JPH0568672U - Patent analysis table - Google Patents
Patent analysis tableInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0568672U JPH0568672U JP870392U JP870392U JPH0568672U JP H0568672 U JPH0568672 U JP H0568672U JP 870392 U JP870392 U JP 870392U JP 870392 U JP870392 U JP 870392U JP H0568672 U JPH0568672 U JP H0568672U
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- column
- target
- judgment
- judgment target
- constituent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Abstract
(57)【要約】
【目的】 当該出願人の発明における構成要件と他人の
発明等における構成要件との比較判断を容易に行うこと
ができる特許解析表を提供する。
【構成】 判断対象及び被判断対象を特定する対象特定
欄１と、上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象が有する構成
要件を記載する構成要件記載欄２と、上記判断対象及び
上記被判断対象が有する構成要件を記載し、上記判断対
象及び上記被判断対象のそれぞれについて上記判断対象
及び上記被判断対象が有する構成要件で上記構成要件記
載欄に記載した構成要件と当該欄に記載した構成要件と
の比較結果を複数種類の記号を用いて記載する解析欄３
と、上記解析欄の記載に基づき上記判断対象についての
解析結果を記載する対策欄４と、を備えたことを特徴と
する。
(57) [Summary] [Object] To provide a patent analysis table that enables easy comparison and judgment of the constituent features of the applicant's invention and the constituent features of another person's invention. [Structure] The target specifying column 1 for specifying the judgment target and the judgment target, the constituent requirement description column 2 for describing the constituent requirements of the judgment target and the judgment target, and the judgment target and the judgment target Describe the constituent requirements, and for each of the judgment target and the judgment target of the judgment target and the judgment target has the constituent requirements described in the above-mentioned constituent requirements column and the constituent requirements described in the relevant section Analysis column 3 in which the comparison result is described using multiple types of symbols
And a countermeasure column 4 in which the analysis result of the determination target is described based on the description in the analysis column.
Description
【０００１】[0001]
本考案は、例えば日本国内及び外国における特許法、実用新案法、意匠法、商 標法、著作権法等を含む知的財産権法の見地より判断対象と被判断対象とを比較 解析する特許解析表に関する。 The present invention is a patent that compares and analyzes the judgment target and the judgment target from the viewpoint of intellectual property law including patent law, utility model law, design law, trademark law, copyright law, etc. in Japan and abroad. Regarding the analysis table.
【０００２】[0002]
例えば特許法に基づき出願した発明について、審査、審判段階で拒絶理由通知 書に挙げられた引例の構成要件と上記発明の構成要件との比較、拒絶理由対処の ための請求範囲の記載の減縮の仕方、あるいは取得した特許権の権利範囲が他人 の特許権等と抵触するか否かの判断等については、当該出願人の発明における構 成要件と他人の発明等における構成要件とが複雑に絡み合い、上述した比較判断 等は困難な場合が多く、手間のかかる作業であるという問題がある。 本考案は、このような問題点を解決するためになされたもので、上記比較判断 を容易に行うことができる特許解析表を提供することを目的とする。 For example, for inventions filed under the Patent Act, at the examination and trial stages, the constituent requirements of the reference cited in the notice of reasons for refusal are compared with the constituent requirements of the invention described above, and the reduction of the description of the claims for dealing with the reasons for refusal Regarding the method, or whether or not the acquired patent right conflicts with another person's patent right, etc., the composition requirements of the applicant's invention and the composition requirements of another person's invention, etc. are complicatedly entangled. However, the above-mentioned comparison judgment is often difficult, and there is a problem that it is a laborious work. The present invention has been made in order to solve such a problem, and an object thereof is to provide a patent analysis table capable of easily performing the above-mentioned comparison and judgment.
【０００３】[0003]
本考案は、知的財産権法の見地より判断対象と被判断対象とを比較解析する特 許解析表において、 上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象を特定する対象特定欄と、 上記対象特定欄に記載した判断対象及び被判断対象に対応する位置に配され、 上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象が有する構成要件を記載する構成要件記載欄と 、 上記構成要件記載欄に隣接する欄であって、上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象 に対応する位置に配され、上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象が有する構成要件を 記載し、上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象のそれぞれについて上記構成要件記載 欄に記載した構成要件と当該欄に記載した構成要件との比較結果を複数種類の記 号を用いて記載する解析欄と、 上記解析欄の記載に基づき上記判断対象についての解析結果を記載する対策欄 と、を備えたことを特徴とする。 In the patent analysis table for comparing and analyzing the judgment target and the judgment target from the viewpoint of the intellectual property right law, the present invention includes the target specifying column for specifying the judgment target and the judgment target and the target specifying column. In the position corresponding to the described judgment target and judgment target, the constituent requirement description column for describing the constituent requirements of the judgment target and the judgment subject, and a column adjacent to the constituent requirement description column, Describe the constituents of the judgment target and the judgment target, which are arranged at the positions corresponding to the judgment target and the judgment target, and describe each of the judgment target and the judgment target in the above-mentioned constituent requirement description column. The analysis column in which the result of comparison between the constituent requirements described in the above and the constituent requirements described in the relevant column is described using a plurality of types of symbols, and the analysis result for the judgment target based on the description in the above analytical column are described. A countermeasure field for, characterized by comprising a.
