JPH09204557A - Automatic review system for automatic teller machine - Google Patents
Automatic review system for automatic teller machineInfo
- Publication number
- JPH09204557A JPH09204557A JP1212596A JP1212596A JPH09204557A JP H09204557 A JPH09204557 A JP H09204557A JP 1212596 A JP1212596 A JP 1212596A JP 1212596 A JP1212596 A JP 1212596A JP H09204557 A JPH09204557 A JP H09204557A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- automatic transaction
- scrutiny
- automatic
- transaction device
- execution
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07F—COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
- G07F19/00—Complete banking systems; Coded card-freed arrangements adapted for dispensing or receiving monies or the like and posting such transactions to existing accounts, e.g. automatic teller machines
- G07F19/20—Automatic teller machines [ATMs]
- G07F19/209—Monitoring, auditing or diagnose of functioning of ATMs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06312—Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/02—Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、自動取引装置の精
査に関するもので、特に、精査を自動で行う機能に関す
るものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to scrutiny of an automatic transaction device, and more particularly to a function of automatically performing scrutiny.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】金融機関の精査業務は、自動取引装置に
装填した現金の金額を運用した結果が、自動取引装置か
ら回収した残金と合致しているかチェックすることであ
り、この精査を自動取引装置自身で現金を計数すること
で行えるようになっている。自動取引装置において精査
を実行する場合、各種取引は一時取り扱い中止となり、
精査終了後、取り扱いが再開できるものである。2. Description of the Related Art The scrutiny of a financial institution is to check whether the result of operating the amount of cash loaded in the automatic transaction device matches the balance recovered from the automatic transaction device. It can be done by counting cash in the device itself. When conducting detailed inspections on automated transaction equipment, various transactions will be temporarily suspended,
After the close inspection, the handling can be resumed.
【0003】従来より、この精査をホスト等からの遠隔
指示やスケジューラによる時刻設定により自動取引装置
自身で実行するシステムが構築されており、係員が自動
取引装置の所に出向かなくても、精査が行えるようにな
っている。Conventionally, a system has been constructed in which this automatic inspection is executed by the automatic transaction device itself by remote instruction from a host or the like and time setting by a scheduler. Even if an attendant does not go to the automatic transaction device, the detailed inspection is performed. You can do it.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、精査を
実行している間は自動取引装置は取り扱い中止となるの
で、遠隔指示やスケジューラに従って精査を実行する
際、精査実行対象の自動取引装置にしかない取引処理機
能があったり、同じ場所に設置されている他の自動取引
装置の稼働率が低いと、顧客の待ち時間が長くなり、サ
ービスの低下を招くという問題がある。However, since the automatic transaction device is discontinued during the execution of the detailed inspection, when performing the detailed inspection according to the remote instruction or the scheduler, the transaction only available in the automatic transaction device for which the detailed inspection is executed. If there is a processing function or if the operating rate of another automatic transaction device installed at the same place is low, there is a problem that the waiting time of the customer becomes long and the service deteriorates.
【0005】[0005]
【課題を解決するための手段】上述した課題を解決する
ため、本発明は、現金を計数する精査機能を有する自動
取引装置の自動精査システムにおいて、上位装置からあ
る自動取引装置に対して精査実行指示を出す際に、同じ
場所に設置されている他の自動取引装置の状態および精
査実行対象の自動取引装置の状態に応じて精査実行の可
否を確認する確認手段を上位装置に備え、精査実行可と
判断された場合に該当自動取引装置では精査を実行する
ことを特徴とする。In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is an automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device having a scrutiny function for counting cash, which is performed by a host device on an automatic transaction device. When issuing an instruction, the host device is equipped with a confirmation means that confirms whether or not the detailed inspection can be performed according to the state of other automatic transaction devices installed in the same place and the state of the automatic transaction device subject to the detailed inspection. When it is judged to be acceptable, the corresponding automatic transaction device is characterized by performing a detailed examination.
