JP3090240B2 - AD converter test equipment - Google Patents

AD converter test equipment

Info

Publication number
JP3090240B2
JP3090240B2 JP04326903A JP32690392A JP3090240B2 JP 3090240 B2 JP3090240 B2 JP 3090240B2 JP 04326903 A JP04326903 A JP 04326903A JP 32690392 A JP32690392 A JP 32690392A JP 3090240 B2 JP3090240 B2 JP 3090240B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
logic
output
conversion output
expected value
converter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP04326903A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH06177758A (en
Inventor
茂 村山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Advantest Corp
Original Assignee
Advantest Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Advantest Corp filed Critical Advantest Corp
Priority to JP04326903A priority Critical patent/JP3090240B2/en
Publication of JPH06177758A publication Critical patent/JPH06177758A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3090240B2 publication Critical patent/JP3090240B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
  • Analogue/Digital Conversion (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】この発明は例えばAD変換器試験
装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to, for example, an AD converter test apparatus.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】図4にAD変換器を試験する場合の試験
装置の構成を示す。図中1はパターン発生器を示す。パ
ターン発生器1は被試験AD変換器2に与えるアナログ
信号ALと、このアナログ信号ALを正しくAD変換し
た期待値パターン信号EXPH,EXPLを発生する。
期待値パターン信号EXPH,EXPLは被試験AD変
換器2のAD変換出力信号ADOUT と共に論理比較器3
に与えられ、論理比較器3において論理比較され期待値
と不一致が発生したとき不良と判定し、不良解析メモリ
4に不良を表わすデータを書込む。
2. Description of the Related Art FIG. 4 shows a configuration of a test apparatus for testing an AD converter. In the figure, reference numeral 1 denotes a pattern generator. The pattern generator 1 generates an analog signal AL to be supplied to the AD converter under test 2 and expected value pattern signals EXPH and EXPL obtained by correctly AD-converting the analog signal AL.
The expected value pattern signals EXPH and EXPL are output to the logical comparator 3 together with the AD conversion output signal AD OUT of the AD converter 2 under test.
When a logical comparison is made in the logical comparator 3 and a mismatch with the expected value occurs, it is determined to be a failure, and data representing the failure is written to the failure analysis memory 4.

【0003】論理比較器3は期待値との不一致を表わす
不良表示信号FMFと、被試験AD変換器2のAD変換
出力ADOUT の各ビットの論理状態を表わすエラー論理
情報FMCとを出力する。不良表示信号FMFはAD変
換出力ADOUT が期待値と不一致になったとき、「1」
論理を出力し、この「1」論理を不良表示信号として第
1不良解析メモリ4に書込む。これと共にパターン発生
の順番を表わす番号も不良表示信号FMFと同一のアド
レスに書込む。このようにパターン発生の順番を表わす
番号(アドレスに相当する)を不良表示信号FMFと共
に第1不良解析メモリに書込むことにより、不良解析時
に不良発生の期待値パターンを特定することができる。
The logic comparator 3 outputs a failure indication signal FMF indicating a mismatch with an expected value and error logic information FMC indicating a logic state of each bit of an AD conversion output AD OUT of the AD converter 2 under test. The failure display signal FMF is “1” when the AD conversion output AD OUT does not match the expected value.
Logic is output, and this "1" logic is written into the first failure analysis memory 4 as a failure display signal. At the same time, a number indicating the order of pattern generation is also written at the same address as the defect display signal FMF. By writing a number (corresponding to an address) indicating the order of pattern generation in the first failure analysis memory together with the failure display signal FMF, an expected value pattern of failure occurrence can be specified at the time of failure analysis.

