KR20100001133A - Method for correcting optical proximity effect - Google Patents
Method for correcting optical proximity effect Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20100001133A KR20100001133A KR1020080060932A KR20080060932A KR20100001133A KR 20100001133 A KR20100001133 A KR 20100001133A KR 1020080060932 A KR1020080060932 A KR 1020080060932A KR 20080060932 A KR20080060932 A KR 20080060932A KR 20100001133 A KR20100001133 A KR 20100001133A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- image
- pattern
- etched layer
- optical proximity
- proximity effect
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F1/00—Originals for photomechanical production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g., masks, photo-masks, reticles; Mask blanks or pellicles therefor; Containers specially adapted therefor; Preparation thereof
- G03F1/36—Masks having proximity correction features; Preparation thereof, e.g. optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70425—Imaging strategies, e.g. for increasing throughput or resolution, printing product fields larger than the image field or compensating lithography- or non-lithography errors, e.g. proximity correction, mix-and-match, stitching or double patterning
- G03F7/70433—Layout for increasing efficiency or for compensating imaging errors, e.g. layout of exposure fields for reducing focus errors; Use of mask features for increasing efficiency or for compensating imaging errors
- G03F7/70441—Optical proximity correction [OPC]
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
Abstract
Description
The present invention relates to an optical proximity effect compensation method, and more particularly, to an optical proximity effect compensation method capable of accurately performing calibration after an etching process.
As the degree of integration of semiconductor devices increases, design rules of the devices decrease, and many studies for this have been conducted.
In the exposure process for realizing a fine pattern, an exposure source with a short wavelength is used as an effort to increase resolution, and as the size of the pattern gradually decreases, exposure such as extreme ultraviolet rays having a wavelength similar to the size of the pattern In the case of using a circle, the influence of light diffraction and interference in the exposure process is greatly increased and the distortion of the pattern is intensified.
This phenomenon is called the optical proximity effect, and light is generated from a different optical path than the optical path to achieve the same layout as the designed layout. It is not possible to implement it in a distorted form.
Since the distorted patterns have to be compensated because they lower the yield and performance of the semiconductor device, an optical proximity effect compensation method has been developed for this purpose.
Compensation of the optical proximity effect is generally performed by extracting calibration data for the photosensitive film pattern formed by the exposure developing process.
However, the photoresist pattern is formed by etching the etched layer formed under the photoresist pattern by using the photoresist pattern as an etch mask in the etching process after the exposure development process due to the process index that changes as the pattern becomes more precise and finer. In this case, the etching cannot be performed.
Therefore, since the photoresist pattern formed after the exposure and development process and the etched layer pattern formed after the etching process are not formed in the same shape, the optical proximity to the etched layer pattern is only compensated for by the optical proximity effect performed using only the calibration of the photoresist pattern. Since the effects cannot be accurately corrected, there is still a problem in that the pattern is formed distorted.
In order to solve such a problem, calibration may be performed on the etched layer pattern formed by the etching process performed after the exposure and developing process, and the optical proximity effect may be compensated for using the etched layer pattern, but reliability of data for calibration of the etched layer may be compensated. Apart from this, there is a problem that optical proximity effect compensation cannot be performed accurately.
The reason can be seen through the optical proximity effect compensation method according to the prior art described below.
FIG. 1A is a photograph showing a conventional inspection (DI) image, and FIG. 1B is a photograph showing a conventional inspection (FI) image.
As illustrated in FIG. 1A, the DI image is an image after the exposure and development processes are performed and shows the
At this time, since the calibration extracted from the
As shown in FIG. 1B, the FI image shows the
The DI contour image and the FI contour image are extracted using the DI image and the FI image thus obtained (S1).
In this case, the contour image is an image of a line connecting the outer portion of the pattern, and in the case of the DI contour image, the contour image is represented by a line connecting the outer portion of the
The FI contour image extracted in this manner should appear as a line connecting the outer portion of the
Next, the target layout and the FI contour image are aligned (S2).
At this time, the target layout and the FI contour image are not aligned correctly, because the exposed subpatterns around the etched layer pattern are recognized as noise in the FI contour image, so that the FI contour image does not match the target layout.
For this reason, accurate information may not be obtained even at the step S3 of performing calibration using alignment information of the FI contour image and the etched layer pattern.
The method currently used to perform the calibration of the etch pattern is to measure the CD for the etch pattern, which is very cumbersome and inaccurate data.
As a result, the optical proximity effect compensation cannot be accurately performed due to the incorrect calibration of the etched layer pattern formed through the etching process.
In the optical proximity effect compensation method of the present invention, the lower pattern exposed during the etching process for forming the etched layer pattern acts as a noise to solve the problem that accurate calibration data cannot be obtained.
The optical proximity effect compensation method of the present invention comprises the steps of extracting a DI contour image using a development inspection (DI) image and
Performing a first calibration using the DI contour image;
Extracting the FI contour image using a final inspection (FI) image, and
Removing an image of a noise pattern except an image of an etched layer pattern from the FI contour image;
Performing a second calibration using the FI contour image from which the image of the noise pattern has been removed; and
Modeling using the first and second calibration results and performing optical proximity effect compensation using the first and second calibration results.