【0006】[0006]
【発明の実施の形態】図1は本発明の第1の実施の形態
を示す自動精査システムのブロック図である。図におい
て、1は自動取引装置(ATM)で、例えば1つの営業
店に複数台設置される。これら自動取引装置には、遠隔
指示やスケジューラの時刻設定に従って、自身で保有し
ている現金を計数し、その結果を記録する自動精査機能
を有する。1 is a block diagram of an automatic inspection system according to a first embodiment of the present invention. In the figure, reference numeral 1 is an automatic transaction apparatus (ATM), and a plurality of ATMs are installed in one business store, for example. These automatic transaction devices have an automatic scrutiny function of counting cash held by themselves and recording the result according to a remote instruction or time setting of a scheduler.
【0007】2は中継装置で、複数台の自動取引装置1
は、この中継装置2、電話機3a、公衆網3bを介して
監視端末4に接続される。このように、監視端末4はそ
れぞれの自動取引装置1と接続され、情報の通知が行わ
れる。ここで、前記監視端末4には、自動取引装置で自
動精査を実行する際、その可否を確認する機能が備わっ
ている。[0007] 2 is a relay device, which is a plurality of automatic transaction devices 1
Is connected to the monitoring terminal 4 via the relay device 2, the telephone 3a, and the public network 3b. In this way, the monitoring terminal 4 is connected to each automatic transaction device 1 and information is notified. Here, the monitoring terminal 4 has a function of confirming whether or not the automatic scrutiny is performed by the automatic transaction device.
【0008】図2は精査実行可否確認処理全体の流れを
示すフローチャート、図3は監視端末4に備えられてい
る精査実行可否確認機能による精査実行可否確認処理の
流れを示すフローチャートであり、以下に、第1の実施
の形態における自動精査処理の流れを説明する。まず、
自動取引装置1が監視端末4等からの遠隔指示もしくは
自身のスケジューラの時刻設定により精査実行の命令を
受けると(SA1)、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1
は、監視端末4に対して精査実行可否の確認要求を通知
する(SA2)。この通知を受けて、監視端末4では精
査実行可否の確認処理を行う(SA3)。FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing the flow of the detailed examination execution propriety confirmation processing, and FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing the flow of the detailed examination execution feasibility confirmation processing by the precise examination execution propriety confirmation function provided in the monitoring terminal 4. The flow of the automatic scrutinizing process in the first embodiment will be described. First,
When the automatic transaction device 1 receives a command for execution of close inspection by a remote instruction from the monitoring terminal 4 or the time setting of its own scheduler (SA1), the automatic transaction device 1 to be executed for close inspection
Notifies the monitoring terminal 4 of a confirmation request of whether or not the detailed examination can be executed (SA2). In response to this notification, the monitoring terminal 4 performs a confirmation process as to whether or not the inspection can be performed (SA3).
【0009】次に、このSA3の確認処理を図3を用い
て説明する。まず、監視端末4は精査実行対象の自動取
引装置1が設置されている場所の自動取引装置1の台数
をマスタファイルより調べる(SB1)。次に、この設
置場所で稼働している自動取引装置の台数の最新情報を
得て(SB2)、設置台数と稼働台数を比較する(SB
3)。Next, the confirmation process of SA3 will be described with reference to FIG. First, the monitoring terminal 4 checks from the master file the number of automatic transaction devices 1 at the location where the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is installed (SB1). Next, obtain the latest information on the number of automated teller machines operating at this installation location (SB2), and compare the installed number with the operating number (SB).
3).
【0010】前記SB3の比較処理で設置してある自動
取引装置1のうち、半分以上が稼働していると判断する
と、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1でのみ有効な取引が
あるか判断する(SB4)。このSB4の判断で、精査
実行対象の自動取引装置1でのみ有効な取引がないと判
断すると、精査実行OKと判断する(SB5)。When it is determined that more than half of the automatic transaction apparatuses 1 installed in the comparison processing of SB3 are operating, it is determined whether or not there is a valid transaction only in the automatic transaction apparatus 1 to be scrutinized ( SB4). If it is determined in SB4 that there is no valid transaction only in the automatic transaction device 1 subject to scrutiny, it is determined to be scrutinized (SB5).
