 may include two cylinders 315 placed, for example between a central frame member 313 and side tension members 304 to provide damping to motion in a side direction to the yoke.
- the location of damping devices, such as hydraulic cylinders can be placed anywhere to damp the motion of the vessel relative to the tower. Both passive damping and active forcing cylinders may be provided for redundancy.
- FIG. 18A shows an alternative arrangement for active forcing control of the mooring systems of FIG. 18.
- a flexible tension member 375 is secured between the yoke arms 311 , for example at ballast members 302 , and a powered winch 380 .
- Uni-direction position active control is illustrated in FIG. 18A.
- Bi-directional control is activated by placing a second winch on the vessel 20 and connecting a cable or wire rope to the ballast member 302 after passing through a turning block connected to the end of a spar to create a force tending to separate the vessel from the tower.
- the winch 380 or winches are responsive to sensors of a PID controller as illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2C to produce a control force on the vessel as a function of displacement as illustrated by curve C of FIG. 1.
- FIGS. 19 and 20 are top and side views of a mooring system 500 where yoke arms 502 are coupled to a turntable 504 rotatably supported on a central shaft of a tower, pier, spar, SPM FPSO or spread moored FPSO, all schematically represented by the block 510 .
- a hydraulic torque actuator is pivotably coupled to each of the yoke arms 502 and a torsion spring element 514 disposed on the vessel 20 .
- the torsion spring element 514 acts in series with the hydraulic actuator 512 or in parallel with it to reduce the back and forth motion x of the vessel 20 with respect to the central shaft 511 .
- FIG. 21 shows a top view of a hydraulic torque actuator 512 A for active control.
- a cylinder 513 is divided into one or more chambers with internal fins 516 in each of the chambers connected alternatingly to outside cylinder 513 and inside cylinder 513 A to form oil tight chambers.
- Control valve 515 pilot controlled by a PID controller which senses angular deflection about axis 518 , causes actuator 512 A actively to oppose displacement x of the vessel 20 from its quiescent state, by admitting pressurized oil into alternating chambers to generate torque between cylinder 513 A connected to the hull and cylinder 513 connected to torque arm.
- the PID controller can pressure modulate the pump 515 to achieve displacement opposition.
- FIG. 22 A similar arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 22 where a passive control arrangement provides damping of the angular motion of hydraulic torque actuator 512 B about shaft 518 to be used with a restoring force device such as torsion springs and/or pendular weights.
- a passive control arrangement provides damping of the angular motion of hydraulic torque actuator 512 B about shaft 518 to be used with a restoring force device such as torsion springs and/or pendular weights.
- a restoring force device such as torsion springs and/or pendular weights.
- FIG. 23 illustrates a cylindrical module having inner and outer annular walls 519 , 520 and internal fins 522 which separate the annular space between walls 519 , 520 into a segment filled with elastomeric material 523 .
- fins 522 are alternatingly connected to walls 519 or 520 .
- Inner wall 519 is arranged and designed to be coupled to vessel 20 ;
- outer wall 520 is designed and arranged to be coupled to arm or actuator 512 .
- Voids 524 in each segment 523 allow the elastomeric material to compress between corresponding alternating connected fins 522 as the outer wall 520 tends to rotate about the inner wall 519 .
- FIGS. 24 and 25 Another example of a torsion damping element 530 is illustrated in FIGS. 24 and 25 in a top cross section view to be used with a restoring force device such as torsion springs and/or pendular weights.
- the torsion damping element 530 of FIGS. 24, 25 includes inner and outer cylindrical walls 532 , 534 which are arranged and designed to accept brake disks 535 as shown in FIG. 25.
- brake pressure ring 536 When hydraulic pressure is applied to brake pressure ring 536 , the disks, which are alternatingly connected to walls 534 are forced into sliding contact with one another resulting in friction which retards relative motion between the outer wall 534 and inner wall 532 .
- FIGS. 26 and 27 schematically illustrate in top and side views a mooring arrangement similar to that of FIGS. 19 and 20, but with hydraulic cylinders 546 positioned between the vessel 20 and torque arms 512 A.
- a sensor 547 is provided for measurement of the angle of the torque arms from the quiescent position of the vessel.
- the hydraulic cylinders are provided with PID controls and circuitry to actively force or passively dampen the motion of the vessel 20 .
- Predictive circuits responsive to sea condition sensors are provided to predict the force of wind, waves, and current on the vessel 20 to actively apply forces, via the cylinder 546 , to oppose such forces.
- FIG. 28 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the invention with a tower 1000 having a turntable 1005 rotatably supported on the tower by water lubricated bearings for example.
- a first arm 1010 is pivotably connected at 1011 to turntable 1005 at a height which is located at or about the average projection 1015 of the vessel longitudinal roll axis at its intersection with the vertical axis of the tower.
- a second arm 1020 is pivotably connected to the first arm 1010 at pivot 1021 .
- a torsion spring mechanism can be provided at coupling 1021 as appropriate.
- a spring damper mechanism 1025 e.g., like one of the torsion spring mechanisms described above, is supported by a vessel bracket 1030 and is rotatably coupled with two degrees of rotation to second arm 1020 at pivot 1031 .
- FIG. 28 effectively removes the roll component of the vessel 2000 on the mooring arms 1010 , 1020 because of the placement of the connection 1011 of the arm 1010 to turntable 1005 along the average projection of the vessel longitudinal axis 1015 at the tower 1000 .
- the arrangement of FIG. 28 produces a similar restoring force as that of FIG. 18, without using a pendular weight as restoring element.
- the damping mechanism 1025 may be advantageous in resisting yaw forces.
- Active and passive damping components are described for vessel mooring systems and disposed in various configurations for tower-arm/yoke-vessel systems. Such damping components may also be useful in certain CALM systems which have high momentum energy and could benefit, like the arrangements discussed above, from active forcing systems or passive damping systems which exert restoring forces which are independent of vessel position.
- damping components such as brake shoes on linearly sliding structures (damping force only), brake shoes on rotating disks or drums (damping force only), cables on winches or drums (restoring force and/or damping force) and elastomeric elements with restoring force and/or damping force can be substituted for hydraulic cylinder components.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
- Revetment (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This Non-Provisional Application claims priority from
Provisional Application 60/175,150 filed on Jan. 7, 2000. - 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates generally to the field of mooring arrangements for vessels, particularly offshore vessels such as Floating Production and Offloading Vessels (FPSOs) or Floating Storage and Offloading vessels (FSOs) used in offshore hydrocarbon production. Still more particularly, the invention concerns active and passive damping arrangements for yoke/spring systems and yoke/pendulum systems which are spring-like to restore a vessel toward an equilibrium position with respect to a generally stationary body such as a tower or an anchored buoy.
- 2. Description of the Prior Art
- There are numerous examples of yoke arrangements that couple a vessel to a body such as a tower or an anchored buoy or other generally stationary body. U.S. Pat. No. 4,290,158 shows a mooring yoke for a vessel which is coupled for rotation with a turntable on the top of the buoy. U.S. Pat. No. 4,309,955 shows a mooring yoke having two outer ends pivotably coupled to a vessel and having a counter weight on the yoke ends positioned outwardly beyond the coupling point of the vessel. U.S. Pat. No. 4,396,046 illustrates a yoke coupled between a mooring buoy and a vessel, where the yoke provides a base for a fluid conduit between a swivel on the buoy and fluid conduits on the vessel. U.S. Pat. No. 4,516,942 illustrates a yoke placed between a tower and a vessel, where ends of the two outer arms of the yoke are connected to the vessel by cables. Weights are positioned in the outer ends of the yoke arms, such that the yoke acts much like an undamped spring or a pendulum between the vessel and the tower. Dutch Patent 8602806 shows disconnectable yoke arms suspended from a tower. U.S. Pat. No. 4,530,302 shows a subsea yoke having its outer arms suspended by cables from the vessel. An enhanced pendulum effect is achieved by weight in the outer arms. The movement of the cables in the water increases damping of the spring effect of the weighted yoke arms. U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,856 shows a yoke coupled between a vessel and a tower. Weights are suspended from yoke arms near the tower. U.S. Pat. No. 4,694,771 also shows a yoke coupled between a vessel and a tower. Pendulum weights are provided on the yoke arms at their coupling to the tower. U.S. Pat. No. 4,568,295 shows a yoke positioned between an anchored buoy and a vessel, with the outer ends of the yoke arms suspended from the vessel and with a weight positioned on the yoke so that a pendulum arrangement is provided which acts like an undamped spring between the buoy and the vessel. U.S. Pat. No. 4,784,079 shows a tower-supported yoke suspended from a frame of a vessel with a pendulum weight provided at the end of the yoke arms. U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,038 shows a tower supported submerged yoke with quick-action couplings for disconnection. A weight at the end of the yoke suspended from cables or rods from the vessel causes the yoke to act like a pendulum or undamped spring, but the water acting on the suspension members and yoke damps the spring-like system more than if the yoke were entirely above water. U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,797 show other submerged yoke mooring systems.