【0004】一方第2不良解析メモリ5には不良発生時
に被試験AD変換器2が出力したエラー論理情報FMC
を書込む。このエラー論理情報を解析することにより、
どのビットの出力が「1」か「0」か何れで期待値と不
一致になったかを知ることができる。図5に論理比較器
3の具体的な構成を示す。図では被試験AD変換器2の
一つの出力端子のAD変換出力ADOUT を期待値と比較
する部分の構成を示す。図5において3Aはアナログの
レベル比較部を示す。このレベル比較部3Aに「1」論
理の基準電圧VOHと、「0」論理の基準電圧VOLとを与
え、入力信号ADOUTの電圧がVOHより高ければ「1」
論理と判定し、VOLより低ければ「0」論理と判定す
る。この判定結果はラッチ回路3B,3Cに入力され、
ストローブパルスSTROBEにてラッチされる。ラッ
チ回路3Bと3Cのラッチ出力はそれぞれ正相出力端子
Qと、逆相の出力端子※Qとを有し、それぞれのラッチ
出力信号をFH,FZH,FL,FZLと呼ぶことにす
る。これらのラッチ出力信号FH,FZH,FL,FZ
Lはディジタル比較部3Dに入力される。このディジタ
ル比較部3Dにはラッチ出力信号FH,FZH,FL,
FZLの外に期待値信号EXPH,※EXPH,EXP
L,※EXPLが入力され、これら期待値信号EXP
H,※EXPH,EXPL,※EXPLとラッチ出力信
号FH,FZH,FL,FZLとがナンドゲート群で比
較され、その比較結果がオアゲートOR1 とOR 2 を通
じて取出され、不良表示信号FMFとエラー論理情報F
MCとが出力される。
On the other hand, when a failure occurs, the second failure analysis memory 5
Logic information FMC output from the AD converter 2 under test
Write. By analyzing this error logic information,
Which bit output is “1” or “0”,
You can know if they match. Figure 5 shows the logical comparator
3 shows a specific configuration. In the figure, the AD converter 2 under test is
AD conversion output AD of one output terminalOUTCompare with expected value
The configuration of the part to be performed is shown. In FIG. 5, 3A is an analog
5 shows a level comparison unit. "1" theory is applied to this level comparison unit 3A.
Reference voltage VOHAnd a reference voltage V of "0" logicOLAnd give
Input signal ADOUTVoltage is VOH"1" if higher
Judge as logic, VOLIf it is lower, it is determined to be "0" logic
You. This determination result is input to the latch circuits 3B and 3C,
It is latched by the strobe pulse STROBE. Luck
The latch outputs of the switch circuits 3B and 3C are positive-phase output terminals, respectively.
Q and output terminal of opposite phase
The output signals will be referred to as FH, FZH, FL, FZL.
You. These latch output signals FH, FZH, FL, FZ
L is input to the digital comparison unit 3D. This digital
The latch comparator 3D has latch output signals FH, FZH, FL,
Expectation signal EXPH, * EXPH, EXP outside FZL
L, * EXPL are input and these expected value signals EXP
H, * EXPH, EXPL, * EXPL and latch output signal
No. FH, FZH, FL, FZL are compared with NAND gate group
Are compared, and the comparison result is OR gate OR1And OR TwoThrough
The fault indication signal FMF and the error logic information F
MC is output.

【0005】図6にAD変換出力ADOUT の論理と期待
値との比較結果を表にして示す。AD変換出力ADOUT
がH,Z,L(ZはHとLの中間で高インピーダンス状
態を指す)の順に変化するとき、ラッチ出力FHは
「0」,「1」,「1」、ラッチ出力FLは「1」,
「1」,「0」と変化する。このとき期待値EXPH=
「0」、EXPL=「1」つまりL論理のとき不良表示
信号FMFは「1」,「1」「0」の順に変化する。こ
れの意味するところは期待値がL論理のときはAD変換
出力ADOUT がL論理のときだけ不良表示信号FMFは
「0」論理(良:PASS)となり、他は「1」論理
(不良:FAIL)となることを表わしている。またエ
ラー論理情報FMCは「0」,「1」,「1」の順に変
化する。期待値がL論理のとき、エラー論理情報FMC
が「0」論理のときはAD変換出力ADOUT がH論理
(VOHより高い電圧)になっている状態でFAILとな
ったことを意味し、他の「1」論理はAD変換出力AD
OUT がVOHより低い論理に位置していることを表わして
いる。
FIG. 6 is a table showing the comparison result between the logic of the AD conversion output AD OUT and the expected value. AD conversion output AD OUT
Change in the order of H, Z, L (Z indicates a high impedance state between H and L), the latch output FH is “0”, “1”, “1”, and the latch output FL is “1”. ,
It changes to “1” and “0”. At this time, the expected value EXPH =
When “0”, EXPL = “1”, that is, L logic, the failure display signal FMF changes in the order of “1”, “1”, and “0”. This means that when the expected value is L logic, the failure display signal FMF becomes “0” logic (good: PASS) only when the AD conversion output AD OUT is L logic, and “1” logic (bad: FAIL). The error logic information FMC changes in the order of “0”, “1”, and “1”. When the expected value is L logic, error logic information FMC
Is "0" logic, it means that the A / D conversion output AD OUT has become FAIL in the state of H logic (voltage higher than V OH ), and the other "1" logic is the A / D conversion output AD.
OUT indicates that it is located at a logic lower than V OH .

