EP2791039B1 - Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système d'ascenseur et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur - Google Patents
Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système d'ascenseur et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2791039B1 EP2791039B1 EP12798693.3A EP12798693A EP2791039B1 EP 2791039 B1 EP2791039 B1 EP 2791039B1 EP 12798693 A EP12798693 A EP 12798693A EP 2791039 B1 EP2791039 B1 EP 2791039B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- vibrations
- sensor
- value
- operating value
- lift installation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 title 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 37
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 50
- 239000003380 propellant Substances 0.000 description 22
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 21
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 21
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 4
- 108010066057 cabin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010183 spectrum analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004604 Blowing Agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000030808 detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perception of sound Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009415 formwork Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B3/00—Applications of devices for indicating or signalling operating conditions of elevators
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
- B66B5/0025—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system for maintenance or repair
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0037—Performance analysers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an elevator installation with a sensor for detecting vibrations and to a method for operating such an elevator installation according to the subject matter of the patent claims.
- An elevator system has moving mechanical components, such as a drive, cabin and shaft doors, car door drive, a car door closing mechanism, guide rollers, or guide shoes, whose proper functioning is to be ensured.
- the individual components are maintained and maintained at regular intervals.
- the cost of such maintenance is relatively inefficient, since the maintenance intervals are fixed and do not depend on the effective wear of a concrete elevator system and its components.
- a reliable indication of the degree of wear of a moving mechanical component is the degree of vibration. In normal permissible operation, a certain degree of vibration is not exceeded. As wear on a component progresses, the vibrations increase noticeably. If a predeterminable degree of vibration is exceeded, the time has come to repair or replace the component.
- Vibrations propagate as sound or structure-borne sound waves and can be detected by means of a sensor.
- sound waves here are waves that propagate in a gaseous medium such as air
- structure-borne sound waves here are waves that propagate in a solid medium such as steel or iron.
- sensors that are designed as microphones, accelerometers or voltage measuring sensors are suitable.
- An evaluation circuit is connected to one or more sensors. The evaluation circuit and at least one associated sensor form a monitoring unit.
- the evaluation circuit has a processor with which the evaluation circuit evaluates the recorded sound or structure-borne sound waves.
- the recorded sound or sound Structure-borne sound waves can be evaluated in terms of their amplitude and frequency in the evaluation circuit and compared with a predetermined value.
- Another unsolved problem is the upgrading of an existing elevator system with a monitoring unit. Because the existing elevator control of the elevator system is not intended to evaluate information of the monitoring unit or even state information, such as operating condition of the elevator system, speed or position of the cabin, the monitoring unit. Also to this problem statement expresses itself WO 2009/126140 A1 Not.
- JP 10/059645 A JP 2005/247468 A and WO 2009/150251 A2 is also received on the monitoring of an elevator by means of evaluation of vibrations.
- the latter two documents relate in particular to the monitoring of individual components such as a drive unit or a car door.
- the monitoring methods presented in these documents show the same in WO 2009/126140 A1 identified disadvantages.
- the object of the invention is an improved and more reliable monitoring unit for monitoring the components of an elevator installation, in particular to develop by means of detection and evaluation of vibrations.
- an existing elevator system should be easy to retrofit with a monitoring unit for monitoring the components.
- the task is solved with a lift system that uses a sensor and an evaluation circuit features.
- vibrations can be detected with the sensor, which are generated during operation of the elevator installation.
- the evaluation circuit is connected to the sensor.
- the vibrations detected by the sensor can be evaluated by the evaluation circuit.
- the elevator system is characterized in that by means of the evaluation circuit, the detected vibrations are comparable with a predefinable operating value and a predefinable threshold value.
- the operating value represents a value of vibrations which occur in a permissible normal operation of the elevator installation.
- the threshold represents a value of vibration that is inadmissible.
- the vibrations generated are in a characteristic frequency range and / or amplitude range. With continuous wear and aging of the components, this frequency range or amplitude range changes accordingly. These changes in the vibration behavior can be detected by sound or structure-borne sound waves through the sensor.
- the vibrations are recorded as sound or structure-borne sound waves from the sensor, forwarded to the evaluation circuit and evaluated there spectrally. This means that the vibrations are evaluated in terms of amplitude and frequency.
- the vibrations evaluated in this way are compared with the operating value and the threshold value.
- the operating value represents a vibration value, as it usually occurs during normal operation of the elevator system.
- the threshold represents an impermissible vibration value, which indicates a malfunction or excessive wear of a component.
- the evaluation circuit has at least one processor which performs the spectral analysis and the value comparison and a memory unit in which the operating value and the threshold value are stored.