- The prior art described above provides mooring systems for vessel position control by relying on the deflection of a mechanical system to generate a spring-like restoring force, especially for tower/yoke systems. The damping of the tower-yoke-vessel systems arises primarily through friction of the vessel as it moves through the water in an oscillatory manner when environmental forces cause the vessel to move against its yoke.
- Other mooring systems of course exist and all mooring systems can be generally categorized according to the type of restoring force produced as SALM or TLP systems, CALM systems or tower/yoke systems. In a SALM or TLP arrangement, the angular deflection of mooring legs result in inward mooring leg tension and an included angle to create a restoring force. In a CALM system, deflection of mooring legs increases mooring tension to produce a restoring force. In a tower/yoke system, deflection of pendular or spring systems results in a restoring force.
- All three of the mooring categories described above have the following characteristics:
- (1) The spring-like restoring forces are reactive and for that reason are not applied to the vessel until the vessel motion passes through the neutral or quiescent point;
- (2) The damping force in the system is a small percentage of the spring-like restoring force; and
- (3) As a consequence, momentum load on the mooring system is often a significant component of peak restoring loads, especially in body-yoke-vessel systems such as tower/yoke mooring systems.
- In all of the stationary body-yoke-vessel arrangements described above, a mathematical model of a spring positioned between a stationary body and a movable body is appropriate with a small damping element placed in series with the spring. The stationary body is modeled as a fixed point. The mass of the movable body, i.e., the vessel, is very large. The momentum of the vessel causes it to move through the neutral point of the yoke and to move to the other side of it due to the system's inherent lack of energy dissipation, and because the counter restoring force of the system cannot be generated until the vessel passes through the neutral or quiescent point to the other side. The natural damping force of the vessel moving through the water is not enough to prevent oscillatory motion of the vessel.
- In other words, if a vessel is disturbed by wind, waves and current to a position away from its mooring neutral position, it obtains a potential energy with respect to the mooring devices which support it from a stationary point. The vessel is returned toward its neutral point with its potential energy converted into kinetic energy with the speed of the vessel increasing at the neutral point. This kinetic energy, if there is little or no damping in the mooring system, must be absorbed or converted into potential energy on the opposite side of the neutral point which requires greater vessel excursion or displacement from the neutral point than would be necessary in a mooring system with greater damping.
- A primary object of the invention is to provide an active “forcing system” or active damping system by which excursions of a vessel past a neutral point of a yoke of a stationary body-yoke-vessel system are opposed by an active controlled restoring force. By applying such controlled force, displacement amplitudes of the vessel can be reduced or even eliminated, with the result that the overall size, weight and cost of the mooring system can be reduced.
- Another object of the invention is to provide a passive damping system by which vessel oscillations past the neutral point are rapidly damped with the result that extreme displacement amplitudes of the vessel, that is amplitudes of the oscillation, are significantly reduced or even critically damped, with the result that a smaller system can be provided with reductions in size, weight and cost.
- Another object of the invention is to provide a tower-yoke-vessel arrangement in which maximum displacement amplitudes of the vessel are small enough so that a product flow line from the tower to the vessel needs no supporting frame such as the yoke itself, but rather can be run from the top of the tower to the vessel.
- Another object of the invention is to provide an arrangement by which forces are produced to control the motion of the vessel substantially independently of its displacement position magnitude from the mooring quiescent point.
- Another object of the invention is to provide damping in a body-arm-vessel system through the use of pressure control devices coupled between the body and the arm or between the arm and the vessel.
- The objects identified above, as well as other features and advantages are realized in several alternative embodiments of the invention described herein. An active damping system is provided in several embodiments where a signal is produced which is proportional to the displacement of the vessel from a neutral position of a body-yoke-vessel system. The signal controls the direction and magnitude of force of a cylinder linked to the yoke for applying a force to it in a direction opposite to that of its present motion.
- A passive damping system is provided in other embodiments by which a damping hydraulic cylinder is applied in the yoke arms or arm so as to provide automatic passive damping force to a yoke with its ends connected directly to the vessel.
- The invention includes arrangements with redundant cylinders by which both active and passive damping can be provided for a mooring arrangement. Components other than hydraulic cylinders can be used to achieve active and passive damping. Possible alternatives include brake shoes on linearly sliding structures or on rotating disks or drums all of which provide a damping force only. Cables from winches or drums are used in an active restoring force arrangement and/or a damping force. Electrical linear activators provide a restoring force and/or damping force. Elastomeric elements provide restoring and damping characteristics.
- One embodiment of the invention includes a tower with a submerged yoke coupled to the tower and to the vessel. The tower includes a top section with a fluid swivel mounted on its top. Fluid conduits extend to the vessel from the tower-mounted swivel without the benefit of support from the submerged yoke.
- FIG. 1 is a restoring force vs. displacement graph which illustrates the alternative arm/yoke mooring systems of the invention including a pendulum soft yoke system, a passive stiff spring system and an active system using a feedback control system and force producing cylinder or other mechanism to restore a vessel toward its mooring neutral point;
- FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate in side and top views a yoke mooring system including a feedback control system to actively force the vessel back to its neutral point;
- FIG. 2C is a more detailed schematic diagram of a PID feedback control system for actively forcing the vessel back to its neutral point;
- FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate in side and top views a spring-damping system installed in the arms of a yoke between a tower and a vessel;
- FIG. 4 illustrates the hydraulic cylinder of FIGS. 3A, 3B and which includes a piston-rod arrangement including a spring for forcing the piston toward a neutral position and a hydraulic damping arrangement to minimize mooring system oscillations;
- FIG. 4A illustrates an alternative construction of the damping cylinder of FIG. 4;
- FIGS. 5 and 6 are top and side views of a horizontal shaft axis stiff yoke mooring arrangement with a hydraulic cylinder and active damping system similar to that of FIG. 2A and a redundant hydraulic cylinder and passive damping system similar to that of FIG. 4;
- FIGS. 7 and 8 are top and side views of a vertical axis stiff yoke mooring arrangement with dual redundant hydraulic cylinders;
- FIGS. 9 and 10 are top and side views of a torque tube yoke mooring system;
- FIGS. 11 and 12 are top and side views of a stiff strut mooring system;
- FIG. 13 is a top view of a stiff strut mooring system with hydraulic cylinders acting directly on a central torque arm;
- FIG. 14 is a side view of a stiff strut mooring system with hydraulic cylinders acting on a lever arm on the center line of a vessel, but externally mounted;
- FIG. 15 is a side view of a stiff strut mooring system with one or more hydraulic cylinders acting on a lever arm on the center line of the vessel but with the mounting reversed from that of FIG. 14;
- FIGS. 16 and 17 are side and top views of a disconnectable mooring system arranged and designed for shallow water installations where the lever arms of FIGS. 14 and 15 are connected to the tower rather than to the vessel;
- FIG. 18 is a side view of a tower-yoke mooring system with ballast weights of a pendulum system and with active and/or passive damping;
- FIG. 18A is a schematic illustration similar to that of FIG. 18 but with a winch/tension element as the mechanism for providing active force restoration;
- FIGS. 19 and 20 are schematic illustrations of a yoke mooring system with torque arms which include hydraulic torque activators for actively or passively providing restoring force;
- FIGS. 21 and 22 are respectively active and passive hydraulic activators suitable for use with the system of FIGS. 19, 20;
- FIG. 23 illustrates an elastomeric damping mechanism which can be used in place of the torque activators of FIGS. 19 and 20 to provide both spring restoring and damping resistance to angular motion;
- FIGS. 24 and 25 illustrate a brake pad damping arrangement to provide damping resistance to angular motion in place of the torque activators of FIGS. 19 and 20;
- FIGS. 26 and 27 illustrate schematically hydraulic cylinders for active or passive damping torsion arms of a tower-yoke-vessel mooring system; and
- FIG. 28 illustrates schematically an arrangement with an arm which couples a vessel to a tower where the turntable is located along a line which runs through an average roll axis of the vessel and where the arrangement includes a passive damping element.