【0006】従って不良表示信号FMFが「1」論理に
なる毎に、パターン発生の番号と共にエラー論理情報F
MCを不良解析メモリに記憶しておくことによりパター
ン番号から期待値を知ることができるから、AD変換出
力ADOUT がどの論理でFAILとなったかを解析する
ことができる。期待値がH論理のとき、AD変換出力A
OUT がH,Z,Lの順に変化すると、不良表示信号F
MFは「0」,「1」,「1」の順に変化する。つまり
AD変換出力ADOUT がH論理のときPASSとなり、
AD変換出力ADOUT がZ,Lの状態では不良、FAI
Lを表わす「1」論理を出力する。エラー論理情報FM
CはAD変換出力ADOUT がH,Z,Lの順に変化する
とき「1」,「1」,「0」の順に変化する。つまりこ
のときはAD変換出力ADOUT がVOLより高い電圧にあ
るときFMCは「1」論理を出力し、VOLより低い電圧
のときFMCは「0」論理となる。
Therefore, every time the failure display signal FMF becomes "1" logic, the error logic information F together with the pattern generation number is displayed.
Since the expected value can be known from the pattern number by storing the MC in the failure analysis memory, it is possible to analyze which logic of the AD conversion output AD OUT is FAIL. When the expected value is H logic, AD conversion output A
When D OUT changes in the order of H, Z, and L, the defective display signal F
The MF changes in the order of “0”, “1”, “1”. That is, when the AD conversion output AD OUT is H logic, it becomes PASS,
Bad when AD conversion output AD OUT is in Z, L state, FAI
The logic "1" representing L is output. Error logic information FM
C changes in the order of “1”, “1”, and “0” when the AD conversion output AD OUT changes in the order of H, Z, and L. That is, at this time, when the AD conversion output AD OUT is at a voltage higher than V OL , the FMC outputs “1” logic, and when the AD conversion output AD OUT is at a voltage lower than V OL, the FMC becomes “0” logic.

【0007】期待値が高インピーダンスZのときAD変
換出力ADOUT がH,Z,Lの順に変化すると不良表示
信号FMFは「1」,「0」,「1」と変化する。つま
りAD変換出力ADOUT がVOHとVOLの間にあるときだ
けPASSと判定し、それ以外ではFAILと判定する
ことを意味している。このときエラー論理情報FMCは
「0」,「0」,「1」と変化し、このときはAD変換
出力ADOUT がVOLより高いとき「0」論理を出力し、
OLより低いとき「1」論理を出力する。
When the AD conversion output AD OUT changes in the order of H, Z, and L when the expected value is high impedance Z, the failure display signal FMF changes to “1”, “0”, and “1”. That is, PASS is determined only when the AD conversion output AD OUT is between V OH and V OL , and FAIL is determined otherwise. At this time, the error logic information FMC changes to “0”, “0”, “1”. At this time, when the AD conversion output AD OUT is higher than V OL , “0” logic is output,
When the voltage is lower than V OL , “1” logic is output.