【０００４】 このように構成することで、対象特定欄には判断対象及び被判断対象を記載し 、構成要件記載欄には上記判断対象及び被判断対象に対応して上記判断対象及び 被判断対象が有する構成要件を記載する。解析欄にも上記判断対象及び被判断対 象が有する構成要件を記載し、上記構成要件記載欄に記載した構成要件と上記解 析欄に記載した構成要件とを、判断対象及び被判断対象のそれぞれについて比較 しその解析結果を複数種類の記号を用いて解析欄に記載する。よって、解析欄に 記載された上記記号は、判断対象及び被判断対象についての構成要件毎の比較結 果を視覚的に表示しているので比較結果を容易に認識可能なように作用する。 又、対策欄は、上記解析結果に基づき上記判断対象の取りうる措置を示してい るので、どのような措置をとればよいかを直ちに認識可能なように作用する。With such a configuration, the judgment target and the judgment target are described in the target specifying column, and the judgment target and the judgment target are described in correspondence with the judgment target and the judgment target in the constituent requirement description column. Describe the configuration requirements of. In the analysis column, the constituent requirements of the judgment target and the judgment target are also described, and the constituent requirements described in the above-mentioned constituent requirement description column and the constituent requirements described in the above-mentioned analysis column are set as the judgment target and the judgment target. Each is compared and the analysis results are described in the analysis column using multiple types of symbols. Therefore, the symbol described in the analysis column visually displays the comparison result for each constituent requirement of the judgment target and the judgment target, and thus acts so that the comparison result can be easily recognized. In addition, the measure column indicates the measures that can be taken based on the analysis result, so that it can be immediately recognized what kind of measures should be taken.
【０００５】 又、本考案は、上記対策欄には、上記判断対象を実施する場合の対策事項を記 載する実施対策欄を備えることもでき、又、特許対策欄を備えることもできる。Further, in the present invention, the countermeasure column may include an implementation countermeasure column in which countermeasure items in the case of implementing the determination target are described, or a patent countermeasure column.
【０００６】 実施対策欄及び特許対策欄には、他人の権利と抵触せずに出願人の発明等を実 施するための措置、拒絶理由に対処するための措置を記載することより、実施対 策欄及び特許対策欄は取り得る措置を直ちに認識可能なように作用する。In the implementation countermeasure column and the patent countermeasure column, the measures for implementing the invention of the applicant without conflict with the rights of others and the measures for dealing with the reasons for refusal are described. The measures column and the patent measures column act so that the possible measures can be immediately recognized.
【０００７】 又、本考案は、上記解析欄に記載した構成要件と上記構成要件記載欄に記載し た上記判断対象及び被判断対象における構成要件との比較結果における上記記号 は、上記判断対象が有する構成要件を示す第１の記号と、上記判断対象が有しな い構成要件を示す第２の記号と、上記被判断対象が有する構成要件を示す第３の 記号と、を備えるようにしてもよい。Further, according to the present invention, the symbols in the comparison result of the constituent requirements described in the above-mentioned analysis column and the constituent requirements in the above-mentioned judgment target and judgment target described in the above-mentioned constituent requirement description column are A first symbol indicating a constituent requirement that the subject has, a second symbol indicating a constituent requirement that the judgment target does not have, and a third symbol indicating a constituent requirement that the judgment target has Good.
【０００８】 このように構成することで、第１ないし第３の記号は、比較結果をより明確に かつ迅速に認識可能なように作用する。With such a configuration, the first to third symbols act so that the comparison result can be recognized more clearly and quickly.
【０００９】 又、本考案は、上記判断対象が例えば日本国及び外国の特許等の公開、公告公 報のような特許文献である場合、上記第１の記号は、上記判断対象における上記 特許文献の請求範囲に記載の独立項に記載がある構成要件を示す第４の記号と、 上記判断対象における上記請求範囲に記載の従属項に記載がある構成要件を示す 第５の記号と、を備えるようにしてもよい。Further, in the present invention, when the judgment target is a patent document such as publication of Japanese patents and foreign patents, public announcement, etc., the first symbol is the above-mentioned patent document in the judgment target. A fourth symbol indicating a constituent requirement described in the independent claim described in the claim, and a fifth symbol indicating a constituent requirement described in the dependent claim described in the above-mentioned claim in the determination target. You may do it.
【００１０】 このように構成することで第４及び第５の記号は、判断対象が特許文献である 場合に独立項又は従属項の認識を比較結果から容易に判断可能なように作用する 。With such a configuration, the fourth and fifth symbols act so that the recognition of the independent term or the dependent term can be easily determined from the comparison result when the determination target is a patent document.
【００１１】 又、上記構成要件記載欄は、上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象が特許公報であ る場合には、上記判断対象および被判断対象の請求項を記載する請求項欄を備え 、上記構成要件記載欄に記載される上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象が有する構 成要件は、上記請求項欄に記載される請求項別で請求項に対応して記載すること もできる。In addition, when the judgment target and the judgment target are patent gazettes, the configuration requirement description field includes a claim field for describing the claims of the judgment target and the judgment target. The constituent requirements of the judgment target and the judgment target described in the constituent requirement description column may be described in correspondence with the claims for each claim described in the claim clause.
【００１２】[0012]
本考案の特許解析表の一実施例を示す図１及び図２を参照し、特許解析表につ いて説明する。尚、特許解析表とは、上記知的財産権法の見地から、判断対象で ある例えば当該人の出願あるいは権利化後の発明等における構成要件と、被判断 対象である拒絶理由通知書に挙げられた引例の発明等あるいは他人の特許権等に 係る発明における構成要件とを挙げ、両構成要件が同一か否かを比較しこの比較 結果を比較結果の種類に対応した記号にて示すことで、上記両構成要件の重複部 分の有無、重複している態様等を視覚的に容易に認識可能とし、あわせて上記比 較結果から拒絶理由に対処するための措置、他人の権利と抵触せずに発明等を実 施するための措置を記入するようにした表をいう。 The patent analysis table will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 showing one embodiment of the patent analysis table of the present invention. From the perspective of the above intellectual property law, the patent analysis table is included in the judgment subject, for example, the constituent requirements in the applicant's application or the invention after the patenting, and the notice of refusal to be judged. By referring to the constituents in the cited invention or the invention relating to the patent right of another person, the two constituents are compared to see if they are the same, and the comparison result is indicated by a symbol corresponding to the type of the comparison result. , It is possible to easily visually recognize the overlapping parts of the above two constituent elements, overlapping manners, etc., and at the same time, take measures to deal with the reason for refusal from the above comparison result, conflict with the rights of others. It means a table in which measures for implementing the invention, etc. are entered without the need of doing so.