- An advantage of this two-stage value comparison lies in the determination of the operating value. Because it is detectable without feedback from the elevator control, whether the elevator system is in operation or is still. This is particularly advantageous for retrofits of elevator systems. Thus, for example, the evaluation during the standstill of the elevator system decide independently, if not required components of the monitoring unit can be set in a stand-by mode and only then to awaken from stand-by mode when the evaluation determines an operating value.
- a quality value can be calculated from the comparison of the vibrations with the operating value and the threshold value.
- the quality value is calculated as the ratio between the time duration in which the threshold value is reached or exceeded and the time duration in which the operating value is reached or exceeded.
- the evaluation circuit compares this quality value with a predefinable critical quality value.
- the critical quality value is preferably stored in the memory unit. If the critical quality value is reached or exceeded, a responsibility alert can be triggered.
- the state change alarm indicates that at least one component of the monitored elevator system is to be replaced or repaired. Thanks to the calculation of the quality value and the comparison with a critical quality value, false triggering of the state change alarm can be largely avoided.
- a state change alarm can be triggered.
- the evaluation circuit can now be configured so that if it does not receive vibration signals from an associated sensor for a period of about 8, 14, or more hours, it triggers a state change alarm.
- the cause of the trip namely the failure of the sensor or the interruption of a connection to the sensor, can be communicated, which simplifies the location of the fault for a service technician.
- the evaluation unit has a time indication unit.
- the evaluation circuit the time to trigger a state change alarm due to a lack of the operating value depending on the time of day and / or day specify.
- a state change alarm can be triggered even if the operating value falls below at least one hour.
- the triggering of a state change alarm can only take place after several weeks, since the elevator system can be idle for a long time, for example, during the summer holidays.
- a still further aspect relates to the setting of the operating value by means of a learning run of the elevator installation.
- This learning run is performed after the installation of the evaluation circuit and the associated sensor.
- the sensor absorbs the vibrations generated during this learning run and the evaluation circuit stores these vibrations as an operating value on the memory unit.
- An advantage of detecting the operating value by means of a learning run is that always the same monitoring unit consisting of sensor and evaluation circuit can be installed independently of the type of elevator installation. This reduces the coordination effort when configuring and ordering a monitoring unit. In addition, a mounting of a monitoring unit with incorrectly stored operating value is excluded. Alternatively, the operating value can be stored beforehand on the memory unit of the evaluation circuit as a function of the type of elevator installation. The learning journey can be omitted.
- the evaluation circuit preferably calculates the threshold value after acquisition of the operating value by means of a learning run.
- the operating value serves as the starting point.
- the amplitudes of the frequencies recorded in the spectral analysis for the operating value are multiplied by a predefinable factor.
- the calculated threshold value is stored on the memory unit.
- the threshold value can be stored beforehand on the memory unit of the evaluation formwork as a function of the type of elevator installation.
- the elevator installation in the case of a state change alarm, is provided for maintenance work.
- a service technician is notified to service the elevator system. This increases the efficiency of the maintenance work. This is because maintenance work is only carried out when a component is actually to be repaired or replaced.
- Fig. 1 shows an elevator system 10.
- This elevator system has a car 1, a counterweight 2, a support and propellant 3, in which the car 1 and the counterweight 3 are suspended in a 2: 1 ratio and a pulley 5.1.
- the traction sheave is 5.1 with a in the Fig. 1 for clarity, not shown Drive unit coupled and is in operative contact with the support and propellant 3rd
- the car 1 and the counterweight 2 are movable by means of a rotational movement of the traction sheave 5.1, which transmits a drive torque of the drive unit to the support and propellant means 3 substantially along vertically oriented guide rails.
- the guide rails in the Fig. 1 not shown.
- the car 1 and the counterweight 2 are guided by means of guide elements, such as guide shoes or guide rollers on the guide rails.
- the counterweight 2 is suspended in a first loop of the carrying and propellant 3.
- the first loop is formed by a part of the support and propellant 3, which lies between a first end 3.2 of the support and propellant 3 and a guide roller 5.2.
- the counterweight 2 is suspended by means of a bearing 4.1 on the first loop.
- the counterweight 2 is coupled to the bearing 4.1.
- the bearing 4.1 represents the fulcrum of a counterweight support roller 4.
- the support and / or propellant 3 extends from a first fixed point, to which the first end 3.2 of the support and / or propellant is attached, down to the counterweight roller 4
- the carrying and / or propellant 3 wraps around the counterweight carrying roller 4 by approximately 180 ° and then extends upwards to the first deflecting roller 5.2.
- the cabin 1 is suspended in a second loop of the carrying and / or propellant 3.
- the second loop is formed by a part of the carrying and / or propellant, which lies between a second end 3.1 of the carrying and / or propellant 3 and a traction sheave 5.1.