- Soft yoke mooring systems rely on restoring forces generated by linkages connected to pendular weights. As a result, the restoring force is sinusoidal with displacement as shown in curve “A” of FIG. 1. FIG. 1 is a restoring force versus displacement diagram showing restoring force as a function of displacement of a yoke from a vessel. The neutral or quiescent point is the position of the yoke when the vessel is at rest. Because the restoring force for displacements about the neutral point is so low (essentially zero), soft yoke systems i.e. pendular yoke systems as illustrated by curve A require relatively large displacements to generate the required restoring force and absorb kinetic energy. This characteristic requires large linkages and weights which implies high cost of steel structures. Because there is little damping, peak compression loads toward the tower of a magnitude of 5/9 of peak tension loads away from the tower are seen. For example, the compression restoring force, for a negative displacement of −Δ4 at F4′ is approximately 5/9 as large as F4 for tension restoring forces for a +Δ4 displacement. The area under Curve “A” (pendular system) between the neutral point and the restoring force point F4 of maximum displacement Δ4 represents the work or energy stored in the restoring system.
- FIG. 1 shows in Curve “B” that if a linear spring were provided, rather than a pendulum yoke system, a linear force versus displacement relationship results. With a linear restoring spring, the area under the “B” curve from the neutral point to the Δ3 point can equal the same area under the “A” curve but at a reduced displacement. As a result, the size of the mooring linkages can be reduced (with a reduction of the cost of steel structures) where a linear restoring spring is used as compared to a pendulum yoke system.
- As mentioned above, the area under each of Curves A, B, C represents work or energy. The energy under the pendular Curve A and the spring Curve B is stored energy and can only be dissipated through vessel motion through the water and is zero at their neutral point.
- Further improvement is obtained with an active system, illustrated by Curve “C”, where a constant magnitude restoring force is applied to the linkage system. Restoring force is a constant magnitude as a function of displacement. The area under the curve C represents dissipated energy which is applied to retard vessel motion at any position along the displacement curve including at the neutral point. Alternative restoring force curves, other than a constant curve C, may result from an optimum active feedback force system. Even shorter displacements are required of the yoke arms and linkages with an even further reduction of the cost of steel structures. Alternative embodiments, based on the concepts of FIG. 1 of using a PID controller for a constant (or non-constant) restoring force, and using a spring/damping system for a variable restoring force are presented below.
- The invention is embodied not only in tower systems or submerged arm/yoke turntable assemblies at the structure or body, but also in mooring buoys coupled to above sea surface turntables.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate
vessel 20 and a tower-submergedyoke arrangement 10 which includesrocker arms 12 from which the ends of theyoke arms 14 are pivotably suspended.Pendular weights 13 may be provided on the ends ofyoke arms 14. Eachrocker arm 12 is pivotably coupled to avessel support member 16. Thetop extension 17 of therocker arm 12 rotates toward thetower 5 when thevessel 20 moves toward the tower in response to an environmental disturbance (such as wind, current or waves) and vice versa. The angular position of the rocker armtop extension 17 is proportional to the vessel excursion from a neutral position. An angularposition sensing device 22 is installed on therocker arm 12. Thesensing device 22 generates a signal onlead 23 which is representative of therocker arm 12 position measured from neutral position. That signal is applied to a Proportional Integral and Derivative Controller (PID Controller 24) which generates a control signal onlead 25 to a pressure source andlogic circuit 26 for controlling application of pressurized hydraulic fluid to a cylinder-arm arrangement 28 coupled between the rocker armtop extension 17 and thevessel 20. The arrangement includes a cylinder/piston 30 andarm 32. When the rocker armtop extension 17 pivots toward the tower 51, the hydraulic piston/cylinder 30 is forced in a direction to pull thearm 32 toward thevessel 20 in order to oppose counter-clockwise motion of thetop extension 17 of therocker arm 12. When therocker arm extension 17 pivots toward thevessel 20, thePID Controller 24 acts to cause the hydraulic cylinder/piston 30 to move in a direction to push thearm 32 away from thevessel 20 in order to oppose clockwise motion of thetop extension 17 of therocker arm 12. - In general terms, the arrangement of FIGS. 2A and 2B is an active force restoring system where a motion opposing force is applied to the
yoke arms 14 when a position away from a neutral position is sensed. A PID Controller 24 (or any equivalent negative feedback automatic control system) provides a feed back signal to hydraulic cylinders to force the vessel back toward a neutral position. - In theory, the
pendular weight 13 is not necessary, because motion resistance is provided by the active negative feedback automatic control system with the hydraulic mechanisms described above. However, the arrangement of FIGS. 2A and 2B is preferred in that theweights 13 on the ends of the yoke arms provide a pendulum restoring force with natural damping due to their submerged position in the water. Such natural damping is in addition to the damping force of thevessel 20 moving in the water. The active damping system as described above adds active return force to the system such that with properly sized hydraulic piston/cylinders 30 androcker arm 12 lengths andarm lengths 32, only small excursions from the neutral position are experienced in response to environmental forces on the vessel. The arrangement of FIGS. 2A and 2B can alternatively be configured without active control so that passive damping is achieved by using a damping piston/cylinder 24 without a PID Controller or pressure source. - FIG. 2C presents a more detailed description of the feedback system described above. The mathematical model of a mooring system between a geostationary point or axis (such as a tower, or a CALM, etc.) includes a mechanism between a vessel and the geostationary point which is spring like. That mechanism may include a yoke-pendulum mass arrangement or a yoke-torsion spring arrangement and the like. A damping force is also associated with the spring. Such damping is inherently in any mechanical system, such as a yoke-pendulum system. Schematically, damping is modeled as a
dash pot 1 which produces a restoring force as a linear function of velocity of the floating body with respect to the stationary point P. The spring force of the mechanism is modeled as aspring 3 between the floating body FB and the stationary point P. Thespring 3 produces a restoring force which is linearly proportional to the displacement of the vessel from its neutral position. According to the invention, an active system for providing restoring force in the form of anactuator 5, placed between the vessel FB and the stationary point P is provided either in substitution for thespring 3 and dashpot 1 or in combination with same. Aposition sensor 6 measures displacement x from the vessel with respect to a neutral point NP from the geostationary point P. The displacement signal x(t) onlead 6′ is compared to the neutral or desired position xn by comparator 7 to produce an error signal e(t) for application to thePID controller 24. The Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID)controller 24 generates an output control signal u(t) onlead 9 as a function of constants Kp, KI, KD which respectively multiple the error signal, its integral and its derivative with respect to time. A time modulated hydraulic pressure p(t) is generated onlines lead 2A to one end ofactuator 5 and a hydraulic pressure is applied to an opposite end ofactuator 5, when u(t) is a negative value. Active control forces applied to the vessel FB cause it to move only small distances in the face of disturbances of wind, waves and current which tend to move the vessel toward or away from the geostationary point. - Alternatively, a system in which a measurement m′ of wind, wave and current forces produces a control function u′ as indicated by the dashed lines of FIG. 2C, which could preposition the vessel in anticipation of the arrival of the forces generated thereby.