【００１３】 又、このような特許解析表の使用方法としては、大きく分けて２つの使用方法 が考えられる。一つは、判断対象が当該人に関するものである場合であり、例え ば当該人の出願に係る発明と拒絶理由通知書に挙げられた引例の発明等との比較 において、新規性、進歩性、特許法２９条の２に該当するか否か等の判断材料と して使用可能である。又、このようにして比較し補正した発明等が登録され該発 明を実施するときには、上記発明が他人の特許権に係る発明等と利用、抵触関係 にあるか否か、他人の製品との関係はどうか等の判断材料としても使用可能であ る。さらに、改良発明等をした場合にどのような請求範囲として出願すればよい か等の判断材料としても使用可能である。Further, as a method of using such a patent analysis table, there are roughly two methods of use. One is the case where the subject of judgment is the person concerned.For example, when comparing the invention of the applicant's application with the invention of the reference cited in the notice of reasons for refusal, etc., novelty, inventive step, It can be used as a material for judging whether or not Article 29-2 of the Patent Act applies. In addition, when the inventions etc. thus compared and amended in this way are registered and the invention is put into practice, whether or not the above invention is in use or conflict with the invention etc. relating to the patent right of another person, and whether or not the invention is related to the product of another person. It can also be used as a criterion for determining the relationship. Further, it can be used as a material for determining what claims should be filed when an improved invention or the like is made.
【００１４】 他の一つは、判断対象が第三者に関するような場合である。例えば相手人が何 等かの権利を取得している場合等に、請求項欄を設けることにより情報提供、特 許異議申立、特許無効の審判を請求項毎に行う際に、上記権利を全部又は部分的 に消滅させる要因を挙げる判断材料としても使用可能である。又、当該人の製品 が相手人の製品を侵害するおそれのある場合にその判断材料としても、又、その 侵害に対処するための条件の判断材料としても使用可能である。 このような特性を有する特許解析表の具体的な作成手順を以下に説明する。The other one is a case where the determination target is a third party. For example, if the other party has acquired some right, etc., by providing a claim column, all the above rights are provided when information is provided, patent opposition, and trial for patent invalidation is made for each claim. Alternatively, it can be used as a criterion for deciding a factor that causes partial disappearance. It can also be used as a judgment material when the product of the person concerned may infringe the product of the other party, and as a judgment material of the condition for dealing with the infringement. A specific procedure for creating a patent analysis table having such characteristics will be described below.
【００１５】 本特許解析表は、図１にその全体を示すように、紙面の左端から右端へ横方向 に対象特定欄１、構成要件記載欄２、解析欄３、対策欄４及び備考欄５の順で区 画され、紙面の上側から下側へ縦方向にそれぞれ上述した各欄が延在する。尚、 解析欄３の最も上欄には後述するように判断対象及び被判断対象の構成要件を記 入するため、対象特定欄１、構成要件記入欄２及び対策欄４における最も上欄に はなにも記入しないようにするのが好ましいが、図２に示すように、構成要件記 載欄２には判断対象と被判断対象とにおける各構成要件の相関関係を図式的に関 連図として記載するようにしてもよい。又、対象特定欄１、構成要件記載欄２等 の配列順は、上述した順番に限るものではないが、比較の容易さより構成要件記 載欄２及び解析欄３は互いに隣接するのが好ましい。As shown in FIG. 1 in its entirety, the present patent analysis table has a target identification field 1, a component description field 2, an analysis field 3, a countermeasure field 4 and a remarks field 5 in the horizontal direction from the left end to the right end of the paper. The columns described above extend in the vertical direction from the upper side to the lower side of the paper. In addition, in the uppermost column of the analysis column 3, since the constituents of the judgment target and the judgment target are entered as will be described later, the uppermost column in the target specifying column 1, the constituent requirement entry column 2 and the countermeasure column 4 is Although it is preferable not to fill in anything, as shown in FIG. 2, the configuration item recording column 2 graphically shows the correlation of each configuration item between the judgment target and the judgment target. It may be described. Further, the arrangement order of the target specifying column 1, the constituent requirement writing column 2 and the like is not limited to the order described above, but it is preferable that the constituent requirement writing column 2 and the analysis column 3 are adjacent to each other for ease of comparison.
【００１６】 対象特定欄１には、判断対象である、例えば当該人の特許出願や特許権等と、 一つもしくは複数の被判断対象である他人の特許出願、特許権、あるいは雑誌、 技術文書、文献、商品等と、を特定するための情報、例えば公報番号、公報発行 日、出願人、国籍、審査請求の有無、雑誌名、文書名、出版日、発行日等を記入 する。 尚、以下の説明では当該人の特許出願について雑誌が拒絶理由として示された 場合を例とする。図２に示すように、特許解析表の対象特定欄１の記載欄１０１ には本願発明に関する事項を記入し、その下側に配置される記載欄２０１には拒 絶理由通知書にて挙げられた雑誌である引例Ａに関する事項を記入し、その下側 に配置される記載欄３０１には補正後の本願発明に関する事項を記入する。尚、 いずれの記載欄に何を記載するかは限定するものではない。In the object identification column 1, for example, the patent application or patent right of the person concerned, which is the judgment object, and the patent application, patent right, or magazine, or technical document of one or more judgment objects Enter information for identifying documents, products, etc. such as publication number, publication date, applicant, nationality, examination request, journal name, document name, publication date, issue date, etc. In the following explanation, the case where the journal is shown as the reason for refusal regarding the patent application of the person concerned is taken as an example. As shown in FIG. 2, in the description column 101 of the subject identification column 1 of the patent analysis table, the matters relating to the invention of the present application are entered, and in the entry column 201 arranged below the entry column 101, the rejection reason notice is included. Enter the items related to Reference A, which is a magazine, and the items related to the present invention after amendment in the description column 301 located below it. It should be noted that what is described in any of the columns is not limited.