【0011】前記SB3の比較処理で設置してある自動
取引装置1のうち、稼働台数が半分以下と判断した場
合、あるいはSB4の判断で、精査実行対象の自動取引
装置1でのみ有効な取引があると判断した場合は、精査
実行対象の自動取引装置1がよく使用されているかどう
か判断する(SB6)。このSB6の判断は、精査実行
直前の一定時間内の使用回数の大小で判断する。Among the automatic transaction apparatuses 1 installed in the comparison process of SB3, when it is determined that the number of operating machines is less than half, or at SB4, the transaction valid only in the automatic transaction apparatus 1 to be scrutinized is determined. If it is determined that there is, it is determined whether or not the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is frequently used (SB6). The determination at SB6 is made based on the number of times of use within a fixed time immediately before the execution of the close inspection.
【0012】このSB6の判断で、精査実行対象の自動
取引装置1がよく使用されていないと判断すると、精査
実行OKと判断する(SB5)。また、SB6の判断
で、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1がよく使用されてい
ると判断すると、精査実行NGと判断する(SB7)。
図2に戻り、監視端末4でこのように精査実行の可否が
確認されて、精査実行OKと判断されると(SA4)、
精査実行対象の自動取引装置1に精査実行OKを通知す
る(SA5)。この通知を受けて、精査実行対象の自動
取引装置1は精査を実行する(SA6)。If it is determined in SB6 that the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is not used frequently, it is determined that scrutiny is OK (SB5). If it is determined in SB6 that the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is frequently used, it is determined that the scrutiny is NG (SB7).
Returning to FIG. 2, if the inspection terminal 4 confirms whether or not the inspection can be executed in this manner and determines that the inspection is OK (SA4),
Notifying the automatic transaction device 1 of the scrutiny execution target that scrutiny execution is OK (SA5). Upon receipt of this notification, the automatic transaction device 1 subject to scrutiny executes scrutiny (SA6).
【0013】また、監視端末4で精査実行NGと判断さ
れると、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1に精査実行NG
を通知する(SA7)。この通知を受けて、精査実行対
象の自動取引装置1は精査を実行せず、取引可能な状態
を続ける。以上説明したように、本発明の第1の実施の
形態によれば、監視端末4と自動取引装置1がインタフ
ェースを持つことにより、自動取引装置における精査実
行時に、自動取引装置1が監視端末4に精査実行確認を
行い、同じ場所に設置されている自動取引装置1の状態
や精査実行対象の自動取引装置1が持つ処理機能および
使用頻度に応じて精査実行の可否を確認し、精査実行O
Kの判断が出た場合のみ精査を実行することにした。Further, when the monitoring terminal 4 judges that the detailed examination execution is unsuccessful, the detailed examination execution is unsuccessful in the automatic transaction apparatus 1 which is the object of detailed examination execution.
Is notified (SA7). Upon receipt of this notification, the automatic transaction device 1 targeted for scrutiny does not perform scrutiny, and continues to be in a state where transactions can be performed. As described above, according to the first embodiment of the present invention, since the monitoring terminal 4 and the automatic transaction device 1 have an interface, the automatic transaction device 1 causes the monitoring terminal 4 to perform the inspection at the automatic transaction device. Strict inspection execution confirmation is performed, and whether or not the detailed inspection execution is possible is confirmed according to the state of the automatic transaction apparatus 1 installed at the same location, the processing function of the automatic transaction apparatus 1 subject to the detailed inspection execution, and the frequency of use.
We decided to carry out scrutiny only when K was judged.
【0014】これにより、稼働している自動取引装置1
の台数が少ない時に稼働している自動取引装置が精査に
入って取り扱いができなくなるというようなことが無く
なり、稼働中の自動取引装置1の台数を安定させること
ができ、顧客の待ち時間が長くなることを防ぐことがで
きる。図4は本発明の第2の実施の形態を示す自動精査
システムのブロック図である。As a result, the automatic transaction apparatus 1 in operation
The number of automated trading machines that are operating when the number of operating automated trading machines is small and there is no possibility that they cannot be handled due to scrutiny, the number of automated trading machines 1 that are operating can be stabilized, and the waiting time of customers is long. Can be prevented. FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an automatic inspection system showing a second embodiment of the present invention.
【0015】図において、1は自動取引装置で、例えば
1つの営業店に複数台設置される。これら自動取引装置
には、遠隔指示やスケジューラの時刻設定に従って、自
身で保有している現金を計数し、その結果を記録する自
動精査機能を有する。5は通信装置で、複数台の自動取
引装置1は、この通信装置5、モデム5b、専用線5c
を介してホスト6に接続される。In the figure, reference numeral 1 is an automatic transaction device, and a plurality of automatic transaction devices are installed in one business store, for example. These automatic transaction devices have an automatic scrutiny function of counting cash held by themselves and recording the result according to a remote instruction or time setting of a scheduler. Reference numeral 5 is a communication device, and the plurality of automatic transaction devices 1 are the communication device 5, the modem 5b, and the leased line 5c.