In this case, after performing the optical proximity effect compensation, performing a simulation on the layout in which the optical proximity effect compensation is completed, extracting a simulation image, and performing optical proximity effect compensation until the target layout matches the simulation image; The method may further include repeating the simulation.
The DI image is an image obtained by measuring a photoresist pattern formed by forming an etched layer on an upper surface of a semiconductor substrate, applying a photoresist layer on the etched layer, and performing an exposure and development process using an exposure mask having the target layout. Characterized in that it comprises a.
The DI contour image may include a line connecting an outer portion of the image of the photoresist pattern.
The FI image may include an image obtained by measuring an etched layer pattern and a noise pattern.
The noise pattern may include a lower pattern formed on a lower layer of the etched layer pattern.
The FI contour image may include a line connecting an outer portion of the etched layer pattern image and a line connecting an outer portion of the noise pattern image.
In addition, removing the image of the noise pattern except the image of the etched layer pattern from the FI contour image may match the target layout of the lower pattern with the FI contour image, thereby forming an image of the etched layer pattern in the FI contour image. It is characterized in that it comprises the step of removing the information on the image of the subpattern from the FI contour image leaving information about.
The performing of the second calibration may include aligning the target layout with the FI contour image from which the image of the noise pattern has been removed.
The optical proximity effect compensation method of the present invention can perform accurate calibration using a scanning electron microscope image of an etched layer pattern formed after an etching process, thereby improving the accuracy of optical proximity effect compensation, thereby improving characteristics of a semiconductor device. .
Hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail.
2 is a flowchart of an optical proximity effect compensation method according to the present invention.
An etched layer is formed on the semiconductor substrate, a photosensitive film is applied on the etched layer, and a photosensitive film pattern is formed using a mask having a target layout.
In this case, a hard mask layer may be further formed on the etched layer to facilitate etching of the etched layer.
The DI image of the present invention is an image obtained by measuring the
First, the DI contour image is extracted using the DI image (S10).
As illustrated in FIG. 3B, the DI contour image of the present invention may be represented by a
Next, a first calibration is performed using the DI contour image (S20).
At this time, since there is no singular pattern that may generate noise around the photoresist pattern, it is possible to accurately calibrate using the DI contour image.
Calibration can be understood as a task for minimizing the degree of mismatch by extracting the mismatched parts by matching the actual implementation pattern with the target layout.
It can be easily selected and used by those skilled in the art from conventional calibration methods.
In the present invention, it can be understood as a task for extracting and minimizing a portion where the DI contour image does not match the target layout.
The etched layer is then etched using the photoresist pattern as an etch mask to form an etched layer pattern.
In this case, the etched layer pattern may not have the same shape as the target layout due to various process variables including an etching process.
The FI image of the present invention is an image obtained by measuring the etched
Next, the FI contour image is extracted (S30).
At this time, the FI contour image should be a dotted line connected to the image outline of the etched layer pattern as shown in FIG. 4B, but the noise patterns are exposed around the etched layer pattern, so that the FI contour image is a dotted line connecting the image outline of the etched layer pattern ( 70 as well as dotted
In this case, the noise pattern includes a lower pattern formed on the lower layer of the etched layer pattern.
Next, the image of the noise pattern except the image of the etched layer pattern is removed from the FI contour image (S40).
Since the FI contour image reflects both the image of the etched layer pattern and the image of the noise pattern, the FI contour image removes the noise pattern from the FI contour image and performs calibration using only information on the image of the etched layer pattern.
In this case, the step of removing the image of the etched layer pattern and the image of the noise pattern from the FI contour image may be performed through the following process.
Matching the target layout of the noise pattern with the FI contour image, and removing information on the image of the noise pattern from the FI contour image while leaving information on the image of the etched layer pattern in the FI contour image.
As a result, the FI contour image is separated from the image of the etched layer pattern and the image of the noise pattern at the same time, so that only necessary information can be extracted and used separately.
Next, the FI contour image and the target layout are aligned (S50).
In this case, the FI contour image aligned with the target layout becomes a FI contour image in which the image of the noise pattern is removed in step S40.
Next, a second calibration is performed using the alignment information on the FI contour image and the target layout (S60).
That is, since the second calibration is performed using information obtained by matching only the image of the etched layer pattern with the target layout in the FI contour image, the calibration can be accurately performed without the influence of the noise pattern.
In this case, the alignment information may be an error of alignment between the image of the etched layer pattern and the target layout.
Next, modeling is performed using the above-described first and second calibrations (S70).
That is, modeling reliability may be improved by including not only the first calibration using the DI contour image but also the second calibration data using the alignment information on the etched layer pattern and the target layout.
In this case, modeling is a process of extracting an equation or the like for describing that the layout is implemented on the actual wafer.
It is readily available to those skilled in the art from conventional modeling methods.
Herein, it can be understood as a process for describing a layout in which the mismatched parts are minimized through the first and second calibrations on the actual wafer.