- the cabin 1 is suspended by means of two cabin carrying rollers 7.1, 7.2 on the second loop.
- the carrying and / or propellant 3 extends from a second fixed point, to which the second end 3.1 of the carrying and / or propellant is attached, down to a first cabin roller 7.1.
- the carrying and / or propellant 3 wraps around the first cabin roll 7.1 by approximately 90 °, then extends substantially horizontally to a second cabin roll 7.2 and umschling the second cabin roll 7.2 by approximately 90 °. Furthermore, the carrying and / or propellant 3 extends upward to the traction sheave 5.1. From the traction sheave 5.1, the carrying and / or propellant 3 finally extends to the first guide pulley 5.2.
- the two fixed points at which the first and second ends 3.2, 3.1 of the carrying and / or propellant 3 are attached, the guide pulley 5.2, the traction sheave 5.1, and the guide rails of the car 1 and the counterweight 2 are directly or indirectly to a supporting structure, typically shaft walls, coupled.
- the first end 3.2 of the carrying and / or propellant 3 is coupled to a sensor 8.
- the sensor 8 detects structure-borne sound waves, which transmits the carrying and / or propellant 3 thereto.
- the senor 8 is coupled to a guide rail of the counterweight 2.
- the sensor 8 detects structure-borne sound waves, which transmits the guide rail to the sensor 8.
- the structure-borne sound waves arise during operation of the elevator installation 10 due to vibrations of movable elevator components.
- vibrations occur through the play between the guide elements of the car 1 or the guide elements of the counterweight 2 and the corresponding guide rails, by the drive unit, by the play in the bearings of the guide pulley 5.2, traction sheave 5.1, cabin roll 7.1, 7.2 and counterweight roller 4, and Vibrations of the carrying and blowing agent 3 itself.
- vibrations can also be generated by movements of the cabin and landing doors, door drive and the like. Also on the bearing 4.1, on which the counterweight 2 is suspended, and on guide elements, where the counterweight 2 are guided on guide rails, vibrations occur.
- the positioning of the sensor 8 in the area of the elevator installation 10 is not limited to that in the Example shown arrangement at the first end 3.2 of the supporting and / or blowing agent 3 and the detection of structure-borne sound waves limited.
- the positioning of the sensor 8 as well as the manner of detecting the vibrations, namely sound waves or structure-borne sound waves depends on the component to be monitored and the design of the elevator installation 10, in particular the monitoring unit by a person skilled in the art.
- a sensor 8 which is designed to detect structure-borne sound waves, can be positioned, for example, at the second end 3.1 of the carrier and / or propellant 3.
- structure-borne sound waves which are transmitted to the cabin side via the carrying and / or propellant means 3 can be detected.
- the support rollers 7.1, 7.2 of the car 1 or other components that are arranged on the car 1 can be monitored.
- a sensor for monitoring the engine or other drive parts, such as gear or traction sheave 5.1 can be positioned on the motor housing to detect the vibrations generated by the components to be monitored.
- Structure-borne sound waves can also be detected in the region of the cabin 1, for example with sensors attached to a door panel of a car door, a housing of the door drive, a panel of a cabin wall or a cabin floor. In this way, vibrations of moving components, such as the car door, the carousel rollers 7.1, 7.2, the guide elements of the car 1 or door drive can be measured.
- movable components of a shaft door generate vibrations that can be measured, for example, as structure-borne sound waves on the door panels of a shaft door.
- a sensor is preferably arranged on a door panel.
- Another group of sensors relates to sensors that detect sound waves.
- Such sensors measure vibrations of components of the elevator system, which can be detected as air pressure waves.
- the arrangement of these sensors is possible in the entire area of the shaft space, wherever the vibrations of the components can be detected as sound waves.
- a sensor 8 preferably detects sound or structure-borne sound waves in a frequency range between 0 and 60000 Hz, in particular between 0 and 2500 Hz.
- the Fig. 2 shows a monitoring unit 20, which comprises at least one sensor 8 and an evaluation circuit 9.
- the sensor 8 transforms the detected sound or structure-borne sound waves into a signal and transmits this signal via a signal transmission path, typically a signal line or a wireless connection, to an evaluation circuit 9.
- This evaluation circuit 9 is provided for the evaluation of the detected sound or structure-borne sound waves.
- the evaluation circuit 9 has at least one analog / digital converter 14, a processor 11, a memory unit 12 and a time indication unit 13. Incoming analog signals from the sensor 8 are first converted by the analog / digital converter 14 into a digital signal. This digital signal is transmitted to the processor 11 and analyzed spectrally, in particular the frequencies and amplitudes of the transmitted sound or structure-borne sound waves.
- the processor 11 determines frequency bands and determines a measured signal intensity for each of these frequency bands.