- Alternatively, the actuator could be an electrical/mechanical actuator such as a motor driven screw or the like.
- The arrangement of FIGS. 3A and 3B provides a tower-submerged
yoke combination 10 which couples avessel 20 to a mooring body such as atower 5 or anchored buoy (not illustrated) or the like. Although the embodiment of the invention calls for a submerged yoke Y, the yoke Y can alternatively be arranged to be entirely above the water or partially above and partially below the water. The yoke Y includesyoke arms 14. In the arrangement of FIGS. 3A and 3B, the ends of theyoke arms 14 are coupled to thevessel 20 by means ofhydraulic cylinders 47 which are coupled to foam filled neutrally buoyant 48 struts which in turn are connected to the vessel by pivots 40. The yoke arms are also pivotably connected by means ofpivots 42 to aturntable 44 at thetower 5. In other words, the yoke Y is free to rotate about thevertical axis 46 of the tower, and auniversal pivot 42 is provided so that the yoke can pivot with respect to the tower due to surge and roll motions of the vessel. Ahydraulic cylinder 47 assembly is placed in eachyoke arm 14 to provide a direct spring restoring force and damping to reduce vessel motion due to environmental forces. In other words, a large spring anddamper mechanism 47 is placed in each of theyoke legs 14. In the arrangement of FIGS. 3A and 3B,cylinder 47 preferably include springs, and damping hydraulic pressure is passively applied through orifices and check valves as described below with reference to FIG. 4, or through PID Control over metering valves. Such a PID Control arrangement is similar to that described above by reference to FIG. 2A. Alternatively, vessel position is maintained by hydraulic pressure only (i.e., without the arrangement of FIG. 4), controlled by a PID Controller which controls a pressure source and metering valves. Again, such a PID Control arrangement is similar to that described above by reference to FIG. 2A. - FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the
hydraulic cylinder 47 that is positioned in theyoke arms 14 as illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B. Ahydraulic cylinder 47 having anouter housing 50 which is connectable viastruts 48 to thevessel 20 is provided. (See FIG. 3A.) A spring loadedrod 46 runs through the cylinder with apiston 54 positioned at a neutral force position within the cylinder. Vessel roll is accommodated in that therod 46 is free to rotate within thehousing 50. - If the
vessel 20 pulls away from theturntable 44, the fluid in the right chamber 64 is forced out through theright line 57. As the check valve 66 on the right side of the cylinder is closed to flow from the right, fluid is forced through the dampingorifice 60 which results in a back pressure in the right chamber 64 resisting motion and absorbing kinetic energy. If the rate of motion is high, pressure in the right chamber 64 may exceed a pre-set limit and theright relief valve 59′ will allow additional fluid to flow to the reservoir. - At the same time, the
left chamber 56 is expanding in volume which is fed by fluid through the dampingorifice 60. If theright relief valve 59′ has allowed the passage of fluid toreservoir 62, the flow from the dampingorifice 60 will not be sufficient to keep theleft chamber 56 full of oil. The negative pressure created by this lack of oil will be compensated by flow from thereservoir tank 62 through theleft check valve 58 and leftline 57 into theleft chamber 56. - Once the cylinder reaches its maximum extension, this cycle reverses, resulting in a retardation of motion of the vessel toward the turntable.
- The schematic drawing of FIG. 4A shows an
alternative cylinder arrangement 47′ with a tube within a tube construction for lateral stiffness where a structuralouter tube 50′ provides stiffness for a structuralinner tube 46′ which reciprocates with the outer tube. The damping cylinder of FIG. 4A is suitable for connection at thetower 10 end, because the sleeve shown resists lateral load. Sliding rings 49 resist lateral loads and moments between thecylinder housing 50′ and therod 46′. - The spring/damping
hydraulic cylinder 47 arrangement of FIG. 4 is provided in each of theyoke arms 14 of FIGS. 3A and 3B. Eachhydraulic cylinder 47 is coupled to thevessel 20 by means of a foam filled neutrallybuoyant strut 48 to reduce side loads on thehydraulic cylinder 47. Thepiston rod 46 of thecylinder 47 is arranged to rotate about the longitudinal axis of thecylinder 47 to allow for rolling of the vessel due to environmental forces. - The foam filled
strut 48 is mounted below the water level of the vessel at an angle to match the wave induced pitch and heave motion of the vessel bow. - It is preferred to mount the yoke Y below water level in order to minimize overturning loads on the tower. Advantageously, a
product swivel 60 is mounted on an above-water extension of the tower.Hydrocarbon fluid conduits 62 run from theproduct swivel 46 to thevessel 20. Because vessel displacements from the tower are not great, due to the spring/damping system of FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 4, and because the yoke Y is mounted below water with the fluid swivel above water, thefluid conduits 62 from thefluid swivel 60 to thevessel 20 do not have to be supported by a ship support superstructure, thereby reducing structure required on the vessel and the tower. - FIGS. 5 and 6 show another arrangement of a yoke mooring system, but with dual redundant
hydraulic cylinders 70 of the kind illustrated in FIG. 2A and in FIG. 4. In other words,cylinder 70 may be of the kind likecylinder 28 of FIG. 2A with active damping and including a PID Controller with error signal on deflection. It also may be a passive damping control like that of FIG. 4 with a spring centered damping mechanism with hydraulic pressure relief. - In the FIG. 5 arrangement, two
horizontal shafts 72 are installed within the hull ofvessel 20. Eachshaft 72 penetrates the hull through a water lubricated bearing/outboard 74 and stuffing gland/inboard 76. Eachshaft 72 is restrained from rotating by ahydraulic cylinder 70 acting ontorque arms 78 attached to theshaft 72. Eachshaft 72 has a shaft bearing 80 at its inner most end which primarily resists the radial load of the hydraulic cylinder and secondarily maintains the horizontal position of theshaft 72 relative to the water lubricatedbearing 74 at the hull. At the extreme outboard end of eachshaft 72, theexterior torque arm 75 connects to astrut 82 connected to goosenecks 84 which are in turn connected to aturntable 86 rotatably supported aboutvertical shaft 88 of thetower 10. Each strut is coupled to atower turntable 86 at the lowest practical point to minimize overturning moments and reduce the cost of thepiles 88 andtower base 89. Theturntable 86 rests on the verticalcentral shaft 88 which extends upwardly to act as the base forswivel 46, above any potential wave action. Thehydraulic cylinders 70 alternatively can be mounted external to the hull viaexternal torque arms 78 in a compact arrangement as illustrated in FIG. 6. - Each of the
hydraulic cylinders 70 can be configured in a number of ways. Single or double cylinder/systems may be provided for eachcylinder 70. For example, a single active, or a single passive or a mixed active and passive cylinder may be provided. An active system with a PID Controller with error signal generation with vessel movement may be provided like that of FIG. 2A. A passive system like that of FIGS. 4 or 4A may be provided with spring centered, damped and pressure relieved features. - The mooring arrangement of FIGS. 7 and 8 is similar to that of FIGS. 5 and 6, but the
shaft 72′ is mounted vertically. Thehydraulic cylinders 70 can be mounted in plane with thestrut 82 and connectedtorque arm 85 in asingle cylinder system 70, e.g., below the water line or a doublecylindrical system cylinders - The
shaft 72 could be internal to the hull with a hull trunk mounted horizontal as described below foralternative 6, or the shaft could protrude through the bottom of the hull similar to that ofEmbodiment 3 described above, with cylinders and bearings internal as well. - In FIG. 8 the
shaft 72′torque arms 85 are journaled by water lubricatedbearings 73 andbearings 73′ which need not be water lubricated. Thetower 10′ with gooseneck connection toturntable 86 and fluid swivel may be substantially the same as in FIG. 6. - FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate an embodiment similar to that of FIGS. 5 and 6. With this arrangement there is a single “torque tube” or
