JP2581350Y2 - Rhombus tower - Google Patents

Rhombus tower

Info

Publication number
JP2581350Y2
JP2581350Y2 JP1991080452U JP8045291U JP2581350Y2 JP 2581350 Y2 JP2581350 Y2 JP 2581350Y2 JP 1991080452 U JP1991080452 U JP 1991080452U JP 8045291 U JP8045291 U JP 8045291U JP 2581350 Y2 JP2581350 Y2 JP 2581350Y2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
tower
main
axis
arm
upper body
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP1991080452U
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0735654U (en
Inventor
収平 岩田
Original Assignee
収平 岩田
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 収平 岩田 filed Critical 収平 岩田
Priority to JP1991080452U priority Critical patent/JP2581350Y2/en
Publication of JPH0735654U publication Critical patent/JPH0735654U/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2581350Y2 publication Critical patent/JP2581350Y2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Electric Cable Installation (AREA)
  • Suspension Of Electric Lines Or Cables (AREA)

Description

【考案の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】この考案は、送電線支持物本体の
構成部材の構造配置に係わる骨組強度の効率化および線
占用用地の縮小ならびに既設鉄塔の建替え工法の合
理化等に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a rationalization of rebuilding method of reduction as well as existing tower efficiency and line under private use land width of the frame intensity related to structural arrangement of the transmission line support material body components is there.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来の支持物は、図のような形の鉄
塔で、本体の4面が同形で、その断面が正方形の四角
鉄塔(図A、C)と本体の相対する2面が同形で、そ
の断面が矩形(図B)の方形鉄塔が代表的で、同図A
の四角鉄塔が一般的にれている。いずれも本体の
一側面とY軸方向の構造軸が線路方向と一致(正体)
るもので、本体構成部材の強度について四角鉄塔では
電線路の方向とこれに直角の方向の強度とが等しく、
方形鉄塔では電線路の方向と、これに直角の方向の強度
にした設計となっている。(JEC−127−19
79、送電用支持物設計標準)先行技術として「実公昭
15−14983号公報」に、正方形の鉄塔本体(主
塔)を45度捻り変位した構造が開示され、回転するこ
とにより鉄塔材を約3割節約し得る旨の理論が説示され
ている。 本体を45度捻ることにより断面形状が斜方形
となり、本願と形状的に類似するが、塔体を回転するこ
とにより派生する絶縁間隔の短縮、腕金長大化等の問題
については不知であり、また外力に対応する2本の塔柱
について重量計算を行うなど不合理かつ非実用的技術思
想のため比較の対象に供し得ないものである。 また、
「特開昭60−226973号公報」に、構造物の主要
部を単一主柱材をもって三角形状に接合した平面トラス
(腹材不使用)の構成を基本とし、くせ下の骨組みを平
面トラスを4面構成して4角錐台とした鉄塔構造が開示
され、腹材を使用する従来の構造に比べ主柱材応力の集
中がなくなるため鉄塔強度の安定化、部材の大幅な節減
(鉄塔重量の低減)が達成される旨の理論が説示されて
いる。 この鉄塔の部材構成は従来の骨組みと全く異な
り、架渉線(地線、電線)を吊持する腕金が単一部材
で、腕金を保持する主柱材が3本(2本は補剛材)で、
上部断面が棒状(−)、骨組みの正面の形状が鳥居型
(H)、側面が人形A型をな し、くせ部の断面が斜方形
(◇)で、くせ部より下の骨組み形状が主柱材2本を逆
V状に接合した三角形の平トラスを4面構成した4角
錐台状の回転型特殊構造の鉄塔であるため、(イ).斜
風時に腕金からくせ部までの主柱材(3本構成)に応力
不均衡が発生する。(ロ).腹材を使用しない骨組みの
ため細長比(L/R)の関係で主柱材に太い鋼材の使用
が必要で、鉄塔重量が重くなる。(ハ).地上高の高い
鉄塔や大規模鉄塔の下部本体の構成が難しく適用できな
い。など実用困難な諸問題が潜在するので、くせ下で主
柱材を逆V型に分岐し、応力を分割する骨組み(2箇
所)は本願と形状、構造力学的に類似するが、他の2箇
所はX型分岐で異形であることなど、その技術的思想、
目的、形状、効果等について本願と異なる点が多く単純
に比較検討することは適切でない。
Conventional support material is a shape of tower as in FIG. 3, 4 structure surface of the body in the same shape, its cross section is a square tower (FIG. A, C) of the square that faces the body The two sides are the same shape ,
A typical example is a square tower with a rectangular cross section (B in the figure).
Square tower is for general-many. Both those structural axes of one side and the Y-axis direction of the body coincides with the line direction (identity), the direction of the to-wire path by a square tower about the strength of the body structure member, and the strength of the perpendicular direction thereto equally,
For a square tower, the strength in the direction of the electric line and in the direction perpendicular to it
And it has a design that was different from the. (JEC-127-19
79, power transmission supporting structure design standard) "Utility Model as prior art
No. 15-14983 gazette], the square tower main body (main
The tower is twisted and displaced by 45 degrees.
And the theory that the tower material can be saved by about 30% is explained.
ing. The cross-sectional shape is rectangular by twisting the body by 45 degrees
And similar in shape to the present application, but
Problems such as shortening of the insulation interval, lengthening of the arm, etc.
I don't know about it, and two tower columns
Irrational and impractical technical
It cannot be used for comparison because of its imagination. Also,
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Sho 60-226973 discloses a major structure.
Truss with triangular joints with a single main pillar
(No abdominal material used)
Disclosure of a steel tower structure consisting of four surface trusses and a truncated pyramid
Of the main column material, compared to the conventional structure using web material.
Stabilization of tower strength and significant savings in materials due to the absence of the inside
(Reduction in tower weight)
I have. The structure of this tower is completely different from the conventional framework.
And a single arm that suspends the trolley wire (ground wire, electric wire)
In, three main pillars to hold the arm (two stiffeners),
The upper section is rod-shaped (-), and the front shape of the skeleton is torii
(H), to a side the name dolls A type, the cross section of the habit portion rhombus
In (◇), the frame below the habit is inverted two main pillars
Square configured four surfaces flat surface truss triangle joined to V-shaped
Because it is a frustum-shaped rotating tower with a special structure, (a). Slant
Stress on the main pillar (3 pieces) from the arm to the habit in the wind
Imbalance occurs. (B). Framed without stomach
Because of the slenderness ratio (L / R), use thick steel for the main pillar
Is necessary, and the tower becomes heavier. (C). High above ground
The structure of the lower body of a tower or large-scale tower is difficult to apply.
No. And other practically difficult problems.
A frame that splits the column into an inverted V-shape and splits the stress (2
Is similar in shape and structural mechanics to the present application, but the other two
The place is an X-shaped branch and is a variant,
Many differences from this application in terms of purpose, shape, effects, etc.
It is not appropriate to weigh it.