Is connected to the host 6 via.
【0016】このように、ホスト6はそれぞれの自動取
引装置1と接続され、情報の通知が行われる。ここで、
前記ホスト6には、自動取引装置で自動精査を実行する
際、その可否を確認する機能が備わっている。なお、こ
のホスト6が持つ精査実行可否確認機能は、図1で説明
した監視端末4が持つ機能と同じであり、処理の流れは
図2および図3で説明したものと同じである。In this way, the host 6 is connected to each automatic transaction apparatus 1 and information is notified. here,
The host 6 has a function of confirming whether or not the automatic transaction is performed by the automatic transaction device. The function of confirming whether or not the host 6 can perform the inspection is the same as the function of the monitoring terminal 4 described with reference to FIG. 1, and the flow of the process is the same as that described with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.
【0017】すなわち、自動取引装置1に対して精査実
行命令が出ると、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1はホス
トに対して精査実行可否の確認要求を通知し、この通知
を受けて、ホスト6では精査実行可否の確認処理を行
う。この確認処理は、まず、ホスト6は精査実行対象の
自動取引装置1が設置されている場所の自動取引装置1
の台数をマスタファイルより調べ、次に、この設置場所
で稼働している自動取引装置の台数の最新情報を得て、
設置台数と稼働台数を比較する。That is, when a detailed inspection execution command is issued to the automatic transaction device 1, the automatic transaction device 1 to be executed in detail notifies the host of a confirmation request of confirmation execution possibility, and upon receipt of this notification, the host 6 Then, a confirmation process for confirming whether or not the detailed examination can be performed is performed. In this confirmation processing, first, the host 6 is the automatic transaction device 1 at the place where the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is installed.
From the master file, and then obtain the latest information on the number of automated teller machines operating at this installation location,
Compare the number of installed units and the number of operating units.
【0018】この比較処理で設置してある自動取引装置
1のうち、半分以上が稼働していると判断すると、精査
実行対象の自動取引装置1でのみ有効な取引があるか判
断する。この判断で、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1で
のみ有効な取引がないと判断すると、精査実行OKと判
断する。When it is determined that more than half of the automatic transaction devices 1 installed in this comparison process are operating, it is determined whether or not there is a valid transaction only in the automatic transaction device 1 subject to scrutiny. If it is determined in this determination that there is no valid transaction only in the automatic transaction device 1 subject to scrutiny, it is determined that scrutiny is OK.
【0019】前記比較処理で設置してある自動取引装置
1のうち、稼働台数が半分以下と判断した場合、あるい
は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1でのみ有効な取引が
あると判断した場合は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1
がよく使用されているかどうか判断する。この判断で、
精査実行対象の自動取引装置1がよく使用されていない
と判断すると、精査実行OKと判断する。Of the automatic transaction devices 1 installed in the comparison process, when it is determined that the number of operating machines is less than half, or when it is determined that there is a valid transaction only in the automatic transaction device 1 subject to scrutiny. , Automatic transaction device 1 subject to scrutiny
Determine if is used often. With this judgment,
If it is determined that the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is not being used often, it is determined to be scrutinized.
【0020】また、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1がよ
く使用されていると判断すると、精査実行NGと判断す
る。このように、ホスト6で精査実行の可否が確認され
て、精査実行OKと判断されると、精査実行対象の自動
取引装置1に精査実行OKを通知する。この通知を受け
て、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1は精査を実行する。When it is determined that the automatic transaction device 1 to be scrutinized is frequently used, it is determined that the scrutiny is NG. As described above, when the host 6 confirms whether or not the detailed examination can be performed and determines that the detailed examination is performed, the detailed transaction execution OK is notified to the automatic transaction device 1 that is the target of the detailed examination. Upon receiving this notification, the automatic transaction device 1 that is the object of the detailed inspection executes the detailed inspection.