horizontal shaft 100 which controls both port and starboardexternal torque arms 106. This provides additional yaw control and provides the advantage of eliminating one if not both inboard bearings. The water lubricatedhull penetration bearings 104 are arranged and designed to provide a level of axial restraint, and thetorque arms 106 are designed to accept out of plane loading along the axes ofstruts 82. The shaft and torque arms are of greater section modulus to resist this additional component of bending moment. - The
cylinders 170 are redundant in that one hydraulic cylinder achieves active damping as described above by reference to FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C or thehydraulic cylinder 170 can be an arrangement for passive damping as described above by reference to FIGS. 4 and 4A. In other words, both an active damping arrangement and a passive damping arrangement are simultaneously provided. - A significant advantage of the arrangement of FIGS. 9 and 10, however, is that due to activation through a
common torque tube 100, hydraulic cylinder redundancy can be achieved through two rather than four cylinders. - The arrangement of FIGS. 11 and 12 is simplified from the arrangements described above by eliminating the yoke and struts and connecting the
vessel 20 to thetower 10′ through asingle arm 150. Yaw of the vessel is either free or constrained by a torsionally elastic element at thevertical shaft 160 of thehull torque arm 162. Thehull torque arm 162 links thevertical shaft 160 to ahorizontal shaft 164. Thehull torque arm 162 is mounted in ahull trunk 166. Thetorque arm 162 is connected toshaft 164 which protrudes through the sides of thetrunk 166 where water lubricatedbearings 168, backed by stuffingglands 170 support thehorizontal shaft 164. Theshaft 164 includestorque arms 172 andbearings 174 outboard of thetorque arms 172. Theseoutboard torque arms 172 are activated by one or two hydraulic cylinders port and starboard which can be either all active, all passive or mixed active and passive. - The
cylinders 175, connected between the hull of thevessel 20 and thetorque arms 172 are dual redundanthydraulic cylinders 175 with one cylinder on each side being an active damping construction as described above by reference to FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, or being a passive spring centered pressure relieved damping device as described above by reference to FIGS. 4 and 4A or mixed. If theshaft 164 is sufficiently strong, redundancy can be reduced by providing onecylinder 175 on the port side and another on the starboard side of thevessel 20 for redundancy. The cylinders can be either passive or active or one passive and the other active. - Like the arrangement of FIGS. 11 and 12 of
Alternative 6, FIG. 13 shows ahorizontal shaft 184 that supports acentral torque arm 180 but hydraulic activation is through direct action ofcylinder 182 on the torque arm. To facilitate the vertical displacement due to angular rotation and axial displacement of thecylinder rods 183, trunk mountedelastic boots 187 are connected to therods 183 to prevent seawater leakage.Water lubrication bearings 187 are provided to allow rotation ofshaft 184 with respect totrunk 166. Thecylinder 182 may provide active forcing or passive damping as described above. - All of the compact configurations described above can be installed in the vessel fore peak space forward of the collision bulkhead. Alternatively, the arrangement of FIG. 14 is externally mounted. The configuration is similar to that of FIG. 13, but the lever or
torque arm 188 is supported on ahorizontal shaft 190 supported by externally mountedcheek plates 192. At least one, preferably twohydraulic cylinders 194 are pivotably coupled between thetorque arm 188 and thevessel 20. As before, the cylinders may be active forcing cylinders as described above, or a passive damping cylinder as described above or mixed. The lever rotation shaft axis is oversized (that is, theshaft 190 has an enlarged diameter), because thestrut 150 andcylinders 194 have horizontal components of force which act in the same direction. Nevertheless, the hydraulic cylinders are above water, accessible and maintainable. - The arrangement of FIG. 15 modifies the arrangement of FIG. 13 by reversing the
cylinder 194 and mounts to thestrut 150, thereby canceling those horizontal components but requiring cylinders with twice the stroke to allow the same vessel translation. - The arrangement of FIGS. 16 and 17 reverses the connection of the lever arm and combines some elements of previous Alternatives to offer a disconnectable single point mooring system for shuttle tankers. By providing a floating
strut 150″ and the majority of the control equipment at thetower 10′, a mooring point is provided which can connect through pull-incouplings 200 toshuttle tankers 20′ minimally modified. Because the system of FIGS. 16 and 17 does not rely on pendular weight for restoring forces, the yoke arms or struts 150″ can be made light enough to float after disconnection from the vessel, Dualredundancy damping cylinders 204 are coupled between the lever ortorque arms 188 and thestruts 150″. Thetorque arms 188′ are also pivotably coupled to theturntable 44 of thetower 10′. - FIG. 18 is a side view of a tower based mooring system with a yoke rotatably supported on a
turntable 44 of thetower 10′″. Aballast cylinder 302 is placed belowtension members 304 which are coupled indirectly to thevessel 20 via asuspension frame 300. Ahydraulic cylinder 310 either like that of FIG. 2A (active forcing) or like that of FIG. 4 (passive damping), or both an active cylinder and passive cylinders, is placed between eachyoke arm 311 and theframe 300 or alternatively between frame members and each of thetension members 304. The alternative locations of thehydraulic cylinder 310 may include twocylinders 315 placed, for example between acentral frame member 313 andside tension members 304 to provide damping to motion in a side direction to the yoke. The location of damping devices, such as hydraulic cylinders can be placed anywhere to damp the motion of the vessel relative to the tower. Both passive damping and active forcing cylinders may be provided for redundancy. - FIG. 18A shows an alternative arrangement for active forcing control of the mooring systems of FIG. 18. A flexible tension member375 is secured between the
yoke arms 311, for example atballast members 302, and apowered winch 380. Uni-direction position active control is illustrated in FIG. 18A. Bi-directional control is activated by placing a second winch on thevessel 20 and connecting a cable or wire rope to theballast member 302 after passing through a turning block connected to the end of a spar to create a force tending to separate the vessel from the tower. Thewinch 380 or winches are responsive to sensors of a PID controller as illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2C to produce a control force on the vessel as a function of displacement as illustrated by curve C of FIG. 1. - FIGS. 19 and 20 are top and side views of a
mooring system 500 whereyoke arms 502 are coupled to aturntable 504 rotatably supported on a central shaft of a tower, pier, spar, SPM FPSO or spread moored FPSO, all schematically represented by theblock 510. A hydraulic torque actuator is pivotably coupled to each of theyoke arms 502 and atorsion spring element 514 disposed on thevessel 20. Thetorsion spring element 514 acts in series with thehydraulic actuator 512 or in parallel with it to reduce the back and forth motion x of thevessel 20 with respect to thecentral shaft 511. - Several examples of
hydraulic torque actuators 512 for the arrangement of FIGS. 19 and 20 are presented below. FIG. 21 shows a top view of ahydraulic torque actuator 512A for active control. Acylinder 513 is divided into one or more chambers withinternal fins 516 in each of the chambers connected alternatingly tooutside cylinder 513 and insidecylinder 513A to form oil tight chambers.Control valve 515, pilot controlled by a PID controller which senses angular deflection aboutaxis 518, causesactuator 512A actively to oppose displacement x of thevessel 20 from its quiescent state, by admitting pressurized oil into alternating chambers to generate torque betweencylinder 513A connected to the hull andcylinder 513 connected to torque arm. Alternatively, the PID controller can pressure modulate thepump 515 to achieve displacement opposition. - A similar arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 22 where a passive control arrangement provides damping of the angular motion of