- a frequency band is understood here to mean a frequency range, for example a frequency range from 1297 to 1557 Hz (see Fig. 3 ).
- the signal intensity denotes a value which depends on the amplitude of the measured frequencies in this frequency band.
- the processor 11 now sets the measured signal intensity for each particular frequency band and compares this signal intensity in the frequency bands with a first signal intensity stored in the memory unit 12 for the corresponding frequency band or a second signal intensity stored in the memory unit 12 for the corresponding frequency band the first signal intensity is.
- the first signal intensity corresponds to the operating value and the second signal intensity corresponds to the threshold value.
- the processor 11 counts the number of time steps in which the signal intensity during operation of the elevator installation reaches or exceeds the operating value and the number of time steps in which the signal intensity during operation of the elevator installation reaches or exceeds the threshold value.
- the indication of time steps required for this purpose is provided by the time indication unit 13 to the processor 11.
- the ratio of time steps with threshold value to time steps with operating value is determined in a further evaluation.
- This ratio represents a quality value of the vibrations. If this quality value exceeds a certain critical quality value, then a state change alarm is triggered. Occasional disturbances, which occur only for a short period of time or few time steps, are thus filtered out.
- the Fig. 3 shows an exemplary evaluation of the vibrations.
- the measured frequencies are here divided into ten frequency bands between 0 and 2595 Hz. For each of these frequency bands, the signal intensity is recorded over time or time steps.
- an operating value is specified for the frequency band 1297-1557 Hz. From this operating value, a threshold value is calculated, which here is for example 100% above the operating value. Preferably, the threshold value can be set to at least 10% above the operating value.
- the signal intensity exceeds the allowable threshold for the latter frequency band.
- the critical quality value is exceeded three times ("trip not ok"). In these three cases, a state change alarm is triggered. Once the signal intensity is above the threshold. Since in this case the calculated quality value falls below the predetermined critical quality value, no state change alarm occurs. The crossing of the threshold is due to a one-time short event, namely a hit on the side wall of the cabin ("hit car wall"). This short event is filtered out by the additional evaluation of the quality value.
- the critical quality value is set here, for example, to 10%. This means that for every 100 time steps with a measured signal intensity that is above the operating value, there will be 10 time steps with a measured signal intensity that is above the threshold value. Accordingly, in the evaluation described above, the quality value is three times the critical quality value of 10%, and once the quality value is below the critical quality value of 10%, despite exceeding the threshold value.
- the critical quality value is preferably determinable to at least 10%. In further preferred Executions, the critical quality value can also be set to at least 20, 30, 40 or 50%.
- the critical quality value is preferably stored in the memory unit 12 of the evaluation circuit 9.
- the operating value is preferably determined by means of a learning run. During this learning run, the sensor 8 measures the vibrations that occur. In the evaluation circuit 9 or the processor 11, a characteristic signal intensity for each frequency band is determined therefrom, for example a maximum signal intensity or an average signal intensity. This signal intensity is then stored in the memory unit 12 of the evaluation circuit 9 as an operating value.
- the threshold value is preferably calculable from the operating value and represents a characteristic signal intensity increased by a certain percentage. This threshold value can be calculated in the processor 11.
- a further evaluation of the vibrations relates to a self-test of the sensor 8 or the signal transmission path.
- the evaluation circuit 9 or the processor 11 counts the time steps in which the signal intensity does not reach the operating value. These time steps represent a period of time in which the elevator installation 10 stands still.
- the processor 11 checks whether this period of time exceeds a certain time value. For this purpose, the processor 11 compares the time duration with a time value stored in the control unit. If the processor 11 detects an exceeding of this time value, then a sensor malfunction is assumed. This time value is calculated on the basis of a characteristic profile of use of the elevator installation 10 and represents a period of time in which the elevator installation 10 would have had to be used with a very high probability. If this time value is exceeded, a state change alarm is also triggered.
- the triggering of the state change alarm leads at least to the fact that the elevator installation 10 is provided for a maintenance work in which the malfunction of the elevator installation 10 is remedied. For example, a service center is alerted to instruct a service technician to service the corresponding elevator installation 10. Alternatively, when a state change alarm is triggered, the service technician is notified directly via a mobile radio receiving system in communication with the elevator installation to service the corresponding elevator installation 10.
- the elevator system is also silent when a state change alarm occurs.
- a service technician is also instructed to wait for the lift system 10 and to put it back into service.
- the detection of the vibrations by the sensor 8 and the evaluation thereof in the evaluation circuit 9 according to the above procedure is not limited to the configuration of the elevator installation 10 shown.
- the monitoring of the vibrations of moving components also relates to elevator systems with a suspension ratio of 1: 1, 3: 1, etc., counterweightless elevator systems, elevator systems with machine room or, more generally, elevators in which moving components cause vibrations.