【0021】また、ホスト6で精査実行NGと判断され
ると、精査実行対象の自動取引装置1に精査実行NGを
通知する。この通知を受けて、精査実行対象の自動取引
装置1は精査を実行せず、取引可能な状態を続ける。以
上説明した本発明の第2の実施の形態のように、ホスト
6に精査実行可否確認機能を備えることとしても、第1
の実施の形態と同様に、稼働している自動取引装置1の
台数が少ない時に稼働している自動取引装置が精査に入
って取り扱いができなくなるというようなことが無くな
り、稼働中の自動取引装置1の台数を安定させることが
でき、顧客の待ち時間が長くなることを防ぐことができ
る。When the host 6 determines that the detailed examination is not successful, it notifies the automatic transaction device 1 of the detailed examination to the fact that the detailed examination is unsuccessful. Upon receipt of this notification, the automatic transaction device 1 targeted for scrutiny does not perform scrutiny, and continues to be in a state where transactions can be performed. As in the case of the second embodiment of the present invention described above, even if the host 6 is provided with the scrutiny execution possibility confirmation function, the first
In the same manner as in the above embodiment, when the number of operating automatic transaction devices 1 is small, the automatic transaction devices that are operating do not go into scrutiny and cannot be handled. It is possible to stabilize the number of devices of No. 1 and prevent the waiting time of the customer from becoming long.
【0022】なお、上述した第1の実施の形態および第
2の実施の形態では、自動取引装置の稼働台数が半分以
上あるかどうかを精査実行可否の確認基準としている
が、この設定は任意に変更可能である。また、有高の情
報等も判断の基準とすることもできる。例えば、監視端
末4はホスト6で自動取引装置1毎に有高の情報を管理
し、精査実行可否処理時に、精査実行対象の自動取引装
置1以外の自動取引装置1の有高が少ない場合は、精査
実行NGと判断する。これにより、精査実行対象の自動
取引装置以外の自動取引装置の有高が少ない状態で精査
実行対象の自動取引装置が精査に入ってしまい、他の自
動取引装置が頻繁に使用されることで、現金が無くなっ
てしまい、装置が停止してしまうことを防止できる。In the above-described first and second embodiments, whether or not the number of operating automatic transaction apparatuses is more than half is used as the confirmation standard for scrutiny execution. However, this setting is optional. It can be changed. Further, information on the amount of money can also be used as a criterion for judgment. For example, when the monitoring terminal 4 manages the amount of money for each automatic transaction device 1 by the host 6, and the amount of the automatic transaction devices 1 other than the automatic transaction device 1 subject to the detailed inspection is small at the time of the detailed inspection execution possibility processing, , It is judged that the detailed examination is NG. As a result, the automatic transaction device subject to scrutiny enters the scrutiny in a state where there are few automatic transaction devices other than the automatic transaction device subject to scrutiny, and other automated transaction devices are frequently used. It is possible to prevent the apparatus from stopping because the cash is lost.
【0023】さらに、第1の実施の形態では、自動取引
装置1が監視端末4に精査実行可否の確認要求通知を出
し、この通知を基に監視端末4で精査実行可否の確認を
行うこととしたが、監視端末4から自動精査をリモート
指示する段階で、図3で説明した精査実行可否確認処理
を行って、精査実行OKの判断が出た場合のみリモート
指示を出すこととしてもよい。Further, in the first embodiment, the automatic transaction device 1 issues a confirmation request confirmation confirmation permission / prohibition confirmation notification to the monitoring terminal 4, and the monitoring terminal 4 confirms whether or not the inspection inspection execution permission is possible. However, at the stage of remotely instructing the automatic close inspection from the monitoring terminal 4, the close inspection execution feasibility confirmation process described with reference to FIG. 3 may be performed, and the remote instruction may be issued only when the result of the close inspection is OK.
【0024】[0024]
【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明は、自動取
引装置における精査実行時に、自動取引装置が上位装置
に精査実行確認を行い、同じ場所に設置されている自動
取引装置の状態や精査実行対象の自動取引装置が持つ処
理機能および使用頻度に応じて精査実行の可否を確認
し、精査実行OKの判断が出た場合のみ精査を実行する
ことにした。As described above, according to the present invention, the automatic transaction device confirms the detailed execution execution to the upper-level device at the time of executing the detailed inspection in the automatic transaction device, and the state and the detailed inspection of the automatic transaction device installed in the same place. Whether the detailed examination can be performed or not is confirmed according to the processing function and the frequency of use of the automatic transaction device to be executed, and the detailed examination is decided to be executed only when it is determined that the detailed examination is OK.