hydraulic torque actuator 512B aboutshaft 518 to be used with a restoring force device such as torsion springs and/or pendular weights. In this arrangement, when vessel displacement results in angular rotation ofcylinder 513A relative tocylinder 513, oil in the chambers formed byfins 516 as above results in volume changes in the oil tight chambers. Decreasing volume is expelled through relief valves A or A′ while oil to increasing volume is sucked from reservoir T. Expelling oil from decreasing volume chambers through check valves creates resisting pressure and torque which resists angular motion. - As an example of a torsion damping element, a
spring element 512A is illustrated also below. FIG. 23 illustrates a cylindrical module having inner and outerannular walls internal fins 522 which separate the annular space betweenwalls elastomeric material 523. Thusfins 522 are alternatingly connected towalls Inner wall 519 is arranged and designed to be coupled tovessel 20;outer wall 520 is designed and arranged to be coupled to arm oractuator 512.Voids 524 in eachsegment 523 allow the elastomeric material to compress between corresponding alternatingconnected fins 522 as theouter wall 520 tends to rotate about theinner wall 519. - Another example of a
torsion damping element 530 is illustrated in FIGS. 24 and 25 in a top cross section view to be used with a restoring force device such as torsion springs and/or pendular weights. Thetorsion damping element 530 of FIGS. 24, 25 includes inner and outercylindrical walls brake disks 535 as shown in FIG. 25. When hydraulic pressure is applied tobrake pressure ring 536, the disks, which are alternatingly connected towalls 534 are forced into sliding contact with one another resulting in friction which retards relative motion between theouter wall 534 andinner wall 532. - FIGS. 26 and 27 schematically illustrate in top and side views a mooring arrangement similar to that of FIGS. 19 and 20, but with
hydraulic cylinders 546 positioned between thevessel 20 andtorque arms 512A. Asensor 547 is provided for measurement of the angle of the torque arms from the quiescent position of the vessel. The hydraulic cylinders are provided with PID controls and circuitry to actively force or passively dampen the motion of thevessel 20. Predictive circuits responsive to sea condition sensors are provided to predict the force of wind, waves, and current on thevessel 20 to actively apply forces, via thecylinder 546, to oppose such forces. - FIG. 28 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the invention with a
tower 1000 having aturntable 1005 rotatably supported on the tower by water lubricated bearings for example. Afirst arm 1010 is pivotably connected at 1011 toturntable 1005 at a height which is located at or about the average projection 1015 of the vessel longitudinal roll axis at its intersection with the vertical axis of the tower. Asecond arm 1020 is pivotably connected to thefirst arm 1010 atpivot 1021. A torsion spring mechanism can be provided atcoupling 1021 as appropriate. Aspring damper mechanism 1025 e.g., like one of the torsion spring mechanisms described above, is supported by a vessel bracket 1030 and is rotatably coupled with two degrees of rotation tosecond arm 1020 at pivot 1031. - The arrangement of FIG. 28 effectively removes the roll component of the vessel2000 on the
mooring arms connection 1011 of thearm 1010 toturntable 1005 along the average projection of the vessel longitudinal axis 1015 at thetower 1000. The arrangement of FIG. 28 produces a similar restoring force as that of FIG. 18, without using a pendular weight as restoring element. The dampingmechanism 1025 may be advantageous in resisting yaw forces. - Active and passive damping components are described for vessel mooring systems and disposed in various configurations for tower-arm/yoke-vessel systems. Such damping components may also be useful in certain CALM systems which have high momentum energy and could benefit, like the arrangements discussed above, from active forcing systems or passive damping systems which exert restoring forces which are independent of vessel position.
- Other damping components such as brake shoes on linearly sliding structures (damping force only), brake shoes on rotating disks or drums (damping force only), cables on winches or drums (restoring force and/or damping force) and elastomeric elements with restoring force and/or damping force can be substituted for hydraulic cylinder components.
- The drawings presented above for various coupling arrangements between a body (such as a tower) and a vessel are schematic in nature. One of skill in the art of offshore mooring systems will understand that two or three axes may be provided as required at the various pivoting joints.
Claims (82)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/756,644 US6439147B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-01-09 | Mooring systems with active force reacting systems and passive damping |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17515000P | 2000-01-07 | 2000-01-07 | |
US09/756,644 US6439147B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-01-09 | Mooring systems with active force reacting systems and passive damping |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010029879A1 true US20010029879A1 (en) | 2001-10-18 |
US6439147B2 US6439147B2 (en) | 2002-08-27 |
Family
ID=22639125
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/756,644 Expired - Lifetime US6439147B2 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-01-09 | Mooring systems with active force reacting systems and passive damping |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6439147B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2003520725A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2761801A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001051345A1 (en) |
Cited By (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2004011326A1 (en) * | 2002-07-30 | 2004-02-05 | Mooring Systems Limited | Mooring system with active control |
US20040154518A1 (en) * | 2000-02-26 | 2004-08-12 | Hadcroft John Mackay | Mooring device |
WO2004076273A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-10 | Merlo Group Limited | Boat mooring system. |
US20050087118A1 (en) * | 2000-02-26 | 2005-04-28 | Hadcroft John M. | Method for accommodating large movements in a mooring system |
US6938570B2 (en) | 2001-04-17 | 2005-09-06 | Mooring Systems Limited | Mooring robot |
US6983712B2 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2006-01-10 | Fmc Technologies, Inc. | Offloading arrangements and method for spread moored FPSOs |
WO2006054180A1 (en) * | 2004-11-22 | 2006-05-26 | Bluewater Energy Services Bv | Apparatus for offshore transfer of fluid |
US20060156744A1 (en) * | 2004-11-08 | 2006-07-20 | Cusiter James M | Liquefied natural gas floating storage regasification unit |
EP1705111A1 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2006-09-27 | Bluewater Energy Services B.V. | Mooring apparatus with moveable ballast weight |
EP1764300A3 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-05-16 | Intellectual Capital and Asset Management GmbH | method and apparatus for diminishing swing motion of ships |
EP2070812A1 (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-17 | Bluewater Energy Services B.V. | Mooring assembly |
KR100981224B1 (en) | 2008-03-09 | 2010-09-10 | 정홍범 | The driving system of making a ship veer actively |
US20100272517A1 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2010-10-28 | Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited | Automated mooring method and mooring system |
WO2011059918A1 (en) * | 2009-11-12 | 2011-05-19 | Shell Oil Company | Tender assisted drilling spar |
US20110139054A1 (en) * | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-16 | Sofec,Inc. | Adjustable and disconnectable submerged-yoke mooring system |
ITMO20110216A1 (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2013-02-20 | Simone Cheli | APPROACH APPROACH FOR BOATS |
CN103144745A (en) * | 2013-03-25 | 2013-06-12 | 浙江海洋学院 | Flexible butting device of offshore platform |
ITMO20120250A1 (en) * | 2012-10-17 | 2014-04-18 | Zad Marine Di Cheli Simone | APPROACH APPROACH FOR BOATS |
EP2927378A1 (en) * | 2014-04-01 | 2015-10-07 | Ondernemingen Jan De Nul, naamloze vennootchap | Vessel with a spud and method for limiting forces that are exerted by the hull of a vessel on a spud |
US20160355241A1 (en) * | 2013-12-11 | 2016-12-08 | Nauti-Craft Pty Ltd | Docking control for vessels |
CN107420362A (en) * | 2017-09-05 | 2017-12-01 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七〇九研究所 | A kind of compensation hydraulic buoyant raft caging system |