- Deviating from the example shown in Fig. 1 Several sensors at different points of the elevator system can also be positioned simultaneously, which have a common evaluation circuit, are assigned in groups to an evaluation circuit or each have their own evaluation circuit.
Landscapes
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Lifting Devices For Agricultural Implements (AREA)
- Harvester Elements (AREA)
- Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)
- Keying Circuit Devices (AREA)
Claims (10)
- Installation d'ascenseur (10) avec- un capteur (8) avec lequel les vibrations qui sont produites lors du fonctionnement de l'installation d'ascenseur (10) sont aptes à être détectées, et- un circuit d'analyse (9) qui est relié au capteur (8) et avec lequel les vibrations détectées par le capteur sont aptes à être analysées,étant précisé qu'à l'aide du circuit d'analyse (9), les vibrations détectées sont aptes à être comparées à une valeur de fonctionnement et à une valeur seuil aptes à être prédéfinies, caractérisée en ce qu'à l'aide du circuit d'analyse (9), une valeur de qualité est apte à être calculée à partir de la comparaison des vibrations avec la valeur de fonctionnement et des vibrations avec la valeur seuil, et en ce que la valeur de qualité est calculée à partir d'un rapport entre la durée pendant laquelle la valeur seuil est atteinte ou dépassée, et la durée pendant laquelle la valeur de fonctionnement est atteinte ou dépassée.
- Installation d'ascenseur (10) selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que lors du dépassement d'une valeur de qualité critique, une alarme de changement d'état est apte à être déclenchée.
- Installation d'ascenseur (10) selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que lorsqu'on arrive au-dessous de la valeur de fonctionnement pendant une durée apte à être prédéfinie, une alarme de changement d'état est apte à être déclenchée.
- Installation d'ascenseur (10) selon la revendication 3, caractérisée en ce que la durée est d'au moins une heure.
- Installation d'ascenseur (10) selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la valeur de fonctionnement est apte à être fixée à l'aide d'une course d'apprentissage de l'installation d'ascenseur (10).
- Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation d'ascenseur (10) avec- un capteur (8) et- un circuit d'analyse (9) qui est relié au capteur,étant précisé qu'un capteur (8) détecte les vibrations qui sont produites lors du fonctionnement de l'installation d'ascenseur (10) et que le circuit d'analyse analyse les vibrations détectées par le capteur,
étant précisé que le circuit d'analyse (9) compare les vibrations détectées à une valeur de fonctionnement et à une valeur seuil aptes à être prédéfinies,
caractérisé en ce que le circuit d'analyse (9), à partir de la comparaison des vibrations avec la valeur de fonctionnement et des vibrations avec la valeur seuil, calcule une valeur de qualité,
et en ce que la valeur de qualité est formée à partir d'un rapport entre la durée pendant laquelle la valeur seuil est atteinte ou dépassée, et la durée pendant laquelle la valeur de fonctionnement est atteinte ou dépassée. - Procédé selon la revendication 6, caractérisé en ce que lors du dépassement d'une valeur de qualité critique, une alarme de changement d'état est apte à être déclenchée.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 6 ou 7, caractérisé en ce que lorsqu'on arrive au-dessous de la valeur de fonctionnement pendant une durée apte à être prédéfinie, une alarme de changement d'état est déclenchée.
- Procédé selon la revendication 8, caractérisé en ce qu'une durée d'au moins une heure est prédéfinie.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 6 à 9, caractérisée en ce que la valeur de fonctionnement est fixée à l'aide d'une course d'apprentissage de l'installation d'ascenseur (10).