【0008】期待値がX(ドントケア)のときはAD変
換出力ADOUT がどの領域にあってもPASSとなる。
以上の説明を要約して示すと、下記の表1のようにな
る。 表1 期待値 “L” “H” “Z” “X” H FAIL PASS FAIL PASS VOH────────・・────・・────・・───── Z FAIL FAIL PASS PASS VOL────────・・────・・────・・───── L PASS FAIL FAIL PASS
When the expected value is X (don't care), PASS is set regardless of the area of the AD conversion output AD OUT .
Table 1 below summarizes the above description. Table 1 Expected values “L” “H” “Z” “X” H FAIL PASS FAIL PASS V OH ──────── ──── ──── ──── ───── Z FAIL FAIL PASS PASS V OL ──────── ·· ──── ·· ──── ·· ───── L PASS FAIL FAIL PASS

【0009】[0009]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】被試験体がAD変換器
の場合、連続的に変化するアナログ電圧をAD変換する
ものであるから、AD変換出力ADOUT の各ビットの論
理はサンプリングのタイミングのズレ等に応じて「1」
論理であるべきが「0」論理となったり、或はその逆に
なったりすることが多い。特に最下位桁(LSB)のビ
ット及びこれに近いビットのAD変換出力ADOUT はビ
ット誤差により正確に期待値に合致しない場合が多い。
このため従来の試験装置によってAD変換器を試験する
と不良の判定ばかり出されてしまう欠点がある。
When the DUT is an A / D converter, the analog voltage that changes continuously is subjected to A / D conversion. Therefore, the logic of each bit of the A / D conversion output AD OUT is determined by the sampling timing. "1" according to the displacement
It should be logic, but often becomes "0" logic, or vice versa. In particular, the A / D conversion output AD OUT of the least significant bit (LSB) bit and a bit close to this bit often does not exactly match the expected value due to a bit error.
For this reason, there is a disadvantage that when the AD converter is tested by the conventional test apparatus, only a defect is determined.

【0010】またAD変換器の試験においては良否判定
試験を行なった後にAD変換出力ADOUT をメモリに取
込む作業を行なっている。つまりAD変換出力ADOUT
をメモリに取込み、このメモリに取込んだAD変換出力
ADOUT を例えば高速フーリエ変換装置に与えて周波数
分析し、不用な周波数スペクトルが発生していないか否
かを見る試験も合せて行なっている。
In the test of the A / D converter, a work of loading the A / D conversion output AD OUT into a memory after performing a pass / fail judgment test is performed. That is, AD conversion output AD OUT
Is stored in a memory, and an AD conversion output AD OUT captured in the memory is supplied to, for example, a fast Fourier transform device to perform a frequency analysis, and a test is performed to check whether an unnecessary frequency spectrum is generated. .

【0011】AD変換出力ADOUT をメモリに取込むに
は、期待値をH論理に固定し、この状態でエラー論理情
報FMCを見ると、図6に示すようにAD変換出力AD
OUTがH論理のとき、FMC=「1」、AD変換出力A
OUT がL論理のときFMC=「0」となるからエラー
論理情報FMCを取出すことにより、AD変換出力AD
OUT を取出すことができる。
In order to load the AD conversion output AD OUT into the memory, the expected value is fixed to H logic, and when the error logic information FMC is viewed in this state, as shown in FIG.
When OUT is H logic, FMC = "1", AD conversion output A
Since FMC becomes "0" when D OUT is at L logic, the error conversion information FMC is taken out to obtain the AD conversion output AD.
OUT can be taken out.

【0012】然るにこの場合期待値をH論理に固定しな
ければならないから、良否判定試験とAD変換出力AD
OUT の取込作業とを同時に実行することはできない。従
って従来は良否の判定作業と、AD変換出力ADOUT
メモリへの取込作業とを別々に実行しているため試験に
時間が掛る欠点がある。
However, in this case, since the expected value must be fixed to the H logic, the pass / fail judgment test and the AD conversion output AD
OUT capture operation cannot be performed simultaneously. Therefore conventionally there is a disadvantage that the time test for running a determination work quality, and capture operations to memory AD conversion output AD OUT separately consuming.

【0013】[0013]