WO2017215053A1 (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2017-12-21 | 天津市海王星海上工程技术股份有限公司 | Single point mooring out-transportation terminal |
WO2019197645A1 (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2019-10-17 | Technip France | Facility for using fluid in a stretch of water, and associated assembly and operating method |
NO20181157A1 (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2020-03-06 | Apl Tech As | A energy absorption arrangement for reducing peak mooring loads |
US10794539B1 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2020-10-06 | Sofec, Inc. | Systems and processes for recovering a vapor from a vessel |
WO2020206249A1 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2020-10-08 | Sofec, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
US10899602B1 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2021-01-26 | Sofec, Inc. | Submarine hose configuration for transferring a gas from a buoy |
WO2021092385A1 (en) * | 2019-11-08 | 2021-05-14 | Sofec, Inc. | Surge damping system and processes for using same |
US11279446B2 (en) | 2019-04-05 | 2022-03-22 | Sofec, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
US11319036B2 (en) | 2019-08-19 | 2022-05-03 | Sofec, Inc. | Mooring systems and processes for using same |
US11459067B2 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2022-10-04 | Sofec, Inc. | Systems and processes for recovering a condensate from a conduit |
US11679844B2 (en) | 2019-11-08 | 2023-06-20 | Sofec, Inc. | Mooring support structures, systems for mooring vessels, and processes for using same |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL151170A0 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2003-04-10 | Es Cell Int Pte Ltd | Embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells derived therefrom |
JP3676321B2 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2005-07-27 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Thrust measurement device for small planing boat |
US20040105725A1 (en) * | 2002-08-05 | 2004-06-03 | Leverette Steven J. | Ultra-deepwater tendon systems |
WO2004099061A1 (en) | 2003-05-05 | 2004-11-18 | Single Buoy Moorings Inc. | Hydrocarbon transfer system with a damped transfer arm |
GB0323698D0 (en) | 2003-10-09 | 2003-11-12 | Saipem Uk Ltd | Apparatus and method for reducing motion of a floating vessel |
WO2005097590A1 (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-20 | Mooring Systems Limited | A mooring device for holding a floating vessel adjacent a mooring facility |
WO2009041834A1 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2009-04-02 | Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited | Mooring system and control |
GB2467345A (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-04 | Univ Exeter | Mooring limb |
NL2002680C2 (en) * | 2009-03-27 | 2010-09-28 | Konink Roeiers Vereeniging Eendracht | A hydraulic mooring cable holding device. |
JP2012096774A (en) * | 2010-10-04 | 2012-05-24 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Trimaran ship with roll-reducing function |
US9308969B2 (en) * | 2011-03-22 | 2016-04-12 | Technology From Ideas Limited | Mooring component having a smooth stress-strain response to high loads |
US8714098B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2014-05-06 | John Thomas WEBB | Shock absorbing docking spacer with fluid compression buffering |
CN102785761B (en) * | 2012-08-02 | 2015-05-13 | 江苏科技大学 | Self-regulation type single point mooring system |
CN102806981B (en) * | 2012-08-21 | 2015-05-13 | 江苏科技大学 | Energy-saving type floatable ocean platform movement control device |
AU2015234695A1 (en) * | 2014-03-25 | 2016-09-15 | Trelleborg Marine Systems Melbourne Pty Ltd | Automated mooring device |
US10207905B2 (en) | 2015-02-05 | 2019-02-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Control system for winch and capstan |
NL2018030B1 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2018-06-28 | European Intelligence B V | Mooring system |
KR101859592B1 (en) * | 2017-05-31 | 2018-05-18 | 한국해양과학기술원 | Ship mooring device using spring bellows structure |
NO345396B1 (en) | 2018-07-10 | 2021-01-18 | Apl Tech As | A system for quick release of mooring and loading and unloading lines between a loading and unloading station at sea and a vessel |
IT202100021290A1 (en) * | 2021-08-05 | 2023-02-05 | Atlantide Soc A Responsabilita Limitata | MOORING DEVICE FOR BOATS |
Family Cites Families (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3008158A (en) | 1954-08-25 | 1961-11-14 | Dorothy B Stinson | Universal mooring and ramp |
GB1424665A (en) * | 1972-02-04 | 1976-02-11 | Secretary Trade Ind Brit | System for controlling the position of a moored floating vessel |
DE2262240C3 (en) | 1972-12-20 | 1975-07-10 | Aktien-Gesellschaft Weser, 2800 Bremen | Anchoring system for a floating jetty |
GB1489093A (en) | 1973-12-21 | 1977-10-19 | Petroles Cie Francaise | Anchorage systems |
US3863590A (en) | 1974-01-14 | 1975-02-04 | Imodco | Automatic mooring system |
US4290158A (en) | 1977-04-04 | 1981-09-22 | Amtel, Inc. | Mooring buoy |
NO145826C (en) | 1979-02-14 | 1982-06-09 | Moss Rosenberg Verft As | DEVICE FOR SUPPLYING A LIQUID CONSTRUCTION |
US4309955A (en) | 1980-02-29 | 1982-01-12 | Amtel, Inc. | Riser-to-vessel-mooring-terminal |
US4396046A (en) | 1981-08-19 | 1983-08-02 | Amtel, Inc. | Buoy-to-yoke coupling system |
NL8202335A (en) | 1982-06-09 | 1982-08-02 | Single Buoy Moorings | Apparatus for holding a buoyant body in place relative to another body. |
US4493282A (en) | 1983-03-18 | 1985-01-15 | Exxon Production Research Co. | Combination mooring system |
US4530302A (en) | 1983-03-25 | 1985-07-23 | Sofec, Inc. | Submerged single point mooring apparatus |
NL188841C (en) | 1983-05-03 | 1992-10-16 | Single Buoy Moorings | Mooring device. |
US4532879A (en) * | 1984-06-04 | 1985-08-06 | Exxon Production Research Co. | Combination mooring system |
NL8403978A (en) | 1984-12-31 | 1986-07-16 | Single Buoy Moorings | Mooring device. |
EP0222748A1 (en) | 1985-06-03 | 1987-05-27 | Brian Watt Associates, Inc. | Offshore mooring/loading system |
US4665856A (en) | 1985-10-03 | 1987-05-19 | Sofec, Inc. | Mooring apparatus |
NL8601716A (en) | 1986-07-01 | 1988-02-01 | Single Buoy Moorings | Mooring device. |
NL8602526A (en) | 1986-10-08 | 1988-05-02 | Single Buoy Moorings | WORK ISLAND, ANCHORED BY TENSION-RELATED EMPLOYERS AND EQUIPPED WITH MEANS FOR MOORING A SHIP. |
NL192797C (en) | 1986-11-06 | 1998-02-03 | Bluewater Terminal Systems Nv | Mooring device. |
NL193530C (en) | 1986-12-19 | 2000-01-04 | Bluewater Terminal Systems Nv | Device for mooring a floating body, for example a ship, to a body anchored to the seabed. |
NL8700920A (en) | 1987-04-16 | 1988-11-16 | Single Buoy Moorings | Mooring device. |
NL8800927A (en) * | 1988-04-11 | 1989-11-01 | Single Buoy Moorings | MOORING SYSTEM WITH QUICK COUPLING. |
NL8800932A (en) | 1988-04-11 | 1989-11-01 | Single Buoy Moorings | MOORING SYSTEM. |
US5014638A (en) * | 1990-03-05 | 1991-05-14 | Ilves Juhani E | Mooring construction for a boat |
US5243926A (en) | 1991-12-20 | 1993-09-14 | Wright Terrell S | Apparatus for securing watercraft to a dock |
US5361716A (en) | 1993-10-18 | 1994-11-08 | Dock Tender, Inc. | Boat mooring device and method |
IT1283549B1 (en) | 1996-03-21 | 1998-04-22 | Tecnomare Spa | STRUCTURE FOR THE MOORING OF SHIPS |
US5997374A (en) | 1998-05-05 | 1999-12-07 | Imodco, Inc. | Vessel securing system |
-
2001
- 2001-01-05 AU AU27618/01A patent/AU2761801A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-01-05 JP JP2001551737A patent/JP2003520725A/en active Pending
- 2001-01-05 WO PCT/US2001/000278 patent/WO2001051345A1/en active Application Filing
- 2001-01-09 US US09/756,644 patent/US6439147B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (50)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7055448B2 (en) | 2000-02-26 | 2006-06-06 | Mooring Systems Limited | Method for accommodating large movements in a mooring system |
US20040154518A1 (en) * | 2000-02-26 | 2004-08-12 | Hadcroft John Mackay | Mooring device |
US6910435B2 (en) | 2000-02-26 | 2005-06-28 | Mooring Systems Limited | Mooring device |
US20050087118A1 (en) * | 2000-02-26 | 2005-04-28 | Hadcroft John M. | Method for accommodating large movements in a mooring system |
US6938570B2 (en) | 2001-04-17 | 2005-09-06 | Mooring Systems Limited | Mooring robot |
US6983712B2 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2006-01-10 | Fmc Technologies, Inc. | Offloading arrangements and method for spread moored FPSOs |