【００１７】 構成要件記載欄２について、まず記載欄１０１に対応する記載欄１０２には補 正前の当該人の特許出願（以下、本願発明と記す）の明細書に記載されている構 成要件を表す語句、目的、効果等の特徴的な語句等を請求項毎に請求項に対応さ せて記載する。例えば当該明細書の請求項１に防錆塗料であって、その含有量が ５％以上であり、水溶性である塗料が記載されている場合、請求項１に該当する 行には「防錆塗料、 の含有量５％以上、水溶性ビークル」と記載する。 又、請求項１を引用する請求項(以下、単に従属項と記す)である請求項２には上 記含有量が１０ないし１５％であることが記載されている場合、請求項２に該当 する行には「１０ないし１５％」と記載する。Regarding the configuration requirement description column 2, first, in the description column 102 corresponding to the description column 101, the configuration requirement described in the specification of the patent application of the person before correction (hereinafter referred to as the present invention) Characteristic words and phrases that indicate the, characteristic words and words such as purposes and effects are described in correspondence with each claim. For example, when claim 1 of the specification describes a rust preventive paint having a content of 5% or more and being water-soluble, the line corresponding to claim 1 indicates "rust preventive Paint, content of 5% or more, water-soluble vehicle ". In addition, if claim 2 which is a claim that refers to claim 1 (hereinafter referred to simply as a dependent claim) has a content of 10 to 15%, it corresponds to claim 2. In the line to do, write "10 to 15%".
【００１８】 尚、上述したような、請求項に対応して構成要件を記載する必要は必ずしもな く、請求項は必要に応じて省略してもよく、あるいは主要な請求項又は他の請求 項を引用しない請求項(以下、独立項と記す)のみを抽出して記載してもよい。As described above, it is not always necessary to describe the constituent features corresponding to the claims, and the claims may be omitted as necessary, or the main claims or other claims. You may extract and describe only the claim which does not quote (it is hereafter described as an independent claim).
【００１９】 又、解析欄３の最も上段であって、予め、等の記号が付された記載欄５３ には、上記等に対応した語句を記載する。例えば、記載欄５３のの欄には「 防錆塗料」と記載し、記載欄５３のの欄には「５％以上」と記載し、記載欄５３ のの欄には「水溶性ビークル」と記載し、記載欄５３のの欄には「１０ないし １５％」と記載する。In addition, in the description column 53, which is the uppermost row of the analysis column 3 and is provided with symbols such as, in advance, the words and phrases corresponding to the above are written. For example, in the column of the description column 53, it is described as "rust preventive paint", in the column of the description column 53 is described as "5% or more", and in the column of the description column 53 is "water-soluble vehicle". It is described, and "10 to 15%" is described in the column of the description column 53.
【００２０】 次に、解析欄３と補正前の本願発明記載欄とが交差する記載欄１０３には、記 載欄１０２に記載したからの構成要件と記載欄５３に記載したからの構 成要件との交差箇所に、独立項に記載されている内容を示すときには「◆」の記号 を記載し、従属項に記載されている内容を示すときには「◇」の記号を記載する。 具体的に説明すると、記載欄１０３において、記載欄１０２にて「防錆塗料」 と記載した行と記載欄５３のの列３ａとが交差する箇所には、「防錆塗料」 は独立項の記載内容であるから「◆」の記号を記載し、記載欄１０２にて「５％ 以上」と記載した行と記載欄５３のの列３ｂとが交差する箇所には、「５％ 以上」は独立項の記載内容であるから「◆」の記号を記載し、記載欄１０２にて「 水溶性ビークル」と記載した行と記載欄５３のの列３ｃとが交差する箇所に は、「水溶性ビークル」は独立項の記載内容であるから「◆」の記号を記載し、 記載欄１０２にて「１０ないし１５％」と記載した行と記載欄５３のの列３ ｄとが交差する箇所には、「１０ないし１５％」は従属項の記載内容であるか ら「◇」の記号を記載する。Next, in the description column 103 where the analysis column 3 intersects with the description column of the present invention before amendment, the configuration requirement from the description column 102 and the configuration requirement from the description column 53 are described. At the intersection with and, the symbol "◆" is shown when showing the contents stated in the independent clause, and the symbol "◇" is shown when showing the contents stated in the dependent clause. To be more specific, in the description column 103, the "rust prevention paint" is an independent item at the intersection of the line described as "rust prevention paint" in the description column 102 and the column 3a of the description column 53. Since it is the description content, the symbol "◆" is described, and "5% or more" is written at the intersection of the line described as "5% or more" in the description field 102 and the column 3b of the description field 53. Since it is the content of the independent paragraph, the symbol "◆" is described, and at the intersection of the row described as "water-soluble vehicle" in the description column 102 and the column 3c of the description column 53, "water-soluble vehicle" is written. "Vehicle" is the content described in the independent paragraph, so the symbol "◆" is described, and the line "10 to 15%" in the description column 102 and the column 3d of the description column 53 intersect with each other. Indicates the symbol "◇" because "10 to 15%" is the content of the dependent claim.