【課題を解決するための手段】この発明ではAD変換出
力ADOUT の論理が期待値と一致しなくてもAD変換出
力ADOUT の論理がH論理か、L論理の何れか一方の状
態にあればPASSと判定する論理比較手段を設けるも
のである。この論理比較手段によればAD変換出力AD
OUT と期待値の論理が完全に一致しなくても、AD変換
出力ADOUT がH論理か、L論理にあればPASSと判
定し、H論理とL論理の中間の状態にあれば不良と判定
する。従って例えばH論理からL論理に移る動作、又は
H論理からL論理に移る動作が規定の時間以上掛るよう
な動作を検出することができ、この点でAD変換器の不
良を検出することができる。
Means for Solving the Problems The logic of AD conversion output AD OUT even not match the logic expected value of AD conversion output AD OUT in this invention or H logic, it is in one of states of logic L For example, a logical comparison means for determining PASS is provided. According to this logical comparison means, the AD conversion output AD
Even if the logic of OUT and the expected value do not completely match, if the AD conversion output AD OUT is H logic or L logic, it is judged as PASS, and if it is in the middle state between H logic and L logic, it is judged as defective. I do. Therefore, for example, it is possible to detect an operation in which the transition from the H logic to the L logic or the operation from the H logic to the L logic takes a predetermined time or more, and it is possible to detect a defect of the AD converter at this point. .

【0014】またこの発明による論理比較手段で動作さ
せる場合、エラー論理情報はAD変換出力ADOUT の論
理と一致して取出すことができる。よって良否判定作業
と、AD変換出力ADOUT の論理波形の取込作業とを一
度に平行して実行することができる。この結果試験に要
する時間を短かくするとができる利点も得られる。
When operated by the logic comparison means according to the present invention, the error logic information can be extracted in accordance with the logic of the AD conversion output AD OUT . Therefore, the pass / fail judgment work and the work of taking in the logic waveform of the AD conversion output AD OUT can be executed at the same time. As a result, there is an advantage that the time required for the test can be shortened.

【0015】[0015]

【実施例】図1にこの発明の一実施例を示す。図1にお
いて、図5と対応する部分には同一符号を付して示す。
この発明ではディジタル比較部3Dにモード切替手段1
0及び11を設け、これらモード切替手段10及び11
において入力端子Aを選択するときは、従来と全く同じ
モードで試験を行なうことができるが、入力端子Bを選
択すると、この発明で提案する論理比較手段として動作
する。
FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, parts corresponding to those in FIG. 5 are denoted by the same reference numerals.
According to the present invention, the mode switching means 1 is provided in the digital comparison unit 3D.
0 and 11 are provided, and these mode switching means 10 and 11 are provided.
When the input terminal A is selected, the test can be performed in exactly the same mode as in the prior art, but when the input terminal B is selected, it operates as the logical comparison means proposed in the present invention.

【0016】つまりモード切替手段10及び11は入力
端子Sに与える論理値に応じて選択する入力端子が切替
られる。例えば入力端子SにH論理を与えると入力端子
Aを選択し、入力端子SにL論理を与えると入力端子B
を選択する。モード切替手段10が入力端子Aを選択す
ると、図5に示した従来の装置と同様にラッチ出力FZ
HとFZLのノアゲート出力をナンドゲート群の一つの
入力端子に与える状態に切替られる。またモード切替手
段10が入力端子Bを選択すると、この状態ではラッチ
出力FHとFLをナンドゲートした出力をナンドゲート
群の一つの入力端子に与える状態に切替られる。この切
替によってオアゲートOR1 から出力される不良表示信
号FMFはAD変換出力ADOUT がH論理か、L論理の
何れか一方の状態にあれば、期待値と論理が合致しなく
てもFMF=「0」を出力し、PASSと判定する。
That is, the input terminals to be selected by the mode switching means 10 and 11 are switched according to the logical value given to the input terminal S. For example, when H logic is applied to the input terminal S, the input terminal A is selected, and when L logic is applied to the input terminal S, the input terminal B is selected.
Select When the mode switching means 10 selects the input terminal A, the latch output FZ is set in the same manner as in the conventional device shown in FIG.
The state is switched to a state in which the NOR gate outputs of H and FZL are applied to one input terminal of the NAND gate group. When the mode switching means 10 selects the input terminal B, in this state, the state is switched to a state in which an output obtained by NAND gate of the latch outputs FH and FL is applied to one input terminal of the NAND gate group. By this switching, the failure display signal FMF output from the OR gate OR 1 is FMF = “FMF =“, even if the expected value and the logic do not match if the AD conversion output AD OUT is in either the H logic state or the L logic state. "0" is output, and PASS is determined.