【0025】これにより、稼働している自動取引装置の
台数が少ない時に稼働している自動取引装置が精査に入
って取り扱いができなくなるというようなことが無くな
り、稼働中の自動取引装置の台数を安定させることがで
き、顧客の待ち時間が長くなることを防ぐことができ
る。As a result, when the number of operating automatic transaction devices is small, it is possible to prevent the operating automatic transaction devices from going into a scrutiny and becoming unusable. It is possible to stabilize, and it is possible to prevent the waiting time of the customer from becoming long.
【図1】本発明の第1の実施の形態を示す自動精査シス
テムのブロック図FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an automatic inspection system showing a first embodiment of the present invention.
【図2】精査実行可否確認処理全体の流れを示すフロー
チャートFIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the entire flow of the confirmation execution possibility confirmation processing.
【図3】監視端末に備えられている精査実行可否確認機
能による精査実行可否確認処理の流れを示すフローチャ
ートFIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a flow of a detailed examination execution possibility confirmation process by a detailed examination execution possibility confirmation function provided in the monitoring terminal.
【図4】本発明の第2の実施の形態を示す自動精査シス
テムのブロック図FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an automatic inspection system showing a second embodiment of the present invention.
1 自動取引装置 4 監視端末 1 Automatic transaction device 4 Monitoring terminal
Claims (8)
引装置の自動精査システムにおいて、 複数台の自動取引装置と上位装置との間を通信可能に接
続し、上位装置に精査実行の可否を確認する確認手段を
備え、精査実行対象の自動取引装置は、精査実行時に上
位装置と通信をして、前記確認手段で精査実行可と判断
された場合に精査を実行することを特徴とする自動取引
装置の自動精査システム。1. An automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device having a scrutiny function for counting cash, wherein a plurality of automatic transaction devices and a host device are communicably connected to each other to confirm whether the scrutiny can be performed by the host device. The automatic transaction device to be scrutinized for performing detailed examination communicates with a higher-level device at the time of scrutiny and executes the scrutiny when the confirmation means determines that scrutiny can be performed. Automatic equipment inspection system.
システムにおいて、 前記確認手段は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置の状態
と、この精査実行対象の自動取引装置と同じ場所に設置
されている他の自動取引装置の状態に応じて精査実行の
可否を判断することを特徴とする自動取引装置の精査実
行システム。2. The automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation means is installed in the same location as the state of the scrutiny execution target automatic transaction device and the scrutiny execution target automatic transaction device. A scrutiny execution system for an automatic transaction device, which determines whether or not scrutiny can be performed according to the state of another automatic transaction device.
システムにおいて、 前記確認手段は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置と同じ場
所に設置されている自動取引装置の稼働台数に応じて精
査実行の可否を確認することを特徴とする自動取引装置
の自動精査システム。3. The automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation means performs the scrutiny according to the number of operating automatic transaction devices installed at the same location as the automatic transaction device to be scrutinized. An automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device, characterized by confirming whether or not
システムにおいて、 前記確認手段は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置の使用頻
度に応じて精査実行の可否を確認することを特徴とする
自動取引装置の自動精査システム。4. The automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation means confirms whether or not the scrutiny can be performed according to the frequency of use of the automatic transaction device targeted for scrutiny. Automatic scrutiny system for trading equipment.
システムにおいて、 前記確認手段は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置およびこ
の自動取引装置と同じ場所に設置されている自動取引装
置の有高に応じて精査実行の可否を確認することを特徴
とする自動取引装置の自動精査システム。5. The automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the confirming means has an automatic transaction device to be scrutinized and an automatic transaction device installed at the same place as the automatic transaction device. An automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device, which confirms whether or not scrutiny can be performed according to the above.