【００２１】 一方、拒絶理由通知書に挙げられた引例Ａには、防錆塗料であり、その含有量 が８％以下であり、溶剤性の塗料である旨が開示されているとした場合、「防錆 塗料」については本願発明のの構成要件であり、「８％以下」についてはの構 成要件に含まれる。一方、「溶剤性ビークル」であることは本願発明の構成要件 ではないでことから、構成要件記載欄２と引例Ａの記載欄２０１とが交差する記 載欄２０２には、「防錆塗料」、「８％以下」と記載し、一方、「溶剤性ビー クル」は新たな構成要件であるので、「溶剤性ビークル」と記載する。さらに 、解析欄３のの最上欄の記載欄５３のの欄に「溶剤性ビークル」を追加記載す る。On the other hand, if the reference A cited in the notice of reasons for refusal discloses that it is a rust-preventive paint, the content of which is 8% or less, and that it is a solvent-based paint, "Rust preventive paint" is a constituent requirement of the present invention, and "8% or less" is included in the constituent requirements of. On the other hand, being a "solvent vehicle" is not a constituent of the invention of the present application, and therefore, a description column 202 in which the constituent requirement description column 2 and the reference column 201 of the reference A cross each other has "corrosion preventive paint". , "8% or less", while "solvent-based vehicle" is a new constituent element, so it is described as "solvent-based vehicle". Furthermore, “solvent vehicle” is additionally described in the column of the description column 53 in the uppermost column of the analysis column 3.
【００２２】 したがって、解析欄３と引例Ａの記載欄２０１とが交差する記載欄２０３にお いて、記載欄２０２にて「防錆塗料」と記載した行と記載欄５３のの列３ａ とが交差する箇所には、本願発明の構成要件が引例Ａにも記載があることを示す 「●」の記号を記載し、記載欄２０２にて「８％以下」と記載した行と記載欄 ５３のの列３ｂとが交差する箇所にも同様に「●」の記号を記載し、記載欄２０ ２にて「溶剤性ビークル」と記載した行と記載欄５３のの列３ｅとが交差す る箇所にも同様に「●」の記号を記載する。 又、引例Ａには「水溶性ビークル」、「１０ないし１５％」であることは 開示されていないので、引例Ａの記載欄２０３において、記載欄５３の「水溶 性ビークル」と記載した列３ｃ及び「１０ないし１５％」と記載した列３dには 、引例Ａに開示がないことを示す「〇」の記号を記載する。Therefore, in the description column 203 where the analysis column 3 and the description column 201 of the reference A intersect, the line described as “rust preventive paint” in the description column 202 and the column 3a of the description column 53 are At the crossing point, a symbol "●" indicating that the constituent features of the invention of the present application are also described in Reference A is described, and the line in which "8% or less" is described in the description column 202 and the description column 53 Similarly, the symbol "●" is also written at the intersection with the column 3b of the description column, and the line where "solvent vehicle" is described in the description column 202 and the column 3e of the description column 53 intersects with each other. Similarly, enter the symbol "●". Further, in Reference A, it is not disclosed that the content is “water-soluble vehicle” or “10 to 15%”. Therefore, in the description column 203 of Reference A, column 3c described as “water-soluble vehicle” in description column 53 In column 3d described as “10 to 15%”, a symbol “◯” indicating that there is no disclosure in Reference A is described.
【００２３】 又、「溶剤性ビークル」であることは本願発明には開示のないことであるので 、本願発明に対応する記載欄１０３において、上記列３ｅが対応する適宜な箇所 に本願発明には開示のないことを示す「〇」の記号を記載する。 尚、以上の説明では引例Ａは雑誌であるとしたが、引例Ａは特許公報であって もよい。この場合、引例Ａにおける請求項に記載される構成要件等に応じて、上 述したように独立項、従属項の区別を行うようにして記号を記載しても良く、又 、そのような区別をせずに、特許公報であっても上述したような「●」等の記号 を使用するようにしても良い。Further, since the “solvent vehicle” is not disclosed in the invention of the present application, in the description column 103 corresponding to the invention of the present application, the invention of the present application is provided in an appropriate place corresponding to the column 3e. Enter the symbol "○" to indicate that there is no disclosure. Although the reference A is a magazine in the above description, the reference A may be a patent publication. In this case, the symbols may be described so as to distinguish between the independent claim and the dependent claim as described above, depending on the constituents, etc. described in the claim in Reference A. Instead of the above, even in patent publications, symbols such as "●" as described above may be used.
【００２４】 以上のようにして解析欄３に記載した記号から以下のことを容易に認識するこ とができる。即ち、記載欄５３にて「水溶性ビークル」と記載した解析欄３の列 ３ｃ及び「１０ないし１５％」と記載した解析欄３の列３ｄについては本願発明 の記載欄１０３には本願発明に開示のあることを示す「◆」及び「◇」の記号が記 載されているが、引例Ａの記載欄２０３における上記列３ｃ、３ｄには引例Ａに 開示の有ることを示す「●」記号の記載ではなく引例Ａに開示のないことを示す「 〇」記号の記載であること、さらに、記載欄５３にて「５％以上」と記載した解 析欄３の列３bについて、本願発明の記載欄１０３及び引例Ａの記載欄２０３の 両者に「◆」、「●」の記号が記載されていることが分かる。よって、「５％ 以上」の構成要件については本願発明と引例Ａとが重複する部分であり、「水溶 性ビークル」及び「１０ないし１５％」の構成要件については本願発明のみに開 示のある構成要件であることが判る。 又、「溶剤性ビークル」の構成要件について、上記列３ｅをたどると本願発 明は「○」の記号であり開示のないことが認識でき、一方、引例Ａは「●」の記 号であり開示のあることが認識できる。As described above, the following can be easily recognized from the symbols described in the analysis column 3. That is, regarding the column 3c of the analysis column 3 described as “water-soluble vehicle” in the description column 53 and the column 3d of the analysis column 3 described as “10 to 15%”, the description column 103 of the invention of the present application describes the invention of the present application. Although the symbols "◆" and "◇" indicating that there is disclosure are described, the "●" symbol indicating that there is disclosure in the reference A is shown in the columns 3c and 3d in the description column 203 of the reference A. The description of the column 3b of the analysis column 3 in which “5% or more” is described in the description column 53 is described as “0”, which indicates that there is no disclosure in the reference A. It can be seen that the symbols "◆" and "●" are described in both the description column 103 and the description column 203 of the reference A. Therefore, the constituents of "5% or more" overlap the invention of the present application and the reference A, and the constituents of "water-soluble vehicle" and "10 to 15%" are disclosed only in the invention of the present application. It turns out that it is a constituent requirement. Further, regarding the constituent requirements of the "solvent vehicle", it can be recognized that the disclosure of the present application is a symbol of "○" and there is no disclosure when tracing the above column 3e, while the reference A is a symbol of "●". It can be recognized that there is disclosure.