【0017】一方モード切替手段11は入力端子Aにオ
アゲートOR2 の出力端子を接続し、入力端子Bに期待
値※EXPHと※EXPLのナンドゲート12の出力を
取出すと共に、このナンドゲート12の出力とオアゲー
トOR2 の出力を排他的論理和回路13で排他的論理を
とり、この排他的論理和をモード切替手段11の入力端
子Bに与える構造としたものである。
On the other hand, the mode switching means 11 connects the output terminal of the OR gate OR 2 to the input terminal A, takes out the outputs of the NAND gates 12 of the expected values * EXPH and * EXPL to the input terminal B, and outputs the outputs of the NAND gate 12 and the OR gate. The exclusive OR circuit 13 takes the exclusive OR of the output of the OR 2 and gives the exclusive OR to the input terminal B of the mode switching means 11.

【0018】この発明の構成によれば図2に示すように
期待値をZとし、モード切替手段10と11を入力端子
Bを選択するモードBに切替ることによりAD変換出力
AD OUT がH論理にあっても、L論理にあっても不良表
示信号FMFは「0」論理となりPASSと判定する。
これに対し、AD変換出力ADOUT がZ領域に存在する
場合には不良表示信号FMFは「1」論理となり、不良
を表わす信号として出力される。
According to the structure of the present invention, as shown in FIG.
The expected value is Z, and the mode switching means 10 and 11 are input terminals.
AD conversion output by switching to mode B for selecting B
AD OUTTable is bad regardless of whether it is in H logic or L logic
The indication signal FMF becomes “0” logic, and is determined as PASS.
On the other hand, the AD conversion output ADOUTExists in the Z region
In this case, the failure display signal FMF becomes logic "1",
Is output as a signal representing

【0019】従って図3に示すようにAD変換出力AD
OUT がストローブパルスSTROBEのタイミングにお
いてH論理かL論理に存在すればPASSと判定される
が、論理の反転動作に時間が掛り、ストローブパルスS
TROBEのタイミングにおいてAD変換出力ADOUT
が高インピーダンス領域Zに存在する場合はFAILと
判定される。
Therefore, as shown in FIG.
If OUT is in H logic or L logic at the timing of the strobe pulse STROBE, it is determined to be PASS. However, the logic inversion operation takes time, and the strobe pulse S
AD conversion output AD OUT at TROBE timing
Is present in the high impedance region Z, it is determined as FAIL.

【0020】一方この状態(期待値がZでモードB)に
おいて、エラー論理情報FMCはAD変換出力ADOUT
がH論理のとき図2に示すようにFMC=「1」、AD
変換出力ADOUT がL論理のときFMC=「0」とな
る。よってこのエラー論理情報FMCをメモリに取込む
ことにより、実質的にAD変換出力ADOUT を取込んだ
と等価となる。
On the other hand, in this state (the expected value is Z and the mode is B), the error logic information FMC contains the AD conversion output AD OUT
Is H logic, as shown in FIG.
When the conversion output AD OUT is at L logic, FMC = "0". Thus by taking the error logic information FMC to memory, it becomes substantially equivalent to the taken AD conversion output AD OUT.

【0021】[0021]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、この発明によれば
従来と同等の試験の外に、AD変換出力ADOUT の各ビ
ットの信号の論理がH論理か、L論理の何れの論理に存
在すればPASSと判定し、高インピーダンス領域に存
在する場合は不良と判定する試験を行なうことができ
る。よってAD変換出力ADOUT の論理反転が遅れるよ
うな不良現象を検出することができる。
As described above, according to the present invention, in addition to the same test as the prior art According to the present invention, logic or H logic of each bit of the signal of the AD converter output AD OUT, present in any logic L logic In this case, a test can be performed in which the signal is determined to be PASS, and when the signal is present in the high impedance region, the signal is determined to be defective. Therefore, it is possible to detect a defect phenomenon in which the logic inversion of the AD conversion output AD OUT is delayed.

【0022】またこの試験と平行してAD変換出力AD
OUT と等価な信号(FMC)取出すことができるから、
良否判定作業と、AD変換出力ADOUT の信号の取込作
業を同時に実行することができる。従って試験時間を短
縮することができる利点が得られる。
In parallel with this test, the AD conversion output AD
Since the signal equivalent to OUT (FMC) can be extracted,
The pass / fail judgment work and the work of taking in the signal of the AD conversion output AD OUT can be performed simultaneously. Therefore, the advantage that the test time can be shortened is obtained.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】この発明の一実施例を示す接続図。FIG. 1 is a connection diagram showing one embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】この発明の動作を説明するための図。FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the operation of the present invention.