【0003】[0003]

【考案が解決しようとする課題】従来、送電線支持物
鉄塔構造設計を行う際の想定荷重(垂直、水平)
のうち、風荷重の加わる条件は、風が電線路に直角の
の場合と、これに並行する方向の場合あるいは60度
方向からの場合について計算を行っており、それぞれ
の方向の想定荷重は異なるが、常に4本の主脚材と4面
の腹材が対応するとの考え方に立った平面トラス解析
ため本体の骨組を構成する4本の主柱材と4面の腹材の
強度はそれぞれ等しく、最大の荷重に耐える強度となっ
ている。一方、総実荷重のうちの垂直荷重(20%弱)
については常に全主柱材と腹材に均等負荷されるが、水
平方向の荷重(全体の80%強)のうち風圧荷重につい
ては、電線路に直角方向の風(直風圧)による荷重の方
が電線路方向のそれより大きく(比率6:4)支持物の
種類によっては風圧荷重が最大となる風の角度は直線、
角度鉄塔では線路方向に対して60度(斜風)、引留鉄
塔では90度(直風圧)の方向としているそのため、
最も多用されている直線、角度鉄塔は斜風時が最も苛酷
な荷重条件となるので、これに対応した構造配置、即ち
斜風対向が最も有効となる。 1.従来の鉄塔は、全て電線路に正体(Y構造軸が並
行)して建っているが、 四角鉄塔に丁度45度方向から
の風による荷重が働いた場合、風向線(対角線)上の2
本の主柱材と、これに隣接する腹材は応力負担するが、
他の主柱材2本は応力負担しない(引張と圧縮力
殺)ため、前記2本が設計応力より過負荷状態での2脚
対応といった強度不安定問題が潜在した従って、常時
斜風多発地においては、鉄塔本体を斜風方向(約45〜
75度)に捻って斜風対向させれば4脚対応となり効果
的である。 2.しかし、本体を回転することによって本体と電線と
の間隔が短縮(接近)され絶縁協調が保てなくなること
と腕金寸法の長大化が必要となった。 3.また、本体を回転した状態において電線路と直角方
向から風が吹いた場合には前述同様、2本の主柱材に応
力が集中する不均衡問題(逆効果)が発生するので万全
な方策とは言えず全風向対応策、即ち、風向に拘らず常
時4脚対応する鉄塔構造の確立が必要となる。 4. 従来の四角鉄塔(正方・矩形)を元位置で建替(同
一形状の嵩上げ)える場合、図Aのように新旧の基礎
体が接近または重合するため、基礎体および塔体の新
設、撤去作業の並行実施は困難であり危険を伴った .図Aのように2回線鉄塔の塔体幅cは、鉄塔の腕
金で支持された電線横振れ時の塔体との最小絶縁間隔
を基準にした腕金の長さbの2倍と本体幅aを加えた間
であるが、本体幅aの塔体幅cに占める割合は、77
〜154KV級で約15%、220〜275KV級で約
20%程度あり、2回線の電線相互の所要線間距離(最
小絶縁間隔)に対する割合は更に大きく、電圧の上昇と
ともにその割合が大きくなるので、線下占用用地幅
くなる。近年、鉄塔の大規模化に伴い本体幅が広くな
り、その分用地幅も広くなっており用地費の高騰あるい
は用地確保の至難化が問題となっている。 .図6のように従来の懸垂鉄塔では電線弛角θ大き
電線が塔体側に振れたとき腕金吊材に接近するた
め、保安離隔確保のため上下腕金間隔lを標準鉄塔の
隔より大きくとる必要があった。などの諸問題があり
従来の鉄塔構造が実態に即した効率的かつ実用的な構造
配置とはいえない。考案は、これらの問題点を是正
(解消、良)し、より実効性を高めることを目的とす
る。
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] Conventionally , transmission line support
It assumed load when performing structural design (towers) (vertical, horizontal)
Among the conditions applied wind loads, and if the wind towards <br/> direction perpendicular to the electric line, in the case of direction or 60 ° parallel thereto
The calculation is performed for the case from the direction of, and the assumed load in each direction is different, but for the plane truss analysis based on the idea that the four main landing gear members and the four abdominal members always correspond, The strengths of the four main pillar members and the four abdominal members constituting the skeleton are equal to each other, and are strengths that can withstand the maximum load. On the other hand , the vertical load of the total actual load (less than 20%)
Is always equally applied to all the main pillars and web members, but among the horizontal loads (more than 80% of the total), the wind pressure load is the one due to the wind perpendicular to the wireway (direct wind pressure). Depending on the type of support, the angle of the wind at which the wind load becomes maximum is linear,
60 degrees to the line direction at an angle tower (oblique wind), the dead-end towers is the direction of 90 degrees (straight wind pressure). for that reason,
The most frequently used straight and angle pylons are most severe in oblique winds
Load condition, the structural arrangement corresponding to this, that is,
Oblique wind opposition is most effective. 1. In conventional towers, the identity (Y structure axis is
If it is built on the line), worked load due from just 45 ° direction in a square tower to <br/> wind, 2 on wind direction line (diagonal line)
And the main pillar material of the present, belly material which is adjacent to this is the stress burden,
Other main pillar two no stress strain (tensile and compressive forces phase <br/> killing) for, two legs in the overload state from the two design stress
There was a potential problem of strength instability such as response . Therefore, always
In places with frequent oblique winds, the main body of the tower is installed in the oblique wind direction (approx.
(75 degrees) to face the oblique winds