【００２５】 したがって、拒絶理由に対処するための本願発明の特許請求の範囲の補正内容 としては、「水溶性ビークル」、「含有量１０ないし１５％」を構成要件に 限定すれば良いことが解析欄３の記号から容易に判断することができる。尚、本 願発明についてこのような限定を行えば、「防錆塗料」の構成要件が加わって いても差し支えないことも判断できるので、構成要件を「防錆塗料」、「水 溶性ビークル」及び「含有量１０ないし１５％」に限定すればよいことがわか る。 尚、このように判断した事項を対策欄４の該当する記載欄である、例えば特許 対策欄に文字、図式等で記載することもできる。 又、上記特許対策欄には、「本願発明の塗料は水溶性であるから、防錆塗料を １０％以上配合することができ、それによって顕著な防錆性を得ることができる 」旨の効果等を記載しておくこともできる。 又、対策欄４に記載することができる実施対策欄には、本願発明等を実施する 場合における障害、その主な理由、実施上の注意事項等を記載することもできる 。Therefore, the content of amendment of the scope of claims of the present invention for coping with the reason for refusal is analyzed by limiting “water-soluble vehicle” and “content 10 to 15%” to the constituent elements. It can be easily determined from the symbol in column 3. It should be noted that, if the above-mentioned limitation is applied to the invention of the present application, it can be judged that the constituents of the "rust preventive paint" may be added, so that the constituent requirements are "rust preventive paint", "water-soluble vehicle" and It is understood that the content should be limited to 10 to 15%. Note that the items determined in this way can also be described in characters, diagrams, etc. in the corresponding description column of the countermeasure column 4, for example, the patent countermeasure column. In addition, in the above-mentioned patent measure column, the effect of "because the coating composition of the present invention is water-soluble, it is possible to add 10% or more of a rust-preventive coating, and thereby obtain a remarkable rust-preventive property." It is also possible to describe such as. In addition, in the implementation countermeasure column that can be described in the countermeasure column 4, obstacles in the case of implementing the invention of the present application, main reasons therefor, precautions for implementation, etc. can also be described.
【００２６】 以上の比較、解析結果に基づき、本願発明について記載する記載欄３０２には「 防錆塗料」、「水溶性ビークル」及び「含有量１０ないし１５％」の構成 要件を記載し、解析欄３における記載欄３０３の該当する箇所には、「◆」あるい は「◇」の記号を記載しておく。 又、補正にて防錆塗料の含有量を増したことから、引例Ａとの差において本願 発明は防錆効果を有するので、例えば解析欄３における記載欄５３には「防錆効 果」の記載をし、補正後の本願発明の記載欄３０３における該当する欄には、顕 著な効果を有することを意味する「＋＋＋」の記号を記載しておく。尚、引例等と の比較において本願発明の効果の度合により「＋＋」のように記号を変化させても 良く、逆に本願発明はそのような効果を奏しないときには「−」の記号を記載する ようにしてもよい。Based on the above comparison and analysis results, in the description column 302 describing the invention of the present application, the constituent requirements of “rust preventive paint”, “water-soluble vehicle” and “content 10 to 15%” are described and analyzed. In the corresponding portion of the description column 303 in column 3, the symbol "◆" or "◇" is described. Further, since the content of the anticorrosion paint is increased by the correction, the present invention has an anticorrosion effect in the difference from the reference A. For example, in the description column 53 in the analysis column 3, the “anticorrosion effect” is described. After the description, the corresponding column in the description column 303 of the present invention after correction is provided with a symbol "++++" which means that it has a remarkable effect. Incidentally, in comparison with the reference, etc., the symbol may be changed like “++” depending on the degree of the effect of the present invention, and conversely, when the present invention does not exhibit such an effect, the symbol “−” is described. You may do it.
【００２７】 又、新たな態様として、上記拒絶理由通知を受領した後補正前に、本願出願後 に、防錆塗料であり、その含有量が１５％であり、水溶性である商品Ｙが販売さ れたことが分かった場合を考えてみる。 商品Ｙの構成要件記載欄２における記載欄４０２には、「防錆塗料」、「、 １５％」及び「水溶性ビークル」と記載する。又、解析欄３における記載欄４ ０３には、上述した方法で「●」を記載する。この記載欄４０３の記載内容より商 品Ｙは本願発明の補正後の構成要件をすべて満たしていることが分かり、補正後 の本願発明によれば、上記引例Ａに対しても商品Ｙに対しても対処できることが 容易に判断できる。In addition, as a new aspect, after receiving the notification of reasons for refusal and before amendment, after the application of the present application, a product Y which is a rust preventive paint and has a content of 15% and is water-soluble is sold. Consider the case when it is known that the person was touched. In the description column 402 in the configuration requirement description column 2 of the product Y, “rust preventive paint”, “, 15%” and “water-soluble vehicle” are described. In the description column 403 in the analysis column 3, "●" is entered by the method described above. It can be seen from the contents of this description column 403 that the product Y satisfies all the constituent features after the correction of the invention of the present application, and according to the invention of the present invention after the correction, the product Y is also compared with the product A for the above-mentioned reference A. You can easily determine that you can deal with.