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP12798693.3A EP2791039B1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2012-12-03 | Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système d'ascenseur et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur |
PL12798693T PL2791039T3 (pl) | 2011-12-14 | 2012-12-03 | Diagnoza błędów instalacji dźwigowej oraz jej komponentów za pomocą czujnika |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP11193507.8A EP2604564A1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2011-12-14 | Diagnostic d'erreur d'une installation d'ascenseur et de ses composants à l'aide d'un capteur |
PCT/EP2012/074238 WO2013087439A1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2012-12-03 | Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système de levage et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur |
EP12798693.3A EP2791039B1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2012-12-03 | Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système d'ascenseur et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2791039A1 EP2791039A1 (fr) | 2014-10-22 |
EP2791039B1 true EP2791039B1 (fr) | 2015-10-28 |
Family
ID=47326124
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11193507.8A Withdrawn EP2604564A1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2011-12-14 | Diagnostic d'erreur d'une installation d'ascenseur et de ses composants à l'aide d'un capteur |
EP12798693.3A Active EP2791039B1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2012-12-03 | Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système d'ascenseur et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11193507.8A Withdrawn EP2604564A1 (fr) | 2011-12-14 | 2011-12-14 | Diagnostic d'erreur d'une installation d'ascenseur et de ses composants à l'aide d'un capteur |
Country Status (20)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9309089B2 (fr) |
EP (2) | EP2604564A1 (fr) |
JP (1) | JP6151268B2 (fr) |
KR (1) | KR102039321B1 (fr) |
CN (1) | CN103998362B (fr) |
AU (1) | AU2012350888B2 (fr) |
BR (1) | BR112014013968B1 (fr) |
CA (1) | CA2857090C (fr) |
ES (1) | ES2561104T3 (fr) |
HK (1) | HK1199436A1 (fr) |
IN (1) | IN2014CN04256A (fr) |
MX (1) | MX348134B (fr) |
MY (1) | MY168886A (fr) |
PH (1) | PH12014501214B1 (fr) |
PL (1) | PL2791039T3 (fr) |
PT (1) | PT2791039E (fr) |
RU (1) | RU2591835C2 (fr) |
SG (1) | SG11201403102UA (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2013087439A1 (fr) |
ZA (1) | ZA201404360B (fr) |
Families Citing this family (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9394138B2 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2016-07-19 | Otis Elevator Company | Method and system for dampening noise or vibration using a motor |
WO2012076329A1 (fr) * | 2010-12-07 | 2012-06-14 | Inventio Ag | Installation d'ascenseur pourvue d'un capteur acoustique pour détecter des bruits de structure |
EP2658803B1 (fr) * | 2010-12-28 | 2019-06-12 | Otis Elevator Company | Systèmes de commande d'ascenseur |
FI122598B (fi) * | 2011-04-01 | 2012-04-13 | Kone Corp | Menetelmä hissijärjestelmän toimintakunnon valvomiseksi |
WO2014131656A1 (fr) * | 2013-02-26 | 2014-09-04 | Kone Corporation | Test pour structure d'ascenseur |
EP3008006A4 (fr) * | 2013-06-10 | 2017-03-15 | Otis Elevator Company | Contrôle du bruit d'un ascenseur |
EP2813911A1 (fr) * | 2013-06-13 | 2014-12-17 | Assa Abloy Ab | Surveillance de porte |
WO2015022185A1 (fr) * | 2013-08-13 | 2015-02-19 | Inventio Ag | Système de surveillance d'une installation d'ascenseur |
US20150284214A1 (en) * | 2014-04-07 | 2015-10-08 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Ag | Elevator health check |
JP6681176B2 (ja) * | 2015-11-17 | 2020-04-15 | オーチス エレベータ カンパニーOtis Elevator Company | エレベータかごモーションアラートシステム |
EP3299325B1 (fr) * | 2016-09-26 | 2020-12-09 | KONE Corporation | Detection d'impact dans une porte d'ascenseur |
WO2018162436A1 (fr) * | 2017-03-07 | 2018-09-13 | Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab | Système d'entrée connecté |
AU2018233072B2 (en) * | 2017-03-15 | 2021-05-20 | Inventio Ag | Method and device for monitoring operating parameters in a passenger transport installation |
US10547917B2 (en) | 2017-05-12 | 2020-01-28 | Otis Elevator Company | Ride quality mobile terminal device application |
US10669121B2 (en) * | 2017-06-30 | 2020-06-02 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator accelerometer sensor data usage |
US11014780B2 (en) | 2017-07-06 | 2021-05-25 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator sensor calibration |
US10829344B2 (en) * | 2017-07-06 | 2020-11-10 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator sensor system calibration |
US20190010021A1 (en) * | 2017-07-06 | 2019-01-10 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator sensor system calibration |
KR102616698B1 (ko) | 2017-07-07 | 2023-12-21 | 오티스 엘리베이터 컴파니 | 엘레베이터 상태 모니터링 시스템 |
EP3453667B1 (fr) | 2017-09-07 | 2022-05-11 | Otis Elevator Company | Systèmes de sonorisation d'ascenseur |
EP3459890B1 (fr) | 2017-09-20 | 2024-04-03 | Otis Elevator Company | Surveillance de l'état de systêmes de freinage de sécurité pour ascenseurs |
US11339026B2 (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2022-05-24 | Otis Elevator Company | System for processing pressure sensor data |
ES2932083T3 (es) * | 2017-12-14 | 2023-01-11 | Inventio Ag | Procedimiento y dispositivo para controlar un estado de una instalación de transporte de personas mediante el uso de un doble digital |
US11724910B2 (en) | 2018-06-15 | 2023-08-15 | Otis Elevator Company | Monitoring of conveyance system vibratory signatures |
US11518650B2 (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2022-12-06 | Otis Elevator Company | Variable thresholds for an elevator system |
US11673769B2 (en) | 2018-08-21 | 2023-06-13 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator monitoring using vibration sensors near the elevator machine |
US12006185B2 (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2024-06-11 | Otis Elevator Company | Continuous quality monitoring of a conveyance system |
EP3873839A4 (fr) * | 2018-11-02 | 2022-06-01 | KONE Corporation | Agencement pour détecter des défaillances de palier dans un ascenseur |
JP6975124B2 (ja) * | 2018-11-14 | 2021-12-01 | 株式会社日立製作所 | エレベーター制御システム |
US11613445B2 (en) | 2018-12-05 | 2023-03-28 | Otis Elevator Company | Vibration monitoring beacon mode detection and transition |
EP3670415A3 (fr) | 2018-12-21 | 2020-07-15 | Otis Elevator Company | Capteur virtuel pour surveillance d'ascenseur |
CN112557069A (zh) * | 2019-09-25 | 2021-03-26 | 北京国双科技有限公司 | 一种设备振动故障检测方法、装置、***及存储介质 |
US11643301B2 (en) * | 2019-10-28 | 2023-05-09 | Otis Elevator Company | System and method for monitoring sheave bearing condition |
WO2021199106A1 (fr) * | 2020-03-30 | 2021-10-07 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Système de commande de porte d'ascenseur |
CN112880812A (zh) * | 2021-01-19 | 2021-06-01 | 广州特种机电设备检测研究院 | 扶梯故障检测方法、***和存储介质 |
CN112938678B (zh) * | 2021-01-29 | 2022-05-03 | 广东卓梅尼技术股份有限公司 | 一种电梯振动故障的诊断算法 |
CN113264429A (zh) * | 2021-03-15 | 2021-08-17 | 上海电气集团股份有限公司 | 升降设备的振动数据处理、模型训练、检测方法、*** |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4512442A (en) * | 1984-03-30 | 1985-04-23 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Method and apparatus for improving the servicing of an elevator system |
JPH0737310B2 (ja) * | 1989-06-13 | 1995-04-26 | 三菱電機株式会社 | エレベータの監視装置 |
DE9015495U1 (de) * | 1990-11-12 | 1992-01-02 | Technischer Überwachungs-Verein Bayern e.V., 8000 München | Meßwertaufnehmer zum Erfassen physikalischer Kenngrößen eines Personen- und/oder Lastenaufzugs |
JPH1059645A (ja) * | 1996-08-19 | 1998-03-03 | Hitachi Building Syst Co Ltd | エレベータ異常検出装置 |
FI20002390A0 (fi) * | 2000-10-30 | 2000-10-30 | Kone Corp | Menetelmä hissin automaatioven kunnon valvomiseksi |
US6439350B1 (en) * | 2001-07-02 | 2002-08-27 | Otis Elevator Company | Differentiating elevator car door and landing door operating problems |
JP2005247468A (ja) * | 2004-03-02 | 2005-09-15 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | エレベータ装置 |
JP4722845B2 (ja) * | 2004-03-30 | 2011-07-13 | 三菱電機株式会社 | エレベータ制御装置 |
US7143001B2 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2006-11-28 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Method for monitoring operating characteristics of a single axis machine |
JP4744826B2 (ja) * | 2004-08-18 | 2011-08-10 | 東芝エレベータ株式会社 | エレベータの異常診断装置 |
FI118466B (fi) * | 2005-04-08 | 2007-11-30 | Kone Corp | Kunnonvalvontajärjestelmä |
FI118532B (fi) * | 2005-08-19 | 2007-12-14 | Kone Corp | Paikannusmenetelmä hissijärjestelmässä |
US8540057B2 (en) * | 2008-03-06 | 2013-09-24 | Inventio Ag | Generating elevator installation maintenance information |
US8418815B2 (en) * | 2008-04-08 | 2013-04-16 | Otis Elevator Company | Remotely observable analysis for an elevator system |
WO2009150251A2 (fr) * | 2008-06-13 | 2009-12-17 | Inventio Ag | Ascenseur et procédé de maintenance d'un ascenseur de ce type |
JP5297895B2 (ja) * | 2009-05-27 | 2013-09-25 | 株式会社日立製作所 | エレベーターのドア装置 |
US8893858B2 (en) * | 2010-06-29 | 2014-11-25 | Empire Technology Development Llc | Method and system for determining safety of elevator |
-
2011
- 2011-12-14 EP EP11193507.8A patent/EP2604564A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
-
2012
- 2012-12-03 KR KR1020147019348A patent/KR102039321B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2012-12-03 MX MX2014007040A patent/MX348134B/es active IP Right Grant
- 2012-12-03 ES ES12798693.3T patent/ES2561104T3/es active Active
- 2012-12-03 RU RU2014128655/11A patent/RU2591835C2/ru active
- 2012-12-03 PT PT127986933T patent/PT2791039E/pt unknown
- 2012-12-03 JP JP2014546407A patent/JP6151268B2/ja active Active
- 2012-12-03 PL PL12798693T patent/PL2791039T3/pl unknown
- 2012-12-03 BR BR112014013968-7A patent/BR112014013968B1/pt active IP Right Grant
- 2012-12-03 CA CA2857090A patent/CA2857090C/fr active Active
- 2012-12-03 WO PCT/EP2012/074238 patent/WO2013087439A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2012-12-03 SG SG11201403102UA patent/SG11201403102UA/en unknown
- 2012-12-03 EP EP12798693.3A patent/EP2791039B1/fr active Active
- 2012-12-03 MY MYPI2014701508A patent/MY168886A/en unknown
- 2012-12-03 CN CN201280061854.XA patent/CN103998362B/zh active Active
- 2012-12-03 IN IN4256CHN2014 patent/IN2014CN04256A/en unknown
- 2012-12-03 AU AU2012350888A patent/AU2012350888B2/en active Active