It is a target. 2. However, by rotating the body, the body and the wire
The distance between the wires is shortened (closer) and insulation coordination cannot be maintained
And the size of the arm has to be lengthened. 3. When the main body is rotated,
When the wind blows from the direction, the two main pillars
As imbalance problem (reverse effect) where power concentrates occurs, it is perfect
It is not an effective measure, and it is a countermeasure for all wind directions, that is, regardless of the wind direction.
It is necessary to establish a tower structure that can handle four legs. 4. Rebuilding (the under position of a conventional rectangular tower (square-rectangular)
If obtaining bulk up) one shape, for accessing or polymer basis of old and new, as in FIG. 5 A, new basal body and tower body, parallel implementation of removal work was accompanied Tsu danger is difficult. 5 . Tower body width c of the two-line pylons as shown in FIG. 4 A is an arm of a steel tower
Minimum insulation distance between the tower body during swing next to the wire which is supported with gold
Although the Ru twice the spacing der plus body width a of length b of the cross-arm which is a reference, a percentage of the tower body width c of the body width a, 77
About 15% by ~154KV class, there about 20% 220~275KV class, the required distance between two of the wire cross-two-line (top
The ratio to the small insulation interval) is even larger,
Since the ratio increases in both cases, the under-line occupancy land width also increases . In recent years, the width of the main body has become
And the land width has been widened and the land cost has risen.
The problem is that it is difficult to secure land. 6 . Since the magnitude <br/> physician and the wire electric wire slack angle θ in the conventional suspension tower as in FIG. 6 approaches the arm-hanging member when swung to the tower side, the upper and lower cross-arm distance l for security spaced securing was necessary Tsu there to take greater than between <br/> interval of the standard tower. There are various problems such as,
The conventional tower structure is not an efficient and practical structural arrangement according to the actual situation. The present invention corrects these problems.
(Eliminated, improvements), and aims to enhance the effectiveness.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記の諸問題を解決する
ため、本考案における菱形構造の鉄塔は、まず、従来の
四角鉄塔の本体を最も苛酷な風圧荷重条件となる斜風方
向に対向するため45度捻り、斜風時に4脚が同時対応
する配置とすることにより設計強度の効率運用を図っ
た。
Means for Solving the Problems To solve the above problems
Therefore, the diamond-shaped tower in the present invention
The oblique wind direction in which the main body of the square tower is the most severe wind pressure load condition
Twist 45 degrees to oppose each other, 4 legs simultaneously support in oblique wind
Design for efficient operation of the design strength.
Was.

【0005】そして、さらに斜風対向とした状態で電線
路と直角方向から風が吹いた場合において発生する主柱
材応力の不均衡を緩和し、主柱材応力の軽減と均斉化を
図るための方策として上部の主柱材応力が最大となる最
下腕金取付け点(ベンド)において各主柱材を逆Y形に
分岐し、応力を分割する。
[0005] Then, the electric wire is
Main pillars generated when wind blows from a direction perpendicular to the road
Alleviates material stress imbalance and reduces and equalizes main column material stress.
As a measure to achieve this,
At the lower arm mounting point (bend), each main pillar is inverted Y-shaped
Branch and split stress.

【0006】また、従来の四角鉄塔の本体を45度回転
することによって発生する電線との接近(絶縁間隔短
縮)、腕金の長大化等の問題を解決するため、回転鉄塔
の本体の断面を従来の四角または矩形鉄塔の本体断面に
内接する斜方形とした。
Further, the main body of the conventional square tower is rotated by 45 degrees.
Close to the electric wire (short insulation interval)
Rotating towers to solve problems such as
Of the body of a conventional square or rectangular tower
It was an inscribed rhombus.

【0007】また、斜風対向のため回転した斜方形の鉄
本体のX構造軸上の両端の主柱材の間隔を広げて菱形
とし、直風圧あるいは斜風圧の水平横荷重に強い骨組み
とするとともに本体と腕金構造を一体化した骨組みとし
[0007] Also, a rectangular iron which is rotated to face a diagonal wind.
The distance between the main pillars at both ends on the X- structure axis of the tower body is increased to form a rhombus, and the frame is strong against horizontal or horizontal load due to direct or oblique wind pressure.
And a framework that integrates the main body and arm structure
Was .

【0008】[0008]

【作用】上記のように斜風対向のため回転した後の鉄塔
の上部本体形状が斜方形あるいは菱形をなし、ベンド下
の主柱材を逆Y型に分岐して主柱材を8本とした下部本
体形状が八角形をなす骨組みの鉄塔を使用することによ
り、斜風時に応力負担しない2本の主柱材が応力を負担
し、過負荷となる他の2本の主柱材の応力も分割され、
それぞれ均斉化されるので、常時(全風向の荷重)全脚
(8本)対応が可能となり、下部の本体断面が八角形と
なることにより斜風時の投影面積も35%減少するので
強度上最も弱い箇所であるベンド下の塔体が安定強化さ
れる。
[Action] As above, the tower is rotated after facing the oblique wind.
The upper body has a rhombic or rhombic shape,
The lower main book which made the main column material of 8 branches into the inverted Y type
By using a steel tower with an octagonal body shape
The two main pillars that do not bear the stress during the sloping wind bear the stress
Then, the stress of the other two main pillars that are overloaded is also divided,
All legs are always balanced (load in all wind directions)
(8) can be handled, the lower body section is octagonal
As a result, the projected area at the time of oblique wind is also reduced by 35%
The tower under the bend, which is the weakest point in strength, is strengthened stably
It is.

【0009】回転する本体の断面を従来の四角または矩
形鉄塔の断面に内接する斜方形また は菱形とすることに
より電線との絶縁間隔や腕金の寸法を変える必要がな
く、本体の受風投影面積も縮小するので風圧荷重が減少
する。また、1本の主柱材に生じる弯曲応力(対捻力)
も、弯曲半径(主柱材間の間隔)が45度回転変位する
ことにより70%に軽減する。
The cross section of the rotating body is a conventional square or rectangular.
Or rhombus inscribed in the cross-sectional shape tower to be rhombic
There is no need to change the insulation distance from the wires or the dimensions of the arm.
And also reduces the wind pressure load as the projected area of the main unit is reduced.
I do. In addition, the bending stress (anti-torsion force) generated in one main pillar
Also, the radius of curvature (interval between the main pillars) is displaced by 45 degrees
By this, it is reduced to 70%.

【0010】本体と腕金構造を一体化することによっ
て、塔体幅(横幅)が本体幅だけ縮小されるため、送電
線路(2回線鉄塔)における線下占用用地幅も約20%
縮小する。また、これにより図4Aのように四角鉄塔
断面形状から本体の3構面(コの字に相当する部分)を
削除した形となり、その部分の部材(水平材、腹材)も
省略される。
By integrating the main body and the arm structure,
Because the tower width (width) is reduced by the body width,
Approximately 20% of the occupied land under the line on the track (two-circuit tower)
to shrink. This also square tower as in Figure 4A
Ri Do from the cross-sectional shape and form that <br/> remove 3 Plane (portion corresponding to the U-shape) of the body, that portion of the member (horizontal member, web members) also
Omitted.

【0011】また、本体を45度回転し、斜方形とする
ことにより従来の懸垂鉄塔で2本必要であった腕金吊材
図6のように1本となり、腕金吊材と電線との接近間
隔が従来より大きくとれるので、その分上下の腕金間隔
も短縮できる。
Further , the main body is rotated by 45 degrees to form a rectangular shape.
Two necessary and there was cross-arm hanging member becomes one as shown in FIG. 6 in the conventional suspension tower by, the approaching distance between the arm-Tsuzai and wire, can be increased than the conventional, the correspondingly vertical cross-arm The interval can be shortened.

【0012】さらに、のように鉄塔を建替える場合
に、新設する鉄塔本体のベンド点より下部の主柱材を逆
Y型に分岐する本構想を適用するれば新旧の基礎体
近、重合しないため、旧設備を解体撤去することなく鉄
塔の建替えが可能となる。
Further, when the tower is rebuilt as shown in FIG. 5 , the main column material below the bend point of the new tower body is reversed.
If this concept of branching into a Y type is applied, the old and new foundations will not be in close proximity and polymerize, so that the tower can be rebuilt without dismantling and removing the old equipment.

【0013】[0013]

【実施例】実施例について図面を参照して説明すると、
図1Aおよび図2Aは、本考案による菱形構造鉄塔を代
表する支持物の斜視図で、図1Aは懸垂型(直線鉄
塔)、図2Aは耐張型(角度鉄塔)示す1.図1の懸垂型の菱形鉄塔の骨組みは、上部本体が斜
風対向のため45度回転した形状であり、図4Bのよう
に従来の鉄塔本体(四角)の断面形状に内接した斜方形
で、これに従来と同じ形状の腕金主材(2)を取付けて
上部本体の骨組みを形成している。 また、上部と下部の
主柱材応力の緩和と均斉化を図るためベンド点(14)
で上部と下部の主柱材(1)を逆Y型に分岐する。 これ
によりベンド点(14)より下の主柱材(1)が8本と
なり、下部本体の断面形状が八角形となり斜風時投影面
積が縮小する。 また、腕金の本体(斜方形)への取付け
は図1Bおよび6図Bのように本体の主柱材2本と各主
柱材間を連結する水平材(3)の延伸方向に連設した2
本の補助材(15)の先端との4箇所において腕金主材
(2)と連結し保持する。 また、腕金の取付けは図6の
ように 腕金主材(2)を本体のY軸上2本の主柱材に
取付け、1本の腕金吊材(5)をX軸上の1本主柱材
(1)より取付ける。2.図2の耐張型の鉄塔の骨組みは、上部本体を斜風対
向のため45度回転した斜方形(四角に内接)のX構造
軸上の2本の主柱材(1)の間隔を図4Cのように拡げ
(Y構造軸とX構造軸の比が1:4)て図4Aの従来の
鉄塔の断面形状から本体部を取り除いた形状とし、本体
と腕金が一体化した骨組みを形成する。 そして、図7
A,BのようにY構造軸上の主柱材間を対角材で結構
し、X構造軸上の 両側の主柱材(1)に電線(10)
耐張がいし装置(8)で引留め、ラーメン構造(門型)
の塔体内に吊設したV吊り懸垂がいし装置(7)にてジ
ャンパー線(11)を保持する。3.既設の鉄塔を建替える工法においては、上部本体を
従来と同じ四角形とし、図5Bのように旧鉄塔の基礎体
(13)を撤去することなく新鉄塔の基礎を構築するこ
とができる。 また、本体と腕金が一体となった菱形の耐
張構造鉄塔に建替える場合は、図5Cのように 新鉄塔
基礎を旧鉄塔の基礎体から十分離れた場所に構築するこ
とが可能であり、塔体の組立ても、図8のように送電線
の片側を停止後、新鉄塔の上部構造の左半分を組立て、
電線(10)を新鉄塔の左側の主柱材(1)に移設後、
旧鉄塔の停止側の腕金を撤去し、停止側(左)を活か
す。次に反対(右)側の回線を停止後、右半分の塔体を
組立て、電線を新鉄塔の右側の主柱材(1)に移設後、
旧鉄塔の停止側の腕金を撤去し、停止側(右)を活かし
た後、旧鉄塔の下部塔体と基礎体(13)を撤去し、建
替えと移線を完了する。
With reference to the drawings EXAMPLE,
1A and 2A are perspective views of a support representing a diamond-shaped steel tower according to the present invention , and FIG. 1A is a suspension type (straight iron).
Tower), FIG. 2A shows a tension-type (angle towers), 1. The framework of the suspended diamond tower shown in Fig. 1 has an upper body that is oblique.
The shape is rotated 45 degrees due to wind opposition, as shown in FIG. 4B
Rectangle inscribed in the cross-sectional shape of the conventional tower body (square)
Then, attach the arm metal main material (2) of the same shape as the conventional
It forms the framework of the upper body. Also, the top and bottom
Bend point (14) to relax and equalize the stress of the main pillar
Then, the upper and lower main pillars (1) are branched into an inverted Y shape. this
The number of main pillars (1) below the bend point (14)
, The cross-sectional shape of the lower body becomes octagonal, and the projection surface during oblique winds
The product shrinks. Also, attach the arm to the main body (rhombic)
As shown in FIGS. 1B and 6, FIG.
2 connected in the direction of extension of the horizontal member (3) connecting the column members
At four places with the front end of the auxiliary material (15) of the book, the arm metal main material
Connect and hold with (2). The mounting of the arm is shown in FIG.
As cross-arm main material (2) to the two main pillar on the Y axis of the body
Attach, one arm suspension (5) to one main pillar on X axis
(1) Install. 2. The framework of the tension type tower shown in Fig. 2 consists of
Orthogonal (inscribed in a square) X structure rotated 45 degrees for orientation
Increase the distance between the two main pillars (1) on the shaft as shown in FIG. 4C.
4A (the ratio of the Y-structure axis to the X-structure axis is 1: 4).
Remove the main body from the cross-sectional shape of the tower
To form an integrated framework. And FIG.
A diagonal between the main pillars on the Y-structure axis as shown in A and B
Then , the electric wire (10) is fastened to the main pillars (1) on both sides on the X-structure axis by a tension insulator (8) , and the ramen structure (gate type)
The jumper wire (11) is held by a V-hanging suspension insulator (7) suspended in the tower body . 3. In the construction method of rebuilding the existing tower,
The same square as before, and the base of the old tower as shown in Fig. 5B
Building the foundation of a new tower without removing (13)
Can be. In addition, the rhombus-resistant
If Kenkaeru Zhang structure pylons, child build enough away to <br/> basis for new towers from the basic body of old tower as in FIG. 5C
When the tower body is assembled, after stopping one side of the transmission line as shown in FIG. 8 , assemble the left half of the upper structure of the new steel tower,
After moving the electric wire (10) to the main pillar (1) on the left side of the new tower,
Remove the arm on the stop side of the old tower and use the stop side (left)
You. Next, after stopping the circuit on the opposite (right) side, assemble the right half of the tower and move the electric wire to the main pillar (1) on the right side of the new tower ,
Remove the arm on the stop side of the old tower and make use of the stop side (right)
After that, the lower tower and the foundation (13) of the old steel tower were removed and
You complete the place and Utsurisen.

【0014】[0014]

【考案の効果】本考案は以上説明したように構成され
ているので、以下に記載されるような効果を奏する。
[Effect of the invention The present invention is constructed as described above
Therefore, the following effects can be obtained.

【0015】従来の直線、角度鉄塔の本体(四角)の構
造軸を45度回転し、その対角線を構造軸として斜風対
向とし、更にベンド点より下部の主柱材を逆Y字形
して応力を分割する構造とすることにより主柱材応力
の均斉化が可能となり、従来の鉄塔構造において、ネッ
クであった45度風向時に発生する主柱材応力の不均衡
2脚対応)が是正され、常に(全風向に対し)4脚対
する構造となった。 これにより支持物強度の安定性と
実効性が高まった。
[0015] Conventional linear, the structure axis angular tower body (squares) rotated by 45 degrees, an oblique style pair with its diagonal structure axis
MukaiToshi main pillar stress by a structure to further divide the stress by dividing <br/> Toki the bottom of the main column member in the opposite Y-shaped than the bend point
Can be equalized, and in conventional tower structures,
Imbalance of the main column material stress generated at 45-degree wind direction was a click
(For two legs ) has been corrected, and the structure is always compatible with four legs (for all wind directions) . As a result, the stability of the support
Effectiveness has increased.

【0016】下部本体の断面形状が八角形(四角形また
は矩形に内接)となことによって斜風時の投影面積が約
34%縮小するので塔体風圧荷重も減少する。
The sectional shape of the lower body is octagonal (square or rectangular).
Is inscribed in a rectangle.)
Since it is reduced by 34%, the tower wind pressure load is also reduced.

【0017】また、塔体と腕金を一体化し支持物の塔
体幅を縮小することによって線下占用用地約20%
小するため、用地費の節減が可能となる。
Further, the tower body and the arm-integrated, thus land width for the line under occupied in reducing the tower body width of the support material is about 20%
In order to shrink, it becomes possible to reduce the land cost.

【0018】また、既設の鉄塔建替えに、本構造を適用
することによって旧鉄塔の基礎体を改修、撤去する必要
がないので、工法の効率化と作業の安全性向上する
[0018] In addition, the existing tower reconstruction, repair the foundation of the old tower I'm in applying the present structure, need to be removed
Since there is no, safety is improved efficiency and working method.

【0019】また、懸垂型鉄塔に本構想(上部本体が斜
方形)を適用することによって、腕金吊材が1本とな
り、電線との離隔が吊材が2本の従来鉄塔より大きくと
れるので腕金間の間隔がその分短縮できる。 などのほ
か、本体幅(主柱材間の間隔)の短縮による投影面積の
縮小、主柱材弯曲率の減小等に伴う主柱材、腹材の軽量
化、建替工事の工期短縮、労務費の軽減など多方面での
効果が期待できる
In addition, the concept of the suspended tower is that the upper body is oblique.
By applying (square), only one armrest
If the distance from the electric wire is greater than that of the two conventional steel towers,
The distance between the arms can be shortened accordingly. Such as
Or, the projected area can be reduced by reducing the body width (the distance between the main pillars).
It can be expected to be effective in various fields, such as reduction of the main column material and abdominal material due to reduction of the main column material curvature rate, reduction of the construction period of rebuilding work, and reduction of labor costs.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本考案を代表する菱形構造鉄塔で、同図Aは懸
垂型の斜視図と平面図。同図Bと同図Cは菱形構造の本
体に腕金を取付けた懸垂型鉄塔の部材構成を示す平面と
正面図。
FIG. 1 is a perspective view and a plan view of a suspended type tower, which is a diamond-shaped structure tower representing the present invention. FIGS. B and C are a plan view and a front view, respectively, showing a member configuration of a suspended steel tower in which a ferrule is attached to a rhombus-shaped main body.

【図2】本考案を代表する菱形構造鉄塔で、同図Aは耐
張型の斜視図と平面図。同図Bと同図Cは本体と腕金が
一体化した菱形構造の耐張型鉄塔の部材構成を示す平面
と正面図。
FIG. 2 is a perspective view and a plan view of a tension type steel tower, which is a diamond-shaped steel tower representing the present invention. FIGS. B and C are a plan view and a front view showing a member configuration of a tension-type steel tower having a rhombic structure in which a main body and arm members are integrated.

【図3】従来使用されている代表鉄塔の形態による分類
図で、同図Aは四角鉄塔、同図Bは矩形鉄塔、同図Cは
烏帽子鉄塔の正面図と側面図。
FIGS. 3A and 3B are classification diagrams according to the form of a conventionally used representative tower. FIG. A shows a square tower, FIG. B shows a rectangular tower, and FIG.