【００２８】 以上説明したように、本願発明及び引例等における構成要件を記載した上で、 これらの構成要件が本願発明に記載があるのか否か、引例等には開示等があるの か否かを異なる種類の記号で解析欄３に記載するだけで、例えば拒絶理由に対処 するための措置等について解析欄３に記載した記号を見るだけで容易に差異を見 つけ技術範囲の異同を判断することができる。As described above, after describing the constituents in the invention of the present application and the reference, whether these constituents are described in the invention of the present application, whether the disclosure is disclosed in the reference, etc. Just by describing the different types of symbols in the analysis column 3, for example, by looking at the symbols described in the analysis column 3 regarding measures to deal with the reason for refusal, it is possible to easily find the difference and determine the difference in technical scope. be able to.
【００２９】 又、相手方が権利を取得しており、例えば特許異議申立、特許無効審判等を行 なう場合においても、上述した「本願発明」に関して構成要件、記号等を記載した 欄に特許異議申立等の被申立人が有する発明等に関する事項を記載し、上述した 場合と同様に処理することで、解析欄３に記載される記号から一部又は全部の請 求項に対し特許異議申立をするに際しどの点を強調すべきかを容易に判断するこ とができる。Further, even when the other party has acquired the right and makes a patent opposition, for example, a patent invalidation trial, etc., the patent opposition in the column in which the constituent requirements, symbols, etc. are described in the above “invention invention” By stating the matters relating to the invention, etc. of the respondent, such as the petition, and processing in the same manner as described above, a patent opposition is filed against some or all of the claims from the symbols listed in analysis column 3. You can easily determine which points should be emphasized when doing this.
【００３０】 又、図２に示すように作成された特許解析表において、本願発明と引例等とを 比較するだけでなく、例えば引例Ａと商品Ｙとの比較を行なうために使用するこ とも勿論できる。Further, in the patent analysis table created as shown in FIG. 2, it is of course used not only to compare the invention of the present application with the reference, but also to compare the reference A with the product Y, for example. it can.
【００３１】 尚、以上の説明では日本国内の「特許」を例に取り説明したが、これに限るも のではなく、実用新案登録出願は勿論のこと、意匠登録出願、商標登録出願につ いても適用可能であり、又、外国の出願にも適用可能なことは勿論である。In the above description, “patents” in Japan are taken as an example, but the present invention is not limited to this, and not only utility model registration applications but also design registration applications and trademark registration applications. Of course, it is also applicable to foreign applications.
【００３２】[0032]
以上詳述したように本考案によれば、本願発明及び引例等における構成要件を 記載する構成要件記載欄を備え、記載した構成要件が本願発明に記載があるのか 否か、引例等には開示等があるのか否かを異なる種類の記号で記載する解析欄を 備えたことより、例えば本願発明と引例との差異を容易に比較することができ拒 絶理由に対処するためにどのような措置等を行えばよいかの判断が解析欄に記載 した記号を見るだけで容易に認識することができる。 As described above in detail, according to the present invention, there is provided a constituent requirement description column for describing constituent requirements in the present invention and references, and whether or not the described constituent requirements are described in the present invention is disclosed in the reference. By providing an analysis column that describes whether or not there is a different type of symbol, for example, it is possible to easily compare the difference between the invention of the present application and the reference, and what measures should be taken to deal with the reason for refusal? The decision as to whether or not to do the above can be easily recognized only by looking at the symbol described in the analysis column.
【図１】 本考案の特許解析表の一実施例における特許
解析表の全体を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an entire patent analysis table in an embodiment of the patent analysis table of the present invention.
【図２】 本考案の特許解析表の具体的な使用例を説明
するための図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining a specific example of use of the patent analysis table of the present invention.
１…対象特定欄、２…構成要件記載欄、３…解析欄、４
…対策欄、５…備考欄。1 ... Target identification field, 2 ... Configuration requirement description field, 3 ... Analysis field, 4
... Countermeasure column, 5 ... Remark column.
Claims (6)
断対象とを比較解析する特許解析表において、 上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象を特定する対象特定欄
（１）と、 上記対象特定欄に記載した判断対象及び被判断対象に対
応する位置に配され、上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象
が有する構成要件を記載する構成要件記載欄（２）と、 上記構成要件記載欄に隣接する欄であって、上記判断対
象及び上記被判断対象に対応する位置に配され、上記判
断対象及び上記被判断対象が有する構成要件を記載し、
上記判断対象及び上記被判断対象のそれぞれについて、
上記構成要件記載欄に記載した構成要件と当該欄に記載
した構成要件との比較結果を複数種類の記号を用いて記
載する解析欄（３）と、 上記解析欄の記載に基づき上記判断対象についての解析
結果を記載する対策欄（４）と、 を備えたことを特徴とする特許解析表。1. A patent analysis table for comparing and analyzing a judgment target and a judgment target from the viewpoint of the intellectual property law, and a target specifying column (1) for specifying the judgment target and the judgment target, and the above target. Adjacent to the configuration requirement description column (2), which is placed at a position corresponding to the determination target and the determination target described in the specific column, and which describes the configuration requirements of the determination target and the determination target, and the configuration requirement description column It is a column to be arranged, is arranged in a position corresponding to the judgment target and the judgment target, and describes the constituent requirements of the judgment target and the judgment target,
For each of the judgment target and the judgment target,
Regarding the judgment target based on the description of the analysis column (3), which describes the result of comparison between the configuration requirements described in the configuration requirement description column and the configuration requirements described in the relevant column using a plurality of types of symbols, A patent analysis table characterized by including a countermeasure section (4) in which the analysis result of (1) is described.
場合の対策事項を記載する実施対策欄を備えた、請求項
１記載の特許解析表。2. The patent analysis table according to claim 1, wherein the countermeasure column includes an implementation countermeasure column in which countermeasure items for implementing the judgment target are described.
求項１又は２記載の特許解析表。3. The patent analysis table according to claim 1, wherein the measure column includes a patent measure column.