システムにおいて、 前記確認手段は、精査実行対象の自動取引装置と同じ場
所に設置されている自動取引装置の稼働台数と、この精
査実行対象の自動取引装置の使用頻度の情報を組み合わ
せて、精査実行の可否を確認することを特徴とする自動
取引装置の自動精査システム。6. The automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation means is the number of operating automatic transaction devices installed at the same location as the automatic transaction device to be scrutinized and the execution of this scrutiny. An automatic scrutiny system for an automatic transaction device, characterized by confirming whether or not scrutiny can be performed by combining information on the frequency of use of the target automatic transaction device.
システムにおいて、 前記上位装置は、監視端末であることを特徴とする自動
取引装置の自動精査システム。7. The automatic inspection system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the higher-level device is a monitoring terminal.
システムにおいて、 前記上位装置は、ホストであることを特徴とする自動取
引装置の自動精査システム。8. The automatic inspection system for an automatic transaction device according to claim 1, wherein the host device is a host.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP1212596A JP3004202B2 (en) | 1996-01-26 | 1996-01-26 | Automatic inspection system for automatic transaction equipment |
TW085110499A TW376482B (en) | 1996-01-26 | 1996-08-29 | Automatic review system for automatic teller machine |
KR1019970002069A KR100339504B1 (en) | 1996-01-26 | 1997-01-24 | Automatic Inspection System of Automatic Transaction Device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP1212596A JP3004202B2 (en) | 1996-01-26 | 1996-01-26 | Automatic inspection system for automatic transaction equipment |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH09204557A true JPH09204557A (en) | 1997-08-05 |
JP3004202B2 JP3004202B2 (en) | 2000-01-31 |
Family
ID=11796827
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP1212596A Expired - Fee Related JP3004202B2 (en) | 1996-01-26 | 1996-01-26 | Automatic inspection system for automatic transaction equipment |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3004202B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100339504B1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW376482B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2011118835A (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-16 | Omron Corp | Medium issuing machine |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106971454A (en) * | 2017-04-13 | 2017-07-21 | 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 | Fault detection method, device and the fault alarm safeguarded are installed for ATM |
-
1996
- 1996-01-26 JP JP1212596A patent/JP3004202B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1996-08-29 TW TW085110499A patent/TW376482B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1997
- 1997-01-24 KR KR1019970002069A patent/KR100339504B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2011118835A (en) * | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-16 | Omron Corp | Medium issuing machine |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3004202B2 (en) | 2000-01-31 |
KR970059969A (en) | 1997-08-12 |
KR100339504B1 (en) | 2002-08-14 |
TW376482B (en) | 1999-12-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JPH10255112A (en) | Automatic teller machine monitoring method and system therefor | |
US8280030B2 (en) | Call routing system and method of using the same | |
JP2008217464A (en) | Automatic teller machine | |
JPH09204557A (en) | Automatic review system for automatic teller machine | |
US6535578B1 (en) | Fault control and restoration in a data communication system | |
CN111338947A (en) | Test method, test device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
JP2001185465A (en) | Control method of reference wafer for manufacturing line of semiconductor device and its system and recording medium | |
JPH1125352A (en) | Customer guide system, automatic teller machine and guide information managing device | |
JPS58158767A (en) | Transaction processing device | |
JP2023178586A (en) | Information processing device | |
KR20060093781A (en) | Method for issuing cash receipt and apparatus for processing the same | |
JP6852829B1 (en) | Route management system, route management method and program | |
JP4096647B2 (en) | Cash processing method | |
JPH08123876A (en) | Automated equipment monitoring system and fault informing method in the automated equipment monitoring system | |
JP3006141B2 (en) | Centralized management of automatic transaction equipment | |
TW202226122A (en) | Information processing device, method, and medium | |
JPH05233673A (en) | Ledger information correcting method for transaction | |
JPS59170969A (en) | Master monitoring system of on-line automatic machine | |
JPH0561800A (en) | Fault analyzing method | |
JP2013250704A (en) | Failure handling system, automatic transaction device, failure handling method and failure handling program | |
JPH10241016A (en) | Transaction continuation processing method against money dispensing transaction fault in automatic teller machine | |
KR100948774B1 (en) | Cash dispenser management server and method | |
JP5932710B2 (en) | Monitoring device | |
JP4030950B2 (en) | Excess amount management apparatus, method and program thereof | |
JPS636660A (en) | Automatic transaction processing system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081119 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081119 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091119 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091119 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101119 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101119 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111119 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111119 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121119 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121119 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131119 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |