EP2995529A1 - Vorrichtung zur überwachung der kupplung eines schienenfahrzeugs und entsprechendes schienenfahrzeug - Google Patents
Vorrichtung zur überwachung der kupplung eines schienenfahrzeugs und entsprechendes schienenfahrzeug Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2995529A1 EP2995529A1 EP15183690.5A EP15183690A EP2995529A1 EP 2995529 A1 EP2995529 A1 EP 2995529A1 EP 15183690 A EP15183690 A EP 15183690A EP 2995529 A1 EP2995529 A1 EP 2995529A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- beacon
- signal
- communication medium
- extracted
- integrity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 20
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/34—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for indicating the distance between vehicles or trains by the transmission of signals therebetween
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61G—COUPLINGS; DRAUGHT AND BUFFING APPLIANCES
- B61G7/00—Details or accessories
- B61G7/14—Safety devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0054—Train integrity supervision, e.g. end-of-train [EOT] devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0081—On-board diagnosis or maintenance
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0018—Communication with or on the vehicle or train
- B61L15/0027—Radio-based, e.g. using GSM-R
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0018—Communication with or on the vehicle or train
- B61L15/0036—Conductor-based, e.g. using CAN-Bus, train-line or optical fibres
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a device for confirming the integrity of a hitch of a railway train comprising at least a first car and a second car, the device comprising a communication medium extending between the first car and the second car, a first beacon embedded in one of the cars and connected to the communication medium, a second beacon embedded on board the other cars and connected to the communication medium.
- the invention applies to the field of railway safety, in particular to the confirmation of integrity of a railway train.
- the term "confirmation of integrity” means the detection of the non-rupture of a coupling of the railway train, that is to say the non-breaking of the mechanical connection between two wagons or two cars of a railway train, whether it is "screw", automatic or any other type of coupling.
- a transmitter to generate a signal at a first car of a train convoy, located at the tail of the convoy, and to apply this signal, successively over time and in the form of a signal. acoustic wave, to a pressure line of the railway convoy.
- a receiver placed on board a second car of the train convoy, located at the head of the convoy, is adapted to receive the acoustic wave generated by the transmitter and propagating in the pressure line.
- the acoustic wave can not propagate between the transmitter and the receiver along the pressure line.
- the receiver no longer receiving the acoustic wave generated by the transmitter, then detects a coupling failure within the railway train.
- the acoustic wave emitted by the transmitter attenuates during its propagation along the pressure line. Because of the length of railway convoys, the power of the acoustic wave reaching the receiver is likely to be at a level similar to that of the random noise present in the pressure line and which is also detected by the detector. It is then not possible to state with a sufficient level of reliability that the signal detected by the detector is the acoustic wave that has been emitted by the onboard transmitter aboard the first car. This means that it is not possible to say, with a sufficient level of reliability, that the railway convoy is always intact.
- An object of the invention is therefore to propose a device that makes it possible to confirm the integrity of a railway train with better reliability.
- the subject of the invention is a railway train comprising a device for confirming the integrity of a hitch as defined above, to confirm the integrity of a hitch of said railway train.
- a railway train 2 comprising a device 4 for confirming integrity according to the invention is represented on the figure 1 .
- the railway train 2 comprises a plurality of cars 6, including a head car 6A and a car 6B tail.
- the cars 6 are connected two by two together by a hitch (not shown).
- the detection device 4 comprises a communication medium 8, a control beacon 10 and a transmitting beacon 12.
- the communication support 8 extends along the railway train 2. In particular, the communication support 8 extends between the head car 6A and the tail car 6B.
- the control beacon 10 is aboard the leading car 6A, and the transmitting beacon 12 is on board the car 6B tail. Each of the control and transmitting beacons 12 is connected to the communication medium 8.
- the communication support 8 is able to break in case of rupture of the coupling between the cars 6A, 6B.
- the communication medium 8 is for example a general pressure line of the railway train 2, intended to pneumatically control a braking system of the railway train 2.
- the communication support 8 is an electric cable of the railway train 2.
- control beacon 10 comprises an information processing unit 14 connected to a receiver 16.
- the processing unit 14 comprises a memory 18 and a processor 20.
- the memory 18 stores a reception software 22 and a comparison software 24.
- the memory 18 further comprises a first storage area 28 of a predetermined code, for example a 256-bit code.
- the processor 20 is capable of executing the software 22, 24 stored in the memory 18.
- the receiver 16 is able to pick up signals propagating along the communication medium 8. In the case of a pressure line forming the communication medium 8, the receiver 16 is able to receive acoustic waves. In the case of an electrical cable forming the communication medium 8, the receiver 16 is able to receive electrical signals.
- the receiving software 22 is able to process the signals picked up by the receiver 16 to extract a code.
- the comparison software 24 is able to compare each code extracted by the receiving software 22 with the predetermined code.
- the transmitting beacon 12 includes an information processing unit 32, connected to a transmitter 34.
- the processing unit 32 includes a memory 36 and a processor 38.
- the memory 36 stores transmission software 40.
- the memory 36 further comprises a second storage area 42 of the predetermined code.
- the transmitter 34 is able to apply signals to the communication medium 8.
- the emitter 34 is suitable for applying acoustic waves.
- the transmitter 34 is able to apply electrical signals.
- the transmission software 40 is able to generate a signal modulated by the predetermined code.
- the transmission software 40 is further adapted to transmit the signal generated to the transmitter 34.
- the transmission software 40 of the transmitting beacon 12 generates a signal modulated by the predetermined code which is stored in the second storage area 42.
- the predetermined code then forms coding data.
- the transmitter 34 of the transmitting beacon 12 applies the signal to the communication medium 8.
- the transmitting beacon 12 transmits the signal successively over time at a repetition rate greater than 0.1 Hz, preferably greater than 1 Hz, for example greater than 5 Hz.
- the receiving software 22 of the control beacon 10 processes said signal to extract a code. Then the comparison software 24 compares the received code with the predetermined code which is stored in the first storage area 28. If the code received is identical to the predetermined code, then the railway train 2 is considered to be intact and the control beacon 10 transmits a signal confirming the integrity of the railway train, for example for an operator or a rail network monitoring system.
- the control beacon 10 does not receive a signal comprising a code identical to the predetermined code, then the control beacon 10 does not emit a signal confirming the integrity of the railway vehicle.
- control beacon 10 and the transmitting beacon 12 are further adapted to implement at least one transmission error detection algorithm.
- control and transmitter beacons 12 are adapted to implement a conventionally known CRC (for "cyclic redundancy check”) transmission error detection algorithm.
- CRC for "cyclic redundancy check”
- the algorithm implements a predetermined generator polynomial.
- the predetermined generator polynomial is adapted to allow detection, with a reliability greater than a predetermined reliability threshold, of possible transmission errors between the control beacon 10 and the transmitting beacon 12.
- the memory 18 of the processing unit 14 of the control beacon 10 also stores a calculation software 44.
- the memory 18 further comprises a third storage area 46 of the generator polynomial.
- the control beacon 10 illustrated by the figure 4 has no first storage area of the predetermined code.
- the memory 36 of the processing unit 32 of the transmitting beacon 12 also stores a calculation software 48.
- the memory 36 further comprises a fourth storage area 50 of the generator polynomial.
- the calculation software 44 is suitable for applying the detection algorithm implementing the generator polynomial stored in the third zone of storage 46, respectively the fourth storage area 50, to a code.
- the calculation software 48 of the transmitting beacon 12 is suitable for applying the detection algorithm to the predetermined code stored in the second storage area 42.
- the calculation software 44 of the control beacon 10 is clean. applying the detection algorithm to a code provided by the receiving software 22.
- the calculation software 48 of the transmitting beacon 12 calculates a control key relating to the predetermined code. Then the transmission software 40 of the transmitting beacon 12 transmits to the transmitter 34 a signal modulated by the predetermined code and the corresponding control key. The control key then forms the encoding data. The transmitter 34 applies said signal to the communication medium 8.
- the receiver 16 of the control beacon 10 receives a signal conveyed by the communication medium 8
- the reception software 22 of the control beacon 10 processes said signal to extract a code and a corresponding key.
- the calculation software 44 calculates a control key relating to the code extracted by the reception software 22, by means of the generator polynomial stored in the third storage area 46.
- the comparison software 24 compares the key extracted by the software of 22 and the key calculated by the calculation software 44. If the calculated key is identical to the extracted key, then the railway train 2 is considered to be intact and the control beacon 10 emits a signal confirming the integrity of the train convoy for example to an operator or a monitoring system of the rail network.
- the control beacon 10 does not receive a signal comprising a code identical to the predetermined code, then the beacon of control 10 does not emit a signal confirming the integrity of the railway vehicle.
- control beacon 10 is aboard the car 6B, and the transmitting beacon 12 is aboard the leading car 6A.
- the control beacon 10 illustrated by the figure 7 differs from the control tag illustrated by the figure 4 in that it comprises an emitter of electromagnetic waves 52, also called "transmitting antenna".
- the memory 18 of the control beacon 10 stores transmission software 56, similar to the transmission software 40 described above.
- the memory 18 of the control beacon 10 does not store comparison software.
- the transmitter beacon 12 illustrated by the figure 8 differs from the transmitting beacon illustrated by the figure 5 in that it comprises an electromagnetic wave receiver 58, also called “receiving antenna", as illustrated by the figure 8 .
- the The memory 36 of the transmitting beacon 12 stores a comparison software 60, similar to the comparison software 24 described above.
- the memory 36 also stores a reception software 62, similar to the reception software 22 described above.
- the transmitting antenna 52 is able to emit an electromagnetic signal in the air.
- the transmitting antenna 52 of the control beacon 10 is able to emit an electromagnetic signal either directly towards the receiving antenna 58 of the transmitting beacon 12 or through a communication network. of type GSM-R for example.
- the receiving antenna 58 is adapted to receive an electromagnetic signal propagating in the air.
- the receiving antenna 58 of the transmitting beacon 12 is adapted to receive an electromagnetic signal either directly from the transmitting antenna of the control beacon 10, or through a communication network, from type GSM-R for example.
- the transmission software 40 of the processing unit 32 of the transmitting beacon 12 is able to generate a signal modulated by a code, also called “modulation code", for example the predetermined code or a random code.
- the third storage area 46 of the control beacon 10 and the fourth storage area 50 of the transmitting beacon 12 store a predetermined function.
- a function is suitable for associating an image code with a code provided to the function.
- the calculation software 44 of the control beacon 10 and the calculating software 48 of the transmitting beacon are each adapted to apply the predetermined function stored in the third storage area 46, respectively the fourth storage area 50, to a code.
- the transmission software 40 of the transmitting beacon 12 generates a signal modulated by the modulation code.
- the modulation code then forms the coding data.
- the transmitter 34 of the transmitting beacon 12 applies the generated signal to the communication medium 8.
- the calculation software 48 of the transmitting beacon 12 applies the predetermined function which is stored in the fourth storage area 50 to the code. modulation to obtain a reference image code.
- the receiving software 22 of the control beacon 10 processes said signal to extract a code. Then the calculation software 44 calculates the image code, by the predetermined function which is stored in the third storage area 46, of the extracted code. The transmission software 56 of the control beacon 10 then generates a response signal comprising the image code of the extracted code. Then the transmitting antenna 52 of the control beacon 10 emits the response signal in the air in the form of an electromagnetic wave.
- the transmitting beacon receiving software 62 processes said signal to extract a code from it. picture. Then the comparison software 60 compares the extracted image code and the reference image code. If the extracted image code is identical to the reference image code, then the railway train 2 is considered to be intact and the control beacon 10 transmits a signal confirming the integrity of the railway train, for example to an operator or a railway monitoring system.
- the receiving antenna 58 of the transmitting beacon 12 does not receive a signal from the transmitting antenna 52 of the control beacon 10, then the control beacon 10 does not emit a signal confirming the integrity of the railway vehicle.
- the control beacon 10 does not emit a rail vehicle integrity confirmation signal.
- control beacon 10 is aboard the car 6B, and the transmitting beacon 12 is aboard the leading car 6A.
- the control beacon 10 illustrated by the figure 11 differs from the control tag illustrated by the figure 7 in that it does not include an emitter of electromagnetic waves. This is replaced by a transmitter 64, similar to the transmitter 34 of acoustic or electrical signals illustrated by the figure 8 , connected to the communication support 8.
- the transmitter beacon 12 illustrated by the figure 12 differs from the transmitting beacon illustrated by the figure 8 in that it does not include an electromagnetic wave receiver. This is replaced by a receiver 66, similar to the receiver 16 of acoustic or electrical signals illustrated by the figure 7 , connected to the communication support 8.
- the communication medium 8 is used bidirectionally as shown in FIG. figure 13 , that is, for the transmission of signals transmitter beacon 12 to the control beacon 10, and the control beacon 10 to the transmitting beacon 12.
- the operation of the device 4 represented on the Figures 10 to 12 is similar to the operation of the device 4 illustrated by the Figures 6 to 8 .
- the device 4 is able to further transmit in the generated signal a first tag 10, 12 to a second tag 12, 10 via the communication medium 8 additional information, not related to the confirmation integrity of the convoy, this information being in addition to the coding performed on the generated signal, to confirm the integrity of the train.
- the communication medium 8 is used bidirectionally or not, thus allowing a communication, not necessarily related to the confirmation of integrity, between the first beacon 10, 12 and the second beacon 12, 10.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1458474A FR3025479B1 (fr) | 2014-09-10 | 2014-09-10 | Dispositif de confirmation d'integrite d'un attelage d'un convoi ferroviaire et convoi ferroviaire associe |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2995529A1 true EP2995529A1 (de) | 2016-03-16 |
EP2995529B1 EP2995529B1 (de) | 2019-06-12 |
Family
ID=51987326
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15183690.5A Active EP2995529B1 (de) | 2014-09-10 | 2015-09-03 | Vorrichtung zur überwachung der kupplung eines schienenfahrzeugs und entsprechendes schienenfahrzeug |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2995529B1 (de) |
AU (1) | AU2015224435B2 (de) |
BR (1) | BR102015022101B1 (de) |
CL (1) | CL2015002549A1 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2744650T3 (de) |
FR (1) | FR3025479B1 (de) |
RU (1) | RU2697162C1 (de) |
SA (1) | SA115360748B1 (de) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106314481A (zh) * | 2016-08-20 | 2017-01-11 | 徐州翔和高科电气有限公司 | 一种矿山机车运输监控***全列车管理装置及方法 |
CN112124352A (zh) * | 2019-06-24 | 2020-12-25 | 上海梅山钢铁股份有限公司 | 一种防止干熄焦电机车断裂事故的方法 |
CN112158230A (zh) * | 2020-09-28 | 2021-01-01 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | 一种列车完整性检测方法、装置及列车控制单元 |
EP3592625B1 (de) | 2017-03-09 | 2023-06-07 | Thales Austria GmbH | Zug mit einer anlage zur überwachung der integrität des zuges und entsprechendes verahren |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2580925B (en) * | 2019-01-30 | 2021-06-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Train protection system |
EP3919345A1 (de) | 2020-06-05 | 2021-12-08 | ECM S.p.A. | Bordvorrichtung und verfahren zur bestimmung der zugintegrität nach länge |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19802896A1 (de) * | 1998-01-21 | 1999-07-22 | Siemens Ag | Einrichtung zur Zugintegritätskontrolle |
DE19833279A1 (de) * | 1998-07-24 | 2000-02-10 | Deutsche Bahn Ag | Einrichtung zur Überwachung der Zugvollständigkeit, sowie der Überprüfung der Bremsprobe bei lokbespannten Zügen |
DE19828906C1 (de) * | 1998-06-18 | 2000-05-04 | Abb Daimler Benz Transp | Verfahren zur fahrzeugautonomen Feststellung und Überprüfung der Vollständigkeit eines Zuges ohne durchgehende elektrische Leitung |
DE19922267A1 (de) * | 1997-11-11 | 2000-11-09 | Siemens Ag | Einrichtung zur Zugintegritätskontrolle |
DE10107571A1 (de) * | 2000-11-09 | 2002-05-23 | Alcatel Sa | System zur Überprüfung der Vollständigkeit eines Fahrzeugverbundes |
EP2050647A1 (de) * | 2007-10-19 | 2009-04-22 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Kommunikationseinheit für ein Schienenfahrzeug und zugehöriges Schienenfahrzeug |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SU1216065A1 (ru) * | 1984-10-29 | 1986-03-07 | Уральское Отделение Всесоюзного Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательского Института Железнодорожного Транспорта | Устройство дл автоматического контрол расформировани составов на сортировочной горке |
DE19951259B4 (de) * | 1999-09-09 | 2004-12-09 | Db Cargo Ag | Einrichtung zur Erkennung der Zugvollständigkeit bei aus einem Triebwagen und Wagen bestehenden Zügen |
-
2014
- 2014-09-10 FR FR1458474A patent/FR3025479B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2015
- 2015-09-03 EP EP15183690.5A patent/EP2995529B1/de active Active
- 2015-09-03 ES ES15183690T patent/ES2744650T3/es active Active
- 2015-09-08 SA SA115360748A patent/SA115360748B1/ar unknown
- 2015-09-09 CL CL2015002549A patent/CL2015002549A1/es unknown
- 2015-09-09 RU RU2015138461A patent/RU2697162C1/ru active
- 2015-09-09 AU AU2015224435A patent/AU2015224435B2/en active Active
- 2015-09-09 BR BR102015022101-0A patent/BR102015022101B1/pt active IP Right Grant
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19922267A1 (de) * | 1997-11-11 | 2000-11-09 | Siemens Ag | Einrichtung zur Zugintegritätskontrolle |
DE19802896A1 (de) * | 1998-01-21 | 1999-07-22 | Siemens Ag | Einrichtung zur Zugintegritätskontrolle |
DE19828906C1 (de) * | 1998-06-18 | 2000-05-04 | Abb Daimler Benz Transp | Verfahren zur fahrzeugautonomen Feststellung und Überprüfung der Vollständigkeit eines Zuges ohne durchgehende elektrische Leitung |
DE19833279A1 (de) * | 1998-07-24 | 2000-02-10 | Deutsche Bahn Ag | Einrichtung zur Überwachung der Zugvollständigkeit, sowie der Überprüfung der Bremsprobe bei lokbespannten Zügen |
DE10107571A1 (de) * | 2000-11-09 | 2002-05-23 | Alcatel Sa | System zur Überprüfung der Vollständigkeit eines Fahrzeugverbundes |
EP2050647A1 (de) * | 2007-10-19 | 2009-04-22 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Kommunikationseinheit für ein Schienenfahrzeug und zugehöriges Schienenfahrzeug |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
HEITMANN R ET AL: "SYSTEME ZUR ZUGVOLLSTAENDIGKEITS-UEBERWACHUNG", SIGNAL + DRAHT, TELZLAFF VERLAG GMBH. DARMSTADT, DE, vol. 89, no. 11, 1 November 1997 (1997-11-01), pages 22 - 25, XP000779910, ISSN: 0037-4997 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106314481A (zh) * | 2016-08-20 | 2017-01-11 | 徐州翔和高科电气有限公司 | 一种矿山机车运输监控***全列车管理装置及方法 |
CN106314481B (zh) * | 2016-08-20 | 2018-06-01 | 徐州翔和高科电气有限公司 | 一种矿山机车运输监控***全列车管理装置及方法 |
EP3592625B1 (de) | 2017-03-09 | 2023-06-07 | Thales Austria GmbH | Zug mit einer anlage zur überwachung der integrität des zuges und entsprechendes verahren |
CN112124352A (zh) * | 2019-06-24 | 2020-12-25 | 上海梅山钢铁股份有限公司 | 一种防止干熄焦电机车断裂事故的方法 |
CN112124352B (zh) * | 2019-06-24 | 2022-01-14 | 上海梅山钢铁股份有限公司 | 一种防止干熄焦电机车断裂事故的方法 |
CN112158230A (zh) * | 2020-09-28 | 2021-01-01 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | 一种列车完整性检测方法、装置及列车控制单元 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2015224435A1 (en) | 2016-03-24 |
ES2744650T3 (es) | 2020-02-25 |
EP2995529B1 (de) | 2019-06-12 |
BR102015022101A2 (pt) | 2016-03-15 |
FR3025479B1 (fr) | 2017-10-06 |
RU2697162C1 (ru) | 2019-08-12 |
CL2015002549A1 (es) | 2016-05-13 |
SA115360748B1 (ar) | 2019-08-15 |
AU2015224435B2 (en) | 2019-01-31 |
FR3025479A1 (fr) | 2016-03-11 |
BR102015022101B1 (pt) | 2022-06-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2995529B1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur überwachung der kupplung eines schienenfahrzeugs und entsprechendes schienenfahrzeug | |
EP2238026B1 (de) | Verteiltes flugsteuerungssystem | |
EP2891590B1 (de) | Gelenktes Landfahrzeug, das eine Steuerungsvorrichtung beim Entgleisen des Fahrzeugs umfasst, und entsprechendes Steuerungsverfahren der Entgleisung | |
US10524094B2 (en) | Communication system, aircraft/spacecraft and communication method | |
CN112352443A (zh) | 用于实时远程车辆监控***的安全架构 | |
EP3501940A1 (de) | Schienenfahrzeug, entsprechendes schienensystem und verfahren zur zusammensetzung des schienenfahrzeugs | |
EP2599683B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Signalisierung für einen Zug | |
EP2295306B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum sicheren Bahnbetrieb | |
US11479279B2 (en) | System and method for protecting a communication between a balise and a guided vehicle from cross-talk | |
JP2014071632A (ja) | 車両用情報収集装置 | |
FR3058290B1 (fr) | Equipement avionique avec signature a usage unique d'un message emis, systeme avionique, procede de transmission et programme d'ordinateur associes | |
US10878250B2 (en) | Determining presence of a rail vehicle on a track based on image data | |
US20220078196A1 (en) | Drone capable of autonomously determining trustworthiness of messages received | |
EP0699573B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Übertragung von Informationen durch Baken und Bake zur Verwendung in einer solchen Vorrichtung | |
EP3536579B1 (de) | Kontrollverfahren von schienenfahrzeugen, entsprechende vorrichtung und entsprechendes system | |
EP3306834B1 (de) | Schienenfahrzeug, das mit einer datenkommunikationsvorrichtung ausgestattet ist | |
CA2674754C (fr) | Procede de reduction de collisions des emissions dans un slot tdma pour des liaisons de donnees | |
CA2478779C (fr) | Procede et dispositif de maintenance d'un equipement de radionavigation d'un aeronef | |
JP2004101239A (ja) | 支障物検知装置 | |
CN115426152A (zh) | 一种信号采集模块故障检测方法、装置及存储介质 | |
FR2994278A1 (fr) | Balise de detresse amelioree ayant la capacite d'emettre un signal de detresse et un signal contenant des donnees de navigation de l'aeronef ou du navire | |
FR2933830A1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif de correction d'erreurs de transmission. | |
EP2782265A1 (de) | Wiederholungskontrolle in einem Netzwerk | |
FR3017756A1 (fr) | Procede de transmission d'un signal audio ou video sur un lien acoustique dans un milieu sous-marin | |
JP2015149564A (ja) | 車載通信システム |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160921 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20190108 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1142165 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190615 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602015031692 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190912 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190912 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190913 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1142165 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190612 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191014 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2744650 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20200225 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191012 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602015031692 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20200313 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200224 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG2D | Information on lapse in contracting state deleted |
Ref country code: IS |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190903 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190903 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20150903 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190612 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230823 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230928 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20231124 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230927 Year of fee payment: 9 |