- 2012-12-14 US US13/714,517 patent/US9309089B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-05-29 PH PH12014501214A patent/PH12014501214B1/en unknown
- 2014-06-13 ZA ZA2014/04360A patent/ZA201404360B/en unknown
- 2014-12-29 HK HK14113031.8A patent/HK1199436A1/zh unknown
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2791039B1 (fr) | Diagnostic d'erreurs d'un système d'ascenseur et de ses composants au moyen d'un capteur | |
EP2649002B1 (fr) | Installation d'ascenseur pourvue d'un capteur acoustique pour détecter des bruits de structure | |
DE10362095B4 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Verringern von Aufzugsschwingungen | |
EP2516305B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de détermination du mouvement et/ou de la position d'une cabine d'ascenseur | |
DE60125238T2 (de) | Verfahren zur überwachung des türenmechanismus für einen aufzug | |
EP3304231B1 (fr) | Surveillance d'une installation de convoyage | |
DE102007006316B3 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Seillageüberwachung einer seilbetriebenen Transportanlage und seilbetriebene Transportanlage | |
EP1621504B1 (fr) | Bande de mesure et dispositif pour déterminer le mouvement d'un object | |
EP3131843B1 (fr) | Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation d'ascenseur et dispositif de commande d'ascenseur fonctionnant selon le procédé | |
DE102006034962B4 (de) | Verfahren zum gesicherten Bremsen eines Tores sowie Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
WO2009112564A1 (fr) | Système de surveillance de l’usure, équipement de transport à traction par câble et procédé de surveillance des pièces d’usure de celui-ci | |
DE102010049954A1 (de) | Rolltreppendiagnosevorrichtung und Rolltreppendiagnosesystem | |
DE112015003122T5 (de) | Seilverschleißdehnungsdiagnosevorrichtung für einen Aufzug, Seilverschleißdehnungsdiagnoseverfahren für einen Aufzug, und ein eine Seilverschleißdehnung diagnostizierendes vorstehendes Teil für einen Aufzug | |
EP3317218A1 (fr) | Dispositif de surveillance pour une installation d'ascenseur | |
EP3595997A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour surveiller des paramètres de fonctionnement dans une installation de transport de personnes | |
DE102010062154A1 (de) | Sicherheitseinrichtung für einen Aufzug | |
WO2016193079A1 (fr) | Surveillance d'un système d'ascenseur | |
DE102021109462A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Überwachung einer Aufzugsanlage sowie Verfahren | |
DE102017112381B4 (de) | Automatisiertes Analyseverfahren für verschleißbehaftete Teile an Aufzugsanlagen | |
DE102020205217A1 (de) | Verfahren und Steuerungssystem zur Wartung des Türmechanismus einer Aufzugsanlage | |
DE102017108574A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Funktionsüberwachung einer Aufzugsanlage | |
DE10362096B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Verringern von Aufzugsschwingungen | |
EP3684671A1 (fr) | Système de rails et procédé pour faire fonctionner un système de rails au moyen d'une pièce mobile guidée sur rails et d'une commande centrale | |
EP1714933A1 (fr) | Système de commande de vitesse d'ascenseur |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140528 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150604 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 757813 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20151115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012005129 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2561104 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20160224 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20160127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160228 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160129 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502012005129 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20160729 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20121203 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20211119 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20211222 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20211221 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20211227 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20211227 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20211125 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20211229 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230519 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230605 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20230101 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 757813 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20221203 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20221231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221204 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221231 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231219 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231221 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231226 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20231228 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20240118 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231227 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20240101 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221203 |