【図3】この発明の動作を説明するための波形図。FIG. 3 is a waveform chart for explaining the operation of the present invention.

【図4】AD変換器を試験する場合の試験装置全体の概
略の構成を説明するためのブロック図。
FIG. 4 is a block diagram for explaining a schematic configuration of an entire test apparatus when testing an AD converter.

【図5】従来の技術を説明するための接続図。FIG. 5 is a connection diagram for explaining a conventional technique.

【図6】従来の技術の動作を説明するための図。FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining the operation of the conventional technique.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 パターン発生器 2 被試験AD変換器 3 論理比較器 4 第1不良解析メモリ 5 第2不良解析メモリ 10,11 モード切替手段 REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 pattern generator 2 AD converter under test 3 logical comparator 4 first failure analysis memory 5 second failure analysis memory 10, 11 mode switching means

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 被試験AD変換器にアナログ信号を与
え、そのAD変換出力を論理比較器において期待値と論
理比較し、AD変換出力が期待値と不一致が発生したと
き、不良と判定するAD変換器試験装置において、 AD変換出力が期待値の論理に関係なくH論理又はL論
理の何れかに存在する場合を良と判定し、H論理とL論
理の中間に存在する場合を不良と判定する論理判定手段
を設けたことを特徴とするAD変換器試験装置。
An analog signal is supplied to an AD converter under test, the AD converted output is logically compared with an expected value in a logical comparator, and when the AD converted output does not match the expected value, the AD which is determined to be defective is determined. In the converter test device, the case where the AD conversion output exists in either the H logic or the L logic irrespective of the logic of the expected value is determined as good, and the case where the AD conversion output exists between the H logic and the L logic is determined as bad. An AD converter test apparatus, comprising:
JP04326903A 1992-12-07 1992-12-07 AD converter test equipment Expired - Lifetime JP3090240B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP04326903A JP3090240B2 (en) 1992-12-07 1992-12-07 AD converter test equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP04326903A JP3090240B2 (en) 1992-12-07 1992-12-07 AD converter test equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH06177758A JPH06177758A (en) 1994-06-24
JP3090240B2 true JP3090240B2 (en) 2000-09-18

Family

ID=18193040

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP04326903A Expired - Lifetime JP3090240B2 (en) 1992-12-07 1992-12-07 AD converter test equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3090240B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH06177758A (en) 1994-06-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6789224B2 (en) Method and apparatus for testing semiconductor devices
US7688658B2 (en) Semiconductor device in which a plurality of memory macros are mounted, and testing method thereof
KR20000034827A (en) semiconductor memory test method and apparatus thereof
JPH10188597A (en) Memory tester
JP3090240B2 (en) AD converter test equipment
JPH10106292A (en) Memory tester
JPH06201801A (en) Improved data analyzer and analyzing method used for bist circuit
US6105156A (en) LSI tester for use in LSI fault analysis
JPH06119799A (en) Device for testing memory
JPH063413A (en) Method and device for inspecting logic signal
JP3455402B2 (en) Semiconductor memory test equipment
KR100253707B1 (en) Apparatus and method for testing semiconductor device
KR102670596B1 (en) Method for configuring address of buffer memory for semiconductor test, and semiconductor test apparatus implementing the same method
JP3472972B2 (en) IC test equipment
JP3532617B2 (en) IC test equipment
JP3223924B2 (en) Logic comparator for IC test equipment
JP2578076Y2 (en) Defect data acquisition device for IC test equipment
JP3185187B2 (en) IC test equipment
JPH05281292A (en) Ic tester using ad circuit
JPS6039186B2 (en) semiconductor element
JPH1186593A (en) Integrated circuit test device
JP2000285698A (en) Memory testing deivce
JP2002168918A (en) History information recorder for device for testing semiconductor
JPS63233384A (en) Logical check of printed circuit board unit
JPH0926460A (en) Semiconductor testing device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20000613

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080721

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080721

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090721

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090721

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100721

Year of fee payment: 10