【図4】支持物の塔体(本体と腕金)構造の変化を示す
断面図で。同図Aは従来の四角鉄塔の体構造。同図B
は、図Aの本体(四角)構造軸を45度回転し、その
本体に内接する斜方形とし、同図Aの腕金の長さと同
じ長さの腕金を取付けて塔体幅cを5aとし、上部主柱
材応力の軽減、均斉化のためベンド下の主柱材を分岐し
た場合の懸垂型の塔体構造(点線は回転前の本体部、破
線はベンド下の主柱材を示す)。同図は、同図の本
体のX軸上の両主柱材間隔を拡げて塔体幅cを従来の四
角鉄塔の塔体幅cから本部幅aを差し引いた長さ(両腕
金の長さ2b)と同じ長さとし、上部主柱材応力
、均斉化のためベンド点より下の主柱材を逆Yに分
した場合の耐張型の塔体構造(点線は従来の塔体、破
線はベンド下の主柱材を示す)。
FIG. 4 shows the change in the structure of the tower ( main body and arm) of the support.
In cross section . Figure A shows the tower structure of a conventional square tower. FIG.
Is a body (squares) structure axis in Figure A rotated 45 degrees, its
And rhombus inscribed in the body, the length b equal length tower body width c attach the cross-arm of the arm-in figure A and 5a, the upper main pole
Branches the main pillar under the bend to reduce material stress and equalize
Tower structure (dotted pendent when the main body portion of the pre-rotation, broken
The line indicates the main pillar under the bend ). FIG C is drawing B of the body of the X of the tower body width c is spread both main pillar spacing on axis conventional four
Length obtained by subtracting headquarters width a from tower body width c of square tower (both arms
Length 2b) the same length Satoshi gold, light <br/> decrease of the upper main pillar stress, the tension-type in the case of branching in the opposite Y-shaped main pillar below the bend point for homogenized tower Body structure (dotted line indicates conventional tower body, broken
The line indicates the main pillar under the bend ).

【図5】本構想を適用し、既設鉄塔を建替える場合の新
旧基礎の配置(接近)状況を示す図で、同図Aは新旧鉄
塔の形状(四角鉄塔)同一で基礎体が接近する場合の
平面と正面図。同図Bは、本体の上部構造が既設鉄塔と
同形(四角)で下部の新基礎体を45度回転し旧基礎と
重合しない場合の正面と平面図。同図Cは、本体構造と
腕金構造が一体化した菱形構造鉄塔で新旧基礎体が重合
しない場合の平面と正面図を示す。
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the layout (approach) of old and new foundations when the existing concept is rebuilt by applying the present concept, and FIG. 5A shows the old and new towers having the same shape (square tower) and the foundations approaching each other. Plane and front view of the case. Fig. B shows that the upper structure of the main body is
Rotate the lower new foundation by the same shape (square) by 45 degrees to the old foundation
FIG. 2 is a front view and a plan view when no polymerization is performed . FIG. C shows the main body structure and
New and old foundations are superimposed on a diamond-shaped steel tower with integrated arm structure
Shows a plan and a front view when not.

【図6】電線弛角の大きい懸垂型鉄塔(菱形構造)の腕
金吊材(1本)と電線の接近状況を示す図で、同図Aは
正面図、同図Bは平面図、同図Cは側面図。
FIG. 6 is a view showing the approaching state of the electric wire and the arm suspension material (one piece ) of the suspension tower (rhombic structure) having a large angle of electric wire, FIG. 6A is a front view, FIG. FIG. C is a side view.

【図7】本体と腕金が一体化した菱形構造の耐張型鉄塔
の電線支持状況を示す図で、同図Aは平面図、同図Bは
正面図。
FIG. 7: A tension-type steel tower having a diamond-shaped structure in which the main body and the arm are integrated.
FIG. A is a plan view, and FIG.
Front view.

【図8】従来の四角鉄塔を菱形鉄塔(本体、腕金一体
化)に建替える場合の工法手順を示す平面と正面図で、
同図Aは建替え前の状況図、同図Bは旧鉄塔を包み込ん
で新鉄塔を組立て中の状況図、同図Cは新鉄塔の組立て
完了時の状況図。
[Fig. 8] A conventional square tower is replaced with a rhombic tower (body and arm
Plan and front view showing the construction procedure when rebuilding to
Figure A shows the situation before rebuilding, and Figure B wraps around the old steel tower.
Figure C shows a situation where a new tower is being assembled.
The situation diagram at the time of completion.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 主柱材 2 腕金主材 3 水平材 4 対角材 5 腕金吊材 6 斜材・腹材 7 V吊り懸垂がいし装置 8 耐張がいし装置 9 懸垂がいし装置 10 電線 11 ジャンパー線 12 主脚材 13 基礎 14 ベンド点(最下腕金の主柱材取付け箇所) 15 補助材 a 本体幅 b 腕金長さ c 塔体幅 l 保安離隔(最小接近距離) θ 電線弛角DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Main pillar material 2 Arm metal main material 3 Horizontal material 4 Diagonal material 5 Arm metal hanging material 6 Diagonal material / Abdominal material 7 V Suspension insulator device 8 Tensile insulator device 9 Suspension insulator device 10 Electric wire 11 Jumper wire 12 Main leg material 13 Basic Body 14 Bend point (where the main pillar of the lower arm is attached) 15 Auxiliary material a Body width b Arm length c Tower width l Security separation (minimum approach distance) θ Wire slant angle

Claims (2)