成要件記載欄に記載した上記判断対象及び被判断対象に
おける構成要件との比較結果における上記記号は、上記
判断対象が有する構成要件を示す第１の記号と、上記判
断対象が有しない構成要件を示す第２の記号と、上記被
判断対象が有する構成要件を示す第３の記号と、を備え
た請求項１ないし３のいづれかに記載の特許解析表。4. The symbol in the result of comparison between the constituent requirements described in the analysis column and the constituent requirements of the judgment target and the judgment target described in the constituent requirement description column indicates the constituent requirements of the judgment target. 4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising a first symbol, a second symbol indicating a constituent element that the judgment target does not have, and a third symbol indicating a constituent element that the judgment object has. Patent analysis table.
記第１の記号は、上記判断対象における上記特許文献の
請求範囲に記載の独立項に記載がある構成要件を示す第
４の記号と、上記判断対象における上記請求範囲に記載
の従属項に記載がある構成要件を示す第５の記号と、を
備えた請求項４記載の特許解析表。5. When the determination target is a patent document, the first symbol is a fourth symbol indicating the constituent element described in the independent claim in the patent document of the determination target. The patent analysis table according to claim 4, further comprising: a fifth symbol indicating a constituent element described in the dependent claim of the claim in the determination target.
び上記被判断対象が特許公報である場合には、上記判断
対象および被判断対象の請求項を記載する請求項欄を備
え、上記構成要件記載欄に記載される上記判断対象及び
上記被判断対象が有する構成要件は、上記請求項欄に記
載される請求項別で請求項に対応して記載する、請求項
１記載の特許解析表。6. The configuration requirement description column includes a claim column that describes the claims of the determination target and the determination target when the determination target and the determination target are patent publications. The patent analysis table according to claim 1, in which the constituents of the judgment target and the judgment target described in the requirement description column are described in correspondence with the claims for each claim described in the claim column. ..
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP870392U JPH0568672U (en) | 1992-02-26 | 1992-02-26 | Patent analysis table |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP870392U JPH0568672U (en) | 1992-02-26 | 1992-02-26 | Patent analysis table |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH0568672U true JPH0568672U (en) | 1993-09-17 |
Family
ID=11700300
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP870392U Pending JPH0568672U (en) | 1992-02-26 | 1992-02-26 | Patent analysis table |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0568672U (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6457058B1 (en) * | 2017-12-06 | 2019-01-23 | 株式会社ゴールドアイピー | Intellectual property system, intellectual property support method and intellectual property support program |
| JP2019102099A (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2019-06-24 | 株式会社ＡＩ Ｓａｍｕｒａｉ | Intellectual Property System, Intellectual Property Support Method and Intellectual Property Support Program |
-
1992
- 1992-02-26 JP JP870392U patent/JPH0568672U/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6457058B1 (en) * | 2017-12-06 | 2019-01-23 | 株式会社ゴールドアイピー | Intellectual property system, intellectual property support method and intellectual property support program |
| WO2019111545A1 (en) * | 2017-12-06 | 2019-06-13 | 株式会社 ＡＩ Ｓａｍｕｒａｉ | Intellectual property system, intellectual property assistance method, and intellectual property assistance program |
| JP2019101944A (en) * | 2017-12-06 | 2019-06-24 | 株式会社ＡＩ Ｓａｍｕｒａｉ | Intellectual Property System, Intellectual Property Support Method and Intellectual Property Support Program |
| JP2019102099A (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2019-06-24 | 株式会社ＡＩ Ｓａｍｕｒａｉ | Intellectual Property System, Intellectual Property Support Method and Intellectual Property Support Program |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ng | Automatic thresholding for defect detection | |
| Richards | The trafficking of migrant workers: What are the links between labour trafficking and corruption? | |
| Scordato | Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims | |
| JPH0568672U (en) | Patent analysis table | |
| KR20220072233A (en) | Method and apparatus for providing trademark-related information using artificial intelligence | |
| Marciano | Economic analysis of law | |
| McFarland | In Search of the Transaction or Occurrence: Counterclaims | |
| Birnbaum et al. | Standardized Agreements and the Parol Evidence Rule: Defining and Applying the Expectations Principle | |
| Feldman | Preemption and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Implications for Federal Indian Law | |
| Schurr et al. | Effective selling approaches to buyers' objections | |
| Smith et al. | Determination of forming limits for aluminum alloys | |
| EP0830014A3 (en) | Detection of oblique scratches in video signals | |
| JP3839822B2 (en) | Method for analyzing damage status of goods in logistics process, damage status analysis system and recording medium | |
| Beavers et al. | Choosing and Protecting the Corporate Name | |
| Landmon et al. | Chevron Deference on the Brink: Small Fish May Mean Big Changes for FDA | |
| Owens | Software Reverse Engineering and Cleanrooming, When Is It Infringement? | |
| McDonald | An Analysis of Remittitur's Effects on the Timing to File a Notice of Appeal | |
| Levenstam et al. | Punitive Damages Awards against Successor Corporations: Deterrent of Malicious Torts or Legitimate Acquistions | |
| Kuosman | Sufficiency of the Description of Collateral in a UCC Section 9-203 Security Agreement: A Critique of White & (and) Summers' Approach | |
| Badenhorst | The nature and features of ‘unused old order rights’ under the MPRDA revisited: The story of Gouws’ farm | |
| Fudge | Limiting Equity: The Definition of Employer Under the Ontario Pay Equity Act | |
| Ramey | Congress Hatches the Egg: Justice Thomas's Textual Mandate Test for Preemption | |
| Ginn | United States Supreme Court Changes in Determining Whether Judicial Decisions Should Apply Retroactively | |
| Knobel | Accession of movables to land, South African law and Dutch law | |
| Al-Shafei Mr | Criteria for Considering the Shari’a Need when Applied to a Commercial Insurance Contract: An Applied Jurisprudential Study |