The first optical proximity effect compensation is performed using the modeling data obtained as described above (S80).
Next, a simulation is performed on the layout in which the first optical proximity effect compensation is completed (S90).
In this case, the simulation may predict an image in which the layout in which the optical proximity effect compensation is completed is implemented on the actual wafer.
Next, the target layout and the simulated image are compared and verified (S100).
In this case, the simulation image may be referred to as a wafer image that can be implemented later through a photolithography process.
That is, the wafer image may include an image of the final pattern formed on the wafer through a photolithography process using an exposure mask.
If the simulation image does not match when compared with the target layout, the second optical proximity effect compensation is performed again, and the simulation image is compared with the target layout by comparing the simulation image and the target layout for the layout where the second optical proximity compensation is completed. In comparison, it is preferable to repeatedly perform the optical proximity effect compensation until the same shape is achieved so as to implement the desired target layout.
As described above, after performing the etching process by performing the calibration process using the DI contour image as well as the calibration using the FI contour image to compensate for the optical proximity effect, the modeling of the etched layer pattern is precisely performed so that the optical proximity effect compensation is more accurate. Make sure it's done correctly.
In addition, by verifying that the etched layer pattern close to the same shape as the target layout may be implemented through simulation, the characteristics of the semiconductor device may be improved by allowing the etched layer pattern to be implemented without distortion from the target layout of the etched layer pattern.
Figure 1a is a photograph showing a development inspection (DI) image of the prior art.
1b is a photograph showing a prior art final inspection (FI) image.
2 is a flowchart of an optical proximity effect compensation method according to the present invention;
Figure 3a is a photograph showing a development inspection (DI) image of the present invention.
Figure 3b is a photograph showing a DI contour image of the present invention.
4A is a photograph showing a final inspection (FI) image of the present invention.
Figure 4b is a photograph showing a FI contour image of the present invention.
Claims (9)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020080060932A KR20100001133A (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Method for correcting optical proximity effect |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020080060932A KR20100001133A (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Method for correcting optical proximity effect |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20100001133A true KR20100001133A (en) | 2010-01-06 |
Family
ID=41811465
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020080060932A KR20100001133A (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Method for correcting optical proximity effect |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR20100001133A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019022547A1 (en) * | 2017-07-28 | 2019-01-31 | 연세대학교 산학협력단 | Target substance concentration measuring apparatus |
WO2021221965A1 (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-04 | Kla Corporation | Image alignment for noisy images |
-
2008
- 2008-06-26 KR KR1020080060932A patent/KR20100001133A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019022547A1 (en) * | 2017-07-28 | 2019-01-31 | 연세대학교 산학협력단 | Target substance concentration measuring apparatus |
WO2021221965A1 (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2021-11-04 | Kla Corporation | Image alignment for noisy images |
US11494924B2 (en) | 2020-04-28 | 2022-11-08 | KLA Corp. | Image alignment for noisy images |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP4675854B2 (en) | Pattern evaluation method, evaluation apparatus, and pattern evaluation program | |
US7438996B2 (en) | Mask correcting method | |
US8166424B2 (en) | Method for constructing OPC model | |
US8332783B2 (en) | Control of critical dimensions in optical imaging processes for semiconductor production by extracting imaging imperfections on the basis of imaging tool specific intensity measurements and simulations | |
US7600213B2 (en) | Pattern data verification method, pattern data creation method, exposure mask manufacturing method, semiconductor device manufacturing method, and computer program product | |
US20110202893A1 (en) | Contour Self-Alignment For Optical Proximity Correction Model Calibration | |
KR100881194B1 (en) | Method of inspecting mask using aerial image inspection equipment | |
KR101204667B1 (en) | Method of correcting CD of phase shift mask and manufacturing the phase shift mask | |
JP2009210635A (en) | Pattern prediction method, pattern correction method, method for manufacturing semiconductor device, and program | |
US20080052660A1 (en) | Method of correcting a designed pattern of a mask | |
CN111443567B (en) | Optical proximity correction model and optical proximity correction method | |
KR100924335B1 (en) | Method for correcting optical proximity using multi-dose simulation | |
KR20100001133A (en) | Method for correcting optical proximity effect | |
US20070124719A1 (en) | Method of forming a mask pattern for a semiconductor device | |
US8114557B2 (en) | Method for optical proximity correction | |
KR100801737B1 (en) | Method for processing a optical proximity correction of semiconductor device's pattern | |
KR20090000868A (en) | Method for optical proximity correct | |
KR20080102648A (en) | Method of optical proximity correction | |
US20070141476A1 (en) | More accurate and physical method to account for lithographic and etch contributions in OPC models | |
KR20090071738A (en) | Method for verifying patterns by using multi - layout data | |
KR100966998B1 (en) | Method for processing optical proximity correction | |
KR20110001140A (en) | Method for correcting optical proximity effect | |
KR20080062699A (en) | Method for optical proximity effect correction | |
KR100881518B1 (en) | Method for opc modeling of semiconductor device and its structure | |
KR20100001135A (en) | Method for processing optical proximity correction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WITN | Withdrawal due to no request for examination |