(57)【実用新案登録請求の範囲】(57) [Scope of request for utility model registration] 【請求項1】 上部本体、下部本体及び腕金からなる架
空送電線路を支持するための鉄塔であって、 上部 本体は、構造断面の形状が斜方形をなし、その対角
線と構造軸が合致し、対角線のY軸が電線路方向に、X
軸がこれと直角方向に合致し、Y軸とX軸の構造軸の長
さの比が1:1相対する2面が同形の構面を有し、
稜角点に形鋼、鋼管等で成形した主柱材(1)を配
た構造であり、 下部本体は、断面形状が正方形に内接する八角形で、主
柱材(1)が8本からなる構造であり、 腕金は上部本体に取り付けられ、 最下腕金の主柱材取り付け箇所にて上部本体の主柱材と
下部本体の主柱材とが逆Y型に連結されてなることを特
徴とする菱形構造の鉄塔。
1. A frame comprising an upper body, a lower body and an arm.
A steel tower for supporting the air transmission lines, upper body, without the the rhombic shape of the structural section, matches the diagonal <br/> lines and structural shaft, the electric wire path direction diagonal of Y-axis And X
Axis coincides with this direction perpendicular, the ratio of the length of the structure axis in the Y-axis and X-axis is 1: two opposite sides at 1 has a Plane isomorphic, form each <br/> dihedral angle point steel, primary post material molded steel pipe or the like (1) and disposed
The lower body is an octagon with a cross section inscribed in a square.
The pillar (1) has a structure consisting of eight pieces, the arm is attached to the upper body, and the main pillar of the upper body is attached to the main pillar of the lower arm.
The main column material of the lower body is connected in an inverted Y-shape.
A tower with a diamond-shaped structure that represents the symbol.
【請求項2】 上部本体及び下部本体からなる架空送電
線路を支持するための鉄塔であって、 上部本体は、構造断面の形状が斜方形をなし、その対角
線と構造軸が合致し、対角線のY軸が電線路方向に、X
軸がこれと直角方向に合致し、Y軸とX軸の構造軸の長
さの比が 1:3〜4で、相対する2面が同型の断面を有
し、各稜角点に形鋼、鋼管等で形成した主柱材(1)を
配設した構造であり、 下部本体は、断面形状が矩形に内接する八角形で、 主柱
(1)が8本からなる構造であり、 上部本体にがいし装置が取り付けられ、 上部本体の主柱材と下部本体の主柱材とが逆Y型に連結
されてなる ことを特徴とする菱形構造の鉄塔。
2. An overhead power transmission comprising an upper body and a lower body.
This is a steel tower for supporting railway tracks, and the upper body has a rectangular cross-section,
The line and the structural axis match, and the diagonal Y axis is
The axis is perpendicular to this, and the lengths of the structural axes Y and X
The ratio of the lengths is 1: 3 to 4, and the two opposing surfaces have the same cross section.
At each corner point, a main pillar (1) made of shaped steel, steel pipe, etc.
The lower body has an octagonal cross-section inscribed in a rectangle and has a structure composed of eight main pillars (1). The insulator is attached to the upper body , and the lower body is Column material and main column material of lower body are connected in inverted Y shape
A tower with a diamond-shaped structure, characterized by being made .
JP1991080452U 1991-06-29 1991-06-29 Rhombus tower Expired - Lifetime JP2581350Y2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1991080452U JP2581350Y2 (en) 1991-06-29 1991-06-29 Rhombus tower

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1991080452U JP2581350Y2 (en) 1991-06-29 1991-06-29 Rhombus tower

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0735654U JPH0735654U (en) 1995-07-04
JP2581350Y2 true JP2581350Y2 (en) 1998-09-21

Family

ID=13718654

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1991080452U Expired - Lifetime JP2581350Y2 (en) 1991-06-29 1991-06-29 Rhombus tower

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2581350Y2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101018845B1 (en) * 2008-09-17 2011-03-04 한국전력공사 Iron tower for power transmission

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60226973A (en) * 1984-04-25 1985-11-12 日立電線株式会社 Iron tower

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0735654U (en) 1995-07-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH0355369A (en) Flat truss structure for supporting overhead power transmission line
JP2581350Y2 (en) Rhombus tower
CN106400670A (en) Suspended-cable and cable-stayed secondary suspender combined type large-span bridge structure
CN213980169U (en) Composite material cross arm tower
CN210946439U (en) Bridge span structure
US2307215A (en) Building structure
JP2740833B2 (en) Facility method of arch form support
CN206034306U (en) King -tower
JP2825155B2 (en) Construction method of space truss structure
CN206233085U (en) A kind of secondary suspension rod combined type long-span bridge structure of suspension cable oblique pull
CN213980168U (en) Composite cross arm tower
CN209523125U (en) Hoist cable scaffold support construction and system
US2049783A (en) Transmission tower
CN220336431U (en) Protective platform opening and closing pavement plate for building construction
CN212404774U (en) Wind-resistant stabilizing device for construction of arch rib of steel truss flexible arch bridge
CN214995797U (en) Safety hanging basket for pipe truss overhead operation
JP3337655B2 (en) Power transmission triangle tower
CN217629458U (en) Anti-falling and anti-electric isolation shed for crossing railway and highway bridges
JP7365627B2 (en) Gate type pole and contact line switching method
CN108104349A (en) One kind is baroclined bar truss beam string combining structure and implementation
JP2004263383A (en) X type crossing chord beam string structure body
CN107299769A (en) A kind of windproof pillar for construction site
RU1795024C (en) Joint of open-section bars of three-dimensional cover
JPH01312109A (en) Cable stayed bridge
JPH01312108A (en) Cable stayed bridge