US8215256B2 (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2012-07-10 | Cavotec Moormaster Limited | Mooring system with active control |
WO2004011326A1 (en) * | 2002-07-30 | 2004-02-05 | Mooring Systems Limited | Mooring system with active control |
AU2003281692B2 (en) * | 2002-07-30 | 2009-11-19 | Cavotec Moormaster Limited | Mooring system with active control |
US20100012009A1 (en) * | 2002-07-30 | 2010-01-21 | Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited | Mooring system with active control |
WO2004076273A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-10 | Merlo Group Limited | Boat mooring system. |
US20060156744A1 (en) * | 2004-11-08 | 2006-07-20 | Cusiter James M | Liquefied natural gas floating storage regasification unit |
WO2006054180A1 (en) * | 2004-11-22 | 2006-05-26 | Bluewater Energy Services Bv | Apparatus for offshore transfer of fluid |
EP1705111A1 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2006-09-27 | Bluewater Energy Services B.V. | Mooring apparatus with moveable ballast weight |
EP1764300A3 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-05-16 | Intellectual Capital and Asset Management GmbH | method and apparatus for diminishing swing motion of ships |
US8408153B2 (en) | 2007-09-26 | 2013-04-02 | Cavotec Moormaster Limited | Automated mooring method and mooring system |
US20100272517A1 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2010-10-28 | Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited | Automated mooring method and mooring system |
EP2070812A1 (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2009-06-17 | Bluewater Energy Services B.V. | Mooring assembly |
KR100981224B1 (en) | 2008-03-09 | 2010-09-10 | 정홍범 | The driving system of making a ship veer actively |
WO2011059918A1 (en) * | 2009-11-12 | 2011-05-19 | Shell Oil Company | Tender assisted drilling spar |
US20110139054A1 (en) * | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-16 | Sofec,Inc. | Adjustable and disconnectable submerged-yoke mooring system |
WO2011075441A1 (en) * | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-23 | Sofec, Inc. | Adjustable and disconnectable submerged-yoke mooring system |
US9573659B2 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2017-02-21 | Sofec, Inc. | Adjustable and disconnectable submerged-yoke mooring system |
US8763549B2 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2014-07-01 | Sofec, Inc. | Adjustable and disconnectable submerged-yoke mooring system |
ITMO20110216A1 (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2013-02-20 | Simone Cheli | APPROACH APPROACH FOR BOATS |
ITMO20120250A1 (en) * | 2012-10-17 | 2014-04-18 | Zad Marine Di Cheli Simone | APPROACH APPROACH FOR BOATS |
CN103144745A (en) * | 2013-03-25 | 2013-06-12 | 浙江海洋学院 | Flexible butting device of offshore platform |
US20160355241A1 (en) * | 2013-12-11 | 2016-12-08 | Nauti-Craft Pty Ltd | Docking control for vessels |
US9849947B2 (en) * | 2013-12-11 | 2017-12-26 | Nauti-Craft Pty Ltd | Docking control for vessels |
EP2927378A1 (en) * | 2014-04-01 | 2015-10-07 | Ondernemingen Jan De Nul, naamloze vennootchap | Vessel with a spud and method for limiting forces that are exerted by the hull of a vessel on a spud |
BE1021821B1 (en) * | 2014-04-01 | 2016-01-20 | Jan De Nul, Naamloze Vennootschap | VESSEL WITH AN ANCHOR POLE AND METHOD FOR LIMITING FORCES EXERCISED ON A ANCHOR POLE BY A HULL OF A VESSEL |
WO2017215053A1 (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2017-12-21 | 天津市海王星海上工程技术股份有限公司 | Single point mooring out-transportation terminal |
CN107420362A (en) * | 2017-09-05 | 2017-12-01 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七〇九研究所 | A kind of compensation hydraulic buoyant raft caging system |
WO2019197645A1 (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2019-10-17 | Technip France | Facility for using fluid in a stretch of water, and associated assembly and operating method |
FR3080086A1 (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2019-10-18 | Technip France | FLUID OPERATING SYSTEM IN WATER EXCHANGE, ASSEMBLY METHOD AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF |
NO20181157A1 (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2020-03-06 | Apl Tech As | A energy absorption arrangement for reducing peak mooring loads |
US11679843B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2023-06-20 | Apl Norway As | Energy absorption arrangement for reducing peak mooring loads |
NO346077B1 (en) * | 2018-09-05 | 2022-02-07 | Apl Norway As | An energy absorption arrangement for reducing peak mooring loads |
US11267532B2 (en) | 2019-04-05 | 2022-03-08 | Sofec, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
WO2020206249A1 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2020-10-08 | Sofec, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
US11279446B2 (en) | 2019-04-05 | 2022-03-22 | Sofec, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
EP3947136A4 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2023-01-04 | SOFEC, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
EP3947135A4 (en) * | 2019-04-05 | 2023-01-04 | SOFEC, Inc. | Disconnectable tower yoke mooring system and methods for using same |
US11319036B2 (en) | 2019-08-19 | 2022-05-03 | Sofec, Inc. | Mooring systems and processes for using same |
WO2021092385A1 (en) * | 2019-11-08 | 2021-05-14 | Sofec, Inc. | Surge damping system and processes for using same |
US11560203B2 (en) | 2019-11-08 | 2023-01-24 | Sofec, Inc. | Surge damping systems and processes for using same |
US11679844B2 (en) | 2019-11-08 | 2023-06-20 | Sofec, Inc. | Mooring support structures, systems for mooring vessels, and processes for using same |
US10899602B1 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2021-01-26 | Sofec, Inc. | Submarine hose configuration for transferring a gas from a buoy |
US11459067B2 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2022-10-04 | Sofec, Inc. | Systems and processes for recovering a condensate from a conduit |
US10794539B1 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2020-10-06 | Sofec, Inc. | Systems and processes for recovering a vapor from a vessel |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6439147B2 (en) | 2002-08-27 |
JP2003520725A (en) | 2003-07-08 |
AU2761801A (en) | 2001-07-24 |
WO2001051345A1 (en) | 2001-07-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6439147B2 (en) | Mooring systems with active force reacting systems and passive damping | |
US4088089A (en) | Riser and yoke mooring system | |
US9174710B2 (en) | Vessel, motion platform, method for compensating motions of a vessel and use of a Stewart platform | |
EP0147176B1 (en) | Motion compensators | |
US11142287B2 (en) | System and method for compensation of motions of a floating vessel | |
US5894895A (en) | Heave compensator for drill ships | |
US6648074B2 (en) | Gimbaled table riser support system | |
US3496898A (en) | Marine riser structure | |
US20190292023A1 (en) | Transportable inline heave compensator | |
CA2462071C (en) | Multi-purpose coiled tubing handling system | |
KR101205357B1 (en) | Horizontal leveling apparatus for structure on floating sea facility and a floating sea plant using the same | |
US5435262A (en) | Semi-submersible offshore platform with articulated buoyancy | |
US4226204A (en) | Off-shore mooring device for a large-sized floating body | |
NO335020B1 (en) | Loop-damping support system for riser table | |
EP0166779A1 (en) | Turret for mooring vlcc size vessels | |
KR20100113202A (en) | Apparatus for reducing rolling motion for ships | |
US20210354789A1 (en) | A energy absorption arrangement for reducing peak mooring loads | |
US3839976A (en) | Constant force device | |
CA1205740A (en) | Marine riser tensioner | |
GB2349611A (en) | Sizing of tension lines for a tension leg platform | |
US3739590A (en) | Stinger connection | |
CA1112520A (en) | Riser and yoke mooring system | |
WO2020161380A1 (en) | Arrangement for energy recovery from motions of a floating structure | |
JPS5847816A (en) | Regulator for axial force | |
JPH01122883A (en) | Auto-tensioner device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FMC CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:COTTRELL, ROY H.;BOATMAN, L. TERRY;LUI, YONGHUI;REEL/FRAME:011440/0085 Effective date: 20010108 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FMC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:012707/0126 Effective date: 20011126 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SOFEC, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019920/0871 Effective date: 20061228 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |